HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-21-21 EO&WR Committee Packet1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS & WATER RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING and SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BY TELECONFERENCE
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Board Room
TUESDAY September 21, 2021 1:00 P.M.
This is a District Committee meeting. This meeting is being posted as a special meeting in order to comply with the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54954.2) in the event that a quorum of the Board is present. Items will be deliberated, however, no formal board actions will be taken at this meeting. The committee makes recommendations to the full board for its consideration and formal action.
AGENDA
1.ROLL CALL
2.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TOSPEAK TO THE COMMITTEE ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
COMMITTEE'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
This meeting is being held via teleconference. Members of the public may submit theircomments on agendized and non-agendized items by either of the following two meth-ods:
a)No later than a half hour before the start of the meeting, complete and submit aRequest to Speak Form. Your request to speak will be acknowledged duringthe “Public Participation” portion of the meeting when the committee will hearyour public comment. When called to speak, please state your Name and the
City in which you reside. You will be provided three minutes to speak.
OR
b)No later than a half hour before the start of the meeting, email your comment to
BoardSecretary@otaywater.gov and it will be read aloud during the “Public Par-
ticipation” portion of the meeting. Please provide your Name and the City inwhich you reside, with your comment. Your comment must not take more thanthree minutes to read.
The District’s meeting is live streamed. Information on how to watch and listen to the
District’s meeting can be found at this link: https://otaywater.gov/board-of-directors/agenda-and-minutes/committee-meetings/
2
DISCUSSION ITEMS 3. AWARD OF A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO JENNETTE COMPANY, INC. FOR THE 1200 PRESSURE ZONE IMPROVEMENTS – PHASE II PROJECT IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $296,990.00 (MARCHIORO) [5 minutes]
4. APPROVAL OF FINAL CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 10 IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED A REDUCTION OF ($127,413.00) TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION FOR THE 870-2 PUMP
STATION REPLACEMENT PROJECT (LONG) [5 minutes]
5. FISCAL YEAR 2021 YEAR-END REPORT ON THE DISTRICT’S FISCAL YEARS 2019-2022 STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE PLAN (KERR) [15 minutes]
6. ADJOURNMENT
BOARD MEMBERS ATTENDING: Tim Smith, Chair Gary Croucher
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be delib-
erated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the Dis-trict’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website. Copies of the
Agenda and all attachments are also available by contacting the District Secretary at (619)
670-2253.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to par-
ticipate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at 619-670-2253 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting I certify that on September 17, 2021, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on September 17, 2021. /s/ Tita Ramos-Krogman, District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: October 6, 2021
SUBMITTED BY: Jeff Marchioro Senior Civil Engineer
PROJECT: P2653-001103 DIV. NO. 5
APPROVED BY: Bob Kennedy, Engineering Manager
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
Jose Martinez, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to Jennette Company, Inc. for the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements – Phase II Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a construction contract to Jennette Company, Inc. (Jennette) and to authorize the General Manager to execute a construction contract with Jennette for the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements – Phase II Project in an amount not-to-exceed $296,990.00 (see Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a construction contract with Jennette for the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements – Phase II Project in an amount not-to-exceed
$296,990.00.
AGENDA ITEM 3
2
ANALYSIS:
On November 6, 2019, the District awarded a construction contract to Piperin Corporation (Piperin), located in Escondido, California, to complete the first phase of the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements
Project which included Portable Trailer Mounted VFD Trailer Pump connections and existing driveway improvements at the 1200-1 Pump
Station/978-1 Reservoir site. The District accepted Phase I of the project on August 3, 2020.
After completion of the Phase I project, the District’s Portable
Trailer Mounted VFD Pump was deployed at the 1200-1 Pump Station/978-1 Reservoir site and placed into service on April 5, 2021 in support
of the 1200-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Project (CIP P2533). Completion of the 1200-1 Reservoir coating project is anticipated October 2021 at which time the trailer pump will be repurposed to support the second phase of the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements Project (CIP P2653).
The second phase of the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements Project includes the replacement of the existing 1200-1 Pump Station discharge header, pressure relief, suction manifold, and yard piping improvements. The improvements are necessary since a temporary repair, completed by Operations, within the confines of a small vault
adjacent to the 1200-1 PS discharge header has a short life expectancy and needs to be replaced. The existing pressure relief
bypass has been repaired a few times and has reached the end of its useful life. The suction manifold valves are no longer functional.
Staff prepared the bid documents in-house.
On Tuesday, August 3, 2021, the Project was publicly advertised for
bid using Periscope, an online bid solicitation website. The Project was also advertised in the Daily Transcript and the District’s public website. Periscope provided electronic distribution of the Bid
Documents, including specifications, plans, and addendum. A Pre-Bid Meeting was held on August 11, 2021, which was attended by two (2) contractors. Two (2) addenda were sent out to all bidders and plan houses to address questions and clarifications to the contract documents during the bidding period.
Staff reached out to twenty-nine (29) contractors directly via email
and telephoned several contractors to encourage them to submit a bid.
Bids were publicly opened on August 24, 2021, with the following
results:
3
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID AMOUNT
1 Jennette Company, Inc. (San Diego, CA)$296,990.002M-Rae Engineering, Inc. (Descanso, CA)$319,500.00
3 GSE Construction Company Inc. (Livermore, CA)$338,700.00
4 Cora Constructors Inc. (Palm Desert, CA)$340,777.005Piperin Corporation (Escondido, CA)$367,000.006Abhe & Svoboda, Inc. (Alpine, CA)$384,144.00
7 Cass Construction, Inc. dba Cass Arrieta (El Cajon, CA)$452,500.00
8 Blue Pacific Engineering & Construction (San Diego, CA)$529,500.00
The Engineer’s Estimate is $400,000.
A review of the bids was performed by District staff for conformance with the contract requirements and determined that Jennette was the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Jennette holds a Class A, General Engineering, Contractor’s License in the State of California, which meets the contract document’s requirements, and is valid
through 09/30/2023. The reference checks indicated a very good to excellent performance record on similar projects. An internet background search of the company was performed and revealed no outstanding issues with this company.
Staff verified that the bid bond provided by Jennette is valid. Staff will also verify that Jennette’s Performance Bond and Labor and
Materials Bond are valid prior to execution of the contract.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP P2653, as approved in the FY 2022 budget, is $850,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and forecast including this contract, are $766,222. See Attachment B for budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budgets, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget for CIP P2653 is sufficient to support the Project.
The Finance Department has determined that, under the current rate model, 100% of the funding is available from the Betterment Fund.
4
GRANTS/LOANS:
Engineering staff researched and explored grants and loans and found none currently available for this Project.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide exceptional water and wastewater service to its customers, and to
manage District resources in a transparent and fiscally responsible manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, "To be a model water agency
by providing stellar service, achieving measurable results, and continuously improving operational practices."
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
JM/BK:jf
https://otaywater365.sharepoint.com/sites/engcip/Shared Documents/P2653 1200 PZ Improvements/Staff Reports/2021 10 06 1200 PZ Phase II Award/BD 10-06-21 Staff Report 1200PZ Phase II.docx Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2653-001103
Award of a Construction Contract to Jennette Company, Inc. for the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements – Phase II Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on September 21, 2021. The Committee supported staff's recommendation.
NOTE:
The “Committee Action” is written in anticipation of the Committee moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item or modified to reflect any discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to presentation to the full Board.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2653-001103
Award of a Construction Contract to Jennette Company, Inc.
for the 1200 Pressure Zone Improvements – Phase II Project
8/27/2021
Budget
850,000
Planning
Consultant Contracts 50 50 - 50 PETTY CASH CUSTODIANStandard Salaries 44,575 44,575 - 44,575
Total Planning 44,625 44,625 - 44,625
Design 001102
Service Contracts 85 85 - 85 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATION
Standard Salaries 37,334 35,334 2,000 37,334 200 200 200 Public Advertisement
2,000 2,000 2,000 Reprographics
Total Design 39,619 35,419 4,200 39,619
Construction
Construction Contracts 13,154 13,154 - 13,154 AZTEC FENCE CO II INC
149,523 149,523 - 149,523 PIPERIN CORPORATION
Consultant Contracts 11,026 11,026 - 11,026 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Security Services 2,324 2,324 - 2,324 WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION
Service Contracts 555 555 - 555 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INCStandard Salaries 124,900 24,900 100,000 124,900
29,957 - 29,957 29,957 TechKnowsion, Inc.
