HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-04-18 EO&WR Committee PacketOTAY WATER DISTRICT
ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS & WATER RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
and
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Board Room
TUESDAY
December 4, 2018
12:00 P.M.
This is a District Committee meeting. This meeting is being posted as a special meeting
in order to comply with the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54954.2) in the event that
a quorum of the Board is present. Items will be deliberated, however, no formal board actions
will be taken at this meeting. The committee makes recommendations
to the full board for its consideration and formal action.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JU-
RISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
DISCUSSION ITEMS
3. APPROVE A $50,000 (FROM $175,000 TO $225,000) INCREASE TO THE CIP
R2147 BUDGET AND AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO JAUREGUI AND
CULVER, INC. FOR THE RALPH W. CHAPMAN WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY
FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED
$158,091.58 (MARCHIORO) [5 minutes]
4. APPROVE CLOSE OUT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT
WITH SIMPSON SANDBLASTING AND SPECIAL COATINGS, INC. IN THE
AMOUNT OF $97.23 FOR THE 980-2 RESERVOIR INTERIOR/EXTERIOR COAT-
INGS AND UPGRADES PROJECT (MARTIN) [5 minutes]
5. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4356 TO APPROVE THE AMENDED AND RESTATED
REGIONAL WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO AND THE PARTICIPATING AGENCIES IN THE METROPOLITAN
SEWERAGE SYSTEM. THE UPDATED AGREEMENT INCORPORATES THE PURE
WATER SAN DIEGO PROGRAM (BEPPLER) [5 min]
2
6. FIRST QUARTER UPDATE ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2019 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM (MARTIN) [5 min]
7. ADJOURNMENT
BOARD MEMBERS ATTENDING:
Tim Smith, Chair
Gary Croucher
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be delib-
erated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the Dis-
trict’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at the
open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website. Copies of the
Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by contacting
her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability that would require accommodation in order to enable you to partici-
pate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at 670-2280 at least 24 hours prior to
the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on November 30, 2018 I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the
regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at least
24 hours in advance of the meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code Section
§54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on November 30, 2018.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 2, 2019
SUBMITTED BY:
Jeff Marchioro
Senior Civil Engineer
PROJECT: R2147-
001103
DIV. NO. 3
APPROVED BY:
Bob Kennedy, Engineering Manager
Dan Martin, Assistant Chief of Engineering
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approval to Increase the CIP R2147 Budget in an Amount of
$50,000 and Award of a Construction Contract to Jauregui &
Culver, Inc. for the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation
Facility Fuel System Improvements Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board):
1. Increase the budget by $50,000 (from $175,000 to $225,000);
2. Award a construction contract to Jauregui & Culver, Inc.
(Jauregui) and to authorize the General Manager to execute a
construction contract with Jauregui for the Ralph W. Chapman
Water Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF) Fuel System Improvements
Project in an amount not-to-exceed $158,091.58 (see Exhibit A
for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To increase the overall CIP R2147 budget in the amount of $50,000
(from $175,000 to $225,000) and to obtain Board authorization for the
General Manager to enter into a construction contract with Jauregui
for the RWCWRF Fuel System Improvements Project(Project) in an amount
not-to-exceed $158,091.58.
2
ANALYSIS:
On July 25, 2017, the County of San Diego inspected the RWCWRF under
the authority of the California Health and Safety Code (H&SC), to
determine compliance with applicable provisions of the H&SC, the
California Code of Regulations (CCR), and the San Diego County Code
of Regulatory Ordinances (SDCC). The County Compliance Inspection
Report contained a violation related to the existing below grade,
single-walled diesel fuel piping between the existing 12,000 gallon
bulk tank and two (2) 65 gallon day tanks serving the RWCWRF
generator and Pump 1 engine.
The existing below grade fuel oil piping, partially installed
together with the original treatment plant in 1979, must be replaced
to gain compliance with the County of San Diego inspection report and
current codes. The existing below grade fuel oil piping will be
replaced with a mix of below grade and above grade piping to minimize
the below grade piping length. A late 1980’s/early 1990’s era return
tank located within the bulk storage area will also be replaced. The
return tank has reached the end of its useful life.
Staff prepared the contract documents in-house. The District’s as-
needed engineering design consultant (Michael Baker) provided
guidance and peer review.
On October 17, 2018, the Project was formally advertised for bid
using BidSync, an online bid solicitation website. The Project was
also advertised in the Daily Transcript. BidSync provided electronic
distribution of the Bid Documents, including specifications, plans,
and addendums. A Pre-Bid Meeting was held on October 24, 2018, which
was attended by two (2) contractors that specialize in fuel systems
work. Two (2) addenda were sent out to all bidders and plan houses
to address questions and clarifications to the contract documents
during the bidding period.
Bids were publicly opened on November 8, 2018, with the following
results:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
AMOUNT
CORRECTED
BID AMOUNT
1 Jauregui & Culver, Inc.
(Escondido, CA) $163,418.74 $158,091.58
2 GEMS Environmental Management
Services, Inc.
(Concord, CA) $250,197.82 $221,056.40
The Engineer’s Estimate is $120,000, which includes below grade
conduits estimated at $5,000 for CIP R2150-RWCWRF Secondary Chlorine
Analyzer and Feed System. District staff added additional scope via
3
addendum, which included an allowance item for additional below grade
conduits estimated at $5,000 for CIP P2485-SCADA-Infrastructure and
Communications Replacement. The corrected bid amounts listed in the
table above do not include the two (2) below grade conduit bid items
for separate CIP’s R2150 and P2485. The below grade conduit work
will be completed under separate contracts.
Because only two (2) bids were received, staff contacted several
general contractors to inquire as to why they did not bid the
Project. A variety of reasons were given and they are shown in the
table below:
CONTRACTOR REASON
1 Jenal Engineering Corp
(Lemon Grove, CA) Too busy.
2 Western Pump
(San Diego, CA)
Too busy. They can be selective with
bids because there are more bids to
choose from. Sealed formal public bids
are typically less attractive compared
to simpler contracts.
3
Bonsall Petroleum
Construction, Inc.
(Bonsall, CA)
Too busy.
4
PK Mechanical Systems,
Inc.
(Wildomar, CA)
Too busy.
A review of the bids was performed by District staff for conformance
with the contract requirements and determined that Jauregui was the
lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Jauregui holds a Class A,
General Engineering, Contractor’s License in the State of California,
which meets the contract document’s requirements, and is valid
through June 30, 2019. Jauregui also holds a specialty Service
Station Equipment and Maintenance (C-61/D40) contractor license. The
reference checks indicated a very good to excellent performance
record on similar projects. An internet background search of the
company was performed and revealed no outstanding issues with this
company.
Staff verified that the bid bond provided by Jauregui is valid.
Staff will also verify that Jauregui’s Performance Bond and Labor and
Materials Bond are valid prior to execution of the contract.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP R2147, as approved in the FY 2019 budget, is
$175,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast including this contract, are $222,352. See Attachment B for
budget detail.
4
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that with a budget increase of $50,000,
CIP R2147 will be completed within the new budget amount of $225,000.
The Finance Department has determined that, under the current rate
model, 100% of the funding is available from the Replacement Fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
exceptional water and wastewater service to its customers, and to
manage District resources in a transparent and fiscally responsible
manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, "To be a model water agency
by providing stellar service, achieving measurable results, and
continuously improving operational practices."
GRANTS/LOANS:
Engineering staff researched and explored grants and loans and found
none available for this Project.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
JM/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP R2147 RWCWRF Fuel Lines Replacement\Staff Reports\Revised2 - BD 01-02-19 Staff Report
RWCWRF Fuel Lines Award to Jauregui.docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2147-001103
Approval to Increase the CIP R2147 Budget in an Amount of
$50,000 and Award of a Construction Contract to Jauregui &
Culver, Inc. for the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation
Facility Fuel System Improvements Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 4, 2018.
The Committee supported staff's recommendation.
NOTE:
The “Committee Action” is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2147-001103
Approval to Increase the CIP R2147 Budget in an Amount of
$50,000 and Award of a Construction Contract to Jauregui &
Culver, Inc. for the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation
Facility Fuel System Improvements Project
11/9/2018
Budget
175,000
Planning
Standard Salaries 2,995 2,995 1,000 3,995
Total Planning 2,995 2,995 1,000 3,995
Design 001102
Consultant Contracts 6,600 3,178 3,423 6,600 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC
1,080 - 1,080 1,080 RFYEAGER
Standard Salaries 26,332 26,332 1,000 27,332
- - 150 150 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
- - 1,200 1,200 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
Total Design 34,012 29,509 6,853 36,362
Construction
- - 158,092 158,092 Jauregui & Culver, lnc.
- - 8,000 8,000 Construction Manager
- - 8,000 8,000 Staff Time
- - 7,905 7,905 Construction Contract Contingency @5%
Total Construction - - 181,996 181,996
Grand Total 37,006 32,504 189,849 222,352
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
r2147-RWCWRF Fuel Lines Replacement
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
OTAY WATER DISTRICTRALPH W. CHAPMAN RECLAMATION FACILITY (RWCWRF)FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS - LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT A
CIP R2147F
P:
\
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
\
C
I
P
R
2
1
4
7
F
u
e
l
L
i
n
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
\
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
-
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
(
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
)
SR-94/CAMPO RD
JAM
A
C
H
A
B
L
V
D
F
U
R
Y
L
N
SR-9
4
/
C
A
M
P
O
R
D
JAMA
C
H
A
R
D
!\
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
?ò
Aä%&s
?p
?Ë
F
0 1,000500
Feet
RWCWRFFUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTSSITE
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 2, 2019
SUBMITTED BY: Dan Martin
Assistant Chief of
Engineering
PROJECT: P2546-001103
DIV. NO. 5
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approve Close Out Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with
Simpson Sandblasting and Special Coatings, Inc. for the 980-2
Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coatings & Upgrades Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
approve close out Change Order No. 2 to the existing contract with
Simpson Sandblasting and Special Coatings, Inc. (Simpson) in the
amount of $97.23 for the 980-2 Reservoir Interior/ Exterior Coatings
& Upgrades Project (see Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to execute
close out Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $97.23 to the
construction contract with Simpson for the 980-2 Reservoir
Interior/Exterior Coatings & Upgrades Project.
2
ANALYSIS:
The 980-2 Reservoir is one of two 5.0 million gallon potable water
storage facilities in the 980 pressure zone that serve the central
area of the District. The 980-2 Reservoir was originally constructed
in 1988. The 980-2 Reservoir was last recoated on the interior
surface in 2001, and the coating on the exterior is original to the
tank.
At the October 4, 2017 Board Meeting, the Board awarded a
construction contract in an amount of $1,146,327.00 to Simpson to
replace the existing interior and exterior coatings for the 980-2
Reservoir. In addition to replacing the reservoir coating, the
Project includes structural upgrades to comply with the current
American Water Works Association (AWWA) and the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration standards at both Federal (OSHA) and State
(Cal-OSHA) levels.
Since the award of the construction contract, one change order has
been issued. Change Order No. 1 removed and replaced the reservoir’s
rafters and girders. The cost associated with Change Order No. 1 was
$229,152.00. Change Order No. 1 also included contract time as a
result of the added structural work at the 980-2 Reservoir. Time
impacts associated with this change added ninety-six (96) days.
Close out Change Order No. 2 (Exhibit B), which is the subject of
this staff report, addresses the following items and serves to close
out the construction contract:
Steel patch plate and puddle weld repairs for the reservoir
interior floor;
Preparation and coating application to multiple bollards and
site appurtenances;
A credit for additional inspection performed outside specified
contract working hours;
A credit for damaged asphalt;
Addition of contract time due to weather impacts per the
contract.
In total, the fifty-six (56) additional days added to the contract
will result in a revised total contract duration of 329 calendar
days, as shown in close out Change Order No. 2.
3
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP P2546, as approved in the FY 2019 budget, is
$1,690,000.00. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, are $1,689,913.00. See Attachment B for the budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget for CIP P2546 is sufficient to support
the Project.
The Finance Department has determined that, under the current rate
model, 100% of the funding is available from the Replacement Fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
exceptional water and wastewater service to its customers, and to
manage District resources in a transparent and fiscally responsible
manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, “To be a model water agency
by providing stellar service, achieving measurable results, and
continuously improving operational practices.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM/RP:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2546 - 980-2 Reservoir Int-Ext Coating\Staff Reports\BD 01-02-2019\BD 01-02-2019, Staff
Report 980-2 Reservoir Coating Change Order No 2_REV1.docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Project Location for 980-2
Exhibit B – Close out Change Order No. 2
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2546-001103
Approve Close Out Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with
Simpson Sandblasting and Special Coatings, Inc. for the
980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coatings & Upgrades
Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 4, 2018. The
Committee supported Staff's recommendation.
NOTE:
The “Committee Action” is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2546-001103
Approve Close Out Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with
Simpson Sandblasting and Special Coatings, Inc. for the
980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coatings & Upgrades
Project
11/19/2018
Budget
1,690,000
Planning
Standard Salaries 4,042 4,042 - 4,042
Consultant Contracts - - - -
Service Contracts 2,310 2,310 - 2,310 HDR ENGINEERING INC
Regulatory Agency Fees 50 50 - 50 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Total Planning 6,402 6,402 - 6,402
Design
Standard Salaries 25,763 25,763 - 25,763
Service Contracts 79 79 - 79 DAILY JOURNAL CORP
Total Design 25,843 25,843 - 25,843
Construction
Standard Salaries 150,000 145,805 4,195 150,000
Construcion Contract 1,146,327 1,097,781 48,546 1,146,327 SIMPSON SANDBLASTING - CONTRACTOR
229,152 229,152 - 229,152 CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 APPROVED
97 - 97 97 CHANGE ORDER No. 2
Service Contracts 30,240 30,240 - 30,240 ALYSON CONSULTING-CM
83,289 83,289 - 83,289 CSI SERVICES-SPECIALTY INSPECTION
3,282 3,282 - 3,282 NINYO & MOORE-WELDING INSPECTION
1,815 1,815 - 1,815 NV5 INC - STRUCUTRAL INSPECTION
10,500 816 9,684 10,500 WATCHLIGHT
979 979 - 979 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS- Hard Copy Specs
688 688 - 688 CLARKSON LABORATORY
Project Contingency 1,300 - 1,300 1,300 CONTINGENCY
Total Construction 1,657,669 1,593,847 63,822 1,657,669
Grand Total 1,689,913 1,626,091 63,822 1,689,913
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
P2546-980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
OTAY WATER DISTRICT980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & UpgradesLocation Map
EXHIBIT A
F
P:
\
\
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
\
C
I
P
P
2
5
4
6
-
9
8
0
-
2
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
I
n
t
-
E
x
t
C
o
a
t
i
n
g
\
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
-
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
p
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
0 750375
Feet
CIP P2546
980-2 Reservoir
ACC
E
S
S
R
D
SALT CREEK
GOLF CLUB
HU
N
T
E
!\
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
?ò
Aä%&s
?p
?Ë
F
944-1R
980-1
927-1R
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
P
K
W
Y
ACCESS RD
Contract / P.O. Change Order No. 2 page 2 of 3
Description of Work
Description
Increase Decrease Time
Item No. 1:
This Change Order increases the amount allocated for Bid Item 21, 5/16-
inch Steel Patch Plates by $1,980.00 to a new authorized amount of
$4,455.00. (Add 12 EA at $165/EA)
$1,980.00 4
Item No. 2:
This Change Order provides for installation of puddle welds to repair pitted
areas of the reservoir floor.
$2,563.70 5
Item No. 3:
This Change Order provides for surface preparation and coating application
to multiple bollards and site appurtenances.
$1,316.53 3
Item No. 4:
Reimbursement for grinding removal ($1.50/SF) and replacement
($15.00/SF) of damaged asphalt concrete paving at the 980-2 Reservoir.
(Credit 285 SF at $16.50/SF)
$4,702.50 0
Item No. 5:
Reimbursement for additional inspection costs outside normal work hours
per Section 00800-1.2 at the 980-2 Reservoir.
$1,060.50 0
Item No. 6:
Add 44 calendar days due to weather impacts per Contract Specifications
00700-8.5
$0.00 $0.00 44
Sub Total Amount $5,860.23 $5,763.00 56
Total Net Change Order Amount $97.23
Revisions to: BID SCHEDULE
Item # Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
21 8-inch Diameter 5/16-inch Thick Steel Patches 27 EA $165 $4,455.00
Reason:
Item No. 1:
The Contract Bid Item No 21, 5/16-inch Steel Patch Plates, required a quantity adjustment resulting from field conditions.
Item No. 2:
Subsequent to sandblasting of the interior floor, pitting of the existing steel was discovered in multiple locations requiring
remedial action. It was determined that filling the pits by puddle welds to replace corroded steel while providing a smooth
surface for coating adherence was the most cost-effective repair method. This change order is required to provide for the
additional scope.
Item No. 3:
During punchlist development it was determined that the existing coating for 6 bollards, an air/vac enclosure, fire hydrant and
air-gap piping adjacent to the 980-2 Reservoir was nearing the end of its life cycle. To provide a consistent coating service life
it was determined to incorporate surface preparation and coating application to remaining site appurtenances. This change
order is required to provide for the additional scope.
Contract / P.O. Change Order No. 2 page 3 of 3
Item No. 4:
The Contractor damaged existing asphalt concrete paving at the 980-2 Reservoir. In lieu of replacing the damaged asphalt
concrete paving the contractor elected to utilize the District’s FY2018 As-Needed Asphaltic Concrete Paving Services Contract
pricing to reimburse the District for the associated repair cost. This change order is required to reimburse the District for costs
associated with damaged asphalt concrete replacement at the 980-2 Reservoir.
Item No. 5:
Contract Documents Section 00800-1.2 provides for reimbursement of additional expenses of Owner’s personnel and inspection
services resulting from work outside normal working hours. The Contractor requested and was granted authorization to work
overtime with the provision for reimbursement of additional inspection costs. The delta between overtime and regular time
inspection costs is $21/hr. A total of 50.5 hours of overtime inspection was provided requiring premium time reimbursement.
This change order is required to reimburse the District for additional costs associated with providing inspection outside normal
working hours as requested by the Contractor.
Item No. 6:
Contract Documents Section 00700-8.5 provides for no cost time extensions due to weather impacts on the project progress.
Weather impacted the project forty-four (44) days between April and September 2018. The project was impacted on April 17,
18, 20, 24-27; May 3-4, 9-10, 15, 23, 30; June 4, 7, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25, 27, 29; July 5, 7, 12, 16, 18-20; August 1, 10-11, 14,
16, 18, 21, 24-25, 27-28; September 4 & 7, 2018 due to weather.
CA#878060 NV#72342 AZ#255672
Corporate Office • 14665 Rancho Vista Drive • Fontana, CA 92335
P: (909) 928-0000 • F: (909) 829-0024
November 2, 2018
Doug Cook
Alyson Corp
9968 Hibert Street, #109
San Diego, CA 92131
Re: Otay Water District
980-2 Resevoir
Request for Delay Days
Mr. Cook,
This letter is for the request of additional contract days to be added to the contract. Simpson
Sandblasting is requesting 44 contract days to be added to the contract due to excessive heat, and
excessive humidity. These environmental conditions resulted in environments that were not within the
project specifications or the paint manufacturer’s product data sheets, thus causing Simpson to not be
able to proceed with the scheduled coatings work. All daily reports have been submitted and each delay
day is documented and noted for a requested contract day. Please review all daily reports for
confirmation of the amount of delay days requested.
Simpson would also like to request 5 additional days for the puddle welding work performed on pitted
areas of steel, 3 additional days for painting of bollards & pipes, and 3 additional contract days for the
plate welding.
Please feel free to contact me in regards to these requested days. (951) 233-7076.
Respectfully,
Rusty Simpson
Project Manager
Job Number Date PCO Type PCO No.
7/23/2018 CONTRACT 2
Labor:
Item Craft ST Hours OT Hours ST Rate OT Rate Labor Total Payroll Taxes %Work Comp Work Comp %Per Diem Rate Daily Truck Rate Qty/Days Benefits Total Tracking Code
1 BOILERMAKER 8.00 3.00 $81.63 $115.74 $1,000.26 18.00%Iron/Steel
Erection 9.93%$100.00 $100.00 1.0 $0.00 $1,479.63 550-1 - Carbon Field
2 NON-PREVAILING 0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Clerical 0.51%$0.00 310-1 - Carbon Shop -
Paso
3 NON-PREVAILING 7.00 $78.48 $0.00 $549.36 SELECT
CLASS 0.00%$75.35 $624.71 410-1 - Paso Paint Shop -
Labor
4 NON-PREVAILING $0.00 $0.00 SELECT
CLASS 0.00%$0.00 100 - Engineering
5 NON-PREVAILING $0.00 $0.00 SELECT
CLASS 0.00%$0.00 110 - CAD/Drafting
6 SELECT CRAFT SELECT
CLASS 0.00%$0.00 SELECT CODE
Equipment:
Item Duration Charged # Of Units
Onsite ST Quantity OT Quantity ST Rate OT Rate Standby Rate Total
1 HOURLY 1.00 8.00 2.40 $8.33 $15.07 $1.97 $102.81
2 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
3 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
4 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
5 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
6 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
8 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
9 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
10 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
11 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
12 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
13 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
14 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
15 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
16 HOURLY $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
17 $0.00 $0.00
18 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
20 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Materials:
Item Description Quantity Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Tax Rate
1 8.75%Cost $2,104.35
2 8.75%Surcharge %0.00%$0.00
3 $0.00 0.00%Markup %15.00%$315.65
4 $0.00 0.00%Total $2,420.00
5 $0.00 0.00%Cost $102.81
6 $0.00 0.00%Equipment Markup %15.00%$15.42
7 $0.00 0.00%Total $118.23
8 $0.00 0.00%Cost $0.00
Subcontractors:Tax $0.00
Item Total Markup %0.00%$0.00
1 Total $0.00
2 Cost $0.00
3 Markup %0.00%$0.00
4 Total $0.00
5 Cost $0.00
Freight:Markup %0.00%$0.00
Item Total Total $0.00
1 Bonding Bonding %1.00%$25.64
2
Profit Profit %Profit %0.00%$0.00
5 $2,563.70
Signature of Owner's Representative/General Contractor Name Date
PRT Project Manager Signature Name Date
Tracking Code
Tracking Code
SELECT CODE
550-44 - Misc. Equip Rental
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
Summary of Charges
Standby Quantity
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
Name
Same
Owner
Qtay Water District
SELECT CODE
41075
Job Name
Paso Robles Tank, Inc.
