HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-18-06 E&O Committee PacketOTAY WATER DISTRICT
ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
and
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY,CALIFORNIA
Board Room
Monday
December 18,2006
4:00 P.M.
This is a District Committee meeting.This meeting is being posted as a special meeting
in order to comply with the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54954.2)in the event that
a quorum of the Board is present.Items will be deliberated,however,no formai board actions
will be taken at this meeting.The committee makes recommendations
to the full board for its consideration and formal action.
AGENDA
1.ROLL CALL
2.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
INFORMATION I ACTION ITEMS
3.TOUR OF THE DATA CENTER (STEVENS)[15 minutes]
4.APPROVE THE PROPOSED PRINCIPLES OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO FOR
THE SAN DIEGO 17 PUMP STATION AND FLOW CONTROL FACILITY
(POSADA)[10 minutes]
5.AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH RBF CONSULT-
ING FOR PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE
640-1 AND 640-2 RESERVOIRS PROJECT FOR AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-
EXCEED $1,196,735 (POSADA)[10 minutes]
6.ADJOURNMENT
BOARD MEMBERS ATTENDING:
Gary Croucher
Jose Lopez
1
All items appearing on this agenda,whether or not expressly listed for action,may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
If you have any disability that would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting,please call the District Secretary at 670-2280 at least 24
hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on December 15,2006,I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda
near the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District,said
time being at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting of the Board of Directors (Gov-
ernment Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley,California on December 15,2006.
2
AGENDA ITEM 4
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board MEETING DATE:January 3,2007
N/ADIV.
NO.:
P2425-
001101
PROJECT NO.:Jim Peasley
Engineering Manager
Rod Posada ~~o~,
Chief,Engineering
Manny Magafia~~
Assistant General ~nager,Engineering and Operations
Principles of Understanding for San Diego 17 Pump Station
and Flow Control Facility Execution Authorization
SUBJECT:
APPROVED BY:
(Assl.GM):
APPROVED BY:
(ChieD
SUBMITTED BY:
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors authorize the General Manager to
execute the Principles of Understanding (POU)for San Diego 17
Pump Station and Flow Control Facility.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain the Board of Directors authorization for the General
Manager to sign the proposed Principles of Understanding (POU)
for San Diego 17 Pump Station and Flow Control Facility (SD17).
The SD17 POU is to be executed by the San Diego County Water
Authority,City of San Diego,and Otay Water District.Please
see Attachment B.
ANALYSIS:
The City of San Diego (City)will expand the Alvarado Water
Treatment Plant (AWTP)to 200 million gallons per day by 2010
and excess capacity will be available to meet treated water
needs of other member agencies of the San Diego County Water
Authority (Water Authority).The excess treatment capacity
could be used to serve the Otay Water District (Otay).Otay has
the largest demand of any Water Authority member agency for
treated water south of the AWTP.
The City has long contemplated construction of a new pump
station located at the AWTP capable of providing treated water
into the Water Authority's aqueduct system,specifically
Pipeline No.4 of the Second San Diego Aqueduct,for delivery
into the City's Mid City Pipeline at the existing San Diego 18
Flow Control Facility.
The City applied for a Proposition 50,Chapter 3 Water Security
grant (Prop 50 Grant),via the State Department of Health
Services (DHS)to enhance the City's water security system that
included construction of the San Diego 17 Pump Station and Flow
Control Facility (SD17)at the AWTP,as one of the security
components through enhanced reliability for the region.The
total capacity of SD17 is approximately 60 million gallons per
day.The project cost for SD17 is projected to be approximately
$20 million.Approximately $10 million will come from the Prop
50 Grant with the remaining portion of funding to be split
between both the City and Otay.The Water Authority will not
contribute funds to the SD17 project.
Prior to executing a Prop 50 Grant contract with DHS for grant
funding for construction of SD17,the City is required to show
DHS that there is an agreement with Otay for a contractual
commitment to purchase treated water produced at the AWTP.The
City requires an agreement with the Water Authority to gain
access to the regional aqueduct system.