296,990 - 296,990 296,990 Jennette Company, Inc. 3,000 - 3,000 3,000 Corrosion Engineer
3,000 - 3,000 3,000 Geotechnical Engineer
3,000 - 3,000 3,000 Laboratory14,850 - 14,850 14,850 Construction Manager
29,699 - 29,699 29,699 Contingency @10%
Total Construction 681,978 201,482 480,496 681,978
Grand Total 766,222 281,526 484,696 766,222
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water Districtp2653-1200 Pressure Zone Improvements
Committed Expenditures Outstanding Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
OTAY WATER DISTRICT1200-1 PRESSURE ZONE IMPROVEMENTS-PHASE IILOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT A
CIP P2653F
C:
\
O
n
e
D
r
i
v
e
\
O
t
a
y
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
\
E
N
G
C
I
P
-
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
\
P
2
6
5
3
1
2
0
0
P
Z
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
\
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
-
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
-
S
t
a
f
f
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
.
m
x
d
0 730365
Feet
1200-1 PS/978-1RESERVOIR
CANTA LOMAS
VI
S
T
A
G
R
A
N
D
E
R
D
PENCE DR
V
I
S
T
A
S
I
E
R
R
A
D
R
!\
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
DIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
ÃÅ54
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ905
§¨¦805
CANTA LOMAS
VISTA
G
R
A
N
D
E
R
D
F
NTS
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: October 6, 2021
SUBMITTED BY: Michael J. Long Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2083-001103 P2562-001103 DIV. NO. 2
APPROVED BY: Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
Jose Martinez, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Final Contract Change Order No. 10 in an amount
not-to-exceed a reduction of ($127,413.00) to the Construction Contract with Pacific Hydrotech Corporation for the 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board) authorize the General Manager to execute the Final Contract Change Order No. 10 to the existing construction contract with Pacific
Hydrotech Corporation (PHC) in the reduced amount of ($127,413.00) for the 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Project (Project) (see Exhibits A and B for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to execute the Final Change Order No. 10 to reduce the existing PHC construction
contract in an amount not-to-exceed ($127,413.00) for the Project.
AGENDA ITEM 4
2
ANALYSIS:
The District’s existing High Head (870-1) and Low Head (571-1) Pump Stations constructed in 1962 and 1966, respectively, have reached the
end of their useful lives. The 870-2 Pump Station Project will replace these facilities and includes replacement of existing
Reservoir inlet/outlet piping, construction of recirculation system pumps, and a chloramine disinfection booster system. Improvements of the access road and the installation of utilities for electrical,
gas, sewer, and communication services are also included.
The 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Project also includes the replacement of the 571-1 Reservoir (36.7 MG) floating cover and liner. The 571-1 Reservoir was originally built in 1967. In 1993,
the District retrofitted the existing Reservoir to install a reservoir liner and floating cover. The existing liner and floating
cover were more than 24 years old and nearing the end of their useful lives. As part of the overall Project, the existing Reservoir outlet stub-out piping located beneath the Reservoir was replaced, which allows the new 870-2 Pump Station to simultaneously perform its primary function (pump from the 571-1 Reservoir to the 870-1
Reservoir), recirculate the 571-1 Reservoir, and achieve a future function (pump from the 571-1 Reservoir to the 624 Pressure Zone). The replacement of the cover and liner under this Project mitigates having to take this critical Reservoir out of service a second time within the next few years.
The demolition of the Low Head and High Head Pump Stations will be completed later (not part of this Project) when the new 870-2 Pump Station has been brought online and completed its warranty period.
At the July 5, 2017 Board Meeting, the Board awarded a construction contract in the amount of $16,925,900.00 to Pacific Hydrotech. Since
the award of the construction contract, nine (9) change orders have been approved.
Change Order No. 1, which totaled $26,269.83, compensated the contractor for changes associated with the 571-1 Reservoir cover and
liner improvements. These changes included provisions for additional cover buoyancy floats; replacement of existing unsalvageable batten bar anchor bolts; contractor reservoir disinfection in lieu of
contract specified District disinfection; weather related days; and an adjustment to the contract milestone date for the 571-1 Reservoir.
In total, Change Order No. 1 added twenty-seven (27) days to the contract.
3
Change Order No. 2, which totaled $48,698.12, compensated the
contractor for changes including the following: modifications to the new electric meter room to accommodate San Diego Gas & Electric accessibility requirements; modifications to provide two (2) 250-
gallon aqueous ammonia tanks in lieu of one (1) 550-gallon tank to better serve Station operations; provisions for two (2) 30-inch
magnetic flow meters in lieu of ultrasonic flow meters to provide more resiliency and flexibility with anticipated flow conditions; and repairs to an existing rectifier electrical conduit adjacent to the
access road. Change Order No. 2 also addressed contract time including weather days. In total, Change Order No. 2 added sixteen
(16) days to the contract.
Change Order No. 3, which totaled $64,864.00, compensated the
contractor for several changes including the following: modifications to the dimensions of the backup generator concrete
foundation pad; addition of structural support members for the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) equipment, and emergency generator muffler; revisions to the Stations louvers and associated masonry; installation of door louvers for the compressor room doors; increasing the discharge piping on the 570 zone
(recirculation) pumps to 18-inches; revisions to provide a sewn protective thermal insulation jacket with clips for the emergency generator muffler and exhaust piping; modifying the emergency generator exhaust roof penetration to simplify future muffler removal/servicing; and consolidation of exterior lighting controls in
a new contactor and control panel. Change Order No. 3 also addressed contract time including weather days. In total, Change Order No. 3 added twenty-five (25) days to the contract.
Change Order No. 4, which totaled $49,157.89, compensated the
contractor for several changes including the following: surge protection for indoor devices; additional pipe supports; spare engine
exhaust catalysts; modification to Victaulic couplings; and relocation of chemical analyzers. Change Order No. 4 also reconciled credits associated with the unused portions of the
Environmental/Regulatory Compliance and Reservoir Improvement Allowance items. Change Order No. 4 also addressed contract time
including weather days. In total, Change Order No. 4 added forty-four (44) days to the contract.
Change Order No. 5, which totaled $95,725.00, compensated the contractor for several changes including the following: profile and
alignment revisions to the 66-inch and 30-inch discharge yard piping and suction header elevation; modifications to the Type D emergency batteries and test switch locations; addition of a fuel containment
structure; providing position switches at the surge tank isolation valve; modifications to the thermal insulation for the pump engine
coolant line piping; fire rated door hardware at door D-12; addition
4
of bollards and a metal protective enclosure at the diesel fuel lines
entrance location to the Pump Station; revisions to the suction header platform handrail; revisions to the pump engine natural gas pipe sizes; modifications to the cable tray support; ethernet
communications to the pump engines; additional costs associated with dewatering existing vault No. 7; elevation and layout modifications
to the suction header walkway and engine platform structures; and credits for unused items. Change Order No. 5 also addressed contract time including weather days. In total, Change Order No. 5 added
thirty-eight (38) days to the contract.
Change Order No. 6, which totaled $40,125.89, compensated the contractor for several changes including the following: credits associated with revisions to chain link fencing; modifications to the
overhead crane electrical feed circuit; installation of flashing around pump engine exhaust canopy roof penetration; handrail and
steps at the fuel containment structure; incorporation of handwheels on all suction header valves; Type II gate well frames and lids; additional conduit between CP-100 and the telephone backboard; additional electrical grounding of the gas engines; custom grade adjustment for the oil interceptor; relocation of pump engine
batteries; and modifications to the planned hydroseed mix. Change Order No. 6 also addressed contract time including weather days. In total, Change Order No. 6 added twenty-seven (27) days to the contract.
