HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-06-10 Board PacketOTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY,CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY
October 6,2010
3:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1.ROLL CALL
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4.APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 5,2010
5.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
7.ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST IS
MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A PAR-
TICULAR ITEM:
a)·APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(MND)FOR THE SAN MIGUEL REGIONAL TRAINING FACILITY PROJECT
b)APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO THE CONTRACT WITH MWH FOR
THE RALPH W.CHAPMAN WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY UPGRADE
PROJECT
c)APPROVE FUNDING FOR THE DISTRICTS ASSET MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
ACTION ITEMS
8.FINANCE,ADMINISTRATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
a)APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH JESUS H.KURODA FOR THE IN-
STALLMENT PAYMENT OF CAPACITY FEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
1
BOARD OF DIRECTOR'S POLICY 7,CONDITIONS FOR INSTALLMENT
OR DEFERRED PAYMENTS TO THE DISTRICT (CHARLES)
b)ADOPT ORDINANCE NO.527 AMENDING SECTION·27.04,REQUIRE-
MENTS AND LIMITATIONS FOR OBTAINING WATER SERVICE,USE OF
SUBMETERS FOR RESALE OR DISTRIBUTION OF WATER,OF THE
DISTRICTS CODE OF ORDINANCES (CALDERON)
9.BOARD
a)DISCUSSION OF 2010 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
10.REVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF THE 2010 EMPLOYEE SURVEY (WILLIAMSON)
11.REPORT ON THE FISCAL YEAR-END 2010 STRATEGIC PLAN AND PERFORM-
ANCE MEASURES (STEVENS)
REPORTS
12.GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
a)SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
13.DIRECTORS'REPORTS/REQUESTS
14.PRESIDENTS REPORT
15.ADJOURNMENT
2
All items appearing on this agenda,whether or not expressly listed for action,may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda,and any attachments containing written information,are available at the
District's website at www.otaywater.qov.Written changes to any items to be considered at
the open meeting,or to any attachments,will be posted on the District's website.Copies
of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by
contacting her at (619)670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting,please call the District Secretary at (619)670-2280 at least 24
hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on October 1,2010,I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the
regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District,said time being at
least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Government
Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley,California on October 1,2010.
3
AGENDA ITEM 4
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
May 5,2010
1.The meeting was called to order by President Bonilla at 3:30 p.m.
2.ROLL CALL
Directors Present:Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
Director Absent:None
Staff Present:General Manager Mark Watton,Asst.General Manager of
Administration and Finance German Alvarez,Asst.General
Manager of Engineering and Water Operations Manny
Magana,General Counsel Yuri Calderon,Chief of Information
Technology Geoff Stevens,Chief Financial Officer Joe
Beachem,Chief of Engineering Rod Posada,Chief of
Operations Pedro Porras,Chief of Administration Rom Sarno,
District Secretary Susan Cruz and others per attached list.
3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve the agenda.
5.APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 21,2009
A motion was made by Director Breitfelder,seconded by Director Lopez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve the minutes of the Special Meeting of May 21,2009.
1
6.PUBLIC PARTICIPATION -OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITH It'!THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
Ms.Monica Fernandez from the U.S.Census Bureau indicated that she wished to
request that the District share with its constituents that the Census enumerators are
visiting households to collect census information and to encourage them to open
their doors and assist the enumerators in collecting data for the census.She stated
that the participation rate from the East County has been very good,but there are
still many who have not yet returned their forms.She indicated that they expect to
complete the data collection in approximately two months.
Director Robak inquired if the District qualifies for any funding as a result of the
census in some way.Ms.Fernandez stated that the U.S.Census Bureau allocates
funding Federally and it is based on the increase in population.If the District
receives federal funds,it may increase due to growth within the District's service
area.
CONSENT CALENDAR
7.ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION,UNLESS A REQUEST IS
MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
A motion was made by Director Croucher,seconded by Director Breitfelder and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher,Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve the following consent calendar items:
a)AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT,
IN SUBSTANTIALLY THE FORM ON FILE WITH THE DISTRICT
SECRETARY,WITH ELECTRONIC PAYMENT EXCHANGE TO PROVIDE
WEB PAYMENT TRANSACTION PROCESSING SERVICES FOR
APPROXIMATELY $30,000 ANNUALLY
b)APPROVE AN AGREEMENT WITH NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS,
LLC,A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY FOR THE
INSTALLATION OF A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT THE 850-3
RESERVOIR SITE
c)APPROVE AN AS NEEDED SCHEDULING SERVICES CONTRACT TO
CPM PARTNERS IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $175,000 FOR
FISCAL YEARS 2011 AND 2012,ENDING JUNE 30,2012
2
d)APPROVE CREDIT CHANGE ORDER NO.3 TO THE QRIGINAL
CONTRACT WITH NATGUN CORPORATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF THE 1296-3 RESERVOIR PROJECT FOR A DEDUCTIVE AMOUNT
NOT-TO-EXCEED <$200,453.10>
ACTION ITEMS
8.FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION
a)ADOPT ORDINANCE NO.524 AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
SECTIONS 9.04,9.04.8,28.01.B,AND APPENDIX A;AND DELETING
SECTION 28.04;WHICH WILL INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING
CHANGES EFFECTIVE JULY 1,2010:
i.MODIFY THE CAPACITY FEE TO SHOW A NEW "COMBINED"
METHODOLOGY OF CHARGING CAPACITY FEES REFLECTING
THE VALUE OF THE DISTRICTS CURRENT AND FUTURE
ASSETS;
ii.UPDATE THE TRIAD CAPACITY FEE BASED ON THE NEW
"COMBINED"METHOD DESCRIBED ABOVE AND THE TRIAD
AGREEMENT;
iii.MODIFY THE ANNEXATION FEE TO REFLECT A NEW "BUY-IN"
METHODOLOGY WHICH WILL ONLY BE CHARGED TO NEW
CUSTOMERS ANNEXING INTO THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOUNDARIES;
iv.CREATE A NEW WATER SUPPLY FEE TO FUND THE EXPANSION
PORTION OF NEW WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS;AND
v.ELIMINATE ID 9,RANCHO JAMUL ZONE 1655 FEE.
Accounting Manager Rita Bell indicated that staff had conducted a study of the
District's capacity and annexation fees.She stated the purpose of capacity fees is
to ensure that growth pays for growth.These fees are reviewed every four to six
years to make sure that they are equitable and accurate and the fees are increased
quarterly by the ENR index.She stated that the District issued a Request for
Proposal (RFP)in July 2009 to retain a consultant to conduct the Water and Sewer
Capacity and Annexation Fee Study.In October 2009,three (3)firms responded
and under the General Manager's authority,PBS&J was retained to perform the
study.Accounting Manager Bell indicated that staff will be presenting the findings
of the study and discuss the proposed methodology for the calculation of the fees.
Ms.Bell indicated that the water capacity fee study was last updated in November
2004.In that study,capacity fees were calculated utilizing the incremental capacity
fee method and the capacity fee was set at $4,120.The capacity fee is currently
3
$5,437 which reflects quarterly adjustments since 2004 based on the ENR Index.It
was indicated that the water annexation fee was last updated iQ May 2006 based on
an in-house study.Accounting Manager Bell stated that the fees are typically
reviewed at the same time to assure that costs are not overlapping in the calculation
of the fees.The annexation fee was set at $1 ,411 in May 2006 and the current fee
is $1,602 following quarterly adjustments based on the ENR Index.She introduced
Ms.Karen Keese from PBS&J who will review the various methods used to
establish the capacity,annexation and new water supply fees.
Ms.Keese thanked District staffs who were very helpful with assisting PBS&J in
establishing the District's new capacity fees.She stated that they looked at the
various calculation methods that meet legal requirements and guidelines and match
the growth life of the District.She reviewed the different calculation methods in
detail that staff had considered (see slide no.8):
1)Incremental:Ms.Keese stated that the District is currently using an
Incremental fee method that is usually implemented during the growth
years of an agency (those that are 1%to 30%built-out).
2)Buy-In:Ms.Keese stated that when an agency is near build-out,the Buy-
In method is utilized as the majority of their assets/facilities are in place
and there are very few,if any,expansion assets required.Ms.Keese
indicated that the Buy-In method requires new developers to buy into an
existing system to reimburse existing users for the contributions they
have made to establish the capital facilities for their development's use.
3)Combined:Ms.Keese stated that if an agency is at the mid-point of
growth,where it has fixed assets and new capital improvement projects,a
Combined (Incremental and Buy-In)fee method is an appropriate method
to utilize.She stated that the District is currently in the mid-point of its
growth and staff will be discussing moving from the Incremental method
to the Combined method to calculate the District's capacity fee.
She stated that there were two different methods to value the cost of existing assets
in the Combined Fee:
1)Reproduction:Original cost of existing facilities increased for inflation
(inflating the cost to construct an existing facility to 2010 cost value).
2)Replacement:Construction cost to build an existing facility if it were bid
today.Ms.Keese noted that in some cases,such as treatment plants,it
may cost less to build the same facility today because of new technology.
She indicated that there are also other cost considerations that the District must
make in determining the value of assets.They are:.
1)Depreciated Value of Assets:A measure of wear/tear and takes into
consideration the remaining service life of the asset.
4
2)Full Value of Assets:Do not consider depreciation in.the value of assets.
Assets are continuously being maintained to service level standards and
maintenance cost is not capitalized (is not put into the value of the asset).
Maintenance is an operational expense.
Ms.Keese indicated that Replacement is becoming the industry standard for setting
asset values.The District is utilizing this method to value its pipelines as staff can
easily calculate their replacement cost without a full engineering study as the
District,through its GIS system,knows the size of the pipelines,their location,dates
they were put into place,materials utilized,etc.The District will utilize Reproduction
cost to value its other facilities as the information to rebuild the facility without a full
engineering study is not readily available.
Accounting Manager Bell presented a slide (see slide no.12)comparing Otay's
proposed capacity fee with other water agencies and cities in the County.She
noted that many of agencies'fees are lower than Otay as they have not updated
their fees as there is very little growth in their service area.She indicated that Otay
WD is in line with Helix WD's,Olivenhain MWD's,and Padre Dam MWD's updated
capacity fees.
Ms.Keese stated that as part of the study,staff looked at establishing a new Water
Supply Fee.The Water Supply Fee is a new fee in the industry and is being
considered/implemented by agencies due to the current water shortage and the
water allocations instituted by CWA.It was noted that the allocation set for each
agency is based on existing users and the basis for the Water Supply Fee is new
development should either bring in new water supplies or pay a fee to offset the
cost of constructing new water resources.The District is proposing a Water Supply
Fee of $864 to new customers.The fee will also be adjusted quarterly based on the
ENR index to support new water resources projects identified in the District's CIP
and Master Plan.New customers would pay this new fee and the water capacity
fee.
Accounting Manager Bell presented a slide (see slide no.15)comparing Otay's
proposed Water Supply Fee with other water agencies and cities in the County.
She noted that the District's fee is low compared to the other agencies.The reason
the District's fee is set lower is it has more new resources projects than most other
agencies and has a larger number of new customers to spread the cost of the new
resources projects to.Many agencies do not have much growth.
Director Brietfelder inquired if the new water supply fee is sufficient.Ms.Bell stated
that the new water supply fee is sufficient as it covers the cost of the expansion
portion of all of the District's new water supply projects and divides the cost among
its new customers.
Ms.Keese reviewed the proposed annexation fee of $1 ,477 which will be charged
to only those customers who are annexing their property from outside the District's
5
boundaries.New customers will be required to pay this fee to pay for their share of
existing facilities along with the Capacity Fee and new Water S.upply Fee.
Accounting Manager Bell noted that city annexations include other services such as
fire protection,police,trash services,etc.Therefore,many cities do not charge an
annexation fee.She stated that water agency and city annexation fees,thus,are
not comparable.She also noted that the water annexation fee is based on property
taxes and availability taxes paid by existing/current customers.
She presented a slide showing a comparison of the totals for all three fees for Otay,
other water agencies,and cities (see slide no.19).It was noted that the Otay is in
line with other agencies who have recently updated their fees.
Ms.Keese provided a comparison of the total fee for the different fee
methodologies:Replacement Cost Using Depreciated Value,Replacement Cost
Using Full Value,Reproduction Cost Using Depreciated Value,and Reproduction
Cost Using Full Value (see slide nos.20 thru 23).She indicated that staff is
recommending that the District utilize the Combined Replacement/Reproduction
Cost method using Depreciated Value.
With the proposed capacity/annexation fees and implementation of a new supply
fee,Accounting Manager Bell indicated that the fiscal impact to the District will
result in an additional $644,OOO±for Capacity Fees and $269,OOO±for New Supply
Fee revenues.She noted that there are no anticipated annexations to the District in
FY 2011 and,therefore,zero Annexation Fees revenues are expected.
Accounting Manager Bell requested that the Board Adopt Ordinance No.524 to
amend the District's fees that includes the elimination of Improvement District (I D)9,
Rancho Jamul Zone 1655 fee.She indicated that ID 9 was a unique fee and,as
part of the study,has been incorporated into the new proposed fees structures.
General Counsel Yuri Calderon read the General Manager's recommendation into
the record:
•Adopt Ordinance No.524 Amending the Code of Ordinances Section 9.04,
9.04B,28.01 B,and Appendix A;and Deleting Section 28.04
•Incorporate the following changes effective July 1,2010:
o Modify the Capacity Fee to Show a New "Combined Methodology of
Charging Capacity Fees Reflecting the Value of the District's Current
and Future Assets
o Update the Triad Capacity Fee Based on the New "Combined"Method
Described Above and the Triad Agreement
6
o Modify the Annexation Fee to Reflect a New "Buy-In"Methodology
Which will Only be Charged to New Customers ADnexing into the Otay
Water District Boundaries
o Create a New Water Supply Fee to Fund the Expansion Portion of
New Water Supply Projects
o Eliminate 109,Rancho Jamul Zone 1644 Fee
Director Croucher inquired when and how the District updates its data to project the
number of meter that will be sold,number of connections,etc.Accounting Manager
Bell stated that the District's Engineering Department updated its Water Resources
Master Plan in 2009 which indicates the number of new customers,future facility
needs,etc.She stated that staff utilizes this Water Resources Master Plan as the
basis for the rate study and the District's CIP.Ms.Keese indicated that this is a
standard practice in the industry.Agencies will update their Master Plans every 3 to
5 years and following the update of their Master Plans,they will update their fees.
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem noted that the District's Master Plan is updated
every 5-6 years unless there are significant changes to developmenUland use that
were not anticipated.He stated that staff is aware that the environment does
change and continuously reviews if the plan needs to be updated.Ms.Keese
further shared that the District's rate model includes an "economic model"for staff to
update if,for instance,a new supply source is being considered.The cost of the
new project can be input in the rate model to update fees.
Director Croucher also inquired if customers could annex into Otay without
annexing into CWA to ensure that customers are not double charged for capacity
fees for projects that are only specific to the District and do not utilize CWA facilities.
General Manager Watton indicated that CWA and its attorney are reviewing this
issue.Otay and CWA agreed to set the issue aside until CWA's new annexation
policy moves forward.
Director Breitfelder indicated that he is pleased with new supply fee as it
demonstrates that the District's priority is fairness for the District's existing and new
customers.
Director Robak thanked staff for the detailed presentation and inquired if a flow
chart is available to show how everything flows together.Ms.Keese stated that a
flow chart is available and a copy was provided to Director Robak.
Director Robak inquired if it was common for agencies to determine their fees based
on SANDAG's figures for future development.Ms.Keese stated that most agencies
hire an engineering firm to develop their Master Plan and these firms generally
utilize SANDAG's figures.The agencies then fine-tune the figures based on the
their specific knowledge of development in their service area.Chief of Engineering
Rod Posada stated that the District continuously reviews its Master Plan and CIP
projects and re-prioritizes the projects as needed.
7
Director Robak inquired if the ENR Index is decreasing.Rita B!=lll stated yes and
that the current ENR is based on 2009 figures.She also indicated that fees will be
adjusted by four quarters of the ENR Index and therefore fees could be $1 less or
higher.
Director Robak thanked Ms.Keese and staff for explaining the District's GIS
correlation with quantifying and determining cost of District assets.He also
indicated that he was pleased with the elimination of ID 9,Rancho Jamul Zone 1655
fee,in Division 5.
In response to an inquiry from Director Lopez,Accounting Manager Bell indicated
that the District's last Capacity Fee Study was completed by Black &Veatch in 2004
and that the Annexation Fee was updated 2 years later in-house.
A motion was made by Director Croucher,seconded by Director Robak and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Directors Bonilla,Breitfelder,Croucher, Lopez and Robak
None
None
None
to approve staffs'recommendation.
9.BOARD
a)DISCUSSION OF 2010 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
There were no changes to the meeting calendar.
REPORTS
10.GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Watton stated that Utility Cost Management,LLC (UCM),
reviewed the District's SDG&E Utility bill and indicated that no discrepancies were
found.He stated that UCM commended District staff that reviewed bills,etc.and
noted that SDG&E representatives should also be commended as well.
He indicated that the Finance Department received another Certificate of
Achievement award from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)for
the sixth year in a row.The Finance Department received the award for the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2009.
8
Director Croucher inquired if the District's Water Resource Master Plan will be
continually updated as new information is identified as the plan.is currently based
on 2009 information.Staff indicated that,yes,the plan will be continually reviewed.
General Manager Watton shared that staff will be reviewing internal controls to
assure that the District has the right processes and procedures in place.Chief
Financial Officer Beachem added that the District auditors have completed their first
review of the contract review process and stated that it had gone well.
General Manager Watton stated that staff plans to present the District's FY 2011
BUdget to the Board at the May 17,2010 Special Board Meeting/Budget Workshop.
He indicated that District staff is continuing to have problems with the City of San
Diego's request for Water Supply and Verification Reports (WSA).He stated that
the District cannot provide a WSA with the information they are providing.District
staff is continuing to work out this issue with the City.
The City of Chula Vista has requested that the District prepare WSA's for a couple
projects.The requests are for large developments and noted that the request
provides an idea of the growth that is planned to return within the City.
He indicated that the District's Emergency Genset was purchased by Comision
Estatal de Servicios Publicos de Tijuana (CESPT).The generator was placed on
the surplus list that was approved by the Board on January 6,2010.He noted that
the generator,which was used for back-up power for the District's Administration
Building,can no longer be utilized in the United States because of new Air Pollution
Control Department (APCD)regulations.However,it can be utilized in Mexico
where it can remain functional.
He lastly shared staffs estimate on water sales.He stated that water sales are
much below budget and that it will be a challenge to predict sales for the last couple
months of the fiscal year due to the slow economy and cooler summer months.
Staff is prepared should sales continue at current levels.
11.PRESIDENTS REPORT
President Bonilla presented a video of the ceremony for La Morita,CESPTs
Inauguration of the Water Reclamation Plant in Tijuana,Mexico that will produce 8
MGD of recycled water.He indicated that the Baja Governor Jose Guadalupe
Osuna Millan and the Director of the National Water Commission of Mexico Jose
Luis Luege Tamargo,as well as other important representatives of water and
environmental entities attended the ceremony.Director Bonilla also stated that the
Mexican officials were very commendable to Otay WD and were very appreciative
of the District's support.
President Bonilla also provided an update of the meetings he attended during the
month of April 2010.He stated on April 9 he attended an Ad Hoc Legal Matters
Committee to review issues related to pending litigation matters and,on the same
9
day,he and General Manager Watton met with Mayor Sanders to provide an update
on Olay's projects,as well as discuss outstanding matters between the District and
the City of San Diego.He met with Supervisor Dianne Jacob on April 14 to provide
an update on Otay WD's matters and Supervisor Jacob had kind words about the
District and stated she was proud of how Otay is being managed.On April 16 he
met with City of Chula Vista Councilmember Steve Casteneda to provide an update
on Otay matters and projects.He also met with General Manager Watton on the
same day to review items to be presented at the April committee meetings.On
April 19 he met with staff to sign the bond documents related to the closing of the
bond refinancing sale.He attended the District's Finance,Administration and
Communications Committee on April 20 and commended Director Breitfelder for his
participation and constructive comments at the meeting.He also attended the
Chula Vista Interagency Water Task Force meeting on April 26 where they
discussed various projects and 2010 water pricing.He shared that he attended
CEPT's Inaugural Ceremony celebrating the opening of their new Water
Reclamation Plant,"La Morita"on April 27.The mayor and governor also attended
and it was a very nice experience.He lastly reported that he met with General
Manager Watton and General Counsel Calderon to discuss the May board agenda.
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
12.CLOSED SESSION
The board recessed to closed session at 4:45 p.m.to discuss the following items:
a)CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS [GOVERNMENT
CODE §54956.8]
PROPERTY:INTENT TO PURCHASE WATER FROM A NEW SOURCE
AGENCY NEGOTIATORS:MARK WATTON,YURI CALDERON &
BONIFACIO GARCIA
NEGOTIATING PARTIES:GOUGH THOMPSON,NS AGUA,AND OTHER
POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POTABLE WATER AND/OR THEIR
DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES,SUCCESSORS OR OTHER
AUTHORIZED ENTITIES
UNDER NEGOTIATION:PRICE AND TERMS OF ACQUISITION,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TIMING AND AMOUNT OF
ACQUISITION
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
13.REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION.THE BOARD MAY
ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
10
The board reconvened at 5:45 p.m.and General Counsel Yuri Calderon indicated
that the board took no reportable action in closed session.
14.ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board,President Bonilla adjourned the
meeting at 5:46 p.m.
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
11
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 7a
MEETING DATE:October 6,2010TYPEMEETING:Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY:Lisa Coburn-Boyd O(t!.f!>
Environmental Compliance
Specialist
PROJECT:P2466 -DIV.NO.5
001101
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
APPROVED BY:
(Asst.GM)
SUBJECT:
Ron Ripperger ~
Engineering Manager
Rod posada~o~
Chief,Engineering
Manny Maga~~
Assistant General\;anager,Engineering and Operations
Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the San
Miguel Regional Training Facility
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District)Board of Directors (Board)
approves the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)for
the San Miguel Regional Training Facility Project (see Exhibit A for
project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board approval for the adoption of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration for the San Miguel Regional Training Facility Project.
ANALYSIS:
The project is a Regional Emergency Services Training Center (RESTC)
established in partnership with the District,the San Miguel
Consolidated Fire District (Fire District)and the Heartland Training
Facility Authority (HTFA).The RESTC will be located on a 3.5-acre
site at the District's Regulatory Site.A long-term lease and Joint
Use Agreement between the District and the Fire District for the
RESTC site were approved by the District's Board on December 5,2007.
This site will be co-used and co-habitated by the District.
The intent of the RESTC is to provide emergency services training to
fire and public utilities entities to meet modern-day training
standards and requirements.As shown in the proposed site plan
(Exhibit B),this facility would provide a variety of training props
including a pre-engineered five-story training tower prop;a
simulated hazardous materials prop;search and rescue props including
trench rescue,confined space rescue,and Rescue Systems 1 and 2
certified site props;overpass bridge simulation;vehicle extrication
area;water recovery system;fire attack and control simulations;
rappelling;row-construction prop;and a propane driven fire
simulation system.The site would also include one portable office
building,two portable classrooms;and one pre-engineered apparatus
and equipment storage building with bathroom/shower facilities.The
facility would be Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)compliant.
The RESTC's facility and operational requirements would be met by
extending the electrical conveyances,water lines,sewer lines,and
storm drains that exist on-site.The facility would also serve as an
alternative Emergency Operation Center.
ICF International was issued a Task Order to prepare the Initial
Study and MND for the project under their As-needed Environmental
Services contract with the District.Based on the findings of these
documents,and with proper mitigation measures taken,as outlined in
the draft MND (See Attachment B),the project will not have a
significant effect on the environment.The Initial Study and Draft
MND were submitted for a 30-day review period on August 18,2010.
The findings and mitigation measures will be finalized and the Final
MND will be available after the public review period is complete and
any changes are made based on comments received during this period.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This project supports the District's Mission Statement,"To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater services to the customers of
Otay Water District,in a professional,effective,and efficient
manner."This project fulfills the District's strategic goal to
"Identify District required training and identifies resources for
desired training."
LEGAL IMPACT:
No legal impact is anticipated.However,in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act process,the Final MND will have
the normal 30-day legal challenge period once the Notice of
Determination (NOD)is recorded with the County of San Diego.The
2
NOD will be recorded within five (5)working days after Board
adoption of the MND.
oeneit£..rpi!C
P:\WORKING\CIP P2466 Regional Training Facility\Staff Reporte\BD 10-06-10,Staff Report,SMRTF MND Adoption,(LCB-RR).doc
LCB/RR:j f
Attachments:Attachment A
Attachment B -Draft MND
Exhibit A -Location Map/Site Plan
Exhibit B -Site Plan
3
<:,."P2466-001101
ATTACHMENT A
Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the San
Miguel Regional Training Facility
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on September 16,2010 and
the following comments were made:
•Staff is requesting that the Board of Directors (Board)
approve the adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration
(MND)for the San Miguel Regional Training Facility Project
(Project).
•Staff indicated that approval of the Project is necessary
to establish a Regional Emergency Services Training Center
(RESTC).
•It was indicated that the RESTC will be co-used and co-
habitated by the Otay Water District (District),San Miguel
Consolidated Fire District (Fire District),and the
Heartland Training Facility Authority (HTFA)to provide
emergency services training to public utilities and fire
entities.A long-term lease and Joint Use Agreement
between the District,Fire District and HTFA was approved
by the Board on December 5,2007.
•Staff stated that the RESTC would provide a variety of
training props,including a confined space training prop
that will be useful for operations to obtain confined space
and trench rescue training.In addition,staff indicated
that the RESTC would also serve as an alternative Emergency
Operation Center.
•Staff stated that ICF International prepared the Initial
Study &Draft MND and indicated that mitigation measures
are needed for two significant impacts,biological
resources and traffic.It was indicated that based on the
findings of the documents,with proper mitigation measures
taken,the Project will not have a significant impact on
the environment.
•On August 18,2010,the Initial Study and Draft MND were
submitted for a 30-day review period.Staff indicated that
Caltrans,CAL Fire,and the Native American Heritage
Commission submitted comment letters to the District.
Staff stated that the letters do not require any changes to
the Draft MND.
•The Committee stated that the Project is highly desireable
as it would provide necessary training to staff and local
fire agencies.
•Staff indicated that the site/land cannot be utilized for
any other purpose and that the District does not plan to
expand facilities within this area of the District.The
leasing and utilization of the land as a shared emergency
services training facility is a beneficial use of the land.
Following the discussion,the Committee supported staffs'
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent
item.
ATTACHMENT B
Draft MND
CD Attached
//
P2466
REGULA TORY SI TE
BOUNDARY
_~----1 REGIONAL TRAINING
FACILITY SITE
EXHIBIT A
GTAY WA TER DISTRICT
SAN MIGUEL REGIONAL TRAINING FACILITY
SITE PLAN
."t'"..,""...~."-
)1 \i\
~
.....
I ~'"~
~
IMPERIAL
BEACH
........0a.w
0::..........
0-(/)
u::>/u::>
'<t INU.
U.U./<.:>z520::~
a:
CLASSROOM
BLDG.
RESERVE
APPARATUS
BUILDING
TRENCH
RESCUE
PROP
TRAINING
TOWER
I FUTURE I~~R~_~A':Lj
FIRST RESPONDER
TRAINING AREA
~FLAMABLE
c=::aUQUID PROP
VEHICLE
EXTRACTION
AREA
o
OCOVERED
BLEACHERS
OVERPASS---I&-
BRIDGE
SIMULATION
CONFINED SPACE
TRAINING PR~O~P~~__.-J----r----===::::--j==============r=j--7~--~
(ROOFl
~
GTAY WATER DISTRICT
SAN MIGUEL REGIONAL TRAINING FACILI TY
SITE PLAN
elP #P2466
EXHIBI T "Bit
Quality Assurance Approval Sheef-
Project No.:f'z4te (p
Document Description:$f-a~or+il2Y"-the.a:.J.&F Ql1 4f:the tt-~
-{or ihe.€ian tfi~klef ll~i¢Oal-rra,niOdrae;li~P'1J'ed
~1-3//10Dat~7
Author:
Printed Name
QA Reviewer:
Sign
~f,~Il.-V0t-M~
Printed arne
Manager:
Signature
7Zo AI 12 (~1~6-f;4f."
Printed Name
The above signatures attest that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability the
signers verify that it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended information;
being grammatically correct and free of formatting and typographical errors;accurately presenting calculated values
and numerical references;and being internally consistent,legible and uniform in its presentation style.
AGENDA ITEM 7b
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board MEETING DATE:October 6,2010
5DIV.
NO.
R2096-
001102
PROJECT/
SUB-PROJECT:
APPROVED BY:
(Asst.GM):
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
SUBMITTED BY:Lisa Coburn-Boyd cx.ct3
Environmental Compliance
Specialist
Ron Ripperger ~
Engineering Manager
Rod Posada ~~~.
Chief,Engineering
Manny Magana~~
Assistant General M~nager,Engineering and Operations
SUBJECT:Change Order No.1 to the Contract with Montgomery Watson
Harza for the Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling Facility
Upgrade Project
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District)Board of Directors
(Board)approves Change Order No.1 to the existing contract
with Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH)for the Ralph W.Chapman
Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF)Upgrade Project,in an amount
not-to-exceed $83,301,(see Exhibit A for project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to execute
Change Order No.1 (see Exhibit B)in an amount not to exceed
$83,301 to the contract with MWH for the RWCWRF Upgrade Project.
ANALYSIS:
At the October 7,2009 Board Meeting,MWH was awarded a
professional engineering services contract for the RWCWRF
Upgrade Project.This project consists of the pre-design,
design,and construction phase engineering services for the
upgrade of the treatment plant.The specific elements of this
upgrade include the modification of the existing aeration basins
to achieve nitrification and de-nitrificationr rehabilitation of
the blower system and associated aeration piping r ~eplacement of
the floating cover for the filter backwash storage reservoirr
and selected automation enhancements for the facility.The Pre-
Design Report has been completed and MWH is now in the design
phase of the project.
During the pre-design phase of the project,MWH conducted a
workshop on May 5 r 2010 for District staff to discuss the
different components of the project.During this workshop,
several important enhancements to the design scope were
explored.Specifically,staff requested that the following
items be added to the original scope of work via Change Order
No.1 to increase plant efficiency and productivity:1)Replace
the existing aeration diffuser system with a new panel type
aeration system,2)Add Return Activated Sludge (RAS)and Waste
Activated Sludge (WAS)pumping modifications to improve plant
process control and automation,and 3)Add seven (7)process
instruments that will further aid in the automation of the
treatment plant.Staff believes that it is prudent to include
these plant and process control enhancements at this time as
part of the upgrade project in an amount not-to-exceed $83 r 301.
