HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-05-06 Board Minutes••
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
July 5,2006
1 The meeting was called to order by Vice President Lopez at 3 40 P m
2 ROLL CALL
Directors Present
Directors Absent
Staff Present
Breittelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
Bomlla (handling pressing business matters and IS unable
to attend)
General Manager Mark Watton,Asst GM Administration
and Finance German Alvarez,Asst GM Englneenng and
Water Operations Manny Magana,General Counsel Yun
Calderon,Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens,
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem,Chief of Engineering
Meho:Arbabran,Chief of Operations Pedro Porras,Chief
of Development Services Rod Posada,ChIef of
Administration Rom Sarno,District Secretary Susan Cruz
and others per attached hst
3 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4 APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Breittelder,seconded by Director Croucher and
earned With the Iollowmq vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
Director BOnilla
to approve the agenda
5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING OF MAY 30,
2006
A motion was made by Director Brerttelder,seconded by Vice President Lopez
and earned With the followinq vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
Directors Brertfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
Director BOnilla
1
••
to approve the rrunutes of the special board meetmg of May 30,2006
6 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one Wished to be heard
CONSENT CALENDAR
7 ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM
Director Breltfelder requested that Items 6h,ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 4082
AMENDING POLICY 26,DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENTS,6J,ADOPT THE OTAY MESA VALUE ENGINEERING STUDY,
and 6k,ACCEPT MR JOSE RODRIGUEZ'S REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF
PENALTY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,617 FOR AN UNAUTHORIZED
SEWER CONNECTION,be pulled for discussion
A motion was made by Director Croucher,seconded by Director Breitfelder and
carned With the followmq vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
Director Bonilla
to approve the followinq consent calendar Items
a)ADOPT RESOLUTION INCORPORATING THE NATIONAL INCIDENT
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEM INTO
FUTURE DISTRICT EMERGENCY RESPONSE EFFORTS
b)REJECT ROSETE /DUCUT CLAIM
c)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 4083 TO ESTABLISH THE TAX RATE FOR
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO 27 AT $0007 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-
2007
d)APPROVE REVISIONS TO THE CERTIFICATE INCENTIVE PROGRAM,
RATIFY ONE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SIDE LETTER
FOR IN-RANGE ADJUSTMENTS,ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 4084 TO
REVISE THE DRUG FREE WORKPLACE BOARD POLICY NO 22, AND,
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 4086 TO REVISE THE EMPLOYEE
RECOGNITION BOARD POLICY NO 2
2
••
e)APPROVE UTILITY AGREEMENT NO 31755 WITH CALTRANS FOR
SR 905 UTILITY RELOCATIONS
f)AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ZONDIROS
CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $930,316 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE SR 905 UTILITY RELOCATIONS,ALTA
ROAD VAULTS AND METER BYPASS PROJECT
g)AWARD A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT TO
PBS&J IN THE AMOUNT OF $119,580 FOR THE REVISION OF THE
WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT FOR THE DISTRICTS RECYCLED
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
h}AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO BLAIR RASMUSSEN
CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $60,747 FOR THE REMODEL
OF THE METER SHOP
INFORMATION I ACTION ITEMS
8 ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS
a)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 4082 AMENDING POLICY 26,DISTRICT
ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS
Director Brertfelder indicated that he wished to confirm his understanding of the
proposed revised policy HIs understanding IS that the board approves
reimbursement agreements at their Inception and It IS again presented to the
board prior to processing the reimbursement He asked If this understanding
was accurate Chief of Development Services Rod Posada Indicated that that
was correct He stated that additionally,If there are agreements that are older
than five years,they would also be presented for board consideration
It was discussed that several staff members review the reimbursement requests
In detail and If staff disaqrees with the amount requested,they contact the
developer and review areas with the developer where there IS concerns He
stated that many times, the developer agrees to a lower fIgure than ongmally
requested
DIrector Brerttelder Indicated that It seems that the Drstnct's staff has the process
pretty much handled He indicated that he felt It appropriate that the board
approve the mrtiai agreement and only If there were drscrepancies or Issue WIth
the requested reimbursement,otherwise he felt that It need not be brought back
for board approval as It may be perceived that the board IS Interferrng Withthe
contracts (pohtrctzmq the action)
General Manager Watton mdicated that some reimbursements are hundreds of
thousands or rrulhons of dollars and he would like the board to be aware of the
3
••
amounts of the reimbursements that are being provided and that agreements are
bemq closed He stated that he had not looked at It from the standpoint of the
board actually mterfermq with the contracts which IS another matter He stated
that It IS brought back to expose the board to the reimbursements
Director Croucher mdrcated that the Engineering and Water Ops Committee
reviewed this Item and staff had brought to their attention the weaknesses In the