Change Order No. 7, which totaled $60,567.00, compensated the contractor for several changes including the following: revisions to the ammonia alarm horn/beacon mounting location; provides for cathodic protection jumper wires at the meter vault and cathodic system retesting; installation of concrete curbs at unpaved access
road crossings; additional data communication and programming for chlorine analyzers; revisions to programming for pump emergency stop
buttons; installation of additional UPS receptacles; replacement of sodium hypochlorite and ammonia pressure switches; revisions to the trip rating of panel LP-2 main circuit breaker; modifications to the
site drainage at the Pump Station entrance; provides custom protective enclosures for fuel piping; provides type II gate well
frame/lid to provide tracer wire access. Change Order No. 7 also addressed contract time including weather days. In total, Change Order No. 7 added nine (9) days to the contract.
5
Change Order No. 8, which totaled $59,903.35, compensated the
contractor for several changes including the following: an additional valve and piping modifications at the 30-inch piping interconnection; installation of a storm drainpipe to convey stormwater from the new
V-ditch to the underground storm drain system; installation of a 1-inch AVAR and relocation of the 66-inch suction header pressure
transmitter assembly; additional signage in the pipe galley, chemicalrooms, and fuel containment area; drainage modifications to the metervault; additional V-ditches and concrete curb; delineation posts and
rock protection; engine canopy lighting and a meter vault flood alarmswitch; north access road grading and paving modifications; credit
for unused electrical and control systems allowance; credit forunused specialized equipment electrical connections allowance; creditfor unused agency permit fees allowance. Change Order No. 8 also
addressed contract time including weather days. In total, ChangeOrder No. 8 added forty-six (46) days to the contract.
Change Order No. 9, which totaled $117,045.51, compensated the contractor for several changes including the following: Exterior Gas Engine Driven Pump Systems P102 & P104: remove and re-install modified Victaulic connection spool between butterfly valve
and Cla-Val; install Romac ECF400 between pump discharge flange and heat exchanger; reinstall two (2) existing pipe stanchions beneath Cla-Val and install a new pipe support with strap beneath the heat exchanger; apply contractual coating system to all new piping and damaged existing coating materials.
Electrical Motor Driven Pump Systems P101 & P105: remove spool between the pump outlet flange and Cla-Val; modify length of spool between pump discharge flange and spool piece; install Romac ECF400 between pump discharge flange and heat exchanger; apply contractual coating system to all new piping and damaged existing coating
materials.
Final Contract Change Order No. 10, which is the subject of this staff report, reduces the contract amount by ($127,413.00) to a final contract amount of $17,360,843.59 to compensate the District for the
unanticipated construction management, staff, and pump expert expenses resulting from the delayed operation of the Pump Station
since the substantial completion was achieved on June 29, 2020.
As of August 25, 2021, the 870-2 Pump Station has passed the 7-day
testing requirement and has been accepted as 100% complete. Since achieving substantial completion on June 29, 2020, all repairs and
forensic analysis of pump systems defects are complete and confirm the long-term safety and reliability of the 870-2 Pump Station.
6
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP P2083, as approved in the FY 2021 budget, is $19,850,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast are $19,694,695. See Attachment B-1 for the budget detail.
The total budget for CIP P2562, as approved in the FY 2021 budget, is $2,900,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments, and forecast, including this contract, are $2,778,410. See Attachment B-
2 for the budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budgets, the Project Manager anticipates that the budget is sufficient to support the Project.
The Finance Department has determined that, under the current rate model, 100% of the funding is available from the Replacement Fund for
CIPs P2083 and P2562.
GRANTS/LOANS:
Engineering staff researched and explored grants and loans and found
none currently available for this Project.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
exceptional water and wastewater service to its customers, and to manage District resources in a transparent and fiscally responsible manner” and the District’s Vision, “To be a model water agency by providing stellar service, achieving measurable results, and continuously improving operational practices.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
MJL/RP:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2083 870-2 Pump Station Replacement\Staff Reports\BD 10-06-21 Pacific Hydrotech Change Order No 10\BD 10-06-21 Staff Report CO No 10 for the 870-2 PS.docx Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action Attachment B1 – P2083 Budget Detail Attachment B2 - P2562 Budget Detail Exhibit A – 870-2 Pump Station Project Location Exhibit B - 870-2 Pump Station Project Detail Map
Exhibit C – Change Order No. 10
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2083-001103 P2562-001103
Approval of Final Contract Change Order No. 10 in an amount not-to-exceed a reduction of ($127,413.00) to the
Construction Contract with Pacific Hydrotech Corporation for the 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee) reviewed this item at a Committee Meeting held on September 21, 2021. The Committee supported staff’s recommendation.
NOTE:
The “Committee Action” is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent to the Board as a Committee approved item or modified to reflect any discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
ATTACHMENT B-1 – P2083 Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2083-001103 P2562-001103
Approval of Final Contract Change Order No. 10 in an amount not-to-exceed a reduction of ($127,413.00) to the
Construction Contract with Pacific Hydrotech Corporation for the 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Project
8/24/2021
Budget
19,850,000
PlanningConsultant Contracts 53,611 53,611 - 53,611 HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL31,005 31,005 - 31,005 HELIX ENVIRONMNTL PLANNING INC17,094 17,094 - 17,094 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC211,296 211,296 - 211,296 ICF JONES & STOKES INCRegulatory Agency Fees 2,109 2,109 - 2,109 CA DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE720 720 - 720 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER1,570 1,570 - 1,570 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH3,924 3,924 - 3,924 STATE WATER RESOURCESService Contracts 2,260 2,260 - 2,260 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO164 164 - 164 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT505 505 - 505 THE SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNEStandard Salaries 233,775 233,775 - 233,775 Fixed Asset 580,444 580,444 - 580,444
Total Planning 1,138,478 1,138,478 - 1,138,478
Design 001102
Consultant Contracts 136 136 - 136 THE WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION
4,850 4,850 - 4,850 BURKETT & WONG ENGINEERS INC14,068 14,068 - 14,068 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL3,034 3,034 - 3,034 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY4,625 4,625 - 4,625 ROGER B WOODHULL22,149 22,149 - 22,149 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICAL AND10,484 10,484 - 10,484 HUNSAKER & ASSOCIATES6,086 6,086 - 6,086 HDR ENGINEERING INC682,870 682,870 - 682,870 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC7,974 7,974 - 7,974 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INCRegulatory Agency Fees 3,694 3,694 - 3,694 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC18,348 18,348 - 18,348 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGOService Contracts 98 98 - 98 DAILY JOURNAL CORPORATIONStandard Salaries 677,054 677,054 - 677,054 Supplier Contracts 5,350 5,350 - 5,350 INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS INC
Total Design 1,460,820 1,460,820 - 1,460,820
ConstructionConstruction Contracts 790 790 - 790 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC14,206,343 14,206,343 - 14,206,343 PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION(127,413) (127,413) (127,413) PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION CO No. 1741,845 741,845 - 741,845 PACIFIC WESTERN BANKConsultant Contracts 16,270 16,270 - 16,270 ALYSON CONSULTING437,691 425,389 12,302 437,691 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC1,319 1,319 - 1,319 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICAL AND10,240 10,240 - 10,240 NV5 INC83,341 83,341 - 83,341 ON-SITE TECHNICAL SVCS INC
17,623 17,623 - 17,623 RBF CONSULTING
1,038,300 1,038,300 - 1,038,300 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INC
438 438 - 438 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICAL
For Ops Only - Contracted Services 1,375 1,375 - 1,375 LYNN'S LOCKSMITH SERVICE
INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT & MA 1,281 1,281 - 1,281 MALLORY SAFETY & SUPPLY LLC
OTHER AGENCY FEES 339,493 339,493 - 339,493 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
Parking and Tolls 29 29 - 29 PETTY CASH CUSTODIANProfessional Legal Fees 276 276 - 276 ARTIANO SHINOFF280 280 - 280 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFFRegulatory Agency Fees 11,758 11,758 - 11,758 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGOSecurity Services 41,112 41,112 - 41,112 WATCHLIGHT CORPORATIONService Contracts 3,628 3,628 - 3,628 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC119 119 - 119 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPTStandard Salaries 269,260 269,260 - 269,260
Total Construction 17,095,397 17,210,508 (115,111) 17,095,397
Grand Total 19,694,695 19,809,806 (115,111) 19,694,695
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water Districtp2083-PS - 870-2 Pump Station Repl
Committed Expenditures Outstanding Commitment & Forecast
Projected Final Cost
ATTACHMENT B-2 – P2562 Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2083-001103 P2562-001103
Approval of Final Contract Change Order No. 10 in an amount not-to-exceed a reduction of ($127,413.00) to the
Construction Contract with Pacific Hydrotech Corporation for the 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Project
8/24/2021
Budget
2,900,000
Planning
Regulatory Agency Fees 50 50 - 50 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Total Planning 50 50 - 50
Design 001102Mileage Reimbursement 14 14 - 14 PETTY CASH CUSTODIANStandard Salaries 51,320 51,320 - 51,320
Total Design 51,333 51,333 - 51,333
Construction
Construction Contracts 206 206 - 206 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC
2,414,577 2,414,577 - 2,414,577 PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION
125,493 125,493 - 125,493 PACIFIC WESTERN BANKConsultant Contracts 36,583 36,583 - 36,583 ALYSON CONSULTING129,300 129,300 - 129,300 MICHAEL BAKER INT'L INCStandard Salaries 20,869 20,869 - 20,869
Total Construction 2,727,026 2,727,026 - 2,727,026
Grand Total 2,778,410 2,778,410 - 2,778,410
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
p2562-Res - 571-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replac
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final Cost
OTAY WATER DISTRICT870-2 PUMP STATIONLOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT A
CIP P2083F
P:
\
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
\
C
I
P
P
2
0
8
3
8
7
0
-
2
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
\
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
-
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
,
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
p
,
M
a
y
2
0
1
6
.
