HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-19-11 EO&WR Committee PacketOTAY WATER DISTRICT
ENGINEERING, OPERATIONS &WATER RESOURCES COMMITTEE MEETING
and
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
Board Room
THURSDAY
May 19, 2011
12:00 P.M.
This is a District Committee meeting. This meeting is being posted as a special meeting
in order to comply with the Brown Act (Government Code Section §54954.2) in the event that
a quorum of the Board is present. Items will be deliberated, however, no formal board actions
will be taken at this meeting. The committee makes recommendations
to the full board for its consideration and formal action.
AGENDA
ROLL CALL
2. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION —OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURIS-
DICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
DISCUSSION ITEMS
3. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT'S 2010 URBAN
WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND FOLLOWING THE HEARING, ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 4175 APPROVING THE DISTRICT'S 2010 URBAN WATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN (KENNEDY) [5 minutes]
4. APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO PROPULSION CONTROLS
ENGINEERING IN THE AMOUNT OF $103,356 FOR THE REMANUFACTURE OF
MOTORS FOR THE 803-1 AND 850-2 PUMP STATIONS (SILVERMAN) [5 minutes]
5. APPROVE AN INCREASE TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET FOR CIP P2490 FOR
THE 1296-1 RESERVOIR INTERIOR/EXTERIOR COATING PROJECT FROM $350,000
TO $475,000 (KAY) [5 minutes]
6. APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO KIRK PAVING IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $200,000 FOR AS-NEEDED ASPHALT PAVING
SERVICES FROM JULY 1, 2011 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012 (ANDERSON) [5 minutes]
7. APPROVE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MS. DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
(MSDC) LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, IN AN AMOUNT NOT-
TO-EXCEED $162,305.85 AND TO REIMBURSE MSDC FOR THE COMPLETION OF
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
FOR AIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER — RECPL-16-INCH 860 ZONE RECYCLED
PIPELINE ON AIRWAY ROAD (CHARLES) [5 minutes]
8. APPROVE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ASPIRE-ENCORE AT RANCHO
DEL REY HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION FOR UP TO 50% OF THE
CONSTRUCTION COSTS, NOT-TO-EXCEED $25,500, FOR THE CONVERSION OF
AN EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT FROM A POTABLE WATER
IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO A RECYCLED WATER IRRIGATION SYSTEM (CHARLES)
[5 minutes]
9. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 3RD QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2011 UPDATE
(KAY) [10 minutes]
10. SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE (WATTON) [10 minutes]
11. ADJOURNMENT
BOARD MEMBERS ATTENDING:
Jose Lopez, Chair
Gary Croucher
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be delibe-
rated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the District's
website at www.otavwater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at the open
meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District's website. Copies of the Agenda
and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by contacting her at (619)
670-2280.
If you have any disability that would require accommodation in order to enable you to participate
in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at 670-2280 at least 24 hours prior to the meet-
ing.
Certification of Posting
certify that on May 13, 2011 I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the regular
meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at least 24 hours
in advance of the meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on May 13, 2011.
~,,
S san Cruz, District Secret
~~ ~ `~~
2
p~,as~-e~,.a
,~~ !ar su~ ~
~T,~°~~ o~~ s
TYPE ~l1EETING: Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY: Bob Kennedy
Associate Civil Engineer
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
APPROVED BY: Rod Posada ~~+
(Chief) Chief , Engineering
~ '' ~ ~.
MEETING DATE: June 1 , 2 011
PROJECT / P1210 - DIV~ ALL
SUBPROJECTS: 001000 ~~~
APPROVED BY: Manny Magana
(Asst. GM): Assistant General M Hager, Engineering and Operations
SUBJECT: Public Hearing for he Otay Water District's 2010 Urban
Water Management Plan and Approve Resolution Noe 4175
Approving the District's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan
' ~' • '[ r~. • ,.
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors
(Boa~~d), after holding a public hearing on the District's 2010
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), approve Resolution No. 4175
approving the District's 2010 UWMP.
~~ ~ ~ • . e
Please see Attachment Ae
•z
That the Board, after holding a public hearing on the District's
2010 UWMP, approve Resolution. Noe 4175 (Attachment B) approving
the District's 2010 UWMP (Attachment C).
Since 1984, California's Urban Water Management Planning Act
(Act) has required each urban water supplier in the State to
prepare an UWMP, The requirement applies to each urban water
supplier that provides water for municipal purposes either
directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplies
more than 3,000 acre-feet (AF) of water annually, These
agencies must update their UWMP at least once every five years
on or before December 31St in years ending in five and zero. The
deadline for submittal of the 2010 UWMP for retail water
purveyors was extended to July 31, 2011 as a result of recent
legislation. Sections 10610 through 10657 of the California
Water Code detail the information that must be included in these
plans, In accordance with the Act, the District is required to
update and adopt its plan for submittal to the California
Department of Water Resources (DWR) by July 1, 2011. Appendix A
in Attachment C contains the text of the Act.
The District utilized DWR's "Guidebook to Assist Urban Water
Suppliers to Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan" dated
March 2011 and Senate Bill 7-7 (SBX 7-7) to prepare the UWMP,
SBX 7-7 was passed in November 2009 with the goal of reducing
California's urban per capita water use by 20 percent by
December 31, 2020 with an incremental goal of reducing per
capita water use by 10 percent by December 31, 2015.
An UWMP is required in order for a water supplier to receive DWR
administered State grants, loans, and drought assistance, In
addition, the UWMP is the reference document cited in Water
Supply Assessment and Verification Reports mandated in 2001 by
Senate Bill 610 and Senate Bill 221 for new developments,
Each urban water supplier is also required to meet SBX 7-7
goals, which are discussed in the UWMP. The UWMP includes
projections of the District's future demands and supplies, based
on estimates of future growth in the District's service area.
It also discusses the steps the District has taken to promote
water conservation and ensure water is being used wisely. The
strategies outlined in UWMP are intended to allow the District
to continue to provide a safe and reliable water supply to its
customers.
As required by the Act, the public hearing was noticed in
newspapers of general circulation including the San Diego Union
Tribune, the Star News, and the East County Californian. In
addition, a draft notice was posted on the District's webpage.
The District also noticed and solicited comments from the Water
Authority, the City of Chula Vista, the City of San Diego, the
County of San Diego, local planning groups and sent copies of
the draft UWMP to local libraries.
The District's 2010 UWMP is consistent with the Water
Authority's 2010 UWMP, Demand and population estimates, along
with service reliability, are consistent with those used by the
~a
Water Authority, The table below outlines the projected
population and the water demand for the District through 2035,
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Service Area
Population 219,223 1242,241 258,037 269,522 284,997
Annual Demand ~
~~ (AF/year)44,883 53,768 63,811 70,669i 77,171
Demands with
Conservation a4,883 46,321 49,815 52,774 56,614
(AF/year)~
One amendment made to the Act since preparation of the
District's 2005 UWMP require a plan to include water use
projections for lower income and affordable households, to
assist with compliance with the existing requirement under
Section 65589.7 of the Government Code, that suppliers grant
priority for the provision of service to affordable and lower
income households°
FISCAL II~PAC`I' m
,-
An approved UWMP is required in order for the District to
receive DWR administered grants, loans, and to receive drought
assistance.
~w~i 7~ti~~e1~~.se~•7~1E
This project supports the District's Mission statement, "To
provide the best quality of water and wastewater service to the
customers of the Otay Water District, in a professional,
effective and efficient manner," and the District's Strategic
Goal, in planning for infrastructure and supply to meet current
and future potable water demands.
..
In accordance with the Act, the District will meet itS legal
requirement if its 2010 UWMP is approved by its Board by
July 1, 2011 and copies of the UWMP are submitted to DWR by
July 30, 2011.
3
~ ,r ~
Gea~eral 3+~ariag~~
P: \'siORF<ING\CIP 00210 WMP & PEIR\tJ4dMP 2C10 Update\Staff Report\BD 06-O1-11, Ut^IMP, (BK-RR) .doc
BK/RR/RP:]i
Attachments: Attachment A - Committee Action
Attachment B - Resolution No, 4175
Attachment C - Otay Water District 2010 UWMP
4
~~_ssFaF~
G'~
.- g~~
ttl p, '7
e~, ~
~A~~ C~YS~~`J
1.
,-... k~ ,. s ,,
SUBJECT/PROJECT: publ is Hearing for the Otay Water District's 2010 Urban
:Water Management Plan and Approve Resolution No. 4175
P1210-001000 ;Approving the District's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on May 19, 2011.
The Committee supported Staff's recommendation,
r~[~]~Yra~~i
The "Committee Action" is written in anticipation of the
Committee moving the item forward for Board Approval. This
report will be sent to the Board as a Committee approved item,
or modified to reflect any discussion or changes as directed
from the Committee prior to presentation to the full Board.
_ ._ s ~,t, t , ~.>
RESOLUTION NO, 4175
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT ADOPTING THE
2010 URBAN WATER MANAGMENET PLAN
WHEREAS, the Otay Water District (District) has completed
the 2010 Urban Water Management Plan pursuant to the
requirements of the California Water Code section 10610 et seq.;
F~TI
WHEREAS, the plan is the formal document to discuss past,
current, and projected water demands; current and alternative
water conservation measures; water supply deficiencies; and
future management practices°
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors
of the Otay Water District approves and adopts the plan entitled
"2010 Urban Water Management Plan" for the Otay Water District;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager of the
District is authorized and directed to implement the water
conservation measures included in the plan as the District's
part in the local and regional water conservation effort.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of
the Otay Water District at a regular meeting this lst day of
June, 2011.
ATTEST:
District Secretary
President
.,
Subject: Public Hearing fior the Otay Water Disfirict's Project No.: P1210-001000
2010 Urban Water Management Plan
(UVVMP) end Approve Resolution No. 4175
Approving the District's 2010 Urban Water
f~anagement Plan
Document Description: Staff Report for the June 1, 2011 hoard Meeting.
~~ ~,;;
Author:
Signature
fob Kennedy
Printed Name
Date
~.
~~ k~~~~
QA Reviewer:~ ~ ~ (~ f ~
ignat e Date
Ron Ripperger
Printed Name
The above signatures attest that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability the
signers verify that it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended information;
being grammatically correcf and free of formatting and typographical errors; accurately presenting calculated values
and numerical references; and being internally consistent, legible and uniform in its presentation sfyle.
■
~
i
M
~
~
Y
y
v
~
~
~
V
~
~
~
t t\/1■
Pr
e
ar
a
ti
o
n
of
2
0
7 0
U
W
M
P
p
♦U
p
d
a
t
e
Re
q
u
i
r
e
d
by
la
w
ev
e
r
y
5
ye
a
r
s
.
♦P
u
r
p
o
s
e
an
d
im
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
ha
s
gr
o
w
n
si
n
c
e
fi
r
s
t
required
10
ye
a
r
s
ag
o
.
♦I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
de
t
a
i
l
e
d
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
(a
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
st
e
p
s
,
schedule)
on
fu
t
u
r
e
su
p
p
l
y
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
♦I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
el
e
m
e
n
t
s
of
dr
o
u
g
h
t
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
planning.
♦C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
me
m
b
e
r
ag
e
n
c
i
e
s
.
~ P~VISHIc~ ~~Sw ~ ~ ~G 4TFR o~s~a`
n
n
en
e
~ s
o
re
ar
~
n
an
♦D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
fu
t
u
r
e
su
p
p
l
i
e
s
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
to
re
l
i
a
b
l
y
me
e
t
de
m
a
n
d
s
.
♦U
t
i
l
i
z
e
as
su
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
in
pr
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
of water
su
p
p
l
y
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
an
d
ve
r
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
re
p
o
r
t
s
under SB
61
0
&
S
B
22
1
.
♦R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
be
el
i
g
i
b
l
e
to
re
c
e
i
v
e
fu
n
d
i
n
g
or
dr
o
u
g
h
t
as
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
fr
o
m
th
e
St
a
t
e
.
~~
~
'
d
.~
-0
~h
~:y
~
z
'
f
x
F
.
,
f,:
.
~
~
t
l
a
'.
.
~, °.
~
%
a
7?
~:~
5
,
~
.
,
p
~
,
,
.
.
.
~ ~ ~'s
;
.
...
- A
te,
~
a
.~
'
~
.
-~
.n
.
~
v
_
„x
:
-
~
;
m
,
$
'
°
.
.
,
.
~
.
.
~
.
.
;
s
5
f
~
~
~
~
Y~:
?
;
a
4
t
u
i
`+
~
.
.
".rn:~'~. : ^?'P~ ~ ~, ` '4~t, ti'nuFS`" -'~,...
`~
.,,
~_;
._.
.
::.
.
_
.1
.
;
.,.
.
~~
'
'
~
:
;
~
~
;
,
~
.'~
;
,
<*~
!
!
'
'
?
'
~
'
'
~
'
'
c
~
~t
"
'
~
.
~
:
±"".
u
x
.
.
~
i
~r
-
+~
p
v
.
~
w
-
c
-
7'~
r
r
.
,
.
r
e
i
o
«
:
'
w.,
.
.
^
+
ea
-
...
,
m
~
.
*
k.
'~e
.
.
•
,.
'
~
.
~.. --r. .. .. ,1, .k,,.:,a~+,...-3x7'~~.:~ ~-?"~..-'~;:;, 3°k •OTAY _,
a
s
e
w
or
e
¨
S
B
X
7-7
Co
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
:
—
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
ga
l
l
o
n
s
pe
r
ca
p
i
t
a
da
y
(g
p
c
d
)
wa
t
e
r
use.
—
Se
t
ta
r
g
e
t
fo
r
in
t
e
r
i
m
gp
c
d
wa
t
e
r
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
by
20
1
5
.
—
Se
t
ta
r
g
e
t
fo
r
2
0
%
gp
c
d
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
by
20
2
0
.
♦W
a
t
e
r
us
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
fo
r
lo
w
e
r
in
c
o
m
e
an
d
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
s
♦S
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
to
de
a
l
wi
t
h
un
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
i
e
s
:
—
Cl
i
m
a
t
e
ch
a
n
g
e
—
Re
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
/L
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e
ac
t
i
o
n
s
—
Wa
t
e
r
su
p
p
l
y
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
&c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
g P~V~SHE~'~~~ • ~ ~~T~G~
S
A
N
D
A
G
Se
r
i
e
s
72
Fo
r
e
f r
ca
s
t
s
o
20
3
0
Wa
t
e
r
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
Se
r
v
i
c
e
Ar
e
a
.
Fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
Se
r
i
e
s
12
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
3,
7
5
9
,
0
0
0
Si
n
g
l
e
-Fa
m
i
l
y
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Un
i
t
s
71
3
,
4
0
0
Mu
l
t
i
-Fa
m
i
l
y
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
Un
i
t
s
57
0
,
9
0
0
Em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
t
s
1,
6
8
2
,
1
0
0
y Pg~~s~►F~ ~~S~ • ~ ~ti~~~G~
Wa
t
e
r
Us
e
Ta
r
et
Me
t
h
o
d
s
9►
♦M
e
t
h
o
d
1
—
8
0
%
of
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
ga
l
l
o
n
s
pe
r
ca
p
i
t
a
(g
p
c
d
)
po
t
a
b
l
e
water use
¨
Me
t
h
o
d
2
.~
: _
—
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
ap
p
l
i
e
d
fo
r
in
d
o
o
r
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
use,
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
ar
e
a
wa
t
e
r
us
e
,
an
d
CI
I
us
e
s
.
♦M
e
t
h
o
d
3
—
9
5
%
of
hy
d
r
o
l
o
g
i
c
re
g
i
o
n
ta
r
g
e
t
of
st
a
t
e
'
s
20
x
2
0
2
0
Water
Co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
.
¨
Me
t
h
o
d
4
(F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
20
1
1
)
—
Dr
a
f
t
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
a
l
ta
r
g
e
t
me
t
h
o
d
to
be
up
d
a
t
e
d
20
1
4
-
Ex
c
e
l
Sp
r
e
a
d
s
h
e
e
t
ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
o
r
of
ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
ta
r
g
e
t
♦A
s
s
u
m
e
d
sa
v
i
n
g
s
of
me
t
e
r
i
n
g
of
un
m
e
t
e
r
e
d
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
♦A
s
s
u
m
e
d
wa
t
e
r
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
in
d
o
o
r
,
CI
I
,
and
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
wa
t
e
r
us
e
i~w ~ ~ ~~~,F~p IF,.
~
t
h
o
d
7
Ba
_
s
P
l
i
n
~
10
Ye
a
r
Ba
s
e
Pe
r
i
o
d
S
D
C
W
A
Me
t
h
o
d
fo
r
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
To
t
a
l
Po
t
a
b
l
e
De
m
a
n
d
s
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Po
t
a
b
l
e
Wa
t
e
r
Us
e
AF
-Ex
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Fi
s
c
a
l
Ye
a
r
19
9
6
-2
0
0
19
9
7
-2
0
0
6
19
9
8
-2
0
0
7
19
9
9
-2
0
0
8
20
0
0
-2
0
0
9
20
0
1
-2
0
1
0
AF
Y
a
gp
C
d
AF
Y
a
gp
C
d
q~
/
e
gp
c
d
q~
(
a
gp
C
d
Q~
(
a
gp
C
d
AF
Y
a
gpCdPopulationAnnualcd
19
9
6
23
,
7
5
3
17
6
.
5
120,102176.5
19
9
7
24
,
5
6
0
17
6
.
9
24
,
5
6
0
17
6
.
9
123,901176.9
,.
19
9
8
22
,
8
7
4
15
9
.
9
22
,
8
7
4
15
9
.
9
22
,
8
7
4
15
9
.
9
127,700159.9
19
9
9
25
,
4
4
2
17
2
.
7
25
,
4
4
2
17
2
.
7
25
,
4
4
2
17
2
.
7
25
,
4
4
2
17
2
.
7
131,499172.7
20
0
0
29
,
9
0
1
19
7
.
3
29
,
9
0
1
19
7
.
3
29
,
9
0
1
19
7
.
3
29
,
9
0
1
19
7
.
3
29
,
9
0
1
19
7
.
3
135,301197.3
20
0
1
30
,
0
0
2
18
7
.
0
30
,
0
0
2
18
7
.
0
30
,
0
0
2
18
7
.
4
30
,
0
0
2
18
7
.
0
30
,
0
0
2
18
7
.
0
30
,
0
0
2
187.0143,228187.0
20
0
2
35
,
1
8
2
20
1
.
4
35
,
1
8
2
20
1
.
4
35
,
1
8
2
20
1
.
4
35
,
1
8
2
20
1
.
4
35
,
1
8
2
20
1
.
4
35
,
1
8
2
201.4155,946201.4
20
0
3
34
,
5
3
6
18
6
.
3
34
,
5
3
6
18
6
.
3
34
,
5
3
6
18
6
.
3
34
,
5
3
f
i
18
6
.
3
34
,
5
3
6
18
6
.
3
34
,
5
3
6
186.3165,514186.3
20
0
4
39
,
5
7
9
20
4
.
4
39
,
5
7
9
20
4
.
4
39
,
5
7
9
20
4
.
4
39
,
5
7
9
20
4
.
4
39
,
5
7
9
20
4
.
4
39
,
5
7
9
204.4172,868204.4
20
0
5
37
,
6
7
8
18
5
.
0
37
,
6
7
8
18
5
.
0
37
,
6
7
8
18
5
.
0
37
,
6
7
8
18
5
.
0
37
,
6
7
8
18
5
.
0
37
,
6
7
8
185.0181,792185.0
20
0
6
41
,
2
5
8
41
,
2
5
8
19
7
.
3
41
,
2
5
8
19
7
.
3
41
,
2
5
8
19
7
.
3
41
,
2
5
8
19
7
.
3
41
,
2
5
8
197.3186,688197.3
20
0
7
41
,
9
0
9
41
,
9
0
9
19
6
.
6
41
,
9
0
9
19
6
.
6
41
,
9
0
9
19
6
.
6
41
,
9
0
9
196.6190,263196.6
20
0
8
38
,
0
4
5
38
,
0
4
5
17
5
.
4
38
,
0
4
5
17
5
.
4
38
,
0
4
5
175.4193,586175.4
20
0
9
34
,
9
7
1
34
,
9
7
1
15
9
.
3
34
,
9
7
1
159.3195,932159.3
10
-
Ye
a
r
gp
c
d
18
5
18
7
18
9
19
0
18
9
188
No
t
e
s
:
a.
Fr
o
m
C
W
A
Dr
a
f
t
Me
m
b
e
r
Aa
e
n
c
v
De
m
a
n
d
Fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
Fo
r
Ot
a
v
W
D
Ib
.
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
fr
o
m
SA
N
D
A
G
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
19
9
4
-2
0
1
0
(r
e
e
d
2/
2
2
/
2
0
1
1
)
D
e
m
a
n
d
Ta
r
et
9►
20
°
R
d
i
n
2
2
e
uc
t
o
b
0
0
o
y
Ye
a
r
20
1
5
20
2
0
20
2
5
20
3
0
2035
G
P
C
D
Go
a
l
17
1
15
2
15
2
152152
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
21
9
,
2
2
3
24
2
,
2
4
1
25
8
,
0
3
7
26
9
,
5
2
2
284,997
2
0
%
by
20
2
0
De
m
a
n
d
Ta
r
g
e
t
(A
F
)
42
,
0
6
9
41
,
3
2
1
44
,
0
1
5
45
,
9
7
4
48,614
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
fr
o
m
S
A
N
D
A
G
Se
r
i
e
s
12
fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
.
~ Pg~isHE~l~~i~ • ~ ~~r~G~
n
as
e
on
e
em
a
n
or
e
c
a
s
Ye
a
r
20
1
5
20
2
0
20
2
5
20
3
0
2035
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
M
&I
41
,
8
1
1
50
,
7
0
9
60
,
7
6
0
67
,
6
2
5
71,135
De
m
a
n
d
(S
A
N
D
A
L
)
Ba
s
e
l
i ne
Ag
.
99
86
78
7163
De
m
a
n
d
(
C
W
A
)
Ne
a
r
-t
e
r
m
2,
9
7
3
2
,
9
7
3
2,
9
7
3
2,9732,973
An
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
s
To
t
a
l
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
44
,
8
8
3
53
,
7
6
8
63
,
8
1
1
70
,
6
6
9
77,171
De
m
a
n
d
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
M
&I
de
m
a
n
d
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
fr
o
m
S
A
N
D
A
L
Se
r
i
e
s
12
fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
.
g P~~~sHE~,~s ~ • ~ ~'~ ',~~~G~
Wa
t
e
r
Us
e
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
W
U
E
Go
a
l
&A
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
y
~
Co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
ui
r
~
e
m
en
t
A F
q
)
Ye
a
r
20
1
5
20
2
0
20
2
5
20
3
0
2035
To
t
a
l
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
44
,
8
8
3
53
,
7
6
8
63
,
8
1
1
70
,
6
6
9
77,171
De
m
a
n
d
20
%
by
20
2
0
42
,
0
6
9
41
,
3
2
1
44
,
0
1
5
45
,
9
7
4
48,614
De
m
a
n
d
Ta
r
g
e
t
Wa
t
e
r
Us
e
-2
,
8
1
4
-12
,
4
4
7
-19
,
7
9
6
-24
,
6
9
5
-28,557
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Go
a
l
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
4,
4
0
0
5,
0
0
0
5,
8
0
0
6,
8
0
0
8,000
Ad
j
u
s
t
e
d
W
U
E
0
-7
,
4
4
7
-13
,
9
9
6
-17
,
8
9
5
-20,552
Go
a
l
(S
u
r
p
l
u
s
)
Ba
s
e
d
on
S
B
X
7-7
Me
t
h
o
d
1
Ca
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
Ol P0L►~~EO,~iSW • ~ a1 '9T~G~
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
D
e
m
a
n
d
Th
r
o
u
h 2035
9►
Ye
a
r
20
1
5
20
2
0
20
2
5
20
3
0
2035
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
21
9
,
2
2
3
24
2
,
2
4
1
25
8
,
0
3
7
26
9
,
5
2
2
284,997
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
To
t
a
l
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
44
,
8
8
3
53
,
7
6
8
63
,
8
1
1
70
,
6
6
9
77,171
De
m
a
n
d
(A
F
)
Ad
j
u
s
t
e
d
W
U
E
0
-7
,
4
4
7
-13
,
9
9
6
-17
,
8
9
5
-20,552
Go
a
l
(A
F
)
(S
u
r
p
l
u
s
)
To
t
a
l
Ba
s
e
l
i
n
e
44
,
8
8
3
46
,
3
2
1
49
,
8
1
5
52
,
7
7
4
56,614
De
m
a
n
d
w/
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
(A
F
)
Ta
b
l
e
fr
o
m
St
a
f
f
Re
p
o
r
t
g P~~,ISNEO,~~~ • ~ ~G'9T H
Pr
e
ar
a
t
i
o
n
of
20
7
0
U
W
M
P
p
So
u
r
c
e
s
of
Gr
a
d
u
a
l
Ch
a
n
g
e
an
d
So
u
r
c
e
s
of
Su
d
d
e
n
or
Short-term
Un
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
y
Ch
a
n
g
e
an
d
Un
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
y
Gr
o
w
t
h
de
v
i
a
t
e
s
fr
o
m
S
A
N
D
A
G
Se
v
e
r
i
t
y
,
ti
m
i
n
g
,
an
d
frequency
Fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
t~ ~~
~ ~
,
Im
p
a
c
t
s
fr
o
m
lo
n
g
-t
e
r
m
ch
a
n
g
e
s
Re
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
are put in
in
te
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
an
d
ra
i
n
f
a
l
l
pl
a
c
e
th
a
t
fu
r
t
h
e
r
limit supply
.:..
