Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-04-12 Board Packet 1 OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING DISTRICT BOARDROOM 2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY April 4, 2012 3:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 7, 2012 AND SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 14, 2012 5. RECESS FOR A RECEPTION FOR DEPARTING BOARD MEMBER JAIME BONILLA 6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR 7. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A PARTICULAR ITEM: a) DECLARE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SURPLUS TO THE DIS- TRICT’S NEEDS b) APPROVE THE FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF A CONFINED SPACE TRAINING PROP AT THE HEARTLAND RE- GIONAL FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY LOCATED ON THE DISTRICT’S REGULATORY SITE IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000 ACTION ITEMS 8. ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS 2 a) APPROVE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 24-INCH RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE ON ALTA ROAD, NORTH OF LONE STAR ROAD, FOR A PORTION OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT, RecPL-24-INCH 860 ZONE, ALTA ROAD/AIRWAY ROAD (R2077), IN THE AMOUNT OF $930,962.16 (KENNEDY) 9. BOARD a) DISCUSSION ON APPOINTMENT TO VACANCY ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DIVISION 2 b) DISCUSSION OF 2012 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR REPORTS 10. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT a) SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE 11. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS 12. PRESIDENT’S REPORT/REQUESTS a) Committee Appointments 13. ADJOURNMENT 3 All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board. The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website. Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280. If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at (619) 670-2280 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Certification of Posting I certify that on March 29, 2012, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code Section §54954.2). Executed at Spring Valley, California on March 29, 2012. /s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary 1 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT March 7, 2012 1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:34 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Directors Present: Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Directors Absent: Bonilla (out-of-town on business) Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Asst. General Manager German Alvarez, General Counsel Daniel Shinoff, Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod Posada, Chief of Operations Pedro Porras, Chief of Administration Rom Sarno, District Secretary Susan Cruz and others per attached list. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA President Jose Lopez recommended that item 16a, Receive Nominations and Appoint a Member and Alternate Member to the City of Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency’s Oversight Board, be deferred to a later date when all board members are present to consider the item. He proposed that the item be added to the agenda of the Special Board meeting to be held on March 19, 2012 when all members are anticipated to be present. A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Robak and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Director Bonilla to approve the deferral of Item 16a, Receive Nominations and Appoint a Member and Alternate Member to the City of Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency’s Oversight Board, to be addressed at the special board meeting to be held on March 19, 2012. AGENDA ITEM 4 2 5. RECOGNITION OF EMPLOYEES RETIRING FROM THE DISTRICT: a) MANNY MAGANA, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS; 9 YEARS OF SERVICE b) LARRY OLDS, LEAD RECYCLED WATER DISTRIBUTION OPERATOR, 20 YEARS OF SERVICE c) DAVID CHARLES, PUBLIC SERVICES MANAGER, 31 YEARS OF SERVICE On behalf of the District and the Board, President Lopez presented plaques to Mssrs. Manny Magana, Larry Olds and David Charles in recognition of their retirement from the District. The members of the board expressed their appreciation to the retirees and thanked them for their dedicated service to the District. 6. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 1, 2012 AND SPECIAL BOARD MEETING OF FEBRUARY 21, 2012 A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Director Bonilla to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of February 1, 2012 and the special meeting of February 21, 2012. 7. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA No one wished to be heard. 8. RECESS OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING AND CONVENE A MEETING OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY The Otay Water District board meeting was recessed at 3:48 p.m. and a meeting of the Otay Water District Financing Authority board was convened. 9. ROLL CALL 3 Directors Present: Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak 10. RE-AFFIRM OFFICERS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Robak and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Director Bonilla to re-affirm officers of the Otay Water District Financing Authority as follows: a) Director Lopez as President b) Director Gonzalez as Vice-President c) Mr. Mark Watton as Executive Director d) Mr. Joe Beachem as Treasurer/Auditor e) Ms. Susan Cruz as Secretary 11. ADJOURN OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING AND RECONVENE OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING President Lopez adjourned the Otay Water District Financing Authority meeting at 3:52 p.m. and convened the Otay Water District board meeting. CONSENT ITEMS 12. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A PARTICULAR ITEM: Director Mark Robak requested that Items 13e and 13f be pulled for discussion. e) APPROVE ENGAGEMENT LETTER FROM THE AUDITING FIRM OF WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS, LLP TO CONTRACT FOR AUDIT SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2012 Finance Manager Jim Cudlip indicated that Diehl and Evans, LLP has performed the audit of the District’s financial statements for the past three (3) years and staff is recommending that the District retain Diehl and Evans, LLP to perform the District’s FY 2012 audit. He noted that the board had approved Diehl and Evans, LLP to perform the District’s audit for one (1) year with four (4) additional one year options. This would be the third of the four one-year options. 4 Mr. Cudlip stated that in FY 2011, after the audit on the District’s financial statements had started, Diehl and Evans merged with White and Nelson creating the firm White Nelson Diehl Evans, LLP (WNDE). He indicated that the audit team will stay the same for FY 2012 and that the service fee increased slightly from $33,000 to $34,000. It was noted that a year ago, at the board’s direction, the Diehl and Evans’ partner overseeing the audit was changed from Mr. Harvey Schroeder to Mr. Nitin Patel as it was felt that it would provide a new view of the District’s financials. Mr. Schroeder had overseen the audit for two (2) years and this will be Mr. Patel’s second year to oversee the audit. Mr. Cudlip indicated that the manager overseeing the FY 2012 audit will be Mr. David Foreman who worked with Mr. Patel last year. In response to a question from Director Robak, Mr. Nitin Patel stated that there are no particular areas of focus for the audit at this time, but will be addressed once the audit begins. A motion was made by Director Robak, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Director Bonilla to approve staffs’ recommendation. f) APPROVE A THREE-YEAR AGREEMENT (ONE-YEAR WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW FOR TWO ADDITIONAL YEARS) WITH MARSTON+MARSTON, INC. FOR THE PUBLIC OUTREACH AND CREATIVE SERVICES FOR AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $200,000 FOR THE LIFE OF THE AGREEMENT. THE CONTRACT ALLOWS THE DISTRICT TO CONTINUE USING MARSTON+MARSTON, INC. UNTIL EITHER PARTY CHOOSES TO TERMINATE THE BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP Communications Officer Armando Buelna stated that Board Policy establishes procedures for contracts exceeding $50,000, and in compliance with that policy, staff forwarded a RFP to 20 local public relations firms. The District received five (5) responses. Mr. Buelna stated that after review of the RFPs, and based on the overall evaluation and scoring by a panel, Marston+Marston ranked the highest based on their experience working with water agencies, qualifications and knowledge of technical 5 support related to the District’s needs. He recommended that the Board approve a contract with Marston+Marston. It was indicated that Marston+Marston’s services include assistance with news letters, press releases, the District’s Consumer Confidence Report, and social media. Mr. Buelna indicated that the firm is currently working on creating a link for the District’s Facebook, Twitter and YouTube sites. Directors Robak and Croucher expressed their support of the RFP process and bid results and stated that they looked forward to the District continuing to work with Marston+Marston. A motion was made by Director Robak, seconded by Director Croucher and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Directors Bonilla to approve staffs’ recommendation. Upon a motion by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Directors Bonilla to approve the following remaining consent calendar items: a) APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT WITH NEWest CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE RALPH W. CHAPMAN WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY UPGRADE PROJECT, IN AN AMOUNT NOT- TO-EXCEED $17,896 b) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION FOR THE 30-INCH POTABLE WATER PIPELINE IN HUNTE PARKWAY IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $1,212,257.13 c) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. (AIS) AND AUTHORIZE AN AGREEMENT WITH AIS FOR THE 850-3 RESERVOIR EXTERIOR COATING AND UPGRADES PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $293,300 6 d) ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 531 AMENDING SECTIONS 25, CONDITIONS FOR WATER SERVICE; 28, CONNECTION FEES AND CHARGES FOR POTABLE OR RECLAIMED WATER SERVICE; 38, SERVICE FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS; OF THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF ORDINANCES TO INCLUDE MANDATED FIRE SERVICE STANDBY CAPACITY FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES g) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4193 DESIGNATING MR. JAMES BOND, COUNCILMEMBER FROM THE CITY OF ENCINITAS AND DIRECTOR FOR SAN DIEGUITO WATER DISTRICT, TO VOTE FOR THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVES TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY) WHEN BOTH OWD REPRESENTATIVES ARE ABSENT FROM A MEETING OF THE AUTHORITY ACTION ITEMS 13. GENERAL MANAGER a) REVIEW DRAFT QUESTIONNAIRES FOR THE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AND AWARENESS AND CALL CENTER SURVEYS Communications Officer Armando Buelna indicated that Rea & Parker Research will perform two customer surveys on behalf of the District: 1) Customer Satisfaction and Awareness Survey (General Survey) and 2) Call Center Survey. Mr. Buelna stated that the margin of error for the surveys is ±5.7% with 95% confidence level. He indicated to achieve this level of confidence, the consultant will make several thousand phone calls to acquire 300 valid respondents. If the District wished to reduce the margin of error to ±5%, many more calls would need to be made, which would then require additional data processing and would, thus, increase the cost to perform the survey. At the request of the Finance, Administration and Communications Committee, Mr. Buelna provided to the Board the following additional cost to obtain lower margins of error: o Reduce Margin of Error to ±5% is $2,500 per survey ($5,000 for both surveys) o Reduce Margin of Error to ±4.5% is $4,375 per survey ($8,750 for both surveys) o Reduce Margin of Error to ±4% is $6,500 per survey ($13,000 for both surveys) Mr. Buelna indicated that the District has funds budgeted to cover the cost of both surveys with a margin of error of ±5.7%. 7 In response to a question from Director Gonzalez, Mr. Buelna stated that there is an option to reduce the margin of error with one survey to ±4% or ±4.5% and have the other survey with a margin of error at ±5.7%. Upon inquiry by Director Robak regarding the possibility of including re-purified water questions in the survey, General Manager Mark Watton stated that it could be coordinated with Rea & Parker Research to do so. He also stated that additional input/information about re-purified water is available from the results of the City of Chula Vista’s survey as it contained more extensive questions pertaining to re- purified water. A motion was made by Director Gonzalez, seconded by Director Croucher and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Directors Bonilla to reduce the margin of error to ±4.5% for the customer survey and maintain the call center survey’s margin of error at ±5.7%. 14. ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS a) APPROVE THE WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT REPORT DATED JANUARY 2012 FOR THE HAWANO PROJECT Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy indicated that Board approval is required for the the submittal of the WSA Report to the County of San Diego. He discussed the background of Senate Bills 610 and 221, and indicated that SB 221 did not apply as this project is an industrial development. Mr. Kennedy stated that the Hawano Project involves the development of a 79.6 acre parcel of twenty three (23) Industrial/Commercial lots and is located within the East Otay Mesa Specific Plan, Subarea 1 of the County’s General Plan at the southwest corner of the intersection of Alta Road and Airway Road. A location map was provided to the Board. It was noted that the expected water demands for the Hawano Project is approximately 75.6 AFY of potable water and 9.6 AFY of recycled water and is consistent with the demands in the District’s 2008 Water Resources Master Plan that was updated in November 2010. Mr. Kennedy indicated that the WSA Report states the following, “The regional and local water supply agencies acknowledge the challenges of supply and fully intend to develop sufficient reliable supplies to meet demands. Water suppliers recognize 8 additional water supplies are necessary and portfolios need to be reassessed and redistributed with intent to serve existing and future needs.” He said that the status of the current water supply situation is documented in the WSA Report with the intent that the water agencies plan to develop sufficient water supplies to meet demands. Staff believes that the Board has met the intent of SB 610 statute in that Land use agencies and water suppliers have demonstrated strong linkage. It was noted that the Hawano Project WSA Report includes (4) four Otay Water District Planned Local Water Supply Projects: o Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Well (500-600 AFY) o Rosarito Ocean Desalination Project (24,000-50,000 AFY) o Otay Mesa Lot 7 Groundwater Well (300-400 AFY) o Otay Mesa Recycled Water Supply Link Project (400-800 AFY) A slide was presented that showed the Projected Balance of Supply and Demand based on data from the District’s 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. Staff indicated that it projects the District’s demand for a single dry year and multiple dry years and is based on meeting the SBX 7-7 conservation goal of a 10% per capita water use reduction by 2015. Mr. Kennedy stated that water demand and supply forecasts are included in the planning documents of Metropolitan, CWA, and the Otay Water District. He indicated that the Hawano Project’s SB 610 WSA demonstrates and documents that sufficient water supplies are planned for and are intended to be available over the next 20 years. Director Croucher stated that the Engineering, Operations and Water Resources Committee believes that it is very important to assure that extensive planning of water supply is taken seriously. He indicated that the Committee thoroughly reviews water supply assessment reports prior to recommending that they move forward for consideration and approval by the full board. A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Directors Bonilla to approve the Water Supply Assessment Report dated January 2012 for the Hawano Project. 9 15. BOARD a) DISCUSSION OF 2012 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR It was noted that the 2012 Board Meeting Calendar will be revised to indicate that the July 2012 Board meeting will be held on July 11, 2012. President Lopez indicated that a Special Board meeting has beem scheduled for March 19, 2012. On motion by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Robak and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak Noes: None Abstain: None Absent: Director Bonilla a special board meeting was scheduled for March 19, 2012 at 3:00pm. It was indicated that the District will keep the September meeting scheduled on the 5th unless there is an issue with having a quorum present at the meeting. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 16. ITEMS ARE PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS. a) REPORT ON DIRECTORS’ EXPENSES FOR THE 2ND QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2012 This is an informational item and no request was received from the board to hear a report on this item. b) UPDATE ON THE 2ND QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REPORT Associate Civil Engineer Daniel Kay provided a status report on the second quarter of FY 2012’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). He indicated that the overall expenditures through the second quarter of FY 2012 totaled approximately $7.2 million, which is about 31% of the District’s fiscal year budget. In response to a question from Director Robak regarding the 944-IR Recycled Water Pump Station Improvements Project, Associate Civil Engineer Daniel Kay indicated that the pressure reducing valves are not physically located at that Pump 10 Station, but are located within Otay Lakes Road, Eastlake Parkway, and Olympic Parkway. In response to an additional question by Director Robak regarding the pressure reducing criteria, Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy indicated that American Water Works Association (AWWA) provides guidelines on appropriate system pressures. The District tries to provide a pressure of approximately 65psi with the guidelines indicating a maximum pressure of 270psi. Director Robak inquired about how the District addresses high levels of pressure within its area. Mr. Kennedy stated that the District’s Water Resource Master Plan addresses this issue and also indicates that the District establish a process that includes pressure adjustments when connecting to older systems. This was an informational agenda item and no action was taken by the Board. c) INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT’S RECORDS RETENTION POLICY At the Board’s request, Chief Information Officer Geoff Stevens stated that the District’s new Records System was implemented over the past year and a half and as part of the implementation process, staff reviewed the retention policies of other agencies to assure that the District’s retention policy (adopted in February 2010) is in-line with other agencies. Mr. Stevens indicated that an area where change has occurred from the original adopted retention policy is the management of electronic documents. In discussion with the District’s attorney, it was indicated that email is treated as transitory communication; it is not a record in and of itself. Email communications become a record when some content or aspect of the document makes it a record, such as an attached contract to the email communication. With this scenario, Mr. Stevens stated that the contract should be stored in the District’s Records System instead of the email system. Mr. Stevens stated that in researching CWA and the State of California’s policy on the handling of electronic information, particularly emails and computer back-up tapes, CWA’s policy indicates that emails are retained for four (4) months; the State of California statutes does not indicate a specific time, but does require that the agency determine a policy. It was recommended that such electronic information be retained for 13 months as it would make sense that the recipient may wish to have reference to it for a period of time. Mr. Stevens indicated that generally, the District maintained 3 years of emails and this revision will change retention to 13 months. 11 Director Robak indicated that he believes the District’s Records Retention Policy should remain the same with regards to retaining email communications for 3 years; he also voiced his concerns about changing the retention timeline. General Counsel Daniel Shinoff indicated that the law requires agencies to hold all records in perpetuity in absence of a policy, but believes the main purpose of the District’s Records Retention Policy is to impose discipline. Director Croucher pointed out that emails have almost become conversational. He believes the 13-month retention is a fair and generous timeline and feels that it is appropriate for the policy. This was an informational agenda item and no action was taken by the Board. REPORTS 17. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE A copy of the County Water Authority’s (CWA) PowerPoint presentation was distributed to the board which provided an update on the Carlsbad Seawater Desalination Project. An article published by The Sacramento Bee, “Water Tunnels Would be Huge Project—if they Clear Huge Obstacles,” and a copy of a policy recommendation from CWA regarding potential disbursements of proceeds resulting from the CWA vs. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) litigation was also provided the board. General Manager Mark Watton indicated that he and President Lopez will be attending MWD’s rate hearing on March 12, 2012 to voice their concerns regarding MWD’s plan to increase rates by approximately 11%. Mr. Watton indicated that MWD has not been trying to reduce costs to minimize rate increases and continues to carry a vacancy rate in their budget of about 25%. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT General Manager Watton provided an update on the Rosarito Desalination Project and indicated that there will be a press release indicating that Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. will be moving forward with the project. General Manager highlighted information from his report that included an update on the District’s social media, SDRMA Insurance, meter reading efficiency, meter sales, and water purchases. Director Croucher requested that the General Manager’s Report include a chart for recycled water purchases (similar to the potable water purchase chart that is in the report). 12 18. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS There were no additional reports from Directors. 19. PRESIDENT’S REPORT President Lopez reported on meetings he attended in February 2012 and indicated that on February 2 he attended the Metro Commission’s monthly meeting to discuss the Commission’s FY 2013 Draft Strategic Plan and other matters. On February 8 he attended the District’s employee recognition luncheon. He indicated that on February 9 he met with Mr. John Lynch, Vice Chairman and CEO of the Union- Tribune, to discuss a WatchDog article regarding the District’s consultants. He noted that Director Bonilla, General Manger Watton, and Consultants Mr. Cruz Bustamante, Mr. Steve Castaneda, Mr. Hector Mares, Mr. Enrique Morones and Mr. Pete Silva also attended the meeting. On February 10, President Lopez met with General Manager Watton to discuss items that were scheduled to be presented at the February committee meetings. On February 16 he attended the Engineering, Operations and Water Resources Committee meeting where the committee reviewed, discussed and made recommendation on items that would be presented at the March board meeting. On February 21 he attended a Special meeting of the District’s Board to discuss the Salt Creek matter. On February 24 he met with General Manager Watton and General Counsel Dan Shinoff to discuss items that would be presented at the March 2012 board meeting. He also attended the San Ysidro Chamber of Commerce’s 90th Annual Installation Dinner on February 24. On February 25-26 he attended the MWD/CWA Hoover Dam Tour, and on February 27 he attended a Retirement Reception for Mr. Manny Magana, the District’s Assistant General Manager of Engineering and Operations. President Lopez indicated that on March 6 he met with San Diego County Water Authority officials to prepare for Metropolitan Water District’s rate hearing scheduled on March 12. RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION 20. CLOSED SESSION The Board recessed to closed session at 5:09 p.m. to discuss the following matters: a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION [GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9] (I) SALT CREEK GOLF, LLC, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, CASE NO. 11-13898-LA11 13 b) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION [GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9] 2 MATTERS Director Croucher left the board meeting at 5:43pm. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION 21. REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION The Board reconvened at 5:44 p.m. General Counsel Dan Shinoff indicated that no reportable actions were taken in closed session. 22. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the meeting at 5:44 p.m. ___________________________________ President ATTEST: District Secretary 1 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OTAY WATER DISTRICT March 14, 2012 1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 4:37 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Directors Present: Bonilla, Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez and Robak (arrived at 4:41 p.m.) Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Assistant General Manager of Administration and Finance German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager of Engineering and Water Operations Manny Magana, General Counsel Daniel Shinoff, Attorney Christina Cameron, Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod Posada, Chief of Operations Pedro Porras, Chief of Administration Rom Sarno, District Secretary Susan Cruz and others per attached list. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA A motion was made by Director Bonilla, seconded by Director Croucher and carried with the following vote: Ayes: Directors Bonilla, Croucher, Gonzalez and Lopez Noes: Director Robak Abstain: None Absent: None to approve the agenda. 5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA No one wished to be heard. AGENDA ITEM 4 2 WORKSHOP 6. REVIEW THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTEREST/FORM 700 FILING General Counsel Dan Shinoff indicated that the State of California requires that all board members and board-designated employees receive ethics training (AB1234) every other year. He stated that this training would fulfill the State mandated training requirement and his firm would provide attendees to today’s meeting Certificates of Participation for participating in today’s training. He introduced Ms. Christina Cameron of his office, Stutz Artiano Shinoff & Holtz, who would provide a review of Ethics Laws and the From 700/Statement of Economics Interest form. He indicated that Ms. Cameron was employed by City of San Diego for twenty years where she worked on high profile issues. She also worked with a number of local political leaders in San Diego and is Ethics Counsel to the City of San Diego. He stated that she is recognized as the County-wide expert on Form 700 issues. Ms. Cameron indicated that AB1234 Training covers many things:  Conflict of Interest  Brown Act  Public Records Act  California Sunshine Rule  Public Contracting  Ethics Laws She discussed the open meeting laws or the Ralph M. Brown Act which requires that public agencies conduct their business at meetings that are open to the public. The Act requires that all meetings be publicized in advanced and that meeting agendas provide details of the items to be discussed at the meeting. It was noted that only items listed on the agenda may be discussed at the meeting. There are limited exceptions that allow for some items to be discussed in private, but these items must still be noted on the meeting agenda. Such items include real estate negotiations, certain personnel matters (not including salary matters), and litigation. Ms. Cameron indicated that the Act defines a meeting of the body as whenever a majority of its members transacts or discusses the business of the public agency. A majority cannot talk privately about an issue that is before a body. This includes discussions by phone, email or at a local coffee shop. She stated that the Brown Act also prohibits “serial meetings,” any series of communications that results in a majority of a governing body conferring on an issue. This can occur when e-mails are forwarded members of the board, through staff intermediaries, or signing onto joint memoranda. She stated the Public Records Act allows the public access to a public agency’s documents created to conduct the “people’s business.” Public records may be any 3 writing that was prepared, owned, used or retained by a public agency. There are exceptions which include documents prepared in support of litigation or those developed during the “deliberative process” (see attached copy of presentation). It was inquired if an email that had been deleted (“trashed”), if it would be subject to the Public Records Act. It was discussed that agencies should maintain a records retention policy/schedule which identifies when records are purged and the agency should maintain its records accordingly. If an email is in the possession of the agency, then it is considered a record. If it has been purged, as per the retention policy, then it is no longer a record. Ms. Cameron reviewed the Form 700/Statement of Economic Interests form. She indicated that elected officials, department heads, some employees and candidates are required to file a Form 700. The District’s Conflict of Interest Code identifies those District positions that have been designated to file a Form 700 and what those positions are required to disclose. She noted that officials must file within 30 days of assuming office, annually, and within 30 days of leaving office. Candidates file when they declare their candidacy. She stated that filers should disclose the following:  Investments: o $2000 or more in value (excluding mutual funds) o Reportable Sources: Generally, businesses that have or will contract with the District to provide services, supplies materials, machinery or equipment o Disclose investments in all publicly traded and local companies  Real Property: o $2,000 or more in value; ownership and leases (excluding personal residence) o Reportable Sources: Generally property located in or near the District (sometimes limited to property that may be developed as residential property or may be considered by the District for any school use)  Income: o $500 or more per year from any one source o Reportable Sources: Generally sources that have or will contract with the District to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment o Half of your spouse’s non-government salary o Excludes inheritance itself, but once the inheritance is invested, it may need to be disclosed  Gifts: o $50 or more 4 o Reportable Sources: If the District’s code does not identify reportable sources, then disclose gifts from any source (see attached copy of presentation for exceptions) o Includes rebates/discounts not available to the public o $420 per calendar year limit from a single reportable