m
x
d
ROLLRESERVOIR(571-1)
LOW HEADPUMP STATION
HIGH HEADPUMPSTATION
FOR PROJECT DETAILSEE EXHIBIT B
ACCESS FROMALTA RD
OWD PROPERTY LINE(APPROX)
FirearmsTrainingFacility
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
!\
?ò
Aä
?Ë
;&s
?p F
0 250125
Feet
OTAY WATER DISTRICT870-2 PUMP STATIONPROJECT DETAIL MAP
EXHIBIT B
CIP P2083F
P:
\
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
\
C
I
P
P
2
0
8
3
8
7
0
-
2
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
\
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
-
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
,
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
t
a
i
l
M
a
p
,
M
a
y
2
0
1
6
.
m
x
d
0 10050
Feet
Legend
ExistingEasementOWD
ExistingParcelOWD
ExistingEasementSDGE
ProposedStructure
ProposedWater
ProposedStormDrain
ProposedSewer
ProposedGas
ProposedSiteCivil
ExistingWaterOWD
C!r(D
OTAY WATER DISTRICT 2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BLVD, SPRING VALLEY, CA. 91978, (619) 670-2222
CONTRACT/P.O. CHANGE ORDER No. 1 0
PROJECT/ITEM: 870-2 Pump Station Replacement
CONTRACTORNENDOR: Pacific Hydrotech Corporation REF.CIP No.: P2083/P2562
APPROVED BY: Board REF. P.O. No: 720067
DESCRIPTION:
DATE: 8/27/21
Charges attributable to the 870-2 PS (CIP 2083). This Change Order provides for reimbursement of additional District costs associated with an extended Process Operational Testing Period resulting from multiple pump system failures.
REASON: Subsequent to commencing the specified Process Operational Testing Period multiple substantial pump failures occurred. Four of these failures required removal of the pump system for repair and replacement at manufacturer facilities resulting in significant time impacts to the prescribed 7-day testing period and additional District expenditures for staff and consultants including specialists in rotating equipment, vibration and forensic failure analysis to determine probable causes, provide opinions and validate manufacturer repair and replacement work. This Change Order is necessary to allow the District to recover the additional expenditures resulting from the multiple substantial pump failures.
CHANGE P.O. TO READ: Revise Contract to deduct $127,413.00 and add O days time for a total Contract amount of $17,360,843.59 with a Contract Duration of 1070 Calendar Days.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT/P.O. AMOUNT:
ADJUSTED AMOUNT FROM PREVIOUS CHANGE:
TOTAL COST OF THIS CHANGE ORDER:
NEW CONTRACT/P.O. AMOUNT IS:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
CONTRACT/P.O. TIME AFFECTED BY THIS CHANGE:
REVISED CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
$ 16,925,900.00
$ 562,356.59
$ (127,413.00)
$ 1 t,360,843.59 10/4/19
No
6/30/20
IT IS UNDERSTOOD WITH THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS, THAT THE CONTRACTORNENDOR IS AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO MAKE THE HEREIN DESCRIBED CHANGES. IT IS ALSO AGREED THAT THE TOTAL COST FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER CONSTITUTES FULL AND COMPLETE COMPENSATION FOR OBLIGATIONS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT/P.O. ALL OTHER PROVISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT/P.O. REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
STAFF APPROVALS:
SIGNATURE· � PROJ. MGR: � DATE: S/1/21
NAME: =-Da::.cv=id....:.P..;;.ow.;.;.;e:c.:.r ____________ DIV MGR: ?1/�ZoATE: �,/Cffoo2...,)
TITLE: Project Manager DATE: �/yfz/ CHIEF:___________ DATE: ___ _
COMPANY & Pacific Hydrotech Corporal/on ADDRESS: 314 E. 3'" Street DISTRICT APPROVAL:
Perris. CA 92570 GEN. MANAGER: __________ DATE: ___ _
COPIES: □ FILE (Orig.), □ CONTRACTORNENDOR. □ CHIEF-ENGINEERING, D CHIEF-FINANCE, □ ENGR. MGR. D ACCTS PAYABLE, D INSPECTION, D PROJ MGR., □ ENGR SECRETARY, □PURCHASING, □ PROJECT BINDER
EXHIBIT C
P2083 & P2562-001103
C.O. AMOUNT BY DATE DESCRIPTION TYPE C.O.