:
.
.
.
.
._; ~
._ . _ _:
.:
_
av
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
,.
Wi
l
l
i
n
g
n
e
s
s
to
pa
y
fo
r
De
l
t
a
fi
x
.
;~.;
_~
~, ~ , •G ~TFR D15~~`
Wa
t
e
r
S
h
r
n
in
n
PI n
o
t
a
e
C
o
t
e
a
g
g
cy
Wa
t
e
r
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
Wa
t
e
r
Su
p
p
l
y
Wa
t
e
r
St
a
g
e
s
Wa
t
e
r
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
Wa
t
e
r
Su
p
p
l
y
Co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
DMP Stage
A
te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
ge
n
e
r
a
l
wa
t
e
r
su
p
p
l
y
sh
o
r
t
a
g
e
du
e
to
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
Stage 1
de
m
a
n
d
or
li
m
i
t
e
d
su
p
p
l
i
e
s
su
c
h
as
a
di
s
r
u
p
t
i
o
n
to
th
e
po
t
a
b
l
e
wa
t
e
r
tr
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
,
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
or
st
o
r
a
g
e
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
of
Me
t
r
o
p
o
l
i
t
a
n
or
th
e
Wa
t
e
r
Au
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
,
or
of
ot
h
e
r
ag
e
n
c
i
e
s
wh
e
r
e
b
y
su
c
h
sy
s
t
e
m
s
be
c
o
m
e
in
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
to
me
e
t
lo
c
a
l
or
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
de
m
a
n
d
.
A
lo
n
g
-t
e
r
m
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
or
un
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
sh
u
t
d
o
w
n
,
ma
j
o
r
Stage 2
sy
s
t
e
m
di
s
r
u
p
t
i
o
n
,
or
mu
l
t
i
-y
e
a
r
dr
o
u
g
h
t
.
A
ma
j
o
r
un
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
sh
u
t
d
o
w
n
or
di
s
r
u
p
t
i
o
n
to
th
e
tr
e
a
t
e
d
Stage 3
or
un
t
r
e
a
t
e
d
wa
t
e
r
sy
s
t
e
m
s
su
c
h
as
th
o
s
e
ca
u
s
e
d
by
na
t
u
r
a
l
di
s
a
s
t
e
r
,
ma
j
o
r
sy
s
t
e
m
fa
i
l
u
r
e
,
or
ac
t
s
of
wa
r
.
Ta
b
l
e
38
of
th
e
O
W
D
20
1
0
U
W
M
P
~ P~~~sriF~,~s ~ • ~ ~~~~G~
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Wa
t
e
r
Sh
o
r
t
a
g
e
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
Levels
Wa
t
e
r
Sh
o
r
t
a
g
e
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
Le
v
e
l
s
Wa
t
e
r
Us
e
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
Co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Ta
r
g
e
t
DMP Sta eg
1
—
Su
p
p
l
y
Wa
t
c
h
Vo
l
u
n
t
a
r
y
Up
to
1
0
%
Stage 1 or 2
2
—
Su
p
p
l
y
Al
e
r
t
Ma
n
d
a
t
o
r
y
>
1
0
%
- 2
0
%
Stage 2 or 3
3
—
Su
p
p
l
y
Cr
i
t
i
c
a
l
Ma
n
d
a
t
o
r
y
>
2
0
%
- 4
0
%
Stage 3
4
—
Su
p
p
l
y
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Ma
n
d
a
t
o
r
y
Ab
o
v
e
4
0
%
Stage 3
Ta
b
l
e
39
of
th
e
O
W
D
20
1
0
U
W
M
P
an
d
fr
o
m
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
Co
d
e
of
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
Se
c
t
i
o
n
39 ~ P~~~sHE~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~G
•
~
~)
a
1~
I
[
I
l
l
l
~
i
i
!~
_ .
Draft
Ot
a
y
Wa
t
e
r
District
20
1
0
Urban Water
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Plan
Ad
o
p
t
e
d
June xx, 2011 Prepared fw:9rF4 o~~SP ~Ofay Waier District
25
5
4
SweetwaterSprings Boulevard Spring Valley, California 91978 Prepared by:~Tl~~~!~9275 Sky Park Court, Suife 200 San Diego, California 92123
~ ~~ i
~ ~ Kr ~~~
a~ ; ~ s~~,
~ ~ ~ ~
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: June 1, 2011
SUBMITTED BY: Gary Silverman PROJECT/ P2502-001102 DIV. 5
Senior Civil Engineer SUBPROJECT: P2503-001102 ~1~•
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
APPROVED BY: Rod Posada ~~~ Cs~ -~~ °(cnie~ Chief , Engineering
APPROVED BY: Manny Magana~" ~ ~
(,asst. inn): Assistant General pager, Engineering and Operations
SUBJECT: Authorize the Issuance of a Purchase Order to Remanufacture
Motors for the 803-1 and 850-2 Pump Stations
~~~ ~,~~ r. ~.
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
authorizes the General Manager to issue a purchase order to
Propulsion Controls Engineering (PCE} in the amount of $103,356 for
the remanufacture of motors at 803-1 and 850-2 Pump Stations (see
Exhibit A for Project location).
~~ Uri • ~:
Please see Attachment A.
~- X~
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to issue a
purchase order in the amount of $103,356 to PCE for the remanufacture
of motors at the 803-1 and 850-2 Pump Stations.
.~r
The 803-1 and 850-2 Pump Stations are located adjacent to each other
at the Regulatory Site, Both pump stations currently lift water from
the 520 Reservoirs to their respective pressure zones. With the new
640-1 and 640-2 Reservoirs in place since 2008, and the completion of
the 36-inch Jamacha Road pipeline in the fall of 2010, the District
now has the opportunity for significant energy cost savings by
modifying these stations to enable pumping from the 640-1 and 640-2
Reservoirs rather than the 520-2 and 520-3 Reservoirs.
To accomplish this change in pumping operation, it is necessary to
replace the motor starters in the existing motor control centers
(MCCs) with VFDsa This will allow the existing pumps to operate at a
lower speed to match the reduced pumping head. It will also provide
the operational flexibility to return to the higher pumping head
configuration, if necessary, The VFDs related controls were approved
at the May 4, 2011 Board Meeting.
The 120-foot decrease in pumping head will result in an estimated
savings in energy usage of approximately $85,000 per year. At this
rate, the estimated project costs will be recovered within 12 years,
well within the useful life of the two pump stations, In addition,
because the Project reduces energy consumption, it qualifies under
the SDG&E Energy Efficiency Business Incentive Program. Application
has been made and the Project has been pre-approved by SDG&E for an
incentive payment of approximately $75,000, reducing the payback time
by about one year.
In association with installing VFDs, it is also necessary to
remanufacture the existing motors so they are compatible with the
VFDs. Quotations were solicited on April 12, 2011 from vendors to
remanufacture a total of eight (8) motors (four (4) for the 803-1
Pump Station and four (4) for the 850-2 Pump Station). The selected
vendor will pick up the motors at the project site, do the specified
work off-site at its shop, and deliver the remanufactured motors to
the project site when the work is complete. District staff will
dismount and remount the motors in coordination with the vendor.
In accordance with District Purchasing Procedures, three quotations
were received on April 26, 2011, as presented in the following table:
Pump Station PCE EMS Sloan
803-1 PS (P2502)$52,924.00 $58,000.00 $59,811.08
850-2 PS (P2503)$50,432°00 $54,000e00 $75,020,44
Total $103,356a00 $112,000.00 $134,~31a52
All three vendors have offered the Services that were requested.
Therefore, by virtue of their quotation being the lowest, it is
recommended that the required motor remanufacturing services be
purchased from PCE for $103,356,
2
~zsc~z~ zr~~~cT ,. .
The budget for CIP P2502 is $525,000, Total expenditures, plus
outstanding commitments and forecast, including this contract, is
$447,861, See Attachment B-1 for budget detail°
The budget for CIP P2503 is $650,000, Total expenditures, plus
outstanding commitments and forecast, including this contract, is
$407,'743, See Attachment B-2 for budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budgets, the Project Manager has
determined that each budget is sufficient to support the project.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the
Betterment Fund for both CIP P2502 and CIP P2503,
.,. ~~
This Project supports the District's Mission statement, "To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater services to the customers of
Otay Water District, in a professional, effective, and efficient
manner." This Project fulfills the District's Strategic Goals No. 1
- Community and Governance, and No. 5 - Potable Water, by maintaining
proactive and productive relationships with the Project stakeholders
and by guaranteeing that the District will provide for current and
future water needs.
,,
None. '
~,
General Manager
P: \t4CRK:IJG\CIP P25C2 a"03~~i Pump Station i4ocif'_cations\S_aff Reports\nD-OS-04-11, Staff Report, Authorize Purchase cf Vr^DS arn ALCs, `,GS-
~~'.cec
GS/RR:jf
Attachments° Attachment A - Committee Action
Attachment B-1 - Budget Detail for CIP P2502
Attachment B-2 - Budget Detail for CIP P2503
Exhibit A - Location Map
3
R~P,e_rsaar~
o,
4' '_ ~$
g~ ~
.i~A ..,` ~ ~Fes. cai,e ~~
~, ~ ~:
SUBJECT/PROJ~C?; ;Authorize the Issuance of a Purchase Order to Remanufacture
P2502-001102 '; Motors for the 803-1 and 850-2 Pump StationsP2503-001102
,~ i ~ ~ ' ~~
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on May 19, 2011. The Committee supported
Staff's recommendation.
~~r..,~
The "Committee Action °' is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board,
~R'~Llf?W~^
9
~ ~'f
~6f ' - 4 ~
i
B.. '.~
~A, ~~t!
i ~ ~.
Sl1~JECT/PROJ~C~: ;Authorize the Issuance of a Purchase Order to Remanufacture
P2502-001102 ;Motors for the 803-1 and 850-2 Pump StationsP2503-001102
Otay YVater Disirici Da4e Upda4ed: t~Aarch 01, 2011
P2502 - 803-1 Pump Station Modifications
Outstanding projected Fina/Budget Committed Expenditures Commitment & %ndoNComments
525,000 Cost
FOPEC3St
Planning
Labor 11,545 11,545 !,-11,545
Consultant Contracts 9,710 675 ~ 9,035 9,710 HVAC ENGINEERING INC
IliTotal Planning
Design
21,255 12,220 9,035 21,255
Labor 30,712 15,712 15,000 30,712
Consultant Contracts 175 175 -175 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
3,750 -3,750 3,750 EPA
TOta! Design
Construction
34,637 15,887 18,750 34,637
labor 80,000 80,000 80,000
VFD Procurement 141,919 ~, 141,919 141,919 SLOAN
ALC Procurement 67,126 ~ 67,126 67,126 ONE SOURCE
Motor Remanufacture 52,924 52,924 52,924 PCE
A/C Installation 50,000 50,000
To2a9 Construction
Grand Tota!
341,969
397,861
-
28,107
391,969
419,754
391,969
447,861
RC~~ esw~~.
G 9~~A
~7. v
~. ~ ~ t i~:
SU~JEC°f/PROJECT: ;Authorize the Issuance of a Purchase Order to Remanufacture
P2502-001102 Motor's for the 803-1 and 850-2 Pump StationsP2503-001102
Otay Water District Date Upda4ed: ~lprii 26, 2011
P2503 - 850-2 Pump Station Modifications
Outstanding p~,~cPed finalBudgeP Committed ~xpenditur~s Commitment & Vendor/Comments
650,000 Cost
FOPBC2Sf
Planning
Labor 18,930 18,930 18,930
Consultant Contracts 9,710 1,000 8,710 9,710 HVAC ENGINEERING INC
Total Planning
Design
28,640 ~~ 19,930
~
8,710 28,640
Labor 24,864 ~~ 14,864 10,000 24,864
Consultant Contracts 175 ' 175 -175 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
3,750 ; -3,750 3,750 EPI
Equipment Rental 2,790 1 2,790 -2,790 ART'S TRENCH PLATE
Total Design
Construction
31,579 i~ 17,829 13,750 31,579
Labor 75,000 ~ -75,000 75,000
VFD Procurement 104,966' -104,966 104,966 SLOAN
ALC Procurement 67,126 67,126 67,126 ONE SOURCE
Motor Remanufac4ure 50,432 -50,432 50,432 PCE
A/C Installation --50,000 50,000
Total Construc4ion
Grand Total
297,524
357,743
( -
37,759
347,524
369,984
347,524
407,743
52 s7 852 1638
5 EL CAJONOJECT
Mission
Boy 8 ~A ME:,A 25 y
94 ~~, ~l
ea ~ `•~-'`~~y4F7~
c(h'~ONA~C1 ~ ~ .. "YU ( n.
na
fa —
0
000
~~
a,~xYW
ower otoyV'STA Reservar
IMPERIAL
BEACH S 905
7ijuona Estuory (y~EXICOTIJUANA
VICINITY MAP
t__ ; ~ %~: ;%~`,.ti
~~ _~_~_
CAMPO ROAD 94
~j
~ ~J
m
REGULATORY
SITE
850-2 PUMP
STATION
803-1 PUMP
STATION
\\~-_~._>
~,~~~ti:, OT~Y WATER DISTRICT
g0~-1 ~,ND ~~5~—~ FUP✓P ~iF~i':CI~ ~~bOC~IFICEITION~.
,,~r r: _,
EXHIBIT A
,>'
~ ~ ~
Author: '~ ~ ~ ~~
-~
The above signatures atfiest fihaf the attached document has been reviev~ed and to the best of their ability the
signers verify that it meets fhe District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended
information; being grammatically correct and free of formatting and typographical errors; accurately presenting
calculated values and numerical references; and being internally consistent, legible and uniform in its
presentation style.
~ ~ ~
=:~~ ., ; ~;_ ,~r ~ .,
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: June 1, 2 O 11
SUBMITTED BY: Daniel Kay ~~ PROJECT/ P2490- DIV, 5
Associate Civil Engineer SUBPROJECTS: 001103 NO.
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
APPROVED BY: Rod Posada ~~~ '~ -~ o
(Chief) Chief , Engineering
APPROVED BY: Manny Magana ~~
(Asst.~~t): Assistant General Hager, Engineering and Operations
SUBJECT: Increase the Budget for CIP P2490 for the 1296-1 Reservoir
Interior/Exterior Coating Project
., ~.~.~ - ~ ~.Y~ ~~. ~~
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors
(Board) authorize an increase to the FY 2011 Budget for CIP
P2490 for the 1296-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Project
from $350,000 to $475,000 (see Exhibit A for Project location).
r' ~ a:
Please see Attachment A,
r.
To obtain Board approval to increase the budget for the 1296-1
Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Project by $125,000,
,.
On February 3, 2010, the Board awarded a construction contract
to West Coast Industrial Corporation (West Coast) in the amount
of $690,000 for coating the interior and exterior of both the
1296-1 and 1296-2 Reservoirs and to perform structural upgrades
to each reservoir, When th.e construction project was awarded,
the total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, for the 1296-1 Reservoir (l.OMG) portion of the work,
were $347,615. The FY 2010 CIP project budget was $350,000.
This amount was not revised for FY 2011 since the project had
just begun and the forecast at that time still showed that the
budget was adequate. However, due to the complexity of the
1296-1 Reservoir, consisting of lead removal and containment
along with removal of coal tar on the interior, the budget
should have been increased by $55,000 for FY 2011 to account for
an increased level of inspection. The budget for the 1296-2
Reservoir (2.OMG) project is adequate.
The second reason for staff's request to increase the 1296-1
Reservoir project budget is for extended costs incurred due to
the contractor's low productivity rate and inability to complete
the project on time° The original contract completion date was
August 19, 2010, but waS extended to December 23, 2010 due to
additional scope of work required and weather delays. Taking
into account the current forecast completion date of June 30,
2011, the project completion will be delayed by over six (6)
months, This delay translates into additional costs for the
District that were not anticipated when the project budget was
updated for FY 2011.
West Coast took seven (7) months to complete the coating and
structural upgrades on the 1296-2 Reservoir. The 1296-1
Reservoir work began in October 2010, and will be completed on
June 30, 2011. The District required additional Construction
Management (CM), full-time specialty inspection along with
additional staff time that will amount to $70,000. The table
below details the two (2) components of the budget increase
request.
FY 2011 Budget Shortfall (Staff)$55,000
Costs incurred since 12-23-10 (Staff,$0,000
specialty inspection, CM, mist)
TOTAL $125,000
Currently, West Coast is in the process of removing and
recoating the top coat for the lower portion of the interior
walls and the floor of the 1296-1 Reservoir. This work is
required in order to pass the Volatile Organic Compound (VOC)
tests. The new coating failed the VOC tests twice due to the
lack of curing of the first two coats. Once this work is
finished, the project will be complete,
Staff is evaluating the merits of assessing liquidated damages
to West Coast in order to recoup a portion of the District's
costs due to the unapproved extended duration of the contract.
2
The total amount of liquidated damages from December 23, 2010 to
June 30, 2011 will be $7,500,
FI~~~~ ~~~~~~e
The total budget for CIP P2490, as approved in the FY 2011
budget, is $350,000° Total expenditures, plus outstanding
commitments and forecast to date, are $474,579 (see attachment B
for budget details), The Project Manager has determined that
with a budget increase of $125,000, the project will be
completed within -the new budget amount of $475,000,
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available
from the Replacement Fund,
~~~A~~~~~ ~OA~m
These projects support the District's Mission statement, "To
provide safe reliable water, recycled water, and wastewater
services to our community in an innovative, cost efficient
water-wise, and environmentally responsible mannero "as well as
the General Manager's vision, to be "„e prepared for the future..°”
by guaranteeing that the District will always be able to meet
future water supply obligations and plan, design, and construe
new facilities°
R ` ._.
None,
~e~eral ~elariag~~° —
P:\WORKING\CIP P2~?90\Staff Reports\Staff Report Budget Increase\BD 06-01-11 Staff Report Increase
to Total Project Budgets (P2490, P2492), (DK-RR).doc
DK/RR/RPejf
Attachments° Attachment ~ - Committee Action
Attachment B - Budget Detail for P2490
Exhibit A - Location Map
3
i~j,ai rxt; '
t: ~~ r :1:
SUBJECT/PROJECT: Increase the Budget for CIP P2490 for the 1296-1 Reservoir
P2490-001103 ;.Interior/Exterior Coating Project __..
CONtMITTEE A.CTION'o
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on May 19, 2011. The Committee supported Staff's
recommendation.
i~ti3~~M
The "Committee Action" is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent to
the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
~~PO~,ISH~~,~a
fY • ~ m
G
~~FA o~9'~P,
ATTACHMENT ~
Otay Water District Date Updated: May 04, 2011
P2490 - 1296-1 Reservoir InUExt Coating &Upgrade
Budget Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
projected Final
Cost VendaNCamments
475,000
Planning
Labor 7,832 7,832 7,832
Regulatory gqency Fees 50 50 -50 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Total Planning 7,882 7,882 -7,882
Design
Labor 40,136 40,136 40,136
Professional Legal Fees 1,206 1,206 -1,206 GARCIA CAIDERON & RUIZ LLP
Consultant Contracts 700 700 -700 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
Total Design 42,043 42,043 -42,043
Construction
Labor 46,754 46,754 10,000 56,754
Consultant Contracts 1,160 1,160 -1,160 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Construction Contracts 4,640 4,640 -4,640 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
314,040 254,040 60,000 314,040 WEST COAST IND COATINGS INC
1,110 1,110 -1,110 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC
Service Contracts 126 126 -126 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO
787 787 -787 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
36,0 36,000 -36,000 SCHIFF ASSOCIATES
36 36 -36 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
CloseouUAcceptance --10,000 10,000
TOYeI C011StfUCtlOf1 404,654 344,654 80,000 424,654
Gland Total 454,579 394,579 50,000 474,579
Miss
Bo,
~ c~v
.-.. .
~~jj/~~ ~,~j~~ ~~~/~
/I //j ''
ji~ ~
~~~%%%%y'•;~
'r
~"~ra~~•
.-
PROJECT
SfTE __J
_.__ ___ _ __PROCTOR
1296-2 RESERVOIR _r__. ___._;:._
-_
_
_..__ o~
129fi-1 RE5ERttOtR _ r_ _.<
~
wJ
BEAR tijT -j
N WAY ~ ___
~ ,w p
__ __ ~_ _ ~
,_ _ ._._. a ~~,~'
_ - ---
1296-3 RESERVOIR
_..
_ _
PROCTOR VALLEY RD - ~_-` -`
~Pg`tSHE° ~9s OTAY WATER DI STRi CT
`~ ~ ~ °' 1296-1 & 7296-2 RESERVOIR
9re~`~ EXTERIOR/INTERIOR COATING AND UPGRADES
CIP P2490 & CIP P2492
~XHI.BIT A
Subject: Increase the Budget for CIP P2490 for the Project No.: P2490-001103
1296-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Project
Document Description: Staff Report for June 1, 2010 Board Meeting
Author: - `~/lam//~
Signature Date
Daniel Kay
Printed dame
Ron Ripperger
Printed Name
The above signatures attest that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability the signers
verifiy that it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended information; being
grammatically correct and free of formatting and typographical errors; accurately presenting calculated values and
numerical references; and being internally consistent, legible and uniform in its presentation style.
~' ~~ ~
,,.
k',
TYPE MEETING: Regular Boarct MEETING DATE: June 1, 2011
SUBMITTED BY: Frank Anderson, Utility N.O./G.F. NO: DIV. PLO.
Services Manager ~A~
APPROVED BY: Pedro Porras, ~~ ,~V~
(Chiefl
Chief, Water Operations
APPROVED BY: Manny Magana,
(Asst. GM):
Assistant General M n ger, Engine°ring & Operations
SUBJECT: AWARD PURCHASE ORDER TO KIRK PAVING FOR ANNUAL AS NEEDED
PAVING SERVICES
That the Board authorize issuing a blanket purchase order to
Kirk Paving in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for as-needed
asphalt paving services from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012,
~~~ .r,~ ~
Please see Attachment ~~A"e
~r~frr~.T~z~t
To present bid results and request that the Board authorize
issuing a blanket purchase order to Kirk Paving for as-needed
asphalt paving services from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012
in an amount not to exceed $200,000.