source o Disclose both the source and any intermediary  Business Positions: o Own 10% or more of a business o Reportable Investments: Real property holdings and sources of income in excess of $10,000 of a business o Your share of the income from the business o Note: Service on a non-profit board of directors is not a business position It was noted that if a District Official is required to disclose interests under Category 5 of the District’s Conflict of Interest Code, then the official must disclose all investments and business positions in any banking, savings and loan or other financial institution, whether they are doing or planning to do business within the District’s service area or not. Ms. Cameron also noted that Category 6 is similar to Category 5, in that, officials must disclose all business positions in, and sources of income from business entities that provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment of a type purchased or leased by the District, whether they are doing or planning to do business within the District’s service area. She also stated that if an official personally sold a car, he/she must disclose to whom they sold their car to as it is identified as a good or service that the District would purchase. The monies received from the sale would be disclosed as income. It was also discussed that gambling winnings is considered income and should be reported. There was discussion if the cost associated with travel and meals on the water infrastructure tours hosted by Metropolitan Water District/San Diego County Water Authority (MET/CWA), must be disclosed. It was indicated that they should be disclosed, but such tours are not subject to the gift limitation of $420 per calendar year. It was requested that Ms. Cameron confirm that such tours are reportable as Otay is a member of CWA and MET. It was also requested that she confirm, if an official is a Director of CWA and, thus, a member of MET, if the travel/meal costs would be reportable. There was further discussion, if a gift is received through a raffle process (chance), then it is not required that the gift be disclosed, however, if it is given, then it should be disclosed by the recipient. One time event tickets, if unused, or given to another, are not required to be reported. However, the recipient of the tickets would need to report the cost of the tickets. Ms. Cameron provided an overview of the Conflict of Interest Laws. She stated that there are three ways in which an individual can have a conflict of interest; under the Political Reform Act, Contracts and Common Law: 5  Political Reform Act: Public officials must not participate in decisions if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will affect an economic interest of that official. o Applies to any decision relating to permits, licenses, contacts o The official must recuse from participating in the decision  When recusing, the official must leave the room o If an official violates this act, there are penalties that can be incurred , including fines, criminal prosecution and removal from office  A Public Official is: o Elective office holders o High level employees who have the ability to make discretionary decisions for the District  Decisions include preliminary negotiations, advising, and making recommendations leading up to a decision; wherein a decision can be voting, appointing, entering into contracts or otherwise obligating the District o Consultants Ms. Cameron indicated that the individual, as public official, must be able to understand and recognize when they have an economic interest so that they will know when a conflict might arise. Economic interest, as defined by statute, may be any of the following:  Owning a business  Being on a company’s board of directors  Owning or leasing property (near or affected by a decision)  Owning stock or having an investment interest  Personal financial effect: saving or having to spend $250 or more as a result of a decision  Campaign contributions in excess of $250 (limited circumstances)  Income of more than $5090 from an individual or private entity  Your spouse, dependent child, or registered domestic partner having any of the interests above  Gift(s) greater than $420 during the 12 months prior to the decision An exception is if an official has an economic interest in a decision that would otherwise require disqualification but that interest is no different than that of the public generally, then he or she may not be precluded from participating. An example of such an issue is the implementation of rate increases or rebates; all District customers will be affected by a rate increase/rebate, but the District cannot enact a water rate change without the vote of the board. Ms. Cameron noted that if an official has a conflict and wishes to recuse himself/herself from participating in a decision, the official must identify the disqualifying interest. The official must then leave the room while the item is being 6 discussed and voted upon. There is a limited exception when an official, who has a disqualifying event, may still participate during the voting stage. If the District is making a decision that affects the official’s own property, then the official has the right, under due process, to speak on behalf of his/her property. If this is the situation, the official would leave the dias and submit a speaker slip to participate as a member of the public. This does not apply to business interests, a situation where an individual has a business partner who owns the land along with the elected official, the partner can then speak on behalf of the business. If an official is truly the only owner, then the exemption applies. There are administrative and monetary penalties for failing to disclose economic interests or failure to disqualify where a conflict exists which includes:  Administrative or civil monetary penalties  Criminal prosecution which in turn may lead to removal from office She stated that there are special rules with regard to contracts. Public officials cannot have an economic interest in any contract made by his/her agency. This is referred to as a “section 1090 problem.” Government Code Section 1090 applies only to contracts and will be applied to identify, not only if the public official must recuse himself/herself from the decision, but if the District itself may be precluded from entering into a contract with a vendor. She noted that if an individual is a board member, it is presumed that they have participated in every contract when the board is the authority to issue the contract. She indicated that Section 1090 voids contracts and thus, the local agency does not have to pay for the goods or services received under the contract and may even seek repayment of amounts already paid. The criminal penalties are severe and can lead to fines and up to three (3) years in prison, and a lifetime ban on holding office. She reviewed examples of economic interests in contracts which included the following relationships with contracting parties:  Employee  Attorney, agent or broker  Supplier of services or goods  Landlord-Tenant  Creditor-Debtor  Officer or employee of non-profit corporation  Includes spouse community and separate property These relationships are not defined by statute and can be complicated or involve intermediaries. They are also broadly applied by the courts. There are some exceptions, such as, when an official’s economic interest is deemed as remote; some employment situations, stock ownership derived from employment, and landlord- tenant relationships. The official then may disclose his/her interest and recuse themselves from the decision. The agency is then allowed to enter into the contract. 7 Director Bonilla left at 6:15 p.m. Another exception is non-interests or minor interests, such as, stock of less than 3% in a corporation, reimbursement of expenses and uncompensated service on non-profit boards. In these situations, there are no recusal requirements and the official may participate in the decision making process. Ms. Cameron reviewed the Common Law Conflict of Interest which included:  Personal interests: familial relationships, friendships, or general sympathy for a particular viewpoint  Inquiring of yourself if there is a non-economic situation which makes you unable to make a decision in a fair manner primarily for the benefit of the public She reviewed the competitive bidding process and indicated that it is designed to give all interested parties the opportunity to do business with the government on an equal basis, eliminates favoritism, and ensures the public gets the best deal by promoting competition. She indicated that the state competitive bidding requirement is necessary when a public works project is worth over $5000. The project must be publicized for bid and is awarded to the lowest responsible/responsive bidder. She discussed the laws regarding the misuse of public funds. This law is to ensure that the public’s money is being used for a demonstrable public purpose. She stated that the law prohibits using public agency resources for personal or political purposes, sending mass mailings at public expense (an exception is if it is communicating information for a purpose and not promoting an official), or making a gift of public resources or funds. Ms. Cameron also reviewed the laws regarding bribery, extortion and honoraria:  Bribery: An official may not receive something of value in exchange for an action or vote. Even agreeing to a bribe is forbidden  Extortion: An official may not demand something of value form someone else in exchange for an action or vote  Penalties include: o Criminal prosecution with possible prison time o Fines, loss of one’s office o Permanent disqualification from holding public office  Honoraria: Officials generally may not receive payment for giving speeches, participating on panels or meetings, or attending events o Exceptions apply to officials who also work in professions which routinely include paid speaking She lastly reviewed post employment restrictions and incompatible offices. She stated that elected officials and some high level administrative officers may not represent others before their former agency for one year after leaving office. This only applies to 8 compensated work and also applies to attorneys. Incompatible offices indicates that you cannot hold two public offices that are essentially in conflict with one another, that is, it is difficult to be clear as to which of the agencies you are operating on behalf of. If you hold two public offices, by operation of law, you will be discharged from the first office and deemed to have taken the second office. 7. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the meeting at 6:25 p.m. ___________________________________ President ATTEST: District Secretary STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: April 4, 2012 SUBMITTED BY: Stephen Dobrawa Purchasing Manager PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL APPROVED BY: Rom Sarno, Chief of Administrative Services German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager Mark Watton, General Manager SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the Board declare the identified vehicles and equipment as surplus to the District’s needs. COMMITTEE ACTION: See “Attachment A”. PURPOSE: To present a list of vehicles and equipment and obtain Board declaration that the items identified on the list are surplus to the District’s needs. ANALYSIS: Listed below are various vehicles and equipment that have been determined by the user departments to be of no use, obsolete (spare parts and service not available), beyond useful life, and/or not cost-effective to repair or operate and therefore, surplus to the District’s needs. AGENDA ITEM 7a 2 The District’s Purchasing Manual identifies the process for disposing of material, equipment, and supplies that have been declared surplus. Typically, items declared surplus are disposed of by sale through public auction. Before vehicles and equipment (where the individual acquisition cost exceeded $5,000) can be disposed of, the Board must first declare the items as surplus (ref: Purchasing Manual, Section 12). Vehicles Identified as Surplus Item Qty Description Reason for Declaration 1 1 Unit 100, 1997 Ford Aerostar Van, FA# 8100, VIN 1FMDA31X2VZC23120, 60,700 miles No longer meets District’s operational specifications. No longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 2 1 Unit 102, 1998 Ford Explorer, FA# 8102, VIN 1FMZU34X2WZA99943, 77,500 miles Same as above. 3 1 Unit 112, 1999 GMC C-8500 7-8 yard dump truck, FA# 8112, VIN 1GDP7H1C1XJ512299, 69,000 miles Same as above. 4 1 Unit 7, 1993 Ford F800 water truck, VIN 1FDXK84AXPVA09159 Same as above. 5 1 Unit 9, 1993 Ford F800 flat bed truck, VIN 1FDXK84E1PVA23857 Same as above. 6 1 Unit 142, 2003 Ford F250 pickup truck, VIN 3FTNX20L63MB16392, 79,500 miles Same as above. Equipment Identified as Surplus Item Qty Description Reason for Declaration 1 1 1980 Cummins KT1150 300kw Generator Set, SN 31113566 No longer meets operational specifications or requirements; no longer required. 2 1 1980 Caterpillar 3406DI 325 hp engine, SN 90U8967 Not operational; not cost-effective to maintain and operate. 3 1 Compressor, Ingersol Rand FA# 3097 No longer meets operational specifications or requirements; no longer required. 3 4 1 Truck crane, Autocrane 3023, FA# 3423 No longer meets operational specifications or requirements; no longer required; no longer supported. 5 1 Forklift, Champ, FA# 435 No longer required. 6 1 Sewage Motor and Pump, Variable Drive, 15hp, SN T04T0220256R-3 and SN XSX SR6/246/LS No longer meets operational specifications or requirements; no longer supported by manufacturer; not cost- effective to operate. 7 1 Ion Chromatograph and Autosampler, model DX-120, SN 99090451, RFID #A0227 and SN 99100043; RFID #A0228 No longer required. 8 3 Sewage Treatment Blower and Motor, Spencer 100hp, SN 254900 and SN IMA486796-G2-UE No longer operational; no longer required. 9 6 Valve actuator, Rotor Type AQ130U10.1, SN B13149K, SN B13129C3, SN B13149C2, SN B13149B5, SN B13149A1, SN B13148L1 No longer cost-effective to operate and maintain; no longer required. 10 1 Compac Rack Server, FA #03454 No longer supported by manufacturer; not cost- effective to operate and maintain; no longer required. 11 1 Laserjet Printer, Model 8550GN, FA #03837, RFID #A0073 No longer required; not cost-effective to maintain and operate. 12 1 Lot NEC 2000 PBX, NEC 2000 IVS, - 190 peripheral devices (phones and ports), 2 attendant consoles and miscellaneous attached storage devices No longer required; no longer supported by manufacturer. 13 1 Sewage Pump Motor, variable drive, 15 hp, Type VEU-TFC-6S, ID #621008 T04T0220256R-1 Broken/inoperable; not cost-effective to repair. 14 2 Pump, Pioneer, Model P6F00F, SN 2503, SN 2509 Broken/inoperable; not supported by manufacturer; not cost- effective to repair. 15 1 Unit 1565, 1987 Case 680 backhoe tractor, SN 17730619 No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 4 16 1 Electric motor, ARC Castle Electric, SN US66331760 No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 17 1 Electric Motor, SN D-7002574 No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 18 8 Electric motor, US Electric, Model G 42526, SN U01T2640191R-1, SN U01T2640191R-2, SN U01T2640191R-3, SN U01T2640191R-4 No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 19 1 Electric motor, General Electric, Model 6326A, SN Z11Z283R12-3R-2 No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain. 20 6 Pump, Peerless, SN 258581, SN 258583, SN 565577, SN 258584, SN 258582, SN 237321 No longer required. 21 1 Electric motor, General Electric, Model 6334A, SN B0060920 No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 22 1 Electric motor, General Electric, SN KOL-BF43A-H No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 23 1 Lot 2” ClaValve parts, 11 pieces No longer required. 24 1 Lot 4” ClaValve parts, 16 pieces No longer required. 25 1 Lot 6” ClaValve parts, 12 pieces No longer required. 26 1 Lot 8” ClaValve parts, 4 pieces No longer required. 27 1 Lot 10” ClaValve parts, 1 piece No longer required. 28 1 12” ClaValve Pump Control No longer required. 29 1 14” ClaValve No longer required. 30 1 16” ClaValve, check valve No longer required. 31 2 Electric motor, General Electric, 40 hp No longer meets District’s operational specifications; no longer cost-effective to maintain and operate. 5 FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer The salvage value and associated gain or loss on items is not determined until their disposal. Therefore, the fiscal impact of the recommended action is not known at this time. STRATEGIC GOAL: This action supports the District’s goal to ensure financial health through efficient operations. LEGAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT/PROJECT: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT COMMITTEE ACTION: The Administration, Finance and Communications Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on March 19, 2012 and the following comments were made:  Staff is requesting that the board declare the identified vehicles and equipment listed within staffs’ report obsolete and surplus to the District’s needs.  It was discussed that there is a Gen-Set on the list to be surplused because it no longer meets the Air Pollution Control District’s requirements. This particular Gen-Set is 300kW and is older than the previously surplused Gen- Set. Once this Gen-Set is declared surplus, it will be offered to Mexico’s water agencies across the border, before it is auctioned. The District will also have the Gen-Set appraised to determine its value.  It was noted that Mexico’s water agency purchased a previously surplused Gen-Set from the District. That Gen- Set was also surplused because it no longer met the Air Pollution Control District’s requirements. The Gen-Set now provides back-up power to one of their pump stations. Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’ recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item. STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: April 4, 2012 SUBMITTED BY: Lisa Coburn-Boyd Environmental Compliance Specialist Ron Ripperger Engineering Manager PROJECT: P2382- 001000 DIV. NO. 5 APPROVED BY: Rod Posada, Chief of Engineering German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager Mark Watton, General Manager SUBJECT: Purchase of a Confined Space Training Prop for the Heartland Regional Fire and Public Safety Training Facility for Joint Use by Otay Water District and Fire District Personnel GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board) authorize the funds for the purchase and installation of a Confined Space Training Prop at the Heartland Regional Fire and Public Safety Training Facility (Heartland Training Facility) located on the District’s Regulatory Site in the amount of $80,000 (See Exhibit A for location of the Training Facility). COMMITTEE ACTION: See Attachment A. PURPOSE: To obtain Board authorization for the funds, in the amount of $80,000, to purchase and install a confined space training prop at the Heartland Training Facility. This prop will be available for training of District employees and Fire District and Emergency Services personnel. AGENDA ITEM 7b 2 ANALYSIS: On December 21, 2007, San Miguel Fire District (San Miguel) entered into a Ground Lease and Joint Use Agreement with the District. According to this Agreement, San Miguel was to construct a state-of- the-art regional training facility at the District’s Regulatory site. Construction of the facility began in May 2011. Also, in May 2011, San Miguel entered into an agreement with the Heartland Fire Training Facility Authority for the operation of the training facility now known as the Heartland Regional Fire and Public Safety Training Facility. The construction of the training facility is being done in two phases because of funding constraints. Phase One construction is underway and includes site grading, walls, installation of all utilities, and the construction and/or installation of several training props. The props to be installed in Phase One include the bridge prop, the trench training prop, an electrical vault training prop (provided and to be installed by SDG&E) and a confined space training prop. The confined space prop will provide valuable training opportunities for District personnel at an easily accessible site. At the present time, District staff must arrange for confined space training at Helix Water District. Exhibit B shows the location of the various props and buildings within the training facility site and the phase in which they will be constructed. Exhibit C is a photograph of a similar confined space prop at the Escondido Fire Training Facility. FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer The funding for the Confined Space training prop will be taken from P2382 – Safety and Security Improvements. The total budget for P2382, as approved in the FY2012 budget is $3,397,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments to date, including the funding of this training prop, are approximately $1,795,657. See Attachment B for budget detail. Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager anticipates that the budget for CIP P2382 will be sufficient to support this Project. Finance has determined that 40% of the funding is available from the Expansion fund and 60% of the funding is available from the Betterment Fund. 3 STRATEGIC GOAL: This project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide customers with the best quality water, wastewater and recycled water service in a professional, effective, and efficient manner.” LEGAL IMPACT: None. LCB/RR:jf P:\WORKING\CIP P2382 - Safety and Security Improvements\Staff Reports\BD 04-04-12, Staff Reports, Confined Space Prop, (LCB-RR).docx Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action Attachment B – Budget Detail Exhibit A – Location Map Exhibit B – Training Facility Site Plan Exhibit C – Confined Space Prop Photograph ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT/PROJECT: P2382-001000 Purchase of a Confined Space Training Prop for the Heartland Regional Fire and Public Safety Training Facility for Joint Use by Otay Water District and Fire District Personnel COMMITTEE ACTION: The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on March 21, 2012 and the following comments were made:  Staff requested that the Board authorize the funds for the purchase and installation of a Confined Space Training Prop at the Heartland Regional Fire and Public Safety Training Facility (Heartland Training Facility) located on the District’s Regulatory Site in the amount of $80,000.  Staff indicated that the District entered into a lease and joint use agreement with the San Miguel Fire Protection District (SMFPD) in 2007, which SMFPD would build a training facility at the Otay Water District’s Regulatory site. As the construction for the training facility began in May 2011, SMFPD entered into an agreement with the Heartland Fire Training Facility Authority to operate the facility.  Staff stated that there are two (2) phases to the construction of the facility and is illustrated on page 2 of the staff report and shown on Exhibit B.  Staff noted that the Confined Space Training Prop will provide valuable training opportunities for District personnel at an easily accessible site. It was indicated that the District currently arranges for confine space training at Helix Water District.  As an employee of the SMFPD, Committee member Gary Croucher inquired if there would be a conflict of interest issue if he were to be involved with the consideration of this agenda item. Legal Counsel stated that there would not be a conflict of interest issue because the purchase is from an independent third party and funding for the facility is not going to the SMFPD.  In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that the District will have access to all of the props at the Facility. Staff also stated that the term of the lease for the training facility is 30 years from December 2007 and indicated that there is an option to extend the lease for an additional 20 years. Staff noted that if the lease terminates for any reason, the property and all of its improvements are surrendered to Otay Water District. Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’ recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item. ATTACHMENT B SUBJECT/PROJECT: P2382-001000 Purchase of a Confined Space Training Prop for the Heartland Regional Fire and Public Safety Training Facility for Joint Use by Otay Water District and Fire District Personnel Budget 3,397,000 Safety/Security Upgrades 001000 Addl subprojects 000000 x02102 x30136 Labor 162,727 162,727 162,727 Books, Periodicals And Subscriptions 348 348 - 348 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO Books, Periodicals And Subscriptions 96 96 - 96 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT Annual Support Maintenance For Software 38,322 3,333 34,989 38,322 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC Consultant Contracts 500 500 - 500 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING Consultant Contracts 2,500 2,500 - 2,500 DARRYL THIBAULT Consultant Contracts 625 625 - 625 PEXIS CORPORATION Computer Training 17 17 - 17 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN Safety Training 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 JB SAFETY & RESCUE SERVICES Safety Training 562 562 - 562 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC Gas Detectors 23,867 23,867 - 23,867 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 124 124 - 124 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 7,156 7,156 - 7,156 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 1,012 1,012 - 1,012 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY Infrastructure Equipment & Materials 27,394 27,394 - 27,394 EMCOM ELECTRONICS SYSTEMS INC Infrastructure Equipment & Materials 2,091 2,091 - 2,091 WESCO DISTRIBUTION INC Infrastructure Equipment & Materials 34,989 - 34,989 34,989 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC Security Services 574 574 - 574 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY Security Services 970 970 - 970 ALCEM FENCE COMPANY INC Security Services 598,920 598,920 - 598,920 STANDARD ELECTRONICS Security Services 354 354 - 354 MARWEST ACCESS CONTROLS Security Services 6,346 6,346 - 6,346 ADVANCED ELECTRONIC SOLUTIONS2 Security Services 344,676 309,687 34,989 344,676 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC Security Services 11,835 11,835 - 11,835 ENHANCED COMMUNICATIONS Security Services 3,875 3,875 - 3,875 PEXIS CORPORATION Security Services 4,875 4,875 - 4,875 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS Security Services 1,215 1,215 - 1,215 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC Security Services 20,490 20,490 - 20,490 PRIME ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC Security Services 5,973 5,973 - 5,973 SPECIALTY DOORS AND AUTOMATION #REF!14,109 - 14,109 14,109 BRAULT INC #REF!4,476 - 4,476 4,476 NEAL ELECTRIC CORP Service Contracts 3,995 3,995 - 3,995 MSA SYSTEMS INC Service Contracts 97,354 62,365 34,989 97,354 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC Service Contracts 2,300 2,300 - 2,300 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS Service Contracts 1,980 1,980 - 1,980 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING Service Contracts 459 459 - 459 SPECIALTY DOORS AND AUTOMATION Safety Equipment Misc Materials 135 135 - 135 MARWEST ACCESS CONTROLS Safety Equipment Misc Materials 2,365 2,365 - 2,365 STONEHOUSE SIGNS INC Safety Equipment Misc Materials 824 824 - 824 IDENTICARD SYSTEMS Safety Equipment Misc Materials 2,516 2,516 - 2,516 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY Safety Equipment Misc Materials 8,400 8,400 - 8,400 C & I EQUIPMENT CO Building And Grounds Materials 90 90 - 90 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO Building And Grounds Materials 721 721 - 721 C W MCGRATH INC Building And Grounds Materials 1,698 1,698 - 1,698 T M PEMBERTON Building And Grounds Materials 120 120 - 120 CONSTRUCTION RESIDUE RECYCLING Building And Grounds Materials 6,200 6,200 - 6,200 FRANK & SON PAVING INC Building And Grounds Materials 578 578 - 578 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT Building And Grounds Materials 14,599 14,599 - 14,599 ENTERPRISE SECURITY INC Building And Grounds Materials 16,913 16,913 - 16,913 ACCESS SECURITY CONTROLS For Ops Only - Contracted Services 4,484 4,484 - 4,484 ACCESS SECURITY CONTROLS For Ops Only - Contracted Services 450 450 - 450 WALTCOMM For Ops Only - Contracted Services 8,775 8,775 - 8,775 ADVANCED COMMUNICATIONS Security Vulnerability Study 92,008 92,008 - 92,008 EMA, INC. Onsite Training 18 18 - 18 GREYSTONE ENVIRONMENTAL Reimbursement from EPA (115,000) (115,000) - (115,000) x30074 208,843 208,843 - 208,843 Construction Contract 30,000 - 30,000 30,000 ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SERVICES Confined Space Prop 80,000 80,000 80,000 EC CONSTRUCTORS Total Safety/Security Upgrades 1,792,840 1,524,299 268,541 1,792,840 Fire Protection 003000 Labor 191 191 191 For Ops Only - Contracted Services 2,626 2,626 - 2,626 AZTEC FIRE & SAFETY Total Fire Protection 2,817 2,816 - 2,816 Grand Total 1,795,657 1,527,116 268,541 1,795,657 Vendor/CommentsCommittedExpenditures Outstanding Commitment & Forecast Projected Final Cost HWY 94 CAMPO RD. P: \ W O R K I N G \ P 2 4 6 6 \ S t a f f R e p o r t s \ E x h i b i t A 2 - 9 - 1 2 OTAY WATER DISTRICTHEARTLAND REGIONAL FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITYLOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A CIP P2382 §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ §¨¦ ÃÅ ÃÅ ÃÅ ÃÅ ÃÅ ÃÅ ÃÅ ÃÅ ÃÅ ! DIV. 5 DIV. 2 DIV. 4 DIV. 1 DIV. 3 5 8 805 9454 94 125 905 125 905 125 VICINITY MAP F 0 400200Feet FNTS PROJECT SITE TRAINING FACILITYSITE P: \ W O R K I N G \ P 2 4 6 6 \ S t a f f R e p o r t s \ E x h i b i t C 2 - 9 - 1 2 OTAY WATER DISTRICTHEARTLAND REGIONAL FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY EXHIBIT C CIP P2382 STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: April 4, 2012 SUBMITTED BY: Bob Kennedy Sr. Civil Engineer PROJECT NO./ SUBPROJECT: R2077-001103 DIV. NO. 2 APPROVED BY: Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager Mark Watton, General Manager SUBJECT: Reimbursement Agreement with International Industrial Park, Inc., a California Corporation, Project location Alta Road & Lone Star Road, for a Portion of the Capital Improvement Program Project, RecPL-24-Inch 860 Zone, Alta Road/Airway Road (R2077) GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board) approves the request for the General Manager to execute a Reimbursement Agreement with International Industrial Park, Inc., a California Corporation, Project location Alta Road & Lone Star Road, for the construction of a 24-inch recycled water pipeline on Alta Road, north of Lone Star Road, for a portion of the Capital Improvement Program Project, RecPL-24-Inch 860 Zone, Alta Road/Airway Road (R2077), in an amount of $930,962.16 (see Exhibit A-1 within the Reimbursement Agreement for Project location). COMMITTEE ACTION: Please see Attachment A. PURPOSE: To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement (see Attachment C) with International Industrial Park, Inc., a California Corporation, for reimbursement of construction costs for a 24-inch recycled water pipeline on Alta Road North, north of Lone Star Road, for a portion of the Capital Improvement Program Project, RecPL-24-Inch 860 Zone, Alta Road/Airway Road (R2077), in an amount of $930,962.16. AGENDA ITEM 8a 2 ANALYSIS: International Industrial Park, Inc., as part of its CG 4754 Project, is widening portions of Alta Road, north of Lone Star Road. As part of these improvements, the Developer has agreed to install approximately 1,510 lineal-feet of 24-inch steel recycled pipe and be reimbursed by the District. Since the Developer is currently required to improve Alta Road, north of Lone Star Road, the Developer has agreed to install a portion of the 24-inch steel recycled water pipeline adjacent to its MUP 98-001- W1 Phase 2B project and enter into a Reimbursement Agreement (Agreement) per Policy No. 26 (see Exhibit B within the Agreement) with the District. Staff negotiated with the Developer to provide the Developer with cathodic design and welding inspection. Additionally, the District has agreed to use actual costs rather than the 5% and to reimburse the Developer via progress payments on a monthly basis. See Exhibit A-2 within the Agreement which depicts the total of $930,962.16 corresponding to the maximum construction and estimated soft costs for this Project. The soft costs to be reimbursed to the Developer are $29,470 or 3% of the total Project cost. The District will have Valley Construction Management (VCM) monitor the contractors work and facilitate the coordination and cooperation between District, Contractor, and Developer. In compliance with Policy No. 26, the Developer has received three responsive bids for the pipeline construction and submitted copies to the District. Staff evaluated and certified that the bids are in compliance with Policy No. 26 requirement. They are as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT Basile Construction $886,492.16 TC Construction $921,183.50 CCL Contracting $1,012,119.00 Bert W. Salas $1,044,852.00 Cass Construction $1,351,806.00 FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer The approved total budget for CIP R2077, as approved in the Fiscal Year 2012 budget, is $4,500,000. Expenditures to date are $1,976,409. Total commitments to date, including this Agreement are approximately $2,911,590. (See Attachment B for budget detail.) The Project Manager anticipates that, based on the attached financial analysis, the budget will be sufficient to support this Project. Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the Expansion Fund. 3 STRATEGIC GOAL: This Project supports the District's Mission Statement, "To provide the best quality of water and wastewater service to the customers of the Otay Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner," and the District's strategic goal, "To satisfy current and future water needs for potable, recycled, and wastewater services." LEGAL IMPACT: None. BK/RP:jf P:\Public-s\Staff Reports\2011\BD 4-4-12, Staff Report, International Industrial Park, Inc Reimbursement Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action Attachment B – Budget Detail Attachment C – Reimbursement Agreement w/Exhibits Exhibit A-1 – Location Map Exhibit A-2 – Construction and Soft Costs Reimbursable Estimate Exhibit B – District Code of Ordinances Policy No. 26 Exhibits C-1 & C-2 – Description of CIP R2077 ATTACHMENT A SUBJECT/PROJECT: R2077-001103 Reimbursement Agreement with International Industrial Park, Inc, a California Corporation, Project location Alta Rd & Lone Star Road, for a Portion of the Capital Improvement Program Project, RecPL-24-Inch 860 Zone, Alta Road/Airway Road (R2077) COMMITTEE ACTION: The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed this item at a meeting held on March 21, 2012 and the following comments were made:  Staff requested that the Board approves the request for the General Manager to execute a Reimbursement Agreement with International Industrial Park, Inc., a California Corporation, Project location Alta Road & Lone Star Road, for the construction of a 24-inch recycled water pipeline on Alta Road, north of Lone Star Road, for a portion of the Capital Improvement Program Project, in an amount of $930,962.16  Staff stated that International Industrial Park, Inc., as part of its CG 4754 Project, will be widening the west half of Alta Road between Lone Star Road and Calzada de la Fuente. Staff indicated that as part of this improvement, the Developer has agreed to install approximately 1,500 lineal-feet of 24-inch steel recycled pipe and be reimbursed by the District.  In compliance with Policy No. 26, the Developer received five (5) responsive bids for the pipeline construction and submitted copies to the District. It was noted that staff evaluated and certified that the bids submitted are in compliance with Policy No. 26. Staff indicated that the five firms who submitted bids are listed on page 2 of the staff report.  Staff indicated that Basile Construction was the lowest bidder. Staff verified with the Contractor’s State Licensing Board that Basile Construction has a current License. Staff also checked the Federal Exluded Parties List System EPLS as now recommended on a recent program specific audit for USBR funded projects.  Staff stated that Valley Construction Management will monitor the contractors work and facilitate the coordination and cooperation between the District, Contractor and Developer.  Staff noted that the pipeline construction includes cathodic design and welding inspection, therefore the District has agreed to use actual costs rather than the typical 5% of the construction cost to be used for soft costs as stated in Policy 26.  Exhibit A-2 of the Agreement identifies the total reimbursement as $930,962.16, which is the maximum reimbursement amount for this Project and includes $29,470 of soft costs to be reimbursed to the Developer. Staff indicated that the soft costs are approximately 3% of the total Project cost.  In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that Associate Civil Engineer Daniel Kay will be the District’s overall Project Manager of the project, Valley CM will oversee the project’s day-to-day progress, and Inspection Supervisor Brandon DiPietro and Construction Inspector Jonathan Chambers will oversee the inspection aspect of the project.  Staff noted that the District has the opportunity to collaborate its project with the Developer project to save money, increase efficiency and minimize the impact on the community.  In response to a question by Legal Counsel, staff had indicated that the Federal Government will be reimbursing a portion of the project’s costs and that the Davis-Bacon compliance is not required for Title XVI agreements. Staff verified that the Prevailing Wage requirement does not apply to this project because it is funded with Federal grant money. Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’ recommendation and presentation to the full board as an action item. ATTACHMENT B Date Updated: March 07, 2012 Budget 4,500,000 Planning 001101 Labor 85,034 85,034 85,034 Professional Legal Fees 1,737 1,737 - 1,737 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLP Other Agency Fees 46 46 - 46 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Consultant Contracts 38,003 38,003 - 38,003 LEE & RO INC Consultant Contracts 67,553 67,553 - 67,553 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC Service Contracts 1,182 1,182 - 1,182 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO Contracted Services 360 360 - 360 KIRK PAVING INC Total Planning 193,916 193,916 - 193,916 Design 001102 Labor 429,327 429,327 429,327 Mileage Reimbursement 21 21 - 21 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN Office Supplies 64 64 - 64 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN Professional Legal Fees 104 104 - 104 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLP Professional Legal Fees 481 481 - 481 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF Regulatory Agency Fees 6,667 6,667 - 6,667 CITY TREASURER Regulatory Agency Fees 156 156 - 156 STATE WATER RESOURCES Regulatory Agency Fees 6,783 6,783 - 6,783 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Other Agency Fees 6 6 - 6 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN Consultant Contracts 50,584 50,584 - 50,584 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL Consultant Contracts 49,380 49,380 - 49,380 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC Consultant Contracts 27,738 27,738 - 27,738 HDR ENGINEERING INC Consultant Contracts 23,139 23,139 - 23,139 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC Consultant Contracts 8,000 8,000 - 8,000 SAN-LO AERIAL SURVEYS Consultant Contracts 4,140 4,140 - 4,140 CPM PARTNERS INC Consultant Contracts 2,275 2,275 - 2,275 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC Consultant Contracts 640 640 - 640 SWINERTON MANAGEMENT Service Contracts 6,680 2,462 4,218 6,680 REPROHAUS CORP Service Contracts 1,800 1,800 - 1,800 SAN-LO AERIAL SURVEYS Service Contracts 138 138 - 138 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO Total Design 618,122 613,904 4,218 618,122 Construction 001103 Labor 92,634 92,634 92,634 Meals and Incidentals 16 16 - 16 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN Professional Legal Fees 83 83 - 83 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF Materials 822 822 - 822 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC Materials 47 47 - 47 CW MCGRATH INC Inventory 1,938 1,938 - 1,938 INVENTORY Outside Services 3,180 3,180 - 3,180 ALCEM FENCE COMPANY INC Outside Services 50 50 - 50 CW MCGRATH INC Consultant Contracts 21,808 21,808 - 21,808 JC HEDEN AND ASSOCIATES INC Consultant Contracts 4,930 4,930 - 4,930 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Consultant Contracts 4,653 4,653 - 4,653 RBF CONSULTING Consultant Contracts 926 926 - 926 CPM PARTNERS INC Consultant Contracts 700 700 - 700 HDR ENGINEERING INC Construction Contracts 870 870 - 870 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Construction Contracts 1,029,489 1,029,489 - 1,029,489 RANCHO VISTA DEL MAR Construction Contracts 930,962 - 930,962 930,962 INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK INC Construction Contracts 548 548 - 548 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC Service Contracts 21 21 - 21 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT Infrastructure Equipment & Materials 127 127 - 127 HANSON AGGREGATES INC Infrastructure Equipment & Materials 178 178 - 178 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC Infrastructure Equipment & Materials 490 490 - 490 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 Infrastructure Equipment & Materials 1,938 1,938 - 1,938 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - DPW Contracted Services 400 400 - 400 PENHALL COMPANY Contracted Services 2,742 2,742 - 2,742 KIRK PAVING INC Total Construction 2,099,552 1,168,589 930,962 2,099,552 Grand Total 2,911,590 1,976,409 935,180 2,911,590 Vendor/Comments Otay Water District RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta Gate/Airway Committed Expenditures Outstanding Commitment & Forecast Projected Final Cost ATTACHMENT C REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WATER FACILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH R2077 RECPL-24-INCH, 860 ALTA RD – ALTA GATE/AIRWAY RD FOR 1510 LF OF 24-INCH STEEL RECYCLED PIPELINE, DEVELOPER PROJECT ON ALTA RD & LONE STAR ROAD (PASEO DE LA FUENTE) FOR MUP 98-001-W1 This Reimbursement Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of this _____ day of ___________, 2012, by and between the Otay Water District, a Municipal Water District formed under the Municipal Water District