HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-13-09 Board PacketOTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY,CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY
May 13,2009
3:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1.ROLL CALL
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4.SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a)PRESENTATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICTS 2009 SCHOLARSHIP
AWARD
b)PRESENTATION OF THE 2009 OTAY PHOTO CONTEST AWARD
c)PRESENTATION OF THE 2009 BEST IN SHOW PHOTO CONTEST
AWARD
5.PRESENTATION REGARDING THE GLOBAL WATER BRIGADES (GUERREIRO)
6.APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 7,
2009 AND FEBRUARY 4,2009
7.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
8.ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST IS
MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A PAR-
TICULAR ITEM:
a)APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT TO
AECOM FOR THE MIDDLE SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN GROUNDWA-
1
TER WELL PILOT PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED
$1,065,037
b)APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF FIVE (5)PURCHASE ORDERS TO VARI-
OUS VENDORS FOR HARDWARE COSTS OF A CISCO LAN SWITCH
AND SERVICES;HARDWARE COSTS OF A HEWLETT-PACKARD EVA
AND SERVICE MAINTENANCE;HARDWARE COSTS OF A HEWLETT-
PACKARD C-CLASS ENCLOSURE,FOUR (4)BLADE SERVERS AND FI-
BERSWITCH;AND SERVICES TO DESIGN,IMPLEMENT,AND INSTALL
A WIRELESS BROADBAND TO CONNECT THE REGULATORY SITE AND
30 MG RESERVOIR;AND FOR THE PURCHASE OF 35 RUGGEDIZED
PANASONIC LAPTOP COMPUTERS FOR FIELD MOBILE STAFF;FOR A
TOTAL COST OF $469,677
c)DECLARE IDENTIFIED VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AS SURPLUS TO
THE DISTRICTS NEEDS
d)APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE MARSTON+MARSTON,INC.CON-
TRACT FOR PUBLIC RELATIONS SERVICES TO EXPAND THE SCOPE
OF SERVICES AND INCREASE THE NOT-TO-EXCEED VALUE TO
$75,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 (FY 2009)AND INCREASE THE TERM
OF THE AGREEMENT THROUGH FY 2011 ON A YEAR-TO-YEAR BASIS,
PROVIDED THE VALUE OF SUCH SERVICES DOES NOT EXCEED
$90,000 IN FY 2010 AND 2011
ACTION ITEMS
9.ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS
a)APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES CONTRACT TO
ICF JONES &STOKES FOR THE OTAY MESA RECYCLED WATER SUP-
PLY LINK SYSTEM PIPELINES PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-
EXCEED $213,087 (COBURN-BOYD)
10.ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCE
a)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.4134 TO IMPLEMENT AN IDENTITY THEFT
RED FLAGS POLICY (CUDLlP)
b)DECLARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A MODIFIED DROUGHT
LEVEL 2,EFFECTIVE JULY 1,2009,TO EXCLUDE WATERING SCHED-
ULES AND DROUGHT PRICING
11.BOARD
a)DISCUSSION OF 2009 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
2
b)CONSIDERATiON TO CAST VOTES FOR A REGULAR SPECIAL DiS-
TRICT MEMBER AND ALTERNATE SPECIAL DISTRICT MEMBER ON
THE LOCAL AREA FORMATION COMMISSION'S BOARD OF DIREC-
TORS
REPORTS
12.GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
d)SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
13.DIRECTORS'REPORTS/REQUESTS
14.PRESIDENTS REPORT
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
15.CLOSED SESSION
a)CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -PENDING LITIGATION [GOV-
ERNMENT CODE §54956.9(a)]
(I)MULTIPLE CASES RELATED TO THE FENTON BUSINESS CEN-
TER AND FILED WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY
OF SAN DIEGO CONSOLIDATED UNDER CASE NO.37-2007-
00077024-CU-BC-SC
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
16.REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION.THE BOARD MAY
ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
17.ADJOURNMENT
3
All items appearing on this agenda,whether or not expressly listed for action,may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda,and any attachments containing written information,are available at the
District's website at www.otaywater.gov.Written changes to any items to be considered at
the open meeting,or to any attachments,will be posted on the District's website.Copies
of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by
contacting her at (619)670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting,please call the District Secretary at (619)670-2280 at least 24
hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on May 8,2009,I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the regu-
lar meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District,said time being at least
72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code
Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley,California on May 8,2009.
4
AGENDA ITEM 6
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
January 7,2009
1.The meeting was called to order by President Croucher at 3:33 p.m.
2.OATH OF OFFICE CEREMONY
The Honorable Ron Roberts,Supervisor of the County of San Diego,presided
over the District's Oath of Office Ceremony and swore in District Directors Jaime
Bonilla,Jose Lopez and Mark Robak,who represent Divisions 2,4 and 5
(respectively)of the District's service area.
Director Bonilla presented Supervisor Roberts a plaque on behalf of the District
and thanked him for his outstanding dedication and tireless service to the people
of San Diego County.
Director Lopez presented a plaque to Director Croucher on behalf of the District
Board of Directors for his leadership and excellent service as president of the
Otay Water District Board of Directors for the past year.
The meeting was recessed at 3:42 p.m.for a reception and reconvened at 3:55
p.m.
3.ROLL CALL
Directors Present:Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
Staff Present:General Manager Mark Watton,Asst.GM Administration
and Finance German Alvarez,Ass!.GM Engineering and
Water Operations Manny Magana,General Counsel Yuri
Calderon,Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens,
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem,Chief of Engineering
Rod Posada,Chief of Operations Pedro Porras,Chief of
Administration Rom Sarno,District Secretary Susan Cruz
and others per attached list.
4.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
5.ELECTION OF BOARD PRESIDENT,VICE PRESIDENT AND TREASURER
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Bonilla and
carried with the following vote:
i
I
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
1
to elect Director Croucher as President,Director Lopez as Vice President and
Director Bonilla as Treasurer.
6.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
\
to approve the agenda.
7.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
8.RECESS OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING AND CONVENE A
MEETING OF THE OTAY SERVICE CORPORATION
The Otay Water District board meeting was recessed at 3:59 p.m.and a meeting
of the Otay Service Corporation board was convened.
9.ROLL CALL
Directors Present:Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
10.ELECTION OF OFFICERS:PRESIDENT,VICE-PRESIDENT OR TREASURER
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Bonilla and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:-
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to elect Director Croucher as President,Director Lopez as Vice President and
Director Bonilla as Treasurer.
11.APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS:EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER AND SECRETARY
2
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and
carried with the following vote:
~.•.Ii
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
.,'
to elect General Manager Watton as Executive Director,Joe Beachem as Chief
Financial Officer and District Secretary Cruz as Secretary.
12.ADJOURN OTAY SERVICE CORPORATION BOARD MEETING AND
RECONVENE THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING
President Croucher adjourned the Otay Service Corporation meeting at 4:00 p.m.
and reconvened the Otay Water District board meeting.
13.APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 18,2008
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve the minutes of the regular board meeting of September 3,2008.
14.CUSTOMER GAN'S APPEAL
Chief of Administration Rom Sarno indicated that this item is an appeal by Mr.
Rick Gans that the board reconsider the assessment of the $5,000 fine imposed
upon him (Mr.Gans)for tampering with and operating the District's water system
without proper authorization.Chief of Administration Sarno noted that a copy of
a letter dated December 30,2008 from Mr.Gans was placed on the dias for the
board which references the cost invoiced to Mr.Gans for repairs to the District's
system of $3,444.29.He indicated that the $3,444.29 has been paid in full by Mr.
Gans and the only outstanding issue is the $5,000 fine.He indicated that staffs'
recommendation is for the board to uphold the General Manger's decision to
impose a $5,000 fine for tampering with and operating the district's water system
without proper authorization.
Mr.Gans indicated that he appreciated the opportunity to speak to the board on
this matter.He stated that he wished that he and his wife were attending today's
board meeting under different circumstances and that all he can do is provide his
personal apology and acknowledge that he had made a bad mistake.He
indicated that they have had a lot of personal family problems in their lives and
3
he felt that it had lead to some bad choices.He stated that he could not
apologize enough for what he had done and that he had lost his job with
California American where he worked for 30 years.He stated that they have lost
a lot of finances to family and to this situation and all that he can do at this point
is try to rebuild and move forward.Mr.Gans assured the District that he would
never do anything like this again.He indicated that he did use the water very
conservatively,however,he understands that this does not make it right and he
is very sorry.
Director Bonilla indicated that this is a very difficult situation as the board has an
obligation to its ratepayers.He stated that they understand that people make
mistakes and that no one is perfect,including the persons sitting on this dais.He
stated that when he first heard of the situation he was very offended given the
fact that there are many people with many problems.Stealing resources from
another is inexcusable.He indicated that the District does not like to set a
precedent in excusing fines,especially with something that is always enforced by
the District.He stated,however,the fact that Mr.Gans and his wife had come in
person to appeal the fine and expressed genuine regret goes a long way with
him and with the rest of the District.He has a lot of respect for those who admit
to their mistakes and he asked that the board reconsider the fine.He asked
General Counsel Calderon if there are any legal reasons that the fine could not
be reconsidered.
General Counsel Calderon indicated that it is the board's responsibility to
consider the appeal.It is not an appeal on the findings of the District's staff,it is
an appeal of the imposition of a fine.The board can either uphold,reduce,or
eliminate the fine.
Director Robak inquired if all costs related to water use,investigation,and repair
the District's system have been paid for by Mr.and Mrs.Gans.Chief of
Administration Sarno indicated that such costs have been paid.Director Robak
indicated that he too appreciated Mr.and Mrs.Gans coming to the board
meeting and admitting their mistake and taking accountability for their actions.
He stated that he has empathy for his loss,particularly his livelihood and he is in
concurrence that the board waive the fine.
Director Breitfelder indicated that he is touched and empathizes with the
motivation behind the motion to waive the fine,but felt that the District would
better serve the public interest if we don't let our personal sympathy trump the
public's interest.He stated that he felt it would set a bad precedent and felt that
the District should draw a hard line.
Director Lopez indicated that he concurs with Directors Bonilla and Robak.He
stated that this is very tough.However,the fact that Mr.Gans has made good on
his payment to the District for the damages he has caused,he concurs to waive
the $5,000 fine.
A motion was made by Director Bonilla,seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
4
"
•
•
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
Director Breitfelder
None
None
to accept the appeal with regard to the imposition of a the $5,000 fine (waive the
$5,000 fine).
CONSENT CALENDAR
15.ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
A motion was made by Director Robak,seconded by Director Breitfelder and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
To approve the following consent calendar items:
a)APPROVE A TWENTY-FOUR (24)MONTH EXTENSION OF THE
AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOILS AND
TESTING FOR AS-NEEDED GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
b)AWARD A PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING
SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE SAN MIGUEL HABITAT
MANAGEMENT AREA AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATION PROJECTS
FOR CALENDAR YEARS 2009,2010 AND 2011 IN THE AMOUNT OF
$987,807
c)APPROVE A FIVE YEAR CONTRACT WITH UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES,INC.FOR CLEAN-OUT SERVICES OF 850 METER BOXES
PER YEAR IN THE AMOUNT OF $124,312.50,PLUS APPROPRIATE
INCREASES TIED TO THE SAN DIEGO CONSUMER PRICE INDEX
d)ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.4132 AMENDING THE DISTRICTS 401 (a)
PLAN TO INCLUDE MATCHING EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS TO
CERTAIN GROUPS AND APPROVE A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
ADOPTION AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE EMPLOYEE
CONTRIBUTION COMPONENTOF THE 401(a)PLAN AT A LATER
DATE
16.BOARD
5
a)DISCUSSION OF 2009 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
Director Breitfelder indicated that when he first was elected to the Otay Water
District Board,the district held two board meetings a month (first and third
Wednesday of the month)and it has since been trimmed to one meeting a
month,the first Wednesday of each month.He indicated that he assumed that
the first day of the month has been the easiest and most convenient for the
majority.He felt,however,that the first week of the month tends to be the most
busy and difficult week of the month.He indicated that he has heard lately that
some members may agree with him that the first week may be a little
inconvenient relative to the other weeks of the month.He suggested that the
board consider changing the District board meetings to the third week of the
month.
Director Robak indicated that he wasn't prepared to talk about changing the date
of the meeting,but it has been on his mind to make the board meeting as
accessible to the public as the District can.He indicated that he felt holding
meetings later in the day would make District meetings more accessible.
Director Bonilla indicated that the District has in past,changed the meeting time
to later in the day (5:00 p.m.)to make it more accessible to the public.He
indicated that the district's staff would stay until 8:00 p.m.or 9:00 p.m.Closed
session would then follow the meeting and by then the public had left the
meeting.He indicated that it was found to be counter productive.He stated that
he would be very reluctant to change the meeting day or time and feels that the
first week of the month has been working.He also noted that the members of
the board have also adjusted their personal calendars to work with the first week
of every month and to change it would be a problem,especially for him.
Director Lopez indicated that he too recalls the late evenings for board meetings
and he also has set his calendar for the first week of every month.He indicated
that the board already has the flexibility to change the board meeting day as
needed.He stated that the first Wednesday of every month has been working
and he suggests that we leave the schedule as is.
Director Breitfelder indicated that as the first Wednesday seems most convenient
for most directors,he withdraws his suggestion to change the meeting day.
Director Croucher indicated for the record that he also supports leaving the
meeting schedule as is for consistency for the public.He indicated that he felt
that once you start changing dates and taking everyone off their rhythm,they
begin to forget the new meeting dates.He stated that he felt that it is good to
keep it consistent for all involved.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
17.THESE ITEMS ARE PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY.NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING
AGENDA ITEMS.
6
•
.,
•
President Croucher indicated that the following are informational items submitted
by staff for the board's review.He asked if the board wished to hear a report on
any of the informational items below.No requests were received.
a)INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE 2007 AND 2008 ANNUAL WATER
CONSERVATION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE REPORT
b)INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE
CALIFORNIA URBAN WATER CONSERVATION COUNCIL'S
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING URBAN WATER
CONSERVATION IN CALIFORNIA
REPORTS
18.GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
a)SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
General Manager Watton indicated that the design for the 36-inch pipeline from
Flow Control Facility (FCF)No.14,one of the District's flagship projects,is
concluding.He stated that it is expected that the project will be bid out shortly.
He indicated that there are a few things that staff will be discussing with CWA
now and into the future to assist with the project,one of which is the FCF.He
stated that CWA has been helpful and accommodating with this project.
He noted that the District's annual employee recognition luncheon has been
scheduled on January 21 at the Cottonwood Golf Club.
He stated that the board may have noticed that the District is renovating the
landscaping around the Administrative Building in which plant material is being
replaced with water efficient plants.He indicated that the renovation is about half
complete and we should see the results of the renovation soon.He noted that
the District's outlying facilities (pump stations,reservoirs,etc.)have also been
reviewed and updated.
He noted that Water Conservation Manager William Granger attended the
California Urban Water Council's meeting to vote on the revisions to the Best
Management Practices (BMP's).The BMP's will become a key feature into the
future and he wished to acknowledge Water Conservation Manager Granger and
his staff on their work with the California Urban Water Council and having the
District's input on the BMP's heard.The proposed revisions were passed at the
meeting.
He also shared that the District's Information Technology Department has
developed a rate calculator which is available on the District's website.It allows
customers to calculate their water bill based on current usage with the rate
increase and drought pricing.He stated that the District has been recognized for
the rate calculator and it has become a more sophisticated tool since that
7
•
recognition was received.He noted that the District is one of few agencies who
offers the bill calculator and at this level of sophistication.He indicated that first
set of bills at the new rates was mailed this past Monday.Customer service is
ready to answer questions with regard to the new rates.
General Manager Watton indicated that the number of meters sold by the District
this past month is at an all time low.This is not only true for Otay,but for the
County as a whole.He stated that staff has adjusted the District's budget,but
the District is still a little under.The District is collecting about 71 %of what was
projected.He stated that the difference will not be so dramatic this time as staff
had budgeted what they thought was very low.However,the District is still
experiencing differences.Part of the reason is that Otay Mesa customers do not
pay annexation fees,their fees are charged in a different way and it hits the
budget differently.
Director Robak inquired if the Calavo Sewer Lift Station Project was completed or
if its construction was extended beyond December 31,2008.Chief of
Engineering Posada indicated that the project was extended beyond December
31,2008 as staff is negotiating a small change order with the contractor for the
discovery of unknown utility lines.The time frame adjustment will be made part
of the change order contract.It is expected that the project will be completed
within the next month.
Director Robak inquired with regard to the recycled water that the District is
taking from the South Bay Water Reclamation Plant (SBWRP)if it is take or pay.
General Manager Watton confirmed that the District's contract is take or pay.
This is the second winter that the District is taking water from the City of San
Diego's SBWRP and it has been working out well.The take or pay is based on
an annual average and the District has been taking more than the District's
contracted take or pay.He indicated that staff will be providing closed session
briefings to the District's committee and board on upcoming City matters.
San Diego County Water Authority Update:
President Croucher indicated that General Manager Watton was elected as Vice
Chair to CWA's board of directors.General Manager Watton indicated that MWD
is struggling with water supply issues and their budget.He indicated that CWA
will be discussing revising their CIP in response to the MWD's proposed rate
increases.He indicated,as discussed in the past,that the upcoming years will
become tougher.
President Croucher also shared that he was appointed to CWA's committee on
Bay Delta Programs.
19.DIRECTORS'REPORTS/REQUESTS
Director Breitfelder indicated that a representative from the Voice of San Diego
presented at the Council of Water Utilities and he mentioned that he has received
8
•
a lot input from the public about what they see as a paradox.On the one hand
they are hearing that we have a long term water shortage problem and on the
other hand the County is poised to continue housing construction at substantial,if
not,normal levels.He stated that we will probably hear more about this in future.
The speaker also talked about the consumption of recycled water.Director
Breitfelder also shared with regard to CSDA that Supervisor Greg Cox,Ms.Chris
Frahm and former Senator Steve Peace presented on Special Districts as
stewards of public funds and shared some comments about Sacramento.
Director Jamie Bonilla wished everyone a happy and healthy new year.He
congratulated President Croucher on his reelection as President.He stated that
he has lead the District well and has demonstrated conduct and character.He
indicated that the board has been happy with the way he has represented the
District and that he knows that staff is appreciative of him and comfortable with
him leading the District in the next year through what will be very difficult times.
He stated that he felt that the District will again be successful under his
leadership.
Director Lopez indicated that he concurs with Director Bonilla.He stated that he
was happy to hear that the District is preparing to respond to customers
regarding the rates and the current water situation.He asked that President
Croucher continue to keep the board abreast of issues and congratulated him on
his reelection.
Director Robak thanked everyone who supported him in his election to the
District's board.He stated that this will be a challenging year not just for this
water district, but the country and state.He indicated that he spoke with Mr.
Steve Peace in mid-November and he had indicated that he was at the State
Budget Director's office in late October and the Director had shared with him that
the state's cash position was projected to be $17,500 in February.He stated that
that puts everything in perspective.He indicated that we have our work ahead of
us and this is going to be a very challenging year.
20.PRESIDENTS REPORT
Director Croucher indicated that he wished to thank the members of the board for
their confidence in him and that he appreciated the support they have provided
him over the year.He stated that he felt that this was an amazing group of
individuals at Otay and that this is a true team.He indicated that he felt that the
District has been successful because the board and staff work together.He
indicated that the upcoming few years will be a struggle and the toughest thing
that the District will need to accomplish is to educate its customers that California
is in a long term drought and the various water supplies issues related to the Bay
Delta,Colorado River,etc.He stated that the District will continue to use its
Strategic Plan to guide its operations and that one of the District's goals in the
Strategic Plan was to become a leader in the industry.He indicated that we can
look back and say that the District has become a leader in the industry.The
awards the District has received for its operations and finance certainly support
this.
9
•
21.ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board,President Croucher
adjourned the meeting at 4:40 p.m.
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
10
•
AGENDA ITEM 6
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
February 4,2009
1.The meeting was called to order by President Croucher at 3:30 p.m.
2.ROLL CALL
Directors Present:Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
Staff Present:General Manager Mark Watton,Asst.GM Administration
and Finance German Alvarez,Asst.GM Engineering and
Water Operations Manny Magana,General Counsel Yuri
Calderon,Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens,
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem,Chief of Engineering
Rod Posada,Chief of Operations Pedro Porras,Chief of
Administration Rom Sarno,District Secretary Susan Cruz
and others per attached list.
3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and
carried with the following vote:
I
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve the agenda.
5.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
6.APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF
OCTOBER 9,2008
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
Noes:None
1
Abstain:None
Absent:None
to approve the minutes of the regular board meeting of October 9,2008.
CONSENT CALENDAR
7.ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
Director Breitfelder indicated that he wished to pull item 6b from the Consent
Calendar.
A motion was made by Director Robak,seconded by Director Lopez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve the following consent calendar items:
a)APPROVE PURCHASE ORDERS FOR THE PURCHASE OF VARIOUS
FLEET VEHICLES FROM TOYOTA CARLSBAD,IN THE AMOUNT OF
$90,907.88,AND FROM EL CAJON FORD,IN THE AMOUNT OF
$72,914.84;ADDITIONALLY,THE GENERAL MANAGER WILL ISSUE
PURCHASE ORDERS UNDER HIS SIGNATORY AUTHORITY TO
KEARNY MESA CHEVROLET IN THE AMOUNT OF $12,052.50 AND TO
PEARSON FORD IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,387.59
c)REVIEW OF THE WINTER 2009 CUSTOMER PIPELINE NEWSLETTER
d)APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO THE CONTRACT WITH
ARRIETA CONSTRUCTION FOR THE RALPH W.CHAPMAN WATER
RECYCLING FACILITY FORCEMAIN AIRNAC REPLACEMENTS AND
ACCESS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
President Croucher presented consent calendar item 6b for discussion:
b)APPROVE THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
("ENVIRONMENTAL MOU")SETTING FORTH CERTAIN TERMS AND
UNDERSTANDINGS OF THE PARTIES (OTAY,SYCUAN BAND OF
KUMEYAAY NATION,AND CONSULTANTS)RELATING TO THE
PREPARATION OF THE CEQA DOCUMENTS REQUIRED IN
CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION;AUTHORIZE
THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER THE
2
ENVIRONMENTAL MOU;AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER AND
THE GENERAL COUNSEL TO NEGOTIATE TERMS OF A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SETTING FORTH CERTAIN
TERMS,CONDITIONS,GOALS AND UNDERSTANDINGS OF THE
PARTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ANNEXATION PROCESS AND
ACTIONS/RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH PARTY INVOLVED (THE
ANNEXATION MOU")
Director Breitfelder indicated that he wished to hear more elaboration on this
item.President Croucher indicated that this item was discussed in the
Engineering,Operations and Water Resources Committee and inquired if
Director Breitfelder was interested in a review of the discussion at the committee
or if he was interested in a presentation of any new developments since the
committee's discussion.Director Breitfelder indicated that he wished that staff
provide both.General Manager Watton indicated that there are no new
developments since the committee's discussion.He stated LAFCO had informed
the District that it did not need to reorganize the Padre Dam and Otay areas for
sewer services and that the agencies could instead execute an interagency
agreement.He indicated that Sycuan had decided not to pursue sewer on the
original 640 acres of reservation land and that their current treatment plant could
meet their needs for sometime.He indicated that it may,however,become an
issue in the future sometime.He stated that they also discussed how to proceed
with the environmental issues.He indicated that a Negative Declaration was
distributed,but not officially published,and it received some negative feedback.
The Negative Declaration was withdrawn and Sycuan is planning to do a full
Environmental Impact Report.He stated that this item is an approval of the
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)that was developed with the tribe and its
consultants with regard to the performance of the environmental documents and
lays out the responsibilities of all the parties.
Director Breitfelder inquired if there is any feedback from Sycuan on whether
"Plan B"is still on their time table.General Manager Watton indicated that
everyone is working together and we want to pursue this as aggressively as
possible.There are other agencies involved in the annexation process (LAFCO,
CWA,etc.)and the annexation will need to work through all the agencies.
A motion was .made by Director Robak,seconded by Director Lopez and carried
with the following vote:
IiI
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla, Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve staff recommendation.
3
ACTION ITEMS
8.ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS
a)APPROVE THE WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION
REPORT DATED JANUARY 2009 FOR THE OTAY RANCH L.P.OTAY
RANCH PRESERVE AND RESORT COMMUNITY PROJECT (RESORT)
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AS REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 610
AND SENATE BILL 221
Engineering Manager Jim Peasley indicated that the board has viewed this
presentation several times.He stated the only changes are the dates,name and
numbers.However, there is one significant difference,this project is outside the
Otay Water District service area.He indicated that the law requires that the
District prepare water supply reports and,in this particular case the project is
planned to be permitted through the County of San Diego.He indicated that the
project is located east of the lake and will have use of the lake.He stated that it
is a fairly large project,approximately 2000 acres,and has a demand of
approximately 1800 AF including recycled if it is possible.The project may not
be able to utilize recycled water because of its proximity to the lake.Otay may
be required to have 100%offset supplies for this project as a condition of
annexation into Metropolitan Water District (MWD)and San Diego County Water
Authority (CWA).Staff plans to provide 100%offset.He indicated that staff
believes that the board has met the intent of SB 610 and SB 221 as staff has
communicated with the land use agencies and is planning to meet the supplies
needs of the resort project.The Resort Project Water Supply Assessment and
Verification Report (WSA&V)clearly documents the current water supply
situation and that sufficient water supplies are planned to meet the resort's
demand.He indicated the following projects are expected to meet their demand,
along with other similarly situated projects (such as,Sycuan,etc.):
•Middle Sweetwater River Groundwater Well (1500 AF)
•Otay River Groundwater Desalination (4,500 AF)
•Rosarito Ocean Desalination Project (11,200 AF)
•North District Recycled Water Project (1,200 AF)
•Rancho del Rey Groundwater Well (600 AF)
•Otay Mesa Lot 7 Groundwater Well (660 AF)
He indicated that the above projects far exceed the needs of the projects.He
stated that the District may not be successful in developing all these projects,but
are convinced that we will do one or more in order to meet the needs of the
resort project.He stated that the District has met the intent of the law and staff is
requesting that the board approve the WSA&V Report.
Director Breitfelder inquired with regard to the committee notes that they indicate
that there may be a little bit of indecision in CWA's and MWD's position regarding
100%offset.They indicate that they "would like"versus "will require"and he
4
I
wished to clarify that in staffs'recommendation,that the resort project will
participate in 100%offset.Engineering Manager Peasley indicated that staff will
be bringing back to the board in the future,plans to develop those local water
supplies and a mechanism to fund those local water supplies.He indicated that
the developer in this case is interested in participating in that program.It is
understood that they will participate in 100%offset,but it is not set in stone yet,
but it is certainly where we are headed.He indicated that he wished to clarify
that MWD &CWA have not yet required 100%offset,but may as a condition of
annexation.General Manager Watton indicated that they could request
additional conditions.He stated that the WSA&V discusses the probability of
having a long term supply and this is what Engineering Manager Peasley is
addressing.It does not go into the detail of what the offsets will be.The report
indicates the reasons that the District is making the finding that water will be
available.As we get closer,then the District will indicate exactly what we will be
doing.
President Croucher indicated that this item was discussed in committee and he
wished to note that the District is not guaranteeing sufficient supplies.Staff has
made the developer aware that if a Drought Level III alert is declared,it would not
sell any new meters except under specific conditions.The District is still
following its policies and is being proactive and not reactive.Engineering
Manager Peasley indicated that the state law does not require that the District
have the water,but it must plan to have the water.
Director Robak indicated with regard to the supply projects,one of the things he
has been thinking about is looking at ways that the District can be innovative and
increase the use of recycled water in single family homes and for fire service
through the fire hydrants.He understands there are obstacles,however,he
inquired if there has been any consideration in doing so.Engineering Manager
Peasley indicated that staff has evaluated recycled fire service quite extensively
in the past and,while there are a lot of obstacles,they can be overcome.He
stated that one of the things that staff is evaluating is converting multi-
family/master meters in the central area into two meters for indoor and outdoor
use.This will enhance recycled water use and would save approximately 300 AF
of potable water.
General Manager Watton indicated that the resort developer will need to
convince the City of San Diego that recycled water can be utilized upstream of
the reservoir.He stated that while we are planning on utilizing recycled water
and are pushing hard for it,there are still regulatory obstacles to overcome.
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Robak and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
5
to approve staff recommendation with the understanding that the water needs will
be 100%offset.
9.GENERAL MANAGER
a)APPROVE A CHANGE IN THE HIRING AUTHORITY FOR THE VACANT
ASSISTANT DISTRICT SECRETARY POSITION
President Croucher indicated that the committee wished to present this item to
the board as it does affect the board procedures with regard to the assistant
position which would report to District Secretary Cruz.He noted that the
committee addressed the board's concerns while still having staff happy with the
process.It is presented to allow the board to review the hiring process in more
detail.General Manager Watton indicated that the last bullet of the committee
notes provides some instruction to staff in presenting the top candidates resumes
to the board.President Croucher indicated because of the confidential nature of
the position the committee members wished to assure that all board members
felt comfortable with the individual hired as the board would interact with this
individual in District Secretary Cruz's absence.
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve staff recommendation.
10.BOARD
a)CONSIDERATION TO NOMINATE A DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE
FOR A REGULAR DISTRICT MEMBER AND AN ALTERNATE MEMBER
ON THE SAN DIEGO FORMATION COMMISSION
President Croucher indicated that he has been in contact with Olivenhain MWD
and they will be nominating President Croucher for the Alternate position and the
current LAFCO Alternate,Mr.John Ingalls,for the Primary position.He also
spoke with Mr.Ingalls and they both would like to move forward with nominating
Mr.Ingalls for the Primary position and President Croucher for the Alternate
position.
A motion was made by Director Bonilla,seconded by Director Lopez and carried
with the following votes:
Ayes:Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez,Robak
6
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
to nominate President Croucher for the Alternate position and Mr.Ingalls for the
Primary position on LAFCO's board of directors.
b)DISCUSSION OF THE 2009 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
President Croucher indicated that with regard to the board workshop,District
Secretary Cruz is contacting the members of the board to set-up meetings with
each director to discuss topics for the board retreat workshop.He stated,that it
is hoped by the next meeting we will have a date for the workshop.
Director Bonilla inquired if the March Finance,Administration and
Communications Committee meeting has been scheduled.District Secretary
Cruz indicated that it has not.Director Bonilla indicated that his March schedule
is getting very busy and he would like to try and have the meeting in the first
week of March.District Secretary Cruz indicated that she would work with staff
to schedule a meeting in the first week of March.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
11.THESE ITEMS ARE PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY.NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING
AGENDA ITEMS.
President Croucher indicated that the following are informational items submitted
by staff for the board's review.Director Robak requested a presentation on item
"a"below.
a)INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING THE NORTH DISTRICT
RECYCLED WATER REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT,PHASE I CONCEPT STUDY
Environmental Compliance Specialist Lisa Coburn-Boyd indicated that she will be
presenting on Jhe final report of the North District Recycled Water System
Development Project.She stated that as the District is a recognized leader in the
use of recycled water for irrigation and commercial uses,it is continually looking
at ways to expand its recycled water program and an area within the District's
service area is the North District.She stated that in 2007 the District utilized
consultant PBS&J to perform a study of utilizing recycled water in the North
District and this is a summary of the report.She indicated that there were five
technical memorandums that were combined in the report which included the
project definition,regulatory process,watershed protection,public outreach and
implementation plan.She presented a slide showing where the North District is
located (see attached copy of presentation).The project description described
the potential recycled water customers which include:
7
•Golf Courses
•Regional Parks &Schools
•Churches
•Homeowner Association Common Areas
•Commercial Developments
•Cuyamaca College
•Water Conservation Garden
She indicated that the estimated recycled water use is about .7 MGD average
day with a maximum of 1.4 MGD per day.The Ralph W.Chapman Water
Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF)produces about 1.3 MGD.
She stated that upgrades would be required to the RWCWRF to provide recycled
water service which includes:
•Modifications to RWCWRF's chlorine contact basin to ensure proper
chlorine contact time
•Replacement of pumps,motors &appurtenances at RWCWRF effluent
pump station
•Construction of a transmission main pipeline
•Retrofit the existing 832-1 Potable Reservoir to be used for recycled water
•Construction of the distribution system pipeline
•Upgrade data collection,logging,and regulatory compliance reporting
systems
She presented slides depicting the proposed recycled distribution system within
the North District and the alternative changes proposed to modify the chlorine
contact basin at the RWCWRF (see attached copy of presentation).
She indicated that the project cost for the distribution and transmission system
would be about $14 to $15 million.The on-site retrofit costs would be borne by
the customers,operational costs may be reduced due to energy savings as the
recycled water would no longer be pumped to eastern Chula Vista,and
watershed monitoring costs are unknown at this time as staff does not know the
extent that the District may be required to monitor the watershed.
She reviewed the regulatory costs and indicated that the District would need to
revise its permit as its current permit does not allow for recycled water use in the
Middle Sweetwater Basin.The RWCWRF will also need to be retrofit to reduce
the nitrogen levels in its effluent and modify its chlorine contact basin as noted
earlier.The effluent is too high for the District's current permit and the study will
also evaluate different ways to reduce total nitrogen in the effluent.
Environmental Compliance Specialist Coburn-Boyd also indicated that watershed
protection is also a large concern.She noted that the TDS levels of the recycled
water are in the range of natural water and should not impact ground or surface
8
water quality and permitting appears to be feasible based on current and
historical water quality data.Water quality monitoring stations are located
throughout the watershed and they will be used to analyze and monitor the water
quality in the watershed.She stated that a Mitigation and Monitoring Plan can be
devised to use as a safety factor.
She indicated that the stakeholders include:
•Regulatory Agencies:Regulatory Water Quality Control Board,CA
Department of Public Health,and the County Department of Public Health
•Local Agencies:Sweetwater Authority,Helix Water District and Padre
Dam Water District
•Potential Customers
•Public at Large
There are three phases to the study and Phase I is complete and a copy of the
study has been provided to the regulatory and local agencies for their review and
comment.Phase II will include further investigation of issues identified in Phase I
as needing further study and Phase III will include tasks that would pave the way
for construction and implementation of the North District Recycled Water Project.
Director Robak inquired when Phase I of the implementation study was provided
to the agencies.Environmental Compliance Specialist Coburn-Boyd indicated
that Sweetwater Authority has had a copy of the study for a month and they are
preparing a staff report to present the study to their board on February 11,2009
as an informational item.The RWQCB has had the study for about two weeks.
They were optimistic that the District could amend its permit to allow the use of
recycled water in the North District.It is expected that we would have comments
back within 60 days.
b)INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING THE PROPOSED MIDDLE
SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN GROUNDWATER WELL PILOT
PROJECT
Engineering Manager Peasley introduced Dr.Michael Welch who has been
instrumental in the Middle Sweetwater River efforts dating back to the 1990's.
He indicated that Dr.Welch is the local expert in the Middle Sweetwater Basin
and will be assisting the District to assure the project goes smoothly.
REPORTS
12.GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Watton indicated with regard to the District's 36-inch Pipeline
Project that the District has experienced some delay with regard to the Caltrans
permit,mainly due to the District's former consultant's work.He indicated that
staff is working with Caltrans and it is expected that the permit will be acquired,
however,it will delay the project a couple more months.He indicated that there
9
are penalties for not taking the water on time and the district will need to
negotiate the penalties which may be subject to discussions with the District's
former consultant.
He indicated that he has received good feed back on the Annual Employee
Recognition Luncheon held on January 21,2009 and wished to commend the
staff that coordinated the luncheon.
He noted that water use is down approximately 6%which is on track with other
county agencies.He indicated that staff will be reviewing the CWA allocation
details which will be reported in his General Manager Report each month.He
indicated that this will allow the board to track the District's customer water use
and actual results against the allocation program.He stated that the allocation
program may be instituted as early as April.
He indicated that the District is experimenting with wireless infrastructure at the
treatment plant.He stated that this will ultimately lead to improvements for the
District's Scada System and communications with outlying facilities,enhanced
security,and eventually remote automated meter reading.
He stated that staff is beginning to work on the Fiscal Year 2010 budget.He
indicated that there will be items in the budget that will be very dynamic such as
water supply and cost.Staff is also monitoring the expense side and avoiding
any costs possible without harming the District's mission.He stated that it will be
a very exciting budget in trying to balance water supply,costs and conservation.
General Manager Watton also shared that staff has issued the RFP for audit
services.He stated that staff will be reviewing the responses with the Finance,
Administration and Communications Committee in March.
San Diego County Water Authority Update:
President Croucher indicated that he has been reappointed to several CWA
committees including the Small Contractor Outreach and Opportunities Program
(SCOOP)Committee,SANDAG and the Ad Hoc Conservation Committee.He
indicated that conservation remains one of the key focuses as it is the lowest
cost water resource (water that is saved).He stated that $190 to $200 is spent
an AF for conserved water versus $800 AF that is spent to physically bring the
water to San Diego.He stated that a special committee has been formed with
Ms.Fern Steiner as chair and President Croucher as co-chair to discuss water
conveyance issues.He stated that the MWD budget continues to be another
issue of focus as there is a possibility that there will be a 21 %rate increase this
year.This worries all the retail agencies in the County.He stated that the
Oroville Reservoir is extremely low,the snow pack levels are at 64%of normal
and the Bay Delta is still an issue.We will continue to have tough water issues
to work through.
10
General Manager Watton indicated that he attended CWAlMWD meetings this
morning and it was discussed that the MWD rate increase rnay be as high as
35%to be effective January 2010.CWA is looking at approximately a 20%
increase also effective January 2010.
He also shared with regard to the Council of Water Utilities that the bylaws
indicate a rotation for the position of chair and vice chair between the north and
south agencies.He indicated this year,Helix Water District is chairing and their
board president is the chair.Next year a district from the north chairs,Vallecitos
Water District,and their board president will chair.The following year,the
bylaws indicate that a south agency will chair and their general manager would
hold the chairmanship and the next year,the north will chair with their general
manager chairing,etc.He indicated that Otay Water District is on the rotation
next year to chair the Council of Water Utilities once a month and he would be
chair.
13.DIRECTORS'REPORTS/REQUESTS
Director Breitfelder indicated that,from General Manager Watton's report,he
understands that there is a director from CWA who made the observation that not
only the retail agencies need to tighten their belt.He stated that that comment
resonated with him and,he is certain,with others as well.General Manager
Watton indicated that that certainly is an active area of conversation with both
MWD and CWA.Director Breitfelder thanked Chief Financial Officer Beachem
for the return on LAIF which have been very good.
Director Robak indicated that the Water Conservation Garden is trying to prepare
for the many people who will want information on what they can do to cut back on
their landscape watering when the cutbacks and drought pricing goes into effect.