A i' A
As a regular course of business, the District is required to
maintain and repair its water delivery infrastructurem Routinely
this work requires the removal and re-installation of asphalt
paving in public roadways, It has been proven more effective and
efficient for the district to use outside contractors for its
asphalt paving work,
A11
Therefore, the Dis~rict has used outside asphalt paving contract
service for more than six (6) yearsa
As-needed paving service has been included in the FY 2012
Operating Budget under Contracted Servicesa The FY 2012 budget
for Contracted Services is $200,000°
In accordance with District purchasing requirements, a notice
was published and bids were solicited for this work on a "unit
price" basiso On May 3, 2011 six (6) contractors attended a
mandatory pre-bid meeting and on May 10 2011, bids were received
and publicly opened with the following results from four (4)
hi rl~lPrc
~~~d~~'
~7~1.C~I1'te~
Scores
Kirk Paving 838,30
SC Services 843°50
Frank & Son 1017°70
Hardy & Harper 1084,90
The low bidder was determined to be Kirk Paving, Lakeside, CA,
Attachment B was produced by the purchasing manager and is
attached,
Kirk Paving served as the FY10 as-needed paving services
contractor for the District for a yearly contract of $200,000
with no change orders, We are confident that they will be able
to perform the required workm
,~ -
The FY 2012 budget request includes $200a000 for as-needed
paving servicesa The project manager has projected that this
requested amount is sufficient to meet the paving needs in the
2012 fiscal year°
~~- ~~i
Strategyo Stewards of Public Infrastructure
Goalo Conduct the best practice preventative maintenance
activities°
4 ~ ~ ~~ ,;
None°
Atta~~hment "A", Com~m.itte° ~~tion
~ ~~yrsH~Q'~~
W • a 0~
Z
(Award Purchase Order to Kirk Paving for Annual As-Needed
SUBJECT/PROJECT: 'Paving Services
• ~ t ~
the Engineering/Operations and Water Resources Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on i"Iay 19, 2011, The Committee supported
Staff's recommendation.
~~~
The `Committee Action" is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for board approval. This report w~l_1 be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the fu11 board.
.y •; ~.
Item Wght Type of Service
1 10 Asphalt 0"-6"
2 5 Asphalt 7"-12"
3 5 Cap/Sheet 0"-1
4 1 Satin Seal
5 1 Traffic Strippinc
6 1 Grinding
7 1 Traffic Loops
8 1 Sand/Seal
9 1 Base Rem/Rep
10 10 Saw Cut 0"-6"
11 10 Saw Cut 6"-12"
12 1 Saw Cut 12" +
Score onths 1-6
~ i T['7'd~+i .'
Item ~Type of Service
1 10 Asphalt 0"-6"
2 5 Asphalt 7"-12"
3 5 Cap/Sheet 0"-1
4 1 Satin Seal
5 1 Traffic Strippinc
6 1 Grinding
7 1 Traffic Loops
8 1 Sand/Seal
9 1 Base Rem/Rep
10 10 Saw Cut 0"-6"
11 10 Saw Cut 6"-12"
12 1 Saw Cut 12" +
Score f~lonths 7-12
..:.
1 i
Kirk Paving
Bid Total
Price Score
$ 19.00 190
$ 19.50 97.5
$ 2.50 12.5
$ 0.50 0.5
$ 1.00 1
$ 3.25 3.25
$ 14.00 14
$ 1.75 1.75
$ 25.00 25
$ 3.00 30
$ 3.50 35
$ 4.00 4
414.5
,. ~. .-r
Bid Total
Price Score
$ 22.00 220.00
$ 27.00 135.00
$ 4.50 22.50
$ 0.40 0.40
$ 1.50 1.50
$ 2.00 2.00
$ 20.00 20.00
$ 0.80 0.80
$150.00 150.00
$ 2.50 25.00
$ 3.50 35.00
$ 4.50 4.50
616.7
~'FGl;~:'~~i
Bid Total
Price Score
$ 16.25 162.50
$ 18.25 91.25
$ 2.75 13.75
$ 1.00 1.00
$ 1.25 1.25
$ 4.00 4.00
$ 19.00 19.00
$ 2.50 2.50
$ 90.00 90.00
$ 5.00 50.00
$ 6.00 60.00
$ 8.25 8.25
503.5
SC Seri+ices
Bid Total
Price Score
$ 16.00 160.00
$ 18.00 90.00
$ 2.75 13.75
$ 1.00 1.00
$ 1.50 1.50
$ 2.50 2.50
$ 20.00 20.00
$ 2.00 2.00
$ 18.00 18.00
$ 5.00 50.00
$ 5.00 50.00
$ 6.00
6
.
0
0
~~.'+ ~'
Bid Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid Total
Price Score Price Score Price Score Price Score
$ 19.60 196 $ 22.00 220.00 $ 17.00 170 $ 17.00 170
$ 20.00 100 $ 27.00 135.00 $ 18.75 93.75 $ 19.00 95
$ 2.65 13.25 $ 4.50 22.50 $ 2.75 13.75 $ 2.75 13.75
$ 0.50 0.5 $ 0.40 0.40 $ 1.70 1.7 $ 1.00 1
$ 1.00 1 $ 1.50 1.50 $ 1.25 1.25 $ 1.50 1.5
$ 3.25 3.25 $ 2.00 2.00 $ 4.00 4 $ 2.50 2.5
$ 14.00 14 $ 20.00 20.00 $ 19.00 19 $ 20.00 20
$ 1.75 1.75 $ 0.80 0.80 $ 2.50 2.5 $ 2.00 2
$ 25.00 25 $ 1.50 1.50 $ 90.00 90 $ 18.00 18
$ 3.00 30 $ 2.50 25.00 $ 5.00 50 $ 5.00 50
$ 3.50 35 $ 3.50 35.00 $ 6.00 60 $ 5.00 50
$ 4.00 4 $ 4.50 4.50 $ 8.25 8.25 $ 5.00 5
423.75 468,2 5'94.2 428.75
~3~.25 104.9 1017.7 843.5
i . ~ • ~ ~i; 1 . ,' ..
Subject: Approval to award purchase order to Kirk Paving for FY12 annual as-needed paving
services. Project No.: Utilities iVlaintenance Operating Budget-Contractual Services
Document Description: Staff report for the June 1, 2011 Board IVleeting.
~;:
Author: ~, ~ - Date: ~ ~' ,1
Signature
Printed Na
QA Reviewer: - Date: ~ ~Z~~~
Signature
Punted Name
Manager: ~ ~~~~~ Date: ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~1 ~
Si~natur~
~~~'~-r~3~~1`a~`c~- ~ c~
Printed Name
The above signatures attest that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability, the signers
verify that it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended information; being
grammatically correct and free of formatting and typographical errars; accurately presenting calculated values and
numerical references; and being internally consistent, Ieg~ibLe and uniform in its presentation style.
~ ~.
g~s~
m~
~_q ~3~~
TYPE f~IEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: June 1 , 2 O 11
SUBMITTED BY: David Charlesy em_ PROJECT/ D0672- DIV. NO. ~
Public Services Manager SUBPROJECT: 090017
R2058-
001103
APPROVED BY: Rod Posada ~ ~~•~,
Chief, Engineering
APPROVED BY: Manny Magan~ ' ,%"~~
(Asst.GM): Assistant General Iva:°lager, Engineering and Operations
SUBJECT: Reimbursement Agreement with MSe Development Company LLC, for
a Portion of the Capital Improvement Project for Airway
Business Center - RecPL-16-Inch 860 Zone, Air~Nay Road (CIP
82058)
~E~T~~t~.~, d~~~.~ERa ~ R~C~JJ1~~'D~1'TIi~I~3m
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
authorizes the General Manager to enter info a Reimbursement
Agreement with MS, Development Company LLC, a California Limited
Liability Company (MSDC) in an amount not to exceed $162,305x85 and
to reimburse MSDC for the completion of construction of a portion of
the Capital Improvement Project for Airway Business Center - RecPL-
16-Inch 860 Zone recycled pipeline on Airway Road (CIP 82058), lsee
Exhibit A for Prod ect location) o
Please see Attachment A,
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
reimbursement agreement (see Attachment B) and authorize payment with
MSDC for reimbursement of construction costs of a portion of the
Capital Improvement Project for Airway Business Center - RecPL-16-
Inch 860 Zone recycled pipeline on. Airway Road (CIP 82058), in an
amount not to exceed $162,305,85,
~1'~i7 T.V~T~,
Since the Developer was required to widen Airway Road, staFf
conditioned the Developer, MSDC, as part of the Otay Mesa Fed-Ex
Project (Project), to install approximately 1,383 linear feet of 16-
inch PVC pipe, in the Otay Mesa area,
The District would like to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement per
Policy 26, Due to the expedited nature of the Project, the Developer
had to build this Project and seek reimbursement at a later date,
The Developer received bids for the pipeline construction from three
responsive bidders and submitted copies to the District, Staff and
District Counsel evaluated and certified that these bids were in
compliance with Policy 26 requirements and concurred with the award
to Rand Engineering, the low bidder. The bids are as follows:
~id~.e~~~~d ~a~u~t
Rand Engineering $160,183,80
Western Pacific Pipeline $180,100,00
KTA Construction $178,540,00''
Staff used the following methodology to evaluate the reimbursement
request submitted by MSDCe
a,) A quantity take-off (see Attachment C)
b,) CIP price verification sheet (see Attachment D)
c,) Comparison of prices and quantities against the
reimbursement request (see Attachment E)
Staff reviewed and is in agreement with the information on the
documents provided°
~'TS~~L I2~~~~T m
The total budget for CIP R2058, as approved in the FY 2011 budget, is
$3,500,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, is $1,298,546, See Attachment F for budget detail,
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager has
determined that the budget iS sufficient to support the project,
Finance has determined that l00% of the funding will be available
from the Expansion Fund,
E
s.
This Project is in line with the District's Strategic Focus Area
No. 3, Financial Health; No. 5, Potable Water; and No, 6, Recycled
Mater, to increase recycled water use to help augment total water
supply,
~,~~~1L ~~Ts~1~~`I' o
None,
des>e~°~l ~~~a:~:~~~e~
P:\Pub-ic-s\S^1AFF REPOP.TS\2011\BD OS-04-11, Staff Report, Airway Rd Fed Ex Reimbursement, (DC-RP).dcc
BD/DC/RP;jf
Attachments° Exhibit A - Location Map
Attachment A - Committee Action
Attachment B - Reimbursement Agreement
Attachment C - Quantity Take-Offs
Attachment D - Price Verification Sheet
Attachment E - Comparison of Prices and Quantities
1~gainst the Reimbursement Request
Attachment F - Budget Detail
3
~ua~~q
EXHIBIT A
a p~B~P`
AIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER
DEVELOPER: MS DEVELOPMENT CO. LLC
PROJECT#: D0672-090017
APN: 646-130-60, 619 66.y 63, 64-00
ADDRESS: AIRWAY 1tOAD
DN: 2
ID: 7
DATE: 4/18/2011
0 170 340 680 1, 020 1, 360
Feet
~VECtNITY MAP
15
16
0
~~F~ v L
DN.4 ----
4 ,:~,
5 f M ~ ~\r'1 t
`J r_
•1 ~~
~ ----° ~
s
Nn
W Q~~ E~~
S
~ _ - —:,.
I
~L~sH~4
~ ~ I~~UI , ' 0~
O
~~F+~ at8'~~`
~ ~ ~.
SUBJECT/PROJECT: ;Reimbursement Agreement with MS . Development Company LLC,
D0672-090017 'for a Portion of the Capital Improvement Project for Airway
Business Center - RecPL-16-Inch 860 Zone, Airway Road (CIP
R2058)
COMMITTEE ACTIONm
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on May 19, 2011. The
Committee supported Staff's recommendation.
M►[~7~M
The "Committee Action" is written in anticipation of the
Committee moving the item forward for board approval. This
report will be sent to the Board as a Committee approved item,
or modified to reflect any discussion or changes as directed
from the Committee prior to presentation to the full Board.
J ` 1 ~.
'~
This Reimbursement Agreement ("A~reeent99) is cntcrcd into as of this day of
2011, by and between the OTAY WATER DISTRICT, a Municipal Water
District formed under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911 ("District") and MS.
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
with and address at 560 Ranchito Drive, Escondido, California 92025 ("Developer-"), in view of
the following facts and for the following purposes:
I~ECI'I'AI,S
A. District's Board of Directors has adopted a Master Plan and approved a Capital
Improvement Program ("CIP") for all regional water facilities ("Planned CIP Fac~lit~es")
throughout District. There are a number of Planned CIP Facilities within and adjacent to Airway
Business Center (the "I)evelopanent") (see Exhibit A), which Developer will construct within
District's service area in City of San Diego, California.
G6 J9
GG
~ 9
97
9 9
C~ A A~(D °~ / ~ .a ,.~o~i .,,..ao~..,-;1-.or7 ti,-, x'..1„1-.Y+ A— ~4t~~.1.0.1 1, o,-o~.,
~~~ 9 9 ~~~a.vaiv~u aava v~v.
C. Developer intends to develop its property, which will include substantial public
improvements, including the construction of certain of the Planned CIP Facilities within the
Development ("12equirecl CIP Facilities") as more fully depicted or described in Exhibits B-1
and B-2.
D. Developer recognizes that District will need to construct regional facilities to
support this development, typically in advance of the Developer paying all capacity fees.
E. Developer shall conform to, and comply with, all of the conditions set forth in
D1S$T1Ct's current Policy 26, attached hereto as Exhibit C.
F. Developer shall comply with all terms and conditions in the current District's
Code of Ordinances and in the District's Standard Specifications.
G. Developer agrees to encourage participation by Emerging Business Enterprises on
construction contracts related to this agreement.
H. In coordination with this Agreement, Developer and District have entered into
that certain Agreement for Construction of a Water System dated March 16, 2009
("Constr~etion Agr°eeeraY9) wherein Developer's obligations regarding the construction and
completion of the Required CIP Facilities are more fully set forth. The Parties acknowledge that
where the terms and conditions of this agreement conflict with the Construction Agreement on
matters pertaining to construction and completion of the Required CIP Facilities, the
Construction Agreement will control. Similarly, where the terms end ~onclitians of the
Construction Agreement conflict with this Agreement on matters pertaining to the
reimbursement of Developer by District, this Agreement will control.
1~O~V, 'I'I~E~F~RE, in consideration of the above Recitals and of the promises and
agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, District and the Developer do hereby promise and
agree as follows:
1. Proiect Cost
Developer shall design and construct, install and complete the Required CIP
facilities described in Exhibits B-1 and B-2 in the manner more fully set forth in the Construction
Agreement, and shall provide all funds needed for the design, construction, installation and
completion of the Required CIP Facilities. In order to remain eligible for reimbursement as
provided under this Agreement, the Required CIP Facilities must be constructed and completed
within the time provided in the Construction Agreement. Furthermore, to remain eligible for
reimbursement, Developer must construct the Required CIP Facilities in compliance with all
applicable laws, rules and regulations.
2. Itefrnburseanent
Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement for the cost and expense of
constructing and completing the Required CIP Facilities consistent with District's Policy No. 26
and consistent with any Construction Agreement in form and function satisfactory to the District.
Except as provided in Policy 26, the District will pay 100% of the reimbursement cost after the
General Manager accepts the project and the Board approves the request for reimbursement.
Developer shall submit a request for reimbursement in writing to the District and
shall attach all documents necessary to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of District, that the work
has been completed and accepted and the costs and expenses have been actually and reasonably
incurred. The necessary documents shall include (i) copies of bid documents, (ii) invoices, (iii)
unconditional lien releases, and (iv) any other documentation as requested by the District.
E
~c:
If not otherwise earlier terminated, this agreement shall terminate on the earlier
of (i) the date on which the reimbursements contemplated herein have been paid, or (ii) five (5)
calendar years from the date first set forth above, which shall be the date of Board approval;
provided that all Developer's warranties and indemnifications shall remain in effect until
terminated in accordance with their respective terms. District may terminate this Agreement and
its obligations if the General Manager determines that Developer has failed to comply with its
obligations hereunder or under the Construction Agreement.
•. ,
Developer shall be required to adhere to District's process for submittal of
improvement plans, which includes bonding for all facilities to be constructed, construction
agreements, deposits for District staff time and project acceptance.
5. Record I~eei~in~
Developer shall keep an accurate record of the actual cost to construct the
Required CIP Facilities for which reimbursement is requested, in accordance with generally
accepted accounting procedures. Developer shall allow an authorized District representative,
during Developer's regular business hours and upon reasonable notice, to examine and duplicate
any records relevant to verifying the actual cost to construct the Required CIP Facilities,
including, without limitation, all contract bids and invoices. Any changes occurring during
construction shall be properly documented. Back-up documentation shall be kept by Developer
for three (3) years after the completion of the facilities and be provided to District for its review
upon its request.
1 ~.
No change orders will be permitted unless the change order results from a change
in the work, design or specifications initiated by District during the construction of the Required
CIP Facilities.
/ ~ r
a. Incorporation of fZecitals and Exhibits. The recitals set forth above and all
e~ibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this
Agreement to be given the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein.
b. Amendments. No amendment, modification, supplement, termination ar
waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless executed in writing
by both parties and then only in the specified instance and for the specific purpose given.
c. Notices. Any demand upon or notice required or permitted to be given by
one party to the other party shall be in writing. Except as otherwise provided by law, any
demand upon or notice required or permitted to be given by one party to the other party
in connection with this Agreement shall be effective (i) on the date a personal delivery is
accepted, (ii) on the date a facsimile of the notice is sent, or on the next business day if
the fax is sent after 5:00 p.m. or on a Saturday, Sunday, or holiday; provided that receipt
and confirmation of the facsimile transmission is attached to a copy of the faxed notice,
(iii) on the second business day after mailing by certified or registered United States mail,
return receipt requested, or (iv) on the succeeding business day after mailing by Express
Mail or after deposit with a private delivery service of general use (e.g., Federal Express),
postage or fee prepaid as appropriate, addressed to the party at the address shown below:
If tm District: Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, California 91978-2004
~ttn: General Manager
Telephone: (619) 670-2222
If to I)evel~per: Monaf Saeed
1VIS. Development Company LLC,
l~ California Limited Liability Company
560 Ranchito Drive
Escondido, California 92025
Telephone: (619) 865-3900
email : lebznz@yahoo . com
Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner set forth in
this paragraph.
d. Indemnity. Developer agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold
harmless District and its governing boards, agents, officers and employees from and
against any and all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any
person or property, including injury to employees, agents or officers, which arise from or
are connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the negligent acts or
omissions or willful misconduct of Developer or its agents, officers or employees, in
performing the Work, or any part thereof, and all expenses of investigation and defending
against same; provided, however, that Developer's duty to defend, indemnify and hold
harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the negligent acts or
omissions or willful misconduct of District or its governing board, agents, officers or
employees. District and Developer agree that in the event of any joint or concurrent
negligence, they will apportion any established or agreed upon liability proportionate to
their respective degree of fault.
e. Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement and each provision herein
shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties
agree that the proper venue for the resolution of any disputes under this Agreement shall
be with the Superior Court of the County of San Diego.
f. Successors in Interest. The Agreement and all rights and obligations
contained herein shall be in effect whether or not any or all parties to the Agreement have
been succeeded by another entity, and all rights and obligations of the parties signatory to
this Agreement shall be vested and binding on their successors in interest.
g. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts,
each or which counterpart, if fully executed, shall be deemed an original. I~To counterpart
shall be deemed to be an original or presumed delivered unless and until the counterpart
executed by the other party to this Agr~erraenf is in the physical possession of the party
seeking enforcement thereof.
h. Effective Date. This Agreement shall not bind the parties and become
effective until such time as the authorized representative of I3eveloper has executed the
Agreement, and District his approved and tie authorized re~re~entative cif District has
executed this Agreement.
i. Corporate Authority. The persons executing phis t~greement on behalf of
the parties hereto represent and warrant that: (i} such pa.ty i~ duly organized and existing;
(ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this 1~greernent ors behalf of said
party; (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions
of any other Agreement to which said is bound.
II~t ~IITNESS i~HEREOF, this t~greement is enecuted by District and by I?evelaper as
of the date first above written.
T'A~' ~3'A7['E12 I)IST' C'I'
A Caiiforr~i~ Il~Iun~cipat mater District
General IVlanager
t.
5
P:~Public-s~AGREEMENTS~Nf3. Development Co LLC CIP R2058 Reimbursement.docx
~~eti a
W ~ ~ EXHIBIT A-1
4
@R rn8'~P
AIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER
DEVELOPER: MS DEVELOPMENT CO. LLC
PROJECT#: D0672-090017
APN: 646-130-60, 61, 62, 63, 64-00
ADDRESS: AIRWAY ROAD
DiV: 2
ID: 7
DATE: 4/18/2011
0 170 340 680 1,020 1,360
Feet
f----
_,
DN.4 r---
_, i
~~ ~ ,~
4J ~ j1 ~ ,; ~=~.:~ ~
~~~ 7 _,_... DIV 2~~ - ~_,
~ ' Ll
LOCATION M A ,.
N~
WQf~E
v~s
~ ~ •
` ' ~ `i~ ►~ 11'
CIP N~smb~r: l2~058
._~ .,, .:
WORK ORDER NO:n/a DlRE~TOR DIVISl09d:2
PROJECT' t►~ANAGER:{Gennedy LD. LOCATION:7
Of21C.~11VA1. A~PROVE~ DATEe 6/16/1999 PRIORITY 1
9~ELA'TE~ C!P PROJECTS:82048, 82077, 82087,BUDGET° ANtOtI~°C:$3,500,000
82088
DESCRIPTION OF PR0.6E~T
Construction of approximately 10,700 feet of 16-inch pipeline within the 860 Pressure Zone in Airway
Road from Otay Mesa Road to Alta Road. Portions of this project will be constructed by developers
and these are subject to reimbursement at actual cost per Board policy.
JlIS1"IFIG~4TlON OF PF20JEC°T:
This project will provide transmission capacity for development of Otay Mesa within the 860
Pressure Zone.
COMM~I'~:
funding opportunity is the United States Sureau of Reclamation Wa~sr fZeclamation and Reuse
Program, Title ?Ci/i of P.L. 102-575.
EllD DETii.,
Fl1t~DINC~ SOl1RCE:
Recycled
~:1
expansion e errnen# i?eplacement Total
100% 100%
700%100%
~DITUE SCOiEIlL. ( $1000):
PFZIO YEARS: FY F1' Fl( FY FY Fl°
TOi'AL 20'! 1 2012 2013 2094 20a 5 2016 TO°fAL
$1,000 $1,000 $1,495 $5 $3,500
~ c c 1 ~
..~ •'t ice►(
. - ('
PF~O,DECT SCFIEi~ULE:ESTIIIAATED ESTIiVIAI"E~
ST,ARl° DATE:FiNISFi DATE:
PB~OJE~T
PHASE:
PLANN6PdC:07/01 12/09
DESIGh1:01/10 06/11
COtJSTR~ICTION:07/11 06/13
PROJ~GTED IN~REN9ENT~,~ OPERATION EXPENDITU#ZES SC4iEDt1LE {$):
FY FY F1°FY FY FY
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
$3,600 $3,700 $3,800
PROJECT LOC~4l°iOt~: Thoanas Bros, Map: 1351 OUVD Map Book: 12
o ~OT ESA R D
Dr
D
~+ ,4'( R4~~i~ Y
O
fi P,~ D
_....§r:.~,.,.~,~,~
... _...j"'~~
'l~
Submi ec9 By: Bob Kennedy Rafe:2/19/2010
Exhibit C
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subjec$Policy Date Date
iVumber Ado ted Revised
26 2/10/93 7/05/06DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS
PURPOSE
This policy establishes guidelines fvr how tl~e District will
administer reimbursement agreements for facilities, both Master Plan
and Non-Master Plan. It also describes when and how the District will
participate in the cost of such facilities.
RAC"K(;RllT7nTll
Policy 25 requires that development which creates the need for new
facilities must bear all costs to construct and finance the on-site,
in-tract and off-site water, wastewater, and recycled water systems.
"On-site" facilities are defined as those pipelines, pump stations and
reservoirs required within a developer's project boundaries. `°Off-
site" facilities are those facilities located outside a project°s
boundary that are required to serve the project. "In-tract"
facilities are defined as those non-regional facilities that serve
only the project being constructed. These facilities are typically 6
inch through 12 inch pipelines. In-tract facilities are the sole
responsibility of the developer/property owner until the facilities
and all required property easements are dedicated to, and accepted by,
the District pursuant to authority granted by the Board to the General
Manager.
The District's Master Plan includes all regional on-site and off-site
facilities anticipated to be necessary to provide service throughout
the District. The District's capacity fees have been calculated to
pay for the cost of all the regional facilities identified in the
Master Plan including the developer/property owner portion of such
facilitiesm The District does not subsidize development but it does
undertake responsibility to insure that those regional facilities
necessary to serve a particular development are constructed and that
the costs associated with the construction of said facilities is
fairly distributed among all users,
P(~T,TC`Y
A, Master Plan Facilities-Reimbursement by the District: For
facilities identified in the Master Plan, both on-site and off-site,
the District may reimburse the developer for construction and design
costs if the project meets the following guidelines:
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subjecfi Policy Date Date
Number Ado ted Revised
26 2/10/93 7/05/06DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS
1. The project must be in the District's approved five-year Capital
Improvement Program (CI P) at the time of the request, and shall
not exceed the CIP budget amount without prior Board approval.
