Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08-06-08 Board Packet
OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING DISTRICT BOARDROOM 2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD SPRING VALLEY,CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY August 6,2008 3:30 P.M. AGENDA 1.ROLL CALL 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA 5.APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF MAY 7, 2008 AND SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 23,2008 CONSENT CALENDAR 6.ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A PAR- TICULAR ITEM: a)AWARD A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT (TWO YEARS WITH THREE OPTION YEARS)TO WILLIS RISK AND INSURANCE SERVICES FOR CONSULT- ING SERVICES FOR BENEFITS AND AS THE DISTRICTS BROKER OF RECORD IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,000 PER YEAR FOR THE FIRST TWO YEARS AND UP TO THREE ADDITIONAL TERMS WITH COSTS IN- CREASES LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF 3%PER YEAR b)AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO FOX CONSTRUCITON FOR THE REGULATORY SITE STORAGE BINS AND EQUIPMENT COVER RE- LOCATION PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $225,000 c)ADOPT THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 1296-3 RES- ERVOIR CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1 d)ADOPT THE 2008 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM e)ADOPT A "SUPPORT"POSITION ON SENATE BILL 1XX -PERATA RE- LATED TO FUNDING FOR WATER QUALITY,FLOOD CONTROL,WATER STORAGE AND WILDLIFE PRESERVATION PROJECTS ACTION ITEMS 7.ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS a)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.4128 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT REQUESTING FORMAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY AND METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT FOR THE CONCURRENT AN- NEXATION OF TERRITORY DESCRIBED AS "SYCUAN RESERVATION" TO THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT (CHARLES) b)ADOPT THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE JAMACHA ROAD 36-INCH POTABLE WATER PIPELINE AND 12-INCH POTABLE WATER PIPELINE REPLACEMENT PROJECT (RIPPERGER/COBURN- BOYD) c)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.4129 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT WAIVING BOARD POLICY NO.21 AND AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT TO LEE &RO,INC.FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE DE- SIGN OF THE 36-INCH PIPELINE,SDCWA OTAY FCF NO.14 TO THE REGULATORY SITE PROJECT TO LEE &RO,INC.IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $769,000 (RIPPERGER/GRUNOW) 8.GENERAL MANAGER a)ADOPT AN "OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED"POSITION ON AB 2986 (LENO)RELATING TO WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS (BUELNA) 9.BOARD a)DISCUSSION OF 2008 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 10.THIS ITEM IS PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEM. a)UPDATE ON DROUGHT RESPONSE CONSERVATION PROGRAM (SARNO) 2 REPORTS 11.GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT a)SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE 12.DIRECTORS'REPORTS/REQUESTS 13.PRESIDENTS REPORT RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 14.CLOSED SESSION a)CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -POTENTIAL LITIGATION [GOV- ERNMENT CODE §54956.9(b)] 1 CASE b)CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -PENDING LITIGATION [GOV- ERNMENT CODE §54956.9(a)] MULTIPLE CASES RELATED TO THE FENTON BUSINESS CENTER AND FILED WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO RECENTLY CONSOLIDATED UNDER CASE NO.37-2007- 00077024-CU-BC-CTL;AND TWO NON-CONSILIDATED CASES,NOS.37- 2008-83163-CU-PO-CTL AND 37-2008-00086689-CU-PO-CTL 1 CASE -AMERICAN PROTECTION INSURANCE V.OTAY WATER DIS- TRICT,DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,#08- CV-0662-JM-POR OTAY WATER DISTRICT V.NORTHROP GRUMMAN RETURN TO OPEN SESSION 15.REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION.THE BOARD MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION 16.ADJOURNMENT 3 All items appearing on this agenda,whether or not expressly listed for action,may be de- liberated and may be subject to action by the Board. If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to participate in this meeting,please call the District Secretary at 670-2280 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Certification of Posting I certify that on August 1,2008,I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District,said time being at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code Section §54954.2). Executed at Spring Valley,California on August 1,2008. ary 4 AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT May 7,2008 1.The meeting was called to order by President Croucher at 3:38 p.m. 2.ROLL CALL Directors Present: Croucher,Breitfelder,Lopez and Robak Directors Absent:Bonilla Staff Present:General Manager Mark Watton,Asst.GM Administration and Finance German Alvarez,Asst.GM Engineering and Water Operations Manny Magana,General Counsel Yuri Calderon,General Counsel Aerobel Banuelos,Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens,Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem,Chief of Engineering Rod Posada, Chief of Operations Pedro Porras,Chief of Administration Rom Sarno,District Secretary Susan Cruz and others per attached list. 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak None None Director Bonilla to approve the agenda. 4.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5.SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY a)PRESENTATION TO WATER CONSERVATION POSTER CONTEST WINNER b)PRESENTATION TO WATER CONSERVATION PHOTOGRAPHY CONTEST WINNER c)PRESENTATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICTS SCHOLARSHIP AWARD 1 General Manager Walton presented Ms.Gianna Casanova from Olympic View Elementary the first place award for the Education Water Conservation Poster Contest.She thanked Otay for selecting her artwork and indicated that she will do her part to save water. Mr.Walton presented Analucia Partida from Monte Vista High School as winner for the photography contest.He presented her with a certificate as well as $1,000 check.Ms.Partida thanked the District for the scholarship opportunity and for assisting her with her future goals. 6.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA No one wished to be heard. 7.APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF JANUARY 14,2008 A motion was made by Director Robak,seconded by Director Breitfelder and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak None None Director Bonilla to approve the minutes of the regular board meeting of January 14,2008. CONSENT CALENDAR 8.ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A PARTICULAR ITEM: Director Robak requested that item 7a,AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE RALPH W.CHAPMAN WASTEWATER RECYCLING FACILITY (RWCWRF)OFFICE BUILDING AND METER SHOP REMODEL PROJECT TO TELLIARD CONSTRUCTION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $275,800,be pulled for discussion. A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak None None 2 Absent:Director Bonilla to approve the following consent calendar items: b)APPROVE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN OTAY WATER DISTRICT (DISTRICT)AND CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER DISTRICT (CAL- AM)FOR MODIFICATIONS TO AND THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AN EXISTING METERED INTERCONNECTION TO SUPPLY WATER TO THE DISTRICT AND CAL-AM IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY c)APPROVE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN OTAY WATER DISTRICT (DISTRICT)AND HELIX WATER DISTRICT FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A NEW METERED INTERCONNECTION TO SUPPLY WATER TO THE DISTRICT IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY d)APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO.4 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT WITH PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE 640-1 AND 640-2 RESERVOIRS PROJECTS IN THE AMOUNT OF <$4,846> e)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.4122 AMENDING CODE OF ORDINANCES' POLICY NO.7,CONDITIONS FOR INSTAlLMENT OR DEFERRED PAYMENTS TO THE DISTRICT,AND POLICY 15,USE OF DISTRICT CREDIT CARDS,PETTY CASH,AND EXPENDITURES INVOLVING DISTRICT CREDIT f)DECLARATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT President Croucher presented agenda item 7a for discussion: a)AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE RALPH W. CHAPMAN WASTEWATER RECYCLING FACILITY (RWCWRF)OFFICE BUILDING AND METER SHOP REMODEL PROJECT TO TELLIARD CONSTRUCTION IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $275,800 Director Robak indicated that he is in support of a new office structure for staff at the wastewater treatment plant because staff has been housed in trailers for over 15 years.However,he indicated that he wanted to confirm that the remodel and new office building are part of the long-term plans for the treatment plant.There was a study of Otay's North District area regarding the need for recycled water and the future of the treatment plant.The study concluded that the treatment plant is an asset to the District and will provide recycled water to the Rancho San Diego area. 3 A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Robak and carried with the following vote: i I i Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak None None Director Bonilla to approve the award of construction contract for the Ralph W.Chapman Wastewater Recycling Facility Office Building and meter shop remodel project to Telliard Construction in the amount of $275,800. ACTION ITEMS 9.BOARD a)ESTABLISH NEW LEGAL,LEGISLATIVE AND CONSERVATION COMMITTEE . President Croucher indicated that he spoke with the General Manager,Chairs of Engineering,Operations and Water Resources Committee and the Finance, Administration and Communications Committee,and Director Bonilla regarding establishing a new Legal,Legislative and Conservation Committee.Director Bonilla agreed to chair this new committee and President Croucher will sit on the committee as well.The recommendation for formation of this committee came about as a result of concern regarding the amount of work and time it sometimes takes for the Finance,Administration and Communications Committee to address and review the items that comes before it. Director Robak requested clarification regarding items that the committee would address.President Croucher indicated that the committee would review legislative items and the goal is to disseminate some of the work between the already established committees so that the meetings can be completed in a timely manner.He indicated that all items that go before this committee will also be presented to the full Board.There was discussion regarding the need for a legal committee.President Croucher indicated that there is currently an Ad Hoc Legal Committee.However,no Board members were assigned to that committee.It will be dissolved and the Legal,Legislative and Conservation Committee will hear issues that previously would have been heard by the Ad Hoc Legal Committee.He explained that the Ad Hoc Legal Committee addressed issues that arose between regularly-scheduled Board meetings that require immediate attention.This committee would then make recommendations to present to the full Board.The Fenton Business Center lawsuit is an example of a legal matter that is currently active that was addressed by the Ad Hoc Legal Committee. 4 There was discussion as to whether the matters concerning Conservation should be included with Legal and Legislative matters.It was suggested that conservation matters remain with the Administration and Finance Committee. A motion was made by Director Robak,seconded by Director Lopez and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Directors Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak None None Director Bonilla to establish the Legal and Legislative Committee with Director Bonilla as Chair and President Croucher as co-Chair.: b)DISCUSSION OF 2008 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR It was noted that the June Board meeting has been moved from June 4 to June 10,2008.It was also noted that June 23,2008 is reserved for a Board workshop if further discussion is needed regarding the Budget. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 10.THESE ITEMS ARE PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS. a)UPDATE ON THE DISTRICTS SCHOOL EDUCATION PROGRAM b)RATE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS FOR POTABLE AND RECLAIMED WATER c)PROPOSED DELINQUENT ACCOUNT PROCESS Director Breitfelder inquired if committee members recall any particular committee discussion regarding the above items that would be of interest to the full Board.President Croucher noted that no one wished to comment and indicated that there is also Attachment A which notes bullet points from the committee discussion which is attached to each staff report that may be referenced as well. REPORTS 11.GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT a)SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE 5 General Manager Watton indicated that the second paragraph on page two of the General Manager's Report discusses that the Legislative Analyst Office (LAO)is still considering taking special districts property tax revenues within the confines of Proposition 1-A in order to supplement the state budget.Proposition 1-A has some restrictions that the special district taxes may only be taken two times within ten years and the State must pay back the first loan before it can borrow a second time. He indicated that the San Diego County Water Authority (CWA)Board approved a drought response program.Otay staff will bring a model drought response ordinance before this Board in June and request that the Board take similar action. The outreach events for the month of April included the Water Conservation Garden Festival.Attendance at the festival surpassed last year's attendance. He thanked District employees who assisted in manning the booths at events such as these. On page five,under Finance,it was indicated that staff will be restructuring some meter routes to level the workload.The restructuring might impact some customers insofar as the due dates of their water bills might shift three to six days.Notices were mailed to these customers who might be impacted by the restructuring. Staff will present the Fiscal Year 2009 Budget to the Board on June 10,2008. There will possibly be rate increases due to increases from the Metropolitan Water District and CWA.Staff has not yet finalized its proposal,but will be working to accommodate the rate increases and still carry on the mission of the District. Regarding the variable rate bonds,he indicated that there is a lot of information in the public about market and auction rate securities and how certain groups are being impacted,in particular,with the auction securities.He noted that the District did not have any auction securities.The District does,however,have about $13 million in variable securities.He indicated that Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem explains in the report how the District is protected and does not have exposure to the market as may be the case for others.Staff has been and will continue to be very conservative with District investments. On page six,the first bullet under "Engineering,"he indicated that Staff has been working on the Water Resources Master Plan with PBS&J and the City of Chula Vista to discuss the City's building projections and water needs through the year 2020.The District has taken a more conservative view as to the outlook of growth and water needs in the coming years. He indicated that staff received a formal letter from Sycuan to annex 640 acres of reservation land to the District for water and sewer service.Sycuan is also 6 requesting annexation of some of the parcels that they own that are in the Padre Dam Municipal Water District to Otay for sewer service.Those parcels that are receiving water from Padre Dam will continue to receive water service from Padre Dam but will receive sewer service from Otay. There was discussion regarding the amount of water the reservation would require.General Manager Watton indicated that not all of the reservation land to be annexed will be developed or inhabited.Most of the land will remain vacant. He indicated that the annexation will possibly take several years to complete. He indicated that he attached to the General Manager's report a copy of CWA's Drought Management Plan Implementation Report that was presented to the Water Planning Committee at CWA,a Water Resources Report from CWA and a copy of the Drought Management Plan PowerPoint presentation which includes information from MET.He indicated that this presentation shows that the snowpack is declining due to warmer weather and evaporation.He pointed out that the comparison chart indicates snowpack reported on March 1,2008 was 116%of normal but as of April 21,2008,it was 78%of normal. He further reviewed projections by MET that indicate the current water demand is 2.18 million acre feet.He explained that the chart illustrates that Water Supply Drought Management (WSDM)is the stored water that MET has to make up the water shortage.Currently,MET estimates there is a shortage of 665 thousand acre feet.If this trend continues,the storage levels in 2007,2008 and 2009 will decrease every year.If the water storage supply continues to decrease,by the years 2010 and 2011,he predicts that growth will be halted. a)SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE President Croucher indicated that CWA moved forward with the $1.8 million media outreach ads for water conservation.There will also be ads from MWD and CWA. He indicated that the San Vincente Dam water level was raised 112 to 113 feet. CWA will also be addressing issues regarding water rights and water quality for Lake Hodges which will involve the City of San Diego and a couple of other member agencies.General Manager Watton indicated that Olivenhain Municipal Water District will possibly initiate a lawsuit regarding the water quality issues against CWA and the City of San Diego with regard to Lake Hodges. 12.DIRECTORS'REPORTS/REQUESTS Director Robak inquired about the decision of Sycuan to annex with Otay instead of Padre Dam.He asked if there are any issues that will be different because Sycuan is a sovereign nation.General Manager Watton indicated that the reservations in San Diego County are not in a sphere of influence so LAFCO evaluates those annexations to determine which water district would be the most 7 !. practical for annexation purposes.Otay is considering Sycuan like it would any other property owner or developer who requests annexation to the district.They are required to perform Sub-Area Master Plan water studies,water and/or sewer studies,pay the same fees,etc.Additional information will be presented to the Board as the process continues. Director Robak indicated that there was record attendance at the Spring Garden Festival.He indicated that he received a tri-fold brochure in the mail from Grossmont Healthcare District.The brochure highlighted Fred Hanson as one of the "heroes"of East County.Mr.Hanson was one of the founders of Otay Water District.He was also one of the first developers in the Mt.Helix area.Mr. Hanson also established the Fred J.Hanson Institute for World Peace at San Diego State University.Director Robak recommended that since Mr.Hanson has had a history with Otay and has contributed to the development of portions of the east county area of San Diego County,that the 640-1 and 640-2 Reservoirs be named after Mr.Hanson.President Croucher suggested that this item be placed on an agenda for future consideration by the Board. Director Lopez commended staff for their work on the District's Strategic Plan. He indicated the document is admired by other agencies and he wished to note staffs'good work and that he felt that it is an exceptional document. Director Breitfelder indicated that the Conservation Action Committee was still very much focused on the state ordinance.He reported that The Centre for Organization Effectiveness presented at the Council of Water Utilities meeting held on April 15,2008.They discussed the Certified Public Manager Program. The Water Agencies Association hosted Senator Alex Padilla.He was well received and spoke about the benefits of establishing uniform standards for water use throughout the State. 13.PRESIDENTS REPORT President Croucher indicated that he and General Manager Watton met with General Managers and Board Presidents of Helix Water District,Padre Dam Water District,Sweetwater Authority Water District and Lakeside Water District to discuss agenda items for the September meeting of the Joint Agencies to be held at Helix Water District.Additional information will be provided at a later date. He indicated that CSDA will be sponsoring a Legislative symposium on May 12 in Sacramento.He recommended that Director Breitfelder and other Board members who are interested attend. He announced that the Ribbon's Around the Garden event is scheduled on May 17.He encouraged Board members attend this event.Also,there is a WateReuse meeting scheduled on May 21.Board members should have received information regarding this meeting in their Board packet information. 8 He indicated that the naming of the 640-1 and 640-2 Reservoirs be placed on the next agenda. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 14.CLOSED SESSION The board recessed into closed session at 4:20 p.m.to discuss the following matters: a)CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -PENDING LITIGATION [GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9(a)] (i)AMERICAN PROTECTION INSURANCE CO.v.OTAY WATER DISTRICT (CASE NO.08-CV-0662-JM-POR) (ii)OTAY WATER DISTRICT v.NORTHROP GRUMMAN (ORANGE COUNTY SUPPERIOR COURT,CASE NO.07CC08916) b)CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -POTENTIAL LITIGATION [GOV-ERNMENT CODE §54956.9(b)) 2 CASES RETURN TO OPEN SESSION 15.REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION.THE BOARD MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION The board reconvened at 6:00 p.m.General Counsel Aerobel Banuelos indicated that no reportable actions were taken in closed session. 16.ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Board,President Croucher adjourned the meeting at 6:00 p.m. President ATTEST: District Secretary 9 AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AND June 23,2008 1.The meeting was called to order by President Croucher at 3:40 p.m. 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3.ROLL CALL Directors Present:Bonilla Breitfelder,Lopez and Robak Director Croucher participated via teleconference. Staff Present:General Manager Mark Watton,Asst.GM Administration and Finance German Alvarez,Asst.GM Engineering and Water Operations Manny Magana,General Counsel Aerobel Banuelos,Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens,Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem,Chief of Engineering Rod Posada,Chief of Operations Pedro Porras,Chief of Administration Rom Sarno,Assistant District Secretary Connie Rathbone and others per attached list. 4.APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Robak and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak None None None to approve the agenda. 5.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA No one wished to be heard. 1 WORKSHOP 6.ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.4124,APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 2008-2009 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS;APPROVE FUND TRANSFERS FOR POTABLE,RECYCLED,AND SEWER;AND DIRECT STAFF TO PROCEED WITH THE RATE STUDY AND PROPOSITION 218 HEARING AND NOTICES Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem indicated that following the presentation of the budget at the June 10,2008 Board meeting,the Board requested additional information.Staff will be presenting three options for approval of the Operating Budget,a $30.9 million CIP Budget,and associated fund transfers. Finance Manager Rita Bell indicated that on June 10,2008 San Diego County Water Authority (CWA)announced a 13.2%increase in water costs to its member agencies.She further explained that because of this decision to increase the water costs from CWA was announced on the same day of the Otay Water District Board meeting,June 10,2008,staff did not calculate this higher cost in the rate model presented to this Board on June 10.Staff had estimated an increase from CWA of 6.4%to 10.3%in fiscal year 2009.The 2.9%higher water rate added an additional $409,600 to the budget. To respond to the Board's concerns regarding economic challenges,Staff developed three scenarios as follows: ~No Growth -Assumes that no meters will be sold in FY 2010 and 2011 and associated reduction by $54 million over a six-year period in the CIP Budget ~State Property Tax Shift -This is a new law which allows the State to "borrow"property tax revenue from local entities.The most the State could take in one year is $1,240,000.The State would have to repay the amount borrowed before it could borrow again. ~Combined No Growth and Tax Shift -This scenario combines the effect of the two individual scenarios above. Staff presented three debt coverage ratio options which are expected to maintain the District's financial strength so that the AA-credit rating can also be maintained: •Option 1 -95%Debt Coverage Ratio proposes an Operating Budget of $66.8 million,a rate increase of 11.4%and transfers of $27 million. •Option 2 -100%Debt Coverage Ratio proposes an Operating Budget of $67.1 million,a rate increase of 12.4%and transfers of $27.3 million 2 •Option 3 -125%Debt Coverage Ratio proposes an Operating Budget of $68.2 million,a rate increase of 17.2%and transfers of $28.4 million. Staff indicated that these are "base"options. Mr.Beachem introduced Suzanne Harrell from Harrell &Company Advisers.Ms. Harrell explained the debt coverage ratio options in greater detail emphasizing the long-term targets of the District.She also explained how the debt coverage ratio scenarios can protect the District's assets in case of no growth.(See PowerPoint Presentation for charts and details.)She reiterated that the District has a very good credit rating and it would be difficult to improve that rating at this point. Mr.Beachem indicated that the budget supports the District's Strategic Plan objectives,66 CIPs in Fiscal Year 2009 along with a high level of service to our customers and will assist in meeting reserve targets. There was discussion regarding non-operating income.Staff indicated that the District has approximately 30 leases which generate income.There are 29 cell site leases.The contracts for these leases are renegotiated every five years to ascertain market value.There is one golf course lease.It is anticipated that six or seven new cellular agreement leases may be completed in the next six months. In conclusion,Staff is requesting the Board approve one of the three options for the Operating Budget.These options are supported by rate options for potable and recycled water and a recommended sewer increase.The options and percentages of increases are: V'Option 1 -11.4% V'Option 2 -12.4% V'Option 3 -17.2% V'Sewer Rate increase of 4.6% Staff is also requesting Board approval for the CIP Budget of $30.9 million. Director Bonilla indicated that in selecting one of the three options,Board members should consider which option will give the best cash flow for the District.He indicated that since Otay is a non-profit organization,the Board should pick an option to keep the District financially strong.He feels Option 2 will be the best option for the best financial stability. President Croucher commended staff for the work that was put into the PowerPoint presentation and options available for selection.He indicated that he supports Option 2 as the best choice for the District. 3 ! , There was discussion regarding the decrease in sewer revenues.Mr.Beachem indicated the figure presented is winter-based averaging. A motion was made by Director Croucher,seconded by Director Bonilla and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Noes: Abstain: Absent: Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher and Lopez None Director Robak None to adopt Resolution No.4124 to approve the FY 2008-2009 Operating and Capital Budgets.:Director Robak abstained from voting because the information that was posted on-line for his review was the FY 2007-2008 budget.He indicated he did not have the proper information to make an informed vote. ACTION ITEMS 7.CONSIDERATION TO PROVIDE A SPONSORSHIP OF $500 TO THE OAK BROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL AND STEEL CANYON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS WHO WILL REPRESENT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE NATIONAL HISTORY DAY COMPETITION IN MARYLAND WITH A PRESENTATION ON THE HISTORY OF CALIFORNIA WATER WARS Staff indicated that they wanted to make the Board aware of this sponsorship. No motion was necessary. 8.ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Board,President Croucher adjourned the meeting at 4:40 p.m. President ATTEST: Assistant District Secretary 4 I, AGENDA ITEM 6a STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING:Regular Board MEETING DATE:August 6,2008 SUBMITTED BY:Kelli Will iamson .W.OJG.F.NO:DIV.NO.All APPROVED BY:Rom Sarno,Chief of Administrative Service (ChieD APPROVEDBY:~rman Alvarez,Assistant General Manager,Finance and (Asst.GM): inistration I' I SUBJECT:Award of Contract to Willis Risk and Insurance Services (Willis)for Consulting Service for Benefits and as the District's Broker of Record GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors award a five year contract (two years with three option years)to willis as the District's new Benefit Consultant and Broker of Record effective August 6, 2008. COMMITTEE ACTION: See Attachment A. PURPOSE: To award a contract to Willis as the District's new Benefit Consultant and as the District's Broker of Record effective August 6,2008. ANALYSIS: Human Resources staff contacted local agencies and colleagues to establish a list of potential benefit consultants and invited fifteen consultants to participate in a Request for Proposal process.Eight consultants responded to the request.Human Resources and Purchasing staff reviewed the proposals,checked client references,and invited three of the eight consultants to participate in an interview process.The three consultants invited to the interview process included:Westland Insurance Brokers,Alliant Driver Specialty Group,and Willis.Based on the proposal,interviews,and client references,it is recommended that the District enter into a two-year agreement with Willis to begin as the District's Benefits Consultant and Broker of Record effective August 6,2008 though June 30,2010, with an option to continue the contract for up to three additional one-year increments. Willis is a global company that has been providing insurance services to clients for over 175 years.They provide a wealth of knowledge and expertise that is customized to the clients' needs.The San Diego affiliate of Willis was established in 1968.Willis specializes in public entities and the San Diego team is dedicated to helping human resource departments control costs and increase productivity.Their mission is to help agencies perform at the highest possible level by delivering cutting-edge health insurance solutions.The District is confident that they will be able to perform to the District's standards. I. I I II FISCAL IMPACT: By entering in to this contract,there will be an annual cost- savings of approximately $3,000 as summarized below. The District and Willis negotiated a set annual fee of $35,000 for the first two year contract.Willis will refund any commissions paid by the carriers to the District.The first quarter fees will be pro-rated based on an August 6,2008 implementation of the contract.If the District chooses to continue the contract for the up to three additional terms,cost increases are limited to a maximum of 3%. The previous Broker's contract (Bradawn)was based on a per employee per month fee and,as such,the monthly cost fluctuated based on employee count.The District paid approximately $32,000 per year and this cost may have increased this year if we had continued with the same consultant.In addition,the consultant received a commission from one of the plans in the amount of approximately $6,000. The District is currently in the Special District Risk Management Association (SDRMA)medical plan for a minimum of three years.SDRMA does not pay commissions.If at a future time the District chooses to utilize the services of Willis to move away from SDRMA and into another health insurance plan, Willis reserves the ability to re-negotiate the annual fee not to exceed 3%of the commissions of the health plan. STRATEGIC GOAL: "Retain a Dedicated Workforce."The District's Employee Benefits Program is a critical component to recruit and retain employees. LEGAL IMPACT: GetkraiManager Attachment A -Committee Action Attachment B -Contract ATTACHMENT A [ _ -····_··r·········-··············__·-··················------..---_--.._ -..-._- --SUBJECT/PROJECT:Award of Contract to Willis Risk and Insurance Services (Willis)for Consulting Service for Benefits and as the D0526-010287 District's Broker of Record ____---_..__..__.-.__.,-_".___,-----"-___,..,._._-,-___._~__---,-"-"._._,.._.,..__._",_.__.•.._--_-,--"._--__--_.__._-_.-•.........._-_._---_.-._---,-_..---_._.__.•.•.•...._.."."..-,..,.,,,-.,-.--,,---",--.,.,."._. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Finance,Administration,and Communications Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 21,2008.The following comments were made: •Staff contacted other local agencies to develop a list of potential benefit consultants.A Request for Proposal (RFP) was forwarded to fifteen (15)consultants and eight (8) proposals were received.Three were selected for the interview process: o Westland Insurance Brokers o Alliant Driver Specialty Group o Willis Risk and Insurance Services •Staff is requesting that the board approve a two year contract with an option for three additional years for a total of five years with Willis Risk and Insurance Services (Willis)as the District's new Benefit Consultant and Broker of Record. • A net annual fee of $35,000 was negotiated for the first two (2)years and any commissions Willis receives from the carriers will be refunded to the District.The District can renew the contract for up to three years with a maximum cost increase of 3%per year provided the District stays with SDRMA. •If approved the contract would be effective August 6,2008. •If the District decides in the future to change its health carrier (move from SDRMA),Willis can re-negotiate the annual fee not to exceed 3%of the commissions of the new medical carrier. •Willis Risk and Insurance Services also offers a 10%rate guarantee.If the District feels there are areas that Willis can improve upon (based on quarterly evaluations by the District),Otay can receive a discount up to 10%of its annual fee.A copy of the Evaluation Form is attached as Exhibit B of Attachment D to staff's report. •It was noted that Willis has been doing business since the 1800's and began its business in London.They are an international firm and are now headquartered out of New York. Their local San Diego office will provide services to the District.Other local clients include the Cities of Escondido,Poway and National City. •It was inquired if there were any lessons learned from the District's relationship with its previous benefit consultant that was incorporated into current negotiations.It was discussed that staff negotiated a good faith transition into the contract as they wished to assure a smooth transition from the District's current benefits consultant.The District also negotiated into the contract that commissions would be returned to the District should they be received so that no commissions would be paid to the consultant above the consultant's annual fee.Also a cap of 3%on the annual fee was negotiated into the contract should the District,in future,move to a new medical carrier. •It was noted that Willis,as a policy,does not accept overrides and contingencies as they wish to assure their clients that their focus is on obtaining them the best rates. •The committee discussed the primary benefits of a Benefit's Consultant which included the responsibilities of: o Preparing the summary plan descriptions o Handling activities with current and previous benefits administrator,including runoff claims o Administering the District's self-insured dental benefits o Handling the District's: -Stop-loss Carrier -Life Insurance Carrier -Long-Term and Short-term Disability -Employee Assistance Program,etc . •It was discussed that the current Benefits Consultant's (Bradawn)fee is $32,000 which is based on the number of employees.It is expected that the fee would have increased this year and because they also retain commissions paid to them by the carriers,they received approximately $6,000 in addition to their fee for a total cost of $38,000.Willis fee !i! i I rI is $35,000 per year and any commissions they receive is returned to the District which would create savings. •It was noted that the first quarter billing from Willis will be prorated as services will not cover a full quarter in the initial period. •The committee requested that staff include the rating sheet of the three consultants selected for the interview process (Attachment C)and that they be included in any future presentations.Also attached (Attachment B)is the rating sheet for the eight consultants who submitted a proposal. •The Committee noted a potential conflict of interest issue involving the previous Benefits Consultant.It was stressed to the Willis representatives of the Committee's desire that they have no conflict of interests with the organizations that they recommend to assure that the-District is receiving unbiased advise. The committee supported staffs'recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent calendar. I INSURANCE BROKER RfP REVIEW ATTACHMENT B Broker's abUitylo provide proactive Broker's Broker's and other support tothe PerceiVed'ability knowledge and/or assigned staff's Qualifications,DislJicrs Human ofbrDker to availabilityand Resoun:es Completeness, negollalea technicalsupport accessibility,background,and functionincluding Proposedfeesas addressed benelits program related 10 the including Ihe experience of dissemination of compared to level requested Totlt Score COMMENTS that meets the Imple~nlatlon of location ofthe Consultantand currentgeneral 01 effortexpended information, needsafthe an Online Benefits office thaiwill be staff andlearn and legalupdates IQlldabllity. Disbict.o=nrollment serviCing our composition.as well as time-p,account senSitive insurancecarrier information. SCORE 1S ,.2.1S 2.,.,.,.. Large.negotiating power,30+yrs expoin buSiness since 1925. Steve Dobmwa Slralegicfocus,multi-yearstrategy,pooledexpeOerice·SDRMAJEIA. Alliant RosemaryDries CommiSsions:keep same,negotiable.a lotoflocalbusiness. RomSamo NegatiVe:referencedwanting to worl<with an Insurance CommitteeatIhe District.. KelliWiniamson On lineenrollment strategy-assiSl getting QUotes from WAs. Combined Rating:1S 8 2.lS 2.8 ,...Local -San Diego Local-RanchO Bemardo,largesize.negotiating power,wellnessconlacts. Steve Dobrawa Materials submittedwerenottoo impressive,in business for30 years.california RosemaryDries Online enronmenl-benefits connectand newsletter.Corporate BenefitseCCB)RomSamo No copies ofmanagement reports.etc. Kelri Williamson Fee structure:no info,negotiate. CombinedRating:1S ,.2.1S ,.S 8 83 30+yrs exp.local-MissIon Valley,use BenExcell,experience wlth pooledprograms. Steve Dobrawa Smallerflnn,lessexperience-nO!much info.on employee qualificatiOns.Coordinated Rosemary Dries Weak on benchmalting,nodiscussiOn ofrole ofon lineimplemenlation.Benefits Corp. (Cac)RomSamo No copies ofmanagementreports.etc.,did notprovidebackgroundofkeyemployees Kelli Williamson Onlyone designated represenlalive,had COBRA and FSAAdminlstrallonin house. CombinedRating:12 S 1S ,. ,.•6 67 Fee structure:$20 000 flatfee,$10,000 for on line enrollment. Not local,San Clemente,cut and pasteapproach to proposalwith errors. s_""""'"Hours based feeslnJcture and unidentifled fees fill"on line setupand otherSimilarwort- Keenan &Rosemary Dries Goodreporting,Benefit Bridgeon 6nesystem,goodbenchmarking capabilltles. Assoc.RomSamo On line benefitprogram is includedin costs,on line wellness programKeenanFd. KeIliWiftiamsoo Fees:538,000upto 176hours after$240fhour.fee offsets bycommiSSiOns. Combined Rating:1S ,.S 1S 2.7 ,.82 Large,San Diego office,MeteerHeallh on line &EasyEnroll. SteveDobrawa Proposal was overwhelming altimes,nola greal response,poorly organiZed. Mercer RosemaryDries Tookapproach that we need 10buildaprogramwithoutreal1Zing thatwe are in SDRMA. RomSamo didn'tundefstand OIay's business,cookiecutterapproach toproposal KeDi Williamson Notwell structured,a lotofmaterial notreqUired -confusiflg proposal. combined Rating:1S S 2.,.lS ,.S 8.Fee:$30 000 first vear.no commitmenton D:1clno. Local·Mission Valley,30+years exp,in businesss.~ce 19n,ranked in top 100 insuranceagencies. Steve Dobrawa Wen organiZed,public company. Westland Rosemary DrIes Umitedpublicagency experience.on ~ne and computeroriented. Romsamo Fees:$121PEPM +$6IPEPM for onlilleber.efit option. Kelll Williamson CombinedRatlog:1S ,.2.1S 1S ,.7 .2 ------------_._-- INSURANCE BROKER RFP REVIEW ATIACHMENTB Broker's abilityto provide proactive Broker's Broker's and other support to ltIe Perceivecl abmly knowledgeandfor assigned staff's Qua.lllications,DiStrict's Human ofbrokerto availability and Resources Completeness, negotiate a led1nicalsupport accessibility,bacllgl1Jund,aoel function including Proposed fees as addressed benefits program related10 the indudingthe e:w::perience of dissemination of compared 10level I<!Quesled TOlal Score COMMENTSimplemenl3lionofConsultantandthatmeetstheanOnlineBenefitslocationofthestaffandlearncurrentgeneralofeffortexpendedinformalion, needs ofthe Open Enrollment officethatWill be composition.and regalupdates readability. District servicing our as wellas time-process.account.sensitive insurance carrier information. Local-La Jolla.125publicentity clients.97%retentionrate,large staff. Steve Dobrawa Thorough proposal.vel)'TeSponsive -unlimited assistance. Willis Rosemary Dries wroteresponse addressing Olay's current benefit structure. RomSamo Knowwhat wearelooking for,on lineHR lralning,HR partner. Kelli Winiamson SHQ Live.O/fectWor1cslsolutions·on line systems.10%rate reductionifnotsatisfied. Combined Rating:15 ,.2'15 2.5 ,.95 Fees:Commissions exoected$551<.fee structure needs 10 be neqotiated. Local-carlsbad.good public experience.poor fee structure related toOtay's requirements. Steve Dobrawa No online open enrollment currentlY,working with BenefitsPointbutnolyetavailable. RosemaryDries Fee:req moreinfo even though most c1ienl$all!pubrlCentities.W5P RomSamo KeRi Williamson CombinedRating:15 5 15 15 15 5 9 79 Panel's Recommendation for Interview:Alliant,Westland,and Willis Panel's Bcu::k-up group:California Corporate Benefits (CCB)andKeenan 2 .~------------~._-----.. INSURANCE BROKER RFP INTERVIEW ATIACHMENTC Accuracy.Appropriateness Providing Creative Leverage &Strength ofProjec Approachability,ofresponses10 FeesRelevant to References"."..'"Influence In Ihe Questions thai Total Score COMMENTSSolutionsIndustryMgr.CommunicatiOn match the the Proclucl Complete Style Dlstricfs needs SCORE ,.,.15 2.,.,.Checked •• Large.negotiating power,30+yrs exp,inbusiness since 1925;Good resources. Steve Dobrawa Strategic:focus.multi-yearstrategy,pooled experience-SDRMAlEJA. Patry Caro CommisSions:keep sameas we currently pay:negotiable.a rot of local business. Alliant Negative:referencedwanting to wor1l:with an Insurance Committeeat the District;Leasthands-on; RomSamo more COfPOrale;Didn'tget asenseofp<>.n;onalservlce;Presenters were notthe peoplewho would beseMclrtg ouraccount(more likeasales call). Ker~Williamson Checked On fine enrollment strategy-aSSiStgelting quotesfrom TPAs. Combined Rating:7 ,.,. ,.•1..,Local -$an Diego Local.MissionValley,30+yeatS elCp,in business since f9n.ranked in top100insurance ageneies. SteveDobrawa wen organized.public company. Paltycaro Umiteclpublicagency experience,on line and computeroriented. Westland RomSamo Fees:$12/PEPM +$6IPEPMfor online benelitoptjon. Theyacknowledged theywerenotthe biggestbrokerbutconveyedthatthey stilllladgreat leverage Kelli Wtlliamson Checked in industrythrough excellentrelationships with carriers.Strength:Team environmer.l;Brokerand ValueAdded Services.Onlybroker thaisell!Thank You caretsafterinterview. Combined Rating:,.S ,.2.•,.71 They have fewer human resources. Local-La Jolla,125public entitydients.97%retention rate,large staff. Steve Dobrawa Thorough proposal,veryresponsive·unfimited assiStance. Paltycaro wroteresponse addressing Otay'scurrentbenefit structure. Willis RomSamo Knowwhat we are lookingfor,on r.ne HR training,HR partner.Has own benefitatlomeys;strong team;has accuracy (2xpeer review):Brokerand Value Ackled Services. Kelri Wilrtamson Checked BHQLive,Direct Worksfsolutions·on linesystems,10%rate reduction If not satisfied. Combined Rating:,.,.,.2.,.•7•Fees:CommissionS expected$651<.fee structure needs to be negotiated. ATTACHMENT 0 AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AND WILLIS RISK &INSURANCE SERVICES OF SAN DIEGO THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 6th day of August,2008,by and between the OTAY WATER DISTRICT,a municipal water district,formed and existing pursuant to California Municipal Water District Act of 1911,as amended (the "DISTRICT"),and WILLIS RISK &INSURANCE SERVICES,a New York corporation (the "CONSULTANT). RECITALS WHEREAS,the DISTRICT desires to employ a CONSULTANT to provide insurance brokerage services. WHEREAS,the DISTRICT has determined that the CONSULTANT is an insurance brokerage firm and is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the DISTRICT,and the CONSULTANT is willing to perform such services. NOW,THEREFORE,THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1.ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT.The DISTRICT hereby agrees to engage the CONSULTANT and the CONSULTANT hereby agrees to perform the services hereinafter set forth in accordance with all terms and conditions contained herein. The CONSULTANT represents that all services required hereunder will be performed directly by the CONSULTANT or under direct supervision of the CONSULTANT. 2.SCOPE OF SERVICES.The CONSULTANT will perform services as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A ". The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all research and reviews related to the work and shall not rely on personnel of the DISTRICT for such services,except as authorized in advance by the DISTRICT The DISTRICT may unilaterally,or upon request from the CONSULTANT,from time to time reduce or increase the Scope of Services to be performed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement.Upon doing so,the DISTRICT and the CONSULTANT agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction or increase in the compensation associated with said change in services. 3.PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION. The Human Resources Manager is designated as the Project Coordinator for the DISTRICT and will monitor the progress and execution of this Agreement.The CONSULTANT shall assign a single Project Director to provide supervision and have overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this Agreement for the CONSULTANT.Executive Vice President,Employee Benefits,of WILLIS RISK &INSURANCE SERVICES is designated as the Project Director for the CONSULTANT. 4.COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT.The compensation for the CONSULTANT for the performance of all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be an annual fee of $35,000.The annual fee shall be paid in quarterly installments,with the first payment prorated for the partial quarter of service. CONSULTANT acknoweldges that it has or may receive broker commissions directly from the various insurance companies selected by the DISTRICT.The amount of any such commissions received shall be deducted from the annual fee and shall appear as a credit on the quarterly invoice following CONSULTANT's receipt of such commission. In the event that the DISTRICT elects to remove its medical and prescription plan from the Special District Risk Management Authority,the DISTRICT and the CONSULTANT shall negotiate a new annual fee that is equal to no more than a 3% commission on the medical and prescription plan.This new annual fee shall constitute total compensation for all services rendered under this Agreement. The CONSULTANT's compensation may be revised if the DISTRICT requests a change in the Coverages and/or Services during the Term of this Agreement,and if both parties enter into a written agreement documenting any change in Coverages,Services,or compensation.In addition,if there is a material change in the risk/exposure base,or the overall number of employees,both parties may revise the compensation upon further discussion. Should the DISTRICT exercise its renewal option under Section 7 of this Agreement,the DISTRICT and CONSULTANT shall negotiate an increase to the annual fee of no more than 3%. 5.ACCEPTABILITY OF WORK.The DISTRICT shall decide any and all questions which may arise as to the quality or acceptability of the services performed and the manner of performance,the acceptable completion of this Agreement and the amount of compensation due. 6.PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE.CONSULTANT shall place up to 10% of the annual fee at risk based on quarterly evaluations by the DISTRICT.The criteria for evaluation will include the timely and accurate delivery of services outlined in the Scope of Services compared to evaluation criteria developed mutually by the DISTRICT and CONSULTANT,as set forth in the attached Exhibit "8".The DISTRICT will provide feedback no later than one week after the end of each quarter and CONSULTANT will work to remedy each issue raised to the DISTRICT's satisfaction.If at the end of each year of this Agreement, service is deficient in a noted area,CONSULTANT agrees to return fees equal to the amount stated in the calculations section of Exhibit "8". 7.LENGTH OF AGREEMENT.The time duration of this Agreement is from August 6,2008 to June 30,2010 (2-year agreement),which may be extended by the DISTRICT in one-year increments for up to an additional three years (until June 30,2013). 8.DISPOSITION AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.The Memoranda, Reports,Plans,Specifications and other documents prepared under the terms of this agreement by the CONSULTANT for this Project,whether paper or electronic,shall become the property of the DISTRICT for use with respect to this Project,and shall be turned over to the 2 DISTRICT upon completion of the Project,or any phase thereof,as contemplated by this Agreement Contemporaneously with the transfer of documents,the CONSULTANT hereby assigns to the DISTRICT and CONSULTANT thereby expressly waives and disclaims,any copyright in,and the right to reproduce,all written material,drawings,plans,specifications or other work prepared under this agreement,except upon the DISTRICT's prior authorization regarding reproduction,which authorization shall not be unreasonably withheld.The CONSULTANT shall,upon request of the DISTRICT,execute any further document(s) necessary to further effectuate this waiver and disclaimer. The CONSULTANT agrees that the DISTRICT may use,reuse,alter,reproduce, modify,assign,transfer,or in any other way,medium or method utilize the CONSULTANT's written work product for the DISTRICT's purposes,and the CONSULTANT expressly waives and disclaims any residual rights granted to it by Civil Code Sections 980 through 989 relating to intellectual property and artistic works. Any modification or reuse by the DISTRICT of documents,or specifications prepared by the CONSULTANT shall relieve the CONSULTANT from liability under Section 14 but only with respect to the effect of the modification or reuse by the DISTRICT,or for any liability to the DISTRICT should the documents be used by the DISTRICT for some project other than what was expressly agreed upon within the Scope of this project,unless otherwise mutually agreed. The CONSULTANT shall maintain all books,documents,papers,employee time sheets,accounting records,and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and shall make such materials available at its office at all reasonable times during the term of this Agreement and for three (3)years from the date of final payment under this Agreement,for inspection by the DISTRICT and for furnishing of copies to the DISTRICT,if requested. 9.INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT.Both parties hereto in the performance of this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents,employees, partners or joint venturers with one another.Neither the CONSULTANT nor the CONSULTANT'S employees are employee of the DISTRICT and are not entitled to any of the rights,benefits,or privileges of the DISTRICT's employees,inclUding but not limited to retirement,medical,unemployment,or workers'compensation insurance. Neither the DISTRICT nor its officers,agents or employees shall have any control over the conduct of the CONSULTANT or any of the CONSULTANT's employees except as herein set forth,and the CONSULTANT expressly agrees not to represent that the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT's agents,servants,or employees are in any manner agents,servants or employees of the DISTRICT,it being understood that the CONSULTANT, its agents,servants,and employees are as to the DISTRICT wholly independent CONSULTANTs and that the CONSULTANT's obligations to the DISTRICT are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement 10.ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTING.This Agreement contemplates the personal services of the CONSULTANT and the CONSULTANT's employees, and it is recognized by the parties that a substantial inducement to the DISTRICT for entering into this Agreement was,and is,the professional reputation and competence of the CONSULTANT and its employees.Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be 3 iI, I.' assigned by the CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of the DISTRICT.Nothing herein contained is intended to prevent the CONSULTANT from employing or hiring as many employees,or subCONSULTANTs,as the CONSULTANT may deem necessary for the proper and efficient performance of this Agreement.All agreements by CONSULTANT with its subCONSULTANT(s)shall require the subCONSULTANT to adhere to the applicable terms of this Agreement. 11.COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW.The CONSULTANT,in the performance of the services to be provided herein,shall comply with all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations,and all applicable local ordinances,rules and regulations, whether now in force or sUbsequently enacted. 12.LICENSES,PERMITS,ETC.The CONSULTANT represents and covenants that it has all licenses,permits,qualifications,and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to practice its profession.The CONSULTANT represents and covenants that the CONSULTANT shall,at its sole cost and expense,keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement,any license,permit,or approval which is legally required for the CONSULTANT to practice its profession. 13.STANDARD OF CARE. A.The CONSULTANT,in performing any services under this Agreement,shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the CONSULTANT'S trade or profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations.The CONSULTANT shall take all special precautions necessary to protect the CONSULTANT's employees and members of the public from risk of harm arising out of the nature of the work and/or the conditions of the work site. B.Unless disclosed in writing prior to the date of this agreement,the CONSULTANT warrants to the DISTRICT that it is not now,nor has it for the five (5)years preceding,been debarred by a governmental agency or involved in debarment,arbitration or litigation proceedings concerning the CONSULTANT's professional performance or the furnishing of materials or services relating thereto. C.The CONSULTANT is responsible for identifying any unique products,treatments,processes or materials whose availability is critical to the success of the project the CONSULTANT has been retained to perform,within the time requirements of the DISTRICT,or,when no time is specified,then within a commercially reasonable time. Accordingly,unless the CONSULTANT has notified the DISTRICT otherwise,the CONSULTANT warrants that all products,materials,processes or treatments identified in the project documents prepared for the DISTRICT are reasonably commercially available.Any failure by the CONSULTANT to use due diligence under this sUb-paragraph will render the CONSULTANT liable to the DISTRICT for any increased costs that result from the DISTRICT's later inability to obtain the specified items or any reasonable substitute within a price range that allows for project completion in the time frame specified or,when not specified,then within a commercially reasonable time. 14.NON-DISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS.The CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age,race,color, ancestry,religion,sex,sexual orientation,marital status,national origin,physical handicap,or medical condition.The CONSULTANT will take positive action to insure that applicants are employed without regard to their age,race,color,ancestry,religion,sex,sexual orientation, marital status,national origin,physical handicap,or medical condition.Such action shall include but not be limited to the following:employment,upgrading,demotion,transfer, 4 recruitment or recruitment advertising,layoff or termination,rates of payor other forms of compensation,and selection for training,including apprenticeship. 15.CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.The DISTRICT may from time to time communicate to the CONSULTANT certain confidential information to enable the CONSULTANT to effectively perform the services to be provided herein.The CONSULTANT shall treat all such information as confidential and shall not disclose any part thereof without the prior written consent of the DISTRICT.The CONSULTANT shall limit the use and circulation of such information,even within its own organization,to the extent necessary to perform the services to be provided herein.The foregoing obligation of this Section 15,however,shall not apply to any part of the information that (i)has been disclosed in publicly available sources of information;(ii)is,through no fault of the CONSULTANT,hereafter disclosed in publicly available sources of information;(iii)is already in the possession of the CONSULTANT without any obligation of confidentiality;or (iv)has been or is hereafter rightfully disclosed to the CONSULTANT by a third party,but only to the extent that the use or disclosure thereof has been or is rightfully authorized by that third party. The CONSULTANT shall not disclose any reports,recommendations, conclusions or other results of the services or the existence of the subject matter of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the DISTRICT.In its performance hereunder,the CONSULTANT shall comply with all legal obligations it may now or hereafter have respecting the information or other property of any other person,firm or corporation. CONSULTANT shall be liable to DISTRICT for any damages caused by breach of this condition,pursuant to the provisions of Section 16. 16.INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS.The CONSULTANT agrees to defend,indemnify,and hold harmless the OTAY WATER DISTRICT,its officers, officials,certified volunteers,employees and representatives,against and from any and all liability,loss,damages to property,injuries to,or death of any person or persons,and all claims, demands,suits,actions,proceedings,attorneys'fees,and defense costs,of any kind or nature, including workers'compensation claims,of or by anyone whomsoever,resulting from or arising out of a negligent or wrongful act,error or omission by CONSULTANT in CONSULTANT's performance of this Agreement.Should the District be named in a suit,or should a claim be brought against it by suit or otherwise,resulting from or arising out of the CONSULTANT's negligent performance of this Agreement,CONSULTANT will defend DISTRICT (at DISTRICT's request and with counsel satisfactory to DISTRICT)and will indemnify DISTRICT for any judgment rendered against it or any sums paid out in settlement or otherwise. 17.WORKERS'COMPENSATION.The CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers'Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California,the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Government Code and all amendments thereto;and all similar state or Federal acts or laws applicable;and shall indemnify,and hold harmless the DISTRICT and its officers,and employees from and against all claims,demands,payments,suits,actions,proceedings and judgments of every nature and description,inclUding attorney's fees and defense costs presented,brought or recovered against the DISTRICT or its officers,employees,or volunteers,for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement. 5 18.INSURANCE.The CONSULTANT,at its sole cost and expense,shall purchase and maintain,and shall require its subCONSULTANTs,when applicable,to purchase and maintain throughout the term of this agreement,the following insurance policies: ~A.If checked,Professional Liability Insurance (errors and omissions)with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. S.Automobile insurance covering all bodily injury and property damage incurred during the performance of this Agreement,with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident.Such automobile insurance shall include owned,non-owned, and hired vehicles ("any auto"). C.Commercial general liability insurance,with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrencel$2,000,000 aggregate,covering all bodily injury and property damage arising out of its operations under this Agreement. D.Workers'compensation insurance in an amount sufficient to meet statutory requirements covering all of CONSULTANT'S employees and employers'liability insurance with limits of at least $1,000,000 per accident.In addition,the policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the DISTRICT.Said endorsement shall be provided prior to commencement of work under this Agreement. E.The aforesaid policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the DISTRICT,its officers,employees,and volunteers.,so that any other policies held by the DISTRICT shall not contribute to any loss under said insurance.Said policies shall provide for thirty (30)days prior written notice to the DISTRICT of cancellation or material change. F.Said policies,except for the professional liability and workers' compensation policies,shall name the DISTRICT and its officers,agents and employees as additional insureds,and separate additional insured endorsements shall be provided. G.If required insurance coverage is provided on a "claims made"rather than "occurrence"form,the CONSULTANT shall maintain such insurance coverage for three years after expiration of the term (and any extensions)of this Agreement.In addition,the "retro"date must be on or before the date of this Agreement. H.Any aggregate insurance limits must apply solely to this Agreement. I.Insurance shall be written with only California admitted companies which hold a current policy holder's alphabetic and financial size category rating of not less than A VIII according to the current Best's Key Rating Guide,or a company equal financial stability that is approved by the DISTRICT's Chief of Administrative Services.In the event coverage is provided by non-admitted "surplus lines"carriers,they must be included on the most recent California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI list)and otherwise meet rating requirements. J.This Agreement shall not take effect until certificate(s)or other sufficient proof that these insurance provisions have been complied with,are filed with and approved by the DISTRICT's Risk Manager.If the CONSULTANT does not keep all of such insurance policies in full force and effect at all times during the terms of this Agreement,the DISTRICT may obtain such coverage at CONSULTANT's expense and deduct the cost of such insurance from payments due to CONSULTANT under this Agreement,or may elect to treat the failure to maintain the requisite insurance as a breach of this Agreement and terminate the Agreement as provided herein. K.All deductibles and self-insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be disclosed to and approved by the DISTRICT. 19.LEGAL FEES.If any party brings a suit or action against the other party arising from any breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any inaccuracies in any of the representations and warranties on the part of the other party arising out of this Agreement, then in that event,the prevailing party in such action or dispute,whether by final judgment or 6 out-of-court settlement,shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other party all costs and expenses of suit,including attorneys'fees. For purposes of determining who is to be considered the prevailing party,it is stipulated that attorney's fees incurred in the prosecution or defense of the action or suit shall not be considered in determining the amount of the jUdgment or award.Attorney's fees to the prevailing party if other than the DISTRICT shall,in addition,be limited to the amount of attorney's fees incurred by the DISTRICT in its prosecution or defense of the action, irrespective of the actual amount of attorney's fees incurred by the prevailing party. 20.MEDIATION/ARBITRATION.If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement,or the breach thereof,the parties agree first to try,in good faith,to settle the dispute by mediation in San Diego,California,in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association (the "AAA")before resorting to arbitration.The costs of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties.Any controversy or claim arising out of,or relating to,this Agreement,or breach thereof,which is not resolved by mediation shall be settled by arbitration in San Diego,California,in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the AAA then eXisting.Any award rendered shall be final and conclusive upon the parties,and a judgment thereon may be entered in any court having jurisdiction over the SUbject matter of the controversy.The expenses of the arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties to the arbitration,provided that each party shall pay for and bear the costs of its own experts, evidence and attorneys'fees,except that the arbitrator may assess such expenses or any part thereof against a specified party as part of the arbitration award. 21.TERMINATION.A.This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by the DISTRICT.Termination without cause shall be effective only upon 60-day's written notice to the CONSULTANT.During said 60-day period the CONSULTANT shall perform all services in accordance with this Agreement. B.This Agreement may also be terminated immediately by the DISTRICT for cause in the event of a material breach of this Agreement,misrepresentation by the CONSULTANT in connection with the formation of this Agreement or the performance of services,or the failure to perform services as directed by the DISTRICT. C.Termination with or without cause shall be effected by delivery of written Notice of Termination to the CONSULTANT as provided for herein. D.In the event of termination,all finished or unfinished Memoranda Reports, Plans,Specifications and other documents prepared by the CONSULTANT,whether paper or electronic,shall immediately become the property of and be delivered to the DISTRICT,and the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of the Notice of Termination,not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder,and less any damages caused the DISTRICT by the CONSULTANT's breach,if any.Thereafter,ownership of said written material shall vest in the DISTRICT all rights set forth in Section 8. E.The DISTRICT further reserves the right to immediately terminate this Agreement upon:(1)the filing of a petition in bankruptcy affecting the CONSULTANT;(2)a reorganization of the CONSULTANT for the benefit of creditors;or (3)a business reorganization,change in business name or change in business status of the CONSULTANT. 22.NOTICES.All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing,and shall be personally delivered;or sent by overnight mail (Federal Express or the like);or sent by registered or certified mail,postage prepaid,return receipt requested;or sent by ordinary mail,postage prepaid;or telegraphed or cabled;or 7 delivered or sent by telex,telecopy,facsimile or fax;and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (i)if personally delivered,the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice,(ii)if sent by overnight mail,the business day following its deposit in such overnight mail facility,(iii)if mailed by registered,certified or ordinary mail,five (5)days (ten (10)days if the address is outside the State of California)after the date of deposit in a post office,mailbox, mail chute,or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service,(iv)if given by telegraph or cable,when delivered to the telegraph company with charges prepaid,or (v)if given by telex,telecopy,facsimile or fax,when sent.Any notice,request,demand, direction or other communication delivered or sent as specified above shall be directed to the following persons: To DISTRICT: To CONSULTANT: Human Resources Manager Human Resources OTAY WATER DISTRICT 2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard Spring Valley,CA 91978-2096 Executive Vice President,Employee Benefits Willis Risk &Insurance ,Services 4250 Executive Square,Suite 250 La Jolla,CA 92037 Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner specified in this Section.Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice,demand,request or communication sent.Any notice,request,demand,direction or other communication sent by cable,telex,telecopy,facsimile or fax must be confirmed within forty-eight (48)hours by letter mailed or delivered as specified in this Section. 