He stated that there are many choices at the Garden which can be
overwhelming.He stated that the staff of the Garden is working on developing
quick information pamphlets that include basic things that they can do to their
landscape to make it water efficient,the cost per square foot to make the
suggested changes,and where they can buy the plants/materials.He shared
that he was elected as the chair of the Metro Commission,the sewer agency for
San Diego County.He indicated that they are facing many issues at the Metro
Commission a.s well.He stated that the City of San Diego has just issued debt
and they are potentially asking the participating agencies to share in the cost.He
stated that,fortunately,Otay is a small contributor to the sewer flow and the
financial impact will be relatively minor to the district.
14.PRESIDENTS REPORT
Director Croucher also commended staff on the Employee Appreciation Event
and Director Breitfelder for his leadership in recognizing the possible duplication
of services through the Water Agencies Association quarterly dinners.He
acknowledged him for considering the publics interest in leading the discussion
of possibly dissolving the Water Agencies Association.He lastly shared that Ms.
11
Nora Jaeske,Conservation Action Committee,is stepping it up with the
homeowners associations in encouraging water conservation.He stated that if
there are ways the District can support her efforts,it should continue to do as she
is becoming a champion in the industry for water conservation.
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
15.CLOSED SESSION
The board recessed into closed session at 4:26 p.m.to discuss the following
matters:
b)CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL -POTENTIAL LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9(b)]
1 CASE
c)CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.8]
PROPERTY:INTENT TO PURCHASE WATER FROM A NEW SOURCE
AGENCY NEGOTIATORS:YURI CALDERON,MARK WATTON
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:GOUGH THOMPSON,NS AGUA,AND
OTHER POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POTABLE WATER AND/OR THEIR
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES,SUCCESSORS OR OTHER
AUTHORIZED ENTITIES
UNDER NEGOTIATION:PRICE AND TERMS OF ACQUISITION,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TIMING AND AMOUNT OF
ACQUISITION
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
16.REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION.THE BOARD
MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
The board reconvened at 5:25 p.m.General Counsel Calderon indicated that the
board took one action in closed session:
A motion was made by President Croucher,seconded by Director Bonilla and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
12
to authorize the General Manager to enter into a non-binding Letter of Intent to
acquire a new source of desalinated water for the District.
There were no other reportable actions taken in closed session.
17.ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board,President Croucher
adjourned the meeting at 5:26 p.m.
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
13
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 8a
,., .
May 13,2009TYPEMEETING:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
Regular Board
James Peasley ~~o~
Engineering Manager
Rod posad~~o~
Chief,Engineering
MEETING DATE:
PROJECT No.P2129-
001101
DIV.No.ALL
APPROVED BY:
(Ass!.GM):
SUBJECT:
Manny Magana
Assistant General Manager,Engineering and Operations
Award a Professional Engineering Services Contract to AECOM
for the Middle Sweetwater River Basin Groundwater Well Pilot
Project
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District)Board awards a Professional
Engineering Services Contract to AECOM for the Middle Sweetwater
River Basin Groundwater Well Pilot Project (MSR Well Pilot Project)
in an amount not to exceed $1,065,037 (see Attachment B for project
location map).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board approval authorizing the General Manager to enter
into a Professional Engineering Services Contract with AECOM in an
amount not to exceed $1,065,037 for the MSR Well pilot Project.
ANALYSIS:
At the February 4,2009 Board Meeting staff presented a Staff Report
that provided information regarding the proposed MSR Well pilot
Proj ect.
The development and/or acquisition of potential groundwater supply
projects by the District have evolved and have been resurrected in
response to the regional water supply issues related to
climatological,environmental,legal,and other challenges that have
impacted regional water source supply conditions,such as the court
rulings regarding the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and the spiraling
water pricing pressures.Local ground water supply projects will
allow for less reliance upon imported water,achieve a level of
independence of the regional wholesale water agencies,and diversify
the District's water supply portfolio consistent the District's March
2007 Integrated Water Resources Plan.
Also,proposed land use development projects planned to be served by
the District,that are not currently within the jurisdictions of the
San Diego County Water Authority (Water Authority)and the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California will likely be
required,as a condition of annexation,to be supplied by alternative
water resources to 100%offset their projected potable water supply
requirements.
As a result,and in recognition of the need to develop sufficient
alternative water supplies,the District is taking the next step
towards development of a production groundwater well within the
Middle Sweetwater River Basin which is the implementation of a well
pilot project.This new additional water supply project had been
thoroughly studied and documented in the 1990's in cooperation with
Sweetwater Authority.
The Middle Sweetwater River Basin is located within the Sweetwater
River watershed and is that reach of the river from Sweetwater
Reservoir to the upstream Loveland Reservoir.See Attachment B for a
map of the Middle Sweetwater River Basin.It is known that the
higher quality groundwater is located in the vicinity of what was
once called the Singing Hills Golf Course (i.e.,in the upper portion
of the Middle Sweetwater River Basin).
The ultimate objective of the District is to develop a groundwater
well production system within the Middle Sweetwater River Basin
capable of producing a sustainable yield of potable water as a local
supply.
The purpose of the MSR Well pilot Project is to identify the
feasibility of developing a groundwater resource production system
and to determine and assess any limitations or constraints that may
arise.
The MSR Well Pilot Project scope of work will accomplish seven
primary goals as follows:
•Updating project setting information presented in prior reports.
•Updating project alternatives analyses presented in prior
reports.
•Developing a groundwater well pilot project implementation plan.
2
I
I
•Planning,design,construction,and implementation of test pilot
monitoring and extraction wells.
•Develop cost and feasibility recommendations,an implementation
plan,and scope of work for production facilities to extract the
amount of purveyed retail water from the groundwater supply at a
sustainable yield of potable water.
•Develop cost and feasibility recommendations for potential
imported untreated groundwater recharge system and for expanded
groundwater production facilities capable of producing an
enhanced sustainable yield of potable water.
•Develop an implementation plan and identify the scope of work
for tasks required to develop the recommended future groundwater
recharge and expanded production facilities.
The project concept and scope of work has been discussed with
Sweetwater Authority staff and they provided comments which are
incorporated into the scope of work.Sweetwater Authority staff
prepared an informational report to share the intent of the MSR Well
Pilot Project with their Board at their February 11,2009 meeting.
The groundwater conjunctive use concept planned to be developed is
described as the extraction of the quantity of water from the
groundwater basin that was placed there by customers of the District
by means of their use of imported treated water that contributed to
the overall volume of groundwater within the basin.This quantity
has been estimated to be on the order of 12.5%of the total
consumption of the District customers within that basin,as measured
by their water meters.In the 1994/1995 timeframe 810 acre-feet per
year was the estimated quantity that was placed into the groundwater
basin.Currently,that 12.5%quantity could be on the order of 1,000
acre-feet per year.The scope of work will address this concept
while further development of the groundwater basin as an additional
supply resource is appropriately considered.
Further development of the groundwater basin to enhance the total
groundwater production,may be accomplished by the District by means
of additional extraction (i.e.,a quantity of water from the
groundwater basin that is placed there by means of either injection
and/or spreading basins using imported untreated water as the
resource supply).The existing La Mesa Sweetwater Extension
Pipeline,owned and operated by the Water Authority,once converted
to an untreated water delivery system,could be the conveyance system
to transport untreated water for this conjunctive use concept.
These two distinct water resource supply conjunctive use concepts are
to be addressed so they may coexist and to allow for their
development in separate phases.
3
r
The scope of work to complete the MSR Well Pilot Project consists of
many major tasks and is to address the groundwater supply concepts
outlined above.
The primary desired outcome of the MSR Well Pilot Project is for the
engineering consultant to determine and make recommendations if it is
financially prudent and physically feasible to develop a groundwater
well production system within the Middle Sweetwater River Basin
capable of producing a sustainable yield of up to 1,500 acre-feet per
year of potable water for the District.If it is deemed that a
Middle Sweetwater River Basin Groundwater Well Production Project is
viable then the consultant will develop and provide a groundwater
well production project implementation plan and related scope of
work.
In accordance with Policy 21,the District solicited professional
engineering services from consulting firms to accomplish the MSR Well
Pilot Project by placing an advertisement on the District's website
on February 17,2009 and in various publications including the
following:
Date of
Advertisement Publication
2-19-2009 San Diego Union Tribune
2-18-2009 Bid America
2-18-2009 Engineering and General Contractors Assoc.
2-18-2009 San Diego Daily Transcript
2-18-2009 Construction Bid Source
Fifteen (15)firms submitted a letter of interest along with a
statement of qualifications.The request for proposal and scope of
work for professional engineering services was sent to all fifteen
firms resulting in four (4)written proposals received on or before
March 19,2009 from the following consulting firms:
Original Proposed Final Proposed
Consulting Firms Fee Fee
AECOM $1,004,537.00 $1,065,037.00
WorleyParsons $1,680,490.00
HDR $1,707,794.00
CH2M Hill $1,732,054.50
The selection panel evaluated and scored all written proposals.The
selection panel was comprised of four staff members,Jim Smyth of
Sweetwater Authority,and Michael Welch (consultant).Staff decided
to invite all four firms to make a presentation and be interviewed.
4
After completion of the presentations and interviews,the panel
completed the consultant ranking process and concluded that AECOM was
very qualified,with the best overall proposal,and provided the best
value.References for AECOM were checked and they received high
ratings.A summary of the complete evaluation is shown in Attachment
C.Staff anticipated that the fee level for the MSR Well Pilot
Project would be on the order of $1,200,000.
Staff and Michael Welch met with AECOM on April 14,2009 to review
and discuss the scope of work and negotiate the proposed fee.Mutual
understanding of the District's expectations and desired outcomes
were achieved,resulting in minor scope of work and fee revisions.
Staff added $10,000 for addition geophysical testing,added $10,500
for a security guard for the drilling rig,and added an optional
scope of work item at $40,000 for additional environmental work for
the potential of a production well system.Staff is confident that
AECOM will perform at a very high standard.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total budget for the Capital Improvement Program (CIP)Project
P2129,the Groundwater Exploration Program,as part of the approved
FY2009 CIP budget,is $2,530,000,which is to be used for the MSR
Well Pilot Project for the remainder of the current fiscal year.
Expenditures to date are $582,985.Total expenditures,plus
outstanding commitments and estimated staff time,including this
contract,totals $1,730,000.
Based on a review of the budget the Project Manager has determined
the budget is deemed sufficient to support this project.As a part
of the fiscal year 2010 budget development and approval process,a
CIP project for the MSR Basin Groundwater Well System is being
developed for Board consideration.
Finance has determined that 100%of the funding is available from the
Expansion Fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The Middle Sweetwater River Basin Groundwater Well Pilot Project
support the District's Mission Statement,"To provide the best
quality of water and wastewater service to the customers of the Otay
Water District,in a professional,effective,and efficient manner"
and the Otay strategic goal,in planning for infrastructure and
supply to meet current and future potable water demands.
5
I
I
I
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
P:\jpeasley\Middle sweetwater River Basin (P2129l\BD 05-13-09,Staff Report,Consultant Selection Awat:d MSR to AECOM,(JP-RP).doc
JP/RP:j f
Attachments:Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
6
P2129-001101
COMMITTEE ACTION:
ATTACHMENT A
Award a Professional Engineering Services
to AECOM for the Middle Sweetwater River Basin
Groundwater Well Pilot Project
I
The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on April 22,2009.The following
comments were made:
•
•
•
•
Staff issued a RFP soliciting proposals for professional
engineering services to accomplish the Middle Sweetwater River
Basin Groundwater Well Pilot Project (MSR Well Pilot Project).
The District received fifteen (15)letters of interests from
engineering consulting firms.The request for proposal was sent
to all fifteen respondents and four (4)written proposals were
received.
After reviewing the written proposals,staff decided to
interview all four firms.The selection panel rated the written
proposals along with the presentations and interviews.The
panel selected AECOM as it was felt they had the best overall
proposal that provided the best value.AECOM has very good
qualifications and they received high ratings from their
references.Staff had projected that the fee for the project
would be about $1.2 million.
Staff met with AECOM to discuss the scope of work for the
project and negotiate the proposed fee.There were minor
additions made to the scope of work so that the desired outcome
on the project may be achieved.It was noted that a portion of
the additional scope for environmental work is optional($40,000
of $60,500)and mayor may not be required based on the outcome
of the pilot well efforts.
It was discussed that the fee amounts received from the other
firms were higher primarily because their proposals included
levels of effort beyond what had been requested within RFP.
7
•It was indicated that the Sweetwater Authority staff is
supportive of the project and participated in the evaluation of
the consultant firm proposals.
The committee supported presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
8
Middle Sweetwater RiverSystem Study
WaterResourcesAudit
ATTACHMENT B
2 2
FIGURE 2-'
June 1991
ValumRJ
ATTACHMENT C
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RANKINGS BY PANEL MEMBERS
Middle Sweetwater River Basin Groundwater Well Pilot Project (P2129)
(WRITTEN )ORAL'
TOTAL AVERAGE ReferencesSoundnessandAVERAGESCORESCOREQuafiflCationsofUnderstandingofViab~ity of Consultanfs Additional Strength ofproject Presentation,Qualityof
scope,schedule,Proposed Fee commitment SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL creativity,insight to communication response toStaffresourcesProposedloOSESCOREissuesmanagersk~ls questionsProjectPlan
SCORE 20 20 25 35 YIN 100 15 15 10 10 150"
MannyMaoana 19 19 23 .3S""96 15 14 10 10 145
Rod Posada 18 18 24 .as:..95 13 11 9 8 136
AECOM JimPeasley 18 15 18 iii Y 86 90 14 12 8 9 129 132 GoodRonRiDoomer181822_•.:.~93 13 12 9 9 136
JimSmoilh 17 16 14 .11S 82 10 13 7 6 118
Michael Welch 18 14 18 -a 85 11 13 9 10 128
MannvMaaana 17 18 19 21 75 11 12 7 7 112
RadPasada 16 16 20 21 73 11 12 8 6 110
WorteyParsons JimPeaslev 16 12 19 .L-y 68 72 9 9 8 6 100 108RanRiooeroer1515182169111178106
JimSmvth 18 16 18 .ll.73 13 13 9 8 116-Michael Welch 17 13 20 21 71 8 11 7 5 102
Manny Maoana 18 17 20 -_._19-74 12 13 9 9 117
RadPosada 17 15 21 ,i9'72 12 12 8 6 110
CH2MHiII Jim Peasley 20 18 19 .JJBL Y 76 72 13 10 10 10 119 112RanRiooeroer161518~68 12 11 7 8 106
JimSmvth 13 18 16 '::~_.66 13 11 8 8 106
Michael Welch 20 17 19 111 75 11 11 10 9 116
MannvMaaana 20 20 25 19 84 13 14 8 8 127
RadPosada 18 18 22 19 77 12 14 8 7 118
HDR Jim Peaslev 17 16 20 19 Y 72 75 8 13 7 7 107 113
Ran Riooeroer 17 17 21 19 74 12 14 8 8 116
JimSmvth 15 17 16 19 67 10 13 8 8 106
Michael Welch 17 16 21 Ill.-.-q'-~73 8 14 5 4 104
AGENDA ITEM 8b
STAFF REPORT
Finance
DIV.NO.
ALL
May 13 2009
W.O.lG.F.NO:
MEETING DATE:Re~glaroard
Bi •'ns,IT Operations
Manag r .#~
Geoffrey S~hief Information Officer
German Alv~istant General Manager,Administration and
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
APPROVED BY:
(Ass!.GM):
SUBMITTED BY:
TYPE MEETING:
SUBJECT:IT related Contracts for FY09 Needing Board Approval
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board approves the following purchase orders to cover
budgeted expenses for Fiscal Year 2009 to:
•Computer Masters,Inc.in the amount of $52,288 to cover
hardware costs of a Cisco LAN switch and services.
•Insight Enterprises,Inc.in the amount of $109,617 to cover
hardware costs of a Hewlett-Packard EVA and service maintenance.
•The Logicalis Group in the amount of $76,733 to cover hardware
costs of a Hewlett-Packard C-Class enclosure,four blade servers
and fiber switch.
•The Logicalis Group in the amount of $72,800 for services to
design,implement,and install a wireless broadband to connect
the Regulatory site and 30 MG Reservoir.
•Paradigm System Solutions,Inc.in the amount of $158,239 to
purchase 35 ruggedized Panasonic laptop computers for field
mobile staff.
COMMITTEE ACTION:-------
See attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To authorize the purchase of equipment and services necessary to
support both IT daily operations'and enhance District systems to meet
emerging business needs as identified in the District Strategic Plan.
ANALYSIS:
In conjunction with the Fiscal Year 2009 District budget the IT
Department presents to the Board specific technology related expenses
that require Board approval because they exceed the General
Manager's authorized approval limit of $50,000 for a specific
contract.These contracts and purchases are required to either
operate the District's technology environment or to make planned
technology related infrastructure improvements.Each item requiring
the District to issue a purchase order or contract for greater than
$50,000 is described in detail in the following section.This report
is assembled in parallel with the FY2009 Budget.All of the items in
this staff report are specifically itemized in the FY2009 Budget as
well.By presenting these items collectively,we want to provide to
the Board a more detailed view of expenses related to the Districts'
information systems.
All purchasing guidelines have been met for the specific items in
this report.Certain items are purchased utilizing state authorized
competitive contracts which guarantees competitive pricing.For the
specific capital items,including hardware upgrades,these items are
competitively bid.In each case we select the lowest bid but have
high confidence in the quality of service from the recommended firms.
Approval of these items at this time allows us to finalize contracts
and complete these projects by June 30,the end of the new fiscal
year.We have attempted,wherever possible to synchronize our
contract renewal dates with the District's fiscal year and budget
approval process.
The following are detailed descriptions of the specific requests:
Summary Table
VENDOR ITEM AMOUNT PURCHASE PROCESS FUNDING
Computer Masters,Cisco Core Switch $52,288 Competitive Bid CIP 2469
Insight HP Enterprise Virtual $109,617 Competitive Bid CIP 2469
Array (EVA)
Logicalis HP Enclosure Servers $76,733 Competitive Bid CIP 2469
and Switch
Logicalis Wireless services $72,800 Competitive Bid CIP 2469
CIP 2443
Paradigm System Panasonic Rugged $158,239 Competitive Bid CIP 2443
Solutions Laptops
TOTAL $469,677
Note:Funding is itemized in the FY2009 Otay Budget
Explanation of Costs
The Information Technology Department planned the following purchases
in the capital and operating budget requests the Board approved for
Fiscal Year 2009.
Wireless Network:
In the first half of Fiscal Year 2009,Otay Water's IT Department
finalized design of a wireless broadband connection to the Treatment
Plant,which is near completion.This project serves as a proof of
concept for future expansion to other core sites.The second phase
extends the wireless broadband connection to the Regulatory site and
30 MG Reservoir.This wireless broadband network provides high speed
connection toOtay Water's local area network,and establishes a
secure backbone on which SCADA,video surveillance,security and
access control traffic may travel.Future projects will extend the
wireless broadband connect to all core sites with significantly
improved secure access for field staff and operational savings to the
District.
Logicalis -$72,800.Services to install high speed wireless
connection to the Regulatory site and 30 MG Reservoir requires high
level implementation and hardware integration skills.It is estimated
we will utilize $72,800 of implementation services to properly
install,test,and implement this important upgrade.This expenditure
includes design and implementation and is exclusive of hardware such
as antennas,radios,solar backup power and cameras that will be
purchased separately.
Network Switch:
Computer Masters -$52,288.The core Cisco network switch is at end
of life and at capacity.Replacement of the switch will allow for
gigabit traffic to high end users and also allow for future expansion
and additional network connectivity.This critical device is no
longer supported by the manufacturer.
Colocation Hardware Enhancements:
Insight -$109,617.The Enterprise Virtual Array (EVA)will allow us
to do full data replication to our Disaster Recovery collocation
site.In the event of a disaster we would now be forced to use tape
backups and restoring data to a different platform.This may require
days before business resumption.With disk-to-disk replication,we
will have an immediate backup of all data in the same platform as our
data center,as this EVA is the same as the Data Center EVA.
Logicalis -$76,733.Hewlett-Packard C-Class Blade enclosure and
servers.The enclosure will house four servers and a fiber switch for
our DR collocation center.The enclosure and four servers will meet
our growing needs for the next fiscal year.They provide an
additional layer of compatibility in the event of a disaster.
Field Mobile Devices:
Paradigm System Solutions -$158,239.Our field mobile devices are
at capacity and end of life for our new GIS environment.IT
Operations and GIS staff carefully reviewed the best devices for our
current and future needs in consultation with our GIS and IMS
vendors.Staff researched available field mobile models and reached
consensus that Panasonic ruggedized laptop models F-8 and CF-30 offer
the best feature set and price.The new field mobile laptops have
FISCAL IMPACT:
Gobi (Verizon air cards)and Geographical Positioning Systems (GPS)
as well as touch screens for red-lining and bright sunscreen
displays.We will purchase 35 Panasonic Toughbook CF-30s at a unit
cost of $4,158 plus taxes and recycling fees.
~/6-
The items referenced above request a total of $469,677 budgeted from
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)funds.These items are also
specifically included in the recommended FY2009 Capital Budgets.
The approved total budget for CIP 2443 as approved in the FY 2009
budget is $250,000.Expenditures to date are $27,220.The remaining
balance for FY2009 is $222,780,all of which will be used in these
purchases.
The Project Manager anticipates,based on financial analysis,that
the budget will be sufficient to support this project.
Finance has determined that 100%of the funding for this project is
available from the Betterment Fund.
The approved total budget for CIP 2469 as approved in the FY 2009
budget is $500,000.Expenditures to date are $229,737,leaving a
current balance of $270,263.These purchases will expend $246,897
leaving a balance of $23,366.
The Project Manager anticipates,based on financial analysis,that
the budget will be sufficient to support this project.
Finance has determined that 100%of the funding for this project is
available from the Betterment Fund.
Funding Capital 2009 CIP 2009 Remaining These Ending
Source Project Budget Expenditures Balance Purchase Balance
Orders
CIP Field Mobile $250,000 $27,220 $222,780 $222,780 $0
2443
CIP IT Network &$500,000 $229,737 $270,263 $246,897 $23,366
2469 Hardware
TOTAL $493,043 $469,677 $23,366
These funds are budgeted,unencumbered,and funds are available for
these purchases.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
These items are in support of the District's Strategic Plan,
specifically the strategy of Business Efficiency.
•Develop and deploy the field wireless network for key
facilities.
•Develop optimized field work processing using integrated
technology.
•Optimize functionality,business continuity,bandwidth,and use
of SCADA.
•Update Security Assessment and implement Technology
Recommendations.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
General Manager
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
ATTACHMENT A
IT related O&M and Capital Contracts for FY09
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 29,2009.The
following comments were made:
•
•
•
The Fiscal Year 2009 budget outlines a number of items
critical for the support and infrastructure improvement for
the District's information systems.
Staff reaffirmed that the Information Technology plan still
fits the District's needs and performed an extensive bid
process.The District selected the lowest responsive
bidder in each case.The bid process reaffirmed that the
District is receiving competitive pricing.
The following equipment and services are planned for
purchase:
o A switch from Computer Masters at a cost of $52,288:
The District's switch is at capacity and is no longer
supported.Replacing the switch will allow for future
expansion and additional network connectivity.The
switch will be supported through CISCO and the VAR
(Value Added Reseller -Vendor that the switch was
purchased from)and the District's systems engineer is
receiving training from CISCO.
o EVA (HP Enterprise Virtual Array)from Insight at a
cost of $109,617:EVA will provide the ability to
fully-duplicate the District's data systems in the
District's Disaster Recovery collocation center.This
will provide immediate backup to all District data in
the event of a disaster.
o HP Enclosure and four (4)servers from Logicalis at a
cost of $76,733:The HP Enclosure will house four
servers and a switch for the District's Disaster
Recover collocation center.
o Wireless services from Logicalis at an annual cost of
$72,800:A wireless broadband connection was
I
I
I
•
•
installed to the Treatment Plant to test the
technology for future expansion to other core
facilities.This second phase will extend the
wireless broadband connection to the Regulatory site
and 30 MG Reservoir.The wireless broadband
connection will provide high speed connection to
Otay's local area network and will provide secure
services for SCADA,video surveillance and security.
The service will also allow extending such wireless
communications to other District facilities.
o Panasonic rugged laptops (35)from Paradigm System
Solutions at a cost of $158,239:The new laptops
would provide a higher quality platform to support the
new GIS environment.Some of the new technology
includes staffs'ability to see where facilities are
located in comparison to where they are standing.
Additionally,the District's existing tablets are over
four (4)years old,are at capacity,and are no longer
meeting the District's needs (end-of-life).It was
discussed that staff carefully looks at the life cycle
of equipment to ensure that equipment is only replaced
when they are mature and near the end of their life
cycle.The District's objective is to buy equipment
when it is in the upper third of the curve of its
lifecycle.The equipment then is kept for four to
five years as the technology matures.
The committee inquired if AT&T was not considered for
wireless service.Staff indicated that the District does
have AT&T services and the wireless broadband services from
Logicalis would provide backup services.Staff indicated
that all wireless access will be secure (encrypted).
The new technology will allow staff to inspect facilities
without having to go out to the facility and will lay the
groundwork for future boardband connections which allow the
District to receive meter reads without traveling the
service area.The technology will also allow the
monitoring of facilities with camera systems.If an object
enters a designated zone,it will send an alarm to the
monitoring station.Staff can also use the camera systems
to monitor fire within the District's service area and
share the images and information with emergency response
agencies.These technologies will make the District more
efficient and the new equipment and technology will
eventually pay for itself.
The committee supported presentation to the full board on the
consent calendar.
AGENDA ITEM Be
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY:Stephen DObraw~
Purchasing Manager
MEETING DATE:
W.O.lG.F.NO:
May 13,2009
DIV.NO.All
serVi~Rom Sarno
Chief,Ad~m.niSrative
German Alvar
Assistant 1 Manager,Administration and Finance
APPROVED BY:
(Asst.GM):
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
SUBJECT:DECLARATION OF SURPLUS,VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board declare the identified vehicles and equipment as
surplus to the District's needs.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See "Attachment A".
PURPOSE:
To present a list of vehicles and equipment
declaration that the items identified on the list
District's needs.
and obtain Board
are surplus to the
ANALYSIS:
Listed below is a list various vehicles and equipment that have been
determined by the user departments to be of no use,obsolete (spare
parts and service not available),beyond useful life and/or not cost
effective to repair or operate and therefore,surplus to the
District's needs.
Vehicles Identified as Surplus
Item Qty Description Reason for
Declaration--
No longer meets
District's
operational
1 1
2000 Ford F250 pickup truck,unit #116,specifications.No
VIN 1FTNX20LYEA99261,104,986 miles longer cost
effective to
maintain and
operate.
2 1
1999 GMC 2500 pickup truck,unit #109,Same as above.VIN 1GDGC24RXXF048649,112,232 miles
1998 Chevy 2500 pickup truck,unit #105,
3 1 miles,VIN 1GCGC24R5WE190612,136,476 Same as above.
miles
4 1 1997 Ford F250 pickup truck,unit #97,Same above.VIN 1FTHF25H6VEA68213,100,745 miles as
5 1 1992 Ford F250 pickup truck,unit #82,Same above.VIN 1FTHX25G6NKA29692,101953 miles as
6 1
1991 Ford F250 pickup truck,unit #57,Same above.VIN 1FTHF25G8MCA19560,37,245 miles as
Equipment Identified as Surplus
Item Qty Description Reason for
Declaration--
No longer meets
6"YellowMine high-line PVC pipe with operational
7 1440'couplers,gaskets and spines specifications or
requirements.No
longer required.
No longer meets
operational
8 1
Trailer mounted Kohler Gen Set,F/A specifications or
#2153 requirements.No
longer meets State
emission standards.
9 1 Trailer with generator housing,No longer required.#2WB02682
10 1 lot Misc.excavator buckets Same as above.
11 1 lot Misc.Tractor attachments including Same above.disc harrow as
Mikasa S#G1275,G1276,Not operable and
12 4 compactors not cost effectiveW1928,2-468 to repair.
13 3 Bulk fuel tanks No longer required.
Not operable and
14 1 Sign Board,FA#2142 not cost effective
to repair.
I:!
15 1 Case tractor,unit #392,S #5270257 No longer required.
16 1 Champion grade #1519,VIN Same above.710A15718424152 as
17 1 Caterpillar 235 Loader,S #3252101 Same as above.
Before the vehicles
cost exceeded $5000)
the items as surplus
and equipment (where the individual acquisition
can be disposed of,the Board must first declare
(ref:Purchasing Manual,Section 12).
The District's Purchasing Manual identifies the process for disposing
of material,equipment,and supplies that have been declared surplus.
It is the District's intention to dispose of the above identified
vehicles and equipment by sale through public auction.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The salvage value and associated gain or loss on items is not
determined until their disposal.Therefore,the fiscal impact of the
recommended action is not known at this time.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This action supports the District's goal to ensure financial health
through efficient operations.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments
Attachment A -Committee Action Statement
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
ATTACHMENT A
DECLARATION OF SURPLUS,VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration,and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 29,2009.The
following comments were made:
•
•
•
•
The District's code indicates that equipment identified as
surplus to the District's needs must be presented to the
board at a regularly scheduled meeting.The items
identified for surplus are listed in staffs'report.
Staff indicated that the vehicle and equipment identified
for surplus no longer meets the District's operational
specifications/requirements and are no longer cost
effective to maintain,operate or repair.Additionally,
some vehicles and equipment no long meet new regulatory air
requirements.
It was discussed that the District had decided last fiscal
year to move to maintaining vehicles in the fleet only
until their warrantee ended then they would be identified
for replacement (5 years or 60,000 miles).There are still
vehicles in the district's fleet that must be surplused as
they do not fall under this new strategy.They are older
vehicles such as the ones identified in the staff report
list.The new retention/replacement criteria allows the
District te obtain better cost recovery and it also saves
the District on maintenance costs.
There are provisions within the District's disposal
procedures that allow disposal of equipment to Mexico.
Staff has been contacting CESPT whenever equipment is being
surplused.CESPT did have an interest in pump sets that
the District had surplused,however,they had problems
transporting the equipment over the border.Staff also
offered cubic foot read RAMAR AMR meters to CESPT,which
they declined because they require metric read meters.
•It was indicated that the vehicles and equipment will be
disposed of through public auction.The benefit of
disposal through an auction house is they have expertise in
establishing market price.
The committee supported staffs'recommendation and presentation
to the full board on the consent calendar.
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 8d
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY:Armando Buelna ,II!?
Communications Officer
APPROVED BY:
MEETING DATE:
W.O.lG.F.NO:
May 13,2009
DIV.NO.All
SUBJECT:Amend existing Agreement with Marston+Marston Inc.Public
Relations Services
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Director amend the District's existing
agreement with Marston+Marston Inc.dated August 14,2007 to:
1.Increase the not-to-exceed value to $75,000 for FY-2009
2.Expand the Scope of Services to include;
a.Development of a Drought Communications Plan
b.In conjunction with staff,develop and implement the
Jamacha Pipeline Construction Community Outreach Plan
c.In conjunction with staff,develop a Bi-national
Desalination Facility Community Outreach Strategy;
3.Increase the Term of the Agreement through FY-2011 on a
year-to-year basis,provided the value of such services
does not exceed $90,000 in FY-2010 and FY-2011.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A
BACKGROUND
Board Policy establishes procedures governing the selection of
professional consultants in the performance of District work.
The policy sets forth procedures for selecting consultants for
contracts greater than $50,000.
The District currently has a time and service Agreement with
Marston+Marston Inc.for public and community relations work for
$49,000 per year.The Scope of Services includes producing
quarterly newsletters,an annual Consumer Confidence Report,
periodic bill inserts,translation services,graphic design,and
media relations strategies.
The District has since expanded the Agreement's Scope of
Services to include working with staff to develop a Drought
Communications Plan,a Jamacha Pipeline Construction Outreach
Plan,and a Bi-national Desalination Facility community and
media outreach strategy.As a result,the original Agreement
amount is not sufficient to cover the cost of the added
services.
Marston+Marston Inc.plays an important role in the development
and implementation of the District's community outreach plans
and programs.With the addition of several high profile issues
including the water supply shortage,the Jamacha Pipeline
construction project,and the first of its kind bi-national
seawater desalination agreement,the continuity of this effort
is critical.
Drought Communications Plan -At your January 7,2009 board
meeting,staff presented a Drought Communications Plan for your
Board's consideration.
Jamacha Pipeline Project Recognizing this major construction
project will affect residents along the alignment,a
Construction Outreach Plan was developed to foster understanding
and support for the project.Elements of the plan include
creating a dedicated website and phone hotline,project signage,
neighborhood meetings and ongoing communications with affected
communities.The plan's activities are expected to continue
through the fall of 2010.Outreach expenses are project at
$25,000 through the end of project.
Bi-national Seawater Desalination - A bi-national seawater
desalination facility would be a major source of new water for
the San Diego region.The outreach plan's goal is to develop the
messages,tools,and tactics to build regional support for this
exciting international venture.Expenses are projected to total
$35,000 through the end of FY-2011.
In conclusion,this action would obtain your Board's
authorization to:
1.Amend the existing Agreement with Marston+Marston Inc.to
extend its Term through the end of FY 2011;
2.Expand the Agreement's Scope of Services to include Drought
Communications,the Jamacha Pipeline Construction outreach,
and the Bi-national Desalination facility community,media,
and public outreach;
3.Increase the existing Purchase Order 708807 for FY-2009
from $49,000 to $75,000,and establish not-to-exceed
amounts of $90,000 for Fiscal Year 2010 and $90,000 for FY-
2011.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The total Fiscal Year 2009 budget for P2009 is $22,000,000.For
P2451,it is $5,000,000.Total expenditures,plus outstanding
commitments for P2009 are approximately $4,764.292,leaving a
balance of $17,235,708.Total expenditures for P2451 are
$161,001,leaving a balance of $4,838,999.
Based on a review of the budget by the Communications
Officer,funds are available and sufficient for the additional
public relations services included in the Agreement.Funds will
be expended in FY 2009,FY2010,and FY2011.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments
Attachment A -Committee Action Statement
Attachment B -Proposed Agreement for Public and Community Relations
Attachment C -Strikethrough copy of Agreement for Public and Community
Relations
ATTACHMENT A
Amend existing Agreement with Marston+Marston Inc.Public
SUBJECT/PROJECT:Relations Services
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 29,2009.The
following comments were made:
•
•
Staff is requesting that the Marston+Marston Inc.contract
be increased to $75,000 (from $49,000)for Fiscal Year 2009
and extended through Fiscal Year 2011 wherein the contact
amount will not exceed $90,000 in 2010 and 2011.
The District has expanded the scope of work from the
original agreement to include:
o Developing a Drought Communications Plan:This plan
was presented at the January 7,2009 board meeting and
includes outreach to the public and media to educate
them on the drought and water shortage.
o Developing an Outreach Plan for the Jamacha Pipeline
Construction Project:This is a major project that
will affect residents along the pipeline alignment and
the goal of the plan is to foster understanding and
support for the project.It includes creating a
dedicated website and a phone hotline,creating
project signage,holding neighborhood meetings and
communications with the communities impacted by the
project.
o Developing a Bi-national Desalination Facility
Community and Media Outreach Strategy:The goal of
the outreach is to build regional support and includes
the development of messages,tools and strategies to
promote support for the project as a new water source
for the San Diego Region.
•
•
•
Marston+Marston Inc.has been working with the District to
develop the plans and strategies so they may be deployed as
soon as they are needed.The following messages have been
integrated throughout all the plans:
o Conservation and Drought Preparedness
o Promoting more proactive/self-policing strategies for
conservation as opposed to neighbors reporting on
neighbors.
o The District is a good steward of the water systems
and has received recognition from the industry through
awards.
The District is also surveying its customers to receive
their feedback on how they will change their water use if
rates are increased due to the water shortage.The
feedback has been helpful.
The committee inquired if Marston+Marston Inc.had the
capacity to support the additional work.Ms.Myrna Marston
of Marston+Marston Inc.indicated that Otay Water District
is high on her firm's priority list and it will always
receive a large commitment from her organization.They have
been working with the District for eight years.
Following the discussion the committee supported staffs'
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
Attachment._B
CONTRACT FOR
PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS
THIS CONTRACT (herein "Agreement")is made and effective as of May 13,2009,by
and between the Otay Water District,a municipal water district organized pursuant to the
provisions ofthe Municipal Water District Law of 1911,commencing with Section 71000 of the
Water Code of the State of Califomia,as amended (herein "OWD")and Marston+Marston,Inc.
(herein "Vendor").
WHEREAS,OWD has identified specific public and community relations work for
which it requires consultant services;and
WHEREAS,this work is identified with the Agreement and with EXHIBIT "A",titled
"SCOPE OF SERVICES"and EXHIBIT "B",titled "SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION",and
WHEREAS,Vendor has offered to perform the proposed work in accordance with the
terms ofthis Agreement and as set forth in EXHIBIT "A"and EXHIBIT "B";
NOW,THEREFORE,the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.0 SERVICES OF VENDOR
1.1.Scope of Services.In compliance with all the terms and conditions of this
Agreement,the Vendor shall perform the work or services set forth in the Scope of Services
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.The Vendor warrants that all
work and services set forth in the Scope of Services will be performed in a competent,
professional and satisfactory manner.
1.2.Compliance With Law.All work and services rendered hereunder shall be
provided in accordance with all ordinances,resolutions,statutes,rules,and regulations of the
OWD and any Federal,State or local governmental agency ofcompetent jurisdiction.
1.3.Licenses,Permits,Fees and Assessments.The Vendor shall obtain at its
sole cost and expense such licenses,permits and approvals as may be required by law for the
performance ofthe services required by this Agreement.
Page 1 of7
2.0 COMPENSATION
2.1.Contract Sum.For the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement,and
costs incurred in connection therewith,Vendor shall be compensated in accordance with the
Schedule of Compensation attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this
reference.
2.2.Method of Payment.Provided that Vendor is not in default under the
terms of this Agreement,Vendor shall be paid monthly in accordance with the terms set forth in
Exhibit B.
3.0 COORDINATION OF WORK
3.1.Representative of Vendor.Myrna Marston is hereby designated as being
the principal and representative ofVendor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work
and services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith.
3.2.Contract Officer.Mark Watton,General Manager of the OWD,is hereby
designated as being the OWD representative authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the
work and services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (herein
"Contract Officer").The General Manager of OWD shall have the right to designate another
Contract Officer by providing written notice to Vendor.
3.3.Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment.Vendor shall not
contract with any person or entity to perform in whole or in part the work or services required
hereunder without the express written approval of OWD.Neither this Agreement nor any
interest herein may be assigned or transferred voluntarily or by operation of law,without the
prior written approval ofOWD.Any such prohibited assignment or transfer shall be void.
3.4.Independent Contractor.Neither OWD nor any of its employees shall
have any control over the manner,mode or means by which Vendor,its agents or employees,
perform the services required herein,except as otherwise set forth.Vendor shall perform all
services required herein as an independent contractor of OWD and shall remain under only such
obligations as are consistent with that role.Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner
represent that it or any ofits agents or employees are agents or employees ofOWD.