20 The District has approved a Sub-Area Master Plan (SAMP) and any
required maps, upon which the facilities are clearly described.
3e The developer makes an irrevocable offer to dedicate the
facilities and any easements required for the operation and
maintenance of the facilities to the District, which offer is
accepted by the General Manager and all applicable language and
documentation of the dedication s) is prepared and recorded, all
in the manner authorized by the Board.
4. The developer enters into an Agreement for Construction of a
Water System with the District.
5. The developer/property owner obtains bids from qualified
contractors and provides copies of the bids to the District, The
developer/property owner is responsible for selecting the lowest
responsive responsible bidder. The developer/property owner will
be reimbursed for the CIP portions of the project based on the
unit prices submitted with the lowest responsive responsible bid.
6. The cost of addressing environmental issues, such as burying a
reservoir, shall not be reimbursable unless they are currently
addressed in the District's Master Environmental Impact Report
and CIP.
7. All soft costs, such as engineering, inspection, bonds, etc,,
will be included in the reimbursement cost at five percent of the
construction costse
8. Except as provided below, the District will pay 100 percent of
the reimbursement cost after the General Manager accepts ,the
project.
9. The District may elect to finance the facilities by borrowing if,
after analysis by the Finance Department, it is determined that
the borrowing fits into the District's financial plan as outlined
in Policy 25<
10. If for any reason reimbursement funds are not vailable at the
time the project is operationally complete, the District may
elect to defer or a portion of the reimbursement the District
determines is due the developer until the General Manager accepts
Page 2 of 7
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
B0~4RD OF DIRECTORS POL6CY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number Ado ted Revised
26 2/10/93 7/05/06DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS
the dedication of the project and until all liens, claims and/or
bonds, as applicable, have been released in the manner provided
under the Agreement for Construction of a Water System.
11. Funds for reimbursement shall be carried as a CIP until the
reimbursement is made,
12. Each reimbursement agreement requires approval by the Board. A
Staff Report will be prepared and reviewed with the Finance
Department prior to presentation to the Board for approval.
13, This type of reimbursement agreement ends five (5) years after
Board's original approvals The reimbursement agreement may be
terminated prior to said (5) year term by the General Manager
upon a determination that the developer has failed to comply with
its obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement or the
Agreement for Construction of a Water System.
14. If the reimbursement agreement expires prior to the facilities by
the District or prior to payment of reimbursement, the Developer
shall no longer be entitled to reimbursement. The Developer may
submit new documentation andrequest that the District enter into
a new reimbursement agreement. If the District agrees to enter
into a new reimbursement agreement for the facilities, however,
the District may revise the terms and amounts of reimbursement at
its discretion based on information available at the time of the
requests
15, All reimbursement requests shall be submitted to the Board for
consideration and shall not be processed without prior Board
approvals
B. Non-Master Plan Facilities-Reimbursement to Developer by Future
Users: Occasionally, a developer/property owner requests the District
to administer a reimbursement agreement to collect money from future
customers who connect to the facility built by the developer/property
owner, If the District agrees, the District collects the
reimbursement amount from each customer connecting to the facility,
together with any other District connection feese The reimbursement
portion of the customer's payment is forwarded by the District to the
developer/property owner as reimbursement.
The District may administer this type of reimbursement agreement if
the developer/property owner°s project meets the following criteria
and guidelines:
Page 3 of 7
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
064RD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number Ado ted Revised
26 2/10/93 7/05/06DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS
1. The developer/property owner demonstrates the facilities to be
constructed have adequate capacity to serve future customers,
2, The developer/property owner requests and executes a
reimbursement agreement, which is presented to the Board for
approval in conjunction with the presentation of an agreement to
construct.
3. The property owner deposits with the District the estimated cost
for District staff to prepare a nexus study and obtain Board
approval for the reimbursement agreement. District staff will
provide a written estimate of the required deposit to the
property owner within 15 days of the property owner's request.
4. The property owner provides three (3) bids from qualified
contractors for the purpose of establishing the cost of the
facilities and the portion of the reimbursement amount which is
to be allocated to future connections.
5. A nexus study shall be performed by District staff to identify
those who may benefit from the construction of the proposed
facility and the amount they shall reimburse the
developer/property owner who constructed the facility.
6. Prior to the public notice being sent to those property owners
affected by the reimbursement agreement, an informational staff
report will be presented to the Board.
7, The District shall notice all those property owners that will be
subject to the reimbursement charge. These property owners will
then be responsible to pay their fair share of the cost of the
facilities at such time as they connect to the system, The fair
share will be based on their Assigned Service Unit/Equivalent
Dwelling Unit (ASU/EDU) contribution to the total projected
ASU/EDU to use the systemm The reimbursement charge will be in
addition to any other fees a property owner would pay to the
District to obtain service.
8. Each reimbursement agreement requires approval by the Board.
Prior to presenting a reimbursement agreement to the Board, staff
must obtain two originals signed by an authorized representative
of the developer/property owner, A Staff Report must then be
prepared and reviewed with the Finance Department prior to
presentation to the Board for approval.
Page 4 of 7
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
~OAl2D OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number Ado ted Revised
26 2/10/93 7/05/06DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS
9, This type of reimbursement agreement shall be valid for 10 years
from the date of Board approval. After the 10 year period has
lapsed the collection of the reimbursement amount by the District
shall cease.
10. Concurrently with submission of a signed reimbursement agreement,
the developer/property owner must pay an administrative fee to
the District to defray costs related to the review of the request
and the negotiation and execution of the reimbursement agreement.
The amount of the administrative fee will be calculated at the
staff rate existing at the time of said submission.
11. In addition, concurrently with payment of the fee described
above, developer must pay a fee to defray costs estimated to be
incurred per each connection to be established during the term of
the reimbursement agreement. The amount of this fee will be
calculated based on an estimated 6 man hours per connection, The
staff rate in existence at the time the reimbursement agreement
is executed will be used as a base and it will be projected to
change each year to account for changes in the COLA, as
determined by the District's finance department.
12. The District will not distribute any reimbursement funds to the
developer/property owner until the project has been accepted by
the Boards The distribution of reimbursement funds will occur as
the District collects the funds from new customers who connect to
the facility, but not more frequently than once per year°
13, District staff shall collect the reimbursement amount due at the
same time the standard District capacity fees for the new service
are collected.
14. If the reimbursement agreement expires prior to the facilities by
the District or prior to payment of reimbursement, the Developer
shall no longer be entitled to reimbursement. The Developer may
submit new documentation andrequest that the District enter into
a new reimbursement agreement, If the District agrees to enter
into a new reimbursement agreement for the facilities, however,
the District may revise the terms and amounts of reimbursement at
its discretion based on information available at the time of the
request.
15a All reimbursement requests shall be submitted to the Board for
consideration and shall not be processed without prior Board
approval,
Page 5 of 7
OTAY WATcR D1STR9CT
BOARD OF DIf2ECTORS POLICY
Subjecfi Policy
Number
Date
Ado ted
Date
Revised
26 2/10/93 7/05/06DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS
Ce Non-Master Plan Facilities-Reimbursement to Developer by the
District: Normally the District would not participate in the cost of
facilities which are not identified in the Master Plan, These
facilities are of benefit only to the adjoining property and should
ordinarily be financed solely by the developer/property owner
proposing the new facilitye Nonetheless, there may be circumstances
where the General Manager determines that it is appropriate for the
District to participate in the cost of a non-Master Plan facility,
Typical reasons would be in order to accommodate future growth or
betterment of the system. In these instances, the District may
establish special fees to recover the reimbursement costs from
benefiting property owners as they connect to the system.
The District may reimburse the developer/property owner for
construction costs if the project meets the following criteria and
guidelines:
1, The General Manager has determined that it is appropriate for the
District°s customers to participate in the construction of the
project.
2. The developer/property owner shall obtain three (3) bids from
qualified contractors and provide copies of the initial bids to
the District° The developer/property owner is responsible for
selecting the lowest responsive bidder. The developer/property
owner will be reimbursed for the CIP portions of the project
based on the unit prices submitted with the lowest responsive
bid.
3, A nexus study will be performed by the District to identify those
property owners who may benefit from the construction of the
proposed facility,
4. Prior to the public notice being sent to those property owners
affected by the reimbursement agreement, an informational Staff
Report shall be presented to the Board.
5, The District shall notice all those property owners which will be
subject to the reimbursement charge. These properties will then
be responsible to pay their fair share of the cost of the
facilities, plus interest, at such time as they connect to the
system.
6. The developer/property owner shall request and execute the
reimbursement agreement with the District prior to awarding any
contracts for construction.
Page 6 of 7
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
~OAf2D OF DIRECI"ORS POLICY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number Ado ted Revised
26 2/10/93 7/05/06DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS
7. Each reimbursement agreement requires approval by the Board. A
Staff Report shall be prepared and reviewed with the Finance
Department prior to presentation to the Board for approval.
8. Except as provided below, the District will pay 100 percent of
the reimbursement cost after the General Manager accepts the
project.
9. The District may elect to finance the facilities by borrowing, if
it is determined that borrowing is in the best interest of the
District°s customers,
10. If for any reason reimbursement funds are not available at the
time the project is operationally complete, the District may
elect to defer the reimbursement until the General Manager
determines that it is appropriate to make payments,
11. Funds for reimbursement shall be carried as a CIP until the
reimbursement has been made,
12. This type of reimbursement agreement contains no end date for the
collection by the District of its contributed share of the cost,
and shall be the responsibility of all current and subsequent
property ownerse
13. District staff shall collect the reimbursement amount due at the
same time the standard District capacity fees for the new service
are collected.
14. If the reimbursement agreement expires prior to the facilities by
the District or prior to payment of reimbursement, the Developer
shall no longer be entitled to reimbursement, The Developer may
submit new documentation andrequest that the District enter into
a new reimbursement agreement. If the District agrees to enter
into a new reimbursement agreement for the facilities, however,
the District may revise the terms and amounts of reimbursement at
its discretion based on information available at the time of the
request.
15o All reimbursement requests shall be submitted to the Board for
consideration and shall not be processed without prior Board
approval.
Page 7 of 7
1,
_ t
1 1
t ~
Description (~AfVD CiTAY Staff Recomanendation
16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 2 2 2
16" PVC 0905 C235 DR18 1340 1,383 1383
76" END CAP 1 1 1
10° PVC C900 CL 200 105 105 105
10" RPDA (Interconnect)1 1 1
10'° RSGV 2 2 2
8" END CAP 1 1 1
8" PVC C900 CL 200 88 88 88
8" RSGV 2 2 2
6" END CAP 1 1 1
6" PVC C900 CL 200 44 44 44
6" RSGV 1 1 1
4" AIR VAC 3 3 3
4" BLOW OFF 4 4 4
2" BLOW OFF 1 1 1
CONNECT TO EXISTING 1 1 1
Prepared By: ~ Dater --' "' I
David Charles
Public Services Manager
-.. .- .~
AIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER CO SD TRACT 5304-1 P:\Public-s\CIP Reimbursements\DEVELOPER CIP REIMBURSEMENT
SPREADSHEETS MONTHLY\Spreadsheets\AIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER CO SD TRACT 5304-1~AIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER CO SD
TRACT 5304-1 Quantity Take Offs R2058
~. _.
~~~a
~ 3 ~t
_~: ~~—~ ~~_ ~~ ~ ,— ~ ,~ t ~ ~ 2 -r~, _ _ e.. ~ ~~~ ,;" t 1= —
:.e ~_ ~ ' '. ir. ~
~~~CP9~'~a~~~~~~~~~~t~'~ ~~C~~6'9~8~~"@C~~~90~
16'° BUT~fEF~FLY VALVE $4,950.00 $4,95~.OQ $4,950.00
16" PVC 0905 6235 DR18 $ 67.00 $47.00 $47.00
16" E~9~ GAP $900.00 X900.00 $900.00
10'° PVC C900 CL 200 $36.00 $36.00 $36.00
10" RPC3,~! (Interconnecf)$21,330.00 X21,330.00 $21,330.00
10° RSGV $1,650A~$1,650.00 $1,650.00
8" ~f~[~ CAP $300.00 $300.00 $300.00
8" PVC 0900 CL 200 $29.00 $29.00 $29.00
8" ~SGV $1,300.00 $1,300.OQ $1,300.00
6" Ef~D CAP $750.00 $750.00 $750.00
6" PVC 0900 GL 200 $27.00 $27.00 $27.00
6" RSGV $1,100.00 $1,100.00 ~a1,100.00
4" AlF~ V64C $6,600.00 ~a6,60~.00 $6,600.00
4° SLOW Ot=F $4,840.00 X4,840.00 $4,540.00
2" SLOW OAF $1,716.00 $1,716.00 $1,716.00
C~~It~ECTTfl ~XISTIIVG $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Prepared By:___ _
~r~ndon C~~t'i~~~~,.-_
Inspectioe~ Supervisor
Date: ~ . ~~~
AIRWAY BUSINESS CENTER GO SD TRACT 5304-1P:\Public-s\CIP F2eimbursementslDEVELOPER CIP REIMBURSEMERIT SPREADSHEETS
D/IMOPlTHLY~Spreadsheets~AIRW~IY BUSINESS CENTEfd CO SD TRACT 5304-1~AIidWAY BUSINESS CENTER CO SD TRACT 5304-1 Price Verification
82058
O
T
A
Y
W
A
T
E
R
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
CI
P
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
SH
E
E
T
R2
0
5
8
Re
c
P
l
- 16
-I
n
c
h
,
86
0
Zo
n
e
,
Ai
r
w
a
y
Rd
- Ot
a
y
Ni
e
s
a
l
A
l
t
a
f2
d
Lo
w
e
s
t
Bi
d
-Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
Ra
n
d
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
-
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
#
d0
6
7
2
-
09
0
0
1
7
Ai
r
w
a
y
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
Ce
n
t
e
r
Co
Sa
n
Di
e
g
o
Tr
a
c
t
53
0
4
-1
CI
P
R2
0
5
8
Re
c
P
l
- 1~
-I
n
c
h
,
860 Zone, Airway Rd - Otay
Me
s
a
/A
l
t
a
Rd
Ai
r
w
a
y
Ai
r
w
a
y
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
Ai
r
w
a
y
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ce
n
t
e
r
Ad
d
So
f
t
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
Ac
t
u
a
l
Ac
t
u
a
l
OW
D
Un
i
t
Ac
t
u
a
l
O
W
D
Add SoftActual OWD
QT
Y
Un
i
t
Pr
i
c
e
Co
s
t
Co
s
t
5%
Ce
n
t
e
r
To
t
a
l
QT
Y
Pr
i
c
e
Co
s
t
Cost 5°/aTotal
16
"
BU
T
T
E
R
F
L
Y
VA
L
V
E
2
$4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
9,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
49
5
.
0
0
$
10
,
3
9
5
.
0
0
2
$4
,
9
5
0
.
0
0
$
9
,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$495.00$10,395.00
16
"
PV
C
C9
0
5
C2
3
5
DR
1
8
13
4
0
$4
7
.
0
0
$ 62
,
9
8
0
.
0
0
$
3,
1
4
9
.
0
0
$
66
,
1
2
9
.
0
0
*
1,
3
8
3
$4
7
.
0
0
$6
5
,
0
0
1
.
0
0
$3,250.05$68,251.05
16
"
EN
D
CA
P
1
$9
0
0
.
0
0
$
90
0
.
0
0
$
45
.
0
0
$
94
5
.
0
0
1
$9
0
0
.
0
0
$9
0
0
.
0
0
$45.00$945.00
10
"
PV
C
C9
0
0
CL
20
0
10
5
$3
6
.
0
0
$
3,
7
8
0
.
0
0
$
18
9
.
0
0
$
3,
9
6
9
.
0
0
10
5
$3
6
.
0
0
$3
,
7
8
0
.
0
0
$189.00$3,969.00
10
"
RP
D
A
(I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
)
1
$2
1
,
3
3
0
.
0
0
$
21
,
3
3
0
.
0
0
$
1,
0
6
6
.
5
0
$
22
,
3
9
6
.
5
0
1
$2
1
,
3
3
0
.
0
0
$2
1
,
3
3
0
.
0
0
$1,066.50$22,396.50
10
"
RS
G
V
2
$1
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$
3,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
16
5
.
0
0
$
3,
4
6
5
.
0
0
2
$1
,
6
5
0
.
0
0
$3
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$165.00$3,465.00
8"
EN
D
CA
P
1
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$
30
0
.
0
0
$
15
.
0
0
$
31
5
.
0
0
1
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$3
0
0
.
0
0
$15.00$315.00
8"
PV
C
C9
0
0
CL
20
0
88
$2
9
.
0
0
$
2,
5
5
2
.
0
0
$
12
7
.
6
0
$
2,
6
7
9
.
6
0
88
$2
9
.
0
0
$2
,
5
5
2
.
0
0
$127.60$2,679.60
8"
RS
G
V
2
$1
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$
2,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
13
0
.
0
0
$
2,
7
3
0
.
0
0
2
$1
,
3
0
0
.
0
0
$2
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$130.00$2,730.00
6"
EN
D
CA
P
1
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$
75
0
.
0
0
$
37
.
5
0
$
78
7
.
5
0
1
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$7
5
0
.
0
0
$37.50$787.50
6"
PV
C
C9
0
0
CL
20
0
44
$2
7
.
0
0
$
1,
1
8
8
.
0
0
$
59
.
4
0
$
1,
2
4
7
.
4
0
44
$2
7
.
0
0
$1
,
1
8
8
.
0
0
$59.40$1,247.40
6"
RS
G
V
1
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
1,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
55
.
0
0
$
1,
1
5
5
.
0
0
1
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$55.00$1,155.00
4"
AI
R
VA
C
3
$6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$
19
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$
99
0
.
0
0
$
20
,
7
9
0
.
0
0
3
$6
,
6
0
0
.
0
0
$1
9
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
$990.00$20,790.00
4"
BL
O
W
OF
F
4
$4
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
$
19
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$
96
8
.
0
0
$
20
,
3
2
8
.
0
0
4
$4
,
8
4
0
.
0
0
$1
9
,
3
6
0
.
0
0
$868.00$20,328.00
2"
BL
O
W
OF
F
1
$1
,
7
1
6
.
0
0
$
1,
7
1
6
.
0
0
$
85
.
8
0
$
1,
8
0
1
.
8
0
1
$1
,
7
1
6
.
0
0
$1
,
7
1
6
.
0
0
$85.80$1,801.80
CO
N
N
E
C
T
TO
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
1,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
50
.
0
0
$
1,
0
5
0
.
0
0
1
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$50.00$1,050.00
*
Ac
t
u
a
l
L.
F
.
ce
r
t
i
f
i
e
d
on
si
t
e
pe
r
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
TO
T
A
L
$
16
0
,
7
8
3
.
8
0
TOTAL $162,305.85
O
W
D
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
Reimbursement $162,305.85
AI
R
W
A
Y
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
CE
N
T
E
R
CO
SD
TR
A
C
T
53
0
4
-1
rev
i
s
e
d
5-1
2
-1
1
P:
\Pu
b
l
i
c
-s\C
I
P
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
\D
E
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
CI
P
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
SP
R
E
A
D
S
H
E
E
T
S
MO
N
T
H
L
Y
\S
p
r
e
a
d
s
h
e
e
t
s
l
A
I
R
W
A
Y
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
CENTER CO SD TRACT 5304-
1 WI
R
W
A
Y
BU
S
I
N
E
S
S
CE
N
T
E
R
CO
SD
TR
A
C
T
53
0
4
-1
rev
i
s
e
d
5-1
2
-1
1
Re
i
m
b
0y48 H~Q
0 ¢ '`~t~tai • ~ Ot
fi
r.L
SUBJECT/PROJECT: .Reimbursement Agreement with MS. Development Company LLC,
D0672-090017 for a Portion of the Capital Improvement Project for Airway
82058-001103 ~ Business Center - RecPL-16-Inch °60 Zonc, Airway Road (CIP
82058)
_.... _..._.... _ ...... .. ............ _. ..... ........ _............... P.............. .......... ... ........... ..... .........._.._.......
Otay Water District Date U dated. May 11, 2011
82058 - RecP~ - 16-Inch, 860 Zone, Airway Road - Otay Mesa/Alta
Budget Committed E,rpenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Fina/
Cost Vendor/Comments
3,500,000
Planning
Labor 74,525 74,525 ',74,525
Business Meetings 17 17 I 17 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
----- -Professionai Legal Fees -385 385 !- '385 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLP
Consultant Contracts 10,127 10,127 '10,127 LEE & RO WC
116,202 ~ 97,410 ''~~18,793 '116,203 JONES &STOKES ASSOCIATES INC
Reimbursement 8058 123,911 '-123,911 '',- ',123,911 ORIX OTAY LLC
Total Planning 325,167 306,375 '18,793 '325,168
Design ~I
Labor -- --372,895 i 372.895 I,'372,895
Office Supplies 32 ~32 '','32 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Regulatory Agency Fees 6,667 '~6,667 -6,667 CITY TREASURER
- ----156 ~----156 -~-',156 STATE WATER RESOURCES
6,783 6,783 -6,783 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Consultant Contracts 10,500 ;10,500 -10,500 SAN-LO AERIAL SURVEYS
45,413 ,45,413 I -45,413 HDR ENGINEERING INC
--- ---2,625 I 2,625 '.- ~2,625 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
42,424 '',42,424 j -42,424 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL
74,448 !74,448 I 74,448 DARNELL &ASSOCIATES INC
23,139 !23,139 '-23,139 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC
12,890 '12,890 12,890 CPM PARTNERS WC
Service Contracts 3,100 ',3,100 3,100 SAN-LO AERIAL SURVEYS
2,000 '2,000 i 2,000 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS CO
138 138 '-138 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO
6,660 ~2,461 '4,199 i 6,660 REPROHAUS CORP
I
Total Design 609,868 i 605,669 '4,199 ~609,868
Construction I ~
Labor 2,452 i 2,452 ',2,452
Consultant Contracts 4,653 4,653 ',- i 4,653 RBF CONSULTING
193,173 ',193,173 '',- ~193,173 J GARY BURKE CORPORATION
926 'I 926 ;r - I 926 CPM PARTNERS INC
Reimbursement Agreement 162,306 i 162,306 162,306 MS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC
~- --
Total Construction 363,510 ',201,204 ',162,306 li 363,509
Grand Total 1,298,545 1,113,248 185,298 1,298,546
~.F_.w ~ _s
~ubjec~: ~eimbursernent Agre~rnent with i~S. Development Project Flo.: X0672-0900'17
Company LLB, for a Portion of the G~pital 82058-001103
improvement project for Ainivay business Center -
Rec6~L-'16-inch 8a0 Zone, Ai~vvay Road (~1~ X2058)
~ocurrient ~escriplioti: ~t~ff Re~or~t foo-the Ju~~e 'l, 2011 ~oai~d ~eetinc~
~ ~'~~ ~
~ig~~~tu~re Date'
David Charles
printed ~I~me
,/~ ~ - ,~~
QA Reviewer: ,~~~~7 ~~
%Signatu~~ ~ Date
Gary Silverman
printed Name
~`~ _ ~.~ _ ,,
Manger: ~*---~ ~ ~ ~ _ ,
Signature Date
Rod Posada
~'rint2d dame
~h~ apove signatures a~tesf that fihe ~ir~ched document has been reviewed and to the best of Their ability the
signers verity ghat it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended
information; being grammatically correct and frze of formatting and typographical errors; accurately preserving
calculated values and numerical references; and being internally consistent, legible and uniform in its presentation
style.
~ ~~ ~,~ 1 ~
~~a~~~~~~- ~°~~a~, n
~,.
~ ~_..
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board MEETING DATE:June 1 , 2 011
SUBMITTED BY:David Charles ~'PROJECT fVO./R2094- DIV. NO. 2
Public Services Manager SUB-PROJECT:001101
APPROVED BY:Rod Posada Win._.(Chief)° ~- ~ .,:
Chief, Engineering
APPROVED BY:Manny Magana
(Asst.GM):Assistant General Mz,!~ager,Engineering and Operations
SUBJECT:
f
Authorization to Execute a Reimbursement Agreement with Aspire-
Encore at Rancho Del Rey Homeowners Association for the
Conversion of a Potable Water Irrigation System to a Recycled
Water Irrigation System
+~ .~ ~ s ~.