825 26th St.
Paso Robles, CA 93446
Otay Water District
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Proposed Change Order (PCO)
Puddle welding
PCO Title/Description
Select Equipment
Customer
Class
AREA 2 BOILERMAKER-
BLACKSMITH
CARBON SHOP
PAINTER
CAD/DRAFTING
Select Equipment
Equipment Description
Welding Machine 250-450A
ENGINEERING
SELECT CLASS
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
Total Calendar Days Requested:
SELECT CODE
Tracking Code
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
Freight
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
Name
0.00%
Material
PCO Total:
Description
Description
Labor
Subcontractor
Overhead
(Contract)
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
Tracking Code
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
$0.00Overhead %
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
Select Equipment
Select Equipment SELECT CODE
Select Equipment
Select Equipment
SELECT CODE
Select Equipment SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
SELECT CODE
RESET FORM
. ~,<~~,~~'tf:'l'' ·s.:,:~,
CSI
SERVICES
CSI Services, Inc., P.O. Box 801357, Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316 /
INVOICE SUBMITTED TO: DATE OF INVOICE: 05/30/18 V
Engineering Department
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
JOB DESCRIPTION:
Project Name: As-Needed Coating Inspection
OWD Project Manager: Kevin Cameron
CIP No: Various
AUTHORIZATION:
Purchase Order Number: 720092 ~
Consultant Project Number: 218529
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RELATED TO INVOICE: 04/23/2018 to 05/11/2018
Perform Coating Inspection Services.
AUTHORIZED AND INVOICED FEE:
Original Fee Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 1 Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 2 Amount Authorized
Total Fee Amount Authorized
Amount of This Invoice
Amount Previously Invoiced
Total Amount Invoiced to Date
$175,000.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$175,000.00
$ 10,180.25
$ 95,280.75
$ 105 ,461.00
Amount Previously Paid
Authorized Fee Amount Remaining
Percent Complete
$ I-e5;46 t.oo-q ~. z..e>o · 1S""t~~
$ 69,539.00
CONTRACTED DATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION: June 30, 2019
Invoice has been reviewed and found correct.
6/3/18
Chris Sweeney/Project Coordinator Date
FOR OWD USE ONLY
TOTAL
:&0~ f..-4-(~
Date Div Mgr Date
70%
Chief Date
INVOICE
BILL TO
CSI Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 801357
Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316
us
(877)27 42422
www .csiservices.biz
Otay Water District
Attn: Accounts Payable
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
PO/AUTH.
720092
DATE ACTIVITY
04/23/2018 Inspector
04/24/2018 Inspector
04/25/2018 Inspector
04/26/2018 Inspector
04/27/2018 Inspector
04/30/2018 Inspector
05/01/2018 Inspector
05/02/2018 Inspector
05/03/2018 Inspector
05/04/2018 Inspector
05/07/2018 Inspector
05/08/2018 Inspector
05/09/2018 Inspector
05/10/2018 Inspector
05/10/2018 Inspector
05/11/2018 Inspector
PROJECT NO
218529
ACTIVITY
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services-OT
Coating Inspection Services
There will be a 3 percent surcharge for payments made with a credit BALANCE DUE
card
FederaiiD (EIN}:45-0532361
INVOICE# 8220
DATE 05/30/2018
DUE DATE 06/29/2018
TERMS Net30
PROJECT NAME
Reservoir 980-2
QTY RATE
8:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
4:00 94.75
4:00 94.75
4:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
5:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
8:00 94.75
2:00 115.75
8:00 94.75
AMOUNT
758.00
758.00
758.00
758.00
758.00
379.00
379.00
379.00
758.00
473.75
758.00
758.00
758.00
758.00
231.50
758.00
$10,180.25
~ ' ~~-..._.t ~ 1,;~" ~·""". " :r
CSI
SERVICES
CSI Services, Inc., P.O. Box 801357, Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316 V' Z018 JUL -9 AM 9-q I
INVOICE SUBMITTED TO: DATE OF INVOICE: 07/06/2018 yi
Engineering Department
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
JOB DESCRIPTION:
Project Name: As-Needed Coating Inspection
OWD Project Manager: Kevin Cameron
CIP No: Various
INVOICEN
AUTHORIZATION:
Purchase Order Number: 720092 ~
Consultant Project Number: 218529
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RELATED TO INVOICE: 05/14/18 to 06/29/18
Perform Coating Inspection Services.
AUTHORIZED AND INVOICED FEE:
Original Fee Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 1 Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 2 Amount Authorized
Total Fee Amount Authorized
Amount of This Invoice
Amount Previously Invoiced
Total Amount Invoiced to Date
Amount Previously Paid
Authorized Fee Amount Remaining
Percent Complete
CONTRACTED DATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION: June 30, 2019
Invoice has been reviewed and found correct.
7/6/18
Chris Sweeney/Project Coordinator Date
FOR OWD USE ONLY
$175,000.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$175,000.00
$ 26,556.13
$105,461.00
$ 132,017.13
$ 105,461.00
$ 42,982.87
75%
Amount Project No. Project Account No.
~ 2k, ss-b. !2 l'Z 5Ll(o-O()l\03 -3lOL-S"2.<al Ol [~-332-(
~ Zlo I 5~~ ~ '~ TOTAL
-,.
~ ~~ 1\1otl'l
Date Div Mgr Date Chief Date
INVOICE
BILL TO
CSI Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 801357
Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316
us
(877)27 42422
www .csiservices.biz
Otay Water District
Attn: Accounts Payable
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
PO/AUTH.
720092
DATE ACTIVITY
05/14/2018 Inspector
05/15/2018 Inspector
05/16/2018 Inspector
05/17/2018 Inspector
05/18/2018 Inspector
05/18/2018 Inspector
05/21/2018 Inspector
05/22/2018 Inspector
05/22/2018 Inspector
05/23/2018 Inspector
05/24/2018 Inspector
05/24/2018 Inspector
05/25/2018 Inspector
05/29/2018 Inspector
05/30/2018 Inspector
05/31/2018 Inspector
05/31/2018 Inspector
06/01/2018 Inspector
06/04/2018 Inspector
06/05/2018 Inspector
06/06/2018 Inspector
06/07/2018 Inspector
06/08/2018 Inspector
06/11/2018 Inspector
06/12/2018 Inspector
06/13/2018 Inspector
06/14/2018 Inspector
PROJECT NO
218529
ACTIVITY
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services-OT
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services-OT
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services-OT
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
FederaiiD (EIN):45-0532361
INVOICE# 8281
DATE 07/06/2018
DUE DATE 08/05/2018
TERMS Net 30
PROJECT NAME (J_ :j
Reservoir 980-2 'P2S4b
QTY RATE AMOUNT
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
4:00 94.75 379.00
4:00 94.75 379.00
4:00 94.75 379.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
2:30 115.75 289.38
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
DATE ACTIVITY ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
06/15/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/18/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/19/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/20/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/21/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/22/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/25/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/26/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/27/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/28/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
06/29/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
............. ····-· ............................................... ... ········ ................ ····*···· ..... ................... ..............
There will be a 3 percent surcharge for payments made with a credit BALANCE DUE $26,556.13 card
FederaiiD (EIN):45-0532361
-""-,.,.. <' •
CSI OTAY WATER DI STRICT RECEIVE D
SERVICES
CSI Services, Inc., P.O. Box 801357, Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316 Of8 AUG f 7 AH 9: SS
INVOICE SUBMITTED TO:
Engineering Department
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
JOB DESCRIPTION:
Project Name: As-Needed Coating Inspection
OWD Project Manager: Kevin Cameron
CIP No: Various
DATE OF INVOICE: 08/12/2018 ~
INVOICEN
AUTHORIZATION:
Purchase Order Number: 720092 V
Consultant Project Number: 218529
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RELATED TO INVOICE: 07/02/18 to 08/04/18
Perform Coating Inspection Services.
AUTHORIZED AND INVOICED FEE:
Original Fee Amount Authorized
Change Order No. I Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 2 Amount Authorized
Total Fee Amount Authorized
Amount of This Invoice
Amount Previously Invoiced
Total Amount Invoiced to Date
Amount Previously Paid
Authorized Fee Amount Remaining
Percent Complete
CONTRACTED DATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION: June 30,2019
Invoice has been reviewed and found correct.
8/17/18
Chris Sweeney/Project Coordinator Date
FOR OWD USE ONLY
$175,000.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$175,000.00
$ 26,580.75
$ 132,017.13
$ 158,543.88
$ 158,543.88
$ 16,456.12
9.5%
. Amount Project No. Project Account No.
~J-GJ 5~0~ 7S V2-s-LJ6-DtJ\\0 ~-)\t>L-5Utc> \ l"L-3~l
J
l-P2bl 5~0~ !S TOTAL
.,..~,.-~""'~---
CSI
SERVICES
INVOICE
BILL TO
Otay Water District
CSI Services, Inc.
P .0. Box 801357
Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316
us
(877)2742422
www.csiservices.biz
Attn: Accounts Payable
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
PO/AUTH. PROJECT NO
720092 218529
DATE ACTIVITY ACTIVITY
07/02/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/02/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/02/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/03/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/03/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/03/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/05/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/05/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/05/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/06/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/06/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/06/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/07/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/07/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/09/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/09/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/10/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/11/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/12/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/12/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/12/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/13/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/13/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/14/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/16/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
07/16/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
07/17/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
FederaiiD (EIN):45-0532361
INVOICE # 8385R
DATE 08/12/2018
DUE DATE 09/11/2018
TERMS Net 30
-----
PROJECT NAME
Reservoir 980-2
QTY RATE AMOUNT
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
2:00 115.75 231.50
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 115.75 926.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
2:00 115.75 231.50
8:00 94.75 758.00
DATE ACTIVITY ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
07/17/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-Or 4:00 115.75 463.00
07/18/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 7:00 94.75 663.25
07/24/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
07/25/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-or 1:00 115.75 115.75
07/25/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
07/26/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
07/27/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
07/28/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
07/30/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
07/30/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-or 1:00 115.75 115.75
07/31/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
08/01/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
08/02/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
08/02/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-Or 3:00 115.75 347.25
08/03/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services 8:00 94.75 758.00
08/04/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-or 8:00 115.75 926.00
There will be a 3 percent surcharge for payments made with a credit BALANCE DUE $26,580.75 card
Federal tO (EIN):45-0532361
CSI oT · y \·,;"'· EH li ~ lRICT
SERVICES
RE r.FI\l EO
CSI Services, Inc., P.O. Box 801357, Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316 V l]_..
2018 SEP J4f-PM Q: 56
INVOICE SUBMITTED TO: DATE OF INVOICE: 09/13/2018 v"'
Engineering Department
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
JOB DESCRIPTION:
INVOICE NOS
AUTHORIZATION:
Project Name: As-Needed Coating Inspection
OWD Project Manager: Kevin Cameron
Purchase Order Number: 720092 /
Consultant Project Number: 218529
CIP No: Various
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RELATED TO INVOICE: 08/06/18 to 08/31/18
Perform Coating Inspection Services.
AUTHORIZED AND INVOICED FEE:
Original Fee Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 1 Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 2 Amount Authorized
Total Fee Amount Authorized
Amount of This Invoice
Amount Previously Invoiced
Total Amount Invoiced to Date
Amount Previously Paid
Authorized Fee Amount Remaining
Percent Complete
CONTRACTED DATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION: June 30, 2019
Invoice has been reviewed and found correct.
9/17/18
Chris Sweeney/Project Coordinator Date
FOR OWD USE ONLY
$175,000.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$175,000.00
$ 15,882.75 j
$ 158,579.88
$ 174,426.63
$ 158,579.88
$ :519.37
99%
Pro·ect Account No.
-()Q/103 -3/02--SZ/ulol /2---332-/
t -lo-~
Date
~ ~ «,\ Lo\lf'
Chief Date
-; .... .,.,-.: ~'"'.,
CSI
SERVICES
INVOICE
BILL TO
Otay Water District
CSI Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 801357
Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316
us
(877)27 42422
www .csiservices.biz
Attn: Accounts Payable
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
PO/AUTH. PROJECT NO
720092 218529
DATE ACTIVITY ACTIVITY
08/06/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/06/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
08/07/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
08/07/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/08/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/09/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/09/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
08/10/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/13/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/14/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/14/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
08/15/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/15/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
08/16/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/17/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/17/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
08/20/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/21/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/22/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/23/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/24/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/27/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/28/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/29/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/30/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
08/30/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services-OT
08/31/2018 Inspector Coating Inspection Services
FederaiiD (EIN):45-0532361
INVOICE# 8442
DATE 09/13/2018
DUE DATE 10/13/2018
TERMS Net 30
PROJECT NAME
Reservoir 980-2
QTY RATE AMOUNT
8:00 94.75 758.00
2:00 115.75 231.50
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
2:00 115.75 231.50
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
4:00 94.75 379.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
8:00 94.75 758.00
1:00 115.75 115.75
8:00 94.75 758.00
There will be a 3 percent surcharge for payments made with a credit
card
BALANCE DUE
FederaiiD (EIN):45-0532361
$15,822.75
~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
CSI OlAY t1·~1 Eh Ld ~ I RICT
R E~FIV ED
SERVICES l
CSI Services, Inc., P.O. Box 801357, Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316 V"'znt8 SEP PM 2: 22
INVOICE SUBMITTED TO:
Engineering Department
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
JOB DESCRIPTION:
Project Name: As-Needed Coating Inspection
OWD Project Manager: Kevin Cameron
CIP No: Various
DATE OF INVOICE: 09/19/2018 /
INVOICE NOEV
AUTHORIZATION:
Purchase Order Number: 720579 /
Consultant Project Number: 218529
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES RELATED TO INVOICE: 09/04/18 to 09/12/18
Perform Coating Inspection Services.
AUTHORIZED AND INVOICED FEE:
Original Fee Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 1 Amount Authorized
Change Order No. 2 Amount Authorized
Total Fee Amount Authorized
Amount of This Invoice
Amount Previously Invoiced
Total Amount Invoiced to Date
Amount Previously Paid
Authorized Fee Amount Remaining
Percent Complete
CONTRACTED DATE OF PROJECT COMPLETION: June 30, 2019
Invoice has been reviewed and found correct.
9/19/18
Chris Sweeney/Project Coordinator Date
FOR OWD USE ONLY
$175,000.00
$ 0.00
$ 0.00
$175,000.00
$ 4,089.50
$ 0.00
$ 4,089.50
$ 0.00
$170,910.50
0.01%
Pro'ect Account No.
f>Q l 0!-'l'b-'~ ~'j~ lo\1\\lg
Div Mgr Date Chief Date
O'L l:fSf"' tf}t~l I~
INVOICE
BILL TO
CSI Services, Inc.
P.O. Box 801357
Santa Clarita, CA 91380-2316
us
(877)27 42422
www.csiservices.biz
Otay Water District
Attn: Accounts Payable
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
PO/AUTH.
720579
DATE ACTIVITY
09/04/2018 Inspector
09/05/2018 Inspector
09/05/2018 Inspector
09/06/2018 Inspector
09/06/2018 Inspector
09/07/2018 Inspector
09/12/2018 Inspector
····-····---.
PROJECT NO
218529
ACTIVITY
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services-OT
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services-OT
Coating Inspection Services
Coating Inspection Services
. ... --· --· ·-
INVOICE # 8464REV
DATE 09/19/2018
DUE DATE 10/19/2018
TERMS Net 30
PROJECT NAME
Reservoir 980-2
QTY RATE
8:00 96.45
8:00 96.45
1:00 115.75
8:00 96.45
1:00 115.75
8:00 96.45
8:00 96.45
-...... --.. ··-·. -...... --..
AMOUNT
771.60
771.60
115.75
771.60
115.75
771.60
771.60
--..... -
There will be a 3 percent surcharge for payments made with a credit BALANCE DUE $4,089.50 card
FederaiiD (EIN):45-0532361
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 2, 2019
SUBMITTED BY:
Stephen Beppler
Senior Civil Engineer
PROJECT: S1502-
001000
DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Bob Kennedy, Engineering Manager
Dan Martin, Assistant Chief, Engineering
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 4356 to Approve the Amended and Restated
Regional Wastewater Disposal Agreement Between the City of San
Diego and the Participating Agencies in the Metropolitan
Sewerage System
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
adopt Resolution No. 4356 (Attachment B) to approve the Amended and
Restated Regional Wastewater Disposal Agreement between the City of
San Diego (City) and the Participating Agencies (PA) in the
Metropolitan Sewerage System (Metro) (Agreement) and authorize the
General Manager to execute the Agreement. The updated Agreement
(Exhibit A) incorporates the Pure Water San Diego (Pure Water)
program, which is a long-range regional water reuse plan with the
goal of realizing a secondary equivalent Point Loma Wastewater
Treatment Plant (PLWTP) and a new local sustainable water supply.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
In order to comprehensively and equitably address the costs and
revenues associated with the Pure Water project and the related
2
construction, expansion, and modification of the Metro wastewater
facilities, the City and the PAs wish to amend and restate the
Agreement.
ANALYSIS:
Background
The Metropolitan Wastewater Joint Powers Authority (JPA) is a
coalition of municipalities and special districts in the southern and
central portions of San Diego County that share in the use of the
City's regional wastewater collection and treatment facilities. The
District is one of twelve (12) PAs in the JPA party to the agreement
with the City for wastewater treatment. Other JPA member agencies
include the cities of Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon,
Imperial Beach, La Mesa, National City, Poway, the County of San
Diego Sanitation District, the Lemon Grove Sanitation District, and
Padre Dam Municipal Water District. The District contributes roughly
0.5% of the wastewater flow to the Metro system while the JPA
represents approximately 35% of the Metro flow.
The City’s sewage system dates back to 1885, but a formal agreement
between the PAs was not established until 1998 under a Regional
Wastewater Disposal Agreement. The Metropolitan Wastewater
Commission (Metro Commission) was formed at that time pursuant to the
terms of the Agreement between the PAs and the City. In 2001, the
JPA was formed to provide the PAs with a stronger voice in the
operations of the Metro System.
PLWTP operates under a National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit modified under section 301(h) & (j)(5) of the
Clean Water Act, which allows for the facility to operate as an
advanced primary treatment plant under a waiver that must be renewed
every 5 years. The loss of that waiver would require PLWTP to
upgrade to secondary treatment. For the permit renewal in 2015, the
Pure Water program strategy allows for the attainment of treatment
within the Metro system that could allow PLWTP to be permitted as
equivalent to secondary treatment. This involves diverting 83 MGD of
sewage for water purification to potable water quality while allowing
the PLWTP to continue its current operating process. The first phase
of the Pure Water project to be constructed at the North City Water
Reclamation Plant is expected to produce 30 MGD of indirect potable
reuse water to be conveyed to Miramar reservoir.
To continue to operate the PLWTP at the advanced primary treatment
level, the City is seeking passage of federal legislation, with
support from the environmental community. The proposal, called Ocean
3
Pollution Reduction Act II (OPRA II), will allow the City’s NPDES
permit to be based on secondary equivalency with a commitment to
implement potable reuse of wastewater. Until permanent federal
legislation is adopted to recognize secondary equivalence, there is
uncertainty about the total financial cost strategy for wastewater
associated with the Pure Water project.
Amended and Restated Regional Wastewater Agreement
The proposed changes to the existing 1998 Regional Wastewater
Disposal Agreement primarily consist of the following:
1. Define the Pure Water program and secondary equivalency for
PLWTP;
2. Change methodology for repayment of future capital investment
projects, where costs for Pure Water are based upon flow and
strength commitments for planning year 2050 as listed in
Exhibit G of the Agreement;
3. Set cost allocations between water and wastewater facilities
reflective of wastewater operation requirements for secondary
discharge for ocean disposal;
4. Establish alternative capacity rights reflecting secondary
equivalency implementation, which reduces the wastewater
infrastructure construction for Pure Water to reflect the flow
projections for planning year 2050;
5. Provide a maximum cap on financial exposure to wastewater
customers from the Pure Water program based upon the cost of
converting PLWTP to secondary treatment, determined to be $1.8
billion in November 2018 dollars for a capacity of 180 MGD;
6. Establish criteria for requiring agencies to obtain additional
treatment capacity should their flow and/or strength exceed
their contracted limits and setting penalties if they fail to
do so upon notification; and
7. Provide sharing of potential future water revenues when Pure
Water potable supply costs become less expensive than other
supply sources.
The District’s flow and strength commitments identified in Exhibit G
of the Agreement are based upon the assumption that the Ralph W.
Chapman Water Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF) will be operational
through 2050. Should the District decide to cease treating flow at
RWCWRF, additional Pure Water flow and strength capacity would need
to be obtained following the procedures established in the Agreement.
Underpayments to the date of revising the capacities would need to be
paid within 4 years on a quarterly basis.
4
District staff reviewed each of the developmental drafts of the
Agreement and provided numerous comments that are viewed as providing
safeguards for the District. Among these are providing adequate
durations before additional flow or strength capacity commitments are
triggered by exceeding the established Pure Water limits set in
Exhibit G of the Agreement. Initial drafts had set this at 3 months,
with subsequent negotiations extending this to 3 years of continuous
exceedance levels at 10 percent above the commitment level. With the
District’s operation of RWCWRF currently being considered in the
District’s planning year 2050 capacity rights, it was important that
short-term shutdowns of the plant not result in the need to obtain
additional capacity rights. If the District were to trigger the need
for increasing contract capacity and not do so, the Agreement
provides for the City to assess damages at $1 for each gallon of flow
in excess of the contract capacity during each quarter year of
occurrence until the new capacity is obtained.
Pure Water Phase I cost projection dated October 2018 estimated the
total cost to Water and Wastewater at $1.44 billion. Metro
Wastewater allocation is currently projected at thirty-nine percent
(39%) of the overall estimated cost and City Water allocation is
sixty-one percent (61%). At this distribution of costs, Phase I is
projected at $562 million or about 31% of the Wastewater portion of
the Pure Water commitment. Based upon Exhibit G of the Agreement,
the District’s portion of the Phase I costs is currently projected at
$2.57 million, with a total Pure Water cost estimated at $8.23
million in 2018 dollars.