As proposed,Otay could purchase untreated water from the Water
Authority at the prevailing untreated water rate or potentially
from any other untreated water source,and the City would treat
untreated water for Otay at the AWTP and then pump treated water
into the aqueduct system at SD17.This treated water would then
be taken at the existing Otay connections on the Water Authority
aqueduct system downstream of the AWTP.It is contemplated that
Otay will pay the City for actual costs to produce and pump
treated water at the AWTP.The Water Authority will not charge
for the treated water produced at the AWTP and pumped into the
aqueduct system,if the untreated water is purchased from the
Water Authority,since Otay will pay transportation,supply,
storage,and customer service charges for all untreated water
purchased from the Water Authority.This reflects the intent of
the Water Authority rate structure to provide for a single total
charge for water anywhere along the aqueduct system.
It is the stated policy of the Water Authority to maximize the
use of local facilities and reduce treated water demand on the
southern end of the aqueduct system.These principles allow for
greater use of local facilities.Maximizing the use of local
treatment facilities also provides opportunities to provide
treated water to the region during planned shutdowns and
emergencies.This is in line with the integrated Water
2
Resources Plan (IRP)that is currently under preparation.
contemplated 8D17 agreement provides the regional benefit
integrating the AWTP into the regional water system.
The
of
The Water Authority Board of Directors authorized their General
Manager to execute the 8D17 POU at their November 30,2006 Board
meeting.The City is not required to request authorization from
City Council to execute the 8D17 POU.This is the City's
typical practice.
Both the 8D17 POU and the anticipated final agreement will be
three-party arrangements for treatment and pumping by the City,
transportation,etc.,by the Water Authority,and use by Otay.
It is anticipated that the City will maximize its use of the
AWTP with no numerical target imposed to allow operational
flexibility for the three agencies.
The Water Authority is concerned about aqueduct system
reliability,integrity,and security as it relates to the
operation of 8D17 in coordination with the aqueduct system
operations.The City and the Water Authority both have
expressed a desire to own 8D17.The issue of 8D17 ownership
will be discussed further and addressed in the final agreement.
Once all parties approve the 8D17 POU,staff will begin
negotiating the final agreement with the City and Water
Authority and return to the Board in the spring of 2007 for
approval.
The City projects that the 8D17 Pump 8tation and Flow Control
Facility project will cost approximately $20 million.If the
City does acquire the Proposition 50,Chapter 3 Water 8ecurity
grant,then approximately $10 million will come from that
source.The remaining portion of funding is planned to be split
between the City and Otay in proportion to the 8D17 capacity
that each agency obtains.It is estimated that Otay should
acquire 50 mgd capacity of the 60 mgd 8D17 Pump 8tation to meet
projected demands and provide emergency water supply service.
The Otay capital cost obligation would be about $8.3 million for
50 mgd of 8D17.The Water Authority will not be contributing
funds to the 8D17 project.
The capital cost for 8D17 is not currently within the Otay
capital improvement program (CIP).However,there are two
capital projects within the current Otay CIP that would not be
required if 50 mgd of capacity in 8D17 is acquired.The total
3
capital cost of the two projects are more than triple the $8.3
million for SD17.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As the SD17 POU does not commit the District to any expenditures
or benefits,there is no direct fiscal impact.As explained in
the above analysis if the subsequent agreement does come to
fruition the District stands to benefit by avoiding two
substantial elP projects.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The SD17 POU supports the Otay Mission Statement,"To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater service to the
customers of the Otay Water District,in a professional,
effective,efficient,and sensitive manner,in all aspects of
operation,so that public health,environment and quality of
life are enhanced."and the Otay strategic goal,in planning for
infrastructure and supply to meet current and future potable
water demands.
LEGAL IMPACT:
Legal counsel has reviewed the SD17 POU and takes no exception
to the form.
JP/RP/MM:jfp
4
ATTACHMENT A
rsUBjECTipRojECT:-T-p~i;;cipiesof-U;;de~s-t~;;di;:;g-io~···s;;:;:;--i5iegoi7P;';mp ····St~tion ··-i
i II and Flow Control Facility Execution Authorization I
i PROJECT NO.:P2425-001101 .l "",.".".".".""..""".,_'"."__,"__~","._.."__"".__"""__"__J
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering and Operations Committee met on December 18,
2006 and supported staff's recommendation.