23.CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND POLITICAL REFORM ACT OBLIGATIONS.The CONSULTANT shall at all times comply with the terms of the Political Reform Act and the DISTRICT's Conflict of Interest Code.CONSULTANT has received and reviewed a copy of the District's Conflict of Interest Code. CONSULTANT covenants that neither it,nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any financial interest,directly or indirectly,which would conflict in any manner with the interests of the DISTRICT or which would in any way hinder CONSULTANT's performance of services under this Agreement.In the performance of this Agreement,no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer,employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the DISTRICT.The CONSULTANT also agrees not to specify any service,product,treatment,process or material in which the CONSULTANT has a material financial interest,either direct or indirect,without first notifying the DISTRICT of that fact.The CONSULTANT shall immediately disqualify itself and shall not use its official position to influence in any way any matter coming before the DISTRICT in which the CONSULTANT has a financial interest as defined in Government Code Section 87103. The CONSULTANT represents that it has no knowledge of any financial interests that would require it to disqualify itself from any matter on which it might perform services for the DISTRICT.CONSULTANT acknowledges that prior to entering into this Agreement and during the term,CONSULTANT shall have a duty to disclose to the DISTRICT any and all circumstances that may pose an actual or potential conflict of interest under state law or the DISTRICT's Conflict of Interest Code.If a potential conflict of interest issue arises, 8 CONSULTANT shall fully cooperate in any inquiry and provide the DISTRICT with all documents or other information reasonably necessary to enable the DISTRICT to determine whether or not a conflict of interest existed or exists. ~If checked,the CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the reporting requirements of the Political Reform Act and the DISTRICT's Conflict of Interest Code. Specifically,the CONSULTANT shall file a Statement of Economic Interests with the DISTRICT's General Manager in a timely manner on forms which the CONSULTANT shall obtain from the office of the DISTRICT's General Manager. The CONSULTANT shall not conduct or solicit any non-District business while on DISTRICT time or using DISTRICT property. The CONSULTANT shall be strictly liable to the DISTRICT for all damages, costs or expenses the DISTRICT may suffer by virtue of any violation of this Paragraph 23 by the CONSULTANT.Failure to comply with the provisions of this Section 23 shall constitute a material breach of the Agreement and cause for termination under Section 21. 24.MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A.Computation of Time Periods.·If any date or time period provided for in this Agreement is or ends on a Saturday,Sunday or federal,state or legal holiday,then such date shall automatically be extended until 5:00 p.m.Pacific Time of the next day which is not a Saturday,Sunday or federal,state or legal holiday. B.Counterparts.This Agreement may be executed in multiple Counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,but all of which,together,shall constitute but one and the same instrument. C.Captions.Any captions to,or headings of,the sections or subsections of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties hereto,are not a part of this Agreement,and shall not be used for the interpretation or determination of the validity of this Agreement or any provision hereof. D.No Obligations to Third Parties.Except as otherwise expressly provided herein,the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon,or obligate any of the parties hereto,to any person or entity other than the parties hereto. E.Exhibits and Schedules.The Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto are hereby incorporated herein by this reference for all purposes. F.Amendment to this Agreement.The terms of this Agreement may not be modified or amended except by an instrument in writing executed by each of the parties hereto. G.Waiver.The waiver or failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any future breach of any such provision or any other provision hereof. H.Applicable Law.This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. I.Entire Agreement.This Agreement supersedes any prior agreements, negotiations and communications,oral or written,and contains the entire agreement between the parties as to the subject matter hereof.No subsequent agreement,representation,or promise made by either party hereto,or by or to an employee,officer,agent or representative of any party hereto shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby. J.Successors and Assigns.This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. K.Construction.The parties acknOWledge and agree that (i)each party is of equal bargaining strength,(ii)each party has actively participated in the drafting,preparation 9 , i f and negotiation of this Agreement,(iii)each such party has consulted with or has had the opportunity to consult with its own,independent counsel and such other professional advisors as such party has deemed appropriate,relative to any and all matters contemplated under this Agreement,(iv)each party and such party's counsel and advisors have reviewed this Agreement,(v)each party has agreed to enter into this Agreement following such review and the rendering of such advice,and (vi)any rule or construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement, or any portions hereof,or any amendments hereto. 25.BROKER SERVICES AGREEMENT ADDENDUM:CONSULTANT agrees to abide by the Broker Services Agreement Addendum,Exhibit C,and incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. OTAY WATER DISTRICT By:--,--,--,-__---,__,.-,-,-__ Mark Watton,General Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Aerobel Banuelos Attorney WILLIS RISK &INSURANCE SERVICES (Corporation -signatures oftwo corporate officers) By: (Name) (Print) (Title) By:-::-;-_-,-_ (Name) (Print) (Title) 10 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant agrees to perform consulting services as required by DISTRICT.Consultant shall provide the necessary qualified personnel to perform the services.In performance of the services Consultant services include: 1.Strategic Planning •Assist in defining and prioritizing strategic health &welfare plan objectives •Assist in the evaluation of internal technical capabilities to determine increased/improved applications for administrative processes •Identify underperforming vendor relationship •Assess carrier/vendor customer service levels •Develop project action timelines •Periodic review of employee demographics •Assist in the development of an employee survey.Conduct survey and provide an executive summary detailing results •Discuss relevant benchmarking data 2.Financial Analysis •Perform financial review and analysis of experience reports •Assess current funding arrangements for appropriateness and make recommendations as needed to assist in calculating annual benefit budget,billing rates,annual reserve requirements and proposed plan design changes •Evaluate current costs of benefits versus effectiveness of plan design •Review managed care expense and administrative service fees (where applicable) •Analyze utilization data and cost containment results of medical management •Forecast projected benefit costs to include maximum exposure •Evaluate excess loss coverage •Prepare experience reviews as directed •Assist in developing appropriate employee contributions levels •Perform trend analysis from available diagnostic and normative data •Completion of IRS Form 5500 for signature by District's designated representative as needed 3.Renewal •Analyze and negotiate renewals with vendors •Review vendor renewal methodology,experience data,and assumptions for accuracy and logic •Compare vendor renewal with Willis projections •Develop and present alternative plan designs and provisions with associated financial and member impact analysis •Finalize program design,rates,and fees a minimum of 60 days prior to effective date •Prepare an accurate renewal document with recommendations for delivery to senior 11 I!iI' management (as needed) 4.Marketing •Develop plan specification based on feedback from strategic planning meeting •Jointly determine list of vendors best suited to meet plan goals and objectives •Develop vendor performance guarantees with monetary penalties as necessary •Assist in the review of current electronic data transfer processes with vendors •Perform pre-marketing evaluation of census data,network service areas,and administrative needs •Evaluate carrier client support services •Evaluate vendor financial ratings and accreditation •Review provider network accessibility/employee match •Perform critical analysis and comparison of plan features and costs •Assist in the scheduling of selected finalist site visits •Assist in conducting finalist negotiations •Prepare and submit a summary report with recommendations to management •Assist in the notification of all bidders as to the final outcome 5.Annual Enrollment •Assist in the planning of employee meetings.round tables.and health seminars •Provide guidance and develop a comprehensive communication strategy. •Assist with creation of communication material. •Introduce workable technology solutions for communications and enrollment where appropriate (e.g.propose online open enrollment strategy to streamline process) •Assist with collation and distribution of open enrollment material to active employees and retirees •Coordinate vendor sponsored communication material 6.Compliance •Provide legislative updates as needed •Review plan documents and summary plan descriptions for regUlatory compliance from a non-legal perspective (client would need to retain legal advice).Assist with preparing corresponding amendments •Provide access to periodic web casts compliance sessions 7.Account Management Services •Meet and present to District staff,Board and employees as required •Serve as a liaison between the client and all insurance companieslvendors •Monitor administrative process and assist in the smooth resolution of elevated issues •Act as an employee/employer advocate in the resolution of ongoing claims issues 8.Transition Services •Use best efforts to implement smooth transition from prior insurance brokerage firm to 12 CONSULTANT,including but not limited to working with client and all insurance companies/vendors to transition the insurance companies/vendors to CONSULTANT and coordinating with prior insurance brokerage firm to obtain all DISTRICT health and welfare materials and related documents 13 EXHIBIT B Evaluation Form Please mark -using the scale provided -your level of service for the question. 1 =Poor 2 =Not Good 3 =Good 4 =Very Good 5 =Excellent Criteria 1Sl 2na 3ra 4'"Avg. Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Account Management: •Willis team members are readily accessible in person,by phone and email. •Willis listens well to our unique needs and asks questions to clarify mutual understanding. •Willis provides high-touch,proactive service to our account. •Willis communicates regularly and clearly on progress and implementation issues. Expertise: •Willis meets our expectations for evaluating the efficiency of our plans. •Willis provides value added ideas to help us control costs and meet District objectives. •Willis keeps us updated on changing legislature and recommends appropriate action when needed. Projects: •Assist with finalizing and adopting the Dental and Flexible Spending Account Summary Plan Descriptions and Plan Documents. •Assist with creating an "Addendum Medical Summary Plan Description"which addresses the District's Eligibility and Extension of Coverage and any other nuances not covered in the Blue Shield Summary Plan Descriptions. •Coordinate with Bradawn,Inc in retrieving all District health and welfare material needed and informing all relevant vendors of new brokerage firm information. •Assist with other proiects as decided. 14 --11111 1 Score (Calculations based on pre-determined criteria and weighted averages): 0-22 Points 10%of Fees Returned 23 -32 Points 6%of Fees Returned 33 -43 Points 3%of Fees Returned 44 points or greater 0%of Fees Returned 15 ,, EXHIBIT C BROKER SERVICES AGREEMENT ADDENDUM Requested Language The following disclosure is made by Willis Insurance Services of San Diego ("we"or "us')to The OTA Y WA TER DISTRICT (''you'),in connection with the agreement for insurance brokerage services ("Services')entered into between the parties. Before we bind the specific insurance coverage you desire to purchase we will disclose to you in writing: (a)a summary of all quotes and indications we sought and received with certain pertinent information,or,if you prefer,a copy of all quotes and indications we sought and all quotes or indications we received in connection with that coverage; (b)any interest we may have in,or contra~tual arrangements we may have with,any of the prospective insurers; (c)the maximum amount or percentage rate of compensation which we,our parent companies,subsidiaries or affiliates, may receive in connection with the placement of the insurance coverage;and we will obtain your written consent to the amount or rate of compensation we will receive before coverage is bound. You understand and agree that you shall make final decisions with respect to underwriting submissions and all matters relating to your insurance coverage,risk management,and loss control needs and activities.We will procure the insurance coverage chosen by you,prepare insurance binders,and review and transmit policies to you. We will assess the financial soundness of the insurers we recommend to provide your coverages based on publicly available information,including that produced by well-recognized rating agencies.Upon request,we will provide you with our factual analysis of such insurers.We cannot, however,guarantee or warrant the solvency of any insurer or any intermediary that we may use to place your coverage. We will review all policies and endorsements delivered to us by insurers or intermediaries for the purpose of confirming their accuracy and conformity to negotiated specifications and your instructions and advise you of any errors in,or recommended changes to,such policies.You agree that you will also review all policies and endorsements delivered to you and advise us of any questions you have or of any document or provision that you discover which you believe may not be in accordance with your instructions. We will meet,as requested by you,with your representatives to explain coverage and policies. We will promptly respond to your requests for coverage information,analysis of changing market conditions,and assistance in developing procedures for handling loss exposures,and assist you in reporting subsequent changes in underwriting information to insurance companies. 16 We will inform you of the reporting requirements for claims,including where claims should be reported and the method of reporting to be used,if applicable.Please carefully review any claims-reporting instructions or information we provide you because failure to timely and properly report a claim may jeopardize coverage for the claim.In addition,you should retain copies of all insurance policies and coverage documents as well as claims-reporting instructions after termination of the policies because in some cases you may need to report claims after termination of a policy. Prior to binding we will also seek your written consent to the actual commission we will earn from each carrier as required by the Assurance of Discontinuance with the Attorney General of the State of New York. Commissions are paid by insurers from the premiums you pay and are earned by us for the entire policy period at the time we place policies for you. If any insurer requires us to receive commissions in regard to any of the Coverages which are inconsistent with the provisions above,we will promptly notify you of such commissions and seek your written consent to receive them. Our compensation may be revised if you request a change in the coverages and/or services during the term of this Agreement and we enter into a written agreement documenting any change in Coverages,Services and Compensation. In some cases the use of a wholesale broker may be beneficial to you.We will not directly or indirectly knowingly place or renew your insurance business through a wholesale broker unless we first disclose to you in writing: (a)any interest we have in,or any contractual agreements we have with,the wholesale broker; (b)any alternatives to using the wholesale broker; (c)any compensation we or our corporate parents,subsidiaries or affiliates will receive as a result;and obtain your consent to do so.If we expect to recommend the use of a wholesale broker,any compensation we or our corporate parents,subsidiaries or affiliates will receive as a result is also included in the total compensation provided for in the brokerage agreement between the parties. Other parties such as underwriting managers or managing general agents may also earn and retain usual and customary commissions for their roles in providing insurance products and services to you.If any such parties are corporate parents,subsidiaries or affiliates of ours,any compensation we or our corporate parents,subsidiaries or affiliates will receive is included in the total compensation provided for in the brokerage agreement between the parties. You may choose to use a premium finance company,property appraiser,structured settlement firm or other similar service provider in connection with the insurance coverages we place for you or the Services we provide to you.If you elect to use a service provider from which we or our corporate parents,subsidiaries or affiliates will receive any compensation directly or indirectly relating to the services you purchase from the provider,we will disclose additional 17 f I information regarding that compensation to you before you make a final decision to use the service provider. In the ordinary course of business we may also receive and retain interest on premiums you pay from the date we receive the funds until we pay them to the insurers or intermediaries. As an insurance intermediary,we normally act for you.However,we or our corporate parents, subsidiaries or affiliates may provide services to insurers for some insurance products.These services may include (a)acting as a managing general agent,program manager or in other similar capacities which give us binding authority enabling us to accept business on their behalf and immediately provide coverage for a risk;(b)arranging Iineslips or similar facilities which enable an insurer to bind business for itself and other insurers;or (c)managing Iineslips for insurers.Contracts with these insurers may grant us certain rights or create certain obligations regarding the marketing of insurance products provided by the insurers. We may place your insurance business under such a managing general agent's agreement, binding authority,Iineslip or similar facility when we reasonably consider that these match your insurance requirements/instructions.When we intend to do so,we shall inform you and disclose the contractual arrangements we have with the insurer in accordance this disclosure. We may also provide reinsurance brokerage services to insurers with which your coverage is placed pursuant to separate agreements with those insurers.We may be compensated by the insurers for these services in addition to any compensation we may receive for placement of your insurance coverages. The insurance market is complex,and there could be other relationships which are not described in this document which might create conflicts of interest.Notwithstanding any possible conflict which might exist,we will act in your best interests at all times in providing the Services to you.If a conflict arises for which there is no practicable way of complying with this commitment,we will promptly inform you and withdraw from the engagement,unless you wish us to continue to provide the Services and will provide your written consent. Prices on the Services specified herein are exclusive of all federal,state and local sales,use, excise,receipts,gross income and other similar taxes and governmental charges.Any such taxes or charges upon the Services provided hereunder,now imposed or hereafter becoming effective during the term of this agreement,shall be added to the price herein provided and paid by you unless,in lieu thereof,you provide us with a valid tax exemption certificate acceptable to us. NO:4631-9035-7250.v.2ND:4631-9035-7250,v.1 18 San Diego County Water Authority Water Supply Update Diversifying San Diego County's Water Supply Portfolio Local Surface Water 6% Recycled2% Groundwater 2% 2007 Conservation 7% 7% MWD Groundwater 76%6% Canal Lining Transfer 9% 110Transfer 6% 2020 Seawater Desalination Recycled Water 10% 6% 110 Transfer 22% 1 Lake Oroville June2006:897.12FeelElevation -3,492,262AaeFeet Lake Oroville February 2008:719.86FeetElevation 1.412,a24Acre Feet 2 Governor Proclaims Statewide Drought -June 4,20081----------.............-""""''"'''''',:,,''''''/: •Critically dry conditions in 2007 and 2008 -Snowpack was 67%of normal -Runoff forecast at 55%of normal -Driest spring on record in Northern California -Reservoir levels low -Oroville and Colorado River Basin system at about 50%percent of capacity •Largest court-ordered delivery restrictions in history -Deliveries from Delta -one-third of allocation (Drought impacts and Judge Wanger Ruling on Delta Smelt) •-800,000 acre-feet lost due to pumping restrictions -MWD share of loss:250,000 acre-feet MWD Regional Storage Levels -Including Emergency Storage- ~ January 2007 January 2008 CurrentTrend January 2009 _Dry-Year Storage o Emergency Storage 3 MWD 2009-2013 Base Case Water Balance (Applying 1988-1992 Hydrology:Historical worst 5 consecutive years) ---------1_._---~----- 2.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 3.0 --- 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 .CRA Supplies .SWP Supplies •Dry-Year Storage •Gap MWD 2009-2013 Base Case Ending Storage (Applying 1988-1992 Hydrology)1-------_......._----- 1.0 0.8 ....,0.6Q)Q)u..~u«0.4cg ~0.2 0.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 •Groundwater •Surface Water 4 MWD Actions to Reduce Potential Shortages •MWD's "no action"base case has unacceptable risk to shortage and storage •MWD focusing on four strategies to improve reliability,called "combined actions" -Conservation 200,000 AFNR (100,000 AF in '09) -Local resources 200,000 AFNR -Delta improvements 130,000 to 190,000 AFNR -Transfers 200,000 AFNR MWD Actions to Reduce Potential Shortages •MWD staff and member agency groups working on -conservation enhancements and -acceleration of local supply projects 5 MWD 2009-2013 Combined Actions Water Balance (Applying 1988-1992 Hydrology) 0.0 I 2.0 3.0 "-,---....--.-----.----..--------=-- I • 2.5 0.5 ....Q) Q) '7~1.5 u<l: cg 1.0 2009 a eRA Supplies 2010 .SWP Supplies 2011 •Dry-Year Storage 2012 5·Year Actions 2013 •Remaining Need MWD 2009-2013 Combined Actions Ending Storage (Applying 1988-1992 Hydrology) 1.0,---------- ....Q) Q)'7~u<l:c~~ 0.8 0.4 0.2 - 0.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ~l Groundwater •Surface Water 6 MWD 2009-2013 Cumulative Water Balance (Applying 1988-1992 Hydrology) Base Case15.0--- ,. Combined Actions ....,10.0 Q) Q) IfQ)~c:~5.0 ~ 0.0 2009-2013 2009-2013 .CRA Supplies .SWP Supplies •Dry-Year Storage 5-Year Actions •Remaining Need Summary 1---------""""""""""""""-•Water supply shortage is possible as early as 2009 -Shortages could be significant -Prolonged multi-year shortages possible -MWD 5-Year Supply Plan combined actions will help... •...but even with full implementation,significant shortages may occur •Implementation of near-and long-term Bay Delta fixes is critical 7 8 AGENDA ITEM 6b STAFF REPORT 5P2465- 001000, P2466- 001101 August 6,2008 DIV. NO. MEETING DATE: PROJECT/ SUBPROJECT: Ron Ripperger ~ Engineering Manager Rod posad~~ Chief,Engineering Manny Magan~~3AA-Mn~>-Assistant General ~anager,Engineering and Operations Award of a Constr tion Contract for the Regulatory Site Material Storage Bins and Equipment Cover Relocation Project Regular Board Ron Gruno~~ Sr.Civil~~~~r APPROVED BY: (Asst.GM): SUBJECT: APPROVED BY: (Chief) SUBMITTED BY: TYPE MEETING: GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the Otay water District (District)Board awards a construction contract to Fox Construction (Fox)for the Regulatory site Material Storage Bins and Equipment Cover Relocation Project in an amount not to exceed $225,000 (see Exhibit A for project location). COMMITTEE ACTION: Please see Attachment A. PURPOSE: To obtain Board approval authorizing the General Manager to enter into a construction agreement with Fox for the installation of material storage bins and the relocation of an existing equipment cover at the District's Regulatory Site in an amount not to exceed $225,000. ANALYSIS: Currently,the existing temporary storage bins at the Regulatory Site used by the Operations Department are small and do not have the capacity to store large quantities of construction materials.These bins are essential to the District's operations and the larger permanent material storage bins will allow the District to increase the efficiency of its daily operation activities. Based on an evaluation of design alternatives,it was determined that the best solution is to construct the Material Storage Bins southeast of the 520-2 Reservoir (see attached Exhibit B).The six (6)Material Storage Bins will be constructed of concrete masonry block 8-feet in height.The base bid for the Material Storage Bins included Asphaltic Concrete (AC)paving.Bid Alternative No.4 substituted Portland Cement Concrete (PCC)paving for the AC paving. Staff recommends using the PCC.PCC paving has less maintenance costs and was less expensive than the AC paving.The largest bin will be 65-feet wide by 30-feet deep for storage of recyclable material.The five smaller bins will be 25-feet wide by 30-feet deep.A pipe rack for CML&C pipe is also included in this project, together with additional AC paving for truck access.This facility will be very similar to the material storage facility constructed near the 980-2 Reservoir project.The design for this project was performed by in-house staff. In addition to the storage bins and pipe rack work,this project will also include relocating the existing structural steel equipment cover used by the Operations Department for storing a variety of equipment.The equipment cover will be moved to just east of the existing two pump stations at the Regulatory Site and re-assembled. This work is required due to conflicts with the site layout of planned structures and training areas for the upcoming regional training facility joint-use project with the San Miguel Fire District.This item of work was added by addendum (Exhibit B shows the existing location and the proposed location of the equipment cover). The project was advertised for bid on the District's website and several other publications including the Union Tribune and San Diego Daily Transcript. A non-mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting was held on June 19/2008.A presentation was given by District Staff to explain the project and answer any questions and/or discuss concerns from the contractors. Six (6)contractors attended the meeting.Meeting minutes were published as a part of Addendum No.1. Subsequently,two addenda were sent out to all bidders and plan houses to address questions and clarifications to contract documents during the bidding period and to include the relocation of the existing equipment cover as well as alternate bid items. 2 I It.!..•'...•...~ r 1 , II:••: " ! i r~I I Bids were publicly opened on July 3/2008 with the following results: CONTRACTOR 1 Fox Construction 2 Willkom Construction/Inc. 3 M.A.Stevens Construction 4 New Century Construction,Inc. 5 Healey Construction Co. 6 St.Thomas Enterprises,Inc. 7 Blair Rasmussen Construction/Inc. S HTA Engineering &Construction,Inc. 9 Heffler Company,Inc. Base Bid Amount $227/000 $262/700 $319/460 $362/000 $367/611 $393/000 $409/800 $420/000 $"445/000 Alt.No.4 Bid Item AC To PCC Net Difference -$2/000 -$14/039 $71/928 -$20/000 -$21/260 $33/000 $41/600 $20/000 -$20/000 TOTAL BID $225,000 $248,661 $391,388 $342,000 $346,351 $426,000 $451,400 $440,000 $425,000 The Engineer's Estimate is $218/000. The evaluation process included reviewing all bids submitted for conformance to the contract documents.The lowest bidder/Fox/ submitted a responsible bid and holds Class A/Class B/and Class C32 Contractor/s licenses which expire on September 30/2008. References were checked and Fox was found to be a highly rated company.Staff also verified that it can comply with the bonding requirements for this project. FISCAL IMPACT:~ The total budget for CIP P2465 (Construction of Materials Storage Bins)/as approved in the FY2009 budget/is $250/000.Total expenditures/plus outstanding commitments and forecast/are $248/462.See Attachment B for budget detail.The total budget for CIP P2466 (includes equipment cover relocation)/as approved in the FY2009 budget/is $220/000.Total expenditures/plus outstanding commitments and forecast,are $100/906 (see Attachment B for budget detail). The Project Manager anticipates that/based on the attached financial analysis/the CIP budgets will be sufficient to support this project. Finance has determined that 100%of the funding is available from the Expansion Fund. 3 STRATEGIC GOAL: This project supports the District's Mission Statement,"To provide safe,reliable water,recycled water,and wastewater services to our community in an innovative,cost efficient water-wise,and environmentally responsible manner,"as well as,the General Manager's vision,"...prepared for the future..."by guaranteeing the District will always be able to meet future water supply obligations and plan,design,and construct new facilities. LEGAL IMPACT: P:\WORKING\CIP P2465 Material Storage Bins\Staff Reports\BD 08-06-08 Staff Report Bid Award?-7-08 (RG-RR).doc RG/RR:jf Attachments:Attachment A Attachment B Exhibit A Exhibit B 4 SUBJECT/PROJECT: P2465-001000 P2466-001101 ATTACHMENT A Award of a Construction Contract for the Regulatory Site Material Storage Bins and Equipment Cover Relocation Project COMMITTEE ACTION: The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22,2008.The following comments were made: •Staff indicated that there are temporary storage bins at the Regulatory Site used by the Operations Department to store construction materials.This project will construct larger permanent material storage bins. •Staff determined that the best location for a larger permanent storage bin facility will be adjacent to the 520- 2 Reservoir.The Regulatory Site location allows Operations staff to access the material storage bins when needed for work in the North District. •Included in this project is relocation of the existing structural steel equipment cover at the Regulatory Site which is used by the Operations Department for storing a variety of equipment.Since the equipment cover is located where the new Joint Training Center will be,it will be relocated to just east of the existing pump stations. •After the pre-bid meeting,two addenda were sent out to all bidders to address questions and clarify changes to the contract.It was determined that concrete paving be used instead of asphalt paving. •Nine bids were received;Fox Construction was the lowest responsible bidder. •Staff recommends that the contract be awarded to Fox Construction which was the lowest bidder. Following the discussion,the committee supported staffs' recommendations and presentation to the full board on the consent calendar. Otay Water District ATTACHMENT 8 P2465-Regulatory Site Material Storage Bins Date Updated:July 7,2008 Outstanding Projected Vendor /Committed Expenditures Commitment &Budget Final Cost Comments $250,000 Forecast Regulatory Site Material Storage Bins In House/Labor 52,359 42,359 10,000 52,359 ---------Regulatory Agency Fee 50 50 -50 County Of San Diego Service Contracts 60 60 -60 San Diego Daily Transcripts 1,593 -1,593 1,593 Mayer Reprographics I_~____-- Subcontract -- Temporary Labor -- Construction Contracts 180,000 -180,000 180,000 Fox Construct ion Contingency (4%)7,200 -7,200 7,200 Fox Construction----,--------Accpt-close-out 7,200 -7,200 7,200 - - Grand Total $248,462 $42,469 $205,993 $248,462 Otay Water District P2466 -Regional Training Facility Date Updated:July 7,2008 Outstanding Projected Vendor /Budget Committed Expenditures Commitment &Final Cost Comments $220,000 Forecast Planning ._--- In House/Labor --28,078 28,078 28,078 - Professional Legal Fees 1,123 1,123 -1,123 Garcia,Calderon &Ruiz LLP----_._.-----Consultant Contracts 13,105 13,105 -13,105 Jones &Stokes Associates------Subcontract -------f------Temporary Labor -- Total Planning $42,306 $42,306 $-$42,306 Design In House/Labor -- In House/Labor -------(future)--- ---------------------- - - Total Design $-$-$-$- Construction -----------In House/Labor 10,000 10,000 10,000--+-------Equip_Cover relocation Contract 45,000 45,000 45,000 Fox Construction ---------_<;ontingency (4%)1,800 -1,800 1,800 Fox Construction -------Accpt-close-out 1,800 -1,800__1,800--- Total Construction $58,600 $-$58,600 $58,600 Grand Total $100,906 $42,306 $58,600 $100,906 IMPERIAL BEACH VICINITY MAP / / / OT AY WA TER DISTRICT REGULATORY SITE MATERIAL STORAGE BINS LOCA TION MAP EXHIBIT A ~I P2465 COPPS LANE PUMP STATION MATERIAL STORAGE BINS EXISTING EQUIPMENT COVER LOCATION j EXISTING FENCE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT COVER LOCATION x x~X-X_...----------x ...~ HILLSDALE ---t~~-~ PUMP STATION -I "iI, -/1-----/1-__-----/1---11-__----11----- OT AY WA TER DISTRICT REGULATORY SITE MATERIAL STORAGE BINS SITE PLAN P2465 EXHIBIT B AGENDA ITEM 6c STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE:August 6,2008TYPEMEETING:Regular Board SUBMITTED BY:L~,sa Coburn-Boyd cX...e:.-6 .->;/';Environmental Compliance Specialist PROJECT:P2143 -DIV.NO.5 001101 GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the otay Water District (District)Board approve the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)for the 1296-3 Reservoir Project (see Exhibit A for project location). APPROVED BY: (Chief) APPROVED BY: (Asst.GM) SUBJECT: Ron Ripperger ~ Engineering Manager Rod posad~ Chief,Engineering Manny Magafia~~~ Assistant General Ganager,Engineering and Operations Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 1296-3 Reservoir Construction Project COMMITTEE ACTION: Please see Attachment A. PURPOSE: To obtain Board authorization for approval of a MND for the construction of the 1296-3 Reservoir. ANALYSIS: The 2.0 million gallon 1296-3 Reservoir will be constructed adjacent to and south of the existing 1296-1 and 1296-2 Reservoirs located in Jamul,at the west end of Bear Mountain Way.As identified in the 2002 Water Resources Master Plan,storage in the 1296 Pressure Zone is currently deficient by 3.1 MG and will be deficient by 12.14 MG for the projected ultimate conditions.The construction of the 1296-3 Reservoir will partially reduce the storage deficiency and add storage capacity for the 1296 Pressure Zone. On April 11,2006,the District's General Manager signed a contract with BRG Consulting,Inc.to perform environmental services for the 1296-3 Reservoir.These environmental services include the preparation of a MND to satisfy the conditions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).BRG Consulting has completed an initial study and draft MND.Based on the findings of these documents,and with proper mitigation measures taken,as outlined in the draft MND,the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. The draft MND was submitted for 30-day public review on October 18, 2007.Two comment letters were received;one from the U.s.Fish and wildlife Service and the other from the Native American Heritage Commission.BRG Consulting has incorporated these comments into the MND and finalized the document on June 12,2008. FISCAL IMPACT: None. STRATEGIC GOAL: This project supports the District's strategic goal of designing and constructing new infrastructure and to satisfy current and future water needs for Potable,Recycled,and Wastewater Services. LEGAL IMPACT: No legal impact is anticipated.However,in compliance with the CEQA process,the final MND will have the normal 30-day legal challenge period once the Notice of Determination (NOD)is recorded with the County of San Diego.The NOD will be recorded within five (5) working days after Board adoption of the MND. P,\WORKING\CIP P2143\Wo30106\Environmental\BD 08-06-08,1296-3 Reservoir MND Adoption.doc Attachments:Attachment A Attachment B Exhibit A 2 ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT/PROJECT:·TAdoptio~ofaMi tigated Negative Declaration for the P2143-001101 1296-3 Reservoir Construction Project COMMITTEE ACTION: The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee reviewed this item at the meeting held on June 17,2008.The following comments were made: •Staff is requesting adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)for the 1296-3 Reservoir Project.This project is adjacent to the existing 1296-1 and 1296-2 Reservoirs. •Construction of the reservoir will impact 1.2 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub.The U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service asked for a 2:1 ratio for a total mitigation requirement of 2.40 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub.The 2.40 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub will be preserved in the Otay Water District's existing Habitat Management Area (HMA). •The MND outlines mitigation measures required to reduce potential impacts associated with construction of the reservoir such as:air quality,noise,soils and water quality.Staff indicated that the roads will be paved after construction due to damage caused by equipment and heavy traffic to and from the construction site. •The project was included in the District's 1994 Biological Opinion from the US Fish and Wildlife Service which identified biological impacts for future crp projects;no additional biological permitting will be required. •Staff has attended the Jamul-Delzura Planning Group meetings to inform the community of the construction. Staff received no comments or concerns from the Planning Group. Following the discussion,the committee supported staffs' recommendations and presentation to the full board on the consent calendar. ........! ATTACHMENT 8 Listed as a separate document on the website at www.otaywater.gov ,Board,Board Agenda,BD 08-06-08,Attachment B,MND for P1296-3 Res Final Ad A copy of the MND on CD can be provided upon request.Please contact Lisa Coburn- Boyd in the Engineering Department at Otay Water District at 619-670-2219 to obtain a copy. ." "'"\")~.., .... I ""SCALE:1"=500' IMPERIAL BEACH VICINITY MAP STAFF REPORT AGEN-DA ITEM 6d TYPE MEETING:Regular Board SUBMITTED BY:Armando Buelna~ Communications Officer APPROVED BY: MEETING DATE: W.O.lG.F.NO: August 6,2008 DIV.NO.All SUBJECT:2008 Legislative Program Guidelines GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the 2008 Otay Water District Legislative Program. PURPOSE: To provide direction to staff in the formulation of the District's response to legislative initiatives on issues affecting the District during the 2008 legislative session. COMMITTEE ACTION: See Attachment A BACKGROUND Each legislative session,representatives to the California legislature sponsor some 2,000 to 3,000 bills or significant resolutions.Many of these measures become law and affect special districts in substantive ways.The same is true with each session of the House of Representatives or the Senate. Legislative programs establish guidelines and policy direction that can be used by staff in monitoring legislative activity, and facilitate actions that can be taken quickly in response to legislative initiatives. The principles provided in the 2008 Legislative Program are meant to serve as guidelines for staff in formulating a consistent District response to legislative initiatives.This is particularly helpful in dealing with time sensitive matters such as last minute amendments should calls or letters to legislators be needed.Sensitive or controversial policy matters will nevertheless be brought to the full Board of Directors for deliberation and direction. FISCAL IMPACT: None. LEGAL IMPACT: None. Attachments Attachment A -Committee Action Report Attachment B -2008 Otay Water District Legislative Program ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT/PROJECT:2008 Legislative Program Guidelines COMMITTEE ACTION: The Legal,Legislative and Conservation Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 23,2008.The following comments were made: • • • • • It was discussed that once yearly staff presents the Legislative Program for the boards review.The Legislative Program provides a guideline to staff when drafting responses to pending legislation. Staff noted that any controversial or sensitive matters would be presented to the board for discussion and to provide direction to staff. Staff indicated that the Finance,Administration and Communications Committee had reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 22,2008.They had requested that the guidelines be brought back to committee as they were not certain of the board's standing on restricting the use of recycled water for groundwater recharge.Since that meeting,the Legal,Legislative and Conservation Committee was initiated,and as the guidelines would fall under the purview of the new committee it was agendized for its review. The Legislative Program was updated through discussions with staff and on positions the board took on various legislative matters. It was discussed that the guidelines are intended for the more usual legislation and would not substitute for engaging the board in discussions on controversial or sensitive legislative matters. • • It was noted that staff recommendations on Assembly Bill 2986 and Senate Bill lXX-Perata are consistent with the Legislative Program Guidelines presented today. The committee inquired if there were any comments from members of the board on their views.It was indicated that there were no other views expressed by the board with the exception of comments from the Finance,Administration and Communications Committee on April 22,2008. The committee supported staffs'recommendations and indicated that as members of the Finance,Administration and Communications Committee had an opportunity to also review this item that it be presented to the full board on the consent calendar. ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT/PROJECT:2008 Legislative Program Guidelines COMMITTEE ACTION: The Finance,Administration,and Communications Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 22,2008.The following comments were made: •It was discussed that once yearly staff presents the Legislative Program for the boards review.The Legislative Program provides a guideline to staff when drafting responses to pending legislation. •The Legislative Program was updated through discussions with staff on positions the board took on various legislative matters. • • • • The committee inquired with regard to Bi-National Initiatives,item "a"under "Oppose efforts to"on page 6 of the Legislative Program,if the district had any bi- national legislative issues that it is opposing.It was indicated that there were none at this time. Staff noted that any controversial or sensitive matters would be brought forward for the board to deliberate and provide direction to staff. The committee suggested that verbiage be added on page 1 under Legislative Policy Guidelines indicating that the District would have a more proactive approach in supporting legislation. The committee also discussed with regard to Water Services, item "d"under "Oppose efforts to"on page 2,that the District did not know the position of the full board on this item and suggested that the Legislative Program be tabled for further discussion and brought back to the next committee meeting. Following the discussion,the committee supported staffs' recommendations and presentation to the full board on the consent calendar. ;' Otay Water District 2008 Legislative Program Legislative Policy Guidelines Effective Date: Legislative Policy Guidelines The Otay Water Legislative Policy Guidelines for the 2007-2008 Legislative Sessions include the following: Water Services Support efforts to: a.Provide a comprehensive plan to address Bay-Delta environmental issues. b.Study and promote "Around-the-Delta"alternatives as a way to improve water quality or water transport and reduce the possibility of levee failure. c.Support efforts to promote additional surface and underground water storage infrastructure to ensure water availability and quality. d.Study Global Climate Change and its potential impact on the snow pack,rising sea levels,increased salinity in the Delta,the possibility of reduced precipitation or more severe storms. e.Provide financial support to projects designed to mitigate the potential negative impacts of Global Climate Change on water supply reliability. f.Provide ongoing federal and state funding for the California Bay-Delta. g.Support implementation of the Quantitative Settlement Agreement. h.Provide reliable water supplies to meet California's short and long-term needs. i.Develop a comprehensive state water plan that balances California's competing water needs and results in a reliable supply of high-quality water for the San Diego region. j.Provide conveyance and storage facilities that are cost effective,improve the reliability and quality of San Diego region's water supplies as well as the Bay-Delta region. k.Equitably allocates costs of the Bay-Delta solution to all those benefiting from improvements. 1.Support agriculture to urban water transfers. m.Promote desalination pilot studies and projects. n.Reduce restrictions on recycled water usage. o.Reduce restrictions on injecting recycled water into basins where there is no direct potable use. p.Provide financial incentives for recharge of groundwater aquifers using recycled water. q.Encourage feasibility studies ofwater resource initiatives. r.Increase funding for infrastructure and grant programs for construction, modernization or expansion of water,wastewater treatment,reclamation facilities and sewer systems. s.Provide funding for water recycling,groundwater recovery and recharge,surface water development projects and seawater desalination. lof6 Otay Water District 2008 Legislative Program t.Mandate uniform or similar regulations and procedures by state agencies in the processing and administering of grants and programs. u.Streamline grant application procedures. v.Limit the availability,or prohibit the installation,of water softening appliances that discharge brine to the sewer systems feeding treatment plants that produce recycled water. w.Improve the existing Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta water conveyance system to increase flexibility and enhance water supply,water quality,levee stability and environmental protection. x.Evaluate long-term threats to the Delta levee and conveyance system and pursue actions to reduce risks to the state's water supply and the environment. y.Promote or assist voluntary water transfers between willing buyers and willing sellers. z.Establish reasonable statewide approaches to sewer reporting standards. Oppose efforts to: a.Make urban water supplies less reliable or substantially increase the cost of imported water without also improving the reliability and/or quality of the water. b.Create unrealistic or costly water testing protocol. c.Create unrealistic or costly to obtain water quality standards for recycled water or storm water runoff. d.Restrict use ofrecycled water for groundwater recharge. e.Disproportionately apportion costs of water. f.Establish new water or recycled water fees solely to recover State costs without also providing some benefit. g.Create undo hurtles for seawater desalination projects. h.Ban the use of or make the use of eminent domain for water infrastructure projects more costly or burdensome. i.Create regulatory schemes that alter or limit the existing authority to reuse and recycle water. J.Create unreasonable or confusing sewer reporting standards. Financial Support efforts to: a.Support efforts to clarify procedures and provisions of Proposition 218 in the wake of the Bighorn decision. b.Require the federal government and State of California to reimburse special districts for all mandated costs or regulatory actions. c.Give special districts the discretion to cease performance of unfunded mandates. d.Provide for fiscal reform to enhance the equity,reliability,and certainty of special district funding. e.Provide incentives for local agencies to work cooperatively,share costs or resources. f.Provide for the stable,equitable and reliable allocation of property taxes. g.Continue to reform workers compensation. 20f6 Otay Water District 2008 Legislative Program h.Authorize financing of water quality,water security,and water supply infrastructure improvement programs. 1.Promote competition in insurance underwriting for public agencies. j.Establish spending caps on State of California overhead when administering voter approved grant and disbursement programs. k.Require disbursement decisions in a manner appropriate to the service in question. 1.Encourage funding infrastructure programs that are currently in place and that have been proven effective. m.Produce tangible results,such as water supply reliability or water quality improvement. n.Provide financial incentives to projects that increase reliability,diversity,and reduce green house gasses. Oppose efforts to: a.Impose new,unfunded state mandates on local agencies and their customers. b.Undermine Proposition IA -Protection ofLocal Government Revenues -and the comprehensive reform approved by voters in 2004. c.Reallocate special district reserves in an effort to balance the state budget. d.Reallocate special district revenues to fund infrastructure improvements in cities or counties. e.Usurp special district funds,reserves,or other state actions that force special districts to raise rates,fees or charges. f.Complicate existing conservation-based rate structures. g.Establish funding mechanisms that put undue burdens on local agencies or make local agencies de facto tax collectors for the state. h.Complicate compliance with SB 610 and SB 221. Governance/Local Autonomy Support efforts to: a.Expand local autonomy in governing special district affairs. b.Establish reasonable standards for reporting director expenditures. c.Establish meaningful,targeted special district reform. d.Create consistent definitions of types ofmeetings directors may use for purposes of compensation. e.Set fair,consistent and reasonable standards for board member compensation. f.Promote comprehensive long-range planning. g.Assist local agencies in the logical and efficient extension of services and facilities to promote efficiency and avoid duplication ofservices. h.Streamline the Municipal Service Review Process or set limits on how long services reviews can take or cost. 1.Establish clear and reasonable guidelines for appropriate community sponsorship activities. j.Reaffirm the existing "all-in"financial structure,or protect the San Diego County Water Authority voting structure based on population. 30f6 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 1. J. k. 1. m. n. 40f6 Otay Water District 2008 Legislative Program Oppose efforts to: a.Assume the state legislature is better able to make local decisions that affect special district governance. b.Create one-size-fits-all approaches to special district reform. c.Unfairly target one group of local elected officials. d.Usurp local control from special districts regarding decisions involving local special district finance,operations or governance. e.Limit the board of directors'ability to govern the district. f.Create unfunded local government mandates. g.Create costly,unnecessary or duplicative oversight roles for the state government of special district affairs. h.Change the San Diego County Water Authority Act regarding voting structure,unless it is based on population. 1.Shift the liability to the public entity and relieve private entities of reasonable due diligence in their review of plans and specifications for errors,omissions and other Issues. J.Place a significant and unreasonable burden on public agencies,resulting in increased cost for public works construction or their operation. Conservation Support efforts to: Provide funding for water conservation programs. Encourage the installation of water conserving fixtures in new and existing buildings. Promote the environmental benefits of water conservation. Enhance efforts to promote water awareness and conservation. Offer incentives for landscape water efficiency devices such as ET controllers and soil moisture sensors. Develop landscape retrofit incentive programs and/or irrigation retrofit incentive programs. Permit local agencies adopting stricter ordinances requiring water wise landscaping for commercial and residential development. Create tax credits for citizens or developers who install water wise landscapes. Create tax credits for citizens who purchase high efficiency clothes washers,dual flush and high-efficiency toilets and irrigation controllers above the state standards. Expand community-based conservation and education programs. Develop incentives for developers to install water wise landscape in new construction. Encourage large state users to conserve water by implementing water efficient technologies in all facilities both new and retrofit. Create higher incentives for solar power. Encourage large state water users to conserve water outdoors. Otay Water District 2008 Legislative Program o.Educate all Californians on the importance of water,and the need to conserve, manage,and plan for the future needs. Oppose efforts to: a.Weaken federal or state water efficiency standards. Safety,Security and Information Technology Support efforts to: a.Provide funding for information security upgrades. b.Provide incentives for utilities and other local agencies to work cooperatively,share costs or resources. c.Provide funding for communication enhancements,wireless communications,GIS or other technological enhancements. d.Encourage or promote compatible software systems. e.Fund infrastructure and facility security improvements. f.Protect state,local and regional drinking water systems from terrorist attack or deliberate acts of destruction,contamination or degradation. g.Provide funds to support training or joint training exercises. h.Equitably allocate security funding based on need,threats and/or population. 1.Encourage or promote compatible communication systems. Oppose efforts that: a.Create unnecessary,costly,or duplicative security mandates. Optimize District Effectiveness Support efforts to: a.Continue to reform Workers Compensation. b.Give utilities the ability to avoid critical peak energy pricing or negotiate energy contracts that save ratepayers money. c.Develop reasonable Air Pollution Control District engine permitting requirements. d.Reimburse or reduce local government mandates. e.Allow public agencies to continue offering defined benefit plans. f.Result in predictable costs and benefits for employees and taxpayers. g.Eliminate abuses. h.Retain local control of pension systems. 1.Be constitutional,federally legal and technically possible. J.Establish practical limits on the use of eminent domain. Oppose efforts to: a.Restrict the use of,or reallocate,district property tax revenues to the detriment of special districts. b.Create unrealistic ergonomic protocol. c.Micromanage special district operations. 50f6 l!II t !I i ," ~_: :i I' \~ Otay Water District 2008 Legislative Program d.Balance the state budget by allowing regulatory agencies to increase permitting fees. Hi-National Initiatives Support efforts to: a.Promote and finance cross-border infrastructure development such as water pipelines,desalination plants or water treatment facilities. b.Develop cooperative and collaborative solutions to cross-border issues. c.Develop and enhance understanding of the interdependence ofcommunities on both sides of the border with the goal ofimproved cross-border cooperation. Oppose efforts to: a.Usurp local control over the financing and construction of water supply and infrastructure projects in the San Diego/Baja California region. 60f6 AGENDA ITEM 6e TYPE MEETING:Regular Board SUBMITTED BY:Armando Buelna~ STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: W.O.lG.F.NO: August 6,2008 DIV.NO.All Communications Officer APPROVED BY: SUBJECT:SB lXX -Perata,Water Quality,Flood Control,Water Storage and Wildlife Preservation. GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors take the position of "Support"on Perata relating to funding Water 'Qual i ty,Flood Control, Storage and Wildlife Preservation projects. PURPOSE: SB lXX Water To authorize taking a "Support"position on SB lXX -Perata relating to funding Water Quality,Flood Control,Water Storage and Wildlife Preservation projects. COMMITTEE ACTION: See Attachment A BACKGROUND Senate Bill lXX (Second Extraordinary Session)would appropriate a total of $610,890,000 from voter approved Propositions 50,lE,and 84 for a variety of water quality,flood control,water storage and wildlife preservation projects. SB lXX notes that California voters recognize the value of water to the economy,environment,and overall well-being of the state.It also recognizes that the state is facing challenges managing water due to climate change,uncertainty regarding the availability of water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta,an increase in state population,limitations on public funds,and other factors. Of note,SB lXX includes funding for emergency response actions that can provide ecosystem,water quality,fisheries enhancement,and water supply reliability benefits in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta in the next two years (see Attachment D). In total,about 60 percent of the funds appropriated in this bill are for flood protection related activities,and another 15-20 percent are for projects that protect or improve drinking water quality.The bill also funds completing the CalFed surface storage feasibility studies and environmental documents,improving regional water planning and groundwater management,and restoring critical environmental resources. Supporters of SB lXX note this bill will address the need for an immediate response to deal with the decline of the delta smelt,the issue of seismic stability of levies in the Delta,and the potential for disruption of water supplies due to emergencies such as earthquakes or floods. Supporters note that while a comprehensive plan for the Delta is still necessary,it will take many years to implement.In the mean time,voters have approved funding for water resources projects. Moreover,they cite that specific projects have been identified that can be implemented immediately and will provide immediate benefits to water supply reliability and to the Delta.Lastly,such projects are consistent with recommendations proposed by the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan and the Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force. Acknowledging the bill would fund worthwhile actions,the primary opponent,the Department of Water Resources,opposes the bill because it is not part of a "Comprehensive approach to addressing California's water needs,which must include surface storage as a component to address future impacts on water availably due to climate change and population." FISCAL IMPACT:#' None. LEGAL IMPACT: None. MaMrs= Attachments A -Committee Action Report B -SB lXX -Perata,Water quality,Flood Control, Water storage and Wildlife Preservation C -Senate Floor Analysis D -California Urban Water Agencies Delta Near- Term/Emergency Response Actions E -Sacramento Bee Editorial -New water bond? First,spend existing billions ATTACHMENT A SB lXX -Perata,Water Quality,Flood Control,Water SUBJECTIPROJECT:Storage and Wildlife Preservation COMMITTEE ACTION: The Legal,Legislative and Conservation Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 23,2008.The following comments were made: •SB lXX -Perata would appropriate $6.1 billion to fund near-term Bay Delta fixes.Funding will come from voter approved Propositions 50,IE and 84. • • • • Staff recommends that the board take a position of "Support"on SB lXX -Perata relating to funding water quality,flood control,water storage and wildlife preservation projects. The California Urban Water Agencies (CUWA)has identified a list of projects for near-term Bay Delta fixes that would provide immediate benefits to both the Bay Delta and water supply issues.Supporters agree with the long-term plan and that a comprehensive approach must also be part of the solution,however,there is concern that it would take too long. The identified list of projects by the CUWA is already approved and the projects are currently sitting idle waiting for funding.SB lXX -Perata would provide the funding to move the projects forward. Staff is requesting the Board's formal action as it is a more powerful representation of "Support"of SB -lXX - Perata. Following the discussion the committee supported staffs' recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent calendar. CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-2007-o8 SECOND EXTRAORDINARY SESSION ATTACHMENT 8 SENATE BILL No.1 Introduced by Senators Perata,Machado,and Steinberg September 14,2007 An act to add Division.33 (commencing with Section 83000)to the Water Code,relating to water,and making an appropriation therefor. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 1,as introduced,Perata.Water quality,flood control,water storage,and wildlife preservation. (1)Under existing law,various bond acts have been approved by the voters to provide funds for water projects,facilities,and programs.The Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of2006,a bond act approved by the voters at the November 7,2006,statewide general election,authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of $4,090,000,000 for the purposes offinancing disasterpreparedness and flood prevention projects.The Safe Drinking Water,Water Quality and Supply,Flood Control,River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of2006, an initiative bond act approved by the voters at the November 7,2006, statewide general election,authorizes the issuance of bonds in the amount of$5,388,000,000 for the purposes offinancing a safe drinking water,water quality and supply,flood control,and resource protection program.The Water Security,Clean Drinking Water,Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002,approved by the voters at the November 5, 2002,statewide general election,authorizes,for the purposes of financing a safe drinking water,water quality,and water reliability program,the issuance ofbonds in the amount of$3,440,000,000. This bill,with regard to those bond funds,would appropriate $610,890,000 as follows:ofthe funds made available pursuant to the 99 SB 1 -2- Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006, $50,000,000 to the Department of Water Resources for essential emergency preparedness supplies and projects,and $150,000,000 to the department for stormwaterflood managementproject grants;ofthe funds made available pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water,Water Quality and Supply,Flood Control,River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of2006,$50,000,000 to the State Department ofPublic Health for grants and loans for small community drinking water systems infrastructure improvements and related actions,$50,400,000 to the State Department ofPublic Health for grants for projects to prevent or reduce the contamination of groundwater that serves as a source of drinking water,$40,000,000 to the department for administrative costs, planning grants,and local groundwater assistance grants,$50,000,000 to the department for pI:ojects to relocate existing Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta water intake facilities,$60,000,000 to the department for expenditures to increase the department's ability to respond to levee breaches and to reduce the potential for levee failure,$100,000,000 to the department for the acquisition,preservation,protection,and restoration of Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta islands,$12,000,000 to the department to complete planning and feasibility studies associated with new surface storage under the California Bay-Delta Program, $15,000,000 to the department for planning and feasibility studies to identify potential options for the reoperation of the state's flood protection and water supply systems,$10,000,000 to the department to update the California Water Plan,$10,000,000 to the department for planning and feasibility studies for projects to reduce ecosystem conflicts in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta,and $10,000,000 to the State Coastal Conservancy for projects on the Santa Ana River;and of the funds made available under the Water Security,Clean Drinking Water, Coastal and Beach ProtectionAct of2002,$3,490,000 to the department for planning and feasibility studies associated with surface storage under the California Bay-Delta Program. The bill would provide that up to 5%of the funds appropriated by the bill may be expended to pay for the administrative costs of that program.The bill would provide that funds appropriated by the bill are available for encumbrance until June 30,2009.On January 10,2008, program recipients would be required to report to the fiscal committees of the Legislature with regard to the committed and anticipated expenditures ofthese funds. 99 -3-SB 1 The people ofthe State ofCalifornia do enact asfolloWs: DIVISION 33.INTEGRATED WATER SUPPLY AND FLOOD PROTECTION PLANNING,DESIGN,AND IMPLEMENTATION 83000.The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following: (a)Water is vital to the economy,environment,and overall well-being ofthe state. (b)California faces increasing challenges in managing its water supply due to climate change,uncertainty regarding the availability ofwaterfrom the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and other sources, an increasing state population,limitations on public funds,and other factors. (c)California must adopt a new,updated,and comprehensive set of water planning,design,and implementation policies that reflect these realities to protect its water supply future. 1 SECTION 1.Division 33 (commencing with Section 83000) 2 is added to the Water Code,to read: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 (2)Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act,the State Water Resources Control Board and the California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies with authority over matters relating to water quality. This bill would require the state board,in consultation with other agencies,to develop pilot projects in the Tulare Lake Basin and the Salinas Valley focused on nitrate contamination.The bill would require the state boardto create an interagency task force,as needed,to oversee the pilot projects and submit a report to the Legislature on the scope and findings of the projects within 2 years of receiving funding.The state board would be required to implement recommendations for developing a groundwater cleanup program for the Central Valley Water Quality Control Region and the Central Coast Water Quality Control Region based upon pilot.project results within 2 years of submitting the report to the Legislature. Vote:majority.Appropriation:yes.Fiscal committee:yes. State-mandated local program:no. 99 SB 1 -4- 1 (d)In the past,state laws,funding schemes,and administrative 2 actions have treated the planning,construction,and operation of 3 water supply,groundwater,and flood control systems as separate 4 and distinct activities,thereby reducing efficiency and water supply 5 reliability. 6 (e)California has not taken full advantage ofthe cost savings, 7 the environmental benefits,or the expediency of more efficient 8 operations and usage ofexisting water supply,storage,and flood 9 protection facilities. 10 (f)It is the policy of the state to more effectively integrate its 11 flood protection systems with its water supply and conveyance 12 systems in order to conserve limited public dollars,increase the 13 available water supply,improve water quality,increase wildlife 14 and ecosystem prote~tions,protect public health and safety,and 15 address the effects of climate change. 16 (g)The purpose of this division is to require the integration of 17 flood protection and water systems to achieve multiple public 18 benefits,including all ofthe following: 19 (1)Increasing water supply reliability in the least costly,most 20 efficient,and most reliable manner to meet current and future state 21 needs. 22 (2)Increasing use ofwater use efficiency and water conservation 23 measures to increase and extend existing water supplies. 24 (3)Reducing energy consumption associated with water 25 transport,thereby reducing state greenhouse gas emissions. 26 (4)Improving water management to protect and restore 27 ecosystems and wildlife habitat. 28 83001.In order to provide the least costly,most efficient,and 29 reliable water supply to a growing state,it is the intent of the 30 Legislature that the department accomplish the following 31 objectives: 32 (a)Integrate state flood protection and water supply systems. 33 (b)Promote conjunctive use of groundwater storage capacity 34 to improve overall water supply and flood system operation. 35 (c)Promote increased water use efficiency through expanded 36 use ofwater conservation,water recycling,and improvements in 37 technology. 38 83002.The sum ofsix hundred ten million eighthundred ninety 39 thousand dollars ($610,890,000)is hereby appropriated as follows: -5-SB 1 1 (a)Of the funds made available pursuant to Chapter 1.699 2 (commencing with Section 5096.800)ofDivision 5 ofthe Public 3 Resources Code,the sum of two hundred million dollars 4 ($200,000,000)is hereby appropriated as follows: 5 (1)Pursuant to subdivision (c)ofSection 5096.821 ofthe Public 6 Resources Code,the sum offifty million dollars ($50,000,000)to 7 the department for the acquisition,design,and construction of 8 essential emergency preparedness supplies and projects.Prior to 9 the design or construction of any project funded pursuant to this 10 paragraph,the California Bay-Delta Authority,or its successor, 11 shall approve the specific project or program. 12 (2)Pursuant to Section 5096.827 ofthe Public Resources Code, 13 the sum ofone hundred fifty million dollars ($150,000,000)to the 14 department for grant~for stormwater flood management projects 15 that reduce flood damage and provide other benefits,including 16 groundwater recharge,water quality improvement,and ecosystem 17 restoration.Not less than one hundred million dollars 18 ($100,000,000)ofthis amount shall be available for projects that 19 address immediate public health and safety needs,strengthen 20 existing flood control facilities to address seismic safety issues. 21 Twenty million dollars ($20,000,000)shall be available for local 22 agencies to meet immediate water quality needs related to 23 combined municipal sewer and stormwater systems to prevent 24 sewage discharges into state waters.Twenty million dollars 25 ($20,000,000)shall be available for stormwater flood protection 26 projects in the northern San Francisco Bay area and Marin County 27 for the purposes of protecting public safety and property from 28 flood events. 29 (b)Of the funds made available pursuant to Division 43 30 (commencing with Section 75001)ofthe Public Resources Code, 31 the sum of four hundred seven million four hundred thousand 32 dollars ($407,400,000)is hereby appropriated as follows: 33 (1)Pursuant to Section 75022 of the Public Resources Code, 34 the sum of fifty million dollars ($50,000,000)to the State 35 Department of Public Health for grants for small community 36 drinking water system infrastructure improvements and related 37 action to meet safe drinking water standards.First priority for these 38 funds shall be given to disadvantaged or severely disadvantaged 39 communities lacking resources to provide safe drinking water to 40 residents.Small community drinking water systems that are SB 1 -6- 1 dependent on surface water and are under orders from the State 2 Department ofPublic Health to boil water from existing treatment 3 systems for parasites,viruses,or giardia shall be eligible for grants 4 for drinking water system infrastructure improvements. 5 (2)Pursuant to Section 75025 of the Public Resources Code, 6 the sum of fifty million four hundred thousand dollars 7 ($50,400,000)to the State Department ofPublic Health for grants 8 for projects to prevent or reduce the contamination ofgroundwater 9 that serves as a source of drinking water.Funds appropriated by 10 this paragraph shall be available for immediate projects needed to 11 protect public health by preventing or reducing the contamination 12 ofgroundwater that serves as a major source ofdrinking water for 13 a community. 