FISCAL IMPACT,~
The original MW co~$458 r 813 is currently funded from
ClP R2096.The total budget for ClP R2096,as approved in the
FY 2011 budget,is $2,500,000.Expenditures to date are
$270 r 590.Total commitments to date,including this Change
Order,are approximately $713 r 855.See Attachment B for budget
detail.
The Project Manager anticipates that the budget,based on the
attached financial analysis,will be sufficient to support this
project.
Finance has determined that funding for this project is
available from the Replacement Fund (100%).
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This project supports the Districtrs Mission statement,"To
provide the best quality of water and wastewater services to the
customers of Otay Water District,in a professional r effective,
and efficient mannerlf and the District's Strategic Goal,"To
satisfy current and future water needs for potable,recycled,
and wastewater services."
2
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
P:\WORKING\CIP R2096 -RWCWRF Blower System Rehab-Replace\Staff Reports\BD 10-06-10,Staff Report,RWCWRF Upgrade Project Change
Order.doc
LCB/RR:jf
Attachments:Attachment A
Attachment B -Budget Detail
Exhibit A Project Location
Exhibit B -Change Order No.1
3
R2096-001102
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECTlPROJECT:iCh~ng~Order No .itc;··the Contract with Montgom~;:::YW~t··~·on
i Harza for the Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling Facility
i Upgrade Proj ect
.....................................\.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering,Operations,and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on September 16,2010 and the following
comments were made:
•Staff is requesting that the Board of Directors approve Change
Order No.1 to the existing contract with Montgomery Watson
Harza (MWH)for the Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling Facility
(RWCWRF)Upgrade Project,in an amount not-to-exceed $83,301.
•On May 5,2010,during a pre-design workshop conducted by MWH
with District staff,several important enhancements to the
design scope were discussed and it was agreed that the following
improvements,which will enhance the plant's efficiency and
productivity,be added to the original scope.These items are
included in the change order:
o Replace the existing aeration diffuser system with a new
panel type aeration system;
o Add Return Activated Sludge (RAS)and Waste Activated
Sludge (WAS)pumping modifications to improve plant process
control and automation;and
o Add seven (7)process instruments that will further aid in
the automation of the treatment plant.
•It was indicated that MWH agreed with the proposed enhancements,
therefore staff is requesting that the Board approve Change
Order No.1 to the contract with MWH.
•In response to a question from the Committee,staff stated that
it was necessary for the District·to upgrade its treatment plant
process to meet waste discharge requirements for nitrogen,which
was the original contract with MWH.Since the District was
upgrading the plant,it was decided to include additional
enhancements to make the treatment plant more efficient and to
increase automation of the plant.The SCADA system has
eliminated the need for night-shifts and weekends.These
enhancements will provide further automation and possibly reduce
the number of operators needed.
•Staff stated that automation would also provide additional
information that the District does not currently have and will
give staff a better handle of the level of solids being
processed by the treatment plant.METRO charges the District
for the strength of the sewage (sludge)process,and this cost
is increasing.The enhanced information will allow the District
to determine when it would be more cost effective for the
District to handle its own sludge.
Following the discussion,the Committee supported staffs'
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B
SUBJECT:
R2096-001102
Change Order No.
Watson Harza for
Facility Upgrade
1 to the Contract with Montgomery
the Ralph W,Chapman Water Recycling
Project
Olay Water District
r2096 -RWCWRF •Upgrades and Modifioatlons
Date Updated:August 31,2010
Budqet Outstanding Projected FinalCommiltedexpendituresCommitment&Cost Vendor/Comments
2,500,000 Forecast
Planning
Labor 48,482 48,482 48,482
Professional Leqal Fees 603 603 -603 GARCIA CALDERON &RUIZ LLP
Consultant Contracts 11,200 11,200 -11,200 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
Consultant Contracts 458,813 98,850 359,963 458,813 MWH AMERICAS INC
83.301 83.301 83.301 C.O.#1 MWH AMERICAS INC
Consultant Contracts 678 678 -678 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Service Contracts 250 250 250 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO
Service Contracts 68 68 68 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Service Contracts 10,860 10,860 -10,860 E S BABCOCK &SONS INC
Total Planninq 530,954 170,991 359,963 530.954
Design
Labor 14,083 14,083 14,083
Consultant Contracts 3,500 3,500 -3,500 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
Total Desiqn 17,583 17,583 -17,583
Construction
Labor 55,080 55,080 55,080
Rents and Leases 5,557 5,557 -5,557 EQUIPCO SALES &SERVICE
MWH AMERICAS,PENHALL,
Service Contracts 13,039 13,039 -13,039 SOUTHERN CAL TELECOM
Infrastructure Equipment &
Materials 434 434 -434 EQUIPCO SALES &SERVICE
Infrastructure Equipment &REXEL,CABLES PLUS,
Materials 7,907 7,907 -7,907 COMPUTER AIDED SOLUTIONS
Total Construction 82,016 82,016 -82,016
Grand Total 713,855 270.590 443,264 713,855
.,
'"...
IMPERIAL
BEACH
VIC rTY MAP
ooco
II
~
ill...Jt3
CI)
PROJECT
SITE
cTAY WATER DISTRICT
RWCWRF -UPGRADES AND MODIFICATIONS
CIP#R2096
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BLVD.,SPRING VALLEY,CA.91978,(619)670 -2222
CONTRACT/P.O.CHANGE ORDER No.1
PROJECT/ITEM:Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling Facility Upgrade Project
CONTRACTORIVENDOR:MWH REF.CIP No.:"R2096
APPROVED BY:General Manager REF.P.O.No:711767 REF.WO No.:N/A DATE:08/31/10
DESCRIPTION:
Provide design services and preparation of bid documents for the modifications to the RWCWRF
Upgrade project as detailed in the Attachment A,Additional Scope of Services,and Exhibit B,Budget
Breakdown Per Task dated August 31,2010.
REASON:
The modifications of the original design services were identified by MWH and District Staff as
enhancements that would increase the treatment plant efficiency and productivity.
CHANGE P.O.TO READ:
Revise Contract to add $83,301 for a total Contract amount of $542,114.00.
Completion date remains at 06/30/12.
ORIGINAL CONTRACT/P.O.AMOUNT:
ADJUSTED AMOUNT FROM PREVIOUS CHANGE:
TOTAL COST OF THIS CHANGE ORDER:
NEW CONTRACT/P.O.AMOUNT IS:
CONTRACT/P.O.TIME AFFECTED BY THIS CHANGE:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE:
REVISED CONTRACT COMPLETION DATE
$
$
$
$
458,813.00
458,813.00
83,301.00
542,114.00oDays
6/30/12
6/30/12
IT 15 UNDERSTOODWITH THE FOLLOWING APPROVALS,THAT THECONTRACTORNENDOR IS AUTHORIZED AND DIRECTED TO MAKE THE HEREI N DESCRIBED
CHANGES.ITIS ALSO AGREED THATTHETOTAL COST FOR THIS CHANGEORDER CONSTITUTESFULLAND COMPLETE COMPENSATION FOR OBLIGATIONS
REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT/P.O.ALLOTHER PROVISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT/P.O.REMAIN IN FULLFORCE AND EFFECT.
STAFF APPROVALS:
PROJ.MGR.01kui't:..ofnM"Q''B~DATE:~I z..lZ4l~--=----,0 I I
DIV.~GR:7hHA ~DATE:9/~/ZIJ)tJ
CHIEF:DATE:,_---'-_
ASST.GEN.MANAGER:._
DISTRICT APPROVAL:
DATE:_
GEN.MANAGER:_______DATE:_
COPIES:0 FILE (Orig.)0 CONTRACTORNENDOR 0 CHIEF-ENGR 0 CHIEF-FINANCE 0 AGM/ENG-OPS
o ENGR.MGR.0 INSPECTION 0 PROJ MGR 0 ENGR.SECRETARY 0 PURCHASING 0 ACCTS PAYABLE
C:\DoclIments and Settings\klwitter\Local Setlings\TemoorarvInternet Files\Content.Outlook\EVUQZ4Vx\Change Order #1 -RWCWRF Uograde ProiecLdoc
CHANGE ORDER LOG
Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling Facility Upgrade Project
ConsultanUContractor:MWH
Project:R2096
Subproject:001102
APPROVED
C.O.AMOUNT BY DATE DESCRIPTION TYPE C.O.
1 $83,301.00 Board 10/6/2010 Compensation for design of additional scope items.Owner
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Total C.O.'s To Date:
Original Contract Amount:
Current Contract Amount:
Change Order Breakdown for the Month:
Month Net C.O.$Limit Authorization
9/10 $83,310.00 $2,000 Insp
$10,000 PM/Sr.Engr.
$20,000 DivM
$25,000 Chief
$35,000 AGM
$50,000 GM
>$50000 Board
H:\RWCWRF Upgrade Project_Change Order Log 1
$83,301.00
$458,813.00
$542,114.00
18.2%
C.O.%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9/1/2010
August 31,2010
MWH
Attachment A
RWCWRF Upgrade Project
Additional Scope of Services
The below Scope Modifications cover design services (Task A.Project Management and
Administration;Task B.Preliminary Design and Task C.Final Design and Bid Document
Preparation)to be provided by MWH Americas,Inc.("MWH")to coincide with the
recommended project contained in the "Otay Water District,Ralph W.Chapman Water
Reclamation Facility Upgrade Project,Preliminary Design Report."
MWH shall perform additional services necessary to complete the design services as modified
below:
•Instead of re-using existing aeration diffuser system,a new aeration diffuser system -
Parkson HiOx®LlltraFlex Aeration Panels (based on August 26,2010 meeting)will be
provided.MWH will coordinate with the District and aeration diffuser manufacturer to
determine the number and arrangement of the aeration diffuser panels.MWH will
provide additional mechanical drawings to show the new diffuser grid system (plans,
sections and details)and expand specification section on Control Strategies to include
the new diffuser system.The District will negotiate with the aeration diffuser
manufacturer -Parkson and provide MWH a description of the services and materials
that Parkson will be supplying,along with a quote.
•Instead of dividing each basin into one anoxic zone and one aerobic zone,each basin
will be divided into four zones:two anoxic,one future swing and one aerobic.
Additional compartments were dictated by kinetic requirements revealed by modeling
of the District's Nitrogen data.
•The existing influent weirs will be converted to V-notch weirs (total of 3).
•The design will provide variable frequency drive (VFD)and flow indicating transmitters
(FIT)for each RAS flow meter at the aeration basins (total of 3).Flow meters will be
added at the discharge of RAS pumps and piping will be modified to provide straight
pipe.
•The design will include replacement of the buried 18-inch header and 12-inch header
that transitions into 8-inch line to aeration basin for channel aeration.An additional
civil drawing will be necessary to illustrate the plan and section of the yard piping and
profile.
•The design will include air flow transmitters for grit chamber and channel aeration.Air
flow measurements will be sent to the SCADA system and be part of blowers control.
•The design will include a flow rate controller for the control of blower system.
•The design will include the following:
•New air flow monitoring system for Headworks -Grit Removal/Classifier
(requires some piping modification).
•VFD and controls ofeach existing RAS pump.
•RAS -Add a flow meter to each RAS pump discharge line.(Requires significant
piping modification)
•Secondary Clarifier Skimming Trough -Add an actuator to rotate trough as well
connect to SCADA.(Requires adding motorized actuators)
With no AS-BUILT P&IDs,the design will include re-construction of P&IDs only for any
affected areas as needed to facilitate this project only.
•Electrical and Instrumentation design to support the equipment modifications listed in
this Attachment is included.
The Scope Modifications are based on the following assumptions:
1.The District will pressure test the existing 8-inch line to the grit chamber and the design
does not include modifications to the 8-inch line to the grit chamber.
2.Since original mylars are not available,the District will engage surveyor to perform
potholing and field surveys to locate surface and sub-surface features where the air
piping will be replaced.lhe District will provide MWH aerial photogrammetric survey
and digital topographic mapping data in Microstation V8 format.A final digital
topographic map (topo map)of the project site at a scale of one inch equals twenty feet
(1"=20'),with a contour interval of one (1)foot containing the specific ground shot
data and underground utility pothole data will be provided to MWH to proceed with the
design.The map accuracy will meet or exceed the specifications published in the US
Department of Transportation's Reference Guide Outline and l\Iational lVIapping
Standards.Field data will be incorporated into a digital topographic mapping on which
the new air piping will be mapped and designed.Digital topographic mapping will be
provided to MWH.
3.The District will engage geotechnical subconsultant to perform subsurface exploration
where the new filter air scour blowers will be located,and provide IVIWH a geotechnical
report.
4.The District will engage a corrosion subconsultant to test the soil samples for soil
corrosivity and provide MWH recommendations for controlling corrosion of
underground air piping.
EXHIBIT B
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT -AMENDMENT No.1
BUDGET BREAKDOWN PER TASK
August 31 2010,
I I I
Amended
IHourly Rate Amended Contract IContractHours Amended Contract
Task A.Project Management&Administration*,
I
Total Hours by Task 136 hr $23,574
Principal In Charge W.Moser 6 hr $245.00 $1,470.00
Project Manager J.Wojslaw 46 hr $205.00 $9,430.00
Supervising Professional P.Low 24 hr ,$155.00 $3,720.00
Senior Professional J.DeCarolis 28 hr $144.00 $4,032.00
Administrator N.Sampson 32 hr $87.00 $2,784.00
Direct Expenses
Subconsultants $-
Mileage 1333 per mile $0.61 $806.47
Misc.Other Direct Costs i $90.20 [
Associated Project Costs $1,331.44
,,,
Task B.Preliminary Design**
Total Hours byTask 528 hr $108,551
Principal In Charge W.Moser 4 hr $245.00 $980.00
Project Manager J.Wojslaw 52 hr $205.00 $10,660.00
TAC R.Stephenson 50 hr $205.00 $10,250.00
Principal Professional II V.Nevo 100 hr $202.00 $20,200.00
Principal Professional I M.Shahabi 10 hr $188.00 $1,880.00
Supervising Professional P.Low 148 hr $155.00 $22,940.00
Senior Professional ).DeCarolis 164 hr $144.00 $23,616.00 ,
Administrator N.Sampson o hr $87.00 $-:
--
Direct Expenses
Subconsultants ,CPM Construction $8,400.00
RBA :
Mileage o per mile $0.61 $-
Misc.Outside Reproduction $396.97
CADD 65 hr $18.43 $1,197.95
Associated Project Costs $5,169.12
Amended
Contract Hours Hourly Rate Amended Contract Amended Contract
Task C.Final Design and Bid Document Preparation I
i Total Hours by Task 1841.2 hr $327,610--I
Principal In Charge !W.Moser O,hr $245.00 $-
Project Manager J.Wojslaw 44 hr $205.00 $9,020.00
TAC R.Stephenson.L.Yaussi,155 hr 1$205.00 $31,775.00 I
M.Fordham,S.Hinman.H.
Durham
Supervising Professional J.Loucks 12 hr $158.00 $1,896.00
Principal Professional II Y.Nevo O'hr $202.00 $-
Principal Professional I M.Shahabi,D.Wilcoxson,196 hr $188.00 $36,848.00
J.Mohr,B.Tai
Supervising Professional P.Low,E.Pascua 247 hr $155.00 $38,285.00 .
Senior Professional J.DeCarolis,M.Ketabdar,562 hr $144.00 $80,928.00
SWiliiams :
Senior Designer Design Staff 625.2 hr $144.00 $90,028.80
Administrator N.Sampson o hr '$87.00 $-
Direct Expenses
Subconsultants CPM Construction $14,000.00
Mileage 600 permile $0.61 $363.00
Misc.Outside Reproduction 2236.3 cost $1,845.00 $2,459.90
CADD 216 hr $18.43 $3,980.88
Associated Project Costs $18,025.35
,
*Includes Project Management of Additional Scope.I
**Additional hours are associated with developing newscope items to a level suitable for design (cales,layouts,etc.).These items were only identified in PDR but notdeveloped yet.
Task A +Task B +Task C (Amended)
Task A +Task B +Task C (Original)
Task A +Task B +Task C (Amendment Amount)
2,505 hours
2,036 hours
469 hours
$
$
$
459,735
376,434
83,301
Dtay Water District
Ralph W.Chapman WRF Upgrade Project
Revised List of drawings
General
1 G-l Cover Sheet
2 G-2 Location and Vicinity Maps;Drawing Index
3 G-3 General Notes,Abbreviations and Symbols
Civil
4 C-l Grading Plan
5 C-2 Yard Piping Plan I
6 C-3 Piping Profiles I
7 C-4 Yard Piping Plan II &Piping Profiles II
8 C-5 Civil Details I
Structural
9 GS-l Structural Details
10 lS-l Aeration Basin Baffles I
11 15-2 Aeration Basin Baffles II
12 3S-1 Blower Building Modifications
13 3S-2 Air Scour Blower Foundation and Walls
Mechanical
14 GM-l Piping Schedule
15 M-l Mechanical Details
16 M-2 Mechanical Details
17 lM-l Aeration Basin Diffuser Demo
18 lM-2 Aeration Basin mixers &pumps -Plan
19 lM-3 Aeration Basin mixers &pumps -Sections
20 lM-4 Aeration Basin Air Piping-Plans &Sections
21 1M·S Aeration Basin Grids -Plans
22 1M·6 Aeration Basin Grids -Sections
231M·7 Aeration Basin Grids·Details
24 3M-l Blower Building -Plan
25 3M-2 Blower Building -Sections
26 3M-3 Air Scour Blower Plan &Sections
27 5M·l RAS Pumps Discharge Flow Meters
~SM 2 WA'iJ Qaoster PUFRI3 PlaR &SectiaRs
Legend
Black font =As proposed
FFOOOORed 01 +OOOfont =New scope Page 1
Electrical
29 GE-1 Electrical Symbols
30 GE-2 Electrical Notes and Abbreviations
31 GE-3 Electrical Details II
32 GE-4 Electrical Details II
33 E-1 Elecrtical Site Plan
34 E-2 Electrical Demolition drawing
35 E-3 Single Line Diagram
36 E-4 Control Schematics I
37 E-5 Control Schematics II
38 E-6 Conduit Development
39 E-7 Conduit and cable Schedule
40 E-8 Panalboard Schedule
41 1E-1 Aeration Basin Electrical Plan
42 3E-1 Blower Bldg Electrical Plan
43 3E-2 Air Scour Electrical Plan
44 5E-1 RAS Pumps and WAS Booster Pump
45 7E-l Grit Chamber Air Monitoring System and
Secondary Clarifier Skimming Trough
%7E 2 Diesel Tank bevel Transmitter
Hfluent Pump Pressure Transmitter
Instrumentation
47 GI-1lnstrumentation Sysmbols &Abbrevciations
48 GI-2 Instrumentation Details
49 GI-3 Network Block Diagram
50 11-1 P&ID 1Aeration Basins
51 11-2 P&ID II Aeration Basins
52 31-1 P&ID III Aeration Blowers and RAS Pumps
53 31-2 P&ID IV Air Scour Blowers
~51 1 P&ID V RAS and '.A/AS Pumf'ls &WAS 800ster Pump
55 71-1 P&ID VI Grit Chamber Air Monitoring System and
Secondary Clarifier Skimming Trough
~71 2 P&ID VII Diesel Tank level Transmitter
Effluent Pumf'l Pressure Transmitter
Number of Proposed Drawings =42
Number of New Drawings =10
Legend
Black font =As proposed
FFOOOORed 01+OOOfont =New scope Page 2
Otay Water District
Ralph W.Chapman WRF Upgrade Project
Additional Specification Sections
Construction Specifications In tHute (C51)MF-2004
Section Title Comments
262923 Variable Frequency Drives VFD for RAS Pumps
409100 Process Control and Instrumentation Expanded section
409102 In-Line Liquid Flow Measuring RAS flow meter
409104 Gas Flow Measuring Air flow meters and transmitter
409106 Level Measuring Diesel tank
409108 Pressure Measuring Effluent Pump
409300 Control Strategies Expanded section
412011 Rotary Pipe Skimmer If skimmer is to be replaced.
412517 Diffusers,Fine Bubble,Fixed New aeration grid systems
431058 Corrosion Resistant Cast Iron Soil Pipe New Air Header.
(ASTM A 518JA 861,Modified)
432233 Progressing Cavity Pumps WAS Booster Pump
433012 Valve and Gate Actuators Secondary Clarifier Skimming
Trough
Quality Assurance Approval Sheet .-
Project No.:1'12.05'"
Document Description:.'5t-a~or.f;faY'Boa.,..d a..?p,..ova.(+-__
C ba,,'6 c ...d P-~:#"-+0 ~...w.H ''''S c..Ctv1+rac+i""'or:.L..-±b...............,.e-~__---
1)W C.W 1)1==Ur'acad~1?C<fj.e......~~--.L+_
Author:~~.73(jd_
Signature Dat~I
Li-S-a.C.ob urn -/Soycl
Printed Name
QA Reviewer:
Date
rll/IO
Date
Manager:
~IJ glp1fJf/L-~
Printed Name
The above signatures attest that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability the
signers verify that it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended information;
being grammatically correct and free of formatting and typographical errors;accurately presenting calculated values
and numerical references;and being internally consistent,legible and uniform in its presentation style.
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 7c
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board
SUBMITTED B offrey Stevens,Chief
ormation Officer
APPROVED B :
(Chief)
MEETING DATE:
W.O.lG.F.NO:
October 6 2010
DIV.NO.
ALL
APPROVED BY:
(Asst.GM):
SUBJECT:
German Al~Assistant General Manager,Administration and
Finance
Asset Management FY 2011 Contract Approvals
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board authorizes the General Manager to negotiate and enter
into an agreement with:
1.Westin Engineering Inc.for asset management project consulting
services in an amount not to exceed $220,000,and
2.Spatial Wave for software development and modification to the
Field Mapplet application and related software to accommodate
asset management process improvements in an amount not to exceed
$200,000.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To authorize the purchase of services necessary to support the asset
management project (P2486)as identified in the District Strategic
Plan.
BACKGROUND:
The asset management program was initiated in FY 2009 with the
purpose of establishing an industry best practices approach to
managing the over the half billion dollar in ground assets the
District maintains.To that end the District solicited proposals
from leading consulting firms to provide assistance over the life of
the project.Westin Engineering was the successful and lowest cost
bidder.During FY 2009 an overall plan was developed and an asset
hierarchy and inventory were created.In FY 2010 an asset
criticality rankings were developed and a set of pilot projects were
initiated to develop the most effective methods to collect and
process the huge amount of data required to manage over 250,000
assets.This work was completed and in FY 2011 we an~icipate a full
scale data collection and storage effort as well as additional work
improving asset management business practices.
ANALYSIS:
Developing and improving the District's ability to manage assets is
becoming increasingly critical to the District's future success and
fiscal health.The District maintains upwards of 250,000 separate
items,from pipes to pump stations,all of which need to be managed
in order to obtain the best value over their lifecycle.While the
book value of District assets is approximately $551 million that does
not represent the replacement cost -which may be as high as $750
million.The asset management project was initiated in FY 2009 and
will likely continue through FY 2013.In FY 2009 and FY 2010 staff
developed an overall asset management plan,and completed work on
several pilot projects to determine how best to identify,capture,
and manage detailed asset data.The pilot projects proved that the
data is largely available and can be efficiently gathered and
processed.In addition,detailed criticality rankings for assets have
been developed to prioritize future work or replacements.We are now
ready to expand our efforts from our initial pilot area (Copps Lane
Pump Station)to the entire District in a phased approach.We are
also ready to develop the life expectancy and cost replacement
estimates,as well as develop the detailed and asset specific
methodology for condition assessment.
This project also explores how to improve the business processes that
maintain and support assets.For example,our pilot efforts in valve
exercising,a task we do over 3000 times a year,allowed us to cut
overall costs nearly 50%and to outsource non-value added tasks like
painting.We also modified our Field Mapplet software to allow us to
streamline data entry giving the crews more productive work time.
In conclusion,the pilot projects to establish the feasibility and
test the methodology to collect asset data and improve asset related
business processes have been successful.We are now ready to expand
from proven pilot level to the enterprise level.The following
contracts are essential to completing this effort as planned.
Westin Engineering
This contract will allow the District to obtain consulting assistance
from Westin Engineering to assist in enterprise wide data capture of
asset data,determine expected service levels for assets,complete
the calculation for replacement costs for assets like reservoirs and
pump stations,and assist in the development of methodologies to
conduct detailed condition assessments.The original consulting
services for this work was competitively bid and stated that we
anticipated using the same consultant through the initial and middle
phases of this project.While this contract is not competitively
bid,we are using the same rates as the earlier contract and have
received a reduction in rates of approximately $45 per hour over the
original pricing for the bulk of the labor in this contract.We did
compare these costs to other engineering consulting firms and found
the costs to be appropriate and competitive.We recommend the Board
authorize the General Manager negotiate and enter into a contract
with Westin Engineering for the needed consulting services in an
amount not to exceed $220,000.
Spatial Wave
The District requires that the data systems and field applications be
modified to support enhanced and streamlined asset management
business practices and processes.For FY 2011 and FY 2012 we are
recommending that $200,000 be allocated for these tasks.This will
complete a major piece of work associated with improving the
efficiency and lowering the per unit costs of expensive repetitive
business processes that are required to support the large installed
asset base we maintain.This is a sole source contract because
Spatial Wave is modifying proprietary software that is not supported
through other license providers.This work will enhance the existing
off-the-shelf Field Mapplet application by allowing the District to
capture data and information in a simplified form while maintain the
capabilities of the existing software.
FISCAL IMPACT:~-
The total budget for erp 2486,as approved in the FY 2011 budget is
$1,214,295.Total expenditures to date are $262,028 leaving a balance
of $952,266.The items referenced above request a total of $420,000
and will leave a balance of $532,266.
The Project Manager anticipates that,based upon the above
information,the erp budgets will be sufficient to support the
project.
Finance has determined that funding will be available for erp P2486.
Funding for erp P2486 will be 100%replacement.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
These items are in support of the District's Strategic Plan,
•Develop and implement an Asset Management Program Plan to extend
useful life of capital assets.
•Develop optimized field work processing using integrated
technology.
•Develop information systems support for asset management
program.Specifically the strategy of Business Efficiency.
LEGAL IMPACT:NA
None.
General Manager
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:.Asset Management FY 2010 Contract Approvals
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration
reviewed this i tem at a meeting
the following comments were made:
and Communications
held on September 16,
Committee
2010 and
•The overall goal of the Asset Management Program is to
reduce operating expenses by maintaining assets
effectively and efficiently over their life cycle through
industry best practices.
•As the asset management system must contain the right
information to assist staff in making good decisions,
staff put a lot of emphasis,with the assistance of
consultants/experts,in determining the information that
should be maintained in the system.It was also noted
that there must be a balance in the information
maintained;enough to allow good decision making,but not
so much that it would require a great deal of effort to
maintain.
•The FY 2010 project milestone was to complete the data
collection for all District assets.To assist in the
development of this process,staff implemented several
pilot programs that included valve exercising and a
reservoir and pump station.Staff validated through the
process that a very high percentage of the needed
information was available and would not require a lot of
searching.The pilot program also included the
development of an efficient process to collect the data
(forms,processing of data,entries,etc.)
•Staff presented the findings of the pilot program for
Valve Exercising.Working with team members,staff did a
thorough analysis of the Valve Exercising process to
understand the process and how it can be improved.The
team really focused on how the labor cost could be
reduced and was able to cut labor significantly by
focusing on changes to the process and targeting the
specific skills needed to accomplish the task.This new
business process is already in place.
The analysis also resulted in reducing the time it took
for staff to enter data for the Valve Program by
implementing software that allows staff to enter the data
in the field which will result in a savings of 2 hours of
staff time.Staff is in the process of developing this
software solution.This same approach will be utilized
with other business processes.
•The data architecture design will allow data to flow to
both the GIS and work management systems.The
information collected will allow staff to analyze
information from a map perspective or a work perspective
to enhance work processes and efficiency.
•The focus in FY 2011 is to continue to collect data for
the Asset Management System.The groups responsible for
the maintenance of each of the facilities will serve on a
team whose task will be to collect the data.
•As part of the Asset Data Collection process,staff will
develop an asset hierarchy to understand how the
different levels of equipment relate to one another
(lowest level to highest level of equipment)and define
attributes of the equipment.
•The District will also need to determine its desired
service level.If it is too high,it could be too costly
(waste time and money),or too low,the goals for the
facilities life will not be met.Additionally,the
District will need to identify the current condition of
its assets,their useful life (when they are expected to
fail),its replacement value and its
importance/criticality to the system.
•The Asset Management system will provide the knowledge to
allow staff to prioritize and schedule maintenance on the
assets that have the most critical need.
•Staff is requesting that the board authorize an agreement
with Westin Engineering Inc.for consulting services for
the Asset Management Proj ect in an amount not-to-exceed
$220,000 and to Spatial Wave for software development and
modification to the Field Mapplet application and related
software to accommodate asset management process
improvements in an amount not-to-exceed $200,000.
•It was discussed that valve exercising has become a focus
over the last couple years and staff wanted a more
programmatic approach to the process (how often does the
District really need to exercise the valves,how can make
process more efficient,etc.).During the review of the
process,the District found a piece of equipment that
Helix WD was surplusing that made the process more
efficient.As the District developed a more organized
approach,the efficiency created less personnel
requirements.Changes to the program also included
outsourcing some of the work,such as painting of the
valve facilities,and possibly the traffic control needs,
etc.
•It was noted that the software for the Asset Management
system is "off-the-shelf"software and Spatial Wave will
be retained to modify the program to customize it for
specific District needs.
Upon completion of the discussion the committee supported
staffs'recommendation and presentation to the full board on the
consent calendar.
AGENDA ITEM Sa
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE:October 6,2010TYPEMEETING:
SUBMITTED BY:
Regular Board
David Charles Ifl1::--
Public Services Manager
PROJECTNO.l P1438-
SUBPROJECT:010000
DIV.NO.2
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
APPROVED BY:
(Ass!.8M):
SUBJECT:
Rod Posada
Chief,Engineering
Manny Magafi~~
Assistant G:nera~~ger,Engineering and Operations
Execution of a Promissory Note with Mr.Jesus H.Kuroda-San
for the OWD Capacity Fee for a 3/4-inch Meter and the Water
Supply Fee for the property located at 8649 Avenida De La
Fuente,San Diego,California 92154
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District)Board of Directors (Board)
approves the execution of a Promissory Note in the amount of $8,521
between Mr.Jesus H.Kuroda-San (Mr.Kuroda)and the District for the
OWD Capacity Fee for a 3/4-inch Meter and the Water Supply Fee for
the property located at 8649 Avenida De La Fuente,San Diego,
California 92154 (see Exhibit A).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board approval for the General Manager to execute a
Promissory Note (Note)in the amount of $8,521 between Mr.Kuroda and
the District (see Exhibit A).Mr.Kuroda has requested a 12-month
payment plan (see Exhibit C)for the.OWD Capacity Fee for a 3/4-inch
Meter and the Water Supply Fee for the property located at 8649
Avenida De La Fuente,San Diego,California 92154.