current policy The committee had asked staff to recommend Improvements to
the policy They also asked staff to get Input from the developers as well He
stated that he felt that It was part of the board's Job to Improve the future and
Identify weaknesses
General Counsel Calderon Indicated that there IS no real Involvement by the
board In reviewing the amount of the reimbursement He stated that staff
reviews the reimbursement very thoroughly and the reimbursement request IS
simply being presented for final approval as It exceeds the General Managers
authonty He indicated that many times the reimbursements are not requested In
the fiscal year In which they are expected and It IS appropnate to present It to the
board so they are aware of the requests
General Manager Watton indicated that the reimbursement IS fact based and
would be difficult for board members to Interfere or Influence
DIrector Brenfelder mquired what would stop a board member from utrhzmq the
Implied threat of his/her power and also what happens If a board member votes
no on the reimbursement request General Manager Watton Indicated that the
developer would probably sue the district as, again, the reimbursement IS fact
based General Counsel Calderon indicated that there IS a contract In place and
the Distnct would be bound by the contract The only thing that the DIstrict could
dispute IS the actual charges which would need to be backed With factual data
Director Brertfelder indicated that It would be naive for the board not to recoqruze
that there IS at least an unphed threat here He indicated that he has stated hrs
posiuon and IS ready to vote
A motion was made by DIrector Croucher,seconded by DIrector Robak and
earned WIth the followmq vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstam
Absent
Directors Croucher, Lopez and Robak
Director Breittelder
None
Director Borutla
to approve staffs'recommendation
b)ADOPT THE OTAY MESA VALUE ENGINEERING STUDY
4
••
Sr CIvil Engineer Randy Klaahsen Indicated that the recycled system In the Otay
Mesa area was originally Installed to serve a power plant He stated that there
was currently 20 and 30-lnch transrrussion pipelines Installed In the area He
stated that typically the District does not use less than s-mch pipelines on
standard distribution networks and thus, If the zoning In the Otay Mesa area was
changed to residential,the current drstnbution and transrrussion system could
handle the needs without any problems He stated that If the area should change
from industrial to residentral there would be a slight Increase In demand for
recycled water In the area It was noted that the Otay Mesa study looked at both
scenanos,If the area remained mdustnal or was rezoned for residential
HI indicated that the value engineering's study goal was to
•Promote a team approach
• Look at alternatives to reduce capital costs for servicing the Otay Mesa
860 zone with recycled water
•Address developer concerns constructing the local recycled water system
He indicated that the anginal plan was to serve the Otay Mesa area with recycled
water through a reservoir and pump station and to build a transmission network
from the west to the east He Indicated that a panel of 15 members from various
aqencies and the City of San Diego came up with 32 different Ideas that were
whittled down to 10 to 12 Ideas Hams and ASSOCiates reviewed the Ideas and
calculated cost and benefit for each and Identified the followmq key alternatives
•Pipeline from the North along proposed Route 125
•Pipeline from North from La Media Road
•PIpeline from North along Wueste Road
•Downsizmq Exaction Project Distnbunon System
•Eliminate recycled water use on demands under 1 acre foot a year
He stated that It was determined that the Wueste Road alternative provided the
same level of service at a lower cost and eliminated the need for the 450-2
reservoir and the 860-1 pump station along wrth the long-term maintenance
associated with such Infrastructure
He stated that ultimately the District would be required to meet approximately 18
MGD durrng the height of summer The drstnctplans to meet the supply With
100%recycled water
Director Robak inquired what year staff expected demand to reach 18 MGD and
If the district would have the capacity to serve this demand Sr CIVil Engineer
Klaahsen mdrcated In the year 2030 He Indicated that the District currently has
7 1 MGD supply and the District Will need to acquire additional supplies He
stated that this IS being addressed by the Integrated Water Resources Plan
General Manager Watton indicated that current demand was peaking at over 8
MGD at the moment He indicated that the City of San Diego allows the Distnct
5
•~,....•.!t.I., -iii _•
to take at peak If the water IS available If It IS not, the system IS supplemented
with potable water
He stated the cost difference for the pipeline from the west alternative cost
approximately $20 5 million and the Wueste Road alternate cost approximately
$14 1 million With a difference of $6 4 million In capital cost savings He noted
that the operation and maintenance cost Will also go down (from $636,000/year
to $238,OOO/yearas the anginal planned reservoir and pump station have been
eliminated
He Indicated they reviewed the distnbunon network and were able to reduce the
network from 240,000 linear feet to 150,000 linear feet while stili getting good
overall coverage In the system He stated that general counsel did not
recommend eliminating recycled water use on users that would have a demand
of less than 1 acre foot a year because of the sense of unfairness to adjacent
properties and the requirement for a nexus study under California Government
Code Section 66000
Sr CIvil Engineer Klaahsen Indicated that staff was asking the board to
•Adopt the Otay Mesa Value Engineering Study
•Adopt the downsized distribution system network that Will relieve some of
the burden on developers and save approximately $8 8 million dollars In