14 (A)The State Department of Public Health shall prioritize 15 project funding based on the following criteria: 16 (i)The threat posed by groundwater contamination to the 17 affected community's overall drinking water supplies,including 18 the need for the treatment or construction of alternative supplies 19 ifgroundwater is not available due to contamination..' 20 (ii)The potential for groundwater contamination to spread and 21 reduce drinking water supply and water storage capacity for major 22 population areas. 23 (iii)The potential ofthe project,iffully implemented,to enhance 24 local water supply reliability. 25 (iv)The potential of the project to increase opportunities for 26 groundwater recharge and optimization ofgroundwater supplies. 27 (B)The State Department ofPublic Health shall give additional 28 consideration to projects that meet any ofthe following criteria: 29 (i)The project is implemented pursuant to a comprehensive 30 basinwide groundwater quality management and remediation plan 31 or is necessary to develop a comprehensive groundwater plan. 32 (ii)Affected groundwater provides a local supply that,if 33 contaminated,will require the importation ofadditional water from 34 the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta or the Colorado River. 35 (iii)The project will serve an economically disadvantaged 36 community. 37 (iv)Multiple contaminants affect more than one-third of the 38 well capacity ofa local water system. 39 (C)Of the funds appropriated by this paragraph,two million 40 dollars ($2,000,000)shall be allocated to the State Department of -7-SB 1 1 Public Health to contract with the State Water Resources Control 2 Board for the purposes of Section 83002.5. 3 (3)Pursuant to Section 75026 of the Public Resources Code, 4 the sum offorty million dollars ($40,000,000)to the department 5 for administrative costs,planning grants,and local groundwater 6 assistance grants. 7 (4)Pursuant to subdivision (d)of Section 75029 of the Public 8 Resources Code,the sum offifty million dollars ($50,000,000)to 9 the department for projects that relocate existing Sacramento-San 10 Joaquin Delta water intake facilities and that meet all of the 11 following criteria: 12 (A)Have completed documentation required under the 13 California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 (commencing 14 with Section 21000)of the Public Resources Code)and a notice 15 ofdetermination has been filed prior to June 30,2007. 16 (B)Have demonstrated multiple benefits in the environmental 17 documentation,including a net benefit to delta pelagic fisheries 18 and drinking water quality improvement. 19 (C)Are able to complete design and,if the project involves 20 construction,commence construction within the 2007-08 fiscal 21 year. 22 (D)Have local and federal cost sharing. 23 (5)Pursuant to Section 75033 of the Public Resources Code, 24 the sum of one hundred sixty million dollars ($160,000,000)to 25 the department as follows: 26 (A)Sixty million dollars ($60,000,000)to increase the 27 department's ability to respond to levee breaches and to reduce 28 the potential for levee failure,including,but not limited to,the 29 following: 30 (i)Acquisition and positioning of emergency construction 31 materials and equipment. 32 (ii)Emergency projects to prevent levee failure or repair levees 33 or other flood control facilities to restore conveyance and flood 34 protection. 35 (iii)Preparation for,and implementation of,a delta emergency 36 operations plan. 37 (iv)Emergency contracts for activities relating to a flood fight 38 or levee failure to prevent or mitigate loss of,or damage to,life, 39 health,property,or essential public services. SB 1 -8- 1 (B)One hundred million dollars ($100,000,000)for the 2 acquisition,preservation,protection,and restoration of 3 Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta islands.Projects shall be selected 4 to improve the stability of the delta levee system,reduce 5 subsidence,and assist in restoring the ecosystem of the delta. 6 Priority shall be given to projects that improve conditions for delta 7 smelt and other native fish.Eligible projects include,but are not 8 limited to,all of the following: 9 (i)Suisun Marsh tidal marsh restoration. 10 (ii)Dutch Slough tidal marsh restoration. 11 (iii)Decker Island restoration. 12 (iv)Exotic species control. 13 (6)Pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 75041)of 14 Division 43 ofthe Public Resources Code,the sum offorty-seven 15 million dollars ($47,000,000)to the department as follows: 16 (A)(i)Twelve million dollars ($12,000,000)to complete the 17 planning and feasibility studies associated with new surface storage 18 under the California Bay-Delta Program. 19 (ii)The planning and feasibility studies shall inClude the 20 following information: 21 (I)The identification of specific construction and operation 22 conditions proposed for each surface storage facility,including 23 consideration of climate change,an estimated schedule for the 24 construction and completion ofeach project funded under Section 25 75041,and the total costs ofconstructing each project. 26 (II)A description ofthe estimated total costs to construct each 27 project and an allocation of the costs to public and private 28 beneficiaries. 29 (iii)Any feasibility study conducted by or funded by the state 30 for new surface storage under the California Bay-Delta Program 31 shall evaluate funded projects consistent with all statutory and 32 other legally established requirements for protection of 33 environmental and natural resources,including protections for the 34 McCloud River pursuant to Section 5093.542 of the Public 35 Resources Code. 36 (iv)The feasibility studies shall be prepared and submitted to 37 the Governor and the Legislature no later than December 31,2008. 38 (B)(i)Fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000)for planning and 39 feasibility studies to identify potential options for the reoperation 40 of the state's flood protection and water supply systems that will -9-SB 1 1 optimize the use of existing facilities and groundwater storage 2 capacity. 3 (ii)The studies shall incorporate appropriate climate change 4 scenarios and be designed to determine the potential to achieve 5 the following objectives: 6 (I)Integration offlood protection and water supply systems to 7 increase water supply reliability and flood protection,improve 8 water quality,and provide for ecosystem protection and restoration. 9 (II)Reoperation ofexisting reservoirs,flood facilities,and other 10 water facilities in conjunction with groundwater storage to improve 11 water supply reliability,flood control,and ecosystem protection 12 and to reduce groundwater overdraft. 13 (III)Promotion ofmore effective groundwater management and 14 protection and great~r integration ofgroundwater and surface water 15 resource uses. 16 (IV)Improvement of existing water conveyance systems to 17 increase water supply reliability,improve water quality,expand 18 flood protection,and protect and restore ecosystems. 19 (C)Ten million dollars ($10,000,000)to update the·California 20 Water Plan,including evaluation of climate change impacts,the 21 development ofstrategies to adapt to climate change impacts,and 22 the identification ofstrategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 23 related to the storage,conveyance,and distribution ofwater. 24 (D)Ten million dollars ($10,000,000)for planning and 25 feasibility studies for projects to reduce ecosystem conflicts in the 26 Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.The department shall commence 27 these studies by January 1,2008. 28 (7)Ofthe funds made available pursuant to subdivision (i)of 29 Section 75050 of the Public Resources Code ten million dollars 30 ($10,000,000)is appropriated to the State Coastal Conservancy 31 for projects on the Santa Ana River. 32 (c)Ofthe funds made available pursuant to subdivision (a)of 33 Section 79550 of the Public Resources Code,the sum of three 34 million four hundred ninety thousand dollars ($3,490,000)is hereby 35 appropriated to the department for planning and feasibility studies 36 associated with surface storage under the California Bay-Delta 37 Program. 38 83002.5.To improve understanding of the causes of 39 groundwater contamination,identify potential solutions and 40 funding sources to clean up or treat groundwater,and ensure the SB 1 -10- 1 provision ofsafe drinking water to all communities,the State Water 2 Resources Control Board,in consultation with other agencies as 3 specified in this section,shall develop pilot projects in the Tulare 4 Lake Basin and the Salinas Valley that focus on nitrate 5 contamination and do all ofthe following: 6 (a)(1)In collaboration with relevant agencies and utilizing 7 existing data,including groundwater ambient monitoring and 8 assessment results along with the collection of new information 9 as needed,do all of the following: 10 (A)Identify sources,by category ofdischarger,ofgroundwater 11 contamination due to nitrates in the pilot project basins. 12 (B)Estimate proportionate contributions to groundwater 13 contamination by source and category ofdischarger. 14 (C)Identify and analyze options within the board's current 15 authority to reduce current nitrate levels and prevent continuing 16 nitrate contamination of these basins and estimate the costs 17 associated with exercising existing authority. 18 (2)In collaboration with the State Department ofPublic Health, 19 do all of the following:. 20 (A)Identify methods and costs associated with the treatment 21 of nitrate contaminated groundwater for use as drinking water. 22 (B)Identify methods and costs to provide an alternative water 23 supply to groundwater reliant communities in each pilot project 24 basin. 25 (3)Identify all potential funding sources to provide resources 26 for the cleanup ofnitrates,groundwater treatment for nitrates,and 27 the provision of alternative drinking water supply,including,but 28 not limited to,state bond funding,federal funds,water rates,and 29 fees or fines on polluters. 30 (4)Develop recommendations for developing a groundwater 31 cleanup program for the Central Valley Water Quality Control 32 Region and the Central Coast Water Quality Control Region based 33 upon pilot project results. 34 (b)Create an interagency task force,as needed,to oversee the 35 pilot projects and develop recommendations for the Legislature. 36 The interagency task force may include the board,the State 37 Department ofPublic Health,the Department ofToxic Substances 38 Control,the California Environmental Protection Agency,the 39 Department ofWater Resources,local public health officials,the -11-SB 1 1 Department of Food and Agriculture,and the Department of 2 Pesticide Regulation. 3 (c)Submit a report to the Legislature on the scope and findings 4 ofthepilotprojects,including recommendations,within two years 5 ofreceiving funding. 6 (d)Implement recommendations in the Central Coast Water 7 Quality Control Region and the Central Valley Water Quality 8 Control Region pursuant to paragraph (4)ofsubdivision (a)within 9 two years ofsubmitting the report described in subdivision (c)to 10 the Legislature. 11 83002.6.Up to 5 percent of the funds appropriated by this 12 division may be expended to pay the costs incurred in the 13 administration ofthat program. 14 83002.7.Funds appropriated by this division shall only be 15 available for encumbrance until June 30,2009.On January 10, 16 2008,any program that is the recipient of an appropriation made 17 by this division shall report to the fiscal committees of the 18 Legislature on the details of all committed and anticipated 19 expenditures of these funds.The report shall include'all of the 20 following information: 21 (a)Fiscal detail ofstate operations support and local assistance 22 costs. 23 (b)A general description ofthe project and the project funding 24 made available by an appropriation in the annual Budget Act for 25 the 2007-08 fiscal year or proposed to be made available in the 26 annual Budget Act for the 2008-09 fiscal year. 27 (c)A description of the manner in which funds have been 28 expended and a plan for the future expenditure offunds. 29 (d)An anticipated timeframe for the full expenditure of the 30 appropriation. 31 (e)An anticipated timeframe for the full completion of the 32 designated project. 33 (f)The amount oftotal matching project funding that is being 34 provided by an entity other than the state. 35 83003.The Legislature further finds and declares the following: 36 (a)At the November 7,2006,statewide general election,the 37 voters approved nine billion five hundred thousand dollars 38 ($9,000,500,000)in general obligation bonding authority to 39 improve flood protection,water supply reliability,water quality, 40 fish and wildlife,parks and open space,and othernatural resources. SB 1 -12- 1 This is in addition to the eleven billion one hundred thousand 2 dollars ($11,000,100,000)previously authorized by the voters 3 since 1996 for similar uses. 4 (b)The Legislative Analyst reports that at the end of the 5 2006-07 fiscal year,more than one billion two hundred thousand 6 dollars ($1,000,200,000)ofthe previously authorized eleven billion 7 one hundred thousand dollars ($11,000,100,000)will not have 8 been appropriated or otherwise committed for voter-approved uses. 9 (c)The proceeds ofbonds approved by the voters ofthe state 10 for water and natural resources should be appropriated and 11 expended for those uses,as directed by the voters. o 99 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis ISENATE RULES COMMITTEE IOffice of Senate Floor Analyses 11020 N Street,Suite 524 1(916)651-1520 Fax:(916) 1327-4478 THIRD READING Page lof9 ATTACHMENT C SB 1xxi II II Bill No: Author: Amended: Vote: SB 1XX Perata (D),et al As introduced 21 Water quality,flood control,water storage, SENATE NATURAL RES.&WATER COMMITTEE ._._--~---~._~~-_._..~_.~-----------~._---------.----- AYES:Steinberg,Kehoe,Kuehl,Machado, NOES:Hollingsworth NO VOTE RECORDED:Margett,Cogdill SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE SUBJECT ----_._~-_. and wildlife preservation 5-1,10/08/07 Migden Not available SOURCE Author _~IGE~~This bill appropriates a total of $610.89 M from Propositions 50,1E,and 84,for a variety of purposes. ANALYSIS_.._._----- Existing law: Propositions 50,1E,and 84 authorized a total of $12.918 B in general obligation bonds,as follows: IPropositi IBallol Amount IFunded Programs CONTINUED SB 1XX http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_000l-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_105141_se...7/17/2008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis Page 2 on t ---------+-----+---------+---------------------------------- 50 111/021 $3.44 B IWater Security,Safe Drinking 1 1 IWater,Clean Water &Water I 1 1Quality,Contaminant &Salt 1 1 IRemoval Technology,CALFED 1 I IBay-Delta Program,Integrated 1 I IRegional Water Management, 1 I IColorado River,&Coastal I 1 IWatershed &Wetland Protection. I 1 1 ---------+-----+---------+---------------------------------- 1E 111/061$4.090 B ILevees,Weirs,Bypasses &State ·1 I IPlan of Flood Control Facilities,I 1 IState Costs of Flood Control & I 1 IFlood Prevention Projects, 1 1 1Protection,Reaction And 1 I IEnhancement of Flood Protection 1 1 1Corridors .'&Bypasses,Stormwater 1 1 IManagement Projects. 1 I 1 1 1 1---------+-----+---------+----------------------------------1 I 84 1 11/06 1$5.388 B ISafe Drinking Water &Water 1 I 1 IQuality,Flood Control,Statewide I 1 1 IWater Planning,Protection Of I 1 I IRivers,Lakes &Streams,Forest &I 1 I IWildlife Conservation,Protection 1 I I IOf Beaches,Bays,&Coastal 1 I 1 IWater,Park &Nature Education 1IIIFacilities,&Sustainable I 1 I ICommunities &Climate Change I 1 1 IReduction.I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 ----------------------------------------------------------- This bill appropriates a total of $610.89 M from Propositions 50,1E,and 84,for a variety of purposes. The proposed appropriations are: ------------------------------------------------------------ IProposition 50 I Page 20f9 3 SB 1XX --~---- Page 1--------+-------------------------------------------------__1 1$3.49 M IComplete CalFed surface storage studies.1 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_10514 Lse...7/17/2008 Iimprovements.Disadvantaged or severely Idisadvantaged communities lacking resources to Iprovide safe drinking water to residents have Ifirst priority to the funds. SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis Iproposition 1E I I 1--------+--------------------------------------------------- 1$50.0 M IFlood emergency preparedness. I I 1--------+--------------------------------------------------- 150.0 M Istormwater flood management projects: I--------+---------------------------------------------------I $lOO+MAddress immediate public health and I safety needs and strengthen existing flood I control facilities to address seismic I.safety issues. I--------+---------------------------------------------------I $20 MMeet immediate water quality needs I related to combined municipal sewer and I stormwater systems to prevent sewage I discharges. I --------+---------------------------------------------------I $20 MStormwater flood protection projects inIthenorthernSanFranciscoBayareaand I Marin County. I I 1--------+--------------------------------------------------- 1$200.0 ITotal Proposition 1E 1M I I I Iproposition 84 I 1 I 1--------+---------------------------------------------------1 1$50.0 M ISmall community drinking water system I SB 1XX----~.- Page 4 II III I I 1--------+---------------------------------------------------1 150.4 M IPrevent/reduce groundwater contamination that I Page 3 of9 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_10514 Lse...711712008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis laffects drinking water sources.Establishes Icriteria for prioritizing funds.Establishes and Ifunds two pilot projects in the Tulare Lake Basin land the Salinas Valley to focus on nitrate Icontamination. 1 I1--------+--------------------------------------------------- 40.0 M IRegional water planning and local groundwater Iassistance. I--------+--------------------------------------------------- 50.0 M IRelocates existing Delta water intake facilities Ithat meet specified criteria. I--------+--------------------------------------------------- 160.0 M IFlood control projects in the Delta: I 1--------+~--------------------------------------------------1 I $60 MIncrease the Department of Water I I Resources'(DWR's)ability to respond to I I levee breaches and reduce the potential for I I levee failure.1 I I I1--------+---------------------------------------------------1 I I $100 MAcquire,preserve,protect,and restore I I I Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta islands.I I I Specifies eligible projects.I I I I1--------+---------------------------------------------------1 112.0 M ICompletes CalFed surface storage studies.IIISpecifiesthattheplanningandfeasibilityI I I studies are to identify the specific construction I 1 land operation conditions of the projects and the 1Ilestimatedtotalcoststoconstructeachproject,I I land be submitted to the Governor and the IIILegislaturenolaterthan12/31/08.I I I I fJ SB 1XX--~------- Page 5 --------+--------------------------------------------------- 15.0 M IStudy options for reoperating the state's flood Iprotection and water supply systems to optimize Ithe use of existing facilities and groundwater Istorage capacity.Specifies that the studies Ishall incorporate appropriate climate change Iscenarios,and requires that the studies be Idesigned to determine the potential to achieve Ispecific objectives. I--------+--------------------------------------------------- 10.0 M IUpdating the California Water Plan,including Page 4 of9 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_10514Lse...7/1712008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis levaluation of climate change impacts,the Idevelopment of strategies to adapt to climate Ichange impacts,and the identification of Istrategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions Irelated to the storage,conveyance,and Idistribution of water. I--------+--------------------------------------------------- 10.0 M IPlanning and feasibility studies for projects to Ireduce ecosystem conflicts in the Delta.Requires IDWR to begin these studies by 1/1/08. I--------+--------------------------------------------------- 10.0 M ISanta Ana River Parkway projects. I--------+--------------------------------------------------- $407.4 ITotal Proposition 84 M I·I In addition,the bill: Page 5 of9 A.The value of the water to the economy, environment,and overall well-being of the state. 1.Makes numerous findings and declarations regarding such things as: 6 B.The challenges facing the state in managing water due to climate change,uncertainty regarding the availability of water from the Delta and other SB 1XX.-~-------_.- Page sources,an increase in state population,limitations on public funds,and other factors. c.The need to adopt a new,updated,and comprehensive set of water planning,design,and implementation policies. D.Missed opportunities to manage our water more efficiently and to make our supplies more reliable. E.The need to require integrating flood protection and water systems to achieve multiple benefits. 2.Makes a number of additional findings about the amount of voter approved debt for water resources related bonds and the amount of unexpended bond funds still available for appropriation. hUp:llinfo.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_105141_se...7/17/2008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis 3.Provides that funds appropriated by this bill shall only be available for encumbrance until June 30,2009. 4.Requires that on January 10,2008,any program that is the recipient of an appropriation made by this bill shall report to the fiscal committees of the Legislature specific details of all committed and anticipated expenditures of these funds. 5.Allows up to five percent of the appropriated funds to pay the costs incurred in the administration of that program. Page 6 of9 FISCAL EFFECT______0 ••••__ Local:No Appropriation:Yes Fiscal Com.:Yes According to the Senate Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Impact (in thousands) ~~j()J:'__~:L_Q"J~j._c:>ns 2009-10 Fund----.-._~---------- Delta:emergency prep. BondI Stormwater flood Bond2 7 2007-08 $110,000 $150,000 2008-09 SB 1XX---.__._---------- Page management projects Drinking water programs $100,400 Bond3 SWRCB:groundwater unknown,likely >$10,000 GF/BF4 cleanup program (cost pressure) Local groundwater assistance $40,000 Bond3 Delta:water quality $50,000 Bond3 Delta:flood control $100,000 Bond3 planning/feasibility studies:$47,000 Bond3 water supply,conveyance, flood control systems SCC:Santa Ana Parkway $10,000 Bond3 planning/feasibility studies:$3,490 BondS surface water storage Debt service:increased payment $38,762$38,762 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_Lcfa_20071009_105141_se...7/17/2008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis Genera16 1The Disaster Preparedness and Flood Prevention Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 1E),and The Safe Drinking Water,Water Quality and Supply,Flood Control,River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (Proposition 84) 2Proposition 1E 3Proposition 84 4Unknown 5Water Security Clean Drinking Water,Coastal and Beach Protection Act of 2002 (Proposition 50) 6Assumes a 30-year bond sold at 4.783 percent interest and 3 percent inflation. Page 7 of9 SUPPORT (Verified 10/9/07) Association of California Water Agencies Audubon California Big Sur Land Trust Butte Environmental Council California Coastal Coalition California Council of Land Trusts [j SB 1XX-__0_".---'.'- Page 8 California League of Conservation Voters California Native Plant Society California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation California Sportfishing Protection Alliance California Trout California Water Association California Water Impact Network California Watershed Network City of Los Angeles Clean Water Action Community Water Center Contra Costa Water District Defenders of Wildlife East Bay Municipal Utility District Environmental Defense Environmental Entrepreneurs Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Environmental Water Caucus Federation of Fly Fishers Forest Issues Group Friends of the River Friends of the Trinity River High Sierra Rural Alliance League of Women Voters of California Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Marin Municipal Water District Metropolitan Water District of Southern California http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_000l-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_105141_se...711712008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis Mountain Lion Foundation Natural Resources Defense Council Planning and Conservation League Restore the Delta Sierra Foothills Audubon Society Sierra Nevada Alliance The Nature Conservancy TreePeople Truckee River Watershed Council Tulare Basin Wildlife PartnersPeople Tuolumne River Trust Urban Creeks Council Winnemem Wintu Tribe Page 8 of9 OPPOSITION (Verified 10/9/07) Department of Water Resources SB 1XX--.._-_.._"--- Page 9 Friant Water Authority Valley Ag Water Coalition _1\B:(~UME:!'I'rS I~§lJ1?PQB:T Supporters point out all of the important activities that would be funded by this bill. About 60 percent of the funds appropriated in this bill are for flood protection related activities,and another 15-20 percent are for projects that protect or improve drinking water quality.The bill also funds completing the CalFed surface storage feasibility studies and environmental documents,improving regional water planning and groundwater management,and restoring critical environmental resources. __ARQUMEN'I'S_:r.~__Q~Q~I'!'IQ!'I_While acknowledging that the bill funds worthwhile actions,DWR opposes the bill because it is not part of a "comprehensive approach to addressing California's water needs,which must include surface storage as a component to address future impacts on water availably due to climate change and population." Other opponents raise concerns with the appropriateness of specific appropriations or conditions: 1.Studying options for reoperating the state's flood protection and water supply systems. 2.Requirements of the CalFed surface storage studies. 3.Pilot projects in the Tulare Lake Basin and the Salinas Valley to focus on nitrate contamination. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_10514Lse...7/1712008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Bill Analysis 4.Flood emergency preparedness. 5.Regional water planning and local groundwater assistance. Page 9 of9 CTW:nl 10/9/07 Senate Floor Analyses SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:SEE ABOVE ****END **** http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_OOO1-0050/sbx2_1_cfa_20071009_1 05141_se...7/17/2008 SBX2 1 Senate Bill,2nd Ext.Session -Vote Information UNOFFICIAL BALLOT MEASURE:SBX2 1 AUTHOR:Perata TOPIC:Water quality,flood control,water storage, DATE:01/07/2008 LOCATION:SEN.FLOOR MOTION:Senate 3rd Reading SB1 Perata (AYES 23.NOES 11.)(PASS) AYES **** Page 1 of 1 Alquist Calderon Cedillo Correa Ducheny Florez Kehoe Kuehl Lowenthal Machado Negrete McLeod Oropeza Padilla Romero Scott Simitian Torlakson Wiggins Yee NOES **** Corbett Migden Perata Steinberg Aanestad Ackerman Ashburn Battin Cogdill Cox Denham Dutton Harman Hollingsworth McClintock ABSENT,ABSTAINING,OR NOT VOTING ********************************* Maldonado Margett Ridley-Thomas Vincent Wyland Runner http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/billlsen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_1_vote_20080107_0258PM_...7/17/2008 SBX2 1 Assembly BILL,2nd Extraordinary Session -Status CURRENT BILL STATUS MEASURE:S.B.No.1 (2nd Ex.Sess.) AUTHOR(S)Perata,Machado,and Steinberg. TOPIC Water quality,flood control,water storage,and wildlife preservation. HOUSE LOCATION ASM TYPE OF BILL : Active Non-Urgency Appropriations Majority Vote Required Non-State-Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non-Tax Levy LAST HIST.ACT.DATE:OS/29/2008 LAST HIST.ACTION To Com.on WATER. COMM.LOCATION ASM WATER Page 1 of 1 TITLE An act to add Division 33 (commencing with Section 83000)to the Water Code,relating to water,and making an appropriation therefor. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx2_1_bill_20080529_status.html 7/17/2008 ATTACHMENT D.•.....'•...."..,....-.":,. ·-i:'-..".:.'. May 23,2008 Mr.Lester Snow Director Department ofWater Resources P.O.Box 942836 Sacramento,CA 94236 Subject:Delta Ne?r-Term/Emergency Response Actions Dear Lester: The California Urban Water Agencies (CUWA)Board has adopted a list ofnear-tenn/emergency response actions that should be implemented within 24'months to reduce flood risks,provide fisheries benefits,improve water supply reliability,and improve water quality.The enclosed CUWA Position Paper describes these actions.A long-tenn solution for the Delta will take many years to implement;however,with the declining fish populations,seismic and flooding risks,and the current umeliable nature of the Delta as a source of drinking water for more than 23 million people,we cannot afford to wait for the long-tenn solution.We must immediately begin to implement near-term/emergency response actions. The CUWA Board has identified the following four high priority projects.Weare prepared to work with the Department of Water Resources (DWR)to identify implementation and funding mechanisms that win allow these projects to proceed and be completed within 24 months. Franks Tract-Middle River Corridor/Two Barrier Pilot Project -This pilot project involves testing two temporary barriers at two locations to partially isolate Middle River and Old River near Franks Tract.The temporary barriers would be tested together with preventive flow control actions and possibly modified Delta Cross Channel operations to maintain positive San Joaquin River outflow and reduce smelt and salmon migration toward the export pumps.Modeling studies have shown this project could provide equivalent or better protection for delta smelt compared to the December 2007 Federal Court delta smelt decision,while reducing \,later supply costs.The project will include monitoring the effect ofthese barriers on delta smelt,salmon,and other fish species of interest.This project has the potential to provide immediate benefits and will also provide data needed to evaluate dual conveyance as the long-term solution. Franks Tract/Three Mile Slough -Franks Tract project alternatives will potentially reduce Delta salinity intrusion in the fall,reduce the water supply impacts resulting from the Federal Court decision,and provide protection for delta smelt.DWR is currently evaluating several alternative barriers around Franks Tract and plans to have a certified Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIRJEIS)by May 2010.We urge you to accelerate the pace of this study and to conduct a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of the Three Mile Slough barrier in the next two years. CA 95814 916.552.2929 San Francisco Public Utilities Commission City of San Diego Water Department Santa Clara Vailey Water District 455 Capitol Mail,Suite 705,Sacramento, City of Sacramento Alameda County Water District San Diego County Water Authority Metropolitan Water District ol SOuthern California FAX 916.552.2931 Zone 7 Water Agency Contra Costa Water District East Bay Municipal Utility District Los Angeles Department of Water 8<Power Demonstration Fish Protection Screen at Clifton Court Forebay -Bond funding is available for a demonstration screen at Clifton Court Forebay.The pilot study will include monitoring data on the screen's effectiveness in reducing entrainment and predation losses in Clifton Court Forebay. Levee and Conveyance Improvements -Bond funding is available faT improvements to levees and to build new intakes and improve water supply aqueducts crossing the Delta that will improve water supply reliability;recently constructed interties expand the pool of beneficiaries from these improvements.Funding available in Proposition IE should be allocated to improve south Delta levees vital to the protection of critical infrastructure.To achieve improvements expeditiously,advance funding commitments are needed under agreements with an agency capable ofcarrying out the work in a timely manner. The CUWA Position Paper includes a number of other actions we believe should be implemented in the near-term.Some of the projects that CUWA believes should be implemented quickly,such as the alternative intake fbr Contra Costa Water District and stockpiling of materials to deal with a Delta emergency are already proceeding at a fast pace. Many important ecosystem restoration projects that would provide critical habitat for delta smelt and salmon species are being evaluated by DWR.The schedules for these projects need to be accelerated. CUWA's recommendations are consistent with the recommendations proposed by the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan and Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force.We urge you to consider our recommendations for near-term actions.We would like to meet with you to discuss how CUWA can assist DWR in moving quickly to implement the projects identified in our Position Paper. Sincerely, ~//?U·~·O~ Paul Piraino Chair,CUWA Board of Representatives CALIFORJ."IfIA URBAN WATER AGENCIES POSITION PAPER REGARDING DELTA NEAR-TERM/EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIONS POSITION CUWA will assume a leadership role in advancing near-term/emergency response actions that can provide ecosystem,water quality and water supply reliability benefits in the next two years. There are projects identified for immediate implementation that would reconcile competing interests,improve alld preserve all beneficial uses of the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta (Delta) and address critical issues in a timely manner.These projects also lay a foundation for any ofthe long-term visions for the Delta. BACKGROUND The crashing populations ofdelta smelt and other species;the Federal Court delta smelt decision reducing statewide water supplies;and the lack of preparedness for a highly probable seismic, flood,or other event that will disrupt water supplies for an extended period have amplified the need for action to emergency levels. IDENTIFICATION OF NEAR-TERl\1/EMERGENCY ACTIONS Actions have been identified that require immediate implementation to protect the Delta.These projects can be built within 24 months and will immediately reduce flood risks;provide benefits for fisheries,water supplies,and water quality;and offer a solution to future water reductions. To qualifY as near-term/emergency response projects,each must produce results within the next two years and meet the following criteria: •Have a certified Environmental Impact Report (ElR)or the ability to obtain complete environmental documentation within six to eight months (e.g.,Operations,Criteria,and Plan (OCAP]process,Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP1,agency partnerships,etc.); •Have permits in place or the ability to obtain all necessary permits within six to eight months; •Have funding through existing bonds,authorizations or local matches; •Have construction completed and begin operating within 24 months. The following is a list ofemergency response actions that address the critical Delta issues.All of these projects have funding in place,can begin construction over the next year and can produce results in the next two years.These projects will bring over $500 million of construction combined,creating over 10,000 new jobs.Implementing these near-term/emergency response projects does not foreclose or promote any future scenario for the Delta;rather they would make the decisions easier by providing science-based evidence of what works and what doesn't in improving Delta sustainability. I.Flood and Levee Failure/Emergency Preparedness •Freshwater flows in the Delta must be protected and quickly restored after a major emergency such as a seismic event or flood.Protection of the transportation corridors,aqueducts,gas pipelines,and railroads,and restoration of freshwater flows is essential.Stockpiling materials for repairs and channel barriers at key locations in the Delta will allow protection ofcritical infrastructure corridors (includillgHighway 4,aqueducts,gas pipelines,and railroads)and timely restoration of a freshwater pathway to export facilities.This would reduce the effects of salt water intrusion and water curtailments to the 23 million Califomians dependent on the Delta for water.Costs are approximately $70 to $80 million and funding is available from voter approved Proposition 84. •Allocate $10 million from Proposition 84 for improvements to water supply aqueducts that cross at least 10 miles of the Delta.This funding is for design and construction of interties among water supply aqueducts,such that lifeline water supplies may be maintained in the event of levee failure while repairs are made. •Reduce the potential for levee failure by improving the level of flood protection afforded by various levees in the south Delta vital to the protection of water supply reliability,key transportation routes,gas and electric utility lines,agricultural lands, and south Delta water channels for fish,wildlife and recreation.The cost of these improvements is $120 million consisting of $100 million from Proposition IE and $20 million in local matching funds.To achieve improvements expeditiously authorize advance funding commitments for this work under agreements with an agency capable ofcarrying out the work in a timely manner.Levees to be improved to provide added protection to water supply infrastructure include: o Lower Roberts Island o Lower Jones Tract o Upper Jones Tract o Woodward Island o Palm-Orwood Tract II.Franks Tract Delta Quality and Smelt Recovery Pilot Projects:Middle River Corridor/Two BarrierPilot Project and Three-Mile Slough Barrier Alternative •The objective ofthese Delta pilot projects near Franks Tract is to provide equivalent or better protection for Delta smelt as compared to the December 2007 Federal Court decision,while reducing water supply costs to the State Water Project (SWP) and Central Valley Project (CVP),and protecting Delta water quality in the near- term. 2 •The Middle River Corridor/Two Barrier Pilot Project at Franks Tract includes testing the installation of two temporary barriers in the central Delta together with preventive flow control actions and modified Delta Cross Channel operations to maintain positive San Joaquin River outflow and impede smelt migration toward export pumps.Implementation of the pilot project will include monitoring the effect ofthe actions on delta smelt,all races ofsalmon and steelhead and other fish species ofinterest •Preliminary modeling studies have shown that the two barrier option,together with flow control actions,to maintain positive net flow on the San Joaquin River could potentially provide protection for delta smelt equivalent to the Federal Court delta smelt decision,while reducing the water supply impacts and Delta water quality degradation resulting from implementation ofthe court decision. • A pilot project that includes two temporary barriers is estimated to cost $40 million. •The Department of Water Resources (DWR)Franks Tract project altematives (Three Mile Slough barrier and False River barrier)would potentially reduce Delta salinity intmsion in the fall,reduce the water supply impacts resulting from the Federal Court delta smelt decision,and provide protection for delta smelt.DWR should accelerate the Franks Tract/Three Mile Slough barrier project and include a near-tenn pilot project to test the Three Mile Slough barrier. III.Alternative Intake for Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) This CCWD water quality project provides Delta fishery benefits by reducing Delta diversions in the fish sensitive period from January through June,increasing screened diversion capacity and by allowing operational flexibility in pumping locations when sensitive fish species are present in the Delta. •The altemative intake would protect water quality during emergencies by providing a separate intake to provide fresh,safe drinking water when other Delta intakes are impacted by crisis situations and unable to operate. •The additional intake improves water quality for CCWD's 550,000 customers and improves water supply reliability for up to 6 million Bay Area residents through existing,permitted interties with other Bay Area water agencies.It would allow wheeling of high quality water through existing interties to Bay Area agencies to relieve drought or regulatory shortages. •CCWD has begun construction.The total cost for this project is estimated at $110 million,$60 million pledged by CCWD and $50 million earmarked in voter approved Proposition 84 funding. 3 \ I t "~ IV.Demonstration Fish Protection Screen at Clifton Court Forebay •This project would reduce entrainment and predation losses of salmon,steelhead, and delta smelt in Clifton Court Forebay and at the Banks Pumping Plant with capacity ofnot less than 500 cubic feet per second. •It would provide for monitoring to determine the screen's effectiveness in reducing entrainment,salvage and predation ofaquatic species. •It could also be used to evaluate the effectiveness of project implementation under partner~hip agreements. V.Ecosystem Habitat Improvements •Decker Island -Decker Island,in the western Delta,is composed of old dredged spoils and,unlike other Delta islands,is several feet above sea level.Material from Decker Island should be excavated and used to reinforce levees on nearby Delta islands such as Sherman and Jersey.Excavation of Decker Island could result in approximately 400 acres of restored tidal marsh along the main migration corridor for juvenile salmon and Sacramento splittail -two native species thought to benefit most from tidal marsh restoration.Thus,this project could contribute material to address Delta stability issues and create new habitat.Over 400,000 cubic yards of material was removed from thirty acres on the island and restored to tidal marsh and riparian habitat.The 473 acre parcel on the island was sold last July for approximately $9 million.The new owners have not disclosed their intentions for the island. •Dutch Slough -The Dutch Slough site offers an opportunity for large-scale tidal marsh restoration,habitat enhancement and open space preservation in eastern Contra Costa County.The project is being implemented collaboratively by DWR, the Califomia Bay Delta Authority,the California State Coastal Conservancy,and the City of Oakley. The 1,200 acre Dutch Slough site was acquired by DWR in 2003.DWR and its partners have completed a restoration plan that is desi.gned both to restore habitat and generate information about how best to restore Delta habitat in the future. Information gained could be invaluable for long-term Delta management.The project is ready for implementation.DWR has completed an administrative draft EIR and is expected to release the draft EIR in the near future,as discussed in the Public Policy Institute ofCalifornia (PPIC)report (p.82). •MeiJls Landillg ill Suisun ltfarsh -Meins Landing is a DWR restoration project being funded by the Delta Levee Program and the Suisun Marsh Preservation Agreement State/Federal interests.In 2005,680 acres of land for tidal restoration was purchased to meet Suisun Marsh Plan goals,provide Assembly Bill 360 net habitat enhancement and offset impacts of levee projects on Van Sickle Island. 4 Preliminary modeling by DWR indicates that the Meins landing project may reduce salinity in the interior of the Delta. Suisun Marsh has largely been managed as non-tidal seasonal wetlands for waterfowl and other birds.Levees and gates prevent tidal inundation of large areas ofmanaged wetlands.Restoration ofbrackish tidal marsh would improve habitat for native fish in an area where they are less vulnerable to the Delta pumps.Brackish marsh restoration would reduce habitat for waterfowl,but these losses could be more then offset by creating and promoting managed freshwater marshes and wildlife friendly agriculture on central and western Delta Islands and in the Yolo Bypass. Unlike much of the central and western Delta,elevations in Suisun Marsh general1y anow immediate restoration of tidal marsh habitat.Restoration could start immediately at the Meins Landing site purchased by DWR for that purpose. Agencies should proceed with restoration planning for the Suisun Marsh,as discussed in the PPIC report (pp.79,182). •Restore Floodplain Habitat and Salmon Migration Through the Yolo Bypass - Authorize construction of fish passage and'flow control facilities at the Fremont Weir.Inundation of the Yolo Bypass provides excellent rearing habitat for juvenile salmon and splittail and critical spawning habitat for the splittail.Presently the bypass is only inundated once every three years on average and sometimes goes for four to five years without inundation.Increasing the frequency of inundation on even a small portion ofthe bypass could substantially improve conditions for splittail and salmon by increasing food availability.Salmon growth and survival have been greater when they pass through the bypass rather than traveling down the Sacramento River.Providing these flows would require notching or gating the Fremont Weir to allow a controlled inflow ofwater into the bypass in years when the stage of the Sacramento River is below the crest of the weir.The goal would be to create inundated floodplain habitat on a publicly owned portion of the bypass -not privately owned land.Modification ofthe Fremont Weir could also allow improved fish migration through the bypass,permitting juvenile salmon to bypass the Delta Cross Channel and other hazards associated with migrating through the Delta. Pennanent modifications to Fremont Weir would cost $10 to $30 million and a temporary pilot project would cost about $2 mi11ion.This restoration effort will also analyze the relocation of diversions in the southern Yolo Bypass/Cache Slough region to reduce aquatic ecosystem impacts.This project has been extensively studied by DWR and is caned for by the PPIC report (p.79)and the CALFED Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan. 5 Editorial:New water bond?Fir... ••• .......''. ,..'!'.t:. '..,..•.: ~J';'$i,;~~io8eo This story Is taken from Sacbee I Opinion. ~~••_va••~•••O&~••••~_••••••_~~~.¥_~ow_v••••__~_.~.'I ~u••__h ", "-__-.-.~••_•••••__• Editorial:New water bond?First,spend existing billions Proposition 84 funds should be the first choice for improving state water supplies Published 1.2:00 am PDT Wednesday,July 1.6,2008 Following the driest spring in recorded history,California faces a water challenge of epic dimensions. Reservoirs are low.Hundreds of fires have ravaged dozens of watersheds.Salmon,smelt and other fish are in trouble,adding to the complexity of moving water through the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta. Under pressure from worried farmers and business leaders,Gov.Arnold Schwarzenegger and U.S.Sen.Dianne Feinstein last week unveiled their latest multibillion-dollar bond proposal to finance water projects and river restoration efforts.This latest plan Is an improvement over previous versions,reducing the total debt down to $9.7 billion and creating a more level playing field for water Investments of all types. But before state leaders restart discussion on new water bonds,they should take full advantage of bonds that voters already have approved.In 2006,voters passed Proposition 84,a $5.4 billion bond initiative that included billions of dollars for water projects and watershed protection.To date,lawmakers have appropriated only $2.8 billion of those funds, leaving billions that could be spent immediately. What Is holding up that investment? Schwarzenegger bears much of the responsibility.Last year,he vetoed a bill by Senate leader Don Perata that would have appropriated unspent funds from Proposition 84 and other water bonds,includIng Proposition 50 In 2002 and Proposition 13 in 2000.At the time,the governor wanted Perata's help in advancing a water bond to build reservoirs,so he vetoed the appropriations bill in a naked attempt to apply pressure on the Senate leader. That gambit dIdn't work,and one year later,the state's water problems have worsened.So this week,Perata and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass came back with a new bill that would allocat~$812 million in past bond funds for water supply,conservation and flood control projects. Of this money,$50 million would go to cleaning up groundwater basins,an essential source I[ I! II I I~I Ii I http://www.sacbee.comlllO/v-print/story/l 085494.html 7/17/2008 Editorial:New water bond?Fir...Page 2 of2 of supply in Southern California.$200 million would go to integrated water management, including regional efforts to share supplies and reduce water waste.Nearly $200 million would go into efforts to restore the Delta,Improve water quality and help water districts avoid impacts on fish.More than $15 million would go toward studies of new reservoir projects. While critics say they are tired of spending state money on studIes of reservoirs,there's no getting around these reviews.No reservoir project will get permits,or approval from taxpayers,If the state can't say how much water will result,what It will cost,who will benefit and what the environmental impacts will be. Indeed,if Schwarzenegger had signed last year's legislation,he and the state would be one step closer toward getting those answers. The governor and FeinsteIn deserve credit for noting the urgency of a shrinking Sierra snowpack and working to secure a long-term response. But in twisting arms to get a water bond passed,they shouldn't be takIng hostages.Water bond monies approved by voters deserve to be spent now,before a calamity turns into a crisis. Go to:Sacbee /Back to story This article is protected by copyright and should not be printed or distributed for anythIng except personal use, The Sacramento Bee,2100 Q St"P,O.Box 15n9,Sacramento,CA 95852 Phone:(9I6)321-1000 i I r"1 f http://www.sacbee.coro/l10/v-print/story/1085494.html 7/17/2008 } II I[ I!I~i AGENDA ITEM 7a STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING:Regular Board MEETING DATE:August 6,2008 SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY: (Chief) David Charles~ Public Services manager Rod posad~~~ Chief,Engineering PROJECT:D0526- 010287 DIV.NO.5 APPROVED BY: (Asst GM) SUBJECT: Manny Magana Assistant General Manager,Engineering and Operations Adopt Resolution No.4128 Requesting Terms and Conditions for the Sycuan Annexation of APN 516-040-01 for Water Services GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No.4128 of the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District (Otay)requesting formal terms and conditions from the San Diego County Water Authority (CWA)and Metropolitan Water District (MWD)for the concurrent annexation of certain real property (referred to herein as the Original Sycuan Reservation)owned by the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation (Sycuan)to said Agencies (see Exhibit A for project location). COMMITTEE ACTION: Please see Attachment A. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Resolution is to obtain terms and conditions from CWA and MWD for the proposed concurrent annexation of the Original Sycuan Reservation to Otay,CWA and MWD. ANALYSIS: Sycuan submitted to Otay a written request and petition for annexation,signed by Daniel J.Tucker,Sycuan Tribal Chairman, on behalf of Sycuan and dated April 11,2008 (Petition). Through the Petition,Sycuan requests Otay to commence annexation proceedings for the Original Sycuan Reservation to have access to water and sewer service,and certain other parcels owned by Sycuan (the Group B Parcels)to have access to sewer services only.Water service is made available by Otay near the geographical area of the parcels through Improvement District No.20.Sewer service is made available through Improvement District No.18. The Original Sycuan Reservation encompasses an area covering approximately 634 acres of developed and undeveloped land and has no entitlement to water or sewer service from any other local agency.Sycuan currently uses well water to supply all its water needs and wishes to annex to Otay to provide an alternative source of water to reduce its dependency on well water and to possibly prevent the depletion of several wells in the area.If the concurrent annexation of the Original Sycuan Reservation is accomplished,Sycuan will install,at its cost, all required facilities to connect to the Otay water system through a master meter. The annexation of the Original Sycuan Reservation,which is outside Otay1s sphere of influence,will have to be processed and approved through the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO),the San Diego County Water Authority (CWA),and Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Dexter Wilson Engineering,Inc.(Dexter Wilson)is working with Sycuan to prepare all documentat ion required for annexation of the Original Sycuan Reservation,through LAFCO,to Otay and its concurrent annexation to CWA and MWD.Although Dexter Wilson has not finalized and is not ready to submit the application package required by LAFCO,it has requested that Otay adopt and submit a resolution to obtain terms and conditions for the concurrent annexation of the original Sycuan Reservation to Otay,CWA,and MWD. Dexter Wilson has also requested that annexation of the Original Sycuan Reservation and Group B Parcels for sewer service only be considered separately at a later date.A LAFCO reorganization will be required for the Group B Parcels,which are within Padre Dam service area and consist of approximately 575 acres.This means that,for sewer service only,these parcels would have to be deannexed from Padre Dam and annexed to Otay Water District Improvement District No.18.Since the annexation of the Group B Parcels to Otay will not require annexation to CWA or MWD,and since the petitioner is not ready to proceed with that portion of the Petition,Otay has agreed to process that portion of the Petition separately at a later date. 2 Finally,Dexter Wilson has requested that the annexation of the Original Sycuan Reservation to Otay for sewer service also be considered at a later date because the needs analysis for sewer service is not yet complete.The annexation of Group B Parcels and the Original Sycuan Reservation for sewer service would require the approval or waiver of other local agencies,including possibly the waiver of Policy 1-107 by the County of San Diego. Further information concerning these proposed annexations will be presented to this Board as it becomes available. Sycuan has indicated their commitment to a goal by working toward projects that will offset the projected 400 acre-feet per year subject to approval by the Otay Water District Board of Directors and the Sycuan Tribal Council.The 400 acre feet required by this annexation will be offset and,thus,will not require an increase of imported water delivery to Otay.The specifics of the offsets are indicated in the Master Plan Water Report dated July 15,2008, by Dexter Wilson,which include the Middle Sweetwater River Groundwater and Sweetwater Basin Recycled Water Project. Dexter Wilson prepared and submitted a Sub Area Master Plan (SAMP) dated June 2008 at the request of the Sycuan Tribal Chairman. Staff conducted a review of the SAMP which provided an engineering evaluation of the water needs of the existing development (consisting of approximately 40 single family dwellings,a casino, an administration building,tribal offices,a medical center,and a fire department)to analyze the feasibility of providing domestic water service and fire flow to the site.The SAMP has determined that the water requirements of the Original Sycuan Reservation will be approximately 400 acre-feet per year. A projected need of incorporated into the Water Management Plan. 392 acre-feet per year for Sycuan was San Diego County Water Authority 2005 Urban it will pay capacity facilities,and will It is anticipated that if Sycuan is annexed, fees,will install and construct the required pay for water service when such is provided. FISCAL IMPACT:~ None is anticipated at this time.Sycuan has paid all processing fees required by Otay and will be responsible for all other applicable fees and costs relating to the annexation.If the annexation is approved,District staff will calculate anticipated fiscal impacts,including the annexation fee and capacity fee for the unique circumstances of this annexation. 3 STRATEGIC GOAL: Provide water service to meet customer needs. LEGAL IMPACT: None at this time. General Manager p:\public-s\STAFF REPORTS\200B\BD 8-6-08 -Staff Report,Concurrent Annexation Sycuan to CWA MWD,(DC-RP).doc Attachments:Attachment A Exhibit A Y:\Board\CurBdPkg\FINANCE\BD 8-6-08 -Staff Rpt for Concurrent Annexation Sycuan to CWA MWD.doc 4 SUBJECT/PROJECT: ATTACHMENT A Adopt Resolution No.4128 Requesting Terms and Conditions for the Sycuan Annexation of APN 516-040-01 .......Do526- 010287 "'f or Wat e r Se r vi ce s....................1 COMMITTEE ACTION: The Finance,Administration,and Communications Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 21,2008.The following comments were made: • • Staff indicated that staff is requ"esting that the board adopt Resolution No.4128 to request formal terms and conditions from CWA and MWD for the concurrent annexation of the Original Sycuan Reservation to Otay,CWA and MWD. The reservation is currently on well water.The wells are becoming depleted and Sycuan is looking to secure a more reliable source of water.They currently have eight (8) active wells. •The reservation is approximately 634 acres.Current water needs is 250 acre feet (AF)per year with a projected need of 400 AF per year. • • The reservation is outside the District's sphere of influence and must be annexed through LAFCO,CWA and MWD.A Sub-Area Master Plan (SAMP)has been prepared and submitted by Sycuan's consultant,Dexter Wilson.Staff has reviewed the SAMP and Sycuan has indicated their commitment to projects,subject to the approval of the District's board and Sycuan's Tribal Council,that will offset their 400 AF/year water needs. The committee discussed possible offsets which may include the Middle Sweetwater River Groundwater Replenishment Project and the Sweetwater Basin Recycled Water Project wherein the District has an approximate 1,500 AF claim.There may also be opportunities for the District to team up with Sycuan on the North District Project and Otay Mesa for other offset possibilities. • • • • • • • It was discussed that staff has a high level of confidence that 400 AF is accurate based on staff's review of the buildings,family dwellings,etc.planned for the reservation. It was noted that the District has worked with Dexter Wilson on other SAMP and Hydrology projects.They are also involved in the Resort project in East Chula Vista and the District has a good relationship with Dexter Wilson.Their staff is very familiar with Otay's system and it is a well recognized firm in San Diego. The reservation is also requesting sewer services for the Original Sycuan Reservation.They have requested,however, that the sewer annexation be considered separately at a later date along with a parcel of land within the Padre Dam service area which will require a reorganization through LAFCO. It was discussed that the Districi's sewer service line ends on Dehesa Road approximately one (1)mile east of the Dehesa Road and Willow Glen Drive intersection,and the water line ends in front of the Dehesa Elementary School located at 4612 Dehesa Road.Sycuan will construct and pay for all required facilities to connect to the District's water and sewer facilities on Dehesa Road. Staff noted that no new facilities will be required to provide water or sewer services to Sycuan.The District's facilities were designed and sized to serve Sycuan and to accommodate service to developments that never occurred in the early 1990's.The Committee asked which tank would serve Sycuan. Staff indicated that the Singing Hills reservoir,located at 2568 Pence Drive (803-3 Reservoir),would serve Sycuan.It was also noted that Sycuan has an existing reservoir tank which will be utilized for their water service needs.The District will work with Sycuan on a peaking agreement for this reservoir. Water and Sewer services will only be for the benefit of tribal lands. The committee inquired if the Annexation was to occur and the water and sewer lines were to be constructed,if there was a mechanism for other neighboring property owners to also hook up to the system.Staff replied that it could be possible and that there typically would be a reimbursement procedure for such an event as per Policy 26 of the District's Code of Ordinances. •The reservation also has a treatment plant for reclaimed water.Reclaimed water is used for irrigation,toilets in reservation buildings and their cooling towers. •The Committee looked at an aerial photo of the Sycuan property where the location of both their water tank and treatment plant was located. The committee supported staffs'recommendation and presentation to the full board as an action item. t.:~:i:~iI. J-14330 EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION TO GTAY WATER DISTRICT,SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY,&METROPOLITAN WATER DISfRICT Parcel"A II All ofSection 13,in Township 16 South,Range 1 East,San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego,State of California,according to the Official Plat thereof file in the County Recorder of said County. Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 13,Township 16 South,Range 1 East,San Bernardino Meridian;. 1)thence North 89°57'32"East 2608.26 feet along the North line of said Section; 2)thence South 89°49'21"East 2618.92 feet continuing along said North line; 3)thence South 01°31'25"East 2582.00 feet along the East line of said Section; 4)thence South 00°50'52"East 2552.79 feet continuing along said East line 5)thence South 89°03'14"West 2628.11 feet along the South line of said Section; 6)thence South 88°29'23"West 2751.75 feet continuing along said South line; 7)thence North 00°08'38"East 2614.61 feet along the West line of said Section; 8)thence North 00°49'58"East 2641.44 feet along said West line to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing 633.75 acres,more or less. ~~21~1/ Patrick A.McMichael,L.S.6187 Jb/14330_PdA_annex to otaymwd.006 589"03'14'W 2628J1' (COURSE 5) ~~iL~'~~" PATRICK A.McMICHAEL.LS 6187 DATE ~~~jj"D@1M '11~ (COURSE 2) 589"49'21"£2618.92' 633.750 ACRES .~~©iJD@[NJ 'iI~ iJ 'iI®~,[ffi '11 ~ ~.rn3.IMi]. P.D.B. (COURSE 1 ) N89"57'32'E 2608.26' N.W.COR.SEC.13 -N- 1000 SOO 0 !i SCALE 11&;::1000' RICK ENOINEElUNO COMPANY OTAY WATER DISTRICT ANNEXATION OF ALL OF SECTION 13 OF TOWNSHIP 16 SOUTH,RANGE 1 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN,IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA COORDINATESt---t----t~--------___I RiLUWBK'S rIP MAP NO. t--t----lf------------fIICOIlDING DATB --------1FsiSCALE:§fu~.:.:..------. t---t----tI------------IarAY W.o.IlIlBD NO.-----"1DA:~IE:~==_--_I t---;t-----f----1IMP.IIST.NO.~____I~DRA:~:wN~..!!.BY~:-__:_---_I REV.DA'IE DESCRIP110N W.O.NO.: :!CHI.v-2COI 01.35 RESOLUTION NO.4128 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT REQUESTING FORMAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FROM THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY AND METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT FOR THE CONCURRENT ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO SAID AGENCIES (APN 560-040-01)(Water -Sycuan D0526) WHEREAS,the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation ("Sycuan") to the Otay Water the District desires provisions of the Reorganization Act of Section 56000 of the the annexation (the owned by Sycuan to the has submitted a request for annexation District (District)and pursuant thereto, to initiate proceedings under the Cortese/Knox/Hertzberg Local Government 2000,Division 3,commencing wiJ:h California Government Code,.for "Annexation")of certain real property service area of the Otay Water District. WHEREAS,the proposed change of organization includes the following jurisdictional change(s): •Concurrent annexation of the real property to the Otay Water District,the San Diego County Water Authority and the Metropolitan Water District. WHEREAS,the purpose of this proposed annexation is to provide water service to the territory to be annexed. WHEREAS,the territory subject to the proposed Annexation is inhabited in part and uninhabited in part,and a legal description of the territory is set forth in Exhibit A,attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (the "Annexation Territory");and WHEREAS,it is in the interest of the Otay Water District to obtain formal terms and conditions from the San Diego County Water Authority and the Metropolitan Water District for the concurrent annexation of said territory to those agencies and to the Otay Water District,and WHEREAS,the Otay Water District requests that the proposed annexation be subject to the following terms and conditions: 1.The Owner of the Annexation Area shall pay to the Otay Water District all reorganization and processing fees. Page 1 of 3 2. 3. 4 . The Owner of the Annexation Area shall pay all fees of the San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission including,but not limited to,fees of the State Board of Equalization. The Owner of the Annexation Area shall complete and submit to the Otay Water District,the application package required by LAFCO to process the Annexation,together with all documents required therefore. The owner of the annexation Area shall pay to San Diego County Water District all annexation and processing fees. j;I! 5.The Owner of the Annexation Area shall pay to Metropolitan Water District all annexation and processing fees. 6.Upon annexation to Otay Water District,Owner shall install,at its sole cost and expense, all water and fire protection facilities as may be required by Otay Water District and no water service shall be provided to the Annexation Area until such facilities are installed and accepted by Otay Water District and all applicable terms of service are fulfilled. Any improvements to existing facilities and/or new facilities and works required to connect,or expand connections,to the County Water Authority system and/or the Metropolitan Water District system shall be provided at the cost of the annexed territory.Annexation to the County Water Authority shall be in compliance with the Act and annexation to the Metropolitan Water District shall not conflict with Division III,Annexations,of the Metropolitan Water District Administrative Code. 7.Owner shall obtain and transfer to Otay Water District,at no cost to Otay Water District, easements and rights-of-way for any facilities necessary to service the Annexation Area. Page 2 of 3 Water service by Annexation Area accordance with Otay. 8.Otay Water District to shall be subject to and the rules and regulations the in of NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,DETERMINED AND ORDERED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT THAT: Section 1 The terms and conditions set forth on the recitals to this Resolution are hereby approved and this Resolution Requesting Formal Terms and Conditions is hereby adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District. Section 2 Each,the San Diego County Water Authority and the Metropolitan Water District is hereby requested to determine and establish formal terms and conditions for the concurrent annexation to said agencies and to'Otay Water District of the territory as described in Exhibit A. Section 3 The General Manager,General Counsel and District Secretary are hereby ordered and requested to forward this Resolution to all necessary parties and to take all actions required to give full effect to the intent of this Resolution. PASSED,APPROVED,AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District at a regular meeting thereof held on August 6,2008,by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: President ATTEST: secretary Page 3 of 3 )-14330 EXHIBIT "A" ANNEXATION TO DTAY WATER DISTRICT,SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY,&METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT Parcel"A II All of Section 13,in Township 16 South,Range 1 East,San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego,State of California,according to the Official Plat thereof file in the County Recorder of said County. Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section13,Township 16 South,Range 1 East,San Bernardino Meridian;. 1)thence North 89°57'32"East 2608.26 feet along the North line of said Section; 2)thence South 89°49'21"East 2618.92 feet continuing along said North line; 3)thence South 01°31'25"East 2582.00 feet along the East line of said Section; 4)thence South 00°50'52"East 2552.79 feet continuing along said East line 5)thence South 89°03'14"West 2628.11 feet along the South line of said Section; 6)thence South 88°29'23"West 2751.75 feet continuing along said South line; 7)thence North 00°08138"East 2614.61 feet along the West line of said Section; 8)thence N9rth 00°49'58"East 2641.44 feet along said West line to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing 633.75 acres,more or less. ~~21~V Patrick A.McMichael,L.S.6187 Jb/14330_PcIA_annex to otaymwd.006 S89"03'14'W 2628J1' (COURSE 5) ~~iLS'~3tP~' PATRICK A.McMICHAEL.LS 6187 DATE ~~~irD@[N]'iJ~ (COURSE 2) 589"49'21"E 2618.92' 633.750 ACRES ..~~~liD@1Nl 'iJ~ If 'iJ®~,~'iJ ~ @.~.[M]. P.D.B. (COURSE 1 ) N89"57'32'E 2608.26' N.W.COR.SEC.13 -N- 1000 500 0 !I SCALE 1"=1000' RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY OTAY WATER DISTRICT ANNEXAnON OF ALL OF SECTION 13 OF TOWNSHIP 16 SOUTH,RANGE 1 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN,IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA COORDINATESt----t---t------------1RECORDER'S F/P ______-tiMAP~~N~O.~======I1---i--i-----1RllCORDING DAm:::SCALE: t----t---t------------1 0TAY W.O.DEHD NO.-----~D~'1L~TE~:-=-===----1 1---i--i--IIMP.DIST.No.~D~RA:~WN~B2.!Y:i....:-1 REV.DATE DESCRIPTION W.O.NO.: MI \d_1 4272\14330_owdwtr_onnx01.dO"30-MAY-2008 09_35 SYCUAN SEWER ANNEXATION MAP _..~-- -N------·- I SCAL-£:,.-2000' ___--..:----tj/i$1'!~jC ~oewA1J.iW[r~¢ONtl~~f"-. D(lSTING NAY WATf;ROISTRicr· ......"...,,......,,.../PROPOSED·OWO SEWER ~. SERVICE A~EA Bd,VNOARY : rOTAYWATER [)ISTRICT~ '-.'.--. \\pAClFlC\OWG\8Z1004\LAI'CO\F'GUR£2.0WG 04-I0-08 10,OS,21 LAYOVT,WI ._---------- AGENDA ITEM 7b 5TAFF REPORT MEETING DATE:August 6,2008TYPEMEETING:Regular Board SUBMITTED BY:Lisa Coburn-Boyd o:(C8 Environmental Compliance Specialist PROJECT:P2009,P2038-DIV.NO.5 001101 APPROVED BY: (Chief) APPROVED BY: (Asst.GM) SUBJECT: Ron Ripperger ~ Engineering Manager Rod posad~i)s~ Chief,Engineering Manny Maga~--Jnt.A -:..J Assistant General ~nager of Engineering and Operations Adoption of a Miticated Negative Declaration for the Jamacha Road 36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline and 12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline Replacement Project GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the Otay Water District (District)Board approve the adoption of a Re-circulated Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)for the Jamacha Road 36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline and 12- Inch Potable Water Pipeline Replacement Project.