4.0 INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
4.1.Insurance.The Vendor shall procure and maintain,at its sole cost and expense,in
a form and content satisfactory to OWD,during the entire term ofthis Agreement including any
extension thereof,a policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per
occurrence basis in an amount not less than either (i)bodily injury liability limits of $250,000.00
per person and $500,000.00 per occurrence and property damage liability limits of $100,000.00
per occurrence and $250,000.00 in the aggregate or (ii)combined single limit liability of
$500,000.00.Said policy shall include coverage for owned,non-owned,leased and hired cars.
The above policy of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name OWD,its
directors,officers,employees and agents as additional insureds.The insurer shall waive all rights
Page 2 of7
of subrogation and contribution it may have against OWD,its directors,officers,employees and
agents and their respective insurers.The policy ofinsurance shall provide that said insurance may
not be amended or canceled without providing thirty (30)days prior written notice by registered
mail to OWD.In the event said policy of insurance is canceled,the Vendor shall,prior to the
cancellation date,submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Section 4.1 to the
Contract Officer.No work or services under this Agreement shall commence until the Vendor
has provided OWD with Certificates of Insurance or appropriate insurance binders evidencing
the above insurance coverages and said Certificates of Insurance or binders are approved by
OWD.
CANCELLATION:
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30)
DAYS ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED THEREIN.
Initials
The provisions of Section 4.1 shall not be construed as limiting in any way the extent to
which the Vendor may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any persons or
property resulting from the Vendor's activities or the activities of any person or persons for which
the Vendor is otherwise responsible.
The insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by
companies qualified to do business in California,rated "A"or better in the most recent edition of
Best Rating Guide,The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register,and only if they are of a
financial category Class VII or better,unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager
ofOWD due to unique circumstances.
4.2.Indemnification.The Vendor agrees to indemnify OWD,its directors,
officers,agents and employees against,and will hold and save them and each ofthem harmless
from,any and all actions,suits,claims,damages to persons or property,losses,costs,penalties,
obligations,errors,omissions or liabilities,including applying any legal costs,attorneys fees,or
paying any judgment (herein "Claims or Liabilities")that may be asserted or claimed by any
person,firm or entity arising out ofor in connection with the negligent performance ofthe work
or services of Vendor,its agents,employees,subcontractors,or invitees,provided for herein,or
arising from the negligent acts or omissions of Vendor hereunder,or arising from Vendor's
negligent performance of or failure to perform any term,provision covenant or condition ofthis
Agreement,but excluding such Claims or Liabilities to the extent caused by the sole negligence
or willful misconduct ofOWD.
5.0 TERM
5.1.Term.This Agreement shall be effective as of May 13,2009.Unless
earlier terminated in accordance with Section 5.2 below,this Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect until June 30,2010.In addtion,District has the option to extend this Agreement
for the period from July 1,2010 to June 30,2011 by providing written notice to the Vendor,on
Page 3 0[7
or prior to June 1,2010,ofDistrict's election to extend the tenn hereof.Such notice will include
a description of any changes to the services required by the District during FY2011.
5.2.Tennination Prior to Expiration ofTenn.Either party may tenninate this
Agreement at any time,with or without cause,upon ten (10)days written notice to the other
party.Upon receipt ofthe notice oftennination,the Vendor shall immediately cease all work or
services hereunder except as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer.In the event
oftennination by OWD,Vendor shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior
to the effective date of the notice of tennination and for such additional services specifically
authorized by the Contract Officer.OWD shall be entitled to reimbursement for any
compensation paid in excess ofthe services rendered.
6.0 MISCELLANEOUS
6.1.Covenant Against Discrimination.The Vendor covenants that,by and for
itself,its heirs,executors,assigns and all persons claiming under or through them,that there shall
be no discrimination against or segregation of,any person or group ofpersons on account ofrace,
color,creed,religion,sex,marital status,national origin,or ancestry in the perfonnance of this
Agreement.The Vendor shall take affinnative action to ensure that applicants are employed and
that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race,color,creed,religion,
sex,marital status,national origin or ancestry.
6.2.Non-liability of District Officers and Employees.No officer or employee
of OWD shall be personally liable to the Vendor,or any successor in interest,in the event ofany
default or breach by OWD or for any amount which may become due to the Vendor or to its
successor,or for breach ofany obligation ofthe tenns ofthis Agreement.
6.3.Conflict of Interest.No officer or employee of OWD shall have any
financial interest,direct or indirect,in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee
participate in any decision relating to the Agreement which affects his financial interest or the
financial interest of any corporation,partnership or association in which he is,directly or
indirectly,interested,in violation ofany State statute or regulation.
The Vendor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not payor give any
third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
Initials
6.4.Notice.Any notice demand,request,document,consent,approval,or
communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person
shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid,first-class mail,in the case of
OWD,to the General Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer,OWD,2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd.,Spring Valley,CA 91978,and in the case ofthe Vendor,to the person
at the address designated on the execution page ofthis Agreement.
6.5.Interpretation.The tenns of this Agreement shall be construed in
accordance with the meaning ofthe language used and shall not be construed for or against either
Page 4 of?
partyby reason ofthe authorship ofthis Agreement or any other rule of construction which might
otherwise apply.
6.6.Integration:Amendment.It is understood that there are no oral
agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes
and cancels any and all previous negotiations,arrangements,agreements and understandings,if
any,between the parties,and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement.This Agreement
.may be amended at any time by the mutual consent ofthe parties by an instrument in writing.
6.7.Severability.If any part of this Agreement shall be declared invalid or
unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree ofa court of competent jurisdiction,such invalidity
or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are
hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties
hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party ofthe
basic benefit oftheir bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
6.8.Waiver.No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a
non-defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.
A party's consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring the party's consent or
approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party's consent to or
approval of any subsequent act.Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and
shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this
Agreement.
6.9.Corporate Authority.The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of
the parties hereto warrant that (i)they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement
on behalf of said party;(ii)the executing and entering into this Agreement does not violate any
provision ofany other Agreement to which said party is bound.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as
ofthe date first written above.
OTAy WATER DISTRICT
Mark Watton,General Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Yuri Calderon,General Counsel
VENDOR:
By:_
Myrna Marston
Page 5 of?
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
.All items described herein shall be provided by Vendor as part ofhis compensation to further
OWD's objectives regarding water delivery and supply,as such objectives are described below
and may be further described to Vendor by the Contract Officer in writing during the Term of
this Agreement:
1.The Vendor shall produce a quarterly OWD newsletter and electronic newsletter in
coordination with Contract Officer or his designee.
2.The Vendor shall produce an annual Consumer Confidence Report in coordination
with the Contract Officer or his designee to be completed for mailing prior to July 1st
ofthe OWD fiscal year.
3.The Vendor shall provide OWD with as-needed media relations strategy,coordination
and assistance.
4.The Vendor shall provide OWD with as assigned periodic bill inserts.
5.The Vendor will provide OWD with as-needed media relations and outreach
assistance including graphics support in-house or by subcontract.
6.The Vendor will provide OWD with special projects assistance as assigned.
7.Vendor shall provide direct or subcontracted editing,proofreading,or translation to
Spanish services for OWD.
8.Vendor shall provide as assigned assistance developing or implementing a
Drought/Supply Shortage Communication Plan.
9.Vendor shall provide as assigned assistance implementing the OWD Jamacha
Pipeline Community Outreach Plan.
10.Vendor shall provide as-assigned assistance developing the OWD Bi-national
Desalination outreach plan.
Page 6 of7
3.
4.
5.
EXHIBITB
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
1.Vendor shall submit separate monthly invoices describing in detail the services
and tasks performed during the prior calendar month for items in EXHIBIT "A",1
through 8,9,and 10.
2.Compensation will be at an average billing rate of$85 per hour for project
management and $175 per hour for senior staff in items 1 through 8 in EXHIBIT
"A".
Compensation will be at an average billing rate of$85 per hour for project
management and $175 per hour for senior stafffor a sum not-to-exceed $25,000
for work and services performed in EXHIBIT "A",item 9;and, $85 per hour for
project management and $175.per hour for senior staff for a sum not-to-exceed
$35,000 for work and services performed in EXHIBIT "A"item 10.
Vendor will be reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
the performance ofthe work identified in EXHIBIT "A".Prior to receiving
reimbursement,Vendor shall estimate potential expenses and obtain the written or
electronic approval ofthe Contract Officer or designee before incurring expenses.
Vendor shall submit to OWD detailed receipts and a detailed invoice for said out-
of-pocket expenses.
Each invoice is payable within thirty (30)days ofacceptance of the invoiced
amounts by OWD.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,it is agreed and undertood that aggregate compensation to
Consultant for services rendered (i)from July 1,2008 to June 30,2009,shall not exceed
$75,000;(ii)from July 1,2009 to June 30,2010,shall not exceed $90,000;and (iii)from July
1,2010 to June 30,2011 shall not exceed $90,000.
Page 7 of7
Attachmen-t C
CONTRACT
FOR
PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY RELATIONS
___THIS CONTRACT (A:GREEMENT),herein "Agreement")is made this-l41B day August 2007and
effective as of May 13,2009,by and between the Otay Water District,a California 8peeialmunicipal
water district organized pursuant to the provisions ofthe Municipal Water District,hereinafter referred
te-as-!!.Law of 1911,commencing with Section 71000 ofthe Water Code ofthe State ofCalifornia,
as amended (herein "OWD!!.:}and Marston+-Marston,Inc.,hereinafter referred to as "Vendor".(herein
"Vendor").
___WHEREAS,OWD has identified specific public and community relations work for which it
requires consultant services;and
___WHEREAS,this work is identified within thiswith the Agreement and withi&-with EXHIBIT
"A",titled "SCOPE OF SERVICES"and EXHIBIT "B",titled "SCHEDULE OF
COMPENSATION4~and
___WHEREAS,Vendor has offered to perform the proposed work in accordance with the terms
ofthis Agreement and as set forth in EXHIBIT "A"and EXHIBIT "B";
NOW,THEREFORE,in eonsideratioa of the muwaleo¥ooants aad agreemeats ofthe parties eoataiaed
and refereReed hereia,the OWD aad Vendor hereby hereto agree as follows:
1.0 __SERVICES
VENDOR
OF
______1.1.-Scope of Services.In compliance with all the terms and conditions of this
Agreement,the Vendor shall perform the work or services set forth in the "8COPE OF
8ERVICE8"Scope of Services attached hereto as EXHIBIT "Exhibit A"as requested by OWD and
incorporated herein,-by reference.The Vendor warrants that all work and services set forth in the
"8COPE OF 8ERVICE8"Scope of Services will be performed in a competent,professional and
satisfactory manner.
Page 1 of 11
_____1.2.-Compliance With Law._All work and services rendered hereunder shall be
provided in accordance with all ordinances,resolutions,statutes,rules,and regulations of the
OWD and any Federal,State or local governmental agency of competentjurisdiction.
______1.3.-License&,Permit&,Fees and Assessments.The Vendor shall obtain,at its
sole cost and expense,such licenses,permits and approvals as may be required by law for the
performance ofthe services required by this Agreement.
__COMPENSA
TION
______2.1.Contract Agreement Sum.For the services rendered pursuant to this
Agreement,and costs incurred in connection therewith,Vendor shall be compensated in accordance
with the "SCHEDlJT...,E OF COMPENSATION"Schedule ofCompensation attached hereto as Exhibit ~B!.!
and incorporated herein by this reference.
2.2.Method of Payment._Provided that Vendor is not in default under
the terms of this Agreement,Vendor will 13reseat the OWD with ashall be paid monthly iavoiee of
serviees 13edoffiled as 13fO'lided fur ia Exhibit "R".SHbjeet to in accordance with the terms aad eoaditioas set
forth in Exhibit ~B",the OWD shall13ay the iavoiee \'lithia 45 days of its 13reseatmeat to the OWD.
__3.0 COORIDNATION COORDINATION OF WORK
I 3-.1.-Representative of Vendor._Myrna Marston is hereby designated as being the
principal and representative of Vendor authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the work and
services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith.
_____3.2.-Contract Officer.The-Mark Watton,General Manager of the OWD,ef-his
desigaee,is hereby designated as being the OWD representative to the OWD authorized to act in its
behalf with respect to the work and services specified herein and make all decisions in connection
therewith (!.!herein "Contract Officer-').The Geaeml Maaager's desigaee shall be desigaated ia 'Nritiag to
Veador,othen'lise oBly the COBtFaet Offieer shall aet oa behalfofOWD").The General Manager ofOWD shall
have the right to designate another Contract Officer by providing written notice to Vendor.
I 3.3.-Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment._Vendor shall not contract
with any person or entity to perform in whole or in part the work or services required hereunderIwithouttheexpresswrittenapprovalofOWD._Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be
Page 2 of 11
assigned or transferred voluntarily or by operation oflaw,without the prior written approval ofOWD.
Any such prohibited assignment or transfer shall be void.
_____3.4.-Independent Contractor._Neither OWD nor any of its employees shall have any
control over the manner,mode or means by which Vendor,its agents or employees,perform the
services required herein,except as otherwise set forth._Vendor shall perform all services required
herein as an independent contractor of OWD and shall remain under only such obligations as are
consistent with that role._Vendor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any ofits
agents or employees are agents or employees ofOWD.
____INSURANCE AND
INDEMNIFICATION
___4.1.-Insurance.The Vendor shall procure and maintain,at its sole cost and expense,in a
form and content satisfactory to OWD,during the entire term of this Agreement including any
extension thereof,a policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per
occurrence basis in an amount not less than either (i)bodily injury liability limits of $250,000.00 per
person and $500,000.00 per occurrence and property damage liability limits of $100,000.00 per
occurrence and $250,000.00 in the aggregate or (ii)combined single limit liability of $500,000.00.
Said policy shall include coverage for owned,non-:owned,leased and hired cars.
___The above policy of insurance shall be primary insurance and shall name OWD,its directors,
officers,employees and agents as additional insured§.The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation
and contribution it may have against OWD,its directors,officers,employees and agents and their
respective insurers.The policy of insurance shall provide that said insurance may not be amended or
canceled without providing thirty (30)days prior written notice by registered mail to OWD.In the event
said policy of insurance is canceled,the Vendor shall,prior to the cancellation date,submit new
evidence ofinsurance in conformance with this Section 4.1 to the Contract Officer.No work or services
under this Agreement shall commence until the Vendor has provided OWD with Certificates of
Insurance or appropriate insurance binders evidencing the above insurance 6o,'eragecoverages and said
Certificates ofInsurance or binders are approved by OWD.
CANCELLATION:
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BECA~rCELLEDCANCELEDBEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DAT THEREOF,THE ISSUING COMPANY SHALL MAIL THIRTY (30)
IM¥DAYS ADVANCE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED THEREIN.
[to be initialed]
______________________Initials~==========
Page 3 of 11
AgeDt
___The Venaor l:lnaerslanas that the provisions ofthis-Section 4.1 shall not be construed as limiting in
any way the extent to which the Vendor may be held responsible for the payment of damages to any
persons or property resulting from the Vendor's activities or the activities of any person or persons for
which the Vendor is otherwise responsible.
___The insurance required by this Agreement shall be satisfactory only if issued by companies
qualified to do business in California,rated "A"or better in the most recent edition of Best Rating
Guide,The Key Rating Guide or in the Federal Register,and only if they are of a financial category
Class VII or better,unless such requirements are waived by the Risk Manager of OWD due to unique
circumstances.
______4.2.-Indemnification.The Vendor agrees to indemnify OWD,its directors,officers,
agents and employees against,and will hold and save them and each ofthem harmless from,any and
all actions,suits,claims,damages to persons or property,losses,costs,penalties,obligations,errors,
omissions or liabilities,including applying any legal costs,attorneys fees,or paying any judgment
(herein %laims"Claims or liabilities")Liabilities")that may be asserted or claimed by any person,firm or
entity arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work or services of
Vendor,its agents,employees,subcontractors,or invitees,provided for herein,or arising from the
negligent acts or omissions of Vendor hereunder,or arising from Vendor's negligent performance of
or failure to perform any tenn,provision covenant or condition ofthis Agreement,but excluding such
elaimsClaims or liabilitiesLiabilities to the extent caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of
OWD.
5.0 TERM
______5.1.-Term.This agreementAgreement shall be in full terce on a month to month basis l:lntil
sl:lch timeeffective as the agreement isofMay 13,2009.-Unless earlier terminated as proyiaea in accordance
with Section 5.2 ef.below,this agreementAgreement shall continue in full force and effect until June 30,
2010.In addtion,District has the option to extend this Agreement for the period from July 1,2010 to
June 30,2011 by providing written notice to the Vendor,on or prior to June 1,2010,of District's
election to extend the term hereof Such notice will include a description of any changes to the
services required by the District during FY2011.
______5.2.-Termination Prior to Expiration ofAgreement.Term.Either party may terminate
this Agreement at any time,with or without cause,upon ten (l0)days written notice to the other party.
Upon receipt of the notice of termination,the Vendor shall immediately cease all work or services
hereunder except as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer._In the event oftermination
by OWD,Vendor shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date
of the notice of termination and for such additional services specifically authorized by the Contract
Officer.OWD shall be entitled to reimbursement for any compensation paid in excess of the services
rendered.
(j.O MISCELI"~EOUS
MISCELLANEOUS
6.0
______6.1.Covenant Against Discrimination.The Vendor covenants that,by and for
itself,its heirs,executors,assigns and all persons claiming under or through them,that there shall be
Page 40f 11
no discrimination against or segregation of,any person or group of persons on account of race,color,
creed,religion,sex,marital status,national origin,or ancestry in the performance ofthis Agreement.
The Vendor shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees
are treated during employment without regard to their race,color,creed,religion,sex,marital status,
national origin or ancestry.
6.2.Non Liabilitvliability of District Officers and Employees._No officer or
employee of OWD shall be personally liable to the Vendor,or any successor in interest,in the event
of any default or breach by OWD or for any amount which may become due to the Vendor or to its
successor,or for breach ofany obligation ofthe terms ofthis Agreement.
6.3.Conflict of Interest.No officer or employee of own shall have any financial
interest,direct or indirect,in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any
decision relating to the Agreement which affects his financial interest or the financial interest of any
corporation,partnership or association in which he is,directly or indirectly,interested,in violation of
any State statute or regulation._
The Vendor warrants that it has not paid or given and will not payor give any third
party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.
Initials
______6.4.-Notice.Any notice demand,request,document,consent,approval,or
communication either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be
in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid,frrst-:class mail,in the case ofOWD,to the
General Manager and to the attention of the Contract Officer,OWD,2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.,
Spring Valley,CA 91978,and in the case ofthe Vendor,to the person at the address designated on the
execution page ofthis Agreement.
______6.5.-Interpretation.The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance
with the meaning ofthe language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason
ofthe authorship ofthis Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.
______6.6.-Integration:Amendment.It is understood that there are no oral agreements
between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any
and all previous negotiations,arrangements,agreements and understandings,if any,between the
parties,and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement._This Agreement may be amended at any
time by the mutual consent ofthe parties by an instrument in writing.
6.7.-Severability.IR the eveRt that If any part of this Agreement shall be declared
invalid or unenforceable by a valid judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction,such
invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which
are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent ofthe parties hereunder
unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party ofthe basic benefit of
their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.
Page 5 of 11
6.8.-Waiver._No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-
defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.A party's
consent to or approval of any act by the other party requiring the party's consent or approval shall not
be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the other party's consent to or approval of any subsequent
act,.Any waiver by either party ofany default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver ofany other
default concerning the same or any other provision ofthis Agreement~
6.9.-Corporate Authority._The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the
parties hereto warrant that (I)sueh party is duly organized and existing,(IIi)they are duly authorized to
execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party,-trn.Jii)the executing and entering into
this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed and entered into this Agreement as of
the date first written above.
OTAY WATER DUnRiCT BY:
Mark Watton
Interim General Manager
APPROVED A.8
TO FORM:
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
8tephen Doarawa,
OWD PurehasingMark Watton,General Manager _
APPROVED AS
TO Cill-lTENTFORM:
Yuri Calderon,
OWI)..General Counsel
Page 6 of 11
MARSTON &MARSTON BY;
Page 7 of 11
VENDOR:
By:
________________________Myrna Marston-
ChiefExee.Offieer
Page Page 8 of of11
EXHIBIT~A!.!
SCOPE OF SERVICES
All items described herein shall be provided by Vendor as part ofhis compensation to further-
OWD's objectives regarding water delivery and supply.Objeetives,as such objectives are described
below and may be further described to Vendor by the Contract Officer in writing during the Term
ofthis Agreement:
1.The Vendor shall produce ~quarter1y OWD newsletters and electronic newsletters in
coordination with Contract Officer or his designee.
2.The Vendor shall produce an annual Consumer Confidence Report in coordination
with the Contract Officer or his designee to be completed for mailing prior to MyJuly
1st ofthe OWD fiscal year.
3.The Vendor shall provide OWD with as-needed media relations strategy,coordination
and implementatioH assistance.-
4.The Vendor shall provide OWD with as assigned periodic bill inserts.
5.The Vendor will provide OWD with as-_needed media relations and outreach
assistance including graphics support in-house or by subcontract.
6.The Vendor will provide OWD with special projects assistance as-_assigned.-
Vendor shall provide direct or sub eOHtraetcontracted editing--aad,proofreading,or translation
serviees to Spanish services for OWD.
Page Page 9 of of 11
7.
8.Vendor shall provide as assigned assistance developing or implementing a
Drought/Supply Shortage Communication Plan.
9.Vendor shall provide as assigned assistance implementing the OWD Jamacha
Pipeline Community Outreach Plan.
10.Vendor shall provide as-assigned assistance developing the OWD Bi-national
Desalination outreach plan.
Page Page 10 of of 11
EXHIBIT ==B!!
SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
1.CORlflensation will be at an average billing rate of$85 per hO\lr for the projeet
management and graphie design staff,and $175 per hO\lr for senior stafffer a sum not to
exeeed $4,(;)(;)(;).(;)(;)per month fer serviees deseribed inEXHIBIT "A".
2.Vendor shall provide OWD with invokes showmg the work perfoFffied for the previo\ls
month ofthe TeFffi,iael\lding a detailed deseription oftasks perfoFffied for O',vD.
3."\There the serviees deseribed in EXHIBIT "A"exeeed $4,(;)(;)(;).00 per month,Vendor
shall estimate tees and sosts in advanse for additional work,and obtain either written or
eleetroais approv:al from the Contrast Offieer or designee prior to sommeaeing work.
4.Ifprojeeted hO\lFS in any oae given month exeeed $4,(;)(;)(;).(;)(;)per month,the Vendor shall
bill at an hoOOy rate of $85 per hOl:lf fer the projeet management and graphie design staff,
and $175 per hO\lr fer senior staff\lpon approval by the Contrast Offiser or designee.
I,~Vendor shall submit separate monthly invoices describing in detail the services
and tasks perfonned during the prior calendar month for items i!1 EXHIBIT "A"1
through 8,9,and 10.
2.Compensation will be at an average billing rate of$85 per hour for project
management and $175 per hour for senior staffin items 1 through 8 in EXHIBIT
3.Compensation will be at an average billing rate of$85 per hour for project
management and $175 per hour for senior staff for a sum not-to-exceed $25,000
for work and services perfonned in EXHIBIT "A",item 9;and,$85 per hour for
project management and $175 per hour for senior stafffor a sum not-to-exceed
$35,000 for work and services perfonned in EXHIBIT "A"item 10.
4.Vendor will be reimbursed for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
the perfonnance ofthe work identified in "E](hibit "".'.EXHIBIT "A".Prior to
receiving reimbursement,Vendor shall estimate potential expenses and obtain the
written or electronic approval ofthe Distriet Contract Officer or designee before
incurring expenses._Vendor shall submit to the Distriet OWD detailed receipts and
a detailed invoice for said out-of.:pocket expenses.-
5.Each invoice is payable within thirty (30)days ofacceptance ofthe invoiced
amounts by OWD.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,it is agreed and undertood that aggregate compensation to
Consultant for services rendered (i)from July 1,2008 to June 30,2009,shall not exceed
$75,000;(in from July 1,2009 to June 30,2010,shall not exceed $90,000;and (iii)from July
1,2010 to June 30,2011 shall not exceed $90,000.
Page Page 11 of of 11
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 9a
.,
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board MEETING DATE:May 13,2009
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
SUBMITTED BY:Lisa Coburn-Boyd 0(l!8 PROJECT:
Environmental Compliance
Specialist
Ron Ripperger ~
Engineering Manager
Rod posada~~.
Chief,Engineering
R2058-001101 DIV.NO.1&2
R2077-001101
R2087-001101
Award of a Professional Environmental Consulting Services
Contract for the Otay Mesa Recycled Water Supply Link System
Pipelines Project
APPROVED BY:
(Asst.GM):
SUBJECT:
Manny Magan (
Assistant Gener 1 Engineering and Operations
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District)Board awards a
Professional Environmental Consulting Services Contract to ICF
Jones &Stokes for the Otay Mesa Recycled Water Supply Link
System Pipelines Project in an amount not to exceed $213,087
(see Attachment B for location maps).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board approval authorizing the General Manager to
enter into a Professional Environmental Consulting Services
Contract in an amount not to exceed $213,087 to ICF Jones &
Stokes for the Otay Mesa Recycled Water Supply Link Pipelines
Project.
ANALYSIS:
The District is committed to expanding the use of recycled water
in order to minimize its overall demand for potable water.One
of the areas not currently served with recycled water is the
Otay Mesa service area.In order to expand our distribution
system to supply this area,the Otay Mesa Recycled Water Supply
Link Project is currently being designed.This project consists
of three pipelines,the Wueste Road pipeline (R2058),the Alta
Road pipeline (R2077),and the Airway/La Media Road pipeline
(R2088).Once they are constructed,these pipelines will convey
recycled water to the Otay Mesa 860 Pressure Zone.
The environmental compliance for the project is a necessary
component of the planning and design phases.A Request for
Proposals to provide the environmental review and compliance for
the construction of the three pipelines was issued on
January 26,2009 to twelve consulting firms.These twelve firms
submitted Letters of Interest and Statements of Qualifications
in response to the advertisement for environmental services for
the project.On February 12,2009,five proposals were received
from the following firms,RECON,Helix Environmental Planning,
PBS&J,ICF Jones &Stokes,and BRG Consulting.
In accordance with the District's Policy 21,staff evaluated and
scored all written proposals and selected the top three firms
(PBS&J,BRG Consulting,and ICF Jones &Stokes)for formal oral
interviews.The interview selection panel was comprised of five
(5)Staff members.After completion of the interviews,the
panel completed the consultant ranking process and concluded
that ICF Jones &Stokes was the most qualified consultant,with
the best overall proposal.References for ICF Jones &Stokes
were checked and received high ratings.A summary of the
complete evaluation is shown in Attachment C.
District Staff met with ICF Jones &Stokes to negotiate the fee
and review the proposed scope of work.Mutual understanding of
the District's expectations and desired results were achieved,
resulting in a lower revised fee.Staff is very confident that
ICF Jones &Stokes will perform to a very high level.
FISCAL IMPACT.~
The funding ~or the environmental compliance for the Otay Mesa
Recycled Water Supply Link Project will be available from the
budgets of the CIP projects,R2058,R2077,and R2087.The
approved total budget for R2058 is $2,876,234 and expenditures
to date are $37,315.The approved total budget for R2077 is
$4,079,349 and expenditures to date are $68,145.The approved
total budget for R2087 is $2,038,249 and the expenditures to
date are $73,240.
2
The Project Manager has determined that the funds available in
the budgets will be sufficient for the environmental services
contract and will be used proportionally to the extent of
environmental work needed for each pipeline.A portion of the
funds will be expended in FY 2009,but the majority of the funds
will be expended in FY 2010.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This project supports the District's Mission Statement,"To
provide the best quality of water and wastewater service to the
customers of the Otay Water District in a professional,
effective,and efficient manner."This project also supports
the District's strategic goal of creating a comprehensive
environmental program that is proactive in response to
environmental compliance.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
P:\WORKING\CIP R2058\Staff Reports\BD 05-13-09,Staff Report,Otay Mesa Pipelines Environmental
Contract,(LC-B-RR).doc
Attachments:Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
3
'SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2058-001101
R2 077- 0011 01
R2087-001101
ATTACHMENT A
Award of a Professional Environmental Consulting Services
Contract for the Otay Mesa Recycled Water Supply Link
System Pipelines Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 22,2009.The
following comments were made:
•
•
•
•
Staff indicated that this project consists of three (3)
pipelines which will expand the use of recycled water into
the Otay Mesa service area.The pipelines projects are the
Wueste Road Pipeline,the Alta Road Pipeline and the
Airway/La Media Road Pipeline.
The location of the proposed pipelines were indicated on a
map of the District's service area.It was discussed that
the Wueste Road Pipeline would be installed mainly within
the roadway and would follow the many curves in Wueste
Road.The line will connect into the Alta Road Pipeline
and Alta Road will connect into the Airway/La Media Road
Pipeline.
The Pipelines Project is in the first phase of the design
stage and environmental compliance is a necessary component
of the planning and design phases.An RFP was sent to 12
consulting firms for the provision of environmental review
and compliance services for the construction of the three
pipelines._Six proposals was received.
A panel of five (5)staff members reviewed the proposals
and scored and ranked them according to the selection
process.The three (3)top firms,PBS&J,BRG Consulting,
and ICF Jones &Stokes,were selected for oral interviews.
The panel selected ICF Jones &Stokes as the most qualified
consultant.Staff felt that they had a clearer
understanding of the compliance issues that would need to
be resolved for the Pipelines Project and that they were
more qualified to do the work.
•
•
•
•
Staff indicated,of the three top firms selected for
interview,ICF Jones &Stokes had the highest proposed fee.
Staff met with ICF Jones &Stokes to negotiate the fee and
review the proposed scope of work.Their fee was
negotiated down to $213,078.
It was discussed that the project is approaching 30%design
completion and there are some environmental issues that
would need to be resolved before the District can move
further.Those issue include:
o Potential impact from construction noise in the
vicinity of sensitive receptors.
o Potential significant indirect impact from
construction noise to sensitive bird species in the
biological habitat.
o Potential significant traffic impact from temporary
closure of access to recreation areas and pathways
during construction.
o Potential significant impact to water quality from
locating the reclaimed water line in proximity to a
drinking water reservoir.
o Potential significant traffic impact from the closure
of access to businesses and traffic congestion at
intersections during construction.
o Potential significant impact to cultural and
biological resources from construction of pipeline
within undeveloped area.
It was indicated that specific environmental issues
included impact to vernal pools,impact to the Quino
Checkerspot Butterfly Habitat,lake access disruption and
the proximity of a portion of the pipeline to the Otay
Lakes Reservoir.It was discussed that there have been no
history of breaks and air-vacs and blow-offs will be
installed at grade,so they will not accidentally be hit.
It was noted that there are recycled lines already
installed in the area,so this project is not precedent
setting.Staff is prepared to address the issue.
It was discussed that the District's contract with the City
of San Diego for recycled water is "take or pay."When the
contract was negotiated,the concerns of drought cutbacks
and slowed growth was not an issue.Staff is exploring
other areas where recycled water can be used so the
District can utilize the recycled water it has contracted
to take annually.
t1Ii
t
:
!I1:
•It is expected that construction on the Wueste Road
pipeline will begin in FY 2010 and in FY 2011 construction
will continue onto Alta Road and then to the Airway/La
Media Road pipeline.Contruction of the three (3)
pipelines is expected to be completed in FY 2012.
•The demand on the Otay Mesa recycled system is expected to
be 300 AF for current connected customers This will
increase the demand on the District recycled system by 10%.
It was discussed that the Electric Plant,which is planned
in the area,will be air cooled and will not utilize
recycled water.However,if they should change their
plans,then there would be a large increase in recycled
water demand.
•It was discussed that the conversion of Industrial to
Residential land use in the Otay Mesa area has been halted
at this time.No additional development in the area is
currently planned.
•Customers in the Otay Mesa area include the Otay Mesa Power
Plant,the De la Fuente Plant,and Otay Mesa area
businesses'irrigation.
•The committee inquired with regard to the "Summary of
Proposal Rankings by Panel Members,"if staff had adjusted
Jones &Stokes "Proposed Fee"score from "21"to "17"
because of the outcome of the negotiations with them on
their fee.Staff indicated that they had not,their score
for "Proposed Fee"was "21"prior to negotiations and this
score should have been reflected in the summary chart.It
is a typographical error.The committee asked staff to
confirm the numbers and requested that the item be
presented as an action item.
The committee supported presentation to the full board as an
action item and requested that staff verify the "Proposed Fee"
score and based on the correct score,would make a
recommendation to the full board.
Attachment B
R2087 Wueste Rd.Pipeline
R2058
Airway/La Media Rd.
Pipeline
Attachment C (Revised)
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RANKINGS BY PANEL MEMBERS
<Otay Mesa Recycled Water Supply Link Pipelines Project>
(WRmEN ~ORAL'
Soundness and TOTAL AVERAGE References
Qualifications of UndefS1andinga Viability of Consultant's AVERAGE Additional creativity,Strength of project Presentation,Quality of SCORE SCOREscope,schedule Proposed Fee commitment SUBTOTAL SUBTOTAL communication responsetoStaffresources'Proposed 100BE SCORE insight to issues manager skills questionsProjectPlan
SCORE 20 20 25 35 YIN 100 15 15 10 10 lSO-PasslFail
UsaCobum-B<Jyd 18 17 20 33 88 12 11 7 7 125
RogerHolly 17 18 22 33 gO 11 12 8 7 128
BRG DamelKiJy 17 18 22 33 Y 90 88 12 11 7 7 127 125
BobKonnedy 18 16 18 33 __...!l_5__10 11 7 7 120
RonRipperger 17 17 22 33 89 11 11 6 7 124
~m-B<Jyd 19 17 22 19 77
__Ro erHoIly'15 17 21 19 72
Helix DanielKa~18 17 22 19 Y 76 76 Did NotInterview
BobKennedy 20 16 20 19 75
Ron Ripperger 18 18 23 19 78
UsaCoburn-Bovd 20 -19 2.'!._____~L__----~~--1---15 14 10 10 133
RogerHoIlv 17 18 21 21 77 14 14 10 9 124
Jones&Stokes Daniel KiJy 18 19 24 21 Y 82 81 14 14 10 10 130 128 Pass
BobKenne<ty 20 19 24 21 84 15 14 10 10 133
Ron Ripperger 17 17 21 21 76 13 13 9 9 120
UsaCobum-Boyd 10 13 14 29 66
RooerHoi/y 16 16 19 29 80
Kleinfelder DanielKiJv 19 17 19 29 y ___8_4__75 Did NotInterview
Bob Kennedv 16 12 14 29 71
RonRipperger 10 15 18 29 72
UsaCobum-B<Jvd 14 13 13 35 75 10 11 8 6 110
--Bs!B.erHolly 17 18 20 35 90 10 11 7 7 125
PBS&J DanielKay 17 18 23 35 Y 93 84 9 11 6 6 125 116
BobKennedy 16 .!.3 15 35 79 6 6 5 5 101
RonRipperger 15 15 20 35 85 11 11 7 7 121
Usa Cobum-Boyd 16 17 18 19 70
RogerHolly 15 17 18 19 ___6_9__
RECON Danie/Kay 17 16 18 19 Y 70 69 Did NolInterview
BobKennedy 16 14 16 19 65 I
RonRipperger 15 15 20 19 69 I
Consultant I Proposed Fee i Lowest Fee
I Score Adiusted Fee
fi!?~~_.___+.$187,311__+.!-ow~~t.E~"_L_~__-------&~~~i~i-__=:_r~_~~;~~;~-i--2~}io~o--±=_~L--~~-~--
-----~_es&StOl~LI $319~r.!l1%-90%~_I-_.17'$213,078
RECON 1 $320,052 ~]%-90%'17'
HELIX !$324444 101%-110%'17'
'Table is incorrect,not numbers in spreadsheet above.
IProoosed Fee I %Above
Consultant Lowest Fee Score Adjusted Fee
PBS&J I $187,311 Lowest Fee 35
BRG I $190,592 0-10%33
Kleinfelder I $234855 I 21-30%29
Jones &Stokes $319,059 61%·70%21 5213,078
RECON I $320,052 71%-80%19
HELIX I $324,444 71%-80%19
Corrected Table.
PM Signature:~~.':B~d.
QC Review:~\...C-<..-..-t'
Engineering Manager"ThrrA ~
AGENDA ITEM 10a
TYPE MEETING:
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
APPROVED BY:
(Asst.GM):
STAFF REPORT
Regular B0/!:nl/p,a,-MEETING DATE:
James CUd~~Manager W.O.lG.F.NO:Jo~em,Chief Financial Officer
German Al~sistant General Manager
May 13,2009
DIV.NO.All
SUBJECT:Adopt Resolution No.4134 to Implement the Proposed Identity
Theft Red Flags Policy,Policy No.51
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board adopt Resolution No.4134 to implement the
proposed Identity Theft Red Flags Policy (Policy No.51)(see
Attachment B).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
On November 9,2007,the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
published the Identity Theft Red Flag Rule,16 CFR Part 681 (see
Attachment 0),as a part of the implementation of the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003 (FACTA).All utilities
that provide water/wastewater service on credit (i.e.;send a
bill for past service),are required to develop a program to
comply with this rule.
ANALYSIS:
The Identity Theft Red Flag rule requires any creditor to
develop a program to detect,prevent,and mitigate identity
theft.Utility companies are specifically mentioned in the
definition of a creditor,so this rule clearly applies to water
and wastewater utilities.
A Red Flag is "a pattern,practice,or specific activity that
indicates the possible existence of identity theft."Identity
theft is defined as "a fraud committed or attempted using the
identifying information of another person without authority."
Identity thieves use other person's identifying information to
open new accounts and misuse existing accounts,creating havoc
for consumers and businesses.The FTC has issued a regulation
(the Red Flags Rules)requiring financial institutions and
creditors to develop and implement a written Identity Theft
Prevention Program ("Program")as part of FACTA.The FTC
regulation requires that the Program must:
1.Identify relevant red flags and incorporate them into the
Program.
2.Identify ways to detect red flags.
3.Include appropriate responses to red flags.
4.Address new and changing risks through periodic Program
updates.
5.Include a process for administration and oversight of the
Program.
The FTC regulation does not specify exactly how a Program must
be written.Rather,it provides illustrative examples of
suspicious documents and/or activities that might cause the
creditor to question the validity of the personal identifying
information being presented.It simply states:"The Program
must be appropriate to the size and complexity of the financial
institution or creditor and the nature and scope of its
activities."
The District is allowed to initiate whatever actions are deemed
most appropriate at the time a red flag is identified or
suspected,depending on the specific circumstances surrounding
the occurrence.Also,as the District upgrades current computer
software programs and capabilities,staff may implement new or
additional detection methods and responses that become available
with the new technology.
The Identity Theft Red Flags Policy being presented for the
Board's approval fulfills the five requirements listed above.