exaction pipelines
•Continue to require all new developments to Install recycled water
drstnbution systems and Irrigate landscaping With recycled water
Director Robak mquired With regard to the nexus of what has been and WIll be
Installed and the need to acquire additional resources from the City, are the
developer paying their fair share Sr Civil Engineer Klaahsen Indicated that the
District only has two capital Improvement projects for the system,the main
transrrussion pipeline on Alta Road and a transmiss.cn pIpeline on AIrway Road
He Indicated that the developers are Installing the rest of the system
General Manager Watton indicated that developers also pay a meter fee for the
recycled system which IS kept by the DIstrict He stated that finance calculates
this fee on the whole recycled system,not Just the Otay Mesa area He indicated
that the fees are not unique to the Otay Mesa area
Director Robak further mqurred If the ratepayers who do not utilize recycled water
assist In paying for the cost of recycled water for those ratepayers who do or are
the developers paying for the full system General Manager Watton Indicated
that the way fees are set-up,all ratepayers are paymg for the recycled system
He indicated that the potable customers also receiving a benefit from a supply
standpomt Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that the potable and
reclaimed capacity fee IS a cornbmed calculation He Indicated that it is the same
fee for both services He mdicateo that In a sense,the potable customer IS
paying for a portion of the reclaimed CIP system
6
•.~t•
Director Robak Indicated that he Just wished to be sure that ratepayers are
paymq equitably for potable,sewer and recycled services General Manager
Watton Indicated that the rate study several years ago had identfted that the
sewer customers were not paymq their fair share This IS when the Distnct
determmed what sewer rates should truly be to answer the nexus question
Sr CIvil Engineer Klaahsen also added that there was a npple effect dependmg
on where the supply would come from If the supply came from the South Bay
Reclamation Plant, then staff would need to assure that the distnbution systems
did not get over pressunzed and that the pump stations can be upgraded without
requmnq a full retrofit It was determined that the Distnct Will need to add an
Impeller to some pumps In the 680 pump station In 2015 and the pumps would
need to be changed out at the 944 pump station In 2025 DIrector Robak
mquired that In the future, If re-punfied water was approved for consumption,
would the purple pipes still be required General Manager Watton Indicated that
new systems would no longer require dual piping and the potable system would
be Sized to frt the new Situation However,m areas where dual pipmq exists.the
purple pipes would continue to be utilized for capacity purposes General
Manager Watton added that studies mdicate that the cost IS less to continue
systems as they are now,rather than moving to re-punficatron
Director Croucher indicated that the Engmeenng and Water Operations
Committee also discussed this Item at length and the POSSIbility of providrnq
reclaimed water south of the border,should there be a need,through the current
project He stated that he was also happy that all current facrhtres would
contmue to be utilized which IS a change from dISCUSSions from three to four
years ago where some facilmes would no longer be utihzed. He stated that It was
encouraqrnq to be able to work out,through bramstormmq sessions WIth other
agencies,a solution to maxirruze the use of facilmes already In the ground
A motion was made by Director Croucher,seconded by Director Robak and
earned WIth the follOWing vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
DIrectors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
Director BonIlla
to approve staffs'recommendation
c)ACCEPT MR JOSE RODRIGUEZ'S REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF
PENALTY FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,617 FOR AN UNAUTHORIZED
SEWER CONNECTION
Director Bnetfelder Indicated that there was discussron In the Englneenng and
Water Operations Cornrruttee the desire to waive the $50 apphcatron fee He
stated that Items approved on the consent calendar IS an approval of staffs'
7
••
recornrnendatron He stated by approving staffs'recornmendation on this Item,
the board would not be approvmq the committee's desire He Wished to discuss
this Item so the committee's request can be acted upon
Director Croucher mdicated that the Engmeenng and Operations Committee
noted that the homeowner ord not have anythmg to do With the Illegal connection
and that he, In fact, had a legal connection He stated that the homeowner
purchased the property approximately a month pnor to the District's Inspector
idennfymq that there was an Illegal connection from the property He stated that
the $50 application fee IS charged to dissuade fnvolous claims and It also covers
staffs' time to process the warver He stated In thts particular case, because the
homeowner's request IS true and valid and had the district acted upon the Illegal
connection,It would have been prior to his ownership of the property,the
committee Wished to also refund the application fee
Vice President Lopez mdrcated that the recommendation to waive the application
fee of $50 IS noted In the committee actron attachment General Counsel
Calderon indicated that trus Item IS presented as all requests for penalty waivers
must be presented to the Board of DIrectors for approval
Director Robak mquired where the Illegal line was hooked to It was mdicated
that the Illegal lme was connected from the pool area to the storm dram
Director Breitfelcer mdicated that he Wished to note that the fee IS to cover staffs'
time and a waiver of such a fee could set precedent for other Issues which may
not be so convenient to the district Vice President Lopez indicated that he felt
that It was appropnate m thrs particular case.