(See Exhibit A for project location.) COMMITTEE ACTION: Please see Attachment A. PURPOSE: To obtain Board authorization for approval of the Re-circulated Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)for the Jamacha Road 36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline and 12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline Replacement Projects. ANALYSIS: The IS/MND for the project first went out for public notice on October 18,2007.The IS/MND actually covers two pipeline projects that are considered jointly as the "project"since they share the same project site.The project description included in the original IS/MND is described in the following four paragraphs. The Jamacha Road 36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline consists of the construction of a 36-inch cement mortar lined and coated steel pipeline which will transfer water from the Otay 14 Flow Control Facility (FCF),located at 290 South Third Street in the City of EI Cajon to the District's 640-1 and 640-2 Reservoirs at the District's Regulatory Site located in Rancho San Diego.The pipeline is approximately five miles in length and will provide the District with a water supply of 12 million gallons per day of on-peak capacity and 16 MGD of off-peak capacity from the Helix Levy Water Treatment Plant.This pipeline will provide the District with the infrastructure needed to transport sufficient potable water to sustain a minimum of ten continuous days outage during emergencies. This pipeline also enhances reliability,flexibility,and security for the District by providing access to alternate raw water supply sources. The pipeline has an alignment that terminates at the northeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Third Street (adjacent to the Otay 14 FCF)in EI Cajon and then heads south within the right-of-way (ROW)of Third Street before heading west within the ROW of East Washington Avenue. The pipeline then heads south onto Jamacha Road and follows the ROW of Jamacha Road before heading west within the ROW of Brabham Street and then south in the ROW of Via Rancho San Diego.The pipeline then travels southwest on Fury Lane,before heading southwesterly as it passes through the Southern boundary of Cuyamaca College before terminating at the District's Regulatory Site. The construction of the this pipeline project consists primarily of trench and backfill activities.The construction along Jamacha Road may occur during the day or night depending on traffic conditions. Intermittent blasting is required along portions of the pipeline outside the ROW of area roadways where bedrock is encountered, specifically along the southern boundary of Cuyamaca Community College between Fury Lane and the District's Regulatory site.The construction will also involve microtunneling along this same portion of the project site.The construction will be confined to a 50-foot corridor for all disturbed areas outside of the ROW of area roadways and will include revegetation.The construction of this 36-inch pipeline is expected to be completed within two years. The Jamacha Road 12-Inch Pipeline Project is the replacement of approximately 3,450 feet of concrete cylinder pipe with 12-inch polyvinyl chloride pipe along Jamacha Road,between Hidden Mesa Road and Hillsdale Road.The replacement of this section of pipeline is necessary because the existing pipeline segment is severely corroded due to fluctuations in the high water table in this area.The 2 If:Ii ii " ,:I ' Ii ti replacement work will take place in the existing ROW of Jamacha Road and does not expand the capacity of the existing system. On October 5,2006,the District's General Manager signed a contract with Infrastructure Engineering Corporation (IEC)to perform the engineering design and environmental services for this project.IEC hired HDR,Inc.(HDR)as a subconsultant to perform the environmental services for the project.These environmental services include the preparation of an IS/MND to satisfy the conditions of CEQA.HDR completed the IS and draft MND.These documents have concluded that the project,with proper mitigation measures in place,as outlined ln the final IS/MND (See Attachment B),will not have a significant effect on the environment. After the circulation of the IS/MND,but prior to its adoption, issues arose during final design that caused the District to consider two alternative alignments for CIP P2009 that would bypass the portion of the project that travels 400 linear feet through East Washington Avenue (Exhibit B).A description of the two alternative alignments is as follows: Alternative 2:From the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Third Street,CIP P2009 would head east within the ROW of Lexington Avenue for approximately 715 feet before heading south within the ROW of Dichter Street for approximately 1,215 feet and then east in the ROW of Dumar Avenue for approximately 750 feet.CIP P2009 then heads south within the ROW of Waterloo Avenue for approximately 2,550 feet and then west onto Gustavo Street for approximately 1,765 feet until it reaches the intersection of Gustavo Street and Jamacha Road.From this point on Jamacha Road CIP P2009 follows the original alignment. Alternative 4:From the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Third Street,CIP P2009 would head south within the ROW of Third Street for approximately 1,215 feet before heading west within the ROW of Dumar Avenue for 480 feet and then southwest on Aladdin Lane for approximately 315 feet.From Aladdin Lane the pipeline would head southeast on Jamacha Road for approximately 425 feet before reaching the East Washington Avenue intersection.This alternative proposes an underground crossing of East Washington Avenue for a distance of approximately 50 feet before continuing south on Jamacha Road following the original alignment. An analysis of the environmental impacts of the proposed modifications to the alignment of CIP P2009 are included in the revision to the original IS/MND.This analysis concludes that there will not be any new environmental impacts due to the changes and that no additional mitigation is required. 3 The amended IS/MND was re-circulated for a 30-day period beginning on June 2 and ending on July I,2008.One comment letter was received from the Native American Heritage Commission and HDR has incorporated the letter and their response into the final re-circulated IS/MND. It should be noted that another alternative alignment may ultimately be chosen over the two alternatives discussed in the revised MND.For example,an alignment that follows Third Avenue along the original alignment to Dumar Ave.and then turns east on Dumar where it then follows the Alternative 2 alignment,has also been identified as an alternative alignment.In this case,the environmental impacts are the same as all of the other alignments and the mitigation measures would be identical.Therefore,there would not be any revisions to the MND and no additional Board action would be necessary.Though it is not a requirement under CEQA,in order to be a good neighbor,the District will send a notice (see Attachment C)to the homeowners along the portion of the alignment that was not previously identified in the revised MND,describing the project and informing them of the hearing for the adoPti~MND. FISCAL IMPACT:~ None. STRATEGIC GOAL: This project supports the District's strategic goal of designing and constructing new infrastructure and to satisfy current and future water needs for Potable,Recycled,and Wastewater Services. LEGAL IMPACT: No legal impact is anticipated.However,in compliance with the CEQA process,the Final MND will have the normal 30-day legal challenge period once the Notice of Determination (NOD)is recorded with the County of San Diego.The NOD will be recorded within five (5) wo~a~ardadoption of the MND. G~neral Manager P:\WORKING\CIP P2D09 36-inch PL -FCF 14 to Reg Site\staff Reports\BD 08-06-08,CIP P2009 &P2038 Re-circulated IS-MND Adoption.doc Ii LC-B/RR/RP:jf Attachments:Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Exhibit A Exhibit B 4 ATTACHMENT A I .1 Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the .Jamacha Road 36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline and 12-Inch t Potable Water Pipeline Replacement Project 1 SUBJECT/PROJECT: I P2009,P2038- 001101 I .. COMMITTEE ACTION: The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22,2008.The following comments were made: •Staff indicated that this Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)includes two projects:the Jamacha Road 36-inch potable water pipeline (P2009)and the 12-inch potable water pipeline replacement (P2038). •The 12-inch potable water pipeline replacement project has a Notice of Exemption (NOE)but is included in the MND because it is a component of the overall project. •The MND address environmental impacts such as air quality, biological resources,noise,hazards and hazardous materials and traffic control. ~Hazards and hazardous materials are included due to old gas stations within the City of EI Cajon where the tanks may have leaked and contaminated the soil. ~Air quality encompasses control of dust and dirt debris surrounding the construction site. ~Noise levels will be monitored to determine if barriers need to be constructed. ~A transportation and traffic control plan will be put in place and flyers will be mailed as a community outreach effort to notify the community of construction and traffic delays. 5 • A habitat conservation plan has been submitted to Fish and Wildlife Services.This required a separate permit so was not included in the MND. •Issues arose during the design phase of the 36-inch pipeline alignment through the City of EI Cajon. Alternative alignments were proposed.Because of these alternative alignments,an amendment was made to the MND. However,no new environmental impacts were found and no additional mitigation was necessary.The MND was then recirculated to the State Clearninghouse and 13 agencies and also published in the Union Tribune.Only one comment was received from the Native American Heritage Commission. •Another alternate alignment was identified for a segment of the pipeline.HDR confirmed that this segment conforms to the other alternative alignment?Homeowners in the area that might be affected by the construction work were notified.Staff indicated that once the project is under construction,the District will initiate more community outreach. Following the discussion,the committee supported staffs' recommendations and presentation to the full board as an action item. ATTACHMENT B A copy of the MND on CD can be provided upon request.Please contact Lisa Coburn- Boyd in the Engineering Department at Otay Water District at 619-670-2219 to obtain a copy. ATTACHMENT C Important Notice Capital Improvement Project CIP P2009:Jamacha Road 36-lnch Potable Water Pipeline CIP P2038:12-lnch Potable Water Pipeline Replacement Project Summary: The Board of Directors of the Otay Water District (OWD)will be considering adoption of a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for two capital improvement projects.The first project,CIP P2009,is the installation of a 36-inch potable (drinking)water pipeline from Flow Control Facility (FCF)#14 located at 290 South Third Street in the City of EI Cajon to the OWD's Regulatory Reservoir complex located in Rancho San Diego.The second project,CIP P2038,is the replacement of a 12-inch potable water pipeline located along Jamacha Road south of Avocado Ranch Road. A public hearing to consider and adopt the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration will be held on August 6,2008 at the headquarters of the Otay Water District.The draft Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for public review at the OWD offices located at 2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard,Spring Valley,CA 91978.The draft Mitigated Negative Declaration has been circulated for public review. Detail: CIP P2009 and P2038 propose the construction and/or replacement of potable water pipelines from Otay 14 FCF facility,located at 290 S.Third Street in the City of EI Cajon,to the OWD's 640-1 and 640-2 reservoirs at the OWD Regulatory Site,located in Rancho San Diego. Implementation of the projects would provide the OWD with the infrastructure needed to provide sufficient water to sustain a minimum of ten-day continuous outage for use during emergencies (e.g.,providing adequate fire flows,bolstering storage,and ensuring sufficient emergency supplies). For more information: Please contact Lisa COburn-Boyd,Environmental Compliance Specialist,at (619)670-2219 for more information. About Otay Water District: The Otay Water District was founded in 1956 to serve as a public water utility.The district distributes water to more than 191,500 ratepayers within approximately 125.5 square miles of southeastern San Diego County,including the communities of Jamul,La Presa,Rancho San Diego,Spring Valley,eastern Chula Vista,Otay Mesa and unincorporated communities adjacent to southern EI Cajon and La Mesa. cc:City of EI Cajon County Supervisor Dianne Jacob , EXHIBIT A P2009 36-INCH PIPELINE,SDCWA FCF NO.14 TO REGULATORY SITE IMPERIAL BEACH OTAV e\-ISHE:O OTAY WATER DISTRICT 41°~ 008N"'-<DN"'-III I-oa. ::::&« o...r..:N P2009 NOT TO SCALE OTAY WATER DISTRICT 36-INCH PIPELINE,SDCWA FCF NO.14 TO REGULATORY SITE ALIGNMENTS AT JAMACHA ROAD AND WASHINGTON AVENUE OTAY eng N Q. Q. 9-(:lziii:0::~./a:...-=--* .....0Q. ::I< l'Il'l IiiN- /Xlg N"-CD ,.N"-CD ~'tlN> /Xl IMPERIAL0BEACHICDN I CD EXHIBIT B Mitigated Negative Declaration Adoption Jamacha Road 36...inch Potable Water Pipeline (P2009) & 12 ...inch Potable Water Pipeline Replacement (P2038) August 2008 Project Description •Two projects (P2009 &P2038)are included intheMND •P2009 is the 36--inch pipeline Rroject that begins at the Otay 14 FCF in El Cajon and travels to the OWD Regulatory site •P2038 is the replacement of concrete cylinder pipe with PVC pipe along]amacha Rd. •P2038 has a NOE but is included in the MND because it is a component of the overall project Environmental Impacts Requiring Mitigation •Air Quality •Biological Resources •Hazards and Hazardou's Materials •Noise • T ransportation/Traffic ~I.(Draft MND Public Review •Draft Initial Study/MND was sent to the State Clearinghouse in October 2007 and distributed to 13 agencies •One comment letter received from Native American Heritage Commission ~----".~ignment Modifications Proposed ~~'~~_A~ •During the design phase,issues arose concerning the 36/inch pipeline alignment through the City of El Cajon •Several alternative alignments through this area were proposed Ilt~~ft..~\ >0 Amended IS/MND •The alternative alignments are described in an amendment to the original MND •The environmental impacts of the alternative alignments were analyzed •No new significant environmental impacts were identified •No additional mitigation necessary Amended MND Recirculated •Amended IS/MND was sent to the State Clearinghouse on October 2007 and distributed to 13 agencies •Notice of the availability of the Amended IS/MND was published in the San Diego Union Tribune •One comment letter received from Native American Heritage Commission "'4!'~"!iI'.."'j,;,;&la.ditional Alignment Alternative • A segment of a possible alternative alignment (Alt.2a)was not identified in the Amended IS/MND •This segment substantially conforms to the other alternative alignments •Homeowners that might be directly impacted were notified with a flyer from the District i\doption of the Final MND •The Board to consider adoption of the final MND on August 6,2008 •Within 5 days of adoption,the Notice of Determination will be filed •30 days after filing,the statute of limitations for legal challenges from those agencies or individuals that commented on theMND concludes Questions? AGENDA ITEM 7c STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE:August 6,2008 5DIV.NO.P2009-001102PROJECT: Regular Boa~1? Ron Gruno4C~ Sr.Civil Engineer Ron Ripperger ~ Engineering Manager Rod posada~~ Chief,Engineering ~::~~t:~~~~~~rof Engineering and Operations APPROVED BY: (Ass!.GM) APPROVED BY: (Chief) SUBMITTED BY: TYPE MEETING: SUBJECT:Award of a Professional Engineering Design Services Contract for the Completion of the Design of the 36-Inch Pipeline, SDCWA Otay FCF No.14 to the Regulatory Site Project GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the Otay Water District ("District")Board 1)waive Policy 21,of the District Code of Ordinances,2)award a professional engineering design services contract to Lee &Ro,Inc.(Lee & Ro),and 3)authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with Lee &Ro in an amount not to exceed $769,000 (see Exhibit A for the project location). COMMITTEE ACTION: Please see Attachment A. PURPOSE: To obtain Board approval to waive Policy 21 for this contract and to authorize the General Manager to enter into a professional engineering services agreement with Lee &Ro for the completion of the design of the 36-Inch Pipeline,SDCWA Otay FCF No.14 to the Regulatory Site project ("Project"),in an amount not to exceed $769,000. ANALYSIS: In accordance with District Code of Ordinances Policy No.21, staff recommended to the Board at its October 4,2006 meeting that Infrastructure Engineering Corporation ("IEC")receive a contract for providing professional design and miscellaneous services for the subject project.The Board,acting on staff's recommendation,subsequently awarded a contract on October 4, 2006 and the General Manager entered into a contract with IEC on October 5,2006. IEC proceeded with the design and environmental services for the project and in September 2007,a Value Engineering Workshop was conducted by Harris &Associates to review IEC's draft 60% project design submittal.The purpose of the workshop was to determine what improvements could be made to the design to improve the project and reduce future construction costs.One of the items,(13.2)included in the 'Value Engineering Report, suggested that the 60%designed alignment within Jamacha Road, between Granite Hills Drive and Washington Avenue,should be re- evaluated due to the number of bends,traffic flow,and compliance with the City's requirements.Re-routing the pipeline out of the busy intersection of Jamacha Road and Washington Avenue would avoid a variety of items such as, contaminated water,contaminated soils,and congested utilities. In November 2007,staff reviewed the Value Engineering Workshop's comments and compared it with the 60%design submittal.Because of the discussion that took place in the workshop regarding Item 13.2 for the Granite Hills -Washington Avenue reach,staff requested that IEC and RBF Consulting review an alternate alignment (see Exhibit B for Alternative 2/2a)and see how it compared with the 60%design submittal.Based on the information contained in those reports and assertions from IEC that an alternate alignment was not feasible because of hydraulic losses and excessive costs,staff continued supporting the concept that the 60%designed alignment was still the best alignment,as far as cost and schedule. In January 2008,the City of El Cajon ("City")responded in a meeting to IEC that the City had strong concerns about the 60% design submittal pipeline alignment going through the busy and congested Jamacha Road/Washington Avenue corridor ("Corridor"). In early February 2008,during a follow-up meeting that included District staff,the City reiterated their concerns.As a result of the repeated concerns raised by the City,the District formed a Focus Group to study the proposed alignment through the Corridor.The Focus Group was led by Harris &Associates and was comprised of several experts in pipeline design,trenchless technology and construction.IEC and City staff also participated in the Focus Group.The Focus Group ultimately recommended that an alternate alignment be used due to the many concerns and unknowns associated with the busy Corridor. A meeting was held on June 5,2008 with the City to provide an opportunity for IEC to present the merits of continuing with the 60%designed alignment.At that meeting IEC presented the reasons why they felt the alignment,as planned,was the best choice.The City again reiterated their concern about the Corridor and suggested the pipeline be designed along an alternate alignment out of the Corridor.The City added they would not permit the 60%designed alignment,but would permit and support the District with another alignment such as the one recommended in the Focus Group report.IEC subsequently followed up with the City Attorney regarding the District's rights to be in the City's right-of-way and received confirmation that the City would continue to assert that it had prior and superior rights.To date,IEC has not obtained a permit from the City on the 60%designed alignment. In addition to concerns with the City's approval,the Caltrans encroachment permit to be obtained by IEC on behalf of the District,is behind schedule.The latest information regarding approval timeframes for this permit suggests that the permit will not be approved by Caltrans until the end of October. with the inability of reaching a resolution with IEC on the pipeline alignment within the City's limits,the District is terminating IEC's services under the contract. Due to the critical nature of this Project,the delays that this Project has suffered thus far,and the District's commitment to complete the Project by March 2010,staff is recommending that the District move promptly to retain another consulting engineer for the Project.Towards this end,staff recommends that the Board waive Policy 21 and allow the General Manager to enter into an agreement with the firm of Lee &Ro. If staff was required to repeat the selection process pursuant to Policy 21,the District would lose valuable time on the Project and likely would not find a better candidate than Lee & Ro.Lee &Ro was tied for second in the original consultant selection process conducted in October 2006,less than two years ago.Lee &Ro recently and successfully performed on the District's 30-Inch Recycled Water Pipeline project design and is currently involved with program management for Flow Control Facility (FCF)#14 at the San Diego County Water Authority (CWA).Staff believes Lee &Ro is more than capable of taking on this project and is in the best position to expedite its completion. There are two possible scenarios to consider for resolution of remaining design services for the Project. Scenario 1 is optimistic and assumes that the transfer of work product from IEC to the District goes well including verification of IEC's final invoices.In this case,Lee &Ro would finalize the contract documents assumed to be at 90% completion,complete all permit work,design Alternate alignment,finalize easement and appraisal work and take liability for the Project design.This scenario assumes that IEC will also provide aerial survey for the original alignment. In this scenario,IEC would get paid up to $1,100,000 for services rendered.Lee &ROIS design fee would be $515,500. Scenario 2 assumes that the resolutidn of the contract with IEC does not go well,IEC is unable to justify final invoices,and the transfer of information does not occur or is delayed significantly.In this case,Lee &Ro would have to essentially recreate the entire design using the existing IEC 90%design scanned plans as a guide and using new aerial survey for the original alignment provided by the District.Under this scenario,IEC will not be paid beyond what they have been already paid ($909,000)and Lee and Ro's fee would be $769,000. In addition,both scenarios assume that the District will provide Lee &Ro with aerial survey,potholing to locate existing utilities,geotechnical exploration and corrosion review for design of Alternate alignment.The following table provides the detailed costs for both scenarios: Contract with lEC (includes c.o.'s) lEC Design of Alternate Alignment (amount offered by District and rejected by lEC.lEC proposed $460/000) lEe $1/449/283 $192,000 Lee &Ro Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Lee &Ro's Design Fee and Construction Support Services District Provided Services Total Payments to lEC Total Project Cost Delta Cost:lEC vs. Lee &Ro $1/641,283 $515,501 $81/285 $1/100/000 $1/696/786 <$55/503> $768/589 $52/645 $909/224 $1,730,458 <$89/175> Under Scenario 1,the District will be spending an additional $56,000 and under Scenario 2,the District will be spending an additional $89,000 to complete the design services. Lee &Rols scope of work will include the following items: •Review all lEC work product including design plans, specifications,permit status,easement documents and stamp and take liability for the complete Project. •Design Alternate alignment within the City of EI Cajon (see Exhibit B). •Respond to contractor questions during the bidding process. •Provide construction phase services. Fee negotiations for the above scope with Lee &Ro were concluded on July 17,2008.Staff recommends the award of a Professional Engineering Services contract to Lee &Ro for a not to exceed amount of $769,000. FISCAL IMPACT:~ The total Fiscal Year 2009 budget for ClP P2009 is $22,000,000. The actual costs paid on this project as of July 1,2008,are $1,732,322.Total expenditures,plus outstanding commitment and forecast including this contract,are approximately $4,069,881. Attachment B lists commitments,expenditures,and projected final costs for the project.Based on the financial budget,the Project Manager has determined that the budget is sufficient to support the project. Finance has determined that 100%of the funding for ClP P2009 is currently available from the Expansion Fund. STRATEGIC GOAL: This project supports the District's strategic goal of designing and constructing new infrastructure and to satisfy current and future water needs for potable,recycled,and wastewater services. LEGAL IMPACT: Geil:eral Manager P,\WORKlNG\ClP P2009 36-inch PL -FCF 14 to Reg Site\Staff Reports\BD 08-06-08,ClP P2009 &P2038 Lee &Ro ENgineering Services Awardl.doc RDG/RR/RP:jf Attachments:Attachment A Attachment B Exhibit A Exhibit B ATTACHMENT A 'sUBJECT/PRoJEcT:Award of a Professional Engineering Design Services P2009-001102 Contract for the Completion of the Design of the 36-Inch Pipeline,SDCWA OtayFCF No.14 to the Regulatory Site Project COMMITTEE ACTION: The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22,2008.The following comments were made: •Staff is requesting approval to waive the District's Policy 21 -Policy for Selection of Professional Consultants and award a contract to Lee &Ro for the completion of the design of the 36-inch pipeline project.Waiving Policy 21 will save valuable time on the project. •The committee discussed that waiving Policy 21 was in the best interest of the project and concurred in waiving Policy 21.Following committee's discussion,General Counsel suggested that a resolution be presented for formal action by the board to waive Policy 21.Resolution No. 4129 is presented as Attachment C for this purpose. •Staff indicated that a contract was entered into in October 2006 with Infrastructure Engineering Corporation (IEC)to provide professional design services for this project. •In September 2007,a Value Engineering Workshop was conducted.As a result of the workshop,a report was generated that suggested the 60%designed alignment of the pipeline within Jamacha Road between Granite Hills Drive and Washington Avenue should be reevaluated due to traffic constraints and other issues.The City of El Cajon is also concerned about the traffic problems that the project would cause along the Jamacha Road/Washington Avenue corridor and said it would not permit the alignment as proposed. •After Staff met with lEC on several occasions to discuss this alignment issue,they were unable to reach consensus with lEC as to how to proceed with the redesign,as a result,the decision was made to terminate the contract with lEC.The District requested and received,as of today,electronic documentation from lEC concerning this project.Staff is evaluating the data to determine what was provided. •There was discussion regarding the timeline of the project. Staff indicated that it is anticipated the project will be ready to bid for construction in January 2009 but may not be completed by the original March 2010 deadline when the District is scheduled to start receiving water from CWA. Staff indicated that it is possible to make up some time during the construction phase of the project. •General Manager Watton indicated that the City of EI Cajon will support an alternative alignment but we still need approval from them.He has spoken with contacts at CWA regarding construction of this pipeline and anticipated construction delays and when Otay will be ready to receive water. •Staff noted that the fee amount has already been negotiated with Lee &Ro so staff will not need to bring this item back to the Board once approved. Following the discussion,the committee supported staffs' recommendations and presentation to the full board as an action item. ATTACHMENT B Date Updated:July 17,2008 Engineering Design Services Design of the 36-Inch to the Regulatory Site Award of a Professional Contract for the Completion of the Pipeline,SDCWA Otay FCF No.14 Project OlayWater District P2009 -36-lnch Pipeline from SDCWAOlayFCFNo.14 to theRegulatory Site SUBJECT/PROJEcT:i P2009-001102 i L... Outstanding ProjectedAnal Vendor/BUdget Committed Expenditures Commitment&Comments$22,000,000 CostForecast Planning Labor 209,725 209,725 209,725 Printing 993 993 993 OCB REPROGRAHICS BusinessMeetings 110 110 110 PETTYCASH 49 49 49 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Professional Legal Fees 5,595 5,595 5,595 BURKE WILLIAMS &SORENSEN 3,282 3,282 3,282 GARCIACALDERON &RUIZ LLP Consultant Contracts 1,100,000 909,224 190,776 1,100,000 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING(revised) Service Contracts 398 398 -398 UNIONTRIBUNE 957 957 -957 SD DAILYTRANSCRIPT 350 350 -350 RYAN BETHKE 705 705 -705 OLLI BROS Subcontract 12,266 12,266 -12,266 HELIX WATERDISTRICT Temporary Labor 16 16 -16 SEDONASTAFFING Total Planning $1,334,445 $1,143,670 $190,776 $1,334,446 Design In House/Labor 307,815 257,815 50,000 307,815 ConsultantContracts 52,645 52,645 52,645 POTHOLlNG,SURVEY,SOILS 93,000 18,750 74,250 93,000 SAN DIEGOCOUNTYWATER 107,138 79,134 28,004 107,138 HARRIS&ASSOCIATES INC 5,377 5,377 5,377 WRA &ASSOCIATES INC 1,050 1,050 1,050 SOUTHLANDTITLE 1,640 1,640 1,640 CALTRANS 633,589 633,589 633,589 LEE&RO INC Focus Group 1,639 1,639 1,639 LEE&RO INC 57,040 7,040 50,000 57,040 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT Special Projects 48 48 -48 SEDONASTAFFING Mealsand Incidentals 162 162 -162 PETTYCASH Advertising/Bid 87 87 87 SAN DIEGO DAILYTRANSCRIPT OtherAgency Fees 7,830 7,830 7,830 CITYOF EL CAJON Remaining Fees 15,000 7,830 7,170 15,000 Total Design $1,284,059 $383,025 $901,034 $1,284,059 Construction In House/Labor 274,829 24,829 250,000 274,829 ServiceContracts 818 818 -818 UNIONTRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO Consultant Contracts 1,088,785 64,465 1,024,320 1,088,785 RBF CONSULTING 135,000 135,000 135,000 LEE&RO INC Construction Contracts 527,000 106,250 420,750 527,000 SAN DIEGO COUNTYWATER -16,200,000 CONSTRUCTION Allowance 500,000 500,000 500,000 Contingency (3%)528,000 528,000 528,000 Service Contracts 266 266 266 MCGRAW-HILLCONSTRUCTION Computer Software Professional Legal Fees 100,000 100,000 100,000 GARCIACALDERON &RUIZ LLP AccpUclose-out 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total Construction $3,174,698 $196,628 $2,978,070 $19,374,698 Grand Total $5,793,203 $1,723,322 $4,069,881 $21,993,203 P2009 EXHIBIT A 36-INCH PIPELINE.SDCWA FCF NO.14 TO REGULATORY SITE OTAV el-ISH€O OTAY WATER DISTRICT 41°~ P2009 NOT TO SCALE OTAY WATER DISTRICT 36-INCH PIPELINE,SDCWA FCF NO.14TO REGULATORY SITE ALIGNMENTS AT JAMACHA ROAD AND WASHINGTON AVENUE ~\..\SHE:'O IMPERIAL BEACH OTAYolu .c. .slr...;........... I~..---------......-------------------------------...2loNa. 0.9-~so:~0.:...;..-.# <XloI <DN I<0 <XlooN"'-<D N ""'-<0 ...~t-------------------..-----------------------....~~ ......ltlonN EXHIBIT B Attachment C RESOLUTION NO.4129 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT WAIVING BOARD POLICY NO.21 AND AWARDING A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT TO LEE &RO,INC. Whereas,Policy No.21 of the Otay Water District ("District")sets forth the procedures pursuant to which professional consultants in engineering,architectural,landscape architectural,environmental,land surveying and construction management may be retained from the private sector to augment the District's professional capabilities or for the performance ofspecialized services not available to the District from the existing District work force; Whereas,in 2006,District staff utilized Policy 21 to identify and recommend Infrastructure Engineering Corporation ("IEC")to serve as the consulting engineer for the 36-Inch Pipeline,SDCWA Otay FCF No 14 to the Regulatory Site Project ("Project"); Whereas,at its October 4,2006 meeting,the District's Board of Directors acted on District's staffs recommendation and awarded a contract to IEC for the Project; Whereas,the District recently terminated IEC's services for the Project because IEC failed to propose reasonable alternatives to handle delays that are due to the pipe alignment proposed by IEC,including delays in obtaining permits and clearances required for the Project; Whereas,consulting firm Lee &Ro finished tied for second in the original consultant selection process conducted in 2006,recently and successfully performed on the District's 30-inch Recycled Water Pipeline project design and is currently providing program management for Flow Control Facility #14 at the San Diego County Water Authority; Whereas,the District is committed to completing the Project by March 2010 and prompt retention of a replacement consulting engineer is necessary to meet the March 2010 completion date for the Project;and Whereas,following Policy 21 for the selection ofthe replacement consulting engineer would result in the loss of additional valuable time on the Project,the design and permitting of which was scheduled for completion nearly 12 weeks ago,and would likely not result in finding a better candidate than Lee &Ro; Now,therefore,be it resolved,ordered and determined as follows: SECTION 1.The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.. SECTION 2.Board Policy 21 is hereby waived for purposes of selecting a new consulting engineer for the Project. SECTION 3.A professional engineering design services contract is awarded to Lee &Ro,Inc. SECTION 4.The General Manager is authorized to negotiate and execute an agreement with Lee &Ro,Inc. in an amount not to exceed $769,000. SECTION 5.This Resolution shall be effective as ofthe date it is adopted. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Otay Water District Board ofDirectors at a regular meeting held this 6th day ofAugust,2008. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: President ATTEST: District Secretary STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 8a TYPE MEETING:Regular Board SUBMITTED BY:Armando Buelna~ Communications Officer MEETING DATE: W.O./G.F.NO: August 6,2008 DIV.NO.All APPROVED BY: SUBJECT:AB 2986 -Leno -Waste discharge requirements GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of position on Assembly Requirements. PURPOSE: Directors Bill 2986 take (Leno) an "Oppose unless Amended" relating to Waste Discharge To authorize taking an "Oppose unless Amended"position on AB 2986 (Leno)relating to Waste Discharge Requirements. COMMITTEE ACTION: See Attachment A BACKGROUND Assembly Bill 2986,relating to waste discharge requirements,is an effort to address aging sewer systems through the issuance of an annual report card.Specifically,the bill requires the State or Regional Water Quality Control Board to issue a report card to every collection system and every sewage treatment plant in California based on objective methodologies for measuring system performance. The stated purpose of AB 2986 is to inform every community in California about the health of their sewer systems to ensure that problem systems will be clearly identified to voters and rate payers.The sponsors feel that by knowing the state of their sewer system,the public would be more supportive of actions such as rate increases or other measures that support upgrades to facilities with failing grades. None. FISCAL IMPACT: The sponsors of the bill are the Friends of the Earth and the San Francisco Baykeeper.The motivation was sewer spills in January 2008 into Richardson Bay in the Marin area. The bill's public information provisions require state permits, monitoring data,inspection reports,enforcement orders and violations to be made available for public viewing and downloading on the State and Regional Water Board websites. Opponents of AB 2986 are concerned that rather than encourage ratepayers to make an additional investment in infrastructure through increased fees and charges during difficult times,given competing priorities,a "D"or "F"grade will cause customers to question the wisdom of expending additional monies on a "failed" or "failing"systems.They are also concerned about how these letter grades will be used by investment bankers when preparing public bond issuances. Moreover,AB 2896 would assign the entire cost of this program to local public agencies through new fees.Consequently,local ratepayers would be asked to fund the hiring of new state employees for a new grading program. AB 2986 is opposed by ACWA,CASA,CSAC,CWEA,and the League of Cities have recommended amendments to the author that would eliminate the "Report Card"approach and replace it with a requirement that the state board development a Sewer System Infrastructure Rating methodology that takes into account the range of actors relevant to sewer system sustainability,not simply the number of overflows. AB 2986 is currently in the Senate Appropriations Committee, however,no hearing date has been requested by the author. ¢ LEGAL IMPACT: None. Attachments Attachment A -Committee Action Report B -Assembly Bill 2986 -Amended C -AB 2986 Senate Committee Analysis D -Letter of opposition from the Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP) E -Draft Letter of opposition. ATTACHMENT A SUBJECTIPROJECT:AB 2986 -Leno -Waste Discharge Requirements COMMITTEE ACTION: The Legal,Legislative and Conservation Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 23,2008.The following comments were made: •Staff recommends that the board take an "Oppose unless Amended"position on Assembly Bill 2986. •The Bill was introduced to address aging sewer systems and would required the State or the Regional Water Quality Control Board to develop a methodology to grade sewer system performance. •The sponsors of the bill believe that a grading system would bring to the public's attention failing sewer systems and, thus,would encourage public support of rate increases or other measure to upgrade these failing systems.Opponents believe that it would encourage exactly the opposite response and it could also affect public bond issuances as bond holders may look negatively upon failed systems. •The bill proposes that letter grades of A,B,C,etc.be used to rate systems.It is felt that such grading is too simplistic for sewer systems as such systems are very highly and comprehensively regulated.In addition,the District already polices its system as a "Process Safety Review"must be performed on the District's sewer systems every five years per policy. •There are also concerns regarding the standards that will be required and that the grading of the systems could be more punitive and penalty focused. •Additionally,the entire cost of the program would fallon local public agencies through new fees. • • The committee inquired what the Operations Department's stance was on this issue.Staff indicated that they agree with the recommendation of "Oppose unless Amended." It was indicated that AB 2986 is currently on hold and no hearing date has been set. The committee supported staffs'recommendations and presentation to the full board as an action item. AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 23,2008 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 8,2008 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 25,2008 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 24,2008 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-2007-o8 REGULAR SESSION ATTACHMENT B \"l:!!~~~.< 11:: 'I " I ASSEMBLY BILL Introduced by Assembly Member Leno (Coauthor:Assembly Member Huffman) February 22,2008 No.2986 An act to amend Section 75050.2 ofthe Public Resources Code,and to add Chapter 18 (commencing with Section 14080)to Division 7 of the Water Code,relating to water quality,and making an appropriation therefor. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 2986,as amended,Leno.Waste discharge requirements. (1)Under existing law,the State Water Resources Control Board andthe California regional water quality control boards prescribe waste discharge requirements for publicly owned treatment works and other dischargers in accordance with the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act (state act)and the federal Clean Water Act.Existing law, commencing the year in which funding is provided,requires the state board to develop a uniform overflow event report form to be used by the system owner or operator to report sanitary sewer system overflows. Existing law,commencing the year in which funding is provided, requires a database on sanitary sewer system overflows and spills to be developed and made available to the public. 95 AB 2986 -2- This bill,by January 1,2010,would require the state board and each regional board to post on their respective Internet Web sites,at a minimum,copies of specified water quality documents maintained in their files and generated on or after January 1,2009.The state board and each regional board would be required to post on their respective InternetWeb sites additional water quality documents generated between January 1,2006,and December 31,2008,iftheyhave electronic copies of those documents. The bill would require the state board,commencing January 1,2011, to issue annually a letter grade,as specified,for each separate sanitary sewer system,---eaeh sewage treatment plant,---eaeh combined sewer system,and--eaeh combined sewer system treatment plant in the state that is subject to waste discharge requirements in accordance with letter grading methodologies that the state board would be required to establish.The state board would be required,by July 1,2009,to establish a methodology for measuring "peaking factors,"as defined,and to establish,as necessary,monitoring and reporting requirements to measure peaking factors. The bill would require the state board,by July 1,2010,and by July 1 ofeach year thereafter,to establish a list ofall sewage treatment plants that treat waste collected from separate sanitary sewer systems and for which the state board makes specified findings relating to wet weather peak flows.A satellite sewer system,as defined,that discharges sewage to a sewage treatment plant that has been placed on that list would be required to install and operate flow meters or employ another flow monitoring methodology approved by the state board or a regional board,for at least 3 years,as described,unless the state board or the appropriate regional board makes a specified finding regarding the satellite sewer system. The bill would require the state board to impose fees upon owners and operators of separate sanitary sewer systems,sewage treatment plants,combined sewer systems,and combined sewer system treatment plants and others subject to waste discharge requirements,as provided, to finance the prudent implementation of these provisions.The state board would be required to establish a fee schedule so that the total amount offees collected equals the amount necessary to recover costs incurred in the implementation of these provisions.The bill would require the state board to deposit the fees in the California Clean Water Act Fund,which the bill would establish in the State Treasury.The moneys in the fund would be eofttinuously appropriated available,upon 95 -3-AB 2986 appropriation by the Legislature,to the state board for expenditure by the state board and for allocation to the regional boards,as necessary, to implement the bill's provisions. (2)The Safe Drinking Water,Water Quality and Supply,Flood Control,River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of2006,approved by the voters at the November 7,2006,statewide general election,makes available,upon appropriation by the Legislature,$90,000,000 to the state board for matching grants to local public agencies to reduce and prevent stormwatercontamination ofrivers,lakes,and streams.Existing law establishes a list of projects that are eligible to receive funding pursuant to this stormwater program. This bill would specifY that,under prescribed circumstances and upon appropriation for those purposes,projects to install flow meters or implement otherflow monitoring methods approved by the state board to measure specified stormwater impacts and projects to assist with certain sanitary sewersystem and combined sewer system improvements to reduce stormwater inflow and infiltration are eligible to receive funding pursuant to this stormwater program. Vote:majority.Appropriation:yes&-no.Fiscal committee:yes. State-mandated local program:no. The people ofthe State ofCalifornia do enact asfollows: 1 SECTION 1.This act shall be known,and may be cited,as the 2 California Clean Water Act. 3 SEC.2.Section 75050.2 of the Public Resources Code is 4 amended to read: 5 75050.2.(a)The state board shall develop project selection 6 and evaluation guidelines for the allocation offunds made available 7 pursuant to subdivision (m)ofSection 75050.Upon appropriation, 8 the funds shall be available for matching grants to local public 9 agencies,not to exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000)per 10 project,for projects to achieve any of the following purposes in 11 accordance with the requirements ofthat subdivision: 12 (1)Complying with total maximum daily load requirements 13 established pursuant to Section 303(d)ofthe Clean Water Act (33 14 U.S.c.Sec.1313(d))and this division where pollutant loads have 15 been allocated to stormwater,including,but not limited to,metals, 16 pathogens,and trash pollutants. 95 AB 2986 -4- 1 (2)Assistance in implementing low-impact development and 2 other onsite and regional practices,on public and private lands, 3 that seek to maintain predevelopment hydrology for existing and 4 new development and redevelopment projects.Projects funded 5 pursuant to this paragraph shall be designed to infiltrate,filter, 6 store,evaporate,or retain runoff in close proximity to the source 7 ofwater. 8 (3)Implementing treatment and source control practices to meet 9 design and performance standard requirements for new 10 development. 11 (4)Treating and recycling stormwater discharge. 12 (5)Implementing improvements to combined municipal sewer 13 and stormwater systems. 14 (6)Implementing best management practices,and other 15 measures,required by municipal stormwater permits issued by a 16 California regional water quality control board or the state board. 17 (7)Assessing project effectiveness,including,but not limited 18 to,monitoring receiving water quality,determining pollutant load 19 reductions,and assessing improvements in stormwatet discharge 20 water quality. 21 (8)Installing flow meters,or implementing other flow 22 monitoring methods approved by the state board,to measure 23 stormwater impacts pursuant to Section 14083 ofthe Water Code 24 in satellite sewer systems serving severely disadvantaged 25 communities. 26 (9)Assistance for sanitary sewer systems and combined sewer 27 systems that have received a grade of "F"pursuant to Section 28 14082 ofthe Water Code for improvements to reduce stormwater 29 inflow and infiltration in severely disadvantaged communities. 30 (b)(1)For the purpose of implementing subdivision (a),the 31 state board shall give preference to a project that does one ormore 32 of the following: 33 (A)Supports sustained,long-term water quality improvements. 34 (B)Is coordinated or consistent with any applicable integrated 35 regional water management plan. 36 (2)The allocation of funds pursuant to this section shall be 37 consistent with water quality control plans and Section 75072. 38 (c)The state board shall require grant recipients for projects 39 described in subdivision (a)to assess and report on project 40 effectiveness,which may include monitoring receiving water 95 -5-AB 2986 CHAPTER 18.PUBLIC INFORMATION,SEWER SYSTEM GRADING, AND WET WEATHER FLOWS quality,detennining pollutant load reductions,and assessing improvements in stonnwater discharge water quality resulting from project implementation. SEC.3.Chapter 18 (commencing with Section 14080)is added to Division 7 of the Water Code,to read: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14080.For the purposes of this chapter,all of the following 11 tenns shall have the following meanings: 12 (a)"Combined sewer system"means any wastewater collection 13 system that conveys sanitary,commercial,and industrial 14 wastewater and stonnwaterthrough a single-pipe collection system 15 to a sewage treatment plant. 16 (b)"Combined sewer overflows"means sewage overflows from 17 a combined sewer system,as defined by the United States 18 Environmental Protection Agency Combined Sewer Overflow 19 Control Policy (59 Fed.Reg.18688,April 19,1994).. 20 (c)"Peaking factor"means the ratio ofpeak wet weather flows 21 in sewer lines compared to average dry weather flows in sewer 22 lines. 23 (d)"Sanitary sewer overflow"means any overflow,spill, 24 release,discharge,or diversion from a separate sanitary sevv'er 25 system at a point prior to the sewage treatment plant.Sanitary of 26 untreated or partially treated wastewater from a sanitary sewer 27 system.Sanitary sewer overflows include all ofthe following: 28 (1)Overflows or releases of untreated or partially treated 29 wastewater that reach the waters ofthe United States. 30 (2)Overflows or releases of untreated or partially treated 31 wastewater that do not reach the waters ofthe United States. 32 (3)Wastewater backups into buildings or private property that 33 are caused by blockages or flow conditions within the 34 system-maintained portion ofa separate sanitary sewer system. 35 (e)"Sanitary sewer system"means any separate sanitary sewer 36 system or any combined sewer system that is a system of pipes, 37 pump stations,sewer lines,or other conveyances designed and 38 used to collect and convey sanitary sewage to a sewage treatment 39 plant.Sanitary sewer systems include only those systems that are 40 comprised ofmore than one mile ofpipes or sewer lines. 95 AB 2986 -6- 1 (f)"Satellite sewer system"means the portion,if any,of a 2 sanitary sewer system that is owned or operated by an entity or 3 public agency other than the entity or public agency that owns and 4 operates the sewage treatment plant to which the sanitary sewer 5 system is tributary. 6 (g)"Secondary treatment"means a level of treatment that 7 complies with Section 133.102 of Title 40 ofthe Code of Federal 8 Regulations. 9 (h)"Separate sanitary sewer system"means any system ofpipes, 10 pump stations,sewer lines,or other conveyances designed and 11 used to collect and convey sanitary sewage,separate from 12 stormwater,to a sewage treatment plant. 13 (i)"Sewage treatment plant"means any facility used for the 14 treatment ofsewage and capable ofproviding secondary treatment 15 ofsewage,unless the owner or operator ofthe facility has secured 16 a modified permitpursuant to 33 U.S.C.Section 1311(h),in which 17 case the plant is capable of achieving primary treatment or 18 equivalent treatment,as defined in 33 U.S.C.Section 1311(h). 19 (j)"Waste discharge requirements"means waste'discharge 20 requirements prescribed pursuant to this division,including waste 21 discharge requirements issued in accordance with the national 22 pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES)permit program, 23 or the state board's Statewide General Waste Discharge 24 Requirements for Sanitary Sewer Systems,Order No. 25 2006-0003-DWQ,adopted May 2,2006. 26 14081.(a)By January 1,2010,the state board and each 27 regional board shall post on their respective Internet Web sites,at 28 a minimum,copies ofthe following documents maintained in their 29 files and generated on or after January 1,2009: 30 (1)All waste discharge requirements prescribed by the state 31 board or a regional board. 32 (2)Any information,data,or report required to be submitted to 33 the state board or a regional board pursuant to monitoring 34 requirements set forth in waste discharge requirements. 35 (3)Any report addressing inspection,including,but not limited 36 to,United States Environmental Protection Agency inspection 37 reports,of any permitted facility by the state board,a regional 38 board,or any contractor retained by the state board or a regional 39 board. 95 -7-AB 2986 1 (4)Any proposed tentative or final administrative enforcement 2 order issued by the state board or a regional board,including any 3 administrative compliance order,time schedule order,and final 4 administrative civil liability order,and any administrative civil 5 liability complaint issued by the state board or a regional board. 6 (5)Any judicial complaint filed by or against the state board or 7 a regional board,or in which the state board or a regional board 8 is a party,relating to a violation ofthis division or the federal Clean 9 Water Act,and any settlement agreement,consent decree,or 10 judgment resolving any judicial case relating to a violation ofthis 11 division or the federal Clean Water Act in which the state board 12 or a regional board is a party. 13 (6)Any list established pursuant to subdivision (b)of Section 14 14083. 15 (b)By January 1,2010,the state board and each regional board 16 shall post on their respective Internet Web sites copies ofany of 17 the documents described in subdivision (a),generated between 18 January 1,2006,and December 31,2008,for which the state board 19 or a regional board has electronic copies. 20 (c)For purposes of this section,"post"means placing the 21 documents on the Internet Web site in a format that may be readily 22 downloaded by the public. 23 (d)The state board or a regional board may require a person 24 subject to waste discharge requirements to submit documents 25 required by the waste discharge requirements in electronic form 26 as prescribed by the relevant board. 27 (e)Documents sealed by a court,exemptfrom disclosure under 28 the California Public Records Act(Chapter 3.5 (commencing with 29 Section 6250)ofDivision 7 ofTitle 1 ofthe Government Code), 30 orfor distribution or consideration in a closed session under the 31 Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with 32 Section 11120)ofChapter 1 ofPart 1 ofDivision 3 ofTitle 2 of 33 the Government Code),shall not be subject to posting on an 34 Internet Web site pursuant to this section. 35 14082.(a)Commencing January 1,2011,the state board shall 36 issue a letter grade of"A,""B,""C,""D,"or "F"annually for each 37 separate sanitary se'vver system,eaeh sewage treatment plant,eaeh 38 eombined sC'vver system,and eaeh eombined sC\ver system 39 treatment plant.ofthe following that is subject to waste discharge 40 requirements: 95 i :j AB 2986 -8- 1 (1)A separate sanitary sewer system. 2 (2)A sewage treatment plant. 3 (3)A combined sewer system. 4 (4)A combined sewer system treatment plant. 5 (b)By July 1,2009,the state board shall propose a letter grading 6 methodology consisting of grades "A,""B," "C,""D,"or "F"for 7 each ofthe following: 8 (1)Separate sanitary sewer systems. 9 (2)Sewage treatment plants. 10 (3)Combined sewer systems. 11 (4)Combined sewer system treatment plants. 12 (c)By January 1,2010,and after providing public notice and 13 opportunity for public comment,the state board shall establish a 14 letter grading methodology for each type of system or plant 15 described in subdivision (b). 16 (d)The state board shall review the letter grading methodologies 17 established pursuant to subdivision (c)every five years 18 commencing with 2015,to determine whether advances in 19 wastewater collection and treatment warrant revisions'to impose 20 more stringent methodologies.The state board shall provide public 21 notice and opportunity for comment prior to making changes to a 22 letter grading methodology. 23 (e)The letter grading methodology for separate sanitary sewer 24 systems shall consist ofthe number,volume,andcause ofsanitary 25 sewer overflows for each 100 miles ofsewer line. 26 (f)The letter grading methodology for sewage treatmentplants 27 shall reflect violations ofwaste discharge requirements,ineidents 28 of bypassing any portion of the treatment plants,and diseharges 29 ofaft)!sewage that has not reeeived seeondary treatment.. 30 (g)The letter grading methodology for each combined sewer 31 system shall reflect the combinedsewer system's adherence to the 32 provisions set forth in the system's waste discharge requirements 33 and long-term combined sewer system control plan. 34 (h)The letter grading methodology for each combined sewer 35 system treatment plant shall reflect adherence to the requirements 36 set forth in each treatment plant's waste discharge requirements. 37 14083.(a)By July 1,2009,the state board shall establish a 38 methodology for measuring peaking factors for purposes of this 39 section.The state board shall also establish,as necessary, 40 monitoring and reporting requirements to measure peaking factors. 95 !.....~. ~r! f t1'·1 -9-AB 2986 1 (b)By July 1,2010,and by July 1 of each year thereafter,the 2 state board shall establish a list ofall sewage treatment plants that 3 treat waste collected from separate sanitary sewer systems and for 4 which the state board finds both ofthe following: 5 (1)The sewage treatment plant has experienced a peaking factor 6 that equals or exceeds a designation of"seven." 7 (2)Peak wet weather flows have either caused or contributed 8 to discharges in violation of waste discharge requirements from 9 the sewage treatment plant,or caused or contributed to a bypass 10 of secondary treatment during a storm that does not exceed the 11 rainfall depth duration frequency of10 years and 24 hours as posted 12 by the Department ofWater Resources. 13 (c)The state board-shttH may review,and modifY ifnecessary, 14 the designated peaking factor established in paragraph (1)of 15 subdivision (b)every five years eommeneing v/ith 2015,to reflect 16 current information about the levels ofpeak wet weather flow that 17 correlate with increased risk of sanitary sewer overflows,or 18 discharges in violation of waste discharge requirements.Before 19 establishing the list pursuant to subdivision (b),the state board 20 shall provide public notice and opportunity for comment. 21 (d)(1)Any satellite sewer system that discharges sewage to a 22 sewage treatment plant that has been placed on the list pursuant 23 to subdivision (b)shall,within two years ofthatplacement,install 24 and operate flow meters,adequate to measure all oremploy another 25 flow monitoring methodology approved by the state board or a 26 regional board,adequate to measure or accurately estimate 27 discharges to the sewage treatment plant,for at least three years. 28 (2)Paragraph (1)does not apply ifthe state board or a regional 29 board finds,based on clear and convincing evidence,that the 30 satellite sewer system's contribution of wet weather peak flows 31 does not pose a risk of causing or contributing to discharges in 32 violation ofwaste discharge requirements or causes or contributes 33 to a bypass"""6f ofsecondary treatment during a storm that does not 34 exceed the rainfall depth duration frequency of 10 years and 24 35 hours as determined by the department. 36 (e)The satellite sewer system shall continue to operate the flow 37 meters or employ otherflow monitoring methodologies required 38 pursuant to subdivision (d)unless either the sewage treatment plant 39 to which it discharges is removed from the list establishedpursuant 40 to subdivision (b)or the state board or a regional board finds,based 95 I:I,I' IIi.·, IiI! Ii I'~!~I f Il:II l.:.fti~i l! II': I !! AB 2986 -10- 1 on clear and convincing evidence,that the satellite sewer system's 2 additional contribution ofwet weather peak flows no longer poses 3 a risk ofcausing or contributing to discharges in violation ofwaste 4 discharge requirements or causes or contributes to a bypass--et'of 5 secondary treatment during a storm that does not exceed the rainfall 6 depth duration frequency of 10 years and 24 hours as determined 7 by the department.Before making that finding,the state board 8 shall provide public notice and opportunity for comment. 9 14084.(a)The state board shall impose fees upon owners and 10 operators of separate sanitary sewer systems,sewage treatment 11 plants,combined sewer systems,and combined sewer system 12 treatment plants,and on those persons subject to waste discharge 13 requirements for the purposes offunding implementation ofSection 14 14081 as determined by the state board,to finance the prudent 15 implementation of this chapter.The state board shall establish a 16 fee schedule so that the total amount offees collected pursuant to 17 this section equals the amount necessary to recover costs,including, 18 but not limited to,administrative costs,incurred in the 19 implementation ofthis chapter. 20 (b)The fees shall be deposited in the California Clean Water 21 Act Fund,which is hereby established in the State Treasury. 22 Not'vvithstanding Seetion 13340 of the GO'v'emment Code,the 23 moneys in the fund are hereby eontiftUously appropriated,viithout 24 regard to fiseal year,to the state board for Moneys in thefundshall 25 be available,upon appropriation by the Legislature,to the state 26 board for expenditure by the state board and for allocation to 27 regional boards,as appropriate,to implement this chapter. o 95 AB 2986 Assembly Bill-Status Page I of I CURRENT BILL STATUS OS/23/2008 A.B.No.2986 Leno (Coauthor:Huffman). Waste discharge requirements. LOCATION SEN AMENDED DATE MEASURE : AUTHOR(S) TOPIC HOUSE +LAST TYPE OF BILL Active Non-Urgency Non-Appropriations Majority Vote Required Non-State-Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non-Tax Levy LAST HIST.ACT.DATE:07/10/2008 LAST HIST.ACTION In committee:Set,first hearing.Hearing canceled at the request of author. COMM.LOCATION SEN APPROPRIATIONS HEARING DATE 08/04/2008 TITLE An act to amend Section 75050.2 of the Public Resources Code,and to add Chapter 18 (commencing with Section 14080)to Division 7 of the Water Code,relating to water quality. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2951-3000/ab_2986_bilC20080715_status.ht...711612008 AB 2986 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis Page 1 of 8 ATTACHMENT C AB 2986 SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Senator S.Joseph Simitian,Chairman 2007-2008 Regular Session BILL NO: AUTHOR: AMENDED: FISCAL: URGENCY: AB 2986 Leno May 23,2008 Yes No HEARING DATE: CONSULTANT: June 23,2008 Bruce Jennings SUBJECT SUMMARY WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENT .Existing law ,under the federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 and 1987,known as the Clean Water Act, establishes federal guidelines for surface water quality protection. 1)Authorizes water quality programs,requires federal effluent limitations and state water quality standards, requires permits for the discharge of pollutants into navigable waters,provides enforcement mechanisms,and authorizes funding for wastewater treatment works construction grants and state revolving loan programs,as well as funding to states and tribes for their water quality programs. 2)Authorizes state agencies to administer many of the Clean Water Act's provisions,including authorizing the State Water Resources Control Board (state board)and the Regional Boards to regulate proposed federally-permitted activities that may result in a discharge to water bodies. 3)Provides that states,their political subdivisions and interstate agencies are not preempted from adopting or enforcing standards,limitations or requirements as long as they are no less stringent than their federal counterparts. 4)Under the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, establishes a comprehensive state program to protect both surface and ground water quality and the beneficial uses of water.Grants regulatory authority to the SWRCB and the D AB 2986 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2951-3000/ab_2986_cfa_20080620_185204_...7/1612008 AB 2986 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis Page 2 nine semi-autonomous California regional water quality control boards as the "principal state agencies with primary responsibility for the coordination and control of water quality." 5)Under state law,requires that Proposition 84 Storm Water Grant Program funds be used to provide matching grants to local public agencies for the reduction and prevention of storm water contamination of rivers,lakes,and streams. This bill 1)Requires the state board and each regional board,by January I,2010,to post on their respective websites copies of all documents generated from 2006 through 2009 regarding waste discharge requirements (WDRs),WDR monitoring information,facility inspections, administrative enforcement orders,sewage treatment plants with peak wet weather flow problems (generated starting 2009),and administrative and judicial complaints. 2)Requires the state board,starting January I,2011,to issue a letter grade (A to F)annually for each sewer system,sewage treatment plant,combined sewer system,and combined sewer system treatment plant in the state subject to waste discharge requirements,using a letter grade methodology established by the board in 2010. 3)Requires the state board,by July I,2010 and by July 1 annually thereafter,to list central sewage treatment plants that experience a high incidence of peak wet weather flows that result in WDR violations or that bypass secondary treatment,as specified. 4)Requires the state board,starting in 2015,to review the methodologies for both its letter grade process and the peak wet weather flow factors. 5)Requires a satellite sewer system that discharges wastewater to a central treatment plant that is listed on the high peaking factor list to install and operate flow meters or another flow monitoring methodology approved by the state board or a regional board,unless the state board AB 2986 Page 3 or regional board deems the installation inappropriate. 6)Makes eligible for the state board's matching grant Page 20f8 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2951-3000/ab_2986_cfa_20080620_185204_...711612008 AB 2986 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis program,funded by $90 million of bond proceeds from the Safe Drinking Water,Water Quality and Supply,Flood Control River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006, earmarked for reduction and prevention of stormwater contamination of rivers,lakes,and streams,severely disadvantaged communities that install flow meters or to implement other flow monitoring methods approved by the state board,as specified. 7)Requires the state board to impose a fee on sewage system owners or operators and on WDR permit holders to fund implementation of the information systems developed and administered by the board and regional boards.Revenue generated by this fee must be deposited in the proposed California Clean Water Act Fund and is appropriated by the Legislature to be made available to the state board as well as for making allocations to regional boards for the purposes of this act. COMMENTS nU__Purpose_of Bi1lu According to the author,..On January 25 and January 31,2008,more than -five million gallons of untreated and partially treated sewage was discharged into Richardson Bay from a public treatment plant run by the Sewerage Agency of Southern Marin.Thereafter,the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released inspection reports showing that poorly maintained tributary sewer systems are overwhelming the Marin treatment plant with inflows of storm water. The Marin spills are indicative of a statewide problem with sewage treatment plant capacities,sanitary sewer overflows,and system leaks that compromise health,safety, and water quality in our rivers,estuaries,bays,and the ocean. When sewers fail,it is usually a surprise to the rate payers served by that system.The average voter has no easily understandable means of discerning the health and AB 2986 Page 4 performance of their wastewater treatment infrastructure. AB 2986 seeks to inform every community in California about the health of their sewer systems and ensures that problem systems will be clearly identified to voters and rate payers." Page 3 of 8 .~LJ~ging sewag~_~!:_ems_The nation I s million-mile network of sewage collection pipes is designed to carry roughly 50 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2951-3000/ab_2986_cfa_20080620_185204_...7/1612008 AB 2986 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis trillion gallons of raw sewage daily to about 20,000 treatment plants.In 2001,however,the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency estimated there were 40,000 sanitary sewer overflows (SSO)and 400,000 backups of untreated sewage into basements.Many sewage pipes are between 50 and 100 years old and can develop cracks or joint openings from the weight and vibration of roads,soil,and structures above them,and from the corrosive actions of water,bacteria and chemicals from inside and out.Plant roots can widen these openings,allowing raw sewage to escape into groundwater.Rainwater entering the pipes through cracks and openings,or from illegal connections, can overwhelm the capacity of the system,forcing raw sewage to purge through manholes into streets and streams, back up into basements,or otherwise bypass treatment plants.Even during dry weather,clogged,malfunctioning, or overloaded systems can discharge raw sewage;during wet weather many of these aging systems are simply overwhelmed causing significant spills into California's waterways. According to state board statistics,in the Bay Area alone there have been 276 sewage spills this year that either flowed into Bay Area waterways ot contained at least 1,000 gallons of effluent.In total,these spills account for more than 14 million gallons of sewage entering the environment,the statistics show.These numbers don't include the Jan.26 and Jan.31 spills of 5.15 million gallons of raw and partially treated sewage by the Sewerage Agency of Southern Marin treatment plant in Mill Valley. Page 4 of 8 :3L_II1\~Cl:c::t:.~~_~_§§".,~g_e_§pg~5l_A small drop of fecal matter can contain millions of microorganisms of many types,some of which are pathogenic.Microbial pathogens in raw or inadequately treated sewage can cause illnesses ranging from temporary stomach cramps to life-threatening [1 AB 2986 Page 5 conditions such as inflammation of the heart.Inadequately treated human sewage can also contaminate edible filter-feeding shellfish,which filter viruses from water and can then infect humans with concentrations of viruses that are 100 to 900 times greater than in the surrounding water.High concentrations of infectious viruses can cause disease in unsuspecting consumers far from the spill. Also in sewage are the myriad chemical wastes discharged into sewage collection systems from industrial,commercial, institutional,and household activities.Industrial chemicals include a wide range of substances,from heavy metals such as mercury,lead,and cadmium;to agents that http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asmlab_2951-3000/ab_2986_cfa_20080620_185204_...7/1612008 AB 2986 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis have been manufactured such as sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid;to more recently engineered compounds such as the toxic plastic additive di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). Sewage spills can also damage homes and businesses and threaten waterways and beaches. 