The policy also has been reviewed and discussed with the
District's auditors (Diehl,Evans &Company).The District's
customer service staff will oversee the daily activities related
to identity theft detection and prevention,ensure that all
members of the customer service staff are trained to detect and
respond to red flags,and provide ongoing oversight to ensure
that the program is effective.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
2
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Demonstrate financial health through formalized policies,
prudent investing,and efficient operations.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A)Committee Staff Report
B)Identity Theft Policy No.51
C)Resolution No.4134
D)Copy of Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR Part 681
E)Customer Service Red Flags
3
ATTACHMENT A
Adopt Resolution No.4134 to Implement the Proposed
SUBJECTIPROJECT:Identity Theft Red Flags Policy,Policy No.51
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration,and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 29,2009.The
following comments were made:
•The FTC has issued a regulation (Red Flags Rules)that
requires financial institutions and creditors to develop
and implement an Identity Theft Prevention Program.The
program should detect,prevent,and mitigate identity
theft.
•Utility companies are specifically mentioned in the
definition of creditor,so the Red Flags Rule applies to
the District.
•The FTC regulation does not specify exactly how a policy
must be written,but rather provides guidelines and
examples of suspicious documents and activities that might
cause the creditor to question the validity of the identity
of the individual.The program also must be appropriate to
the size and complexity of the organization.
•Staff has developed Board of Directors Policy 51,Identity
Theft Red Flags Policy,in response to the FTC regulations.
Staff is requesting that the board adopt Resolution No.
4134 implementing the policy.
•The committee inquired how it was determined that the
presented policy complies with the FTC regulation.Staff
indicated that Policy 51 was discussed with the District's
Auditor,Legal Counsel,Financial Consultant and the
Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)and they all
agree that the presented policy is valid and responds to
the FTC regulation requirements.
C:\Documents and Settings\susanc\Local Settings\Temporary Internet
Files\OLK86\CommMtgIdentityTheft051309.doc
•
•
•
It was indicated that the policy must be reviewed annually
and staff may,in future,make recommendation to revise the
policy as needed.
The committee inquired to what extent is the District
already doing what is in the policy.Staff indicated that
the District is already doing about 95%of what's in the
policy.The policy will formalize what has already been
implemented.Staff noted that one of the changes that came
out of the development of the policy is the District will
be incorporating passwords for the Eden System for a more
secure access to the customer data system.
The committee indicated that they wished to hear Legal
Counsel's feedback on the proposed policy.
The committee requested that this item be presented to the full
board as an action item so the board may receive Legal Counsel
Yuri Calderon's feedback on the proposed Identity Theft Red
Flags Policy.
Attachment B
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number Adopted Revised
IDENTITY THEFT RED FLAGS POLICY 51 5/13/09
PURPOSE
This policy is established to comply with regulations issued by the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC),16 CFR Part 681,as part ofthe implementation ofthe Fair and Accurate
Credit Transaction Act of2003 (FACTA).The FACTA requires that "financial institutions"
and "creditors"with "covered accounts"implement written programs which provide for
detection ofand response to specific activities ("red flags")that could be related to identity
theft.An FTC rule notice states that creditors include "utility companies,"and provides that
"utility accounts"are covered accounts.
SCOPE
The FTC regulations require the establishment ofan Identity Theft Prevention Program
("Program")that includes reasonable policies and procedures to:
1.Identify relevant red flags and incorporate them into the Program.
2.Detect red flags.
3.Include appropriate responses to red flags.
4.Address new and changing risks through periodic Program updates.
5.Include a process for administration and oversight of the Program.
BACKGROUND
Identity thieves use other person's identifying information to open new accounts and misuse
existing accounts,creating havoc for consumers and businesses.The FTC,the federal bank
regulatory agencies,and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)have issued
regulations (the Red Flags Rules)requiring financial institutions and creditors to develop and
implement written Identity Theft Prevention Programs as part ofFACTA.The Programs
must provide for the identification,detection,and response to patterns,practices,or specific
activities -known as "red flags"-that could indicate identity theft.
POLICY
1.Relevant Red Flags
Red flags are warning signs or activities that alert a creditor to potential identity theft.
The guidelines published by the FTC include 26 examples ofred flags which fall into the
five categories below:
•Alerts,notifications,or other warnings received from consumer reporting
agencies or service providers.
1
•Presentation ofsuspicious documents.
•Presentation of suspicious personal identifying information.
•Unusual use of,or other suspicious activity related to,a covered account.
•Notice from customers,victims ofidentity theft,or law enforcement authorities
regarding possible identity theft in connection with customer accounts.
After reviewing the FTC guidelines and examples,staffdetermined that the following red
flags are applicable to customer accounts.These red flags,and the appropriate responses,
are the focus of this Program.
•Suspicious Documents and Activities:
o Documents provided for identification appear to have been altered or
forged.
o The photograph,physical description,and/or other information on the
identification is not consistent with the physical appearance ofthe person
presenting the identification.
o Information on the identification is not consistent with readily accessible
information that is on file with the District.
o The customer does not provide required identification documents when
attempting to establish a utility account.
o A customer refuses to provide proof ofidentity or appropriate security
code information when discussing an established utility account.
o A person other than the account holder or co-applicant requests
information or asks to make changes to an established utility account.
o Mail sent to the customer is returned repeatedly as undeliverable although
transactions continue to be conducted in connection with the account.
• A customer notifies the District ofany ofthe following activities:
o Utility statements are not being received.
o Unauthorized changes to a utility account.
o Unauthorized charges on a utility account.
o Fraudulent activity on the customer's bank account or credit card that is
used to pay utility charges.
•The District is notified by a customer,a victim ofidentity theft,or a member of
law enforcement that a utilities account has been opened for a person engaged in
identity theft.
2.Detecting Red Flags
Red flags may be detected as employees interact with customers during the routine
handling ofnew and/or existing accounts.The following is a list ofdetection methods
that the District may use to prevent identity theft.
2
•Require customers to present government-issued identification information to
open a new account.Types ofnecessary information include:
o Name
o Address
o Phone number
o Photo identification
•Independently contact the customer (in the case ofphone or internet setup ofnew
accounts).
•When fielding a request to access and/or modify an existing account,verify
identity ofthe customer by requesting specific pieces ofpersonal identifying
information (identification similar to that used to open the account that matches
information on the Customer Information System).
•For online or automated phone system access of customer accounts,require the
establishment ofsecurity codes and/or questions during the initial set-up ofthe
account.
3.Responses to Red Flags
Ifpersonnel identify a red flag associated with a new or existing customer account,one or
more ofthe following actions will be taken to rectify the situation.
•Do not establish the utility account or make changes to an existing account until
the customer's identity has been confirmed.
•For an existing account,the District may discontinue the services associated with
that account and/or:
•Attempt to contact the customer independently,using information already on the
Customer Information System.
•Continue to monitor the account for evidence ofidentity theft and contact the
customer to discuss possible actions.
o Change the passwords,security codes,or other security devices that
permit access to an existing account.
o Reopen an existing account with a new account number.
o Close an existing account.
•Notify local law enforcement and provide them with all the relevant details
associated with the event.
4.Periodic Program Review and Updates
The Finance Department staff is required to prepare an annual report which addresses the
effectiveness ofthe Program,documents significant incidents involving identity theft and
related responses,provides updates related to external service providers,and includes
3
recommendations for material changes to the Program.Recommendations for changes
will be based on the following:
•Experience with identity theft.
•Changes to the types ofaccounts and/or programs offered.
•Implementation ofnew systems and/or new vendor contracts.
5.Administration and Oversight ofthe Program:
Specific roles are as follows:
•The Customer Service Manager will oversee the daily activities related to identity
theft detection and prevention,ensure that all members ofthe customer service
staffare trained to detect and respond to red flags,and provide ongoing oversight
to ensure that the Program is effective.
•The ChiefFinancial Officer will prepare the annual report,which reviews all
aspects ofthe Program as described above,and submit the report to the General
Manager.
•The General Manager will review the annual report and approve any
recommended changes to the Program,both annually and on an as-needed basis.
4
Attachment C
RESOLUTION NO.4134
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
OTAY WATER DISTRICT IMPLEMENTING
IDENTITY THEFT RED FLAGS POLICY (POLICY NO.51)
WHEREAS,the Otay Water District Board of Directors have
been presented with an Identity Theft Red Flags Policy for the
Otay Water Districti and
WHEREAS,the Identity Theft Red Flags Policy has been
reviewed and considered by the Board,and
WHEREAS,it is in the interest of the District to adopt the
Identity Theft Red Flags PolicYi and
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,DETERMINED AND ORDERED by
the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District that the
Identity Theft Red Flags Policy for the District,incorporated
herein by reference,is hereby adopted as the District's Identity
Theft Red Flags Policy.
PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of
Otay Water District at a board meeting held this 13th day of May
2009,by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
ATTACHMENT D
Friday,
November 9,2007
Part IV
Department of the Treasury
Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency
12 CFR Part 41
Federal Reserve System
12 CFR Part 222
Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation
12 CFR Parts 334 and 364
Department of the Treasury
Office of Thrift Supervision
12 CFR Part 571
National Credit Union
Administration
12 CFR Part 717
Federal Trade Commission
16 CFR Part 681
Identity Theft Red Flags and Address
Discrepancies Under the Fair and
Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003;
Final Rule
Federal Register/Vol.72,No.217/Friday,November g,2007/Rules and Regulations 63771
12.Personal identifying information
providedis associated with known
fraudulent activity as indicated by internal or
third-party sources used by the federal credit
union.For example:
a.The address on an application is the
same as the address provided on a fraudulent
application;or
b.The phone number on an application is
the same as the number provided on a
fraudulent application.
13.Personal identifying information
provided is ofa type commonly associated
with fraudulent activity as indicated by
internal or third-party sources used bythe
federal credit union.For example:
a.The address on an application is
fictitious,a mail drop,or prison;or
b.The phone number is invalid,or is
associated with a pager or answeringservice.
14.The SSN pI'Ovided is the same as that
submitted by other persons opening an
account or other members.
15.The address or telephone number
provided is thesame as or similar to the
account number or telephone number
submittedby an unusually large numberof
other persons opening accounts or other
members.
16.The person opening the covered
account or the member fails to provide all
required personal identifying information on
an application or in response to notification
that the application is incomplete.
17.Personal identifying information
provided is not consistent with personal
identifying information that is on file with
the federal credit union.
18.For federal credit unions that use
challenge questions,the person opening the
covered account or the member cannot
provide authenticating information beyond
that which generally would be available from
a wallet or consumer report.
Unusual Use of,or Suspicious Activity
Related to,the Covered Account
19.Shortly following the notice of a change
of address for a covered account,the
institution or creditor receives a request for
a new,additional,or replacement card or a
cell phone,or for the addition ofauthorized
users on the account.
20.A new revolving credit account is used
in a manner commonly associated with
known patterns of fraud patterns.For
example:
a.The majority ofavailable credit is used
for cash advances or merchandise that is
easily convertible to cash (e.g.,electronics
equipment or jewelry);or
b.Themember fails to make the first
payment or makes an initial paymentbut no
subsequent payments.
21.A covered account is used in a manner
that is not consistent with established
patterns ofactivity on the account.There is,
for example:
a.Nonpayment when there is no history of
late or missed payments;
b.A material increase in the use of
available credit;
c.A material change in purchasing or
spending patterns;
d.A material change in electronic fund
transfer patterns in connection with a deposit
account;or
e.A material changein telephone call
patterns in connection with a cellular phone
account.
22.A covered account that has been
inactive for a reasonably lengthy period of
time is used (taking into consideration the
type of account,the expected pattern ofusage
and other relevant factors).
23.Mail sent to the member is returned
repeatedly as undeliverable although
transactions continue to be conductedin
connection withthe member's covered
account.
24.The federal credit union is notified that
the member is not receiving paper account
statements.
25.The federal credit union is notified of
unauthorized charges or transactions in
connection with a member's covered
account.
Notice From Members,Victims ofIdentity
Theft,LawEnforcementAuthorities,or Other
Persons Regarding Possible Identity Theft in
Connection With Covered AccountsHeld by
the Federal Credit Union
26.The federal credit union is notified by
a member,a victim of identity theft,a law
enforcement authority,or any other person
thatithas opened a fraudulent account for
a person engaged in identity theft.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 681
Authority and Issuance
•Forthe reasons discussedin the joint
preamble,the Commission is adding
part 681 oftitle 16 ofthe Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 681-IDENTITY THEFT RULES
Sec.
681.1 Duties ofusers ofconsumer reports
regarding address discrepancies.
681.2 Duties regarding the detection,
prevention,and mitigation of identity
theft.
681.3 Duties of card issuers regarding
changes of address.
Appendix A to Part 68l-Interagency
Guidelines on Identity Theft Detection,
Prevention,and Mitigation
Authority:Pub.1.108-159,sec.114 and
sec.315;15 U.S.c.1681m(e)and 15 U.S.C.
1681c(h).
§681.1 Duties of users regarding address
discrepancies.
(a)Scope.This section applies to
users of consumer reports that are
subject to administrative enforcement of
the FCRA by the Federal Trade
Commission pursuant to 15 U.S.c.
1681s(a)(1)(users).
(b)Definition.For purposes of this
section,a notice ofaddress discrepancy
means a notice sent to a user by a
consumer reporting agency pursuant to
15 U.S.C.1681c(h)(1),that informs the
user ofa substantial difference between
the address for the consumer that the
user provided to request the consumer
report and the addressees)in the
agency's file for the consumer.
(c)Reasonable belief (1)Requirement
to form a reasonable belief A user must
develop and implement reasonable
policies and procedures designed to
enable the user to form a reasonable
belief that a consumer report relates to
the consumer about whom it has
requested the report,when the user
receives a notice of address discrepancy.
(2)Examples ofreasonable policies
and procedures.(i)Comparing the
information in the consumer report
provided by the consumer reporting
agency with information the user;
(A)Obtains and uses to verify the
consumer's identity in accordance with
the requirements of the Customer
Information Program (CIP)rules
implementing 31 U.S.c.5318(1)(31 CFR
103.121);
(B)Maintains in its own records,such
as applications,change of address
notifications,other customer account
records,or retained CIP documentation;
or
(C)Obtains from third-party sources;
or
(ii)Verifying the information in the
consumer report provided by the
consumer reporting agency with the
consumer.
(d)Consumer's address.(1)
Requirement to furnish consumer's
address to a consumer reporting agency.
A user must develop and implement
reasonable policies and procedures for
furnishing an address for the consumer
that the user has reasonably confirmed
is accurate to the consumer reporting
agency from whom it received the
notice of address discrepancy when the
user;
(il Can form a reasonable beliefthat
the consumer report relates to the
consumer about whom the user
requested the report;
(ii)Establishes a continuing
relationship with the consumer;and
(iii)Regularly and in the ordinary
course of business furnishes information
to the consumer reporting agency from
which the notice of address discrepancy
relating to the consumer was obtained.
(2)Examples ofconfirmation
methods.The user may reasonably
confirm an address is accurate by:
(il Verifying the address with the
consumer about whom it has requested
the report;
(ii)Reviewing its own records to
verify the address ofthe consumer;
(iii)Verifying the address through
third-party sources;or
(iv)Using other reasonable means.
(3)Timing.The policies and
procedures developed in accordance
63772 Federal Register/Vol.72,No.217/Friday,November 9,2007/Rules and Regulations
with paragraph (d)(I)ofthis section
must provide that the user will furnish
the consumer's address that the user has
reasonably confirmed is accurate to the
consumer reporting agency as part ofthe
information it regularly furnishes for the
reporting period in which it establishes
a relationship with the consumer.
§681.2 Duties regarding the detection,
prevention,and mitigation ofidentity theft.
(a)Scope.This section applies to
financial institutions and creditors that
are subject to administrative
enforcement of the FCRA by the Federal
Trade Commission pursuant to 15
U.S,c.1681s(a)(I).
(b)Definitions.For purposes of this
section,and Appendix A,the following
definitions apply:
(1)Account means a continuing
relationship established by a person
with a financial institution or creditor to
obtain a product or service for personal,
family,household or business purposes.
Account includes:
(i)An extension of credit,such as the
purchase of property or services
involving a deferred payment;and
(H)A deposit account.
(2)The term board ofdirectors
includes:
(i)In the case of a branch or agency
ofa foreign bank,the managing official
in charge ofthe branch or agency;and
(H)In the case ofany other creditor
that does not have a board ofdirectors,
a designated employee at the level of
senior management.
(3)Covered account means:
(i)An account that a financial
institution or creditor offers or
maintains,primarily for personal,
family,or household purposes,that
involves or is designed to permit
multiple payments or transactions,such
as a credit card account,mortgage loan,
automobile loan,margin account,cell
phone account,utility account,
checking account,or savings account;
and
(H)Any other account that the_
financial institution or creditor offers or
maintains for which there is a
reasonably foreseeable risk to customers
or to the safety and soundness of the
financial institution or creditor from
identity theft,including financial,
operational,compliance,reputation,or
litigation risks.
(4)Credit has the same meaning as in
15 U.S.c.1681a(r)(5).
(5)Creditor has the same meaning as
in 15 U.S.C.1681a(r)(5),and includes
lenders such as banks,finance
companies,automobile dealers,
mortgage brokers,utility companies,
and telecommunications companies.
(6)Customer means a person that has
a covered account with a financial
institution or creditor.
(7)Financial institution has the same
meaning as in 15 U.S.C.1681a(t).
(8)Identity theft has the same
meaning as in 16 CFR 603.2(a).
(9)Red Flag means a pattern,practice,
or specific activity that indicates the
possible existence ofidentity theft.
(10)Service providermeans a person
that provides a service directly to the
financial institution or creditor.
(c)Periodic Identification ofCovered
Accounts.Each financial institution or
creditor must periodically determine
whether it offers or maintains covered
accounts.As a part ofthis
determination,a financial institution or
creditor must conduct a risk assessment
to determine whether it offers or
maintains covered accounts described
in paragraph (b)(3)(H)ofthis section,
taking into consideration:
(1)The methods it provides to open
its accounts;
(2)The methods it provides to access
its accounts;and
(3)Its previous experiences with
identity theft.
(d)Establishment ofan Identity Theft
Prevention Program.(1)Program
requirement.Each financial institution
or creditor that offers or maintains one
or more covered accounts must develop
and implement a written Identity Theft
Prevention Program (Program)that is
designed to detect,prevent,and mitigate
identity theft in connection with the
opening of a covered account or any
existing covered account.The Program
must be appropriate to the size and
complexity of the financial institution
or creditor and the nature and scope of
its activities.
(2)Elements ofthe Program.The
Program must include reasonable
policies and procedures to:
(i)Identify relevant Red Flags for the
covered accounts that the financial
institution or creditor offers or
maintains,and incorporate those Red
Flags into its Program;
(ii)Detect Red Flags that have been
incorporated into the Program ofthe
financial institution or creditor;
(Hi)Respond appropriately to any Red
Flags that are detected pursuant to
paragraph (d)(2)(H)ofthis section to
prevent and mitigate identity theft;and
(iv)Ensure the Program (including the
Red Flags determined to be relevant)is
updated periodically,to reflect changes
in risks to customers and to the safety
and soundness of the financial
institution or creditor from identity
theft.
(e)Administration ofthe Program.
Each financial institution or creditor
that is required to implement a Program
must provide for the continued
administration of the Program and must:
(1)Obtain approval of the initial
written Program from either its board of
directors or an appropriate committee of
the board of directors;
(2)Involve the board of directors,an
appropriate committee thereof,or a
designated employee at the level of
senior management in the oversight,
development,implementation and
administration ofthe Program;
(3)Train staff,as necessary,to
effectively implement the Program;and
(4)Exercise appropriate and effective
oversight ofservice provider
arrangements.
(f)Guidelines.Each financial
institution or creditor that is required to
implement a Program must consider the
guidelines in Appendix A ofthis part
and include in its Program those
guidelines that are appropriate.
§681.3 Duties of card issuers regarding
changes ofaddress.
(a)Scope.This section applies to a
person described in §681.2(a)that
issues a debit or credit card (card
issuer).
(b)Definitions.For purposes ofthis
section:
(1)Cardholder means a consumer
who has been issued a credit or debit
card.
(2)Clear and conspicuous means
reasonably understandable and
designed to call attention to the nature
and significance ofthe information
presented.
(c)Address validation requirements.
A card issuer must establish and
implement reasonable policies and
procedures to assess the validity ofa
change of address if it receives
notification of a change of address for a
consumer's debit or credit card account
and,within a short period oftime
afterwards (during at least the first 30
days after it receives such notification),
the card issuer receives a request for an
additional or replacement card for the
same account.Under these
circumstances,the card issuer may not
issue an additional or replacement card,
until,in accordance with its reasonable
policies and procedures and for the
purpose of assessing the validity ofthe
change ofaddress,the card issuer:
(1)(i)Notifies the cardholder ofthe
request:
(A)At the cardholder's former
address;or
(B)By any other means of
communication that the card issuer and
the cardholder have previously agreed
to use;and
Federal Register/Vol.72,No.217/Friday,November 9,2007/Rules and Regulations 63773
(ii)Provides to the cardholder a
reasonable means ofpromptly reporting
incorrect address changes;or
(2)Otherwise assesses the validity of
the change of address in accordance
with the policies and procedures the
card issuer has established pursuant to
§681.2 ofthis part.
(d)Alternative timing ofaddress
validation.A card issuer may satisfy the
requirements of paragraph (c)ofthis
section if it validates an address
pursuant to the methods in paragraph
(c)(l)or (c)(2)of this section when it
receives an address change notification,
before it receives a request for an
additional or replacement card.
(e)Form ofnotice.Any written or
electronic notice that the card issuer
provides under this paragraph must be
clear and conspicuous and provided
separately from its regular
correspondence with the cardholder.
Appendix A to Part 681-Interagency
Guidelines on Identity Theft Detection,
Prevention,and Mitigation
Section 681.2 ofthis part requires each
financial institution and creditor that offers
or maintains one or more covered accounts,
as defined in §681.2(b)(3)ofthis part,to
develop and provide for the continued
administration of a written Program to detect,
prevent,and mitigate identity theft in
connection with the opening ofa covered
account or any existing covered account.
These guidelines are intended to assist
financial institutions and creditors in the
formulation and maintenance ofa Program
that satisfies the requirements of §681.2 of
this part.
I.The Program
In designing its Program,a financial
institution or creditor may incorporate,as
appropriate,its existing policies,procedures,
and other arrangements that control
reasonably foreseeable risks to customers or
to the safety and soundness ofthe financial
institution or creditor from identity theft.
II.Identifying Relevant Red Flags
(a)RiskFactors.A financial institution or
creditor should consider the following factors
in identifying relevant Red Flags for covered
accounts,as appropriate:
(1)The types of covered accounts it offers
or maintains;
(2)The methods it provides to open its
covered accounts;
(3)The methods it provides to access its
covered accounts;and
(4)Its previous experiences with identity
theft.
(b)Sources ofRed Flags.Financial
institutions and creditors should incorporate
relevant Red Flags from sources such as:
(1)Incidents of identity theft that the
financial institution orcreditor has
experienced;
(2)Methods ofidentitytheft that the
financial institution or creditor has identified
that reflect changes in identity theft risks;
and
(3)Applicable supervisory guidance.
(c)Categories ofRed Flags.The Program
should include relevant Red Flags from the
following categories,as appropriate.
ExampIes of Red Flags from each of these
categories are appended as Supplement A to
this Appendix A.
(1)Alerts,notifications,or other warnings
received from consumer reporting agencies or
service providers,such as fraud detection
services;
(2)The presentation ofsuspicious
documents;
(3)The presentation ofsuspicious personal
identifying information,such as a suspicious
address change;
(4)The unusual use of,or other suspicious
activity related to,a covered account;and
(5)Notice from customers,victims of
identity theft,law enforcement authorities,or
other persons regarding possible identity
theft in connection with covered accounts
held by the financial institution or creditor.
III.Detecting Red Flags
The Program's policies and procedures
should address the detection of Red Flags in
connection with the opening ofcovered
accounts and existing covered accounts,such
as by:
(a)Obtaining identifying information
about,and verifying the identity of,a person
opening a covered account,for example,
usingthe policies and procedures regarding
identification and verification set forth in the
Customer Identification Program rules
implementing 31 U.S.c.5318(1)(31 CFR
103.121);and
(b)Authenticating customers,monitoring
transactions,and verifying the validity of
change of address requests,in the case of
existing covered accounts.
IV.Preventing and Mitigating Identity Theft
The Program's policies and procedures
should provide for appropriateresponses to
the Red Flags the financial institution or
creditor has detected that are commensurate
with the degree of risk posed.In determining
an appropriate response,a financial
institution or creditor should consider
aggravating factors that may heighten the risk
ofidentity theft,suchas a data security
incident that results in unauthorized access
to a customer's account records held by the
financial institution,creditor,or third party,
or notice that a customerhas provided
informationrelated to a covered account held
by the financial institution or creditor to
someone fraudulently claiming to represent
the financial institution or creditor or to a
fraudulent website.Appropriate responses
may include the following:
(a)Monitoring a covered account for
evidence of identity theft;
(b)Contacting the customer;
(c)Changing any passwords, security
codes,or other security devices that permit
access to a covered account;
(d)Reopening a coveredaccount witha
new account number;
(e)Not opening a new covered account;
(f)Closing an existing covered account;
(g)Not attempting to collecton a covered
account or not selling a covered account to
a debt collector;
(h)Notifying law enforcement;or
(il Determining that no response is
warranted under the particular
circumstances.
V.Updating the Program
Financial institutions and creditors should
updatethe Program (including the Red Flags
determined to be relevant)periodically,to
reflect changes in risks to customers or to the
safety and soundness ofthe financial
institution or creditorfrom identity theft,
based on factors such as:
(a)The experiences of the financial
institution orcreditor with identity theft;
(b)Changes in methods ofidentitytheft;
(c)Changes in methods to detect,prevent,
and mitigate identity theft;
(d)Changes in the types of accounts that
the financial institution or creditor offers or
maintains;and
(e)Changes in the business arrangements
of the financial institution or creditor,
includingmergers,acquisitions,alliances,
jointventures,and service provider
arrangements.
VI.Methods for Administering the Program
(a)Oversight ofProgram.Oversight by the
board of directors,an appropriate committee
ofthe board,or a designated employee at the
level of senior management shouldinclude:
(1)Assigning specific responsibility for the
Program's implementation;
(2)Reviewing reports prepared by staff
regarding compliance by the financial
institution or creditor with §681.2 ofthis
part;and
(3)Approving material changes to the
Program as necessary to address changing
identity theft risks.
(b)Reports.(1)In general.Staffofthe
financial institution or creditor responsible
for development,implementation,and
administration ofits Program should report
to theboard ofdirectors,an appropriate
committee of the board,or a designated
employee at the level ofsenior management,
at least annually,on compliance by the
financial institution or creditor with §681.2
of this part.
(2)Contents ofreport.The reportshould
address material matters related to the
Program and evaluate issues such as:The
effectiveness of the policies and procedures
of the financial institution or creditorin
addressing the risk ofidentity theft in
connection with the opening ofcovered
accounts and with respect to existing covered
accounts;service provider arrangements;
significant incidents involving identity theft
and management's response;and
recommendations for material changes to the
Program.
(c)Oversight ofservice provider
arrangements.Whenever a financial
institution or creditor engages a service
provider to perform an activity in connection
with one or more covered accounts the
financial institution or creditor should take
steps to ensure that the activity of the service
provideris conducted in accordance with
reasonable policies and procedures designed
to detect,prevent,and mitigate the risk of
identity theft.For example,a financial
institution or creditor could require the
service provider by contract to have policies
and procedures to detect relevant Red Flags
63774 Federal Register/Vol.72,No.217/Friday,November g,2007/Rules and Regulations
that may arise in the performance of the
service provider's activities,and either report
the Red Flags to the financial institution or
creditor,or to take appropriate steps to
prevent or mitigate identity theft.
VII.Other Applicable Legal Requirements
Financial institutions and creditors should
be mindful ofother related legal
requirements that may be applicable,such as:
(a)For financial institutions and creditors
thatare subject to 31 U.S.C.5318(g),filing a
Suspicious Activity Report in accordance
with applicable law and regulation;
(b)Implementing anyrequirements under
15 U.S.c.1681c-l(h)regarding the
circumstances under which credit may be
extended when the financial institution or
creditor detects a fraud or active duty alert;
(c)Implementing any requirements for
furnishers of information to consumer
reporting agencies under 15 U.S.C.1681s-2,
for example,to correct or update inaccurate
or incomplete information,and to not report
information that the furnisher has reasonable
cause to believe is inaccurate;and
(d)Complying with the prohibitions in 15
U.S.C.1681m on the sale,transfer,and
placement for collection of certain debts
resulting from identity theft.
Supplement A to AppendixA
In addition to incorporating Red Flags from
the sources recommended in section II.b.of
the Guidelines in Appendix A of this part,
each financial institution orcreditor may
consider incorporating into its Program,
whether singly or in combination,Red Flags
from the following illustrative examples in
connection with covered accounts:
Alerts,Notifications or Warnings from a
ConsumerReporting Agency
1.A fraud or active duty alert is included
with a consumerreport.
2.A consumerreporting agency provides a
notice ofcredit freeze in response to a
request for a consumer report.
3.A consumerreporting agency provides a
notice ofaddress discrepancy,as defined in
§681.1(b)of this part.
4.A consumer report indicates a pattern of
activity that is inconsistent with the history
and usual pattern of activity ofan applicant
or customer,such as:
a.A recent and significant increase in the
volume ofinquiries;
b.An unusual number ofrecently
established credit relationships;.
c.A material change in the use of credit,
especially with respect to recently
established creditrelationships;or
d.An account that was closed for cause or
identified for abuse ofaccount privileges by
a financial institution or creditor.
Suspicious Documents
5.Documents provided for identification
appear to have been altered or forged.
6.The photograph orphysical description
on the identification is not consistent with
the appearance ofthe applicant or customer
presenting the identification.
7.Other information on the identification
is not consistent with information provided
by the person opening a new covered account
or customerpresenting the identification.
8.Other information on the identification
is notconsistent withreadily accessible
information that is onfile with the financial
institution or creditor,such as a signature
card or a recent check.
9.An application appears to have been
altered or forged,orgives the appearance of
having been destroyed and reassembled.
Suspicious Personal Identifying Information
10.Personal identifying information
provided is inconsistent when compared
against external information sources used by
the financial institution or creditor.For
example:
a.The address does not match any address
in the consumerreport;or
b.The Social Security Number (SSN)has
not been issued,or is listed on the Social
SecurityAdministration's Death Master File.
11.Personal identifying information
provided by the customer is not consistent
with other personal identifyinginformation
providedby the customer.For example,there
is a lack ofcorrelation between the SSN
range and date ofbirth.
12.Personal identifying information
provided is associated with known
fraudulent activity as indicatedby internal or
third-party sources used by the financial
institution or creditor.For example:
a.The address on an application is the
sameas the address provided on a fraudulent
application;or
b.The phone number on an application is
the same as the number provided on a
fraudulent application.
13.Personal identifying information
provided is ofa type commonlyassociated
with fraudulent activity as indicatedby
internal orthird-party sources used by the
financial institution or creditor.For example:
a.The address on an application is
fictitious,a mail drop,or a prison;or
b.The phone number is invalid,or is
associated with a pager or answering service.
14.The SSN provided is the same as that
submitted by other persons opening an
account or other customers.
15.The address or telephone number
provided is the same as or similar to the
account number or telephone number
submitted by an unusually large number of
other persons opening accounts or other
customers.
16.The person opening the covered
account orthe customer fails to provide all
required personal identifyinginformation on
an application or in response to notification
that the application is incomplete.
17.Personal identifying information
provided is not consistent with personal
identifying information that is on file with
the financial institution or creditor.
18.For financial institutions and creditors
that use challenge questions,the person
opening the covered account or the customer
cannot provide authenticating information
beyond thatwhich generally would be
available from a wallet or consumer report.
Unusual Use of,or Suspicious Activity
Related to,the Covered Account
19.Shortly following the notice of a change
ofaddress for a covered account,the
institution or creditor receives a request for
a new,additional,orreplacement card or a
cell phone,or for the addition of authorized
users on the account.
20.A new revolving credit account is used
in a manner commonly associated with
known patterns offraud patterns.For
example:
a.The majority of available credit is used
for cashadvances or merchandise thatis
easily convertible to cash (e.g.,electronics
equipment or jewelry);or
b.The customer fails to make the first
payment or makes an initial payment but no
subsequent payments.
21.A covered account is used in a manner
that is not consistent with established
patterns of activity on the account.There is,
for example:
a.Nonpayment whenthere is no history of
late or missed payments;
b.A material increase in the use of
available credit;
c.A material change in purchasing or
spending patterns;
d.A material change in electronic fund
transfer patterns in connection with a deposit
account;or
e.A material change in telephone call
patterns in connection with a cellular phone
account.
22.A covered account that has been
inactive for a reasonably lengthy period of
time is used (taking into consideration the
type ofaccount,the expected pattern of usage
and other relevant factors).
23.Mail sentto the customer is returned
repeatedly as undeliverable although
transactions continue to be conducted in
connectionwith the customer's covered
account.
24.Thefinancial institution or creditor is
notified that the customer is not receiving
paper accountstatements.
25.The financial institution or creditoris
notified ofunauthorized charges or
transactions in connection with a customer's
coveredaccount.
Notice from Customers,Victims ofIdentity
Theft,Law Enforcement Authorities,or Other
Persons Regarding Possible Identity Theft in
Connection With Covered AccountsHeld by
the Financial Institution or Creditor
26.The financial institution or creditor is
notified bya customer,a victim ofidentity
theft,a law enforcement authority,orany
other personthat it has opened a fraudulent
account for a person engaged in identity
theft.
Dated:October 5,2007.
John C.Dugan,
Comptroller ofthe Currency.
By order of the Board ofGovernors ofthe
Federal Reserve System,October 29,2007.
Jennifer J.Johnson,
Secretary ofthe Board.
Dated at Washington,DC,this 16th day of
October,2007.
By order of the Board ofDirectors.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E.Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
Dated:October 24,2007.
=
=
=
=
=
----------
~~-
----
:-A1:count IS opened a~nd .ctosed Require -p-a-fE:el-@Writa~~~·---~~_
~mtl=lti=r;rle-:tJr:ftes -aft@raccrulng=assume-respons·ietlt~v e~--_---:-~·I·_'
-~hJg-"l tjaran<ies--wal-E-f-aeliBJ~Hl~--_~~----=-
-
------I-~--=-
~@ttsrorilerRepresentative IS R.e-quesl €lIS~CIme~~=r=l?)=-~
-:.~~~~Sl§J;~-e:~-]§)=6F-S~-Y)=='GaJllA:-§~S~really .·I9T8 gf @f res!d-e.n ey__ _-=--
___th~e~t~rta~Elt=o~f -Q_w-=n~ef -af t-h·e~_-_~I~_~~-=f=l€lr g-peFf--a€C==0~omJ~:::_ _~--
~~l:t1I~}~~~-----:- -coGLfstorft€r _ - -~=--~
------
- ----:-----
-=--~-------
-Re€f FI=a-=-§Js -~f\lrftt~~~tfiTlEll::Preve.rJ ti 0 rt -
-------
~-a~m~er=lts ste-~£)Jl a.n--1~~t{~Jl1ll~~t~€f>nlitct tn-a t~v-iJi~aI------------------------1,-'---t---_--.---..----=--oen e-rwi se consistent up-to----Lock a-'~C@Lfntfo~-~-QEl-------
--:G1atE-=aj;-GlItJl9t=-------.-.-=lai~k)frnl3~Q!=-I-- --------------- -
.__6i1~@-aN~m §::O t retuxned 2 retbl~rn_eo€t=-c~~)'=im=e=1=l=1§:s ~~e.sl@fl=f=-i fl ------
- -~-------------~--~------..-------- -------- ---_.------ - ------------ ---- ----Gash enJ¥_a.ccgunt~-.---::----.=---~~----------
---------- -~tfftK-crGCo-frnt lr-p-ay_m:e-flt Jl@~--'---
-made -----.---
--- ----- -
:~M~ail j~s'=-ratjJ:rfl=erl Attempt to conta~ct a~~J~l~~t
- --.--=fl:@-I €ler -
------F:----------
--:-
--b'flGk aGGE>lJnt fQr non-----
-----_~aym:cent---
-..- -=----,---------------- ------ -
------.-'-1-- --
AGENDA ITEM 10b
STAFF REPORT
DIV.NO.All
May 13,2009MEETINGDATE:
jt?."./7.<f'• .f"J ;,:.'..W.O./G.F.NO:·~f-..A:'~./l-::)d--o\/L..-'[0~
Joseph R.Beachem,Chief Financial Officer
William Gr::~jf'Conservation Manager Vv'C;
German AIV~Assistant General Manager
Declaration and Implementation of a Modified Drought Level 2,
Effective July 1,2009,to Exclude Watering Schedules and
Drought Pricing
APPROVED BY:
(Ass!.GM):
SUBJECT:
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY:
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
The General Manager recommends that the Board:
•Declares a Drought Level 2 due to water supply
cutbacks,effective July 1,2009.
•Defers implementation of drought pricing.
•Accepts the deferral of Drought Level 2 watering
schedules done under the General Manager's authority,
and
•Directs staff to monitor ongoing sales data with
periodic updates to the Board.
!
I
..I
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To declare and implement a modified Drought Level 2,effective
July 1,2009,to exclude watering schedules and drought pricing.
ANALYSIS:
With both MWD and CWA declaring a Stage 2 Drought,staff is
recommending that the District also declare a Level 2 "Drought
Alert."MWD projects a 13%water shortage during the next
fiscal year.The impact of this water supply shortage on San
Diego County has been mitigated by CWA's successful efforts to
secure additional water supplies.So,while there is a 13%
water shortage at MWD,CWA has reduced that impact for San Diego
County customers to only 8%.Additionally,Otay's successful
efforts are expected to completely offset the remaining 8%CWA
water shortage.Much of this offset is due to the significant
shift of water sales from potable to reclaimed,credit for
recent growth,past conservation program activity,and the level
of conservation achieved this fiscal year by Otay customers.
Based on these factors,the District is expected to remain under
the allocation levels in 2010.Even if the water shortage
worsens over the next two years,as CWA anticipates,the
District will be able to maintain water sales at levels below
the allocations if additional conservation is achieved
by customers.CWA anticipates shortages moving up from 8%to
11%in 2011 to 14%in 2012.At these reduced allocation levels,
the District's customers will need to increase the conservation
levels for the District to avoid the CWA penalty pricing.
Staff anticipates that the combined effect of the pricing
signals sent on January 1,2009,the pending increase on
September 1,2009,the existing economic difficulties,and the
declaration of a Level 2 will be sufficient to motivate the
added conservation.For this reason,a declaration of a Level 2
"Drought Alert"is recommended but without the implementation of
Stage 2 rates.However,with the uncertainty of the future
sales volumes,monitoring of sales and conservation must be
continued,allowing the District to react in a timely manner to
insufficient or excess levels of conservation.
As part of the District's declaration of a Level 2 water
shortage,all of the restrictions currently listed under Level 1
will become mandatory beginning July 1,2009.However,given
the expectation that the District will be able to meet its water
savings targets,the General Manager will not assign watering
days or limit landscape watering times.These measures could be
enacted as needed,should the water shortage become more severe.