A motion was made by Director Breltfelder,seconded by Director Croucher and
carned With the following vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
Directors Croucher, Lopez and Robak
Director Breittelder
None
Director Bomlla
to approve staffs'recommendation With an amendment to also waive the $50
application fee
9 ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE
a)PUBLIC HEARING TO CONTINUE WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
CHARGES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007
1)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 4078 TO CONTINUE WATER AND
SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGES FOR DISTRICT CUSTOMERS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 TO BE COLLECTED THROUGH
PROPERTY TAXES, TO ADOPT VERBIAGE CHANGES TO
B
••
CLARIFY PENALTY CHARGES WHEN A SIGNER TERMINATES
AN AVAILABILITY DEFERRAL AGREEMENT PRIOR TO ITS
EXPIRATION DATE,AND,CLARIFY THE PROCESS FOR A
PROPERTY OWNER TO GET A REDUCED RATE FOR LAND
THAT MEETS OR EXCEEDS A 30%SLOPE (HENDERSON)
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem indicated that each year the board must
open a public heanng to receive the public's comments on the Distnct contmumq
water and sewer availability fees He indicated that the Distnct contacted all new
customers to notify them that there IS an availability fee that will appears on their
property taxes He Indicated that the fee funds capital expenditures and that the
Drstnct has been collecting the fee for over 30 years which authorized through
the State Code General Counsel Calderon Indicated that state law requires that
the District adopt a resolution annually to reassess the fee
Vice President Lopez opened the pubuc heanng at 4 34 P m No one wished to
be heard The public hearing was closed at 4 34 P m
Director Robak Inquired If there were areas In Jamul where owners are paymg
fees, but were not Within the CWA or MWD boundanes General Manager
Watton Indicated that there are a few thousand acres that are Within Otay's
boundanes where the owners are paymg the Distnct's fees,but they are not
paying CWA or MWD fees. He stated that If the owners of these lands WIsh a
permanent water supply,they would need to annex into CWA and MWD
boundarres He Indicated that property owners who are paymg availability fees
have the ability to submit an application and get water from the Oismct,but there
was no guarantee,as some may also need to buud a pipeline to receive the
water Customers may not necessarily understand trus However,there IS a
value to paying the fee If at some pomt the owner Wishes to develop their parcel
of land and receive water from the distnct
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Robak and
carried With the following vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstam
Absent
Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
Director Bomlla
to approve continuing water and sewer availability charges for FY 2006-2007
10 ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS
a)APPROVE THE DISTRICTS PARTICIPATION IN A JOINT WATER
RECYCLING FACILITY FEASIBILITY STUDY AT A COST NOT TO
EXCEED $80,000
9
••
Sr CIvIl Engineer Klaahsen mdlcated that there would be three participants m the
feasibility study, Otay,Sweetwater Authonty and the City of Chula Vista He
stated that the City of Chula Vista will require an additional 5 MGD of wastewater
capacity from Metro or the new water recycling facrlrty once the city IS bunt out
Sweetwater Authonty recently completed a recycled water master plan and they
have an Interest In the water recycling busmess Unfortunately,one of their
biggest potential users will no longer require recycled water, LLS Power (Duke
Power Plant) and thus, they have approached Otay as It has a need for
additional recycled water supplies
He mdtcated that there are two (2) potential sites that will studied
• 4
th Street and Main In the City of Chula Vista (Otay River Plant)
•Downstream of Sweetwater Authonty's Dam In the Sweetwater River
Shed
He stated that the recycling facility would stnp wastewater from the Spnng Valley
sewer outfall and solids would be returned to the Metro System,strrular to the
Chapman Treatment Plant He stated the treated effluent would be pumped to
pond 1 and 4 In the Use Area where It would be distnbuted to the Distnct's
recycled system.