4).Support_.According to Friends of the Earth,"Aging sewer systems,especially in the San Francisco Bay Area, regularly spill millions of gallons of raw or partially treated sewage into streets,homes,local creeks and the Bay.These spills pose a grave threat to human health and to the environment.Inadequately treated sewage contains high levels of disease-carrying microorganisms and toxic chemicals such as mercury,cyanide and PCBs.Large spills, like the Marin spills in January 2008,can also contaminate shellfish,weaken fish,and deplete water oxygen levels. Unfortunately,the adage "out of sight,out of mind"has applied to our sewers,and most Californians are unaware of how common sewage spills are or how their community's own system is performing.Baykeeper believes that AB 2986 will increase the public's understandihg of the increase accountability for those agencies responsible for protecting our water." Page 5 of 8 _~l~IJositiQQ_The opponents to AB 2986 speak to many points, but these might be summarized as follows: a)Inappropriate Grading Metrics.The proposed criterion for AB 2986 Page 6 grading wastewater collection systems,such as the use of "peaking factor,"not distinguishing between systems (e.g., size,topography,rainfall,age),evaluations based on number of SSOs per 100 miles -all of these provide misleading and inappropriate metrics for understanding system performance. b)The Inappropriateness of a Grading System."Rather than encourage ratepayers to make an additional investment in infrastructure through increased fees and charges during difficult times,we are very concern,given competing priorities,a "D"or "F"grade will cause customers to question the wisdom of expending additional monies on a "failed"or "failing"system?We are also concerned about how these letter grades will be sued by investment bankers when preparing public bond issuances." c)A System for Improvement has been Recently Established. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2951-3000/ab_2986_cfa_20080620_185204_...7/1612008 AB 2986 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis "Two years ago,the state board adopted a statewide permit requiring all public-owned wastewater collection systems in California to implement detailed reporting and sewer system management programs?the program?is designed to improve collection system management,maintenance and operations to achieve the goals of significantly reducing SSOs?" d)The Grading System is Costly."AB 2896?would assign the entire cost of this program to local public agencies through new fees?[is it appropriate to require]local ratepayers to fund the hiring of new state employees for a new grading program [in the context of these agencies paying fees to the Water Boards for implementing a statewide permit]? Several of the major opponents (ACWA,CASA,CSAC,CWEA,and the League of Cities)have recommended amendments to the author that would eliminate the "Report Card"approach and replace it with a requirement that the state board development a Sewer System Infrastructure Rating methodology that takes into account the range of actors relevant to sewer system sustainability,not simply the number of overflows. Page 6 of8 SOURCE SUPPORT OPPOSITION : Friends of the Earth and San Francisco AB 2986 Page 7 Baykeeper American Rivers,Bay Area Sea Kayakers, California Coastkeeper Alliance,Center on Race,Poverty &the Environment,Environment California,Environmental Defense Center, Inland Empire Waterkeeper,Marin Co.Bd.Of Supervisors,Monterey Coastkeeper,Natural Resources Defense Council,Ocean Conservancy, Orange County Coastkeeper,Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Planning and Conservation League,Russian Riverkeeper,San Diego Coastkeeper,Santa Barbara Channelkeeper,Santa Monica Baykeeper, Save the Bay,Seaflow,Sierra Club California, Turtle Island Restoration Network Assn.of CA Water Agencies,Bayshore Sanitary District,CA Assn of Sanitation Agencies,CA State Assn of Counties,CA Water Environment Association,Calaveras County Water District, Castro Valley Sanitary District,Central Valley Clean Water Association,Cities of:Corona, http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_2951-3000/ab_2986_cfa_20080620_185204_...711612008 AB 2986 Assembly Bill -Bill Analysis Eureka,Palo Alto,Sanger,Thousand Oaks, Turlock,County Sanitation Districts of LA County,Covello Group,Delta Diablo Sanitation District,East Bay Dischargers Authority, Eastern Municipal Water District,El Dorado Irrigation District,Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District,Goleta Sanitary District, Goleta West Sanitary District,Ironhouse Sanitary District,Lake County Sanitation District,Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District,Las Virgenes Municipal Water District,League of California Cities,Midway City Sanitary District,Novato Sanitary District,Oro Lorna Sanitary District,Running Springs Water District,Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District and Sacramento Area Sewer District,Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County,South Bayside System Authority, South Orange County Wastewater Authority, Southern CA Alliance of POTWs,Stege Sanitary AB 2986 Page 8 District,Turlock,West County Wastewater District,Western Municipal Water District Page 7 of 8 http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/billlasm/ab_2951-3000/ab_2986_cfa_20080620_185204_...7/16/2008 ATTACHMENT D SCAP SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAAlLIANCE OF PUBLICLYOWNED TREATMENTWORKS May 15,2008 The Honorable Mark Leno California State Assembly PO Box 942849 Room 2114 Sacramento,CA 94248-0001 SUBJECT:AB2986 (Leno)Relating to Wastewater Systems Dear Assembly Member Leno: Via Facsimile The Southern California Alliance of Publicly Owned Treatment Works (SCAP)respectfully opposes your AB 2986 proposed legislation related.to wastewater systems reporting unless amended to address the concerns ofour public wastewater agencies. SCAP represents 85 public agencies that provide both water and wastewater to nearly 18 million people in parts of Los Angeles,Orange,San Diego,Santa Barbara,Riverside,San Bernardino and Ventura counties.We treat and safely reuse or dispose of over 1 billion gallons ofwastewater each day and deliver 1.7 billion gallons ofdrinking water per day. We are aware that the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA),the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA)and the League of California Cities have been working closely with you and your staff to amend AB 2986 and we share their concerns as to the current language ofthe bill.While we very much appreciate your efforts in addressing the important issues raised in your bill,we do not feel that sufficient changes have been made to warrant our support at this time. We join with the previously mentioned organizations in requesting that you consider significant amendments to AB 2986 that will eliminate the "Report Card"approach and replace it with a requirement that the State Water Resources Control Board,or another entity under contract,prepare a "State of the Infrastructure"report that identifies the strengths and shortcomings of our existing wastewater collection systems and provides recommendations for addressing key issues,such as funding needs. Thank you for your consideration ofour concerns. ~sincerelo~_ Pastore ecutive Director 30200Rancho ViejoRoad,Suite B SanJuanCapistmno,CA 92675 Fax:949/489-0150 Tel:949/489-7676 ATTACHMENT E July 17,2008 The Honorable Tom Torlakson,Chair Appropriations Committee State Capitol,Room 4203 Sacramento,CA 95814 Re:AB 2986 (Leno)Relating To Wastewater Systems -Oppose Unless Amended Dear Chair Torlakson: The Otay Water District (OWD)opposes AB 2986 relating to wastewater systems unless the bill is amended to address the concerns of water and sewer agencies.The OWD is dedicated to protecting public health and water quality,and we share Assemblymember Leno's goal to reduce sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs)and prevent unauthorized discharges to our waters.Nevertheless,we are concerned the bill will not further these goals and instead will have unintended consequences. Treatment facilities are already subject to comprehensive discharge permits and rating systems administered by State and federal regulators.Moreover,the State Water Board adopted a statewide permit two years ago that requires all publicly owned wastewater collection systems to implement detailed reporting and system management programs.The effort includes an ambitious schedule to improve collection system management and operations to significantly reduce SSOs.Among other things,the permit program requires a publicly accessible database that provides detailed information about SSOs.The program should have time to produce results before requiring the local agencies to comply with an additional and potentially incompatible regulatory program. In addition,the grading system will not result in improved local infrastructure.Grades of "D"or "F"will not encourage the public to invest in necessary infrastructure as intended by the bill. Rather,the public will be reluctant to spend scarce resources on "failed"or "failing"infrastructure given competing priorities.The grades will encourage third party lawsuits that drain local funds to pay attorneys'fees of plaintiffs and monetary settlements.When agencies disclose their grades to investment bankers under the bill to prepare public bond issuances for infrastructure,the result may be higher costs of bonds and credits. AB 2986 would base grades for wastewater collection systems on the number and volume of SSOs per 100 miles. This metric presumes that the facility size,topography,rainfall,age,etc.ofall systems is sufficiently similar so as to allow regulators to fairly evaluate and compare systems. However,wastewater systems are far too complex for such a simplistic approach.A fair evaluation requires consideration of other factors that include,but are not limited to,water quality impact, containment,and cleanup. Letter to Chair Torlakson Page 2 July 17,2008 AB 2986 applies a "peaking factor"of seven to all collection systems regardless of site-specific or system-specific factors and without technical or engineering support.The one-size-fits-all approach would disadvantage small systems since they do not have the same opportunities as their larger counterparts to equalize flows within the system.In addition,the requirement to meter all flows from all satellites is overly burdensome and unnecessary as well as infeasible for some systems.A single satellite system may connect to the treatment agency's system at multiple locations and have its own satellites.Large regional systems may require thousands ofmeters,which would need periodic maintenance. AB 2896 would create a significant new program for the State and Regional Water Boards to implement.The bill would require local public agencies to bear the program's entire cost through new fees,yet does not establish an upper limit on the amount of staffing and other resources the Water Boards can devote to the program.Public agencies now face difficult economic times and already pay fees to the Water Boards to implement the statewide permit program previously discussed.It would be a better use of resources to focus on the existing program designed to reduce and provide meaningful public information about SSOs. We appreciate the opportunity to provide you these comments and respectfully urge you to consider our concerns if and when AB 2986 comes before you for a vote. Sincerely, Mark Watton General Manager cc:Board ofDirectors Senator Denise Ducheny Senator Dennis Hollingsworth Senator Christine Kehoe Assemblymember Mark Leno 5TAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 9 TYPE MEETING:Regular Board Meeting SUBMITTED BY:Mark Watton, General Manager MEETING DATE: W.O.lG.F.NO: August 6,2008 DIV.NO. SUBJECT:Board of Directors 2008 Calendar of Meetings GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: At the request of the Board,the attached Board of Director's meeting calendar for 2008 is being presented for discussion. PURPOSE: This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the opportunity to review the 2008 Board of Director's meeting calendars and amend the schedules as needed. COMMITTEE ACTION: N/A ANALYSIS: The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar schedule and amend it as needed.Please note that the November 2008 meeting has been moved from November 5 to Thursday,November 13, 2008. STRATEGIC GOAL: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: None. LEGAL IMPACT: None. Attachments:Calendar of Meetings for 2008 G:\UserDataIDistSec\WINWORDISTAFRPTSIBoard Meeting Calendar8-6-08.doc Regular Board Meetings: January 14,2008 Febmary 6,2008 March 5,2008 April 2,2008 May 7,2008 June 10,2008 July 2,2008 August 6,2008 September 3,2008 October 1,2008 November 13,2008 December 3,2008 Board Workshops: Board of Directors,Workshops and Committee Meetings 2008 Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd Wednesday ofEach Month or as Noted) January 22,2008 Febmary 20,2008 March 19,2008 April 16,2008 May 21,2008 June 18,2008 July 16,2008 August 20,2008 September 17,2008 October 15,2008 November 19,2008 December 17,2008 Budget Workshop,June 10 and 23,2008 Board Retreat Workshop,TBD .G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar Attach A for 2008 7-2-08.doc Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 10a TYPE MEETING: SUBMITTED BY: Regular Board Rom Sarno,Chief Of~ Administrative s~s MEETING DATE: W.O.lG.F.NO: August 6,2008 DIV.NO.ALL APPROVED BY: (Chief) APPROVED BY: (Asst.GM): SUBJECT: German Al~Assistant General Manager of Finance and Administration UPDATE -OTAY DROUGHT RESPONSE CONSERVATION PROGRAM GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION: This is informational only and does not require any Board action. COMMITTEE ACTION: See Attachment nA" PURPOSE: To provide an update on the District's Drought Response Conservation Program. ANALYSIS: The Board adopted the District's Drought Response Conservation Program on June 10,2008. The District's Drought Response Conservation Program as contained within Section 39 of the Code of Ordinance is broken into four levels:Levell Drought Watch,Level 2 Drought Alert, Level 3 Drought Critical,and Level 4 Drought Emergency. The District's four levels of its Drought Response Plan are nearly identical to the Water Authority's model,as noted in Attachment D and E.Staff fully expects that the District will declare a level 2 Drought Alert within the next twelve months. Monitoring and Enforcement: As the District gets closer to declaring a Level 2,there will be additional discussions and revisions to the District's plan. Staff will return to the Board with recommendations and implementation plans as required.This will include proposals on enforcement,fines and public information.The language involving enforcement and fines will be included in the District's Code of Ordinances. Drought Pricing: Staff is planning for drought pricing to begin in Level 2.The intent of drought pricing is to be revenue neutral.The District's drought pricing will be presented to the Board in the fall.Finance staff has hired PBS&J,Karen Keese,to assist with evaluating and making recommendations on how to structure and implement the District's drought pricing. FISCAL IMPACT:Unknown at this time.When drought pricing is im emented,the intent is to be revenue/neutral.Recommendations and implementation will be presented to the Board for approval. STRATEGIC GOAL: District's FY 09-11 Strategic Plan related to implementation of the District's Drought Management Plan. LEGAL IMPACT: Gen ral M nager Attachment A:Committee Staff Report Attachment B:Ordinance 516 Attachment C:District Code of Ordinance -Section 39 Attachment D:Summary Table -District's Drought Conservation Program Attachment E:Summary Table -Water Authority's Model Response Ordinance ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT/PROJECT:UPDATE -OTAY DROUGHT RESPONSE CONSERVATION PROGRAM COMMITTEE ACTION: The Legal,Legislative and Conservation Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 23,2008.The following comments were made: • • The board had adopted the District's Drought Response Conservation Program on June 10,2008.This report is primarily to provide an update on the Drought Management Plan. The Drought Response Conservation Program was modeled after CWA's plan and is contained in within Section 39 of the District's Code of Ordinance's and consists of four (4) levels: Level 1 :Drought Watch Level 2 :Drought Alert Level 3:Drought Critical Level 4 :Drought Emergency •The District has declared a Level 1 alert and expects that a Level 2 alert would be declared that would implement penalties within the next twelve (12)months. •Staff is currently developing a Monitoring and Enforcement Plan and a Communications Plan to address enforcement of the drought level alerts and penalties.Staff will present to the board recommendations that will include proposals on enforcement,fines and communications to the public. • A consultant,PBS&J,has been retained to assist the District in evaluating and making recommendations on a drought pricing structure and an implementation plan of the new structure. The goal of the pricing structure is to encourage conservation through tiered pricing. •The District also wishes to coordinate these efforts with other agencies so there is consistency throughout the region. Y:\Board\CurBdPkg\AdminSvc\Drought Response Update Attach A 8-6-08.doc It was noted that PBS&J also works with many local agencies, so efforts to coordinate would be more easily accomplished. •It was discussed that there are still many issues to be worked out with regard to enforcement in lieu of court intervention and how conservation would be determined for those homeowners with large properties,homes and pools. Staff is exploring answers to these issues and recommendations will be presented to the board at a future meeting. •Staff also presented an update on water supplies and noted that currently San Diego County relies heavily on imported water with 76%of water supplies being imported from MWD.It is expected that the reliance on imported water from MWD will fall to 29%with the difference made up by the lID Transfer, conservation,seawater desalination,the canal lining transfer,local surface water,recycled water and groundwater.It was discussed that this past spring was the driest on record in Northern California and reservoir levels are quite low.Adding to the dry conditions is the court- ordered delivery restrictions from the Bay Delta --the largest in history.As such,it is expected that storage levels will be depleted by 2010.Due to these critical conditions the Governor has declared a statewide drought. MWD is focusing on four strategies to improve reliability and reduce potential shortages that include:conservation enhancements,accelerating local supply projects to improve local resources,delta improvements and transfers.It was discussed that shortages could be significant even with full implementation of MWD's plan and could continue over a multi- year period.It is critical that near and long-term Bay Delta fixes be implemented for future water supply needs during the drought. The committee supported staffs'recommendations and presentation to the full board as an informational item. ,; ATTACHMENTS ORDINANCE NO.516 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AMENDING SECTION 39, DROUGHT RESPONSE CONSERVATION PROGRAM,FORMERLY KNOWN AS "CONSERVATION AND WATER SHORTAGE RESPONSE PROGRAM,"OF THE DISTRICT'S CODE OF ORDINANCES WHEREAS,article 10,section 2 of the California Constitution declares that waters of the State are to be put to beneficial use,that waste,unreasonable use,or unreasonable method of use of water be prevented,and that water be conserved for the public welfare;and WHEREAS,conservation of current water supplies and minimization of the effects of water supply shortages that are the result of drought are essential to the public health,safety and welfare;and WHEREAS,regulation of the time of certain water use, manner of certain water use,design of rates,method of application of water for certain uses,installation and use of water-saving devices,provide an effective and immediately available means of conserving water;and WHEREAS,California Water Code sections 375 et seq. authorize water suppliers to adopt and enforce a comprehensive water conservation program;and WHEREAS,adoption and enforcement of a comprehensive water conservation program will allow the Otay Water District (District)to delay or avoid implementing measures such as water rationing or more restrictive water use regulations pursuant to a declared water shortage emergency as authorized by California Water Code sections 350 et seq.;and WHEREAS,San Diego County is a semi-arid region and local water resources are scarce.The region is dependent upon imported water supplies provided by the San Diego County Water Authority,which obtains a substantial portion of its supplies from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.Because the region is dependent upon imported water supplies,weather and other conditions in other portions of this State and of the Southwestern United States affect the availability of water for use in San Diego County;and WHEREAS,the San Diego County Water Authority has adopted an Urban Water Management Plan that includes water conservation as a necessary and effective component of the Water Authority's programs to provide a reliable supply of water to meet the needs of the Water Authority's 24 member public agencies,including the District.The Water Authority's Urban Water Management Plan also includes a contingency analysis of actions to be taken in response to water supply shortages.This ordinance is consistent with the Water Authority's Urban Water Management Plan;and WHEREAS,as anticipated by its Urban Water Management Plan,the San Diego County Water Authority,in cooperation and consultation with its member public agencies,has adopted a Drought Management Plan,which establishes a progressive program for responding to water supply limitations resulting from drought'conditions.This ordinance is intended to be consistent with and to implement the Water Authority's Drought Management Plan; and WHEREAS,the Water Authority's Drought Management Plan contains three stages containing regional actions to be taken to lessen or avoid supply shortages.This ordinance contains drought response levels that correspond with the Drought Management Plan stages;and WHEREAS,the District due to the geographic and climatic conditions within its territory and its dependence upon water imported and provided by the San Diego County Water Authority,may experience shortages due to drought conditions,regulatory restrictions enacted upon imported supplies and other factors.The District has adopted an Urban Water Management Plan that includes water conservation as a necessary and effective component of its programs to provide a reliable supply of water to meet the needs of the public within its service territory.The District's Urban Water Management Plan also includes a contingency analysis of actions to be taken in response to water supply shortages.This ordinance is consistent with the Urban Water Management Plan adopted by the District; and WHEREAS the water conservation measures and progressive restrictions on water use and method of use identified by this ordinance provide certainty to water users and enable District to control water use,provide water supplies,and plan and implement water management measures in a fair and orderly manner for the benefit of the public. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District as follows: 1.The existing Section 39 of the District's Code of Ordinances is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto;and 2.The General Manager and the District Secretary are hereby ordered to take any and all actions and steps necessary to carry out the provisions of this ordinance; and 3.This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the board of Directors of the Otay Water District at a regular meeting duly held this 10th day of June,2008,by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: President ATTEST: Secretary ATTACHMENTC SECTION 39.DROUGHT RESPONSE CONSERVATION PROGRAM .I·t.j i: :: 39.01 DECLARATION OF NECESSITY AND INTENT (a)This Section establishes water management requirements necessary to conserve water,enable effective water supply planning,assure reasonable and beneficial use of water,prevent waste of water,prevent unreasonable use of water,prevent unreasonable method of use of water within the District in order to assure adequate supplies of water to meet the needs of the public,and further the public health,safety,and welfare,recognizing that water is a scarce natural resource that requires careful management not only in times of drought,but at all times. (b)This Section establishes regulations to be implemented during times of declared water shortages,or declared water shortage emergencies.It establishes four levels of drought response actions to be implemented in times of shortage,with increasing restrictions on water use in response to worsening drought conditions and decreasing available supplies. (c)The Level 1 drought response condition measures are voluntary and will be reinforced through local and regional public education and awareness measures that may be funded in part by the District.Beginning at the level 2 drought Response Condition,the District will begin to implement drought pricing.During drought response condition Levels 2,all conservation measures and water-use restrictions are mandatory and become increasingly restrictive in order to attain escalating conservation goals. (d)During a Drought Response Level 3 condition or higher,the water conservation measures and water use restrictions established by this ordinance are mandatory and violations are subject to criminal,civil,and administrative penalties and remedies specified in Section 72 of this ordinance. 1 39.02 DEFINITIONS APPLICABLE TO THE PROGRAM (a)The following words and phrases whenever used in this Section shall have the meaning defined in this sub- section: 1.~Grower"refers to those engaged in the growing or raising,in conformity with recognized practices of husbandry,for the purpose of commerce, trade,or industry,or for use by public educational or correctional institutions,of agricultural, horticultural or floricultural products,and produced: (1)for human consumption or for the market,or (2) for the feeding of fowl or livestock produced for human consumption or for the market,or (3)for the feeding of fowl or livestock for the purpose of obtaining their products for human consumption or for the market.~Grower"does not refer to customers who purchase water subject to the Metropolitan Interim Agricultural Water Program or the Water Authority Special Agricultural Rate programs. 2.~Water Authority"means the San Diego County Water Authority. 3.~DMP"means the Water Authority's Drought Management Plan in existence on the effective date of this Section and as readopted or amended from time to time,or an equivalent plan of the Water Authority to manage or allocate supplies during shortages. 4.~Metropolitan"means the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. 5.~Person"means any natural person, corporation,pUblic or private entity,public or private association,public or private agency, government agency or institution,school district, college,university,or any other user of water provided by the District. 2 39.03 APPLICATION (a)The provisions of this Section apply to any person in the use of any water provided by the District. (b)This Section is intended solely to further the conservation of water.It is not intended to implement any provision of federal,State,or local statutes,ordinances, or regulations relating to protection of water quality or control of drainage or runoff.Refer to the local jurisdiction or Regional Water Quality Control Board for information on any stormwater ordinances and stormwater management plans. (c)Nothing in this Section is intended to affect or limit the ability of the District to declare and respond to an emergency,including an emergency that affects the ability of the District to supply water. (d)The provisions of this Section do not apply to use of water from private wells or to recycled water. (e)Nothing in this Section shall apply to use of water that is subject to a special supply program,such as the Metropolitan Interim Agricultural Water Program or the Water Authority Special Agricultural Rate programs. Violations of the conditions of special supply programs are subject to the penalties established under the applicable program.A person using water subject to a special supply program and other water provided by the District is subject to this Section in the use of the other water. 39.04 DROUGHT RESPONSE LEVEL 1 -DROUGHT WATCH CONDITION (a)A Drought Response Level 1 condition is also referred to as a ~Drought Watch"condition.A Level 1 condition applies when the Water Authority notifies its member agencies that due to drought or other supply reductions,there is a reasonable probability there will be supply shortages and that a consumer demand reduction of up to 10 percent is required in order to ensure that sufficient supplies will be available to meet anticipated demands.The General Manager shall declare the existence of a Drought Response Level 1 and take action to implement the Level 1 conservation practices identified in this Section. 3 (b)During a Level 1 Drought Watch condition,the District will increase its public education and outreach efforts to emphasize increased public awareness of the need to implement the following water conservation practices. The same water conservation practices become mandatory if the District declares a Level 2 Drought Alert condition: 1.Stop washing down paved surfaces,including but not limited to sidewalks,driveways,parking lots, tennis courts,or patios,except when it is necessary to alleviate safety or sanitation hazards. 2.Stop water waste resulting from inefficient landscape irrigation,such as runoff,low head drainage,or overspray,etc.Similarly,stop water flows onto non-targeted areas,such as adjacent property,non-irrigated areas~hardscapes,roadways, or structures. 3.Irrigate residential and commercial landscape before 10 a.m.and after 6 p.m.only. Customers are encouraged to water no more than three days a week using the suggested watering schedule as found on the District's web page.New plantings and newly seeded areas are exempt for 30 days. 4.Use a hand-held hose equipped with a positive shut-off nozzle or bucket to water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties that are not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system. 5.Irrigate nursery and commercial grower's products before 10 a.m.and after 6 p.m.only. Watering is permitted at any time with a hand-held hose equipped with a positive shut-off nozzle,a bucket,or when a drip/micro-irrigation system/equipment is used.Irrigation of nursery propagation beds is permitted at any time.Watering of livestock is permitted at any time. 6.Use re-circulated water to operate ornamental fountains. 7.Wash vehicles using a bucket and a hand-held hose with positive shut-off nozzle,mobile high 4 pressure/low volume wash system,or at a commercial site that re-circulates (reclaims)water on-site~ Avoid washing during hot conditions when additional water is required due to evaporation. 8.Serve and refill water in restaurants and other food service establishments only upon request. 9.Offer guests in hotels,motels,and other commercial lodging establishments the option of not laundering towels and linens daily. 10.Repair all water leaks within forty-eight hours (48)of notification by the District unless other arrangements are made with the General Manager. 11.Use recycled or non-potable water for construction purposes when available. i"! (b)All persons using District water shall make every effort to comply with Level 1 Drought Watch water conservation practices during a Level 2 Drought Alert,and also to comply with the following additional conservation measures: (a)A Drought Response Level 2 condition is also referred to as a "Drought Alert"condition.A Level 2 condition applies when the Water Authority notifies its member agencies that due to cutbacks caused by drought or other reduction in supplies,a consumer demand reduction of up to 20 percent is required in order to have sufficient supplies available to meet anticipated demands.The District Board of Directors shall declare the existence of a Drought Response Level 2 condition and implement the Level 2 conservation measures identified in this section of the ordinance. 39.05 DROUGHT RESPONSE LEVEL 2 -DROUGHT ALERT CONDITION ;:I' III I I "t fl I•f; t 1.Limit residential and commercial landscape irrigation to no more than three (3)assigned days per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the District.During the months of November through April,landscape irrigation is 5 limited to no more than once per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the District.This section shall not apply to commercial growers or nurseries. 2.Limit lawn watering and landscape irrigation using sprinklers to no more than fifteen (15)minutes per watering station per assigned day.Watering times may need to be shortened to avoid run-off.This provision does not apply to landscape irrigation systems using water efficient devices,including but not limited to:weather based controllers,drip/micro- irrigation systems,rotating sprinkler nozzles and stream rotor sprinklers. 3.Water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties,and not irrigated'by a landscape irrigation system on the same schedule set forth above by using a bucket,hand-held hose with positive shut- off nozzle,or low-volume non-spray irrigation. 39.06 DROUGHT RESPONSE LEVEL 3 -DROUGHT CRITICAL CONDITION (a)A Drought Response Level 3 condition is also referred to as a "Drought Critical"condition.A Level 3 condition applies when the Water Authority notifies its member agencies that due to increasing cutbacks caused by drought or other reduction of supplies,a consumer demand reduction of up to 40 percent is required in order to have sufficient supplies available to meet anticipated demands. The District Board of Directors shall declare the existence of a Drought Response Level 3 condition and implement the Level 3 conservation measures identified in this Section. (b)All persons using District water shall comply with Level 1 Drought Watch and Level 2 Drought Alert water conservation practices during a Level 3 Drought Critical condition and shall also comply with the following additional mandatory conservation measures: 1.Limit residential and commercial landscape irrigation to no more than two (2)assigned days per week on a schedule established by the General Manager 6 and posted by the District.During the months of November through April,landscape irrigation is limited to no more than once per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the District.This section shall not apply to commercial growers or nurseries. 2.Water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties,and not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system on the same schedule set forth above by using a bucket,hand-held hose with a positive shut-off nozzle,or low-volume non-spray irrigation. 3.Stop filling or re-filling ornamental lakes or ponds,except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life,provided that such animals are of significant value and have been actively managed within the water feature prior to declaration of a drought response level under this Section. 4.Stop operating non-residential ornamental fountains or similar decorative water features unless recycled water is used. 5.Stop washing vehicles except at commercial carwashes that re-circulate water,or by high pressure/low volume wash systems.If a commercial car wash cannot accommodate the vehicle because of the vehicle size or type,RVs,horse trailers,boats and commercial vehicles will be allowed to wash vehicles using a bucket and a hand-held hose with positive shut-off nozzle,mobile high pressure/low volume wash system. (c)Upon the declaration of a Drought Response Level 3 condition,no new potable water service shall be provided,no new temporary meters or permanent meters shall be provided,and no statements of immediate ability to serve or provide potable water service (such as,will serve letters,certificates,or letters of availability)shall be issued,except under the following circumstances: 1.A valid,unexpired building permit has been issued for the project;or 7 2.The project is necessary to protect the public's health,safety,and welfare;or 3.The applicant provides substantial evidence of an enforceable commitment that water demands for the project will be offset prior to the provision of a new water meter(s)to the satisfaction of the District. This provision shall not be construed to preclude the resetting or turn-on of meters to provide continuation of water service or to restore service that has been interrupted. (d)Upon the declaration of a Drought Response Level 3 condition,the District will suspend consideration of annexations to its service area. (e)The District may establish a water allocation for property served by the District using a method that takes into consideration of the implementation of conservation methods or the installation of water saving devices.If the District establishes a water allocation,it shall provide notice of the allocation by including it in the regular billing statement for the fee or charge or by any other mailing to the address to which the District customarily mails the billing statement for fees or charges for on-going water service.Following the effective date of the water allocation as established by the District,any person that uses water in excess of the allocation shall be subject to a penalty for each billing unit of water in excess of the allocation.The penalty for excess water usage shall be cumulative to any other remedy or penalty that may be imposed for violation of this Section. 39.07 DROUGHT RESPONSE LEVEL 4 -DROUGHT EMERGENCY CONDITION (a)A Drought Response Level 4 condition is also referred to as a "Drought EmergencyH condition.A Level 4 condition applies when the Water Authority Board of Directors declares a water shortage emergency pursuant to California Water Code section 350 and notifies its member agencies that Level 4 requires a demand reduction of more than 40 percent in order for the District to have maximum supplies available to meet anticipated demands.The District shall declare a Drought Emergency in the manner 8 and on the grounds provided in California Water Code section 350. (b)All persons using District water shall comply with conservation measures required during Level 1 Drought Watch,Level 2 Drought Alert,and Level 3 Drought Critical conditions and shall also comply with the following additional mandatory conservation measures: 1.Stop all landscape irrigation,except crops and landscape products of commercial growers and nurseries.This restriction shall not apply to the following categories of use unless the District has determined that recycled water is available and may be lawfully applied to the use. A.Maintenance of trees and shrubs that are watered on the same Bchedule as noted in the Level 3 Drought Critical Condition,by using a bucket,hand-held hose with a positive shut-off nozzle,or low-volume non-spray irrigation; B.Maintenance of existing landscaping necessary for fire protection as specified by the Fire Marshal of the local fire protection agency having jurisdiction over the property to be irrigated; C.Maintenance of existing landscaping for erosion control; D.Maintenance of plant materials identified to be rare or essential to the well being of rare animals; E.Maintenance of landscaping within active public parks and playing fields,day care centers,school grounds,cemeteries,and golf course greens,provided that such irrigation does not exceed two (2)days per week according to the schedule established under the District's Level 3 Drought Critical Condition; F.Watering of livestock;and G.Public works projects and actively irrigated environmental mitigation projects. 9 2 .Repair all water leaks within twenty- four (24)hours of notification by the District unless other arrangements are made with the District. (a)The correlation between the Water Authority's DMP stages and the District's drought response levels identified in this Section of the Code of Ordinance is described herein.Under DMP Stage 1,the District would implement Drought Response Levell actions.Under DMP Stage 2,the District would implement Drought Response Levell or Level 2 actions.Under DMP Stage 3,the District would implement Drought Response Level 2,Level 3, or Level 4 actions. (c)The District may establish a water allocation for property served by the District.If the District establishes a water allocation it shall provide notice of the allocation by including it in the regular billing statement for the fee or charge or by any other mailing to the address to which the District customarily mails the billing statement for fees or charges for on-going water service.Following the effective date of the water allocation as established by the District,any person that uses water in excess of the allocation shall be subject to a penalty for each billing unit of'water in excess of the allocation.The penalty for excess water usage shall be cumulative to any other remedy or penalty that may be imposed for violation of any provision of this Section. 39.08 CORRELATION BETWEEN DROUGHT MANAGEMENT PLAN (DMP) AND DROUGHT RESPONSE LEVELS 10 (b)The drought response levels identified in this Section correspond with the Water Authority DMP as identified in the following table: 1 -Drought Watch 2 -Drought Alert 3 -Drought Critical 4 -Drought Emergency Voluntary Up to 10%Stage 1 or 2 Mandatory Up to 20%Stage 2 or 3 Mandatory Up to 40%Stage 3 Mandatory Above 40%Stage 3 (a)The existence of a Drought Response Level 1 condition may be declared by the General Manager upon a written determination of the existence of the facts and circumstances supporting the determination.A copy of the written determination shall be filed with the Clerk or Secretary of the District and provided to the District Board of Directors.The General Manager may publish a notice of the determination of existence of Drought Response Levell condition in one or more newspapers, including a newspaper of general circulation within the District.The District will also post notice of the condition on their website. 39.09 PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINATION AND NOTICATION OF DROUGHT RESPONSE LEVEL,l~iII I I IiIi I·!' ~ (b)The existence of Drought Response Level 2 or Level 3 conditions may be declared by resolution of the District Board of Directors adopted at a regular or special public meeting held in accordance with State law.The mandatory conservation measures applicable to Drought Response Level 2 or Level 3 conditions shall take effect on the tenth (10)day after the date the response level is declared.Within five (5)days following the declaration of the response level,the District shall publish a copy of the resolution in a newspaper used for pUblication of official notices. (c)The existence of a Drought Response Level 4 condition may be declared in accordance with the procedures specified in California Water Code sections 350 to 352 as note below: 11 350.The governing body of a distributor of a public water supply,whether publicly or privately owned and including a mutual water company,may declare a water shortage emergency condition to prevail within the area served by such distributor whenever it finds and determines that the ordinary demands and requirements of water consumers cannot be satisfied without depleting the water supply of the distributor to the extent that there would be insufficient water for human consumption, sanitation,and fire protection. 351.Excepting in event of a breakage or failure of a dam,pump, pipe line or conduit causing an immediate emergency,the declaration shall be made only after a public hearing at which consumers of such water supply shall have an opportunity to be heard to protest against the declaration and to present their respective needs to said governing board. 352.Notice of the time and place of hearing shall be published pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code at least seven days prior to the date of hearing in a newspaper printed, published,and circulated within the area in which the water supply is distributed,or if there is no such newspaper,in any newspaper printed,published,and circulated in the county in which the area is located. The mandatory conservation measures applicable to Drought Response Level 4 conditions shall take effect on the tenth (10)day after the date the response level is declared. Within five (5)days following the declaration of the response level,the District shall publish a copy of the resolution in a newspaper used for publication of official notices.If the District establishes a water allocation, it shall provide notice of the allocation by including it in the regular billing statement for the fee or charge or by any other mailing to the address to which the District customarily mails the billing statement for fees or charges for on-going water service.Water allocation shall be effective on the fifth (5)day following the date of mailing or at such later date as specified in the notice. (d)The District Board of Directors may declare an end to a Drought Response Level by the adoption of a resolution at any regular or special meeting held in accordance with State law. 12 1 ,1.! " C~[ Otay Drought Response Conservation Program-Section 39 ~. --------'"'~....-...,..-~~~---------~-i" ----. -----_.- --~-~._---_.~•---------------..'---~---=------------ Levell Drought •Level 1 applies when the Water Authority notifies its member Voluntary Up to 10%Stage lor Watch agencies that due to drought orother supply reductions,there is a Stage 2 reasonable probability ofsupply shortages and that a consumer demand reduction ofup to 10%is required in order ensure that sufficient supplies will be available to meet anticipated demands. . •The District General Manager shall declare the existence ofLevel 1 and take action to implement the Level I conservation practices identified in this ordinance. Level 2 Drought •Level 2 applies when the Water Authority notifies its member Mandatory Up to 20%Stage 2 or Alert agencies that due to cutbacks caused by drought or other reduction in Stage 3 supplies,a consumer demand reduction ofup to 20%is required in order to have sufficient supplies available to meet anticipated demands. •The District Board ofDirectors shall declare the existence ofLevel 2 condition. •Drought rates shall begin Level 3 Drought •Level 3 applies when the Water Authority notifies its member Mandatory Up to 40%Stage 3 Critical agencies that due to increasing cutbacks caused by drought or other reduction ofsupplies,a consumer demand reduction ofup to 40%is required in order to have sufficient supplies available to meet anticipated demands. ~•The District Board ofDirectors shall declare the existence ofa Level 3 condition and implement the mandatory Level 3 conservation -of measures identified in this ordinance.» Level 4 Drought • A Level 4 condition applies when the Water Authority Board Mandatory Above 40%Stage 3 0 Emergency declares a water shortage emergencypursuant to Water Code Section ::E:s:350 and notifies its member agencies that Level 4 requires a demand mreductionofmorethan40%in order for the District to have Z maximum supplies available to meet anticipated demands.-of •District shall declare a Drought Emergency in the manner provided C in Water Code Section 350. 1 Drought Response Levels VolQJ1tarY or Mandatory Use Restrictions Retail Conservation Levels Water Aut~ority DMPStage Levell Water-Use Restrictions L Stop washing down paved surfaces,including but not limited to sidewalks,driveways,parking lots,tennis courts,or patios,except when it is necessary to alleviate safety or sanitation hazards. 2.Stop water waste resulting from inefficient landscape irrigation,such as runoff,low head drainage,or overspray,etc.Similarly, stop water flows onto non-targeted areas,such as adjacent property,non-irrigated areas,hardscapes,roadways,or structures. 3.Irrigate residential and commercial landscape before 10 a.m.and after 6 p.m.only.Suggest that customers water no more than three days per week,using the watenng schedule found on the District's web page.New plantings and newly seeded areas are exempt for 30 days. 4.Use a hand-held hose equipped with a positive shut-off nozzle or bucket to water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercIal properties that are not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system. 5.Irrigate nursery and commercial grower's products before 10 a.m.and after 6 p.m.only.Watering is permitted at any time with a hand-held hose equipped with a positive shut-off nozzle,a bucket,or when a drip/micro-irrigation system/equipment is used. Irrigation ofnursery propagation beds is permitted at any time.Watering of livestock is permitted at any time. 6.Use re-circulated water to operate ornamental fountains. 7.Wash vehicles using a bucket and a hand-held hose with positive shut-off nozzle,mobile high pressure/low volume wash system, or at a commercial site that re-circulates (reclaims)water on-site.Avoid washing during hot conditions when additional water is required due to evaporation. 8.Serve and refill water in restaurants and other food service establishments only upon request. 9.Offer guests in hotels,motels,and other commercial lodging establishments the option of not laundering towels and linens daily. 10.Repair all water leaks within forty-eight hours (48)of notification by the District unless other arrangements are made with the District. 11.Use recycled or non-potable water for construction purposes when available. Restnctions shall not apply to use ofwater from private wells or to the use ofrecycled water. 2 DroughtResponse Levels VolU))tary or Man<latory Use Restrictions Re~i1 Conservation Levels Water Authority DMP S~e Level 2 Drought Alert Mandatory Up to 20%Stage 2 or Stage 3 Water-Use Restrictions Level 1 water-use restriction.plus: 1.Limit residential and commerdallandscape irrigation to no more than three assigned days per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the District.During the months ofNovember through April.landscape irrigation is limited to no more than once per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the District.This section shall not apply to commercial growers ornurseries. 2.Limit lawn watering and landscape irrigation using sprinklers to no more than fifteen (15)minutes per watering station per day. This provision does not apply to landscape irrigation systems using water efficient devices.including but not limited to:weather based controllers.drip/micro-irrigation systems and stream rotor sprinklers. 3.Water landscaped areas.including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties,and not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system on the same schedule set forth above.by using a bucket.hand-held hose with positive shut-offnozzle. or low-volume non-spray irrigation. Restrictions shall not apply to use ofwater from private wells or to the use of recycled water. Drought rate pricing begins at Level 2 3 Drought ltC$PQnse Levels Voll,lnt.lryor Mandatory Use Restrictions Retail Conservation Levels WaterAutbQr.ity DMPSta.ge Level 3 -..•Critical Mandatory Up to 40% Water-Use Restrictions Levelland 2 water-use restriction,plus: 1 Limit residential and commercial landscape irrigation to no more than two assigned days per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the District.During the months of November through April,landscape irrigation is limited to no more than once per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the District.This section shall not apply to commercial growers or nurseries. 2.Water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties,and not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system,on the same schedule set forth above,by using a bucket,hand-held hose with a positive shut-offnozzle, or low-volume non-spray irrigation. 3.Stop filling or re-filling ornamental lakes orponds,except to the extent needed to sustain aquatic life,provided that such animals are of significant value and have been actively managed within the water feature prior to declaration ofa drought response level under this ordinance. 4.Stop operating non-residential ornamental fountains or similar decorative water features unless recycled water is used 5.Stop washing vehicles except at commercial carwashes that re-circulate water,or by high pressure/low volume wash systems.If a commercial car wash cannot accommodate the vehicle because its size or type,RVs,horse trailers,boats and commercial vehicles will be allowed to wash vehicles using a bucket and a hand-held hose with positive shut-offnozzle,mobile high pressurellow volume wash system. *No new potable water service shall be provided,no new temporary meters or permanent meters shall be provided,and no statements ofimmediate ability to serve or provide potable water service (such as,will serve letters,certificates or letters of availability)shall be issued,except under the following circumstances: 1.A valid,unexpired building permit has been issued for the project;or 2.The project is necessary to protect the public's health,safety,and welfare;or 3,The applicant provides substantial evidence ofan enforceable commitment that water demands for the project will be offset prior to the provision of a new water meter(s)to the satisfaction ofthe District. This provision shall not be construed to preclude the resetting or tum-on ofmeters to provide continuation of water service or to restore service that has been interrupted. *Upon declaration ofDrought Response Level 3 condition,District will suspend consideration of annexations to its service area. *The District may establish a water allocation for property served by the Districtusing a method that takes into consideration of the implementation of conservation methods or the installation of water saving devices. Restrictions shall not apply to use ofwater from private wells or to the use ofrecycled water. 4 Drought Response Levels Voluntary or Mandatory Use Restrictions Re~iI Conservation Levels Water Authority DMP St!lge Water-Use Restrictions Levell,2,and 3 water-use restriction,plus: L Stop all landscape irrigation,except crops and landscape products of commercial growers and nurseries.This restriction shall not apply to the following categories ofuse unless the District has determined that recycled water is available and may be lawfully applied to the use. A.Maintenance of trees and shrubs that are watered on the same schedule set forth in as noted in the Level 3 Drought Critical Condition by using a bucket,hand-held hose with a positive shut-off nozzle,or low-volume non-spray irrigation; B.Maintenance ofexisting landscaping necessary for fIre protection as specifIed by the Fire Marshal ofthe local fIre protection agency having jurisdiction over the property to be irrigated~ C.Maintenance ofexisting landscaping for erosion control; D.Maintenance ofplant materials identifIed to be rare or essential to the well being ofrare animals; Maintenance of landscaping within active public parks and playing fIelds,day care centers,school grounds,cemeteries,and golf course greens,provided that such irrigation does not exceed two (2)days per week according to the schedule established under the District's Level 3 Drought Critical Condition;. E.Watering of livestock;and F.Public works projects and actively irrigated environmental mitigation projects. 2.Repair all water leaks within twenty-four (24)hours ofnotifIcation by the District unless other arrangements are made with the District. *The District may establish a water allocation for property served by the District. Restrictions shall not apply to use of water from private wells or to the use ofrecycled water. 6 Drought Response Levels T.rigger Model Drought Response Ordinance Drought Response Levels and Water-Use RestnctlOns Voluntary or Mandatory RestrictiODS Customer COuervatioDT.~ Level 1 Drought Watch Level 2 Drought Alert Level 3 Drought Critical Level 4 Drought Emergency March 27,2008 •Level 1 applies when the Water Authority notifies its member agencies that due to drought orother supply reductions,there is a reasonable probability ofsupply shortages and that a consumer demand reduction ofup to 10%is required in order ensure that sufficient supplies will be available to meet anticipated demands. •The [AGENCY GENERAL MANAGER]shall declare the existence ofLevelland take action to implement the Level I conservation practices identified in this ordinance. •Level 2 applies when the WaterAuthority notifies its member agencies that due to cutbacks caused by drought or other reduction in supplies,a consumer demand reduction ofup to 20%is required in order to have sufficient supplies available to meet anticipated demands. •The [AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS]shalldeclare the existence ofLevel 2 condition and implement the mandatory Level 2 conservation measures identified in this ordinance. •Level 3 applies when the Water Authority notifies its member agencies that due to increasing cutbacks caused by drought or other reduction ofsupplies,a consumer demand reduction ofup to 40%is required in order to have sufficient supplies available to meet anticipated demands. •The [AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS]shall declare the existence ofa Level 3 condition and implement the Level 3 conservation measures identified in this ordinance. • A Level 4 condition applies when the Water Authority Board declares a watershortage emergency pursuantto Water Code Section 350 and notifies its member agencies that Level 4 requires a demand reduction ofmore than 40%in order for the [AGENCY]to have maximum supplies available to meet anticipated demands. •[AGENCY]shall declare a Drought Emergency in the manner provided in Water Code Section 350. Voluntary Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory Up to 10% Up to 20% Up to 40% Above 40% Stage lor Stage 2 Stage 2 or Stage 3 Stage 3 Stage 3 1 ~ Do) ("):r 3 (I)::s..... m .. Drought Response Levels Voluntary or Mandatory Use Restrictions Retail Conservation .Levels Water Authority DMP S~age Levell Water-Use Restrictions grbumt WatCh VoluntarY U~to 10%Sta.ze 1 or ~e 2 1.Stop washing downpaved surfaces,including but not limited to sidewalks,driveways,parking lots,tennis courts,or patios,except when it is necessary to alleviate safety or sanitation hazards. 2.Stop water waste resulting from inefficient landscape irrigation,such as runoff,low head drainage,or overspray,etc.Similarly, stop water flows onto non-targeted areas,such as adjacent property,non-irrigated areas,hardscapes,roadways,or structures. 3.Irrigate residential and commercmllandscape before 10 a.m.and after 6 p.m.only. 4.Use a hand-held hose equipped with a positive shut-offnozzle or bucket to water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties that are not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system. 5.Irrigate nursery and commercial grower's products before 10 a.m.and after 6 p.m.only.Watering IS permitted at any time with a hand-held hose equipped with a positive shut-offnozzle,a bucket,or when a drip/micro-irrigation system/equipment is used. Irrigation ofnursery propagation beds is permitted at any time.Watering oflivestock is permitted at any time. 6.Use re-circulated water to operate ornamental fountains. 7 Wash vehicles using a bucket and a hand-held hose with positive shut-offnozzle,mobile high pressure/low volume wash system, orat a commercial site that re-circulates (reclaims)water on-site.Avoid washing during hot conditions when additional water is required due to evaporation. 8.Serve and refill water in restaurants and other food service establishments only upon request. 9.Offer guests in hotels,motels,and other commercial lodging establishments the option ofnot laundering towels and linens daily. 10.Repair all water leaks within five (5)days ofnotification by the [AGENCY]unless other arrangements are made with the General Manager. 11.Use recycled or'non-potable water for construction purposes when available. Restrictions shall not apply to use ofwater from private wells or to the use ofrecycled water. March 27,2008 2 Drought Response Levels Voluntary or Mandatory Use Restrictions Retail Conservation Levels Water Authority DMP Stage Level 2 Drought Alert Mandatory Up to 20%Stage 2 or Stage 3 Water-Use Restrictions Level 1 water-use restriction,plus: 1.Limit residential and commercial landscape irrigation to no more than three assigned days per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the [AGENCY].During the months ofNovember through May,landscape irrigation is limited to no more than once per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the [AGENCY].This section shall not apply to commercial growers or nurseries. 2.Limit lawn watering and landscape irrigation using sprinklers to no more than ten (10)minutes per watering station per day.This provision does not apply to landscape irrigation systems using water efficient devices,including but not limited to:weather based controllers,drip/micro-irrigation systems and stream rotor sprinklers. 3.Water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties,and not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system governed by section 5 (b)(1),on the same schedule set forth in section 5 (b)(1)by using a bucket, hand-held hose with positive shut-offnozzle,or low-volume non-spray irrigation. 4.Repair all leaks within seventy-two (72)hours ofnotification by the [AGENCY]unless other arrangements are made with the General Manager. 5.Stop operating ornamental fountains or similar decorative water features unless recycled water is used. Restrictions shall not apply to use ofwater from private wells or to the use ofrecycled water. March 27,2008 3 DronghtResponse Levels Voluntary or Mandatory Use Restrictions Retail Conservation Levels Water Authority DMP Stage Level 3 Dro~ht Critical MandatolV Up to 400iO S~e3 Water-Use Restrictions Levelland2 water-use restriction,plus: 1 Limit residential and commercial landscape irrigation to no more than two assigned days per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the [AGENCY].During the months ofNovember through May,landscape irrigation is limited to no more than once per week on a schedule established by the General Manager and posted by the [AGENCY].This section shall not apply to commercial growers or nursenes. 2.Water landscaped areas,including trees and shrubs located on residential and commercial properties,and not irrigated by a landscape irrigation system governed by section 6 (b)(1),on the same schedule set forth in section 6 (b) (1)by using a bucket, hand-held hose with a positive shut-off nozzle,or low-volume non-spray irrigation. 3.Stop fIlling or re-filling ornamental lakes or ponds,except to the extentneeded to sustain aquatic life,provided that such animals are ofsignificant value and have been actively managed within the water feature prior to declaration ofa drought response level under this ordinance. 4.Stop washing vehicles except at commercial carwashes that re-circulate water,or by high pressure/low volume wash systems. 5.Repair all leaks within forty-eight (48)hours ofnotification by the [AGENCY]unless other arrangements are made with the General Manager. *No new potable water service shall be provided,no new temporary meters or.permanent meters shall be provided,and no statements ofimmediate ability to serve or provide potable water service (such as,will serve letters,certificates or letters ofavailability)shall be issued,except under the following circumstances: 1 A valid,unexpired building permit has been issued for the project;or 2.The project is necessary to protect the public's health,safety,and welfare;or 3.The applicant provides substantial evidence ofan enforceable commitment that water demands for the project will be offset prior to the provision ofa new water meter(s)to the satisfaction of[AGENCY]. This provision shall not be construedto preclude the resetting or turn-on ofmeters to provide continuation ofwater service or to restore service that has been interrupted for a period ofone year or less. *Upon declaration ofDrought Response Level 3 condition,[AGENCY] will suspend consideration ofannexations to its service area. *The [AGENCY]may establish a water allocation for property served by the [AGENCY]using a method that does not penalize persons for the implementation of conservation methods or the installation ofwater saving devices. RestnctlOns shall not apply to use ofwater from pnvate wells or to the use ofrecycled water. March 27,2008 4 DnJUgh1 Response Levels Voluntary or Mandatory Use Restrictions Retail Conservation Levels Water Authority DMP Stage Water-Use Restrictions Levell,2,and 3 water-use restriction,plus: 1.Stop all landscape irrigation,except crops and landscape products ofcommercial growers and nurseries.This restriction shall not apply to the following categories ofuse unless the [AGENCY]has determined that recycled water is available and may be lawfully applied to the use. A.Maintenance oftrees and shrubs that are watered on the same schedule set forth in section 6 (b)(1)by using a bucket,hand-held hose with a positive shut-offnozzle,or low-volume non-spray irrigation; B.Maintenance ofexisting landscaping necessary for fIre protection as specifIed by the Fire Marshal ofthe local fIre protection agency having jurisdiction over the property to be imgated; C.Maintenance ofexisting landscaping for erosion control; D.Maintenance ofplant materials identifIed to be rare or essential to the well being ofrare animals; E.Maintenance oflandscaping within active public parks and playing fIelds,day care centers,school grounds,cemeteries,and golf course greens,provided that such irrigation does not exceed two (2)days per week according to the schedule established under section 6 (b)(1); F Watering oflivestock;and G.Public works projects and actively irrigated environmental mitigation projects. 2.Repair all water leaks within twenty-four (24)hours ofnotifIcation by the [AGENCY]unless other arrangements are made with the General Manager. *The [AGENCY]may establish a water allocation for property served by the [AGENCY]. Restrictions shall not apply to use ofwater from private wells or to the use ofrecycled water. March 27,2008 5 AGENDA ITEM 11 STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Regular Board Meeting Mark Watton, General Manager General Manager's Report MEETING DATE: W.O.lG.F. NO: August 6,2008 N/A DIV. NO. N/A GENERAL MANAGER: FLAGSHIP PROJECTS: Update on the design of the 36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline from FCF #14 to Regulatory Site (CIP P2009)for the month of June 2008: •Staff has forwarded a letter to IEC terminating their contract with the District.Staff will be presenting for the board's consideration on August 6,2008 a request to award an engineering design services contract to Lee &Ro, Inc.to complete the design of the pipeline project. •The revised Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)was re- circulated for public review and will be presented to the July Committee Meeting and the August Board Meeting. •The draft Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)was submitted to the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Update on the 640-1 and 640-2 Reservoirs Project (CIP P2185)for the month of June 2008: •Graded all the access roads and constructed the ribbon drains along the access roads. •Started the construction of the de-silting basin. •Project schedule is 85%complete and projected to finish November 30,2008.Project is on time and on budget. Communications: •The 2008 Consumer Confidence Report was distributed to customers beginning on June 24,one week before the requirement that it be delivered to consumers.In addition,copies of the CCR were distributed to local libraries within the District's service area.The customer Pipeline newsletter was also distributed in July.Full-color versions of the CCR and Pipeline newsletter are attached for your review,and for contrast,earlier versions.Electronic copies of both documents are available for viewing on the District's website. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AND FINANCE: Administrative Services: •There were three employees hired in the month of July;a Valve Maintenance Worker,Supervising Land Surveyor,and Safety and Security Administrator. •The employees participated in an employee survey at the end of May.The Consultant is preparing the final report which will be presented to the Board of Directors at the September 3rd Board meeting. •The District secured another all-day training session with Gordon Graham,a well-known speaker who presented at the District last month.The District received overwhelmingly positive response from those who attended. He will be presenting on August 20th to all District employees in the areas of Ethical Decision Making and on District policies that relate to this topic.He will also present to the management team a short presentation focusing on the role of supervisors which will be more in depth than the trainings held in June. •Artificial turfgrass rebate program reinstated:On July 30th,the Water Authority received a copy of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)evaluation(see enclosed)that concluded that newer artificial turf does not contain high amounts of lead.The Water Authority is planning to officially reinstate the program in early 2 August and will likely include a retroactive date of June 26th,2008,when the program was originally suspended. •The District submitted two grant proposals to the Department of Water Resources to fund projects that would accelerate the participation level of the district's landscape programs.The 2008 Urban Drought Assistance Grant Program is fast tracked and the successful grant proposals will be announced on July 31st •The applications were due on July 21 st • •Beginning July 1st ,the District began participation in Metropolitan's rebate programs.Residential single family customers can receive a $350 rebate for a residential smart controller,$4 for every rotating sprinkler nozzle installed,a $185 rebate for purchasing a qualified high efficiency clothes washer,and an incentive for installing high efficiency toilets. •There were 212 purchase orders processed in July 2008 for a total amount of $2,705,774.24. In£or.mation Technology and Strategic Planning: •Strategic Plan FY09-FY11:Staff is finalizing the details for the Strategic Plan Objectives and Performance Measures.Chiefs are reviewing and making final changes to the full details of both objectives and performance measures and targets for FY09-FY11. •IT Operations:Staff has rolled out several technology improvements in the last few months.Specific improvements include a new version of CITRIX software,an upgraded version of our SPAM filter,an upgraded Internet pipeline,the replacement and upgrading of storage hardware,and a new set of servers to host GIS for the next five years. •SharePoint:Staff has begun implementation of new tools to improve District efficiency.Share Point is a new framework for internal web applications and provides tools to improve work flow processing and automation of workflow.Pilot areas include Customer Service,HR,and Finance. •Records Management:Staff has begun a scanning project to complete the conversion of paper records to electronic 3 documents.We are at a 5%complete level which is being used to pilot the business processes and the quality control procedures.When the process is fully tested we will expand production and work with the different areas of the agency to gain the full benefits of this technology . •Process Improvements:Staff has delivered the first phase of an expansion of our Infrastructure Management System (IMS)to automate work orders for inspection and surveying.We have also delivered an application which eliminates data entry for meter readers when an account is terminated (as much as 30 a day). Finance: •Improved Check Security -The District's Union Bank representative recently visited the District to offer a new free service that expands on the security of the District check payment process.Currently the District uses the bank's positive pay process where the District sends a file to the bank of each check's number and amount.Only checks with matching information will clear the District's account.In the past,neither Union Bank nor our prior banks have offered the payee as a field that could be used in this verification process.With new software functionality,Union bank has added this field as an option which would prevent any fraudulent manipulation of the payee.Staff will be working with the Bank to implement this expanded service. •Rate Study -Karen Keese,with PBS&J,was selected as the consultant t9 work with staff on the 2007 rate study. The rate study is separated into two major efforts. First the study will review the equity between customer types and will provide recommendations for rate changes separate from the general rate increase.The objective is to bring the revenue from each class closer to the cost of service of each class.The recommended changes, when totaled,will have no net change to overall revenues.The second major effort of the rate study is to recommend an implementation of Drought Stage rates. CWA is about to put forward a recommended strategy.When this is available,both staff and our consultant will evaluate the recommendation to see how it could be implemented at Otay.Staff is looking to bring these 4 changes as well as some rate simplifications to the Board within the next few months. •Bill Print -The transition from DataProse to the new bill print vendor InfoSend is progressing well.Staff will be testing the new vendor's system with a parallel test in August with plans to be live as of September 1. With the new vendor,the District will also be testing "Intelligent Inserting"that will enable the District to target various groupings of customers for inserts that relate to only them.The District will also be testing "Bill Householding"which groups bills going to the same address into one envelope.Both of these new services are at no additional costs and is a part of the overall lower fee charged by the new vendor.Staff is very happy with the prospects of providing greater services to customers at a lower cost. The financial reporting for June 30,2008 is as follows: •For the twelve months ended June 30,2008,there are total revenues of $63,381,067 and total expenses of $63,421,833.The expenses exceeded revenues by $40,766. •Due to both economic downturn and the higher than anticipated rainfall,water sales and purchases are less than anticipated.Additionally,the slowdown in the housing market has impacted Annexation and Meter Fees. Finally,interest rates have dropped,reducing the amount of interest revenue earned. The financial reporting for investments for June 30,2008 is as follows: •The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the Investment Portfolio Details as of June 30,2008 total $87,788,377.18 with an average yield to maturity of 3.481%.The total earnings year-to-date are $4,424,034.62. ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS: Engineering: •RBF was hired in March 2008 to investigate the condition of the existing sewer system,as required by the California State mandated Sewer System Management Plan 5 (SSMP).This investigation will show which sewer mains need to be repaired or replaced and included in next years'CIP.RBF is 70%complete with the Closed Circuit Televising (CCTV).Due to environmental time constraints,scheduled completion of this project is September 2008.(P1210) •Spiess Construction has completed the rough grading operation at the 850-4 Reservoir site.The reservoir is for increased capacity in the 850 Pressure Zone,as required by the 2002 Water Resource Master Plan.This project is expected to be completed in April 2009. (P2191) •Ortiz Corporation (Ortiz)was hired in July 2007 to replace the existing 10-inch ACP Pipeline with a new 12- inch PVC pipeline in Olive Vista Drive because the County of San Diego will be completing road improvements which will conflict with the District's facilities.The project was completed on June 30,2008.(P2459) •Arrieta Construction (Arrieta)was hired to upgrade and replace the existing 12-inch pipelines in the Rancho San Diego area because of the size,age,and the need for increased fire flows.These areas include Chase Ave./Fuerte Ave.,Hidden Mesa Dr.,Jamul Dr.,and Steele Canyon Rd.Arrieta has completed installation of the 12- inch pipeline on Chase Ave./Fuerte Ave.and Hidden Mesa Dr.The paving is complete on Chase/Fuerte Ave.Arrieta has started construction of the 12-inch pipeline on Jamul Dr.This project is expected to be completed in January 2009.(P2038) •ARB Inc.(ARB)was hired in January 2008 to convert a 20- inch potable pipeline to a recycled pipeline in Chula Vista within the District's use area.ARB has completed all potable connections and has begun televising the 20- inch main.This project is expected to be completed in February 2009.(R2081) •NEWest Construction (NEWest)was hired in May 2008 to complete the replacement of the Calavo Sewer Lift Station.NEWest has mobilized and started construction. This project is expected to be completed by December 31,2008.(S2015) 6 •Zondiros Corporation was hired to install a 12-inch steel pipeline on Cactus Rd.and Gailes/Dublin Rd.for future Cal trans construction of the SR-905 Freeway.This project was completed in June 2008.Caltrans began construction of SR-905 at Britannia Street,La Media Road,and Airway Road in April 2008.Staff is coordinating with Caltrans regarding the Utility Agreement reimbursements to the District.(P2440) •In June,PBS&J provided a 50%draft submittal of the Water Resources Master Plan (WRMP)Update and continues to make progress on incorporating all demands into the hydraulic model for both potable and recycled systems for the WRMP.This project is expected to be completed by May 30,2009.(P1210) •Staff began gathering water quality data from the treatment plant to be included in the North District Recycled Water Concept Study.The Concept Study,with all appropriate data,will be completed by December 31, 2008.(R2089) •The Biological Surveys and Cultural Resources Study for the MND that is being prepared for the San Miguel Regional Training Facility project were finalized in June.The final Study needed is for the traffic impacts. A meeting was held in June with the San Miguel Fire Department to clarify the information needed for this Study.The District will be providing the results of the studies to the Fire Department for their permit application from the County by August 15,2008.(P2466) •The District's "As-Needed"environmental consultant, IFC/Jones &Stokes,has been working on the determination of the District's carbon footprint.The task was assigned in late April and staff has been gathering the data for the task to be completed.The results should be available in early fall of 2008.(P1253) •For the month of June 2008,the District sold 8 meters (12 EDUs)generating $43,576 in revenue.Accumulated sales through June 30,2008 were $3,013,334 for 583.5 EDUs.Projected for this period was 85 meters (130.5 EDUs)with a budgeted revenue of $620,633.33 and projected revenue from July 1,2007 through June 30,2008 was $7,447,600. 7 •Approximately 2,163 linear feet of both CIP and developer project pipelines was installed in June 2008.The Construction Division performed quality control for these pipelines . •The following table summarizes Engineering's Project ,purchases and change orders issued during the period of June 1,2008 thru June 30,2008 that were within Staff signatory authority: Contractor/ Date Action Amount Consultant Project 6/4/08 C.O.#1 $4,975 J.C.Heden &Assoc.As-Need Drafting Svcs (S2015,P2422) 6/4/08 C.O.#1 $7,487 J.C.Heden &Assoc.As-Need Drafting Svcs (P2172,P2 040) Swinerton Mgmt &Temporary 6/4/08 Check $20,320 Consulting SvcsConsulting(misc.projects) Swinerton Mgmt &Temporary 6/19/08 Check $10,720 Consulting SvcsConsulting(misc.projects) Water qperations: •On June 27 the District ceased deliveries to Mexico as agreed.Deliveries occurred February through June with a total amount of 10,396.31 acre-feet of water.Deliveries will resume for the months of September and October with a flow of 6.85 MGD.In addition,staff is working with all involved agencies to amend the existing agreement for future flows. •On June 24 the District executed an agreement with Cuyamaca College for the installation of a second meter for its campus.Currently,staff is waiting for their first installment in order to proceed with the meter installation. •Water purchased for the month of June was 4341.1 acre- feet.Beginning FY 07/08 to date,July 1,2007 to June 30,2008 there has been 41291.3 acre-feet of water purchased.This is a -1.56 percent decrease from the same period last year,July 1,2006 to June 30,2007. 8 •In the month of June,2008 there were ten new Automated Meter Reading (AMR)meters installed and 43 meters were retrofitted to AMR meters. •As of July 1,2008 there was a total of 18,193 radio-read meters installed. Total number of potable water accounts is 47,875;this is an increase of 12 accounts from last month,May,2008. •Recycled water consumption for the month of June is as follows: Total flow was 523.4 acre-feet or 170,472,192 gallons and the average daily flow was 5,682,506 gallons per day. Total number of recycled water accounts is 617;this is an increase of four from last month,May,2008. Total recycled water consumption for FY 2008,July 1, 2007 to June 30,2008 was 4574.8 acre-feet. •Wastewater flows for the month of June were as follows: Total basin flow,gallons per day:1,931,000. Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro,gallons per day:641,000. Total Otay flow,gallons per day:1,290,000. Flow Processed at the Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling Facility,gallons per day:1,073,000. Flow to Metro from Otay Water District,gallons per day: 217,000. There were no new wastewater connections for the month of June,2008.The total stands at 6,069 EDU's. ~er G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\GM Report 8-6-08.doc 9 high demand is making water purchases more expensive.Higher energy prices are also adding to the cost because we must pump this water hundreds of miles to Southern California.Combined,these are factors which will effect water rates in 2009.Our best defense against high prices or mandatory water conservation measures is YOU. Forincentive.s ortipson saving VlJa~ ter around your home or business, visit our yvebsite at www.otaywater. gov or t~ke;the.20-Gallon Challenge at wwyV.?Ogalionchallenge.com., Otay Water District Declares Level I Drought Watch In response to Governor Schwarzenegger's California state drought proclamation,the Otay Water District (OWOl has declared a Levell Drought Watch for its service area. Within this level.ratepayers are strongly urged to reduce their water use by 10%. For instance,supply constraints have prompted the MWD to order a30 percent cut in water supplies to farmers and growers subscribing to its Interruptible Agricultural Water Program as provided by contract terms.The agricultural water use cut went Into effect January 1,2008 and affects about 5,000 growers and other agricultural customers in San Diego County.As a result,many of the region's farmers and growers have begun stumping trees or taking other steps to cut production. These actions will have a ripple effect on jobs and onour local economy. Economically, less supply and rain and snow levels around most of the state fell to below-average levels in March through June.Meanwhile,based on environmental concerns,court-or- dered pumping restrictions on water sup- plies from Northern California have been in place since December 2007.These restrictions have cut deliveries to the State Water Project by mote than 465,000 acre-feet so far this year -enough water to meet the annual needs of more than 3.6 million Californians. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDj,the region's primary water importer,plans to meet this year's water demands by withdrawing water from reservoirs and groundwater storage accounts.However,they are also calling for extraordinary conservation measures. 66S ave it or Lose it" Southern California is faced with signifi- cant cuts in water supplies from North- ern California In the foreseeable future and diminishing levels of water storage around California. "Our water supplies are being cut,and we need everyone to pull together and save more water immediately,"said Fern Steiner,the San Diego County Water Authority Board Chair. You may have noticed new conservation advertising around the county these past couple months."This campaign is de- signed to make people aware thatthese cutbacks have created a serious and very real water problem,and to let them know that they can make a big difference in the reliability of our water supply by taking immediate steps now to reduce waste and improve water efficiency,"Steiner said."If we fail to take action,we risk squandering our diminishing supplies and putting the quality of life for our region's 3million residents and our $157 billion economy in jeopardy." The state's water supplies remain im- pacted by a combination of dry conditions and pumping restrictions.Despite storm activity early in 2008, • Save water,save money and see better results. o Sma.rt Irrigation Month! Celebrate water,our natural resource -more valuable than oil,more precious than gold -the essential ingredient of our life,culture,and history.The Water:H20 =Life exhibi- tion opens July 19,2008 and runs through November 30,2008.A special section of the exhibition devoted exclusively to Southern California's water issues will be on display at the Museum for at least two years.That section,titled Water:A California Story, illustrates the fragility of water supplies in the west. In Southern California,most of the water-about 85%-is imported from either the Colorado River or Northern California.Since recent drought conditions have affected the water supply from the Colorado River,and because San Diego is in the driest two-year period since yearly rainfall began being recorded in 1801,the issue of water conservation and infrastructure is at the forefront of many people's minds. SahDiegCl NaMal History Museum ~resenrs:West Coast Premiere of: Water:H20 =Life Exhibition Explores Earth's Precious and Vu nerable Resource CASH FOR PATS The photo on the right was taken before August 10,2005,and below one year later. This road median was replanted as part of the district's Cash for Plants program.The homeowner's association replaced 6,537 sq.ft.of irrigated turf with low water use Mediterranean and California native plants.In addition to using less water,the me- dian also requires less frequent maintenance.In the before photo,notice the street damage caused by overspray from the irrigation system. Because of the savings resulting from the replanted median as well as the attractive new landscaping,the HOA has completed another project replacing 11,000 more sq. ft.of turf.For more information on the Cash for Plants program,visit our website at www.otaywater.gov and click on Conservation. www.smartirrigationmonth.org OTAV WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS The Board of Directors meets on the first Wednesday of the month at 3:30 pm in the Board meeting room. The public is encouraged to attend at 2554 Sweetwater Spring Bvd., Spring Valley,CA. President Gary Croucher,Division 3 gcroucher@otaywater.gov Vice-President Jose Lopez,Division 4 jlopez@otaywater.gov Treasurer Jaime Bonilla,Division 2 jbonilla@otaywater.gov Boardmember Mark Robak,Division 5 OtayWater@cox.net Boardmember Larry Breitfelder,Division 1 Ibreitfelder@otaywater.gov 2008 California-Friendly Landscape Contest Winner Congratulations to linda Whitney,the winner of the 5th Annual California Friendly landscape contest.Her home in the Eastlake community of Chula Vista was selected as the best regional exam- ple of a water saving,California Friendly garden.Linda and her husband Gordon received a$500 gift certificate presented at a special ceremony on Saturday,May 17,and a commemorative paver that will be installed at the Water Conservation Garden in Rancho San Diego.To view photos of all the winning landscapes, visit www.landscapecontest.com. Bye Bye Grass Lawns are so demanding!No other garden plants require as much water or as frequent fertilizing.None require weekly pruning (mowing,after all,is pruning),made even worse by the need for power tools.No plants generate as much green waste either. Isn't it time to say "bye-bye"to your lawn - or at least to most of it? Summertime is the besttime to eliminate your lawn.The best method depends on the type of grass you have.Or rather,on the type of roots your grass has,Dig up apatch of grass.Are the roots fine and threadlike?Or are they as thick and fleshy like the roots that grow outof an old potato?Here are some suggestions for each kind of grass.There are more options but these will getyou started. Grasses with thread-like roots are fairly easy to remove.If you have astrong back (or astrong teenager),dig it out by hand.Or rent asad cutter.Asad cutter is a bit like alawn mower,but it has a broad blade that cuts into the ground and slices out aribbon of grass.Ittakes some skill to maneuver,especially to avoid hitting sprinkler pipes. Solarize yourgrass.Cover the grasswith sheets of plastic (clear or black).then letthe sun "cook"the grass,roots and all.Solarization works bestforgrass in full sun,in parts ofthe county that get really hot.Gardeners alongthe coast may have little success with solarization. Alternatively,spray your grass with one of the new organic certified products or with horticul- tural grade vinl;lgar (TO"20%acetic acid.Household vinl;lgar is typically 5%acetic acid).Once the grass blades are dead,fine roots die too.Follow all label directions. Grasses with thick,creeping roots are harder to kill,unfortunately.They store energy in their roots (that's why they are so thick).If you kill the top growth,blades soon resprout.Roots are so brittle that digging them leaves tiny pieces behind to resprout and regrow. Even most organic gardeners will tell you thatthe only way to kill fleshy-root grasses roots is with glyphosate,the active ingredient in products like RoundupTM and Remuda™. Glyphosate interferes with the synthesis of an enzyme critical to plant metabolism.Insects and animals (that includes humans)don't make this enzyme so it doesn't have the same effect on us.And once the spray dries,it is no longer active. The best time to sprayglyphosate isin summer when grass is growing most actively.Follow labeldirections.Wait two weeks then spray any grass that is still alive.Repeat athird time if necessary. Formors details and information on what to plant in place of grass,attend "Bye Bye Grass" offered atThe Water Conservation Garden,www.TheGarden.org. Cop",,"'te ©Nail Siermall 1008 All"Bilts m,a"ed XERISCAPE:Beautiful landscape on a low-Water Budget Landscape Designer Connie Beck takes the mystery out of Xeriscape landscaping,and shows you why Xeriscape is not "Zeroscape"!Learn the seven principles of xeriscape,plant selection, and planting techniques.The workshop includes aclassroom lecture and an interpretive tour of the xeriscape garden.This class is offered in partnership with Cuyamaca College's Commu- nity Learning Program.For information and to register,call 619-660-4350,or visit wwwcuyamaca.edu/preview Cost is $30. Cooking with Native Plants Cook with a local resource .native plants! Native plant expert Lisa Chaddock shows you where to gather these plants growing wild in San Diego,and howto use them to make tasty dishes at home.Elderberry,fennel,and flat top buckwheat are some oUhe foods you'll be introduced to.Included in the price of the class is Lisa's cookbook and alocatormap for finding native edibles growing in San Diego. Register at www.thegarden.org $12 Members /$15 Non-Members. •••:I. Bye Bye Grass!Parts 1&2 Part 1:Tired of being a slave to your water- thirsty lawnTJoln Nan Sterman to learn how to exterminate your lawn for good!Learn how to prepare the soil fora new garden, along with lots of creative ideas on what to replace it with in Part 2:Your lawn is gone! Nanwlil gUide you through living examples of water-wise landscapes,showyou interesting droughHolerant ground covers,and introduce you to the variety of hardscape options.Regis- terat wwwthegarden.org. II iO se ahorra 0 se pierde!" Otay Water District Declara Estado de Vigilancia por Sequia Nivell En respuesta a la proclamaci6n de sequfa del estado de California por el Gobernador Schwarzenegger, Otay Water District (OWDI ha declarado Estado de vigilancia por Sequfa Nivell para su area de servicio.Dentro de este nivel se exhorta alos usuarios reducir su uso del agua por un 10%. tenido que comenzar a limpiar tocones o tomado otras medidas para reducir la producci6n.Estas acciones tendran un efecto de cascada en trabajos de nuestra economia local. Para incentivos 0 consejos para ahor- rar agua alrededor de su casa 0 negocio,por favor visita nuestra pa- gina web www.otavwater.gov 0 tome el reto de los 20 galones de agua en www.20gallonchallenge.com. continuan siendo afectados debido a una combinaci6n de clima seco Vrestric- ciones de bombeo.A pesar de la gran actividad de Iluvias aprincipios del 2008, los niveles de Iluvia Vnevada en la mayor parte del estado durante los meses de marzo a junio han estado por debajo del promedio normal.Mientras tanto,la orden de la corte de restringir el bombeo de abastecimiento de agua del norte de California ha estado vigente desde dici- embre del 2007.Estas restricciones han recortado las entregas para el Provecto Estatal de Agua (State Water Project) por mas de 465,000 acres-pies hasta este ano -cantidad de agua suficiente para satisfacer la necesidad anual de mas de 3.6 millones de californianos. EI Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDj,el mayor importador de agua en la regi6n,planea cumplir con la demanda de agua para este ano extrav- en do agua de las reservas Vcuentas de almacenamiento de aguas subterraneas. Sin embargo,tambien estas estan solic- itando obtener medidas de conservaci6n extraordinarias. Por ejemplo,limitaciones de_.....IJ""::::Il[1g~~~t::r:r1~"abastecimiento han provo- icado al MWD ordenar una :reducci6n del 30%de abas- ',tecimiento de agua para !rancheros Vagricultores 'inscritos en el programa de 'abastecimiento ininterrum- ipido (Interruptible Agricul- ftural Water Program).EI !'recorte de agua agricola entr6 en efecto ell0 de enero del 2008 Vafecta a aproximadamente 5,000 agricultores Votros clientes agricolas en el condado de San Diego. Como resultado,muchos de los rancheros Vagri- cultores de la regi6n han Enfrentamos significativos recortes en el suministro de agua del Norte de California en un futuro no muv lejano Vla reducci6n a,los niveles de almacenamiento de agua en todo California. "Nuestro suministro de agua esta siendo recortado,Vnecesitamos unirnos todos V ahorrar agua inmediatamente,"dijo Fern Steiner,Presidenta de la Mesa Directiva de Agua del Condado de San Diego. "Esta campana se encuentra disenada para crear conciencia en la gente de que estos recortes han creado un serio Vver- dadero problema ace rca del agua,Vpara hacerles saber que pueden hacer una gran diferencia en cuanto a la durabilidad de nuestros recursos de abastecimiento de agua tomando medidas inmediatas para reducir el desperdicio de agua V mejorar la eficiencia de uso"dijo Steiner. "Si no hacemos algo al respecto,corre- mos el riesgo de desperdiciar nuestro va reducido abastecimiento Varriesgamos la calidad de vida de los 3millones de residentes poniendo en peligro nuestra economia de $57 billones de d6lares. Los recursos de abastecimiento de agua del estado ...-....--:::.,--~----~--.-.-. ~. • •..,..~,.,...._....~.........,••"(1't"'''''¥',.....'''''''''~..~,\....'-:'l,..I'l~''(VV.~ •~,....._..._,~_""--_~!.lt..__•~_.._~__._•.•n •__••_•••,r~t... FOR MOREINFORMATlQNI\BQUTrREOTAYWATER DISTRICTCALL 619.670.2222 OR GOTO WWW.OTAYWATER.GOV The Pipeline Newsletterlspu811shed quarterly bythe Otay Water Distrietandcan also be found online at www.otaywater.gov.lfyou have questions about the newsletter,please contact us dt 2554 SweetwaterSprings Blvd.Spring Valley,CA 97978-2096;Copyri!.iht ©2008 Otay Water District.All rights reserved. ..-~op;u.;..l""'''''''~''~'''''_-_.--'-~.. Water Fluoridation to Begin in November Beginning early November,the public drinking water supply will contain limited amounts offluoride. The Otay Water District (Otay)purchases drinking water from the San Diego County Water Authority that has been treated by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan).Metropolitan is a consortium qf S9uthern California cities and water districts that provides drinking water to residents in Los Angeles,Orange,San Diego,Riverside,San Bernardino and Ventura counties.Metropolitan provides approximately halfof all treated water consumed in San Diego County. In 2003,the Metropolitan board of directors adopted a policy ofconverting its water treatment processes to add fluoride,a tooth cavity fighting agent to reduce and control tooth decay.This action was required by state law,the California Fluoridation Act of 1995, which mandates water systems with more than 10,000 service connections to fluoridate their water supply when outside funds are available to install and operate afluoride system. In addition to water purchased from Metropolitan,Otay also purchases drinking water from the Helix Water District (Helix)and the City ofSan Diego (San Diego).Helix has also converted its treatment process to add fluoride and will begin delivering fluoridated water at the same time as Metropolitan.San Diego,on the other hand,does not add fluoride to its water supply.As a result,most Otay customers will receive a blend of fluoridated water and unfluoridated water. Some fluoride is already present in our water supply.Most water in San Diego County comes from the Colorado River or the Sierra snow pack.As water passes over the surface ofthe earth,from rain and snowmelt to streams and rivers,it picks up fluoride through the natural erosion process. Fluoride is present in our water at approximately0.2 parts per million (ppm),with a range of 0.1 to 0.4 ppm.Metropolitan and Helix will supplement the existing fluoride in the water supply raising itto 0.8 ppm; the level optimal for dental health. Due to the blending ofwaters,which varies by region and time ofyear, many communities served by Otay will receive fluoride at less than .7 ppm. Otay laboratory personnel will closely monitor fluoride levels throughout our service area and will post this information to our website on a monthly basis.We encourage customers who are already taking or are considering taking fluoride supplements to talkto their medical or dental professional. Otay neither advocates nor opposes fluoridation.As a community water district regulated by state law,Otay had no part in the fluoridation decision. It is our guiding principle to keep our customers fully informed on issues affecting your water supply.For additional information regarding fluoridation please visit the following websites: The Otay Water District: www.otaywater.gov/owd/pages/resources.Fluoridation.aspx The American Dental Association: www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/ Center for Disease Control and Prevention: www.cdc.gov/OraIHealth/factsheets/fl-background.html Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: www.mwdh20.com/fluoridation/index.html The Metropolitan Water DistrictofSouthern California willstart addingfluoride to waterbeginning in November. More Payment Options Now Available! Debit and credit card customers now have more payment options and can pay their bill 24/7.Customers can call us at 619-670-2777,24 hours a day,7 days a week.In addition to VISA and MasterCard debit/credit card payments,our credit card service now accepts Discover and American Express.A $3.60 fee is applied to credit card transactions. Web-Payments:Web-payments can be made online 24/7 at no charge.Visit ourwebsite at www.otaywater.gov and click on Pay Your Bill Online.We accept VISA and MasterCard debit and credit cards. Auto-Payment:Using automatic payment service,your bankaccount will be debited each month on a pre-arranged date.An Auto-Payment application form is available online at www.otaywater.gov and click on Customer Service. Secure 24 Hour Drop Box:A 24 hour drop box is available to our customers at our business office located at 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.,Spring Valley. Postal Annex:Payments can also be made atThe Postal Annex in the Terra Nova Shopping Center,374 East H Street,off 1-805 in Chula Vista.Call 619-585-7400 for business hours. Mail Payments:You can mail your payment directly to the OtayWater District,P.O.Box 51375,los Angeles,CA 90051-5675 Take the 20-Gallon Challenge! Saving watermay be easier than you think. Historic dry conditions in California make itessential for residents and businesses to conserve water.Ifevery person saves 20 gallons of water each day,this will help the region by allowing us to store more water for nextyear.Saving wateris easier than you might think. Here are some useful tips for saving water around your home orbusiness. •Check and adjust your irrigation system and timers at least once a month.Promptly fix leaks,breaks,or misaligned sprinklers. •Use the landscape Watering Calculator at www.otaywater.gov to create a watervyise irrigation schedule. •Minimize evaporation by watering during the early morning hours or after sunset when temperatures are cooler. •When the weather is particularly hot,skip one day of watering during the week,or water on the weekend.Visit the Watering Index at www.otaywater.gov.c1ick on conservation to make sure plants are getting the right amount ofwater....---------~ Eastlake High Grad Receives Scholarship •• Each year the OWD awards a $1,000 scholarship to a graduating high schoorsenior living in its service area.For more on the next scholarship competition,visit our website beginning in February 2008.Lauraolid111'rparents,5haron ond Dr,Tim Nolon,a"epl theS1,000OWD H;holarshlp. Otay is proud to award its 2007 scholarship to Eastlake High School graduate laura Nolan. Nolan was a graduating senior at Eastlake High with ;;14;4 GPA.In addition to her strong academiccredentials,Nolan is a recognized leader among her peers,active in school clubs and competitive academics,an outstanding musician,and a community volunteer.This fall she begins her first college semester with the goal ofearning a Ph.D.in anthropology or international relations. •Install aweather smart irrigation controller and replace thirsty unused turfwith water wise plants and receive a rebate ofup to $1.00 per sq.foot. For morewaterconservation tips visit qur website otcall 619-670-2291. Conservation Corner i eline Tick Tock,the Wonderful IrrigatiQ'n Clock By Nan$terman,Plant Inc. (opywrite()NanSterm~n 2007 All rightsreserved Wouldn't'itbegi'eat,,'f someone or some thing took responsibility for watering our gardens? Wish no longer,just use an irrigation clock. Traditional irrigation clocks are gray boxes mounted on the wall ofyour garage or laundry room or just outside the back door. Insfde is q c1o,ck that automatically turns your sprinklers on and off,zone byzone. The newest irrigation clocks use weather data or historical data to decide when and how long to water.The conventional and more widespread clocks aren't that smart.They come preset from the factory to water every zone,10 minutes perday,every day -way,way too much water for any garden. Does your gardener manage your irrigation clock?Some gardeners are good water managers but manyare not.They oft~r set irrigation clocks to overwater dramatically.That isn't good for your plants,for your wallet,or for ourwater supply. Your best bet,is to manage your irrigation clock yourself. How?First,test eal;h zone to find out which plants it waters. Hopefully,your irrigation system is set up so grass is watered separately from thirsty vegetables,which are separate from low water shrubs,which are separate from succulents,and so on. Next,determine how long and how often to water each zone. Visit the LandscapeWatering Calculator at http://apps.sandiego.gov/landcalc/start.do. Enter your zip code,soil type,and type ofwatering system (overhead,drip,etc).Select the type of plants in each zone (shrubs,trees,lawn,etc.).The calculator spits out a watering schedule for each month ofthe year. Each month?Yes,plants use different amounts ofwater in different months.Think about it -in fall,the air is cool and the sun is lower in the sky;plants use less water than in the sunny and warm months oflate spring and early summer. Once you have a plan,mark yourcalendar to adjust your irrigation clock,say on the first of the month,or on the day you pay monthly bills,or some other time that is easy to remember. By the way,did you know that irrigation clocks reset to default when the electricity goes out?Unless you've installed a battery backup,your clock will go back to 10 minutes,every zone,every day.So when the electricity comes back on and you go through the house resetting clocks,include your irrigation clock in that effort. Get a $350 Rebate for Purchasing and Installing a Smart Irrigation Controller Ifyou have at least 2,000 square feet of irrigated landscape and 4 or more irrigation valves,you are eligible to receive a rebate when you have a landscape professional replace your old irrigation timer with a smart irrigation controller.Smart controllers can reduce your total annual water use by 20 percent or 40 gallons per day!For an application or additional information call 619-670-2291. i eline La Fluorizaci6n de Agua Iniciara en Noviembre,2007 Los suministros de agua potable para mas de 18 millones de residentes del sur de California sera fluorizada empezando al final del 2007. OWD compra agua potable del San Diego County Water Authorityy que ha sido tratada por la Metropolitan Water District ofSouthern California (Metropolitan).Metropolitan es un consorcio de ciudades del sur de California y de distritos de agua que proveen de agua a los residentes de los condados de Los Angeles,Orange,San Diego,Riverside,San Bernardino y Ventura. Metropolitan provee aproximadamente la mitad del agua tratada consumida en el condado de San Diego. En 2003,el Consejo Directivo Metropolitan adopto una polftica de convertir su proceso para tratar el agua y anadir fluoro,un agente para combatir la caries dental.Esto vino como respuesta al California Fluoridation Act de 1995 que requerfa que todos los sistemas de agua con mas de 10,000 conexiones 0 usuarios fluorizaran su agua. En adici6n a el agua tratada adquirida de Metropolitan,OWD tambien compra agua "cruda"de San Diego CountyWater Authority,la cual es tratada por HelixWater District en la planta de tratamiento R.M.Levy.Helix tambien ha convertido su proceso de tratamiento y anadir fluoro y empezaran a entregar agua fluorizada al mismo tiempo con Metropolitan. OWD no esta ni a favor ni en contra de la fluorizaci6n.Como somos un distrito de agua regulado por leyes estatales,OWD no tomo parte en la decisi6n de fluorizaci6n.Pero es nuestra polftica mantener a nuestros c1ientes completamente informados sobre cuestiones que afecten su agua. OWD invita a que los c1ientes preocupados sobre la fluorizaci6n 0 los c1ientes que ya estan tomando suplementos de fluoro que hablen con sus medicos 0 dentistas. MetropolitanWater District of Southern California www.mwdh20.org/fluoridation/index.html The American Dental Association www.ada.org/public/topics/fluoride/ Center for Disease Control and Prevention www.cdc.gov/OraIHealth/factsheets/fl-background.htm iAtepte EI Reto De Los 20 Galones! Ahorraragua puede ser mas facil de 10 que crees. Condiciones de sequfa hist6ricas en California hace esencial para los residentes y negocios el conservar agua.Si cada persona ahorra 20 galones de agua diarios,esto ayudara a la regi6n al permitirnos almacenar agua para el pr6ximo ano.Ahorrar agua es mas facil de 10 que usted piensa.Aquf estan algunos consejps (ltiles para ahorrafaguC\;;llrededor de su casa 0 negocio. •Revise y ajuste su sistema de irrigacien y los relojesacompanantes par los menDs una vez al meso Repar fugas y regadores mal alinea dospuntualmente. •Use la calculadora de jardinerfa en www.otaywater.gov para crear un horaria de irr,iga~iQn q!J\?sea conservador de agua. •Reduce evaporaci6n,regando temprano poe las mananas 0 despues del atardecer cuzzndo las temperaturas esten bajas. •Cuando el c1ima esta particularmelilecaluroso,saltese un Gila de riego durante la semana 0 riegue dueante el fin de semana.Visite el fndice de riego en www.otaywater.gov ·Instale un controladorde c1ima intel.igente para la irrigaci6n y remplace cesped sin usa y sediento con plantas que requieran poca agua y reciba un reembolso de $1.00 por cada piecuadrad(). Para mas consejos sobre la conservaci6n de agua,visite nuestra pagina de Internet: www.20gallonchallenge.com/aboutFAQespanol.html FORMORE INFORMATIONABOUTTHEOTAYWATER DISTRICTCALL 619.670.2222 OR GOTO WWW.OTAYWATER.GOV The Pipeline Newsletteris publishedquarterly by the Otay Water District and can also be found online atwww.otaywater.gov.lfyou have questions about the newsletter,please contact us at2554SweetwaterSprings Blvd.Spring Valley,CA 91978-2096.Copyright ©2007 Otay Water District.All rights reserved. Your Consumer Confidence Report Sources The Otay Water District is pleased to provide you with your annual consumer confidence report.This brochure is a snapshot of last year's water quality. Included are details about where your water comes from,what it contains and how it compares to state standards. The information included in this water quality report represents only a small fraction of what we do to ensure high quality drinking water.Using state certi- fied laboratories,we routinely scrutinize the water supply for an entire range of elements that have the potential to degrade the quality of your water. As in years past,your tap water met all U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)and State of California drinking water health standards.The Otay Water District vigilantly safeguards its water supplies and once again we are proud to report that our system has never violated a maximum contaminant level or any other water quality standard. The Otay Water District imports an average of 85 percent ofits water.This imported water is provided by the San Diego County Water Authority,which purchases water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern Califor- nia.Imported water is a blend of Colorado River water and State Water Project water.The Otay Water District also purchases treated water from the City of San Diego and the HelixWater District. The sources of drinking OREGON water (both tap water and bottled water)include rivers,lakes,streams, ponds.reservoirs, springs,and wells.As waterfravelsover the surface ofthe land or through the ground,it dissolves naturally- occurring minerals and, in some cases,radioactive material,and can pick up substances resultingifrom the presence of animals or from human activity. Contaminants that may be present in source water include: •Microbial contaminants,such as viruses and bacteria thafmaycome from sewage treatment plants,septic systems,agricultural livestock operations,and wildlife. •Inorganic contaminants,such as salts and met- als,that can be naturally-occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff,industrial or domestic wastewater discharges,oil and gas production, mining,or farming. •Pesticides and herbicides that may come from avariety of sources such as agriculture,urban stormwater runoff,and residential uses. •Organic chemical contaminants,including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals that are byproducts of industrial processes and petroleum production,and can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff,agricultural application, and septic systems. •Radioactive contaminants that can be naturally- occurring or bethe resultof oil and gas produc- tion and mining activities. The Truth about Tap BELIEFS -Surveys have found that most consumers who drink bottled water do so be- cause they enjoy its taste or its portable convenience.Others drink bottled water because they believe it to be more pure or safer than their tap water. THE TRUTH -Did you know that the average bottle of water can cost up to 1,000 times more than tap water? Despite what its higher cost would lead us to believe, estimates arethat 25-40%of the bottled water on the market is simply repackaged tap water. Tap water is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)under the Safe Drinking Water Act,while bottled water is considered a food and is thus regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Though some bottlers may voluntarily exceed FDA standards,those standards are less stringent than the EPA standards for tap water.For more informatiorl;,visit www.DrinkTap.org. YOUR OPTIONS -During these economically sensitive times,it's important to know that you have other,more affordable,options to bottled water. Chill a pitch~r of tap water in your refrigerator •To enhance the taste of tap water,one simple sug- gestion is to leave an open pitcher in the refrigerator overnight.The exposure to the air allows the small amount of chlorine,which is added to all tap water to ensure adequate disinfection and maintain high qual- ity,to evaporate.Using the chilled water pitcher vyith refillable water bottles ,or thermoses allows for an inexpensive way to achieve portability and a refresh- ing taste. Water Filtration Systems •Another possibility is to install a home water filter system.These systems are convenient,easy to use, and enhance the taste of water.These systems achieve the same desired results,while still costing ~f"fractlor')'of the price of bottled water. For more information'on California state certified water filtration systems,click on the Devices and Machines link under the Certificates and licenses section of the California Department of Public Health website, www.cdph.ca.gov. Conservation It's Easy to Conserve! San Diego County has a semi-arid climate that receives only about 10 inches of rainfall per year.This does not provide enough water to meet local needs and the region must import as much as 90 percent of its water from the Colorado ·River and Northern California.To maintain our quality of life and ensure adequate water supplies now and for future generations,San Diego County residents are encouraged to make a conscious effort to use our limited supply of water as efficiently as possible. The Otay Water District offers a number of programs to save water both indoors and outdoors.For water wise landscaping tips,visit the Water Conservation Garden at Cuyamaca College or gO.to www.thegarden.org.For useful ways to conserv,a.water elf-Qund the house visit our website at www.otaywaler.gov and click on conservation. Safety ,In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink,the USEPA and the State Department of Public Health (Depart- ment)prescribe regulations that limitthe amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems.Department regulations also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that must provide the same protection for public health. Drinking water,including bottled water,may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants.The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk.More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the USEPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1-800-426-4791 or online at www.epa.gov/safewater/hfacts.html. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.Immunocom- promised persons such as persons with cancer under- going chemotherapy,persons who have undergone organ transplants,people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders,soine elderly,and infants can be particularly at risk frominfections.These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. USEPA/Centers for Disease Control (CDC)guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryp- tosporidium and other microbial contaminants are avail- able from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791). 2008 Otay Water District Consumer Confidence Report PARAMETER UNITS MAJOR SOURCES IN DRINKING WATER Aluminum (dl:,Range NO -57 150-200 NO Residue from water treatment process;natural deposits ppb 1000 600 50 erosion Average NO 175 NO 'Barium Range NO ND-l00 NO Oil and metal refineries discharge; ppb 1000 2000 100 natural deposits erosion Average NO NO NO Fluoride Ie)Range 0.2 -0.3 0.2 -0.3 0.2-0.3 Erosion of natural deposits;discharge from fertilizer and Naturally~occurring ppm 2.0 0.1 aluminum factories Average 0.2 0.3 0.3 Fluoride le)Optimal Fluoride Control Range 0.7 -1.3 0.7 1.3 0.7 -1.3 Water additive for dental health Treatment'related Range 0.5 -0.9 0.5-1,0 not added ppm (i)0.1 Average 0.8 0.8 not added Nitrate (as NI (f)Range NO 0.4 NO NO 2.1 Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use;septic tank and sewage; ppm 10 10 0.4 natural deposits erosion Average NO NO NO RADIDLOGICAlS (9) Gross Alpha Range NO -5.5 3.2-5,4 NO Erosion of natural deposits J!.<\Flic)e·Activity pCi/L 15 (0)3 Average NO 4.6 NO Uranium Range 1.5 -3.2 1.6-4.6 NO -2.5 Erosion of natural deposits pCi/L 20 0.43 1 Average 2.3 3.1 NO DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS,DISINFECTANTRESIDUALS,AND DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS PRECURSORS (hI Total Trihalorilelhanes Otay Distribution System Range ~39 72 By-product of drinking water chlorination(ITHMI ppb 80 NA 0.5 Otay Distribution System Highest RAA Average ~50 Haload~l1eAb~s (fivel Otay Distribution System Range ~8-34 By-product of drinkingwater chlorination(HAA51:~t ppb 60 NA 1 Otay Distribution System Highest RAA Average ~23 \Total Chlorine Residual Otay Distribution System Range ~0.1 4.0 Drinking water disinfectant added for treatmentppm[4.0J [4.0J NA Otay Distribution System Highest RAA Average ~2.6 Bromate (i)Range NA ND-8.5 NA By-product of drinkingwater ozonation ppb 10 (0)5.0 Highest NA NO NA RAA~;_L,_ .,~~:-:,DBp'Precursors Control Range 1.9 -2.7 2.6-3.2 2.2·4.9 Various natural and man-made sources ITOCI/h)ppm IT NA 0.30 Average 2.3 2.9 3.3 PRIMARY STANDARDS -LEAD AND COPPER RULE -SAMPLED ATTHE TAP IN 2007 Copper (i)ppm NL=1.3 0.17 0.05 osites above NL out of 54 sampled Internal corrosion of household pipes;erosion of nautural 90th percentile=0.33 deposits Lead,{jJ ppb NL=15 2 5 osites above NL out of 54 sampled Internal corrosion of household pipes;erosion of nautural 90th percentile=2.9 deposits ABBREVIATIONS AL."",.."..,.Action Level DBP DisinfectionBy-Products DLR .."Detection limits for purposes of Reporting MCL ....Maximum Contaminant Level MCLG ...Maximum C6ritamlnant Level Goal MFt "Million'Fillers par liter MRDL ""."Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level MRDLG ..Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal N Nitrogen NA Not Applicable. ND,,.None Detected NL .Notification Level NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Units pCi/L pjcoCuries per liter PHG Public Health Goal ppb .....part per billion ppm part per million RAA...Running Annual Average TT ....Treatment Technique uS/cm ....micro-siemens/centimeter Maximum Contammant Level(MCL):The highest level of acon- taminant that is.allowed in drinking water.Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs)as is economicallyand technologically feasible,Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor,taste,and appearance ofdrinking water, Maximum Contammant Level Goal (MCLGi'The level of acontami· nant in drinking water below which there IS no known orexpected risk to health.MCLGsare setby the US.Environmental Protection Agency. PublicHealth Goal (PHGt:The level of acontaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health, PHGs are set by the Califorma EnVironmental Protection Agency. PrimaryDrinking WaterStandard (PDWS):MCLs and MRDLs for contaminants that affect health along with their monitoring and reporting requirements,and water treatment requirements, MaximumResidual DismfectantLevel(MRDL):The level of a disinfectant added for water treatment that maynot be exceeded at the consumer's tap. Maximum Residual DisinfectantLevelGoal(MRDLG):The level of adismfectant added for water treatment below which there is no known or expected risk to health.MRDLGs are set by the U.S Environmental Protection Agency, PARAMETER UNITS STATE ORfEDERALMCl[MRDl] PHG(MClG) [MRDlG] STATE DlR RANGEAVERAGE SKINNER PLANT HELIXPLANT 'OTAYPLANT MAJDRSOURCESINDRINKING WATER SECONDARY STANOAROS--Aesthetic Standards Aluminum (f)Range NO -57 150-200 NO Residue from water treatment process;natural deposits erosion ppb 200 600 50 Average NO 175 NO Chloride Range 84 -96 84-92 98.101 Runoff/leachingfrom natural deposits;seaWater influen~eppm500NA NA Average 92 88 92 Color Range 1- 2 1 2 1 2 Naturallyoccurring organic materialsUnits15NANA Average 2 2 1 Odor Threshold Range 2 2 NO-2 Naturally-occurring organic materials TON 3 NA 1 Average 2 2 NO Specific Conductance Range 755 927 818-920 832 1330 Substances that form ions in water;seawater influence ~S/cm 1600 NA NA Average 841 869 986 Sulfate Range 134 -202 180-210 126 202 Runoff/leaching from natural deposits;ppm 500 NA 0.5 industrial wastesAverage169195155 Total Oissolved Solids Range 438.551 532-550 418 555 Runoff/leaching from natural deposits;seawater influen.Ce(TOS)ppm 1000 NA NA Average 495 541 498 Turbidity (a)Range 0.05 0.07 0.04 -0.10 0.05 0.29 Soil runoff NTU 5 NA NA Average 0.05 .06 0.13 UNREGULATED CHEMICALS REQUIRING MONITORING Boron NL=Range 130 160 120-140 101 129 Runoff/leaching from naturaldeposits;industrial wastes ppb NA 1000 100 Average 140 125 114 Chromium Vllk)Range 0.07 0.18 NO NO Industnal waste discharge;could be naturally present as ppb NA NA 1 well Average 0.12 NO NO Vanadium Range NO 3.7-5.2 NO Naturally-occurring;industrial waste dischargeppbNANL=50 3 Average NO 4.5 NO FEDERAL REGULATED CONTAMINANTS WITH NO MCLs List 1 Perchlorate ppb NA 4 11-__R_an_g_e_t-I_N_0_"_4_.6_t-I_N_0__t-I__N_O_--illndustriaI waste discharge I Average I NO I NO I NO I OTHER PARAMETERS Alkalinity Range 91 -106 94-129 103 -131 ppm NA NA NA Average 98 109 119 Calcium Range 44 -60 59-61 47 -79 ppm NA NA NA Average 53 60 57 Chlorate (I)Range NO 23 NA NO By-product of drinkingwater chlorination;industrial processes ppb NA NL=800 20 Range 24-43 NA NO Hardness Range 194 -254 250-260 194 -254 Municipal and industrial waste discharges ppm NA NA NA Average 226 255 226 Magnesium Range 19 -25 24-25 4 24 ppm NA NA NA Average 22 24.5 19 pH Range 7.9 -8.2 7.8-8.1 6.9 -8.5 Units NA NA NA Average 8.1 8.0 8.1 Potassium Range 3.8 -4.5 4.1-4.4 4.0 9.6ppmNANANA Average 4.2 4.3 4.9 Sodium Range 73 89 79-84 82.90 ppm NA NA NA Average 83 82 85 FOOTNOTES: lal The turbidity level of the filtered water shall be less than orequal to0.3 NTU in 95%of the measurements taken each month and shall not exceed 1NTU at anytime.Turbidity is ameasure of the cloudiness ofthe water and is an indicator of treatment performance.The monthlyaverages and ranges of turbidity shown in the SecondaryStandards were based on the treatment plant effluent. Ib)Total coliform MCls:No morethan 5.0%of the monthly samples may be total coliform-positive.Compliance is based on the combined distribution system sampling from all the treatment plants. Icl Fecal coliformlE.coliMCls:The occurrence of two 12)consecutive total coliform-positive samples,one of which contains fecal coliform/E.coli,constitutes an acute Mel violation. (d)Aluminum has both primaryand secondary standards. lei Data forthe naturally-occurring fluoride were taken before thefluoridation treatment began.Fluoridation treat- ment ofwater supplies at the Skinnerand Helixplants started in December,2007. III State MCl is 45mg/l as nitrate,which equals 10mg/l as N Igi (h) iii Ii) Ikl III Reported results weretakenfrom four consecutive quarters of monitoring from August 2005 to April 2006 for the Skinner Plant,November2006 -August 2007 for Helix.and calender year 2006 for the OtayPlant. In 2007,all plants were in compliancewith all provisions of the Stagel Oisinfectants/DisinfedionBy-Products (D/DBP)Rule including the DBPprecursor ITOCI control requirement. Running annual averagewas calculated from quarterly resultsofweekly samples.Only Helix is requited to test for Bromate due to the use of ozone for disinfection.Bromate reporting level is3ppb. lead and copper are regulated as aTreatment Technique under the lead and Copper Rule.It requires systems to take water samples at the consumers'tap The action levels,which trigger'Natersystems into takingtreat- ment steps ifexceeded in more than 10%ofthe tap watersamples,are 1.3 ppm for copper and 15ppb for lead. Chromium VI reporting level is 0.03 ppb. Rangesfor the plant effluent were takenfromtwo quarterlysamples.Helix not requred to sample_ •CityofSan Diego's Dlay Water Tr€iltment Plant Su Reporte de Confianza al Consurnidor Otav Water District (OWD)esta orgulloso de proporcionarle su reporte de confianta al consumidor.Este folleto es una fotografia de la calidad del agua del ana pasado.Vienen incluidos los detalles de donde proviene el agua,que contiene Vcomo se compara con los estandares del estado. La informacion incluida en este reporte de calidad del agua representa una pequena fraccion de 10 que hacemos para asegurar agua potable de alta calidad.Usando laboratorios certificados por el estado,rutinariamente escudri- namos el suministro de agua por un completo range de elementos que tienen el potencial de degradar la calidad de su agua. As!como en anos pasados,su agua potable reunio todos los estandares de sa- Iud del EPA Vel estado para agua potable.OWD de una manera vigilante salva- guarda los suministros de agua y una vez mas estamos orgullosos de reportar que nuestro sistema nunca ha violado un nivel contaminante maximo 0 ningun otro estandar de calidad del agua. Una Platica Directa Sobre Agua Todos tienen interesen la calidad de su agua y algunos a veces preguntan,"l,Puedo sentirme seguro bebiendo agua de la lIave?"En el Condado de San Diego,la respuesta es que si.Sistemas Publicos de Agua,tales como los opera- dos por Otay Water District,deben cumplir con estandares para agua potable muy altos impuestos por la United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). EI agua de la lIave es regulada de una manera mas rigu- rosa que el agua embotellada y debe cumplir con todos los estandares de calidad de agua tanto federales como estatales.Estas regulaciones son tipicamente limites numericos en las concentraciones,0 cantidades de ciertos contaminantes en el agua.Para poder cumplir con estas regulaciones,los suministros de agua deben proporcionar un tratamiento especifico,como desinfecci6n y filtraci6n, para asegurar que el agua sea potable. Si todavla estas preocupado 0 prefieres beber agua con un sabor diferente,puedes comprar agua embotellada, pero puede costar hasta 1,000 veces mas que el agua de la lIave.Ademas,existen otras opciones mas econ6micas que comprar agua embotellada.Para mejorar el sabor 0 el olor del agua de la lIave,la cual esta tratada con cloro para asegurar una desinfecci6n adecuada y mantener su alta calidad,la manera mas facil de hacer esto es dejar un recipiente abierto en el refrigerador toda la noche.AI exponer el agua al aire permite que cantidades pequeiias de eloro se evaporen.Ademas enfriar el agua la hace mas refrescante. Otras opciones incluyen sistemas de filtraci6n para casas que son convenientes,mejoran el sabor,y solo cuestan una fracci6n del precio de agua embotellada.Los consumi- dores que deciden comprar una unidad de tratamiento de agua para casas deben leer cuidadosamente la infor- maci6n del producto para que comprendan 10 que estan comprando.Tambien,deben seguir cuidadosamente las instrueeiones de manufaetura para la operaei6n y manten- imiento del sistema,y reeordar cambiarle el filtro de una manera regular. Additional Fluoride Inforn1ation Available The Otay Water District's water comes from multiple sources,each with varying fluoride levels,which blend together within the distribution system.As a result,levels of fluoride differ between individual service connections within our wide service area.In some communities,fluo- ride concentrations will be adequate for dental protection, and in others,supplemental fluoride prescriptions may be Public Participation The Otay Water District encourages public participation from'the customers we serve.The board of directors generally meets on the first Wednesday of each month at 3:30 p.m.atdistrict headquarters,2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.,Spring Valley,91978.We encourage the pub- lic to attend these meetings. needed.For consumers'benefit,fluoride levels are mea- sured per area and posted to the district's website monthly. To view the fluoride concentration level in your community, please visit the Water Resources section of our website, www.otaywater.gov,and click on Fluoridation. For directions,agendas or for further information,call (619)670-2222 or visit our website at www.otaywater.gov. Otay Water District Board of Directors Gary Croucher,President Division 3 Jose Lopez,Vice President...Division 4 Jaime Bonilla,Treasurer Division 2 Larry Breitfelder,Direotor Division 1 Mark Robak,Director Division 5 For More Inforn1ation The Otay Water District appreciates your comments and active participation.If you have questions about the'information contained in this report,or testing processes,please contact Gary Stalker,System Operations Manager,at (619)670-2228 or visit our website at wWw.otaywater.gov.You can also find helpful information by contacting the following agencies: California Department of Public Health Division of Drinking Water and Environmental ManagemJwt 1350 Front Street.Romn2050 San Diego,CA 92U5 VllWw.cdph.ca.gov/programs/ Pages/DWP.aspx United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water (4101 M) 1200 PennsylvaniaAvenue,N.W. Washington,D.C.20460 Safe Drinking Water Hotline:(800)426-4791 wWW.epa.gov/safewater/ Este informe contiene informacion muy importcmte sobre su agua potable. Traduzcalo 0 hable con alguien que 10 entienda bien. Chi ti~t nay th~t quan trQng.Xin nhC1 ngu'oi djch tho quyvj. Mahalaga ang impormasyong ito.Mangyaring ipasalin ito. www.otaywater.gov E-mail:opinion_form@otaywater.gov OTAV WATER DISTRICT 2254 Sweetwater Springs Blvd. Spring Valley,CA 91978-2096 619-670-2222 Pr-SrtStd. us Postage PAID Permit No.2 San Diego CA ND-11.3 3.8 pCi/L 50 NA 4 Range ND-5.5 Decayofnatural andmanmade depositsAverageND pCiLL 5 Nil 0$Range ND Erosil)(J 01nalUla!depositsAve~g.ND ND-2.7 2.2 ppb 80 NA 0.5 ppb 60 NA 1(9)Range By-productof drinkingwaterchlorinationAverage ,Residuesfiool WilIIlrlfea!rT!ef11~efOsiO!lof nalUrql~sits 500 NA 78 -92 Runoff/leachingfrom naturalppm83deposits;seawater influence Units 15 I'iIA f -7.5 NaWrally occurrill!lorJjanicmatelials2, 51 500 NA noncorrosive noncorrosive Leachingfrom naturaldepositsnoncorrosivenoncorrosive ~mho/cm J600 NA Ronge 830 ·902 788-830 Substaocesdlalfurm ions Average 852 812 Inwater..seawallJiltllJelXl! 500 NA Rango 162 -191 Runoff/leaching from naturalppmAv,rngo 179 deposits;industrialwastes 495·543 Runoff/1l!acllillllfrum llilllJra1 504 ooposifs;~rinfluence Units Range MWOCllmbined Sl<inner DLR AVerage TreatmeJllPlants NA NA Range 114-123 100 126ppmAverage119115 NA NA Range 54-59 58-61ppmI\'ierage 57 60 Oocysts/TT (0)Range NO NO 100ml Average NO NO Cysts!TT (0)NO NOl00LNDNO ppm NA NA 230 -250 243 253 241 249 gf;;linsper NA NA 13.4·14.6 14~2 -14.8 Ion 14.1 14.6 NA NA Range 23.0 -25.0 24 25ppmAverage24.0 24.3 PRb I.\aRge NO NO Look~~'JIsolilll1"3 13 3 Avetoge ND NO stooJgeIrisaMpipelms ppm 10 10 Range NO NO0.4 Average NO NO pH Units NA N.A Range 8.0 8.02·8..08Average8.0 8.06 NA NA Range 3.9 -4.1 4.2 4.3ppmAverage3.9 4.2 Rpm NA NA lIange '76 -86·79 83A_79 81 Al DBP DlR HAA5 ICR MCl MClG MRDl MRDlG NA NO NTU pCi/l PHG ppb ppm ppt SI TOC TIHM TI California Action level Disinfection By·Products Detection Limits for purposesof Reporting Haloacetic Acids (five) Information Collection Rule Maximum ContaminantLevel Maximum ContaminantLevel Goal Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Maximum Residual Disinfectantlevel Goal NotApplicable NoneDetected Nephelometric Turbidity Units PicoCuries perliter Public Health Goal Parts perbillion or micrograms per Liter (~g/ll Parts permillion ormilligrams per liter (mg/l) Parts pertrillion ornanogramsperLiter (ng/ll Saturation Index (langelier) Total Organic Carbon Total Trihalomethanes Treatment Technique (al The turbidity level ofthefiltered watershall be lessthan orequalto 0.3 NTU in95%of the measurements taken each month and shall not exceed 1.0 NTU at anytime.Turbidity isa measure af the cloudiness ofthe waterand is a good indicator ofwaterqualityand filtration performance. (bl Total coliform MCls:No morethan 5.0%ofthe monthly samples may be total coliform positive.Compliance is based on the combined Otay W.D.distribution system sampling. 1,760samples were analyzed in 2002.The MClwas notviolated. (cl Fecalcoliform/£.col/MCls:The occurrenceof 2consecutive total coliform positive samples,oneofwhich containsfecal coliform/E.coli,constitutes an acute Melviolation. The MClwas notviolated in 2002. Idl Aluminum and MTBE have both primary and secondary standards. Ie)Fourquarter radiological monitoring results for levy (HWD)are (or 2001,Skinner (MWD) arefor 1998/99. (II StandardisforRadium ·226and -228combined. (gl DlR=1.0 ppbfor each HAA5 analyte (dichloroacetic acid,trichloroacetic acid,monobromo- acetic acid,dibromoacetic acid)exceptfor monochloroacetic acid which has a DlR =2.0 ppb. (hi Total chlorine residual averages based onmonthlyaveragesfromthe OtayWaterDistrict distribution system. (il These are 2002results.Although Environmental Protection Agency mandated testing is required only once everythree years,the Olay Water Districtperformsthese analyses annually as aquality assurance measurefor our customers. State MCl is 45 mg/l as Nitrate,which equels 10.16 mg/l as N. Maximum ContaminantLevel (MCL):The highest level of acontaminant thatisallowed in drinking water.Primary MCls are setas close tothe PHGs or (MClGsl as is economically and technologically feasible.Secondary MCls aresetto protect the odor,taste,and appearance of drinking water. Maximum Contaminantlevel Goal (MCLG):The level of a contaminantin drinking water belowwhich there is no known orexpected risk to health.MClGsare setby the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency. Meximum Residual Disinfectant Level(MRDl):The level of adisinfectantadded for water treatmentthat may not be exceeded at the consumer'stap. Maximum Residual Disinfectant LevelGoal (MRDlGI:The level of adisinfectantadded for watertreatmentbelow whichthere isno known or expected riskto health.MRDlGsaresetby the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Public HealthGoal (PHG):Thelevel ofa contaminantin drinking water belowwhich there is no known orexpected riskto health.PHGs aresetby the California Environmental Protection Agency. Primary DrinkingWater Standard orPDWS:MCls and MRDls for contaminants thataffect health along withtheir monitoring and reporting requirements,andwatertreatment requirementsthat are specified in regulations.Secondary MCls are setto protectthe odor, taste and appearance ofthe drinkingwater. RegulatoryAction Level: The concentration of acontaminantwhich,if exceeded,triggers treatmentor other requirementswhich awatersystem must follow. TreatmentTechnique:Arequired process intended to reduce the level ofa contaminantin drinking water. OTAY WATER DISTRICT PRELIMINARY COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY FORTWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,2008 Exhibit A Annual YTD YTD YTD Budget Actual Budget Variance Var% REVENUE: Water Sales $32,331,300 $30,105,994 $32,331,300 $(2,225,306)(6.9%) Energy Charges 2,018,000 1,834,102 2,018,000 (183,898)(9.1%) System Charges 9,596,300 9,611,046 9,596,300 14,746 0.2% Penalties 852,100 786,762 852,100 (65,338)(7.7%) MWD &CWA Fixed Charges 2,708,800 2,530,306 2,708,800 (178,494)(6.6%) Total Water Sales 47,506,500 44,868,211 47,506,500 (2,638,289)(5.6%) Reclamation Sales 6,001,400 5,955,614 6,001,400 (45,786)(0.8%) Sewer Charges 2,679,100 2,415,371 2,679,100 (263,729)(9.8%) Meter Fees 318,500 70,614 318,500 (247,886)(77.8%) Capacity Fee Revenues 1,414,500 1,468,794 1,414,500 54,294 3.8% Betterment Fees for Maintenance**73,300 895,620 73,300 822,320 1121.9% Annexation Fees 1,464,500 526,435 1,464,500 (938,065)(64.1%) Non-Operating Revenues 1,680,200 2,021,348 1,680,200 341,148 20.3% Tax Revenues 4,003,800 3,931,304 4,003,800 (72,496)(1.8%) Interest 1,038,700 819,359 1,038,700 (219,341)(21.]%) Draw on Designated Funds*408,400 408,400 408,400 0.0% Total Revenue $66,588,900 $63,381,067 $66,588,900 $(3,207,833)(4.8%) EXPENSES: Water Purchases $25,407,100 $23,472,196 $25,407,100 $1,934,904 7.6% CWA~Infrastructure Access Charge 1,090,200 1,090,228 1,090,200 (28)(0.0%) CWA-Customer Service Charge 950,400 949,222 950,400 1,178 0.1% CWA-Emergency Storage Charge 1,507,800 1,507,895 1,507,800 (95)(0.0%) MWD-Capacity Res Charge 569,400 570,980 569,400 (1,580)(0.3%) MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge 552,600 564,193 552,600 (11,593)(2.1%) Subtotal Water Purchases 30,077,500 28,154,714 30,077,500 1,922,786 6.4% Power Charges 2,804,800 2,622,549 2,804,800 182,251 6.5% Payroll &Related Costs 16,012,900 16,086,699 16,012,900 (73,799)(0.5%) Material &Maintenance 4,452,900 4,181,211 4,452,900 271,689 6.1% Administrative Expenses 5,773,300 4,707,985 5,773,300 1,065,315 18.5% Legal Fees 1,209,000 1,410,174 1,209,000 (201,174)(16.6%) Expansion Reserve 2,590,200 2,590,200 2,590,200 0.0% Betterment Reserve 3,432,900 3,432,900 3,432,900 0.0% Replacement Reserve 235,400 235,400 235,400 0.0% Total Expenses $66,588,900 $63,421,833 $66,588,900 $3,167,067 4.8% Excess Revenue (Expense)$$(40,766)$$(40,766) *Board approved Draw on Designated Funds used to fund negotiated benefits. **Staffwas allocating budget estimate prior to March.In March staffused actual IMS cost to calculate the betterment fees spent on maintenance. F:/MORPT/FS2008-0608designaled 7/28/2008 3:00 PM OTAY WATER DISTRICT INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW JUNE 30,2008 INVESTMENT OVERVIEW &MARKET STATUS: At the latest meeting of the Federal Reserve Board on June 25th,there was no change made to the federal funds rate.The last federal funds rate adjustment was made on April 30th,when the Board lowered the rate from 2.25%to 2.00%.This was the seventh reduction in a row since September 18th,when the rate was 5.25%.Due to the ongoing changes in the federal funds rate we have been extending the average maturity ofthe portfolio to maintain above market interest returns as long as possible.As a result,despite the large drop in available interest rates,with this investment strategy the District's overall effective rate ofreturn on its portfolio at June 30th was 3.46%.At the same time the LAIF return on deposits has also dropped over the last several months,reaching an average effective yield of2.89%for the month ofJune.It appears that this drop in interest rates has now bottomed out,with a gradual rise in rates being predicted for either the August or October Federal Reserve Board meeting.Based on our success at maintaining a competitive rate ofreturn on our portfolio during this extended period ofinterest rate declines,no changes in investment strategy are being considered at this time. In accordance with the District's Investment Policy,all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives,in priority order,ofsafety,liquidity,and return on investment. PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE:June 30,2008 8.01: 8.02: 8.02: 8.03: 8.04: 8.05: 8.06: 8.07: 8.08: 12.0: Investment Treasury Securities Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations) Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds) Federal Agency Issues Certificates ofDeposit Short-Term Commercial Notes Medium-Term Commercial Debt Money Market Mutual Funds San Diego County Pool Maximum Single Financial Institution State Limit 100% $40 Million 100% 100% 30% 25% 30% 20% 100% 100% OtayLimit 100% $40 Million 100% 100% 15% 15% 15% 15% 100% 50% Otay Actual o $10.79 Million 1.64% 66.89% 1.23% o 2.28% o 13.87% 1.80% Performance Measu're'F-12 Return on Investment Target:Meet or Exceed 1000/0 of LAIF 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr A FY08 May JUll FY08 4th Qtr FY08 FY08 pr FY08 FY08 4.95 4.30 3.82 3.50 3.46 3.59 4.96 4.18 3.40 3.07 2.89 3.11 0.01 -0.12 -0.42 -0.43 -0.57 -0.48 Month Otay •LAIF 0 Difference -Linear (Difference)I 69.17% Otay Water District Investment Portfolio:06/30/08 3.03% o Banks (Passbook/Checking/CD)•Pools (LAIF &County)0 Agencies &Corporate Notes 27.80% OTAY Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary June 30,2008 Investments Corporate Notes Federal Agency Issues-Callable Certificates of Deposit -Bank Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) San Diego County Pool Investments Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv.365 Equiv. 2,000,000.00 2,051,704.10 2,026,807.12 2.35 1,111 883 4.340 4.401 58,704,100.00 58,630,802.60 58,703,215.78 68.09 930 817 3.590 3.640 1,079,108.00 1,079,108.00 1,079,108.00 1.25 393 195 4.728 4.793 12,228,136.57 12,228,059.53 12,228,136.57 14.18 1 1 2.854 2.894 12,177,099.49 12,219,100.73 12,177,099.49 14.12 1 1 3.329 3.375 86,188,444.06 86,208,774.96 86,214,366.96 100.00%665 580 3.481 3.529 Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return 1,579,602.22 87,768,046.28 June 30 Month Ending 252,713.83 88,753,538.41 3.46% 1,579,602.22 87,788,377.18 Fiscal Year To Date 4,424,034.62 97,220,507.83 4.54% 1,579,602.22 87,793,969.18 665 Fiscal Year Ending 4,424,034.62 580 1.604 3.481 1.627 3.529 I hereby certify that the investments contained in this report are made in accordance with the District Investment Policy Number 27 adopted by the Board of Directors on January 19,2000.The market value information provided by Interactive Data Corporation.The investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow requirements ofthe District for the next six months ofexpenditures.<-~.::'::'~.::::;~:2:'~7_;Zfr-(/2-'~'J.(}sepfi13ea;eri(~hieffJrrancial Officer '.' /'~.."", Run Dale:07122/2008-11:02 Portfolio OTAY AP PM (PRF_PM1)SymRept 6.41.200 Report Ver.5.00 olAY Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments June 30,2008 Page 2 Average Purchase CUSIP Investment#Issuer Balance Date Corporate Notes 36962G2S2 2044 General Electric Capital 11/16/2007 Subtotal and Average 2,027,253.91 Subtotal and Average Federal Agency Issues-Callable 31398AMX7 2064 31331YB74 2073 3133XLTL7 2037 3133XMX71 2042 3133XN6X2 2045 3133XNP52 2057 3133XNS42 2058 3133XNPR4 2059 3133XPDR2 2062 3133XPDSO 2063 3133XPWL4 2065 3133XPX90 2067 3133XPZN7 2068 3133XQC91 2070 3133XQF23 2071 3133XQJ78 2072 3133XQMC3 2074 3133XQUX8 2075 3133XRNM8 2083 3133XRK74 2084 3128X7TT1 2079 3128X7YG3 2082 31398AKSO 2060 31398ANH1 2069 3136F9LP6 2076 3136F9NB5 2077 31398ARD6 2078 3136F9SA2 2080 3136F9TS2 2081 Run Date:07/22/2008 -11:02 FANNIE MAE Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal HomeLoan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal HomeLoan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mortgage Federal Home Loan Mortgage Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc 52,303,203.43 02122/2008 04/07/2008 07/30/2007 11/14/2007 11/20/2007 12/17/2007 12118/2007 12124/2007 01/30/2008 01/30/2008 02/26/2008 03/05/2008 03/03/2008 03/17/2008 03/25/2008 04/14/2008 04/14/2008 04/29/2008 06/30/2008 06/30/2008 06/0212008 06/26/2008 01/07/2008 03/10/2008 04/28/2008 05/12/2008 05/19/2008 06/10/2008 06/25/2008 Stated YTM Days to Maturity ParValue MarketValue BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date 2,000,000.00 2,051,704.10 2,026,807.12 5.000 Aaa 4.340 883 12101/2010 2,000,000.00 2,051,704.10 2,026,807.12 4.340 883 2,000,000.00 1,998,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 598 02119/2010 2,000,000.00 1,979,375.00 2,000,000.00 3.180 3.136 1,010 04/07/2011 3,000,000.00 3,006,562.50 3,000,000.00 5.550 5.474 759 07/30/2010 2,000,000.00 2,004,375.00 2,000,000.00 4.500 4.435 409 08/14/2009 2,000,000.00 2,004,375.00 2,000,000.00 4.500 4.436 780 08/20/2010 2,000,000.00 2,006,250.00 2,000,000.00 4.375 4.315 808 09/17/2010 2,000,000.00 2,011,250.00 2,000,000.00 4.250 4.192 717 06/18/2010 1,800,000.00 1,810,687.50 1,800,000.00 4.350 4.290 906 12124/2010 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.060 3.018 577 01/29/2010 2,000,000.00 1,997,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.250 3.205 759 07/30/2010 2,000,000.00 1,996,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 605 02/26/2010 2,000,000.00 1,997,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.020 2.979 612 03/05/2010 1,905,000.00 1,905,000.00 1,905,000.00 3.350 3.304 794 09/03/2010 2,000,000.00 1,985,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.125 3.081 899 12/17/2010 2,000,000.00 1,983,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.250 3.205 997 03/25/2011 2,000,000.00 1,965,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.150 3.107 1,017 04/14/2011 2,000,000.00 1,980,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.900 2.860 835 10/14/2010 2,000,000.00 1,987,500.00 2,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 850 10/29/2010 2,000,000.00 2,011,250.00 2,000,000.00 3.650 3.598 637 03/30/2010 2,000,000.00 2,008,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.452 547 12130/2009 2,000,000.00 1,997,510.07 2,000,000.00 3.625 3.575 1,066 06/02/2011 2,000,000.00 2,006,940.00 2,000,000.00 4.750 4.685 1,821 06/26/2013 2,000,000.00 2,012,500.00 2,000,000.00 4.500 4.438 920 01/07/2011 2,000,000.00 1,988,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.250 3.205 969 02/25/2011 1,999,100.00 1,993,477.53 1,999,100.00 3.000 2.959 666 04/28/2010 2,000,000.00 1,991,875.00 2,000,000.00 3.100 3.058 680 05/1212010 2,000,000.00 1,997,500.00 1,999,115.78 3.600 3.570 1,052 05/19/2011 2,000,000.00 2,000,625.00 2,000,000.00 3.265 3.220 709 06/10/2010 2,000,000.00 2,003,125.