1 $ 26,269.83 Chief 5/18/2018
Additional buoyancy floats in reservoir; replace existing to be reused anchor bolts,
disinfect reservoir for water quality testing and weather days Lump Sum
2 $ 48,698.12 Chief 1/29/2019
Electric service room modifications; ammonia storage modifications; replace ultrasonic
flow meters with magnetic type; Relocate existing rectifier power conduit and weather
days
Lump Sum
3 $ 64,864.00 Board 4/3/2019
Provide bathroom finishes; increase size of generator foundation; provide additional
HVAC supports, add pilasters for louver relocation; add compressor room louvers;
increase 570-zone discharge piping; emergency generator jacket insulation betterment;
exhaust roof penetration detail modification; lighting controls modification and weather
days
Lump Sum
4 $ 49,157.89 Board 11/7/2019
Cathodic system modifications; HVAC modifications; additional 4-inch irrigation valve;
indoor devices surge protection; surge tank concrete foundation modifications; Type G
LED exit light fixture mount modifications; chemical resistant coating in chemical
rooms; lighting controller modifications; additional pipe supports in the pump room; add
EF-4 to pump room; spare exhaust catalyst and add make-up oil storage tanks;
increase size of Victaulic couplings; add Type A light fixture to electrical service
entrance room; incorporate two new prima roof drains and overflow drains; relocate
HVAC ductwork in electric room; reorientation of electrical busway in emergency
generator room; relocation of chemical analyzers; add 2-inch pressure reducing valves;
add disassembly flanges on pump engine coolant piping; add cove base in restroom;
add flexible connection for engine coolant and gas piping to pump engines; add support
gussets on aluminum platform above the suction piping; add 1-hour fire labeling at the
generator room interior door; weather and bid item quantity adjustments
Lump Sum
5 $ 95,725.00 Board 2/6/2020
Suction piping revisions; type D emergency batteries and test switch locations; fuel
containment structure; position switches at surge tank isolation valve; thermal
insulation for pump engine coolant line piping; door D-12 fire rated door hardware;
protective enclosure for diesel fuel lines; suction header platform handrail modifications;
natural gas engine piping modifications; cable tray support modification; ethernet
communication to pump engines; vault 7 dewatering; AVAR piping connection material
changes; suction header platform modifications; weather and bid item quantity
adjustments
Lump Sum
6 $ 40,125.89 Board 4/1/2020
Fencing revisions; overhead crane electrical feed changes; pump engine exhaust
penetration; handrail and steps at fuel containment; suction header valve handwheels;
gate well frames/lids; conduit between CP-100 and backboard; gas engine electrical
grounding; oil interceptor grade adjustment; relocate pump engine batteries; change
hydroseed mix and density
Lump Sum
7 $ 60,567.00 Board 6/9/2020
Ammonia Alarm Mounting; Meter Vault Cathodic Revisions; Concrete Curbs; Chlorine
Analyzer Data/Comm Mods; Pump Estop Revisions; CP-100 UPS Outlets; Chemical
Pressure Switch Revisions; LP-2 Panel Trip Rating Revision; Entrance Drainage Mod;
Fuel Pipe Protective Enclosure; Gate Well Frame/Lid for Cathodic
Lump Sum
8 $ 59,903.35 Board 10/8/2020
Additional Interconnect Valve; Add 'l Storm Drain Pipe; Relocate Pressure xmiter and
AVAR; Add 'l signage & Display Cover; Meter Vault Drainage Mods; Add 'l V-Ditches
and curb/gutter; Delineation Posts and Rock Protection; Engine Canopy Lighting,
Convenience Outlets, Meter Vault Flood Alarm; North Access Road Grading and
Paving Mods, Bid Item Reconciliation
Lump Sum
9 $117,045.51 Board 5/11/2021 Install equipment connection fittings on P101, P102, P104, P015 Lump Sum
10 ($127,413.00) Board
Reimbursement for additional District costs associated with multiple pump failures
during the Process Operational Period.Lump Sum
Total C.O.'s To Date: $434,943.59 2.6%
Original Contract Amount:$16,925,900.00
Current Contract Amount:$17,360,843.59
Change Order Breakdown for the Month:
Month Net C.O.$ Limit Authorization Absolute C.O.$ Absolute C.O. %
9/21 $0.00 $5,000/5% PM/Supervisor $0.00 0.0%
$10,000/10% Manager $0.00 0.0%
$15,000/20% Chief $0.00 0.0%
$50,000/30%GM $0.00 0.0%
CHANGE ORDER LOG
870-2 Pump Station (P2083 & P2562)
APPROVED
1
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: October 6, 2021
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
SUBMITTED BY: Michael Kerr, Information Technology Manager
APPROVED BY: Adolfo Segura, Chief of Administrative Services
Jose Martinez, General Manager
SUBJECT: FY21 YEAR-END REPORT FOR THE DISTRICT’S FY19-22 STRATEGIC PLAN
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation. This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see “Attachment A”.
PURPOSE:
To provide a year-end report of the District’s FY19-22 Strategic
Performance Plan for FY21.
ANALYSIS:
Summary
The current Otay Water District Strategic Plan is a four-year plan
ranging from the start of FY19 through the end of FY22. This report
details the year-end results for the third year of our four-year program.
Objectives – Target 90%
Strategic Plan objectives are designed to ensure the District executes
mission-developed strategies and makes appropriate changes necessary to
guide the agency, meet new challenges, and positively adapt to change.
FY21 year-end results are below target at 86%, with 44 of 51 active
items completed or on schedule, one (1) objective is behind, and six
(6) objectives are on hold.
AGENDA ITEM 5
2
Objective Behind (1)
CUSTOMER
Strategy #2: Assess and enhance communications tools and increase online
presence and social media exposure.
Objective: Assess communication tools (social media presence).
Staff is finalizing two (2) surveys to assist in analyzing
the District's website. The first survey asks other agencies what
technologies they use for their websites, and the second is to gather
feedback from the public on the District’s current website. Staff was
unable to launch these surveys in the third and fourth quarters because
staff focused on COVID-19-related legislation and relief, but will
distribute the surveys in the first quarter of FY22.
Objectives on Hold (6):
CUSTOMER
Strategy #1: Enhance and build awareness and engagement among the
District’s customers and stakeholders, and within the San Diego Region
of the District’s strategies, policies, projects, programs, and
legislative/regulatory issues.
Objective: Ensure consistency of branding and representation across the
District, using consistent logos, colors, messaging, communications
tools, and other collaterals through enhancement of internal and external
marketing materials.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
44
1
6
1
On Schedule/Completed Behind On Hold Not Started
44 of 51 Active Objectives are On Target (86%)
3
COVID-19-related outreach was a priority for staff. Unfortunately, due
to budget cuts, the objective was placed on hold and assuming budget
availability, this objective will resume in FY22 or FY23. Staff will
continue to ensure the District is using essential branding
consistently, wherever possible.
FINANCIAL
Strategy #3: Enhancement of business systems.
Objective: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
This objective was placed on hold in the first quarter due to COVID-
19.The project is scheduled to resume in FY22.
Objective: Evaluate enhancements to, or replacement, of the rate model
program.
Due to the District's current litigation, this goal has been put on
hold.
INTERNAL BUSINESS PROCESSES
Strategy #2: Enhance customer experience (collaboration between Customer
Service and Communications).
Objective: Customer Information System (CIS)/Customer Relationship
Management (CRM) validation and replacement evaluation.
This objective was placed on hold in the first quarter due to COVID-
19.The project is scheduled to resume in FY22.
Strategy #9: Enhancement of the Confined Space Program.
Objective: Automate confined space regulatory and work forms (electronic
conversion), add confined space data layer in the District’s enterprise
Geographic Information System (GIS), and use data to electronically
automate the District’s confined space inventory.
Pending the hire of a new Safety and Security Specialist, this
objective was placed on hold in the third quarter. The position was
filled in June 2021, and the objective will resume in FY22.
Strategy #10: Optimize District’s Hazardous Waste Operations and
Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) and Confined Space Rescue Team.
Objective: Certify program at Industry State Level and under the Incident
Command System, streamline chlorine gas and confined space rescue
4
training, operations, and response, and convert inventory lists and
equipment logs to electronic form.
Pending the hire of a new Safety and Security Specialist, this
objective was placed on hold in the third quarter. The position was
filled in June 2021 and the objective will resume in FY22.
Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) – Target 75%
KPI’s are designed to track the District’s day-to-day performance. These
indicators measure the effectiveness and efficiency of essential
operational services. The District’s overall goal of 75% is considered
“on target”. For FY21, year-end results are above target at 90%, with 38
of 42 items achieving the desired level or better.
KPI’s are based on established AWWA performance benchmarks, water agency
standards, and historical trends. Seven (7) measures are reported at
year’s end:
•Water Debt Coverage
•Sewer Debt Coverage
•Reserve Level
•Accounts Per FTE
•Leak Detection Program
•Injury Incident Rate
•Enterprise Technology Services
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
38
4
On Target Not on Target
38 of 42 Key Performance Indicators are On Target (90%)
5
KPI’s Not on Target (4):
Overtime Percentage
Target: Less than 100% of the budgeted overtime per quarter
Year-to-date overtime amounted to $167,889 vs. the budgeted amount of
$158,500. Fourth-quarter results were below target ($39,235 actuals vs.
$43,400 budgeted); however, the year-to-date overtime variance was
primarily driven by main breaks in the first and third quarters.
Planned Recycled Water Maintenance Ratio in $
Target: 70% of all labor dollars spent on preventative maintenance per
quarter.
Year-to-date, 55% of labor dollars were spent on preventative
maintenance. However, the target was not met due to unplanned repairs at
the Treatment Plant in the third quarter (internal coolant leak on
effluent pump #1) and repairs associated with the 20-inch recycled main
break in the fourth quarter.
Direct Cost of Treatment per MGD
Target: No more than $1,050 per million gallons spent on wastewater.
Year-to-date expenditures on wastewater treatment per million gallons
was $1,374.69 vs. the annual target of $1,050. Fourth-quarter results
were on target ($895.37 actual vs. $900 target); however, the year-to-
date target was not met. The Treatment Plant facility was off-line for
planned CIP work (Force Main Air-Vac repairs and Filter Storage Tank re-
coating) from November 2020 through February 2021.