NOTE:
The "Committee Action"is written in anticipation of the
Committee(s)moving the item forward for Board approval.This
report will be sent to the Board as a Committee(s)approved
item,or modified to reflect any discussion or changes as
directed from the Committee(s)prior to presentation to the full
Board.
5
ATTACHMENT B
Principles of Understanding for San Diego 17 Pump Station and
Flow Control Facility
November 1,2006
The Otay Water District (Otay),the San Diego County Water Authority (Water Authority)and
the City ofSan Diego (City)are executing and delivering this Principles ofUnderstanding
(POU)to set forth certain goals and understandings in connection with the proposed design,
construction,operation,and maintenance ofthe new connection (SD 17),which includes a new
pump station and flow control facility (FCF).Otay,Water Authority,and the City recognize the
benefits ofconstructing a pump station at the Alvarado Water Treatment Plant (AWTP),which is
owned and operated by the City,to pump treated water produced at the AWTP into the Water
Authority's aqueduct system (Aqueduct)for the benefit of Otay and the City.This proposed
SDI7 will provide Otay and the region with an additional source oftreated water available from
the AWTP for normal service,routine shutdowns,flow reductions in the treated water system or
made available for the region during emergencies.
The City has applied for a Proposition 50,Chapter 3 Water Security grant (Prop 50 Grant),via
the State Department ofHealth Services (DHS)to enhance the City's water security system that
included SD17 as one ofthe security components through enhanced water reliability for the
region.In order to meet Otay's additional water needs,the City,contingent upon City Council
approval,will enter into an agreement with DHS for the Prop 50 Grant and will design,build and
permit SDI7 to provide water to Otay.Because of its connection to the Water Authority's
regional aqueduct system,the Water Authority will operate SD 17.Issues dealing with the
ownership,operation and maintenance of SDI7 will be negotiated and resolved in the final
agreement.
Prior to executing a contract with DHS that includes grant funding for construction ofSD17,the
City needs the contractual commitment of Otay to purchase/utilize potable water produced at the
AWTP.It is contemplated that Otay will pay the Water Authority for imported untreated water at
the prevailing untreated water rate and pay the City for actual costs to produce potable water at
the AWTP.Under the contemplated contract,Otay will pay for a portion ofthe costs of
construction ofthe SD 17 facility,and the City in return will reimburse a portion ofsaid costs to
Otay with a share ofthe Prop 50 Grant funds.That portion ofsaid costs will be agreed upon in
the subsequent agreement.
Therefore,Otay,Water Authority and the City would like to formalize the SD 17 arrangement in
an agreement according to the following principles:
1.All three parties agree that it would be beneficial to construct SD 17 at the AWTP site to
pump treated water from the AWTP into the Aqueduct to transport it for the use ofOtay and
the City.SD 17 accomplishes the regional goal ofmaximizing the use ofexisting local
treated water facilities and also provides a potential benefit to the region in an emergency.
2.Otay,the Water Authority and the City will designate the appropriate staff within two weeks
ofthe date the last party signs this POU to negotiate an agreement as to the terms and
conditions for the design,construction,ownership,operation,and maintenance ofSD17.The
agreement should be presented for approval to the parties'governing bodies by April I,
2007,with final governing bodies'approval targeted for July 2007.
6
3.The agreement will include the finalization ofthe terms of supplying Otay with treated water,
including a pricing structure for the sale,at cost,to produce potable water by the City.Steps
should be taken to ensure that to the extent possible all costs incurred in connection with SD
17 meet the eligibility requirement for reimbursement as prescribed by the Prop 50 Grant
guidelines.
4.Otay will quantify its estimated demand for treated water from SD 17 for the purpose of
Water Authority long term planning needs and will update this need annually as part of the
regional aqueduct operating plan.
5.The design,construction,operation and maintenance ofSD 17 will not adversely impact the
operation ofthe Aqueduct.The Water Authority will approve the design and construction of
SDI7.