The entire Pure Water program costs for all phases to meet the
program goal of producing 83 MGD of potable reuse water was estimated
to cost $2.5 to $3 billion dollars in 2014 when the Cooperative
Agreement between the City of San Diego and San Diego Coastkeeper,
Surfrider Foundation San Diego Chapter, Coastal Environmental Rights
Foundation, and the San Diego Audubon Society was approved to support
the PLWTP’s NPDES Permit.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Pure Water Phase I is projected to cost the District’s sewer
customers $2.57 million. The City is expected to obtain financing
for a large portion of the capital cost, so the impact will be
amortized over a period of 20 to 30 years depending on the types of
financing. There have been several changes to the terms of the
agreement since the City last provided a cost allocation estimate
around June of 2018. Based on the last cost allocation estimate,
Phase I is expected to increase the annual Metro fees by an average
of $250,000 between FY 2019 and FY 2024, which equates to a rate
5
impact of approximately of 9.0% over the same period. The FY 2018
and FY 2019 rate models were prepared including these additional
costs in the projected rates and rate increases. Phase I is expected
to be operational in 2023.
Pure Water Phase II planning costs are expected to begin being
incurred within the next 5 years and the associated capital costs are
expected to begin being incurred in 2030, with Phase II being
operational in 2035. The final methodology for Phase II cost
allocation has not been determined and the City has not provided
final cost estimates, cost allocation figures, or a cost allocation
methodology for Phase II; however, using the same allocation methods
used to determine the impact of Phase I and based on a cap of $1.8
billion, Phase II will cost the District an additional $5.66 million.
Based on the annual cost impact of Phase I, Phase II would equate to
an annual additional expense of $550,000 per year, which would have a
rate impact of approximately 20.0%. The majority of this rate
increase would be anticipated to be incorporated into the rates as
the 2030 construction timeframe approaches and may impact rates up to
and beyond the 2035.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Resolution supports the District’s Mission statement, “To
provide exceptional water and wastewater service to its customers,
and to manage District resources in a transparent and fiscally
responsive manner” and the District’s Vision, “To be a model water
agency by providing stellar service, achieving measurable results,
and continuously improving operational practices.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
Unknown at this time.
SB/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP S1502 - City of San Diego Metro Water Issues\Staff Reports\Bd 01-02-19, Staff Report
Metro JPA Restated and Amended Agreement\BD 01-02-19 Staff Report Metro JPA-Restated and Amended
Wastewater Agreement.docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Resolution No. 4356
Exhibit A – Draft Amended and Restated Regional
Wastewater Agreement
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S1502-001000
Adopt Resolution No. 4356 to Approve the Amended and
Restated Regional Wastewater Disposal Agreement Between the
City of San Diego and the Participating Agencies in the
Metropolitan Sewerage System
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 4, 2018. The
Committee supported Staff’s recommendation.
NOTE:
The “Committee Action” is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO. 4356
RESOLUTION OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT APPROVING THE AMENDED
AND RESTATED REGIONAL WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO
EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Otay Water District (District) is one of 12 participating agencies of the
Metropolitan Sewerage System (Metro System) which is owned and operated by the City of
San Diego (City); and
WHEREAS, the City and the participating agencies entered into that certain Regional
Wastewater Disposal Agreement dated May 18, 1998 (the “1998 Agreement”), which provided,
among other things, for certain contract rights to capacity in the Metropolitan System, a system
of wastewater conveyance, treatment, and disposal facilities, and the establishment of a
mechanism to fund the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the Metro
System by the City and the participating agencies.
WHEREAS, the District adopted Resolution No. 4243 on October 1, 2014, which
supported the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant (PLWTP) National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and included a goal for Pure Water San Diego (Pure
Water) to achieve the standards outlined in the permit by reducing solids discharged from
PLWTP to a level equivalent to that of converting the PLWTP to secondary treatment while
generating a potable water source; and
WHEREAS, the 1998 Agreement does not adequately address the complexities
associated with implementation of the Pure Water program, including new facilities, allocation
and financing of costs, potential revenue distribution, and capacity rights; and
WHEREAS, the City and the participating agencies have been working since 2014 on
deal points for the Pure Water program which have been incorporated into an Amended and
Restated Regional Wastewater Disposal Agreement (Agreement); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement, among other things, sets a capital improvements spending
cap for the participating agencies based upon the cost of converting PLWTP to secondary
treatment; and
Y:\Board\CurBdPkg\ENGRPLAN\2019\BD 01-02-2019\Wastewater Agreement btwn the City of SD and OWD
(SteveB)\Attachment B - Resolution - Amended and Restated Wastewater Disposal Agreement.doc
WHEREAS, the City of San Diego City Council on November 15, 2018 authorized the
Mayor or his designee to execute the Agreement with the participating agencies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water
District that the above stated recitals are incorporated herein by reference;
IT IS RESOLVED FURTHER that the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District
approves the terms and provisions of the Amended and Restated Regional Wastewater Disposal
Agreement; and
IT IS RESOLVED FURTHER that the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District
hereby authorizes the General Manager to execute the Amended and Restated Regional
Wastewater Disposal Agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District on the 2nd day of January, 2019:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
__________________________
President
ATTEST:
_____________________________
District Secretary
60409.00001\30914102.16
AMENDED AND RESTATED
REGIONAL WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO
AND
THE PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
IN
THE METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE SYSTEM
60409.00001\30914102.16
-i-
AMENDED AND RESTATED
REGIONAL WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AGREEMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................... 2
II. OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF THE METRO SYSTEM .................................... 6
III. PAYMENT AND MONITORING PROVISIONS ......................................................... 12
IV. CAPACITY RIGHTS ...................................................................................................... 15
V. SYSTEM OF CHARGES ................................................................................................ 17
VI. PLANNING ..................................................................................................................... 21
VII. FACILITIES SOLELY FOR NEW CONTRACT CAPACITY ..................................... 22
VIII. THE METRO COMMISSION ........................................................................................ 24
IX. DISPUTE RESOLUTION ............................................................................................... 25
X. INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY ................................................................................. 26
XI. INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE ..................................................................................... 27
XII. NOTICES REQUIRED UNDER AGREEMENT ........................................................... 27
XIII. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERMINATION .................................................................. 27
XIV. GENERAL ....................................................................................................................... 28
Exhibits
A. Metro Facilities
B. Contract Capacities
C. Administrative Protocol on Allocation of Operating Reserves and Debt Service Coverage
to Participating Agencies
D. Notice Listing
E. Reclaimed Water Distribution System
F. Pure Water Cost Allocation and Revenues
G. Pure Water Capital Billing Table
60409.00001\30914102.16 -1-
AMENDED AND RESTATED REGIONAL WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED REGIONAL WASTEWATER DISPOSAL
AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of _________________, 20___, by and
between the CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipal corporation (“the City”); and the CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation; the CITY OF CORONADO, a municipal corporation;
the CITY OF DEL MAR, a municipal corporation; the CITY OF EL CAJON, a municipal
corporation; the CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH, a municipal corporation; the CITY OF LA
MESA, a municipal corporation; the LEMON GROVE SANITATION DISTRICT, a political
subdivision of the State of California; the CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, a municipal corporation;
the CITY OF POWAY, a municipal corporation; the OTAY WATER DISTRICT, a political
subdivision of the State of California; the PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, a
political subdivision of the State of California; and the SAN DIEGO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of California (the “Participating Agencies”). The
City and the Participating Agencies may be referred to herein individually as a “Party,” and
collectively as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City and the Participating Agencies (or their predecessors in interest)
entered into that certain Regional Wastewater Disposal Agreement dated May 18, 1998 (the
“1998 Agreement”), which provided, among other things, for certain contract rights to capacity
in the Metropolitan Sewerage System, a system of wastewater conveyance, treatment, and
disposal facilities (“Metro System”) and the establishment of a mechanism to fund the planning,
design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the Metro System by the City and the
Participating Agencies; and
WHEREAS, the purposes of the 1998 Agreement were: (1) to replace the prior-existing
sewage disposal agreements between the City and the Participating Agencies; (2) to provide
certain contract rights to capacity in the Metro System to the Participating Agencies; (3) to
establish a mechanism to fund the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of
the Metro System by the City and the Participating Agencies as necessary to provide hydraulic
capacity, and to comply with applicable law and with generally accepted engineering practices;
and (4) to establish a system of charges which allocates the costs of the planning, design and
construction of such new wastewater conveyance, treatment and disposal facilities as are
necessary solely to provide for new capacity on a fair and equitable basis; and
WHEREAS, on April 29, 2014 the San Diego City Council gave its approval and support
for the Pure Water San Diego program by adoption of Resolution No. R-308906. The
Resolution approved and supported the City’s efforts to develop an implementation strategy to
offload wastewater flow from the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant through
implementation of potable reuse, resulting in effluent discharged to the Pacific Ocean being
equivalent to what would be achieved by upgrading the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant
to a secondary treatment plant (secondary equivalency); and
WHEREAS, the City is implementing a phased, multi-year program designed to
regionally produce at least 83 million gallons per day of safe, reliable potable water using new,
-2-
60409.00001\30914102.16
expanded, or modified facilities, some of which will include Metro System facilities, in order to
achieve secondary equivalency at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant; and
WHEREAS, the Pure Water Program will not only benefit the City by producing
repurified water, but also the Participating Agencies and their wastewater customers, especially
if secondary equivalency is recognized through federal legislation amending the Clean Water
Act. Specifically, implementation of the Pure Water Program will reduce wastewater discharges
to the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant, part of the Metro System where a large portion
of the Participating Agencies’ wastewater is currently treated and disposed by discharging it into
the Pacific Ocean. By diverting wastewater from the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant
and reducing the effluent discharged into the Pacific Ocean, the City and the Participating
Agencies will potentially avoid billions of dollars in unnecessary capital, financing, energy, and
operating costs to upgrade the Point Loma plant to secondary treatment at full capacity.
Avoiding such costs would result in significant savings for regional wastewater customers; and
WHEREAS, the Padre Dam Municipal Water District, the San Diego County Sanitation
District, and the City of El Cajon have proposed a program to produce up to 12 million gallons
per day of safe, reliable potable water for East San Diego County using wastewater that would
otherwise be disposed of in the Metro System (“East County AWP Program”). By offloading
wastewater and wastewater contents from the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant, the East
County AWP Program would, if implemented, help the City’s and region’s efforts to achieve
long-term compliance with the Clean Water Act by producing a regional annual average of at
least 83 million gallons per day of water suitable for potable reuse by December 31, 2035, as
described in the Cooperative Agreement in Support of Pure Water San Diego entered into by the
City and certain environmental stakeholders on December 9, 2014; and
WHEREAS, Section XIV, subsection B, of the 1998 Agreement provided that the Parties
may amend the Agreement by a written agreement between the City and all Participating
Agencies stating the Parties’ intent to amend the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, in order to comprehensively and equitably address the costs and revenues
associated with the Pure Water Program and the related construction, expansion, and/or
modification of Metro System facilities, the City and Participating Agencies wish to amend and
restate the Regional Wastewater Disposal Agreement as provided herein.
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the City and the
Participating Agencies agree as follows:
I.DEFINITIONS
A.Annual Average Daily Flow is the number, in millions of gallons of wastewater
per day (“MGD”), calculated by dividing total Flow on a fiscal year basis by 365
days.
B.Brine is a waste byproduct of the demineralization process at an upstream Water
Repurification System facility or a Reclaimed Water facility.
C.Capital Expense Rate is the cost per acre foot that will apply if the Metro
-3-
60409.00001\30914102.16
System’s Capital Improvement Costs for the Pure Water Program and/or
upgrading of the Point Loma WTP to secondary treatment exceed $1.8 billion, as
further described in Exhibit F.
D.Capital Improvement Costs are costs associated with the planning, design,
financing, construction, or reconstruction of facilities.
E.Chemical Oxygen Demand or “COD” means the measure of the chemically
decomposable material in wastewater, as determined by the procedures specified
in the most current edition of “Standard Methods for the Examination for Water
and Wastewater,” or any successor publication which establishes the industry
standard.
F.City Water Utility PW Costs are those Pure Water Program costs allocated to
the City’s water utility and therefore excluded as Metro System costs under
Exhibit F.
G.Contract Capacity is the contractual right possessed by each Participating
Agency to discharge wastewater into the Metro System pursuant to this
Agreement up to the limit set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto. Contract
Capacity is stated in terms of Annual Average Daily Flow.
H.Flow is the amount of wastewater discharged by the City and each Participating
Agency.
I.Functional-Design Methodology shall mean the process of allocating Operation
and Maintenance Costs and Capital Improvement Costs to Flow and Strength
parameters recognizing the benefits of both the design criteria and the primary
function of a unit process.
J.Metro Commission is the advisory body created under Section VIII.
K.Metro System Costs are those costs set forth in Section 5.2.1.
L.Metro System Revenues are those revenues set forth in Section 5.2.2.
M.Metropolitan Sewerage System or Metro System shall mean and consist of
those facilities and contract rights to facilities which are shown and/or described
in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, including any
amendments thereto authorized by this Agreement.
N.Municipal System shall mean the City’s wastewater collection system, which
consists of pipelines and pump stations, that collects wastewater within the City
of San Diego and conveys it to the Metropolitan Sewerage System for treatment
and disposal.
O.New Capacity is the capacity to discharge wastewater outside the Metro System,
above the Contract Capacity set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto.
-4-
60409.00001\30914102.16
P.New Contract Capacity is the capacity to discharge wastewater into the Metro
System, above the Contract Capacity set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto.
Q.North City Water Reclamation Plant or North City WRP is the 30 million
gallons per day (as of the date of this Agreement) wastewater treatment facility
located at 4949 Eastgate Mall in San Diego, which includes four major processes:
primary treatment, secondary treatment, tertiary treatment, and disinfection.
R.Operation and Maintenance Costs are the costs of those items and activities
required by sound engineering and management practices to keep the conveyance,
disposal, treatment, and reuse facilities functioning in accordance with all
applicable laws, rules, and regulations.
S.Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant or Point Loma WTP is the 240
million gallons per day (as of the date of this Agreement) advanced primary
treatment plant which includes four major processes: screening, grit removal,
sedimentation, and digestion.
T.Projected 2050 Strength and Flow Amounts are the three (3) values described
below:
1.Projected COD 2050 Flows is the estimated amount of Chemical Oxygen
Demand (COD), stated in pounds per day, that the City and each
Participating Agency are projected to have in the 2050 fiscal year.
Projected COD 2050 Flows for each Party are stated in Column 7 of
Exhibit G.
2.Projected Metro Flow 2050 is the estimated amount of Annual Average
Daily Flow, stated in millions of gallons per day (MGD), that the City and
each Participating Agency are projected to have in the 2050 fiscal year.
Projected Metro Flow 2050 for each Party is stated in Column 4 of Exhibit
G.
3.Projected SS 2050 Flows is the estimated amount of Suspended Solids
(SS) stated in pounds per day, that the City and each Participating Agency
are projected to have in the 2050 fiscal year. Projected SS 2050 Flows for
each Party are stated in Column 10 of Exhibit G.
U.Pure Water Capital Melded Percentage or Melded Percentage is the
proportionate share, stated in Column 12 of Exhibit G, by which Pure Water
Program Capital Improvement Costs, Repurified Water Revenue, and the Capital
Expense Rate will be allocated among the City and the Participating Agencies.
The Pure Water Capital Melded Percentage is based on each Party’s proportionate
share of Projected Metro Flow 2050, Projected SS 2050 Flows, and Projected
COD 2050 Flows, which proportions are weighted as described in Footnote 3 of
Exhibit G.
V.Pure Water Program is the City’s phased, multi-year program designed to
-5-
60409.00001\30914102.16
produce at least 83 million gallons per day of Repurified Water using new,
expanded, or modified facilities, some of which will include Metro System
facilities.
W.Reclaimed Water (or Recycled Water) shall have the definition set forth in
Title 22, Division 4 of the California Code of Regulations and shall mean water
which, as a result of treatment of wastewater, is suitable for a direct beneficial use
or a controlled use that otherwise could not occur.
X.Reclaimed Water (or Recycled Water) Distribution System shall mean and
consist of those eight (8) reclaimed water projects listed in Attachment B of the
Stipulated Final Order for Injunctive Relief approved by the U.S. District Court
on June 6, 1997 in U.S.A. v. City of San Diego, Case No. 88-1101-B, and attached
hereto as Exhibit E.
Y.Repurified Water shall mean water which, as a result of advanced treatment of
Reclaimed Water, is suitable for use as a source of domestic (or potable) water
supply.
Z.Repurified Water Revenue is the cost savings that will be realized when the
City water utility’s annual costs per-acre foot for Repurified Water are less than
the purchase costs per-acre foot for comparable water from the San Diego County
Water Authority, as further described in Exhibit F.
AA.Return Flow shall mean the effluent created by the dewatering of digested
biosolids, which includes centrate.
BB.Reuse shall mean to use again, such as water which has been reclaimed or
repurified, or sludge that has been converted to biosolids for beneficial use.
CC.South Bay Land/Ocean Outfall is the facility that is jointly owned by the
International Boundary & Water Commission (U.S. Section IBWC) and the City
of San Diego. The Outfall is planned to convey and discharge treated effluent
from the IBWC’s International Wastewater Treatment Plant and treated effluent
from the City’s South Bay Water Reclamation Plant and the South Bay Secondary
Treatment Plant. As of the date of this Agreement, the Outfall has a current
Average Daily Flow Capacity of 174 million gallons per day. As of the date of
this Agreement, the City owns 39.94% of the capacity of the Outfall and the
balance of the capacity is owned by the IBWC.
DD.South Bay Water Reclamation Plant is the 15 million gallons per day (as of the
date of this Agreement) wastewater treatment facility located at 2411 Dairy Mart
Road in San Diego, which includes four major processes: primary treatment,
secondary treatment, tertiary treatment, and disinfection.
EE.Strength means the measurement of Suspended Solids (SS) and Chemical
Oxygen Demand (COD) within the wastewater Flow and any other measurement
required by law after the date of this Agreement.
-6-
60409.00001\30914102.16
FF.Suspended Solids or SS means the insoluble solid matter in wastewater that is
separable by laboratory filtration, as determined by the procedures specified in the
most current edition of “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater,” or any successor publication which establishes the industry
standard.
GG.Tertiary Component is that portion of the wastewater treatment process that
currently filters the secondary treated wastewater effluent through fine sand
and/or anthracite coal to remove fine Suspended Solids and disinfects it to meet
the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 22, or its successor
for filtered and disinfected wastewater.
HH.Water Repurification System shall mean any facilities, including treatment and
conveyance facilities, the purpose of which is the production or conveyance of
Repurified Water. Water Repurification System includes, but is not limited to:
the Tertiary Component of the North City Water Reclamation Plant to the extent
being used to produce Repurified Water, the North City Pure Water Facility to be
located across the street from the North City Water Reclamation Plant (“North
City Pure Water Facility”); the Repurified Water conveyance system, which will
transport Repurified Water from the North City Pure Water Facility and/or other
facilities to the Miramar Reservoir or other alternative location(s) as determined
by the City; and any other Repurified Water treatment or conveyance facilities
which are part of the Pure Water Program.
II.OWNERSHIP AND OPERATION OF THE METRO SYSTEM
2.1 Rights of the Parties.
The City is the owner of the Metro System, and of any additions to the Metro
System or other facilities constructed pursuant to this Agreement. All decisions with respect to
the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of the Metro System shall rest
with the City, in consultation with the Metro Commission. The Participating Agencies shall have
a contractual right to use the Metro System and to participate in its operation as set forth in this
Agreement. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, and in conformance with all applicable laws,
the City may transfer ownership of all or part of the Metro System at any time. In the event of a
transfer, the City’s successor shall be bound by the terms of this Agreement. Subject to the
terms of this Agreement, any Participating Agency may transfer or assign its rights and
obligations under this Agreement. Any transfer shall first be approved by the City. No transfer
may occur if the City reasonably determines, after consultation with the Participating Agencies
involved, that the proposed transfer will imbalance, or will otherwise adversely impact the City’s
ability to operate the Metro System.
2.2 Metro System Services.
2.2.1 The City shall provide wastewater conveyance, treatment and disposal
services to the Participating Agencies through the Metro System, under
the terms set forth in this Agreement.
-7-
60409.00001\30914102.16
2.2.2 The City shall operate the Metro System in an efficient and economical
manner, maintaining it in good repair and working order, all in accordance
with recognized sound engineering and management practices.
2.2.3 The City shall convey, treat, and dispose of or reuse all wastewater
received under this Agreement in such a manner as to comply with all
applicable laws, rules and regulations.
2.3 Flow Commitment.
2.3.1 Absent agreement of the Parties, all Flow from the Participating Agencies
and the City, up to the capacity limits set forth in Exhibit B or any
amendments thereto, shall remain in the Metro System.
2.3.2 This Agreement shall not preclude any Participating Agency from
diverting Flow from the Metro System as a result of the construction of
reclamation facilities or New Capacity outside of the Metro System.
2.3.3 Any Participating Agency may negotiate an agreement with the City to
withdraw all Flow from the Metro System, which shall provide that the
Agency pay its proportionate share of Capital Improvement Costs.
If a Participating Agency enters into an agreement with the City by
December 31, 2019, to withdraw all Flow from the Metro System by
January 1, 2035, such Participating Agency shall not pay Pure Water
Program Capital Improvement Costs attributable to the Metro System
except for Phase I (as defined below in Section 2.8).
2.4 Funding Obligations.
Nothing in this Section or in this Agreement shall obligate the City to make any
payment for the acquisition, construction, maintenance or operation of the Metro System from
moneys derived from taxes or from any income and revenue of the City other than moneys in or
sewer revenues which go into the Sewer Revenue Fund for the Metro System and from
construction funds derived from the sale of such sewer revenue bonds for the Metro System as
are duly authorized. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to obligate the City to pay
from its annual income and revenues any sum which would create an indebtedness, obligation or
liability within the meaning of the provisions of Section 18 of Article XVI of the Constitution of
the State of California. Nothing in this Section, however, or in this Agreement shall prevent the
City, in its discretion, from using tax revenues or any other available revenues or funds of the
City for any purpose for which the City is empowered to expend moneys under this Agreement.
Nothing herein shall relieve the City from its obligations to fund and carry out this Agreement.
Nothing in this Section or in this Agreement shall obligate any Participating Agency to make any
payment which would create an indebtedness, obligation or liability within the meaning of the
provisions of Section 18 of Article XVI of the Constitution of the State of California, or which is
not authorized by law.