Sewer Overflow Rate (AWWA)
Target & AWWA: Zero (0) overflows per quarter.
The year-to-date target was not met due to one sewage overflow in the
first quarter caused by root intrusion on top of a manhole upstream of
MH-354-074. The collection system in this area was inspected with CCTV
and flushed to ensure that all debris was located and removed.
Next Steps
Staff will continue to execute the plan’s objectives and key performance
indicators and track emerging trends.
Committee Reports – Slideshow
The Strategic Plan results are presented to both the Finance &
6
Administration, and the Engineering, Operations, & Water Resources
Committee with a specific focus on the most relevant information for
each Committee (see “Attachment B”).
Strategic Plan is available on the Board VPN
The Strategic Plan results and associated details are provided in a real-
time, interactive web-based application available to the Board via
secured remote access, VPN (Virtual Private Network). The District
Secretary can facilitate any password or access issues.
FISCAL IMPACT:Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Informational item only; no fiscal impact.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Strategic Plan and Performance Measure reporting is a critical element
in providing performance reporting to the Board and staff.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A – Committee Action Report
Attachment B – PowerPoint Presentation
7
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: FY21 YEAR-END REPORT FOR THE DISTRICT’S FY19-22 STRATEGIC
PLAN
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations & Water Resources and Finance &
Administration Committees reviewed this item at meetings held on
September 21 and 22, 2021, respectively. The Committees support
presentation to the full Board for their consideration.
NOTE:
The “Committee Action” is written in anticipation of the Committee moving
the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent to the
Board as a committee approved item or modified to reflect any discussion
or changes as directed from the committee prior to presentation to the
full Board.
FY21 Year-End Report
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
FY19-22 STRATEGIC PLAN
ATTACHMENT B
Contoso
Pharmaceuticals
Employee growth/ RetentionFinancial Results and
Growth
Increase Customer Satisfaction/Engagement Improve Operational
Efficiency
CUSTOMER FINANCIAL
INTERNAL
BUSINESS
PROCESS
LEARNING
& GROWTH
2
86%
44 Objectives
TRENDS
ON TARGET/COMPLETED
OVERALL TARGET
90%
TOTAL OBJECTIVES52
NOT ON TARGET
OBJECTIVES
ON HOLD
2%
1 Objectives
12%
6 Objectives
75%
85%
95%
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21
NOT STARTED1
RESULT TARGET
ACTIVE
LEARNING AND GROWTH
CUSTOMER
FINANCIAL
INTERNAL BUSINESS
PROCESSES
51
44/51 = 86%6/51 = 12%
3
1/51 = 2%
C01. Enhance and build awareness and engagement among the District’s customers and stakeholders and within the San Diego Region of the District’s strategies, policies, projects, programs, and legislative/regulatory issues
Continue implementation of and enhance the District’s community and business outreach, media, and government relations programs
*Ensure consistency of branding and representation across theDistrict, using consistent logos, colors, messaging, communicationstools, and other collaterals through enhancement of internal andexternal marketing materials
Evaluate and enhance the District’s water conservation programs
CUSTOMER | 4
C02. Assess and enhance communications tools and increase online presence and social media exposure
*Assess communication tools (social media presence)
*Objective placed on hold due to COVID-19
4
Steve Beppler
Sr. Civil Engineer
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
*Objective not on target due to COVID-19
F01. Integrated resource planning and facility optimization
Recycled water long-term business plan
South District Potable Water Supply Alternatives to San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) Pipeline 4 Supply Interruption (catastrophic event)
Treatment Plant long-term business plan (sewer portion)
F02. Evaluation of key system alternatives and financial impact
Conduct desalination (Rosarito) financial analysis
In support of the Engineering Department, conduct recycled water and sewer business financial analysis
FINANCIAL | 19
5
Luis Enriquez
Pump Mechanic II
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
F03. Enhancement of business systems
*Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) validation and replacement evaluation
Evaluate, and if beneficial, implement cloud-based payroll service
Evaluate enhancements to, or replacement, of the rate model program
Implement Paperless Account Payable (AP) solution
Re-evaluate prior payroll solutions and identify any new cloud-based payroll solutions
Complete a sewer cost of service study and recommend a rate structure that will provide for more stable sewer revenues
Evaluate the Capacity and New Water Supply Fees, including an update of applicable costs, and, if possible, recommend a fee structure that is more efficient and effective than the current structure
*Objective has been placed on hold due to COVID-19.
FINANCIAL | 19
(cont’d)
6
Jeff GoinDisinfection Technician
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
F04. Enhancement of the Asset Management (AM) and Capital Improvement Programs (CIP)
Enhancement of the framework for systematic development, validation, and implementation of new CIPs
Enhancements of the AM Program
Financial activity-based cost cross-training
In support of the Engineering Department, enhance financial impact forecasting and analysis of future CIPs
F05. Develop alternative Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) financing strategy to fund ahead of PERS schedule
Optimize funding and liability schedule
FINANCIAL | 19
(cont’d)
F06. Negotiate and implement a new labor agreement and optimize employee benefit programs
Negotiate and implement new labor agreement
Review Deferred Compensation Program for reduced fees and streamlined approach and ensure offerings are fully utilized
7
Lisa Coburn-BoydEnvironmental Compliance Specialist
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
I01. Optimize meter activity operations
Evaluation of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) technology
Explore web-based options for meter reading and backflow test entry
Optimize Global Positioning System (GPS) fleet assignment and routing operation
I02. Enhance customer experience (collaboration between Customer Service and Communications)
Customer electronic communication and outreach
*Customer Information System (CIS)/ CustomerRelationship Management (CRM) validation andreplacement evaluation
8
*Objective has been placed on hold due to COVID-19.
Shannon Coffin
Meter Services Supervisor
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
INTERNAL BUSINESS
PROCESS | 27 (cont’d)
I03. Evaluate and leverage the use of available Human Resources self-service and capital management technology solutions
Evaluate on-boarding programs and implement, if determined necessary
Implement Human Resource Information System (HRIS) in coordination with payroll conversion
Pilot cloud-based human capital performance management system and implement, if determined necessary
I04. Maintain a reliable, scalable, secure, and high-performing technology infrastructure to support current and future service needs
Adopt National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cyber security framework and enhance disaster recovery planning
Advance business processes and operational efficiencies through effective implementation of information technology
Create framework to evaluate cost efficiency of new technology services and cloud vs. on-premise selection
Deploy next generation storage services and communication architecture
9 ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
Theresa KreinbringBusiness Systems Analyst
INTERNAL BUSINESS
PROCESS | 27 (cont’d)
I05. Enhance SCADA system services via SCADA roadmap project
Prioritize fourteen strategic project/initiatives, recently developed
I06. Enhancement of enterprise geographic data
Deploy ArcGIS Pro for 3D analysis
Evaluate the use of Drone2Map technology for asset, field inspections,
and condition assessment
Migrate Geographic Information System (GIS) data structure from geometric network to utility dashboard
Standardization of District asset data and collection processINTERNAL BUSINESS
PROCESS | 27 (cont’d)
10
Alex Schultz
GIS Technician
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
I07. Enhancement of maintenance and program standards
Analyze electric energy-saving programs as they become available
Evaluate the effectiveness of various methods to reduce nitrification events
Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the District’s valve exercise preventative maintenance including proposed recommendations
Evaluate the impacts as a result of recent and upcoming regulatory changes including, but not limited to, Air Pollution Control District (APCD), State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), etc.