6.Issues dealing with the ownership,operation and maintenance ofSD 17 will be negotiated
and resolved in the final agreement.The City will work with the Water Authority and Otay
to develop a mutually agreeable operating plan.All deliveries to the Aqueduct will be
dependant on available Aqueduct capacity.
7.Otay and the City will agree to the estimated cost ofSD 17 and will also agree to the
reimbursement portion attributed to Prop 50 Grant reimbursement.The reimbursement
portion should equal the percentage ofdollars invested to construct SD 17,compared to the
total dollars invested in the overall security project.
8.The Water Authority has no obligations to contribute to the capital and maintenance costs of
SD 17,and as such,the City has,under this agreement,no obligations to provide the Water
Authority with any water supply from SD 17.
9.Otay and the City will agree to the apportionment of maintenance costs for SD 17.
10.The intent ofthis agreement is to treat water at AWTP for delivery to Otay.The City may
contract with Water Authority and/or any third party for any portion ofthe City's capacity in
SD 17 not used by Otay.Any new delivery agreement is subject to Water Authority
approval.
11.Water treated at the AWTP will not receive an additional charge when reintroduced into the
Aqueduct at SD 17 when any ofthe following conditions apply:
•The untreated source water had been purchased from and/or delivered through the Water
Authority..
•The local water introduced is specifically used at SD 18/21 per existing agreement
between the City and Water Authority dated May 31,1994,which allows for up to 93 cfs
capacity.Local water delivered to any other connection will be charged.
•There is sufficient capacity within the treated pipeline to deliver the requested flows.
•Any water delivered under a Metropolitan Water District credit program,which excludes
transportation or other service charge will be subject to those charges ifreintroduced.The
intent is to keep all parties whole.
12.The agreement will address a mutually agreeable accounting process for water delivered into
and out ofAWTP.
13.In the event that the City does not receive Prop 50 grant funding for SD 17 the agreement
will be terminated and with no liabilities or obligations to any of the parties.
7
This POD is agreed to by the following parties:
Otay Water District
Mark Watton
General Manager
Date City ofSan Diego
Anthony Boles
ChiefAcquisition Officer
Date
Approved by San Diego County Water Authority Board Action Item:Date:_
8
AGENDA ITEM 5
STAFF REPORT
5
January 3,
2007
P2l85 DIV.
NO.
MEETING
DATE:
C.I.P.I
G.F.NO:
Regular Board
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
Rod posada~~~
Chief,Engineering
Manny Magan~
Assistant General~nager,Engineering and Operations
Award of a Construction Management Services Contract for the
640-1 and 640-2 Reservoirs Project
APPROVED BY:
(Chien
APPROVED BY:
(Assl.GM):
SUBJECT:
TYPE MEETING:
SUBMITTED BY:
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board authorize the General Manager to enter into a
professional services agreement with RBF Consulting (RBF),for
providing construction management services for the 640-1 and 640-2
Reservoirs project for a not-to-exceed amount of $1,196,735 (see
attached Exhibits A and B for project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization to award a construction management
contract to RBF for the 640-1 and 640-2 Reservoirs Project.
ANALYSIS:
At the December 2006 Board meeting,Pacific Hydrotech Corporation was
awarded the construction contract for the reservoir project.Actual
construction of the project is scheduled to start in January 2007
with processing of submittals and clearing and grubbing to be the
first items of work.This project is critical to meeting the
ultimate demands for the North District.
Consistent with the Otay Water District's (District)practice,a
construction management firm (CM)is used on larger projects that
have a variety of complex construction activities.The CM augments
District staff by providing a team of highly specialized experts and
specialty subconsultants,in addition to the full-time inspection and
monitoring that are required on a daily basis.Having a CM managing
a project of this magnitude also provides the opportunity for
discussion on methods of work and the possibility of cost savings
through value engineering and schedule refinements.
The District solicited construction management services from
engineering consultant firms by placing an advertisement in the San
Diego Daily Transcript from September 14-22,2006.Seventeen (17)
firms submitted a letter of interest and a statement of
qualifications.The Request for Proposal was sent to all seventeen
(17)firms resulting in eight (8)proposals received on October 18,
2006.They are as follows:
1.Parsons Brinckerhoff
2.Swinerton Management &Consulting,Inc.