-8-
60409.00001\30914102.16
2.5 Financial Statements.
2.5.1 The City shall keep appropriate records and accounts of all costs and
expenses relating to conveyance, treatment, disposal, and reuse of
wastewater, and production of Repurified Water, and the acquisition,
planning, design, construction, administration, monitoring, operation and
maintenance of the Metro System and Water Repurification System, and
any grants, loans, or other revenues received therefor. The City shall keep
such records and accounts for at least four (4) years, or for any longer
period required by law or outside funding sources.
2.5.2 Said records and accounts shall be subject to reasonable inspection by any
authorized representative of any Participating Agency at its expense.
Further, said accounts and records shall be audited annually by an
independent certified public accounting firm appointed by the City
pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles. A copy of said
report shall be available to any Participating Agency. As part of said
audit, the actual amount of City Water Utility’s PW Costs, Pure Water
Program costs attributable to the Metro System, Repurified Water
Revenue, and the Capital Expense Rate shall be determined and audited by
the City’s external auditors and Participating Agency representatives, and
a cumulative and annual summary of such amounts shall be included as a
footnote or attachment to the audit of the Metro System. Cost summaries
shall include separate lines for Capital Improvement Costs and Operation
and Maintenance Costs.
2.5.3 The City shall make a good faith effort to complete the annual audit, and
any related adjustments under this Agreement, by the end of the following
fiscal year.
2.6 Limitations on Types and Condition of Wastewater.
2.6.1 Each Participating Agency will comply with all applicable laws, rules and
regulations including its regulatory obligations associated with the
discharge of wastewater into its respective system and from such system
into the Metro System.
2.6.2 Each Participating Agency will minimize to the maximum extent
practicable, the infiltration and inflow of surface, ground or stormwaters
into its respective wastewater systems.
2.6.3 Each Participating Agency will insure that all industrial users of its
wastewater system are regulated by an effective industrial pretreatment
program that conforms to all to all applicable laws, rules and regulations
and that is acceptable to the City. Provided, however, that the City shall
not require the Participating Agencies to take any actions beyond that
-9-
60409.00001\30914102.16
which is required under applicable laws, rules and regulations that can be
taken but are not being taken by the City.
2.6.4 The City and the Participating Agencies agree that nothing in this
Agreement, including the termination of the existing sewage disposal
agreements, shall affect the validity of the Interjurisdictional Pretreatment
Agreements, or the separate transportation agreements that are currently in
effect between or among the City and the Participating Agencies.
2.6.5 Each Participating Agency will not discharge a substantial amount of
sewage originating outside its respective boundaries into the Metro
System without the approval of the City.
2.6.6 Each Participating Agency shall be responsible for the violation of any
applicable laws, rules or regulations associated with its respective
discharge of wastewater into the Metro System. Nothing in this
Agreement shall affect the ability of any Participating Agency to hold
third parties responsible for such violations.
2.6.7 In the event a regulatory agency imposes any penalty or takes other
enforcement action relating to the conveyance, treatment, or disposal of
wastewater in or from the Metro System, the City shall determine if the
City or a Participating Agency or Agencies caused or contributed to the
violation by exceeding its Contract Capacity or by the contents of its
wastewater. The City shall allocate the penalty or other relief, including
the costs of defense, to the Party or Parties responsible. Each responsible
Party, whether a Participating Agency or the City, shall be obligated to
pay its share of such penalty or other relief, and any costs of defense. In
the event that the City cannot make such an allocation, the cost of such
penalty or other relief shall be shared by the Participating Agencies and
the City proportionately based on Flow and Strength.
2.7 Right of First Refusal.
2.7.1 The City shall not sell or agree to sell the Metro System without first
offering it to the Participating Agencies. For the purposes of this section,
“Participating Agencies” shall mean a Participating Agency, a group of
Participating Agencies, or a third party representing one or more
Participating Agencies. The term “sell” shall include any transfer or
conveyance of the Metro System or of any individual treatment or
reclamation facility or outfall within the Metro System.
2.7.2 The City and the Participating Agencies recognize that transfer of
ownership of the Metro System is currently restricted by Sections 6.04 and
6.20 of the Installment Purchase Agreement between the City and the
Public Facilities Financing Authority of the City, which inter alia restricts
the transfer of ownership to the Metropolitan Wastewater Sewage District
-10-
60409.00001\30914102.16
or other governmental agency whose primary purpose is to provide
wastewater treatment. The City shall not seek to impose on bond holders
a waiver of Section 6.04 or 6.20. Absent such a restriction, before the City
sells or agrees to sell the Metro System, or any portion of it, the City shall
offer to sell the Metro System to the Participating Agencies (the “Offer”)
on the terms and at a price equal to that proposed for the sale of the Metro
System to a third party. The Participating Agencies shall have thirty days
from receipt of the Offer (the “Intent to Respond Period”) in which to
notify the City of their intent to respond to the Offer. The Participating
Agencies shall have five months from the expiration of the Intent to
Respond Period in which to accept or reject the Offer. The Offer shall
contain the name of the proposed purchaser, the proposed sale price, the
terms of payment, the required deposit, the time and place for the close of
escrow, and any other material terms and conditions on which the sale is
to be consummated.
2.7.3 If the Participating Agencies give timely notice of their intent to respond
and timely notice of their acceptance of the Offer, then the City shall be
obligated to sell and the Participating Agencies shall be obligated to
purchase the Metro System or any individual treatment or reclamation
facility or outfall within the Metro System, as applicable, at the price and
on the terms and conditions of the Offer. If the Participating Agencies do
not give timely notice of their intent to respond or their acceptance of the
Offer, or do not submit an offer on the same terms and conditions as the
Offer, the City may, following the end of the Offer period, sell the Metro
System, or any portion of it, at a price and on terms and conditions no less
favorable to the City than those in the Offer. The City shall not sell the
Metro System to any third party on terms or at a price less favorable to the
City from the terms and price contained in the Offer absent compliance
with the terms of this Section.
2.7.4 Nothing herein shall prevent the City from entering into a financing
agreement which may impose limits on the City’s power to sell the Metro
System to the Participating Agencies pursuant to Section 2.7.1. if the City
reasonably believes that such a financing agreement is in the City’s best
interest. Neither the entry into such a financing agreement by the City nor
the performance thereof by the City shall constitute a breach or default by
the City hereunder.
2.8 Pure Water San Diego Program.
2.8.1 Each new, expanded, or modified Metro System facility which is used in
relation to the production of Repurified Water (in addition to the
modification and expansion of the North City Water Reclamation Facility)
shall be governed by this Agreement and Exhibit F, attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
-11-
60409.00001\30914102.16
2.8.2 The allocation of Pure Water Program costs pursuant to this Agreement
shall be retroactive through the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, when
Pure Water Program costs were first incurred by the Metro System. When
conducting the year-end adjustments for the fiscal year in which this
Agreement takes effect, the City shall credit or assess such prior costs to
the Parties pursuant to this Agreement.
2.9 Future Negotiations and Cooperation.
2.9.1 This Agreement and Exhibit F specifically contemplate Phase I of the Pure
Water Program, which consists of new, expanded, or modified Metro
System facilities and Water Repurification System facilities designed to
produce only up to 30 million gallons per day of Repurified Water (“Phase
I”). Within one year of the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Parties
intend to meet and negotiate in good faith regarding one or more
amendments to this Agreement or its Exhibits to address:
2.9.1.1 The allocation of specific Pure Water Program costs between
City’s water utility and the Metro System for such later phases;
2.9.1.2 Alternative billing methodologies for Metro System costs;
2.9.1.3 The exclusion of costs related to the industrial discharges
inspection and monitoring program within San Diego under
Section 5.2.1.2.3 of the Agreement;
2.9.1.4 The inclusion of costs for regional, non-Metro System potable
reuse projects in calculating the Capital Expense Rate;
2.9.1.5 A sample calculation of Repurified Water Revenue; and
2.9.1.6 The conveyance and treatment of wastewater generated at United
States military bases under this Agreement.
If such negotiations do not result in an amendment to this Agreement or its
Exhibits concerning these subjects, this Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect as set forth herein. Further, if the City proceeds with a
later phase of the Pure Water Program as authorized under Section 2.1 of
this Agreement, and the Parties have not yet amended this Agreement or
Exhibit F to specifically address such costs by the time they are incurred,
all costs listed in Section I of Exhibit F shall nonetheless be excluded as
Metro System costs under this Agreement.
2.9.2 The City and the Participating Agencies shall cooperate, coordinate, and
negotiate in good faith with the Padre Dam Municipal Water District, San
Diego County Sanitation District, and City of El Cajon on issues that
relate to the East County AWP Program, including, but not limited to, the
-12-
60409.00001\30914102.16
potential transfer of the Mission Gorge Pump Station; disposal of
residuals; and a source control program.
2.9.3 Following the Effective Date of this Agreement, the Parties intend to meet
and negotiate in good faith regarding the disposal, treatment, and/or
management of residuals (solids, brine, and centrate) produced at any new
non-Metro System secondary, tertiary, or advanced wastewater treatment
facilities upstream of any Metro System facilities related to the production
of Repurified Water that currently exist or may exist in the future. Such
negotiations may result in an amendment to this Agreement, or in one or
more separate agreements between the City and the involved Participating
Agencies, regarding the disposal, treatment, and/or management of
residuals at such non-Metro System facilities.
2.9.3.1 In the event that an amendment to this Agreement, or a separate
agreement between the City and the involved Participating
Agencies, regarding the disposal, treatment, and/or management of
residuals at such non-Metro System facilities, cannot be achieved
through direct negotiation, the parties shall use the dispute
resolution process in Article IX of this Agreement.
2.9.3.2 Absent an amendment to this Agreement or a separate Agreement
between the City and involved Participating Agencies as described
above, the involved Participating Agencies shall not dispose of
residuals from new non-Metro System secondary, tertiary, or
advanced wastewater treatment facilities at any point upstream of a
Metro System facility related to the production of Repurified
Water that currently exists or may exist in the future.
III. PAYMENT AND MONITORING PROVISIONS
3.1 Payment for Metro System Facilities.
Through the system of charges set forth in Article V of this Agreement, each
Participating Agency shall pay its share of the costs of planning, design and construction of all of
the Metro System facilities which are identified in Exhibit A hereto, which is incorporated herein
by reference.
3.2 Payment for Additional Metro System Facilities.
Through the system of charges set forth in Article V of this Agreement, each
Participating Agency shall pay its share of the costs of acquisition, or planning, design and
construction of such facilities in addition to those set forth on Exhibit A as are necessary for the
Metro System to maintain compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, including the
Ocean Pollution Reduction Act of 1994 and its successor(s), present and future waivers of
applicable treatment standards at any Metro System treatment facility, and all facilities as are
necessary to convey, treat, dispose, and reuse wastewater in the Metro System to provide the
Contract Capacity set forth in Exhibit B, to maintain hydraulic capacity and as otherwise
-13-
60409.00001\30914102.16
required by sound engineering principles. As a ministerial matter, the City shall amend Exhibit A
from time to time to reflect such additional facilities and shall give notice of any amendments to
the Participating Agencies. The City shall keep an updated version of Exhibit A on file with the
City Public Utilities Department. Exhibit A may be amended to reflect other changes to the
Metro System only as expressly provided in this Agreement.
3.3 Payment for Operation and Maintenance.
Through the system of charges set forth in Article V of this Agreement, each
Participating Agency shall pay its share of the Operation and Maintenance Costs of all Metro
System facilities. The Participating Agencies shall not pay for the Operation and Maintenance
Costs of Water Repurification System, which are City Water Utility PW Costs.
3.4 Charges Based on Flow and Strength; Exception.
3.4.1 Except as otherwise described in this Section 3.4, a Participating Agency’s
share of the charges in this Article III shall be assessed pursuant to Article
V of this Agreement based on its proportionate Flow in the Metro System
and the Strength of its wastewater.
3.4.2 Notwithstanding section 3.4.1, or any other provision of this Agreement, a
Participating Agency’s share of Pure Water Program Capital Improvement
Costs, Repurified Water Revenue, and Capital Expense Rate attributable
to the Metro System under Exhibit F shall be assessed or credited based on
the Parties’ proportionate share of the Pure Water Capital Melded
Percentage stated in Column 12 of Exhibit G. The City shall annually
allocate the estimated and actual Pure Water Program Capital
Improvement Costs and revenues which are attributable to the Metro
System under Exhibit F in proportion to each Party’s Pure Water Capital
Melded Percentage when estimating quarterly payments and conducting
year-end adjustments under Article V.
3.4.3 Each Party recognizes that operation within respective Projected 2050
Strength and Flow Amounts is essential to the accurate allocation of costs
and revenues under the Pure Water Program. In recognition of same, the
Parties agree as follows:
3.4.3.1 Beginning in the next fiscal year after the effective date of this
Agreement, if a Party’s Annual Average Daily Flow, annual
average pounds per day of COD, or annual average pounds per day
of SS exceeds any one of its Party’s Projected 2050 Strength and
Flow Amounts by more than ten percent (10%) for any three (3)
consecutive fiscal years, the City shall prepare an amendment to
Exhibit G that adjusts projections of each Party’s Projected 2050
Strength and Flow Amounts based on information about such
Party’s exceedance and other relevant information using sound
engineering principles. Upon approval by the City and two-thirds
-14-
60409.00001\30914102.16
of the members of the Metro Commission, the City shall, as a
ministerial matter, amend Exhibit G (including the Melded
Percentages in Column 12 of Exhibit G) to reflect the new
Projected 2050 Strength and Flow Amounts for each Party. The
City shall keep an updated version of Exhibit G on file with the
City Public Utilities Department. If the City and two-thirds of the
Metro Commission cannot agree on an amendment to Exhibit G,
the matter shall be submitted to dispute resolution pursuant to
Article IX.
3.4.3.2 Notwithstanding the amounts set forth in Columns 4, 7, and 10 of
Exhibit G, the following Parties will be deemed to have the
following Projected 2050 Strength and Flow Amounts until July 1,
2025:
3.4.3.2.1 Padre Dam: 3.2 MGD Flow; 24,730 lb/day COD;
11,900 lb/day SS
3.4.3.2.2 San Diego County Sanitation District: 13.617 MGD
Flow; 70,210 lb/day COD; 27,830 lb/day SS
3.4.3.2.3 El Cajon: 7.8 MGD Flow; 41,848 lb/day COD; 16,556
lb/day SS
3.4.3.3 If Exhibit G is amended to update one or more Parties’ Projected
2050 Strength and Flow Amounts, the change in Projected 2050
Strength and Flow Amounts and Pure Water Capital Melded
Percentages shall be retroactive in effect, and the City shall use the
updated amounts in estimating quarterly payments and conducting
year-end adjustments for Pure Water Program costs and revenues.
Therefore, any Party that underpaid based on prior Pure Water
Capital Melded Percentages (which were based on prior Projected
2050 Strength and Flow Amounts) shall pay the retroactive amount
due in its quarterly payments the following fiscal year; any Party
that overpaid based on previous Pure Water Capital Melded
Percentages shall receive a credit in its quarterly payments the
following fiscal year. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if
the retroactive amount due exceeds 20% of a Party’s average
annual Metro System payments for the previous four (4) years,
such Party may elect to pay the retroactive amount due in its
quarterly payments over the subsequent four (4) fiscal years, with
interest based on the most recent quarterly earnings rate of the
Local Agency Investment Fund’s Pooled Money Investment
Account; any Party that overpaid based on previous Pure Water
Capital Melded Percentages shall receive a credit in its quarterly
payments the following four (4) fiscal years.
-15-
60409.00001\30914102.16
3.4.3.4 If a Participating Agency (other than those specified in Section
3.4.3.2) intends to divert a portion of its Flow from the Metro
System pursuant to Section 2.3.2 on or before July 1, 2025, the
Participating Agency may provide written notice to the City by
December 31, 2019, requesting an adjustment in its Projected 2050
Strength and Flow Amounts and Melded Percentage in Exhibit G.
If such notice is timely provided, the City shall prepare an
amendment to Exhibit G based on information about such Party’s
diversion and other relevant information using sound engineering
principles. Such amendment shall then be subject to the approval
procedures set forth in Section 3.4.3.1, and the retroactivity
provisions set forth in Section 3.4.3.3; provided, however, that
such an amendment to Exhibit G shall also be subject to an
agreement with the City for the Participating Agency to pay its
proportionate share of Pure Water Program planning, design, and
construction costs incurred to date by the Metro System (based on
such Participating Agency’s prior Melded Percentage), and any
costs for Pure Water Program planning or design changes which
are reasonably necessary due to the intended diversion.
3.5 Monitoring Flow and Strength.
3.5.1 The City shall monitor wastewater that is discharged into the Metro
System for Flow and Strength. The City shall own and operate as part of
the Metro System monitoring devices which will measure the amount of
daily wastewater discharged into the Metro System. These devices shall be
installed at locations appropriate to accurately monitor Flow and Strength.
The City may also monitor wastewater Flow and Strength at other
locations as it deems appropriate.
3.5.2 In measuring Strength, the frequency and nature of the monitoring shall
not be more stringent for the Participating Agencies than it is for the City.
3.5.3 The City shall, at least once every five (5) years, update and provide its
plans for the monitoring system and for the procedures it will use to
determine Strength to the Participating Agencies. The Participating
Agencies shall have the opportunity to review and comment prior to
implementation.
3.5.4 The City shall report Flow and Strength data to the Participating Agencies
at least quarterly.
IV.CAPACITY RIGHTS
4.1 Contract Capacity.
In consideration of the obligations in this Agreement, each Participating Agency
shall have a contractual right to discharge wastewater to the Metro System up to the Contract
-16-
60409.00001\30914102.16
Capacity set forth in Exhibit B. Each Party’s Projected Metro Flow 2050 stated in Exhibit G, is
used solely for the purpose of allocating the Metro System’s Pure Water Program Capital
Improvement Costs, Repurified Water Revenue, and the Capital Expense Rate under this
Agreement, and does not replace or limit Contract Capacity.
4.2 Transfers of Contract Capacity.
The Participating Agencies and the City may buy, sell or exchange all or part of
their Contract Capacity among themselves on such terms as they may agree upon. The City shall
be notified prior to any transfer. Any transfer shall be first approved by the City. No Contract
Capacity may be transferred if the City determines, after consultation with the Participating
Agencies involved in the transaction, that said transfer will unbalance, or will otherwise
adversely impact the City’s ability to operate the Metro System. Provided, however, that the
Participating Agency seeking the transfer may offer to cure such imbalance at its own expense.
Following the City’s consent, as a ministerial matter, the Contract Capacity set forth in Exhibit B
shall be adjusted to reflect the approved transfer. If necessary, Projected Metro Flow 2050 set
forth in Exhibit G shall also be adjusted to reflect the approved transfer using the process set
forth in Section 3.4.3.1, provided, however, that an amendment to Exhibit G due to an approved
transfer shall not be retroactive in effect pursuant to Section 3.4.3.3.
4.3 Allocation of Additional Capacity.
The Parties recognize that the City’s applicable permits for the Metro System may
be modified to create capacity in the Metro System beyond that set forth in Exhibit B as a result
of the construction of additional facilities or as a result of regulatory action. This additional
capacity shall be allocated as follows:
4.3.1 Except as provided in section 4.3.2 below, in the event that the Metro
System is rerated so that additional permitted capacity is created, said
capacity shall be allocated proportionately based upon the Metro System
charges that have been paid since July 1, 1995 to the date of rerating.
4.3.2 In the event that the additional permitted capacity is created as the result
of the construction of non-Metro System facilities, or as the result of the
construction of facilities pursuant to Article VII, such additional capacity
shall be allocated proportionately based on the payments made to plan,
design and construct such facilities.
4.4 Deductions in Contract Capacity.
The Parties further recognize that the Contract Capacity in Exhibit B and
Projected Metro Flow 2050 in Exhibit G may be modified to comply with, or in response to,
applicable permit conditions, or related regulatory action, or sound engineering principles. In the
event that the capacity of the Metro System is rerated to a level below the total capacity set forth
in Exhibit B, the Contract Capacity in Exhibit B and Projected Metro Flow 2050 in Exhibit G
shall be reallocated proportionately pending the acquisition or construction of new facilities. The
City shall acquire or construct such facilities as necessary to provide the Contract Capacity rights
-17-
60409.00001\30914102.16
set forth in Exhibit B, as planning and capacity needs require. The costs of such facilities shall be
assessed pursuant to Section 3.2.
4.5 Amendments to Exhibits B and G.
As a ministerial matter, the City shall prepare amendments to Exhibits B and G to
reflect any adjustment in Contract Capacity pursuant to this Article within ninety (90) days after
the adjustment is made. The City shall give notice of the amendments to each Participating
Agency, and shall provide copies of the amendments with the notice. The City shall keep an
updated version of Exhibits B and G on file with the City Public Utilities Department.
4.6 The South Bay Land/Ocean Outfall.
Nothing in this Article shall limit the City’s right to transfer capacity service
rights in that portion of the South Bay Land/Ocean Outfall which is not part of the Metro
System.
V. SYSTEM OF CHARGES
5.1 Charges Authorized.
The City agrees to implement and the Participating Agencies agree to abide by a
new system of charges. This new system allows the City to equitably recover from all
Participating Agencies their proportional share of the net Metro System Costs through the
imposition of the following charges:
5.1.1 SSC (Sewer System Charge);
5.1.2 NCCC (New Contract Capacity Charge).
5.2 SSC (Sewer System Charge).
The City shall determine the SSC based on the projected Metro System Costs (as
defined below) for the forthcoming fiscal year, less all Metro System Revenues (as defined
below).
5.2.1 Metro System Costs
5.2.1.1 The following shall at a minimum be considered Metro System
Costs for purposes of calculating the annual SSC:
5.2.1.1.1 Except as provided in section 5.2.1.2 (Excluded Costs),
the annual costs associated with administration,
operation, maintenance, replacement, annual debt
service costs and other periodic financing costs and
charges, capital improvement, insurance premiums,
claims payments and claims administration costs of the
Metro System, including projected overhead. Overhead
-18-
60409.00001\30914102.16
shall be calculated using accepted accounting practices
to reflect the overhead costs of the Metro System.
5.2.1.1.2 Fines or penalties imposed on the City as a result of the
operation of the Metro System, unless the fine/penalty
is allocated to the City or a Participating Agency as
provided in Section 2.6.7.