Instead,customers will be encouraged to water no more than
three days a week and encouraged to use the online landscape
watering calculator to develop a customized watering schedule.
In the event the District is not successful in maintaining the
conservation levels this year or increasing the levels in future
years,the District is still well positioned to adjust for the
financial impact of the CWA penalties.Drought pricing is ready
for implementation since it has previously been approved via t'he
218 process.Although no drought pricing is recommended at this
time,it may become necessary in the future.
While the District is not faced with penalty pricing this year,
a Level 2 is recommended since the county,as a whole,is in a
water shortage position and the District's future avoidance of
penalties is dependent,in part,on increased conservation.
Conclusion
The need to declare a Level 2 water shortage and motivate
conservation is twofold.First,a region-wide Level 2
declaration will allow for consistency in broadcasting the
message across agencies and help the region maintain its water
supply.Secondly,the District can avoid substantial future
penalties by conserving enough water to remain below the CWA
allocations.With the significant sale of reclaimed water and
the existing conservation that is occurring,at this time staff
does not recommend the implementation of drought pricing or the
implementation of the watering schedules as authorized in a
Level 2 drought.Instead,staff will monitor the level of
conservation that is achieved and report to the Board as the
year progresses.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The District ensures its continued financial health through
long-term financial planning and debt planning.
LEGAL IMPACT:
Attachments:
A)Committee Action Form
B)Declaratibn of Drought Level 2 Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
..~IID
""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,""""""""""""""""""'"""",,"'"""""''''''''''''''',''"""""""
Declaration and Implementation of a Modified Drought
Level 2 to Exclude Watering Schedules and Drought Pricing
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration,and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 29,2009.The
following comments were made:
•Staff is requesting that the board declare a Level 2
Drought Alert effective July 1,2009 due to water supply
cutbacks.
•On April 14,2009,MWD implemented Stage 2 Allocations as
it is projected that the region will have a 13%supply
shortage during the next fiscal year as:
o The Colorado River is not providing any surplus water
as it has In previous years.
o The State Water Project supplies are reduced due to
recent pumping restricts to protect the Delta smelt
(regulatory drought).
o The State entered into its third consecutive year of
drought.
•In response to MWD's implementation of Stage 2 Allocations,
CWA declared a Stage 2 Drought Alert effective July 1,
2009.CWA expects a 8%water shortage during the next
fiscal yea~.They are also recommending implementation of
Allocations and Penalty Pricing to cover the MWD penalty
costs should CWA go over its Allotment from MWD.
•CWA's supply source includes:
0 MWD Allocation 380,000 AF
0 QSA 155,000 AF
0 Spot Transfers 16,000 AF
Total 551,000 AF
Y;\Board\CurBdPkg\FINANCE\CommMtgDroughtStagesII051309.doc
•Otay's allocation of the 551,000 AF is 39,832 or 7.23%.
Staff believes that Otay can stay within its allocation as:
•
•
•
•
•
•
o CWA's was able to offset the 13%cutback from MWD down
to an 8%cutback.
o Recycled water use has decreased Otay's dependence on
CWA.
o Construction water use is down.
o Otay customers have been conserving.
In the following fiscal years (FY 2011 to 2012),CWA
anticipates a 10%,to possibly as high as 14%,cutback.
The survey of the District's customers indicate that water
sales in FY 2010 will be lower than in FY 2009.Current FY
2009 water use is 7.1%less than the FY 2010 allocations.
Staff is recommending that the board declare a Drought
Level 2,effective July 1,2009,and hold off implementing
drought pricing as it is felt that it is not needed to meet
the District's allocation.However,staff will closely
monitor water sales and recommend implementing drought
pricing when it is needed.
It is expected that many of the CWA member agencies will
not be implementing drought pricing as well.
The code indicates that all Level 1 measures become
mandatory when a Level 2 Alert is declared.Staff is
recommending excluding restrictions on watering days and
duration of watering.The District still recommends that
customers only water three days a week,but will not
enforce the three day restriction or duration of watering
(no more than 15 minutes per watering station per day).
Dought Level I measures include:
o Prohibit the washing down of paved surfaces.
o Prohibit water waste from ineffienceint landscape
irrigation such as runoff and overspray.
o Retricting watering landscapes to after 6:00 p.m.and
before 10:00 a.m.Suggest watering no more than three
days a week using the water schedule found on the
District's web page.
o Use a positive shut-off nozzle for hand watering
landscaped areas.
o Use re-circulated water for ornamental fountains.
Ift
o Wash vehicles using a positive shutoff nozzle and
bucket.
o Restauants to serve water only upon request.
o Offer guests of hotels (lodging establishments)the
option not to launder linens and towels daily.
o Repair all water leaks within 48 hours.
o Use recycled water for construction purposes.
•Drought Level II measures include:
o Limit residential and commercial landscape irrigation
to no more than three assigned days per week on a
schedule established by the District GM.In November
through April,landscape irrigation is limited to no
more than once per week.
o Limit sprinkler irrigation to no more than 15 minutes
per water station per day.
o Use a positive shutoff nozzle to water trees and
shrubs not on automated irrigation systems on the same
schedule as noted above.
•It was indicated that the District's customers will be
notified of the declaration of a Drought Level 2 Alert
through the customer Pipeline newsletter,bill inserts
(bills forwarded in June 2009)and Proposition 218 notices
(forwarded in mid-June 2009).CWA will also implement a
media compaign indicating that a Level 2 Drought Alert has
been declared.
•The committee felt that if a Level 2 Alert is not needed at
this time and the District will not be implementing the
Drought Level 2 Alert fully,then the District should not
declare a Level 2 Alert.The District should stay at the
Drought Level I Alert.
•It was discussed that the drawbacks to not declaring a
Drought Level 2 Alert is the District will not be in
concert with its sister agencies and it will also need to
explain to the media why it is not declaring a Level 2
Alert.
•The committee suggested that the message for the District
not to declare a Level 2 Alert should include that the
District's investments in recycled water use and
conservation (self-policing)has contributed to potable
water savings and cost savings.However,it is still
important to continue to conserve.
I.:.•.•,...
r~11Ii
i
I
•It was discussed that the District can implement drought
pricing fairly quickly.Staff will have water sales
information from another month's of billing and can present
the information in June 2009.
•The committee recommended staying at a Drought Level I
Alert until June 2009.
The committee supported presentation to the full board as an
action item with the committee's recommendation to stay at a
Drought Level I Alert until June 2009.
Attachment B
Declaration and Implementation of
a Modified Drought Level 2,
Effective July 1,2009
1
•MWD/CWA
•Otay Allocation
•Monitoring/Reports
•Implementation of Level 2
2
•MWD -Implemented Stage 2 Allocations
•2010 demand of 2.11 MAF
•2010 Supply of 1.83 MAF
•130/0 Shortage
•First,the Colorado River is not providing any surplus
water,as it has in previous years.
•Second,State Water Project supplies are reduced due
to recent pumping restrictions to protect the Delta
smelt (regulatory drought).
•Third,the state entered into its third consecutive year
of drought.
3
•CWA declared a Stage 2 Drought Alert effective
July 1,2009
•8%Shortage
•Also recommending implementation of Allocations
and Penalty Pricing
4
Agency
Carlsbad MWD
Del Mar,City of
Drought Level
Level II Expected
to Declare by Mid-May
Levell
Timeframe
Most likely within a Couple
of Weeks
Expected to move to a
Level 2 in June
Methodology
Escondido,City of
Fallbrook PUD
Helix WD
LakeSIde WD
Level 2 recommendation May 20 to Council
Level 2 declared Last night -April 27
Level 2 recommendation June 3 to Board
Level 2 Effective July 1
Restrictions not rates
With adjustments -no new meters
effective in 30 days balance of
restrictions effective immediately.
Restrictions not rates
Rates -shifting from proposed 4 tier
drought rates to 3 proposed tier
(currently 2 tiers)
5
Agency Drought Level Timeframe Methodology
Oceanside,City of Level 2 recommendation May 20 public hearing to Restrictions not rates
put drought rates and
drought structure into
ordinance.
Olivenhain MWD Level 2 recommendation May 27 to Board Modified restrictions with no
allocations or pricing.Dropping
non-enforceable restrictions
OtayWD Levell Will bring back to F&A
Committee each month to
reVIew
Padre Dam MWD Level 2 Effective July 1 Running model for rates to get 8%
water use reduction effective July 1
bills
Poway,City of Level 2 recommendation June "Enforcing"restrictions with and
emphasis on awareness and resources
to fix problems.Moving forward
with transition from flat to tiered rate
structure).
Level 2 Effective July I Restrictions not rates
6
Agency
RamonaMWD
Rincon del Diablo
Drought Level
Level 2 anticipated
Level 2
Timeframe
May 12 to Board
Methodology
Restriction with penalties not rates or
allocations.
San Diego,City of
San Dieguito WD
Santa Fe ill
Sweetwater Authority
Vallecitos WD
Level 2 Effective June 1 Restrictions with fines not rates.
Level 2 recommendation May 13 to Board All restrictions,but have not set up
the watering schedule (i.e.days)yet.
MAY be implementing drought
pricing that is set up for a 10%
reduction
Level 2 recommendation May 21 to Board Restriction with penalties not rates or
allocations.
Level 1 or 2 May 27 to Board workshop Open to change
Level 2 July 1 Changing ordinance to include,
"GM shall have the authority and
discretion to determine the
administration ofthe conservation
practices"
7
Agency
Valley Center MWD
Vista ID
Drought Level
Level 2
Level 2
Timeframe
Effective July I
Effective June 1
Methodology
Restriction ofmeter sales moved to a
Level 3.M&I customers will be
provided a voluntary monthly
allocation with possibility ofmoving
to mandatory in 112010 if8%savings
target not achieved
Watering day restrictions,do not
allow operation ofornamental
fountains
8
S!Jpply Source
MWD Allocation
QSA
Spot Transfers
Total
Volume (aft)
380,000
155,000
16,000
551,000
-Other factors that may affect the allocation:
-DWP increased water from SWP to 300/0
-Use of local storage
-MWD final adjustments
9
•Otay's sh,are of CWA Water:7.23%
•CWA's available water is:x 551 ,000 aft
Otay's tentative allocation is:39,832 aft
•Factors making it possible for Otay to be within the
allocation:
•CWA's ability to offset the 13%cutback from MWD down to an 8%
cutback
•Recycled water usage has decreased Otay's dependence on CWA
•Construction water usage is down
•Otay customers level of conservation
10
•Penalty pricing not likely for Otay
•Otay's 2010 tentative allocation =39,832 aft
•Otay's 2009 budgeted purchases =38,793 aft
(Due to conservation and additional recycled.)
•Ongoing conservation is needed to stay within the
allocation
J.
11
•Recommend to Declare Drought Level 2,effective
July 1,2009
•Drought Pricing
•Hold off implementation
•Available as needed to offset lower sales and penalties
•Monitor and implement as needed
•Monitoring sales remains important
•CWA anticipates increased shortages for 2 years before the
shortages decrease
12
New daily reports are available
•Comparing allocations to actual sales
•Comparing historical sales to current sales
13
2009 Water Sales vs 2010 Allocation
18,000,000 --.------------------------------,
16,000,000 -+----------------------------:~
14,000,000 -+-------------------~-----I
"'C 12,000,000 -+-------------------------:~'--------~-+---------{-~10,000 ,000 -t-----------------::~~-=::::.--------\---=~______l
~8,000,000 +----------------:::;;;o~~-------------_1
c:
~6,000,000 -1------~~=-------------------~
4,000,000 -+-------=IfIII"'------------I -2009 Sales
2,000,000 -2010 Allocation 1----1
O-F------.---------r------.-------r--------r---,....---..,....---.,....---....,...-----,--------r-------l
cooI
::J...,
cooI
C)
::J«
cooI0.
CD
C/)
coo...,!.,uo
cooI>o
Z
co 0') 0')
000IIIU C .c
CD co CDo...,LL
Sales Date
0')os!-o.«
•-,
0')oI
C
::J...,
14
•Staff recommends that the Board declare
a Level 2 "Drought Alert"condition
•All the Level 1 measures become
mandatory when a Level 2 is declared
•Excluding restrictions on watering days
and duration of watering
15
•Declare a Drought Level 2 due to water
supply cutbacks,effective July 1st
Defer implementation of drought pricing
•Accept the deferral of Drought Level 2
watering schedules done under the GM's
authority
•Direct staff to monitor ongoing sales data
with periodic updates to the Board
16
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 11a
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board Meeting
SUBMITTED BY:Mark Watton,
General Manager
MEETING DATE:
W.O./G.F.NO:
May 13 2009
DIV.NO.
SUBJECT:Board of Directors 2009 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board,the attached Board of Director's meeting
calendar for 2009 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to reyiew the 2009 Board of Director's meeting calendars
and amend the schedules as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:Calendar of Meetings for 2009
G:IUserDatalDistSeclWINWORDISTAFRPTSIBoard Meeting Calendar4-1-09.dnc
Regular Board Meetings:
January 7,2009
February 4,2009
March 4,2009
April 1,2009
May 13,2009
June 3,2009
July 1,2009
August 5,2009
September 2,2009
October 7,2009
November 4,2009
December 2,2009
Board Workshops:
Board of Directors,Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2009
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 21,2009
February 18,2009
March 18,2009
April 22,2009
May 20,2009
June 17,2009
July 22,2009
August 19,2009
September 23,2009
October 21,2009
November 18,2009
December 16,2009
Budget Workshop,May 21,2009
Board Retreat Workshop,April 28,2009
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting CalendarAttach A for 2009 5-l3-09.doc
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM 11 b
TYPE MEETING:Special Board
SUBMITTED BY:Mark Watton,
General Manager
APPROVED BY:
STAFF REPORT
MEETING
DATE:
W.O.lG.F.NO:
May 13,2009
DIV.NO.
SUBJECT:Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO)Special Districts
2009 Election
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board consider casting votes for a Regular Special District
Member and Alternate Special District Member on LAFCO's Commission.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
PURPOSE:
To present for the Board's consideration the LAFCO Special Districts
2009 Election ballots.
ANALYSIS:
In January of this year,LAFCO solicited nominations for a Regular
Special District Member and Alternate Special District Member to serve
on their Board of Directors.The District's Finance,Administration
and Communications Committee reviewed the request for nominations and
recommended nominating Director Croucher for the Alternate Special
Member and,Mr.Johp Ingalls,Santa Fe Irrigation District,for the
Regular Special District Member.The board concurred at the February
4,2009 board meeting.
The District has received the ballots for the election along with the
Nominating Committee's report/recommendations and the candidates'
nomination forms (please see attached).LAFCO's Nominating Committee
recommends voting for Director Croucher and Mr.John Ingalls for the
Alternate Special District Member and Regular Special District Member
respectively.
The District's ballot must be submitted to LAFCO by May 15,2009.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Participating would support the strategic goal of maintaining effective
communications with other cities,special districts,State and Federal
governments,community organizations and Mexico.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Gen~ral Manager
Attachments:
LAFCO Correspondence and Ballots
LAFCO Nominating Committee Report
Candidates'Nomination Forms
ATTACHMENT A
Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO)Special Districts
SUBJECTIPROJECT:2009 Election
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 29,2009 and the
committee recommended that it be presented for the full board's
consideration as an action item.
"
San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission
Chairman
1600 Pacific Highway.Room 452 •San Diego,CA 92101
(619)531-5400.FAX (619)557-4190
Website:www.sdlafco.org
Bill Horn
County Board of
Supervisors April 3,2009
Vice Chairman
Bud Pocklington TO:Independent Special Districts of San Diego County
South Bay Irrigation District
FROM:Executive Officer
Members Local Agency Formation Commission
Dianne Jacob
County Board of SUBJECT:2009 Special Districts Election
Supervisors
Donna Frye
Councilmember
City of San Diego
Carl Hilliard
Councilmember
City of Del Mar
Belly Rexford
Councilmember
City of Poway
Vacant
Special Districts
Representative
Andrew L.Vanderlaan
Public Member
Alternate Members
Greg Cox
County Board of
Supervisors
Sherri Lightner
Councilmember
Cityof San Diego
Mark Lewis
Mayor
City of EI Cajon
John S.Ingalls
Santa Fe
Irrigation District
Harry Mathis
Public Member
Executive Officer
Michael D.Ott
Counsel
William D.Smith
By our letter of January 16,2009,we solicited nominations for one LAFCO
regular Special District member and one LAFCO alternate Special District
member.By the deadline of February 27,2009,two nominations for the
regular member and five nominations for the alternate member were
received by LAFCO.As required by the Selection Committee Rules,all
eligible nominations were forwarded to the nominating committee.The
2009 nominating committee was comprised of Tom Pocklington (Bonita-
Sunnyside Fire Protection District),JUdy Hanson (Leucadia Wastewater
District),and Augie Scalzitti (Padre Dam Municipal Water District).After
the Candidate's Forum held on March 26,2009 at the San Diego Chapter
of the California Special Districts Association's special meeting,LAFCO
Consultant Harry Ehrlich met with the nominating committee to discuss a
recommended slate of nominees for the open positions.A copy of the
committee's report is attached (Attachment 1),containing ballots on
which to record your votes (Attachment 2).A list of the eligible
independent special districts,formatted in label form,is provided for your
convenience (Attachment 3).Special districts may use the mailing list to
send letters of support or additional biographical material for a particular
candidate.Please note that LAFCO staff has not included any of the
candidates'promotional materials with the election materials.Lastly,
attach~d are a summary and copies of all nominations received
(Attachment 4).
With respect to ballots,there is a separate ballot for each position:yellow
for the LAFCO regular member,and blue for the LAFCO alternate
member.Be sure each ballot is marked only for the number of
positions to be voted for in that category.A ballot that is cast for
more than the indicated number of positions will be disregarded.
Independent Special Districts
April 3,2009
Page Two
The ballots should be considered by your full district board.State Law and the
Selection Committee Rules require a district's vote to be cast by its presiding officer,or
an alternate member of the legislative body appointed by the other members.
Therefore,the certification form has been incorporated with the ballot forms to be
signed by the person who casts your district's votes.A ballot received without a
signed certification form will not be counted.
All nominees are listed on the relevant ballot.An asterisk indicates the nominating
committee's recommendations.Write-in candidates are permitted,and spaces have
been provided for that purpose.
The deadline for receipt of the ballots by LAFCO is May 15,2009.The Selection
Committee Rules require that marked ballots be returned by certified mail,return
receipt requested.Facsimile (FAX)ballots and certification forms will be accepted,IT
necessary to meet the ballot deadline,but originals must be submitted as soon as
possible thereafter.
The Selection Committee Rules stipulate that a majority of the districts shall constitute a
quorum for the conduct of committee business.There are 61 independent special
districts in the County;therefore,a minimum of 31 ballots must be received to certify
that a legal election was conducted.A candidate for a LAFCO member must receive at
least a majority of the votes cast to be elected.The ballots will be kept on file in this
office,and will be made available upon request.
Please call me or Tita Jacque Mandapat if you have any questions.
~
Executive Officer
MDO:tjm
Attachments:1)
2)
3)
4)
Nominating Committee Report and Recommendations
Special District Election Vote Certification Form &Ballots
Independent Special District Labels
Independent Special District Summary of Nominations and Copies
of Nomination Forms
*
2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS ELECTION
BALLOT and VOTE CERTIFICATION
FOR REGULAR lAFCO SPECIAL DISTRICT MEMBER
VOTE FOR ONtY ONE
John Ingalls
(Santa Fe IrrigatIDJr]Di,strri:ct)1
Charles W.Muse
(Helb<Water Diistll'id))
Write-ins
]
~]
I hereby certify that ~cast Ute 'lIotes (Q;1f 1tlhle _
(Name of Distrid))
at the 2009 Spedall Distri:cts SeEedJi:ol!11 Committee IBedion as:
]the presidi!lfllg offiicerr,or
)the duUy/-appoi:Jr]ted allltemate board umember.
(Signature)
(Date)
1<=Nominating commLt1tee's recommendatiIDJIll1
Attachment 2
2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS ELECTION
BALLOT and VOTE CERTIFICATION
FOR ALTERNATE LAFCO SPECIAL DISTRICT MEMBER
VOTE FOR ONLY ONE
Tom Bumgardner (Valley Center Parks and Recreation District)
Tim Geiser (Deer Springs Fire Protection District)
Martin Marugg (Alpine Fire Protection District)
Jo MacKenzie (Vista Irrigation District)
..Gary Croucher (Otay Water District)
Write Ins
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ 1
[ ]
[ I
I hereby certify that I cast the votes ofthe _
(Name of District)
at the 2009 Special Districts Selection Committee Election as:
[
[
]
]
the presiding officer.or
the duly-appointed alternate board member.
(Signature)
(Title)
(Date)
PIe-use-note:The orderin which the candidates>names arelisf~ijJ1l1'ID tidrcnlwmi-/Ib)l'ron.lom selection"
..=Nominating committee's recommendation
Attachment 2
San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission
Chairman
1600 Pacific Highway.Room 452 •San Diego,CA 92101
(619)531-5400.FAX (619)557-4190
Website:www.sdlafco.org
Bill Horn
CountyBoard of
Supervisors
Vice Chairman
Bud Pocklington
South Bay Irrigation District
April 3,2009
TO:
FROM:
Independent Special Districts in San Diego County
2009 Special Districts Election Nominating Committee
Members
Dianne Jacob
County Board of
Supervisors
Donna Frye
Councilmember
Cityof San Diego
Carl Hilliard
Councilmember
City ofDel Mar
Belly Rexford
Councilmember
City ofPoway
Vacant
Special Districts
Representative
Andrew L.Vanderlaan
Public Member
Alternate Members
Greg Cox
County Board of
Supervisors
Sherri Lightner
Councilmember
City of San Diego
Mark Lewis
Mayor
City of EI Cajon
John S.Ingalls
Santa Fe
Irrigation District
Harry Mathis
Public Member
Executive Officer
Michael D.Ott
Counsel
William D.Smith
SUBJECT:Nominating Committee Report and Recommendations
In 2009,independent special district nominations were solicited for:(1)one
regular special district member on LAFCO with a term expiring in 2013,and (2)
one alternate special district member on LAFCO with a remaining term expiring
in 2011.By the deadline of February 27,2009,our office received two
nominations for the LAFCO regular special district member position,and five
nominations for the LAFCO alternate special district member position.
As required by the Selection Committee Rules,a nominating committee was
appointed to review the nominations submitted,and to prepare a list of
recommended candidates.According to the Selection Committee Rules,the
nominating committee is appointed by the chairperson or vice chair of the
Special Districts Advisory Committee.Since Chairwoman Jo MacKenzie is a
candidate for the alternate commission position on LAFCO,Executive Officer
Michael Ott made appointments to the nominating committee.A Candidates
Forum,moderated by Mr.Ott and LAFCO Consultant Harry Ehrlich,was
scheduled on March 26 as part of a special meeting of the San Diego Chapter,
California Special Districts Association.All candidates were invited to attend
and present a brief statement of qualifications.In the interest of impartiality,the
nominating committee decided to conclude its deliberations after the
Candidates Forum.In evaluating the nominations,the committee considered
special district experience,interest,and knowledge of LAFCO issues..For
those -nominees who are incumbents,the committee further considered
attendance records and meeting participation.The committee also wanted to
ensure representation from those types of districts that most often are involved
in making recommendations to LAFCO.The nominating committee's
recommendations for each category follows.
Attachment 1
2009 Nominating Committee Report
April 3,2009
Page Two
NOMINATING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
LAFCO Regular Special District Member
The Nominating Committee recommended John Ingalls (Santa Fe Irrigation District).
LAFCO Alternate Special District Member
The Nominating Committee recommended Gary Croucher (Otay Water District).
Copies of all nominations are attached follOWing this report.
2009 NOMINATING COMMITTEE
TOM POCKLINGTON
Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District
JUDY HANSON
Leucadia Wastewater District
AUGIE SCALZITTI
Padre Dam Municipal Water District
2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS ELECTION
SUMMARY OF NOMINATIONS
REGULAR AND ALTERNATE LAFCO COMMISSIONER
LAFCO Regular Special District Member Candidates
*John Ingalls
(Santa Fe Irrigation District)
Charles W.Muse
(Helix Water District)
LAFCO Alternate Special District Member Candidates
Tom Bumgardner
(Valley Center Parks and Recreation District)
Tim Geiser
(Deer Springs Fire Protection District)
Martin Marugg
(Alpine Fire Protection District)
Jo MacKenzie
(Vista Irrigation District)
*Gary Croucher
(Otay Water District)
Please note:The orderin which the candidates'names are listed were determined by random selection
*=Nominating committee's recommendation
Attachment 4
·I
II
NOMINATED BY:
2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
NOMINATION/RESUME
Date received by LAFCO:
Santa Fe Irrigation District
RECEIVED
FEB 2 02009 .
SAN DIEGOLAFCO
NAME OF NOMINEE:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
NOMINATED FOR:
John S.Ingalls '
P.O.Box 409.Rancho Santa Fe.CA 92067
858-527-2556
jingalls@sfidwater.org
LAFCO Regular Member
DISTRICT EXPERIENCE:.
Elected to Santa Fe Irrigation District Board of Directors in 2002 ,and re-elected in ~006.
Serves on Finance Committee and Organization and Personnel Committee,represents
community on San Dieguito River Valley Regional Open Space Park Joint Powers
Authority Citizens Advisory,Committee.former member of San Dieguito River
Watershed Planning Guidance Group.
LAFCO EXPERIENCE:
Elected in 2005 as LAFCO Alternate Special District Member and re-elected in 2007.
Has consistently attended LAFCO meetings and workshops of importance to special
districts across the County.Provided input to LAFCO on specific issues during the
North Central San Diego County Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence
Update (approved May 2.2005).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Appointed by Board of Supervisors to the San Dieguito Planning Group.participated in
workshops on GP2020 update,and made presentatio.ns to County Planning
.Commission.Worked with Staff of County DPLU,DPW.and Parks Dept.on Specific
Plan Amendments.Direct involvement In 2003 County Zoning Ordinance Relating to
Wireless Telecommunications Facilities (01-03).Corona College Heights Orange &
Lemon Association member/grower of citrus,primarily lemons.Former municipal bond
lawyer and finanCial advisor'to special districts nationwide,personally led efforts to
enact legislation and organize special districts and joint powers authorities in several
states besides California.for schools,water supply.wastewater treatment,.public
power,health care,affordable housing.and environmental cleanup.Active service on
multiple boards of directors.including nonprofit and for-profit corporations,and advisory
boards such as Scripps Clinic Board of Advisors.Ufe member,U.S.Navy League.
Admitted to practice law in New York and Massachusetts.Chairman,Rancho Santa Fe
Association Road &Traffic Committee.Resides in Rancho Santa Fe,with two children.
--._-.-.....-.-.-._--_._--_..--._-_.__.-.-..
"//:....2009 SPECIAL DISTRICT
NOMINATIONIRESUME
RECEIVED
FEB 1 0 2009
SAN DIEGO LAFOO
NOMINTED BY:
NAME OF NOMINEE:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
NOMINATED FOR:.
Date Received byLAFCO _
Helix Water District
Charles W.Muse
7811 University Avenue,La Mesa,CA 91944
619-465-3207"
cmuse33911@aol.com
..
LAFCO REGULAR MEMBER f")
LAFCO ALTERNATE MEMBER ()
DISTRICT EXPERIENCE:
Past President ofHelix Water District Board ofDirectors
President ofCouncil ofWater Utilities
District representative to the Water Conservation Garden Authority
Di~ct representative on Harry Griffen Park Steering Committee
District representative to San Diego River Conservancy and San Diego River Coalition
Board member ofSan Diego East County Chamber ofCommerce
Insurance and Personnel Committee member at Association ofCalifornia Water Agencies
District representative to Association ofCalifornia Water Agencies Joint Insurance Powers
Authority,member ofRisk Management Committee
District representative to National Water Resources Association
LAFCO EXPERIENCE:
None
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Member ofCity ofLa Mesa Citizens'Preparedness Ad Hoc Committee
Retired President and CEO ofGAF Financial and Insurance Services
Served as adju.'1.ct faculty ofthe College for Financial Planning and as instructor at San Diego
State University Department ofFinance for 18 years
Founding Director ofthe_Home for Guiding Hands,residential facility for developmentally
Disabled and currently on Foundation Board
Served as Board member ofLemon Grove Chamber ofCommerce and Vice-Cbair ofSan Diego
Historic Site Board
Served for 14 years as a Planning Conunissioner for City ofLa Mesa
Twice appointed by Govern Reagan to serve on Developmental Disabilities Board for San Diego
and Imperial Counties
Three professional designations:Chartered Life Underwriter,Chartered Financial Consultant
~~
.AuthOri~gnature..
.Attachment 2
Fnm:VAllEY CENTER PARKS ®.760 749 8075 02/27/2009 15:55 I.P.004/DD5
200"1 speCIAL DISTRICTS
.NOMINATION/ftESUME
Oate Received by LAFCO _
NOMINATED BY:Valley cent:er P~ks.and Recrea:tj,oJ\Di..tric;t
District
...
NAME OF NOMINEE:
Address:
Pho.ne:
E·mail:
NOMINATED FOR:
17fiQ)7'9-8852
3-sey:eral sublCQDDDi;ttees for tb;":val1ey·Center BJanningG"Coup.-
6 ·Ye.a.t:s
LAFCO EXPERIENCE:.
1.I'ize.and ewrgengy medical:board for t:wo pars
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:.
1.Director of Parft~l:jse Watill'Belief Boara-]8 mDIlt1uI (2003)
2·.PmM~.Vai,leyQmter Cbmph8r of CQrrmtel;ce _.2 y;earti ..'2~Cbalr"~ley Center -Wutern D~ys,.5 V_lIS;bvolved2S y~s
--_._-.._----------_.-.-
2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
NOMINATIONIRESUMEI RECEIVED
FEB 2.4:2009
Date Received by LAFCO ....:S_A~N......D-.qlolOiilEGloiliOiol·i:::LAAiRl"fe~Or
NOMINATED BY:Deer Springs Fire Protection Dismct
District
NAME OF NOMINEE:
Address:
Phone:
E-mail:
NOMINATED FOR:
Tim Geiser
26208 Jersmond DeDe Rg.EscondWo,CA 92026
MATlNATl@AOL.COM
LAFCO REGULARMEMBER()
LAFCO ALTERNATE MEMBER (X)
DISTRICT EXPERIENCE:
Director-D~r $J?P!m$Fire Protection District.
LAFCO EXPERIENCE:
HaVet10t ~rved 4irectly.I hlwe foUowe4 closely JUafiy oftbe issues that the Board has been confronted with.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
PQt Co~sioner-Qili.fomi~Av~o Commission
Presi4ent ~TANG~T En!S9?!¥es A.~ifl COl])for twen!y-five years
Attachment 2
-..-----_._---_.._--------------------_.._------'-----_.-._--_._-•._..._....-
2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
NOMINATION/RESUMl,:RECEIVE:D
FEB 2·3 2009
Date Received by LAFCO_---.::SANCoi.=-:...aDwle~G.u.o.L.II....A"I=S:wCO"""L--
NOMINATED BY:Alpine Fire Protection District
(District)
NAME OF NOMINEE:M.....a=rt.-in;;,;".~Mo.::ao;,,;;ru;,;;:;gg_·____
Address:,1:;;:.9-.:.7,:,6.:.,P.:,:in::.:er-V.:..li:.:.ew.:.:....:.R.:.::o::::a:=d~,AI~.u::Q~inJ.::e:....:C;:;;lAlo....9;:;.1.:.::9::::Q;.:.1 __~__
Phone:,........l6:..:1-=-9...;;:-44~.,:,S·..,t1..:..75;:;.1:.---.:.
Email:......m......m~.a;:;:,;r:..iiu~gloliig...@....C;;.lo...x~.n;.;;e....t..........
DISTRICT EXPERIENCE:Martin Marugg has served on the Alpine Fire Protection:District
(AFPO)Board since 2002.In November 2006,he was reelected to a four-year term and
held the p'osition of Board President for two years;Marugg represents AFPD as alternate
commissioner of the multi-agency Heartland Communications Authority (HCFA).He has
served as second vice president and membership chairman of the San Diego Chapter of
California .special District's ,Association and as the District's representative to F'AIRA (Fire
Agencies Insurance Risk Authority).He was appointed to FDAC Board of Directors on
February 6,2009 as Zone 6 Director.On Labor Day 2008,he was rEr-elected for a seat on
the Palomar Mountain Mutual Water Company and serves as President for a secon~three
year term of office.
NOMINATED FOR:LAFCO REGULAR MEMBER ( )
LAFCO ALTERNATE MEMBER (X)
LAFCO EXPERIENCE:Mr.Marugg served as Alpine Fire District's representative to the
Fire Districts and County Fire Chi.efs Substantially Similar Plan (SSP)group.He attended
all meetings of both groups in the formation of the SSP position paper.He continues to
serve in this position.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Marugg retired from the San Diego Fire Department
(SDFD)in September 1999 after 32 years of service.One of the highlights of his'tenure
was serving as officer in charge of the ECHO 3 Communications Van which was funded
through the County of-San Diego,and in that capacity responding to all second slann fires
or greater in the County of San Diego and prOViding assistance in setting up the command
structure for the incident.Marugg held the position as Facilities Maintenance Officer for the
San Diego Fire Department.During his 32 years with SDFD he served as Fire Marshal
after the Normal Heights Fire and was in charge of all weed and brush abatement for the
city of San Diego.He also served as the Chief in charge of the Fire Communications
Center for four years during which he supervised 27 dispatchers,4 rear office staff,and 4
dispatch Captains.Since his retirement Marugg has continued his involvement in
community related organizations and has served on the supervisory committee for the
Federal Firefighters Credit Union for nineteen years.
---------------_._._---~---_..__._.._-_.._--_.,~--_._----_.-._.~.._-------_._-----_.__.-."'.__.
l1/'
2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
NOMINATION/tlESUME
RECEiVED
FEB - 9 2009 .
SAN DIEGO LAFOO
Date Received by LAFCO _
NOMINATED BY:-.........:..V~IS;.:..;TA~~IR..::..R:.:.;IG=:..A~T~IO~.~~D:;:.:I.:=.ST..:...:R-.:.I.:.CT~_
District
NAME OF NOMINEE:_.:;Jo:,.·~M:z:;a9::.K.:,l:le::..:nz==ie=-.._
Address:1578 Palgm!!r Drive,San Marcos,CA 92069
Phone:(760)74~7969 '
E-mail:mackgroYP@cox,oet
DISTRICT EXPERIENCE:Elected to Board of Directors in 1992,serving as President in
1993/99,1999,·2004 and 2008.Chaired Water ReUse Committee,W!!ter Rights
CpOOmittee member,and Public Affairs Committee:Eiscal PoliW Committee member
1991-2008.serving as Ch§ir in 1996 -1997,2003 -2004.;2007-2008,PresentlY seOOng
as ghgair of the Wimer Ranch.Committee ar;td Vice-Ct:lajr of the Water SustaioabjJi~
Committee.
NOMINATED FOR:LAFCO REGULAR MEMBER ( )
LAFCO ALTERNATE MEMBER (X)
LAFCO EXPERIENCE:Member ofbAFCO Special Oistrict Advi§Ory Committee,.19i4 to
oresem.Vige-Chair 2001 .to 2004;serving as Chair of the Special &limpet ~dvjlOrv
gpmm;.tteetrgm 2Q05 to present..QQmmittee Member 91 bAFCO's MuniciQ§1 3eryiG!
Bftyiew Wgrking Group.As a lind use planner owning my own consulting firmsins:;e
198§,I have prgeessed.annexatigns,di§$Olulions pod reorganizatigns 19 water and
sewer districts and the citigs QfSan M§rCQs.Esgondidg and Vist§..
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:.Served IS CSDA.San Diego Chapter.Vi9@ PresIdent
199§/i7.President 199§/99.elided swe CSDA Board member Region 6 in 2Q03.
Pru@oUvserviog gO th@ ~Ie.CiDA exeCutive Committee IS TJWilsur@r.khair ClD8
L@gif,ativeCommiUee,2006-;2009.Active in the Asspc,01 Cil.ifomip water Agenci@s
since 1993.§eryjng on the ACWA Membership Committee siOce 1996 and gas ViS!Chair
from 2090 to pres@o!.ACWA R@gion 10 Boargmember since 1997:prescntlyAl1emam
Chair.Actively involved.with the cities of san Marcos ang,ViA:S@rved on the San
MarCQs City Planning CommiS§ioner,San Marcos Affordable Housing Task Force.and
San Marcos Budg@tReview Committee member,1980-1Q82 and 1995 to 2006,Chair
from 1996 to 2006.
(AuthOrized Signature)
",Lisa R.Soto,Board Secretary
I,
,.'.2009 SPECIAL DISTRICTS
NOMINATION/RESUME
Date Received by LAFCO
RECEIVED.
FEB 1 82009
SAN DIEGO LA,FCO
NOMINATED BY:.::::Q:J:::ta~Y......lW~a~t~erwD~i~sto:..::ric~t -,--..,...
NAME OF NOMINEE:.;:::G=ary~C:::.:.r.:::.;ou:.;:ct:.:h~er,----,-
;.
Address:'2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.•Spring Valley,CA 91978
Phone:619-670-2280
I
\
Ii
tiorize .nature)
LAFCO EXPERIENCE:Mr.Croucher is currently a member of LAFCQ's Special Districts
Advisorv Committee and seN.ed as the altemate for Fire Chief Augie @hio on the LAFCq Task
Force on Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services.He also participated asa Board of
Diresetor with the bAFCO Muniseipa!Service Review and has experience at the employee and
staff level serving on two (2)separ@te successful Special District Consolidations which were
reguested Pv the agencies.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:Mr~Croucher was unanimously nominated by the atay,Water
District's Board of Directors for the Alternate Member se@t on LAECQ's Board.He is supported
by both Water'and Fire Districts and .is endorsed by outgoing LAFCO Regular.District
representative.Mr;Andy Menshgk.He and Mr.Jghnlngalls (as Regular LAFCO Member)
desire to work together and support eagb other to ensure Speseial Districts are oroperly and
cOnsistently representeg at LAFCO.·Mr.Croucher is a long-time firefighter in San Diego and a
resident gf Spring Valley.He is the Division Chief for the.San Miguel Consolidated Fire
Protection District and dyring his 24 year career as a firefighter,has moved up the ranks from
Firefighter.Engineer.CaRtain and Battalion Chief to his current position as Division Chief.He ,
has also been recognized for numerousachievemenls including being named Employee ofthe
Year and seNed as the President of the Executive Board of Directors for Southern Area Fire
E ui nt R search SAF R in 2004.'.
//t
NOMINATED FOR:LAFCO REGULAR MEMBER ( )
LAFCO ALTERNATE MEMBER (Xl
DISTRJCT EXPERIENCE:Mr.Gary Croucher was appointed to the Board of the Otay Water
District joJune 2001 by the SO County Board of Supervisors and following his appointment was
elected.twice to the Division 3 seat in November 2002 and 2006 for foyr-year terms.Mr."