Establish an access and defensible space vegetation mitigation program with maintenance schedules for District remote facilities, access roads, and off-road appurtenances
I08. Enhancement of contracting and facility services
Enhance Customer and Public Service security in public lobby areas
Evaluate feasibility of incorporating electric and hybrid vehicles into District fleet
Streamline contract and purchase order (contract) management and lifecycle
11
Tyrese Powell-Slotterbeck
Reclamation Plant Operator II
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
INTERNAL BUSINESS
PROCESS | 27 (cont’d)
I09. Enhancement of the Confined Space Program
Automate confined space regulatory and work forms (electronic conversion), add confined space data layer in the District’s enterprise Geographic Information System (GIS), and use data to electronically automate the District’s confined space inventory
I10. Optimize District’s Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) Confined Space Rescue Team
Certify program at Industry State Level and under the Incident Command System, streamline chlorine gas and confined space rescue training, operations, and response and convert inventory lists and equipment logs to electronic form
12
Leonel Torres
GIS Analyst
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
INTERNAL BUSINESS
PROCESS | 27 (cont’d)
L01. Enhance Leadership and employee training programs, and knowledge transfer process
Continue development of leadership and District-wide training programs
Review and enhance knowledge transfer process to ensure retention of District knowledge (FY22 Q1)
LEARNING AND
GROWTH | 2
13
Rosemary DriesSr. Human Resources Analyst
ON TARGET NOT ON TARGET ON HOLD COMPLETED NOT STARTED
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 LEARNING AND GROWTH
CUSTOMERTRENDS
ON TARGET
KEY PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
FINANCIAL
OVERALL TARGET
INTERNAL BUSINESS
PROCESSES
75%
TOTAL KPIs
42
REPORTED QUARTERLY
35 REPORTED ANNUALLY7
10%
4 KPIs
NOT ON TARGET
90%38 KPIs
RESULT TARGET
4/42 = 10%38/42= 90%
14
98.38%98.43%98.55%
90%
91%
92%
93%
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
ANSWER RATE
Target: 97% average answer rate per quarter annually
Calculation: Number of all calls answered/Number of all calls received
15
TARGET
Kris Holden, Customer Service Rep II, answering a customer call.
3.55 3.51
4.50
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
TECHNICAL QUALITY COMPLAINT (AWWA)
(Customer Service)
Target & AWWA: No more than 7.1 complaints per 1000 customer accounts annually
75th Percentile for population served between 100,001-500,000 (combined utilities)
Calculation: Number of technical quality complaints per year/Number of active customer accounts per reporting period
Peter Grable, Water Systems Operator I,at the 850-2 Pump Station testing water for
chlorine and calibrating analyzers based on the result.
16
TARGET & AWWA BENCHMARK
100%100%100%
90%
95%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
POTABLE WATER COMPLIANCE RATE (AWWA)
(Water Operations)
Target & AWWA: 100% of all health-related drinking water standards per quarter annually
75th Percentile for population served between 100,001-500,000 (water)
Calculation: Number of days the primary health regulations are met/Number of days in the reporting period
17
TARGET & AWWA BENCHMARK
104.8%
87.3%
111.0%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
TARGET
CIP PROJECT EXPENDITURES VS. BUDGET
Target: 95% of budget but not to exceed 100% annually
Calculation: Actual Expenditures/Annual budget
18
850-1 Reservoir Completed Exterior Coating
3.1%
5.6%
4.4%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER INCIDENCE
Target: No more than 5% annually
Calculation: Total cost of Change Orders (not including allowances)/Total original construction contract amount (not including allowances)
Temporary Lower Otay Pump Station Perimeter Fence Installation
19
TARGET
$548.00
$545.00 $545.00
$530
$535
$540
$545
$550
$555
$560
$565
$570
$575
$580
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
O&M COST PER ACCOUNT
Target: Less than $575.00 per account annually (based on Operating budget)
Calculation: Total operations O&M costs/Number of accounts
Allan Raymundo, Lead Customer Service Field Representative, collecting meter reads for a
residential neighborhood in Spring Valley.
TARGET
20
BILLING ACCURACY
(Customer Service)
Target: 99.8% billing accuracy per quarter annually
Calculation: Number of correct bills/Total number of bills during the reporting period
21
Dana Gutierrez, Customer Service Rep II, reviewing integrity checks to ensure billing accuracy.
99.94%99.99%99.99%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
101%
2019 2020 2021
TARGET
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
129%
72%
106%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
105%
110%
115%
120%
125%
130%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
OVERTIME PERCENTAGE
Target: Less than 100% of budgeted overtime per quarter annually (based on Operating budget and historical trends;
FY21 Overtime budget is $182,300)
Calculation: Actual overtime costs (including comp time)/Budgeted overtime costs
Utility Maintenance staff completing a service replacement
(left to right: German Garcia and Silas Hess).
22
TARGET
3
5 5
0
5
10
15
20
25
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
SEWER RATE RANKING
Calculation: Ranking for the average monthly sewer bill
Amy Pinion,Accountant,reviewing sewer rate ranking information.
Target: Bottom 50th percentile for the 28 sewer service providers in San Diego
(Otay ranks 5th out of 28 sewer service providers)
23
TARGET
3
5 5
0
5
10
15
20
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
WATER RATE RANKING
Calculation: Ranking for the average monthly water bill among CWA member agencies
Target: Bottom 50th percentile for the 22 member agencies in San Diego
(Otay ranks 5th out of 22 member agencies)
Hannah Tamjidi, Finance Department Assistant, preparing the budget book.
24
TARGET
165%
188%
272%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
220%
240%
260%
280%
300%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
WATER DEBT COVERAGE RATIO
Target: 150% excluding growth revenue annually
TARGET
25
Calculation: Qualified net operating revenues/Debt service requirements
458-2 Reservoir Tank
1241%
371%
50%
250%
450%
650%
850%
1050%
1250%
1450%
2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
SEWER DEBT COVERAGE RATIO
Target: 150% excluding growth revenue annually
TARGET
26
Calculation: Qualified net operating revenues/Debt service requirements
Brandon Perry, Senior Utility Worker/Equipment Operator,holding a CCTV camera,
which is used to inspect the District’s collection system.
RESERVE LEVEL
100%100%
85%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
Target: No less than 85% annually
(Otay Water District has 7 reserve funds)
TARGET
27
Calculation: Number of reserve funds that meet or exceed fund target levels/Total number of reserve funds
Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer, discussing budget with staff.
ACCOUNTS PER FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE (FTE)
Annual Measure: 407 accounts per FTE annually
Calculation: Potable + Recycled + Sewer Accounts/Number of FTEs
Raisa Arias, Permit Technician, reviewing mylars for a project.
410 410
408
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
28
*Annual measure
78.67%80.47%82.71%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PERCENT OF CUSTOMERS PAYING BILLS ELECTRONICALLY
Target: No less than 75% per quarter annually
Calculation: Number of customers paying bills electronically/Total number of customers
District customer making an online bill payment.
29
TARGET
3.6%3.8%3.9%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM LOSS
Target: Less than 5%of unaccounted water annually
30
TARGET
Calculation: Volume purchased from CWA, City of San Diego & RWCTP Production –volume sold to customers + volume used by
District/Volume purchased from CWA, City of San Diego & RWCTP Production
Stephen Martinez, Lead Meter Maintenance/Cross Connection Worker,
testing a large water meter to ensure accuracy.
74%
77%
66%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PLANNED POTABLE WATER MAINTENANCE RATIO IN $
Target: 66% of all labor costs spent on preventative maintenance per quarter annually
Calculation: Total Planned Maintenance Cost/Total Maintenance Cost
31
TARGET
Silas Hess, Sr. Utility Worker/Equipment Operator,connecting a customer’s meter after
pulling a new copper service.
74%
70%
55%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PLANNED RECYCLED WATER MAINTENANCE RATIO IN $
Target: 70% of all labor costs spent on preventative maintenance per quarter annually
32
TARGET
Calculation: Total Planned Maintenance Cost/Total Maintenance Cost
680/944 Recycled Pump Station
84%
92%93%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PLANNED WASTEWATER MAINTENANCE RATIO IN $
Target: 77% of all labor costs spent on preventative maintenance per quarter annually
Calculation: Total Planned Maintenance Cost/Total Maintenance Cost
Aerial view of the Ralph W. Chapman Recycling Plant
33
TARGET
$1,071.66
$996.29
$1,374.69
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
DIRECT COST OF TREATMENT PER MGD
Calculation: Total O&M costs directly attributable to sewer treatment/Total volume in MG for one quarter
34
Target: No more than $1,050 per MGD spent on wastewater treatment annually
TARGET
Rob Leigh, Lead Reclamation Plant Operator, checking clarity and particulates of a
final effluent sample.