5.2.1.2 Excluded Costs. The following items shall not be considered
Metro System Costs for purposes of calculating the annual SSC:
5.2.1.2.1 Costs related to the City of San Diego’s Municipal
System as determined by reasonable calculations;
5.2.1.2.2 Costs related to the treatment of sewage from any
agency which is not a party to this Agreement;
5.2.1.2.3 Costs related to the inspection and monitoring program
for the industrial dischargers located in San Diego,
including associated administrative and laboratory
services;
5.2.1.2.4 Right-of-way charges for the use of public streets of the
City or any Participating Agency. The City and the
Participating Agencies agree not to impose a right-of-
way charge for the use of its public rights-of-way for
Metro System purposes;
5.2.1.2.5 Capital Improvement Costs of any non-Metro System
facility;
5.2.1.2.6 Capital Improvement Costs for which an NCCC is paid;
and
5.2.1.2.7 City Water Utility PW Costs.
5.2.2 Metro System Revenues.
5.2.2.1 The following revenues shall be at a minimum considered Metro
System Revenues for purposes of determining the annual SSC:
5.2.2.1.1 Any grant or loan receipts or any other receipts that are
attributable to the Metro System, including, but not
limited to, all compensation or receipts from the sale,
lease, or other conveyance or transfer of any asset of
the Metro System; provided, however, that this shall not
include any grant, loan, or other receipts attributable to
the Metro System components of the Pure Water
-19-
60409.00001\30914102.16
Program, which are specifically addressed in Section
5.2.2.1.8.
5.2.2.1.2 All compensation or receipts from the sale or other
conveyance or transfer of any Metro System by-
products, including, but not limited to gas, electrical
energy, sludge products, and Reclaimed Water
(excepting therefrom any receipts allocated pursuant to
section 5.2.2.1.3).
5.2.2.1.3 The distribution of revenue from the sale of Reclaimed
Water from the North City Water Reclamation Plant,
including incentives for the sale of Reclaimed Water,
shall first be used to pay for the cost of the Reclaimed
Water Distribution System, then the cost of the
Operation and Maintenance of the Tertiary Component
of the North City Water Reclamation Plant that can be
allocated to the production of Reclaimed Water, and
then to the Metro System.
5.2.2.1.4 Any portion of an NCCC that constitutes
reimbursement of costs pursuant to Section 7.1.4.
5.2.2.1.5 Any penalties paid under Section 7.3.
5.2.2.1.6 Proceeds from the Capital Expense Rate, as calculated
under Exhibit F and allocated among the City and
Participating Agencies in the proportions set forth in
Column 12 of Exhibit G.
5.2.2.1.7 Those portions of Repurified Water Revenue
attributable to the Metro System, as calculated under
Exhibit F and allocated among the Participating
Agencies in the proportions set forth in Column 12 of
Exhibit G.
5.2.2.1.8 Any grant or loan receipts or any other receipts that are
attributable to the Metro System components of the
Pure Water Program, including, but not limited to, all
compensation or receipts from the sale, lease, or other
conveyance or transfer of any asset of the Metro
System components of the Pure Water Program. Any
proceeds under this section shall be allocated among the
City and the Participating Agencies in the proportions
set forth in Column 12 of Exhibit G.
-20-
60409.00001\30914102.16
5.2.2.2 Excluded Revenue
5.2.2.2.1 Capital Improvement Costs for which an NCCC is paid;
5.2.2.2.2 Proceeds from the issuance of debt for Metro System
projects.
5.2.2.2.3 Proceeds from the sale of Reclaimed Water used to pay
for the Reclaimed Water Distribution System pursuant
to section 5.2.2.1.3 above.
5.2.3 Calculation of SSC Rates.
5.2.3.1 Prior to the initial implementation of the new system of charges,
the City shall prepare a sample fiscal year estimate setting forth the
methodology and sampling data used as a base for Strength based
billing (SBB) which includes Flow and Strength (Chemical
Oxygen Demand (COD) and Suspended Solids (SS)). The analysis
shall be submitted to each Participating Agency.
5.2.3.2 The City shall determine the unit SSC rates by allocating net costs
(Metro System Costs less Metro System Revenues) between
parameters of Flow, COD and SS. This allocation is based on the
approved Functional-Design Methodology analyses for individual
Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) and estimated Operation and
Maintenance (O&M) Costs allocated to the three parameters. The
City may revise the calculations to include any other measurement
required by law after the effective date of this Agreement.
5.2.3.3 The net cost allocated to each of the three parameters (Flow, COD
and SS) shall be divided by the total Metro System quantity for
that parameter to determine the unit rates for Flow, COD and SS.
These unit rates shall apply uniformly to all Participating
Agencies.
5.2.4 Estimate and Billing Schedule and Year End Adjustment
5.2.4.1 The City shall estimate the SSC rates on an annual basis prior to
January 15. The City shall quantify the SSC rates by estimating the
quantity of Flow, COD and SS for each Party, based on that
Party’s actual flow and the cumulative data of sampling for COD
and SS over the preceding years. If cumulative data is no longer
indicative of discharge from a Participating Agency due to the
implementation of methods to reduce Strength, previous higher
readings may be eliminated.
5.2.4.2 Costs of treating Return Flow for solids handling will be allocated
to the Participating Agencies in proportion to their Flow and
-21-
60409.00001\30914102.16
Strength. Return Flow will not be counted against the Participating
Agencies’ Contract Capacity as shown in Exhibit B.
5.2.4.3 The City shall bill the Participating Agencies quarterly, invoicing
on August 1 , November 1, February 1 and May 1. Each bill shall
be paid within thirty (30) days of mailing. Quarterly payments will
consist of the total estimated cost for each Participating Agency,
based on their estimated Flow, COD and SS, divided by four.
5.2.4.4 At the end of each fiscal year, the City shall determine the actual
Metro System Costs and the actual Flow as well as the cumulative
Strength data for the City and each of the Participating Agencies.
The City shall make any necessary adjustments to the unit rates for
Flow, COD and SS based on actual costs for the year. The City
shall then recalculate the SSC for the year using actual costs for the
year, actual Flow, and cumulative Strength factors (COD, SS and
Return Flow) for the City and for each Participating Agency. The
City shall credit any future charges or bill for any additional
amounts due, the quarter after the prior year costs have been
audited.
5.3 NCCC (New Contract Capacity Charge).
If New Contract Capacity is required or requested by a Participating Agency,
pursuant to Article VII, the Metro System shall provide the needed or requested capacity,
provided that the Participating Agency agrees to pay an NCCC in the amount required to provide
the New Contract Capacity. New Contract Capacity shall be provided pursuant to Article VII.
5.4 Debt Financing.
The City retains the sole right to determine the timing and amount of debt
financing required to provide Metro System Facilities.
5.5 Allocation of Operating Reserves and Debt Service Coverage.
The Parties shall continue to comply with the 2010 Administrative Protocol on
Allocation of Operating Reserves and Debt Service Coverage to Participating Agencies, attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C.
VI.PLANNING
6.1 Projected Flow and Capacity Report.
Commencing on July 1, 1999, each Participating Agency shall provide the City
and the Metro Commission with a ten-year projection of its Flow and capacity requirements from
the Metro System. The Agencies shall disclose any plans to acquire New Capacity outside the
Metro System. This “Projected Flow and Capacity Report” shall be updated annually.
-22-
60409.00001\30914102.16
6.2 Other Planning Information.
Each Participating Agency shall provide the City with such additional information
as requested by the City as necessary for Metro System planning purposes.
6.3 Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan.
The City shall prepare a Ten-Year Capital Improvement Plan for the Metro
System that describes the facilities necessary to convey, treat, and dispose of, or reuse all Flow in
the Metro System in compliance with all applicable rules, laws and regulations. The plan shall be
updated annually.
6.4 Notice to Metro Commission.
In the event that the City is not able to include a facility in the Ten-Year Capital
Improvement Plan, the City shall notify the Metro Commission as soon as possible before the
detailed design or construction of such facility provided that the facility will significantly impact
the Metro System.
VII.FACILITIES SOLELY FOR NEW CONTRACT CAPACITY
The Participating Agencies and City are obligated to pay for the acquisition or
planning, design, and construction of new facilities in the Metro System that are needed solely to
provide New Contract Capacity only under the terms provided below.
7.1 Determination of Need for New Contract Capacity.
7.1.1 As part of its planning efforts, and considering the planning information
provided to the City by the Participating Agencies, the City shall
determine when additional facilities beyond those acquired or constructed
pursuant to Article III above will be necessary solely to accommodate a
need for New Contract Capacity in the Metro System, whether by the City
or by the Participating Agencies. The City shall determine: (1) the amount
of New Contract Capacity needed; (2) the Participating Agency or
Agencies, or the City, as the case may be, in need of the New Contract
Capacity; (3) the type and location of any capital improvements necessary
to provide the New Contract Capacity; (4) the projected costs of any
necessary capital improvements; and, (5) the allocation of the cost of any
such facilities to the Participating Agency and/or the City for which any
New Contract Capacity is being developed. The City shall notify the
Participating Agencies of its determination within sixty days of making
such determination.
7.1.2 The City or Participating Agency or Agencies in need of New Contract
Capacity as determined by the City pursuant to section 7.1.1 above, may
choose, in their sole discretion, to obtain New Capacity outside of. the
Metro System in lieu of New Contract Capacity. Under such
circumstances, the Participating Agency or Agencies shall commit to the
-23-
60409.00001\30914102.16
City in writing their intent to obtain such New Capacity. Upon such
commitment, the City shall not be required to provide New Contract
Capacity to such Agency or Agencies as otherwise required under this
Agreement.
7.1.3 The Participating Agencies shall have six months from the date of notice
of the determination within which to comment on or challenge all or part
of the City’s determination regarding New Contract Capacity, or to agree
thereto or to commit, in writing, to obtain New Capacity outside of the
Metro System. Any Participating Agency objecting to the City’s
determination shall have the burden to commence and diligently pursue
the formal dispute resolution procedures of this Agreement within said six
month period. The City’s determination shall become final at the close of
the six month comment and objection period. The City’s determination
shall remain valid notwithstanding commencement of dispute resolution
unless and until otherwise agreed to pursuant to the dispute resolution
process in Article IX, or pursuant to a final court order.
7.1.4 The City and the Participating Agency or Agencies which need New
Contract Capacity shall thereafter enter into an agreement specifying the
terms and conditions pursuant to which the New Contract Capacity will be
provided, including the amount of capacity and the New Contract
Capacity. Each Party obtaining New Contract Capacity shall reimburse the
Metro System for the costs of acquisition, planning, design, and
construction of facilities necessary to provide the New Contract Capacity
that have been paid by other Parties under Section 7.2.3.
7.1.5 The Parties recognize that the City may acquire and plan, design and
construct facilities that are authorized pursuant to both Article III and
Article VII of this Agreement. Under such circumstances, the City shall
allocate the costs and capacity of such facilities pursuant to Article III and
Section 7.1.1 as applicable.
7.2 Charges for Facilities Providing New Contract Capacity
7.2.1 The expense of acquisition, planning, design, and construction of New
Contract Capacity shall be borne by the City or the Participating Agency
or Agencies in need of such New Contract Capacity.
7.2.2 Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement, the City and the
Participating Agencies shall pay for the Operation and Maintenance Costs
of all facilities pursuant to the payment provisions of Article III, including
those facilities acquired and constructed to provide New Contract
Capacity in the Metro System.
7.2.3 Charges for the acquisition, planning, design and construction of facilities
solely to provide New Contract Capacity shall be paid for by the
-24-
60409.00001\30914102.16
Participating Agencies and the City pursuant to the payment provisions in
Article III of this Agreement until an agreement is reached under Section
7.1.4. or pending the resolution of any dispute relating to the City’s
determination with respect to New Contract Capacity.
7.2.4 As a ministerial matter, the City shall prepare amendments to Exhibits A
and B to reflect the acquisition or construction of facilities to provide New
Contract Capacity pursuant to this Article. The City shall give notice of
the Amendments to the Participating Agencies, and shall provide copies of
the Amendments with the notice.
7.3 Liquidated Damages.
7.3.1 The Parties recognize that appropriate capacity and long term planning
for same are essential to the proper provision of sewerage service. In
recognition of same, the Parties agree that discharge beyond Contract
Capacity will result in damages that are difficult to determine. Therefore,
the damages are being liquidated in an amount estimated to the actual
damage that will be incurred by the City, and is not a penalty. In the
event that a Participating Agency exceeds its Contract Capacity after the
City has given notice that New Capacity is required, said Participating
Agency shall be assessed and pay a liquidated damages until such time
as the Participating Agency obtains the required New Capacity. The
liquidated damages shall be one dollar ($1) for each gallon of Flow
which exceeds the Participating Agency’s Contract Capacity for each
quarter in which any exceedance occurs. The amount of liquidated
damages shall be adjusted each fiscal year to reflect the annual
percentage change in the Engineering News Record – Los Angeles
construction cost index.
7.3.2 In the event that a Participating Agency fails to pay the charges imposed
under this Article after the City has given notice that payment is
required, said Participating Agency shall be assessed and shall pay
liquidated damages which shall be determined by multiplying the most
recent quarterly earnings rate of the Local Agency Investment Fund’s
Pooled Money Investment Account times the total outstanding charges.
The Participating Agency shall pay such liquidated damages each quarter
until the outstanding charges are paid in full.
VIII.THE METRO COMMISSION
8.1 Membership.
The Metro Commission shall consist of one representative from each Participating
Agency. Each Participating Agency shall have the right to appoint a representative of its choice
to the Metro Commission. If a Participating Agency is a dependent district whose governing
body is that of another independent public agency that Participating Agency shall be represented
-25-
60409.00001\30914102.16
on the Metro Commission by a representative appointed by the governing body which shall have
no more than one representative no matter how many Participating Agencies it governs. Each
member has one vote in any matter considered by the Metro Commission. The Metro
Commission shall establish its own meeting schedule and rules of conduct. The City may
participate in the Metro Commission on an ex officio, non-voting basis.
8.2 Advisory Responsibilities of Metro Commission.
8.2.1 The Metro Commission shall act as an advisory body, advising the City on
matters affecting the Metro System. The City shall present the position of
the majority of the Metro Commission to the City’s governing body in
written staff reports. The Metro Commission may prepare and submit
materials in advance and may appear at any hearings on Metro System
matters and present its majority position to the governing body of the City.
8.2.2 The Metro Commission may advise the City of its position on any issue
relevant to the Metro System.
IX.DISPUTE RESOLUTION
This Section governs all disputes arising out of this Agreement.
9.1 Mandatory Non-Binding Mediation.
If a dispute arises among the Parties relating to or arising from a Party’s
obligations under this Agreement that cannot be resolved through informal discussions and
meetings, the Parties involved in the dispute shall first endeavor to settle the dispute in an
amicable manner, using mandatory non-binding mediation under the rules of JAMS, AAA, or
any other neutral organization agreed upon by the Parties before having recourse in a court of
law. Mediation shall be commenced by sending a Notice of Demand for Mediation to the other
Party or Parties to the dispute. A copy of the notice shall be sent to the City, all other
Participating Agencies, and the Metro Commission.
9.2 Selection of Mediator.
A single mediator that is acceptable to the Parties involved in the dispute shall be
used to mediate the dispute. The mediator will be knowledgeable in the subject matter of this
Agreement, if possible, and chosen from lists furnished by JAMS, AAA, or any other agreed
upon mediator.
9.3 Mediation Expenses.
The expenses of witnesses for either side shall be paid by the Party producing
such witnesses. All mediation costs, including required traveling and other expenses of the
mediator, and the cost of any proofs or expert advice produced at the direct request of the
mediator, shall be Metro System costs.
-26-
60409.00001\30914102.16
9.4 Conduct of Mediation.
Mediation hearings will be conducted in an informal manner. Discovery shall not
be allowed. The discussions, statements, writings and admissions and any offers to compromise
during the proceedings will be confidential to the proceedings (pursuant to California Evidence
Code Sections 1115 – 1128 and 1152) and will not be used for any other purpose unless
otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. The parties may agree to exchange any information
they deem necessary. The parties involved in the dispute shall have representatives attend the
mediation who are authorized to settle the dispute, though a recommendation of settlement may
be subject to the approval of each agency’s boards or legislative bodies. Either Party may have
attorneys, witnesses or experts present.
9.5 Mediation Results.
Any resultant agreements from mediation shall be documented in writing. The
results of the mediation shall not be final or binding unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the
parties. Mediators shall not be subject to any subpoena or liability and their actions shall not be
subject to discovery.
9.6 Performance Required During Dispute.
Nothing in this Article shall relieve the City and the Participating Agencies from
performing their obligations under this Agreement. The City and the Participating Agencies shall
be required to comply with this Agreement, including the performance of all disputed activity
and disputed payments, pending the resolution of any dispute under this Agreement.
9.7 Offers to Compromise
Any offers to compromise before or after mediation proceedings will not be used
to prove a party’s liability for loss or damage unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing
(pursuant to Evidence Code Section 1152.)
X.INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY
10.1 City Shall Maintain All Required Insurance.
10.1.1 Throughout the term of this Agreement the City shall procure and
maintain in effect liability insurance covering Metro System assets and
operations in the same manner, and to the same extent, as the City insures
similar assets and operations of the City. Such insurance may be provided
through separate policies for the Metro System, or by consolidating the
Metro System with other City assets and operations for insurance
purposes. If the Metro System is insured separately, policy limits,
deductibles, and self-insured retentions shall be equivalent to what the
City procures for other similar City assets and operations. The City shall
maintain all insurance required by law, including workers’ compensation
insurance, and may self-insure for certain losses when allowed by law.
-27-
60409.00001\30914102.16
The proportionate cost of insurance for the Metro System shall be
included in the computation of the SSC.
10.1.2 If the Metro System is insured separately, any policy or policies of
liability insurance carried by the City for the Metro System shall name the
Participating Agencies as additional insureds with evidence of same
supplied to each upon request.
10.1.3 Upon request by the Metro Commission or a Participating Agency, the
City shall promptly provide written coverage and policy information,
including, but not limited to, the scope of coverage, policy limits,
deductibles, and self-insured retentions, including information on any
claims made against the policies and remaining limits and deductibles.
10.2 Substantially Equivalent Coverage.
In the event of a transfer of the Metro System to a nonpublic entity pursuant to
Article II, coverage substantially equivalent to all the above provisions shall be maintained by
any successor in interest.
XI.INTERRUPTION OF SERVICE
Should the Metro System services to the Participating Agencies be interrupted as a result
of a major disaster, by operation of federal or state law, or other causes beyond the City’s
control, the Participating Agencies shall continue all payments required under this Agreement
during the period of the interruption.
XII.NOTICES REQUIRED UNDER AGREEMENT
The City and each Participating Agency shall give notice when required by this
Agreement. All notices must be in writing and either served personally, or mailed by certified
mail. The notices shall be sent to the officer listed for each Party, at the address listed for each
Party in Exhibit D in accordance with this Article. If a Party wishes to change the officer and/or
address to which notices are given, the Party shall notify all other Parties in accordance with this
Article. Upon such notice, as a ministerial matter, the City shall amend Exhibit D to reflect the
changes. The amendment shall be made within thirty (30) days after the change occurs. The City
shall keep an updated version of Exhibit D on file with the City Public Utilities Department. The
City shall provide a copy of the amended Exhibit D to all Parties.
XIII.EFFECTIVE DATE AND EXPIRATION
13.1 Effective Date.
This Agreement shall be effective thirty (30) days after execution by the City and
all of the Participating Agencies, and shall be dated as of the signature date of the last executing
Party.
-28-
60409.00001\30914102.16
13.2 Expiration.
Subject to the rights and obligations set forth in Section 13.4, this Agreement
shall expire on December 31, 2065. This Agreement is subject to extension by agreement of the
Parties. The Parties shall commence discussions on an agreement to provide wastewater
treatment services beyond the year 2065 on or before December 31, 2055, or at such time, if any,
that the Point Loma WTP is required to be upgraded to secondary treatment.
13.3 Contract Capacity Rights Survive Expiration.
The Participating Agencies’ right to obtain wastewater treatment services from
the facilities referred to in, or constructed pursuant to this Agreement shall survive the expiration
of the Agreement. Provided however, upon expiration of this Agreement, the Participating
Agencies shall be required to pay their proportional share based on Flow and Strength of all
Metro System Costs (Capital Improvement Costs and Operation and Maintenance) to maintain
their right to such treatment services. Provided further, that in the event that the Participating
Agencies exercise their rights to treatment upon expiration of this Agreement, the City shall have
the absolute right, without consultation, to manage, operate and expand the Metro System in its
discretion.
13.4 Capital Expense Rate Beyond Expiration.
The Capital Expense Rate, as further described in Exhibit F, shall continue until
the cost difference between (a) the actual sum of Pure Water Program Capital Improvement
Costs and associated debt attributable to the Metro System under Exhibit F and/or the costs to
upgrade the Point Loma WTP and (b) $1.8 billion (as adjusted for inflation), has been fully paid,
or the Agreement expires, whichever is sooner. Notwithstanding, it is the express intent and
desire of the City and the Participating Agencies that if the Agreement expires before the cost
difference has been paid through the Capital Expense Rate, that the Capital Expense Rate
continue in any extension of this Agreement negotiated by the Parties pursuant to Section 13.2
until the cost difference has been fully paid.
13.5 Abandonment.
After December 31, 2065, the City may abandon the Metro System upon delivery
of notice to the Participating Agencies ten (10) years in advance of said abandonment. Upon
notice by the City to abandon the Metro System, the Parties shall meet and confer over the nature
and conditions of such abandonment. In the event the Parties cannot reach agreement, the matter
shall be submitted to mediation under Article IX. In the event of abandonment, the City shall
retain ownership of all Metro System assets free of any claim of the Participating Agencies.
XIV.GENERAL
14.1 Exhibits.
1.This Agreement references Exhibits A through G. Each exhibit is attached
to this Agreement, and is incorporated herein by reference. The exhibits are as follows:
-29-
60409.00001\30914102.16
Exhibit A Metro Facilities;
Exhibit B Contract Capacities;
Exhibit C Administrative Protocol on Allocation of Operating
Reserves and Debt Service Coverage to Participating
Agencies;
Exhibit D Notice Listing;
Exhibit E Reclaimed Water Distribution System;
Exhibit F Pure Water Cost Allocation and Revenues; and
Exhibit G Pure Water Capital Billing Table
14.2 Amendment of Agreement.
Except as provided in this Agreement, and recognizing that certain amendments
are ministerial and preapproved, this Agreement may be amended or supplemented only by a
written agreement between the City and the Participating Agencies stating the Parties’ intent to
amend or supplement the Agreement.