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
authorizes the General Manager to execute a Reimbursement Agreement
for up to 50% of the construction costs not to exceed $25,500 for the
conversion of an existing multi-family development from a potable
water irrigation system to a recycled water irrigation system with
Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del Rey Homeowners Association (HOA)(see
Exhibit A for project location),
~~ i IT`~`~:~ Ada IC~~ a
Please see Attachment A,
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager Lo enter into
an agreement with the HOA for reimbursement of conversion costs
associated with retrofitting an existing potable ~Nater irrigation
system to a recycled water irrigation system (See Attachment B),
~~i~ea,.~~-r
At the September 2, 2009 Board Meeting, the Board approved the
implementation of a pilot program to convert multi-family dSNellinc~
projects that front recycled water mains to utilize recycled water
its ratepayers is the decrease in the utilization of potable water
use and maximizing the use of recycled water. As a result of the
Board action and adoption of Resolution 4145, "District
Administration of Recycled Water Retrofit Program," an agreement is
requested for Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del Rey Homeowners Association,
The HOA will, in accordance to the terms of this agreement, submit
plans to the District and Department of Health Services for approval,
perform the conversion, and retrofit in accordance with the
District's Water agency Standards. Upon completion and certification
of this site to utilize recycled water for on-site irrigation, staff
will bring to the Board a request for reimbursement. The estimated
costs of the facilities is $51,000, The District will then reimburse
the HOA fifty percent (500) of the approved on-site construction
costs of the conversion from the lowest responsive bidder, Thus, the
actual reimbursement would not exceed $25,500.
~~~~~L I~~A~Tm
The total budget for CIP R2094, as approved in the FY 2011 budget is
$3,100,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, iS $1,440,309, See attachment C for budget detail,
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager has
determined that the budget is sufficient to support the reimbursement
conversion for this CIP project°
Finance hay determined that 40% of the funding is available from the
Expansion Fund and 600 of the funding is available from the
Betterment Fund,
This project supports the District's Mission statement, "To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater service to the customers of
the Otay inlater District, in a professional, effective, and efficient
manner," and the Otay Strategic Goal "to develop and improve
infrastructure for increased recycled water use,"
f[~e~11t~~if~~i~rA
None,
2
P:\Public-s~STAFF REPORTS\2011\BD 06-O1-11, Staff Report, Reimbursement Agreement, Aspire-Encore, Rancho
Del Rey HOA, (DC-RP).doc
DC/RPejf
Attachments° Exhibit A - Map of Project Location
Attachment A - Committee Action
Attachment B - Reimbursement Agreement
Attachment C - Budges Detail
3
~PS1.10H@~
A ASPIRE—ENCORE
'ate` AT RANCHO DEL REY HOA
Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del ReyDEVELOPER:Homeowners Association
PROJECT#:R2094
APN: 640-330-01 thru 07, 11 thru 28, 30 thru 45
AREA:NULL
ADDRESS:NULL
OWNER:Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del Rey
HOA
DIR:DIV.2
WID:ID 22/27
DATE:4/21/2011
0 95 190 380 570 760
Feet
.~ ;
+ i~'l~ _ ~~1 , .,1 ~.
/ 1A~, `. ''~~S `M ~1 j
,. r; .~ 160 ', ~
~j fi,
~" ,a~'~'.c=';, 116
. ~4
.-
~~~~ 147, { 123
.
e?,.'.. .+ '
/. ~1~~~ a:+;., y'~ _'i ~~. ~ - ,.rte, ~~i ._ c.~'►,~' . d #, ~I;r ~,y~ -~,r ~'',
` ~ ~~~'~+,,..• 1 ~ ~~.1 °'~, '~;f "1.~ .~- , .,.~.~ ~_`j~. ~~ ~ ~ -~~~~ ~ 110
& ~ ;J ~,S ~\ /yL~~~+Et.. ~,~1~~ A ~ ~r ~ ~ /.~+~ \ ,f//~ 1 ~~:y~,~Q1 ,Y1C~., s,~r+.°"..r
' ~ , ~r ~J
.~ r `s~ 166 '~` ~~ 142 ~~ ~ ~-` `~ ~~~►~~=~ ~S~
,. ~~ 1 ~,~'~ y ,~ .. ,+~_ . ,✓~ #~,;'
~`4.. ~, 3 ~:~ ~~~s:~✓1 a. QS< "a ~ ~~+,,:1. ~ ~ _ '~, ::~ .emu ~;~ ,~ .CSC• ~,_,~ a(~~ _ 4 ~~~ r 121~t ai V ~ ~I ~ ~ ~^`L 1'T ! ~ ~ ` r ~' # }
'~, r ~;.;~~. '`,...~..~~ ,~.~..~. ~.r!^ ,,,.cr 136 t~~'; ° ~oO~g+►Y ~~ `
i. « 33
s'
,: 175 ~ ~,. ' . ' ~ ,~ q ~4~ ~1 ~' 7~~
:~ ~~ r ~ `:
w., _~ . + Aspire-Encore *at Rancho Del Rey HOA ~ !
a Irrigated Area: 186,430 sq ft s~
,~ ~ ~ ~' Estimated Retrofit Cost: $51,000 ~ ~ ~~h' - ! , :' "~ -~~1ej ~'~
'~, s r Potential Potable Water Savings: 13 AcFt per year r _y,. `.' :~ - ~ ~
'f , — a.,;
t
~Pg~~sa-ado,
W ~ ~ m
L
~~~~ Dt8"~~`
SUBJECT/PROJECT: ;Authorization to Execute a Reimbursement Agreement with
;Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del Rey Homeowners Association for
R2094-001101 :the Conversion of a Potable Water Irrigation System to a
'Recycled Water Irrigation System
COMNIITTE~ ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on May 19, 2011. The Committee supported
Staff's recommendation.
~~~
The "Committee Action" is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval, This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
~ Puts►-►EQ ~~
W,~ ,~ 6~
C~
~TFR DISRP`
1 G
Px~,~c~r ~O. I~.2094-001101
IaI~. lino. 22!27
~ . r • ~;
This Agreement for Construction of a Water System ("Agreement") is entered into by
and between the Otay Water District, a Municipal Water District formed under the Municipal
Water District Act of 1911 {"DistrxcY'), and Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del Rey Homeowners
Association, anon-profit mutual benefit corporation, with a business address at 9610 Wapies
Street, San Diego, California, 92121-2992 ("Pai-ti~ipaa~t"). The District and the Participant are
sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "Parties" and each as a "Party." All references
to "Participant" herein are equally applicable to each and every heir, assign or successor in
interest of the Participant. By rrzutual agreement of the parties, this Agreement shall be dated and
efFective on the date indicated on the signature page under the District's signature.
A. Participant desires to install and construct new recycled water facilities or replace
and retrofit existing facilities (the 64Retro~t Facilities"), as further described in Recital C,
below, to qualify the Developrz~ent (defined below) to receive and use recycled water, in lieu of
potable water, for its landscaping needs; and
B. The Retrofit Facilities wzll serve the real property located at Rancho Del Rey
Parkway, Chula Vista, California, and will benefit a development currently commonly known as
Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del Rey (the "I)eveiopment"); and
C. The owner of the Development, or an authorized representative, st~brrvtted an
application, dated August 18, 2010 (the "Application"), to participate in the District's Recycled
Water Retrofit Grant Pilot Program, autJhorized by the Board of Directors on September 2, 2009
(the ".[\~irOA18 S I~ObI~`CdTTS99); and
D. The District staff reviewed the Application and has determined that the
Development qualifies for the I2etro~t I'rog~-arm because: (z) at present, the Development uses
potable water for its izxigation needs; (ii} the locatzon of the Development is such that the Retrofit
Facilities could be connected to the District's Recycled Water System; and (iii) the applicant has
preliminarily demonstrated its willingness and ability to fulfill and satisfy on an ongoing basis alI
requirements to receive recycled water service and manage its recycled water facilities; and
E. The Participant is solely responsible for the cost of adequate and complete Plans
and Specifications, which shall not be considered adequate until reviewed and approved by the
District and any other agency whose approval is required in connection with the proposed
Retrofit Facilities (as approved, the "S TaBL.Y 6bd1~ SP~CI116.a1&OAIS99); and
F. In consideration of the benefit to the District and the region of the conservation of
potable water by using recycled water to irrigate the Participant's landscaping, if the Retrofit
Facilities are installed in accordance with the terms of this Agz-eement and the approved Plans
and Specifications, and after Completion (as defined below), the District will reimburse the
Participant 50% of the approved on-site construction costs of the conversion, as further described
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v103109 Page 1 of 10
p:lpublic-s\staffreports~201 llbd 06-OS-1 I, agreement, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
PI2.O,~EE~T Igo. I22094-001101
I.I). into. 22/27
in this Agreement. Additionally, the District will waive its fees for plan-checking and
Inspection.
~ ~ .. ..
i~i~~' 'I'I3Ei~~'OI~E, in consideration of the above Recitals and of the promises and
agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and
adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, District and Participant do hereby promise and
agree as follows:
Instalta#i~ffi and C)peration of k2~trmfit Facilities
~. G~~eral, In consideration of the Grant, as described below, Participant agrees to do
and perform, or cause to be done and performed, at its expense and without cost or liability to
District, all of the design, construction, installation and other work ("Work") required to
construct and complete the 1Zetrofit Facilities. Participant also agrees to furnish all of the labor,
equipment, materials and improvements ("Labor end lYV~aterials"), except as may be specified
on the Plans and Specifications, required for Completion (as defined in Section 3 of this
Agreement) of the Retrofit Facilities. Participant shall promptly pay and discharge all bills and
claims related to Work on, Labor and Materials for, and Completion of, the Retrofit Facilities.
b. strict Conformity 12equared. The ti~Tork shall be done and performed in a good and
workmanlike manner. The Retrofit Facilities shall be designed, constructed, installed and
operated in strict conformity with the District requirements for recycled water facilities and
service, as set forth in Section 26 of the District's Code of Ordinance (available at District
offices and on the District's website at www.otavwater.gov,) and other related documents and
regulations, including without (imitation the following documents incorporated herein by
reference:
i. Approved Plans and Specifications for tt~e Retrofit Facilities
ii. District's List of Approved Costs
iii. Board Policy 52
zv. DEH Requirements for the Retrofit Facilities
v. Participant's Recycled Water Permit
If at any time during the term of this Agreement, Participant requires assistance to
identify requirements applicable to the recycled water facilities or service, Participant shall
contact the Recycled Water Manager at the District's Operation Department at 619-670-251 Q.
20 Estima~eci Cost
The estimated cost of the Work for the Retrofit Facilities, as approved by District
pursuant to the Plans and Specifications, is fifty-one-thousand Dollars ($S 1,000.Od) (the "Cost
Estimate"). Participant's obligations under this Agreement in connection with the construction
and operation of the Retrofit Facilities are not limited by the amount of the Cost Estimate.
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v103109 Page 2 of 10
p:\puolic-s\staffreports~201I\bd 06-OS-11, agreement, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
~~2C).~C'~' I~1o.122494-401101
IeI~. Igo. 22/27
Participant understands that, although the District will contribute the agreed upon amounts after
Completion (as defined below), Participant must ensure the Completion of the Retrofit Facilities
and mush operate and maintain them in accordance v,~ith all applicable requirements of the
District and the law.
3, I~TOtace of Cor~anletion; Caann~etion Date
For purposes of this Agreement, the Retrofit Facilities, and all Work required therefor,
shall only be deemed completed when all items identified on District's Final
Inspection/Operations Punch List have been completed in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement and the District approved Plans and Specifications, the District receives DEH
acceptance letter and the District formally notifies the Participant ("l~otiee of Corrapletio~n") that
the Retrofit Facilities have been completed ("Completian" or 66Coanpl~ted"). Participant
agrees to Complete the Retrofit Facilities on or before the Seven Hundred and Thirtieth (730th)
day from and after the effective date of this Agreement ("Completion Date"}. Participant
MUST reques# and ex#ension of the Completion Date at least 45 days prior to the Completion
Date if it determines that it might not finish the Work on time. One or more extensions may be
granted by District at its sole discretion and any such extension shall not affect flee validity of
this Agreement. District may request a Deposit, as described and defined in Section 9, below,
prior to granting and extension.
Any defective work or material that may be discovered by the District before the
Completion Date, or before payment on the Grant, must be removed and replaced or repaired, as
appropriate, by the Participant. Into additioaaal Grant money will lie av~i~able for such repairs
or replacements.
The District znay issue a written notice of substantial completion for the purpose of
establishing the date that the District anticipates payment of the Grant might be made, pending
satisfactory Completion and final inspections. If so, said notice sha11 not be considered as
Completion of any portion of the work or relieve the Participant from completing the remaining
work within the specified time and in full eonnpliance with this Agreement and the Plans and
Specifications.
4. Grant
The District will issue an initial list of approved on-site cozzstruction costs (the
66~~proved Costs") after the Participant provides the District a copy of the Participant's contract
with' the low bidder for the Retrofit Facilities. The list of Approved Costs may only be amended
by the District if, during the consixuction of the Work, the District, at its sole discretion,
detezmines that additional costs should be added to the list. Following the issuance of the Notice
of Completion, the Bistrict will reimburse Participant for FIFTY percent (50%) of the Approved
Costs (the "Graa~t") Participant understands that the District the District will not contribute
toward any costs that are not Approved Costs. Participant must provide copies of invoices for
the Work and evidence of payment satisfactory to the District before the District disburses any
portion of the Grant.
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v103109 Page 3 of 10
p:\public-s\staff reports~201 I\bd 06-OS-I 1, agreement, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
PROJECT I4oe I~2094-001101
I.I?. No. 22/27
The term of this Agreement shall be 730 days from the effective date unless extended,
provided that Participant's obligations under Section 9, Participant Indernruty; Section 11,
Changes to Work, Modifications; and Section 72, Responsibility for the Retrofit Facilities, shall
survive the expiration or early ternunation (as provided below) of this Agreement.
1 1 1
This Agreement maybe terminated by District as follows:
(a) Upon ten (10) days written notice to Participant following a failure by Participant
to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement within thirty (30) days after written notice
from District that Participant is non-compliant.
(b) Upon thirty (30) days written notice to Participant that a change in the provisions
of law has occurred such that District would be unable to comply with its obligations hereunder.
(c} At the expu~ation of the 730`h day from the effective date hereof if a determination
by the General Manager of District is made that Participant will be unable to complete the
Retrofit Facilities by the Completion Date and that District does not wish to grant an extension,
as provided under Section 3, above.
7, District Inspection
District shall be allowed to inspect the Retrofit Facilities during alI stages of the Work.
Distract shall be notified a minimum of eve (5) working days prior to the corz~mez~cement of
Work on the Retrofit Facilities. Except as provided in Section 9, below, District agrees to waive
all plan-checking and inspection fees.
~, I9elivery ~~~tecord i)rawin~s
Upon corrtpletion of the Work on the Retrofit Facilities to the satisfaction of the District,
Participant shall deliver to District one complete set of duplicate tracings together with two (2)
prints of the Plans and Specifications for the Retrofit Facilities showing thereon "Record
Drawings" conditions. Delivery of said Record Drawings shall be a prerequisite for the Retrofit
Facilities to be deemed Completed and shall be a prerequisite to the payment of the Grant.
As required by law, the District will deliver copies of the Record Drawings to the San
Diego County Department of Environmental Health ("I~E~").
9, ~artiei~ant I9epostt; Participant ~~aiver
In consideration of Participant's commitment to complete the Retrofit Facilities and in
consideration of the anticipated savings of potable water, which are of benefit to the District, the
District will waive the Deposit herein described. If the Participant fails to coznpiete the Retrofit
Facilities in the manner herein contemplated, Participant shall pay District all costs and expenses
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v103109 Page 4 of 10
p:\publio-s\staff reports~2Q1 I1bd 06-OS-11, agreement, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
P~2~JEC'I' 1~dao 82094-001101
~.D. No. 22/27
incurred in connection with the Retrofit Facilities, including without limitation plan checking,
inspection, attorney's fees, materials furnished, if any, and all other expenses of District directly
attributable to the Retrofit Facilities, plus a reasonable amount for District's overhead costs in
connection theretivith. At such time as requested by District, upon a determination in its sole
discretion that Participant has failed to timely and satisfactorily complete the Retrofit ~`acilities,
Participant shall deposit with District, an amount equal to the District costs and expenses (the
"Deposit"). If an extension is granted, pursuant to Section 3, and Participant fails to ensure that
the Retrofit Facilities are Completed and Accepted prior to the expiration of any such extension,
the Deposit will he forfeited and District shall have no obligation to refund any balance or to
provide any services hereixz contemplated.
In connection wath such failure, Participant specifically waives any claim or right to
receive any reimbursement of the Deposit, any portion of the Grant, any credit against potable
water consumption or any other benefit under this Agreement.
Participant Initials -'~JL~
10. Chances ~f Work; Modr~catgon
It is agreed that conditions now unforeseen may require modifications of the Plans and
Specifications heretofore approved by District. In such event Participant shall obtain District
approval of such changes; provided that alI changes shall be in compliance with all applicable
requirements of law and regulation. No Work shall be commenced on any change requested by
Participant until District's General Manager has approved such change. Approved changes in
Plans and Specifications shall be entered by Participant upon the original tracing of the Plans and
Specifications Participant, and District's approval of said changes shall be endorsed upon said
tracing by District's engineer.
Participant understands and agrees that ~dN~' and ~~L modifications to the Retrofit
Facilities are subject to prior approval by District and the DBH; and such understanding is
evidenced by the Participant's initials below.
Participant Initials
~~. ~2estoonsib~lity for the Retrofit Fa~ilitzes
Participant, its heir, assigns or successors in interest (each, a "Responsible Party"), as
applicable, shall be and, at all times, remain responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any
damage to the Retxofit Facilities, and any liabilities arising from the Retrofit Facilities.
Operation of the Retrofit Facilities shall at all times be in accordance with District's rules and
regulations and all laws, rules and regulations applicable to the recycled water service provided
by District. 7'he IZesportsible Party shall neither^ make nor allow any cdaanges or rnoda~cation~
to the Retrofit ~'cccilrtaes without pYdor wratte~ a1av~^oval by Dastric8 and tdae D~'~1:
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v103109 Page 5 of 10
p.\publio-s\staff reports~011\bd 06-OS-I 1, agreement, :eimbur;ement agreement with aspire-encore ai rancho del rey hoa.doc
P~tOJECB' l~to, T~094-041101
IoI), l~to. 22/27
Participant guarantees all Work and Retrofit Facilities covered by this Agreement.
Participant shall, at no cost or expense to District, correct aII defective Work, and repair or
replace all damaged, defective or malfunctioning Retrofit Facilities, or parts thereof.
The Responsible Party shall ensure that, at all time while the Retrofit Facilities remain in
operation, a properly trained and certified Site Supervisor in compliance with the requirements of
Section 26 of the District's Code of Ordinance and DEH requirement shall be in charge of the
regular maintenance and inspection of the Retrofit Facilities. If damage or defects cause a leak
or other malfianction at any time, the Site Supervisor shall follow the applicable procedures
established thereunder, and any other procedures as from time to time are formulated by the
District or the DEH.
In the event of an emergency, District may disconnect or terminate service to the Retrofit
Facilities without notice and the Responsible Party shall be liable for all costs and expenses
incurred by District. Any .and all sums left unpaid for more than Thirty (30) days after demand
therefor has been made by District shall accrue interest at the legal rate of interest {currently ten
percent (10%) per annum).
~2. Dzstrzct k.ecvcled ~'~ter Service
If the Retract Facilities are Completed and connected. to the District's recycled water
system, Participant shall at all times comply with all requireanents of service,. including without
limitation all ordinance and provisions of the District's Code of Qrdinance, timely payment of
bills issued by the District, ongoing compliance with DEH and District requirements concerning
the use of recycled water, and compliance with the tez~ms of any permits or other federal, state or
local laws or regulations.
Participant agrees that before Participant can purchase and have District install recycled
water metez(s), the following must occur: (i) Participant must Complete the Retrofit Facilities;
(ii) Participant must pay capacity fees and any other appropriate fees and charges; (iii) Dis#rict
must receive a letter of clearance from DBH; (iv) Participant must have submitted all required
documentation for District to process the Grant; and (iv) Participant must be in camplianc~~ ith
all applicable provisions of the Code Ordinances of District. ~.,~~
I~~llll~[:~l
Participant understands that, at the time it pays capacity to purchase the recycled water
meter, it will have the opportunity to request to downsize its existing potable water meter. If the
Participant requests a smaller potable meter, the District agrees to apply credits toward the
puz-chase of capacity for the recycled water meter.
13. Responsibility foa° Water hosts
Participant, on behalf of itself, its heirs, assigns and successors in interest, agrees to be
liable for the cost of all water or recycled water used for the Development, the Work and the
Retrofit Facilities, wz~hout limitation.
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v103109 Page 6 of 10
p:\public-s\staffreports~20i 1\bd 06-OS-I I, agreement, reimbursement agreemenE with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
PROJ"EC'T l~to. 82094-001101
I.D. Nv. 22/27
~ I~
INITIAL
14, Ilse of Water witl~aut I~Ieterq ~7nautho~ized Conztectians; I.iabili~y
No person, other than an employee or agent of District, has any right to operate any part
of the District's distribution systems.
Participant acknowledges that the District has an obligation to ensure the security and
integrity of its facilities and system and has adapted a strict liability standard for any
unauthorized connection to, operation of, or use of any portion of the potable water, recycled
water and/or sewer system. Participant shall be ,subject to a fzne, as from time to tame
detes~mined by the District, and or criminal pr~seeution i~a corZtzecti~an rvitla any unauthorized
connection for any of ats property or the ,development :Furthermore, at District's discretion,
Participant's officers, employees, agents or any independent contractors or subcontractors may
also be subject to criminal prosecution to the maximum extent allowed. by Iaw if there is
evidence of their participation in connection with any such unauthorized connection, use or
operation. In connection with this Agreement, the Work and the Retrofit Facilities, Participant
shall inform alI of its officers, employees, agents or any independent contractors or
subcontractors of this potential liability and shall institute procedures to prevent any such
unauthorized connection, use or operation; and to prevent any cross-connections.
INITIAL
15. Easements to Dastrict
If one or more easements are required in connection with the Retrofit Facilities, the
facilities shall not be considered Completed until the date the easements are recorded with the
San Diego County Recorder.
16. Indemnity
(a) Indernnity. Participant hereby agrees to indemnify, protect, defend and hold
District, its elective and appointive boards, officials, officers, attorxzeys, agents, and employees,
harn~less from any liability, damage, suit or action at law or in equity, judgment, demand, or
claim for damages for personal injury, including death, or for damages to property which may
arise from, or are in any way related to, the acts and/or omissions of Participant, and/or
contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees in any way related to the Retrofit Facilities, the
Work or otherwise under this Agreement, whether such acts and omissions be by Participant or
any of Participant's contractors, sub-contractors, employees, or agents, or by one or more
persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for, Participant or any of
Participant's contractors, subcontractors, employees or agents or any other person whomsoever.
(b) Defense. Participant agrees to appear and defend Dist-~-ict and its elective and
appointive boards, officials, officers, attorneys, agents and employees, with legal counsel
reasonably acceptable to District, from any suits or actions at law or in equity, proceedings,
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v 103109 Page 7 of 10
p:\public-slstaffreports~2011\bd C6-OS-I1, agreement, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
f
judgments, demands, and claims for damages alleged to have been caused, or in any way related
to, any of the aforesaid acts or omissions; provided that:
(c) No Waiver. District does not waive any rights against Participant, which it may
have by reason of the aforesaid indemnity agreement, because of any acceptance of Work or
Retrofit Facilities by District; and
(d) Coverage of Indemnity. The indemnity agreement by Participant shall apply to
ali liabilities, damages and claims for damages of every kind suffered, or alleged to have been
suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations referred to in this paragraph (8), regardless
of whether or not District has prepared, supplied or approved plans andlar specifications for the
Retrofit Facilities and/or the Development; and
(e) Limit of Indemnzty. The agreennent by Participant to indemnify, defend and hold
District harmless shall not include liabilities, damages, or claims for damages caused by the
negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of District, or its elective and appointive
boards, officials, officers, agents, and employees.