Sr CIVil Engmeer Klaahsen Indicated that the treatment method,Membrane
Bioreactor (MBR), would be utilized at the proposed treatment plant He stated
that this treatment method has been studied by CWA and costs about 85% of the
capital cost of a conventional treatment plant He Indicated that It also takes
approximately 50% less area than a conventronal treatment plant and the effluent
quality IS better He noted that the solids would be returned to the Metro System
so the plant would not have to deal with solids handling
He noted that the capital cost for the MBR IS approximately $50 rrulhon and
operatron and mamtenance cost for 30 years IS $13 million He stated that the
cost to send the solids to the Metro System has not yet been estimated,but It
would be charged at a higher rate as the plant would send mqher TSS (Total
Suspended Solids)and hiqher BOD of water He also stated that the cost to
pump the effluent to the Distnct ponds IS not included m the estimates as well
He stated that the present worth cost for the water IS $700 per Acre Foot and thrs
figure drd not mclude the CWA or MWD mcentives The facmty would require
about a four acre site
He indicated that there were some challenges to bUlldmg the MBR facthty He
indicated that they would need to work With the City of San DIego on the solids
disposal and that there may be an opportumty to work With the Spnng Valley
Sarutation oistnct There was also IS an Impact to losmq the power plant as a
customer as they would have utilized 5 MGD of recycled water dally for coohng
purposes He mdicated that dunng low demand days In the winter, the unused
water would need to be stored somehow to avoid paymg the City of San Diego
capacity fees for sending the unused water to their system He Indicated that
10
••
they are explonng ways In which the water can be stored,possibly Injected Into
groundwater,live-stream discharge,etc
Sr CIvil Engineer Klaahsen indicated that staff IS recommending that the Distnct
participate In a JOint study with the City of Chula Vista and Sweetwater Authority
as a 1/3 partner In the Recycling Facility Feasibility Study In an amount not to
exceed $80,000 He noted that Sweetwater Authority has received a $25,000
FAP Loan from the CWA to more forward with the study
DIrector Bnetfelder mquired when the study would be completed Sr CIvil
Engineer Klaahsen mdicated the study would not start for a couple month and
when It IS started It would take approximately SIX to nine months He Indicated
that the study would probably take approximately one year to complete
Vice President Lopez Inquired why CWA would be adrrurustennq the project Sr
CIvil Engineer Klaahsen mdicated that the Sweetwater Authonty would
administer the study CWA IS involved as Sweetwater Authonty received a loan
from CWA to do the study If It IS determined through the study that the recycling
facihty IS feasible,then the partners would need to pay back the $25,000 loan to
CWA General Manager Watton further Indicated that Sweetwater Authonty
ongmally approach CWA as the project was more onented toward the bay front
The project has expanded and now two sites Will be studied
Director Robak mquired why It would make more sense at the outfall rather than
the Chapman Plant Sr CIvil Engmeer Klaahsen indicated that at the outfall
there would be much more wastewater available He mdicated that the
Chapman basrn does not have potential for growth as there IS no new supply
potential m ItS location He mdrcated that there would be approximately 11 MGD
In the outfall pipe that Will be studied
Director Robak mquired how the cost of $700 / AF figure was determined Sr
Civil Engineer Klaahsen indicated that CWA had studied 11 different sites (CWA
MBR Study)In 2005 and this was the figure from their study General Manager
Watton noted that the $700 I AF figure IS for the plant Itself, but that the figure did
not Include the cost for the distnbutron facihtres to the Distnct's use area or the
mcreased solids disposal cost Director Robak mquired what the cost was for AF
at the Chapman Plant General Manager Watton indicated approximately
$1,100 Sr CIvil Engmeer Klaahsen indicated that the economy of scales really
Impacts the cost (5 MGD vs 1 2 MGD)
General Manager Watton mdicated that, per discussrons at CWA,the MBR
process IS not much cheaper for the product water He stated that he was not
certain If this was Improving,but tus understandmg was mainly the land area,
operations and maintenance cost was much less Sr CIvil Engineer Klaahsen
Indicated that the operations and maintenance cost was much less due to the
fact that there was much more automation With an MBR facrhty
11
'"••
Director Robak inqutred If the study would possibly take a look at treating the
effluent water from the Chapman Treatment Plant and treatmg It at the proposed
MBR plant Sr CIvIl Engineer Klaahsen indicated that, yes,that would also be
part of the study
A motion was made by Director Croucher,seconded by Director Robak and
earned with the following vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
Directors Brertfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
Director Borulla
to approve committee recommendation Withthe amendment that the Dismct may
Wishto be partner under both location alternatives If It IS financially beneficial to
the District
11 BOARD
a)DISCUSSION OF 2006 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
There were no changes to the calendar
b)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO 4085 CONCURRING IN THE NOMINATION
OF MS JO MACKENZIE TO CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICT
ASSOCIATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A motion was made by Director Croucher,seconded by Director Breitfelder and
earned With the followrnq vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
Directors Brerttelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
Director Boruila
to adopt Resolution No 4085 concurnng In the nomination of Ms Jo MacKenZie
to the Cauforrua Special District ASSOCiation's Board of Directors.