14.3 Construction of Agreement.
14.3.1 Drafting of Agreement
It is acknowledged that the City and the Participating Agencies, with the
assistance of competent counsel, have participated in the drafting of this
Agreement and that any ambiguity should not be construed for or against
the City or any Participating Agency on account of such drafting.
14.3.2 Entire Agreement
The City and each Participating Agency represent, warrant and agree that
no promise or agreement not expressed herein has been made to them, that
this Agreement contains the entire agreement between the Parties, that this
Agreement supersedes any and all prior agreements or understandings
between the Parties unless otherwise provided herein, and that the terms of
this Agreement are contractual and not a mere recital; that in executing
this Agreement, no Party is relying on any statement or representation
made by the other Party, or the other Party’s representatives concerning
the subject matter, basis or effect of this Agreement other than as set forth
herein; and that each Party is relying solely on its own judgement and
knowledge.
-30-
60409.00001\30914102.16
14.3.3 Agreement Binding on All; No Third Party Beneficiaries
This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of
each of the Parties, and each of their respective successors, assigns,
trustees or receivers. All the covenants contained in this Agreement are for
the express benefit of each and all such Parties. This Agreement is not
intended to benefit any third parties, and any such third party beneficiaries
are expressly disclaimed.
14.3.4 Severability
14.3.4.1 Should any provision of this Agreement be held invalid or
illegal, such invalidity or illegality shall not invalidate the whole of this
Agreement, but, rather, the Agreement shall be construed as if it did not
contain the invalid or illegal part, and the rights and obligations of the
Parties shall be construed and enforced accordingly except to the extent
that enforcement of this Agreement without the invalidated provision
would materially and adversely frustrate either the City’s or a Participating
Agency’s essential objectives set forth in this Agreement.
14.3.4.2 Should a court determine that one or more components of the
allocation of costs set forth in this Agreement places the City or a
Participating Agency in violation of Article XIII D, Section 6 of the
California Constitution with respect to their ratepayers, such components
shall no longer be of force or effect. In such an event, the City and the
Participating Agencies shall promptly meet to renegotiate the violative
component of the cost allocation to comply with Article XIII D, Section 6
of the California Constitution, and use the dispute resolution process in
Article IX of this Agreement if an agreement cannot be reached through
direct negotiation.
14.3.4.3 Should a state or federal agency provide a final, written
determination that the method of allocating Pure Water Program Capital
Improvement Costs under this Agreement violates the requirements of
state or federal grants or loans which are, or will be, used to fund the
wastewater components of the Pure Water Program, such allocation
method will no longer be of any force or effect. In such an event, the
Parties agree that the allocation of Pure Water Program Capital
Improvement Costs attributable to the Metro System will be based on
Strength and Flow as set forth in Section 3.4.1, and the allocation of
Repurified Water Revenue and the Capital Expense Rate will be based on
the Parties’ actual payments to fund the Pure Water Program Capital
Improvement Costs attributable to the Metro System. The City and the
Participating Agencies shall also promptly meet to negotiate an alternative
cost allocation method that would comply with such grant or loan funding
requirements.
-31-
60409.00001\30914102.16
14.3.5 Choice of Law
This Agreement shall be construed and enforced pursuant to the laws of
the State of California.
14.3.6 Recognition of San Diego Sanitation District as Successor to Certain
Parties.
The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the San Diego County
Sanitation District is a Participating Agency under this Agreement as the
successor in interest to the Alpine Sanitation District, East Otay Mesa
Sewer Maintenance District, Lakeside Sanitation District, Spring Valley
Sanitation District, and Winter Gardens Sewer Maintenance District.
14.4 Declarations Re: Agreement.
14.4.1 Understanding of Intent and Effect of Agreement
The Parties expressly declare and represent that they have read the
Agreement and that they have consulted with their respective counsel
regarding the meaning of the terms and conditions contained herein. The
Parties further expressly declare and represent that they fully understand
the content and effect of this Agreement and they approve and accept the
terms and conditions contained herein, and that this Agreement is
executed freely and voluntarily.
14.4.2 Warranty Regarding Obligation and Authority to Enter Into This
Agreement
Each Party represents and warrants that its respective obligations herein
are legal and binding obligations of such Party, that each Party is fully
authorized to enter into this Agreement, and that the person signing this
Agreement hereinafter for each Party has been duly authorized to sign this
Agreement on behalf of said Party.
14.5 Restrictions on Veto of Transfers and Acquisitions of Capacity
Each Party understands and agrees that this Agreement governs its
respective rights and responsibilities with respect to the subject matter hereto and specifically
recognizes that with respect to the transfer and acquisition of Contract Capacity (Section 4.2) or
the creation of New Contract Capacity for any Participating Agency (Article VII), no
Participating Agency has a right to veto or prevent the transfer of capacity by and among other
Participating Agencies or with the City, or to veto or prevent the creation or acquisition of
capacity for another Participating Agency or Agencies, recognizing that by signing this
Agreement each Participating Agency has expressly preapproved such actions. The sole right of
a Participating Agency to object to any of the foregoing shall be through expression of its
opinion to the Metro Commission and, where applicable, through exercise of its rights under the
dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.
-32-
60409.00001\30914102.16
14.6 Right to Make Other Agreements
Nothing in this Agreement limits or restricts the right of the City or the
Participating Agencies to make separate agreements among themselves without the need to
amend this Agreement, provided that such agreements are consistent with this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement or Exhibit F limits or restricts the right of the City or the Participating
Agencies to enter into separate agreements for the purchase or sale of Repurified Water produced
by the Water Repurification System or sharing in City Water Utility PW Costs. Such agreements
shall not affect the cost allocation and Metro System revenues delineated in Exhibit F.
14.7 Limitation of Claims
Notwithstanding any longer statute of limitations in State law, for
purposes of any claims asserted by the City or a Participating Agency for refunds of
overpayments or collection of undercharges arising under this Agreement, the Parties agree that
such refunds or collections shall not accrue for more than four years prior to the date that notice
of such claim is received by the City or a Participating Agency. This also applies to any related
adjustments to each Participating Agency’s share of net Metro System costs or revenues
resulting from the resolution of such claims. The City and the Participating Agencies hereby
waive any applicable statute of limitations available under State law that exceed four years. In
no case shall the limitations period stated in this section begin to accrue until the date that the
annual audit and year-end adjustment from which the claim arises are complete.
14.8 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in counterparts. This Agreement shall
become operative as soon as one counterpart hereof has been executed by each Party. The
counterparts so executed shall constitute one Agreement notwithstanding that the signatures of
all parties do not appear on the same page.
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES
-33-
60409.00001\30914102.16
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment and Restated Regional
Wastewater Disposal Agreement as of the date first set forth above.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF CORONADO Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF DEL MAR Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF EL CAJON Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF LA MESA Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
LEMON GROVE SANITATION
DISTRICT
Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
-34-
60409.00001\30914102.16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER
DISTRICT
Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF POWAY Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
CITY OF SAN DIEGO Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
SAN DIEGO COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT
Approved as to Form:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
EXHIBIT A
60409.00001\30914102.16
EXHIBIT A
METRO FACILITIES AS OF 6/27/18
Existing Facilities
Pt. Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant
Pt. Loma Ocean Outfall
Pump Station #1
Pump Station #2
South Metro Interceptor
North Metro Interceptor
Metro Force Mains 1 & 2
Digested Sludge Pipeline
North City Water Reclamation Plant
Metro Biosolids Center (NCWR Plant Related Facilities)
North City Tunnel Connector
North City Raw Sludge Pipeline
Centrate Pipeline
Rose Canyon Parallel Trunk Sewer
Second Rose Canyon Trunk Sewer
East Mission Bay Trunk Sewer
Morena Blvd. Interceptor
South Bay Water Reclamation Plant
Dairy Mart Road & Bridge Rehab
Grove Avenue Pump Station
Grove Avenue Pump Station Sewer Pipeline
South Bay Raw Sludge Pipeline
South Bay Land/Ocean Outfall1
Environmental Monitoring & Technical Services Laboratory
Centrate Treatment Facility at Metropolitan Biosolids Center
Metro Operations Center (Iv10C) Complex (based on annual facilities allocation)
Additional Metro Facilities
Note: The below listed facilities could be required as part of the Metro System for
hydraulic capacity, good engineering practices and/or compliance with applicable law,
rules or regulations, including OPRA, and the continuation of the City's waiver of
applicable treatment standards at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant
("Waiver").
South Bay Sludge Processing Facility
1 The South Bay Land/Ocean Outfall is jointly owned by the International Boundary and Water Commission, U.S.
Section (60.06%) and the City of San Diego (39.94%). The capacity of the City’s portion of the outfall as of the
date of this Agreement is 74 MGD average dry weather flow, of which the Metro System has a capacity right to 69.2
MGD and the City as an exclusive right to 4.8 MGD.
EXHIBIT A
60409.00001\30914102.16
South Bay Secondary Treatment Plant, Phase I (21 MGD)
South Bay Secondary Sewers, Phase I
Note: These facilities could be required as part of the Metro System for hydraulic
capacity, good engineering practices, compliance with OPRA, and to maintain the City's
Waiver. In the event that hydraulic capacity demands, or the obligations of OPRA (or its
successor) or the terms of the City's Waiver change, these facilities may not be required
or may be modified or supplemented, as appropriate, pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement.
South Bay Secondary Treatment Plant, Phase II (28 MGD)
South Bay Secondary Sewers, Phase II
Note: These facilities could be added to the Metro System as part of Phase I of the Pure
Water Program.
Expansion of North City Water Reclamation Plant
Morena Pump Station
EXHIBIT B
60409.00001\30914102.16
EXHIBIT B
CONTRACT CAPACITIES
Annual Average Daily Flow in Millions of Gallons Per Day
Metro Agency
Original
Contract
Capacity
Additional
Contract
Capacity
New
Contract
Capacity
Transferred
Contract
Capacity
Total
Contract
Capacity
Percent
of
Total
Chula Vista 19.843 1.021 0.000 0.000 20.864 8.182%
Coronado 3.078 0.172 0.000 0.000 3.250 1.275%
Del Mar 0.821 0.055 0.000 0.000 0.876 0.344%
East Otay Mesa*0.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 1.000 0.392%
El Cajon 10.260 0.655 0.000 0.000 10.915 4.280%
Imperial Beach 3.591 0.164 0.000 0.000 3.755 1.473%
La Mesa 6.464 0.359 0.000 0.170 6.993 2.742%
Lakeside-Alpine*4.586 0.255 0.000 0.000 4.841 1.898%
Lemon Grove 2.873 0.154 0.000 0.000 3.027 1.187%
National City 7.141 0.346 0.000 0.000 7.487 2.936%
Otay 1.231 0.056 0.000 0.000 1.287 0.505%
Padre Dam 6.382 0.343 0.000 (0.500) 6.225 2.441%
Poway 5.130 0.264 0.000 0.500 5.894 2.312%
Spring Valley/
Otay Ranch* 10.978 0.545 0.000 (1.170) 10 .353 4.060%
Wintergardens*1.241 0.068 0.000 0.000 1.309 0.513%
Subtotal 83.619 4.459 0.000 0.000 88.078 34.540%
EXHIBIT B
60409.00001\30914102.16
Metro
Agency
Original
Contract
Capacity
Additional
Contract
Capacity1
New
Contract
Capacity2
Transferred
Contract
Capacity3
Total
Contract
Capacity
Percent
of
Total
San Diego 156.381 10.541 0.000 0.000 166.922 65.460%
Total 240.000 15.000 0.000 0.000 255.000 100.00%
* Indicates a sub-area of the San Diego County Sanitation District.
1.Additional Contract Capacity is capacity allocated pursuant to Section 4.3.1 of the Agreement.
2.New Contract Capacity is capacity obtained pursuant to Section 6 of the Agreement.
3.Transferred Contract Capacity is capacity obtained pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Agreement.
EXHIBIT C
60409.00001\30914102.16
EXHIBIT C
ADMINISTRATIVE PROTOCOL ON ALLOCATION OF OPERATING RESERVES
AND DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE TO PARTICIPATING AGENCIES
EXHIBIT D
60409.00001\30914102.16
EXHIBIT D
NOTICE LISTING
City Manager
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91919
Phone: (619) 691-5031
Fax: (619) 585-5612
City Manager
City of La Mesa
8130 Allison Avenue
La Mesa, CA 91942
Phone: (619) 667-1101
Fax: (619) 462-7528
Chief Operating Officer
City of San Diego
202 “C” Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 236-5949
Fax: (619) 236-6067
City Manager
City of Coronado
1825 Strand Way
Coronado, CA 92113
Phone: (619) 522-7335
Fax: (619) 522-7846
City Manager
City of Lemon Grove
3232 Main Street
Lemon Grove, CA 91945
Phone: (619) 464-6934
Fax: (619) 460-3716
Chief Administrative Officer
County of San Diego
1600 Pacific Highway, Rm. 209
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 531-5250
Fax: (619) 557-4060
City Manager
City of Del Mar
1050 Camino Del Mar
Del Mar, CA 92014
Phone: 755-9313 ext. 25
Fax: 755-2794
City Manager
City of National City
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, CA 91950
Phone: (619) 336-4240
Fax: (619) 336-4327
General Manager
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley, CA 91977
Phone: (619) 670-2210
Fax: (619) 670-2258
City Manager
City of El Cajon
200 Civic Center Way
El Cajon, CA 92020
Phone: (619) 441-1716
Fax: (619) 441-1770
City Manager
City of Poway
13325 Civic Center Drive
Poway, CA 92064
Phone: (858) 679-4200
Fax: (858) 679-4226
General Manager
Padre Dam Municipal Water
District
9300 Fanita Pkwy
Santee, CA 92071
Phone: (619) 258-4610
Fax: (619) 258-4794
City Manager
City of Imperial Beach
825 Imperial Beach Blvd.
Imperial Beach, CA 91932
Phone: (619) 423-8300 ext. 7
Fax: (619) 429-9770
EXHIBIT E
60409.00001\30914102.16
EXHIBIT E
RECLAIMED WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
October 23, 2018 Version
60409.00001\30398144.16
EXHIBIT F
PURE WATER PROGRAM COST ALLOCATION AND REVENUES
As part of the Pure Water Program, the City intends to modify the North City Water
Reclamation Plant (a Metro System facility) and expand its capacity to 52 mgd. In addition, the
City intends to construct the North City Pure Water Facility on a nearby site to produce
Repurified Water. This Exhibit F sets forth the costs and revenues associated with the Pure
Water Program which are, or are not, attributable to the Metro System.
I.Costs Excluded from Metro System Costs
All of the following Pure Water Program costs, including Capital Improvement Costs,
Operation and Maintenance Costs, and other related costs (including administration, insurance,
claims, and overhead) are excluded as Metro System Costs for purposes of calculating the annual
Sewer System Charge, and shall be the responsibility of City’s water utility (“City Water Utility
PW Costs”), unless otherwise expressly agreed to pursuant to an amendment to this Exhibit F:
1.1 General Exclusions.
1.1.1 Costs of the Water Repurification System and any Metro System facilities
to the extent constructed, modified, expanded, or used for the purpose of treating water beyond
secondary treatment (ocean discharge standard under current law). This shall include costs for
preliminary treatment, primary treatment, and secondary treatment to the extent such costs are
higher than they would otherwise be due to the production of Repurified Water.
1.1.2 Costs for fail-safe disposal, if necessary, for design capacity for Repurified
Water, including, but not limited to, any costs associated with the reservation of capacity at the
Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant.
1.1.3 Costs for the demolition or replacement of existing Metro System facilities
with similar facilities for the purpose of making space available for Water Repurification System
facilities. Such costs may take into account the current asset value or market value of the
existing Metro System facility.
1.2 Cost Exclusions Specific to North City Water Reclamation Plant
Improvements.
1.2.1 Costs for increased aeration tank volume to the extent the new volume
exceeds the amount necessary to provide 52 mgd capacity. Determination of sizing to provide
52 mgd capacity shall be based on the current tank volume necessary to provide 30 mgd
capacity.
1.2.2 Costs for the methanol feed system.
1.2.3 Costs for brine disposal, including, but not limited to, pump stations,
pipelines, retreatment, ocean outfall, and monitoring.
60409.00001\30398144.16 2
1.2.4 Costs for the use of existing tertiary water filters for Repurified Water
purposes. Such costs may take into account the depreciated value of such filters, or use such
other appropriate valuation method as agreed by the City and authorized representatives of the
Metro Commission. (Costs under this section shall be reimbursed or credited by City’s water
utility to the Metro System.)
II.North City Water Reclamation Plant Improvement Costs Included as Metro System
Costs
Notwithstanding the above exclusions, the City and the Participating Agencies have
specifically agreed that the following Capital Improvement Costs and Operation and
Maintenance Costs related to North City Water Reclamation Plant improvements shall be
included as Metro System Costs for purposes of calculating the annual Sewer System Charge
(and therefore not qualify as City Water Utility PW Costs):
2.1 Costs for chemically enhanced primary treatment for up to 52 mgd capacity.
2.2 Costs for primary effluent equalization for up to 52 mgd capacity.
2.3 Costs for increased volume of aeration tanks that will provide up to, but not
exceeding, 52 mgd capacity. Determination of sizing to provide 52 mgd capacity shall be based
on the current tank volume necessary to provide 30 mgd capacity.
2.4 Costs to add secondary clarifier tanks sufficient for up to 52 mgd capacity.
2.5 Costs for wastewater conveyance facilities to provide wastewater for replacement
of centrate flows that cannot be treated at the North City Water Reclamation Plant due to the
production of Repurified Water.
2.6 Costs for treatment and conveyance of all return flows (micro-filtration and
tertiary backwash) based on Flow, COD, and SS.
III.Cost Allocation Example
Attachment 1 is an example of the City’s Pure Water Phase I Cost Estimate (based on
60% design), and indicates which costs are City Water Utility PW Costs and which costs are
attributable to the Metro System. The Parties agree that Attachment 1 is an illustrative document
to assist the Parties in the future and is not a comprehensive list of all such costs. If there is any
conflict between this Exhibit F and Attachment 1, or if a specific cost is not addressed in
Attachment 1, this Exhibit F shall control.
IV.Revenue Sharing for Repurified Water
4.1 Background. Initially, the parties anticipate that the cost per acre foot associated
with the production of Repurified Water will be more expensive than the cost per acre foot of
untreated imported water. However, it is anticipated that Repurified Water produced under the
Pure Water Program will be less expensive than untreated imported water sometime in the
future. Once Repurified Water produced under the Pure Water Program becomes less expensive
60409.00001\30398144.16 3
than the cost of untreated imported water, the parties agree that there will be revenue from the
Pure Water Program.
4.2 Calculation. Revenue sharing shall occur in each fiscal year during which the
annual cost per acre foot associated with the production of Repurified Water is less than the cost
of untreated water per acre foot from the San Diego County Water Authority (“CWA”). The
annual cost difference shall be known as “Repurified Water Revenue.” Repurified Water
Revenue shall be determined as follows:
Attachment 2 is a summary of billings from CWA showing fixed and variable costs for
untreated water. The Parties agree that Attachment 2 shall be referred to by the Parties in the
future in determining how costs for water delivered at Miramar Reservoir are calculated. If no
untreated water is delivered at Miramar Reservoir in a given year, then the closest point of
delivery of untreated water to the City shall be used.
The City shall estimate whether there will be Repurified Water Revenue in the upcoming
fiscal year prior to January 15 of each year, and the estimated amount of Repurified Water
Revenue shall be effective on July 1 of the upcoming fiscal year.
4.3 Revenue Sharing. Repurified Water Revenue shall initially be shared based on
the relative actual Capital Improvement Costs for the Pure Water Program contributed by City’s
Water Utility and the Metro System. Such Capital Improvement Cost contributions are currently
estimated as (61% City Water Utility and 39% Metro System) until the debt attributable to the
Metro System is fully paid.
Following full payment of debt attributable to the Metro System, Repurified Water
Revenue shall be shared based on the relative actual Operation and Maintenance Costs for Pure
Water Program facilities contributed by City’s Water Utility and the Metro System, calculated
Annual cost per acre foot of CWA untreated water
purchased by the City for delivery at Miramar Reservoir (which
shall be determined based on the total of certain fixed and variable
costs for water actually billed to the City by CWA for water
delivered at Miramar Reservoir in a fiscal year, divided by the
number of acre-feet of CWA water delivered at Miramar Reservoir
that year)
less
Annual cost per acre foot of City Water Utility PW Costs
(which shall be determined based on total annual City Water
Utility PW Costs divided by the number of acre-feet of Repurified
Water actually produced in that year)
multiplied by
The number of acre feet of Repurified Water produced by
Pure Water Program facilities during the applicable fiscal year.
60409.00001\30398144.16 4
annually. Such Operation and Maintenance Costs are currently estimated as (76% City Water
Utility and 24% Metro System) on an annual basis.
4.4 Year-End Adjustment. At the end of each fiscal year during which there is
Repurified Water Revenue, the City shall determine the actual cost per acre foot of CWA
untreated water purchased by the City, the actual cost per acre foot of City Water Utility PW
costs, and the actual amount of Repurified Water produced at Pure Water Program facilities.
Based on the actual cost and production information, the City will recalculate the
Repurified Water Revenue for the prior fiscal year. The City will credit any future charges or
bill for any additional amounts due the quarter after the prior year costs have been audited.
4.5 Change in Potable Reuse Method. The parties acknowledge that the Pure Water
Program will initially use the surface water augmentation method of potable reuse. The use of
CWA untreated water costs in calculating Repurified Water Revenue is intended to provide an
appropriate point of comparison to costs for producing Repurified Water that will be introduced
into surface water. The parties agree that if the City implements direct potable reuse (in which
Repurified Water is introduced directly into a water supply pipeline or facility), the parties shall
meet and negotiate in good faith regarding an amendment to this Exhibit F to appropriately
update the formula for Repurified Water Revenue.