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.452 724 06/25/2010 58,704,100.00 58,630,802.60 58,703,215.78 3.590 817 Portfolio OTAY AP PM (PRF_PM2)SymRept6.41.200 Report VeL 5.00 ':"".'~~:':"_':;',"'~;,~~:},~~;g;;C)':-,·".~-.'.' OTAY Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Investments June 30,2008 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment#Issuer Balance Date ParValue MarketValue Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date Certificates ofDeposit -Bank 205003183 2066 California Bank &Trust 01/22/2008 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 3.180 3.180 570 01/2212010 1002812475 2061 Neighborhood National Bank 12/13/2007 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 4.850 4.850 165 12/13/2008 Subtotal and Average 1,079,108.00 1,079,108.00 1,079,108.00 1,079,108.00 4.728 195 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 10,788,481.79 10,788,476.42 10,788,481.79 2.894 2.854 LAIF COPS07 9009 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 03/07/2007 1,439,654.78 1,439,583.11 1,439,654.78 2.894 2.854 Subtotal and Average 19,371,469.90 12,228,136.57 12,228,059.53 12,228,136.57 2.854 San Diego County Pool SO COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County 07/01/2004 12,177,099.49 12,219,100.73 12,177,099.49 3.375 3.329 Subtotal andAverage 12,177,099.49 12,177,099.49 12,219,100.73 12,177,099.49 3.329 Total and Average 88,753,538.41 86,188,444.06 86,208,774.96 86,214,366.96 3.481 580 Run Date:07/22/2008 -11 :02 Portfolio OTAY AP PM (PRF_PM2)SymRept6.41.200 OTAY Portfolio Management Portfolio Details -Cash June 30,2008 Average Purchase CUSIP Investment#Issuer Balance Date ParValue Union Bank UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 10,016.93 PETTY CASH 9003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 2,800.00 UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 1,542,408.03 PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 24,377.26 UNION IOC 9008 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 05/01/2006 0.00 Average Balance 0.00 Total Cash and Investmentss 88,753,538.41 87,768,046.28 Run Date:0712212008 -11:02 MarketValue 10,016.93 2,800.00 1,542,408.03 24,377.26 0.00 87,788,377.18 Page 4 Stated YTM Days to Book Value Rate Moody's 360 Maturity 10,016.93 0.150 0.148 2,800.00 0.000 1,542,408.03 1.665 1.642 24,377.26 0.000 0.00 4.500 4.438 87,793,969.18 3.481 580 Portfolio OTAY AP PM (PRF]M2)SymRept 6.41.200 OlAY Activity Report Sorted By Issuer July 1,2007 -June 30,2008 ParValue ParValue..._.........................._-,.......__.......-..................................-_.............__.................- Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending CUSIP Investment#Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance Issuer:STATE OF CALIFORNIA Union Bank UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0.150 172,123,481.93 172,198,772.59 UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1.665 13,796,553.35 13,177,351.54 PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 626,971.96 627,729.84 UNION IOC 9008 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 4.500 1,240,481.91 1,253,290.86 Subtotal and Balance 1,049,257.90 187,787,489.15 187,257,144.83 1,579,602.22 Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2.894 83,498,732.05 81,600,000.00 LAIF COPS07 9009 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2.894 315,597.20 8,000,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 18,013,807.32 83,814,329.25 89,600,000.00 12,228,136.57 IssuerSubtotal 15.732%19,063,065.22 271,601,818.40 276,857,144.83 13,807,738.79 Issuer:California Bank &Trust Certificates of Deposit-Bank 2050003183R 1996 California Bank &Trust 3.880 01/2212008 0.00 79,108.00 205003183 2066 California Bank&Trust 3.180 01/22/2008 79,108.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 IssuerSubtotal 0.090%79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 Issuer:FANNIE MAE Federal Agency Issues-Callable 31359M2L6 2012 FANNIE MAE 5.250 12/11/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 31398AMX7 2064 FANNIE MAE 3.000 02/2212008 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Issuer Subtotal 2.279%3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Run Date:07/22/2008-11:03 Portfolio OTAY AP DA (PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200 ReportVer.5.00 OTAY Activity Report Page 2 July 1,2007 -June 30,2008 ..............ParValue ....f><!IryallJE! Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending CUSIP Investment#Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance Issuer:Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Agency Issues-Callable 31331YCZ1 2043 Federal Farm Credit Bank 4.490 11/07/2007 3,000,000.00 0.00 31331YCZ1 2043 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/05/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00 31331YB74 2073 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3.180 04/07/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 0.00 5,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 IssuerSubtotal 2.279%0.00 5,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Issuer:Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Agency Issues-Callable 3133XEMS5 1998 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.000 11/28/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XETX7 2001 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.125 09/14/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XF2C9 2002 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.250 10/03/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XJ2P2 2010 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.200 12/05/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XJ6Q6 2013 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.125 07/20/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XJJV1 2015 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.375 07/10/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XJR91 2016 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.400 10/30/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XJSD1 2017 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.250 01/02/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XJVV7 2018 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.250 08/15/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XJU55 2019 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.350 11/21/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XK3C7 2022 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.500 12/13/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XK6A8 2024 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.300 11/19/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XKLA1 2030 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.375 11/01/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XKN50 2031 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.300 11/07/2007 0.00 5,000,000.00 3133XKSS5 2032 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.300 11/09/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XL6E8 2033 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.400 12/11/2007 0.00 5,000,000.00 3133XLEW9 2034 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.500 07/02/2007 3,000,000.00 0.00 3133XLEW9 2034 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/0212008 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XKVD4 2035 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.500 07/10/2007 3,000,000.00 0.00 3133XKVD4 2035 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/21/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XLMZ3 2036 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.450 07/23/2007 3,000,000.00 0.00 3133XLMZ3 2036 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/23/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00 3133XLTL7 2037 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.550 07/30/2007 3,000,000.00 0.00 3133XLYB3 2038 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.375 08/20/2007 3,000,000.00 0.00 3133XLYB3 2038 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/20/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 Portfolio OTAY AP Run Date:07/2212008 -11:03 DA (PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200 ReportVee.5.00 OTAY Activity Report Page 3 July 1,2007 -June 30,2008 ParValue ParValue Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending CUSIP Investment#Issuer ofPortfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance Issuer:Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Agency Issues-Callable 3133XMXCO 2039 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 11/06/2007 1,000,000.00 0.00 3133XMXCO 2039 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/06/2008 0.00 1,000,000.00 3133XMX71 2042 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 11/14/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XN6X2 2045 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 11/20/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XN7B9 2046 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.400 11/28/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XN7B9 2046 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/28/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XN6R5 2047 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 11/28/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XN6R5 2047 Federal Home Loan Bank 02128/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNC56 2048 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.600 11/28/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNC56 2048 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/28/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNEF2 2049 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.600 11/26/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNEF2 2049 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/23/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNGTO 2050 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 12104/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNGTO 2050 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/04/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNKN8 2051 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.300 12/10/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNKN8 2051 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/10/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNFC8 2052 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 12107/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNFC8 2052 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/03/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNLN7 2053 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.300 12111/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNLN7 2053 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/11/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNN47 2054 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.450 12/12/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNN47 2054 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/12/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNN62 2055 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.450 1211212007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNN62 2055 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/1212008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNM63 2056 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.550 12/17/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNM63 2056 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/17/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XNP52 2057 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.375 12/17/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNS42 2058 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.250 12118/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XNPR4 2059 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.350 12124/2007 1,800,000.00 0.00 3133XPDR2 2062 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.060 01/30/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XPDSO 2063 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.250 01/30/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XPWL4 2065 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.000 02/26/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XPX90 2067 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.020 03/05/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XPZN7 2068 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.350 03/03/2008 1,905,000.00 0.00 Run Date:07/2212008 -11 :03 Portfolio OTAY AP DA (PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200 Report Ver.5.00 OTAY Activity Report Page 4 July 1,2007 -June 30,2008 ParValue Par Value........_..._.-"_..",...__.......,-"................"",....".................... Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending CUSIP Investment#Issuer ofPortfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance Issuer:Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Agency Issues-Callable 3133XQC91 2070 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.125 03/17/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XQF23 2071 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.250 03/25/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XQJ78 2072 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.150 04/14/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XQMC3 2074 Federal Home Loan Bank 2.900 04/14/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XQUX8 2075 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.100 04/29/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XRNM8 2083 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.650 06/30/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XRK74 2084 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.500 06/30/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotaland Balance 52,000,000.00 71,705,000.00 87,000,000.00 36,705,000.00 Federal Agency Issues -Coupon 3133XMY62 2040 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.420 11/08/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XMY62 2040 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/08/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XMYS4 2041 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 11/14/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 3133XMYS4 2041 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/14/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 0.00 4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 0.00 IssuerSubtotal 41.820%52,000,000.00 75,705,000.00 91,000,000.00 36,705,000.00 Issuer:Federal Home Loan Mortgage Federal Agency Issues-Callable 3128X4K67 2000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.250 12107/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X4DY4 2004 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 4.000 07/13/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X5C55 2020 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.500 12/05/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X5G93 2021 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.320 12/06/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X5P51 2023 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.300 12/14/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X5Z35 2026 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.300 10/09/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X5Z35 2027 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.300 10109/2007 0.00 5,000,000.00 3128X5Z84 2028 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.400 10/17/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 3128X5Z84 2029 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 5.400 10/17/2007 0.00 5,000,000.00 3128X7TI1 2079 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 3.625 06/02/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3128X7YG3 2082 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 4.750 06/26/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 31,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 31,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 Issuer Subtotal 4.557%31,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 31,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 Portfolio OTAY AP Run Date:07/22/2008-11:03 DA (PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200 ReportVer.5.00 OTAY Activity Report Page 5 July 1,2007 -June 30,2008 ParValue Par Value--.....-.................................................................................._............. Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending CUSIP Investment#Issuer ofPortfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance Issuer:Federal National Mortage Assoc Federal Agency Issues-Callable 31359MG31 1997 Federal National MortageAssoc 5.000 08/24/2007 0.00 3,000,000.00 31398AKSO 2060 Federal National MortageAssoc 4.500 01/07/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 31398ANH1 2069 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.250 03/10/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3136F9LP6 2076 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.000 04/28/2008 1,999,100.00 0.00 3136F9NB5 2077 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.100 05/1212008 2,000,000.00 0.00 31398ARD6 2078 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.600 05/19/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3136F9SA2 2080 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.265 06/10/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 3136F9TS2 2081 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.500 06/25/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 3,000,000.00 13,999,100.00 3,000,000.00 13,999,100.00 Issuer Subtotal 15.950%3,000,000.00 13,999,100.00 3,000,000.00 13,999,100.00 Issuer:General Electric Capital Corporate Notes 36962G2S2 2044 General Electric Capital 5.000 11/16/2007 2,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 IssuerSubtotal 2.279%0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 Issuer:Neighborhood National Bank Certificates of Deposit-Bank 1002812475 2061 Neighborhood National Bank 4.850 12113/2007 1,000,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 Issuer Subtotal 1.139%0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 Issuer:San Diego County San Diego County Pool SD COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County 3.375 12,071,173.34 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 105,926.15 12,071,173.34 0.00 12,177,099.49 IssuerSubtotal 13.874%105,926.15 12,071,173.34 0.00 12,177,099.49 Run Date:07/22/2008 -11 :03 Portfolio OTAY AP DA(PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200 Report Ver.5.00 OTAY Activity Report July 1,2007 -June 30,2008 Page 6 CUSIP Investment#Issuer Percent ofPortfolio Par Value Beginning Balance Current Transaction Rate Date Purchases or Deposits Par Value-,.'"'-- Redemptions or Withdrawals Ending Balance Run Date:07/2212008 -11 :03 Total 100.000%108,248,099.37 387,456,199.74 407,936,252.83 87,768,046.28 Portfolio OTAY AP DA(PRF_DA)SymRept6.41.200 ReportVer.5.00 OTAY GASS 31 Compliance Detail Sorted by Fund -Investment Class July 1,2007 -June 30,2008 Adjustment in Value Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase Addition Redemption Amortization Change in Ending CUSIP Investment#Fund Class Date Invested Value of Principal to Principal ofPrincipal Adjustment Market Value Invested Value Fund:Treasury Fund LAIF 9001 99 Fair Value 8,885,705.10 0.00 913,732.05 913,732.05 0.00 4,039.27 10,788,476.42 LAIF COPS07 9009 99 Fair Value 9,119,906.33 0.00 315,597.20 8,000,000.00 0.00 4,079.58 1,439,583.11 UNION MONEY 9002 99 Amortized 85,307.59 0.00 1,614.20 76,904.86 0.00 0.00 10,016.93 PETIYCASH 9003 99 Amortized 2,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,800.00 UNION OPERATING 9004 99 Amortized 923,206.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,542,408.03 PAYROLL 9005 99 Amortized 25,135.14 0.00 0.00 757.88 0.00 0.00 24,377.26 2050003183R 1996 99 Amortized 01/2212008 79,108.00 0.00 0.00 79,108.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNION IOC 9008 99 Amortized 12,808.95 0.00 601.50 13,410.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 1002812475 2061 99 Amortized 12113/2008 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 205003183 2066 99 Amortized 01/22/2010 0.00 79,108.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,108.00 SO COUNTYPOOL 9007 99 Fair Value 105,826.00 0.00 171,173.34 171,173.34 0.00 42,101.40 12,219,100.73 31359MG31 1997 99 FairValue 08/24/2007 2,998,125.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 1,875.00 0.00 3133XEMS5 1998 99 FairValue 11/28/2007 2,995,312.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 4,687.50 0.00 3128X4K67 2000 99 FairValue 03/07/2008 2,996,487.12 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,512.88 0.00 3133XETX7 2001 99 FairValue 09/14/2007 2,998,125.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 1,875.00 0.00 3133XF2C9 2002 99 FairValue 10103/2007 2,999,062.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 937.50 0.00 3128X40Y4 2004 99 FairValue 07/13/2007 2,998,661.96 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 1,338.04 0.00 3133XJ2P2 2010 99 Fair Value 12/05/2007 2,997,187.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 2,812.50 0.00 31359M2L6 2012 99 Fair Value 06/11/2008 2,995,312.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 4,687.50 0.00 3133XJ6Q6 2013 99 FairValue 12129/2008 2,989,687.50 0.00 0.00 2,983,125.00 0.00 -6,562.50 0.00 3133XJJV1 2015 99 FairValue 07/10/2008 2,999,062.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 937.50 0.00 3133XJR91 2016 99 Fair Value 01/30/2009 2,998,125.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 1,875.00 0.00 3133XJS01 2017 99 Fair Value 01/0212008 2,996,250.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,750.00 0.00 3133XJU55 2019 99 Fair Value 02123/2009 2,995,312.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 4,687.50 0.00 3133XJVV7 2018 99 Fair Value 02/15/2008 2,997,187.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 2,812.50 0.00 3128X5C55 2020 99 Fair Value 03/05/2010 2,994,552.16 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 5,447.84 0.00 3128X5G93 2021 99 Fair Value 03/06/2009 2,994,197.84 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 5,802.16 0.00 3133XK3C7 2022 99 Fair Value 03/13/2009 2,999,062.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 .0.00 937.50 0.00 3128X5P51 2023 99 Fair Value 09/14/2009 2,990,516.97 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 9,483.03 0.00 3133XK6A8 2024 99 FairValue 09/19/2008 2,995,312.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 4,687.50 0.00 Portfolio QTAY AP Run Date:07/22/2008 -11:03 GO (PRF_GO)SymRept 6.41.200 Report Ver.5.00 OTAY GASS 31 Compliance Detail Page 2 Sorted by Fund -Investment Class Adjustment in Value Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase Addition Redemption Amortization Change in Ending CUSIP Investment#Fund Class Date Invested Value of Principal to Principal of Principal Adjustment MarketValue Invested Value Fund:Treasury Fund 3128X5Z35 2026 99 FairValue 10/09/2008 2,995,527.19 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 4,472.81 0.00 3128X5Z84 2028 99 Fair Value 04/17/2009 2,996,358.03 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,641.97 0.00 3133XKLA1 2030 99 Fair Value 05/01/2009 2,996,250.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,750.00 0.00 3133XKSS5 2032 99 FairValue 05/09/2008 2,997,187.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 '0.00 2,812.50 0.00 3133XLEW9 2034 99 FairValue 07/02/2009 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XKVD4 2035 99 FairValue 05/21/2009 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XLMZ3 2036 99 FairValue 07/23/2009 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XLTL7 2037 99 FairValue 07/30/2010 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,562.50 3,006,562.50 3133XLYB3 2038 99 FairValue 08/20/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XMXCO 2039 99 Fair Value 11/06/2008 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XMY62 2040 99 Fair Value 05/08/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XMYS4 2041 99 Fair Value 04/14/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XMX71 2042 99 Fair Value 08/14/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,375.00 2,004,375.00 31331YCZ1 2043 99 Fair Value 11/05/2009 0.00 2,998,860.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 1,140.00 0.00 36962G2S2 2044 99 Fair Value 12/01/2010 0.00 2,033,740.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,964.10 2,051,704.10 3133XN6X2 2045 99 Fair Value 08/20/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,375.00 2,004,375.00 3133XN7B9 2046 99 Fair Value 05/28/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XN6R5 2047 99 Fair Value 11/28/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNC56 2048 99 Fair Value 11/28/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNEF2 2049 99 Fair Value 11/23/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNGTO 2050 99 FairValue 12104/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNKN8 2051 99 FairValue 12110/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNFC8 2052 99 FairValue 12103/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNLN7 2053 99 FairValue 06/11/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNN47 2054 99 FairValue 06/12/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNN62 2055 99 FairValue 03/12/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNM63 2056 99 FairValue 12/17/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3133XNP52 2057 99 FairValue 09/17/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,250.00 2,006,250.00 3133XNS42 2058 99 FairValue 06/18/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,250.00 2,011,250.00 3133XNPR4 2059 99 FairValue 12124/2010 0.00 1,800,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,687.50 1,810,687.50 31398AKSO 2060 99 FairValue 01/07/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,500.00 2,012,500.00 3133XPDR2 2062 99 Fair Value 01/29/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 3133XPDSO 2063 99 Fair Value 07/30/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,500.00 1,997,500.00 31398AMX7 2064 99 Fair Value 02119/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,875.00 1,998,125.00 3133XPWL4 2065 99 Fair Value 02/26/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3,125.00 1,996,875.00 3133XPX90 2067 99 Fair Value 03/05/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,500.00 1,997,500.00 Portfolio OTAY AP Run Date:07/22/2008 -11 :03 GO (PRF_GD)SymRept6.41.200 Report Ver.5.00 OTAY GASS 31 Compliance Detail Page 3 Sorted by Fund -Investment Class Adjustmentin Value Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase Addition Redemption Amortization Change in Ending CUSIP Investment#Fund Class Date Invested Value ofPrincipal to Principal of Principal Adjustment MarketValue Invested Value Fund:Treasury Fund 3133XPZN7 2068 99 Fair Value 09/03/2010 0.00 1,905,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,905,000.00 31398ANH1 2069 99 Fair Value 02/25/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -11,875.00 1,988,125.00 3133XQC91 2070 99 Fair Value 12117/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -14,375.00 1,985,625.00 3133XQF23 2071 99 FairValue 03/25/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -16,875.00 1,983,125.00 3133XQJ78 2072 99 FairValue 04/14/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -34,375.00 1,965,625.00 31331YB74 2073 99 FairValue 04/07/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20,625.00 1,979,375.00 3133XQMC3 2074 99 FairValue 10/14/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20,000.00 1,980,000.00 3133XQUX8 2075 99 FairValue 10/29/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -12,500.00 1,987,500.00 3136F9LP6 2076 99 FairValue 04/28/2010 0.00 1,999,100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -5,622.47 1,993,477.53 3136F9NB5 2077 99 Fair Value 05/12/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -8,125.00 1,991,875.00 31398ARD6 2078 99 Fair Value 05/19/2011 0.00 1,999,080.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,580.00 1,997,500.00 3128X7TT1 2079 99 FairValue 06/0212011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,489.93 1,997,510.07 3136F9SA2 2080 99 Fair Value 06/10/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 2,000,625.00 3136F9TS2 2081 99 Fair Value 06/25/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,125.00 2,003,125.00 3128X7YG3 2082 99 Fair Value 06/26/2013 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,940.00 2,006,940.00 3133XRNM8 2083 99 Fair Value 03/30/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,250.00 2,011,250.00 3133XRK74 2084 99 Fair Value 12130/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,125.00 2,008,125.00 Subtotal 88,152,667.10 103,814,888.00 1,402,718.29 120,238,211.58 0.00 67,208.18 87,788,377.18 Fund:LAIF COPS 07 INVESTMENTS 3128X5Z35 2027 COPS07 Fair Value 10/09/2008 4,992,545.32 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 7,454.68 0.00 3128X5Z84 2029 COPS07 FairValue 04/17/2009 4,993,930.06 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 6,069.95 0.00 3133XKN50 2031 COPS07 FairValue 11/07/2008 4,992,187.50 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 7,812.50 0.00 3133XL6E8 2033 COPS07 FairValue 12/11/2008 4,996,875.00 0.00 0.00 5,000,000.00 0.00 3,125.00 0.00 Subtotal 19,975,537.88 0.00 0.00 20,000,000.00 0.00 24,462.13 0.00 Total 108,128,204.98 103,814,888.00 1,402,718.29 140,238,211.58 0.00 91,670.31 87,788,377.18 Portfolio OTAY AP Run Dale:07/2212008 -11:03 GD (PRF_GD)SymRept 6.41.200 Report Ver.5.00 OTAY Duration Report Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type Through 06/30/2008 Security ID 36962G2S2 3133XLTL7 3133XNP52 3133XNPR4 3133XN6X2 3133XMX71 3133XNS42 3133XPDSO 31331YB74 31398AMX7 3133XPX90 3133XPWL4 3133XPDR2 3133XPZN7 3133XQMC3 3128X7TT1 31398ARD6 3136F9LP6 31398ANH1 3136F9NB5 31398AKSO 3128X7YG3 3136F9SA2 3133XRK74 3133XQUX8 3133XRNM8 3133XQJ78 3136F9TS2 3133XQC91 Investment# 2044 2037 2057 2059 2045 2042 2058 2063 2073 2064 2067 2065 2062 2068 2074 2079 2078 2076 2069 2077 2060 2082 2080 2084 2075 2083 2072 2081 2070 Fund 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 99 Issuer General Electric Capital Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank FANNIE MAE Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mortgage Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National Mortage Assoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal National MortageAssoc Federal Home Loan Mortgage Federal National Mortage Assoc Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal National MortageAssoc Federal Home Loan Bank Investment Class Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Book Value 2,026,807.12 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,800,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,905,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,999,115.78 1,999,100.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Par Value 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,800,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,905,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,999,100.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Market Value 2,051,704.10 3,006,562.50 2,006,250.00 1,810,687.50 2,004,375.00 2,004,375.00 2,011,250.00 1,997,500.00 1,979,375.00 1,998,125.00 1,997,500.00 1,996,875.00 2,000,000.00 1,905,000.00 1,980,000.00 1,997,510.07 1,997,500.00 1,993,477.53 1,988,125.00 1,991,875.00 2,012,500.00 2,006,940.00 2,000,625.00 2,008,125.00 1,987,500.00 2,011,250.00 1,965,625.00 2,003,125.00 1,985,625.00 Current Rate 5.000 5.550 4.375 4.350 4.500 4.500 4.250 3.250 3.180 3.000 3.020 3.000 3.060 3.350 2.900 3.625 3.600 3.000 3.250 3.100 4.500 4.750 3.265 3.500 3.100 3.650 3.150 3.500 3.125 YTM Current 365 Yield 4.401 3.870 5.550 5.101 c 4.375 3.738c 4.350 3.144c 4.498 4.054c 4.496 4.054c 4.250 3.108c 3.250 3.473c 3.180 4.570c 3.000 3.154c 3.020 3.212c 3.000 3.248c 3.060 3.063c 3.350 3.350c 2.900 4.211 c 3.625 3.767c 3.619 3.749c 3.000 3.352c 3.250 4.191 c 3.100 3.585c 4.500 3.271 c 4.750 4.042c 3.265 3.232c 3.500 2.677c 3.100 3.879c 3.648 2.891 c 3.150 5.419c 3.500 3.183c 3.124 4.596c Maturityl Effective Call Date Duration 12101/2010 2.255 07/30/2008 0.079 09/17/2008 0.000 12/24/2008 0.482 08/20/2008 0.000 08/14/2008 0.000 1211812008 0.465 01/30/2009 0.562 04/07/2009 0.741 02119/2009 0.615 03/05/2009 0.659 0212612009 0.635 01/29/2009 0.561 09/03/2008 0.175 04/14/2009 0.762 06/0212009 0.893 05/19/2009 0.858 04/28/2009 0.804 02/25/2009 0.628 05/12/2009 0.841 01/07/2009 0.497 09/26/2008 0.000 06/10/2009 0.918 12/30/2008 0.498 04/29/2009 0.804 03/30/2009 0.243 04/14/2009 0.757 09/25/2008 0.000 12/17/2008 0.463 Run Date:07/22/2008-11:04 Page 1 Portfolio OTAY AP DU (PRF_DU)SymRept6.41.200 Report Ver.5.00 DTAY Duration Report Sorted by InvestmentType -Investment Type Through 06/30/2008 Investment Book Par Market Current YTM Current Maturityl Effective Security 10 Investment#Fund Issuer Class Value Value Value Rate 365 Yield Call Date Duration 3133XQF23 2071 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,983,125.00 3.250 3.250 4.438c 03/25/2009 0.709 205003183 2066 99 California Bank &Trust Amort 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 3.180 3.224 3.180 01/22/2010 1.517t 1002812475 2061 99 Neighborhood National Bank Amort 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 4.850 4.917 4.850 12113/2008 0.444t ReportTotal 61,809,130.90 61,783,208.00 61,761,614.70 3.761 0.556t t =Duration can not be calculated on these investments due to incomplete Market price data. Run Date:07/2212008 -11:04 Page 2 Portfolio DTAY AP DU (PRF_DU)SymRept6.41.200 ReportVer.5.00 1 20-Gallon Challenge Progress Update July 24,2008 . 2 Strategy Reca p •Phase One -May •Heavy rotation;grab attention --"supplies have been cut" •Phase Two -June-September Continue heavy rotation;shift to tips/behaviors •Prompt public to take action during high-water- use months •Phase Three -October-April •Lower volume of messaging •Lowering water use for fall,push long-term behaviors Current Status 3 •Advertisi ng campaign phase two under way •TV Radio Outdoor •Online •Print "Hosing"Television ad June billboard on Highway 786 ~~ 4 Other Community Activities •Partnerships with museums with water exhibits Natural History Museum (July 19) •Museum of Man (July 12) •Media Relations Approximately 190 reports/articles since June 2007 •Community Relations •120+presentations to date since June 2007 Booths at 40+community events since Jan.2008 •Continuing to recruit community partners Garden Collaborations 5 •Created new outdoor tips brochure in collaboration with Water Conservation Garden •Worked with Quail Botanical Gardens on San Diego County Fair Display 6 Campaign Evaluation •Primary metric:Regional water use levels II 40/0 to date (excluding IAWP reductions) •Need to see greater results over rest of high-water-use months •Secondary metrics: •Website traffic levels/referrals Tracking survey data •Findings will help determine adjustments to advertising campaign 20gallonchallenge.com Traffic Unique Visits 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 o ---.- r-- ~f----,_. --.I!:-:.,I---:~$: ~---........... ~~~ tt~-.",r- ..-j:': !I·,~f----,~~~.I .,'tJ .~ Up 109% 7 January February March April May June July 8 Tracking Poll •Rea &Parker Research •Conducted week of July 14 •Halfway point of five-month heavy rotation •400+households countywide •Margin of error +/-4.8% More than half homeowners with irrigated landscape •Purpose •Track changes in perceptions of water situation Changes in reported conservation behavior •Awareness/effectiveness of advertising Most Important Issue Facing San Diego County Residents Water supply/quality second to gas prices (19%) Gasoline Prices Water Supply/Quality Economy/Jobs Crime Housing Affordability Government Mismanagement Financial Problems in City of SD Immigration Education Environment Traffic GrowthlDevelopment .... - ... I I I I I I I I .2000 02004 .2008 9 0%5%10%15%20%25%30% 40% 35% 30% 25% 200/0 15% 100/0 00/0 Urgency of San Diego Water Supply Problem •April .July Extremely Urgent Urgent Somewhat Problem-Not Not a Urgent Urgent Problem 10 60%see issue as urgent/extremely urgent 60% 50% 30% 20% 10% Problem Worsened or Improved? •April •July Worse Unchanged Improved Not a Problem 11 Respondents who feel water issues worsening up 12% Changes in Conservation Efforts Last Six Months 100% 900/0 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 200k 10% 0% April July 12 Respondents reporting increased conservation up 11 0/0 Where Conservation Messages Seen or Heard 13 60% 40% 0% •April o July-first response onlyoJuly-all responses Effectiveness of Messages in Motivating Conservation .-~-i, .-~= ~I .~ll-I•I..- 40% 35%35% 30%29% 25% 20% 20% 15% 10%8%8% 5% 0% Not at all 2 3 4 Very Effective Effective , SanO.~ 14 WGIer~ Conservation Steps Taken in Response to Messages 50% •April 45%iii July 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 15 8hol1.'trash 8klp .<I~lIs o,F..p lJro {Jo ~{ow..J.flgh Chec ~hr 1/1,~hr 0 er8ho ~lIQ{°l1e{Ja 't Irl1ga .eakIrl"j %....,s.J.J.°t~1I11 'A~qterp ~f'ticle *8011~O'OOr{lItO'0Or I "'e'S OctO's 'Y 0ll,_.liol1 '9i1tlOh o,se "rate..'Jal11s I1Cy ~olS/,.eak,s ~eak.-':>/O'e .,•a,sher 'Ire ,s 86%of those who heard messages responded in some way, SanDilso~·Wahtr~y PEL Likelihood of Increasing Conservation Efforts Under Various Scenarios 100% 900k 80% 70% 60% 500/0 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% o Less Likely to Conserve o No Difference/Not Sure • M ore Likely to Conserve Reservoirs Household Being Drawn Shortages Down Negative Mandatory Impact on Restrictions Economy Cut by Federal Order 16 Consistent high levels of impact from urgent messages «0 -Difso·~·Wvm~oriJy One Thing That Water Authority Can Do to Motivate Conservation 30% 25% 15% 100/0 5% 0% 18%17%17%17% •April i---=-------i DJuly Respondents who say they will not conserve dropped by nearly half 17 18 Most Important Thing Water Authority Should Do to Ensure Reliable Supply •Pursue seawater desalination (21 percent) •Import more water (14 percent) •More public education (10 percent) •Increase voluntary conservation (9 percent) •Increase use of recycled water (9 percent) •Build more reservoirs/storage (8 percent) •Institute mandatory restrictions (7 percent) •Stop building/growth (2 percent) Action Plan/Campaign Adjustments •Increase urgency of message •Drought,supply cuts taking toll on storage •Rationing is on horizon •Stronger focus on tips that deliver major savings •Reduce outdoor watering (3 days a·week or less) •Provide supporting information (incentives,rebates,etc.) •Shift advertising resources •Increase cable TV share;reduce other media •Explore additional venues 19 20 New TV Ad Concept CPSC StaffFinds Synthetic TurfFields OK to Install,OK to Play On NEWS from CPSC u.s.Consumer Product Safety Commission Page 1 of2 Office of Information and Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 30,2008 Release #08-348 Washington,DC 20207 CPSC Hotline:(800)638-2772 CPSC Media Contacts:(301)504-7908 CPSC Staff Finds Synthetic Turf Fields OK to Install,OK to Play On WASHINGTON,D.C.-The U.S.Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)staff today released its evalu_atigfl (pdf)of various synthetic athletic fields.The evaluation concludes that young children are not at risk from exposure to lead in these fields. CPSC staff evaluation showed that newer fields had no lead or generally had the lowest lead levels.Although small amounts of lead were detected on the surface of some older fields,none of these tested fields released amounts of lead that would be harmful to children. Lead is present in the pigments of some synthetic turf products to give the turf its various colors.Staff recognizes that some conditions such as age,weathering,exposure to sunlight,and wear and tear might change the amount of lead that could be released from the turf.As turf is used during athletics or play and exposed over time to sunlight,heat and other weather conditions,the surface of the turf may start to become worn and small particles of the lead- containing synthetic grass fibers might be released.The staff considered in the evaluation that particles on a child's hand transferred to his/her mouth would be the most likely route of exposure and determined young children would not be at risk. Although this evaluation found no harmful lead levels,CPSC staff is asking that voluntary standards be developed for synthetic turf to preclude the use of lead in future products.This action is being taken proactively to address any future production of synthetic turf and to set a standard for any new entrants to the market to follow. As an overall guideline,CPSC staff recommends young children wash their hands after playing outside,especially before eating. A Video News Release will feature b-roll of synthetic turf in use,on-site and laboratory testing,and soundbites in English and Spanish. Video Feed Satellite Coordinates Wednesday,July 30,2008 2:30 PM -3:00PM ET Galaxy 25 Transponder 13 C-Band Downlink Freq:3960V Thursday,July 31,2008 10:30 AM -11:00AM ET Galaxy 3 file://C:\Documents and Settings\susanc\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK86\CPS...7/31/2008 CPSC Staff Finds Synthetic TurfFields OK to Install,OK to Play On Transponder 21 C-Band Downlink Freq:4120H For Technical Information,DURING FEED ONLY,contact Daniel Conboy at (800)920-6397 x 221. Page 2 of2 file:IIC:\Documents and Settings\susanc\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK86\CPS...7/3112008 CPSC Staff!Analysis and Assessment of Synthetic Turf "Grass Blades" CPSC staff identified synthetic turfproducts for analysis oftotal lead content and accessible lead.Staff obtained samples ofturfthat had been left over after installation or that became available when a field was dismantled.Staff also visited in-service synthetic turffields,and used portable X-ray Fluorescence (XRF)testing equipment to detect the presence oflead in the product,as well as a portable field wiping apparatus to measure the exposure potential to the lead. The staffconsidered that exposure to the lead present in some synthetic turfproducts could occur if some ofthe lead gets on children's hands,perhaps when synthetic grass blades break or become worn and release small particles of lead-containing material.The lead on the children's hands may then get transferred from their hands to their mouths through normal hand-to-mouth activity during or after playing on the field. Analytical Methods Lead Content Small pieces of synthetic grass blades were dissolved in concentrated nitric acid using a microwave digestion.The digested sample solutions were then analyzed for lead content using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Accessible Lead (Wipe Sampling) Products found to contain lead were tested for accessibility of the lead;i.e.,whether children using the product could be exposed to the lead that is present. Staff adapted the approach for estimating exposure to lead from contact with lead-containing synthetic turf fields from the approach used to assess children's exposure to arsenic from playing on playground structures built using chromated copper arsenate (CCA)pressure-treated wood (Appendix A). The wipe testing methodology developed for testing pressure-treated wood was used to measure transfer of lead from synthetic grass blades,with one modification.Ghost Wipe™was used in place ofthe polyester cloth wipe used in the wipe sampling for wood.Ghost Wipe™is a commercially available wiping material,15 cm x 15 cm,pre-moistened with deionized water, and sold in individually sealed packets.Company literature indicates that the Ghost Wipe™ meets all ASTM E1792-96E2 specifications for sampling materials for lead in surface dust. The general method involves attaching a Ghost Wipe™to a 1.1 kg weighted disk,8 cm in diameter,installed in a device built to provide a standardized and consistent surface wiping.The disk is dragged down a 50-cm length of turf sample for 10 back and forth strokes.The wipe is then removed for analysis. 1 These comments are those ofthe CPSC staff,have not been reviewed or approved by,and may not necessarily reflect the views of,the Commission. 2 ASTM Standard EI792-96E,"Standard Specification for Wipe Sampling Materials for Lead in Surface Dust," ASTM International,West Conshohocken,PA,www.astm.org. 1 Results Several of the products obtained by staffcontained lead in the synthetic grass with concentratiom ranging from 0.09 percent lead by weight to 0.96 percent.The testing showed that lead content varied between synthetic turfinstallations,and also within a field depending on color. The data show that wiping ofthe surface of lead-containing synthetic turfwith firm pressure results in transfer ofsome lead or lead-containing material to the wipe medium (Ghost Wipe™). Exposure Assessment and Results If it is assumed that transfer oflead-containing residue from the surface ofsynthetic turfhas similar characteristics to transfer ofarsenic-containing residue from wood (Appendix A)(i.e., that the amount ofresidue collected does not increase infinitely,but plateaus at some point during play),then the amount oflead that might collect on the hands ofchildren as they play on turf fields can be estimated from laboratory studies ofsynthetic turf. As discussed in Appendix A,the experimental wipe method using polyester cloths overestimated the amount ofresidue that might be transferred to a person's bare skin by a factor ofbetween five and 13 times,depending on whether a wet or dry cloth was used.Although the relationship between surface residue removal by a Ghost Wipe™and bare skin has not been fully characterized,preliminary tests indicate that the Ghost Wipe™overestimates to a similar degree the transfer ofmaterial from the turf surface to bare hands. The staffbelieves that dividing the results obtained through use of using Ghost Wipes™by five is a reasonable approximation of the amount of lead-containing material that may transfer to children's hands. The exposure assessment described above concerns the accessibility ofthe lead.Another important point to consider is the bioavailability ofthe lead,which relates to the amount oflead that is absorbed by the body.The staff assumed,in this case,that the bioavailability of lead from the material that transfers to skin from contact with lead-containing synthetic turfis the same as the bioavailability of lead from food and drink in the epidemiological studies of lead exposure. The staffs approach,based onthe assessment of exposure to arsenic in pressure-treated wood,is that during play,lead-containing residue is transferred to a child's hands and then a portion of that "handload"is transferred to the mouthduring the day.The staffpractice for assessing whether exposure to a product would result in excessive lead exposure is to assume that about halfofthe residue that collects on a child's hands ends up in their mouths (i.e.,transfer efficiency is 50 percent). The staff used the wipe-testing data to estimate transfer oflead to children's hands during contact with a synthetic turf surface during play.Each wipe value was divided by five to correct the overestimation oftransfer using the Ghost Wipe™,and divided by two to account for the amount of lead that is transferred from the hands to the mouth. CPSC staffrecognizes a level of 10 micrograms of lead per deciliter ofblood (10 j.lg/dL)as a level ofconcern with respect to lead poisoning.To prevent children from exceeding this level, the staffsuggests that chronic ingestion of lead from consumer products should not exceed 2 Ii!IiE:[;j [III: IiI!III! f! I: i 15 /lg lead/day.This value was determined from epidemiological studies ofingestion oflead through food and drink (as discussed above with respect to bioavailability). The results (Table 1)for this set oftested synthetic turf fields show no case in which the estimated exposure for children playing on the field would exceed 15 /lg lead/day. Study Limitations This assessment is subject to a number oflimitations including the accuracy ofthe wipe sampling method for estimating exposure to lead-containing residue from touching or other contact with the synthetic turfsurface;the accuracy ofthe assumptions about the capacity ofbare skin to collect surface residues during a typical play event at a field;and the accuracy ofthe assumptions related to hand-to-mouth transfer oflead-containing residues.Further,the staff did not make adjustments in its assessment to account for the non-uniformity oflead content of synthetic turffields;i.e.,some fields had striped areas that contained lead that constitute only a small part of the total playing surface of the field that otherwise had no detectable lead levels. Childrenplaying on such fields might have some contact with the lead-containing striped areas, but most oftheir contact with the surface would be expected to be with the other parts ofthe turf (not lead-containing).Finally,the bioavailability oflead from synthetic turf may not be the same as it is for the food and drink exposures that were the basis ofthe dose-response assessment used to determine the staffs recommended 15 /lg/dayexposure limit for lead. 3 16 C.F.R.§1500.230.Codified Guidance Policy for Lead in Consumer Products (63 FR 70648;December 22, 1998). 3 Appendix A The staffs previous assessment4 ofchildren's exposure to arsenic from playing on playground structures built using chromated copper arsenate (CCA)pressure-treated wood informed the current approach to analysis of synthetic turfsurfaces and the assessment ofpotential exposure to the lead contained in the turf "grass"fibers.Lessons learned from the CCA studies include: 1)Development ofa treated wood sampling method:A saline-wetted polyester cloth wipe was attached to a 1.1 kg weighted disk,8 cm in diameter.The disk was dragged down a 50-cm length ofwood for 10 back and forth strokes.When compared to results ofresidue transfer using volunteers with bare hands,the polyester cloths picked up approximately 13 times more residue;the experimental values were multiplied by a conversion factor of0.076 to get human skin equivalent handloadings.When the polyester cloths were used dry,they picked up,on average,about 5 times more residue than the volunteer's bare hands did. 2)Understanding of some ofthe characteristics oftreated wood surface residues:Removal of surface residue arsenic correlated with several experimental design features including the material used to wipe tre surface,whether the material was wetted or dry,the amount of force applied during wiping,and the area wiped.A key observation was that the amount of dislodged residue did not necessarily simply increase with changes in method that would likely remove more residue.Rather,the amount of dislodged residue approached a plateau, i.e.,it appeared that the transfer ofmaterial depended on the capacity ofthe transfer medium (whether the skin of hands ofvolunteers or wipes made ofcloth or other materials)to collect residue,which was not infinite. 3)Understanding ofthe nature ofchildren's contact with playground structures and potential exposure to surface residues:The data,in conjunction with activity analysis of children playing on playgrounds,led to the conclusion that despite the large variability in children's playground activities and time spent at a playground,their hands would likely collect surface residues from the wood structures they happened to touch fairly quickly in a play session- what the staff termed "maximum handloading".For the exposure and risk analysis,then,the staff assumed that a child's hands would become contaminated with an amount of arsenic as determined by the experimental study ofresidue transfer.Data from cloth wipes were adjusted for the finding that the cloth wipes always picked up more residue from the wood surfaces thanthe bare skin ofvolunteers. 4 Briefing Package,Petition to Ban Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA)-Treated Wood in Playground Equipment (PetitionHP 01-3),February 4,2003. 4 I! [.u:~_lf.:I~:.' " I·...·]·I !i Table 1.TurfSample Exposure Results and Health Hazard Evaluation Note:nd =none detected;nt =not tested;neg =neglIgible Lead Wipe Estimated dailyFirmDescriptionSubsamplecontent(%)Sampling ingestion oflead (/lg)HResult(/lg)* 1 0.54 65.8 6.6 1 Green,installed 1999;2 0.56 98.7 9.9 removed 2008 3 0.55 39.9 4.0 Average 68.1 6.8 1 Green,indoor field;0.88 14.3 1.4installed2000;in use 1 0.1 1.2 0.12 1 Green;new,2008 2 0.09 1.2 0.12 3 0.9 0.09 Average 1.1 0.11 1 0.42 1.3 0.13 1 Green;new,2008 2 0.47 0.4 0.04 3 0.4 0.04 Average 0.7 0.07 2 Green and other colors;nd nt neginstalled2005;in use 2 Green;unused sample nd nt negsenttolabforanalysis 2 Green;unused sample nd nt negsenttolabforanalysis 2 Green;unused sample nd nt negsenttolabforanalysis 2 Green;unused sample trace nt negsenttolabforanalysis 2 Green;unused sample nd nt negsenttolabforanalysis 2 Red;unused sample nd nt negsenttolabforanalysis Yellow stripes;field in Sideline,1 0.9 0.09 2 Sideline,2 0.53 0.5 0.05useMidfield2.4 0.24 Green nd nt neg Green with yellow Yellow,18 0.7 0.07 Yellow,19 0.96 1.4 0.143stripes;installed 2007;Yellow,20 0.8 0.08inuseYellow,1.0 0.1Average 4 Green;white stripes;nd nt neginstalled2004;in use .. 5 *Amount oflead collected on Ghost Wipe™during wipe testing;ifmultiple wipes were conducted on a sample,the result ofthe first wipe is shown;all values are total lead removed during wipe. t Laboratory wipe results divided by 5 to account for differences in lead residue removal efficiency of the Ghost Wipe™and bare skin.The factor of 5 was taken from the staffs CCA studies;a similar trem was found in limited hand sampling ofsynthetic grass blades.Staff assumes that half ofthe residue that collects on a child's hands will be transferred to the mouth and ingested.Thus,the estimated daily ingestion oflead is the Ghost Wipe™result divided by 5 divided by 2. t The estimated daily ingestion oflead is an estimate ofexposure for children playing on a synthetic turf field.Each estimate in this analysis may be compared to the 15 j..LWday level that CPSC staffsuggests not be exceeded in order to prevent young children from exceeding the 10 j..Lg/dL blood lead level ofconcern 6 AGENDA ITEM 11 STAFF REPORT August 6,2008 DIV.NO. Regular Board MEETING DATE: Sean Prendergast,Finance Cfi?W.O./G.F.NO, Supervisor,Payroll &AP ~ Joseph Beachem,Chief Financial OfficerAPPROVEDBY: (Chief) APPROVED BY:German Alvarez,Assistant General Manager (Asst.GM): TYPE MEETING: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT:Accounts Payable Demand List PURPOSE: Attached is the list of demands for the Board's information. FISCAL IMPACT: SUMMARY CHECKS (2012537-2013151) WIRE TO: CALPERS CITY OF CHULA VISTA -BI-MONTHLY SEWER CHARGES CITY TREASURER -RECLAIMED WATER PURCHASE MAY 08 DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS -DENTAL &COBRA CLAIMS LANDESBANK -CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY -WATER DELIVERIES SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY -CAP FEES 4TH QTR SPEC DIST RISK MGMT AUTH -HEALTH ADMIN SVCS AUG 08 UNION BANK -PAYROLL TAXES NET DEMANDS $5,327,646.16 $846,000.00 $2,678,926.96 $157,371.62 $6,064.07 $30,016.20 $2,432,311.29 $391,710.00 $177,883.16 $297,762.85 TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS $12,345,692.31 RECOMMENDED ACTION: That the Board receive the attached list of demands. Jb/Attachment OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012612 07/02/08 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 823539 06/09/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,079.72 823818 06/12/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 783.01 823108 06/02/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 615.58 2,478.31 2012698 07/09/08 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 824212 06/19108 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,015.71 823989 06/16/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,007.09 823988 06/16/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 770.71 2,793.51 2012849 07/16/08 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 824438 06/23/08 BULKSODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,391.21 824688 06/26/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,063.73 824430 06/23/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 541.71 824439 06/23/08 BULKSODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 418.59 3,415.24 2012933 07/23/08 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 825039 06/30/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,415.83 825038 06/30/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,046.49 825375 07/03/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 856.88 825371 07/03/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 507.24 3,826.44 2013093 07/30/08 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 825701 07/09/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,169.60 825530 07/07/08 BULK SODIUM H:YPOCHLORITE 1,104.35 825818 07/10/08 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 962.77 3,236.72 2012613 07/02/08 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1276 06/24/08 CONSULTING SERVICES -IT DEPT 3,200.00 3,200.00 2012699 07/09108 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1287 07/01/08 CONSULTING SERVICES -IT DEPT 3,200.00 1256 06/16/08 SHAREPOINTPROGRAMMING SERVICES 1,700.00 4,900.00 2012850 07/16/08 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1297 07/08/08 CONSULTING SERVICES -IT DEPT 2,560.00 1270 06/23/08 SHAREPOINT PROGRAMMING SERVICES 1,530.00 4,090.00 2012934 07/23/08 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1307 07/15/08 CONSULTING SERVICES -IT SERVICES 3,200.00 1282 06/30/08 SHAREPOINT PROGRAMMING SERVICES 1,020.00 4,220.00 2013094 07/30/08 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1315 07/22/08 CONSULTING SERVICES -IT DEPT 3,200.00 1327 07/29/08 CONSULTING SERVICES -IT DEPT 3,200.00 1292 07/07/08 SHAREPOINT PROGRAMMING SERVICES 1,360.00 7,760.00 2012614 07/02/08 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131085537 06/11108 BULKAQUA AMMONIA 1,132.56 131085536 06/11108 BULKAQUA AMMONIA 622.69 131085538 06/11/08 BULK AQUA AMMONIA 332.05 2,087.30 2012935 07/23/08 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131088266 06/30108 BULK AQUA AMMONIA 996.14 996.14 2012936 07/23108 00132 AIRGASWEST 103113440 06/30108 BREATHING AIR-TREATMENT PLANT 23.93 23.93 2012700 07/09/08 06300 AIR-TRAK INC 61204 05/27/08 GPS UNITS FOR DISTRICT VEHICHLES 529.11 529.11 Page 1of32 .".-~_7";-~'__~~.~.._...~---""-=-7"..--,---.....•---~~~_"''''-'._- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013043 07/30108 08848 ALANA HAFFNER Ref002387200 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000072289 75.00 75.00 2012537 07/02/08 08764 ALEX LAMBORN Ref002386440 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000094008 118.06 118.06 2012790 07/16/08 08808 ALEXIS ROMERO Ref002386948 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000090618 35.42 35.42 2012538 07/02/08 08767 ALFREDO VELAZQUEZ Ref002386443 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000095636 40.33 40.33 2012615 07102/08 01463 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 68219AOO 06/10/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 40.22 40.22 2012851 07/16/08 01463 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 69387GOO 06/25/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 197.48 197.48 2013095 07/30/08 01463 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 70332800 07/09/08 HONEYWELL ENCLOSED SWITCHES 1,269.65 1,269.65 2012852 07/16/08 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #509 0509003185689 06/25/08 TRASH REMOVAL SERVICES 758.30 0509003187126 06/25/08 ASBESTOS DISPOSAL CONTAINER RENTAL 189.72 0509003188028 06/25/08 TRASH REMOVAL SVCS -TREATMENT PLANT 131.20 1,079.22 2012937 07/23/08 05414 AMARR ENTERPRISES 000430 07/17/08 EMPLOYEE PROGRAM 346.25 346.25 2013044 07/30/08 08881 AMERICAN EAGLE REAL ESTATE Ref002387237 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126241 272.83 272.83 2012701 07/09/08 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L11095701G 07/01/08 PAGER SERVICES 386.19 386.19 2012938 07/23/08 00107 AMERICAN WATER WORKS 3000384277 07/02/08 SITE LICENSES 525.00 525.00 2012539 07/02/08 08727 ANDREW LYON Ref002386403 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126715 36.76 36.76 2012791 07/16/08 08803 ANGELICA ESCOBAR Ref002386943 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000082308 12.94 12.94 2012540 07/02108 08763 ANNIE ORY Ref002386439 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000092645 13.51 13.51 2013096 07/30/08 00002 ANSWER INC 000444 07/22108 TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES 1,000.00 1,000.00 2013097 07/30/08 02197 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 40687 07/18/08 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SERVICES 482.63 40678 06/20/08 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SERVICES 473.96 956.59 2012541 07/02/08 08755 ANTHONY TRAN Ref002386431 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000085294 32.76 32.76 2012792 07/16/08 08792 ANTONIO JOSE Ref002386931 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000045903 79.97 79.97 2012702 07/09/08 02829 APPLIED TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC 186151 06/18/08 640 PROJECT -RADIO EQUIPMENT 12,436.68 12,436.68 2012939 07/23/08 08026 ARB INC LF18828 06/30/08 R2081 -20 INCH LANE AVENUE CONVERSION 56,062.35 56,062.35 Page 2 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013045 07/30/08 08870 ARDO MOHAMED Ref002387226 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000124105 29.81 29.81 2013046 07/30/08 08847 ARMANDO CAMPOS Ref002387199 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000052259 46.82 46.82 2012793 07/16/08 08795 ARMANDO NARVAEZ Ref002386935 07/15108 UB Refund Cst#0000068762 47.90 47.90 2012542 07/02/08 08750 ARNOLDO RODRIGUEZ Ref002386426 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000075579 40.09 40.09 2012940 07/23/08 05753 ARRIETA CONSTRUCTION INC 03 07/03/08 P2038/P2345JP2387 -PL-12 INCH UPSIZE 252,781.56 252,781.56 2013047 07/30/08 08880 ASHLON Ref002387236 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126099 40.43 40.43 2012794 07/16/08 08827 ASSETLINK Ref002386967 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124404 56.45 56.45 2012703 07/09/08 05758 AT&T 08216457280625m06/25/08 OPT-E-MAN INTERNET BANDWIDTH 2,290.95 2,290.95 2012941 07/23/08 05758 AT&T 000424 07/07/08 PHONE SERVICE (HI HEAD P/S-SCADA)32.37 32.37 2012942 07/23/08 07785 AT&T 000000182875 07/01/08 PHONE SERVICES 5,014.82 5,014.82 2013048 07/30/08 08869 ATLAS REO SERVICES Ref002387222 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123213 56.05 56.05 2013049 07/30/08 08886 AUREL ALEGRADO Ref002387242 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000127781 35.52 35.52 2013050 07/30/08 08878 AURIEL ALGRADO Ref002387234 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125373 26.21 26.21 2012704 07/09108 08673 BACKFLOW SERVICES 2432 06/16/08 BACKFLOW REPAIRS &TESTING 3,887.38 3,887.38 2012853 07/16/08 08673 BACKFLOW SERVICES 2467 06/25/08 BACKFLOW SERVICES 1,488.16 1,488.16 2012943 07/23/08 08024 BACKGROUND PROFILES INC 5980000701081 07/01/08 BACKGROUND CHECKS 180.25 180.25 2012543 07/02/08 08740 BERENICE OSUNA Ref002386416 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000041286 92.42 92.42 2012944 07/23/08 08686 BIRMINGHAM PRESS 160184 07/01/08 OTAYSUMMER NEWSLETTER 5,677.75 5,677.75 2012616 07/02108 02434 BLACK BOX CORPORATION 034998 06/10/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 112.00 112.00 2012544 07/02108 08762 BLANCAVASQUEZ Ref002386438 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000092065 43.68 43.68 2012705 07/09/08 00559 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 056641 06/16/08 PLAN CHECKS &INSPECTION SERVICE 20,649.24 056635 06/16108 RECYCLED WATER PLAN CHECKING SERVICES 8,663.40 056604 06/13/08 P1438-AS NEEDED PLAN CHECK SERVICES 2,889.02 32,201.66 2013098 07/30108 00559 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 057427 07/10/08 PLAN CHECKING SERVICES 2,281.10 2,281.10 Page 3 of 32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO7/30/2008 Check#Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012854 07/16/08 03458 BREITFELDER,LARRY 70130508 05/11/08 REIMBURSE TRAVEL CONF EXPENSES 54.00 54.00 2012945 07/23/08 03458 BREITFELDER,LARRY 70130608 07/22/08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 121.68 121.68 2012545 07/02108 08754 BRENDA URBINA Ref002386430 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000084189 44.55 44.55 2013099 07/30/08 03679 BRG CONSULTING INC 08062018 06/30/08 CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR ENV SVCS 7,521.26 7,521.26 2012795 07/16/08 08825 BRIGHTON REO Ref002386965 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123805 49.83 49.83 2013051 07/30/08 08825 BRIGHTON REO Ref002387224 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000123805 36.75 36.75 2012855 07/16/08 01232 BRODING'S BATTERYWAREHOUSE 28483A 06/05/08 SALES TAX 6.74 6.74 2012706 07/09/08 08156 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 422306 06/27/08 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACYSERVICES 3,537.50 3,537.50 2013100 07/30/08 08156 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 422821 07/22/08 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES 3,175.00 3,175.00 2012707 07/09/08 03721 BULLET LOGISTICS INC 06150803350 06/15/08 COURIER SERVICES FOR TREATMENT PLANT 455.40 455.40 2012856 07/16/08 00358 BURNS &SONS TRUCKING INC 200806326 06/25/08 EQUIPMENT MOVED 240.00 200806325 06/25/08 EQUIPMENT MOVED 230.00 470.00 2012857 07/16/08 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 30031 06/23/08 CRUSHED ROCK 94.36 94.36 2012946 07/23/08 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 30118 07/01/08 CRUSHED ROCK 92.70 92.70 2012858 07/16/08 02486 CALIF DEP'T OF PUBLIC HEALTH 10081658 07/02/08 LAB CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 2,811.00 2,811.00 2012947 07/23/08 08490 CALIFORNIA BANK &TRUST 03R 07/03/08 RETENTION FORARRIETA CONSTRUCTION 28,086.83 28,086.83 2013101 07/30/08 08690 CALIFORNIA BANK &TRUST 05/23/08 RETENTION FOR NEWCAST CONSTRUCTION 1,500.00 1,500.00 2012859 07/16/08 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 78195 06/20/08 ASPHALT 1,232.66 1,232.66 2012708 07/09/08 08654 CALIFORNIA METALS SUPPLY 24422 06/13/08 WELDING SUPPLIES 4,516.87 4,516.87 2012860 07/16/08 08654 CALIFORNIA METALS SUPPLY 24985 06/26/08 WELDING SUPPLIES 952.60 952.60 2012948 07/23/08 08654 CALIFORNIA METALS SUPPLY 25037 06/30/08 WELDING SUPPLIES 442.96 442.96 2012546 07/02108 08720 CALIFORNIA PROPERTY INVESTMENT Ref002386396 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000125845 34.14 34.14 2012709 07/09/08 00192 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT 30308 07107108 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL FEE 61.00 000721208 07/07/08 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL FEE 56.00 117.00 Page 4 of 32 ._-------._---~~r-.._.~."~_".~______~_."_.__--------------- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012949 07/23/08 00192 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT 000427 07/21/08 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL FEE 61.00 61.00 2012710 07/09/08 01243 CALIFORNIA-NEVADASECTION 000395 07/07/08 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 200.00 200.00 2013102 07/30/08 01243 CALIFORNIA-NEVADA SECTION 000446 07/23/08 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 100.00 100.00 2012861 07/16/08 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 039686 06/25/08 LUMIDOR GAS DETECTOR REPAIR 1,670.85 041936 06/26/08 CALIBRATION STICKERS 29.78 1,700.63 2012950 07/23/08 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 041780 06/27/08 OXYGEN SENSOR 191.31 191.31 2013103 07/30/08 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 041591 06/30/08 TEST GAS FOR MICRO MAX PRO 410.37 041985 06/30/08 MICRO MAX PRO HOSE EXTENSION WI FITTING 54.98 465.35 2013052 07/30/08 08866 CALVIN SLOCUMB Ref002387219 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000120782 22.14 22.14 2012617 07/02/08 04215 CAMP DRESSER &MCKEE INC 802876322 06/06/08 P2451-BI-NATIONAL OCEAN DESALINATION 7,612.50 7,612.50 2012951 07/23/08 08009 CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC 4000960113 07/01/08 COPIERMAINTENANCE 1,754.58 4000960113A 07/01/08 COPIERMAINT6NANCE 516.62 2,271.20 2013053 07/30108 08867 CARLOS CEBALLOS Ref002387220 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000122024 32.06 32.06 2012711 07/09/08 03572 CARLTON DISANTE &48321 06/30/08 LEGAL SERVICES 712.50 712.50 2012712 07/09/08 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 6780 06/16/08 IMAGE SCANNING SERVICES 40,984.51 6795 07101/08 TEMPORARYSERVICES -RECORDS 1,122.90 42,107.41 2012952 07/23/08 02758 CARMEL BUSINESSSYSTEMS INC 6794 07/01/08 STORAGE &DESTRUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 513.67 513.67 2012547 07/02/08 08725 CAROL DULL Ref002386401 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126347 13.48 13.48 2012548 07/02/08 08615 CARRINGTON MORTGAGE LOAN TRUSl Ref002386385 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124475 50.41 50.41 2012618 07/02/08 03491 CASA DE ORO CAR WASH 384 06/10/08 VEHICLE WASHING 880.99 880.99 2012713 07/09/08 07734 CASINO ACE 000401 07/07/08 DEPOSIT FOR EMPLOYEE HOLIDAY EVENT 250.00 250.00 2012714 07/09/08 03232 CDW GOVERNMENT INC KTR0546 06/19/08 POWER CABLE 137.50 137.50 2012862 07/16/08 03232 CDW GOVERNMENT INC KVB1337 06/23/08 POWER CABLE 206.23 206.23 2012953 07/23/08 04349 CHAMBERS,JONATHAN 000436 07/21/08 EDUCATIONITUITION REIMBURSEMENT 65.00 65.00 2012796 07/16/08 08836 CHANGGOOKANG Ref002386978 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000126533 21.99 21.99 Page 5 of32 --,._-------~,~-~~..~_.,..,-".........,.--~~~....