c)AUTHORIZE OTAY DELEGATES TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
WATER AUTHORITY TO TAKE AN APPROPRIATE POSITION ON
PROPOSITION 84,CAVES BOND INITIATIVE
General Manager Watton Indicated that that he had attached to hrs report some
arguments against Proposition 84 prepared by Ohvennam and arguments In
favor prepared by the Callformans for Clean Water, Parks and Coastal
Protect/on He stated that the Issue was to be aqendized by CWA at the end of
July, but he IS heanng that It may be delayed He Indicated that Director
12
••
Croucher and he (Otay WD's CWA delegates)are,at this time,leanmg toward
opposing the proposition He stated,however,there IS more mformatron bemg
developed and he IS requestmg that the board permit the district's delegates to
decide on a position on Proposition 84 at CWA's meeting scheduled later In the
month
Director Bnetfelder mquued what type of mforrnanon would change their stance
on the proposition General Manager Watton indicated that there could be some
developments on how these bonds WIll be administered relative to the reqionai
master plans If Mr Caves were Involved,that could be a benefit and the district
may wish to lean toward a neutral stance He stated that there could also be
some Issues with regard to the Governor's bond that could develop,though he IS
not anticipating any,but he wished to request that they have enough flexibihty to
consider any changes pnor to makmg their final decisron on thrs matter at CWA's
board meetmq He noted that he IS fairly confident that the decision would be to
oppose for the reasons outhned In his staff report General Manager Watton
mdicated that he was not opposed to the bond rtselt,but to the fact that the public
may believe It IS a water bond He Indicated,as a water agency,the drstnct
should make It clear to the public that they are votrng on a Park and Recreation
bond rather than a water bond.He Indicated that there was billions of dollars rn
bond uunanves thiS year,and he felt that the pubhc may be mislead Into thinking
this $5 3 billion bonds was a "water"bond and not be open to approving another
water bond when the Governor's bond IS presented for approval
Director Croucher indicated that there was an ACWA Region 10 meeting at
Vallecitos WD to dISCUSS Proposmon 84 on July 6,2006 He felt that the Drstnct
should not determine the drstnct's stance on trns Issue prior to other major
Institutions to whom we align the District With (Ie,ACWA)He stated that they
request that they have the opportunity to decrde on a POSitionat CWA's board
meeting later trus month should the vote on thrs Issue not be postpone
Director Robak mqurred If ACWA IS In favor or against Proposition 84 as It was
not clear In the Information provided General Manager Watton Indicated that
they had favored the proposmon until they met With the Region 10
representatives and other agencies
He mdrcated that $1 tnihon was earmarked for the Integrated Regional Water
Management Plans and $91 million was earmarked for San DIego He indicated
that Mr Caves Indicates that there was a billion planned for water projects,but
the actual monies were gOing toward watershed restoratrons and environmental
Issues and water would take a smaller role
A motion was made by DIrector Robak,seconded by DIrector Croucher and
earned With the followmg vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Directors Brertfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
13
Absent
•
Director Borulla
•
to authorize the District's delegates to CWA to take an appropriate position on
Proposition 84,Caves bond uutiatrve
d)REPORT FROM AD HOC COMMITTEE REGARDING GENERAL
MANAGER SALARY REVIEW
Director Croucher Indicated that the committee had reviewed the compensation
of the General Managers for surrounding agencies (Helix WD and Sweetwater
Authority,Padre Dam was not rncluded as their current General Manager has
retired)They also looked at the vehicle allowances provided to the General
Managers Currently,General Manager Watton receives an $800/month vehicle
allowance which the cornrmttee wished to move over Into salary
Director Croucher Indicated that the cornrmttee recommends that the General
Manager's salary be increased to $188,141 86 to brrng his compensation In
parity wIth the District's surrounding agencIes The Increase would Include the
vehicle allowance and 3% cost of living (COLA)Increase provided to all district
employees
Director Breitfelder inqUIred what the General Manager's compensation was at
Sweetwater Authonty and Helix Drrector Croucher Indicated the fotlowinq
Sweetwater
Helix
$180,177 plus a bonus of $5,165
$173,250 plus a $10,000 car allowance
He noted that the figure for Sweetwater was last years salary and that they have
not yet negotiated salary Increases for trus fiscal year Director Croucher
mdrcated that If the COLA Increase of 3% was not Included,General Manager
Watton's salary would be $182,662 which IS In-line With neighbonng agencies