ANALYSIS:
On July 13,2010,staff provided Mr.Kuroda a quote (QTE-I0-094)for
a 3/4-inch meter for the property located at 8649 Avenida De La
Fuente,San Diego,California 92154,in the amount of $13,279 (see
Exhibit B).Mr.Kuroda stated that due to financial hardship,he is
inquiring if the District would entertain monthly installment
payments.
Staff provided Mr.Kuroda with District Policy 7,Conditions for
Installment or Deferred Payment to the District (see Exhibit D),and
informed him that the only fees that would be considered for deferral
are the OWD Capacity Fee and the New Water Supply Fee.These fees
represent $8,521 of the total $13,279 quoted.
In addition,staff also informed Mr.Kuroda that all other fees
indicated in QTE-I0-094,plus an administrative fee of $500 for the
establishment of the Note (included in Exhibit C),would have to be
paid to the District at the time of application,should the Board
approve the execution of the Note.
FISCAL IMPACT.~
The District will receive an administrative fee of $500 and interest
as compensation for the Promissory Note.Due to the relative small
amount of the Note,this does not present a financial hardship for
the District.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This project supports the District's Mission statement,~To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater service to the customers of
the Otay Water District in a professional,effective,and efficient
manner,"and the District's Strategic Goal,~To satisfy current and
future water needs for potable,recycled,and wastewater services.
LEGAL IMPACT:
General Manager
P:\Public-s\STAFF REPORTS\2010\BD 10-06-10,Staff Report,Kuroda Promissory Note,(DC-RP).doc
DC/RP:jf
Attachments:Attachment A
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Promissory Note
Public Services Quote QTE-IO-094
Twelve Month Payment Schedule
Policy 7
2
ATTACHMENT A
sUsJEc'rjpR:OJECT:Execution of a Promisso~YN;t·e with Mr.Jesus H.Kuroda-San
for the OWD Capacity Fee for a 3/4-inch Meter and the Water
P1438-010000 Supply Fee for the property located at 8649 Avenida De La
Fuente,San Diego,California 92154
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration and Communications Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on September 16,2010 and the following
comments were made:
•Mr.Jesus Kuroda who owns a property located at 8649 Avenida
de la Fuente,San Diego requested a quote for a ~-inch meter.
The quote for the ~-inch meter totaled $13,279.
•Mr.Kuroda requested a monthly payment plan due to financial
hardship.The District provided,as per Board of Directors
Policy 7,Conditions for Installment or Deferred Payments to
the District,a Promissory Note for the deferral of Otay
related fees (Capacity and Water Supply)representing $8,521
of the $13,279.
•Mr.Kuroda was informed that,should the board approve the
promissory note,all other fees and the administrative fee for
the establishment of the promissory note of $500 would need to
be paid to the District at the time of application.
•It was
standard
counsel.
discussed that the
agreement and has
The promissory note
proposed Promissory
been reviewed by
is interest bearing.
Note is a
District's
•It was discussed that Policy 7 requires that such Promissory
Notes/Agreements be presented for board approval.The
commi ttee suggested that the policy be revised to authorize
the General Manager to approve such agreements and report
these agreements in the General Manager's monthly report to
the board.The committee also discussed possibly including a
credit check of the applicant as part of the process.
•The committee suggested that the proposed revisions to Policy
7 be presented to the board along with this staff report.
Staff is requesting that the board adopt Resolution No.4168
(Exhibit 1 to these notes),amending Policy No.7,Conditions
for Installment or Deferred Payment to the District,
authorizing the General Manager to approve such agreements and
report any such executed agreements in the General Manager's
monthly report to the board.
Upon completion of the discussion the committee supported staffs'
recommendation and presentation to the full board as an action item.
Exhibit 1
RESOLUTION NO.4168
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT
AMENDING POLICY NO.7,CONDITIONS FOR INSTALLMENT
OR DEFERRED PAYMENTS TO THE DISTRICT
WHEREAS,the District occasionally receives requests for
installment or deferred payment agreements,and
WHEREAS,in circumstances where it is in the District's best
interest that the agreement be made;and
WHEREAS,the Board would like to authorize the General Manager
to negotiate and execute installment or deferred payment agreements
on behalf of the District that do not exceed his signatory authority
as established in Chapter 2,Section 2.01-D of the District's Code of
Ordinances,and
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the
Otay Water District that Policy 7,Conditions for Installment or
Deferred Payments to the District,be amended as per Exhibit 1 to
this resolution.
PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the
Otay Water District at a regular meeting held this 6 th day of October,
2010.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
Page 1 of 2
ATTEST:
Secretary
Page 2 of 2
President
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number Adopted Revised
I
CONDITIONS FOR INSTALLMENT OR DEFERRED 07 10/15/84 5/7/2008
PAYMENTS TO THE DISTRICT 10/06/10
PURPOSE
To establish a policy regarding conditions for making installment
or deferred payments to the District.
BACKGROUND
Occasionally the District receives requests to allow payment of
certain connection charges on an installment or deferred basis.
Approval of these agreements will occur in very limited
circumstances where it is in the District's best interest that the
agreement be made.In addition,if the District is to consider
such requests,the District must not be in a position of risk of
loss in the event of non-payment.
POLICY
The following procedures,terms and conditions shall apply to
requests and arrangements for payment to the District on an
installment or deferred basis:
1.Requests for installment or deferred payments shall be
reviewed by the District.Each request shall indicate the
terms desired with a maximum term of 12 months.The person
or party making the request shall furnish all financial
information or data deemed necessary by the District to
review the request.
2.The General Manager shall have authority to negotiate and
execute deferral agreements with residential and non-
residential customers where the value of the agreement does
not exceed the General Manager's signatory authority as
established in Chapter 2,Section 2.01-0 of the Code of
Ordinance.Deferral agreements requ&stcd by non=residential
customers shall be presented to the goard prior to
mwcution.In adeli tion,the General Manager will inform the
Board of such executed agreements within his monthly report
to the Board of Directors.
3.Where the value of the proposed agreement exceeds the General
Manager's authority,the District shall make a recommendation
to the Board of Directors for approval or disapproval,with
reasons for the recommendation.
4.In emergency situations,the General Manager is authorized to
enter into a deferral agreement exceeding his/her authority
to allow a customer to connect to the District system.The
Page 1 of 2
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number Adopted Revised
I
CONDITIONS FOR INSTALLMENT OR DEFERRED 07 10/15/84 5/7/2008
PAYMENTS TO THE DISTRICT 10/06/10
General Manager shall submit all such deferral agreements to
the Board for ratification at the next regularly scheduled
Board meeting.
5.A minimum down payment of ten percent (10%)of the total
amount to be paid in installments or on a deferred basis is
required and is nonrefundable.
6.Any increases in rates,fees,or charges shall apply to all
connections which have not been made at the time the increase
is adopted,including but not limited to capacity fees and
annexation fees.
7.The only fees that will be considered for deferral are Otay
Capacity Fees and Annexations fees.All labor and materials
costs will not be considered for deferral as this would place
the District in a position of risk in the event of default.
In addition,the District will not make arrangements for
deferral of fees collected by the District on behalf of other
governmental entities.These fees must be paid prior to the
execution of the agreement or payment arrangements must be
obtained from the CWA or MWD by the applicant.
8.For each installment or deferred payment arrangement a
promissory note,payable to the District,shall be executed
to provide for terms of payment of the balance of principal
due,with interest payable monthly at a rate equal to five
percent (5%)per annum over the Federal Reserve Discount
Rate.
9.In addition to execution of a promissory note for the balance
of the payment,the District will consider requiring security
to guarantee payment of the promissory note,such as but not
limited to,a letter of credit,performance bond,lien
contract,certificate of deposit,or other security
satisfactory to the District.
10.An administrative fee for the establishment of a deferral
agreement of $500.00 will be charged for all such agreements.
Page 2 of 2
__________,2010
EXHIBIT A
PROMISSORY NOTE
BETWEEN JESUS H KURODA-SAN AND OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Amount:$8,521.00
Date:
INSTALLMENT NOTE
FOR VALUE RECEIVED,specifically (1)one 3/4-inch meter OWD Capacity Fee and
Water Supply Fee.The meter purchases will be installed and available for service
at 8649 Avenida De La Fuente,San Diego,CA 92154;the undersigned,Jesus H
Kuroda-San,hereby promises to pay to the order of the Otay Water District
(hereinafter "Otay"),as specified below,the principal sum of Eight Thousand Five
Hundred Twenty One Dollars ($8,521.00),together with interest at the monthly rate
in accordance with Otay Policy (5%over the Federal Discount Rate -currently
.25%).
(1)An initial installment of $852.10 shall be due on the date of the
execution of this Note.
(2)Thereafter,twelve (12 consecutive monthly installments of $657.00 shall be
due on the 25th day of each month beginning the 25th day of the month
immediately following the execution of this Note.
(3)The principal and interest shall be payable at 2554 Sweetwater Springs
Blvd.,Spring Valley,CA 91978-2004,until the entire indebtedness is
fully paid.
(4)This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part,without premium,penalty
or discount,at any time,at the option of Jesus H Kuroda-San,together
with accrued interest on the amount prepaid.
Late Charge
If any installment under this Note is not received by Otay within five (5)
business days after the installment is due,Jesus H Kuroda-San agrees to a payment
delinquency charge of 5%of the total amount delinquent.When a payment
delinquency charge is made,such shall be added to the delinquent account as of the
date the account becomes delinquent and such charges shall become an inseparable
part of the amount due as of that time.In the event of delinquency,a notice
shall be mailed to Jesus H Kuroda-San notifying Jesus H Kuroda-San that service
will be turned off unless payment is made.The notice shall indicate the amount
due,including delinquency charges,and that the total amount must be paid within
fifteen (15)calendar days from the date of mailing or presentation of the notice
to Jesus H Kuroda-San to avoid disruption of service.
Acceleration
At its option,Otay may determine that Jesus H Kuroda-San is in default and
may,consequently,accelerate the maturity of all installments,making the unpaid
balance of the Note (the total of the unpaid monthly installments and any unpaid
delinquency charges)due immediately without presentment for payment or any notice,
if:
(1)Jesus H Kuroda-San fails to pay an installment when due.
(2)Jesus H Kuroda-San or any endorser,surety,or guarantor of this Note:
(i)Makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors.
(ii)Offers settlement to any creditors.
(iii)Fails to pay any obligation when due.
(3)Otay discovers that any misrepresentation was made to Otay on behalf of
Jesus H Kuroda-San to obtain credit or an extension_of credit.
(4)Any legal action is commenced against Jesus H Kuroda-San or any
endorser,surety,or guarantor,including:
(i)Entry of judgment.
(ii)Issuance of writ of attachment,order of garnishment,order
or subpoena in supplementary proceedings,execution or
similar process.
(5)A receiver is appointed for Jesus H Kuroda-San or any endorser,surety,
or guarantor.
Otay,at its option,may accelerate the maturity of all installments to
become due immediately if,in the sole opinion of Otay,the financial
responsibility of Jesus H Kuroda-San becomes unsatisfactory.
Attorneys'Fees
Jesus H Kuroda-San agrees that if any referral to an attorney for collection
or any action at law or in equity is brought to enforce this Note for nonpayment at
maturity,the prevailing party will be entitled to reasonable attorneys'fees in
addition to any other relief that the prevailing party may be entitled to.
waivers
No waiver by Otay of any rights or remedies under this Note shall be
considered a waiver of any other subsequent right or remedy.
Jesus H Kuroda-San waives presentment for payment,notice of nonpayment,and
notice of dishonor of this Note.
Jesus H Kuroda-San waives trial by jury in any litigation arising out of or
relating to this Note in which Otay or a holder of this Note is an adverse party,
and further waives the right to interpose any defense,set-off,or counterclaim of
any nature or description,which rights are expressly waived except as provided by
law.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have entered into this agreement as of the
executed date ,2010.
JESUS H.KURODA-SAN
By:_
Property Owner of 8649 Avenida De La Fuente
San Diego,CA 92154
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
By:_
General Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM
EXHIBIT B
Public Services Quote
Jesus H Kuroda-San
CC#298
Date:,2010
As per District Policy #07
Meter/Service
OWD Cap Fee for 3/4-lnch Meter
Water Supply Fee
EXHIBIT C
Qty
1
1
Unit Price
7,641.00
880.00
Total
7,641.00
880.00
8,521.00
ORIGINAL BALANCE
NO.OF PAYMENTS
INTEREST RATE
INITIAL DOWNPAYIVIENT (10%)
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
DOWNPAYMENT
INITIAL MONTHLY PAYMENT
FINAL PAYMENT
FINAL PAYMENT AMT.
$8,521.00
13 Inc.down payment
5.25%
$852.10
$500.00 Establishment of Note
9/30/2010
$657.00
9/25/2011
$655.53
PAYMENT
DATE PAYMENT PRINCIPAL INTEREST BALANCE
$8,521.00
9/30/2010 $852.10 $852.10 $7,668.90
1 10/25/2010 $657.00 $629.42 $27.58 $7,039.48
2 11/25/2010 $657.00 $625.61 $31.39 $6,413.86
3 12/25/2010 $657.00 $629.32 $27.68 $5,784.54
4 1/25/2011 $657.00 $631.21 $25.79 $5,153.33
5 2/25/2011 $657.00 $634.02 $22.98 $4,519.31
6 3/25/2011 $657.00 $638.80 $18.20 $3,880.51
7 4/25/2011 $657.00 $639.70 $17.30 $3,240.82
8 5/25/2011 $657.00 $643.02 $13.98 $2,597.80
9 6/25/2011 $657.00 $645.42 $11.58 $1,952.38
10 7/25/2011 $657.00 $648.58 $8.42 $1,303.81
11 8/25/2011 $657.00 $651.19 $5.81 $652.62
12 9/25/2011 $655.53 $652.62 $2.91 $0.00
TOTAL PAYMENTS $8,734.63 $8,521.00 $213.63
EXHIBIT D
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject Policy Date Date
Number .-Adopted Revised
CONDITIONS FOR INSTALLMENT OR DEFERRED 07 10/15/84 5/7/2008
PAYMENTS TO THE DISTRICT
PURPOSE
To establish a policy regarding conditions for making installment
or deferred payments to the District.
BACKGROUND
Occasionally the District receives requests to allow payment of
certain connection charges on an installment or deferred basis.
Approval of these agreements will occur in very limited
circumstances where it is in the District's best interest that the
agreement be made.In addition,if the District is to consider
such requests,the District must not be in a position of risk of
loss in the event of non-payment.
POLICY
The following procedures,terms and conditions shall apply to
requests and arrangements for payment to the District on an
installment or deferred basis:
1.Requests for installment or deferred payments shall be
reviewed by the District.Each request shall indicate the
terms desired with a maximum term of 12 months.The person
or party making the request shall furnish all financial
information or data deemed necessary by the District to
review the request.
2.The General Manager shall have authority to negotiate and
execute deferral agreements with residential customers where
the value of the agreement does not exceed the General
Manager's signatory authority as established in Chapter 2,
Section 2.01-D of the Code of Ordinance.Deferral agreements
requested by non-residential customers shall be presented to
the Board prior to execution.
3.Where the value of the proposed agreement exceeds the General
Manager's authority,the District shall make a recommendation
to the Board of Directors for approval or disapproval,with
reasons for the recommendation.
4.In emergency situations,the General Manager is authorized to
enter into a deferral agreement exceeding his/her authority
to allow a customer to connect to the District system.The
General Manager shall submit all such deferral agreements to
the Board for ratification at the next regularly scheduled
Board meeting.
Page 1 of 2
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject Policy .-Date Date
Number Adopted Revised -
CONDITIONS FOR INSTALLMENT OR DEFERRED 07 10/15/84 5/7/2008
PAYMENTS TO THE DISTRICT
5.A minimum down payment of ten percent (10%)of the total
amount to be paid in installments or on a deferred basis is
required and is nonrefundable.
6.Any increases in rates,fees,or charges shall apply to all
connections which have not been made at the time the increase
is adopted,including but not limited to capacity fees and
annexation fees.
7.The only fees that will be considered for deferral are Otay
Capacity Fees and Annexations fees.All labor and materials
costs will not be considered for deferral as this would place
the District in a position of risk in the event of default.
In addition,the District will not make arrangements for
deferral of fees collected by the District on behalf of other
governmental entities.These fees must be paid prior to the
execution of the agreement or payment arrangements must be
obtained from the CWA or MWD by the applicant.
8.For each installment or deferred payment arrangement a
promissory note,payable to the District,shall be executed
to provide for terms of payment of the balance of principal
due,with interest payable monthly at a rate equal to five
percent (5%)per annum over the Federal Reserve Discount
Rate.
9.In addition to execution of a promissory note for the balance
of the payment,the District will consider requiring security
to guarantee payment of the promissory note,such as but not
limited to,a letter of credit,performance bond,lien
contract,certificate of deposit,or other security
satisfactory to the District.
10.An administrative fee for the establishment of a deferral
agreement of $500.00 will be charged for all such agreements.
Page 2 of 2
Quality Assurance Approval 5hee~
Subject:Execution of a Promissory Note with Mr.Jesus H.
Kuroda-San for the OWD Capacity Fee for a 3/4-
inch Meter and the Water Supply Fee for the
property located at 8649 Avenida De La Fuente,
San Diego,California 92154
Document Description:Staff Report for October 6,2010 Board Meeting.
Project No.:P1438-
010000
Author:
QA Reviewer:
Manager:
~~
p~am['S{LJ/bLMlH'!
~~r&C/uJL
JXtD ,c\T.(htLr-\es
Printed Name
Date
The above signatures attest that the attached document has been reviewed and to the best of their ability the
signers verify that it meets the District quality standard by clearly and concisely conveying the intended information;
being grammatically correct and free of formatting and typographical errors;accurately presenting calculated values
and numerical references;and being internally consistent,legible and uniform in its presentation style.
AGENDA ITEM 8b
October 6,2010
DIV.NO.W.O.lG.F.NO:
MEETING DATE:
Yuri Calderon,General c~nsel
Aerobel Banuelos,Esq.
Mark Watton,General Man ger
German Alvarez,Assistant General Manager
APPROVED BY:
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY:
SUBJECT:Revision of Certain Code of Ordinance Provisions Regarding the
Use of Ratio Billing Systems in Multiunit Structures
RECOMMENDATIONS:
That the Board adopt Ordinance 525 enacting the proposed amendments to certain
provisions of the Code ofOrdinance.
PURPOSE:
To present to the Board certain Code of Ordinance provisions to clarify and update the
District's policies regarding the resale of water and the use of Ratio Utility Billing
Systems.
ANALYSIS:
The District's Code of Ordinance is currently silent on the use of Ratio Utility Billing
Systems and alternative billing methods by owners ofmultiunit structures.
Under the existing provisions of the Code of Ordinance,the resale of District water is
prohibited with the exception that owners or operators ofmobile home parks,apartments,
condominium complexes,industrial complexes and land used for agricultural purposes
may resell water furnished by the District through the use of a submetering system as
outlined in Section 27.04.
Many multiunit structures in the District are not fitted with submeters and the owners and
operators of such properties are either unable to recover the actual costs of water usage
from tenants or are reselling District water in violation of the Code of Ordinances.
Because many multiunit structures are not equipped to bill water usage through
submetering,District staff and the General Counsel believe it would be appropriate to
clarify in the Code ofOrdinance that,to the extent permissible by law,the owners ofsuch
properties may utilize Ratio Utility Billing systems or other alternative billing methods to
pass-through water charges to their tenants.As such,the District staff and the General
Counsel believe that it would be in the best interest ofthe District to incorporate language
under Article 27,Requirements and Limitations for Obtaining Water Service.
The Staff and the General Counsel recommend that the Board adopt revisions to Section
27.04,as set forth on the attachment to Ordinance 525.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None at this time.
'~J~ounsel rr
Attachment A:Ordinance 525,with the following attachments:
-Attachment 1-Section 27 ofthe Code of Ordinance,marked
2
ATTACHMENT A
i SUBJECTlPROJECT:IRe~i~ionofCertain Code of Ordinance Provisions RegardingltheUseofRatioBillingSystemsinMultiunitStructures
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on September 16,2010
and the following comments were made:
•Staff is requesting that Section 27.04 of the
District's Code of Ordinances be modified to permit
sub-metering (Ratio Utility Billing System),within
the parameters of the law,at any complex where
there is a master meter.
•This is a practice that is already occurring and it
was felt that provisions should be incorporated
within the District's code.The committee discussed
that the District cannot control sub-metering
companies,however,by indicating that they need to
act within the parameters of the law,it protects
the District.State law prohibits companies who sub-
meter from charging their tenants more than the cost
of water.
•Should an issue be raised by a tenant who feels
he/she is being charged more than their landlord's
cost for water,they would need to take the issue up
with their landlord as the District does not have a
relationship with their landlord.
•The committee discussed that sub-metering is
becoming more prevalent due to the increasing cost
of water.Landlords were finding that if they did
not sub-meter their tenants,their apartment water
bills increased by approximately 19%.By sub-
3
metering and charging their tenants for their water
use it encourages them to conserve.
Upon completion of the
staffs'recommendation
as an action item.
discussion the committee
and presentation to the
supported
full board
**Please note the ordinance number assigned to adopt the
changes to Section 27.04 has been updated from 525 to 527.
The updated Ordinance is attached as Attachment B.
4
Attachment B
ORDINANCE NO.527
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AMENDING THE
CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION 27,REQUIREMENTS AND
LIMITATIONS FOR OBTAINING WATER SERVICE
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Directors of Otay Water
District that the language in Section 27,Requirements and
Limitations for Obtaining Water Service,of the District's Code
of Ordinances be amended as per Attachment 1 to this ordinance.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the amendments to
Section 27 of the Code of Ordinances shall become effective
immediately upon adoption.
PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of
the Otay Water District at a regular meeting duly held this 6th
day of October 2010,by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
Page 1 of 1
Attachment 1
SECTION 27 REQUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS FOR OBTAINING
WATER SERVICE
27.01 REQUIREMENT FOR WATER/SEWER PERMIT AND PAYMENT OF
FEES,CHARGES,AND DEPOSITS
A.Requirement for Water/Sewer Permits.Water
meters shall not be installed nor water service furnished
until an application,in the form of a water/sewer permit,
has been executed by the customer at the District office.
B.Requirement for Payment of Fees,Charges and
Deposits.Payment of all required fees,charges and depos-
its shall be made by the customer at the time the water
meter is purchased.A customer requesting water service
shall pay the fees,charges,and deposits as set forth in
Section 28 of this Code.
C.Requirement for a Building Permit.A customer
requesting permanent water service shall be required to
present a valid building permit for the property issued by
the appropriate governmental agency,except that a building
permit is not required by a customer requesting permanent
water service to:1)install and maintain landscaping prior
to the construction of a building;2)perform mass grading
operations;or 3)to satisfy conditions imposed by other
government agencies,including a single meter for grading
for four lots or less which are part of the same parcel
map.Government agencies shall be exempt from the
requirement of presenting a valid building permit.
D.Requirement for a Service Lateral.The customer
requesting water service shall either have an existing
service lateral or purchase a new lateral installation at
the time of the meter purchase.
E.Commercial Parcels -5,000 square feet or Larger
Irrigated Landscape.When a customer requests water
service on a parcel of land with irrigated landscape equal
to 5,000 square feet or more,a separate meter will be
required for irrigation purposes on the site.
F.Reclaimed Water Service Areas.In areas
designated as reclaimed water service areas,the customer
shall be required to install a separate reclaimed water
service lateral and meter to supply irrigation to the
parcel.
G.Second Meter For Indoor Use.Any customer who
obtained a single meter prior to October 17,1990,a second
meter for indoor use may be obtained,without paying water
capacity fees,San Diego County Water Authority fees and
applicable zone charges on the second meter,if the
following criteria are met:
27-1
1.The additional meter is solely for the
purpose of isolating current domestic (indoor)
water use from that used for outdoor landscaping.
The additional meter shall be on a separate
lateral.
2.All costs of on-site plumbing changes,
including approved back-flow prevention devices,
will be the responsibility of the customer.
3.The customer acknowledges that adding a
second meter will result in a second water bill
and associated monthly system fee.
4.The customer will be required to pay
all fees and charges prior to meter installation.
27.02 SIZE OF WATER METER
A water meter shall be sized to ensure that the
maximum demand (in gallons per minute)will not exceed 80%
of the manufacturer's recommended maximum flow rate,as
shown in Section 27.03.In no case shall the water meter
size be less than ~-inch.The size of the water meter and
service lateral required for water service shall be
determined by the General Manager as follows:
A.Detached Single-Family Residential Dwelling Unit.
The customer may submit calculated maximum demand (in
gallons per minute),provided that maximum demand must be
more than twenty four (24)gallons per minute.
B.Apartments,Condominiums,Mobile Home Parks and
other Multiple Family Residential Dwelling Units with
Individual Meters.The calculated maximum demand shall be
per Section 27.02A.
C.Business,Commercial,Industrial,Apartments,
Condominiums,Mobile Home Parks and other Multiple-Family
Residential Dwelling Units.The customer shall submit
building plans signed by a licensed building architect.
The plans shall list the number of fixture units,the
parcel size (in acres),and the calculated maximum demand
(in gallons per minute)to be placed on each water meter.
D.Irrigation.The customer shall submit irrigation
plans signed by a licensed landscape architect.The plans
shall indicate the calculated maximum demand (in gallons
per minute)to be placed on each water meter and the total
area to be irrigated (in square feet).The plans must also
be in compliance with the requirements of Section 27.05.
E.Other.In the case of other types of service not
included above,the customer shall submit information as
27-2
requested by the General Manager.Any customer may request
and purchase a separate meter to isolate landscaping from
indoor use.
F.Requirement for Multiple Meters.The General
Manager may require multiple meters when it is in the best
interest of the District.
27.03 MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM FLOW RATE FOR
DISTRICT METERS
Customers are cautioned to control the rates of flow
of water through District meters.Operation of a meter at
flows in excess of the manufacturer's recommendations will
cause severe damage to operating parts.Rated capacities
for meters used in this District are as follows:
ORDINARY METERS
Meter Size
Recommended
In Inches
3/4
1
1-1/2
2
3
4
6
8
10
Manufacturer's
Maximum Rate in U.S.Gallons
per Minute
30
50
100
160
530
1350
2700
3500
6500
2
3
4
6
27.04
COMPOUND METERS
(Multi-family,Apartments etc.)
285
480
750
1700
USS OF SUBMETERS FOR RESALE OR DISTRIBUTION OF WATER
No customer may resell or redistribute any protion of the
water furnished by the District except as provided below:
A.Use o£Submeters for Resale or Redistribution of
water.Owners or operators of mobile home parks,
apartments,condominium complexes,industrial
complexes and land used for agricultural purposes may
resell water furnished by the District through the use
of a submetering system under the following
conditions:(1)owners and operators shall comply
27-3
with State law (California Code of Regulations Section
4090)prohibiting any surcharge on the water rate;(2)
the water system on the private property side of the
master meter,including the submeters,shall be solely
the responsibility of the owner or operator;and (3)
the owner or operator shall clearly delineate on the
bill that any cost associated with the submeters is a
cost imposed by the property owner or operator and not
by Otay Water District.
B.Ratio Utility Billing Systems.To the extent permitted
under law,owners or operators of multiunit structures
where submeters have not been installed may elect to
implement a Ratio utility Billing System (RUBS)or
alternative billing system to determine proportionate
shares of water charges and bill tenants accordingly.
27.05 CONSERVATION AND LOCAL SUPPLY USE REQUIRE:MENTS
The requirements below apply to all new residential
and commercial developments or redevelopments.The
landscape requirements also apply to any re-landscaping
that is subject to review by the District,the County of
San Diego,City of Chula Vista or the City of San Diego.
1.Indoor Fixtures and Appliances.
appliances installed,including the
list,must be high-efficiency:
•Toilets and urinals
•Faucets
•Showerheads
•Clothes Washers
•Dishwashers
All water fixtures and
ones in the following
"High-efficiencyu means fixtures and appliances that comply
with the most efficient specifications under the EPA
WaterSense®or Energy Star programs,l as in effect at the
time installation commences.
2.Landscape requirements.Only "Smart U irrigation
controllers2 may be installed and only low-water use plants
may be used in non recreational landscapes.All landscapes
1 Certified EPA WaterSense products,and Energy Star products,are at
least 20%more efficient than the applicable federal standards
2 Smart Irrigation Controller means a controller that uses real time,
soil moisture or weather data to automatically adjust irrigation run-
times furthermore,to qualify as a Smart Irrigation Controller,the
device must be certified by the Irrigation Association and/or the EPA
WaterSense program.
27-4
must also be designed and managed consistent with
requirements of the local agency within which the property
is located,be it the County of San Diego,the City of
Chula Vista or the City of San Diego.
a.Installed smart irrigation controllers shall be
properly programmed/scheduled according to the
manufacturer's instructions and/or site specific conditions
based on soil type,plant type,irrigation type,weather
and/or reference evapotranspiration data.
b.Two irrigation schedules shall be prepared,one for
the initial establishment period of three months or until
summer hardened,and one for the established landscape,
which incorporates the specific water needs of the plants
and turf throughout the calendar year.The schedules shall
be continuously available on site to those responsible for
the landscape maintenance and posted at the smart
controller.
c.Any Covenants,Conditions,and Restrictions
(CC&Rs)pertaining to a new subdivision/development shall
not limit or prohibit the use and maintenance of low water
use plant materials and the use of artificial turf,and
shall require property owners to design and maintain their
landscapes consistent with the applicable City and County's
regulations.
d.Dedicated irrigation meters shall be installed
in:
•All parks and common areas with 5,000 square
feet or more of irrigated landscape
•Commercial sites with 5,000 square feet or
more of irrigated landscape
e.In compliance with Section 23.03 of this Code of
Ordinance,pressure regulators must be installed when and
where appropriate to maximize the life expectancy and
efficiency of the irrigation system.
5.New commercial developments must install separate,
dual-distribution systems for potable and recycled water.
6.The requirements of this Section shall not be
interpreted in any way to limit the owner's obligation to
comply with any other applicable federal,state,or local
laws or regulations.