17. Insurance
At all times while doing any Warlc or activity concerning the Retrofit Facilities,
Participant and any contractors and subcontractors or agents shall maintain, at minimum,
commercial or generuC liabzldty policy of insurance in the applicable amount indicated below
based on the estimated cost of the Facilities, per incident coverage for personal injury, property
damage and any other loss arising from or in connection with the Retrofit Facilities.
Estima~ec3 Cost IViinirazurrfl Amount of ~a~surance required
Less than $SOO,OOQ $1,000,000 aggregate; $500,000 per occurrence
$500,000-5,000,000 $3,000,000 aggregate; $1,000,000 per occurrence
More than $5,000,000 $10,004,000 aggregate; $2,000,000 per occurrence
In addition, Participant shall maintain all other insurance coverage required by law,
including but not limited to any applicable wor°leers compensataara insurance.
lie General Provisions
(a} Entire Agreement. The terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement
constirixte the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to the Retrofit Facilities; provided
that, where reference is made to applicable laws, rules or regulations, including those of the
District or DEH, such are incorporated herein by reference.
(b} Enforcement of Agreement. Should either party hereto sue to enforce the terms of
this Agreement, the venue for such action shall be with the Superior Court of the County of San
Diego.
(c) Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in
accordance with the internal laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflict of laws
principles.
Recycled Water TZetrofit Agreement v103109 Page 8 of 10
p:\public-s\staff reports~20] I\bd 06-0~-11, agreemen4, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
1'R(),T~C'I' I~to.1g2094-O01101
I,D.I~o, 22/27
(d) Amendments. No amendment, modification, supplement, termination or waiver
of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless executed in writing by both parties
and then only in the specified instance and for the specific purpose given.
(e) Waiver. The waiver of any term, condition or provision of this Agreement is
valid only as to that specific waiver and does not constitute a waiver of, and shall not be
construed to waive, any other term, condition or provision of this Agreement.
(~ Effective Date. This Agreement become effective on the date on which District
has approved, and the authorized representative of District has executed, this Agreement;
provided that an authorized representative of Participant shall have executed this Agreement
prior to the date on which the District executes this Agreement.
(g) 1Votices. Any notice required or given under this Agreement shall be in writing
and, except as otherwise provided by law, shall be effective {i) upon personal delivery, (ii) on the
day it is faxed, provided that the party giving facsimile notification must retain evidence of
successfizl transmittal of the notice, (iii) on the second business day after mailing by certified or
registered United States mail, return receipt requested, if addressed as follows:
If to Dfistricte Otay Water District
Attention: I'ubdYC Services
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, Califor~aia 91978-2004
Telephone: (619) 670-2241
Facsimile: (619) 670-6184
~f to Participant: Aspire-Encore at Rancho Del Rey Homeowners
Association
Attention: Robert Davis, Board President
9610 Waples Street
San Diego, California 92121
Telephone: (858) 550-7929
Facsimile: (858) 550-7929
Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner set forth in this
Section.
(h) Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which counterpart, if fully executed, shall be deemed an original. No counterpart shall be
deemed to be an original or presumed delivered unless and until the counterpart executed by the
other parry to this Agreement is in the physical possession of the party seeking enforcement
thereof.
{i} Corporate Authority. Each person executing this Agreement of behalf of the
Participant warz-ants that: (i) such party is duly organized and existing; (ii) the signatory is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement ors behalf of said party; (iii) by so executing
Recycled Water Retrofit A~eement v103109 Page 9 of 10
p:\public-s\staff reports~2011\bd 06-OS-11, agreement, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
PROJECT' No. 82094-001101
g.T~.l~t~> 22/27
this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement; and (iv) the
entering in this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said
parry is bound.
~i~d TI\TES~ W~IEI2EOF, this t~greemenf has been executed by an authorized
representative of Participant, on behalf of the Participant, and by the General Manager, on behalf
of District.
OTAY 6Vr~~'EI~ DgSTRIC~'
a California municipal water district
General Manager
Date:
Approved as to Form:
General Counsel
Recycled Water Retrofit Agreement v103109
p:\publio-s\staffreports\20i ]\bd 06-OS-11, agreement, reimbursement agreement with aspire-encore at rancho del rey hoa.doc
Page 10 of 10
~~~OLISHF~,~~
~ ~ ~ ~
G
9~FA ~~6'~P`
/a°TTACHMENT C
Otay Water District Date Updated: May 02, 2011
R2094 -Potable Irrigation Meters to Recycled Water Conversions
8udgel Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost Vendor/Comments
3,100,000
Planning
Labor 72,258 72,258
Meals and Incidentals 22 22 -22 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Professional Legal Fees 2,413 2,413 -2,413 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLP
Service Contracts 983 983 -983 JONES &STOKES ASSOCIATES tNC
Total Planning 3,417 75,675 -75,675
Design
Labor 24,285 24,285
Regulatory Agency Fees 1,042 1,042 -1,042 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Consultant Contracts 72,204 72,204 -72,204 LEE & RO INC
30,035 30,035 -30,035 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL
3,850 3,850 -3,850 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
TOf81 D2SIgf1 107,131 131,416 -131,416
Construction
Labor 95,446 95,446
Other Agency Fees 985,989 985,989 985,989 CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Consultant Contracts 2,488 2,488 -2,488 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC
4,950, 4,950 -4,950 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
16,554 16,554 -16,554 LEE & RO INC
Construction Contracts 144 144 -144 CLARKSON LAB &SUPPLY INC
7,469 7,469 -7,469 SOUTHLAND PAVING
Service Contracts 27 27 -27 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
Total Construction 1,017,619 1,113,065 -1,113,065
Agave & Seguaro
Reimbursement Agreement 20,000 -20,000 20,000
Labor 5,859 5,859
Consultant Contracts 3,342 3,342 -3,342 AECOM USA INC
13,003 13,003 -13,003 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC
Service Contracts 296 296 -296 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
Total Agave & Seguaro 36,642 22,501 20,000 42,501
Aristata
Reimbursement Agreement 10,000 -10,000 10,000
Labor 2.763 2,763
Consultant Contracts 11,517 11,517 -11,517 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC
Service Contracts 296 296 -296 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
Total Aristata 21,814 14,577 10,000 24,577
Tapestry &Mosaic
Reimbursement Agreement 10,500 -10,500 10,500
Labor 4,364 4,364
Consultant Contracts 12,711 12,711 -12,711 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC
Total Tapestry &Mosaic 23,211 17,074 10,500 27,574
Aspire Encore
Reimbursement Agreement 25,500 -25,500 25,500
Total Aspire Encore 25,500 -25,500 25,500
Grand Total 1,235,333 1,374,309 66,000 1,440,309
Subject: P.athflriz~ti~n tc~ Execute a Reimb~rserr~ent ~'roject 1~0.: X2094-00~ 101
~greei~~~t with aspire-Encore at Rancho lei
fey Horneown~rs Association for the
~~~v~rsi~r~ c~~ ~ Potable Water Irrigation Sys~~rra
~~ ~ R~cy~le~ VV'~t~r Irrigation Systerr~
l~ocurnent ~escri~~io~: staff Report for the June 1, 2011 Board ~/I~eting
~~F
Author: ,, ~; ~- ~ ~ ~°
Signature Date
~~vid Charles
Printed Name
o- ~f~~ {~ 1` /~~ ~l
CA Reviewer: ~ ,~
u~Signat ~~e „' Date
Gary Silverman
Printed fame
_---w..~~
~~~ ~ `a
Manager:
Signature Date
Rod Posada
printed Name
The above signatures at~est that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability the
signers veri~y than it meets the District q~ialify standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended
information; being grammatically correct and free ofi formatting and typographical errors; accurately presenting
calculated values and numerical references; and being internally consistent, legible and uniform in its presentation
sryle.
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY:
~Py~1_1~M,~~ ~,~
!,^ >`A~G ~ ` ?S~
1
~ Jto~_Y ~°
~~ ~7 i'~R
~,
..— t z ~ Yt < ice; ...: _
Daniel Kay
Associate Civil Engineer
Ron Ripperger ~,~`-~
Engineering Manager
APPROVED BY: Rod Posada~'~ ~ ~-.
(Chief) _ ~'„
Chief, Engineering
~ '~~ ~
MEETING DATE: June 1, 2 0 1 1
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY: Manny Magana '~'
(Asst GM) Assistant General Ni~,nager, Engineering and Operations
SUBJECT: Informational Item - Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2011 Capital
Improvement Program Report
K. ~ ~;
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
accepts the Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2011 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) Report for review and receives a summary via PowerPoint
presentation.
Cski]~~~iiit~~ilt~M.~~'~i1M~it~i7i~ ~1
Please see Attachment A,
To update the Board about the status of all CIP project expenditures
and to highlight significant issues, progress, and milestones on
major projects.
~~1'e~T~'~7~T_~
To keep up with growth and to meet our ratepayers' expectations to
adequately deliver safe, reliable, cost-effective, and quality water,
each year the District Staff prepares a six-year CIP Plan that
identifies the District infrastructure needs, The CIP is comprised
of four categories consisting of backbone capital facilities,
replacement/renewal projects, developer's reimbursement projects, and
capital purchases,
The Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2011 update is intended to provide a
detailed analysis of progress in completing these projects within the
allotted time and budget, Expenditures through the Third Quarter
totaled approximately $12.3 million, Approximately 43% of the Fiscal
Year 2011 expenditure budget was spent,
~'I~CAT IZ~SPA~°T s
None.
S'I°RAT~GI~ GQ~L
The CIP supports the District's Mission statement, "To provide the
best quality of water and wastewater services to the customers of the
Otay Water District, in a professional, effective, and efficient
manner," and the District's Strategic Goal, in planning for
infrastructure and supply to meet current and future potable water
demands,
None,
Gerz~ral ~~~a.a~e~°
2:\~I~c'\~I~ Quarterly 3enorts\?011\Q3\Staff Report\3D 06-01-ll, S~af` R?port, ~'nird Quar~2r FY 2011 CIP B.eport, ;DK-RR-RPi .hoc
DK/RR/RPojf
Attachments: Attachment A - Committee Action
Presentation
E
~,~~,~ :.
~'~'3^° f
~~
-~ 1
:,.. -, .k.
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on May 19, 2011. The Committee supported
Staff's recommendation.
The "Committee Action" is written in anticipation of the Committee
moving the item forward for Board approval. This report will be sent
to the Board as a Committee approved item, or modified to reflect any
discussion or changes as directed from the Committee prior to
presentation to the full Board.
:1~ .:~-~ -
~~,abjec~: Ir~f~rmational lter~ —Third Qu~~ter ~isc~! ~°e~r Project Flo.: V~rio~us
2t~11 Capital irnprovernent Program Repo
Document description: ~t~ffi Repo~f fior the June 1, 2011 hoard Meeting
Auihor:
Signature date
Daniel Kay
printed dame f
ii ,~.,~-- n6 ~ Wit, ~—_~~f'~1~ ~~,~~"~ , ,may ~_~~ ~eVi2WCf: ~~il `V~
~gnatu `~c'" k,
Gary Silverman
Printed dame
~~;~ ~
~~gnature !~~
F~on FZipperger
Printed blame
~~ ~ ~~
Dat
;' ~~;' ~~J~~;/ ,/ ~q
Date ~ ~ r
The abode signatures attest that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability the
signers verify than it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended information;
being grammatically correct and free of 'formatting and typographical errors; accurately presenting calculated values
and numerical references; and being internally consistent, legible and uniform in its presentation style.
CA
P
I
T
A
L
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
-
~
-
.
Th
i
r
d
Qu
a
r
t
e
r
Fi
s
c
a
l
Ye
a
r
20
1
1
(t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Ma
r
c
h
31
,
20
1
1
)
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
In
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
(P
2
4
8
8
& P2489)
12
9
6
-1
8~
2
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
Co
a
t
i
n
g
(P2490 & P2492)
Ba
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
Th
e
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
CI
P
bu
d
g
e
t
fo
r
Fi
s
c
a
l
Ye
a
r
20
1
1
co
n
s
i
s
t
s
of 82 projects
th
a
t
to
t
a
l
$2
8
.
5
mi
l
l
i
o
n
.
Th
e
s
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
ar
e
br
o
k
e
n
do
w
n
into four
ca
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
:
1.
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
:
$
16
.
2
mi
l
l
i
o
n
2.
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/R
e
n
e
w
a
l
:
$
10
.
0
mi
l
l
i
o
n
3.
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
:
$
2.
3
mi
l
l
i
o
n
4.
De
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
:
$
0.
0
mi
l
l
i
o
n
Ov
e
r
a
l
l
ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
Th
i
r
d
Qu
a
r
t
e
r
Fi
s
c
a
l
Year 2011
to
t
a
l
e
d
$1
2
.
3
mi
l
l
i
o
n
,
wh
i
c
h
is
4
3
%
of
ou
r
fi
s
c
a
l
ye
a
r
bu
d
g
e
t
through
th
e
se
c
o
n
d
qu
a
r
t
e
r
.
2
Fi
s
c
a
l
Ye
a
r
20
1
1
Re
p
o
r
t
(t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Ma
r
c
h
31
,
20
1
1
)
CI
P
FY
20
1
1
FY
20
1
1
FY
20
1
1
To
t
a
l
Li
f
e
-t
o
-
Total~~o Life-to-
CA
T
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Bu
d
g
e
t
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Da
t
e
Bu
d
g
e
t
Li
f
e
-to-DateDate
Sp
e
n
t
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
Budget Spent
1
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
$1
6
,
1
8
1
,
0
0
0
$6
,
7
0
3
,
0
0
0
4
1
%
$1
8
0
,
9
6
9
,
0
0
0
$46,884,00026%
2
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
/
Re
n
e
w
a
l
$1
0
,
0
0
6
,
0
0
0
$4
,
4
1
0
,
0
0
0
44
%
$4
4
,
0
5
3
,
0
0
0
$18,866,00043%
3
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
$2
,
2
4
9
,
0
0
0
$1
,
1
6
0
,
0
0
0
52
°l0
$1
3
,
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
$6,913,00051
4
De
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
$1
2
,
0
0
0
$0
0
%
$7
,
8
8
2
,
0
0
0
$1,0000%
'T
o
t
a
l
:
$2
8
,
4
4
8
,
0
0
0
$1
2
,
2
7
3
,
0
0
0
43
%
$2
4
6
,
3
5
4
,
0
0
0
$72,664,00029%
Ma
j
o
r
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
`
_
~
~
~S
/
. ,,~1
~
o
..
}
JA
M
L
'
[
W
~
~:
-
E
~+s
N.
T
.
S
.
~
J
~
~
_
~
Q
~
PL
A
N
N
I
N
G
- 1
-~
~ A%
~
•
DE
S
I
G
N
- 15
~
~
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
- 5
•
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
IN
US
E
- 2
'~'
,'
j
Q
I
~
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Bo
u
n
d
a
r
y
.
~
MA
J
O
R
Ci
P
PROJECTS
Ci4~
P2
4
6
7
--
Sa
n
Di
e
g
o
Fo
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Feasibility Sludy
P2
3
9
9
--
PL
-3
0
".
98
0
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
to
Fl
u
m
e
Parkway
4
P2
4
3
4
--
Ra
n
c
h
o
De
l
Re
y
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Well
P2
4
5
1
--
Oi
a
y
Me
s
a
Co
n
v
e
y
a
n
c
e
an
d
Disinfection Systerii
P2
4
6
6
--
Re
g
i
o
r
a
i
Tra
i
n
i
n
g
Fac
i
l
i
t
y
P2
4
7
3
--
71
1
-1
Pu
m
p
S±a
n
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
OP2
5
0
2
E
P2
5
0
3
--
80
3
-t
an
d
85
0
-2
Pump
StaLOn Mod~ficauuns
QP2
5
1
1
-N
o
r
t
h
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
/S
o
u
t
h
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
Interconnection System
R2
0
4
8
--
Ot
a
y
Me
s
a
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Pi
p
a
l
i
n
e
s
and Conversions
R2
0
5
8
--
Ai
r
w
a
y
Rd
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Pipeline
R2
0
7
7
--
Al
i
a
Rd
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Pi
p
e
l
i
n
E
R2
0
8
7
--
Wu
e
s
t
e
Rd
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Pipeline
aR2
0
9
1
-- 94
4
-1
R
Re
c
y
c
l
e
d
Wa
t
e
r
Pu
m
p
Station Upgrade
R2
0
9
4
--
Po
t
a
b
l
e
Irr
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Me
t
e
r
to
Recycle Watar Conversions
OR2
0
9
6
--
Ra
l
p
h
W.
Ch
a
p
m
a
n
Wa
t
e
r
Reclamation Faci{ity -
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
an
d
Mo
d
r
f
i
c
a
U
O
n
s
QS2
0
1
9
,
S2
0
2
0
&
S2
0
2
2
--
Sa
n
i
t
a
r
y
Sa
w
e
i
Replacement
~Q
~
P2
4
4
0
--
SR
9
0
5
Uti
l
i
t
y
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
v
P2
4
8
8
&
P2
4
8
9
--H
e
l
i
x
W
D
&
Ot
a
y
WD Agency Interconnections
P2
4
9
0
8
P2
4
9
2
--
12
9
6
-t
&
2
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Coating
P2
4
9
6
-
Ot
a
y
La
k
e
s
Ro
a
d
Uti
l
i
t
y
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
l V
~
P2
5
~
5
&
P2
5
0
6
--
65
7
-1
3
65
7
-2
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Coating
OP
2
0
0
9
--
PL
-3
6
"
SD
C
W
A
Ot
a
y
FC
F
No. 14 io O~~JD Regulatory Site
QS2
0
2
1
-
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
Rd
8-In
c
h
San
i
t
a
r
y
Sewer Replacement
SI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
~a
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
r
~
r
~
C
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
_1
.
2
9
6
-1
&
2
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
Co
a
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ke
y
Ca
m
p
~
n
e
n
t
:
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
an
d
ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
co
a
t
i
n
g
s
on
th
e
12
9
6
-1
&
2 Reservoirs.
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
:
A
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
w
a
s
aw
a
r
d
e
d
to
We
s
t
Coast Industrial
Co
a
t
i
n
g
,
In
c
.
,
on
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
3,
20
1
0
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
is
approximately
9
8
%
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
is
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
for June
20
1
1
.
Co
s
t
:
Th
e
co
m
b
i
n
e
d
FY
20
1
1
pr
o
j
e
c
t
bu
d
g
e
t
s
fo
r
CI
P
s
P2490 and
P2
4
9
2
ar
e
$6
8
0
,
0
0
0
,
of
wh
i
c
h
$7
0
5
,
2
3
8
,
or
1
0
4
%
was spent.
Th
e
li
f
e
-t
o
-d
a
t
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
bu
d
g
e
t
s
ar
e
$9
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
of which
$9
1
6
,
2
3
8
,
or
10
2
%
,
ha
v
e
be
e
n
sp
e
n
t
.
Si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
Is
s
u
e
s
:
Th
e
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
'
s
pr
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
ha
s
be
e
n
sl
o
w
e
r
th
a
n
the
su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
s
.
St
a
f
f
is
mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
th
e
contractor's
pr
o
g
r
e
s
s
to
ad
d
r
e
s
s
th
e
pr
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
s
u
e
s
.
Du
e
to the
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
du
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
st
a
f
f
is
re
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
an
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
in the
bu
d
g
e
t
fo
r
CI
P
P2
4
9
0
(1
2
9
6
-1
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
)
to
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
co
s
t
s
fo
r
th
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
Hi
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
:
No
n
e
.
~
~,,
_
~
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
~
~
s
in
~t
~
n
s
~
r
u
~
~
i
+
~
n
q
65
7
-1
&
2
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
Co
a
t
i
n
g
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ke
y
Co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
In
t
e
r
i
o
r
an
d
ex
t
e
r
i
o
r
co
a
t
i
n
g
s
on
th
e
65
7
-1
&
2
Reservoirs.
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
:
A
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
w
a
s
aw
a
r
d
e
d
to
Bl
a
s
t
c
o
,
Inc., on
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
5,
20
1
1
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
37%
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
is
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
fo
r
July 2011.
Co
s
t
:
Th
e
co
m
b
i
n
e
d
FY
20
1
1
pr
o
j
e
c
t
bu
d
g
e
t
s
fo
r
CI
P
s
P2490 and
P2
4
9
2
ar
e
$6
5
0
,
0
0
0
,
of
wh
i
c
h
$8
4
,
8
6
1
,
or
1
3
%
was spent.
Th
e
li
f
e
-t
o
-d
a
t
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
bu
d
g
e
t
s
ar
e
$7
5
0
,
0
0
0
,
of which
$8
4
,
8
6
1
,
or
l
i
%
,
ha
v
e
be
e
n
sp
e
n
t
.
Si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
Is
s
u
e
s
:
No
n
e
.
Hi
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
:
No
n
e
.
SI
P
Pr
o
'
~
~
t
s
in
Ca
n
s
t
r
u
+
~
t
~
+
~
r
~
k
~`
`
~
a
~
l
~
,~,
~
,
.~
~.•:
:
r
*
~
,
,
1
y
I,v
~~
}
1
~
c
/
~t
'•
m
i
l
\~
~
1
~~
.
~
~~,
r
~~
,
~; ~„ ~
.
. .
"~.
~
.
:
`
s
`~:
,~ ~j
a
~~
~
,.~
F
~
~~
`,
~
~
~
r
*
~
ti.
4
'
Ct
,
~
jk
,~
I
~.
."
t,
,
,,,
.y
F
"~
'r
r
~,
,
, ,~,
.
~r.
`
~y,
"
,-
~.r
+,i
±
~
~
,
'
., :r
:
~
c
ter
;
'
'
~
~
~'
~
~~
-~
~
'~
~~;
.
~
. S
~
~
r:
~a
.
r
~
CI
P
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
in
Co
n
s
~
t
r
u
~
~
i
c
~
r
~
0
De
l
Ri
o
Ro
a
d
&
Gi
l
l
i
s
p
i
e
Dr
i
v
e
Em
e
r
_
g
e
n
c
v
In
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ke
y
Co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
In
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
of
tw
o
6
-i
n
c
h
me
t
e
r
s
,
va
u
l
t
s
,
SC
A
D
A
,
and telemetry
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
fo
r
an
in
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
He
l
i
x
Wa
t
e
r
District.
Sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
:
A
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
w
a
s
aw
a
r
d
e
d
to
LH
W
o
o
d
s
&Sons on
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2,
20
1
1
.
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
9% complete.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
is
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
fo
r
Au
g
u
s
t
20
1
1
.
Co
s
t
:
Th
e
co
m
b
i
n
e
d
FY
20
1
1
pr
o
j
e
c
t
bu
d
g
e
t
s
fo
r
CI
P
s
P2488 and
P2
4
8
9
ar
e
$2
5
5
,
0
0
0
,
of
wh
i
c
h
$6
6
,
8
6
9
1
,
or
2
6
%
was spent.
Th
e
li
f
e
-t
o
-d
a
t
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
bu
d
g
e
t
s
ar
e
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
,
of which
$1
5
6
,
6
8
9
,
or
5
2
%
,
ha
v
e
be
e
n
sp
e
n
t
.
Si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
Is
s
u
e
s
:
No
n
e
.
Hi
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
:
Ot
a
y
an
d
He
l
i
x
Wa
t
e
r
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
ha
v
e
an
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
in place to
sp
l
i
t
5
0
%
of
th
e
co
s
t
fo
r
de
s
i
g
n
,
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
and
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
of
th
e
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Ot
a
y
wi
l
l
re
c
e
i
v
e
the
re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
af
t
e
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
is
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
io
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
St
a
t
u
s
(t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Ma
r
c
h
31
,
20
1
1
)
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
To
t
a
l
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
CI
P
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
Ch
a
n
g
e
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
Pa
y
m
e
n
t
To Change Project
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ti
t
l
e
Am
o
u
n
t
Or
d
e
r
s
Am
o
u
n
t
Da
t
e
Orders Complete
PL
A
N
N
I
N
G
A EC
O
M
MW
H
AM
E
R
I
C
A
S
IN
C
.