Croucher is currently serving his 3rd term as President of may's Board of Directorsind has
served as one of the District's two representatives to CWA since July 2001.He is chajr of Otay's
Engineering.Operations and Water Resources Committee.is past chair of its Employee
Negotiations Ad Hoc Commjttee and serves as the alternate.representative on the Water
Conservation Gargen Authority's Board of Directors.As a member of CWA's Board of pirectors.
Mr.Croucher has been reapoointed to the Legislative.Conservation and Outreach Cgmmittee.
the Small ContFictor Outreach and Oppgrtunity Program Committee and as 2nd Altemate to
SANDAQ.He ;s past ch@ir of their Imported Water Committee and a past member of its
Colorndo River Programs Committee and the Conservation Ad Hoc Committee.Me.Gary
Croucher is currently Vice Chair of CSDA's San Diego Chapter.\'
I
I
!
!
Attachment 3
-------------~-----------------------_._.._---_.._--------_.--..-.----_._.--------------~----------------
AGENDA ITEM 12
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:
SUBMITTED
BY:
SUBJECT:
Regular Board Meeting
Mark Watton,
Gene'ral Manager
General Manager's Report
MEETING
DATE:
W.O.lG.F.
NO:
May 13,2009
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
GENERAL MANAGER:
FLAGSHIP PROJECTS:
Update on the design of the 36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline from
FCF #14 to Regulatory Site (CIP P2009)for the month of March
2009:
•The San Diego County Water Authority's project to upgrade
Otay Flow Control Facility No.14 started March 1,2009.
FCF #14 will be shut down for the planned upgrade until
July 31,2009.The La Mesa Sweetwater Extension (LMSE)
will continue to receive water from FCF #8 until this
upgrade is complete and the temporary reconnection to the
upgraded FCF #14 is made by TC Construction.
•The District received the Encroachment Permit from Caltrans
on March 5,2009 and the Advertisement for Bid was sent out
on March 6,2009.A Pre-Bid Meeting was held on
March 24,2009 and the Bid Opening was scheduled for
April 23,2009.Staff is reviewing the bids and expects to
present the results to the Engineering,Operations and
Water Resources Committee in May for action by the Board at
the June board meeting.
•Staff is working with Jones &Stokes on the preparation of
a Low-effect Habitat Conservation Plan (LEHCP)that will
result in a take permit for the impacts to the California
Coastal Gnatcatcher and its habitat due to the pipeline
construction ln and around Cuyamaca College.A second draft
of the LEHCP is scheduled to be submitted by the end of
April and it is expected that the take permit will be
finalized before October,2009 so that work in the College
area can proceed outside of the breeding season for the
gnatcatcher.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND FINANCE:
Administrative Services:
Human Resources:
•The District held Employee Information Meetings on April
22nd for District employees.These meetings are held
every six months to provide employees with relevant
information regarding key District projects and District
updates.Items covered at the meetings included updates
on water supply,customer rates,the 36-inch pipeline
project,INET migration to SharePoint,Fire Prevention,
and the backflow/cross connection program.
•Please mark your calendars to attend
Summer Recognition Luncheon scheduled for
Operations building.
the District's
July 16th in the
•The Annual Western Region International Public Management
Association for Human Resources (IPMA-HR)Conference was
held in Denver,Colorado,April 20th 22nd •Human
Resources staff attended to obtain the latest information
regarding Human Resources trends and programs.
•New Hires -There were no new hires in the month of
April.
Safety &Security:
•Security -Reviewed bids with IT on installing cameras at
the Reclamation Plant.Staff is planning to phase in the
new LIONEL security panels which will combine alarm and
access control systems (part of Strategic Plan upgrades).
•Conference -Ted Cudal,Safety and Security
Administrator,and staff attended the Asian Business
Association's "Preparing for a Pandemic"meeting on April
23,2009.
2
•Safety Training -The following training events were
completed:
o April 8,2009:Emergency Response Team training for
Ammonia Leaks at the 30 MG Reservoir/980-2 Pump Station
o April 9,2009:Hearing Conservation Training and
Testing
o April 22,2009:Fire Prevention Training (All-Hands)
o April 23,2009:Fire Extinguisher Training with San
Miguel Fire Department (Operations)
o April 28,2009:Respiratory Protection Training and
Fit Testing.
•CAVCOM Communications -Conducted a demonstration of a
new communications system for the Emergency Response Team
(HAZMAT)on April 28,2009.The system will be
compatible with our current 800 MHz radios.
Purchasing and Facilities:
•Purchase of Property Located at 2500 Sweetwater Springs
Blvd The purchase of the lot adjacent to the
Operations'yard continues to move forward.The District
has entered into escrow for the property and has reviewed
and requested a minor change to the title report,
deleting a statement that a location of an easement
cannot be determined.The District has received various
documents including the grant deed that are being
reviewed by legal counsel.It is expected that escrow
should close,as scheduled,on May 7,2009.
•Northrop Grumman/RAMAR -As reported previously to the
Board,the 17,827 RAMAR/Badger AMR meters retained
through the Northrop Grumman litigation are defective and
are of no use to the District.The District attempted to
dispose -of the meters through sale to other water meter
users,including Mexico,and was unable to obtain any
offers.Therefore,the Operations Department declared
them surplus for disposal pursuant to District's surplus
procedures.As such,they will be disposed of under the
General Manager's authority through sale to a scrap
dealer.Depending on the spot market price for "dirty"
brass,it is estimated that the value of the meters is
between $35,000 and $50,000.The disposal of the meters
closes the RAMAR AMR litigation matter.
3
•Purchase Orders -There were 141 purchase orders
processed in April 2009 for a total amount of
$341,189.22.
Water Conservation and School Education:
•Water Conservation Rebate Reservation System:On April
1st,Metropolitan Water District announced that a
reservation system was now in effect due to the
overwhelming success of the rebate programs.
Reservations were available for about a week,and then
customers were told to call back at the beginning of May.
District customers who had an application in hand were
told to go ahead and submit their application and
receipts and that their rebate applications would be
processed.On May 1st,the rebate processing center was
open for two hours until they exhausted the available
funding for the month.Since the announcement of the
reservation system and its severe funding limits,
District staff has been pushing MET and CWA to provide
additional funding for rebates.Staff is working on
resolving all of the rebate requests from customers.
•Outreach events:District staff worked at the Chula
Vista Go Green and Clean Family Day as well as the
Eastlake Walmart's 3rd Annual Children's Earth Day
Celebration on Saturday,April 18.In addition,the
District helped staff the two water agency booths at the
Spring Garden Festival on Saturday,April 25th,which
marked the 10th anniversary of the Garden This year's
Spring Garden Festival attendance exceeded 7,300.Last
year,approximately 6,000 people attended the Spring
Garden Festival event.
•School Education Programs:This year,the District's
entry for the Helix/Otay/Sweetwater high school "water
colors"-photo contest was the regional winner for the
color photography category.In addition,a Garden tour
was conducted this month,and to date,a total of 21
Garden tours have been conducted for schools within the
District.Four more tours are currently scheduled for
May.
•California Friendly Landscape Contest:This year marked
the 6th year of the regional water wise landscape contest
and the District received a record number of entries
4
(fourteen).Last year the District had four entries,
which is our average,and our previous record,which
occurred in the first year of the contest (2004),the
District received seven entries.The majority of this
year's entries were participants in the District's Cash
for Plants pilot program.Regionally,there were over
120 entries as compared to 65 last year.The landscape
finalists will be judged in late April and the winners
announced at the May 16th awards ceremony at the Water
Conservation Garden.
•Water Conservation:FY09 to-date vs.FY07 -Potable
water use is down by approximately 10.3%to-date this
fiscal year as compared to the first nine months of
fiscal year 2007.
In£or.mation Techno~ogy and strategic P~anning:
•New Web-Based System for Customer Issues -IT staff
implemented on April 1st a new web-based system designed
to track customer complaints and issues.The system is
functioning as planned and will allow all staff to share
information about customer issues and to automate
responses to customers to better use technology -like
automatically generated letters,e-mails,or return phone
calls.In addition,it will link customer complaints to
their billing history to provide better functionality to
deal with customer issues.
•Records -IT staff is finalizing its revised records
management program.A team of administrative workers
from all departments is reviewing the new user interface
prior to full implementation.Scanning of the existing
records in the records room is almost complete.Final
requirements for each department have been received and
the vendor (IKON)is customizing the interface.
•Strategic Plan -Third quarter strategic plan
measurements are now due from staff.Staff will be
issuing a report to the Board committee in August for
year-end fiscal 2009.
•IT completed the first phase of installing a wireless
link between headquarters,operations,and the treatment
plant.This high-speed wireless link is the first step
5
in a major upgrade of communications,security,and SCADA
functionality.
•IT is implementing a District wide replacement of the
INET.The new product is called SharePoint and is a
Microsoft product that delivers much better access to
information and is easier to integrate with other
systems.Training will take place in the next month.
Finance:
•CWA/MWD Stage 2 Drought Both MWD and CWA have
implemented a Stage 2 Drought that will be effective on
July 1st .MWD has proj ected a 13%water shortage,which
CWA has been able to reduce down to 8%by obtaining
additional supplies of water.CWA estimates that the
water shortage will continue and worsen over the next two
years before the.situation improves.
•Allocation of Water -CWA is facing an 8%water shortage
and has calculated the available water for the county to
be 551,000 AF.This amount is tentative and may be
adjusted in the next few weeks.CWA has informed member
agencies of the percentage of available water that will
be delivered to each agency.Otay Water District's share
of the available water is 7.229%.This will equate to
39,837 AF in the 2010 budget year.It is estimated that
if customers continue to keep the water consumption at
the current low levels,the District will be able to stay
within the allocation.
•Interim Audit Work -The audit firm of Diehl,Evans and
Company is documenting some of the District procedures
that ensures security and accuracy,and will be testing
these procedures to see that they are functioning as
described.This effort is focused on the internal
controls-.They will return in August,after we have
completed the fiscal year,and will begin the audit of
the financial statements.
The financial reporting for March 31,2009 is as follows:
•For the nine months ended March 31,2009,there
total revenues of $47,928,009 and total expenses
$46,881,879.The revenues exceeded expenses
$1,046,130.
6
are
of
by
The financial reporting for investments for March 31,2009
is as follows:
•The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in
the Investment Portfolio Details as
total $77,692,987.42 with an average
of 2.363%.The total earnings
$1,891,579.78.
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
of March 31,2009
yield to maturity
year-to-date are
•850-4 Reservoir -Spiess Construction continues to place
and weld the steel panels for the reservoir.The
reservoir is for increased capacity in the 850 Pressure
Zone,as required by the 2002 Water Resource Master Plan.
The original contract completion date was May 12,2009,
however,there is a delay in the delivery of additional
steel panels and,therefore,the project will be behind
schedule.This project is now expected to be completed in
July 2009.This project is on budget.(P2191)
•20-Inch Recycled Pipeline Conversion -ARB,Inc.continues
with the conversion of a 20-inch potable pipeline to a
recycled pipeline in Chula Vista within the District's use
area.The 20-inch converted line is now on-line and in
service.This project is on schedule.(R2081)(Note:
The Board authorized an increase to the project budget at
the April 1,2009 Board Meeting in an amount not to exceed
$70,000).
•1296-3 Reservoir -RSH,a subcontractor of Natgun
Corporation,has begun grading for the construction of
the reservoir.The reservoir is for increased capacity
in the 1296 Pressure Zone,as required by the 2009 Master
Plan.This project is on budget and expected to be
completed in February 2010.(P214 3)
•1485-1 Pump Station Replacement -SCW Contracting has
started the construction of the pump cans for the new
pump station.The existing pump station is exposed to the
elements and is at the end of its useful life.The new
pump station will be enclosed,provide more efficient
pumps,and provide for expansion when demands increase in
7
the 1485 zone.This project is on budget and expected to
be completed in February 2010.(P2172)
•SR-905 Utility Relocations -Caltrans submitted a
reimbursement check on March 25,2009 in the amount of
$1,391,521 for utility relocations associated with the
Pacific Rim,Cactus,and Gailes-Dublin utility
relocations.Staff is preparing an invoice for the
remaining SR-905 utility relocations in order to submit
for the remaining reimbursement amount.(P2440)
•For the month of March,2009,the District sold 11 meters
(42 EDUs)generating $246,738 in revenue.Accumulated
revenue through March 31,2009 was $1,556,395 for 94 meters
(310.5 EDUs).Projection for this period was 252 meters
(389.6 EDUs)with budgeted revenue of $2,130,450.
Projected revenue from July 1,2008 through June 30,2009
is $2,840,600.
•Approximately 90 linear feet of both CIP and developer
project pipeline was installed in March,2009.The
Construction Division performed quality control for these
pipelines.
The following table summarizes Engineering's Project purchases
and change orders issued during the period of March 1 thru
March 31,2009 that were within Staff signatory authority:
Contractor/
Date Action Amount Consultant Project
Inter-Agency Water
3/24/09 Check $5,000 City of Chula Vista Meter Connections
Request (P2422)-Utility
Permit
Water qperations:
•Total number of potable water meters is 47,834.
•Potable water deliveries from CWA for the month of March
2009 were 2,472.4 acre feet and 26,333.5 acre feet fiscal
year to-date.
8
•Recycled water consumption for the month of March is as
follows:
Total consumption was 137.5 acre-feet or 44,793,232
gallons and the average daily consumption was 1,444,943
gallons per day.
Total number of recycled water meters is 674.
Total recycled water consumption to date for FY 2009 lS
3352.9 acre-feet.
•Wastewater flows for the month of March were as follows:
•Total basin flow,gallons per day:2,016,523.
•Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro,
gallons per day:669,000.
•Total Otay flow,gallons per day:1,347,000.
•Flow Processed at the Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling
Facility,gallons per day:986,523.
•Flow to Metro from Otay Water District,gallons per
day:361,000.
For the month of March there was one new wastewater
connection;total EDUs is 6,071.
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\GM Report 5-13-09.doc
9
I:
Ii
I'
Ii
tl'·····:·.,.'
!.
I"f
Ir~
AGENDA ITEM 12
Exhibit A
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,2009
I"~
Annual YTD YTD YTD Ii(i
Budget Actual Budget Variance Var%!
REVENUE:!
Water Sales $32,836,500 $21,841,219 $23,860,600 $(2,019,381)(8.5%)rl
Energy Charges 2,047,100 1,412,567 1,467,600 (55,033)(3.7%)!
System Charges 10,619,400 7,268,046 7,811,000 (542,954)(7.0%)~'.,
Penalties 906,900 492,037 665,500 (173,463)(26.1 %)~!
MWD &CWA Fixed Charges 2,819,500 2,537,878 2,070,300 467,578 22.6%I
Total Water Sales 49,229,400 33,551,748 35,875,000 (2,323,252)(6.5%)I
Reclamation Sales 6,344,500 4,230,177 4,420,000 (189,823)(4.3%)
Sewer Charges 2,145,300 1,623,337 1,619,000 4,337 0.3%
Meter Fees 103,800 48,664 77,850 (29,186)(37.5%)
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,301,900 1,142,689 976,500 166,189 17.0%
Betterment Fees for Maintenance 895,900 428,818 671,900 (243,082)(36.2%)
Annexation Fees 483,600 214,112 362,700 (148,588)(41.0%)
Non-Operating Revenues 1,633,100 3,860,042 1,174,750 2,685,292 228.6%
Tax Revenues 4,137,300 2,433,725 2,465,200 (31,475)(1.3%)
Interest 667,800 304,596 438,900 (134,304)(30.6%)
General Fund Draw Down 120,100 90,100 90,100 0.0%
Total Revenue $67,062,700 $47,928,009 $48,171,900 $(243,891)(0.5%)
EXPENSES:
Potable Water Purchases $25,183,600 $16,698,977 $18,393,000 $1,694,023 9.2%
Recycled Water Purchases 1,490,800 871,017 1,050,100 179,083 17.1%
CWA-Infrastructure Access Charge 1,227,500 901,038 901,130 92 0.0%
CWA-Customer Service Charge 1,049,800 779,287 779,580 293 0.0%
CWA-Emergency Storage Charge 1,774,700 1,321,512 1,321,500 (12)(0.0%)
MWD-Capacity Res Charge 602,800 450,468 450,200 (268)(0.1%)
MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge 665,100 498,816 498,600 (2\6)(0.0%)
Subtotal Water Purchases 31,994,300 21,521,115 23,394,110 1,872,995 8.0%
Power Charges 2,780,500 2,\43,071 2,063,300 (79,771 )(3.9%)
Payroll &Related Costs 17,185,400 12,165,203 12,431,450 266,247 2.1%
Material &Maintenance 3,872,800 2,528,422 2,846,600 318,\78 \1.2%
Administrative Expenses 5,467,600 3,565,445 3,880,100 3\4,655 8.\%
Legal Fees 467,500 987,722 350,625 (637,097)(\81.7%)
Expansion Reserve 5,016,700 3,762,500 3,762,500 0.0%
Replacement Reserve 277,900 208,400 208,400 0.0%
Total Expenses $67,062,700 $46,88\,879 $48,937,085 $2,055,206 4.2%
Excess Revenue (Expense)$$1,046,130 $(765,185)$1,811,315 *
*The $1,811,3\5 positive variance reflects the net effect ofthe successful settlement of the AIG/Kemper litigation.The District
received $\,506,000 as net proceeds after deducting agreed upon fees and expenses ofapproximately $744,000 from the $2.25 million
settlement.
F:/MORPT/FS2009-0309 4/27/2009 12:01 PM
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW
MARCH 31,2009
INVESTMENT OVERVIEW &MARKET STATUS:
The federal funds rate has remained constant for the last 4-months.On December 16th,at the Federal Reserve Board's regular
scheduled meeting,the federal funds rate was lowered from 1.00%to "a target range ofbetween Zero and 0.25%"in response to the
nation's ongoing financial crisis,as well as banking industry pressure to ease credit and stimulate the economy.This marked the ninth
reduction in a row since September 18,2007,when the rate was 5.25%.They went on to say:"The Committee anticipates that weak
economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels ofthe federalfunds rate for some time."There were no further
changes made to the federal funds rate at the Federal Reserve Board's subsequent regular scheduled meeting,held on March 18,2009.
Despite the large drop in available interest rates,the District's overall effective rate ofreturn on at March 31st was 2.46%.At the
same time the LAIF return on deposits has also dropped over the last several months,reaching an average effective yield of 1.82%for
the month ofMarch 2009.Based on our success at maintaining a competitive rate ofreturn on our portfolio during this extended
period ofinterest rate declines,no changes in investment strategy are being considered at this time.
In accordance with the District's Investment Policy,all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives,in priority
order,of safety,liquidity,and return on investment.
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE:March 31,2009
Investment
8.01:Treasury Securities
8.02:Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations)
8.02:Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds)
8.03:Federal Agency Issues
8.04:Certificates ofDeposit
8.05:Short-Term Commercial Notes
8.06:Medium-Term Commercial Debt
8.07:Money Market Mutual Funds
8.08:San Diego County Pool
12.0:Maximum Single Financial Institution
State Limit
100%
$40 Million
100%
100%
30%
25%
30%
20%
100%
100%
Otar Limit
100%
$40 Million
100%
100%
15%
15%
15%
15%
100%
50%
Otar Actual
o
$14.00 Million
o
43.91%
3.98%
o
5.17%
o
26.43%
1.26%
Performance Measure F-12
Return on Investment
Target:Meet or Exceed 100%of LAIF
Month
LAIF .Otay D Difference I
Otay Water District
Investment Portfolio:03/31/09
5.23%
DBanks (Passbook/Checking/CD)•Pools (LAIF &County)EJJ Agencies &Corporate Notes
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31,2009
Investments
corporate Notes
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
San Diego County Pool
Investments
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv.365 Equiv.
4,000,000.00 4,013,280.00 4,052,330.19 5.30 877 616 1.973 2.000
,34,000,000.00 34,071,340.00 33,998,862.03 44.45 827 596 3.009 3.051
3,079,108.00 3,079,108.00 3,079,108.00 4.03 373 290 2.794 2.832
14,898,080.09 14,942,974.13 14,898,080.09 19.48 1 1 1.797 1.822
20,455,230.48 20,613,258.05 20,455,230.48 26.74 1 1 1.714 1.738
76,432,418.57 76,719,960.18 76,483,610.79 100.00%429 310 2.363 2.396
Cash
Passbook/Checking
(not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
973,027.24
77,405,445.81
March 31 Month Ending
166,495.29
79,590,142.49
2.46%
973,027.24
77,692,987.42
Fiscal Year To Date
1,891,579.78
81,176,512.29
3.10%
973,027.24
77,456,638.03 429 310
0.251
2.363
0.254
2.396
I hereby certify that the investments contained in this report are made in accordance with the District Investment Policy Number 27 adopted by the Board ofDirectors on January 19,2000.The market
value information provided by Intera 've Data Corporation.The investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow requirements ofthe District forthe next six months ofexpenditures.
¥-IG -02'
Run Date:04/15/2009 -14:56
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF_PM1)SymRept 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31,2009
Page 3
Stated YTM Days to Maturity
BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
20,455,230.48 1.738 1.714
20,455,230.48 1.714
76,483,610.79 2.363 310
Average Purchase
Balance Date ParValue MarketValue
07/01/2004 20,455,230.48 20,613,258.05
20,455,230.48 20,455,230.48 20,613,258.05
79,590,142.49 76,432,418.57 76,719,960.18
Issuer
Total and Average
San Diego County _
Subtotal and Average
Investment#CUSIP
San Diego County Pool
so COUNTY POOL 9007
Run Date:04/15/2009 -14:56
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF_PM2)SymRept 6.41.200
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
March 31,2009
Average Purchase
CUSIP Investment#Issuer Balance Date ParValue
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 46,562.03
PETTYCASH 9003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 2,800.00
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 898,687.95
PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 24,977.26
UNION IOC 9008 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 05/01/2006 0.00
Average Balance 0.00
Total Cash and Investmentss 79,590,142.49 77,405,445.81
Run Date:04/15/2009 -14:56
Market Value
46,562.03
2,800.00
898,687.95
24,977.26
0.00
77,692,987.42
Page 4
Stated YTM Days to
BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity
46,562.03 0.200 0.197
2,800.00 0.000
898,687.95 0.265 0.261
24,977.26 0.000
0.00 4.500 4.438
77,456,638.03 2.363 310
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF]M2)SymRept6.41.200
OTAY
Activity Report
Sorted By Issuer
July 1,2008 -March 31,2009
CUSIP Investment #Issuer
Percent
of Portfolio
ParValue
Beginning
Balance
Current Transaction
Rate Date
Purchases or
Deposits
ParValue
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
Ending
Balance
Issuer:Berkshire Hathaway Fin
Corporate Notes
084664AF8 2094 Berkshire Hathaway Fin 4.200 03/10/2009 2,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal and Balance 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 2.584%0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
Issuer:STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0.200 66,233,933.46 66,197,388.36
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0.265 4,179,917.51 4,823,637.59
PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3,460.72 2,860.72
Subtotal and Balance 1,579,602.22 70,417,311.69 71,023,886.67 973,027.24
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1.822 59,814,598.30 55,705,000.00
LAIF COPS07 9009 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1.822 30,552.09 1,470,206.87
Subtotaland Balance 12,228,136.57 59,845,150.39 57,175,206.87 14,898,080.09
IssuerSubtotal 20.504%13,807,738.79 130,262,462.08 128,199,093.54 15,871,107.33
Issuer:California Bank &Trust
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Subtotaland Balance 79,108.00 79,108.00
Issuer Subtotal 0.102%79,108.00 0.00 0.00 79,108.00
Issuer:FANNIE MAE
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31398AMX7 2064 FANNIE MAE 3.000 02/19/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date:04/15/2009 -14:56 DA(PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Activity Report Page 2
July 1,2008 -March 31,2009
ParValue Par Value
Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending
CUSIP Investment #Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance
Subtotal and Balance 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
IssuerSubtotal 0.000%2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00
Issuer:Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance'2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 2.584%2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
Issuer:Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133XLTL7 2037 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.550 07/30/2008 0.00 3,000,000.00
3133XMX71 2042 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 08/14/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XN6X2 2045 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.500 08/20/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XNP52 2057 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.375 09/17/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XNS42 2058 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.250 12/18/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XNPR4 2059 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.350 12/24/2008 0.00 1,800,000.00
3133XPDR2 2062 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.060 01/29/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XPDSO 2063 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.250 01/30/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XPWL4 2065 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.000 02/26/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XPX90 2067 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.020 03/05/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XPZN7 2068 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.350 09/03/2008 0.00 1,905,000.00
3133XQC91 2070 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.125 12/17/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XQF23 2071 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.250 03/25/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XRNM8 2083 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.650 03/31/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XRK74 2084 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.500 12/30/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XS6Q6 2086 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.500 10101/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00
3133XSDGO 2087 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.650 10102/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00
3133XSDGO 2087 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/02/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XSCCO 2088 Federal Home Loan Bank 4.000 10/14/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00
3133XSFC7 2089 Federal Home Loan Bank 3.400 1010212008 2,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal and Balance 36,705,000.00 8,000,000.00 32,705,000.00 12,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 15.503%36,705,000.00 8,000,000.00 32,705,000.00 12,000,000.00
Run Date:0411512009 -14:56
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA(PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Activity Report Page 3
July 1,2008 -March 31,2009
ParValue ParValue
Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending
CUSIP Investment#Issuer ofPortfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance
Issuer:Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3128X7YG3 2082 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 4.750 12/26/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3128X8JA1 2092 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 2.000 02/18/2009 2,000,000.00 0.00
3128X8QH8 2095 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 2.000 03/16/2009 2,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal and Balance'4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 7.751%4,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 6,000,000.00
Issuer:Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31398AKSO 2060 Federal National MortageAssoc 4.500 01/07/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
31398ANH1 2069 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.250 02/25/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00
3136F9TS2 2081 Federal National Mortage Assoc 3.500 09/25/2008 0.00 2,000,000.00
3136F9WV1 2085 Federal National Mortage Assoc 4.000 07/02/2008 2,000,000.00 0.00
3136FHAA3 2091 Federal National Mortage Assoc 2.000 02/11/2009 2,000,000.00 0.00
31398AVL3 2093 Federal National Mortage Assoc 2.000 03/02/2009 2,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal and Balance 14,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 14,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 18.087%14,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 14,000,000.00
Issuer:General Electric Capital
Corporate Notes
Subtotal and Balance 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 2.584%2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
Issuer:Neighborhood National Bank
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
1002812475 2061 Neighborhood National Bank 4.850 12113/2008 0.00 1,000,000.00
1005581024 2090 Neighborhood National Bank 3.150 12/11/2008 1,000,000.00 0.00
1006200563 2096 Neighborhood National Bank 2.600 02/05/2009 2,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal and Balance 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
Run Date:04/15/2009 -14:56
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Activity Report
July 1,2008 -March 31,2009
Page 4
CUSIP Investment#Issuer
Issuer Subtotal
Percent
of Portfolio
3.876%
ParValue
Beginning
Balance
1,000,000.00
Current Transaction
Rate Date
Purchases or
Deposits
3,000,000.00
ParValue
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
1,000,000.00
Ending
Balance
3,000,000.00
Issuer:San Diego County
San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007
Run Date:04/15/2009 -14:56
San Diego County
Subtotal and Balance
IssuerSubtotal 26.426%
Total 100.000%
12,177,099.49
12,177,099.49
87,768,946.28
1.738 10,278,130.99
10,278,130.99
10,278,130.99
163,540,593.07
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
173,904,093.54
20,455,230.48
20,455,230.48
77,405,445.81
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA(PRF_DA)SymRepl6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
GASS 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
July 1,2008 -March 31,2009
Adjustment in Value
Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase Addition Redemption Amortization Change in Ending
CUSIP Investment#Fund Class Date Invested Value of Principal to Principal of Principal Adjustment Market Value Invested Value
Fund:Treasury Fund
LAIF 9001 99 Fair Value 10,787,944.73 0.00 264,598.30 264,598.30 0.00 45,431.10 14,942,974.13
UNION MONEY 9002 99 Amortized 10,016.93 0.00 369.71 369.71 0.00 0.00 46,562.03
PETIYCASH 9003 99 Amortized 2,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,800.00
UNION OPERATING 9004 99 Amortized 1,542,408.03 0.00 12,158.78 655,878.86 0.00 0.00 898,687.95
PAYROLL 9005 99 Amortized 24,377.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,977.26
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 99 Fair Value 12,219,100.73 0.00 278,130.99 278,130.99 0.00 116,026.33 20,613,258.05
UNION IOC 9008 99 Amortized 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LAIF COPS07 9009 99 Fair Value 1,439,583.11 0.00 30,552.09 1,470,206.87 0.00 71.67 0.00
3133XLTL7 2037 99 Fair Value 07/30/2010 3,006,562.50 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 -6,562.50 0.00
3133XMX71 2042 99 FairValue 08/14/2009 2,004,375.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -4,375.00 0.00
36962G2S2 2044 99 FairValue 12101/2010 2,051,704.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -67,064.10 1,984,640.00
3133XN6X2 2045 99 FairValue 08/20/2010 2,004,375.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -4,375.00 0.00
3133XNP52 2057 99 FairValue 09/17/2010 2,006,250.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -6,250.00 0.00
3133XNS42 2058 99 FairValue 06/18/2010 2,011,250.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -11,250.00 0.00
3133XNPR4 2059 99 Fair Value 12/24/2010 1,810,687.50 0.00 0.00 1,800,000.00 0.00 -10,687.50 0.00
31398AKSO 2060 99 Fair Value 01/07/2011 2,012,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -12,500.00 0.00
1002812475 2061 99 Amortized 12113/2008 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3133XPOR2 2062 99 Fair Value 01/29/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3133XPDSO 2063 99 Fair Value 07/30/2010 1,997,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00
31398AMX7 2064 99 Fair Value 02/19/2010 1,998,125.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 1,875.00 0.00
3133XPWL4 2065 99 Fair Value 02126/2010 1,996,875.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 3,125.00 0.00
205003183 2066 99 Amortized 01/22/2010 79,108.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,108.00
3133XPX90 2067 99 Fair Value 03/05/2010 1,997,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00
3133XPZN7 2068 99 Fair Value 09/03/2010 1,905,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,905,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
31398ANH1 2069 99 Fair Value 02125/2011 1,988,125.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 11,875.00 0.00
3133XQC91 2070 99 Fair Value 12/17/2010 1,985,625.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 14,375.00 0.00
3133XQF23 2071 99 Fair Value 03/25/2011 1,983,125.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 16,875.00 0.00
3133XQJ78 2072 99 FairValue 04/14/2011 1,965,625.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,255.00 2,001,880.00
31331YB74 2073 99 FairValue 04/07/2011 1,979,375.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,245.00 2,000,620.00
3133XQMC3 2074 99 FairValue 10/14/2010 1,980,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21,260.00 2,001,260.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date:0411512009 -14:57 GD (PRF_GD)SymRept6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail Page 2
Sorted by Fund -Fund
Adjustment in Value
Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase Addition Redemption Amortization Change in Ending
CUSIP Investment#Fund Class Date Invested Value ofPrincipal to Principal ofPrincipal Adjustment MarketValue Invested Value
Fund:Treasury Fund
3133XQUX8 2075 99 FairValue 10/29/2010 1,987,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,260.00 2,003,760.00
3136F9LP6 2076 99 FairValue 04/28/2010 1,994,375.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,745.00 2,003,120.00
3136F9NB5 2077 99 Fair Value 05/12/2010 1,991,875.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12,505.00 2,004,380.00
31398ARD6 2078 99 Fair Value 05/19/2011 1,997,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9,380.00 2,006,880.00
3128X7TT1 2079 99 Fair Value 06/0212011 1,997,510.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,809.93 2,008,320.00
3136F9SA2 2080 99 Fair Value 06/10/2010 2,000,625.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,135.00 2,008,760.00
3136F9TS2 2081 99 Fair Value 06/25/2010 2,003,125.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -3,125.00 0.00
3128X7YG3 2082 99 Fair Value 06/26/2013 2,006,940.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -6,940.00 0.00
3133XRNM8 2083 99 Fair Value 03/30/2010 2,011,250.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -11,250.00 0.00
3133XRK74 2084 99 Fair Value 12/30/2009 2,008,125.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -8,125.00 0.00
3136F9WV1 2085 99 FairValue 07/02/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15,620.00 2,015,620.00
3133XS6Q6 2086 99 FairValue 10101/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133XSDGO 2087 99 FairValue 1010212009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3133XSCCO 2088 99 FairValue 10/14/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,880.00 2,001,880.00
3133XSFC7 2089 99 FairValue 04/02/2009 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
1005581024 2090 99 Amortized 12/10/2009 0.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
3136FHAA3 2091 99 Fair Value 02111/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,260.00 2,006,260.00
3128X8JA1 2092 99 FairValue 02/18/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 2,001,500.00
31398AVL3 2093 99 Fair Value 03/02/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,620.00 2,005,620.00
084664AF8 2094 99 Fair Value 12/15/2010 0.00 2,035,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -6,360.00 2,028,640.00
3128X8QH8 2095 99 Fair Value 03/16/2011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,480.00 2,001,480.00
1006200563 2096 99 Amortized 02/04/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
Subtotal 87,788,742.96 23,035,000.00 585,809.87 46,374,184.73 0.00 232,744.93 77,692,987.42
Total 87,788,742.96 23,035,000.00 585,809.87 46,374,184.73 0.00 232,744.93 77,692,987.42
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date:04/15/2009-14:57 GO (PRF_GO)SymRept6.41.200
ReportVer.5.00
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 03/31/2009
Investment Book Par Market Current YTM Current Maturityl Effective
Security ID Investment #Fund Issuer Class Value Value Value Rate 365 Yield Call Date Duration
36962G2S2 2044 99 General Electric Capital Fair 2,018,487.67 2,000,000.00 1,984,640.00 5.000 2.000 5.493 12/01/2010 1.551
084664AF8 2094 99 Berkshire Hathaway Fin Fair 2,033,842.52 2,000,000.00 2,028,640.00 4.200 2.000 3.332 12/15/2010 1.618
3128X8JA1 2092 99 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,001,500.00 2.000 2.000 1.849c 05/18/2009 0.000
3133XQJ78 2072 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,001,880.00 3.150 3.150 2.959c 04/14/2009 0.035
3133XS6Q6 2086 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.500 3.500 O.OOOc 04/01/2009 0.000
3133XQMC3 2074 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,001,260.00 2.900 2.900 2.772c 04/14/2009 0.035
31331YB74 2073 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,620.00 3.180 3.180 3.117c 04/07/2009 0.016
3133XSCCO 2088 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,001,880.00 4.000 4.000 3.808c 04/14/2009 0.035
3133XSFC7 2089 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.400 3.400 3.400 0410212009 0.002
3133XQUX8 2075 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,003,760.00 3.100 3.100 2.719c 04/29/2009 0.076
3136F9LP6 2076 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 1,999,516.25 2,000,000.00 2,003,120.00 3.000 3.031 2.684c 04/28/2009 0.073
3128X7TT1 2079 99 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,008,320.00 3.625 3.625 2.781c 06/0212009 0.169
3136F9WV1 2085 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,015,620.00 4.000 4.000 2.419c 07/0212009 0.252
3128X8QH8 2095 99 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,001,480.00 2.000 2.000 1.922c 03/16/2010 0.944
31398ARD6 2078 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 1,999,345.78 2,000,000.00 2,006,880.00 3.600 3.619 2.902c 05/19/2009 0.131
3136F9SA2 2080 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,008,760.00 3.265 3.265 2.379c 06/10/2009 0.191
31398AVL3 2093 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,005,620.00 2.000 2.000 1.691 c 03/0212010 0.906
3136F9NB5 2077 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,004,380.00 3.100 3.100 2.656c 05/12/2009 0.112
3136FHAA3 2091 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,006,260.00 2.000 2.000 1.633c 02111/2010 0.849
1005581024 2090 99 Neighborhood National Bank Amort 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.150 3.194 3.150 12110/2009 0.679t
205003183 2066 99 California Bank &Trust Amort 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 3.180 3.224 3.180 01/22/2010 0.795 t
1006200563 2096 99 Neighborhood National Bank Amort 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2.600 2.636 2.600 02/04/2010 0.829t
LAIF 9001 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 14,898,080.09 14,898,080.09 14,942,974.13 1.822 1.822 1.822 0.000
LAIF COPS07 9009 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.822 1.822 1.822 0.000
Run Date:0411512009 -14:57 Page 1
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF_DU)SymRept 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by InvestmentType -Investment Type
Through 0313112009
Security 10
SO COUNTY
Investment#Fund
9007 99
Issuer
San Diego County
Investment
Class
Fair
ReportTotal
Book
Value
20,455,230.48
76,483,610.79
Par
Value
20,455,230.48
76,432,418.57
Market Current
Value Rate
20,613,258.05 1.738
76,719,960.18
YTM Current
365 Yield
1.738 1.738
2.253
Maturityl Effective
Call Date Duration
0.000
0.214t
t =Duration can not be calculated on these investments due to incomplete Market price data.
Run Date:04/15/2009-14:57 Page 2
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF_DU)SymRept6,41.200
ReportVeL 5.00
AGENDA ITEM 12
STAFF REPORT
May 6,2009
DIV.NO.
MEETING DATE:
W.O.lG.F.NO:
Regular Board
Sean pren~ergast,Finance~
Supervisor,Payroll &AP ~f
APPROVED BY:Joseph Beachem,Chief Financial Officer
(Chief)
SUBMITTED BY:
TYPE MEETING:
APPROVED BY:German Alvarez,-Assistant General Manager
(Ass!.GM):
Attached is the list of demands for the Board's information.
SUBJECT:Accounts Payable Demand List
PURPOSE:
FISCAL IMPACT:
SUMMARY
CHECKS (2017182-2017792)
WIRE TO:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA -BI-MONTHLY SEWER CHARGES
CITY TREASURER -RECLAIMED WATER PURCHASE FEB 09
CITY TREASURER -WATER DELIVERIES FEB 09
DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS -DENTAL &COBRA CLAIMS
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE -DEPOSIT ON REAL ESTATE
LANDESBANK -CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY -WATER DELIVERIES
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY -3RD QTR CAP FEES
SPECIAL DIST RISK MGMT AUTH -INS PREMIUM MAY 09
UNION BANK -PAYROLL TAXES
TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS
NET DEMANDS
$2,046,706.96
$2,730,604.03
$38,200.12
$42,051.13
$14,434.11
$25,000.00
$17,744.41
$1,716,445.70
$89,842.00
$188,845.64
$433,062.94
$7,342,937.04
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the Board receive the attached list of demands.