27-5
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 9a
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board Meeting
SUBMITTED BY:Mark Watton,
General Manager
MEETING DATE:
W.O.lG.F.NO:
October 6,2010
DIV.NO.
SUBJECT:Board of Directors 2010 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board,the attached Board of Director's meeting
calendar for 2010 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to r~view the 2010 Board of Director's meeting calendars
and amend the schedules as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:Calendar of Meetings for 2010
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTSIBoardMeeting Calendar10-6-1O.doc
Regular Board Meetings:
January 6,2010
February 3,2010
March 3,2010
April 7,2010
May 5,2010
June 2,2010
July 7,2010
August 4,2010
September 1,2010
October 6,2010
November 3,2010
December 1,2010
Board Workshops:
Board ofDirectors,Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2010
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 20,2010
February 17,2010
March 17,2010
Apri121,2010
May 19,2010
June 16,2010
July 21,2010
August 18,2010
September 15,2010
October 20,2010
November 17,2010
December 15,2010
Budget Workshop,Monday,May 17,2010
Special Board Meeting/Board Retreat Workshop,September 15,2010
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar Attach A for 2010 10-6-10.doc
Page 1 of 1
AGENDA ITEM 10
STAFF REPORT
October 6,2010
DIV.NO.All
MEETING DATE:
Human Resources Manager
Rom Sarno,Chief of Administrativ
German A~ssistant General Manager,Finance and
Administration
Regular Board \1\/
Kelli Williamso~~V0SUBMITTEDBY:
APPROVED BY:
(Ass!.GM):
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
TYPE MEETING:
SUBJECT:Present Results of the 2010 Employee Survey
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
This is an informational item.No action is required.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To present the results of the 2010 Employee Survey.
ANALYSIS:
As a part of the District's Strategic Plan,the District worked with
Rea &Parker to develop and implement a scientifically reliable and
repeatable Employee Survey Program in 2008.This year,Human
Resources staff worked with Rea &Parker to make minor edits and
refine some questions based on feedback from the 2008 survey.
The survey was administered the end of June 2010.Employees each
received an email from the General Manager with an overview of the
survey,followed-up by an email from Rea &Parker Research with
individual login information.Employees entered data directly to a
private,secure server only accessible by Rea &Parker Research.Of
the 160 employees,151 completed the survey,or 94%of the
employees,which is a very high participation rate.
As summarized in the report by Rea &Parker Research "The
fundamental conclusion to be drawn from the 2010 Emp~oyee
satisfaction survey is that Otay Water District employees were very
satisfied with their employment when the survey was initially
conducted in 2008 and are presently even more satisfied."Rea &
Parker Research will present highlights of the findings in a
presentation format (Attachment B).A summary of the results can be
found in the Otay Water District 2010 Employee Satisfaction Survey
(Attachment C).
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the Employee Survey was $15,000 and was budgeted.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
FY06-08,4.5.2.1 -"Establish a Repeatable Employee Survey Program"
LEGAL IMPACT:
Attachment A -Committee Report
Attachment B -PowerPoint Presentation
Attachment C -Otay Water District 2010 Employee Satisfaction Survey
SUBJECT/PRO.IECT:
ATTACHMENT A
Present Results of the 2010 Employee Survey
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration and Communications Committee and the
Engineering and Water Operations Committee reviewed this item at
meetings held on September 16,2010 and the following comments
were made:
•In 2008,staff spent a fair amount of time developing an
Employee Survey that the District could use repeatedly
every few years.The 2008 survey results would serve as
a benchmark that future years'surveys can be compared
to.
•It was indicated that the Board received a summary of the
survey results with staffs'report.Staff also has
provided as handouts,a copy of the detailed survey
report which provides responses to individual questions,
a comparative analysis to the 2008 survey and the
quadrant analysis which measures satisfaction against
importance (what is important and satisfactory,what is
satisfactory but not so important,etc.).
•The Employee Survey was conducted as an online
June 2010 by the District's consultant,Rea
Research and there were 107 questions (same
questions as the 2008 survey)
survey in
&Parker
number of
49 questions solicited responses of agreement or
disagreement (whether District provided specific
characteristics well,ie.,I have enough training,
morale in my department is good,etc.);Satisfaction
measure
49 questions also solicited responses of how
important the characteristic was to the employee
4 general satisfaction questions (besides the
specific characteristics,overall how satisfied are
you with your employment with the District,would
you recommend it as a place of employment,etc.)
5 general demographic information (the department an
employee worked in,age,how long they have been
employed by the District,etc.)
•Total participants in the survey was 151 of a 160
employees:
69%were male (70%in 2008)
-Median Age was 45.5 (44.5 in 2008)
Median Length of Service was 6.45 years (6 years in
2008)
Department:
o 39%from Operations (38%in 2008)
o 25%from Admin.Svcs./GM/IT (23%in 2008)
o 23%from Finance (24%in 2008)
o 13%from Engineering (15%in 2008)
Position Type:
o 70%Non-management [including crewleader](78%
in 2008)
o 7%Supervisor/Manager (8%in 2008)
o 14%Management/Department Chief (14%in 2008)
•The Key Findings indicate:
The level of satisfaction among employees with
regard to their employment by the District is
superior.This is higher than the 2008 survey which
indicated the employees'satisfaction was excellent.
The mean rating of their satisfaction with their
employment was 5.95 on a scale from 1,highly
dissatisfied,to 7,highly satisfied.
73%of employees rated their employment at 6 or 7
which is indicative of a great deal of satisfaction.
87%(or 9 out of 10)rated their satisfaction at 5,
6,or 7 (which are all above the midpoint).[53%in
2008 rated their satisfaction at 5,6,or 7]
The above ratings represent an increase in the
overall level of satisfaction.
The above ratings were compared with other
satisfaction surveys (utility or transportation
based)that Rea &Parker Research have done or are
familiar with and in those surveys,50%to 85%
indicated that their satisfaction level was above
the mid-point.Otay's rating was 87%.The mean
satisfaction ratings in the other surveys ranged
from 3.7 and 5.7.Otay's rating was 5.95.Rea &
Parker Research indicated that this is the highest
rating in employee satisfaction that they have ever
experienced.
96%of the employees indicated that they would
recommend Otay as a place of employment.(90%in
2008 )
•Rea &Parker Research indicated that they grouped the 49
questions into 8 categories (Workplace and Resources,
Opportunity for Professional Growth,Compensation and
Benefits,Management/Supervision,Employee Interaction,
Feedback and Employee Evaluation,Morale,and
Communications)where each category had between 5 and 10
questions that the District exhibits these beneficial
employment characteristics.A mean was calculated for
each of the 8 categories and then an average mean of the
eight categories was calculated and it was found that the
overall agreement was 5.80 (agreement that the District
exhibits these characteristics).The average in 2008 was
5.54.83%of the employees ranked the District 5,6 or 7
on all 49 characteristics which is an increase from 76%
in 2008.
•The largest increase in satisfaction were in:
Communications
Morale
Compensation and Benefits
Opportunities for Professional Growth
Workplace and Resources
•In comparing the 2008 survey results with 2010 results,
it indicated that agreement (satisfaction)is growing
faster than importance.Importance has stayed relatively
the same,but satisfaction has increased.
•The characteristics that impacted overall satisfaction
more strongly were:
Morale (Individual and Departmental)
Employees'contributions are valued
District balances work and personal life
Management Team provides effective leadership and
makes informed decisions
•The core characteristics that make Otay an excellent
place to work are:
District promotes safety in the workplace
All necessary resources and equipment are available
to do a good job
Employees consider the benefit package to be good as
well as competitive with other organizations
Financial stability of the District is cited as one
of its strongest characteristics
Supervisors and managers are open to work-related
concerns and treat employees with respect
Departments work well as a team
Employees understand their work goals and objectives
and further understand the relationship between
their work and the success of the District
In the Quadrant Analysis these characteristics
plotted on the upper right hand side of the graph
satisfaction and high importance).
are
(high
•Enhancing the following areas,which already exhibit high
levels of employee satisfaction,may yield even further
increases in employee satisfaction:
Recognition of employees for a job well done
An increased sense of job security
Communication within the District,especially in the
manner in which employees can better understand the
District decision-making process
•The results of the survey indicate that the District is
clearly fulfilling its responsibilities as an employer to
an outstandingly high degree.
•It was discussed that the 2010 survey was essentially the
same as the 2008 survey.There was one question that was
changed from "communication improved"to "communication
effective"and it was clarified which positions were
designated as supervisors.
•Rea &Parker have conducted employee satisfaction surveys
for Imperial Irrigation District,County Water Authority,
CalTrans,etc.
•Employees had
comments.Staff
the comments to
an opportunity
could provide the
the Board if they
to provide open-ended
verbatim transcripts of
wish.
•It was discussed that the Operations Department was lower
in satisfaction compared to the other departments within
the District and if this was typical of other agencies.
It was indicated that it varied at other agencies.At
CalTrans the Sr.Engineers were least satisfied and at
the County Water Authority the Engineers were very
satisfied.It seemed that the general main issue was
"compensation."It was further discussed that this may
be due to many of the personnel of the Operations
Department is further away from management decisions and
possibly the District could enhance communications to the
Operations Department .
•The Committee stated that it is encouraging to know that
staff rated the District highly as an employer,which is
a good reflection on staff,management and board members.
Upon completion of the discussion the committee supported
staffs'recommendation and presentation to the full Board on the
informational calendar.
Ii
»-.,-.,»o
I
~mz
~
OJ
Methodology
+.Online survey -June 29,2010
•Taken at Otay Water District offices
•107 questions
-49 agreement/disagreement
-49 importance
- 4 satisfaction
- 5 general/demographic
•E-mail notices and reminders from GM on June 23 and
Rea &Parker Research on June 28
•134 out of 160 employees participated by July 1
•Additional time (July 8)provided for those away or
otherwise unable to participate -two follow up e-mails
from Rea &Parker Research
•Total participants =151/160 (94 percent)2
Participants
.1.69 percent male (2008 =70 percent)
I.Median age =45.5 (2008 =44.5)
•Median length of service =6.45 years (2008 =6.00 years)
-11 percent 20 or more years (2008 =12 percent)
- 3 percent in first year (2008 =5 percent)
•Department
-Operations =39 percent (2008 =38 percent)
-Administrative Services/GM/IT =25 percent
(2008=23 percent)
-Finance =23 percent (2008=24 percent)
-Engineering =13 percent (2008=15 percent)
•Position type
-Non-management (including crew leader)=79 percent
(2008 =78 percent)
-Supervisor/Manager =7 percent
(2008 =8 percent)
-Management/Department Chief =14 percent
(2008 =14 percent)
Key Findings
+·The level of satisfaction among employees
with their being employed by the Otay
Water District is ~.
•2008 was excellent ----------2010 even greater
extent
•Employees rate their satisfaction with
being an employee of the Otay Water
District at a mean rating of 5.95 on a scale
of 1 =Highly Dissatisfied to 7 =Highly
Satisfied.
Key Findings (cant)
+ ·Nearly three-fourths (73 percent)of
employees rate their employment at 6 or 7
(scale 1-7 --indicative of a great deal of
satisfaction)
• 9 out of 10 (87 percent)rate their
satisfaction at 5,6,7 --all scores above the
scale midpoint.
•These data represent an increase in the
overall level of satisfaction from the 2008
employee survey where the mean rating was
5.45 and 53 percent of employees rated their
employment at 6 or 7.5
Key Findings (cant)
+ ·In comparable public employee surveys,50
percent to 85 percent of employees have
demonstrated satisfaction levels above the
midpoint on their respective satisfaction
scales.
•Mean satisfaction ratings in these other
studies have ranged between 3.7 and 5.7
(on 1-7 scales or scales adjusted to equate
to 1-7).
•Employee satisfaction demonstrated in this
survey by Otay Water District employees is
at the very highest level.6
Key Findings
+• A remarkable percentage of employees
(96 percent)stated that they would
recommend the Otay Water District as a
place of employment.
•This represents an increase of 6 percent
in the level of satisfaction over the
employees in the 2008 survey where 90
percent made this recommendation
OveraU Satisfaction as Employee of Otay Water District
(Mean 2010 rating =5.95 Mean 2008 rating =5.45)
I •2008 Ii2010 I
7=Highly Satisfied
6
5
4
3
2
1=Highly Dlssatisf-ied
0%5%15%20%25%30%
30%
32%
35%40%
41%
45%8
Recommend Otay Water [)jstrict as Place of Employment
V.,96%
Ves.90%
No,10%
NO,4%
////
.'./
0010 10010 20010 30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
2008
Key Findings (cant)
+.The survey contained eight subsections that
identified and categorized 49 employment-
related characteristics.Each of the eight
category related means is averaged to produce
an overall agreement mean of 5.80,which is
higher than the mean in 2008 of 5.54.
•The overall proportion of employees on all 49
characteristics who rank the District as above
the midpoint (5,6,or 7)is 5 out of 6 (83
percent).In 2008,this percentage of 5-7
responses was 76 percent.
10
Key Findings (cant)
+
•Largest increases in satisfaction
-Communications
-Morale
-Compensation and Benefits
-Opportunities for Professional Growth
-Workplace and Resources
11
7.00-
6.03
Survey Categories Agreement Means (Part 1)
Scale:1 =H4Jbly Disagree•..7=Highly Agree (Overall mean =5.80)
iii 2010 .2008
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Wcrkplace and Resources Opportunities for Professional
Growth
Compensation and Benefits Management/Supervision 12
7.00
SUNey Categories Agreement Means (Part 2)
Scale:1=HigblyDisagree...7=Highly Agree (Overall mean =5.80)
I 1lI2010 .2008 I
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00 J
EnllJoyee Interaction
I
Feedback and EmpJoyee Evaluation Morale Conmmications
14
Key Findings (cant)
+.Importance of each category also increased
from 2008 but far less than satisfaction.
•The difference between the overall mean
Importance and overall mean Agreement is
.68 rating points in 2010.
•In 2008,the comparable difference in rating
points between overall agreement and overall
importance was .89.
•This indicates that the gap between
Agreement and Importance has shrunk from
2008 to 2010.
Survey Categories Importance Means (Part 1)
Scale:1=Very UIlimpot'taQt.•7=Very·.ImportaRt (Overall mean =6.48)
I []2010 .2008 I
WorkpJace and Resources Opportunities for ProfessionaJ
Growth
Compensatjon and Benefits Management/Supervision
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Survey Categories Importance Means (Part 2)
Scale:1=Very Unimportant..7=Very Important (Overall mean =6.48)
I El2010 .2008 I
Eflllloyee Interaction Feedback and Employee Evaluation Morale Corrmunications
Key Findings (cant)
+ .•Strongest correlations between
individual characteristics and overall
satisfaction
-Morale -individual and departmental
-Employees'contributions are valued
-District balances work and personal life
-Management team
•Provides effective leadership
•Makes informed decisions
17
18
Key Findings (cant)
-+;.The core characteristics that make the
Otay Water District an excellent place to
work are:
•The District promotes safety in the workplace
•All necessary resources and equipment are
available to do a good job.
•Employees consider the benefit package to be
good as well as competitive with other
organizations.
•The financial stability of the District is cited as
one of its strongest characteristics.
19
Key Findings (cant)
+•The core characteristics that make the
Otay Water District an excellent place to
work are (continued):
•Supervisors and managers are rated highly:
•They are open to work-related concerns
•They treat employees with respect
•Each Department works well as a team.
•Employees understand their work goals and
objectives and further understand the
relationship between their work and the
success of the District.
20
Key Findings (cant)
+•Continued enhancement in the following
areas that already exhibit high levels of
employee satisfaction may yield even
further increases in employee
satisfaction:
•recognition of employees for a job well-done,
•an increased sense of job security,and
•communication within the District,especially in
the manner in which employees can better
understand the District decision-making
process.
Conclusion
+
•The Otay Water District is clearly
fulfilling its responsibilities as an
employer to an outstandingly
high degree.
21
•OTAYWATERDISTRICT
REA&
PARKER
RESEARCH
Survry/Market Research
Economic Cornu/tants
ATTACHMENT C
Otay Water District
2010 Employee
Satisfaction Survey
Prepared for
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley,CA 91978
Prepared by
Rea &Parker Research
P.O.Box 421079
San Diego,California 92142
858-279-5070
www.rea-parke.·.com
August,2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary
Introduction
Methodology
Employee General Information/Demographics
Survey Findings
Overall Satisfaction
Agreement and Importance That the District
Exhibits Certain Employment-Related
Characteristics
Correlations:Characteristics Agreements
and Overall Satisfaction
Satisfaction/Importance Quadrant Analysis
Appendix:
Survey Instrument
Page
iii
1
1
4
7
7
9
13
13
16
Ofay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
11 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
OTAY WATER DISTRICT:2010 EMPLOYEE SURVEY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The fundamental conclusion to be drawn from the 2010 Employee satisfaction survey is that Otay
Water District employees were very satisfied with their employment when the survey was
initially conducted in 2008 and are presently even more satisfied.The level of satisfaction
demonstrated by employees of the District is superior.The Otay Water District is clearly
fulfilling its responsibilities as an employer to an outstandingly high degree.
•Employees rate their satisfaction with being an employee of the Otay Water
District at a mean rating of 5.95 on a scale of 1 =Highly Dissatisfied to 7 =
Highly Satisfied.
•Nearly three-fourths (73 percent)of employees rate their employment at 6 or 7
(indicative ofa great deal ofsatisfaction)and 9 out of 10 (87 percent)rate their
satisfaction at 5,6,7-all scores above the scale midpoint.
•These data represent an increase in the overall level of satisfaction from the
2008 employee survey where the mean rating was 5.45 and 53 percent of
employees rated their employment at 6 or 7.
•In comparable public employee surveys,a range of 50 percent to 85 percent of
employees has demonstrated satisfaction levels above the midpoint on their
respective satisfaction scales.Further,mean satisfaction ratings in these other
studies have ranged between 3.7 and 5.7 (on 1-7 scales or scales adjusted to
equate to 1-7).By all reasonable measures,the employee satisfaction
demonstrated in this survey by Otay Water District employees is at the very
highest level.
• A remarkable percentage of employees (96 percent)stated that they would
recommend the Otay Water District as a place of employment.This represents
an increase of 6 percent in the level of satisfaction over the employees in the
2008 survey where 90 percent made this recommendation.
•The survey contained eight subsections that identified and categorized 49
employment-related characteristics.Each ofthe eight category related means is
averaged to produce an overall agreement mean of5.80,which is higher than the
mean in 2008 of 5.54.
•Among all 49 questions,the proportion of employees on all questions who rank
the District as above the midpoint (5,6,or 7)is 5 out of6 (83 percent).In 2008,
this percentage of 5-7 responses was 76 percent.
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
III Rea &Parker Research
August.2010
•The core characteristics that make the Otay Water District an excellent place to
work are:
•The District promotes safety and all necessary resources and
equipment are available to do a good job.
•Employees consider the benefit package to be good as well as
competitive with other organizations.
•Supervisors and managers are rated highly because they are open to
work-related concerns.Moreover,supervisors treat employees with
respect and each Department works as a team.
•Employees understand their work goals and objectives and further
understand the relationship between their work and the success ofthe
District.
•The financial stability of the District IS cited as one of its strongest
characteristics.
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
IV Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
2010 EMPLOYEE SURVEY
INTRODUCTION
The Otay Water District requested that a consultant conduct an employee survey to assess various
characteristics of job satisfaction among the 160 employees who work for the District.Rea &
Parker Research was selected to be the consultant that would draft,conduct,and analyze a web-
based Internet survey.This survey was developed and conducted so that the 2008 employee
survey,also prepared and administered by Rea &Parker Research,could be used as a basis for
comparisons in employee attitudes and behavior.Also,future employee surveys will be
developed to ensure that longitudinal trends can be identified.
Section A of the survey (included in the appendix)contains 49 questions requesting employees to
indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed that certain positive employment
characteristics were provided and exhibited by the Otay Water District.Another 49 questions
inquired as to the importance or lack of importance that the employees attached to each of these
characteristics.Section B set forth 4 satisfaction based questions,and Section C contained 5
general information/demographic questions for a total of107 questions in the survey.
Methodology
Although much of the survey remained as it had been designed in 2008,telephone conferences
were conducted with Otay Water District management and staff in order to refine the survey so
that it would,even better than in 2008,achieve the goals and objectives of finding out key
satisfaction and importance opinions ofthe employees and be replicable for future tracking.
Two e-mails were sent to each employee-the first from the Otay Water District General
Manager on Wednesday,June 23,2010,as follows:
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
All District Employees
Mark Watton,General Manager
June 23,2010
Employee Survey
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
In our continuing commitment to create and maintain a professional work
environment for employees,the District is asking you to participate in an
employee survey.
The survey is designed to provide you with an opportunity to voice your opinions
and observations about working at the District.Your participation in this survey
is very important in helping the District in its continuing efforts to understand
your perspective on work-related issues and to support and improve your
experience as an employee of the District.
Within a few days,you will receive another e-mail directly from the researchers
-Rea &Parker Research.This second e-mail will provide a unique user name
and password that will enable you to access the survey on line.
There are no right or wrong answers,so just let us know what you think.All
answers will be strictly anonymous and responses will be summarized when
reported.Your individual responses will go directly to the Rea &Parker
Research website and not be individually traceable or identifiable.The District
will not be able to view individual results.The District will only receive
information summarized by Rea and Parker Research.
Please look for the survey link in your e-mail.The District has set aside time
for you to complete the survey on Tuesday,June 29,2010.The survey should
take approximately 20-30 minutes to complete and we ask that you complete the
survey during the beginning of your work shift on Tuesday.All employees who
have workstations,please complete the survey at your workstation.There are
computers located in the Operations Crew Room for employees that do not have
a workstation.
If you have any questions regarding this employee survey,you may contact
Human Resources or Rea and Parker at rparker@rea-parker.com or
lrea@mail.sdsu.edu or at 858-279-5070.
Thank you in advance for your time and contribution,
Mark Watton
After working hours in the evening of Monday,June 28,2010,the following e-mail went out to
all employees from Rea &Parker Research.This e-mail provided the link that had an embedded
unique user name and password (for each employee)that would allow them to access the survey
on Tuesday,June 29.
Dear --------
A few days ago,the District notified you bye-mail that it is conducting an
employee survey.As an employee ofthe Otay Water District,your participation
in this survey is very important in helping the District in its continuing efforts to
Dtay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
2 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
understand your perspective on work-related issues and to support and improve
your experiences as an employee.
When you are ready to begin the survey,which is expected to take approximately
15 minutes,please click on the link below.Each employee has his or her own
distinct and unique link.Upon clicking the link,the survey will be accessible to
you and you will be able to complete it and submit it to our confidential server.
Survey link:http://web2.flagshipresearch.comJ w/wchost.asp?st=rp 10094
&id=1061 &pw=41 S7ZT
If you have any questions,please e-mail meatrparker@rea-parker.com
Thank you in advance for your participation.
Sincerely,
Richard Parker,Ph.D.
President,Rea &Parker Research
P.O.Box 421079
San Diego,CA 92142-1079
858-279-5070
Each employee was able to use his or her own work computer or was provided one for use by the
Otay Water District to access the website and complete the survey.Only 2 employees had
difficulty accessing the website.They were able to call Rea &Parker Research during the survey
and obtain help.
Of the 160 employees,134 completed the survey by Thursday,July L Some employees were
away on vacation and others did not complete the survey for reasons known only to them,so,for
one additional week,the website was left open for those who did not complete their survey to do
so.Once submitted as final,surveys were no longer accessible to employees and were sent
immediately to a secure server maintained by Rea &Parker Research,which was not accessible
by anyone at the Otay Water District.
Follow-up e-mails on Friday,July 2 and Tuesday,July 6 went to those employees who had yet to
complete the survey.During that extended period another 17 employees submitted their surveys,
resulting in 151 completed surveys (94 percent)and leaving 9 not completed.
Data was then taken from the website and loaded into SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences)for analysis.The report that follows details the results and findings of this analytical
process.
Otay Water District
20/0 Employee Survey Report
3 Rea &Parker Research
August,20/0
Employee General InformationlDemographics
Charts 1-5 depict certain demographic characteristics of Otay Water District employees who
responded to the survey (151 out of 160).These employee characteristics are consistent with
those of the 2008 employee survey.Responding employees of the District are 69 percent male
(Chart 1).
The median age of employees is 45.5 (Chart 2),and they have worked for the Otay Water
District for a median of6.45 years,with 11 percent having worked at the District for 20 or more
years and 3 percent presently in their first year ofemployment (Chart 3).
Operations is the largest department (39 percent)followed by Finance (23 percent}-Chart 4,
and almost three-fourths of employees (79 percent)are non-management employees,including
crew leaders (Chart 5).
Chart 1
Employee Gender
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
4 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
Chart 2
Employee Age
(2010 median age::45.5 2008 median age::44.5)
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
10%
O%.----------------~---~--~~--
Chart 3
Employee Length of Service with Otay Water District
2010 median length =6.45 years 2008 median length =6.00 years
Dtay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
5 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
Operations,39%
Otay Water District
20/0 Employee Survey Report
Chart 4
Department of Employment
Finance,23%
Chart 5
Position Type
Managementl
Department
Chief/AGM,14%
6
Administrative
Services/General
Manager/Information
Technology,25%
Engineering,13%
Non-Management
Employee (incl Crew
Leader),79%
Rea &Parker Research
August.2010
SURVEY FINDINGS
Overall Satisfaction
It is very clear that employees of the Otay Water District are quite satisfied with their
employment.Chart 6 shows that employees rate their satisfaction with being an employee of the
Otay Water District at a mean rating of 5.95 on a scale of 1 =Highly Dissatisfied to 7 =Highly
Satisfied.Almost 3 out of4 employees (73 percent)rate their employment at 6 or 7 (indicative of
a great deal ofsatisfaction).Almost 9 out of 10 employees (87 percent)rate the District at 5,6,
or 7--above the midpoint of the scale.This represents a substantial increase in the overall level of
satisfaction from the 2008 employee survey where the mean rating was 5.45 and 53 percent of
employees-a full 20 percent less-rated their employment satisfaction at 6 or 7.
7 =Highly Satisfied
6
5
4
3
2
1=Highly Dissatisfied
Chart 6
Overall Satisfaction as Employee ofOtay Water District
(Mean 2010 rating =5.95 Mean 2008 rating =5.45)
.2008 li2010
41%.,.......--...,....---,'
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
Dray Water District
2010 EmployeeSurvey Report
7 Rea &Parker Research
August.2010
These findings further represent a particularly high level ofsatisfaction compared to public sector
employees who have participated in employee satisfaction surveys that have been conducted by
or are known to Rea &Parker Research.In these comparable public employee surveys,a range
of 50 percent to 85 percent of employees demonstrated satisfaction levels above the midpoint on
their respective satisfaction scales.Further,mean satisfaction ratings in these other studies have
ranged between 3.7 and 5.7 (on 1-7 scales or scales adjusted to equate to 1-7).By all reasonable
measures,the employee satisfaction demonstrated in this survey by Otay Water District
employees is at the very highest level.
In the current survey,employees state overwhelmingly (96 percent)that they would recommend
the Otay Water District as a place of employment.This percentage of employees who would
recommend the District as a place of employment represents an increase of 6 percent over the
employees in the 2008 survey where 90 percent made this recommendation.This is a remarkably
high percentage representing 144 ofthe 150 respondents to this question on the survey-Chart 7.
Chart 7
Recommend Otay Water District as Place of Employment
Yes,90%
2008
2010
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
8 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
In 2008,the survey that is attached in the Appendix was first administered to Otay Water District
employees.The report of the findings from that survey included detailed,question-by-question
analysis in order to identify specific opportunities for improving satisfaction,which was also very
high in 2008.The Otay Water District has been overwhelmingly successful in this regard,
achieving the results described above of96 percent recommending the District as a place to work,
scoring almost 6.0 on a 1-7 scale for employee satisfaction,and having 3 out of 4 employees (20
percent increase from 2008)rate their satisfaction at 6 or 7,when a 4 is the scale midpoint.
As such,this report need not delve into the survey question-by-question-everything is very
highly regarded,with the lowest average satisfaction remarkably being 5.25.That said,to detail
the survey results one question at a time would be counter-productive and,with such detail,likely
cause the overall finding of great satisfaction to become obscured by the minutia.This report,
therefore,will deviate from the format of the 2008 report and discuss the findings much more
broadly.
Agreement and Importance That the District Exhibits
Certain Employment-Related Characteristics
The survey contains several subsections,eight of which identified and categorized 49 positive
employment-related characteristics and sought employee indications of the extent to which the
employees agreed or disagreed that the Otay Water District exhibited these characteristics and
how important these characteristics were to them as employees.Response categories were
offered by the employees on a I-to-7 scale,with I being Highly Disagree and 7 being Highly
Agree that the Otay Water District demonstrates these beneficial employment characteristics and
with 1 being Very Unimportant and 7 being Very Important in terms ofrating the importance of
these characteristics.
These eight categories of questions are as follows:
•Workplace and Resources
•Opportunities for Professional Growth
•Compensation and Benefits
•Management/Supervision
•Employee Interaction
•Feedback and Employee Evaluation
•Morale
•Communications
Otay Water District
20I0 Employee Survey Report
9 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
The technical appendix to this report contains the full distribution of responses to all 49 of these
questions;however,for purposes ofthis report's analytIcal text,the mean rating on the 1-7 scale
and the percentage of respondents indicating substantial agreement and importance (ratings of 5,
6 or 7)will be used to convey the findings.
Charts 8A and 8B serve as a compilation and summary of the agreement data from the survey.
Each of the eight category related means is averaged to produce an overall agreement mean of
5.80,which is higher than the mean in 2008 of 5.54.Among all 49 questions,the proportion of
employees on all questions who rank the District as above the midpoint (5,6,or 7)in agreement
that the District does a good job of providing these work-related characteristics is 5 out of 6 (83
percent).In 2008,this percentage of5-7 responses was 76 percent.
Management/SupervisionCompensationand
Benefits
2.00
1.00-I
Workplace and Resources Opportunities for
Professional Growth
4.00
5.00-
6.00
7.00 I
3.00-
Chart8A
Survey Categories Agreement Means (Part 1)
Scale:1=Highly Disagree...7 =Highly Agree (Overall mean"5.80)
I 012010 .2008 I
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
10 Rea &Parker Research
August.2010
Chart 88
Survey Categories Agreement Means (Part 2)
Scale:1 =Highly Disagree...7'"Highly Agree (Overall mean"5.80)
[]2010 .2008
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Employee Interaction Feedback and Employee
Evaluation
Morale Communications
Charts 9A and 9B portray the mean ratings for each category regarding Importance.In all cases,
mean Importance is greater than mean Agreement.The average of the eight categorical
Importance means is an overall mean of6.48-essentially the same as the 2008 mean of6.47.