He stated that they did check the current COLA rate which was 4 5%, but It was
felt that they should stay With the 3%Increase neqotiated by employees
General Manager Watton also agreed
Director Lopez mcicated that the comrmttee looked at what has been
accomplished since General Manager Watton was appointed along Withrus
expenence and felt that they should bring hIS salary In panty WIth surrounding
agencies
Director Brerttelder mdicated that he Wished a good methodology that was
reasonably consistent WIth what IS beIng done throughout the organization as a
whole and that he was sat.sfieo
Director Robak mdicated that he was In agreement WIth the comments that have
been made concerning the General Manager's effectiveness However,he had
expected a report and not necessarily an action Item He Indicated that he would
have lIked to see a spreadsheet and a little more detail He stated that he did not
14
••
doubt the figures the committee reviewed,but he was only expecting an update
and did not expect to vote on this Issue He did not disagree,but was not
prepared to vote at this time
Director Brerttelder indicated that he felt that tlus was a reasonable request
Director Croucher Indicated that by putting the vote off, he did not want any
confusion as to the board's support for the General Manager He stated that the
committee's recornmenoanon concerning the General Manager's salary was
based on fact and he felt that It was Important that the board not table this Item to
the next meetmg
Director Robak Indicated that he was not In disagreement,however,he had only
expected a report and had not anticipated on votmg on trus Item He had
expected that the Item would be discussed further In closed session
It was noted that wages could not be discussed In closed session and the reason
the process seemed a httle different from the year before IS the General Manager
declined an Increase last year Thus,there was no discussion on the Increase
DIrector Brerttelder Indicated that they felt the comrruttee did a very good job In
reviewmq and making recommendation on this Issue He stated that,however,
as part of standard operating procedure,he felt a board member had the nght to
request documentation to review the mforrnatron In advance prior to an Important
decision He stated on thrs baSIS alone he IS making a motion to table the Issue
until the next board meeting
Vice President Lopez Indicated that he would like to see a 5-0 vote on thrs matter
and would like the President of the board to have an opportunity to vote He
stated In thrs respect,he would agree to table fhrs Item until the next board
meeting
A motion was made by DIrector Brenfelder,seconded by Director Robak and
earned with the followmg vote
Ayes
Noes
Abstain
Absent
Directors Brertfeldar,Lopez and Robak
Direct Croucher
None
Director Bonilla
to table thrs Item untn the next board meetmg
REPORTS
12 GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Watton Indicated that Chief of Operations,Pedro Porras,
accepted the Distnct's award In a ceremony held In Los Angeles from the State
15
••
of Cauforrua for excellence In energy savmqs He stated that the District was one
of two water distrrct's (EI Dorado MWD)who received the award along with
numerous Industnal organizations He Indicated that the award was pnmanly for
the work operations has done to utilize electncal power off-peak which has saved
millions of kilowatt hours The program was part of the State of Cahforrna's plan
to encourage the use of energy dunng off-peak hours rather than dunng the day
when energy demand IS high
He noted that the 30"recycled water pipehne,reservoir and pump station project
was on schedule He also mdrcated that the Firewise landscape groundbreakmg
ceremony held on June 6thwas a very rnce event and It had brought new people
to the garden He stated that the San Miguel Fire Consolidated District had
obtained Prop 50 grant funding for the new firewise landscape and he felt the
new display would be useful to the cornrnuruty
He Indicated that at the May 30,2006 Budget Workshop,the board had a
number of quesuons He stated that a document has been attached to rus report
responding to the board's questrons He noted that If the board had questions
after reading the attachment,to please contact him and staff would be happy to
provide any addrtional mforrnanon the board may require
He noted that the Interactive VOice Response system would be commg on line
soon It was verified that a caller could always default to a live operator
whenever they wish to
General Manager Watton Indicated that staff WIll be prepanng a Request for
Proposal (RFP)for a financial advisor to assist the district with Its pending debt
Issuance He stated that the distnct would be working with the ratmg agencies to
provide them a very good understandmg of what the District does,Its strengths
and the community that It serves,with the Idea that It would help Improve our