LEAK DETECTION PROGRAM
Target: 20% of system surveyed for leaks annually
20%20%20%
0%
10%
20%
30%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
Calculation: Miles of potable pipe surveyed/Total miles of potable pipe
The District’s contractor lowering a See Snake to begin assessment on
a 14” main above Sweetwater Lake.
TARGET
35
INJURY INCIDENT RATE
Target: No more than 4.1 injury incidents per 200,000 hours worked annually
(based on Department of Labor average for similar-size water agencies)
4.4
2.9
2.1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
TARGET
36
Calculation: (Number of recordable injuries/illnesses x 200,000 average hours worked)/total hours
employees worked
Utility Maintenance staff entering an excavation to complete a service replacement
(left to right: David Rocha and Silas Hess).
ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES AVAILABILITY
Target: No less than 99.5% availability
99.5%99.5%99.5%
90%
91%
92%
93%
94%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
Calculation: 3.60 hours of downtime per month/ 1.83 days per year
TARGET
37
Michael Christensen, Network Engineer, monitoring servers in the District’s data center.
99.96%100.00%100.00%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
MARK-OUT ACCURACY
Target: 100% mark-out accuracy per quarter annually
Calculation: Number of mark-outs performed without an at-fault hit, which is damage to a District facility that results from a
missing or erroneous mark-out/Total number of mark-outs
Gus Gracia, Sr. Utility Locator, conducting a mark-out.
38
TARGET
37.0 37.3
32.0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PROJECT CLOSEOUT TIME
Target: 45-day average annually
Calculation: Number of days between NOSC and NOC for all construction projects within the quarter/
Number of construction projects within the quarter
39
TARGET
Ralph W. Chapman Reclamation Facility Recycled Water Storage Tank
100.00%100.00%100.00%
95%
96%
97%
98%
99%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
ANNUAL RECYCLED WATER SITE INSPECTIONS
Target: 100% of recycled sites inspected annually
(125 recycled water sites scheduled for FY21)
Calculation: Cumulative percentage of recycled water sites inspected per quarter of those required by DEH
40
TARGET
Juan Tamayo, Recycled Water Program Supervisor, at a recycled water site in Chula Vista.
100%
96%
100%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
Calculation: Cumulative percentage of recycled site shutdown tests performed per year compared to those scheduled
RECYCLED WATER SHUTDOWN TESTING
Target: 90% of recycled site shutdown tests performed annually
(61 recycled water sites scheduled for shutdown in FY21, 90% = 55 sites)
41
Tanya Ayala-Mason, Recycled Water Specialist, conducting a shutdown test at
Veterans Elementary in Chula Vista.
TARGET
129%
188%
111%
50%
70%
90%
110%
130%
150%
170%
190%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
EASEMENT EVALUATION AND FIELD INSPECTION
Target: 100% assigned easements, evaluated via desktop tools, and inspected annually
(100 easements were assigned for FY21)
42
TARGET
Calculation: Number of easements evaluated and inspected/Total easements assigned for the period
Aaron Hazard, Construction Inspector II, conducting an easement evaluation.
99%
96%
99%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PERCENT OF PM’S COMPLETED –FLEET MAINTENANCE
Target: 90% of scheduled preventative maintenance completed per quarter annually
43
TARGET
Calculation: Number of PM’s completed/Number of PM’s scheduled
Abraham Yanez, Equipment Mechanic II, performing maintenance on an air relief
valve for a vactor truck.
98%
100%100%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PERCENT OF PM’S COMPLETED –RECLAMATION PLANT
Target: 90% of scheduled preventative maintenance completed each quarter annually
Calculation: Number of PM’s completed/Number of PM’s scheduled
44
TARGET
Tyrese Powell-Slotterbeck, Reclamation Plant Operator II, moving chlorine gas
containers after a delivery.
100%100%100%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
PERCENT OF PM’S COMPLETED –PUMP/ELECTRIC SECTION
Target: 90% of scheduled preventative maintenance completed per quarter annually
Calculation: Number of PM’s completed/Number of PM’s scheduled
Motor Control Center at the 803-1 Pump Station
45
TARGET
3298 3319
4723
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
SYSTEM VALVE EXERCISING PROGRAM
Target: 3,080 valves exercised annually
Calculation: Total number of valves exercised per year
46
TARGET
The District’s valve exercising truck
8.44
7.61
15.16
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2019 2020 2021
AWWA BENCHMARK
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
POTABLE WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM INTEGRITY
(Water Operations)
Target: No more than 16 leaks and breaks per 100 miles of distribution system annually
AWWA: 16.1 leaks and breaks per 100 miles of distribution system
(50th percentile Potable Water System Integrity: Leaks and Breaks for population served between 100,000-500,000)
Calculation: [100 (annual total number of leaks + annual total number of breaks)] /total miles of distribution piping
Lawrence Garcia, Water Systems Operator III, at the 850-2 Pump Station.
47
TARGET
4.45
0.96
3.80
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
RECYCLED WATER SYSTEM INTEGRITY
Target: No more than 6.6 leaks and breaks per 100 miles of recycled distribution system annually
48
TARGET
Calculation: (100 x Number of leaks and breaks)/Number of miles of recycled distribution system
680/944 Recycled Pump Station
1.14 1.14 1.14
0
1
2
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
SEWER OVERFLOW RATE (AWWA)
(Wastewater Operations)
Target & AWWA: 0 overflows per quarter
75th Percentile for Sewer Overflow rate for population served between 0-50,000
Calculation: 100 x Total number of sewer overflows during the reporting period/Total miles of pipe in the sewage collection system
Brandon Perry, Senior Utility Worker/Equipment Operator,operating and
documenting the condition of the collection system.
49
TARGET & AWWA BENCHMARK is 0
94%
72%
100%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
EMERGENCY FACILITY POWER TESTING
Target: Test 100% of all facilities scheduled per quarter to have all emergency facilities tested annually
(36 powered ready facilities)
Calculation: Number of facilities tested/Total number of facilities
Emergency standby genset at the Cottonwood Sewer Lift Station
50
TARGET
7
11
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
POTABLE TANK INSPECTION AND CLEANING
Target: 8 potable water storage tanks and/or reservoirs cleaned annually
Calculation: Total number of tanks cleaned and inspected annually
1485-2 Reservoir Tank
51
TARGET
216
429
580
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
MAIN FLUSHING AND HYDRANT MAINTENANCE
Target: 215 mains flushed and fire hydrants maintained annually
Calculation: Total number of mains flushed and fire hydrants maintained per year
Vince Brown, Utility Worker II, exercising a hydrant
valve and flushing a hydrant at the same time.
52
TARGET
631 631 631
5
105
205
305
405
505
605
705
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
CRITICAL VALVE EXERCISING
Target: 631 critical valves exercised annually
Calculation: Total number of critical valves exercised in a year
Luis Zavala, Utility Worker I, exercising a District valve.
53
TARGET
3.77%
2.19%2.16%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
EMPLOYEE VOLUNTARY TURNOVER RATE
(Organizational Development)
54
TARGET
Target: Less than 5% turnover annually
Calculation: Number of voluntary terminations (not including retirements)/Average number of employees
Engineering staff at an employee appreciation lunch
(left to right: Aaron Hazard, Gus Gracia, Joanna Galvan, and Jeff Edwards).
26.84
59.90
16.49
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
TRAINING HOURS PER EMPLOYEE
(Organizational Development)
Calculation: Total qualified training hours for all employees/Average number of FTEs
55
TARGET
Target: 12 hours per employee annually
Eileen Salmeron, Communications Assistant, completing an online cybersecurity awareness training.
35.44
79.04
28.40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
2019 2020 2021
YE
A
R
-EN
D
R
E
S
U
L
T
SAFETY TRAINING PROGRAM
Target: 24 hours per field employee annually
Calculation: Total qualified safety training hours for field employees/Average number of field employees
Steven Farr, Equipment Mechanic II, at a CPR training held at the District.
56
TARGET
QUESTIONS?
https://otaywater.gov/about-otay/news-and-documents/strategic-plan/