Jb/Attachment
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECKREGISTER
FOR CHECKS2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017182 04/01/09 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 838002 03/09/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,371.20
837998 03/09/09 BULIK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 735.67
838134 03/12109 BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 446.91 2,553.78
2017183 04/01/09 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1646 03/24/09 CONSULTING SERVICES -IS DEPT 5,100.00
1637 03/17/09 CONSULTING SERVICES -IS DEPT 5,100.00 10,200.00
2017184 04/01/09 00179 ACRO SALES COMPANY INC 8739 03/09/09 REPAIR GAUGES 225.00 225.00
2017185 04/01/09 10090 AECOM USA INC 7050906 03/10109 PLAN CHECKS &INSPECTION SERVICE 5,270.35 5,270.35
2017186 04/01/09 10091 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE 001092 03/25/09 MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION 30.00 30.00
2017187 04/01/09 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 40759 03/20109 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM SERVICES 377.20 377.20
2017188 04/01/09 00559 BOYLEENGINEERING CORPORATION 7050825 03/09/09 RECYCLED WATERPLAN CHECKING SERVICES 32.00 32.00
2017189 04/01/09 01232 BRODING'S BATIERYWAREHOUSE 4661 CREDIT MEMO (121.70)
4246 CREDIT MEMO (75.00)
4179 03/11/09 REBUILT PARTS 226.28 29.58
2017190 04/01/09 03531 BROWN AND CALDWELL 17781 03/10109 JOB POSTING 200.00 200.00
2017191 04/01/09 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 32398 03/06/09 CRUSHED ROCK 187.28 187.28
2017192 04/01/09 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 052802 03/11/09 LANYARD SHOCKWAVE 223.51 223.51
2017193 04/01/09 04398 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 001103 03/30109 REGISTRATION FEES 1,250.00 1,250.00
2017194 04/01/09 03706 CONSUMERS PIPE &SUPPLY CO S1096774001 03/12/09 SHIPPING CHARGES 297.65 297.65
2017195 04/01/09 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH090291D11 03/26/09 RECLAIMED WATER SHUT DOWN TEST 1,160.25
DEH090288D11 03/20109 RECLAIMED WATERSHUT DOWN TEST 1,071.00
DEH090290D11 03/20109 RECLAIMED WATER SHUT DOWN TEST 833.00
DEH090289D11 03/20109 RECLAIMED WATER SHUT DOWN TEST 773.50
DEH090281D11 03/20109 RECLAIMED WATER SHUT DOWN TEST 416.50
DEH090286D11 03/20109 RECLAIMED WATER SHUT DOWN TEST 357.00 4,611.25
2017196 04/01/09 00099 COUNTYOF SAN DIEGO -DPW 104732 03/05/09 EXCAVATION PERMITS 1,554.05 1,554.05
2017197 04/01/09 08892 CUDAL,TED 17730309 03/24/09 CONF TRAVEL EXP REIMBURSEMENT 25.81 25.81
2017198 04/01/09 00319 DEPARTMENT OFPUBLIC HEALTH 001098 03/25/09 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 90.00 90.00
2017199 04/01/09 01012 EL CAJON FORD 290783 03/27/09 2009 FORD VEHICLES 17,525.65 17,525.65
2017200 04/01/09 09807 EMERYVILLE OCCUPATIONAL 52962 03/11/09 PRE-PLACEMENTPHYSICAL 97.25 97.25
Page 1of 31
OTAYWATERDISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017201 04/01/09 00645 FEDEX 896200549 03/20109 OVERNIGHT PICK-UP &DELIVERY MAILSVCS 33.42 33.42
2017202 04/01/09 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS#1082 0306589 03/11/09 METER SHOP TOOLS 387.03
0306636 03/11/09 FLANGES 112.49 499.52
2017203 04/01/09 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2394481 04/02/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 313.82 313.82
2017204 04/01/09 09571 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC 072994 02105109 HR SOFTWARE SET-UP 500.00 500.00
2017205 04/01/09 00101 GRAINGER INC 9856225819 03111/09 DUAL FLUSH HANDLES 378.21
9856793295 03/11/09 BATTERIES 119.61 497.82
2017206 04/01/09 00174 HACH COMPANY 6142914 03/10109 TURBIDIMETER PARTS 411.91 411.91
2017207 04101109 02629 HANSON AGGREGATES INC 587508 03/06/09 CRUSHED AGGREGATES &ROCK 774.79 774.79
2017208 04/01/09 00169 HAWTHORNE POWER SYSTEMS PC010021618 CREDIT MEMO (128.43)
PS010239405 03/10109 REPAIR PARTS 202.75 74.32
2017209 04/01/09 00713 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 45707990 03/09/09 RACKMOUNT KEYBOARD 1,710.91 1,710.91
2017210 04/01/09 10095 JOHN LEFFERDINK RF625318618 03/24/09 RE-ISSUE REFUND UNDER CORRECT NAME 59.49 59.49
2017211 04/01/09 09881 NATGUN CORPORATION 03/06/09 P2143 1296-3 RESERVOIR 2.0 MG 61,679.00 61,679.00
2017212 04/01/09 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2394465 04102109 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 10,878.62 10,878.62
2017213 04/01/09 09884 NATIONALSAFETYCOMPLIANCE INC 42490 02/28/09 RANDOM DRUG TESTING 1,348.93 1,348.93
2017214 04/01/09 03733 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC TMOOOOO04383 03/06/09 LABOR FOR PHONES SVCS 295.00
TMOOOOO04673 03/12/09 LABOR FOR PHONES SVCS 118.00 413.00
2017215 04/01/09 00510 OFFICE DEPOTINC 466543483001 03/11/09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 111.69 111.69
2017216 04/01/09 07945 OLIN CORP -CHLOR ALKALI 1131140 03/11/09 CHLORINE FOR TREATMENT PLANT 2,187.55 2,187.55
2017217 04/01/09 02084 OLLI BROS 031109 03/11/09 VOLUNTEER SHIRTS 253.45 253.45
2017218 04/01/09 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2394467 04/02109 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 819.00 819.00
2017219 04/01/09 09043 PARADIGM SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS INC 8162 03/11/09 TOUGHBOOK CDIDVD DRIVE 325.65 325.65
2017220 04/01/09 03308 PBS&J 1027546 11/30108 2009 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 37,358.24 37,358.24
2017221 04/01/09 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 001105 04/01/09 PETTYCASH REIMBURSEMENT 757.66 757.66
2017222 04101109 01733 PRICE TRONCONE &11971 02/16/09 DISTRICT RADIO REPEATER SITE RENTAL 3,567.00 3,567.00
Page 2 of 31
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017223 04/01/09 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 9108528 CREDIT MEMO (290.40)
0161937 03/12/09 UNIFORMS 335.90
0125457 02/26/09 UNIFORMS 335.59
0161936 03/12/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 148.78
0161938 03/12/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 106.42
0158240 03/11/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 94.95
0158239 03/11/09 UNIFORMS 57.49
0161939 03/12/09 UNIFORMS 56.41 845.14
2017224 04/01/09 02041 RBF CONSULTING 9020205 03/12/09 CIP P2009 -36 INCH PIPELINE 24,922.50 24,922.50
2017225 04/01/09 00021 RCP BLOCK &BRICK INC 4333901 CONCRETE (983.97)
4333900 03/11/09 CONCRETE 1,967.95 983.98
2017226 04/01/09 06645 RELIABLE ELEVATOR INC 16200 03/01/09 ELEVATOR SERVICE &MAINTENANCE 416.01 416.01
2017227 04/01/09 03279 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES LP 12285032 03/20109 TEMPORARY SERVICES -HR DEPT 1,315.20 1,315.20
2017228 04/01/09 03687 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC M005540858 03/10109 WASTE COOLANT DISPOSAL 100.50 100.50
2017229 04/01/09 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 133069 03/09/09 POTABLE WATER PIPELINES BIDS 96.10 96.10
2017230 04/01/09 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 001101 03/26/09 UTILITY EXPENSES 24,968.15
Cycles 12,13,16 03/20109 UTILITY EXPENSES 9,395.78
001091 03/20109 UTILITY EXPENSES 7,525.62 41,889.55
2017231 04/01/09 06280 SANCHEZ,OMAR 001097 03/25/09 SAFETY BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT 135.74 135.74
2017232 04/01/09 03514 SANTOS,MARCIANO 001108 03/27/09 SAFETY BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT 135.74 135.74
2017233 04/01/09 05983 SIEMENS WATER SLS30084362 03/10109 STRANTROL890 ORP PARTS 1,114.71
2715329 03/11/09 DEIONIZED PROCESSING TANK RENTAL 115.80 1,230.51
2017234 04/01/09 03612 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING 11115 01/31/09 1485-1 PUMP STATION DESIGN 2,842.25 2,842.25
2017235 04/01/09 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C39779 03/12109 AIR CONDITIONING MAINTENANCE 908.00 908.00
2017236 04/01/09 06853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIASOIL 350186 02/28/09 ON CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 8,259.21 8,259.21
2017237 04/01/09 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 28615 03/24/09 LIABILITY INSURANCE 788.79 788.79
2017238 04/01/09 10094 SPRINT NATIONAL LEASE MGMT SD34XC531REF 03/30109 SITE RENTAL PAYMENT REFUND 2,611.28 2,611.28
2017239 04/01/09 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394479 04/02/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 286.73 286.73
2017240 04/01/09 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394471 04/02109 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2017241 04/01/09 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394475 04/02/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 836.30 836.30
Page 3 of 31
...·c_V.;_'UZ
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/112009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017242 04/01/09 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394473 04/02109 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 841.01 841.Q1
2017243 04/01/09 02261 STATE STREET BANK &TRUST CO Ben2394463 04/02109 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,211.54 6,211.54
2017244 04/01/09 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC-SAN DIEGO 20037444 03/11/09 TIRE SERVICE 946.41
20037445 03/11/09 TIRE SERVICE 135.06
20037446 03/11/09 TIRE SERVICE 17.23 1,098.70
2017245 04/01/09 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2127 03/06/09 SCADA SERVER UPGRADE TO SOL 2008 7,681.00
2128 03/06/09 REBUILD TREATMENTPLANT SCADA SERVER 3,220.00
2131 03/10109 WIN911 ALARM SOFTWARE -MAlNT.SUPPORT 1,470.87 12,371.87
2017246 04/01/09 03374 TEK-COLLECT INC C28743 02/27/09 COLLECTION SERVICES 15,000.00 15,000.00
2017247 04/01/09 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWESTINC 79968183001 03/11/09 JACK HAMMER SERVICES 1,104.44
80045118001 03/11/09 CONCRETE 177.79
80047670001 03/11/09 CONCRETE 133.34 1,415.57
2017248 04/01/09 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2394477 04/02/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2017249 04/01/09 03212 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Ben2394457 04/02109 LONG TERM DISABILITY 9,967.15 9,967.15
2017250 04/01/09 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 001107 03/23/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 70.70 70.70
2017251 04/01/09 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2394469 04/02109 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 7,527.17 7,527.17
2017252 04/01/09 06414 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFER AGENTS Ben2394459 04/02/09 401A PLAN 3,254.62 3,254.62
2017253 04/01/09 01994 VORTEX 16148 03/11/09 USED FILTERS 100.00 100.00
2017254 04/01/09 10093 WATEREUSE FOUNDATION 001104 03/19/09 REGISTRATION FEE 325.00 325.00
2017255 04/01/09 00125 WESTERN PUMPINC 00750281N 03/11/09 APCD TESTING 538.00 538.00
2017256 04/01/09 03692 WESTIN ENGINEERING INC 32684 03/09/09 CIP P121 0 -ASSETMANAGEMENT PLAN 5,790.96 5,790.96
2017257 04/08/09 10133 9931 VIA DE LA AMISTAD Ref002394759 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000120104 776.43 776.43
2017258 04/08/09 10160 AARON MOTTER Ref002394786 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000140547 77.91 77.91
2017259 04/08/09 10117 ANTHONY HALL Ref002394743 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000075164 93.41 93.41
2017260 04/08/09 10123 ARTURO GONZALEZ Ref002394749 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000081572 14.36 14.36
2017261 04/08/09 10119 ATISHA HERROD Ref002394745 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000076257 37.78 37.78
2017262 04/08/09 10168 BANCROFT REALTY Ref002394795 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000141970 65.65 65.65
Page 4 of 31
""=~_~--,-,.---.--_~.T'._·~_"",,,",.~~_~~"""""'''-='C-''~~'==-'",".~._..~___"-'-.~'·~',~-'::'-~WJ;!
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 411/2009 TO 4129/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017263 04/08109 10116 BARBARA LOPEZ Ref002394742 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000074036 20.47 20.47
2017264 04/08/09 10191 BLUE BIRD HOMES Ref002394818 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000144322 28.77 28.77
2017265 04/08/09 10173 BRITANIA DEVELOPMENT Ref002394800 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142555 65.30 65.30
2017266 04/08/09 10165 BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENT Ref002394792 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000141724 60.71 60.71
2017267 04/08/09 10164 CAROLINA LEYVA Ref002394791 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000141529 41.97 41.97
2017268 04/08/09 10141 CHRISTOPHER AYALA Ref002394767 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000124896 29.10 29.10
2017269 04/08/09 10163 CYPREXX SERVICES Ref002394790 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000141069 75.00 75.00
2017270 04/08109 10129 DARREN SULLIVAN Ref002394755 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000089423 38.09 38.09
2017271 04/08/09 10124 DAWNA LOMPREY Ref002394750 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000083237 125.10 125.10
2017272 04/08/09 10138 DENISE BOWDEN Ref002394764 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000123306 210.58 210.58
2017273 04/08/09 10126 DESSE BASTO Ref002394752 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000085783 34.55 34.55
2017274 04/08/09 10152 DON PELLETIER GROUP Ref002394778 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000139770 31.29 31.29
2017275 04/08/09 10154 DOWNEY SAVINGS Ref002394780 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000140049 16.72 16.72
2017276 04/08/09 10131 EDUARDO VALENZUELA Ref002394757 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000092717 38.52 38.52
2017277 04/08/09 10108 EDWARD MUNOZ Ref002394734 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000040815 63.14 63.14
2017278 04/08/09 10100 ENRIQUE SURO Ref002394726 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000007166 72.69 72.69
2017279 04/08/09 10137 FANNIE MAE Ref002394763 04107/09 UB Refund Cst #0000123150 10.54 10.54
2017280 04/08/09 10112 FEDERICO DELCASTILLO Ref002394738 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000067639 75.00 75.00
2017281 04/08/09 10182 FIELD ASSET SERVICES INC Ref002394809 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143208 60.88 60.88
2017282 04/08/09 10128 FRANK PATRICELLI Ref002394754 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000087792 53.77 53.77
2017283 04/08/09 10177 FRANKLIN TUM Ref002394804 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143046 5.16 5.16
2017284 04/08/09 10125 GABINA BOSDET Ref002394751 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000084264 16.77 16.77
2017285 04108/09 10151 GREG SEALE Ref002394777 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000138906 45.52 45.52
2017286 04/08/09 10167 GREG SEALE Ref002394794 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000141796 16.47 16.47
Page 5 of 31
~""""""""~~·"",7_._._..~.~.~
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017287 04/08/09 10158 HALIM ABDULLAH Ref002394784 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000140302 24.94 24.94
2017288 04/08/09 10135 HAMANN COMPANIES Ref002394761 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000121800 28.55 28.55
2017289 04/08/09 10142 HERLINDA RYAN INC Ref002394768 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000124979 61.34 61.34
2017290 04/08/09 10171 HERLINDA RYAN INC Ref002394798 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142267 22.69 22.69
2017291 04/08/09 10181 JEFF WAGNER Ref002394808 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143172 5.13 5.13
2017292 04/08/09 10143 JINBONG JEONG Ref002394769 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000125499 45.16 45.16
2017293 04/08/09 10105 JUAN ARCE Ref002394731 04107/09 UB Refund Cst #0000019852 52.71 52.71
2017294 04/08/09 10115 JUAN DOMINGUEZ Ref002394741 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000073827 134.08 134.08
2017295 04/08/09 10144 JUDY BOHLEN Ref002394770 04107/09 UB Refund Cst #0000125501 21.61 21.61
2017296 04/08/09 10146 JUDY BOHLEN Ref002394772 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000127796 64.57 64.57
2017297 04/08/09 10174 KAREN WHEELER Ref002394801 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142737 13.61 13.61
2017298 04/08/09 10120 KAZUMI HASEGAWA Ref002394746 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000080645 12.04 12.04
2017299 04/08/09 10180 LINDA RING Ref002394807 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143145 26.77 26.77
2017300 04/08/09 10121 LUIS RICO Ref002394747 04/07109 UB Refund Cst #0000080873 61.70 61.70
2017301 04/08/09 10156 MARC CARPENTER &ASSOCIATES Ref002394782 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000140245 261.78 261.78
2017302 04/08/09 10189 MARC CARPENTER &ASSOCIATES Ref002394816 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143913 14.09 14.09
2017303 04/08/09 10110 MARGARITA URRUTIA Ref002394736 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000046630 41.16 41.16
2017304 04/08/09 10185 MARICELA GONZALEZ Ref002394812 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143559 51.13 51.13
2017305 04/08/09 10107 MARIE GUZMAN Ref002394733 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000033151 201.07 201.07
2017306 04/08/09 10118 MARIO GONZALEZ Ref002394744 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000075692 41.76 41.76
2017307 04/08/09 10103 MARTHA NARVAEZ Ref002394729 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000014812 8.21 8.21
2017308 04/08/09 10161 MICHELLE MACAWILI Ref002394787 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000140834 8.68 8.68
2017309 04/08109 10172 MORTGAGE CONTRACTING SERVICES Ref002394799 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142278 12.40 12.40
2017310 04/08/09 10127 NEIL BONZAGNI Ref002394753 04107/09 UB Refund Cst #0000085896 48.69 48.69
Page 6 of 31
"";-;.-.....,..'y:~"___,<._.~,,,.__,t~;,;.·~
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017311 04/08/09 10187 NEW VISTA REALTY Ref002394814 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143687 75.00 75.00
2017312 04/08/09 10190 NIEL MAMERTO Ref002394817 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143918 12.56 12.56
2017313 04/08/09 10147 OAKTREE REALTY Ref002394773 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000131617 5.01 5.01
2017314 04/08/09 10132 OAKWOOD DEVELOPMENT INC Ref002394758 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000094370 821.97 821.97
2017315 04/08/09 10186 OBRIEN REAL ESTATE SERVICES Ref002394813 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143654 75.00 75.00
2017316 04/08/09 10193 PACIFIC BUILDING GROUP Ref002394820 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144607 778.35 778.35
2017317 04/08/09 10109 PATRICE RITTER Ref002394735 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000044555 10.78 10.78
2017318 04/08/09 10157 PATRICIA CRUZ Ref002394783 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000140298 57.24 57.24
2017319 04/08/09 10101 PAUL BRADLEY Ref002394727 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000011918 78.97 78.97
2017320 04/08/09 10102 PAUL DOWNER Ref002394728 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000013331 56.70 56.70
2017321 04/08/09 10178 PAUL TACCONE Ref002394805 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143061 75.00 75.00
2017322 04/08/09 10150 PEDRO CALLEROS Ref002394776 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000136507 51.75 51.75
2017323 04/08/09 10159 PEGGYTOMASELLO Ref002394785 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000140343 41.94 41.94
2017324 04/08/09 10136 PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA REALTY Ref002394762 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000122326 49.62 49.62
2017325 04/08/09 10166 RAY ESPINOZA Ref002394793 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000141740 55.64 55.64
2017326 04/08/09 10140 RENEE INGRAM Ref002394766 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000124796 15.88 15.88
2017327 04/08/09 10139 REY DELAPENA Ref002394765 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000123907 29.29 29.29
2017328 04/08/09 10170 ROBERT SCHMIDT Ref002394797 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142124 75.00 75.00
2017329 04/08/09 10113 ROBERT WHEAT Ref002394739 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000068400 67.94 67.94
2017330 04/08/09 10155 ROBERTO GODINEZ Ref002394781 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000140112 75.00 75.00
2017331 04/08/09 10148 ROSE AVEDISIAN Ref002394774 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000133941 59.90 59.90
2017332 04/08/09 10104 RUBEN SERRANO Ref002394730 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000016059 59.20 59.20
2017333 04/08/09 10153 RUTH REYES Ref002394779 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000139824 20.85 20.85
2017334 04/08/09 10130 RYAN OWEN Ref002394756 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000090285 47.34 47.34
Page 7 of 31
~-".~.'~',,"",",~=~~~-::C-'",,-."~-._..-,...-,-.-~~",~~~.~.-.,_•."--....,,...',.~'.c·".f'.....,."
OTAY WATERDISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO4129/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017335 04/08/09 10162 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002394789 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000141066 30.78 30.78
2017336 04/08/09 10176 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002394803 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142843 31.29 31.29
2017337 04/08/09 10179 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002394806 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143141 14.71 14.71
2017338 04/08109 10183 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002394810 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143433 8.68 8.68
2017339 04/08/09 10188 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002394815 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143881 58.07 58.07
2017340 04/08/09 10184 STEPHANIEGARCIA Ref002394811 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143538 17.66 17.66
2017341 04/08/09 10111 STEVEN CAMPBELL Ref002394737 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000053861 30.32 30.32
2017342 04/08/09 10114 SUDBERRY PROPERTIES INC Ref002394740 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000068587 661.50 661.50
2017343 04/08/09 10145 TEAM TOWNSEND Ref002394771 04/07109 UB Refund Cst #0000125646 10.68 10.68
2017344 04/08/09 10149 TEAM TOWNSON Ref002394775 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000134059 58.28 58.28
2017345 04/08/09 10106 TERESA CARDONA Ref002394732 04107/09 UB Refund Cst #0000029024 47.56 47.56
2017346 04/08/09 10192 THE BROOKS KOLKER RESULTS TEAM Ref002394819 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144366 20.88 20.88
2017347 04/08/09 10134 VICENTA COBIAN-CISNEROS Ref002394760 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000120489 75.06 75.06
2017348 04/08/09 10122 VINCE VITALICH Ref002394748 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000081135 24.10 24.10
2017349 04/08/09 10175 WACHOVIA BANK Ref002394802 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142769 125.27 125.27
2017350 04/08/09 10169 WACHOVIA BANK FSB Ref002394796 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142094 159.68 159.68
2017351 04/08/09 10133 9931 VIADE LAAMISTAD Ref002394759 04/07/09 UB Refund Cst#0000120104 776.43 776.43
2017352 04/08/09 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 838247 03116/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,053.43
838246 03/16/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 551.38
837161 02/12/09 BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 282.95 1,887.76
2017353 04/08/09 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1658 03/31/09 CONSULTING SERVICES -IS DEPT 5,780.00
1664 04/07/09 CONSULTING SERVICES -IS DEPT 3,315.00 9,095.00
2017354 04/08/09 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570JD 04/01/09 PAGER SERVICE 431.59 431.59
2017355 04/08/09 00453 AMERICAN RIGGING &SUPPLY 0005301 03/18/09 CHAIN &GRAB HOOKS 3,491.10 3,491.10
2017356 04/08/09 00107 AMERICAN WATER WORKS 2000703949 01/27109 MEMBERSHIP DUES 82.00 82.00
Page 8 of 31
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017377 04/08/09 09885 ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP U2406530 12130108 UB PAYMENTCHARGEBACK 285.12 285.12
2017378 04/08/09 06813 EMPLOYMENT TRAINING 001118 04/03/09 MANDATORYTRAINING 70.00 70.00
2017379 04/08/09 03683 F &L INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS INC 8360 01/30109 SOLENOID VALVES 1,454.69 1,454.69
2017380 04/08/09 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 0307527 03/17109 INVENTORY 5,215.10
0307500 03/17109 INVENTORY 2,020.80
0307498 03/17109 INVENTORY 2,004.58
0307526 03117109 INVENTORY 608.79
0307168 03/16/09 10"DRESSER 392.98
0306634 03/17109 BOLT-CUTTER 119.19 10,361.44
2017381 04/08/09 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SO 309801 03/19/09 COFFEESUPPLIES 45.72
309823 03/19/09 COFFEE SUPPLIES 42.70 88.42
2017382 04/08/09 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 2406085 03/13/09 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 227.77 227.77
2017383 04/08/09 07224 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC 526840 03117/09 PAINT 642.51 642.51
2017384 04/08/09 05981 FROME,TERRY 001117 04/06/09 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 149.60 149.60
2017385 04/08/09 06291 GARCIA CALDERON &RUIZ LLP 2297 03/12109 LEGAL SERVICES JAN 2009 65,994.85
2344 03/31109 LEGAL SERVICES FEB 2009 32,521.31 98,516.16
2017386 04/08/09 03537 GHATECHNOLOGIES INC 536383 03/16/09 TONER 103.44
536771 03/18/09 SOFTWARE 77.58 181.02
2017387 04/08/09 03289 GRANGER,WILLIAM E 001131 04/06/09 COMPUTER LOAN PROGRAM 1,535.15 1,535.15
2017388 04/08/09 00174 HACH COMPANY 6153954 03/18/09 ANALYZER COLORIMETER ASSY 645.74 645.74
2017389 04/08/09 02629 HANSON AGGREGATES INC 588114 03/13/09 CRUSHED AGGREGATES &ROCK 364.97 364.97
2017390 04/08/09 00169 HAWTHORNE POWER SYSTEMS PC100007938 CORE CREDIT (1,612.37)
PS100164181 12117108 REPAIR PART 6,075.52
PS100160494 09/18/08 REPAJRPART 2,698.20
PS100160493 09/18/08 REPAIR PART 899.40
PS100160491 09/18/08 REPAIR PART 899.40
PS100160492 09/18/08 REPAIR PART 899.40
PS100162441 11103/08 FREIGHT FOR REPAIR PART 510.83
PS100164180 12117108 REPAIR PARTS 334.41
PS100167399 03/13/09 REPAIR PARTS 215.34
PS100164184 12/17108 REPAIR PARTS 153.53
PS100161330 10108/08 REPAIR PART 148.37
PS100164183 12/17108 REPAIR PARTS 106.77
PS100161329 10108/08 REPAIR PART 79.28
Page 10 of 31
,-~,~"""".'~7l"7T'Ni
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECKREGISTER
FOR CHECKS2017182THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
467541596001 03/18/09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 62.04
467541941001 03/18/09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.72 857.86
2017408 04108/09 10099 OMC PROPERTIES LLC 001124 04/06/09 WORK ORDER REF #D0098-XX9595 18,926.73 18,926.73
2017409 04/08/09 09987 PACIFIC DEFENSE SYSTEMS 0000993 03/13/09 REWIND 5 HP MOTOR 1,293.98 1,293.98
2017410 04/08/09 03017 PACIFIC SAFETY COUNCIL 65957 03/19/09 CPR/FIRSTAID TRAINING 50.00 50.00
2017411 04/08/09 03308 PBS&J 1037431 03/13/09 2009 MASTER PLAN UPDATE 13,724.50
1037419 03/13/09 CIP P2089-RECYCLED WATER CONCEPT STUD'!10,532.40
1037398 03/13/09 HYDRAULIC MODELING &GIS SUPPORT 390.00 24,646.90
2017412 04/08/09 03649 PECK S HEAVY FRICTION INC 192742 03/16/09 REPAIR PART 64.60
192733 03/16/09 REPAIR PART 64.60 129.20
2017413 04/08/09 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 0177953 03/19/09 UNIFORMS 321.90
0177952 03/19/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 148.78
0177954 03/19/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 109.79
0174726 03/18/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 94.95
0174725 03/18/09 UNIFORMS 55.49
0177955 03/19/09 UNIFORMS 50.65 781.56
2017414 04/08/09 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben2394461 04/02/09 PERS CONTRIBUTION 125,339.34 125,339.34
2017415 04/08/09 01342 R J SAFETYSUPPLY CO INC 25956701 03/19/09 ORANGE SAFETYJACKET 59.98 59.98
2017416 04/08/09 00021 RCP BLOCK &BRICK INC 4334032 03/17/09 CONCRETE 372.38 372.38
2017417 04/08109 01890 RECON 38319 03109109 P1253 -PREPARATION OF THE SUBAREA PLAN 2,351.50 2,351.50
2017418 04/08/09 09993 REPROHAUS CORP 0000112637 03/11/09 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 9,873.63 9,873.63
2017419 04/08/09 10195 RICHARD MICHAELS RF250511722 04/07/09 CUST REFUND FOR OVERPMT 497.77 497.77
2017420 04/08/09 08972 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 0011943 03/19/09 GIS SOFTWARE INSTALLATION &SUPPORT 3,600.00 3,600.00
2017421 04/08/09 00521 RICK POST WELDING &8392 03/13/09 WELDING SERVICES 1,029.38
8387 03/13/09 WELDING SERVICES 630.00
8393 03/13/09 WELDING SERVICES 350.00 2,009.38
2017422 04/08/09 10092 RON OEDING 001093 03/19/09 WELLNESS PROGRAM 418.99 418.99
2017423 04/08109 03279 ROTH STAFFING COMPANIES LP 12286587 03/27/09 TEMPORARY SERVICES -HR DEPT 1,315.20 1,315.20
2017424 04/08/09 00217 RW LITTLE CO INC 91798 03/16/09 POWDER COAT PARTS 970.00 970.00
2017425 04/08/09 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER 6871 03/31/09 SMART LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 180.00 180.00
Page 12 of 31
--:.-.....~""'~...,.~~-"""'-"...,.",.",.,..~..,~..~.~~...~~.,..-..,.,......,....----.,.-"'-,-,..."..,..~~-.,.~.':-...~-..,..,~~-_.'_._._.~."",,..--~:._;~.
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017426 04/08/09 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 001112 03/27/09 UTILITY EXPENSES 49,271.18
001111 03/26/09 UTILITY EXPENSES 19,982.86
001121 04/06/09 UTILITY EXPENSES 1,828.75
001114 03/30/09 UTILITY EXPENSES 300.75
001110 03/05/09 UTILITY EXPENSES 17.23
001129 04/02/09 UTILITY EXPENSE 9.56 71,410.33
2017427 04/08/09 03809 SAN DIEGO NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS 02528253001 03/13/09 JOB POSTING 92.00 92.00
2017428 04/08/09 03592 SOFTCHOICECORPORATION 1995983 03/17/09 PANASONIC TOUGHBOOK LAPTOP 2,991.58
1997139 03/18/09 PANASONIC MODEM 251.76 3,243.34
2017429 04/08/09 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &265052 03/19/09 EXHAUST FAN REPLACEMENT 1,477.00 1,477.00
2017430 04/08/09 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 802583 03/13/09 PORTABLE TOILETRENTAL 112.06
802580 03/13/09 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79.96
802677 03/16/09 PORTABLE TOILETRENTAL 79.96
802581 03/13/09 PORTABLE TOILETRENTAL 79.96
802582 03/13109 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79.96 431.90
2017431 04/08/09 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 28598 03/20/09 LIABILITY INSURANCE 1,508.46 1,508.46
2017432 04/08/09 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 12290 03/19/09 SECURITYSERVICE &REPAIRS 127.50 127.50
2017433 04/08/09 03926 STANDARD PACIFIC CORP 001125 04/06/09 WORK ORDER REF #D0139-XX9568 7,989.36 7,989.36
2017434 04/08/09 00097 STATE BOARD OFEQUALIZATION 440221330309 03/31/09 STORAGETANK MAINT FEE 286.73 286.73
2017435 04/08/09 08399 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT 0806900210 04/06/09 TEMPORARY SERVICES -OPS DEPT 27,208.00 27,208.00
2017436 04/08/09 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20037520 03/17/09 TIRE SERVICE 472.18 472.18
2017437 04108/09 09974 TPO LLC 001126 04/06/09 WORKORDER REF #D0514-010274 319.00 319.00
2017438 04/08/09 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 001130 03/23/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 7,979.01
001134 03/23/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 206.39
001132 03/23/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 188.36 8,373.76
2017439 04/15/09 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 838565 03/23/09 BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 1,323.32
838564 03/23/09 BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 628.29
838450 03/20/09 BULKSODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 487.54
838451 03/20/09 BULKSODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 326.48 2,765.63
2017440 04/15109 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 1677 04/14/09 CONSULTING SERVICES 3,230.00 3,230.00
2017441 04/15/09 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131118514 03/25/09 BULK AQUA AMMONIA 2,086.42