>..,...,.""" OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012549 07102/08 08722 CHASE BANK Ref002386398 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000125895 83.99 83.99 2012550 07/02/08 08758 CHRIS COOPER Ref002386434 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000089323 93.27 93.27 2012715 07/09/08 06519 CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPT 0812681 07/02/08 TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT 10.00 10.00 2013104 07/30108 06519 CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPT 0812304 07/24/08 TRAFFIC COLLISION REPORT 10.00 10.00 2012954 07/23/08 02593 CITY OF CHULAVISTA 071060PU004070807/01/08 UTILITY PERMITS 5,400.00 5,400.00 2013054 07/30/08 08859 CLAYTON ABELS Ref002387211 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000091885 24.28 24.28 2012716 07/09/08 07292 CMH SOFTWARE,INC 25897 06/18/08 ELECTRICAUPI&D DRAWING SOFTWARE 1,283.50 1,283.50 2013105 07/30/08 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE OF CALIFORNIA 10618810 07/03/08 BOOKCASE 160.55 160.55 2012619 07102/08 04398 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 000375 06/30108 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 55.00 55.00 2012955 07/23/08 03307 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 000440 07/22/08 2008 MEMBERSHIP DUES 900.00 000431 07/15/08 REGISTRATION FEE 55.00 955.00 2012863 07/16/08 03706 CONSUMERS PIPE &SUPPLY CO S1067008001 06/25/08 AIR RELEASE PARTS 4,888.57 4,888.57 2013106 07/30108 03624 COpyLINK INC AR89661 07/09/08 SERVICE FOR SHARP COPIERS 1,645.38 AR89660 07/09/08 SERVICE FORSHARP COPIERS 742.71 AR89662 07/09/08 SERVICE FORSHARP COPIERS 353.18 2,741.27 2012797 07/16/08 08807 COREY JOHNS Ref002386947 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000088189 59.96 59.96 2012717 07/09/08 02612 COUNCIL OF WATER UTILITIES 000403 07/08/08 MONTHLY MEETING 75.00 75.00 2013055 07/30/08 08862 COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS Ref002387214 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000095328 61.81 61.81 2012551 07102/08 08705 COUNTRYWIDE Ref002386380 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000122946 35.99 35.99 2012552 07/02/08 08710 COUNTRYWIDE Ref002386386 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000124499 21.17 21.17 2012864 07/16/08 00134 COUNTYOF SAN DIEGO 12179 07/01/08 COUNTY ASSESSOR DATA 58.24 58.24 2012865 07/16/08 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH080513D11 06/27108 RECLAIMED WATERTEST BILLING 1,150.00 DEH080510D11 06/27/08 RECLAIMED WATERTEST BILLING 747.50 DEH080511D11 06/27/08 RECLAIMED WATERTEST BILLING 690.00 DEH080512D11 06/27/08 RECLAIMED WATER TEST BILLING 690.00 000417 06/17/08 PERMIT #HK07132137/HAZ MATERIALS 549.00 DEH080509D11 06/27/08 RECLAIMED WATER TEST BILLING 230.00 4,056.50 Page 6 of 32 ~._"~..,,,.,..,...., OTAYWATERDISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013107 07/30/08 00134 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 000455 07/29/08 FILING &PROCESSING FEE 1,926.75 1,926.75 2013108 07/30/08 00134 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 000454 07/29/08 FILING &PROCESSING FEE 1,926.75 1,926.75 2013109 07/30/08 00184 COUNTYOF SAN DIEGO HK07104908 07/29/08 GENERAL HAZMAT PERMIT FEE 1,850.00 1,850.00 2012866 07/16/08 00099 COUNTYOF SAN DIEGO -DPW 84066 05/06/08 EXCAVATION PERMITS 341.25 341.25 2012956 07/23/08 00099 COUNTY OFSAN DIEGO -DPW 86579 06/05/08 EXCAVATION PERMITS 8,278.39 89318 07/03/08 EXCAVATION PERMITS 1,999.83 10,278.22 2012867 07/16/08 08387 COUNTY OFSO-LANDFILL MGMNT 200806 07/10/08 MICROTURBINE POWERGENERATION 5,338.63 5,338.63 2013056 07/30108 08872 COUNTY PROPERTIES Ref002387228 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124415 17.33 17.33 2013057 07/30108 08877 COUNTY PROPERTIES Ref002387233 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000125099 56.07 56.07 2012957 07/23/08 07601 CREATIVE BENEFITS INC 64739 07/01/08 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCT ADMINISTRATION 577.20 577.20 2012718 07/09/08 06415 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC LLC 00459787 06/17/08 APCD RETROFIT 13,003.38 00459656 06/13/08 APCD ENGINE RETROFIT 13,003.38 26,006.76 2012868 07/16/08 06415 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC LLC 00460139 06/24/08 APCD RETROFIT 13,003.38 13,003.38 2012958 07/23/08 06415 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC LLC 00460391 06/30108 APCD RETROFIT 13,003.38 13,003.38 2012798 07/16/08 07372 DAMACIO SANCHEZ Ref002386925 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000027381 20.00 20.00 2013110 07/30108 08780 DATAPROSE 50251 07/09/08 POSTAGE 15,491.57 50250 07/09/08 BILLING PRINT SERVICES 8,529.42 24,020.99 2012620 07/02/08 03354 DATAPROSE INC 50090 06/11/08 POSTAGE 16,754.52 50089 06/11/08 BILLING PRINT SERVICES 8,302.98 25,057.50 2012959 07/23/08 04550 DATATREE LLC 90034068 06/30/08 MAP PURCHASING SERVICE 99.00 99.00 2012621 07/02/08 08691 DAVID SIMMONS 000374 06/30108 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 350.00 350.00 2012869 07/16/08 03606 DCSE INC 1 06/26/08 MOBILE TECHNOLOGY OPTIMIZATION STUDY 23,600.00 3 06/22108 GIS SOFTWARE L1C &INTEGRATION SVCS 19,306.90 42,906.90 2012622 07/02/08 01797 DELL ENTERPRISES 183751 06/06/08 NAMEPLATE 10.62 10.62 2012719 07109108 02603 DELL MARKETING LP XCP5W18W7 06/19/08 SCADA SERVER UPGRADE 129.41 129.41 2012870 07/16/08 02603 DELL MARKETING LP XCP6DC624 06/20108 SCADASERVER UPGRADE 802.30 Page 7 of 32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total XCP6F8969 06/20/08 SCADA SERVER UPGRADE 543.04 1,345.34 2012871 07/16/08 07680 DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS P080702 07/02/08 EMPLOYEE HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SVCS 1,364.10 1,364.10 2013058 07/30/08 08136 DENNIS DESOUZA CIO REMAXASSO Ref002387225 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123908 43.08 43.08 2012720 07/09108 02733 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 9300808 07/08/08 CPA LICENSE RENEWAL 200.00 200.00 2013111 07/30/08 03744 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 689540 06/30/08 FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS SERVICES 51.00 51.00 2012553 07/02/08 08699 DIANE FEJERAN Ref002386373 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000119340 27.93 27.93 2012623 07/02/08 03417 DIRECTV 805284460 06/19/08 SATELLITE TV SERVICE 4.99 4.99 2012960 07/23/08 03417 DIRECTV 814792567 07/05/08 SATELLITE TV SERVICE 9.98 9.98 2013112 07/30/08 03417 DIRECTV 823598071 07/19108 SATELLITE TV SERVICE 4.99 4.99 2012961 07/23/08 08535 DNSSTUFF,LLC 2150 07/01/08 PROFESSIONALTOOL SET LICENSE 119.00 119.00 2013113 07/30/08 08888 DOMINIC CALMA RF626095501 07/28/08 REFUND PAYMENT 800.00 800.00 2012624 07/02/08 08695 DOUGLAS NERAT 000370 06/30/08 ARTIFICIAL TURF REBATE 1,000.00 1,000.00 2012554 07/02/08 08711 DOWNEY SAVINGS Ref002386387 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124541 50.41 50.41 2012799 07/16/08 08821 DOWNEYSAVINGS Ref002386961 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123272 120.59 120.59 2013059 07/30/08 08821 DOWNEYSAVINGS Ref002387223 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123272 11.70 11.70 2012962 07/23/08 06523 DURAN,PATRICIA 000437 07/21/08 EDUCATIONITUITION REIMBURSEMENT 355.00 355.00 2013060 07/30/08 08876 ED LANDSBURG Ref002387232 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000124946 11.86 11.86 2012555 07/02/08 08718 ED PREHODEN Ref002386394 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125628 32.66 32.66 2012721 07/09/08 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 000396 06/30/08 RECYCLING SERVICES 85.00 85.00 2012963 07/23/08 00230 EDP PRODUCTS INC 805661 06/27/08 CARTRIDGE STORAGE/RETRIEVAL 212.40 212.40 2012800 07/16/08 08814 EDWARD TRACY Ref002386954 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000097442 16.34 16.34 2013061 07/30/08 08814 EDWARD TRACY Ref002387215 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000097442 90.40 90.40 2012801 07/16/08 08784 ELIAS TESFAI Ref002386922 07/15108 UB Refund Cst #0000018996 16.31 16.31 Page 8 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013062 07/30/08 08853 ELIZABETH MELENDREZ Ref002387205 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000083355 9.35 9.35 2012802 07/16/08 08799 ELIZABETH TORRES Ref002386939 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000075124 124.21 124.21 2013063 07/30/08 08843 ELMER TYLER Ref002387195 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000018935 57.68 57.68 2012872 07/16/08 07938 EMCOM ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS INC 00010172 06/24/08 DVR FOR SECURITY SYSTEM 8,789.81 8,789.81 2012803 07/16/08 08805 ENRIQUE DOMINGUEZ Ref002386945 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000084735 97.03 97.03 2012964 07/23/08 08376 ENTERPRISE SECURITY INC 3365 06/27/08 ACCESS CONTROL GATES 14,599.00 14,599.00 2012965 07/23/08 03725 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARC~91775600 06/27/08 UPGRADE SOFTWARE 21,550.00 91773161 06/27/08 PROFESSIONAL DATABASE SUPPORT 8,804.00 91775601 06/27/08 ARC GIS SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 1,616.25 31,970.25 2013064 07/30/08 08849 ERIKASOSA Ref002387201 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000072716 64.84 64.84 2012625 07/02/08 08688 EVIN MCDONEL 000365 06/25/08 ARTIFICIAL TURF REBATE 320.00 320.00 2012556 07/02/08 08697 FAVIOLA HERRERA Ref002386371 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000119099 49.11 49.11 2012873 07/16/08 00645 FEDEX 279343359 07/04/08 OVERNIGHT PICK-UP &DELIVERY MAIL SVCS 11.95 11.95 2012626 07/02/08 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 0271606 06/12/08 REDUCING SOW 638.42 0272583 06/10/08 INVENTORY 415.70 1,054.12 2012722 07/09/08 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 0274277 06/19/08 INVENTORY 1,831.75 0271733 06/16/08 ADAPTERS AND COUPLERS 644.65 2,476.40 2012874 07/16/08 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 02696592 06/27/08 INVENTORY 3,280.99 0272714 06/23/08 CLOW PORT &O-RING 131.73 0272809 06/23/08 REDUCING FLANGE 137.60 3,550.32 2012557 07/02108 08719 FIELD ASSET SERVICES Ref002386395 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125658 57.18 57.18 2013114 07/30/08 08769 FILlNGSUPPLIES.COM 1254 06/18/08 FOLDER LABELS 130.04 130.04 2013115 07/30/08 08005 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC INC 4044056 07/09/08 REALQUEST BUNDLE FOR GIS 1,800.00 12309940 07/10/08 REALQUEST BUNDLE FOR GIS 1,100.00 2,900.00 2012558 07/02/08 08701 FIRST AMERICAN LOANSTAR Ref002386376 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000121817 58.67 58.67 2012804 07/16/08 08804 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Ref002386944 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000083580 183.95 183.95 2012627 07/02/08 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SO 297978 06/06/08 COFFEE SUPPLIES 177.79 177.79 Page 9 of32 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012723 07/09/08 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SD 297997 06/13/08 COFFEE SUPPLIES 211.08 211.08 2012966 07/23/08 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SD 298506 06/27/08 COFFEE SUPPLIES 280.67 280.67 2012967 07/23/08 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 4801314 06/30/08 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 50.98 50.98 2012628 07/02/08 01327 FRANK &SON PAVING INC 069 06/10/08 PAVING SERVICES 5,400.00 074 06/10/08 PAVING SERVICES 1,300.00 6,700.00 2012629 07/02/08 07224 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC 069610 06/11/08 PAINT 901.87 069611 06/11/08 PAINT 177.14 1,079.01 2012724 07/09/08 03094 FULLCOURT PRESS 18055 06/04/08 JUNE BILLING INSERT 1,448.24 1,448.24 2012875 07/16/08 03094 FULLCOURT PRESS 18122 06/24/08 PRINTING CONSUMERCONFIDENCE REPORT 9,756.22 9,756.22 2012559 07/02/08 08753 GABRIELA NAVARRO Ref002386429 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000082006 78.42 78.42 2012725 07/09/08 06291 GARCIA CALDERON &RUIZ LLP 1839 06/30/08 LEGAL SERVICES 30,790.12 30,790.12 2012968 07/23/08 08840 GARY CREASON 000434 07/10/08 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 259.71 259.71 2012805 07/16/08 08834 GARY KENT AND ASSOCIATES Ref002386976 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000126105 58.15 58.15 2012560 07/02/08 08723 GARYSOPATA Ref002386399 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000125991 52.04 52.04 2013065 07/30/08 08879 GARYSOPATA Ref002387235 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125948 46.09 46.09 2012561 07/02/08 08707 GEM Ref002386382 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000123326 692.89 692.89 2012630 07/02/08 03537 GHA TECHNOLOGIES INC 494684 06/11/08 MISC IT SUPPLIES 103.22 103.22 2012726 07/09/08 03537 GHA TECHNOLOGIES INC 494719 06/13/08 TONER 618.02 618.02 2012876 07/16/08 03537 GHA TECHNOLOGIES INC 496924 06/23/08 PLANTRONICS POWER ADAPTER 609.33 496992 06/25/08 KEYBOARD 13.34 622.67 2012969 07/23/08 03537 GHA TECHNOLOGIES INC 498563 06/30/08 MISC IT SUPPLIES 76.50 76.50 2012806 07/16/08 08835 GILBERTO SANTANA Ref002386977 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126206 51.58 51.58 2012807 07/16/08 08816 GLORIA CHAVEZ Ref002386956 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000119871 158.80 158.80 2012562 07/02/08 08717 GMAC Ref002386393 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125480 56.91 56.91 Page 10 of 32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check#Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012808 07/16108 08801 GOSNELL BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA Ref002386941 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000079468 596.24 596.24 2012809 07/16/08 08806 GOSNELL BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA Ref002386946 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000084880 596.24 596.24 2012970 07/23/08 08665 GRAHAM RESEARCH CONSULTANTS 000383 06/30/08 DISTRICT MANAGEMENTTRAINING 4,500.00 4,500.00 2012971 07/23/08 00101 GRAINGER INC 9678914640 07/03/08 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 519.03 9678664179 07/03/08 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 277.87 9678914657 07/03/08 SPRINKLER PARTS 265.20 9678664187 07/03/08 FAN BELT 1.93 1,064.03 2012631 07/02/08 01576 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 934629367 06/11/08 REMOTE PLC COMMUNICATION CABLE 1,034.50 934602964 06/10/08 DATA CENTER CABLES 335.15 1,369.65 2012632 07/02/08 02187 GREENSCAPE 1937 06/06/08 LANDSCAPE WOOD CHIPS 420.00 420.00 2012972 07/23/08 02187 GREENSCAPE 1951 07/01/08 LANDSCAPING SERVICES 6,090.00 6,090.00 2012877 07/16/08 05515 GREENTREE APPLIED SYSTEMS INC 00508021N 06/23/08 SERIAL CABLES 112.95 112.95 2012973 07/23/08 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 27920 06/30/08 TECHNICAL SUPPORT FOR CITRIX 317.47 317.47 2012563 07/02/08 08729 GUADALUPE MARMON Ref002386405 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126771 24.04 24.04 2012633 07/02/08 08487 GUERREIRO,JUAN 000380 07/01/08 EDUCATION/TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 1,373.00 1,373.00 2012564 07/02/08 08739 GURKIRPAL MORROW Ref002386415 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000038603 122.79 122.79 2012878 07/16/08 02630 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY D02493 06/23/08 REPAIR PARTS 975.26 975.26 2012974 07/23/08 02630 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY C62064 06/30/08 REPAIR PART 1,341.85 1,341.85 2012634 07/02/08 00174 HACH COMPANY 5758364 06/09/08 LABORATORYSUPPLIES 135.55 135.55 2012879 07/16/08 00174 HACH COMPANY 5756086 06/06/08 CHLORINE &AMMONIAANALYZER 1,958.36 1,958.36 2012880 07/16/08 02629 HANSON AGGREGATES INC 565445 06/20/08 CRUSHED AGGREGATES &ROCK 204.36 565598 06/23/08 CRUSHED AGGREGATES &ROCK 183.28 387.64 2012727 07/09/08 03639 HARRIS &ASSOCIATES INC 14002 06/16/08 CIP P2009 -36 INCH PIPELINE VALVE ENGG 1,450.00 1,450.00 2012635 07/02/08 00169 HAWTHORNE POWER SYSTEMS PS100050351 03/24/08 REPAIR PARTS 1,711.80 PS100050350 03/24/08 REPAIR PARTS 224.27 1,936.07 2012728 07/09/08 00169 HAWTHORNE POWER SYSTEMS PS100054397 06/16/08 REPAIR PART 191.73 PS100054398 06/16/08 REPAIR PART 41.52 233.25 Page 11 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012975 07/23/08 00169 HAWTHORNE POWER SYSTEMS PC100006474 CREDIT MEMO (6,299.99) PC100006475 CREDIT MEMO (3,096.92) PC100006566 CREDIT MEMO (1,867.68) PC100006198 CREDIT MEMO (1,244.56) PC100006565 CREDIT MEMO (687.49) PC100006567 CREDIT MEMO (373.54) PC100006563 CREDIT MEMO (197.53) PC100006582 CREDIT MEMO (196.03) PC100006564 CREDIT MEMO (171.87) PC100006581 CREDIT MEMO (124.28) PC100006584 CREDIT MEMO (92.38) PC100006583 CREDIT MEMO (26.69) PC100006581 CREDIT MEMO (5.75) PS100047884 01/31/08 REPAIR PARTS 8,715.46 PS100047883 01/31/08 REPAIR PARTS 5,723.51 PS100052943 05/14/08 REPAIR PARTS 5,508.40 PS100047881 01/31/08 REPAIR PARTS 1,941.81 PS100052951 05/14/08 REPAIR PARTS 1,044.67 PS100047882 01/31/08 REPAIR PARTS,684.68 PS100054981 06/30/08 REPAIR PARTS 187.27 PS100052955 05/14/08 REPAIR PARTS 112.17 PS100052965 05/14/08 REPAIR PARTS 11.51 PS100052963 05/14/08 REPAIR PARTS 4.35 9,549.12 2012881 07/16/08 06640 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 7275931 06/27/08 INVENTORY 3,331.63 3,331.63 2012976 07/23/08 06640 HD SUPPLYWATERWORKS LTO 7433205 06/27/08 FLANGES 290.93 290.93 2012810 07/16/08 08833 HECTOR CORDOVA Ref002386975 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126047 53.15 53.15 2012729 07/09/08 00713 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 44430483 CREDIT MEMO (12,421.42) 44422853 06/14/08 HP BLADE SYSTEM 22,520.83 44447105 06/19/08 DATACENTER EQUIPMENT 10,783.19 44413902 06/12/08 HP CAREPACK HARDWARE SUPPORT 732.00 4407121 06/11/08 CAREPACK HARDWARE SUPPORT 654.00 44384149 06/06/08 CAREPACK HARDWARE SUPPORT 654.00 22,922.60 2012882 07/16/08 00713 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 44454135 06/20/08 DATA CENTER GIS SERVERS 10,418.99 44466275 06/23/08 SCADA HARD DRIVES 2,346.80 12,765.79 2013116 07/30/08 00713 HEWLETT·PACKARD COMPANY 44541879 07/09/08 USB KEYBOARDS 431.00 431.00 2012730 07/09/08 06843 HI-TECH AIR CONDITIONING 3269 06/13/08 DATA CENTER AC MAINTENANCE 375.00 375.00 2012977 07/23/08 01109 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 9198369 07/10/08 PAINT SUPPLIES 89.73 89.73 Page 12 of32 ""-'~..~_.--_..~--_..._",----=---------- OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012565 07/02/08 08713 HOMEQ SERVICING INC Ref002386389 07/01108 UB Refund Cst#0000124818 5.35 5.35 2012566 07/02108 08728 HOT CAKES INC Ref002386404 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000126722 778.93 778.93 2012567 07/02/08 08704 HSBC BANK Ref002386379 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000122793 55.41 55.41 2012731 07/09/08 06301 HVAC ENGINEERING INC 5358 06/03/08 PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT 3,843.00 3,843.00 2012636 07/02/08 03743 HYDROTEX 552077 06/10/08 HYDRAULIC OIL 475.75 475.75 2012883 07/16/08 03743 HYDROTEX 5552745 06/26/08 OIL 1,272.76 1,272.76 2013066 07/30/08 08861 IAN ROSS Ref002387213 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000092543 29.26 29.26 2012811 07/16/08 08813 IDELFONSO BAYON Ref002386953 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000093643 48.12 48.12 2012732 07/09/08 01649 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 231144089 06/09/08 LABORATORYSUPPLIES 1,769.41 1,769.41 2013117 07/30/08 02203 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 24052711 07/08/08 SCANNER SOFTWARE LICENSES 22,738.48 22,738.48 2012812 07/16/08 08831 INDIMAC BANK Ref002386973 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125451 58.98 58.98 2012733 07/09/08 07485 INFO-HOLD INC 78588 OS/27/08 INFO-HOLD CUSTOMIZED MESSAGING 595.00 595.00 2013118 07/30/08 03280 INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING 3708 06/27/08 CONST CONSULTANTS/640-1 RESERVOIR 2,548.25 2,548.25 2012734 07/09/08 01982 INTEGRATED OFFICE SYSTEMS 3011 05/20/08 ANNUAL FACSIMILE MAINTENANCE 1,145.00 1,145.00 2012978 07/23/08 02028 INTERACTIVE DATA PRICING AND 05572068 06/30/08 DIAL-UP SERVICE FOR INVESTMENTS 85.00 85.00 2012979 07/23/08 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 28158 06/30/08 PLANT SERVICE 169.00 169.00 2012686 07/09/08 02267 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Ben2386746 07/10/08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 50.00 50.00 2012884 07/16/08 03250 INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC 000407 07/09/08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 55.00 000406 07/09/08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 40.00 95.00 2012735 07/09/08 06630 J C HEDEN AND ASSOCIATES INC OWD020 05/31/08 AS NEEDED ENGINEERING DRAFTING SERVICE:4,987.00 4,987.00 2012980 07/23/08 06630 J C HEDEN AND ASSOCIATES INC OWD021 06/30/08 AS NEEDED ENGINEERING DRAFTING SERVICE:5,050.75 OWD019 05/06/08 AS NEEDED ENGINEERING DRAFTING SERVICE:4,975.00 10,025.75 2013067 07/30/08 08864 JACKARCHER Ref002387217 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000119446 16.61 16.61 2012885 07/16/08 00646 JACKSON-HIRSH INC 0705492 06/23/08 LAMINATING SHEETS 81.62 81.62 Page 13 of32 ~_.".-"'-".-'--,,",'-~~~~..~.~.~-----~-_-...------.~--- OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012568 07/02108 08715 JAIME PENUELA Ref002386391 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000125151 26.36 26.36 2012569 07/02/08 08747 JAKE RHO Ref002386423 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000070410 59.14 59.14 2012570 07/02/08 08746 JAMES SCOTT Ref002386422 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000068569 37.46 37.46 2013119 07/30/08 02290 JAMES,KENNETH E 000456 07/30/08 REIMB SAFETY BOOTS &RENEWAL FEES 316.00 316.00 2012571 07/02/08 08732 JAN PERRY Ref002386408 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000007288 80.39 80.39 2012813 07/16/08 08797 JANETH GUZMAN Ref002386937 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000072573 91.65 91.65 2013068 07/30/08 08863 JENNIFER ENGLISH Ref002387216 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000104368 9.65 9.65 2013120 07/30/08 08779 JIFFY MACHINE 12489 07/09/08 REPAIR PART 600.00 600.00 2013069 07/30/08 08844 JOE GUTIERREZ Ref002387196 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000020169 242.75 242.75 2012572 07/02/08 08756 JOHN NOBEL Ref002386432 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000088286 18.76 18.76 2012573 07/02/08 08744 JOHN SEOG LEE Ref002386420 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000067576 55.88 55.88 2012814 07/16/08 08744 JOHN SEOG LEE Ref002386934 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000067576 80.00 80.00 2012574 07/02/08 08733 JOHN STENCIL Ref002386409 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000009102 121.94 121.94 2012575 07/02/08 08731 JOHN THOMAS Ref002386407 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000006147 134.84 134.84 2012637 07/02/08 03172 JONES &STOKES ASSOCIATES 0053727 06/11/08 HABITAT MGMT ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 14,720.11 0053737 06/11/08 ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 903.05 0053734 06/11/08 ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 501.25 16,124.41 2013121 07/30/08 03172 JONES &STOKES ASSOCIATES 0052706 05/12/08 ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 145.00 145.00 2012815 07/16/08 08789 JOSE CASTILLO Ref002386928 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000030901 49.47 49.47 2013070 07/30/08 08871 JOSE RIVERA Ref002387227 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124190 40.17 40.17 2012816 07/16/08 08822 JOSEPH DAVILA Ref002386962 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123314 18.52 18.52 2012638 07/02/08 02449 JOSEPH G POLLARD CO INC 12262791N 06/11/08 EQUIPMENT FOR WATER OPERATIONS 572.61 572.61 2012886 07/16/08 02449 JOSEPH G POLLARD CO INC 12273171N 06/25/08 EQUIPMENT FOR WATER OPERATIONS 182.65 182.65 2013071 07/30/08 08873 JOSEPH RAMOS Ref002387229 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000124515 107.57 107.57 Page 14 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012817 07/16/08 08786 JUAN MOTA Ref002386924 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000022295 88.50 88.50 2012576 07/02/08 08759 JUAN ZAPIEN Ref002386435 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000089837 75.00 75.00 2012577 07/02/08 08702 KAREN FRISON Ref002386377 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000121903 33.60 33.60 2012578 07/02/08 08703 KAYCI BARTON Ref002386378 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000121913 13.19 13.19 2012736 07/09/08 07493 KEITH OLIVER &ASSOCIATES 1107 06/18/08 EMISSION ENGINE RETROFIT FILTER 4,695.32 4,695.32 2012818 07/16/08 08817 KELLY HA Ref002386957 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000121648 35.34 35.34 2012579 07/02/08 08768 KEVIN WHALEN Ref002386444 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000097383 5.25 5.25 2012580 07/02108 08696 KHISRO KERIM Ref002386370 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000097480 19.09 19.09 2012581 07/02/08 08716 KIM KOESNER Ref002386392 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000125291 46.64 46.64 2012887 07/16/08 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 3989 06/24/08 PAVING SERVICES 4,380.00 3988 06/24/08 PAVING SERVICES 4,682.00 3987 06/24/08 PAVING SERVICES 4,614.00 13,676.00 2012639 07/02/08 04996 KNOX ATTORNEYSERVICE INC 401730 06/07/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 28.50 2012737 07/09/08 04996 KNOX ATTORNEYSERVICE INC 403401 06/13/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 403402 06/13/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 403404 06/13/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 403405 06/13/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 404303 06/19/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 404302 06/19/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 404301 06/19/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 199.50 2012888 07/16/08 04996 KNOXATTORNEY SERVICE INC 405936 06/26/08 DELIVERYOF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 406111 06/26/08 DELIVERYOF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 406112 06/26/08 DELIVERYOF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 405948 06/26/08 DELIVERYOF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 405933 06/26/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 405934 06/26/08 DELIVERYOF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 405935 06/26/08 DELIVERYOF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 199.50 2013122 07/30/08 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 408176 07/06/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 408175 07/06/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 408174 07/06/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 408173 07/06/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 408172 07/06/08 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.50 142.50 Page 15 of32 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check#Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013123 07/30108 01859 LA PRENSA SAN DIEGO 22407 07/25/08 JOB POSTING 48.00 48.00 2013072 07/30108 08852 LACRESHA GETTER Ref002387204 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000080623 12.78 12.78 2012889 07/16/08 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 213147 06/23/08 ASPHALT 40.00 40.00 2012981 07/23/08 08841 LAURA SANCHEZ 000435 07/10108 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 350.00 350.00 2012640 07/02/08 08693 LAVINA RILLING 000372 06/30108 ARTIFICIAL TURF REBATE 930.00 930.00 2013073 07/30108 08857 LAWRENCE PAYNE Ref002387209 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000088152 30.79 30.79 2012738 07/09/08 03607 LEE&RO INC 83503 06/09/08 AS NEEDED ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES 34,165.93 83408 06/09/08 AS NEEDED ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES 5,302.35 39,468.28 2012582 07/02/08 08765 LEON LEONTE Ref002386441 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000095044 28.54 28.54 2012583 07/02/08 08751 LETICIA WILLIAMS Ref002386427 07101/08 UB Refund Cst #0000079264 13.46 13.46 2012982 07/23/08 03123 LEWIS ENGRAVING 23399 07/01/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 15.00 15.00 2012641 07/02/08 00491 LIGHTHOUSE INC 2084067 04/29/08 LED LIGHTING 991.30 991.30 2012890 07/16/08 00491 LIGHTHOUSE INC 2108714 06/25/08 APCD ANTI IDLING L.ED.RETROFIT 2,528.72 2108713 06/25/08 APCD ANTI IDLING LED.RETROFIT 1,030.10 3,558.82 2012819 07/16/08 08812 LINDO LERMA Ref002386952 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000093308 75.00 75.00 2012642 07/02/08 05220 LOGICALIS INTEGRATION SOLUTION S819106 06/11/08 IT DATA CENTER SERVICES 13,650.00 13,650.00 2012739 07/09/08 05220 LOGICALIS INTEGRATION SOLUTION S819123 06/16/08 IT DATA CENTER SERVICES 17,750.00 17,750.00 2013124 07/30108 05220 LOGICALIS INTEGRATION SOLUTION S819279 06/30108 NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE CONSULTING 3,339.66 3,339.66 2012820 07/16/08 08826 LORENA DOMINGUEZ Ref002386966 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124102 13.29 13.29 2012821 07/16/08 08809 LORENA PEINADO Ref002386949 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000090641 20.14 20.14 2012740 07/09/08 03015 LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES 000384 07/03/08 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 658.00 658.00 2012584 07/02/08 08735 LOUISE JULIEN Ref002386411 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000025989 21.20 21.20 2012822 07/16/08 08785 LYNELL DURGAN Ref002386923 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000019209 22.55 22.55 2012891 07/16/08 01054 LYNN'S LOCKSMlTH SERVICE 259518 06/20108 RE-KEY NEW OFFICE 85.00 85.00 Page 16 of32 ..-"'.,...,.,.".....,,-~~-.~~.-_.~...~~--,..- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012585 07/02/08 08766 M ELIZABETH CABEZAS Ref002386442 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000095216 65.38 65.38 2012643 07/02/08 01464 MAG SYSTEMS INC 160474879 06/11/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 1,485.99 1,485.99 2012892 07/16/08 00628 MANHATTAN NAT'L LIFE INS CO 000420 07/15/08 VOLUNTARY LIFE INSURANCE 474.29 474.29 2013074 07/30/08 08875 MANNY LOPEZ Ref002387231 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000124677 28.88 28.88 2013075 07/30/08 08874 MARC CARPENTER &ASSOC Ref002387230 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124543 19.36 19.36 2012823 07116/08 08828 MARC CARPENTER &ASSOCIATES Ref002386969 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124554 63.30 63.30 2012586 07/02/08 08714 MARC CARPENTER AND ASSOCIATES Ref002386390 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124927 47.56 47.56 2012824 07/16/08 08714 MARC CARPENTER AND ASSOCIATES Ref002386971 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124927 16.15 16.15 2012587 07/02/08 07724 MARIA ESTHER RAMIREZ Ref002386375 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000120580 100.24 100.24 2012588 07/02/08 08752 MARIA GONCALVES Ref002386428 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000080536 26.39 26.39 2013125 07/30/08 02902 MARSTON+MARSTONINC 20087 07/01/08 PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES 7,365.00 7,365.00 2012825 07/16/08 08798 MARTHA RODRIGUEZ Ref002386938 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000073677 6.24 6.24 2013126 07/30/08 08890 MARY A CARRILLO 000453 07/30/08 UB REFUND 82.53 82.53 2012589 07/02/08 08700 MARY UN Ref002386374 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000119366 6.00 6.00 2012741 07/09/08 05329 MASTER METERINC 01409571N 06/17/08 INVENTORY 108,027.82 108,027.82 2012893 07/16/08 05329 MASTER METER INC 01412331N 06/24/08 INVENTORY 27,819.43 27,819.43 2013076 07/30/08 08884 MATTCHELLI Ref002387240 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000126662 54.54 54.54 2012644 07/02/08 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0033240lN 06/12/08 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 2,297.08 2,297.08 2012742 07/09/08 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0033241 IN 06/12/08 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 1,278.13 1,278.13 2012894 07/16/08 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 00337831N 06/25/08 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 895.07 895.07 2012983 07/23/08 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0034000lN 06/30108 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 354.50 0034110lN 07/02/08 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 59.26 413.76 2012645 07/02/08 01183 MCMASTER-CARRSUPPLY CO 89674404 06/12/08 SOLENOID VALVE 755.45 89631565 06/11/08 MAINTENANCE ITEMS 243.60 Page 17 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 89640165 06/11/08 REPAIR PART 93.97 1,093.02 2012984 07/23/08 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 91845356 07/03/08 VALVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS 611.74 611.74 2012895 07/16/08 07787 MCMILLIN LAND DEVELOPMENT 000415 07/07/08 CIP REIMBURSEMENT (R2033-001103)325,383.45 325,383.45 2012896 07/16/08 08781 MCMILLIN LAND DEVELOPMENT 000411 07/07/08 CIP REIMBURSEMENT (P2134-0011 03)185,047.80 185,047.80 2012646 07/02/08 08403 MCR TECHNOLOGIES INC 18927 06/11/08 LEVEL TRANSDUCER 562.11 562.11 2013077 07/30108 08885 MCS Ref002387241 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000127720 36.19 36.19 2012590 07/02/08 08712 MDS CONTRACTING ING Ref002386388 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124660 655.95 655.95 2012591 07/02/08 08738 MICHAEL BULLARD Ref002386414 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000036790 40.49 40.49 2013078 07/30/08 08856 MICHAEL STEWART Ref002387208 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000086326 20.91 20.91 2012592 07/02/08 08737 MICHAEL SWEET Ref002386413 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000035644 79.47 79.47 2013079 07/30/08 08860 MICHAELVALLARELLI Ref002387212 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000092526 75.05 75.05 2012743 07/09/08 01577 MINARIK CORPORATION 1058184400 06/19/08 GE PLC EQUIPMENT 9,833.64 1058184200 06/19/08 PLC EQUIPMENT AND MODULES 4,140.81 13,974.45 2012897 07/16/08 01577 MINARIK CORPORATION 1058356500 06/25/08 HMI DISPLAY 4,215.61 4,215.61 2012898 07/16/08 04943 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO INC 062408M01 06/24/08 INSTRUMENT CALIBRATOR 5,547.98 5,547.98 2012647 07/02/08 03393 MOBILE MINI LLC -CA 904127919 06/08/08 RENTAL 40'METERS STORAGE CONTAINER 164.90 164.90 2013127 07/30/08 03393 MOBILE MINI LLC -CA 904129836 06/16/08 RENTAL 40'METER STORAGE CONTAINERS 170.88 904134153 07/06/08 RENTAL 40'METER STORAGE CONTAINERS 164.90 335.78 2012744 07/09/08 03401 MODULAR MERCHANTS 1797 06/19/08 FINANCE DEPT RECONFIGURATION 13,310.56 1796 06/19/08 FINANCE DEPT RECONFIGURATION 941.57 1795 06/19/08 FINANCE DEPT RECONFIGURATION 779.77 15,031.90 2013080 07/30/08 08845 MONTOHIDE SAKURATANI Ref002387197 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000026290 70.12 70.12 2013128 07/30/08 03623 MWHAMERICAS INC 1176291 03/30/08 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED 6,570.56 1195377 06/29/08 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED 1,312.11 7,882.67 2012648 07/02/08 02037 MWH LABORATORIES 239225L1 06/10/08 REGULATORYANALYSES 2,005.00 2,005.00 2012899 07/16/08 02037 MWH LABORATORIES 243071L1 06/25/08 OUTSIDE LABORATORY SERVICES 308.00 Page 18 of32 -~-~.~--- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 241698L1 06/19/08 OUTSIDE LABORATORY SERVICES 300.00 608.00 2012687 07/09108 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2386742 07/10108 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 9,827.79 9,827.79 2012985 07/23/08 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2387115 07/24/08 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 9,837.80 9,837.80 2012649 07/02/08 03733 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC VSH10257909 06/11/08 LABOR FOR PHONES SVCS 118.00 118.00 2012986 07/23/08 03733 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC VSH10258699 06/30/08 LABOR FOR PHONES SVCS 295.00 VSH10258700 06/30/08 LABOR FOR PHONES SVCS 118.00 413.00 2012745 07/09/08 03487 NETWORK INSIGHT NINMS200800953 05/31/08 NETWORK MONITORING SERVICES 14,750.00 14,750.00 2012987 07/23108 03487 NETWORKINSIGHT NINMS200800982 06/30/08 OUTSIDE SUPPORT 615.00 615.00 2012826 07/16/08 08824 NEW CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN Ref002386964 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123801 142.52 142.52 2012650 07/02108 00745 NEWARK 15435534 CREDIT MEMO (56.74) 16004179 06/10/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 952.51 16004974 06/10108 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 771.42 1,667.19 2012746 07/09/08 00745 NEWARK 16037385 06/17/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT 61.87 61.87 2013129 07/30/08 00745 NEWARK 16164116 07/16/08 MULTICONDUCTORCABLE 750.80 750.80 2013130 07/30108 08531 NEWEST CONSTRUCTION 05/23/08 S2015 -CALAVO SEWER LIFT STATION 13,500.00 13,500.00 2012988 07/23/08 05494 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA 901500243022 07/12/08 GIS (AIR-TRAK)CELLULAR SERVICE 3,541.82 3,541.82 2012747 07/09/08 03571 NEXTLEVEL INTERNET INC 15894 06/14/08 INTERNET WEB HOSTING 416.00 416.00 2013081 07/30/08 08850 NICOLE HOBSON Ref002387202 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000073997 101.27 101.27 2012593 07/02/08 08741 NOELSILVERIO Ref002386417 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000044642 54.03 54.03 2012827 07/16/08 08788 NOEL VALCARCEL Ref002386927 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000027589 43.89 43.89 2012594 07/02/08 08761 NORMAAMAR Ref002386437 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000091821 12.26 12.26 2012748 07/09/08 08777 NORMAN KNIGHT 000394 07/07/08 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 224.08 224.08 2012989 07/23/08 08382 NORTH COUNTY FORD 1F81237 06/30108 2008 FORD F-250 TRUCK 17,362.69 1F81236 06/30108 2008 FORD F-250 TRUCK 17,362.69 1F81234 06/30108 2008 FORD F-250 TRUCK 17,362.69 52,088.07 2012828 07/16/08 08832 OAK TREE REALTY Ref002386974 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125921 75.00 75.00 Page 19 of32 >c',~"---,-","=~~,..,,..,....'_ OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012829 07/16/08 08820 OAKTREE REALTV Ref002386960 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123271 59.40 59.40 2013131 07/30/08 02867 OCE 986482649 07/09/08 SERVICE DUALROLL PRINTERW/SCANNER 1,997.64 1,997.64 2012749 07/09/08 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 433284632001 06/18/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2,120.37 434020742001 06/18/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 298.55 433480176001 06/18/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 106.45 433893463001 06/18/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 75.94 433856823001 06/18/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.17 2,620.48 2012900 07/16/08 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 434698653001 06/25/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 253.34 434367552001 06/25/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 182.27 434020819001 06/25/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.23 459.84 2012990 07/23/08 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 434548102001 07/02/08 BOOKCASES FOR FINANCE DEPT 374.08 434892401001 07/02/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 192.04 435101012001 07/02/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 172.52 435101081001 07/02/08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.18 828.82 2012991 07/23/08 07945 OLIN CORP -CHLOR ALKALI 1042521 07/02/08 CHLORINE FOR TREATMENT PLANT 2,187.55 2,187.55 2012651 07/02/08 07945 OLIN CORPORATION 1034365 06/11/08 CHLORINE FOR TREATMENT PLANT 2,187.55 2,187.55 2012652 07102108 08392 ON TRAC 6106923 06/07/08 SHIPPING FOR SCADA COMPUTERS 112.95 6093837 05/31/08 SHIPPING FOR SCADA COMPUTERS 3.95 116.90 2012750 07/09/08 00496 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S2931183001 06/18/08 ETHERNET SWITCH 3,203.97 3,203.97 2012992 07/23/08 06856 ORPAK USA INC 27737 06/01/08 FUEL-O-MAT SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 11,138.56 11,138.56 2012751 07/09/08 02334 OTAY LANDFILL 006707 06/15/08 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES 43.00 43.00 2012993 07/23/08 02334 OTAY LANDFILL 006753 06/30108 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES 508.90 508.90 2012595 07/02/08 08730 OTAY PROJECT LP Ref002386406 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000000624 633.04 633.04 2012688 07/09/08 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2386744 07/10108 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 826.00 826.00 2012994 07/23/08 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2387117 07/24/08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 826.00 826.00 2012995 07/23/08 07499 PACIFIC BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15631 06/30/08 JANITORIAL SERVICES ADMIN,WH,TP &OPS 2,795.00 2,795.00 2012996 07/23/08 06646 PACIFIC HYDROTECH CORPORATION 4591 06/30108 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 768,246.00 768,246.00 2012653 07/02/08 03017 PACIFIC SAFETY COUNCIL 64548 05/31/08 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 365.00 365.00 Page 20 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012596 07/02/08 08736 PAMELA KELLEY Ref002386412 07101/08 UB Refund Cst #0000029352 68.40 68.40 2012654 07/02108 08689 PATRICIACHAMBERLIN 000364 06/25/08 ARTIFICIAL TURF REBATE 469.00 469.00 2012597 07/02/08 08734 PATRICIADAVIS Ref002386410 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000020121 13.41 13.41 2012997 07/23/08 05497 PAYPAL INC 2150335 06/30/08 ON-LINE PAYMENTSERVICES 388.40 388.40 2012901 07/16/08 03308 PBS&J 1011486 06/25/08 2009 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 51,445.95 1011117 06/23/08 CIP P2089-RECYCLEDWATER CONCEPT STUD'!11,691.08 63,137.03 2012998 07/23/08 03308 PBS&J 1011108 06/27/08 GIS UPDATES 37,085.00 37,085.00 2012655 07/02/08 00138 PEARSON FORD CO 886921 06/12/08 REPAIR PART 148.49 148.49 2012999 07/23/08 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 19044 06/30/08 FLAT SAW CUTTING SERVICES 315.00 315.00 2013132 07/30/08 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 19111 07/10/08 FLAT SAW CUTTING SERVICES 195.00 195.00 2012656 07/02/08 00593 PEPPER OIL COMPANY INC 607260 06/27/08 DIESEL FUEL 18,327.16 607261 06/27/08 UNLEADED FUEL 16,461.26 34,788.42 2013000 07/23/08 03457 PERSONAL TOUCH WEST 20563 06/30/08 WATER CONSERVATION PROMOTIONAL ITEMS 2,159.72 2,159.72 2012657 07/02108 08694 PETER PALLOTTO 000371 06/30/08 ARTIFICIAL TURF REBATE 444.00 444.00 2012689 07/09/08 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 000404 07/08/08 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 760.67 760.67 2013001 07/23/08 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 000438 07/21/08 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 527.15 527.15 2013082 07/30/08 08883 PHERLINDA RYAN INC Ref002387239 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000126360 82.38 82.38 2012902 07/16/08 04850 PHIL'S B.B.Q.000408 07/09/08 CATERING SVCS/EMPLOYEELUNCHEON 3,340.86 3,340.86 2013002 07/23/08 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 392521 07/01/08 POSTAL SERVICES 1,626.00 392522 07/01/08 POSTALSERVICES 178.00 1,804.00 2012830 07/16/08 08810 POINTE BUILDERS Ref002386950 07/15108 UB Refund Cst #0000091550 982.76 982.76 2012831 07/16/08 08790 POINTE GOSNELL BUILDERS Ref002386929 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000034571 1,225.70 1,225.70 2012658 07/02/08 05499 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 29604805 05/20/08 WELDING SUPPLIES &EQUIPMENT 537.77 29402396 04/25/08 WELDING SUPPLIES &EQUIPMENT 480.74 29576136 05/20/08 INSPECTION SUPPLIES 31.57 1,050.08 Page 21 of32 _~~.~_'=""...,..,..,..""~=.-=o~.,....,,..=..,--"--_._-- OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012903 07/16108 05499 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 29913575 06/20/08 WELDING SUPPLIES &EQUIPMENT 620.33 620.33 2013003 07/23/08 02976 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 000442 07/23/08 LEGAL SERVICES 73.75 73.75 2012752 07/09/08 01733 PRICE TRONCONE &11846 05/16/08 DISTRICT RADIO REPEATER SITE RENTAL 3,396.00 3,396.00 2012659 07/02/08 07860 PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE CO 000361 06/25/08 LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM 1,565.00 1,565.00 2012660 07/02/08 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 8285605 06/12/08 UNIFORMS 308.55 8285604 06/12/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 116.78 8285606 06/12/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 95.84 8254347 06/04/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 89.00 8280326 06/11/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 89.00 8280325 06/11/08 UNIFORMS 75.26 8254346 06/04/08 UNIFORMS 75.26 8285607 06/12/08 UNIFORMS 71.60 921.29 2012753 07/09/08 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 8311622 06/19/08 UNIFORMS 262.85 8311621 06/19/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 116.78 8311623 06/19/08 MATS,TOWELS&SUPPLIES 95.84 8306380 06/18/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 89.00 8306379 06/18/08 UNIFORMS 75.26 8311624 06/19/08 UNIFORMS 71.60 711.33 2012904 07/16/08 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 8337555 06/26/08 UNIFORMS 260.85 8337554 06/26/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 116.78 8337556 06/26/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 95.84 8332304 06/25/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 89.00 8332303 06/25/08 UNIFORMS 75.26 8337557 06/26/08 UNIFORMS 71.60 709.33 2013004 07/23/08 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 8363471 07/03/08 UNIFORMS 260.85 8363470 07/03/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 116.78 8363472 07/03/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 95.84 8358237 07/02/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 89.00 8358236 07/02/08 UNIFORMS 75.26 8363473 07/03/08 UNIFORMS 71.60 709.33 2013133 07/30/08 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY On Account CREDIT MEMO (35.00) 9097915 CREDIT MEMO (8.80) 9098957 CREDIT MEMO (8.80) 8389287 07/10/08 UNIFORMS 290.80 8389286 07/10/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 116.78 8389288 07/10/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 95.84 8384046 07/09/08 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 89.00 8384045 07/09/08 UNIFORMS 75.26 Page 22 of32 - -------------- OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 71212008 TO 713012008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 8389289 07110108 UNIFORMS 63.47 678.55 2012661 07102108 02917 PTO SALES CORPORATION 9280500015 02119108 VEHICLE REPAIR PART 201.57 201.57 2012662 07102108 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben2386226 06126108 PERS CONTRIBUTION 120,147.30 120,147.30 2012905 07116/08 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben2386738 07/10/08 PERS CONTRIBUTION 121,339.21 121,339.21 2013134 07/30/08 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben2387111 07/24/08 PERS CONTRIBUTION 124,766.72 124,766.72 2012754 07/09/08 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 25045800 06/18/08 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1,459.22 25112800 06/18/08 SAFETY 461.33 1,920.55 2012755 07/09/08 08331 RABO BANKNA 2802o2R 06/04/08 RETENTION FOR SPIESS CONSTRUCTION 37,437.50 37,437.50 2013005 07/23/08 08331 RABO BANK NA 2802o3R 07/02/08 RETENTION FOR SPIESS CONSTRUCTION 13,741.00 13,741.00 2012663 07/02/08 07403 RADIOSHACK CORP 109831 06/10/08 13.8V DC 3 AMP POWER SUPPLY 66.26 66.26 2012664 07/02/08 08029 RANCHO SAN DIEGO-JAMUL 000379 06/30/08 REGISTRATIONfMARK ROBAK 10.00 10.00 2012832 07/16/08 08794 RANDY YOUNIS Ref002386933 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000063521 7.34 7.34 2012665 07/02/08 00766 RANROY PRINTING COMPANY 094010 06/11/08 LETTERHEAD AND ENVELOPES 2,242.28 093974 06/11/08 BUSINESS CARDS 165.94 2,408.22 2013006 07/23/08 00766 RANROY PRINTING COMPANY 094158 06/30/08 POSTCARDS 637.88 637.88 2012666 07/02/08 02041 RBF CONSULTING 8050015 06/06/08 CIP P2009 -36 INCH PIPELINE 5,185.00 5,185.00 2012756 07/09/08 02041 RBF CONSULTING 8050014 06/06/08 P2185-CONST MGMT SVCS 56,010.00 8041284 05/30/08 R2053-RECLAM.PLANT/RECYCLE WTR OFFICE 31,259.15 87,269.15 2013135 07/30/08 02041 RBF CONSULTING 8060054 07/07/08 CIP P2185-CONST MGMT SVCS 59,795.00 59,795.00 2012667 07/02/08 00021 RCP BLOCK &BRICK INC 4327498 06/11/08 CONCRETE 185.87 185.87 2013007 07/23/08 00021 RCP BLOCK &BRICK INC 4328106 07/02/08 PEA-GRAVEL /PORTLAND 427.77 427.77 2013008 07/23/08 04552 REA &PARKER RESEARCH 000398 06/30/08 2008 GENERAL CUSTOMER SURVEY 9,000.00 000386 06/30/08 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEY 4,000.00 13,000.00 2012598 07/02/08 08706 RECONSTRUCT CO NA Ref002386381 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123073 113.37 113.37 2012906 07/16/08 06645 RELIABLE ELEVATOR INC 12321 04/01/08 ELEVATOR SERVICE &MAINTENANCE 390.00 390.00 Page 23 of32 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECKREGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013009 07/23/08 06645 RELIABLE ELEVATOR INC 13308 07/01/08 ELEVATORSERVICE &MAINTENANCE 416.01 416.01 2012833 07/16/08 08796 REYNALDO GONZALES Ref002386936 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000070842 79.46 79.46 2012757 07/09/08 08776 RICARDO REYES 000393 07/07/08 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 350.00 350.00 2012907 07/16/08 08782 RICHARD BOELTER 000412 07/10/08 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 336.31 336.31 2013010 07/23108 01789 RIPPERGER,RONALD H 13620608 06/12/08 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 926.30 926.30 2013083 07/30/08 08865 RITANITSCHE Ref002387218 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000120447 32.66 32.66 2013011 07/23/08 04068 ROADONE TOWING 277497 06/24/08 TOWING CHARGE 150.20 150.20 2012908 07/16/08 04542 ROBAK,MARK 70140608 06/30/08 REIMBURSE MILEAGE EXPENSE 16.16 16.16 2012758 07/09/08 08775 ROBERT CAMPBELL 000392 07/07/08 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 350.00 350.00 2012599 07/02108 08760 RODRIGO PERAZA Ref002386436 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000090774 28.62 28.62 2012668 07/02/08 08770 RON WAGNER 000378 06/30/08 SPONSORSHIP 500.00 500.00 2012834 07/16/08 08783 RONALD BASSETT Ref002386921 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000013657 32.05 32.05 2012600 07/02/08 08743 RONALD WHITE Ref002386419 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000067011 33.99 33.99 2012835 07/16/08 08823 ROY MONTES Ref002386963 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000123677 100.00 100.00 2012759 07/09/08 08149 RPI COATING INC 011812 04/04/08 CIP P1077/458-1 RES.INTERIOR COATING 17,299.40 17,299.40 2012669 07/02/08 05322 RUSSELL PLUMBING &SUPPLIES 13331 06/09/08 PLUMBING REPAIR 1,481.27 1,481.27 2012601 07102/08 08708 RUTH REYES Ref002386383 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000123416 52.95 52.95 2012909 07/16/08 00217 RW LITTLE CO INC 88398 06/25/08 SANDBLASTING/POWDERCOAT SVCS 250.00 250.00 2013136 07/30108 00217 RW LITTLE CO INC 88597 07/10/08 POWDER COATING 100.00 100.00 2012760 07/09/08 00362 RYAN HERCO PRODUCTS CORP 6378888 06/19/08 40 CAPS SLIP FOR RESERVOIRS 422.27 422.27 2012836 07/16/08 08815 SABRI JAMOU Ref002386955 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000119369 30.42 30.42 2012910 07/16/08 05130 SAFARI MICRO INC 165987 06/24/08 PRINTER &MATERIALS 2,006.31 2,006.31 2012837 07/16108 08819 SAID SIPO Ref002386959 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000122950 626.99 626.99 Page 24 of32 •""'~"",~.~~.~~...,.~._-:---c-~,~•..._-----,- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012670 07/02/08 04661 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER 000376 06/26/08 MEETING REGISTRATION 30.00 000368 07/01/08 BUSINESS MEETING 30.00 000377 06/30/08 MEETING REGISTRATION 90.00 150.00 2012911 07/16/08 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER 6674 07/09/08 WASHERVOUCHER PROGRAM 8,064.00 6691 07/09/08 TOILET VOUCHER PROGRAM 4,296.00 6709 07/09/08 CII VOUCHER PROGRAM 39.74 12,399.74 2013137 07/30108 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTYWATER 6728 07/17/08 SMART LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 2,707.50 2,707.50 2012761 07/09/08 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 100489 06/13/08 MATERIAL STORAGE BINS AD 60.05 60.05 2013138 07/30108 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 103922 07/10/08 BID ADVERTISEMENT 58.55 58.55 2012671 07/02/08 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 000360 06/23/08 UTILITY EXPENSES 658.29 000362 06/25/08 UTILITY EXPENSES 36,329.21 36,987.50 2012762 07/09/08 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 000363 06/26/08 UTILITY EXPENSES 57,644.63 000388 07/02/08 UTILITY EXPENSES 47,895.55 000400 07/03/08 UTILITY EXPENSES 85.61 105,625.79 2012912 07/16/08 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 000409 07/03/08 UTILITY EXPENSES 37,108.91 000410 07/02/08 UTILITYEXPENSE 1,726.44 38,835.35 2013012 07/23/08 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 000432 07/18/08 UTILITY EXPENSES 38,392.72 000426 07/17/08 UTILITYEXPENSES 57.84 38,450.56 2013139 07/30108 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 000447 07/24/08 UTILITYEXPENSES 34,975.28 000443 07/18/08 UTILITYEXPENSES 32,383.50 67,358.78 2012838 07/16/08 08830 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002386972 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000125052 21.72 21.72 2012602 07/02/08 08709 SAN DIEGO REALTY INC Ref002386384 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124458 102.28 102.28 2012839 07/16/08 08709 SAN DIEGO REALTY INC Ref002386968 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000124458 42.58 42.58 2012840 07/16/08 08800 SAN MIGUEL RANCH Ref002386940 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000075876 50.80 50.80 2013013 07/23/08 01679 SANCHEZ,EDUARDO 000338 06/19/08 SAFETYBOOTS REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 150.00 2012603 07/02/08 08749 SANDYTADEO Ref002386425 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000072718 55.91 55.91 2012763 07/09/08 05321 SCHIFF ASSOCIATES 02148 05/31/08 CIP P1043-CATHODIC PROTECTION PROGRAM 29,511.50 02047 04/30108 CIP P1043-CATHODIC PROTECTION PROGRAM 17,912.66 02162 05/31/08 CATHODIC PROTECTION DESIGN &INSP SVCS 5,307.98 52,732.14 Page 25 of32 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013014 07/23/08 05321 SCHIFFASSOCIATES 02237 06/30108 ClP P1043-CATHODIC PROTECTION PROGRAM 48,665,20 48,665,20 2013084 07/30108 08887 SCOTT VINSON Ref002387243 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000128069 36,19 36,19 2012913 07/16108 07783 SCRIPPS CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE 17001 06/25/08 EXECUTIVE PHYSICAL 3,634,00 3,634,00 2012604 07/02/08 08698 SEIICHIRO SAITO Ref002386372 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000119187 47,75 47,75 2012841 07/16108 08793 SHANE LASHGARI Ref002386932 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000052813 24,23 24.23 2013140 07/30108 01651 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICAL CTRS 202A 07/24/08 NEW HIRE PHYSICAL 163,00 202 07/24/08 PRE-PLACEMENT 163,00 326,00 2012672 07/02/08 05421 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 63673 06/10108 PAINT 475,34 475,34 2012842 07/16108 08837 SHILLING CORPORATION Ref002386979 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000127294 29,84 29,84 2012673 07/02/08 05983 SIEMENS WATER 7823321 06/12/08 BIOXIDE 710,01 710,01 2012764 07109/08 05983 SIEMENS WATER 2481510 06/13/08 AMMONIA GAS MONITOR 2,846,76 2485832 06/18/08 ACUTEC 35 POWER SUPPLY MODULE 829,65 3,676.41 2013015 07/23/08 05983 SIEMENS WATER 2495663 06/27/08 PM V 75 CHLORINATORS AND INJECTORS 3,476.47 3,476.47 2013141 07/30108 00258 SLOAN ELECTRIC CO 0054065 07/08/08 VIBRATION TESTITRIM BALANCE MOTOR 1,170,00 0054064 07/08/08 VIBRATION TESTITRIM BALANCE MOTOR 700,00 1,870,00 2012674 07/02/08 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C37157 06/11/08 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 857,00 857,00 2013142 07/30108 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C37424 07/10108 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 908,00 908,00 2012675 07/02/08 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 738289 06106108 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 738288 06106108 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 738287 06106108 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 738286 06106108 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 738564 06109/08 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 399,80 2012765 07109/08 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 739709 06/18108 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 79,96 2012914 07/16108 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 740730 06/26108 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 98,15 98,15 2013143 07/30108 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 742130 07/04/08 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 742131 07/04/08 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 742132 07/04/08 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 742133 07/04/08 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 742238 07/07/08 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79,96 399,80 Page 26 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012766 07/09/08 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 000405 06/26/08 PROPERTY &LIABILITYPREMIUM 480,161.49 480,161.49 2013016 07/23/08 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 00259381N 07/01/08 WORKERS'COMPENSATION PROGRAM 61,630.00 61,630.00 2012768 07/09/08 03184 SPIESS CONSTRUCTION CO INC 280202 06/04/08 P2191 -850-4 RESERVOIR (CONSTRUCTION)292,320.00 292,320.00 2013017 07/23/08 03184 SPIESS CONSTRUCTION CO INC 280203 07/02/08 P2191 -850-4 RESERVOIR (CONSTRUCTION)123,669.00 123,669.00 2012915 07/16/08 01717 SPRINGVALLEYCHAMBER OF 2907 07111/08 SPONSORSHIP 350.00 350.00 2012676 07/02/08 03600 SPRINT 000348 06/13/08 WIRELESS CARDS SERVICE-INTERNET 59.99 59.99 2013018 07/23/08 03600 SPRINT 000425 07/13/08 WIRELESS CARDS SERVICE -INTERNET 62.99 62.99 2013019 07/23/08 08839 STAN CANARIS 000433 07/10108 SMART CONTROLLERREBATE 316.93 316.93 2013020 07/23/08 01499 STANDARD AND POOR'S 10184526 07/08/08 ANALYTICAL SERVICES 3,500.00 3,500.00 2012769 07/09/08 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 11137 06/16/08 SECURITY SERVICE &REPAIRS 218.49 218.49 2013021 07/23/08 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 11177 06/27/08 PUMP STATION SECURITYDESIGN WORK 3,100.00 3,100.00 2012770 07/09/08 08772 STANLEY K DVORAK 000385 07/03108 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 350.00 350.00 2012771 07109108 00480 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 000399 06/30108 CALIFORNIA SALES USETAX 977.34 977.34 2012772 07/09/08 01560 STATE CHEMICAL MFG CO,THE 93822679 06/13/08 SHOP SUPPLIES 524.62 524.62 2012690 07/09/08 06295 STATE DISBURSEMENTUNIT Ben2386750 07/10108 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 294.46 294.46 2012691 07/09/08 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2386748 07/10108 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69 2012692 07/09/08 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2386756 07/10108 PAYROLLDEDUCTION 614.76 614.76 2012693 07/09/08 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2386752 07/10108 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 841.01 841.01 2013022 07/23/08 06295 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2387123 07/24/08 PAYROLLDEDUCTION 206.00 206.00 2013023 07/23/08 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2387121 07/24/08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69 2013024 07/23/08 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2387127 07/24/08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 614.76 614.76 2013025 07/23108 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2387125 07/24/08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 841.01 841.01 2012694 07/09/08 02261 STATE STREET BANK &TRUST CO Ben2386740 07/10108 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 7,518.27 7,518.27 Page 27 of32 -~~."""""""'~~~--'-"'-~,,"- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013026 07/23/08 02261 STATE STREET BANK &TRUST CO Ben2387113 07/24/08 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 7,547.13 7,547.13 2012773 07/09/08 08486 STELLARBUILDERS 101 06/19/08 REMODEL FINANCE OFFICE 6,450.00 6,450.00 2013085 07/30/08 08858 STEVE FRAZIER Ref002387210 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000091257 27.66 27.66 2012605 07/02/08 08724 STEVE FRIESEN Ref002386400 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000126132 75.00 75.00 2012606 07/02/08 08726 STEVE LEMACK Ref002386402 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000126421 48.22 48.22 2012843 07/16/08 08829 STEVE LEMACK Ref002386970 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000124799 10.69 10.69 2012607 07102/08 08721 STEVE YARBROUGH Ref002386397 07101/08 UB Refund Cst#0000125850 12.59 12.59 2012774 07/09/08 03738 STEVEN ENTERPRISES INC 02208941N 06/17/08 CARRIER STRIPS 458.64 458.64 2012916 07/16/08 07678 STREAMLINE FORMS &GRAPHICS 34223 06/25/08 DOOR HANGERS 227.35 227.35 2012844 07/16/08 08802 SUMMER ALAYIAN Ref002386942 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000081687 18.44 18.44 2013086 07/30/08 08846 SUSAN HOLT Ref002387198 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000029257 150.00 150.00 2012608 07/02/08 08748 SUSAN MONCRIEF Ref002386424 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst #0000071214 46.72 46.72 2012917 07/16/08 01554 SWANSON INSURANCE AGENCY 000416 07/14/08 NOTARY PUBLIC BOND APPLICATION FEE 85.00 85.00 2012775 07/09/08 00408 SWEETWATER AUTHORITY 000389 07/07/08 HEW COST REIMBURSEMENT 120.67 120.67 2013144 07/30/08 01736 SWIGGERS,JULIE M 000448 07/24/08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL REIMBURSEMENT 154.00 000450 07/24/08 CERT RENEWAL REIMBURSEMENT 130.00 000449 07/24/08 CERT RENEWAL REIMBURSEMENT 56.00 340.00 2012918 07/16/08 01905 SYMPRO INC 04246 05/02/08 ANNUAL SUPPORTIFIXED INCOME MODULE 6,544.13 6,544.13 2012677 07/02/08 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20034539 06/06/08 TIRE REPAIR SERVICES 370.78 370.78 2013027 07/23/08 01834 TC CONSTRUCTION INC 20771 06/30108 WARRANTY FOR STEEL TANK 13,000.00 13,000.00 2012776 07/09/08 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2071 06/18/08 640 PROJECT PHASE I SCADA DEVELOPMENT 7,933.00 7,933.00 2012920 07/16/08 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2072 06/26/08 CONVERT 4 SCADA PS SITES TO ETHERNET 4,558.00 4,558.00 2012921 07/16/08 03608 TELLIARD CONSTRUCTION 06/26/08 R2053-RECLAM.PLANT/RECYCLE WTROFFICE 125,109.81 125,109.81 2012845 07/16/08 08791 TETSUYA MACHIDA Ref002386930 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000038698 9.25 9.25 Page 28 of 32 -~-~-~.~--~-~ OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013087 07/30/08 08842 THOMAS ENDERWICK Ref002387194 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000002256 88.69 88.69 2012678 07/02/08 08771 THOMAS GEAIRN 000381 06/26/08 DAMAGE CLAIM PROPERTY 215.00 215.00 2012846 07/16/08 08811 THOMAS MURRAY Ref002386951 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000092302 54.19 54.19 2012777 07/09/08 02498 THOMPSON,CHAD 000402 07/07/08 CLASS A DRIVER LICENSE RENEWAL 6.00 6.00 2013028 07/23/08 02498 THOMPSON,CHAD 000429 07/21/08 SAFETYBOOTS REIMBURSEMENT 149.95 149.95 2012922 07/16108 08778 THOMSON TAX&ACCOUNTING 11244343 06/23/08 PPC GASB REFERENCE MATERIAL 855.00 855.00 2012919 07/16/08 04977 T-MOBILE 415086045 07/05/08 CELL PHONE &BLACKBERRIES SERVICE 1,307.68 1,307.68 2012609 07/02/08 08757 TODD DREW Ref002386433 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000089183 74.87 74.87 2013088 07/30/08 08868 TOM BACHMAN Ref002387221 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000123000 94.98 94.98 2012679 07/02/08 08692 TOM MCFARLANE 000373 06/30/08 SMART CONTRQLLER REBATE 350.00 350.00 2012610 07/02/08 08745 TONI GUZMAN Ref002386421 07/01108 UB Refund Cst #0000068523 129.89 129.89 2013145 07/30/08 07569 TRIAD PROPERTIES RF626059410 07/24/08 REFUND TO ORIGINALPAYEE 56.45 56.45 2013029 07/23/08 02273 TRUCKIN STUFF 23501 06/30/08 BUMPER 317.86 317.86 2013030 07/23/08 06264 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 000439 07/23/08 REGISTRATION FEES 1,250.00 1,250.00 2012680 07/02/08 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 000366 OS/22/08 DISTRICTEXPENSES 3,707.43 000369 06/23/08 DISTRICT EXPENSES 205.42 3,912.85 2012681 07/02/08 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 172544 04/24/08 AFTER HOURS SECURITYSVCS 527.05 197904 OS/22/08 AFTER HOURS SECURITY SVCS 110.00 637.05 2012778 07/09/08 00340 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 6 06/25/08 ADM FEES FOR '93 CERTS OF PARTICIPATION 1,872.00 20 06/25/08 ADM FEES FOR GEN OBLIGATION BONDS 634.46 2,506.46 2012923 07/16/08 00075 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO 0010072373 07/09/08 BID ADVERTISEMENT 327.25 327.25 2013031 07/23/08 00075 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO 0010027388 05/06/08 BID ADVERTISEMENT 307.20 307.20 2013146 07/30/08 00075 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO 0010085220 07/25/08 BID ADVERTISEMENT/1485-1 PS 599.25 599.25 2012779 07/09/08 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 74545386001 06/18/08 CONCRETE 179.47 74572995001 06/19/08 CONCRETE 159.47 338.94 Page 29 of32 OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS2012537THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012695 07109/08 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2386758 07/10/08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00 2013032 07/23/08 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2387129 07/24/08 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00 2012924 07/16/08 00350 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 000421 07/16/08 REIMBURSE POSTAGE MACHINE 1,650.00 1,650.00 2013033 07/23/08 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 000441 07/23/08 BASIC L1FE/AD&D &SUPP LIFE INS 5,134.11 5,134.11 2012780 07/09/08 06268 UNIVOF SO CALIF-FOUNDATION 3871 06/02/08 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 500.00 500.00 2013034 07/23/08 03212 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Ben2387109 07/24/08 LONG TERM DISABILITY 6,541.26 6,541.26 2012611 07/02/08 08742 UPS SUPPLYCHAIN SOLUTION Ref002386418 07/01/08 UB Refund Cst#0000063508 167.27 167.27 2012781 07/09/08 07674 US BANKCORPORATE PAYMENT 000387 06/23/08 DISTRICT EXPENSES 170.23 170.23 2012925 07/16/08 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 000418 06/23/08 DISTRICT EXPENSES 7,615.40 000414 06/23/08 DISTRICT EXPENSES 4,517.76 000413 06/23/08 DISTRICT EXPENSES 1,459.29 13,592.45 2013147 07/30/08 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 000451 07/22/08 DISTRICT EXPENSES 523.28 000452 07/22/08 DISTRICT EXPENSES 65.75 589.03 2012926 07/16/08 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 01312621N 06/25/08 PURPLE METER LIDS 4,772.79 01312631N 06/25/08 30X48VAULT 1,486.52 6,259.31 2013148 07/30/08 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 01314381N 07/04/08 RECLAIM LIDS (PURPLE)4,772.79 4,772.79 2013035 07/23/08 06829 US SECURITYASSOCIATES INC 227865 06/30/08 AFTER HOURS SECURITYSVCS 680.70 680.70 2012927 07/16/08 02674 USA BLUE BOOK 622324 06/26/08 MV STANDARDS FOR ORP PROBE IN CCB 54.99 54.99 2012696 07/09/08 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2386736 07/10/08 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 11,644.69 11,644.69 2012697 07/09/08 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2386754 07/10/08 401A PLAN 2,456.35 2,456.35 2013036 07/23/08 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2387119 07/24/08 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,638.09 6,638.09 2012782 07/09/08 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 0667582093 06/21/08 WIRELESS DATASERVICES 6,758.10 6,758.10 2013089 07/30/08 08854 VICTOR OSUNA Ref002387206 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000085519 89.73 89.73 2013037 07/23/08 08380 VILLA FORD J825707281 06/30108 2008 FORD RANGERS 40,447.37 8FC22952 06/30108 2008 FORD RANGERS &F-150 PICK-UPS 17,911.75 58,359.12 Page 30 of32 =",,",,~.~~...'.~.~-,-~'- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check#Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2012682 07/02/08 00101 W W GRAINGER INC 9659274121 06109/08 SOLENOID VALVES 854.85 9659421565 06109/08 WAREHOUSE &PAINT SUPPLIES 582.48 9659873476 06/10108 SWITCHES &CONTACT BLOCKS 357.83 9661573429 06/11/08 BOLT CUTTERS 333.57 2,128.73 2012783 07/09/08 00101 W W GRAINGERINC 9668089403 06/19/08 640 RESV CIP PROJECT ESSENTIAL TOOLS 1,998.49 9668671655 06/19/08 VARIOUS ELECTRICAL MATERIAL 688.67 9668089395 06/19/08 SHOP TOOLS UPGRADE 278.88 9668544787 06/19/08 BATTERIES 136.68 9668089411 06/19/08 CONDUITSTRAPS 30.21 3,132.93 2012928 07/16108 00101 W W GRAINGER INC 9671799667 06/25/08 640 RESVCIP PROJECT 241.73 9673900222 06/26108 SHOP TOOLS UPGRADE 106.48 9668837215 06/20108 VARIOUS ELECTRICAL MATERIAL 88.44 436.65 2012784 07109/08 08541 WALLS INSPECTION COMPANYINC 5671 06/19/08 INSPECTION SERVICES 880.00 880.00 2012929 07/16108 00262 WATER AGENCIES ASSOCIATION 000422 07/15/08 MEETING REGISTRATIONS 180.00 180.00 2013149 07/30108 02700 WATER CONSERVATION GARDEN OTAY10809 07/09/08 OPERATING COSTS FOR WATER GARDEN 19,687.50 19,687.50 2013038 07/23/08 00014 WAXIE SANITARYSUPPLY 70723434 07/03/08 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,883.43 1,883.43 2012683 07/02/08 01343 WE GOTYAPEST CONTROL 48764 06/12/08 BEE REMOVAL 115.00 115.00 2012930 07/16108 01343 WE GOTYAPEST CONTROL 48886 06/20108 BEE REMOVAL 230.00 230.00 2013039 07/23/08 01343 WE GOTYAPEST CONTROL 49155 07/02/08 PEST CONTROL -BEE REMOVAL 115.00 49156 07/02/08 PEST CONTROL -BEE REMOVAL 115.00 230.00 2013150 07/30108 01343 WEGOT YA PEST CONTROL 49236 07/08/08 PEST CONTROL -BEE REMOVAL 115.00 48791 06/13/08 PEST CONTROL -BEE REMOVAL 115.00 230.00 2012847 07/16108 08818 WELLS FARGO Ref002386958 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst#0000122552 13.29 13.29 2012931 07/16108 00190 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 816206887 06/20108 LEGAL LIBRARYUPDATES 495.14 495.14 2013151 07/30108 00190 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 816396247 07/20108 LEGAL LIBRARY UPDATES 303.88 303.88 2013040 07/23/08 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 00682111N 06/27/08 APCD TESTING 538.00 538.00 2012785 07/09/08 03692 WESTIN ENGINEERING INC 30867 06/13/08 CIP P1210 -ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 22,761.45 22,761.45 2012932 07/16108 03692 WESTIN ENGINEERING INC 30635 06/26108 WWTP AUTO ENHANCEMENTS ASSESSMENT 9,833.00 9,833.00 2013041 07/23/08 07941 WESTTURF LANDSCAPE MGMT INC 12391 07/02/08 WATER METER BOX CLEAN OUT 1,980.00 1,980.00 Page 31 of32 .-..,..,.~~_..._..~- OTAYWATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2012537 THROUGH 2013151 RUN DATES 7/2/2008 TO 7/30/2008 Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2013042 07/23/08 03437 WIENHOFF DRUG TESTING INC 19747 07/01/08 RANDOM TESTING 585.00 585.00 2012786 07/09/08 08774 WILLIAM SCHNEIDER 000391 07/07/08 ARTIFICIAL TURF RESIDENTIAL REBATE 414.00 414.00 2012848 07/16/08 08787 WILLIAM SMITH Ref002386926 07/15/08 UB Refund Cst #0000027485 13.06 13.06 2012684 07/02/08 02725 WILLIAMS .SCOTSMAN INC 82449601 06/12/08 28'TRAILER RENTAL @TREATMENT PLANT 293.85 293.85 2012787 07/09/08 02725 WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC 82591641 06/18/08 MOBILE OFFICE RENTAL 288.74 288.74 2012788 07/09/08 08773 WINDSOR VIEW HOA 000390 07/07/08 ARTIFICIAL TURF HOA REBATE 450.00 450.00 2012685 07102/08 04574 WRA &ASSOCIATES INC 04/01/08 TRAINING 4,743.75 4,743.75 2013090 07/30108 08855 YONGJUN NA Ref002387207 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst #0000085524 92.26 92.26 2013091 07/30108 08851 YOUNG ACTORS THEATRE INC Ref002387203 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000080291 24.47 24.47 2012789 07/09/08 06288 ZONDIROS CORPORATION 9 06/10108 1905 UTILITY RELOCATIONS 52,128.40 52,128.40 2013092 07/30108 08882 ZULEMA MALDONADO Ref002387238 07/25/08 UB Refund Cst#0000126306 52.83 52.83 GRAND TOTAL 5,327,646.16 5,327,646.16 Page 32 of32