3.PBS&J
4.MARRS Services,Inc.
5.RBF Consulting
6.Simon Wong Engineering
7.Jacobs
8.PinnacleOne
The remaining nine (9)firms (G Force;EPC Consultants Inc.;Miller
Brooks,Environmental Inc.;MTGL;URS;Infrastructure Engineering
Corporation;C2PM;Dudek;and Cornerstone Building Group)chose not
to propose or teamed up with another firm to propose.See attached
Exhibit C for the survey of ran kings by panel members.
In accordance with District Policy 21,staff evaluated and scored all
proposals and selected the top three proposers (PBS&J,RBF
Consulting,and Jacobs)for a formal interview.The staff interview
selection panel was comprised of four individuals from Engineering
and one person from Water Operations.The panel interviewed the
selected firms on November 29,2006.After completion of the
interviews,the review panel unanimously concluded that RBF was the
most qualified consultant.Fee negotiations with RBF for the
particular scope of services were concluded on November 30,2006.
The original fee was for $1,415,513 and was negotiated down to
$1,196,735.
The District has worked with RBF on the 30-inch Recycled Water
Pipeline project and the same proposed team performed the
Construction Management work for the 680/944 Recycled Water Reservoir
and Pump Station.The District has also used RBF for miscellaneous
smaller issues including litigation support.RBF's references were
checked and RBF was found to be a highly rated company.Staff is
2
recommending that the Board authorize the General Manager to enter
into a professional services contract with RBF for a not-to-exceed
amount of $1,196,735.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total budget for crp P2185 is $29,500,000,as revised at the
December 6,2006 Board meeting.The actual costs paid on this
project as of November 30,2006,are $1,791,956.Total expenditures
plus outstanding commitment and forecast to date,including this
contract,are approximately $29,500,000.Attachment B is a table
listing commitments,expenditures,and projected final costs.
Finance has determined that funding for this project will be
available from the Expansion Fund 53%and the Betterment Fund 47%.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This project supports the District's Mission statement,~To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater services to the customers of
Otay Water District,in a professional,effective,efficient,and
sensitive manner ...n.This project fulfills the District's Strategic
Goals No.1 -Community and Governance,and No.5 -Potable Water,by
maintaining proactive and productive relationships with the project
stakeholders and by guaranteeing that the District will provide for
current and future water needs.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None
RR:jf
Attachments
P:\WORKING\CIP 00185\Staff Reports\BD 1-03-07,640-1,2 eM Award.doc
3
ATTACHMENT A
1··SiJBJECT/PR6JECT:·TA;;;;;;;:d··ofaconst;:tlct"iC;;';··M;;;-;;:;;;gement·Se;::;';::Cc·es··C ont;:;;;c·-i:····fo;:.\
L.......Jt~~.~~~==..and~~~==..~~~.~~.v~=r~~.r~j~~~(~=.=.~5)1
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering and Water Operations
a meeting held on December 18,2006.
recommendation.
NOTE:
Committee reviewed this item at
The Committee supported Staff's
The "Committee Action"is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval.This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item,or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
SUBJb.."
Otay Water District
ATTACHMENT B
"Award of a Construction Contract for the 640-1 and 640-2
Reservoirs Project -Budget Detail
Date Updated:November 3D,2006
P2185 -Res -640-1 Reservoir 20 0 MG
Outstanding Vendor/Budget CommiUed Expenditures Commitment&ProjectedFinal Cost Comments$27,000,000 Forecast
Planning
studies $118,929.39 $118,929.39 $118,929.39 Boyle Engineering
In House/labor $102,592.36 $102.592.36
Printing $223.58 $223.58 $223.58 Tiger Reprographics
Office Supplies $25.05 $25.05 $25.05 Petty Cash Custodian
Gas&Eleldric $750.00 $750.00 $750.00 San Diego Gas &Electric
$175,783.84 FMS (No Detail).-Subcontract $175,783.84 $175,783.84
$153,831.91 $153,831.91 $153,831.91 FMS (No Detail)
Miscellaneous $362.25 $362,25 $362.25 Bob Turner's Crane Services Inc.