The difference between the overall mean Importance and overall mean Agreement is .68 rating
pomts.In 2008,the comparable difference in rating points between overall agreement and overall
importance was .89.This implies that the gap between Agreement and Importance has shrunk
from 2008 to 2010.Furthennore,for each category,the difference between Agreement and
Importance means has declined from 2008 to 2010.This indicates that employees feel that the
gap is shrinking between the agreement or satisfaction they have with broad areas of job
satisfaction and the importance that employees attach to these categories.That is,Importance and
Agreement are converging at a very high level.
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
11 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
Chart 9A
Survey Categories Importance Means (Part 1)
Scale:1=Very Unimportant•.•?=Very Important (Overall mean =6.46)
02010 _2008
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00 I
Workplace and Resources Opportunities for
Professional Growth
Compensation and
Benefits
Management/Supervision
7.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
Chart 9B
Survey Categories Importance Means (Part 2)
Scale:1 =Very Unimportant...?=Very Important (Overall mean =6.48)
[J 2010 .2008
Employee Interaction Feedback and Employee
Evaluation
Morale Communications
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
12 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
Correlations:Characteristic Agreements and Overall Satisfaction
Pearson's r measures of association are used here to measure the relationship between the
employees'level of agreement with the various characteristics and their level of overall
satisfaction.High values of Pearson's r are indicative of strong relationships between the
variables.In the situation at hand,high values of Pearson's r represent a greater association
between the various levels of agreement and overall satisfaction.The Pearson's r values for all
49 associations are statistically significant.Among these relationships between overall
satisfaction and the characteristics of agreement,there are 10 such relationships that can be
categorized at or very near what is accepted as a very strong relationship (r 2:.6)and they are
shown in Table 1.Enhancement of the characteristics in Table 1 can be expected to lead to
continued increases in overall employee satisfaction.
;!Cliar:~~teristiccateot
M Morale is Good
De artment Morale is Good
M Contributions are Valued
District Balances Work and Personal Life
Management Team Provides Effective
Leadershi
Management Team Makes Informed
Decisions
M Work is Rewardin
SupervisorlManager Provides Constructive
Feedback
Encouraged to Communicate Openly about
Work-Related Issues
SupervisorlManager Good Work Habits/Sets
Exam Ie
.688
.678
.650
.641
.616
.614
.596
.576
.572
.571
Satisfaction/Importance Quadrant Analysis
Levels of agreement can be mapped on charts with importance such that agreement is graphically
measured against how important an issue tends to be.In Quadrant Analysis,high agreement and
high importance represent characteristics that are indicative of what makes the Otay Water
District a good place of employment.
Dtay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
13 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
The core characteristics that make the Otay Water District an excellent place to work are largely
unchanged over the last survey period.Specifically,employees are appreciative that the District
promotes safety and that all necessary resources and equipment are available to do a good job.
Employees consider the benefit package good as well as competitive with other organizations
Supervisors and managers who directly supervise employees are rated highly because they are
open to work-related concerns. Moreover,supervisors treat employees with respect and each
Department works well as a team.Employees largely understand work goals and objectives and
they understand the relationship between their work and the success of the District.Employees
also volunteered through open-ended responses that the financial stability ofthe District was one
ofits strongest features.
Continued improvement in the following areas that already exhibit high levels of employee
satisfaction may yield further increases in employee satisfaction:recognition for a job well-done,
a sense ofjob security,and communication within the District,especially in the manner in which
employees can better understand decision-making and leadership.
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
14 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
APPENDIX
15 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
Section A
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
EMPLOYEE SURVEY
Employee Work Satisfaction Issues
For each statement below,please indicate your level of agreement or disagreement on a scale
of 1 to 7,where 1 is highly disagree and 7 is highly agree.Then,indicate how important each
issue is to you.Again,use a scale from 1 to 7,where 1 is very unimportant and 7 is very
important.
1.Workplace and Resources
a.The District promotes safety in the workplace.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
I I 2 I 3 I '1 I 5 I 6 I 7 I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
b.I have all the resources and equipment necessary to perform my job well.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
c.I have the information to do my job effectively.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I I 2 I 3 I '1 I 5 I 6 I 7
d.I have adequate time to complete my work.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Al!ree Unimportant Important
I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
e.I have appropriate authority to do my job.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disal!ree Al!ree Unimportant Important
I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
16 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
f.The District promotes healthy lifestyle choices.
Highly Highly I Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
2.Opportunities for Professional Growth
a.My job provides opportunities to advance my skills and abilities.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
b.My work is rewarding.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
c.I receive the training I need to do my job well.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
d.I have opportunities to be innovative in carrying out my job.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
e.I am afforded the opportunity to receive the training I need to advance within the
District.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I '1 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
3.Compensation and Benefits
a.I am fairly paid for the work I do.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
17 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
b.I feel that the pay I receive is competitive with similar jobs in similar organizations
in the area.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I II I 5 I 6 I 7
c.The benefit package provided by the District is good.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disao-ree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I II I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
d.I feel that the benefit package provided by the District is competitive with
benefits provided by
similar organizations in the area.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
e.I understand my benefit plans.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4,I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
4.Management/Supervision
For questions 4a and 4h,the "management team"refers to the team ofsupervisors,
managers and Senior Management••
a.I feel that the management team makes informed decisions.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I II I 5 I 6 I 7
b.The management team demonstrates effective leadership skills.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
For questions 4c through 4g and Sections 6 and 8,please consider your supervisor to he
that person to whom you directly report and conducts your performance review.
c.My supervisor/manager provides me an opportunity to express my thoughts and
concerns.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I II I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
Gtay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
18 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
d.My supervisor/manager treats me with respect.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I ,1 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
e.My supervisor/manager encourages me to learn new skills.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I '1 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
f.My supervisor/manager has good work habits and sets a good example.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
g.My supervisor/manager emphasizes strong customer service on a regular basis.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
5.Employee Interaction
a.The employees in my department work well as a team.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
b.Employees in the District are generally supportive ofeach other.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
c.Employees in my department share relevant work-related information.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
d.Employees in my department are held accountable for their work.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4,I 5 I 6 I 7
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
19 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
e.My ideas and opinions are taken into consideration at work.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
6.Feedhack and Employee Evaluation
NOTE:Question 6h has a "Not Applicable"option for those respondents to this
survey who are new to the District amI have not received a performance evaluation.
a.I receive constructive feedback from my supervisor/manager that helps me
improve my performance.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 1,\I 5 I 6 I 7
b.Overall my employee performance evaluation is fair.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 INA 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 INA
c I am recognized by my supervisor/manager when I do a good job.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I '1 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
d.I understand how my work contributes to the success of the District.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
L I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
7.Morale
a.Morale in my department is generally good.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
I I 2 I 3 I 4,I 5 I 6 I 7 I I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
b.My morale at work is generally good.
Highly Highly Very Very
DisaO'ree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I '1 I 5 I 6 I 7
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
20 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
c.I feel that the contributions I make are valued.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disa<Yree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I It I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
d.The District has practices that are supportive ofbalancing work and personal life.
Highly Highly ,Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
e.I feel that I have job security.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree A<Yree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
f.I am optimistic about my future success with the District.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
8.Communication:
NOTE:Questions 8h,8i,and 8j have a "Don't Know"option for those respondents
to this survey who are new to the District and do not know the answer to any or all
of those questions.
a.My supervisor/manager does a good job ofsharing information with department
employees.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
b.I understand my work goals and objectives.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Aaree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
c.I am encouraged to provide input regarding work-related matters.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree A<Yree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4.I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
21 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
d.I am encouraged to communicate openly.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree A"ree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I ,1 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I '1 I 5 I 6 I 7
e.I feel comfortable sharing my honest opinion about work-related matters with my
supervisor/manager.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree A"ree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
f.I receive timely responses from my supervisor/manager to issues that are most
important to me.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
g.I am afforded an opportunity to participate in goal setting for my department.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 14 1 5 I 6 I 7
h.Communication is effective within the District.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I DK 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I DK
1.Employee information meetings are helpful to keep me informed about District
matters.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I DK 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I DK
J.The Employee PIPELINE Newsletter is a valuable form ofcommunication.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I DK 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 I DK
k.The District does a good job in sharing information with its employees about the
District.
Highly Highly Very Very
Disagree Agree Unimportant Important
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5 I 6 I 7
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
22 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
Section B Overall Employee Satisfaction
9.Overall,how satisfied are you as an employee ofthe District?
Highly
Dissatisfied
I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5
Highly
Satisfied
I 6 I 7
10.What is the best example ofsomething that is going well at the District?
11.What would be the one thing that could be improved at the District?
12.Would you recommend the District as a place ofemployment?
1.Yes 2.No
Section C General Information
Please provide the following information as it relates to you.This information is used for
data comparison purposes only.
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
23 Rea &Parker Research
August,2010
13.Department within the Otay Water District
1.Administrative Services/General Manager/Information Technology
2.Engineering
3.Finance r
4.Operations
14.Length ofservice with Otay Water District
1.0 to 1 year
2.1 year to 3 years
3.3 years to 5 years
4.5 years to 10 years
5.10 years to 15 years
6.15 years to 20 years
7.20 years or more
15.Position Type
1.Non-supervisory employee,including crew leader
2.Supervisor
3.ManagerlDepartment Chief/AGM/GM
16.Age
1.Under 25
2.25 and under 30
3.30 and under 35
4.35 and under 40
5.40 and under 45
6.45 and under 50
7.50 and under 55
8.55 and over
17.Gemler
1.Female
2.Male
Otay Water District
2010 Employee Survey Report
24 Rea &Parker Research
August,20I0
AGENDA ITEM 11
TYPE MEETING:Regular
SUBMITTED BY:Geoffrey
Informat'
Strategic Planning
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE:October 6,2010
W.O.lG.F.NO:DIV.NO.
and
APPROVED BY:
(Asst.GM):
SUBJECT:
German Alva~~7o,Assistant General Manager,Administration and
Finance ~.....
FY 2010 Strategic Plan and Performance Measures Report
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation.This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACT+ON:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To provide a fiscal year-end report on the District's Strategic
Performance Plan.
~ALYSIS:
The District has completed the second year of the Strategic Plan
for FY 2009 to FY 2011.Overall,results continue to be positive
with the District exceeding its target for both strategic plan
objectives (at least 90%complete or on track)and performance
measures (at least 75%on target).Detailed information on each
objective and measure is also available electronically on the
Board Extranet.Looking at these·results in more detail:
30
-_.........._._..._----
Strategic Plan Objectives -Changing to Meet Future Needs
Strategic plan objectives are designed to ensure we are making the
appropriate high-level changes necessary to move the agency in the
planned direction to meet new challenges and opportunities.
Overall performance of strategic plan objectives is positive with
49 of 51 objectives (96%)complete,ahead,or on schedule and two
items behind schedule.Of the objectives that are behind,both
expect to be back on track by next quarter.Three items are not
scheduled to start and one items is on hold;therefore,these four
objectives have been excluded from the calculation.
Objectives:All Scorecard Areas
Summary Detail.....;.....;",,;,;----------------------\
2525.'--n-..----"'r::::l.::.;:l.---- ---.-.-- ---
20
15
10
3
5 --L-"~~0 ~lLT-"'fj~~-'~--a-r--'~::;::1~~Z:z:;~zi~=l;""o ~L~7 ~
Campi Ahead On Schd Behind Hold No Rpts Not Strt
55 Total
49/51 Objectives complete,ahead,or on schedule (96%).
Target is 90%.
Performance Measures -Monitoring Day-To-Day Performance
Performance measures are designed to track the day-to-day
performance of the District.Sometimes referred to as a "dash
board",these items attempt to measure the effectiveness and
efficiency of daily operations.The overall goal is that at least
75%of these measures be rated "on target".District results in
this area are also positive with 39 of 44 (89%)items achieving
the desired level or better.
Measures:All Scorecard Areas
Summary D~tail.....;;,~~--~----~--~------~--.....II
25
20
15
10
5
o
/~-
--~--~~
--
'--5 --,..
1 ~•0 0 0..,.r'L ....//
Compl Ahead On ScM Behind Hold No Rpts Not Strt
44 Total
39/44 Measures on or ahead of schedule (89%).
Target is 75%.
Balanced Scorecard -External View
The Balanced Scorecard methodology is designed to ensure that a
company is performing consistently on a wide range of measures
necessary to ensure both short-term and long-term improvements.
From this perspective the results are also positive.In six of
the eight categories the District is on or ahead of schedule or
target.The areas where we are behind (Learning and Growth-
Objectives and Customer-Measures)should be back on track next
quarter.
Balanced Scorecard
FY 2010 •Qtr 4 •All Departments.
Customer Finandal learning and Growth BusinessProcesses
Objectives Measures Objectives •Measures Objectives •Measures •Objectives •Measures
Green =meets or exceeds/Red =does not meet
Departmental Perspective -Internal View of Performance
The departmental perspective,that is breaking down performance
objectives and measures by the responsible internal departments,
is also positive,Most departments meet or exceed expectations in
both areas.The single objective that is behind for Finance will
be back on schedule by next quarter.
Department View
FY 2010 •Qtr 4 •All Scorecard Areas
_I
Objectives •Measures
•.Objectives •Measures
Objec;tives •Measures
•Objectives •Measures
•Objec;tives •MeasuresS-Operations
Departments
1-Administrative Servic;es
4-lnformation Technology
J-Financ;e
2-englneerlng
Green =meets or exceeds!Red =does not meet
Next Steps
The District will begin developing the FY12-l4 Strategic Plan in
the second quarter of FYll.
FISCAL .:I:MPACT:
None at this time.
STRATEGIC.GOAL:
Strategic Plan and Performance Measure reporting is a critical
element in providing performance reporting to the Board and
staff.
LEGAL IMPACT:
Gar/eral Manager
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECnPROJEC~FY 2010 Strategic Plan and Performance Measures Report
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance,Administration and Communications and the
Engineering,Operations and Water Resources Committees both
reviewed this item at a meeting on September 16,2010 and the
following comments were made:
•Staff presented the 2010 Fiscal Year-end Strategic Plan and
performance report and noted that the District is in its third
three-year Strategic Plan cycle.
•The District's strategic plan has become the core of its
corporate culture.
•
•
Staff indicated that the Strategic Plan objectives and
performance measures continue to exceed its target with the
following results:
o Objectives exceeded the 90%target,where 96%are
either ahead or on schedule (49 of 51 objectives).
(Long-term planning)
o Performance Measures exceeded the 75%target,which
89%(39 of 44)items achieved the desired level or
better.(Day-to-day performance)
Staff stated that the Balanced Scorecard perspective (external
view)are also positive.In six of the eight categories the
District is on or ahead of schedule or target.Two areas
where the District is currently behind are Learning and Growth
and Customer-Measures.Staff indicated that these areas are
being addressed and should be on track next quarter.
•The internal or departmental perspective which breaks down
performance objectives and measures by the responsible
internal departments is positive with nine out of ten
departments on target.
•In the second quarter of fiscal year 2011,the District plans
to develop the FY 2012-14 Strategic Plan and decide where it
should go in the next 3-year cycle.It's an opportunity to set
high-level objectives and performance measures,and staff
believes that efficiency and effectiveness will be very
prominent for the next 3-year cycle.In addition,staff noted
that the District plans to use its asset management
information to help develop the FY 2012-14 Strategic Plan.
Staff indicated that the asset management information will
provide better measures to track performance more accurately.
•It was discussed that staff is reviewing the peer review
process and preparing a recommendation to the General Manager
on several options on how and when it would be the most
advantageous time to participate in the Peer Review Process.
Following the discussion,the committee supported presentation
to the full board as an informational item.
FY 2010 Year End
Strategic Plan Review
Board of Directors
October 6, 2010
Strategic / Business Planning Process
Objective Status Summary
49/51 Complete, Ahead, or On Schedule
Performance Measure Status Summary
88% Complete, Ahead, or On Schedule
Balanced Scorecard View
In 6 of 8 categories of our balanced scorecard, the District is on or
ahead of schedule or on target
Departmental View
Almost all departments meet or exceed the expectations
for objectives and performance measures.
Next Steps
Major plan revisions for FY 2012-2014
Themes of efficiency and effectiveness
Coordinated effort with asset management
Leverage existing system investments
already in place
Results Available On the Board Extranet!
www.otaywater.gov/extranet/login.aspx
AGENDA ITEM 12
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:Regular Board
MEETING
DATE:October 6,2010
SUBMITTED
BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
W.O./G.F.
NO:
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
SUBJECT:General Manager's Report
GENERAL MANAGER:
FLAGSHIP PROJECTS
~Update on the design,construction,and environmental of the
36-Inch Potable Water Pipeline from FCF #14 to Regulatory Site
(CIP P2009)for the month of August 2010:
Installation of the 36-inch pipe is complete with only
pipeline bacteria testing and minor pavement remaining.
The pavement and striping are 98%complete.Connection to
FCF #14 is scheduled for late September.Project
completion is anticipated for October 2010.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND FINANCE:
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Human Resources:
•Open Enrollment -Open Enrollment begins October 1,2010.
HR staff worked with IT to streamline the process.Most
information will be available for review and submittal
online and employees will only be required to complete
information if a change is made or if they wish to enroll
in the flexible spending account.
•Otay Activities Committee -The Committee coordinated the
following event:
o Padres Game vs.San Francisco Giants -September 11th -
The event had a great turnout.A total o£64 tickets
were purchased.
•New Hires
September.
There were no new hires in the month of
Water Conservation and School Education:
•2010 Irrigation Association's National Water &Energy
Conservation Award -The District received notice that it
was the recipient of the award based upon its success in
promoting water-wise landscaping through its incentive
programs,as well as its efforts to promote the Water
Conservation Garden.This award honors significant
achievement in the conservation of water and energy
relating to irrigation procedures,equipment,methods and
techniques.11 public agencies were considered for this
award.Staff will be present to receive the award in
December at the Irrigation Association Conference in
Phoenix.
•Water Conservation Program Activity -The District's
September bill insert,"Fall is the Time for PlantingU ,
has generated many phone calls from customers requesting
the referenced Arboretum All Stars.Many of these
customers are also interested in a residential surveyor
in the District's Cash for WaterSmart Plants program.
•Outreach Events -The District staffed booths at both the
South Bay Green Scene event held at Southwestern College
on September 11th and BonitaFest on September 25th •
•Water Waste Reporting -In September (through the 27th ),
there were a total of 13 reports of water waste,either
phoned in or reported through the District's website.
The water waste report listing the activity is attached.
•School Education Update -In September,two school Garden
tours were conducted involving 80 second graders and 20
adults from Tiffany Elementary School in Chula Vista.
Another nine Garden tours are currently scheduled through
the remainder of the school year.
Purchasing and Facilities:
•Board Room Equipment -Purchasing and IT have begun to
investigate an upgrade to the District's Board Room audio
and visual systems.The current system is nearly 10
years old.
2
•Purchase Orders -There were 137 purchase orders
processed in September 2010 for a total of $1,126,879.80.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:
•Phone System -A second round of demonstrations have been
scheduled to assist in the selection of a new phone
system for the District.A final decision is anticipated
within the next few weeks.
•Asset Management -The Asset Management Steering
Committee has reviewed and approved the recommendations
of the Project Team for FY 11 funding requests for this
project.New developments this month are:
o GIS is working on the new Field Maplet Server for the
Valve Exercise Program.The ArcSDE license and key
has been reversed to 9.3.1 to meet the requirements of
Spatial Wave (FM vendor).The new FM server
installation is expected to be done this week.
o The data collection user interface for pump stations
have been completed by GIS.The internal demo to IT
staff has been conducted.This intelligent design
provides the very user-friendly interfaces that embed
asset hierarchies internally to improve efficiency by
avoiding multiple data entries.It is a very valuable
piece for the data collection effort.
•SharePoint Updates -IT created an online website on
SharePoint for this year's Open Enrollment.The site
went live on October 1st •Employees can access the
website from the office as well as from their home.
FINANCE:
•Electronic Bill Presentment -The new electronic bill and
presentment site went live on June 21,2010.As of
September 13,2010,10,386 customers had registered for
this new online service.Of these,5,059 have chosen to
stop receiving paper bills,and 1,168 selected to have
their balances automatically paid monthly.In the month
of August,the District collected over $900,000 in
payments through this site.
•Automatic Meter Reading Presentation -On September 14th,
Alice Mendez-Schomer gave a presentation on Automated
Meter Reading at the San Diego Water Works Group and
California Water Environment Association of San Diego's
3rd Annual Joint Vendor Fair.Alice spoke to various
water industry staff about the District's experience with
3
AMR technology,the selection process,and the potential
impact of AMR on existing business processe~.
•FY 2010 Audit &CAFR -The auditors are finalizing the
draft financials,with no material audit adjustments
proposed.The audited financials are scheduled to be
presented at the November Board meeting.
•Internal Controls Audit -Draft recommendations are being
finalized for cash and investments.Joe Beachem and Jim
Cudlip met with the District's Union Bank account
representative to implement the agreed upon banking
recommendations as quickly as possible.
•Mexico Water -Mexico did not take any water deliveries
in 2010 due to sufficient rainfall-related storage and a
schedule of requests for FY 2011 has not been received.
Energy rates have remained stable,and overall O&M costs
on the connection were minimal;therefore,rates for
water deliveries to Mexico are only expected to increase
approximately 4%.An update to the rate will be brought
to the Board in November.
•FY 2011 Budget -Staff is currently working on finalizing
the hard copy publishing of the FY 2011 Budget,which is
already available on the District website.Additionally,
this budget has been submitted to GFOA and CSMFO for the
annual budget awards.
•Reserve Policy -The revised Reserve Policy has been
updated to reflect the capacity and annexation fee study,
including the development of the new water supply fee.
This will be presented at the November Board meeting.
•The financial reporting for August 31,2010 is as
follows:
o For the two months ending August 31,2010,there are
total revenues of $14,172,577 and total expenses of
$13,691,399.The revenues exceeded expenses by
$481,178.
•The financial reporting for investments for August 31,
2010 is as follows:
o The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in
the Investment Portfolio Details as of August 31,
2010,total $107,002,302.16 with an average yield to
maturity of 1.056%.The total earnings year-to-date
are $214,256.57.
4
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
•Otay Lakes Road Widening -Southland Paving installed
approximately 1,500 LF of recycled pipeline.They are
continuing to work on the potable Pressure Reducing
Station and installing recycled pipeline in Otay Lakes
Rd.The District and the City partnered in the 12-inch
Recycled Water Pipeline and Road Widening Project on Otay
Lakes Road.The recycled pipeline will start at Telegraph
Canyon Road and end in front of Bonita Vista High School.
The project also includes the relocation of a few potable
water facilities.The project is on budget and on
schedule.(R2094,P2496)
•Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Development -The drilling of
the production well was completed in September.AECOM,
the Consulting Engineer,is analyzing the results of the
well test to determine the safe yield and staff expects
to make a recommendation by mid-October 2010.As of
September 30,2010,all equipment has been demobilized
from the site.Cleaning operations and landscape
restoration is in process and will be completed in the
first week of October.The next step for the project is
to prepare a Request for Proposal for
engineering/architectural design.A recommendation to
the Board will be presented at the January 2011 meeting.
At the same meeting,staff will also provide an economic
analysis of the estimated cost per acre-foot of the water
extracted from the well.Staff is also in the process of
hiring a consultant to prepare preliminary renderings of
the architectural components of the building that will be
shared with the community.These renderings will be
completed by early November 2010.No activity is
expected at the site until the Fall of 2011.(P2434)
•For the month of August 2010,the District sold 7 meters
(15.5 EDUs)generating $86,659 in revenue.Projection
for this period was 12 meters (24 EDUs)with budgeted
revenue of $217,086.Projected revenue from June 1,2010
through June 30,2011 is $2,605,036;against a budget of
$434,173 as of August 31,2010.Revenue collected to
date is $301,140 which is 31%below projection.
•For the month of August staff reviewed 18 potential
easement encroachments and will be gathering all the
necessary information prior to informing customers of the
5
removal of encroachments.The above is part of an on-
going program of easement monitoring.
•Approximately 1,947 linear feet of both ClP and
project pipeline was installed in August 2010.
Construction Division performed quality control
pipelines .
developer
The
for these
•The following table summarizes Engineering's Project
purchases and change orders issued during the period of
August 1 through September 10,2010 that were within staff
signatory authority:
Contractor/
Date Action Amount Consultant Project
8/4/10 Check $5,100.47 Helix Water SDCWA Otay FCF No.14 to
Request Regulatory Site (P2009)
8/4/10 Check $7,975.00 San Diego County SDCWA Otay FCF No.14 to
Request Water Authority Regulatory Site (P2009)
Avocado Blvd &Jamacha Rd
8/5/10 P.O.$5,000.00 RBF Consulting 8-Inch Sewer Main
Replacement (S2019/S2021)
8/11/10 Check $7,738.19 City of EI Cajon SDCWA Otay FCF No.14 to
Request Regulatory Site (P2009)
8/12/10 P.O.$2,600.00 Prowest Appraisal 1485-1 Pump Station
(P2172)
8/24/10 P.O.$3,425.63 Photo Geodetic Hunte Parkway Waterline
Corp.Pipeline (P2399 )
8/25/10 Check $1,319.84 City of Chula Vista Waterline install on
Request Wueste Road (R2087)
9/9/10 P.O.$4,000.00 Dr Mary Anne Hawke Otay Water District Sub
Area Plan (P2494)
Rosarito Desalination
9/10/10 P.O.$45,000.00 Salvador Lopez Facility Conveyance and
Disinfection System
(P2451)
6
Water Operations:
•Total number of potable water meters is 48,139 .
•In August 2010,the District purchased 3,424.1 AF of
potable water from CWA,which is 2.5%more than budgeted
purchases,yet 26.1%below CWA allocation for the year to
date numbers.Below is a chart showing cumulative
purchases vs budget and the allocation.
Potable Water Purchases
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
Jul-10 Aug-Sep-Oct-10 Nov-Dec-Jan-11 Feb-
10 10 10 10 11
.....-Purchases
Budget
~Allocation
Mar-Apr-11 May-Jun-11
11 11
•Recycled water consumption for the month of August is as
follows:
o Total consumption was 531.2 acre-feet or 173,037,832
gallons and the average daily consumption was
5,581,866 gallons per day.
o Total number of recycled water meters is 687.
o Total recycled water consumption to date for FY 2011
is 1,116.0 acre-feet .
•Wastewater flows for the month of August were as follows:
7
G
o Total basin flow,gallons per day:1,951 p DOO.
o Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro,
gallons per day:647,000.
o Total Otay flow,gallons per day:1,304,000.
o Flow Processed at the Ralph W.Chapman Water Recycling
Facility,gallons per day:1,244,000.
o Flow to Metro from Otay Water District,gallons per
day:167,000.
For the month of August there were no new wastewater
connections;total EDUs is 6,080.
8
Water Waste Report
Broken
Sprinklers High Usage Leal<Overspray
Runoff due
to over-
watering
Washing
Down Paved
Surfaces
Washing
Vehicles
without
bucket/
hose nozzle
Watering
after lOam
and before
6pm
Total
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
Julv 2009
Auqust 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 20~0
Februarv 2010
March 2010
April 2010
Mav 2010
June 2010
July 2010
Auqust 2010
September 2010
Total
6 4 4 1 2 17
7 23 9 6 1 1 47
13 35 5 8 10 1 7 79
6 24 9 17 4 4 6 70
11 15 7 8 1 1 9 52
6 17 5 7 2 1 3 41
4 6 2 6 1 1 20
1 6 7 11 1 26
1 15 1 4 1 22
1 2 1 4 1 9
1 2 3 6
2 1 5 2 10
1 4 1 5 11
1 3 4 3 1 1 13
2 2 1 2 1 1 9
4 2 6
3 6 4 13
2,1 5 2 3 13
68 1 168 60 102 22 8 35 464
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
FOR TWO MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31,2010
Exhibit A
Annual YTD YTD YTD
Budget Actual Budget Variance Var%
REVENUES:
Water Sales $36,560,100 $7,493,871 $7,317,900 $175,971 2.4%
Energy Charges 1,854,600 356,204 355,100 1,104 0.3%
System Charges 9,532,200 1,564,172 1,563,200 972 0.1%
Penalties 747,600 140,640 139,600 1,040 0.7%
MWD &CWA Fixed Charges 7,639,400 1,135,217 1,134,000 1,217 0.1%
Total Water Sales 56,333,900 10,690,104 10,509,800 180,304 1.7%
Reclamation Sales 7,620,600 1,913,894 1,841,400 72,494 3.9%
Sewer Charges 2,270,500 409,497 413,350 (3,853)(0.9%)
Meter Fees 50,300 3,969 8,400 (4,431)(52.8%)
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,095,300 161,054 182,400 (21,346)(11.7%)
Betterment Fees for Maintenance 657,400 93,135 109,600 (16,465)(15.0%)
Non-Operating Revenues 1,948,300 306,898 324,683 (17,785)(5.5%)
Tax Revenues 3,843,900 70,213 90,900 (20,687)(22.8%)
Interest 296,200 44,214 49,400 (5,186)(10.5%).,"
General Fund Draw Down 1,657,500 276,300 276,300 0.0%
Transfer from OPEB 1,220,000 203,300 203,300 0.0%
Total Revenues $76,993,900 $14,172,577 $14,009,533 $163,043 1.2%
EXPENSES:
Potable Water Purchases $26,238,700 $5,498,022 $5,464,056 $(33,966)(0.6%)
Recycled Water Purchases 1,179,900 333,055 311,400 (21,655)(7.0%)
CWA-Infrastructure Access Charge 1,550,700 230,696 230,800 104 0.0%
CWA-Customer Service Charge 1,315,200 195,980 196,000 20 0.0%
CWA-Emergency Storage Charge 2,875,200 430,116 430,200 84 0.0%
MWD-Capacity Res Charge 665,100 110,892 110,800 (92)(0.1%)
MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge 1,232,400 204,728 205,400 672 0.3%
Subtotal Water Purchases 35,057,200 7,003,489 6,948,656 (54,833)(0.8%)
Power Charges 2,520,700 523,975 543,600 19,625 3.6%
Payroll &Related Costs 16,749,400 2,629,051 2,607,075 (21,976)(0.8%)
Material &Maintenance 3,769,500 650,485 651,550 1,065 0.2%
Administrative Expenses 5,130,400 587,539 697,031 109,491 15.7%
Legal Fees 451,200 77,559 75,200 (2,359)(3.1%)
Expansion Reserve 2,775,000 462,500 462,500 0.0%
Betterment Reserve 1,435,000 239,200 239,200 0.0%
Replacement Reserve 6,965,000 1,160,800 1,160,800 0.0%
Transfer to Sewer General Fund 390,500 65,100 65,100 0.0%
Transfer to General Fund Reserve 1,750,000 291,700 291,700 0.0%
Total Expenses $76,993,900 $13,691,399 $13,742,412 $51,013 0.4%
EXCESS REVENUES(EXPENSE)$$_481,178 $267,122 $214,056
F:/MORPT/FS2011-0810 9/27/2010 1:59PM
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW
AUGUST 31,2010
INVESTMENT OVERVIEW &MARKET STATUS:
The federal funds rate has remained constant now for over 19-months.On December 16,2008,at the Federal Reserve Board's regular
scheduled meeting,the federal funds rate was lowered from 1.00%to "a target range ofbetween Zero and 0.25%"in response to the
nation's ongoing financial crisis,as well as banking industry pressure to ease credit and stimulate the economy.This marked the ninth
reduction in a row since September 18,2007,when the rate was 5.25%.There have been no further changes made to the federal funds
rate at the Federal Reserve Board's subsequent regular scheduled meetings,the most recent ofwhich was held on September 21,2010.