SA
L
V
A
D
O
R
LO
P
E
Z
-
CO
R
D
O
V
A
TR
A
N
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
DE
S
I
G
N
RA
N
C
H
O
DE
L
RE
Y
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R
WE
L
L
P2
4
3
4
DE
V
E
L
O
P
M
F
M
NO
R
T
F
~
S
O
U
T
H
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
AR
E
A
IN
T
E
R
T
I
E
P2
0
1
0
ST
U
D
Y
P2
4
5
1
DE
S
A
L
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
PR
O
J
E
C
T
SA
N
f
f
A
R
Y
SE
W
E
R
C
C
N
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
AN
D
S1
2
0
1
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
AE
C
O
M
P2
4
5
1
SY
S
T
E
M
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
CE
N
T
E
R
FO
R
~S
U
S
T
A
I
r
1
A
B
L
E
EN
E
R
G
Y
Va
r
i
e
s
SO
L
A
R
PO
W
E
R
FE
A
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
ST
U
D
Y
CP
M
PA
R
T
N
E
F
Z
S
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
NE
E
D
E
D
SC
H
m
U
L
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
DA
R
N
E
L
L
&A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
NE
E
D
E
D
T
R
A
F
F
I
C
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
FO
R
FY
2
0
1
0
AN
D
FY
2
0
1
1
FS
J
G
I
N
F
~
R
I
N
G
PA
R
T
N
E
R
S
IN
C
,
TH
E
Va
r
i
e
s
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
EN
G
I
N
F
~
R
I
N
G
PA
R
T
N
E
R
S
IN
C
,
TH
E
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
NE
F
~
E
D
EL
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
DE
S
I
G
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
HD
R
Va
r
i
e
s
TE
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
LA
B
O
R
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
P2
5
0
2
,
HV
A
C
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
IN
C
P2
5
0
3
HV
A
C
SE
R
V
IC
E
S
FO
R
85
0
-2
PS
&
80
3
-1
PS
LE
E
&
RO
IN
C
P2
0
0
9
DE
S
I
G
N
OF
36
-I
N
C
H
PI
P
E
L
I
N
E
LE
E
&
RO
IN
C
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
NE
E
D
E
D
FJ
~
I
G
I
N
E
~
7
2
1
N
G
DE
S
I
G
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
NO
R
T
H
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
/S
O
U
T
H
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
LE
E
&
RO
IN
C
P2
5
1
1
IM
'
E
R
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
I
O
N
AS
-N
E
m
m
GE
O
T
E
C
H
N
I
C
A
L
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
MT
G
L
IN
C
.
Va
r
i
e
s
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
S2
0
1
9
,
S2
0
2
0
,
MI
C
H
A
E
L
D
KE
A
G
Y
RE
A
L
ES
T
A
T
E
S2
0
2
2
AP
P
R
A
I
S
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
1,
5
6
1
,
6
2
5
.
0
0
$1
7
6
,
8
0
5
.
0
0
$
1,
7
3
8
,
4
3
0
.
0
0
$1
,
7
1
8
,
5
0
4
.
7
1
11.3%COMPLETE
$
11
9
,
5
0
5
.
0
0
$
11
,
5
0
0
.
0
0
$
13
1
,
0
0
5
.
0
0
$
11
8
,
3
1
4
.
4
1
9.6%90.3%
$
45
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
45
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
2,012.900.0%0.0%
$
56
0
,
0
2
5
.
0
0
$
-
$
56
0
,
0
2
5
.
0
0
$
33
4
,
0
9
5
.
3
2
0.0%59.7%
$
3,
9
1
0
,
2
9
7
.
0
0
$
-
$
3,
9
1
0
,
2
9
7
.
0
0
$
-0.0%0.0%
$
34
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
34
,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
2,700.000.0%7.8%
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
90,932.500.0%52.0%
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
14
9
,
5
6
7
.
5
0
0.0%85.5%
$
10
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
10
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
85,930.000.0%85.9%
$
10
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
10
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
54,320.000.0%54.3%
$
15
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
35
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
18
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
17
0
,
8
0
0
.
0
0
23.3%92.3%
$
19
,
4
2
1
.
0
0
$
-
$
19
,
4
2
1
.
0
0
$
1,675.000.0%8.6%
$
58
0
,
1
8
3
.
0
0
$
61
,
6
2
9
.
0
0
$
64
1
,
8
1
2
.
0
0
$
64
1
,
8
1
2
.
0
0
10.6%COMFtETE
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
20,692.500.0%11.8%
$
2,
7
6
9
,
1
1
9
.
0
0
$
-
$
2,
7
6
9
,
1
1
9
.
0
0
$
22
0
,
2
0
1
.
7
4
0.0%8.0%
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
21,460.000.0%12.3%
$
~~,
0
0
0
.
0
0
~
$
-
~ $
»,0
0
0
.
0
0
~
$
~z,000.00~ o.o~ro ~ ~o.s~roli
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
St
a
t
u
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
CI
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ti
t
l
e
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
Am
o
u
n
t
To
t
a
l
Ch
a
n
g
e
Or
d
e
r
s
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
Am
o
u
n
t
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
Pa
y
m
e
n
t
To
Da
t
e
Change OrdersProjectComplete
DE
S
I
G
N
NN
V
H
AM
E
R
I
C
A
S
IN
C
.
82
0
9
6
,
82
0
9
5
,
S2
0
1
8
RW
C
W
R
F
UP
G
R
A
D
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
$
45
8
,
8
1
3
.
0
0
$1
2
2
,
0
4
8
.
0
0
$
58
0
,
8
6
1
.
0
0
$
50
7
,
2
3
6
.
0
9
26.6%87.3°/a
AT
K
I
N
S
(a
k
a
PB
S
&J
)
Va
r
i
e
s
HY
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
MO
D
E
L
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
45
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
4,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
49
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
48
,
9
8
7
.
5
5
8.9%COMPLETE
PB
S
&J
P2
5
1
1
HY
D
R
A
U
L
I
C
AN
A
L
Y
S
I
S
$
5,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
5,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5,
0
0
0
.
0
0
0.0°/aCOMPLETE
PH
O
T
O
GE
O
D
E
T
I
C
CO
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
P2
3
9
9
SU
R
V
E
Y
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
3,
4
2
5
.
6
3
$
-
$
3,
4
2
5
.
6
3
$
3,
1
5
0
.
0
0
0.0%CAMPLEfE
RE
P
R
O
H
A
U
S
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
NE
E
D
E
D
RE
P
R
O
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
SF
~
Z
V
I
C
E
S
$
20
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
20
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
7,
4
2
6
.
3
3
0.0°/o37.1%
SC
H
I
F
F
&A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
Va
r
i
e
s
PR
O
F
E
S
S
I
O
N
A
L
CO
R
R
O
S
I
O
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
25
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
36
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
28
6
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
22
2
,
5
0
3
.
6
8
14.4%77.8%
SO
U
T
H
E
R
N
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
SO
I
L
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
NF
~
D
E
D
GE
O
T
E
C
H
N
I
C
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
11
,
7
6
1
.
3
7
$
18
6
,
7
6
1
.
3
7
$
17
7
,
8
2
3
.
8
3
6.7°/o95.2%
S.
R
.
BR
A
D
L
E
Y
&A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
,
IN
C
.
P2
4
3
4
AR
C
H
f
f
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
5,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
5,
1
0
0
.
0
0
$
5,
1
0
0
.
0
0
0.0%COMPLETE
SU
P
E
R
I
O
R
TA
N
K
SO
L
U
T
I
O
N
S
P2
4
9
1
80
3
-2
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Vi
s
u
a
l
In
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
$
25
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
25
0
.
0
0
$
250.000.0%COMPLETE
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
BR
A
D
L
E
Y
CA
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
GR
O
U
P
P2
1
7
2
14
8
5
-1
PU
M
P
ST
A
T
I
O
N
-T
R
E
E
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
$
50
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
50
0
.
0
0
$
500.000.0%COMPLETE
M
W
H
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
O
R
S
IN
C
Va
r
i
e
s
TE
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
LA
B
O
R
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
15
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$1
3
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
28
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
27
5
,
1
0
0
.
0
0
86.7%COMPLETE
PR
O
W
E
S
T
A
P
P
R
F
I
I
S
A
L
S
P2
1
7
2
AP
P
R
A
I
S
A
L
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
2,
8
2
7
.
5
0
$
-
$
2,
8
2
7
.
5
0
$
2,
6
0
0
.
0
0
0.0%COMPLETE
RB
F
CA
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
P2
0
0
9
36
-I
N
C
H
PI
P
E
L
I
N
E
$
1,
0
8
8
,
7
8
5
.
0
0
$1
4
8
,
0
7
0
.
0
0
$
1,
2
3
6
,
8
5
5
.
0
0
$1
,
2
3
6
,
8
3
3
.
7
5
13.6%COMPLETE
RB
F
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
82
0
5
8
,
82
0
7
7
,
82
0
8
7
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
FO
R
TH
E
OT
A
Y
(v
~
S
A
RE
C
Y
C
L
F
~
WA
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
Y
LI
N
K
$
70
8
,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$
70
8
,
5
6
0
.
0
0
$
13
,
9
6
0
.
0
0
0.0%2.0%
RB
F
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
S2
0
1
9
,
S2
0
2
1
CA
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MA
N
G
A
G
F
I
V
I
E
M
$
5,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
5,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
5,000.0
00.0%COMPLETE
VA
L
L
E
Y
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
NF
~
D
E
D
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
MA
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
AN
D
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
17
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
5
,
1
4
0
.
0
0
0.0°/o60.1°/o12
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
St
a
t
u
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
CI
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ti
t
l
e
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
Am
o
u
n
t
To
t
a
l
Ch
a
n
g
e
Or
d
e
r
s
Re
v
i
s
e
d
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
Am
o
u
n
t
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
Pa
y
m
e
n
t
To
Da
t
e
Change OrdersProjectComplete
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
A.
D
.
HI
N
S
H
A
W
Va
r
i
e
s
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
FO
R
JW
A
'
s
CE
Q
A
$
34
,
6
2
5
.
2
5
$
-
$
34
,
6
2
5
2
5
$
8,
5
0
0
.
5
1
0.0%24.6%
BR
G
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
IN
C
P2
1
4
3
12
9
6
-3
RE
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
EN
V
SV
G
S
$
12
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
72
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
12
4
,
4
9
8
.
5
4
0.0°/COMPLETE
FO
R
E
N
S
I
C
ET
I
T
O
M
O
L
O
G
Y
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
P2
4
9
4
SC
I
E
I
J
C
E
A
D
V
I
S
O
R
R
E
V
I
E
W
$
4,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
4,
0
0
0
.
0
0
0.0%COMPLETE
IC
F
IN
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
(a
k
a
JO
N
E
S
&
ST
O
K
E
S
AS
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
)
P1
2
5
3
S
A
N
MI
G
U
~
HA
B
f
f
A
T
MA
N
A
G
H
V
I
E
N
T
AR
E
A
$
98
7
,
8
0
7
.
0
0
$
-
$
98
7
,
8
0
7
.
0
0
$
68
6
,
9
1
9
.
5
8
0.0%69.5%
IC
F
IN
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
(a
k
a
JO
N
E
S
&
ST
O
K
E
S
AS
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
)
82
0
5
8
/
82
0
7
7
/
82
0
8
7
OT
A
Y
ME
S
A
RE
C
Y
C
L
m
W
A
T
E
R
SU
P
P
L
Y
LI
N
K
PI
P
E
L
I
N
E
S
$
21
3
,
0
8
7
.
0
0
$
9,
1
1
5
.
0
0
$
22
2
,
2
0
2
.
0
0
$
22
2
,
1
4
3
.
9
8
4.3%COMPLETE
IC
F
IN
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
(a
k
a
JO
N
E
S
&
ST
O
K
E
S
AS
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
)
Va
r
i
e
s
AS
-
N
~
m
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
$
37
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
37
5
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
61
,
2
0
6
.
1
9
0.0%'16.3%
DR
.
MA
R
Y
AN
N
E
H
A
W
K
E
P2
4
9
4
SC
I
E
N
C
E
AD
V
I
S
O
R
R
~
V
I
E
W
$
4,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4,
3
5
0
.
0
0
$
-0.0%0.0%
PH
O
T
O
GE
O
D
E
T
I
C
CO
R
P
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
F2
2
0
9
6
AE
R
I
A
L
MA
P
P
I
N
G
$
2,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
2,
4
0
0
.
0
0
$
2,
4
0
0
.
0
0
0.0%COMPLETE
KA
H
N
CO
N
S
F
3
2
V
A
T
I
O
N
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
P2
4
9
4
AD
V
I
S
O
R
RE
V
I
E
W
$
4,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
4,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
4,
0
0
0
.
0
0
0.0%COMPLETE
RE
C
O
N
P2
4
9
4
PF
2
E
P
A
R
A
T
I
O
N
OF
TH
E
SU
B
A
R
E
A
PL
A
N
$
27
0
,
8
5
3
.
0
0
$
-
$
27
0
,
8
5
3
.
0
0
$
18
2
,
7
3
6
.
3
9
0.0%67.5%
TE
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
AS
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
P2
4
9
4
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
FO
R
J
W
A
'
s
NC
C
P
$
34
,
6
2
5
.
2
5
$
-
$
34
,
6
2
5
.
2
5
$
33
,
2
4
2
.
7
7
0.0%96.0%
TH
E
RI
C
K
AL
I
X
A
N
D
A
R
CO
M
P
A
N
Y
(T
R
A
C
)
P2
4
9
4
CO
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
SE
R
V
IC
E
S
FO
R
JW
A
'
s
NC
C
P
$
20
,
2
0
1
.
7
5
$
-
$
20
,
2
0
1
.
7
5
$
7,
3
8
4
.
3
3
0.0%36.6
W
A
T
E
R
R
E
S
O
U
R
C
E
S
AE
C
O
M
P2
4
8
1
MI
D
D
L
E
SW
E
E
T
W
A
T
E
R
RI
V
E
R
BA
S
I
N
GR
O
U
N
D
W
A
T
E
R
W
E
I
L
P
I
L
O
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
$
1,
0
6
5
,
0
3
7
.
0
0
$
-
$
1,
0
6
5
,
0
3
7
.
0
0
$
35
1
,
0
0
9
.
5
9
0.0%33.0%
CA
M
P
DR
E
S
S
E
R
&
MC
K
E
E
IN
C
P2
4
5
1
BI-
NA
T
I
O
N
A
L
DE
S
A
L
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
FE
4
S
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
ST
U
D
Y
$
94
,
5
5
2
.
0
0
$
18
,
0
0
5
.
0
0
$
11
2
,
5
5
7
.
0
0
$
98
,
5
7
7
.
3
4
19.0 %87.6%
CI
T
Y
OF
CH
U
L
A
VI
S
T
A
82
0
9
3
WA
S
T
~
I
N
A
T
E
R
RE
C
L
A
M
A
T
I
O
N
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
ST
U
D
Y
$
15
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
15
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
10
9
,
3
0
2
.
1
8
0.0%72.9%
MI
C
H
A
F
I
R.
WE
L
C
H
P2
4
8
1
EN
G
I
N
E
E
R
I
N
G
PL
A
N
N
I
N
G
SV
G
S
.
$
40
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
40
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
19
,
4
4
0
.
0
0
0.0 %48.6
P
U
B
L
I
C
SE
R
V
I
C
E
S
AE
G
I
S
QV
G
I
N
E
E
F
R
I
N
G
MA
N
A
G
E
7
V
l
E
N
T
Va
r
i
e
s
RE
C
Y
C
L
m
WA
T
F
3
~
PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
I
N
G
,
RE
T
R
O
F
I
T
,
AN
D
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
SE
R
V
IC
E
S
FO
R
DE
V
EL
O
P
E
R
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
$
30
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
30
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
17
1
,
2
0
9
.
9
8
0.0°/57.1°
AE
G
I
S
EN
G
I
N
E
g
2
1
N
G
MA
N
A
G
F
J
V
I
E
N
T
Va
r
i
e
s
R
E
C
Y
C
L
m
WA
T
E
}
2
PL
A
N
CH
E
C
K
I
N
G
,
RE
T
R
O
F
I
T
,
AN
D
IN
S
P
E
C
T
I
O
N
Sd
~
V
IC
E
S
FO
R
DE
V
EL
O
P
F
3
~
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
$
30
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
30
0
,
0
0
0
.
0
0
$
34
,
5
8
9
.
1
0
0.0%11.5%
TO
T
A
L
S
:
$1
7
,
7
8
5
,
3
7
4
.
3
8
$7
6
3
,
9
3
3
.
3
7
$1
8
,
5
4
9
,
3
0
7
.
7
5
$8
,
3
8
2
,
7
9
0
.
2
9
4.3%13
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
St
a
t
u
s
(t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Ma
r
c
h
31
,
20
1
1
)
OR
I
G
I
N
A
L
TO
T
A
L
RE
V
I
S
E
D
TO
T
A
L
%
%EST.
CI
P
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
CH
A
N
G
E
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
EA
R
N
E
D
OF
PROJECTCOMP.
NO
.
PR
O
J
E
C
T
TI
T
L
E
CO
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
AM
O
U
N
T
OR
D
E
R
S
AM
O
U
N
T
TO
DA
T
E
CH
A
N
G
E
COMPLETEDATE
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
Rd
.
P2
0
0
9
/
36
-I
n
c
h
Pi
p
e
l
i
n
e
&
CC
L
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
i
n
g
$1
6
,
1
8
9
,
2
4
3
($
1
,
7
8
1
,
2
9
9
)
$1
4
40
7
,
9
4
4
$1
4
,
4
0
7
,
9
4
4
-11
.
0
0
%
100%September
P2
0
3
8
12
-I
n
c
h
Pi
p
e
l
i
n
e
2010
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
Rd
.
8-
September
S2
0
2
1
In
c
h
Se
w
e
r
A.
B
.
Ha
s
h
m
i
$9
1
,
3
2
0
($
2
,
2
2
6
)
$8
9
,
0
9
4
$8
9
,
0
9
4
0
-2.
4
4
/
0
o100%2010
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P2
4
9
0
/
12
9
6
-1
&
12
9
6
-2
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Co
a
t
i
n
g
We
s
t
Co
a
s
t
X6
9
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
5
8
0
$6
9
2
,
5
8
0
$4
5
4
,
6
9
0
0.
3
7
%
66%Februa ~
P2
4
9
2
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
2011
&
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
65
7
-1
&
65
7
-2
P2
5
0
5
/
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Co
a
t
i
n
g
Bl
a
s
t
c
o
In
c
.
$6
3
2
,
5
0
0
$0
$6
3
2
,
5
0
0
$2
4
3
,
0
1
0
0.
0
0
%
38%July 2011
P2
5
0
6
&
Up
g
r
a
d
e
s
De
l
Ri
o
Ro
a
d
&
P2
4
8
8
/
Gi
l
l
i
s
p
i
e
Dr
i
v
e
LH
Wo
o
d
s
$3
7
9
,
0
0
0
$4
,
9
8
1
$3
8
3
,
9
8
1
$1
4
,
0
0
0
1.
3
1
%
4~~oAugust
P2
4
$
9
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
2011
In
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
TO
T
A
L
S
:
$1
7
,
9
8
2
,
0
6
3
($
1
,
7
7
5
,
9
6
4
)
$1
6
,
2
0
6
,
0
9
9
$1
5
,
2
0
8
,
7
3
8
-9.
8
8
%
14
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Ma
r
c
h
31
,
20
1
1
)
($
0
0
0
)
FI
S
C
A
L
YE
A
R
-T
O
-D
A
T
E
,
03
/
3
1
H
i
LI
F
E
-T
O
-D
A
T
E
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
FY
20
1
1
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
to
CI
P
No
.
Da
s
c
r
i
li
o
n
Ma
n
a
er
Bu
d
et
Ex
en
s
e
s
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Bu
d
et
%
Bu
d
et
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Comments
CA
P
I
T
A
L
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
P2
0
0
9
PL
-
36
-
In
c
h
,
S
D
C
W
A
O
t
a
FC
F
N
o
.
1
4
t
o
R
e
ul
a
t
o
Si
t
e
Ri
er
e
r
$
2,
2
0
0
$
2,
9
0
8
$
70
8
13
2
%
$
21
,
0
0
0
$
1,
1
5
1
Pro'ectcom lete.
P2
0
3
3
PL
- 16
-4
~
c
h
,
12
9
6
Zo
n
e
,
Me
b
d
Ro
a
d
-C
a
m
o/Pr
e
s
i
l
l
a
Ri
e
er
0%
1 82
6
1,
8
2
1
Noe erases for Q3.
P2
0
3
8
PL
-1
2
-I
n
c
h
97
8
Zo
n
e
,
Hi
d
d
e
n
Me
s
a
Ro
a
d
Ka
13
0
34
96
26
%
2,
3
7
8
19
3
Construction Com late art of P2009 .
P2
0
8
3
PS
- 87
0
-2
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
28
,
0
0
0
GP
M
Ri
er
er
50
50
0 h
12
,
5
8
1
12
,
0
0
0
Noe erases for Q3.
P2
1
4
3
Re
s
- 12
9
6
-3
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
2
MG
Ka
5
11
7
11
2
23
4
0
°~
3
54
0
48
Construction com late.
P2
1
7
2
PS
-14
8
5
-1
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ri
er
er
5
28
23
56
0
%
2 49
5
8
Pro'ect com late.
P2
1
9
1
Re
s
- 85
0
-
4
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
2.
2
MG
Ka
5
27
22
54
0
%
3 41
0
9
Pro'ect com late.
P2
2
6
7
36
-In
c
h
Ma
i
n
Pu
m
ou
t
s
an
d
Ai
r
N
a
c
u
u
m
Ve
n
t
i
l
a
t
i
o
n
Ins
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
An
d
e
r
s
o
n
0%
43
5
20
1
Noe erases for Q3.In Design. Coordinating Construction with County
P2
3
1
8
PL
- 20
-In
c
h
,
65
7
Zo
n
e
,
Su
m
m
i
t
Cr
o
s
s
-T
i
e
an
d
36
-In
c
h
Ma
i
n
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
10
0
27
73
27
%
60
0
50
3
Pavin Pro'ect.
P2
3
5
7
PS
- 65
7
-1/
8
5
0
-1
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
De
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
Ke
n
n
e
d
50
18
32
36
%
30
0
28
2
In desi n' to be combined with P2471.
P2
3
7
0
Re
s
-Do
r
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
an
d
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
De
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
Ke
n
n
e
d
67
7
60
10
%
15
0
13
0
In desi n; to be combined with P2471.IF the Rosariio Desal project becomes operational than it may preclude the need for this project hence rw additlonal e~enditures are planned for
P2
3
9
1
PS
-Pe
r
d
u
e
WT
P
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
10
,
0
0
0
GP
M
Pe
a
s
l
e
5
28
23
56
0
%
11
90
0
11
,
8
4
8
FY11.
P2
3
9
9
PL
- 30
-In
c
h
,
98
0
Zo
n
e
,
98
0
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
to
Hu
n
t
e
Pa
r
k
w
a
Si
l
v
e
r
m
a
n
20
0
10
5
95
53
%
3,
6
0
0
75
9
90% desi n com late in Ma 2011.
P2
4
3
1
Re
s
- 98
0
-4
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
5
MG
Ka
5
5
0%
5
90
Q
5,
9
0
0
Pro act on hold.
P2
4
3
4
Ra
n
c
h
o
De
l
Re
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
We
l
l
De
v
e
l
o
me
n
d
Si
l
v
e
r
m
a
n
1 00
0
1,
3
7
3
37
3
13
7
%
4
25
0
1,
6
1
1
Desi n underwa ;due December 2011.FY11 budget revised. Project on hold until first
P2
4
5
1
Ro
s
a
r
i
t
o
De
s
a
l
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Fac
i
l
i
t
Co
n
v
e
rac
e
an
d
Dis
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
st
e
m
Ke
n
n
e
d
1 00
0
21
1
78
9
21
%
30
,
0
0
0
29
,
3
1
5
uarter FY12.This project budget has been expended; may be increased to cover some minor future expenses.
P2
4
6
6
Re
Ton
a
l
Tra
i
n
i
Fac
i
l
i
Co
b
u
m
-B
o
24
14
10
58
%
25
2
1
This project is joirrtlyfunded by SWA and Otay.The SDCWA awarded a LISA grantto SWA to fund up to 50% of the cost of the effort. Monitoring wells in the Otay River have been completed by USGS. Data gathering on well information within the San Diego Formation continues. Otay River participation agreemerd beriveen SWA and Otay
P2
4
6
7
Sa
n
Di
e
o
Fo
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
Fea
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
St
u
d
Pe
a
s
l
e
60
0
1
59
9
0 %
1,
8
0
0
1,
0
4
1
has been a roved b the Board.