Chemical Feed Systems $6.169.48 $6.169.48 $6.169.48 Core-rosion Products
Postage $26.57 $26.57 $26.57 Fed-Ex
Service Contracts $63.80 $63.80 $63.80 Sedona Staffing
Land/Easement .Acquisition $
Total Planning $456,165.87 $558,758.23 $$558,758.23
Design
Subcontract $8,499.72 $8,499.72 $8.499.72 E&JWeed Abatement Co.
$$$$822,000.00 Infrasturcture Engineering Corp --ConsultantContracts 822.000.00 740.215.00 81,785.00
$682.01 $682.01 $682.01 Environmine
$7,800.00 $7,800.00 $7,800.00 Fire Prevention Services Inc.
$600.00 $600.00 $600.00 Pacific Sourhwest Biological
~--$4,720.00 $4,720.00 $4.720.00 WRA &Associates
$9,711.41 $9,711.41 $9,711.41 John Powell &Associates
RegUlatory Agency Fee $1,250.00 $1.250.00 $1,250.00 State ofcalifornia
In House/labor $340.797.08 $340,797.08
Materials $537.10 $537.10 $537.10 Traffic Control Services Inc
$152.00 $152.00 $152.00 Allied Trench Shoring Services
Mvertise and Award $7,306.40 $26.94 $7,279.46 $7,306.40 DCB Reprographics
Total Design $863.258.64 $1,110.271,28 $93,784.46 $1.204,055.72
Construction
In HouseJLabor $92,324.55 $756,704.54 $849,029.09
Materials $122.40 $122.40 $122.40 Office Depot
$5,466.34 $5,466.34 $5,466.34 National Waterworks Inc.
Temporary Labor $382.80 $382.80 Sedona Staffing
Shipping $20.62 $20.62 $20.62 Fed-Ex
Construction Contracts $23.377.00 $23.377.00 $23,377.00 San Diego Gas &Electric
$24,894,000.00 $24,894,000.00 $24,894,000.00 Pacific Hydrotech Corp
~.
$748,820.00 $746,820.00 $746,820.00 Contingency @3%
ConsultantContract(eM)$1.196.735.00 $1,196,735.00 $1.196,735.00 Construction Manager
Professional &Legal Fees $96.00 $96.00 $96.00 Burke Wiliams &Sorensen LLP
$487.20 $487.20 $487.20 Garcia,calderon &Ruiz
service Contracts $649.60 $849.60 $649.60 San Diego DailySCripts
Accpl/dose-out $20,000.00 $20,000.00 In House Staff
Total Construction $26,867,774.16 $122,926.51 $27,614,259.54 $27,737,186.05
Grand Total $28.187,198.67 $1,791,956.00 $27,708,044.00 $29,500,000.00
1"=800'
II
,.J i;;.
i FURY LANE
REGULATORY
SITE
8
EL CAJON
m•"~e--_w>-
V>
V>.\,-,"""'-,,,
W'"
o
Mission
Boy
c
o
~•~
Tijuana Estuary
IMPERIAL
BEACH
'"oo~L...L-=-:-!:!=-;:;;:~~~l.L,
'-
*J:(::::'~'"/
~•c,
mc:,
~.p
:iiEx
W/~uE0-dL'"/roc;o(')
o:>/
:£......._----...-..."""'-_..;..--------------------_..._---...c;
:DTAY WATER DISTRICTuGPROPOSED
is"640-1 AND 640-2 RESERVOIRS'"o~W.O.30018 LOCATION MAP CIP 2185
o:......_.;,,;.;,,;__~!'!"'~~~~~,;,,;,,----------..;;....;;--...
EXHIBIT A
>-1ni.,...~-...".&V"i')0~"""'~lY<
V>"-
>:«eu --_.J
o t00._.._~~..
o;c.
Vault 6 £
Chemical Vault ~
fi 4 o."',M+S~4'!F1'1",',"milf;Gtay Water District
640-1 and 2 Reservoirs Project
•~~~L-_--------------.=VIiIi;=;o:r-;:::;-----------'EXHIBIT B
Exhibit C
SUMMARY OF RANKINGS BY PANEL MEMBERS
640·TAND 640-2 Reservoirs
CJP P2185/WQ 30018
Ou_~'.