They went on to say:"The Committee continues to anticipate that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels
ofthe federal funds rate for an extended period."
Despite the large drop in available interest rates,the District's overall effective rate ofreturn at August 31st was 1.12%,which was a
decrease of 2 basis points (0.02%)from the prior month.At the same time the LAIF return on deposits has remained stable over the
last several months,reaching an average effective yield of 0.51 %for the month of August 2010.Based on our success at maintaining
a competitive rate ofreturn on our portfolio during this extended period ofinterest rate declines,no changes in investment strategy are
being considered at this time.
In accordance with the District's Investment Policy,all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives,in priority
order,of safety,liquidity,and return on investment.
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE:August 31,2010
Investment
8.01:Treasury Securities
8.02:Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations)
8.02:Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds)
8.03:Federal Agency Issues
8.04:Certificates of Deposit
8.05:Short-Term Commercial Notes
8.06:Medium-Term Commercial Debt
8.07:Money Market Mutual Funds
8.08:San Diego County Pool
12.0:Maximum Single Financial Institution
State Limit
100%
$40 Million
100%
100%
30%
25%
30%
20%
100%
100%
Otay Limit
100%
$40 Million
100%
100%
15%
15%
15%
15%
100%
50%
OtayActual
o
$12.53 Million
5.65%
56.78%
2.88%
o
3.75%
o
17.72%
1.50%
Performance Measure F-12
Return on Investment
Target:Meet or Exceed 100%of LAIF
1.80 .,---------------------------------------------;-:-----------,
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
I iii LAIF .Otay a Difference I
$64,612,000
60.52%
OtayWater District
Investment Portfolio:08/31/10
$4,676,193
4.38%
o Banks (Passbook/Checking/CD)•Pools (LAIF &County)0 Agencies &Corporate Notes
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
August 31,2010
Investments
Corporate Notes
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
San Diego County Pool
Investments
Par Market Book %of Days to YTM YTM
Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv.365 Equiv.
4,000,000.00 4,044,740.00 4,008,505.43 3.81 878 98 1.973 2.000
60,612,000.00 60,785,309.03 60,622,782.83 57.64 826 749 1.179 1.195
3,079,108.00 3,079,108.00 3,079,108.00 2.93 374 147 1.399 1.419
18,544,576.56 18,575,059.69 18,544,576.56 17.63 1 1 0.506 0.513
18,920,688.43 18,921,000.00 18,920,688.43 17.99 1 1 0.955 0.968
105,156,372.99 105,405,216.72 105,175,661.25 100.00%521 440 1.056 1.071
Cash
Passbook/Checking
(notincluded in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
1,597,085.44
106,753,458.43
August31 Month Ending
103,985.80
109,196,460.05
1.12%
1,597,085.44
107,002,302.16
Fiscal YearTo Date
214,256.57
111,470,667.30
1.13%
1,597,085.44
106,772,746.69 521 440
0.137
1.056
0.139
1.071
I hereby certify that the investments contained in this report are made in accordance with the District Investment Policy Number 27 adopted by the Board ofDirectors on September 6,2006.The market
value informatio Corporation.The investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow requirements of the District for the next six months of expenditures.
C(--;J.o -/0
Run Date:09/17/2010-15:02
Portfolio OTAY
AP
'pM (PRF]M1)SymRept 6.41.200
Report VeL 5.00
OlAY
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details -Investments
August 31,2010
Average Purchase Stated YTM Daysto Maturity
CUSIP Investment#Issuer Balance Date ParValue MarketValue BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Corporate Notes
084664AF8 2094 Berkshire Hathaway Fin 03/10/2009 2,000,000.00 2,022,860.00 2,005,732.28 4.200 1.973 105 12/15/2010
36962G2S2 2044 General Electric Capital 11/16/2007 2,000,000.00 2,021,880.00 2,002,773.15 5.000 Aaa 1.973 91 12/01/2010
Subtotal and Average 4,009,711.24 4,000,000.00 4,044,740.00 4,008,505.43 1.973 98
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31331GZ36 2155 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/16/2010 4,000,000.00 4,006,240.00 4,011,628.22 1.550 1.374 687 07/19/2012
31331JYF4 2161 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/19/2010 2,000,000.00 1,999,380.00 2,000,000.00 0.900 0.888 902 02119/2013
3133XXRW9 2128 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/29/2010 2,000,000.00 2,010,620.00 2,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 667 06/29/2012
3133XYNSO 2145 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/10/2010 2,000,000.00 2,011,260.00 2,000,000.00 1.280 1.262 831 12/10/2012
3133XYSH9 2147 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/21/2010 2,000,000.00 2,011,260.00 2,000,000.00 1.125 1.110 751 09/21/2012
3133XYXR1 2150 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/14/2010 2,000,000.00 2,001,880.00 2,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 866 01/14/2013
313370NF1 2160 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/20/2010 2,000,000.00 1,997,500.00 2,000,000.00 0.800 0.789 811 11/20/2012
313370P77 2162 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/25/2010 2,000,000.00 1,998,120.00 2,000,000.00 0.850 0.838 908 02/25/2013
313370JRO 2163 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/27/2010 2,875,000.00 2,872,297.50 2,875,000.00 0.850 0.838 726 08/27/2012
3134G1DE1 2140 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 05/19/2010 2,000,000.00 2,004,660.00 2,000,000.00 1.650 1.627 810 11/19/2012
3134G1EH3 2144'Federal Home Loan Mortgage 06/08/2010 2,000,000.00 2,000,280.00 2,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 646 06/08/2012
3137EACK3 2146 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 05/28/2010 2,000,000.00 2,019,380.00 1,999,154.61 1.147 1.154 695 07/27/2012
3137EACK3A 2148 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 05/27/2010 1,030,000.00 1,039,980.70 1,030,000.00 1.125 1.109 695 07/27/2012
3137EACK3B 2149 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 05/27/2010 2,707,000.00 2,733,230.83 2,707,000.00 1.125 1.109 695 07/27/2012
3134G1KZ6 2151 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 07/20/2010 2,000,000.00 2,003,440.00 2,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 688 07/20/2012
3134G1MD3 2153 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 07/22/2010 2,000,000.00 2,006,320.00 2,000,000.00 1.100 1.085 324 07/22/2011
3134G1PK4 2158 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 08/11/2010 2,000,000.00 2,005,040.00 2,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 894 02/11/2013
3136FJR45 2118 Federal National MortageAssoc 01/25/2010 2,000,000.00 2,004,380.00 2,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 877 01/25/2013
31398AH88 2123 Federal National Mortage Assoc 03/24/2010 2,000,000.00 2,001,260.00 2,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 754 09/24/2012
3136FMFRO 2127 Federal National Mortage Assoc 04/05/2010 2,000,000.00 2,010,620.00 2,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 765 10/05/2012
3136FMJF2 2129 Federal National MortageAssoc 04/14/2010 2,000,000.00 2,006,880.00 2,000,000.00 1.250 1.233 621 05/14/2012
3136FMPB4 2132 Federal National Mortage Assoc 04/29/2010 2,000,000.00 2,010,620.00 2,000,000.00 1.480 1.460 7~9 10/29/2012
31398AQ47 2135 Federal National Mortage Assoc 05/05/2010 2,000,000.00 2,003,760.00 2,000,000.00 1.600 1.578 796 11/05/2012
3136FMRH9 2136.Federal National Mortage Assoc 04/29/2010 2,000,000.00 2,013,120.00 2,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 789 10/29/2012
3136FMRG1 2137 Federal National MortageAssoc 05/10/2010 2,000,000.00 2,003,120.00 2,000,000.00 1.300 1.282 617 05/10/2012
31398AW65 2152 Federal National MortageAssoc 07/27/2010 2,000,000.00 2,001,260.00 2,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 695 07/27/2012
3136FMX82 2154 Federal National Mortage Assoc 07/26/2010 2,000,000.00 2,003,760.00 2,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 786 10/26/2012
3136FM4N1 2157 Federal National Mortage Assoc 08/11/2010 2,000,000.00 2,003,760.00 2,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 894 02/11/2013
3136FM6A7 2159 Federal National Mortage Assoc 08/19/2010 2,000,000.00 2,001,880.00 2,000,000.00 1.000 0.986 810 11/19/2012---------
Subtotal and Average 60,018,167.49 60,612,000.00 60,785,309.03 60,622,782.83 1.179 749
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date:0911712010 -15:02 .PM (PRF]M2)SymRept 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
August 31,2010
Average Purchase
CUSIP Investment#Issuer Balance Date ParValue
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 10,033.08
PETTY CASH 9003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 2,800.00
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 1,558,107.44
PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 24,977.26
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/20/2010 690.76
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/20/2010 425.01
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/20/2010 51.89
Average Balance 0.00
Total Cash and Investmentss 109,196,460.05 106,753,458.43
Run Date:09/17/2010 -15:02
Market Value
10,033.08
2,800.00
1,558,107.44
24,977.26
690.76
425.01
51.89
107,002,302.16
Page 4
Stated YTM Daysto
BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity
10,033.08 0.050 0.049
2,800.00 0.000
1,558,107.44 0.142 0.140
24,977.26 0.000
690.76 0.001 0.001
425.01 0.001 0.001
51.89 0.147 0.145
106,772,746.69 1.056 440
Portfolio OTAY
AP
.PM (PRF_PM2)SymRept6.41.200
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
August 31,2010
Page 3
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment#Issuer Balance Date ParValue MarketValue BookValue Rate Moody's 360 Maturity Date
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
2050003183-4 2121 California Bank &Trust 01/2212010 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 1.380 1.380 508 01/2212012
1008995288 2119 Neighborhood National Bank 1211012009 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.400 99 12109/2010
1006200563-2 2126 Neighborhood National Bank 02104/2010 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1.400 1.400 156 02104/2011
Subtotal and Average 3,079,108.00 3,079,108.00 3,079,108.00 3,079,108.00 1.399 147
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07101/2004 12,513,399.46 12,533,968.69 12,513,399.46 0.513 0.506
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/21/2010 6,031,177.10 6,041,091.00 6,031,177.10 0.513 0.506---------
Subtotal and Average 21,328,447.53 18,544,576.56 18,575,059.69 18,544,576.56 0.506
San Diego County Pool
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County 07/01/2004 18,920,688.43 18,921,000.00 18,920,688.43 0.968 0.955
Subtotal and Average 18,920,688.43 18,920,688.43 18,921,000.00 18,920,688.43 0.955
Total and Average 109,196,460.05 105,156,372.99 105,405,216.72 105,175,661.25 1.056 440
Run Date:09/17/2010-15:02
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF_PM2)SymRept 6.41.200
OlAY
Activity Report
Sorted By Issuer
July 1,2010 -August 31,2010
CUSIP Investment#Issuer
Percent
ofPortfolio
Par Value,......_..--._._--
Beginning
Balance
Current Transaction
Rate Date
Purchases or
Deposits
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
Ending
Balance
Issuer:Berkshire Hathaway Fin
Corporate Notes
Subtotal and Balance
IssuerSubtotal
Issuer:STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1.873%
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 18.867%
Subtotal and Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002
UNION OPERATING 9004
PAYROLL 9005
UBNA-201o BOND 9013
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
0.050 55,852,809.88 55,852,786.79
0.142 1,560,013.23 1,046,617.78
65,925.04 65,925.04
0.147 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00
1,083,666.90 67,478,748.15 66,965,329.61
0.513 18,508,449.75 24,500,000.00
0.513 31,177.10 10,000,000.00
34,504,949.71 18,539,626.85 34,500,000.00
35,588,616.61 86,018,375.00 101,465,329.61
1,597,085.44
18,544,576.56
20,141,662.00
Issuer:California Bank &Trust
Certificates ofDeposit -Bank
Subtotal and Balance 79,108.00 7~,108.00
IssuerSubtotal
Issuer:Federal Farm Credit Bank
0.074%79,108.00 0.00 0.00 79,108.00
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31331GZ36 2155
Run Date:09/1712010 -15:37
Federal Farm Credit Bank 1.550 07/16/2010 4,000,000.00 0.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA(PRF_DA)SymRept6.41.200
ReportVer.5.00
OTAY
Activity Report
July 1,2010 -August 31,2010
Page 2
CUSIP Investment#Issuer
Percent
ofPortfolio
ParValue
Beginning
Balance
Current Transaction
Rate Date
ParValue,.,."""""____,,~._.._._""'---,..-
Purchases or Redemptions or Ending
Deposits Withdrawals Balance
Issuer:Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31331JYF4 2161 Federal Farm Credit Bank 0.900 08/19/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal and Balance 0.00 6,000,000.00 0.00 6,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 5.620%0.00 6,000,000.00 0.00 6,000,000.00
Issuer:Federal Home Loan Bank
IssuerSubtotal
Subtotal and Balance
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133XXK22 2124
3133XY2C8 2130
3133XY5H4 2131
3133XYAS4 2133
3133XY004 2138
3133XYCTO 2139
3133XYFP5 2142
3133XYXR1 2150
313370B09 "2156
313370B09 2156
313370NF1 2160
313370P77 2162
313370JRO 2163
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
13.934%
1.250 07/08/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
1.800 07/29/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
1.450 07/30/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
1.600 08/06/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
1.700 08/13/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
1.500 08/13/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
1.020 08/25/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
1.250 07/14/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
0.800 07/27/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
08/27/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
0.800 08/20/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
0.850 08/25/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
0.850 08/27/2010 2,875,000.00 0.00
20,000,000.00 10,875,000.00 16,000,000.00 14,875,000.00
20,000,000.00 10,875,000.00 16,000,000.00 14,875,000.00
Issuer:Federal Home Loan Mortgage
15,737,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
08/10/2010
07/20/2010
07/22/2010
08/11/2010
1.300
1.000
1.100
1.000
11,737,000.00
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage-------
Subtotal and Balance
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3134G1AW4 2134
3134G1KZ6 2151
3134G1M03 2153
3134G1 PK4 2158
IssuerSubtotal 14.741%11,737,000.00 6,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 15,737,000.00
Run Date:09/1712010 -15:37
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA(PHF_DA)SymRept 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Activity Report Page 3
July 1,2010 -August 31,2010
Par Value ParValue..................-_.._........__..........,,--,_.............................._...,_.......
Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or Redemptions or Ending
CUSIP Investment #Issuer ofPortfolio Balance Rate Date Deposits Withdrawals Balance
Issuer:Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31398AC91 2117 Federal National Mortage Assoc 1.500 07/20/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
3136FJ4T5 2120 Federal National Mortage Assoc 1.500 08/16/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
31398AS78 2143 Federal National Mortage Assoc 1.400 08/25/2010 0.00 2,000,000.00
31398AW65 2152 Federal National MortageAssoc 1.000 07/27/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
3136FMX82 2154 Federal National Mortage Assoc 1.000 07/26/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
3136FM4N1 2157 Federal NationalMortage Assoc 1.000 08/11/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
3136FM6A7 2159 Federal National Mortage Assoc 1.000 08/19/2010 2,000,000.00 0.00
Subtotal and Balance 22,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 24,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 22.482%22,000,000.00 8,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 24,000,000.00
Issuer:General Electric Capital
Corporate Notes
Subtotal and Balance 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
IssuerSubtotal 1.873%2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
Issuer:Neighborhood National Bank
Certificates ofDeposit -Bank
Subtotal and Balance 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
Issuer Subtotal 2.810%3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00
Issuer:San Diego County
San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County 0.968 42,446.70 0.00
Subtotal and Balance 18,878,241.73 42,446.70 0.00 18,920,688.43
IssuerSubtotal 17.724%18,878,241.73 42,446.70 0.00 18,920,688.43
Total 100.000%115,282,966.34 116,935,821.70 125,465,329.61 106,753,458.43
Run Dale:09/17/2010 -15:37
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA(PRF_DA)SymRept6.41.200
ReportVer.5.00
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
July 1,2010 -August 31,2010
Adjustment in Value
Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase Addition Redemption Amortization Change in Ending
CUSIP Investment#Fund Class Date InvestedValue ofPrincipal to Principal ofPrincipal Adjustment Market Value Invested Value
Fund:Treasury Fund
LAIF 9001 99 FairValue 18,535,367.70 0.00 8,449.75 6,000,000.00 0.00 -9,848.77 12,533,968.69
UNION MONEY 9002 99 Amortized 10,009.99 0.00 65.22 65.22 0.00 0.00 10,033.08
PETIYCASH 9003 99 Amortized 2,800.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,800.00
UNION OPERATING 9004 99 Amortized 1,044,711.99 0.00 462.64 462.64 0.00 0.00 1,558,107.44
PAYROLL 9005 99 Amortized 24,977.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,977.26
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 99 Fair Value 18,851,000.00 0.00 42,446.70 0.00 0.00 27,553.30 18,921,000.00
36962G2S2 2044 99 Fair Value 12/01/2010 2,032,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -10,120.00 2,021,880.00
084664AF8 2094 99 Fair Value 12115/2010 2,030,740.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -7,880.00 2,022,860.00
31398AC91 2117 99 Fair Value 01/20/2012 2,000,620.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -620.00 0.00
3136FJR45 2118 99 Fair Value 01/25/2013 2,005,620.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,240.00 2,004,380.00
1008995288 2119 99 Amortized 12/09/2010 1,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000,000.00
3136FJ4T5 2120 99 Fair Value 08/16/2012 2,002,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -2,500.00 0.00
2050003183-4 2121 99 Amortized 01/22/2012 79,108.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79,108.00
31398AH88 2123 99 FairVaJue 09/24/2012 2,004,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3,120.00 2,001,260.00
3133XXK22 2124 99 FairValue 06/25/2012 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1006200563-2 2126 99 Amortized 02/04/2011 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00
3136FMFRO 2127 99 FairValue 10/05/2012 2,012,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,880.00 2,010,620.00
3133XXRW9 2128 99 FairValue 06/29/2012 2,012,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,880.00 2,010,620.00
3136FMJF2 2129 99 FairValue 05/14/2012 2,009,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,500.00 2,006,880.00
3133XY2C8 2130 99 FairValue 01/29/2013 2,001,880.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,880.00 0.00
3133XY5H4 2131 99 Fair Value 07/30/2012 2,001,880.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,880.00 0.00
3136FMPB4 2132 99 Fair Value 10/29/2012 2,010,620.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,010,620.00
3133XYAS4 2133 99 FairVaJue 11/06/2012 2,001,880.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,880.00 0.00
3134G1AW4 2134 99 FairValue 05/10/2012 2,001,920.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,920.00 0.00
31398AQ47 2135 99 Fair Value 11/05/2012 2,007,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3,740.00 2,003,760.00
3136FMRH9 2136 99 FairVaJue 10/29/2012 2,014,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,260.00 2,013,120.00
3136FMRG1 2137 99 Fair Value 05/10/2012 2,005,620.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,500.00 2,003,120.00
3133XYDD4 2138 99 Fair Value 11/13/2012 2,002,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -2,500.00 0.00
3133XYCTO 2139 99 Fair Value 08/13/2012 2,002,500.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -2,500.00 0.00
3134G1 DE1 2140 99 Fair Value 11/19/2012 2,008,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -3,340.00 2,004,660.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date:09/17/2010 -15:04 GD (pRF_GD)SymRepl 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
GASS 31 Compliance Detail Page 2
Sorted by Fund -Fund
Adjustment in Value
Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase Addition Redemption Amortization Change in Ending
CUSIP Investment#Fund Class Date Invested Value ofPrincipal to Principal ofPrincipal Adjustment MarketValue Invested Value
Fund:Treasury Fund
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 99 Amortized 690.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 690.76
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 99 Amortized 425.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 425.01
3133XYFP5 2142 99 FairValue 11/25/2011 2,001,880.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,880.00 0.00
31398AS78 2143 99 Fair Value OS/25/2012 2,001,880.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,880.00 0.00
3134G1EH3 2144 99 FairValue 06/08/2012 2,002,540.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,260.00 2,000,280.00
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 99 FairValue 16,026,300.42 0.00 31,177.10 10,000,000.00 0.00 -16,386.51 6,041,091.00
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 99 Amortized 51.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.89
3133XYNSO 2145 99 Fair Value 12/10/2012 2,009,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,880.00 2,011,260.00
3137EACK3 2146 99 Fair Value 07/27/2012 2,014,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 2,019,380.00
3133XYSH9 2147 99 Fair Value 09/21/2012 2,010,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,260.00 2,011,260.00
3137EACK3A 2148 99 Fair Value 07/27/2012 1,037,405.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,575.00 1,039,980.70
3137EACK3B 2149 99 Fair Value 07/27/2012 2,726,463.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,767.50 2,733,230.83
3133XYXR1 2150 99 Fair Value 01/14/2013 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,880.00 2,001,880.00
3134G1KZ6 2151 99 Fair Value 07/20/2012 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,440.00 2,003,440.00
31398AW65 2152 99 Fair Value 07/27/2012 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,260.00 2,001,260.00
3134G1MD3 2153 99 Fair Value 07/2212011 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,320.00 2,006,320.00
3136FMX82 2154 99 Fair Value 10/26/2012 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,760.00 2,003,760.00
31331GZ36 2155 99 Fair Value 07/19/2012 0.00 4,012,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -6,160.00 4,006,240.00
313370BD9 2156 99 Fair Value 04/27/2012 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3136FM4N1 2157 99 FairValue 02/11/2013 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,760.00 2,003,760.00
3134G1PK4 2158 99 FairValue 02111/2013 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,040.00 2,005,040.00
3136FM6A7 2159 99 FairValue 11/19/2012 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,880.00 2,001,880.00
313370NF1 2160 99 FairValue 11/20/2012 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,500.00 1,997,500.00
31331JYF4 2161 99 FairValue 02119/2013 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -620.00 1,999,380.00
313370P77 2162 99 FairValue 02/25/2013 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -1,880.00 1,998,120.00
313370JRO 2163 99 FairValue 08/27/2012 0.00 2,875,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -2,702.50 2,872,297.50
Subtotal 115,548,292.05 30,887,400.00 82,601.41 40,000,527.86 0.00 -28,881.98 107,002,302.16
Total 115,548,292.05 30,887,400.00 82,601.41 40,000,527.86 0.00 -28,881.98 107,002,302.16
Run Date:09/1712010 -15:04
Portfolio OTAY
AP
GD (PRF_GD)SymRepl 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 08/31/2010
Security 10
36962G2S2
084664AF8
313370JRO
313370P77
3136FMFRO
31398AQ47
3137EACK3A
313370NF1
3133XYSH9
31331JYF4
31331GZ36
3133XXRW9
3133XYNSO
3133XYXR1
3136FMJF2
3136FMPB4
3136FMRH9
3134G1DE1
3134G1PK4
3134G1KZ6
3137EACK3
3137EACK3B
3134G1EH3
3134G1MD3
3136FJR45
3136FMRG1
31398AH88
3136FM4N1
31398AW65
Investment#
2044
2094
2163
2162
2127
2135
2148
2160
2147
2161
2155
2128
2145
2150
2129
2132
2136
2140
2158
2151
2146
2149
2144
2153
2118
2137
2123
2157
2152
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Issuer
General Electric Capital
Berkshire Hathaway Fin
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoe
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal National MortageAssoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoe
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Investment
Class
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Book
Value
2,002,773.15
2,005,732.28
2,875,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,011,628.22
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,999,154.61
2,707,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Par
Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,875,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
4,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,707,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Market
Value
2,021,880.00
2,022,860.00
2,872,297.50
1,998,120.00
2,010,620.00
2,003,760.00
1,039,980.70
1,997,500.00
2,011,260.00
1,999,380.00
4,006,240.00
2,010,620.00
2,011,260.00
2,001,880.00
2,006,880.00
2,010,620.00
2,013,120.00
2,004,660.00
2,005,040.00
2,003,440.00
2,019,380.00
2,733,230.83
2,000,280.00
2,006,320.00
2,004,380.00
2,003,120.00
2,001,260.00
2,003,760.00
2,001,260.00
Current
Rate
5.000
4.200
0.850
0.850
1.500
1.600
1.125
0.800
1.125
0.900
1.550
1.250
1.280
1.250
1.250
1.480
1.550
1.650
1.000
1.000
1.147
1.125
1.300
1.100
1.250
1.300
1.500
1.000
1.000
YTM Current
365 Yield
2.000 2.782
2.000 1.892
0.850 1.03ge
0.850 1.03ge
1.500 0.604c
1.600 1.222c
1.125 0.613
0.800 1.051 e
1.125 0.425c
0.900 0.962c
1.393 1.236c
1.250 0.329c
1.280 0.551c
1.250 1.061c
1.250 0.318c
1.480 0.674c
1.550 0.555c
1.650 1.181c
1.000 0.732c
1.000 0.655c
1.170 0.635
1.125 0.613
1.300 1.272c
1.100 0.744c
1.250 0.810c
1.300 0.986e
1.500 1.373e
1.000 0.623c
1.000 0.873c
Maturityl Effective
Call Date Duration
12101/2010 0.249
12/15/2010 0.287
09/27/2010 0.000
02/25/2011 0.484
04/05/2011 0.588
11105/2010 0.178
07/27/2012 1.879
09/20/201 0 0.000
06/21/2011 0.800
11/19/2010 0.000
10/19/2010 0.000
03/29/2011 0.000
06/10/2011 0.769
10/14/2010 0.000
01/14/2011 0.119
04/29/2011 0.655
04/29/2011 0.655
11119/2010 0.216
08/11/2011 0.938
01/20/2011 0.386
07/27/2012 1.287
07/21'2012 1.879
09/08/2010 0.019
07/22/2011 0.885
01/25/2011 0.400
11/10/2010 0.191
09/24/2010 0.063
02/11/2011 0.446
10/27/2010 0.000
Run Dale:09/17/2010 -15:05 Page 1
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF_DU)SymRepI6.41.200
ReportVer.5.00
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -InvestmentType
Through 08/31/2010
Investment Book Par Market Current YTM Current Maturityl Effective
SecurityID Investment#Fund Issuer Class Value Value Value Rate 365 Yield Call Date Duration
3136FMX82 2154 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,003,760.00 1.000 1.000 0.533c 01/26/2011 0.152
3136FM6A7 2159 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,001,880.00 1.000 1.000 0.811 c 11/19/2010 0.000
1008995288 2119 99 Neighborhood National Bank Amort 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.400 1.419 1.400 12109/2010 0.269t
1006200563-2 2126 99 Neighborhood National Bank Amort 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1.400 1.419 1.400 02/04/2011 0.421 t
2050003183-4 2121 99 California Bank &Trust Amort 79,108.00 79,108.00 79,108.00 1.380 1.399 1.380 01/22/2012 1.375t
LAIF BABS 20109012 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 6,031,177.10 6,031,177.10 6,041,091.00 0.513 0.513 0.513 0.000
LAIF 9001 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 12,513,399.46 12,513,399.46 12,533,968.69 0.513 0.513 0.513 0.000
LAIF COPS07 9009 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.530 1.530 1.530 0.000
SDCOUNTY 9007 99 San Diego County Fair 18,920,688.43 18,920,688.43 18,921,000.00 0.968 0.968 0.968 0.000
ReportTotal 105,175,661.25 105,156,372.99 105,405,216.72 0.873 0.265t
t =Duration can not be calculated on these investments dueto incomplete Market price data.
Run Date:09/17/2010-15:05 Page 2
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF_DU)SymRepl 6.41.200
Report Ver.5.00
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING:Regular Board
SUBMITTED BY:Sean Prendergast,Finance
MEETING DATE:
W.O.lG.F.NO:
October 6,2010
DIV.NO.
Supervisor,Payroll &AP
APPROVED BY:Joseph Beachem,Chief Financial Officer
(Chief)
APPROVED BY:German Alvarez,Assistant General Manager
(Asst.8M):
SUBJECT:Accounts Payable Demand List
PURPOSE:
Attached is the list of demands for the Board's information.
FISCAL IMPACT:',1
SUMMARY
CHECKS (2025309-2025755)
WIRE TO:
CALPERS -OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
CITY OF CHULA VISTA -BI-MONTHLY SEWER CHARGES
CITY TREASURER -METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE SYSTEM
CITY TREASURER -RECLAIMED WATER PURCHASE
DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS -DENTAL &COBRA CLAIMS
LANDESBANK -CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER WATER DELIVERIES
SPECIAL DIST RISK MGMT AUTH -INSURANCE PREMIUM
UNION BANK -PAYROLL TAXES
UNION BANK -CERT OF PARTICIPATION -SERIES 2007
UNION BANK -'93 CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION
UNION BANK -GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND -ID 27
UNION BANK -CERT OF PARTICIPATION 2010
UNION BANK -STATE DISABILITY INSURANCE
TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the Board receive the attached list of demands.