credit ratmg and save the district money on the bond Issuance
He also shared that the Distnct had a pre-proposal meetmg on June 8,2006 for
the 36"pipelme project which received an excellent response He lastly noted an
update on the Jamul Indian Village (JIV) He stated that the JIV has submitted
their Sub-Area Master Plan for the casino development and have distnbuted a
notice to the residents of Jamul of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the
project He stated a copy of the EIR IS attached to hIS report
Director Robak mquired If there was a dIfference between a tnbal EIR versus a
regular EIR that the Drstnct would prepare General Manager Watton mdicated
that It IS the same format,but under the autonomy of the Indian government,they
can set up their own EPA and Issue their own environmental Impact statements
He noted that they are quided by the EPA, but they can set up their own Jamul
IndIan VIllage EPA which IS what they Will be dOIng He stated that this was very
common among the Indian nations
16
••
He noted that Brandon DIPietro was awarded an On-the-Spot Award of $100 for
freeing a nine year old boy from under a truck followmg a traffic accident on
Proctor Valley Road In Chula Vista He Indicated that Mr DIPietro had lifted a
truck off the chIld with a gate key from his district vehicle He stated that the child
was severely Injured but survived the accident The DIstrict wished to recognize
Mr DIPietro's wulmqness to go beyond the call of duty and provide assistance to
the public
General Manger Watton indicated that the construction on the Interconnect with
Helix WD has commenced on Sweetwater Springs Blvd near Lama Elementary
School He Indicated that the Monte Vista High and Lama Elementary have been
very appreciative that the Orstnct delayed construction until the close of the
school year He stated that the contractor was domq a good Job and was a little
ahead of schedule
DIrector Robak mqinred If the Distnct was continuing to move forward With the
annexation of the balance of the Monte Vista High School site from Helix WD
General Manager Watton mdrcated that It was Chief of Development Services
Rod Posada mdrcated that Monte Vista has submitted their official request for
annexation to the Distnct LAFCO must approve the annexation and staff
anticipates forwardmg the annexation for board approval In either August or
September 2006
13 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
Director Croucher mdicated that CWA postponed the EIR report for the Carlsbad
desalination plant He noted that the budget Increase of $1 28 million has been
transferred mto the budget for the water conservanon programs He Indicated
that the funds were transferred from reserves
He stated that the MISSion Hills pipeline break repair cost was $3 5 million He
Indicated that trus figure does not Include the water lost from the break He
stated that the demand on the Skmner Water Treatment Plant has gone over
100%production capacity a couple of times In the last month He stated that this
shows the Importance for the Distnct to pursue additional resources through
agreements With the City of San DIego,Helix WD,Padre MWD and Sweetwater
Authonty as It wrll only get worse He stated that Mr Ben Haddad will be retmnq
from the CWA board and that a dec.sion was made In the All Amencan Canal
Lrnrnq project litigation In favor of CWA With no InJunctrons A report should be
forwarded by CWA some time soon
DIrector Robak mqinred when construction would commence on the Iinrng
project General Manager Watton Indicated that the 110 IS set to award the
contract this month and expect that construction would oeqm In October
14 DIRECTORS'REPORTS/REQUESTS
17
••
Director Robak thanked staff, in particular Cornmurucanons Officer Armando
Buelna,who were Involved In the so"Anniversary Open House held on June 17,
2006 He stated that It had gone very well and the people who attended from the
commumty seemed to be very pleased with what the Distnct had shared with
them
He also shared that he along with representatives from the WCG met wrth
Sweetwater Authority to discuss their JOining the JPA He stated that the matter
IS expected to go before their cornrmttee and board this month and that we
should hear soon the outcome of discussions
He thanked staff for the Implementation of the Blue Cross Health Care program
He mdicated that he had requested In past a quarterly report on the District's
consultants and their fees and a quarterly report on legal matters and fees for on-
gOing matters He asked If staff might focus on prov.dinq these reports at the
end of each quarter and that he would very much appreciate It
DIrector Lopez thanked General Manger Watton for the good work that he IS
accompllshmg at the District He stated that he also appreciated his approach In
workmg With the directors
15 ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board,Vice President Lopez
adjourned the meeting at 5 48 P m
ATTEST
18