.~01
Consull....r.
.~__""nol
--'.........'10
lypeofprojoocl
t.lngeo>m_
WRITIEN
-"J..-l~
~•.k>coI.'"-,._.n
,-~'...~
ConouItonl'o
"""""'''-'110E6E.D8E.
MBE.S6E
A<IdI_...._~y.
,nslgl1llO
I••",.
ORAL*
StrenglhofptOfeCl _.-nt"'"".OuOIllyof'''POll'.manoc<""~Uon.km$",~.lions
TOTAL
SCORE
AVERAGE
SCORE
87.00
10101010105101520to101515 150 ...
M.ana 13 13 8 9 16 13 9 _~
R.Posada 13 14 8 iii 18 13 9~r~~rml11 0 n _~
H_;,J bori ""9 ,""9 ----i:8 I~~AI -I K~VAVA~W----"
SCORE
Parsons
Brlnckerhoff
56,40
n.oo
82.20
74,40
•....J]
"".-':'
"
.!><I
~~
118 »,
ROIl Ripperger 10 10 7 7 18 10 9
R.Posada 15 15 &10 19 14 9 6 7 7 8 __
HosseinJu""'-rI 14 15 10 10 19 14 9 6 8 7 9 _,_~
JetryMunoz 14 14 9 10 19 14 9 ;/,\>t;5'2 7 7 7 7 7
PBS&J
Jacobs
SImonWong
Engineering
PlnnacleOne
MARRS
Services,Inc.
RBF Consulting
-~...!!!.Maaana.,....1!.......__---"-'.'1==~'~'==E=~92=±=='~9==f=j'~'=-'~-==.·.=-.;'••••-=ts;.'~d;=·;j~·==.l'=--=·_=L-_-----2.__._~,_6__~-.----,..,!__._-!--.__1...__.--------~~~:=~~=:~::=:1
9
0 ::__:~~.._.1---+-'--".---+4---':'--..==;---+----~'---~-;-.__.~_:--~~~-=-_=~~'26:80
r~~~~~1-=~Jo~"'~""""'~~=E=~"t=l:=~"~=t::::::'~'=:::E=~9~:::l::::'~9~:::t:~'~':::=E=~9~:::l~~'5 7 7 ----.!.-7 7 ---@",":
Ron RippelTJ6f 13 13 8 7 19 13 9 5 6 e 7 7 120',,:
_~ana 11 9 6 6 16 12 9 n
R.Posada 13 13 6 6 16 12 9 \lrei(R1 rrl~0 _11 78_'J""'''""9 ,"'"1~1 8 ~~'~_W~V,Vllo\lg "Jt!rJV MuflOl 12 13 6 5 16 12 9 U\Ls.151n 1 U~\.l...V-',5\76
RQ'lRippe ,12 10 7 5 16 12 9 74
M.MiIt1aF!a 15 15 10 10 16 14 9 10 9 10 9 10 _._~I',__~\>;,:
R Posada 15 15 10 10 16 14 9 9 9 10 9 10 141 F:>,
HosseinJ 15 14 10 10 16 14 9 1431,'"
ok Muno;:-15 15 6 10 16 14 9 1,~~:":':"
RonR,i:JoeITJ6r 14 13 9 8 16 14 9 -=----".:':':.,:
MoM 9 9 8 1I 16 13 __9 _--!J..
R.Posada 10 13 6 9 16 \3 9 _~
HosseinJ 12 15 7 9 16 13 __9 __&6
JerryMtmoz 9 12 9 9 16 13 __9
RonR;ppe I 13 13 7 7 16 13 9 5
M.M.e 15 14 8 8 19 14 9 _5 _..6 6 7
Note:These scores are typical fora particular project.Actual weight scores may vary and will be published as part ofthe RFP.
*OrallntelViews are for projects withfees over$200,000.
**Iffees are less than $200,000,thentotal score is 100 points.
'"Zknatl#==
P~WORKING\CIP 001851WQ 300181A9reements-Contraas-RFPIRFPsICM-lnspedionIP2~85 Policy 21 ConsullanlRating Formror eM RFP.•Is