Jb/Attachment
NET DEMANDS
$2,580,208.37
$28,900.00
$2,847,101.17
$263,200.00
$319,079.74
$26,977.83
$402,897.73
$3,190,603.40
$199,969.89
$325,189.40
$1,685,664.29
$742,341.17
$657,405.80
$771,172.24
$155,063.49
$14,195,774.52
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025309 09/01/10 05136 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS 3028 07/02/10 FOB READERS 2,300.00 2,300.00
2025310 09/01/10 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00672434 08/12/10 TEMPORARY SERVICES 2,178.00 2,178.00
2025311 09/01/10 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131166907 08/11/10 AQUA AMMONIA 2,223.60
131166906 08/11/10 AQUA AMMONIA 2,100.18 4,323.78
2025312 09/01/10 00107 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN 70002349910610 06/01/10 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 198.00 198.00
2025313 09/01/10 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI022441 08/10/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,458.52
BPI021660 08/06/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,593.89
BPI023338 08/12/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,016.32
BPI022024 08/10/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 879.62
BPI022023 08/09/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 841.57
BPI021661 08/09/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 636.38
BPI022877 08/12/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 585.63
BPI023337 08112/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 391.97 11,403.90
2025314 09/01/10 01232 BRODING'S BATIERY 13845 08110/10 REPAIRPARTS 347.87
13431 07126110 REPAIRPARTS 326.09 673.96
2025315 09/01/10 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 37182 08106/10 CRUSHED ROCK 96.07 96.07
2025316 09/01110 11044 CALIFORNIABANK&TRUST 13R 08106110 RETENTION FOR CCL CONTRACTING 22,570.73 22,570.73
2025317 09101/10 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7194 08101110 RECORDS STORAGE 1,774.96
7198 08101110 RECORDS ASSISTANCE 1,482.12
7195 08101110 RECORDS STORAGE 364.00 3,621.08
2025318 09101110 10571 CCL CONTRACTING 13 08106110 P2009/P2038 JAMACHAROAD PIPELINE 428,843.81 428,843.81
2025319 09/01/10 04349 CHAMBERS,JONATHAN 002396 08125110 BACKFLOW RE-CERTIFICATION 200.00 200.00
2025320 09101110 00446 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DE2284 08124/10 WATERLINE INSTALL 1,319.84 1,31~.84
2025321 09/01/10 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH110037D11 08/26110 SHUT DOWN TEST 2,082.50
DEH110030D11 08/26/10 SHUT DOWN TEST 773.50
DEH110055D11 08/26/10 SHUT DOWN TEST 654.50 3,510.50
2025322 09/01/10 02603 DELL MARKETING LP XF2211XF2 08/09110 LAPTOP 2,383.05 2,383.05
2025323 09/01110 03417 DIRECTV 1324047959 08/19/10 SATELLITE TV 5.00 5.00
2025324 09/01/10 01008 ECOLABEQUIPMENTCARE 91589285 08/09110 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 545.17
91589287 08/09/10 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 149.26 694.43
2025325 09/01/10 03227 ENVIROMATRIXANALYTICAL INC 0080173 08109/10 LABORATORYSERVICES 450.00 450.00
Page 1 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check#Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025326 09/01/10 02639 EW TRUCK &EQUIPMENT 256718 08/04/10 REPAIR PART 330.75 330.75
2025327 09101/10 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 0355331 08/06/10 INVENTORY 3,183.19
03551432 08/11/10 INVENTORY 796.34 3,979.53
2025328 09/01/10 08005 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC INC 4054991 08/09/10 METROSCAN ONLINE 6,000.00 6,000.00
2025329 09/01/10 08893 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE 90034070 07/31/10 ONLINE MAPS 130.46 130.46
2025330 09/01/10 00035 FISHERSCIENTIFIC 6320298 08/06/10 LABORATORYSUPPLIES 217.74 217.74
2025331 09/01/10 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3333693 08/06/10 VEHICLE WASH 205.20 205.20
2025332 09/01/10 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2408280 09/02/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 75.00 75.00
2025333 09/01/10 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2408276 09/02/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 300.00 300.00
2025334 09/01/10 03094 FULLCOURTPRESS 21279 08/05/10 BILL INSERTS 1,694.08 1,694.08
2025335 09/01/10 00101 GRAINGER INC 9321253156 08/11/10 CHLORINE PANEL 1,071.51
9320279665 08/10/10 SHOP TOOLS 467.51
9320263263 08/10/10 SOLENOID VALVE 372.27
9319060944 08/09/10 MARKING PAINT 225.90
9320258230 08/10/10 SHOP TOOLS 156.39
9320263271 08/10/10 INSTALLATION PARTS 121.36
9319060936 08/09/10 MARKING PAINT 75.30 2,490.24
2025336 09101/10 00174 HACH COMPANY 6851238 08/06/10 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 992.89 992.89
2025337 09/01/10 00150 HAWTHORNE MACHINERY CO S1932801 08/10/10 EQUIPMENT TRAILER 9,467.78 9,467.78
2025338 09/01/10 10973 HDR ENGINEERING INC 220410H 08/11/10 TEMPORARY LABOR 4,025.00 4,025.00
2025339 09/01/10 08969 INFOSEND INC 44761 07/30/10 BILLING POSTAGE 16,066.62 16,06?62
2025340 09/01/10 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 479829 CREDIT MEMO (3,000.00)
479726 08/23/10 CHLORINE 4,801.80 1,801.80
2025341 09/01/10 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 4598 08/12110 PAVING SERVICES 4,578.35
4600 08/12/10 PAVING SERVICES 4,143.40
4599 08/12/10 PAVING SERVICES 3,020.00 11,741.75
2025342 09/01/10 03607 LEE &RO INC 84108 08/10/10 DESIGN SERVICES 3,401.25 3,401.25
2025343 09/01/10 00491 LIGHTHOUSE INC,THE 0020442 07/28/10 CENTER CONSOLE 315.38
0024538 08/09/10 CENTER CONSOLE 136.52 451.90
2025344 09/01/10 05329 MASTER METER INC 01730871N 08/09/10 INVENTORY 174,752.24
Page 2 of 23
__,~.,.__._~....Z:::::..
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
01729791N 08/04/10 METER PARTS 8,393.20 183,145.44
2025345 09/01/10 12004 MASTER METER SYSTEMS 00551281N 08/04/10 ANNUAL SUPPORT 1,200.00 1,200.00
2025346 09/01/10 11156 MCDERMOTI,THOMAS 002397 08/24/10 CERTIFICATION FEE 90.00 90.00
2025347 09/01/10 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 61491601 08/02/10 SCALE 1,246.65
61841570 08/04/10 AIR VAC PARTS 153.35
62544498 08/12/10 NFPASIGNS 60.56
62420378 08/11/10 WHEEL CHOCKS 57.95
61805958 08/04/10 REPAIR PART 31.98
61739536 08/04/10 STENCILS 28.62 1,579.11
2025348 09/01/10 00805 METRO WASTEWATER JPA 132 07101110 ANNUAL BUDGET 1,052.00 1,052.00
2025349 09/01/10 03623 MWH AMERICAS INC 1351649 08/06/10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 123.23 123.23
2025350 09/01/10 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2408266 09/02/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,614.79 8,614.79
2025351 09/01/10 05494 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA INC 901500243047 08/12110 AIRTRAK 3,832.47 3,832.47
2025352 09/01/10 00510 OFFICE DEPOTINC 529518509001 08/12/10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 113.40
529013504001 08/09/10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100.99 214.39
2025353 09/01/10 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2408268 09/02/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 770.00 770.00
2025354 09/01/10 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 140795 08/10/10 INVENTORY 7,599.67
140821 08/06/10 METER RETROFIT 3,607.24
140828 08/06/10 CAMLOCK WI CAP 135.31
141159 08106/10 TOOLS 105.41 11,447.63
2025355 09101/10 03308 PBS&J 1086124 08/08/10 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 492.00 492.00
2025356 09101110 00137 PETIY CASH CUSTODIAN 002393 08131110 PETTY CASH 351.25 351.25
2025357 09101/10 03274 PREMIER PHOTOGRAPHY 1048 08122110 PHOTOGRAPHY FEE 1,112.44 1,112.44
2025358 09101110 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30119696 08/12/10 UNIFORMS 355.04
30119695 08112110 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 166.12
30119697 08112110 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 137.15
30119029 08/10/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 102.27
30119028 08/10/10 UNIFORMS 71.01
30119698 08112/10 UNIFORMS 58.99 890.58
2025359 09/01/10 09804 PUBLICIA PRESS LTD 201008252113 08/10/10 BUSINESS CARDS 38.06 38.06
2025360 09/01/10 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLYCO INC 27827000 08/11/10 SAFETY SUPPLIES 265.62 265.62
Page 3 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES91112010 TO 9129/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025361 09/01/10 02925 RAHDERS,DOUGLAS 002395 08/25/10 LICENSE &PERMIT 128.25 128.25
2025362 09/01/10 01890 RECON 41598 08/06/10 P1253 -PREPARATION OFTHE SUBAREA PLAN 4,747.05 4,747.05
2025363 09/01/10 00758 SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOURNAL 00529180 08/10/10 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 52.00 52.00
2025364 09/01/10 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 7706 08/12110 WELDING 590.00 590.00
2025365 09101/10 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTYWATER 7379 08/10/10 TOILET PROGRAM 50.00 50.00
2025366 09/01/10 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 002392 08/25/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 50,326.15
002391 08/19/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 39,156.56 89,482.71
2025367 09/01/10 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C43835 07/13/10 AC MAINTENANCE 1,013.00 1,013.00
2025368 09/01/10 06853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL 355043 07/31/10 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 13,733.21 13,733.21
2025369 09/01/10 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 853316 08/11/10 TOILET RENTAL 80.06 80.06
2025370 09/01/10 01717 SPRING VALLEYCHAMBER OF 2054 06/02/10 CONSERVATION ADVERTISING 350.00 350.00
2025371 09/01/10 01324 STARKMFG CO 74378 08/09/10 CANVAS COVER 1,706.29 1,706.29
2025372 09/01/10 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408284 09/02/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 264.00 264.00
2025373 09/01/10 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408274 09/02/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2025374 09/01/10 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408278 09/02/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 836.30 836.30
2025375 09/01/10 02261 STATE STREET BANK &TRUST CO Ben2408264 09/02/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 5,988.68 5,988.68
2025376 09/01/10 11749 STEPHEN V MCCUE ESQ 002398 07/30/10 LEGAL SERVICES 25,375.00 25,375.00
2025377 09101/10 09221 TACKETT,ZACHARY 002394 08/30/10 SAFETYBOOTS 150.00 15p.00
2025378 09/01/10 02188 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS 10039931 08/12/10 MISC ANTENNA 1,148.40 1,148.40
2025379 09/01/10 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20044449 07/29/10 TIRE SERVICE 942.00
20044448 07/29/10 TIRE SERVICE 365.40
20044339 07/19/10 TIRE SERVICE 171.87
20044563 08/11/10 TIRE SERVICE 21.31
20044184 07101110 TIRE SERVICE 20.22 1,520.80
2025380 09/01/10 11754 TECHNOLOGYASSOCIATES K30800112 07/07/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 6,635.50 6,635.50
2025381 09/01/10 03074 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC 51206 07/30/10 TRAFFIC CONES 278.55 278.55
2025382 09/01/10 03563 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INC 087124 08/12110 WATER METER BOX CLEANOUT MAINTENANCE 4,767.75 '4,767.75
Page 4 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025383 09/01/10 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2408282 09/02/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2025384 09/01/10 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 102440000063 09101/10 BASIC L1FE/AD&D &SUPP LIFE INS 5,950.51 5,950.51
2025385 09/01/10 03212 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Ben2408260 09/02/10 LONG TERM DISABILITY 8,789.48 8,789.48
2025386 09/01/10 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 0143750lN 08/11/10 METER BOX LID 2,254.93 2,254.93
2025387 09/01/10 12221 UTAH STATEUNIVERSITY 121 08/19/10 IRRIGATION CUPS 53.00 53.00
2025388 09/01/10 01095 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFER AGENTS Ben2408270 09/02/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,835.43 6,835.43
2025389 09/01/10 06414 VANTAGEPOINTTRANSFER AGENTS Ben2408272 09/02/10 401A PLAN 1,552.59 1,552.59
2025390 09/01/10 07595 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 283951001 08/11/10 SOFT START 2,196.40 2,196.40
2025391 09/01/10 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 63385 08/10/10 PEST CONTROL 115.00 115.00
2025392 09/01/10 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 00908541N 08/09/10 APCD TESTING 400.00 400.00
2025393 09/01/10 03692 WESTIN ENGINEERING INC 36012 08/06/10 CIP P1210 -ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 18,394.58 18,394.58
2025394 09/08/10 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 2393 09/07/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 7,735.00 7,735.00
2025395 09/08/10 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00673915 08/19/10 TEMPORARY SERVICES 2,178.00 2,178.00
2025396 09/08/10 07951 AHLEE BACKFLOW SERVICE INC 27790 07107110 BACKFLOW SERVICE 243.00 243.00
2025397 09/08/10 01463 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 38457800 08/17/10 CONTROL CABLE 252.48 252.48
2025398 09/08/10 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 40898 08/25/10 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE 365.70 365.70
2025399 09/08/10 12085 AP CONTRACTING &ANTHONY'S 2434 08/15110 CEILING MODIFICATION 5,000.00 5,OOp.00
2025400 09/08/10 11282 ASHTON,PATRICK 002417 09/07/10 SAFETY SHOES 150.00 150.00
2025401 09/08/10 05758 AT&T 61942256050810 08/20/10 PHONE SVC (INTERAGENCYWTR MTR CONN)30.67 30.67
2025402 09/08/10 08330 AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 8547826250810 09/08/10 INTERNET BANDWIDTH 1,200.00 1,200.00
2025403 09/08/10 06285 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 10433 08/10/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 2,500.00 2,500.00
2025404 09108/10 06520 BENSKIN,RONALD 002418 09107/10 SAFETY SHOES 126.20 126.20
2025405 09/08/10 12224 BRADLEY CONSULTING GROUP 128 08/02/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 500.00 500.00
2025406 09/08/10 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI024641 08/17/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,458.52
Page 5 of 23
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
BPI025493 08/19/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,106.91
BP1025077 08/18/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,504.45
BP1024172 08/16/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,178.20
BPI025075 08/18/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 915.35
BPI023730 08/16/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 864.63
BPI025492 08/19/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 816.20
BPI025491 08/19/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 419.64
BPI025076 08/18/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 281.29 12,545.19
2025407 09/08/10 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 37239 08/13/10 CRUSHED ROCK 641.89
37251 08/16/10 CRUSHED ROCK 221.39
37278 08/18/10 CRUSHED ROCK 199.98 1,063.26
2025408 09/08/10 01060 CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF 002407 09/01/10 APPLICATION FEES 100.00
002408 09/01/10 APPLICATION FEES 100.00 200.00
2025409 09/08/10 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 074071 08/13/10 REPLACEMENT PARTS 122.06 122.06
2025410 09/08/10 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 12269340 08/19/10 PAPER 113.54 113.54
2025411 09/08/10 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO -DPW 130425 08/10/10 EXCAVATION PERMITS 4,838.72 4,838.72
2025412 09/08/10 07680 DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS P100818 08/25/10 EMPLOYEE HEALTH 1,585.00 1,585.00
2025413 09/08/10 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 1554580810 08/31/10 RECYCLING SERVICES 90.00 90.00
2025414 09/08/10 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 0080313 08/16/10 LABORATORY SERVICES 470.00 470.00
2025415 09/08/10 07596 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS INC 1000220232 08/18/10 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 1,816.23 1,816.23
2025416 09/08/10 12225 EUN PARK 622275556REF 09/01/10 CUSTOMER REFUND 1,916.55 1,916.55
2025417 09/08/10 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 0353446 08/13/10 INVENTORY 734.06
0356802 08/19/10 UNIT TOOLS 94.61 82~.67
2025418 09/08/10 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SD 080677 08/19/10 COFFEE SUPPLIES 383.57 383.57
2025419 09/08/10 07224 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC 334118 08/17/10 WAREHOUSE PAINT 324.56 324.56
2025420 09/08/10 00131 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 002405 09/01/10 BUDGET PRESENTATION 550.00 550.00
2025421 09/08/10 00101 GRAINGERINC 9327963436 08/19/10 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 354.69
9327150844 08/18/10 GREASE GUN 277.57
9326260792 08/17/10 MAINTENANCE ITEMS 124.30
9326010916 08/17/10 MAINTENANCE ITEMS 79.86 836.42
2025422 09/08/10 00713 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 48111238 08/16/10 BLADE SERVER 2,815.52 2,815.52
Page 6 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 91112010 TO 912912010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025423 09/08110 11805 IDENTIFICATION SERVICES 002415 08119110 BACKGROUND CHECK 20.00 20.00
2025424 09108110 03172 JONES &STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0073117 08117110 P1253 SAN MIGUEL HABITAT MGMT AREA 26,387.95
0070335 04/16/10 ON-CALL ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS 106.39 26,494.34
2025425 09/08110 02449 JOSEPH G POLLARD CO INC 12803191N 08113/10 LOCATOR 636.67 636.67
2025426 09108/10 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 240891 08/17/10 ASPHALT 54.40
240856 08/16110 ASPHALT 50.64 105.04
2025427 09/08/10 00491 LIGHTHOUSE INC,THE 0023126 08104110 LED LIGHTING 188.39
0028632 08/19/10 LED LIGHTING 132.90
0019115 07123/10 CENTER CONSOLE 128.71
0028653 08119110 LED LIGHTING 85.86
0028638 08/19/10 LED LIGHTING 69.55 605.41
2025428 09108/10 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 62959495 08117110 STRUT CHANNEL 461.74 461.74
2025429 09108110 00887 MIRAMAR TRUCK CENTER-SAN DIEGO 269827 08/12/10 REPAIR PART 63.00 63.00
2025430 09108110 02503 MORGAN COMPANY 16741 08116110 REPAIR PARTS 438.36 438.36
2025431 09/08/10 03623 MWH AMERICAS INC 1351647 08118/10 RWCWRF UPGRADE 8,268.75 8,268.75
2025432 09108110 10202 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC 1348709 07/14110 TEMPORARY LABOR SERVICES 20,650.00 20,650.00
2025433 09/08/10 03517 NOBEL SYSTEMS 11222 07130110 MAP BOOK 3,720.00
11223 07130110 CCTV INTEGRATION 960.00 4,680.00
2025434 09108/10 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 530194566001 08118/10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 838.66
530128816001 08/18110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.42 913.08
2025435 09/08110 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 140382 08113110 INVENTORY 25,141.37
141179 08113110 METER RETROFIT 5,731.13
141184 08113/10 INVENTORY 4,726.28 35,598.78
2025436 09108110 03017 PACIFIC SAFETY COUNCIL 67472 08127110 TRAINING 499.00 499.00
2025437 09108110 03457 PERSONAL TOUCH WEST 21708 08118/10 OUTREACH MATERIALS 441.21 441.21
2025438 09/08110 04983 PICNIC PEOPLE SAN DIEGO 3439 08106110 SUMMER PICNIC 2,526.41 2,526.41
2025439 09108110 01733 PRICE TRONCONE &12252 08113/10 SITE RENTAL 3,930.00 3,930.00
2025440 09108/10 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30121290 08119110 UNIFORMS 323.32
30121289 08/19110 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 166.12
30121291 08119/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 137.15
30120624 08117110 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 102.27
Page 7 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
30121292 08/19/10 UNIFORMS 66.41
30120623 08/17110 UNIFORMS 66.36 861.63
2025441 09/08/10 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben2408262 09/02/10 PERS CONTRIBUTION 141,923.99 141,923.99
2025442 09/08/10 10415 QUICKSTART INTELLIGENCE INPOOO06143 08/19/10 TRAINING 1,395.00 1,395.00
2025443 09/08/10 10294 QWIKPRINTS 102441348 09/01/10 FINGERPRINT 20.00 20.00
2025444 09/08/10 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLYCO INC 27827001 08/18/10 SAFETY SUPPLIES 51.61 51.61
2025445 09/08/10 06412 ROMERO,TANYA 002403 08/31/10 TUITION 283.32 283.32
2025446 09/08/10 03687 SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 40629911 CREDIT MEMO (171.42)
51619565 08/12/10 TANK SERVICE 199.92
51710563 08/03/10 TANK SERVICE 50.00 78.50
2025447 09/08/10 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 7711 08/13/10 WELDING 475.00 475.00
2025448 09/08/10 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 002412 08/26/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 40,090.24
002413 08/26/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 22,604.96
002414 08/24/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 769.51 63,464.71
2025449 09/08/10 09226 SAN DIEGO TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 5761 08/19/10 BODYWORK 363.50 363.50
2025450 09/08/10 00419 SHAPE PRODUCTS 147270 08/18/10 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 640.80 640.80
2025451 09/08/10 01651 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICALCTRS 227 08/21/10 PRE-PLACEMENT PHYSICAL 88.00 88.00
2025452 09/08/10 03592 SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION 2443483 08/18/10 DESKTOPS 25,800.94
2443839 08/19/10 HOSTBACKUP 976.76 26,777.70
2025453 09/08/10 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C44057 08/16/10 AC MAINTENANCE 1,013.00 1,013.00
2025454 09/08/10 06853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL 355087 08/15/10 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 615.29 615.29
2025455 09/08/10 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 854020 08/19/10 TOILET RENTAL 98.25 98.25
2025456 09/08/10 02987 T M PEMBERTON 28726 08/13/10 CEMENT 942.75 942.75
2025457 09/08/10 02188 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS 10038331 07/26/10 MISC ANTENNA 369.03 369.03
2025458 09/08/10 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20044488 08/16/10 TIRE SERVICE 178.82
20044641 08/19/10 TIRE SERVICE 39.34 218.16
2025459 09/08/10 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 002409 08/23/10 DISTRICT EXPENSES 872.00
002406 08/23/10 DISTRICT EXPENSES 491.13
002404 08/23/10 DISTRICT EXPENSES 133.81 '1,496.94
Page 8 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025460 09/08/10 11606 USA BLUE BOOK 213069 08/13/10 SHOP TOOLS 216.76 216.76
2025461 09/08/10 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 0899480150 08/21/10 WIRELESS SERVICES 9,060.36 9,060.36
2025462 09/08/10 12027 WALTCOMM 20100818 08/18/10 SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 4,500.00 4,500.00
2025514 09/15/10 04070 ABACOR INC 16730 07/26/10 PART INSTALL 1,507.25 1,507.25
2025515 09/15/10 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00675455 08/26/10 TEMPORARYSERVICES 2,224.00 2,224.00
2025516 09/15/10 01463 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 39468800 08/26/10 24VDC SUPPLY 135.71 135.71
2025517 09/15/10 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES#509 0509004066145 08/25/10 TRASH SERVICES 841.23
0509004067429 08/25/10 CONTAINER RENTAL 208.52
0509004068129 08/25/10 TRASH SERVICES 146.80 1,196.55
2025518 09/15/10 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570KI 09/01/10 PAGER SERVICES 135.64 135.64
2025519 09/15/10 12175 APPLE INC 002431 09/13/10 COMPUTER LOAN 2,664.24 2,664.24
2025520 09/15/10 05758 AT&T 082164572808251(08/25/10 INTERNET BANDWIDTH 1,976.64 1,976.64
2025521 09/15/10 12220 ATLAS PUMPING SERVICE 300160 08/25/10 ATLAS PUMPING 7,125.00 7,125.00
2025522 09/15/10 01630 BEARCOM 3963544 08/26/10 RADIO INSTALL 276.57 276.57
2025523 09/15/10 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI026793 08/24/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,455.05
BPI027648 08/26/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,759.89
BPI027647 08/26/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,159.76
BPI025934 08/23/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 713.61
BPI025935 08/23/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 685.94
BPI027646 08/26/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 534.92
BPI026792 08/24/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 303.20 9,612.37
2025524 09/15/10 01232 BRODING'S BATTERY 20333 08/26/10 REPAIR PARTS 163.07
20353 08/26/10 REPAIR PARTS (27.13)135.94
2025525 09/15/10 10756 BROOKFIELD HOMES 002434 09/09/10 WIO REFUND D0017-000002 19,728.30 19,728.30
2025526 09/15/10 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 37265 08/17/10 CRUSHED ROCK 245.08 245.08
2025527 09/15/10 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 073939 08/20/10 SAFETYHARNESS 405.61
073033 08/24/10 BATTERY PACK 102.21 507.82
2025528 09/15/10 02593 CITY OF CHULA VISTA 071 060PU0040810 08/24/10 UTILITY PERMITS 2,400.00 2,400.00
2025529 09/15/10 04119 CLARKSON LAB &SUPPLY INC 51274 07/30/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 387.00
Page 9 of 23
"'""'.'-",~'"L••··.,.....·+,rJ.3'VW+
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2025309THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
51206 07/30/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 362.00
51224 07/30/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 144.00 893.00
2025530 09/15/10 11520 CLINICAL LABORATORY OF 909664 08/23/10 LAB ANALYSIS 241.00 241.00
2025531 09/15/10 04398 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 002426 09/13/10 REGISTRATION FEE 55.00 55.00
2025532 09/15/10 10565 COOPER,BRIAN 17900910 09103/10 TRAVEL EXPENSE 296.68 296.68
2025533 09/15/10 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HK072053640810 08117110 HAZMAT PERMIT 866.00
HK072053630810 08/17/10 HAZMAT PERMIT 684.00
HK072053650810 08/17/10 HAZMAT PERMIT 460.00 2,010.00
2025534 09/15/10 05125 CUDLlP,JAMES 002424 09/08/10 COMPUTER LOAN 752.97 752.97
2025535 09/15/10 02603 DELL MARKETING LP XF2JCDD78 08/25/10 USB DRIVE 110.04 110.04
2025536 09/15/10 05959 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES OTW31791 08/26/10 PUMPING SERVICES 1,585.00 1,585.00
2025537 09/15/10 03417 DIRECTV 1335468613 09/05110 SATELLITE TV 10.00 10.00
2025538 09/15/10 10976 DRAKE CONTROLS -WEST LLC 54618 08/24/10 REPAIR PART 350.60 350.60
2025539 09/15/10 12272 EASTLAKE COMMUNITY CHURCH 002437 09/09/10 WIO REFUND D0698-060027 115.46 115.46
2025540 09/15/10 01012 EL CAJON FORD W49626 07/20/10 VEHICLE REPAIR 105.05 105.05
2025541 09/15/10 00331 EMPLOYMENTDEVELOPMENT DEPT 925023840910 09/13/10 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 11,631.00 11,631.00
2025542 09/15/10 03765 ENGINEERING PARTNERS INC,THE 1310325 08/23/10 DESIGN SERVICES 1,310.00 1,310.00
2025543 09/15/10 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 0080466 08/23/10 LABORATORY SERVICES 580.00 580.00
2025544 09/15/10 03725 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARC~92215482 08/24/10 ESRIEEAP 25,000.00
92197232 07/28/10 DATABASE SUPPORT 1,680.00 26,680.00
2025545 09/15/10 04986 FARR,STEVEN 002430 09/13/10 COMPUTER LOAN 877.99 877.99
2025546 09/15/10 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 0355695 08/24/10 AIRIVAC PARTS 6,397.77
03553311 08/20/10 INVENTORY 982.35
0356064 08/23/10 SHELL CUTTERS 826.29
0356188 08/24/10 SHUTOFF TOOL 453.26 8,659.67
2025547 09/15/10 11665 FIELDSTONE TRISTAN HOA 002428 09/14/10 CUSTOMER REFUND 4,320.00 4,320.00
2025548 09/15/10 09146 FIGUEROA,JIANYNE 002432 09/14/10 TUITION 901.25 901.25
2025549 09/15/10 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SD 083342 08/24/10 WATER FILTERS 488.89 I 488.89
Page100f 23
OTAYWATERDISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/112010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025550 09/15/10 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3345445 08/20/10 VEHICLE WASH 272.16
3341494 08/13110 VEHICLE WASH 75.60 347.76
2025551 09115110 03537 GHA TECHNOLOGIES INC 614045 08125110 HEADSET 269.70 269.70
2025552 09115110 01576 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 949505193 08126110 ELECTICAL TESTER 775.51 775.51
2025553 09/15110 00174 HACH COMPANY 6878329 08125110 SAMPLER REPAIRS 935.38 935.38
2025554 09115110 02629 HANSON AGGREGATES INC 625315 08120110 AGGREGATES 118.47 118.47
2025555 09115110 08610 HENRYBROS ELECTRONICS INC SM29855 08118110 RFIDTAGS 967.88 967.88
2025556 09115110 12229 HM1JOHN CARINO 255007027REF 09113/10 CUSTOMER REFUND 198.80 198.80
2025557 09115110 12271 JOSEPH J LAW 002436 09/09/10 WIO REFUND D0632-010294 6,697.53 6,697.53
2025558 09/15/10 05109 KEARNY PEARSON FORD 365305 08120110 PARTS 570.94 570.94
2025559 09115110 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 4613 08126110 PAVING SERVICES 3,217.70 3,217.70
2025560 09/15110 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 63424638 08123110 WIRE 462.86
63526512 08124110 GUY WIRE 354.75 817.61
2025561 09115110 03745 MEDEROS,CHARLES 002423 09108110 TUITION 1,341.00 1,341.00
2025562 09115110 01577 MINARIK CORPORATION 10788027DD 08124110 PLC MODULES 4,802.50 4,802.50
2025563 09115110 02293 MWH SOFT INC 09572AM 01104110 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTION 3,600.00 3,600.00
2025564 09115110 03733 NEC UNIFIED SOLUTIONS INC TMOOOOO18682 08126110 LABOR 223.00 223.00
2025565 09115/10 00996 NEW HORIZONS 1322308 09103110 COMPUTER TRAINING 2,475.00 2,471.00
2025566 09115110 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 531210734001 08125110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 157.85
531342945001 08126110 OFFICE SUPPLIES 57.08
530573464001 08120110 FOOTREST 53.82 268.75
2025567 09115/10 06856 ORPAKUSA INC 19558 08124110 FUEL SYSTEM 2,191.34 2,191.34
2025568 09115110 12270 OTAYLAKES MEDICAL CONDO 002435 09109/10 WIO REFUND D0512-010141 1,746.07 1,746.07
2025569 09115110 02334 OTAY LANDFILL 009896 08131110 WASTE DISPOSAL 297.48 297.48
2025570 09115110 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 141425 08123110 INVENTORY 13,539.38 13,539.38
2025571 09115110 02930 PACIFIC TEKINC 7453 08118110 REPAIR PART 409.55 I 409.55
Page 11 of 23
~-~w
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025572 09/15/10 03308 PBS&J 1073537 03/18/10 TECHNICAL REVIEW 770.00 770.00
2025573 09/15/10 00227 PELL MELL SUPPLY 47310600 08/25/10 NUTS &BOLTS 1,294.13 1,294.13
2025574 09/15/10 03457 PERSONALTOUCH WEST 21713 08/26/10 PENCILS 331.54 331.54
2025575 09/15/10 10929 PORTABLE POWER SYSTEMS INC 113234 08/23/10 BATTERIES 126.26 126.26
2025576 09/15/10 05499 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 37353808 08/20/10 BOTTLE RENTAL 463.05 463.05
2025577 09/15/10 07346 PRIME ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC 8620 08/23/10 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION 39,108.00
8619 08/23/10 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION 1,500.00 40,608.00
2025578 09/15/10 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30122889 08/26110 UNIFORMS 335.86
30122888 08/26/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 166.12