V.Capital Expense Rate
5.1 Background. The Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant operates under a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit modified under section
301(h) & (j)(5) of the Clean Water Act. If such modified permit were ever revoked or not
renewed, the parties agree that, under current law, the City would have an obligation to upgrade
the Point Loma WTP to secondary treatment. The parties further agree that $1.8 billion is a fair
and comprehensive estimation of the costs that could be incurred by the Metro System to meet
the legal requirements related to the Metro System under current law. The estimate of $1.8
billion is based on the net present value of the capital cost to develop 180 MGD of secondary
treatment at Point Loma WTP as of November 15, 2018.
Therefore, the parties agree that $1.8 billion represents the maximum amount of Capital
Improvement Costs that the Metro System should be obligated to contribute to the Pure Water
Program, the purpose of which is not solely the disposal of wastewater, but also the production
of Repurified Water. The parties agree that this $1.8 billion maximum contribution should apply
whether or not the Point Loma WTP is actually upgraded to secondary treatment to meet legal
requirements in the future because, as of the date of the Agreement, the parties have the option of
upgrading the Point Loma WTP to full secondary treatment for the cost of approximately $1.8
billion.
In light of the above, the parties have agreed that if Metro System costs related to the
Pure Water Program exceed the $1.8 billion, City’s Water Utility will pay a charge for each acre
foot of secondary treated effluent produced by Metro System facilities and used for the
production of Repurified Water.
5.2 Capital Expense Rate. Under the circumstances described below, City’s Water
60409.00001\30398144.16 5
Utility shall pay a charge (“Capital Expense Rate”) for each acre-foot of secondary treated
effluent produced by Metro System facilities and used for the production of Repurified Water.
City’s Water Utility shall pay the Capital Expense Rate if the following costs alone, or in
combination, exceed $1.8 billion (which amount shall be adjusted for inflation):
(a) the sum of all Capital Improvement Costs and associated debt attributable
to the Metro System components of the Pure Water Program under this Exhibit F; and/or
(b) the sum of all Capital Improvement Costs and associated debt for the full
or partial upgrading of the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant to secondary treatment.
Notwithstanding the above, the Capital Expense Rate shall not apply if the Point Loma
WTP is actually upgraded to secondary treatment (or beyond) due to: (a) a change in federal or
state statutory law making it necessary to upgrade the Point Loma WTP to comply with such
new discharge standard; or (b) a final decision by a state or federal court or a federal
administrative agency of competent jurisdiction that an NPDES permit modified under section
301(h) & (j)(5) of the Clean Water Act is thereby revoked or denied renewal due to a finding that
the discharge from the Point Loma WTP violates anti-degradation rules or regulations
promulgated under section 403 of the Clean Water Act.
5.3 Calculation of Capital Expense Rate. The amount per acre-foot of the Capital
Expense Rate shall be determined as follows:
The City shall estimate whether the Capital Expense Rate shall apply to the upcoming
fiscal year (and its amount) prior to January 15 of each year, and the estimated amount of the
Capital Expense Rate shall be effective on July 1 of the upcoming fiscal year.
The sum of all Capital Improvement Costs and associated
debt attributable to (i) the Metro System components of the Pure
Water Program under this Exhibit F and (ii) upgrading of the Point
Loma WTP to secondary treatment (if any)
less
$1.8 billion, as adjusted for inflation each July 1 (starting on July
1, 2019) to reflect the annual percentage change in the Engineering
News Record – Los Angeles construction cost index
multiplied by
1.42 (which estimates the total interest on a 30-year State
Revolving Fund loan with an interest rate of 2.5%)
and divided by
The total number of acre feet per year of secondary treated effluent
that is expected to be produced by Metro System facilities for the
production of Repurified Water over a period of thirty (30) years.
60409.00001\30398144.16 6
For purposes of this Article V of Exhibit F, Capital Improvement Costs and associated
debt shall include such costs incurred by the Metro System prior to the effective date of the
Agreement.
5.4 Year-End Adjustment
At the end of each fiscal year during which the Capital Expense Rate applies, the City
shall determine the actual Capital Improvement Costs and associated debt attributable to the
Metro System components of the Pure Water Program under this Exhibit F and any upgrading of
the Point Loma WTP to secondary treatment, the then-applicable interest amount for outstanding
loans for the Metro System components of the Pure Water Program and Point Loma WTP
upgrades, and the actual amount of secondary treated effluent produced by Metro System
facilities and used for the production of Repurified Water.
Based on the actual cost, interest, and effluent information, the City will recalculate the
Capital Expense Rate for the prior fiscal year. The City will credit any future charges or bill for
any additional amounts due the quarter after the prior year costs have been audited.
5.5 Duration; Expiration
The duration and expiration of the Capital Expense Rate is set forth in Section 13.4 of the
Agreement.
60409.00001\30398144.16
ATTACHMENT 1 – PURE WATER PHASE I COST ESTIMATE
Note: The above estimates are based on 60% design of Phase I of the Pure Water Program.
EXHIBIT G
60409.00001\30914102.16
EXHIBIT G
PURE WATER CAPITAL BILLING TABLE
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 2, 2019
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Assistant Chief of Engineering
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Informational Item – First Quarter Fiscal Year 2019 Capital
Improvement Program Report
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation. This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To update the Board about the status of all CIP project expenditures
and to highlight significant issues, progress, and milestones on
major projects.
ANALYSIS:
To keep up with growth and to meet our ratepayers' expectations to
adequately deliver safe, reliable, cost-effective, and quality water,
each year the District staff prepares a Six-Year CIP Plan that
identifies the District’s infrastructure needs. The CIP is comprised
of four categories consisting of backbone capital facilities,
replacement/renewal projects, capital purchases, and developer's
reimbursement projects.
The First Quarter Fiscal Year 2019 update is intended to provide a
detailed analysis of progress in completing these projects within the
allotted time and budget of $24.52 million. Expenditures through the
First Quarter totaled approximately $4.13 million. Approximately 17%
of the Fiscal Year 2019 expenditure budget was spent (see Attachment
B).
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact as this is an informational item only.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
exceptional water and wastewater service to its customers, and to
manage District resources in a transparent and fiscally responsible
manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, "To be a model water agency
by providing stellar service, achieving measurable results, and
continuously improving operational practices."
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM/RP:jf
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2019\Q1\Staff Report\BD 01-02-19 Staff Report First
Quarter FY 2019 CIP Report (DM-RP).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B - Fiscal Year 2019 First Quarter CIP
Expenditure Report
Attachment C – Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
VARIOUS
Informational Item – First Quarter Fiscal Year 2019 Capital
Improvement Program Report
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a Committee Meeting held on December 4, 2018.
The Committee supported Staff’s recommendation.
NOTE:
The “Committee Action” is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
FISCAL YEAR 2019 1ST QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 9/30/2018)($000)
ATTACHMENT B
2019 09/30/18
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2019
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Comments
CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS -
P2040 Res - 1655-1 Reservoir 0.5 MG Cameron 5$ 13$ (8)$ 260%3,400$ 545$ 2,855$ 16%
Expenditures for this Fiscal Year are to update the
Environmental documents. Expenses are within
project budget.
P2382 Safety and Security Improvements Payne 224 14 210 6%3,251 3,086 165 95%Will be completed and closed by end Q4 FY 2019.
P2405 PL - 624/340 PRS, Paseo Ranchero and Otay Valley Road Cameron 5 - 5 0%650 - 650 0%
This project is tied to P2553 and is driven by the
City of Chula Vista. Construction is scheduled for
FY 2022.
P2451 Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and Disinfection System Kennedy 10 - 10 0%3,975 3,821 154 96%
EIR/EIS complete and Presidential permit issued.
Continue meetings with DDW and AdR.
P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations Marchioro 25 16 9 64%4,000 1,869 2,131 47%
Schedule driven by Caltrans. Caltrans scheduled to
bid work Q3 FY 2019. Completion of construction anticipated for FY 2021.
P2460 I.D. 7 Trestle and Pipeline Demolition Beppler 20 - 20 0%600 5 595 1%
Demolition proposed for FY 2020, environmental
consultant services to be obtained in Q3 of FY 2019
P2485 SCADA - Infrastructure and Communications Replacement Kerr 162 29 133 18%2,428 2,055 373 85%
On track; slightly more budget used because of PLC cost.
P2494 Multiple Species Conservation Plan Coburn-Boyd 50 1 49 2%1,000 912 88 91%
The majority of this budget will be used in the
remaining quarters of FY 2019.
P2500 Padre Dam - Otay Interconnection Dehesa Valley Marchioro 5 - 5 0%140 - 140 0%
Project is driven by Padre Dam pipeline extension
to District boundary.
P2504 Regulatory Site Access Road and Pipeline Relocation Cameron 5 - 5 0%354 331 23 94%Project is driven by County Fire.
P2516 PL - 12-Inch, 640 Zone, Jamacha Road - Darby/Osage Marchioro - - - 0%900 - 900 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Completion of construction anticipated FY 2024.
P2521 Large Meter Vault Upgrade Program Carey 25 - 25 0%620 307 313 50%
On track. Staff will be using the rest of the year to
upgrade and fix various large meter vaults
throughout the District.
P2547 District Administration Vehicle Charging Stations Cameron 5 - 5 0%125 72 53 58%The project is complete and in the warranty period.
P2553 Heritage Road Bridge Replacement and Utility Relocation Cameron 80 2 78 3%1,430 28 1,402 2%
Project is in the Planning stage. Project is driven by
the City of Chula Vista's schedule for replacement. Construction is scheduled for FY 2022.
P2571 Datacenter Network- Data, Storage, and Infrastructure Enhancements Kerr 100 - 100 0%200 - 200 0%
Procured both hardware and implentation cost for
new District Firewall and other security enhancements; remaining balance for CIP is
$100K. Will initiaite the second phase of project/CIP next fiscal year.
P2572 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Replacement Kerr - - - 0%500 - 500 0%Project set to start in FY 2021.
P2584 Res - 657-1 and 657-2 Reservoir Demolitions Marchioro - - - 0%1 - 1 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019. These reservoirs are scheduled to be removed at the end
of their useful life.
P2608 PL - 8-inch, 850 Zone, Coronado Ave, Chestnut/Apple Cameron 40 - 40 0%450 - 450 0%Consultant to be selected in Q2 for design.
P2611 Quarry Road Bridge Replacement and Utility Relocation Cameron 10 6 4 60%1,000 18 982 2%
Project is in the early Planning stage. Project is driven by County's schedule for replacement.
P2612 PL - 12-inch, 711 Zone, Pas de Luz/Telegraph Canyon Rd Cameron 10 - 10 0%500 1 499 0%Consultant to be selected in Q2 for design.
P2614 485-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%895 - 895 0%No expenditures in FY 2019.
P2617 Lobby Security Enhancements Payne 145 - 145 0%150 1 149 1%Lobby Access doors will be secured Q3 FY 2019.
P2619 PS - Temporary Lower Otay Pump Station Redundancy Marchioro 200 44 156 22%1,800 142 1,658 8%
Delivery of redundant trailer and construction
contract award to install redundant trailer scheduled
for July 2019. Completion of construction
anticipated FY 2020. Project on track.
P2623 Central Area to Otay Mesa Interconnection Pipelines Combination Air/Vacuum Valve Replacements Marchioro 130 101 29 78%270 202 68 75%
Construction completed FY 2019 Q1. Project one
year warranty scheduled to complete in FY 2020
Q1.
P2630 624-3 Reservoir Automation of Chemical Feed System Cameron 5 - 5 0%385 - 385 0%Budget for early planning.
P2635 Vista Diego Hydropneumatic Tank Replacement Marchioro 10 - 10 0%400 - 400 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Commencement of planning and design phase pending coordination with P2640.
P2636 980-2 PS Surge Tank Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 150 3 147 2%175 3 172 2%Expenditures expected late in Q2.
P2637 Survey Division Field GPS Equipment Replacement O'Donnell 35 35 - 100%35 35 - 100%Equipment purchased in FY 2019 Q1.
P2638 Buildings and Grounds Refurbishments Payne 57 - 57 0%114 - 114 0%Admin Building paint and grounds FY 2019 Q3.
P2639 Vista Diego Hydropneumatic Pump Station Replacement Marchioro 5 - 5 0%175 - 175 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Commencement of planning and design phase pending coordination with P2640.
P2640 Portable Trailer Mounted VFD Pumps Marchioro 30 15 15 50%400 15 385 4%
Board award for purchase order to procure trailer
anticipated Q4 FY 2019. Project on track.
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 09/30/18 LIFE-TO-DATE, 09/30/18
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2019\Q1\Expenditures\Copy of FY19 1st qtr exp.xlsx Page 1 of 4 11/15/2018
FISCAL YEAR 2019 1ST QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 9/30/2018)($000)
ATTACHMENT B
2019 09/30/18
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2019
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 09/30/18 LIFE-TO-DATE, 09/30/18
P2641 Rancho Jamul Hydropneumatic Tank Replacement Marchioro 1 - 1 0%300 - 300 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Commencement of planning and design phase pending coordination with P2040 and P2640.
P2642 Rancho Jamul Pump Station Replacement Marchioro 5 - 5 0%2,500 - 2,500 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Completion of construction anticipated FY 2024.
P2643 980-1 Pump Station Surge Tanks Replacement Marchioro - - - 0%350 - 350 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Completion of construction anticipated FY 2024.
P2644 803-1 Pump Station Surge Tank Replacement Marchioro - - - 0%350 - 350 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Completion of construction anticipated FY 2024.
P2645 Rolling Hills Hydropneumatic Tank Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%225 - 225 0%Budget for early planning.
P2646 North District Area Cathodic Protection Improvements Marchioro - - - 0%800 - 800 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019.
Completion of construction anticipated FY 2024.
P2647 Central Area Cathodic Protection Improvements Marchioro - - - 0%1,000 - 1,000 0%
No expenditures anticipated in FY 2019. Completion of construction anticipated FY 2023.
P2648 Otay Mesa Area Cathodic Protection Improvements Marchioro 40 - 40 0%400 - 400 0%
Advanced planning work will begin FY 2019 Q3.
Design scheduled for FY 2020.
P2649 HVAC Equipment Purchase Payne 21 10 11 48%130 10 120 8%Multi year; Operation replacement FY 2019 Q3.
R2110 RecPS - 944-1 Optimization and Pressure Zone Modifications Marchioro 25 10 15 40%200 148 52 74%
Pressure reducing station work completed
underbudget FY 2019 Q1. Project on track.
R2116 RecPL - 14-Inch, 927 Zone, Force Main Improvements Marchioro 24 10 14 42%2,159 2,134 25 99%
Construction completed FY 2018 Q3. Project one
year warranty scheduled to complete in FY 2019 Q3.
R2118 Steele Canyon Sewer PS Large Solids Handling Improvements Beppler 105 2 103 2%150 36 114 24%
Project bid in FY 2019 Q1; to be awarded in FY
2019 Q2; and work to be performed in FY 2019 Q3. Budget to be increased to $175K with award of
contract.
R2120 RWCWRF Filtered Water Storage Tank Improvements Beppler 50 - 50 0%500 29 471 6%Construction scheduled for FY 2020.
R2123 Repurpose Otay Mesa Recycled Water Lines Beppler 5 - 5 0%350 - 350 0%Planning work to begin in FY 2019 Q3.
R2125 RecPRS - 927/680 PRS Improvements, Otay Lakes Road Marchioro 45 6 39 13%200 9 191 5%
Planning on track for completion FY 2019. Completion of design and construction phases
anticipated FY 2020.
R2146 Recycled Pipeline Cathodic Protection Improvements Marchioro 20 - 20 0%600 - 600 0%
Planning phase scheduled to begin late FY 2019. Completion of construction anticipated FY 2022.
R2149 680-1R PS Surge Tank Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%175 - 175 0%Budget for early planning.
R2150 RWCWRF - Secondary Chlorine Analyzer and Feed System Beppler 40 5 35 13%45 5 40 11%
Design completed in FY 2019 Q1. Work to be
completed by FY 2019 Q4.
S2012 San Diego County Sanitation District Outfall and RSD Outfall Replacement Beppler 50 - 50 0%1,800 1,111 689 62%
This CIP reimburses the County for work on
transportation pipeline rehabilitation, dependent upon County scheduling.
S2027 Rancho San Diego Pump Station Rehabilitation Beppler 5 1 4 20%3,500 3,050 450 87%
Construction completed in FY 2019 Q1. Final budget adjustment with County to be confirmed in
FY 2019 Q2.
S2043 RWCWRF Sludge Handling System Beppler 5 - 5 0%51 40 11 78%
Review draft report with latest Metro cost projections that include Pure Water Phase 1
spending to confirm assumptions during FY 2019
Q3.
S2047 Asset Management - Info Master Sewer Implementation Zhao 28 - 28 0%58 38 20 66%
No expenditures in FY 2019. Project start has been
moved to FY 2020.
S2061 RWCWRF Aeration Controls Consolidation & Optimization Upgrades (S)Beppler 10 - 10 0%190 - 190 0%
Prepare scope of work in FY 2019 Q4 after aeration
panels replacement and confirmation of aeration system operation.
S2065 RWCWRF - TOC Monitor Beppler 30 23 7 77%30 23 7 77%
Monitor purchased in FY 2019 Q1; installation to be
performed in FY 2019 Q2.
S2067 RWCWRF Roofing Replacement and Natural Light Enhancement Payne 20 - 20 0%165 - 165 0%Anticipate completion early FY 2019 Q4.
Total Capital Facility Projects Total:2,087 346 1,741 17%46,551 20,081 26,470 43%
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS
P2083 PS - 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Marchioro 7,900 1,400 6,500 18%18,950 7,757 11,193 41%Construction on track for completion in FY 2020 Q2.
P2174 PS - 1090-1 Pump Station Replacement (400 gpm)Marchioro 150 3 147 2%2,500 8 2,492 0%
Design scheduled for FY 2020. Advanced planning
work will begin FY 2019 Q3 pending coordination with P2640.
P2400 PL - 20-Inch Pipeline Replacement, 711 Zone, Otay Lakes Road - at Santa Paula Marchioro - - - 0%2,280 - 2,280 0%Planning phase scheduled for FY 2020.
P2507 East Palomar Street Utility Relocation Cameron 5 3 2 60%735 728 7 99%Waiting for reimbursement from Caltrans.
P2508 Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement Program Marchioro 542 9 533 2%1,250 732 518 59%Construction on track for completion in FY 2019 Q3.
P2529 711-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 4 1 80%820 807 13 98%Budget is for warranty repairs; scheduled for Q3.
P2530 711-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 3 2 60%980 957 23 98%Budget is for warranty repairs; scheduled for Q3.
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2019\Q1\Expenditures\Copy of FY19 1st qtr exp.xlsx Page 2 of 4 11/15/2018
FISCAL YEAR 2019 1ST QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 9/30/2018)($000)
ATTACHMENT B
2019 09/30/18
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2019
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 09/30/18 LIFE-TO-DATE, 09/30/18
P2531 944-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%345 321 24 93%Budget is for warranty repairs; scheduled for Q3.
P2532 944-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%960 940 20 98%Budget is for warranty repairs; scheduled for Q3.
P2533 1200-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%810 7 803 1%Budget for early planning.
P2534 978-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 1 4 20%650 595 55 92%
Construction completed FY 2018. Project is in the
two year warranty period.
P2535 458-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating & Upgrades Cameron 5 - 5 0%810 780 30 96%Budget is for warranty repairs; scheduled for Q3.
P2539 South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Utility Relocations Cameron 45 10 35 22%1,090 937 153 86%
Project is driven by SANDAG. Expenditures within
overall project budget.
P2543 850-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 5 1 4 20%875 9 866 1%Budget for early planning.
P2544 850-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 5 9 (4) 180%980 829 151 85%
Construction completed FY 2018. Project is in the two year warranty period.
P2545 980-1 Reservoir Interior Exterior Coating Cameron 5 5 - 100%1,215 1,193 22 98%Budget is for warranty repairs; scheduled for Q3.
P2546 980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 695 276 419 40%1,690 1,621 69 96%
More work was completed in FY 2018 Q4 than anticipated. Expenditures within budget. Project
expected to be accepted in FY 2019 Q2.
P2555 Administration and Operations Parking Lot Improvements Cameron 25 17 8 68%985 600 385 61%
Phase II construction expenditures were expected
to be completed in FY 2018, but the Contractor was delayed by an unresponsive sub-contractor.
Expenditures for FY 2019 wil be over the FY budget, but all expenditures will be within the CIP
budget.
P2557 520 Res Recirculation Pipeline Chemical Supply and Analyzer Feed Replacement Project Beppler 60 6 54 10%125 66 59 53%
Purchase of materials and construction started.
Project to be completed by OPS staff in FY 2019 Q3.
P2561 Res - 711-3 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement Marchioro 2,195 21 2,174 1%2,300 73 2,227 3%Construction on track for completion in FY 2019 Q3.
P2562 Res - 571-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement Marchioro 170 44 126 26%2,900 2,706 194 93%
As part of the larger 870-2 Pump Station project,
the 571-1 Reservoir was placed back into service April 2018.
P2563 Res - 870-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement Marchioro 1 - 1 0%1,000 3 997 0%
Replacement scheduled for FY 2022 to coincide
with completion of new 870-2 Pump Station.
Existing cover/liner materials analyzed by
laboratory in FY 2017 suggested sufficient
remaining life.
P2565 803-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades Cameron 755 27 728 4%1,000 27 973 3%
Construction to begin in late Q2. Project is on schedule.
P2566 520-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades Cameron 10 - 10 0%1,500 - 1,500 0%Budget for early planning.
P2567 1004-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades Cameron - - - 0%905 - 905 0%No expenditures for FY 2019.
P2573 PL - 12-Inch Pipeline Replacement, 803 Zone, Hillsdale Road Beppler 150 236 (86) 157%2,580 2,566 14 99%Construction completed in FY 2019 Q1.
P2574 PL - 12-Inch Pipeline Replacement, 978 Zone, Vista Vereda Beppler 500 71 429 14%2,000 396 1,604 20%
Project bid in FY 2019 Q1 with contract to be
awarded in FY 2019 Q2 and construction to start in FY 2019 Q3.
P2578 PS - 711-2 (PS 711-1 Replacement and Expansion) - 14,000 gpm Marchioro - - - 0%10,000 - 10,000 0%
Replacement scheduled for FY 2023-2024 to coincide with development of Villages 4, 8, 9, & 3.
P2593 458-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades Cameron - - - 0%840 - 840 0%No expenditures for FY 2019.