P2
4
7
1
85
0
/
6
5
7
PR
S
at
La
Pr
e
s
a
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
Sih
r
e
r
t
n
a
n
24
0
18
22
2
8 %
31
0
24
4
60% desi n com late in Ma 2011.This project budget is for water supply feasibility study efforts. MWH completed the preparation a brief study including cost estimates for supply from the SWA Perdue WTP and the North District
P2
4
7
2
Wa
t
e
r
Su
I
Fea
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
St
u
d
i
e
s
Pe
a
s
l
e
30
30
0%
17
5
14
9
to South District Interconnection.
P2
4
7
3
PS
- 71
1
-1
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
Im
ro
v
e
m
e
n
t
Ka
20
0
37
16
3
19
%
50
0
41
8
Pro'ect under construction.
P2
4
7
4
Fu
e
l
St
o
r
e
e Co
v
e
r
s
an
d
Co
n
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
Ke
n
n
e
d
50
16
34
32
%
12
0
83
Pro'ect com late.
P2
4
7
5
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
Fi
r
e
H
Br
a
n
t
Ins
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ke
n
n
e
d
45
10
35
22
%
55
1
Pro'ect com late.Groundwater development planning efforts have been suspended for the Middle Sweetwater River Basin Groundwater Well Pilot Project. Meetings with SWA have occurred with staff agreement on the quantity of imported water conVibuted to the groundwater supply. H the Rosarito Desal project becomes operational it may preclude the need for this project hence no additional expenditures are
P2
4
8
1
Mi
d
d
l
e
Sw
e
e
t
w
a
t
e
r
Ri
v
e
r
Ba
s
i
n
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
We
l
l
Fea
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
Pe
a
s
l
e
50
12
1
71
24
2
%
1 82
0
1,
3
2
5
tanned for in the remainin of FY11.15
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
($
0
0
0
)
FI
S
C
A
L
YE
A
R
-T
O
-D
A
T
E
,
03
1
3
1
1
1
1
LI
F
E
-T
O
-D
A
T
E
CI
P
N
o
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
er
FY
20
1
1
Bu
d
et
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
to
Bu
d
et
%
Bu
d
et
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Comments
CA
P
I
T
A
L
FA
C
I
L
I
T
Y
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
P2
4
8
8
De
I
R
i
o
R
o
a
d
H
e
l
i
x
a
r
x
l
O
t
a
A
en
c
Irr
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
Ka
12
0
27
93
23
%
15
0
62
Pro'ectunderconstruction.
P2
4
8
9
Gil
l
i
s
ie
Dri
v
e
He
l
i
x
an
d
Ot
a
A
en
c
Ime
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
Ka
13
5
46
89
34
%
15
0
74
Pro' ct under construction.
P2
4
9
7
So
l
a
r
Po
w
e
r
Fea
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
St
u
d
Ke
n
n
e
d
15
0
13
13
7
9 %
25
0
20
7
Pre arin draft RFP for review.
P2
5
0
2
80
3
-1
Pu
m
St
a
t
i
o
n
Mod
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Si
l
v
e
r
m
a
n
50
39
11
78
%
20
0
16
1
VFDs and ALCs awarded in May 2011; motors
aw
a
r
d
e
d
in June 2011; HVAC out to bid in May 2011.
P2
5
0
3
85
0
-2
Pu
m
Sta
t
i
o
n
Mod
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Si
l
v
e
r
m
a
n
15
0
45
10
5
30
%
65
Q
60
5
See
P2502.
P2
5
1
0
O
era
t
i
o
n
s
Ya
r
d
Im
ro
v
e
m
e
r
r
t
s
Ka
25
25
0%
37
~
37
0
Pro'ect on hold.
P2
5
1
1
No
r
t
h
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
-S
o
u
t
h
Dis
t
r
i
c
t
In
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
st
e
m
Si
l
v
e
r
m
a
n
80
0
39
2
40
8
49
%
37
,
3
0
0
36
,
9
0
8
PDR underwa ,due December 2011.
82
0
3
4
Re
c
R
e
s
- 86
0
-1
Re
s
e
n
a
i
r
4
MG
Ka
20
0
20
0
0 %
3 80
0
3,
7
7
6
Pro'ect on hold.
82
0
4
8
Re
c
P
L
- Ot
a
Me
s
a
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Pi
el
i
n
e
s
an
d
Co
n
~
r
s
i
o
n
s
Ka
25
0
15
4
96
62
%
2,
2
0
0
1,
9
7
4
Desi n 30 % com lete.
82
0
5
8
Re
c
P
L
-1
6
-
Iri
s
h
,
86
0
Zo
n
e
,
Ai
r
w
a
Ro
a
d
- Ot
a
Me
s
a
/Al
t
a
Ke
n
n
e
d
1,
0
0
0
16
6
83
4
17
%
3,
5
0
0
2,
3
9
3
Revise bud et to $200k for FY11
82
0
7
7
Re
c
P
L
- 24
-In
c
h
,
86
0
Zo
n
e
,
Alt
a
Ro
a
d
-Al
t
a
Ga
t
e
/A
i
r
w
a
Ke
n
n
e
d
1,
7
5
0
13
2
1,
6
1
8
8%
4,
5
0
0
3,
6
6
0
Revise budget to $1,500k. Reimbursement A reement will consume $1,250k of this bud et.
82
0
8
7
Re
c
P
~
- 24
-In
c
h
,
92
7
Zo
n
e
,
Wu
e
s
t
e
Ro
a
d
- OI
icl
O
t
a
WT
P
Ke
n
n
e
d
3,
3
7
8
13
8
3,
2
4
0
4 %
7,
0
0
0
6,
1
4
5
Ea sement acquisition budget for the City of Chula Vista aril the City ofSanDiego. Revise budget to $300 for FY11.
82
0
8
8
Re
c
P
L
- 30
-Ir
x
h
,
86
0
Zo
n
e
,
Co
u
Jai
l
-R
o
l
l
Re
s
e
r
w
i
r
l
8
6
0
-1
Re
s
e
n
r
o
i
r
Ka
24
0
6
23
4
3 %
3,
5
0
0
3,
4
3
7
Pro'ect on hold.
82
0
9
1
Re
c
P
S
- 92
7
-1
Pu
m
p
Sta
t
i
o
n
Up
g
r
a
d
e
(1
0
,
0
0
0
GP
M
)
an
d
Sy
s
t
e
m
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ri
e
er
1,
2
5
0
18
4
1,
0
6
6
15
%
3,
9
5
0
3,
5
1
7
Pro'ect advertised for bid.
82
0
9
2
Di
s
- 45
0
-1
Re
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Di
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
Fac
i
l
i
Ka
2
16
18
-8
0
0
%
74
2
3
Pro' ct com lete.
82
0
9
3
MB
R
Ci
t
of
Ch
u
l
a
Vis
t
a
Fea
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
St
u
d
Pe
a
s
l
e
12
0
12
7
7
10
6
%
21
0
39
The City of Chula Vista and Otay have approved the MBR participation agreement to focus on the treatment facility and related requirements. The City of Chula VisTa awarded a consulting contract to RMC to accomplish the scope ofworic. A final draft report has been prepared incorporating the Ci arxl Ota staffs review comments.
82
0
9
4
Po
t
a
b
l
e
Irri
ati
o
n
Me
t
e
r
s
to
Re
c
sle
d
Wa
t
e
r
Co
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
s
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
50
0
15
0
35
0
30
%
3,
1
0
0
1,
7
3
1
Retrofit project is currently under construction and ins ection on-site is occurrin .
Tot
a
l
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
Fac
i
l
i
t
y
Pro
j
e
c
t
s
To
t
a
l
:
16
,
1
8
1
6,
7
0
3
9,
4
7
8
18
0
,
9
6
9
13
4
,
p
$
5
16
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
($
0
0
0
)
FI
S
C
A
L
YE
A
R
-T
O
-D
A
T
E
,
03
/
3
1
/
1
1
LI
F
E
-T
O
-D
A
T
E
CI
P
N
o
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
er
FY
20
1
1
Bu
d
et
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
to
Bu
d
et
%
Bu
d
et
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Comments
RE
P
L
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
/R
E
N
E
W
A
L
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
P2
3
6
6
AP
C
D
E
in
e
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
an
d
Ret
r
o
f
i
t
s
Ra
n
d
e
r
s
44
2
13
4
30
8
30
%
3,
2
1
3
1,
3
1
9
It
e
m
s
that were onginallyto be purchased during
FY
I
1 are now on hold until FY12.
P2
3
8
2
Sa
f
e
an
d
Se
c
u
r
i
Im
ro
v
e
m
e
r
~
s
Mu
n
o
z
10
2
15
3
51
15
0
%
1,
6
3
5
16
8
We
are updating the Security features such as
ca
m
e
r
a
s
,
antennas and fobs, thaYs whythe
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
to this bud et forthe 3th carter.
P2
4
1
6
SR
-1
2
5
Uti
l
i
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ke
n
n
e
d
50
50
0 %
96
3
49
Le
al Counsel collecti from ORC
P2
4
4
0
I-9
0
5
Uti
l
i
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Si
l
v
e
r
m
a
n
10
0
33
7
43
7
-33
7
%
1,
6
0
0
41
5
Fin
a
l
invoices submitted Ma 2011.
P2
4
5
3
SR
-1
1
Ufi
l
i
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ka
50
1
49
2%
15
5
15
1
Ca
k
r
a
n
s
driven.
P2
4
5
6
Ai
r
a
r
x
i
V
a
c
u
u
m
V
a
l
~
U
ra
d
e
s
Ac
u
r
a
45
0
44
1
9
98
%
2,
7
2
2
22
9
On
Track.
P2
4
5
8
AM
R
Ma
n
u
a
l
Me
t
e
r
Re
la
c
e
m
e
r
~
Ke
e
r
a
n
1,
5
0
0
1,
3
5
2
14
8
90
%
10
,
4
4
8
5,
0
7
9
Ex
p
e
c
t
t
o
use 100% of current Fiscal Year's
bu
d
et.
P2
4
7
7
Re
s
- 62
4
-1
Re
s
e
n
r
o
i
r
Co
v
e
r
Re
Ia
c
e
m
e
M
Ke
n
n
e
d
5
1
4
20
%
45
0
42
2
On
bud et and on schedule.
P2
4
8
4
La
e
Wa
t
e
r
Me
t
e
r
Re
la
c
e
m
e
r
r
t
Pr
o
ra
m
Ke
e
r
a
n
10
0
11
6
16
11
6
%
53
5
29
8
E
ed to use 125% of current F/Y bud et .
P2
4
8
5
SC
A
D
A
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
te
m
an
d
So
f
t
w
a
r
e
Re
la
c
e
m
e
m
St
a
l
k
e
r
35
0
23
9
11
1
68
%
a
1,
3
2
5
80
4
Wi
l
l
s
end 100%of FY11 bud et.
P2
4
8
6
As
s
e
t
M
a
n
a
em
e
r
r
t
P
l
a
n
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
r
t
a
n
d
D
a
t
a
A
c
uis
i
t
i
o
n
St
e
~
;
n
s
60
0
19
0
41
0
32
%
1,
1
5
0
72
5
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
sperxJing adjusted based on staffing
ava
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
P2
4
9
0
12
9
6
-1
Re
s
e
n
r
o
i
r
Irr
t
e
r
i
o
d
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
Co
a
t
i
Ka
24
0
31
7
77
13
2
%
35
0
27
Pr
o
ect under construction.
P2
4
9
1
85
0
-3
Re
s
e
n
r
o
i
r
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
C
o
a
t
i
Ka
10
7
9
10
°/
30
0
29
8
Pr
o
'
e
c
t
t
o
be done FY12.
P2
4
9
2
12
9
6
-
2R
e
s
e
r
w
i
r
ln
t
e
r
i
o
r
l
E
~
d
e
r
i
o
r
C
o
a
t
i
Ka
44
0
39
6
44
90
%
55
0
2
Pr
o
'
e
c
t
u
n
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
P2
4
9
3
62
4
-2
Re
s
e
r
w
i
r
Ir~
e
r
i
o
r
C
o
a
t
i
n
Ka
5
5
0%
95
0
94
9
Pr
o
'
e
c
t
t
o
be dore FY12.
P2
4
9
4
Muf
t
i
le
S
ec
i
e
s
Co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
Co
b
u
m
-B
o
17
0
18
4
14
10
8
%
83
0
10
6
Th
i
s
bud et will be s erdthis fiscal ear.
P2
4
9
5
Sa
n
Mi
uel
Ha
b
i
t
a
t
Ma
n
a
em
e
r
r
U
M
i
t
i
at
i
o
n
Ar
e
a
Co
b
u
r
n
-B
o
25
0
15
5
95
62
%
1,
7
2
5
1,
2
9
3
Th
i
s
bud et will be s errtthis fiscal ear.
P2
4
9
6
Ot
a
La
k
e
s
Ro
a
d
Uti
l
i
t
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Ka
19
5
38
15
7
19
%
25
0
11
4
Ph
a
s
e
1 Constriction corn lete.
P2
5
0
4
Re
ula
t
o
Sit
e
Ac
c
e
s
s
Ro
a
d
an
d
Pi
el
i
n
e
Re
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
20
0
2
19
8
1 %
60
0
59
8
De
~
l
o
er dri~,en.
P2
5
0
5
65
7
-1
Re
s
e
n
r
o
i
r
Irr
t
e
r
i
o
d
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
Co
a
t
i
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
32
5
12
4
20
1
38
%
37
5
25
1
In
construction.
P2
5
0
6
65
7
-2
Re
s
e
n
r
o
i
r
Irr
t
e
r
i
o
r
/E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
Co
a
t
i
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
32
5
35
29
0
11
%
37
5
34
0
In
constructlon.
P2
5
0
7
Ea
s
t
Pa
l
o
m
a
r
St
r
e
e
t
Uti
l
i
Re
l
o
c
a
t
l
o
n
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
20
16
4
80
%
50
0
48
4
In
desi n.
P2
5
0
8
Pi
eli
n
e
Ca
t
h
o
d
i
c
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
ra
m
Ke
n
n
e
d
50
50
0 %
15
0
15
0
Re
v
i
s
e
bud etto s end $5k for FY11.
P2
5
0
9
R.J
.
Do
n
o
v
a
n
Pr
i
s
o
n
Wa
t
e
r
Me
t
e
r
U
ra
d
e
Ri
e
er
-
0
%
60
60
No
e
erases for Q3.
82
0
9
6
RW
C
W
R
F
-U
ra
d
e
s
a
n
d
M
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
r
i
s
Co
b
u
r
n
-B
o
1,
2
0
0
56
9
63
1
47
%
2,
5
0
0
1,
6
9
1
Th
e
project schedule has changed so that not all
of
t
h
e
projected budget will be sperrtthis fiscal ear.
S2
0
1
2
SV
S
D
Ou
[
f
a
l
l
a
n
d
RS
D
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
OM
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
r
r
t
Pe
a
s
l
e
64
2
1
64
1
0%
4,
9
9
2
3,
7
9
8
Th
e
SVSD expenditures are typically billed by
SV
S
D
and paid within the fourth quarter of the
fis
c
a
l
ar.
S2
0
~
9
Aw
c
a
d
o
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
8-In
c
h
Se
w
e
r
Ma
i
n
Im
ro
~
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
1,
5
1
5
13
4
1,
3
8
1
9 %
1,
7
3
0
1,
4
5
2
De
s
i
n corn lete; re ari traffic control tans.
S2
0
2
0
Ca
l
a
w
Dri
e
~
e
8-I
n
c
h
Se
w
e
r
Ma
i
n
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
36
0
11
34
9
3%
42
0
37
4
De
s
i
n corn lete; re ari traffic corrtrol lans.
S2
0
2
1
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
Ro
a
d
8-In
c
h
Se
w
e
r
Ma
i
n
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ka
40
10
9
69
27
3
%
16
0
4
Pr
o
'
ct corn late.
S2
0
2
2
Hi
d
d
e
n
Me
s
a
Dr
i
v
e
8-h
c
h
Se
w
e
r
Ma
i
n
Reh
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
12
0
7
11
3
6 %
15
0
13
1
De
s
i
n corn late; re ari traffic control tans.
S2
0
2
3
Ca
l
a
v
o
Dr
i
e
s
Se
w
e
r
Ma
i
n
Uti
l
i
Re
b
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
50
5
45
10
%
65
51
Co
u
driven.
S2
0
2
4
Ca
m
o
Ro
a
d
Se
w
e
r
Ma
i
n
Re
la
c
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
75
2
73
3 %
3,
2
5
0
3,
2
4
8
To
be assessed in the Sewer Master Plan.
S2
0
2
5
Wi
e
hor
s
t
Wa
Se
w
e
r
Ma
i
n
Re
la
c
e
m
e
r
r
t
Ca
m
e
r
o
n
25
14
11
56
%
17
5
16
1
Co
u
Pro'ect.
To
t
a
l
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
U
R
e
n
e
w
a
l
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
Tot
a
l
:
10
,
0
0
6
4,
4
1
0
5,
5
9
6
44
,
0
5
3
25
,
1
8
7
17
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
(C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
($
0
0
0
)
FI
S
C
A
L
YE
A
R
-T
O
-D
A
T
E
,
03
/
3
1
N
1
LI
F
E
-
TQ
•
D
A
T
E
CI
P
N
o
.
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
er
FY
20
1
1
Bu
d
et
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
s
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Ex
p
e
n
s
e
to
Bu
d
et
%
Bu
d
et
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Comments
CA
P
I
T
A
L
PU
R
C
H
A
S
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
P2
2
8
2
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Ca
ita
l
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
Ra
n
d
e
r
s
54
0
10
3
43
7
19
%
4,
9
4
5
2,
8
3
9
Ke
m
9 received - an F150 on 5/5/11 for
$1
1
,
8
2
5
.
5
6
.
ke
m
6 on order- dump Yuck for $89,925.92.
Ne
m
13 on order - Vactor truck for $305,511.88.
Bo
t
h
ordered trucks to be received before
6/
3
0
/
1
1
.
P2
2
8
5
Of
f
i
c
e
E
ui
me
n
t
an
d
Fur
n
i
t
u
r
e
Ca
ita
l
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
Do
b
r
a
w
a
0
%
48
1
42
No
e
erases for Q3.
P2
2
8
6
Fi
e
l
d
E
ui
me
n
t
Ca
ita
l
Pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
Ra
n
d
e
r
s
20
1
10
9
92
54
%
1,
5
2
7
68
0
Ite
m
14 -generator set for $70,551.93 - on order.
He
m
18 -pump engine moved to FY12.
ke
r
n
20 -TBO FY11.
P2
4
4
3
hf
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
Mo
b
i
l
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
Je
n
k
i
n
s
25
0
52
19
8
21
%
1,
5
5
2
65
3
Aw
a
i
t
i
n
g
Invoices -invoices maybe delayed into
Q1
of next FY
P2
4
6
1
Re
c
o
r
d
s
Ma
n
a
em
e
n
t
S
te
r
n
U
ra
d
e
St
e
v
e
n
s
15
0
38
11
2
25
%
40
6
16
4
Aw
a
i
t
i
Invoices
P2
4
6
9
hfo
r
t
n
a
t
i
o
n
Te
c
h
n
o
l
o
Ne
t
w
o
r
k
an
d
Ha
r
d
w
a
r
e
Je
n
k
i
n
s
30
0
27
7
23
92
%
1,
9
2
1
90
8
E
ect to s end 100 % of FY bud et
P2
4
7
0
A
lic
a
t
i
o
n
S
ter
n
s
De
v
e
l
o
mer
i
t
an
d
Ira
t
e
rat
i
o
n
St
e
v
e
n
s
40
8
34
9
59
86
%
22
1
8
1,
0
8
3
E
ect to s end 100% of FY bud et
P2
5
0
1
Te
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
E
~
me
n
t
U
ra
d
e
Je
n
k
i
n
s
40
0
23
2
16
8
58
%
40
0
16
8
Aw
a
i
t
i
Invoices
Tot
a
l
Cap
i
t
a
l
Pi
x
c
h
a
s
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
To
t
a
l
:
2,
2
4
9
1,
1
8
0
1,
0
8
9
13
,
4
5
0
6,
5
3
7
DE
V
E
L
O
P
E
R
RE
I
M
B
U
R
S
E
M
E
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
P2
1
0
4
PL
- 12
-In
c
h
,
71
1
Zo
n
e
,
La
Me
d
i
a
Ro
a
d
- Bi
r
c
h
l
R
o
c
k
Mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0 %
83
3
83
3
No
e
erases for Q3.
P2
1
0
7
PL
-12
-h
c
h
,
71
1
Zo
n
e
,
Ro
c
k
Mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Ro
a
d
- La
Me
d
i
a
/S
R
12
5
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0%
72
2
72
2
No
ex erases for Q3.
P2
3
2
5
Pl
-1
0
"
to
12
"
Ov
e
r
s
i
z
e
,
12
9
6
Zo
n
e
,
PB
Ro
a
d
-Rol
l
i
n
g
Hil
l
s
Hy
d
r
o
PS
l
P
B
Bn
d
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
1
1
0%
50
50
No
ex erases for Q3.
P2
4
0
2
PL
-12
-h
c
h
,
62
4
Zo
n
e
,
La
Me
d
i
a
Ro
a
d
-Vi
l
l
a
e
7/O
t
a
Val
l
e
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0%
44
4
44
4
No
e
erases for Q3.
P2
4
0
3
PL
-12
-h
c
h
,
62
4
Zo
n
e
,
He
r
i
t
a
e
Ro
a
d
- OI
is/O
t
a
Va
l
l
e
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0%
92
5
92
5
No
ex erases for Q3.
82
0
2
8
Re
c
P
L
- 8-h
c
h
,
68
0
Za
n
e
,
He
r
i
t
a
e Ro
a
d
-S
a
n
t
a
Vi
c
t
o
r
i
a
/O
t
a
Va
l
l
e
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0 %
60
0
60
0
No
ex erases for Q3.
82
0
4
2
Re
c
P
L
- 8-h
c
h
,
92
7
Zo
n
e
,
Ro
c
k
Mo
u
n
t
a
i
n
Ro
a
d
- SR
-
12
5
/E
a
s
t
l
a
k
e
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0
%
14
0
14
0
No
e
erases for Q3.
82
0
4
7
Re
c
P
L
-1
2
-In
c
h
,
68
0
Zo
n
e
,
La
Me
d
i
a
Ro
a
d
- Bi
r
c
W
R
o
c
k
Mo
u
r
r
t
a
i
n
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0
%
45
0
45
0
No
e
erases for Q3.
82
0
8
2
Re
c
P
L
- 24
-In
c
h
,
68
0
Zo
n
e
,
OI
is
Pa
r
k
w
a
-V
i
l
l
a
e 2/H
e
r
i
t
a
e
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
5
5
0
%
1,
7
4
7
1,
7
4
7
No
ex erases for Q3.
82
0
8
3
Re
c
P
L
- 20
-In
c
h
,
68
0
Zo
n
e
,
He
r
i
t
a
e
Ro
a
d
-Vi
l
l
a
e
2/
O
I
is
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
5
5
0
%
40
0
40
0
No
e
erases for Q3.
82
0
8
4
Re
c
P
L
- 20
-In
c
h
,
68
0
Zo
n
e
,
Vil
l
a
e 2 - Her
i
t
a
e/L
a
Me
d
i
a
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
1
1
0
%
97
1
97
0
No
e
erases for Q3.
82
0
8
5
Re
c
P
L
- 20
-In
c
h
,
68
0
Zo
n
e
,
La
Me
d
i
a
-St
a
t
e
/O
I
is
Ch
a
r
l
e
s
0%
60
p
60
0
No
ex erases for Q3.
To
t
a
l
De
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
Re
i
m
b
u
r
s
e
m
e
r
r
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
Tot
a
l
:
12
12
7,
8
8
2
7,
8
8
1
GR
A
N
D
TO
T
A
L
$
28
,
4
4
8
$
12
,
2
7
3
$
16
,
1
7
5
$
24
6
,
3
5
4
$
17
3
,
6
9
0