30122890 08/26/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 137.15
30122213 08/24/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 102.27
30122212 08/24/10 UNIFORMS 56.94
30122891 08/26/10 UNIFORMS 54.99 853.33
2025579 09/15/10 09804 PUBLICIA PRESS LTO 201008252089 08/26/10 BUSINESS CARDS 59.81
201008252079 08/26110 BUSINESS CARDS 38.06 97.87
2025580 09/15/10 09993 REPROHAUS CORP 0000130476 08/24/10 REPRODUCTION SERVICES 816.50
0000130540 08/25/10 BROCHURES 399.06 1,215.56
2025581 09/15/10 12228 ROCKWELL ENGINEERING &11645 08/16/10 PUMP PARTS 7,718.47
11658 08/17/10 REPAIR PARTS 1,334.39 9,052.86
2025582 09/15/10 05130 SAFARI MICRO INC 190307 08/24/10 BATTERY BACKUP 369.75 369.75
2025583 09/15/10 10930 SAGEDESIGNS INC 10083792 08/24/10 RADIO CABLES 1,129.81
10083791 08/13/10 RADIO CABLES 320.26 1,45Q.07
2025584 09/15/10 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 209236 08/25/10 BID ADVERTISING 105.50
209558 08/26/10 BID ADVERTISEMENT 97.75
208279 08/18/10 NOTICE OF INTENT 97.75 301.00
2025585 09/15/10 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 002420 09/01/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 18,714.15 18,714.15
2025586 09/15/10 12080 SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE LLC 0010420926 08/17/10 ADVERTISEMENT OF NOTICE 349.20
0010423533 08/24/10 BID ADVERTISEMENT 342.80
0010424040 08/25/10 BID ADVERTISEMENT 326.80 1,018.80
2025587 09/15/10 05321 SCHIFF ASSOCIATES 05351 06/30110 CATHODIC PROTECTION 4,415.75 4,415.75
2025588 09/15/10 12138 SHELBURNE SHERR COURT 109956 08/23/10 TRANSCRIPTCERT COPY 855,01 I 855.01
Page 120f 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025589 09/15/10 00258 SLOAN ELECTRIC COMPANY 0057885 08/24/10 FAN SHAFT 302.18
0057884 08/24/10 BEARING SPOOL 170.00 472.18
2025590 09/15/10 02799 TARULLI TIRE INC -SAN DIEGO 20044699 08/25/10 TIRE SERVICE 402.56 402.56
2025591 09/15/10 11289 TLCSTAFFING IVC050000043251 09/03/10 CWA INTERN 540.00 540.00
2025592 09/15/10 08542 TNB INC 8124842 08/25/10 UNLEADED FUEL 11,632.08
8124843 08/25/10 DIESELFUEL 11,471.65 23,103.73
2025593 09/15/10 07674 US BANKCORPORATE PAYMENT 002427 08/23/10 DISTRICTEXPENSES 12,403.03
002425 08/23/10 DISTRICTEXPENSES 41.74 12,444.77
2025594 09/15/10 11606 USA BLUE BOOK 220542 08/24/10 COOLING VESTS 141.82 141.82
2025595 09/15/10 02472 WCT PRODUCTS INCORPORATED 123639 08/24/10 LEAK DETECTORS 7,166.63 7,166.63
2025596 09/15/10 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 00914451N 08/26/10 APCD TESTING 400.00
00913761N 08/24/10 FUELISLAND 251.93
00913751N 08/24/10 FUEL ISLAND 225.00 876.93
2025502 09/15/10 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2408651 09/16/10 PAYROLLDEDUCTION 75.00 75.00
2025503 09/15/10 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2408647 09/16/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 150.00 150.00
2025504 09/15/10 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2408637 09/16/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,235.08 8,235.08
2025505 09/15/10 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2408639 09/16/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 770.00 770.00
2025506 09/15/10 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 002433 09/14/10 PETTY CASH 397.99 397.99
2025507 09/15/10 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENTUNIT Ben2408655 09/16/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 264.00 264.00
2025508 09/15/10 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408645 09/16/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 231.69
2025509 09/15/10 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408649 09/16/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 836.30 836.30
2025510 09/15/10 02261 STATE STREETBANK&TRUST CO Ben2408635 09/16/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,042.47 6,042.47
2025511 09/15/10 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2408653 09/16/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2025512 09/15/10 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2408641 09/16/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6,842.04 6,842.04
2025513 09/15/10 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2408643 09/16/10 401A PLAN 1,552.59 1,552.59
2025463 09/15/10 12265 ABC CONSTRUCTION Ref002408620 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000168798 1,595.37 1,595.37
Page 13 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025464 09/15/10 12268 ACI COMMERCIAL Ref002408623 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000169403 14.76 14.76
2025465 09/15/10 12245 AMANDA MANZO Ref002408599 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000154053 91.82 91.82
2025466 09/15/10 12252 AMERICAN EAGLE REAL ESTATE Ref002408607 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000160107 45.78 45.78
2025467 09/15/10 12156 ATLANTIC&PACIFIC REAL ESTATE Ref002408605 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000158967 11.37 11.37
2025468 09/15/10 12260 CAMILLE BRUNO Ref002408615 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000162874 44.15 44.15
2025469 09/15/10 12254 COE INVESTMENTS Ref002408609 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000162165 108.74 108.74
2025470 09/15/10 12257 ED PREHODEN Ref002408612 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000162525 40.41 40.41
2025471 09/15/10 12267 EDEN AGUIRRE Ref002408622 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000168846 42.44 42.44
2025472 09/15/10 12258 ELAINE WALKER Ref002408613 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000162528 107.00 107.00
2025473 09/15/10 12261 EMCTRUST Ref002408616 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000163233 32.24 32.24
2025474 09/15/10 12238 FRED FABIAN Ref002408592 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000091455 18.62 18.62
2025475 09/15/10 12233 GORDON TERHUNE Ref002408587 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000024117 7.75 7.75
2025476 09/15/10 12236 GUADALUPE ROLON Ref002408590 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000058470 79.62 79.62
2025477 09/15/10 12246 HIDEAKI TAKASE Ref002408600 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000154713 51.57 51.57
2025478 09/15/10 12253 INSTACLOSE REAL ESTATE Ref002408608 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000162085 66.56 66.56
2025479 09/15/10 12237 JACQUELINE CHRISTIAN Ref002408591 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000063979 230.33 230.33
2025480 09/15/10 12256 JC AGAJANIAN Ref002408611 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000162204 27.13 27.13
2025481 09/15/10 12243 JUAN GONZALEZ Ref002408597 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000146786 41.33 41.33
2025482 09/15/10 12242 K HOVNANIAN HOMES Ref002408596 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000142171 776.80 776.80
2025483 09/15/10 12235 KAREN ESCOBEDO Ref002408589 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000050802 250.00 250.00
2025484 09115/10 12231 KENNETH MATTERS Ref002408585 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000003752 46.70 46.70
2025485 09/15/10 12240 KRISTY BEAUCHAMP Ref002408594 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000119171 8.70 8.70
2025486 09/15/10 12248 LORENA GUILLEN Ref002408602 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000158276 850.00 850.00
2025487 09/15/10 12266 LORENASABLAN Ref002408621 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000168827 91.84 91.84
Page 14 of 23
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025488 09/15/10 12259 MEJ SADEGHI Ref002408614 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000162629 92.04 92.04
2025489 09/15/10 12239 MELVIN FERNANDEZ Ref002408593 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000092342 32.75 32.75
2025490 09/15/10 12255 NEW DAWN REALTY Ref002408610 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000162194 7.96 7.96
2025491 09/15/10 12262 PATRICIA MCKELVEY Ref002408617 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000163472 38.18 38.18
2025492 09/15/10 12249 PGI INVESTMENT LLC Ref002408603 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000158478 25.59 25.59
2025493 09/15/10 12234 RAQUEL KAMAJI Ref002408588 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000041014 38.16 38.16
2025494 09/15/10 12244 RICHARD CRATER Ref002408598 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000147777 39.89 39.89
2025495 09/15/10 12251 RUSSELLELROD Ref002408606 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000159285 75.57 75.57
2025496 09/15/10 12250 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002408604 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000158728 57.14 57.14
2025497 09/15/10 12247 SAN DIEGO REO REALTORS Ref002408601 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000154944 66.19 66.19
2025498 09/15/10 12264 SANDRA LOZANO Ref002408619 09114/10 UB Refund Cst#0000168589 54.82 54.82
2025499 09/15/10 12241 SRM CONTRACTINGAND PAVING Ref002408595 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000141408 685.73 685.73
2025500 09/15/10 12263 TIM CARROLL Ref002408618 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst#0000163620 23.28 23.28
2025501 09/15/10 12232 ZARMINA KHALlQ Ref002408586 09/14/10 UB Refund Cst #0000019736 113.70 113.70
2025597 09/22/10 06839 A GLASCO 68368 08/31/10 STORAGE ROOM 3,186.00 3,186.00
2025598 09/22/10 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1010 08/30/10 PLAN CHECKING 19,262.50 19,262.50
2025599 09/22/10 11803 AEROTEKENVIRONMENTAL OE00677031 09102/10 TEMPORARY SERVICES 2,178.00 2,178.00
2025600 09/22/10 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131169137 08/31/10 AQUA AMMONIA 1,878.84
131169136 08/31/10 AQUA AMMONIA 1,499.91
131169139 08/31/10 AQUA AMMONIA 828.75
131169138 08/31/10 AQUA AMMONIA 355.47 4,562.97
2025601 09/22/10 00132 AIRGAS WEST INC 103116679 08/31/10 BREATHING AIR 28.85 28.85
2025602 09/22/10 06165 ANITA FIRE HOSE COMPANY ETC 11614 08/31/10 HOSE REPAIR 229.04 229.04
2025603 09/22/10 03285 AZTEC FIRE &SAFETY 45534 08/27/10 FIRE SPRINKLER 600.00 600.00
2025604 09/22/10 00145 BARRETTENGINEERED PUMPS 072607 08/30/10 SUCTION FLAPPER 146.81 146.81
2025605 09/22/10 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI029247 08/31/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,428.54
Page 15 of 23
,".'':__• _,~o:;::,,,".'IE_.'u ;,'~."'."""."',,,,........,.."'......................,...
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check#Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
BPI028710 08/30/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,053.70
BPI029997 09/02/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 743.59
BPI028709 08/30/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 667.50
BPI028711 08/31/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 650.21
BPI029998 09/02110 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 524.54
BPI029999 09/02/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 305.51 7,373.59
2025606 09/22110 08156 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 435709 08/26/10 LEGAL SERVICES 113.75 113.75
2025607 09/22/10 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 37424 09/02/10 CRUSHED ROCK 215.21
37397 08/31/10 CRUSHED ROCK 95.23 310.44
2025608 09/22/10 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 074765 08/30/10 OXYGEN SENSOR 193.56 193.56
2025609 09/22/10 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7210 09/01/10 RECORDS ASSISTANCE 1,824.96
7208 09/01/10 RECORDS STORAGE 328.25
7211 09/01/10 SCANNING SERVICES 326.82 2,480.03
2025610 09/22/10 09801 CENTERBEAMINC 122746 09/01/10 NETWORK MONITORING 1,697.00 1,697.00
2025611 09/22/10 01126 CENTURY WHEEL &RIM CN5915901 08/04/10 TRAILER PARTS 281.83 281.83
2025612 09/22/10 04119 CLARKSON LAB &SUPPLY INC 51862 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 1,356.00
51858 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 412.00
51859 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 409.00
51345 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 362.00
51485 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 362.00
51655 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICALSERVICES 259.00
51861 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICALSERVICES 254.00
51860 08/31/10 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 201.00 3,615.00
2025613 09/22/10 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 1220676 07/14/10 CARTRIDGES 527.44
12283730 08/27/10 LABELS 252.30 779.74
2025614 09/22/10 08387 COUNTY OF SO-LANDFILL MGMNT 201005 09/03/10 MICROTURBINEPOWER GENERATION 9,686.05 9,686.05
2025615 09/22/10 11286 CPM PARTNERS INC 10029 09/01/10 SCHEDULING SERVICES 23,375.00 23,375.00
2025616 09/22110 03744 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 809851 09/07/10 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 102.00 102.00
2025617 09/22/10 08495 DIAZ,JENNY 002439 09/15/10 TUITION 425.00 425.00
2025618 09/22/10 02519 DIEHL EVANS &COMPANY LLP 69175 08/31/10 AUDIT SERVICES 9,900.00 9,900.00
2025619 09/22/10 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 00506031N 08/31/10 ADMINISTRATION FEES 555.00 555.00
2025620 09/22/10 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 0080583 08/27/10 LABORATORY SERVICES 470.00 470.00
Page 16 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025621 09/22/10 03725 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARC~92217742 08/30/10 DATABASE SUPPORT 1,400.00 1,400.00
2025622 09/22/10 00645 FEDEX 722774451 09/17/10 MAIL SERVICES 13.49 13.49
2025623 09/22/10 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 0353609 08/31/10 CONVERSION PARTS 14,793.60
0357409 08/30/10 INVENTORY 4,192.49
0357412 08/30/10 INVENTORY 3,660.53
0357414 08/30/10 INVENTORY 1,884.67
0357405 08/30/10 INVENTORY 1,296.84
0357398 08/30/10 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 512.22
0356822 08/30/10 12"END CAP 195.75 26,536.10
2025624 09/22110 12187 FIRSTAMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 90034080 08/31/10 ONLINE MAPS 99.00 99.00
2025625 09/22/10 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES -SD 083297 09/02/10 COFFEE SUPPLIES 136.97 136.97
2025626 09/22/10 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3349062 08/27/10 VEHICLE WASH 246.24
3349065 08/27/10 VEHICLE WASH 68.04 314.28
2025627 09/22/10 06291 GARCIA CALDERON &RUIZ LLP 4251 09/07/10 LEGAL SERVICES 64,260.70 64,260.70
2025628 09/22/10 00131 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS 002445 08/30/10 MEMBERSHIPISUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 835.00 835.00
2025629 09/22/10 00101 GRAINGER INC 9337429824 08/31/10 SPRAYGUN 43.51 43.51
2025630 09/22/10 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 30607 08/31/10 CITRIX SUPPORT 1,397.38 1,397.38
2025631 09/22/10 00174 HACH COMPANY 6889807 09/02/10 ANALYZER 2,174.50 2,174.50
2025632 09/22/10 04472 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIO 66 08/31/10 CONSULTANT SERVICES 3,600.00 3,600.00
2025633 09/22/10 11874 HERNDON SOLUTIONS GROUP 1163 09/01/10 COMPLIANCE SUPPORT 2,555.00 2,555.00
2025634 09/22/10 00713 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 48189368 08/31/10 BLADE SERVER 1,648.08 1,64~.08
2025635 09/22/10 06843 HI-TECH AIR CONDITIONING 22436 08/31/10 AC MAINTENANCE 650.00 650.00
2025636 09/22/10 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 35485 08/31/10 PLANT SERVICES 186.00 186.00
2025637 09/22/10 02449 JOSEPH G POLLARD CO INC 12815631N 08/31/10 UNIT TOOLS 972.58 972.58
2025638 09/22/10 02156 JWC ENVIRONMENTAL 36389 09/02/10 GRINDER 9,280.08 9,280.08
2025639 09/22/10 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 570634 08/31/10 DELIVERY SERVICES 343.20 343.20
2025640 09/22/10 03607 LEE &RO INC 83723 09/02110 P2009 -DESIGN OF 36-INCH PIPELINE 2,169.00 2,169.00
2025641 09/22/10 01211 MAJOR IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC 605469 08/30/10 HAND PUMPS 704.70 I 704.70
Page 17 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025642 09/22/10 00628 MANHATTAN NATIONAL LIFE 002440 09/15/10 VOLUNTARY LIFE INSURANCE 403.93 403.93
2025643 09/22/10 02902 MARSTON+MARSTONINC 201091 09102110 PUBLIC RELATIONS 3,852.50
201093 09/02/10 BI-NATIONAL DESAL 3,442.50 7,295.00
2025644 09/22/10 05329 MASTER METER INC 01741301N 09/02/10 INVENTORY 104,050.37 104,050.37
2025645 09/22/10 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 64426925 09/02/10 STRUT CHANNEL 223.45 223.45
2025646 09/22/10 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL &ABRASIVE 22214500 08/31/10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 637.53
22214501 09/01/10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 104.05 741.58
2025647 09/22/10 12016 MTGL INC 0019105 08/31/10 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES 6,030.00 6,030.00
2025648 09/22/10 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 531939921001 08/31/10 HARD DRIVE 254.46
532306190001 09/02/10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139.98
532015645001 09/01/10 PARALLEL CONVERTER 91.89 486.33
2025649 09/22/10 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 141396 08/27/10 METER RETROFIT 10,889.14 10,889.14
2025650 09/22/10 05497 PAYPAL INC 8651766 08/31/10 PAYMENT SERVICES 54.10 54.10
2025651 09/22/10 03308 PBS&J 1088470 08/31/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 5,792.50 5,792.50
2025652 09/22/10 05499 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 37508847 09/01/10 WELDING SUPPLIES.261.33 261.33
2025653 09/22/10 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30124314 09/02/10 UNIFORMS 327.86
30124313 09/02/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 166.12
30124315 09/02/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 137.15
30123637 08/31/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 102.27
30124316 09/02/10 UNIFORMS 69.74
30123636 08/31/10 UNIFORMS 58.94 862.08
2025654 09/22/10 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT Ben2408633 09/16/10 PERS CONTRIBUTION 141,487.33 141,481.33
2025655 09/22/10 09804 PUBLICIA PRESS LTO 20100831209871 08/31/10 BUSINESS CARDS 38.06 38.06
2025656 09/22/10 12274 RAYWONG 002438 09/15/10 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 552.00 552.00
2025657 09/22/10 02041 RBF CONSULTING 10080020 09/01/10 CIP P2009 -36 INCH PIPELINE 49,070.00
10080022 09/01/10 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 4,640.00
10080021 09/01/10 SUPPLYLINK 970.00 54,680.00
2025658 09/22/10 02513 REXEL 801088229 08/31/10 SOX LAMPS 416.34 416.34
2025659 09/22/10 05130 SAFARI MICRO INC 190392 08/27/10 PRINTER 520.91 520.91
Page 18 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025660 09/22110 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 7725 09/01/10 WELDING 1,950.00
7722 08/31/10 WELDING 340.00 2,290.00
2025661 09/22/10 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 002443 09/07/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 11,440.90 11,440.90
2025662 09/22/10 07676 SAN MIGUEL FIRE PROTECTION 002421 08/30/10 TEMPORARY LABOR 8,984.74 8,984.74
2025663 09/22/10 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 854846 08/27/10 TOILET RENTAL 80.06
854847 08/27/10 TOILET RENTAL 80.06
854848 08/27/10 TOILET RENTAL 80.06
855080 08/30/10 TOILET RENTAL 80.06 320.24
2025664 09/22/10 11749 STEPHEN V MCCUE ESQ 002441 09/13/10 LEGAL SERVICES 15,067.50 15,067.50
2025665 09/22/10 02987 T M PEMBERTON 28732 08/20/10 CEMENT 528.75 528.75
2025666 09/22/10 11289 TLC STAFFING IVC050000043317 09/10/10 CWAINTERN 270.00 270.00
2025667 09/22/10 04977 T-MOBILE 4150860450910 09/05/10 CELL PHONE SERVICES 247.33 247.33
2025668 09/22/10 12084 TRIACTIVE INC 10793 08/31/10 SOFTWARE SUPPORT 36.72 36.72
2025669 09/22/10 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 820100448 09/01/10 UNDERGROUND ALERTS 268.50 268.50
2025670 09/22/10 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWESTINC 89280572001 08/17/10 CONCRETE 140.29 140.29
2025671 09/22/10 00350 UNITED STATES POSTALSERVICE 104339510910 09/14/10 REIMBURSE POSTAGE MACHINE 2,100.00 2,100.00
2025672 09/22/10 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 002442 08/23110 DISTRICT EXPENSES 3,810.27 3,810.27
2025673 09/22/10 08028 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMEN-SD100106 08/31/10 INSPECTION SERVICES 8,290.00 8,290.00
2025674 09/22/10 10340 WAGEWORKS INC 87514 09/01/10 FLEXIBLE SPENDING 560.40 560.40
2025675 09/22/10 11692 WEST COASTIND COATINGS INC 5 09/01/10 RESERVOIR COATING 70,198.38 70,19$.38
2025676 09/22/10 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 00916391N 08/31/10 VEEDER-ROOT REPAIR 4,706.73 4,706.73
2025677 09/22/10 12277 ZAKGHANIM 230008547REF 09/21/10 CUSTOMER REFUND 11,572.11 11,572.11
2025678 09/29/10 11599 A B HASHMI INC 3 09/03/10 SEWER REPLACEMENT 31,254.59
00008741 09/03/10 RETAINAGE RELEASE 4,454.70 35,709.29
2025679 09/29/10 11798 A D HINSHAWASSOCIATES 3536 09/06/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 1,175.54 1,175.54
2025680 09/29/10 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 2407 09/21/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 8,160.00
2414 09/23/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 4,750.00 12,910.00
Page190f 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025681 09/29/10 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00678540 09109/10 TEMPORARY SERVICES 2,205.25 2,205.25
2025682 09/29/10 00315 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL 1041096578 09/07/10 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 250.00 250.00
2025683 09/29/10 03446 AMERICAN SOCIETYOF CIVIL 002454 09/24/10 REGISTRATION FEE 25.00
002458 09/24/10 REGISTRATION FEE 25.00 50.00
2025684 09/29/10 00107 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN 7000239848 09/22110 MULTI-USER LICENSE 1,078.00 1,078.00
2025685 09/29/10 00107 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN 7000260674 09/02/10 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 82.00 82.00
2025686 09/29/10 00002 ANSWER INC 3822 09/22/10 ANSWERING SERVICES 1,000.00 1,000.00
2025687 09/29/10 00501 AT&T 05089487890910 09/01/10 CONFERENCE PHONE SERVICE 150.71 150.71
2025688 09/29/10 07785 AT&T 000001602103 09/02/10 PHONE SERVICES 5,838.47 5,838.47
2025689 09/29/10 04806 BJ'S RENTALS 305571 09/07/10 CONCRETE 182.70 182.70
2025690 09/29/10 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI030875 09107/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,471.03
BPI030874 09/07/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 785.08
BPI031286 09/09/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 606.40
BPI031285 09/09/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 378.13
BPI019219 07/29/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 261.70
BPI030876 09/07/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,393.96
BPI031767 09/09/10 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,681.51 9,577.81
2025691 09/29/10 02977 BROWN,VINCENT 002447 09/21/10 SAFETY BOOTS 148.14 148.14
2025692 09/29/10 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 37478 09/09/10 CRUSHED ROCK 125.72 125.72
2025693 09/29/10 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 96451 09/07110 ASPHALT 546.45 546.45
2025694 09/29/10 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 075069 09/07/10 LANYARDS 447.17 447-17
2025695 09/29/10 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7209 09101110 SCANNING 244.58 244.58
2025696 09/29/10 11806 COR-O-VAN DATA STORAGE INC DS12392558 09/03/10 DATA STORAGE 355.93 355.93
2025697 09/29/10 06415 CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC LLC 00490529 CREDIT MEMO (2,749.24)
00490476 08/30/10 REPAIR PART 2,813.54
00490531 08/31/10 REPAIR PART 2,469.38 2,533.68
2025698 09/29/10 01335 DICKSON COMPANY 803696 09108/10 CHART RECORDER 591.00 591.00
2025699 09/29/10 03417 DIRECTV 1345410251 09/19/10 SATELLITE TV 5.00 5.00
2025700 09/29/10 04467 ENGINEERING &GENERAL 002451 09/23/10 REGISTRATION FEE 45.00
Page 20 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FORCHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/112010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
002460 09/28/10 REGISTRATION FEE 45.00 90.00
2025701 09/29/10 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 0090077 09/07/10 LABORATORY SERVICES 515.00 515.00
2025702 09/29110 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS #1082 0357402 09/07/10 HYDRANT ADAPTERS 1,087.07
03549331 09/08/10 METERRETROFIT 627.32 1,714.39
2025703 09/29/10 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3360447 09/03/10 VEHICLE WASH 194.40 194.40
2025704 09/29110 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2408887 09/30/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 75.00 75.00
2025705 09/29/10 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2408883 09/30/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 150.00 150.00
2025706 09/29/10 03094 FULLCOURTPRESS 21393 09/07/10 BILL INSERTS 1,693.63 1,693.63
2025707 09/29/10 00101 GRAINGER INC 9343687324 09/09/10 POWER METERS 933.01 933.01
2025708 09/29/10 02187 GREENSCAPE 2464 09/01/10 LANDSCAPING SERVICES 6,090.00 6,090.00
2025709 09/29/10 02629 HANSON AGGREGATES INC 626770 09/07/10 AGGREGATES 114.47 114.47
2025710 09/29/10 10973 HDR ENGINEERING INC 227202H 09/07/10 TEMPORARY LABOR 4,200.00 4,200.00
2025711 09/29/10 08969 INFOSEND INC 45335 08/31/10 BILLING POSTAGE 15,658.48
45334 08/31/10 BILL PRINTING SERVICES 6,940.52 22,599.00
2025712 09/29/10 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SD009100233 09/01/10 JANITORIAL SERVICES 1,062.84 1,062.84
2025713 09/29/10 12280 JOHN STENBERG 625305613REF 09/22/10 CUSTOMER REFUND 75.00 75.00
2025714 09/29/10 01735 JOHNSON,PAMELA 002453 09/23/10 TUITION 125.00 125.00
2025715 09/29/10 03172 JONES &STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0073116 08/17/10 ENVIRONMENTALCONSULTING 5,343.52 5,343.52
2025716 09/29/10 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 4620 09/09/10 PAVING PATCHES 4,876.85 4,876.85
2025717 09/29/10 02902 MARSTON+MARSTONINC 201082 08/02/10 JAMACHAPIPELINE COMMUNITY OUTREACH 595.00
201092 09/02/10 JAMACHAPIPELINE COMMUNITY OUTREACH 297.50 892.50
2025718 09/29/10 03792 MARTINEZ,STEPHEN 002448 09/21/10 SAFETYBOOTS 119.61 119.61
2025719 09/29/10 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL &ABRASIVE 22214502 09/09/10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 52.03 52.03
2025720 09/29/10 03523 NATIONALDEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2408873 09/30/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,243.09 8,243.09
2025721 09/29/10 09884 NATIONAL SAFETYCOMPLIANCE INC 47156 08/31/10 RANDOM DRUG TESTING 555.74 555.74
2025722 09/29/10 05494 NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA INC 901500243048 09/12/10 AIRTRAK 3,756.34 3,756.34
Page 21 of 23
OTAYWATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025723 09/29/10 03215 O'DONNELL,MICHAEL 002457 09/29/10 SAFETY BOOTS 137.01 137.01
2025724 09/29/10 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2408875 09/30/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION -ASSN DUES 770.00 770.00
2025725 09/29/10 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 141674 09/09/10 INVENTORY 632.32 632.32
2025726 09/29/10 03308 PBS&J 1088632 09/05/10 PROFESSIONALSERVICES 2,138.00 2,138.00
2025727 09/29/10 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 25816 09/09/10 CUTTING SERVICES 450.00 450.00
2025728 09/29/10 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 00246 09/28/10 PETTY CASH 585.86 585.86
2025729 09/29/10 12188 PHOTO GEODETIC CORPORATION 4165 09/03/10 AERIAL MAP 3,150.00 3,150.00
2025730 09/29/10 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 526981 09/03/10 PSD RENTAL 208.80 208.80
2025731 09/29/10 10662 PROFESSIONALMAINTENANCE 77658 09/01/10 JANITORIAL SERVICES 2,675.00 2,675.00
2025732 09/29/10 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30126129 09/09/10 UNIFORMS 323.86
30126128 09/09/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 166.12
30126130 09/09/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 137.15
30125376 09/07/10 MATS,TOWELS &SUPPLIES 102.27
30126131 09/09/10 UNIFORMS 63.86
30125375 09/07/10 UNIFORMS 54.94 848.20
2025733 09/29/10 12279 RAQUEL OTIS 626092001 REF 09/16/10 CUSTOMER REFUND 721.52 721.52
2025734 09/29/10 09993 REPROHAUS CORP 0000130619 08/26/10 REPRODUCTION SERVICES 260.37 260.37
2025735 09/29/10 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTYASSESSOR 2010083 09/10/10 ASSESSOR DATA 125.00 125.00
2025736 09/29/10 10972 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SYMPOSIUM 002455 09/27/10 REGISTRATION FEES 50.00 50.00
2025737 09/29/10 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS &ELECTRIC 002452 09/21/10 UTILITY EXPENSES 1,438.57 1,438.57
2025738 09/29/10 07676 SAN MIGUEL FIRE PROTECTION 002422 09/09/10 TEMPORARYLABOR 4,183.65 4,183.65
2025739 09/29/10 09422 SHEA HOMES 002450 09/21/10 METER REFUND 4,901.81 4,901.81
2025740 09/29/10 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 856187 09/08/10 TOILET RENTAL 80.06 80.06
2025741 09/29/10 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408891 09/30/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 264.00 264.00
2025742 09/29/10 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408881 09/30/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2025743 09/29/10 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2408885 09/30/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 836.30 836.30
Page 22 of 23
OTAYWATERDISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2025309 THROUGH 2025755
RUN DATES 9/1/2010 TO 9/29/2010
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2025744 09/29/10 02261 STATE STREET BANK &TRUSTCO Ben2408871 09/30/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 6.043.56 6.043.56
2025745 09/29/10 11754 TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATES K30800116 09/08/10 CONSULTING SERVICES 2.098.75 2.098.75
2025746 09/29/10 11289 TLC STAFFING IVC050000043379 09117110 CWAINTERN 810.00 810.00
2025747 09/29/10 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2408889 09/30/10 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2025748 09/29/10 00350 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 10433951 0910A 09/28/10 REIMBURSE POSTAGE MACHINE 2.100.00 2.100.00
2025749 09/29/10 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 102720000250 09/29/10 BASIC L1FE/AD&D &SUPP LIFE INS 5,981.44 5,981.44
2025750 09/29/10 03212 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE Ben2408867 09/30/10 CONTRIBUTION TO LTO 5.983.90 5,983.90
2025751 09/29/10 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 972494 08/31/10 SECURITYSERVICES 307.55 307.55
2025752 09/29/10 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2408877 09/30/10 DEFERRED COMP PLAN 7,050.63 7,050.63
2025753 09/29/10 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2408879 09/30/10 401A PLAN 1,432.59 1,432.59
2025754 09/29/10 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 64004 09/07/10 PEST CONTROL 115.00 115.00
2025755 09/29/10 03131 WESTERN HOSE &GASKET 220691 09/08/10 HOSE 839.15 839.15
GRAND TOTAL 2,580,208.37 2,580,208.37
Page 23 of 23