P2594 Large Meter Replacement Carey 95 3 92 3%625 344 281 55%
Majority of change outs will be completed in FY
2019 Q3.
P2604 AMR Change Out Carey 1,800 950 850 53%6,290 3,145 3,145 50%
Majority of change outs for this FY 2019 will be
completed by end of Q3.
P2605 458/340 PRS Replacement, 1571 Melrose Ave Marchioro 75 5 70 7%325 8 317 2%
Planning and design on track for completion FY 2019. Construction scheduled for FY 2020.
P2607 Douglas Ave SWA and OWD Interconnection Upgrade Beppler 37 1 36 3%50 1 49 2%
SWA design in progress during FY 2019 Q1.
Construction expected to start in FY 2019 Q3.
P2609 PL - 8-inch, 1004 Zone, Eucalyptus St, Coronado/Date/La Mesa Cameron 10 - 10 0%540 - 540 0%Consultant to be selected in Q2 for design
P2610 Valve Replacement Program - Phase 1 Cameron 95 2 93 2%275 22 253 8%
Delivery of this project is anticipated by Q4 in
coordination with OPS.
P2615 PL - 12-Inch Pipeline Replacement, 803 PZ, Vista Grande Beppler 20 - 20 0%1,200 - 1,200 0%
SWA design in progress during FY 2019 Q1; construction expected to start in FY 2019 Q3.
P2616 PL - 12-Inch Pipeline Replacement, 978 Zone, Pence Dr/Vista Sierra Dr Beppler 180 - 180 0%2,500 16 2,484 1%
SWA design in progress during FY 2019 Q1;
construction expected to start in FY 2019 Q3.
P2625 PL - 12-inch, 978 Zone, Hidden Mesa Road Beppler 1,000 36 964 4%1,500 171 1,329 11%
SWA design in progress during FY 2019 Q1;
construction expected to start in FY 2019 Q3.
P2627 458/340 PRS Replacement, 1505 Oleander Ave Marchioro 75 5 70 7%325 5 320 2%
Planning and design on track for completion FY 2019. Construction scheduled for FY 2020.
P2631 1485-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades Cameron - - - 0%55 - 55 0%No expenditures in FY 2019.
P2633 Otay Mesa Rd and Alta Rd Water Appurtenances Relocations Beppler 10 2 8 20%500 2 498 0%
Review of County design of road improvements
performed in FY 2019 Q1. Planning level design in
progress.
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2019\Q1\Expenditures\Copy of FY19 1st qtr exp.xlsx Page 3 of 4 11/15/2018
FISCAL YEAR 2019 1ST QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 9/30/2018)($000)
ATTACHMENT B
2019 09/30/18
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2019
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 09/30/18 LIFE-TO-DATE, 09/30/18
P2634 Rolling Hills Hydropneumatic Pump Station Jockey Pump Replacement Anderson 35 1 34 3%35 1 34 3%
The pump is 35% complete; anticipate installed by
FY 2019 Q2.
P2651 Automatic Data Processing Koeppen 20 - 20 0%20 - 20 0%On track. The project spending will be at 100% by the
end of March 2019.
R2121 Res - 944-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement Marchioro 1 - 1 0%1,400 19 1,381 1%
Replacement scheduled for FY 2021 since dive
inspection completed in FY 2016 suggested five
years remaining life.
R2139 RWCWRF - Filter Troughs Replacement Beppler 5 - 5 0%30 - 30 0%
Construction started in FY 2019 Q1; completion expected in FY 2019 Q2.
R2143 AMR Change Out Carey 165 58 107 35%525 163 362 31%
Majority of change-outs for FY 2019 will be
completed by end of Q3.
R2145 RWCWRF - Filter Media and Nozzles Replacement Beppler 130 - 130 0%130 - 130 0%
Contract to be awarded in FY 2019 Q2;
construction to be performed in FY 2019 Q3.
R2147 RWCWRF Fuel Lines Replacement Marchioro 150 19 131 13%175 19 156 11%
Design and construction on track for completion FY 2019.
R2148 Large Meter Replacement - Recycled Carey 8 - 8 0%58 - 58 0%
Large meter testing will begin in Q2 and change-
outs scheduled for FY 2019 Q3 and Q4.
R2151 RWCWRF - Bulk Chlorine Vapor Scrubber System Refurbishment Lintner 35 - 35 0%37 - 37 0%
This project is scheduled for the end of January 2019
through February 2019. P.O. created 9/12/2018 for
Integrity Municipal Systems.
S2024 Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement Beppler 4,000 432 3,568 11%10,300 5,476 4,824 53%
Construction on track for substantial completion in
FY 2019 Q4.
S2044 Trenchless Sewer Rehabilitation Beppler 5 - 5 0%550 476 74 87%
One year warranty was over in FY 2019 Q1. CIP to
be closed.
S2045 Fuerte Drive Sewer Relocation Beppler 10 17 (7) 170%370 277 93 75%Construction completed in FY 2019 Q1.
S2046 RWCWRF - Aeration Panels Replacement Beppler 100 3 97 3%450 96 354 21%
Replacement panels to be delivered in FY 2019 Q2 and installed in FY 2019 Q3.
S2048 Hillsdale Road Sewer Repairs Beppler 10 73 (63) 730%720 687 33 95%
Construction completed in FY 2019 Q1. Invoicing
carried over from FY 2018.
S2049 Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation - Phase 2 Beppler 20 - 20 0%1,000 7 993 1%
Planning underway with property issues to be
investigated prior to start of design in FY 2020.
S2050 Rancho San Diego Basin Sewer Rehabilitation - Phase 2 Beppler 20 - 20 0%1,300 - 1,300 0%Begin planning in FY 2019 Q3.
S2051 RWCWRF - Headworks Improvements Beppler 165 23 142 14%250 98 152 39%
Project bid in FY 2019 Q1; contract to be awarded
in FY 2019 Q2; and construction in FY 2019 Q3.
S2053 RWCWRF - Sedimentation Basins Weirs Replacement Beppler 5 1 4 20%60 3 57 5%
Construction started in FY 2019 Q1; completion
expected in FY 2019 Q2.
S2054 Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation - Phase 3 Beppler - - - 0%1,300 - 1,300 0%No action planned for this fiscal year.
S2060 Steele Canyon Pump Station Replacement Beppler - - - 0%200 - 200 0%No action planned for this fiscal year.
S2066 Rancho San Diego Basin Sewer Rehabilitation - Phase 3 Beppler - - - 0%290 - 290 0%No action planned for this fiscal year.
Total Replacement/Renewal Projects Total:21,534 3,777 17,757 18%96,460 35,694 60,766 37%
CAPITAL PURCHASE PROJECTS
P2282 Vehicle Capital Purchases Rahders 520 2 518 0%5,928 4,147 1,781 70%
P.O. for $286,623 will be issued in Q3 and an
additional $10,000 (approx.) will be spent by the
end of Q4, 2019.
P2286 Field Equipment Capital Purchases Rahders 363 - 363 0%2,250 1,470 780 65%
P.O. for $329,350 will be issued in Q3 and an
additional $15,000 (approx.) will be spent by the
end of Q4, 2019.
Total Capital Purchase Projects Total:883 2 881 0%8,178 5,617 2,561 69%
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT PROJECTS
P2595 PL - 16-inch, 624 Zone, Village 3N - Heritage Road, Main St/Energy Way Beppler 1 - 1 0%150 - 150 0%Project under construction.
R2084 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, Village 2 - Heritage/La Media Beppler 14 - 14 0%365 1 364 0%Project under construction.
Total Developer Reimbursement Projects Total:15 - 15 0%515 1 514 0%
122 GRAND TOTAL 24,519$ 4,125$ 20,394$ 17%151,704$ 61,393$ 90,311$ 40%
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2019\Q1\Expenditures\Copy of FY19 1st qtr exp.xlsx Page 4 of 4 11/15/2018
Otay Water District
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Year 2019
First Quarter
(through September 30, 2018)
ATTACHMENT C
870-2 Pump Station –West Station Foundation and Galley Construction
9/13/2018
Background
The approved CIP Budget for Fiscal Year 2019
consists of 106 projects that total $24.5 million.
These projects are broken down into four categories.
1.Capital Facilities $ 2.1 million
2.Replacement/Renewal $21.5 million
3.Capital Purchases $ 0.9 million
4.Developer Reimbursement $ 15.0 thousand
Overall expenditures through the First Quarter of
Fiscal Year 2019 totaled $4.1 million, which is
approximately 17% of the Fiscal Year budget.
2
Fiscal Year 2019
First Quarter Update
($000)
CIP
CAT Description FY 2019
Budget
FY 2019
Expenditures
%
FY 2019
Budget
Spent
Total
Life-to-Date
Budget
Total
Life-to-Date
Expenditures
%
Life-to-Date
Budget
Spent
1 Capital
Facilities $2,087 $346 17% $46,551 $20,081 43%
2 Replacement/
Renewal $21,534 $3,777 18% $96,460 $35,694 37%
3 Capital
Purchases $883 $2 0% $8,178 $5,617 69%
4 Developer
Reimbursement $15 $0 0% $515 $1 0%
Total:
$24,519 $4,125 17% $151,704 $61,393 40%
3
Fiscal Year 2019
First Quarter
CIP Budget Forecast vs. Expenditures
4
$4,125,000
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
FISCAL YEAR PERIOD IN MONTHS
Budget Forecast
Total Expenditures
$24,519,000
5
CIP Projects in Construction
870-2 Pump Station
Replacement Project
(P2083/P2562)
Replacement of existing
870 High Head and
Low Head Pump
Stations.
Remove and Replace
the existing 571-1
Reservoir liner and
cover.
$21.65M Budget
Start: July 2017
Completion: October
2019 870-2 Pump Station – Construction of
West Station Walls
Division No. 2
Location:
North East corner
of Otay Mesa.
Existing 571-1
Reservoir and High
Head/Low Head
Pump Station site.
6
9/28/2018
CIP Projects in Construction
980-2 Reservoir
Interior/Exterior
Coating & Upgrades
Project (P2546)
Remove and replace
existing interior and
exterior coatings.
Construct structural
upgrades to increase
the service life.
$1.45M Budget
Start: November 2017
Completion:
September 2018 980-2 (5.0 MG) – Interior Disinfection
Division No. 5
Location:
980-2 is located at
the north end of
Hunte Parkway.
7
9/17/2018
CIP Projects in Construction
Campo Road Sewer
Replacement Project
(S2024)
Replace existing 10-
inch sewer with 7,420
linear feet of new 15-
inch sewer.
Reconnection of sewer
laterals.
Night work.
$10.10M Budget
Start: July 2017
Estimated Completion:
June 2019 Westbound Campo Road –
East Bore Jacking Pit Preparation
Division No. 5
Location:
Campo Road (SR
94) between
Rancho San Diego
Village Shopping
Center and Rancho
San Diego Towne
Center.
8
10/03/2018
CIP Projects in Construction
Interconnect Airvac
Valve Replacement
(P2623)
Replace 37 existing
potable water
combination
air/vacuum valves on
interconnect pipeline
between 624-3
Reservoir and 870-1
Reservoir.
$0.27M Budget
Start: August 2018
Completed: August
2018 Combination Air/Vacuum Valve
Replacement - Sta 221+ 76
Division Nos. 1 & 2
Location:
South East Chula
Vista at various
locations.
9
8/08/2018
CIP Projects in Construction
OWD Admin &
Operations Parking
Lot Improvements
Project - Phase 2
(P2555)
Seal parking lots.
Install parking stalls
and stripe.
Install equipment
canopy in Operations
parking lot.
$0.99M Budget
Start: May 2018
Estimated Completion:
November 2018
Administration Parking Lots
Seal and Striping work
Division No. 3
Location:
District
Administration and
Operations lots -
Sweetwater
Springs Blvd.,
Spring Valley
10
9/23/2018
CIP Projects in Construction
Hillsdale Road
Waterline Replacement
and Sewer Repairs
(P2573/S2048)
Replacement of 4,129
linear feet of 12-inch
waterline.
Replacement of 760
liner feet of 8-inch
sewer.
$3.17M Budget
Start: October 2017
Completed: July 2018
Hillsdale Road
pavement
restoration in area
that fronts Valhalla
High School
Division No. 5
Location:
Hillsdale Road
between
Jamacha Road
and Vista
Grande Road.
11
7/5/2018
Construction Contract Status
12
PROJECT
TOTAL %
S2045 Fuerte Drive Sewer
Relocation
Burtech Pipeline,
Inc.$169,490 $193,690 $4,082 2.4% $179,572 $179,572 -7.3% 100.0%July 2018
P2573
S2048
Hillsdale Road 12-
inch Waterline
Replacement and
Sewer Repairs ***
TC Construction
Company, Inc.$2,245,060 $2,396,060 $332,569 14.8% $2,591,949 $2,591,949 8.2% 100.0%July 2018
P2623 Interconnect AirVac
Valve Replacement
M-Rae Engineering
Inc.$78,000 $83,000 $0 0.0% $79,310 $79,310 -4.4% 100.0%
August
2018
P2555
OWD Administration
& Operations
Parking Lot
Improvements Ph. II
- Pavement
Restoration
Frank and Son
Paving, Inc.$152,646 $165,046 $0 0.0% $152,646 $86,191 -7.5% 56.5%
November
2018
P2546
980-2 Reservoir
Interior/Exterior
Coating & Upgrades
Simpson
Sandblasting &
Special Coating, Inc.
$998,502 $1,146,377 $229,152 22.9% $1,375,529 $1,326,933 20.0% 96.5%
September
2019
FY 2019 CIP CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
CURRENT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
TOTAL
EARNED
TO DATE
CIP NO. PROJECT TITLE CONTRACTOR
BASE BID
AMOUNT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT W/
ALLOWANCES
% CHANGE
ORDERS W/
ALLOWANCE
CREDIT**
%
COMPLETE
EST.
COMP.
DATE
NET CHANGE ORDERS
LTD*
Construction Contract Status
13
PROJECT
TOTAL %
FY 2019 CIP CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
CURRENT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
TOTAL
EARNED
TO DATE
CIP NO. PROJECT TITLE CONTRACTOR
BASE BID
AMOUNT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT W/
ALLOWANCES
% CHANGE
ORDERS W/
ALLOWANCE
CREDIT**
%
COMPLETE
EST.
COMP.
DATE
NET CHANGE ORDERS
LTD*
P2508
Pipeline CP
Improvements -
Phase II
M-Rae Engineering
Inc.$329,500 $347,000 $0 0.0% $329,500 $0 -5.0% 0.0%
February
2019
P2561
Reservoir 711-3
Floating Cover and
Liner Replacement
Layfield USA
Corporation $1,947,000 $1,997,000 $0 0.0% $1,947,000 $7,000 -2.5% 0.4%March 2019
S2024
Campo Road Sewer
Replacement
Project
Wier Construction
Corporation $7,623,146 $7,816,646 $74,266 1.0% $7,811,412 $3,785,503 -0.1% 48.5%June 2019
P2083
P2562
870-2 Pump Station
Replacement/ 571-1
Reservoir Liner and
Cover Replacement
Pacific Hydrotech
Corporation $16,500,900 $16,925,900 $26,270 0.2% $16,582,332 $6,893,661 -2.0% 41.6%
October
2019
TOTALS: $30,044,244 $31,070,719 $666,338 2.2%$31,049,250 $14,950,119 -0.1%
***PROJECT DOES NOT INCLUDE $149,280 OF ADDITIONAL SCOPE FOR SDRMA FUNDED PAVEMENT, SIDEWALK, CURB AND GUTTER REPAIRS ON HILLDALE ROAD
**THIS CHANGE ORDER RATE INCLUDES THE CREDIT FOR UNUSED ALLOWANCES
*NET CHANGE ORDERS DO NOT INCLUDE ALLOWANCE ITEM CREDITS. IT'S A TRUE CHANGE ORDER PERCENTAGE FOR THE PROJECT
Consultant Contract Status
14
CIP Project Title Consultant
Original
Contract
Amount
Total
Change
Orders
Revised
Contract
Amount
%
Change
Orders
Authorized
Task Orders
to Date
Approved
Payment To
Date
%
Project
Complete
Date of
Signed
Contract
End Date
of
Contract
PLANNING
HAZEN AND SAWYER DPC $ 41,090.00 $ 30,697.50 11/8/2017 6/30/2019
WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC $ 23,000.00 $ 19,880.00 1/23/2018 6/30/2019
DESIGN
P2083 CIP P2083: DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION FOR 870-2 PS CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC $ 624,910.00 $ 387,618.00 $ 1,012,528.00 62.0% N/A $ 963,804.25 95.2% 10/11/2013 6/30/2019
S2024 CIP S2024: CAMPO ROAD SEWER MAIN
REPLACEMENT PROJECT RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY $ 805,705.00 $ - $ 805,705.00 0.0% N/A $ 764,763.53 94.9% 5/27/2014 6/30/2019
HAZEN AND SAWYER DPC $ 18,430.00 $ - 6/14/2018 6/30/2020
HDR ENGINEERING INC $ - $ - 6/14/2018 6/30/2020
CORRPRO COMPANIES INC $ - $ - 8/3/2017 6/30/2019
RFYEAGER $ 231,781.00 $ 131,483.00 7/18/2017 6/30/2019
Varies AS-NEEDED ELECTRICAL SERVICES FY17, 18 & 19 BSE ENGINEERING INC $ 125,000.00 $ - $ 125,000.00 0.0% $ 48,864.00 $ 4,863.76 3.9% 11/22/2016 6/30/2019
PSOMAS $ 212,413.00 $ 201,214.02 7/1/2016 6/30/2018
COMPLETE
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY $ 299,222.50 $ 274,234.99 7/1/2016 12/31/2019
MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC $ 34,565.00 $ 1,230.00 11/7/2017 6/30/2019
NV5 INC $ 244,135.00 $ 181,657.30 11/7/2017 6/30/2019
Varies GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FY15-18 NINYO & MOORE $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 0.0% $ 173,846.63 $ 150,997.83 86.3% 4/9/2015 6/30/2019
GEOCON INCORPORATED $ - $ - 12/7/2017 6/30/2020
NINYO & MOORE $ 15,000.00 $ - 12/11/2017 6/30/2020
ARCADIS TECHNICAL SERVICES INC $ - $ - 8/16/2017 6/30/2019
KEH & ASSOCIATES $ 48,871.00 $ 38,529.63 8/16/2017 6/30/2019
Varies TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FY16-18 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 0.0% $ 108,462.00 $ 63,253.01 36.1% 7/8/2015 6/30/2019
0.0%
22.8%
95.1%
30.5%
0.0%
22.0%
Varies
Varies
Varies
Varies
Varies
Varies WATER RELCAMATION SERVICES FY 18 & 19 $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00
0.0%
0.0%
AS-NEEDED ENGINEERING DESIGN FY 18-20 $ 600,000.00 $ - $ 600,000.00 0.0%
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FY18-20 $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00
AS-NEEDED ENGINEERING DESIGN FY 17-18 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ -
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
ASSET MANAGEMENT FY 18, 19 & 20 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ -
CORROSION ENGINEERING SERVICES FY 18 & 19 $ 577,276.00 $ - $ 577,276.00
AS-NEEDED HYDRAULIC MODELING FY 18 & 19Varies $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 28.9%
Consultant Contract Status
15
CIP Project Title Consultant
Original
Contract
Amount
Total
Change
Orders
Revised
Contract
Amount
%
Change
Orders
Authorized
Task Orders
to Date
Approved
Payment To
Date
%
Project
Complete
Date of
Signed
Contract
End Date
of
Contract
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
P2083 CIP P2083: 870-2 PS CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC $ 853,457.00 $ 74,238.00 $ 927,695.00 8.7% N/A $ 468,806.00 50.5% 7/30/2014 12/31/2019
Varies COATING INSPECTION SERVICES FY18-19 CSI SERVICES INC $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 0.0% $ 174,480.63 $ 174,480.63 99.7% 8/16/2017
6/30/2019
COMPLETE
CSI SERVICES INC $ 14,869.50 $ 14,869.50 9/19/2018 6/30/2021
RFYEAGER $ - $ - 8/13/2018 6/30/2021
ALYSON CONSULTING $ 185,508.22 $ 132,533.22 7/12/2017 6/30/2019
VALLEY CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT $ 342,134.00 $ 300,372.00 6/21/2017 6/30/2019
HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES $ 18,200.00 $ 14,287.51 6/19/2018 6/30/2021
PSOMAS $ 6,800.00 $ - 6/19/2018 6/30/2021
Varies UTILITY LOCATING SERVICES FY 18-20 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 0.0% $ 150,000.00 $ 132,850.00 26.6% 1/23/2018 6/30/2021
ENVIRONMENTAL
P2494 CIP P2494: PREPARATION OF THE SUBAREA PLAN RECON $ 270,853.00 $ - $ 270,853.00 0.0% N/A $ 263,838.11 97.4% 3/28/2008 6/30/2020
HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL $ 158,222.00 $ 36,029.76 11/7/2017 6/30/2020
ICF INTERNATIONAL JONES &
STOKES INC $ 171,303.00 $ 128,583.95 11/7/2017 6/30/2020
Varies SAN MIGUEL HMA CY 2018-2021
ICF INTERNATIONAL JONES &
STOKES INC $ 483,787.40 $ - $ 483,787.40 0.0% N/A $ 33,354.38 6.9% 5/2/2018 6/30/2021
WATER RESOURCES
Varies MICHAEL WELCH ENGINEERING PLANNING SVCS. $ 100,000.00 $ - $ 100,000.00 0.0% N/A $ 22,800.00 22.8% 4/9/2014 6/30/2019
PUBLIC SERVICES
Varies AEGIS
AS-NEEDED DEVELOPER PROJECTS
FY 15-16 $ 400,000.00 $ - $ 400,000.00 0.0% N/A $ 291,437.80 72.9% 2/12/2015 6/30/2019
TOTALS: $ 8,390,988.40 $ 461,856.00 $ 8,852,844.40 5.5% $4,840,851.68
8.5%
86.6%
5.7%
41.2%
Varies LAND SURVEYING FY19-21 $ 250,000.00 $ - $ 250,000.00 0.0%
Varies CONSTRUCTION MGMT/INSPECTION FY 18-19 $ 500,000.00 $ - $ 500,000.00 0.0%
Varies COATING INSPECTION SERVICES FY19-21 $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 0.0%
Varies AS-NEEDED ENVIRONMENTAL FY 18-20 $ 400,000.00 $ - $ 400,000.00 0.0%
QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?
16