131118513 03/25/09 BULK AQUA AMMONIA 2,085.93 4,172.35
Page 13 of 31
__.-c~-""""-_~~~_.'~"","","",=,~",,~~,.'~-~--"~'=~....-.=~~-,,'.
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 41112009 TO 412912009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017442 04115109 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #509 0509003513406 03/25/09 TRASH REMOVAL SERVICES 754.95
0509003514776 03/25/09 ASBESTOS DISPOSAL CONTAINERRENTAL 188.88
0509003515563 03/25/09 TRASH REMOVAL SVCS TREATMENT PLANT 118.83 1,062.66
2017443 04/15/09 02572 ALVAREZ,GERMAN F 14580309 03/27/09 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 122.00 122.00
2017444 04/15/09 02966 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 112701 03/23/09 DEGREASER 470.91 470.91
2017445 04115/09 00453 AMERICAN RIGGING &SUPPLY 0026201 03/25/09 SHOP SUPPLIES 1,249.68 1,249.68
2017446 04/15/09 03446 AMERICAN SOCIETYOF CIVIL 001140 04/09/09 REGISTRATION FEES 180.00 180.00
2017447 04/15/09 08024 BACKGROUND PROFILES INC 267 03/31/09 BACKGROUND CHECKS 89.00 89.00
2017448 04115/09 01232 BRODING'S BATIERYWAREHOUSE 4643 03/26109 AUTOMOTIVE BATIERIES 199.23
4659 03/26/09 AUTOMOTIVE BATIERIES 129.25 328.48
2017449 04115/09 08542 BUCK PETROLEUM CO 3100635 03/24/09 UNLEADED FUEL 8,833.78
3100636 03/24/09 DIESEL FUEL 8,581.84 17,415.62
2017450 04/15/09 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 053102 03/20/09 SAFETY APPAREL 128.39
0531021 03126/09 SAFETY EQUIPMENT PPE 54.94 183.33
2017451 04115/09 07044 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1110899555 03/20/09 REPAIR PARTS 63.22 63.22
2017452 04/15/09 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 11182860 03/25109 CAMERA FORSAFETYVEHICLE PACKETS 87.79
11179570 03/23/09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.01 106.80
2017453 04/15/09 03334 COMPUTER MASTERS 73454 03/26109 5 PORT SATA FOR DISK COPY 118.50 118.50
2017454 04/15/09 03706 CONSUMERS PIPE &SUPPLY CO S1097791001 03/26/09 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 191.47 191.47
2017455 04/15/09 08387 COUNTY OF SO-LANDFILL MGMNT 200902 03/25/09 MICROTURBINE POWER GENERATION 504.90 504.90
2017456 04/15109 03098 CROUCHER,GARY 0 70110209 02/28/09 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 174.00 174.00
2017457 04115109 03417 DIRECTV 986728614 04/05/09 SATELLITE TVSERVICE 10.00 10.00
2017458 04/15109 01926 EAST COUNTY URGENT CARE 1005980309 03120/09 DMV HEALTH EXAM 43.00 43.00
2017459 04115109 06525 ELECTRIC MOTOR SPECIALISTS INC 2863 03/20/09 REBUILD GRINDER MOTOR 428.79 428.79
2017460 04115/09 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 0308399 03/26/09 INVENTORY 3,893.87
0307502 03/23/09 FIRE HYD REPAIR PARTS 929.61
03074981 03/24/09 INVENTORY 814.59
0308393 03/24/09 INVENTORY 647.04
0307528 03123109 INVENTORY 504.27
Page 14 of 31
~.~.~.--'-~--------------'----~'
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECKREGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017480 04/15/09 04676 NAPA AUTO PARTS 142341 CREDIT MEMO (316.74)
145006 CREDITMEMO (64.71)
141504a 02/26/09 REPAIR PARTS 280.13
144752 03/26109 REPAIR PARTS 43.06
144705 03/25/09 REPAIR PARTS 35.96
144802 03/26/09 REPAIR PARTS 33.27
144677 03/25/09 REPAIR PARTS 9.46 20.43
2017481 04/15/09 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2394951 04/16/09 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 11,177.77 11,177.77
2017482 04/15/09 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 469029532001 03/25/09 LASER TONER CARTRIDGE 163.88
468853760001 03/25/09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 110.05
468853978001 03/25/09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.83 295.76
2017483 04/15/09 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2394953 04/16/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 826.00 826.00
2017484 04/15/09 07737 PARADISE CANYON SYSTEMS INC 032009924 03/25/09 EMC EMAILXTENDER 1,620.00 1,620.00
2017485 04/15/09 03308 PBS&J 1038321 03/20109 PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES 806.07 806.07
2017486 04/15/09 03649 PECK S HEAVY FRICTION INC 192998 03/24/09 REPAIR PARTS 179.92
193087 03/26/09 REPAIR PARTS 50.10 230.02
2017487 04/15/09 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 21526 03/20109 FLAT SAW CUTTING SERVICES 260.00 260.00
2017488 04/15/09 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 001146 04/14/09 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 491.21 491.21
2017489 04/15/09 10199 PEXIS CORPORATION 07185 03/30109 EXPERT CONSULTING SERVICES 1,059.00 1,059.00
2017490 04/15/09 05499 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 32601408 03/20109 WELDING SUPPLIES &EQUIPMENT 556.63 556.63
2017491 04/15/09 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALLSUPPLY 0194005 03/26/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 148.79
0194007 03/26/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 109.80
0190812 03/25/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 94.95
0066671 02/04/09 UNIFORMS 67.49
0190811 03/25/09 UNIFORMS 59.39
0194008 03/26/09 UNIFORMS 54.01 534.43
2017492 04/15/09 09804 PUBLICIAPRESS LTD 20093206 03/23/09 BUSINESS CARDS 96.97
20093210 03/23/09 BUSINESS CARDS 59.26 156.23
2017493 04/15109 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 26090700 03/25/09 SAFETY SUPPLIES 779.37 779.37
2017494 04/15/09 00021 RCP BLOCK&BRICK INC 4334104 03/21/09 CONCRETE 1,551.60 1,551.60
2017495 04/15/09 00217 RW LITTLE CO INC 91893 03/23/09 VICTAULIC COUPLING POWDER COAT 275.00 275.00
Page 16 of 31
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017496 04/15/09 09148 S&J SUPPLY COMPANY INC 080862 03/24/09 INVENTORY 7,407.81 7,407.81
2017497 04/15/09 10198 SAN DIEGO &IMPERIAL COUNTIES 001141 04/07/09 SPONSORSHIP 500.00 500.00
2017498 04/15/09 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 001135 04/03/09 UTILITY EXPENSES 61,683.01
001145 04/06/09 UTILITYEXPENSES 70.34 61,753.35
2017499 04/15/09 03273 SAN DIEGO READER 23570 03/12109 JOB POSTING 93.46 93.46
2017500 04/15/09 10197 SENSIBLE ORGANIZING SOLUTIONS 001S0S 04/06/09 WELLNESS PROGRAM 250.00 250.00
2017501 04/15/09 05983 SIEMENS WATER 2733190 03/26/09 WATER SYSTEMS PARTS 3,664.65
2733394 03/24/09 LEAD WASHER 411.85
2723593 03/20/09 COLUMN EXCHANGES 195.72 4,272.22
2017502 04/15/09 03592 SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION 1988164 03/09/09 TOUGHBOOK FOR METER READERS 4,997.05 4,997.05
2017503 04/15/09 01669 SOUTHLAND ENVELOPE CO INC 060559 03/23/09 ENVELOPES 421.52 421.52
2017504 04/15/09 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 803767 03/25/09 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 79.96 79.96
2017505 04/15/09 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 28662 04/02/09 LIABILITY INSURANCE 199.26
28628 03/26/09 LIABILITY INSURANCE 140.22 339.48
2017506 04/15/09 00480 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 001149 03/31/09 SALES USE TAX 1,944.86 1,944.86
2017507 04/15/09 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394967 04/16/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 286.73 286.73
2017508 04/15/09 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394957 04/16/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2017509 04/15/09 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394961 04/16/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 836.30 836.30
2017510 04/15/09 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2394959 04/16/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 841.01 841.01
2017511 04/15/09 02261 STATE STREET BANK &TRUST CO Ben2394949 04/16/09 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,211.54 6,211.54
2017512 04/15/09 10200 SUNROAD CV LAND INC 001147 04/09/09 POTABLE IRRIGATION METER REFUND 23,410.00 23,410.00
2017513 04/15/09 01736 SWIGGERS,JULIE M 001139 04/08/09 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 525.00 525.00
2017514 04/15/09 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20037558 03/23/09 TIRE SERVICE 595.53 595.53
2017515 04/15/09 01834 TC CONSTRUCTION INC RF998564200 04/09/09 RE-ISSUE UB REFUND TO CONTRACTOR 554.41 554.41
2017516 04/15/09 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2132 03/23/09 STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE 111.2.C.1-YR09 12,339.00 12,339.00
2017517 04/15/09 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 80287267001 03/24/09 CONCRETE 199.34 199.34
Page 17 of 31
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017518 04/15/09 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2394963 04/16/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2017519 04/15/09 00350 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 001143 04/13/09 REIMBURSE POSTAGE MACHINE 1,650.00 1,650.00
2017520 04/15/09 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 001137 03/23/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 5,587.27
001142 01/22/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 3,710.92
001138 03/23/09 DISTRICTEXPENSES 50.29 9,348.48
2017521 04/15/09 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 0135930lN 03/25/09 INVENTORY 1,486.30
0135850lN 03/20109 INVENTORY 1,329.85 2,816.15
2017522 04/15/09 10196 US HISPANIC CONTRACTORS &106 04/08/09 SPONSORSHIP 500.00 500.00
2017523 04/15/09 09218 VACO LA JOLLA LLC BILL000000004318 03/27/09 TEMPORARYSERVICES -ENGG DEPT 4,032.16
BILL000000004318 03/27/09 TEMPORARYSERVICES -ENGG DEPT 1,744.32 5,776.48
2017524 04/15/09 01095 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFERAGENTS Ben2394955 04/16/09 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,911.94 6,911.94
2017525 04/15/09 06414 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFER AGENTS Ben2394945 04116109 401A PLAN 2,563.40 2,563.40
2017526 04/15/09 07595 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 282073801 03/23/09 CUTLER HAMMER SOFT START 60 HP 3,771.25 3,771.25
2017527 04/15/09 00014 WAXIE SANITARYSUPPLY 71181932 03/20109 JANITORIALSUPPLIES 1,735.37 1,735.37
2017528 04/15/09 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 53612 03/26/09 PEST CONTROL-BEE REMOVAL 115.00 115.00
2017529 04115/09 00190 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 817963774 03/20109 LEGAL LIBRARY UPDATES 1,802.13 1,802.13
2017530 04/15/09 02230 WILLIAMSON,KELLI M 001144 04/08109 TRAVEL ADVANCEMENT 111.00 111.00
2017531 04/22/09 10209 ALICIA BULGER Ref002395134 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000141049 22.50 22.50
2017532 04/22/09 10239 AMERICAN EAGLE REAL ESTATE Ref002395166 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144113 59.59 59.59
2017533 04/22/09 10233 ANDREW WARBURTON Ref002395159 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143365 20.85 20.85
2017534 04/22/09 10262 ANNA MORGAN Ref002395190 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000074607 44.89 44.89
2017535 04/22/09 10273 ANNA ROSIER Ref002395204 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000125487 17.26 17.26
2017536 04/22/09 10281 ASHLON REALTV Ref002395213 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000136476 37.91 37.91
2017537 04/22/09 10211 ASSETLINK Ref002395137 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000141358 18.74 18.74
2017538 04/22/09 10232 AXIA REAL ESTATE GROUP INC Ref002395158 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143226 53.01 53.01
2017539 04/22/09 10225 BARBARA DOWNING Ref002395151 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142810 49.41 49.41
Page 18 of 31
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017540 04/22/09 10208 BRITANNIA DEVELOPMENTCO Reffi02395133 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000140651 56.46 56.46
2017541 04/22/09 10278 BUSHRA GORYOKA Reffi02395209 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000126745 36.58 36.58
2017542 04/22/09 10280 CALIFORNIA PROPERTY INV Reffi02395211 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000128197 43.04 43.04
2017543 04/22/09 10048 CENTURY 21 FIRST CHOICE Reffi02395212 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000134002 20.85 20.85
2017544 04/22/09 10265 CHRISTY PETERSON Reffi02395194 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000092300 22.78 22.78
2017545 04/22/09 10247 CINDY DWYER Reffi02395174 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000144883 48.17 48.17
2017546 04/22109 10255 CINDY HUGHES Reffi02395182 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000020507 26.34 26.34
2017547 04/22/09 10224 COLDWELL BANKER Reffi02395150 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142771 15.86 15.86
2017548 04/22/09 10272 D.USVALDO LOMELI Reffi02395203 04/22109 UB Refund Cst #0000125458 14.34 14.34
2017549 04/22/09 10253 DAWN WUJCIK LEWIS Reffi02395180 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000007588 75.00 75.00
2017550 04/22/09 10270 DEAN SHECKLES Ref002395201 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000124182 276.08 276.08
2017551 04/22/09 10282 DENNIS DESOUZA Reffi02395214 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000138900 40.24 40.24
2017552 04/22109 10154 DOWNEY SAVINGS Ref002395217 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000140049 41.56 41.56
2017553 04/22/09 10222 DRAWDECA INC Reffi02395148 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142691 51.39 51.39
2017554 04/22/09 10221 EDWARD ROEPKE Ref002395147 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000142562 40.06 40.06
2017555 04/22/09 10137 FANNIE MAE Reffi02395199 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000123150 37.02 37.02
2017556 04/22/09 10219 FIELD ASSET SERVICES Reffi02395145 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142368 49.06 49.06
2017557 04/22/09 10250 FIRE WATCH Ref002395177 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000145779 676.46 676.46
2017558 04/22109 10227 GREG SCOTT Reffi02395153 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143027 47.64 47.64
2017559 04/22109 10223 GREG SEALE Reffi02395149 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142749 48.51 48.51
2017560 04/22/09 10238 GREYHOUND GENERAL INC Reffi02395165 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144076 124.82 124.82
2017561 04/22/09 10243 GREYHOUND GENERAL INC Ref002395170 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144681 49.44 49.44
2017562 04/22/09 10259 HAMED DOST Reffi02395187 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000063663 67.72 67.72
2017563 04/22/09 10216 IMPA C SECURED ASSETS Reffi02395142 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142081 174.99 174.99
Page 19 of 31
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/112009 TO 4/29/2009
Check#Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017564 04/22/09 10263 ISABEL LOPEZ Ref002395191 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000076273 155.15 155.15
2017565 04/22/09 10267 JEAN GILLES Ref002395196 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000094516 24.28 24.28
2017566 04/22109 10260 JESUS CAMPA Ref002395188 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000066802 40.49 40.49
2017567 04/22/09 05887 JOSE'CABRERA Ref002395183 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000037660 194.95 194.95
2017568 04/22109 10254 JOSE ESQUER Ref002395181 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000016074 51.95 51.95
2017569 04/22109 10257 JOSEPH ALKIRE Ref002395185 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000048433 75.77 75.77
2017570 04/22/09 10229 JUDY BOHLEN Ref002395155 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143136 29.47 29.47
2017571 04/22/09 10237 KIM THOMAS Ref002395164 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144056 48.51 48.51
2017572 04/22/09 10264 KIMBERLY MCKELVEY Ref002395193 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000092178 101.95 101.95
2017573 04/22/09 10218 LINDA RING Ref002395144 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142299 69.49 69.49
2017574 04/22/09 10189 MARC CARPENTER &ASSOCIATES Ref002395162 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143913 60.91 60.91
2017575 04/22/09 10228 MARC CARPENTER&ASSOCIATES Ref002395154 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143122 80.31 80.31
2017576 04/22/09 10242 MARC CARPENTER&ASSOCIATES Ref002395169 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144295 42.55 42.55
2017577 04/22/09 10285 MARILYN SCHWARTZ Ref002395218 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000140077 75.00 75.00
2017578 04/22/09 10261 MIKE MASKO Ref002395189 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000069725 61.56 61.56
2017579 04/22/09 10231 MILLLENIA REAL ESTATE Ref002395157 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000143225 12.48 12.48
2017580 04/22/09 10266 MITSURU IKEDA Ref002395195 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000094326 113.95 113.95
2017581 04/22/09 10276 MORTGAGE CONTRACTING SVCE Ref002395207 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000126607 48.68 48.68
2017582 04/22/09 10252 NATHAN WINGO Ref002395179 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000006510 116.87 116.87
2017583 04/22/09 10127 NEIL BONZAGNI Ref002395192 04/22109 UB Refund Cst #0000085896 30.92 30.92
2017584 04/22109 10274 NIAMH O'CONNOR Ref002395205 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000125666 38.34 38.34
2017585 04/22/09 10251 NOJAN TALEBZADEH Ref002395178 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000005810 26.30 26.30
2017586 04/22/09 10271 OAKTREE REALTY Ref002395202 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000124986 54.15 54.15
2017587 04/22/09 10248 PATRICIA MCKELVEY Ref002395175 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000145185 31.30 31.30
Page 20 of 31
OTAYWATERDISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017588 04/22/09 10217 PAULINA UBERA Ref002395143 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000142271 6.11 6.11
2017589 04/22/09 10159 PEGGY TOMASELLO Ref002395131 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000140343 121.90 121.90
2017590 04/22/09 10246 PRISCILLA MUDGE Ref002395173 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000144808 53.01 53.01
2017591 04/22109 10244 RALPH BAEZ Ref002395171 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000144786 60.88 60.88
2017592 04/22109 10236 ROBERT SCHMIDT Ref002395163 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143999 30.60 30.60
2017593 04/22/09 10277 ROBERTWEICHELT Ref002395208 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000126640 55.54 55.54
2017594 04/22/09 10269 ROSALBA CASTRO Ref002395198 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000122968 104.08 104.08
2017595 04/22109 10245 RUBEN BARRON Ref002395172 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000144799 30.61 30.61
2017596 04/22/09 10212 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002395138 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000141366 21.24 21.24
2017597 04/22/09 10213 SAN DIEGO REALTV Ref002395139 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000141542 41.83 41.83
2017598 04/22/09 10214 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002395140 04/22109 UB Refund Cst #0000141619 58.28 58.28
2017599 04/22109 10235 SAN DIEGO REALTV Ref002395161 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000143859 68.03 68.03
2017600 04/22/09 10279 SAN DIEGO REALTV Ref002395210 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000126814 50.56 50.56
2017601 04/22/09 10063 SAN DIEGO REO Ref002395135 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000141147 43.52 43.52
2017602 04/22/09 10215 SANDY MILLER Ref002395141 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000141743 30.21 30.21
2017603 04/22/09 10284 SANDY MILLER Ref002395216 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000139936 48.68 48.68
2017604 04/22/09 10283 SATOSHIISHIZUKA Ref002395215 04/22109 UB Refund Cst#0000139507 57.90 57.90
2017605 04/22/09 10249 SKYLINE CHURCH Ref002395176 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000145467 1,870.41 1,870.41
2017606 04/22/09 10275 SUZAN COLLINS Ref002395206 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000126153 59.99 59.99
2017607 04/22/09 10207 SYLVIA CONTRERAS Ref002395132 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000140548 32.59 32.59
2017608 04/22/09 10258 TAKASHIICHIBAYASHI Ref002395186 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000058104 116.42 116.42
2017609 04/22/09 10210 TEAM TOWNSON Ref002395136 04/22109 UB Refund Cst #0000141352 8.06 8.06
2017610 04/22/09 10234 TEAM TOWNSON Ref002395160 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143561 6.11 6.11
2017611 04/22/09 10240 TEAM TOWNSON Ref002395167 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144202 62.22 62.22
Page 21 of 31
OTAY WATERDISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO4129/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017612 04/22/09 10220 TEAM TOWNSON INC Ref002395146 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142481 20.85 20.85
2017613 04/22/09 10256 TERESA MCCLELLAN Ref002395184 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000045784 8.76 8.76
2017614 04/22/09 10027 TRIMARK PACIFIC HOMES Ref002395200 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000123504 19.71 19.71
2017615 04/22/09 10286 VATItA TA REAL ESTATE GROUP Ref002395219 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000140280 56.17 56.17
2017616 04/22109 10226 WACHOVIA BANK Ref002395152 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000142844 138.46 138.46
2017617 04/22/09 10230 YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY Ref002395156 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst#0000143151 721.62 721.62
2017618 04/22109 10268 YVONNE FULLERTON Ref002395197 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000121911 50.35 50.35
2017619 04/22/09 10241 ZULEMA MALDONADO Ref002395168 04/22/09 UB Refund Cst #0000144243 77.06 77.06
2017620 04/22/09 02097 3E COMPANY INC 3EINV0018877 03/25/09 MSDS ON DEMAND 977.50 977.50
2017621 04/22109 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 838914 03/30109 BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 972.18
839148 04/02/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 666.21
838824 03/27/09 BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 592.01
838913 03/30109 BULK HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION 589.11
839147 04/02109 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 490.51 3,310.02
2017622 04/22/09 02024 ACCOUNTING DAYASSOCIATION 001156 04/21/09 REGISTRATION 130.00 130.00
2017623 04/22/09 03787 ALLIED TRENCH SHORING SERVICE 910466 03/26/09 TRAFFIC CONTROL 399.89 399.89
2017624 04/22/09 01369 AMERICAN BACKFLOW INV10780 04/02/09 BACKFLOW GAUGE CALIBRATION 120.00 120.00
2017625 04/22/09 08026 ARB INC LF20373 03/09/09 R2081 -20 INCH LANE AVENUE CONVERSION 16,258.59 16,258.59
2017626 04/22/09 05758 AT&T 082164572803250~03/25/09 OPTE MAN INTERNET BANDWIDTH 1,905.30 1,905.30
2017627 04/22/09 07785 AT&T 000000547022 04/02/09 PHONE SERVICES 5,956.63 5,956.63
2017628 04/22/09 08330 AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 8547826250309 03/22/09 OPTE MAN INTERNET BANDWIDTH 1,200.00 1,200.00
2017629 04/22109 01232 BRODING'S BATIERYWAREHOUSE 5343 CREDIT MEMO (21.00)
4889 04/01/09 AUTOMOTIVE BATIERIES 668.49
4914 04/02109 AUTOMOTIVE BATIERIES 107.61 755.10
2017630 04/22/09 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 32618 03/30109 CRUSHED ROCK 358.35
32663 04/02/09 CRUSHED ROCK 82.90 441.25
2017631 04/22/09 10206 CALIF DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 001155 04/20/09 CERTIFICATION ApPLICATION 105.00 105.00
2017632 04/22109 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 82559 03/18/09 ASPHALT 394.04 394.04
Page 22 of 31
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECKREGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017633 04/22/09 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 052633 04/01/09 MICRO MAX PRO GAS TECH OVER HAUL 1,082.28 1,082.28
2017634 04/22/09 08009 CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS INC 4002062823 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 645.19
4002060934 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 505.82
4002055623 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 477.56
4002055610 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 34.59 1,663.16
2017635 04/22/09 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 6973 04/01/09 RECORDS STORAGE&SUPPORT 1,442.25
6972 04/01/09 SCANNING ENGINEERING DRAWINGS 48.18 1,490.43
2017636 04/22109 02612 COUNCIL OF WATER UTILITIES 001154 04/16/09 MEETING REGISTRATION 50.00 50.00
2017637 04/22109 00134 COUNTYOF SAN DIEGO 2008238 04/10109 COUNTY ASSESSOR DATA 125.00 125.00
2017638 04/22/09 02122 COUNTYOFSD AIR POLLUTION AP97117746 03/27/09 EMISSION &PERMIT FEES 420.00
97118079 03/26/09 EMISSION &PERMIT FEES 367.00
97118069 03/26/09 EMISSION &PERMIT FEES 367.00 1,154.00
2017639 04/22/09 07601 CREATIVE BENEFITS INC 72510 04/01/09 FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCT ADMIN FEES 721.20 721.20
2017640 04/22/09 07680 DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS P090420 04/20/09 EMPLOYEE HEALTH ADMINISTRATION SVCS 1,372.40 1,372.40
2017641 04/22109 00230 EDP PRODUCTS INC 805935 03/31/09 CARTRIDGE STORAGEIRETRIEVAL 219.60 219.60
2017642 04/22109 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 00459351N 04/02/09 ADMINISTRATION FEES FORCOBRA 555.00 555.00
2017643 04/22/09 03725 ENVIRONMENTALSYSTEMS RESEARC~91944306 03/31/09 PROFESSIONAL DATABASE SUPPORT 408.00 408.00
2017644 04/22/09 00645 FEDEX 916169963 04/17/09 OVERNIGHT PICK-UP &DELIVERY MAILSVCS 8.14 8.14
2017645 04/22/09 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 03075271 04/01/09 INVENTORY 6,699.00
03075261 04/01/09 INVENTORY 4,301.06
0309213 03/27/09 INVENTORY 3,168.88
03074982 03/30/09 INVENTORY 1,993.38
03092131 03/30/09 INVENTORY 1,811.55
0309306 03/27/09 PIPE SUPPORT 118.53 18,092.40
2017646 04/22/09 08005 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC INC 20442176 03/31/09 METROSCAN ONLINE DATA/MAPS 453.15 453.15
2017647 04/22/09 08893 FIRST AMERICAN DATATREE 90034039 03/31/09 ONLINE MAP PURCHASING SERVICE 99.00 99.00
2017648 04/22/09 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SD 310525 04/02/09 COFFEE SUPPLIES 549.19 549.19
2017649 04/22/09 02591 FITNESS TECH INC 5652 04/01/09 FITNESS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 125.00 125.00
2017650 04/22/09 09049 FOX CONSTRUCTION 5 03/30/09 P2465/P2466 MATLSTORAGE BINSICOVER 33,850.00 33,850.00
Page 23 of 31
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES411/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017651 04/22/09 00101 GRAINGER INC 9870839967 04/01/09 CORDLESS RECIPROCATING SAW 487.56 487.56
2017652 04/22109 01576 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 940542772 04/01/09 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 1,172.53
940716110 04/10109 WIRING TOOLS 24.79 1,197.32
2017653 04/22/09 02187 GREENSCAPE 2157 04/01/09 LANDSCAPING SERVICES 6,090.00 6,090.00
2017654 04/22109 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 28797 03/31/09 TECHNICAL SUPPORTFOR CITRIX 585.60 585.60
2017655 04/22/09 00150 HAWTHORNE MACHINERY CO S1847701 03/27/09 REPLACEMENT FORKS 2,181.94 2,181.94
2017656 04/22/09 06843 HI-TECH AIR CONDITIONING 5037 03/30109 DATA CENTER AC MAINTENANCE 375.00
5777 03/31/09 DATA CENTER AC MAlNTENANCE 305.00 680.00
2017657 04/22/09 03743 HYDROTEX 563003 03/30109 OIL SAMPLE KITS 593.87
563028 03/31/09 OILSAMPLE KITS 65.99 659.86
2017658 04/22/09 08491 IDENTIFICATION SERVICES 001115 04/01/09 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 20.00 20.00
2017659 04/22/09 08969 INFOSEND INC 36460 04/02/09 POSTAGE 16,483.65
36382 03/31/09 BILL PRINTING SERVICES 7,411.21 23,894.86
2017660 04/22/09 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 30610 03/31/09 PLANT SERVICE 169.00 169.00
2017661 04/22/09 06630 J C HEDEN AND ASSOCIATES INC OWD026 04102109 TEMPORARY LABORSERVICES 15,665.00 15,665.00
2017662 04/22/09 03077 JANI-KING OF CA INC -SDO SD004090307 04/01/09 OFF-SITE JANITORIAL SERVICES 1,042.00 1,042.00
2017663 04/22109 02448 KEN PIERSON 30914 03/27/09 CRANE RE-CERTIFICATION 450.00 450.00
2017664 04/22/09 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 4240 03/31/09 ANNUAL AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES 9,788.00 9,788.00
2017665 04/22/09 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 467280 03/30109 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.60
467773 04/01/09 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.60
467776 04/01/09 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.60
467783 04/01/09 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.60
467780 04/01/09 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITTEE PACKETS 28.60 143.00
2017666 04/22/09 09511 LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 1714 03/31/09 RESERVOIR FLOATING COVER MAINTENANCE 38,982.00 38,982.00
2017667 04/22/09 08530 LIVE SCAN OF NORTH COUNTY 111160903 03/31/09 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 17.00 17.00
2017668 04/22/09 05220 LOGICALIS INTEGRATION SOLUTION S922791 03/27/09 WIRELESS MESH PILOT PROGRAM 3,000.00
S922894 03/31109 WIRELESS MESH PILOT PROGRAM 500.00 3,500.00
2017669 04/22/09 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLYCO 25851928 04/02109 AIR VAC SUCTION STRAINERS 974.54
25243318 03/26/09 SHOP SUPPLIES 450.72
25274489 03/26/09 SHOP SUPPLIES 236.01 1,661.27
Page 24 of 31
~~~=",.=-,,=~.~.~.~.._.~..oc,-r,.__..~.'.'_.__~"u2.•~..::'-.:-.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017686 04/22/09 09346 RECLAIMED AGGREGATES INC 9390 03/31/09 DUMPING SERVICES 40.00 40.00
2017687 04/22/09 00164 REXEL 800601955 03/27109 ELECTRICAL MATERIAL 132.75 132.75
2017688 04/22/09 09148 S&J SUPPLY COMPANY INC 081044 03/27/09 INVENTORY 555.99 555.99
2017689 04/22/09 03687 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 0038672123 03/27/09 SOLVENT TANK SERVICE 161.54 161.54
2017690 04/22/09 10204 SAMUEL MILAN RF045009017 04/15/09 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 293.34 293.34
2017691 04/22/09 09226 SAN DIEGO TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 5228A 04/01/09 BODY REPAIR 250.00 250.00
2017692 04/22/09 00278 SAN-LO AERIALSURVEYS 23038 03/31/09 COLOR DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTO 1,800.00 1,800.00
2017693 04/22/09 05321 SCHIFF ASSOCIATES 03369 02/28/09 CIP P1043-CATHODIC PROTECTION PROGRAM 12,751.25 12,751.25
2017694 04/22/09 07288 SCHMIDTFIRE PROTECTION CO INC 67798 04/01/09 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM 372.00 372.00
2017695 04/22/09 01651 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICAL CTRS 210 03/27/09 PRE-PLACEMENTEXAMS 466.00 466.00
2017696 04/22/09 05983 SIEMENS WATER 277455 03/27/09 CLARIFIER WEAR STRIPS 75.88 75.88
2017697 04/22109 05627 SIGNA DIGITAL SOLUTIONS INC ARS25765 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 200.00
ARS25764 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 200.00
ARS25766 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 144.00
ARS25763 04/01/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 34.20 578.20
2017698 04/22/09 00590 SPECIALTY SEALS &ACCESSORIES 26790 03/27/09 REBUILD SPARE SEAL 1296-1 PUMP STATION 434.65 434.65
2017699 04/22/09 03184 SPIESS CONSTRUCTION CO INC 280210 04/01/09 P2191 -850-4 RESERVOIR (CONSTRUCTION)36,180.00 36,180.00
2017700 04/22/09 01717 SPRING VALLEY CHAMBEROF 10440409 04/15/09 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 550.00 550.00
2017701 04/22/09 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 12321 03/27/09 SECURITY SERVICE &REPAIRS 880.07 880.07
2017702 04/22109 01460 STATE WATER RESOURCES 0834065 04/13/09 STORM WATER PEMIT FEES 1,008.00 1,008.00
2017703 04/22/09 04977 T-MOBILE 4150860450409 04/05/09 CELL PHONE &BLACKBERRYSERVICES 1,269.86 1,269.86
2017704 04/22/09 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20037649 03/30/09 TIRE SERVICE 284.17
20037655 03/30/09 TIRE SERVICE 105.49 389.66
2017705 04/22/09 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICEALERT OF 320090441 04/01/09 UNDERGROUND TRENCH SERVICE ALERTS 384.00 384.00
2017706 04/22/09 07487 WARRIX,DENNY 001153 04/20/09 SAFETY BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT 118.51 118.51
2017707 04/22/09 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 53686 03/30/09 PEST CONTROL-BEE REMOVAL 115.00 115.00
Page 26 of 31
.....,'..'~=-"'~.:=_'-'.'.:'.~.~""':--";"",.;.·,"0r~,~
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017708 04/22/09 09149 WILLIS RISKAND INSURANCE 0229892 04/01/09 BENEFITS CONSULTING 8,750.00 8,750.00
2017709 04/22/09 01112 ZEP SALES &SERVICE 53325657 03/27109 HAND CLEANER 219.57 219.57
2017710 04/29/09 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 839461 04/09/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,673.60
839282 04/06/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,332.44
839460 04/09/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 648.65
839281 04/06/09 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 591.54
839462 04109109 BULK SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 269.41 4,515.64
2017711 04/29/09 00132 AIRGASWEST 103218631 04/06/09 BREATHING AIR -TREATMENT PLANT 25.73 25.73
2017712 04/29/09 03787 ALLIED TRENCH SHORING SERVICE 912172 04/06/09 TRAFFIC CONTROL 349.25 349.25
2017713 04/29/09 01369 AMERICAN BACKFLOW INV10838 04/08/09 BACKFLOWS &BACKFLOW PARTS 1,832.31
INV10602 03/19/09 BACKFLOW REPAIR PARTS 1,669.76
INV10684 03/25/09 BACKFLOW REPAIR PART 801.70
INV10668 03/25/09 BACKFLOW REPAIR PART 243.11 4,546.88
2017714 04/29/09 03446 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL 001160 04/24109 REGISTRATION 90.00 90.00
2017715 04/29/09 00002 ANSWER INC m261 04/22109 TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES 1,000.00 1,000.00
2017716 04/29/09 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 40768 04/20109 EMPLOYEEASSISTANCE PROGRAM SERVICES 379.50 379.50
2017717 04/29/09 04806 BJ'S RENTALS 220376 04/06/09 CONCRETE 166.39 166.39
2017718 04/29/09 03679 BRG CONSULTING INC 09032719 03/31/09 CONSULTANT CONTRACT FOR ENV SVCS 908.00 908.00
2017719 04/29/09 01232 BRODING'S BATTERYWAREHOUSE 5096 04/08/09 AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES 347.87
5137 04109/09 AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES 322.82
5014 04/06/09 AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES 238.05 908.74
2017720 04/29/09 09800 CALIFORNIA BANK &TRUST 081603R 04/03/09 RETENTION FOR NEWEST CONST 9,334.10 9,334.10
2017721 04/29/09 01243 CALIFORNIA-NEVADA SECTION 001162 04/28/09 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 160.00 160.00
2017722 04/29/09 03491 CASA DE ORO CAR WASH 15 03/25109 VEHICLEWASHING 1,443.95 1,443.95
2017723 04/29/09 10289 CHARLES CUMMINGS RF625565904 04/24/09 ACH PMT TAKEN OUT IN ERROR 161.05 161.05
2017724 04/29/09 03334 COMPUTERMASTERS 73461 03/27109 PC TOOLS SOFTWARE 123.31
73574 04/09/09 USB TO RS232 SERIAL ADAPTER DB9M 41.33 164.64
2017725 04/29/09 05125 CUDLlP,JAMES 001164 04/28109 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 439.54 439.54
2017726 04/29/09 03744 DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICE 731258 04106/09 FINGERPRINT ANALYSIS SERVICES 408.00 408.00
Page 27 of 31
.'~-.,••'.',\.•.~--,.'~,..-~,.._~.,.,~.-~"~>~~
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES4/1/2009TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017727 04/29/09 03417 DIRECTV 995652429 04/19/09 SATELLITE TV SERVICE 5.00 5.00
2017728 04/29/09 03716 ELY,WALTERK 001158 04/23/09 SAFETY BOOTS REIMBURSEMENT 98.76 98.76
2017729 04/29/09 05760 ENHANCED COMMUNICATIONS 001165 04/21/09 DEPOSIT FOR CABLING PROJECT 2,367.00 2,367.00
2017730 04/29/09 03757 FANDEL ENTERPRISES INC 1342 04/06/09 TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING SVCS 3,120.00 3,120.00
2017731 04/29/09 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 03083931 04/07/09 INVENTORY 1,148.40
03083991 04/03/09 INVENTORY 645.74
03065892 04/07/09 METER SHOP TOOLS 167.87
0307718 04/07/09 RIDGIT CUTIERS 41.04 2,003.05
2017732 04/29/09 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 4473126 04/09/09 OVEN THERMOMETER 133.98 133.98
2017733 04/29/09 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2395351 04/30/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 75.00 75.00
2017734 04/29/09 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2395355 04/30/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 313.82 313.82
2017735 04/29/09 00101 GRAINGER INC 9875505423 04/08/09 DUAL FLUSH HANDLE 1,654.09
9875919137 04/08/09 BLADES &GAUGES 562.41
9876186140 04/09109 SPRAY PAINT 375.00 2,591.50
2017736 04/29/09 01576 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 940615436 04/06/09 EQUIPMENT FOR TP WIRING CLOSET 296.81 296.81
2017737 04/29/09 00150 HAWTHORNE MACHINERYCO PS010239866 04/08/09 REPAIR PARTS 339.19 339.19
2017738 04/29/09 06640 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 8756117 04/03/09 INVENTORY 5,067.75 5,067.75
2017739 04/29/09 00062 HELIXWATER DISTRICT 174639860409 04/23/09 WATER BILL -RUSSELL SQ 39.90
178540010409 04/23/09 WATER BILL -AVOCADO BLVD 37.15 77.05
2017740 04/29/09 00297 HILTIINC 1606262088 04/08/09 ROTARY HAMMER 2,810.70 2,810.70
2017741 04/29/09 02263 ITRON INC 95060 04/07/09 ANNUAL SUPPORT FOR MVRS SOFTWARE 1,287.00 1,287.00
2017742 04/29/09 02290 JAMES,KENNETH E 001172 04/29/09 REIMBURSE MEMBERSHIP RNWL 132.00 132.00
2017743 04/29/09 03172 JONES &STOKES ASSOCIATES 0060828 03/14/09 ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 531.49 531.49
2017744 04/29/09 10290 KIM-LOAN TRAN RF622218915 04/28109 REFUND FOR OVER-PAYMENT 319.68 319.68
2017745 04/29/09 04996 KNOX ATIORNEY SERVICE INC 468915 04/06/09 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITIEE PACKETS 28.60
469228 04/07/09 DELIVERY OF BOARD &COMMITIEE PACKETS 28.60
468916 04/06/09 DELIVERYOF BOARD &COMMITIEE PACKETS 28.60 85.80
2017746 04/29/09 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 224694 04/09/09 ASPHALT 37.88 37.88
Page 28 of 31
.~~...,~~.,,:,.:-":,_~;"""",;o,:._,:.~~~.~,'.~,~·-,·~~';:
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES 4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017747 04/29/09 05220 LOGICALIS INTEGRATION SOLUTION IN034049 03/12/09 WIRELESS MESH POWER INJECTORS 1,406.51 1,406.51
2017748 04/29/09 00628 MANHATTAN NAT'L LIFE INS CO 001159 04/24/09 VOLUNTARY LIFE INSURANCE 327.46 327.46
2017749 04/29/09 00887 MIRAMAR TRUCK CENTER-SAN DIEGO 247460 04/08109 REPAIR PARTS 188.59 188.59
2017750 04129109 04676 NAPA AUTO PARTS 145779 CREDIT MEMO (18.27)
146312 04/08109 REPAIR PARTS 489.95
146530 04109109 REPAIR PARTS 242.27
146061 04/07/09 REPAIR PARTS 201.29
146454 04109/09 REPAIR PARTS 154.06
146516 04109/09 REPAIR PARTS 145.12
146453 04109109 REPAIR PARTS 98.95
145687 04/03/09 REPAIR PARTS 55.35
146008 04106109 REPAIR PARTS 42.41
146197 04107109 REPAIR PARTS 23.09
145762 04/03/09 REPAIR PARTS 18.27
145688 04/03109 REPAIR PARTS 18.27
146198 04107109 REPAIR PARTS 18.11 1,488.87
2017751 04/29109 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2395335 04/30109 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 11,177.77 11,177.77
2017752 04/29/09 08531 NEWESTCONSTRUCTION 081603 04103/09 450-1 RESERVOIR DISINFECTION FACILITY 84,006.90 84,006.90
2017753 04/29109 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 470451278001 04108109 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,350.56
470512896001 04108/09 TONER CARTRIDGE 120.13
470451631001 04/08/09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.92
470499123001 04/08109 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.20 1,500.81
2017754 04129109 03101 OTAYWATERDISTRICT Ben2395337 04130109 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 826.00 826.00
2017755 04129/09 08398 PEERLESS MATERIALS COMPANY 3992 04/09/09 WIPING RAGS 250.13 250.13
2017756 04129109 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 21696 04108/09 FLAT SAWCUTTING SERVICES 200.00 200.00
2017757 04129109 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 001163 04128109 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 536.98 536.98
2017758 04129109 03351 POSADA,ROD 15570309 04/20/09 REIMBURSE CONF EXPENSES 151.56
001169 04/28/09 REIMBURSE MEETING EXPENSES 150.43 301.99
2017759 04129109 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 31000043 CREDIT MEMO (37.71)
0194006 03126/09 UNIFORMS 375.73
0225968 04109109 UNIFORMS 324.96
0225967 04/09/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 148.79
0225969 04/09/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 109.80
0222786 04/08/09 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 94.96
0222785 04108/09 ADMINIOPS UNIFORMS,TOWELS &MATS 57.44
Page29 of 31
'.2"'.",,,,
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES4/1/2009TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
0225970 04/09/09 UNIFORMS 52.33 1,126.30
2017760 04/29/09 09804 PUBLICIA PRESS LTD 2093403 04/02/09 BUSINESS CARDS 38.06
20093394 04/02109 BUSINESS CARDS 29.90 67.96
2017761 04/29/09 06645 RELIABLE ELEVATOR INC 16604 04/01109 ELEVATOR SERVICE &MAINTENANCE 416.01 416.01
2017762 04/29/09 04068 ROADONE TOWING 316463 04/08/09 TOWING 141.20 141.20
2017763 04/29/09 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 001157 04/21109 UTILITY EXPENSES 39,110.83 39,110.83
2017764 04/29/09 00871 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 248165 04/22/09 RELOCATION PLA580/PROJ#952545-010 3,202.00 3,202.00
2017765 04/29/09 03514 SANTOS,MARCIANO 001170 04/28/09 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 222.41 222.41
2017766 04/29/09 05321 SCHIFF ASSOCIATES 03518 03/31/09 CIP P1043-CATHODIC PROTECTION PROGRAM 21,134.30 21,134.30
2017767 04/29/09 05983 SIEMENS WATER 2739573 04/08/09 MAINTENANCE PARTS 4,919.80 4,919.80
2017768 04/29/09 05983 SIEMENS WATER 7826154 04/07/09 BIOXIDE FOR TREATMENT PLANT 1,403.85 1,403.85
2017769 04/29/09 05627 SIGNADIGITALSOLUTIONS INC ARS25895 04/03/09 COPIER MAINTENANCE 200.00 200.00
2017770 04/29/09 03592 SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION 2020390 04/08/09 PC DISPLAY 369.37 369.37
2017771 04/29/09 06853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL 350478 03/31/09 ON CALL GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 11,101.43 11,101.43
2017772 04/29/09 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLESERVICES INC 804765 04/02/09 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL 98.25 98.25
2017773 04/29109 09711 SPATIAL WAVE INC 1107751717 04/08/09 CONCEPT DESIGN FORWORK MGMT SYSTEM 2,880.00 2,880.00
2017774 04/29/09 00590 SPECIALTY SEALS &ACCESSORIES 26801 03/31/09 REBUILD SEAL 1,014.85
26794 03/30/09 REBUILD SEAL FOR 1296-1 PUMP STATION 608.92 1,623.77
2017775 04/29/09 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2395353 04/30109 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 286.73 286.73
2017776 04/29109 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2395343 04/30/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2017777 04/29/09 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2395347 04/30/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 836.30 836.30
2017778 04/29/09 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2395345 04/30/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 841.01 841.01
2017779 04/29/09 02261 STATE STREET BANK &TRUST CO Ben2395333 04/30/09 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,363.42 6,363.42
2017780 04/29/09 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20037743 04/06/09 TIRE REPAIR 16.25 16.25
2017781 04/29/09 03261 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC INV0146579 03/03/09 EDEN SYSTEMS CONSULTING 900.00 900.00
Page 30 of 31
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2017182 THROUGH 2017792
RUN DATES4/1/2009 TO 4/29/2009
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2017782 04/29/09 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 80557124001 04/07/09 CONCRETE 160.95 160.95
2017783 04/29/09 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2395349 04/30/09 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2017784 04/29/09 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 001168 04/28/09 BASIC L1FE/AD&D &SUPP LIFE INS 5,310.67 5,310.67
2017785 04/29/09 03212 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Ben2395329 04/30/09 LONG TERM DISABILITY 6,736.20 6,736.20
2017786 04/29/09 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 001166 02/23/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 5,663.99
001171 04/22/09 DISTRICT EXPENSES 1,122.78 6,786.77
2017787 04/29/09 08028 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMEN-SD080206 03/31/09 AS-NEEDED CONSTRUCTION MGMT SVCS 14,205.00 14,205.00
2017788 04/29/09 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2395339 04/30/09 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,079.94 6,079.94
2017789 04/29/09 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2395341 04/30/09 401A PLAN 2,313.32 2,313.32
2017790 04/29/09 02700 WATER CONSERVATION GARDEN 1017 03/03/09 LANDSCAPE DESIGN/SPRING FESTIVAL 150.00 150.00
2017791 04/29/09 03692 WESTIN ENGINEERING INC 32888 04/02/09 CIP P1210 -ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 5,667.32 5,667.32
2017792 04/29/09 03283 WILSON BOHANNAN COMPANY 00588441N 04/06/09 LOCKS 1,480.65 1,480.65
GRAND TOTAL 2,046,706.96 2,046,706.96
Page 31 of 31