Act of 1911 (“District”) and International Industrial Park, Inc., a California Corporation, with an address at 5440 Morehouse Dr., Suite 4000 San Diego, California, 92121 (“Developer”), in view of the following facts and for the following purposes: R E C I T A L S A. District’s Board of Directors has adopted a Master Plan and approved a Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) for all regional water facilities (“Planned CIP Facilities”) throughout District. There are a number of Planned CIP Facilities within and adjacent to the Alta Road and Lone Star Road (Paseo De La Fuente) Improvements for MUP 98-001-W1(the “Development”), which Developer will construct within District’s service area in Otay Mesa, California. B. In connection with the Development and the Facilities, Developer was required to complete a Subarea Master Plan (the “SAMP”) upon which the Planned CIP Facilities are identified. If required, the SAMP has been completed, is entitled “_____________________, dated _______________ and is incorporated herein by reference. Developer will complete the Planned CIP Facilities as identified in the SAMP, if any, or/and as depicted or described in Exhibit ___ attached hereto. C. Developer intends to develop its property, which will include substantial public improvements, including the construction of certain of the Planned CIP Facilities within the Development (“Required CIP Facilities”) as more fully depicted or described in Exhibits A-1 for project location and A-2 for reimbursable estimate. D. Developer recognizes that District will need to construct regional facilities to support this development, typically in advance of the Developer paying all capacity fees. E. Developer shall conform to, and comply with, all of the conditions set forth in District’s current Policy 26, attached hereto as Exhibit B, with the exception of item numbers 6, 7, 8, and 10. F. Developer shall comply with all terms and conditions in the current District’s Code of Ordinances and in the District’s Standard Specifications. G. Developer agrees to encourage participation by Emerging Business Enterprises on construction contracts related to this agreement. H. In coordination with this Agreement, Developer and District have entered into that certain Agreement for Construction of a Water System dated _______________ (“Construction Agreement”) wherein Developer’s obligations regarding the construction and completion of the Required CIP Facilities are more fully set forth. The Parties acknowledge that where the terms and conditions of this agreement conflict with the Construction Agreement on matters pertaining to construction and completion of the Required CIP Facilities, the Construction Agreement will control. Similarly, where the terms and conditions of the Construction Agreement conflict with this Agreement on matters pertaining to the reimbursement of Developer by District, this Agreement will control. OPERATIVE PROVISIONS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals and of the promises and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, District and the Developer do hereby promise and agree as follows: 1. Project Cost Developer shall design and construct, install and complete a portion of the Required CIP facilities described in Exhibits C-1 (CIP) and C-2 (CIP) in the manner more fully set forth in the Construction Agreement, and shall provide all funds needed for the design, construction, installation and completion of the Required CIP Facilities with the exception of construction management and District’s direct costs including, but not limited to, District inspections and construction water. In order to remain eligible for reimbursement as provided under this Agreement, the Required CIP Facilities must be constructed and completed within the time provided in the Construction Agreement. Furthermore, to remain eligible for reimbursement, Developer must construct the Required CIP Facilities in compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations. 2. Reimbursement Developer shall be entitled to reimbursement for the cost and expense of constructing and completing the Required CIP Facilities consistent with District’s Policy No. 26, with the exception of items 6, 7, 8 and 10, and consistent with any Construction Agreement in form and function satisfactory to District. Except as provided in Policy 26, the District will pay 100% of the reimbursement cost via progress payments after the Board approves the request for reimbursement. Developer shall submit a request for reimbursement in writing to District and shall attach all documents necessary to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of District, that the work has been completed and accepted and the costs and expenses have been actually and reasonably incurred. The necessary documents shall include (i) copies of bid documents, (ii) invoices, (iii) unconditional lien releases, and (iv) any other documentation as requested by the District. 3. Termination If not otherwise earlier terminated, this agreement shall terminate on the earlier of (i) the date on which the reimbursements contemplated herein have been paid, or (ii) five (5) calendar years from the date first set forth above, which shall be the date of Board approval; provided that all Developer’s warranties and indemnifications shall remain in effect until terminated in accordance with their respective terms. District may terminate this Agreement and its obligations if the General Manager determines that Developer has failed to comply with its obligations hereunder or under the Construction Agreement. 4. Plan Removal Developer shall be required to adhere to District’s process for submittal of improvement plans, which includes its contractor bonding for all facilities to be constructed, construction agreements and project acceptance. 5. Record Keeping Developer shall keep an accurate record of the actual cost to construct the Required CIP Facilities for which reimbursement is requested, in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures. Developer shall allow an authorized District representative, during Developer’s regular business hours and upon reasonable notice, to examine and duplicate any records relevant to verifying the actual cost to construct the Required CIP Facilities, including, without limitation, all contract bids and invoices. Any changes occurring during construction shall be properly documented. Back-up documentation shall be kept by Developer for three (3) years after the completion of the facilities and be provided to District for its review upon its request. 6. Change Orders No change orders will be permitted unless the change order results from an unforeseen sub-surface condition or from a change in the work, design or specifications initiated by the District, or other governmental agency, during the construction of the Required CIP Facilities. 7. General Provisions a. Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits. The recitals set forth above and all exhibits referenced in this Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement to be given the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. b. Amendments. No amendment, modification, supplement, termination or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless executed in writing by both parties and then only in the specified instance and for the specific purpose given. c. Notices. Any demand upon or notice required or permitted to be given by one party to the other party shall be in writing. Except as otherwise provided by law, any demand upon or notice required or permitted to be given by one party to the other party in connection with this Agreement shall be effective (i) on the date a personal delivery is accepted, (ii) on the date a facsimile of the notice is sent, or on the next business day if the fax is sent after 5:00 p.m. or on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday; provided that receipt and confirmation of the facsimile transmission is attached to a copy of the faxed notice, (iii) on the second business day after mailing by certified or registered United States mail, return receipt requested, or (iv) on the succeeding business day after mailing by Express Mail or after deposit with a private delivery service of general use (e.g., Federal Express), postage or fee prepaid as appropriate, addressed to the party at the address shown below: If to District: Otay Water District 2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard Spring Valley, California 91978-2004 Attn: General Manager If to Developer: Mr. David Wick International Industrial Park, Inc A California Corporation 5440 Morehouse Dr., Suite 4000 San Diego, California 92121 Telephone: (858) 623-9000 x700 Facsimile: (858) 623-9009 Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner set forth in this paragraph. d. Indemnity. Developer agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless District and its governing boards, agents, officers and employees from and against any and all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to employees, agents or officers, which arise from or are connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of Developer or its agents, officers or employees, in performing the Work, or any part thereof, and all expenses of investigation and defending against same; provided, however, that Developer’s duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of District or its governing board, agents, officers or employees. District and Developer agree that in the event of any joint or concurrent negligence, they will apportion any established or agreed upon liability proportionate to their respective degree of fault. e. Applicable Law and Venue. This Agreement and each provision herein shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Parties agree that the proper venue for the resolution of any disputes under this Agreement shall be with the Superior Court of the County of San Diego. f. Successors in Interest. The Agreement and all rights and obligations contained herein shall be in effect whether or not any or all parties to the Agreement have been succeeded by another entity, and all rights and obligations of the parties signatory to this Agreement shall be vested and binding on their successors in interest. g. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each or which counterpart, if fully executed, shall be deemed an original. No counterpart shall be deemed to be an original or presumed delivered unless and until the counterpart executed by the other party to this Agreement is in the physical possession of the party seeking enforcement thereof. h. Effective Date. This Agreement shall not bind the parties and become effective until such time as the authorized representative of Developer has executed the Agreement, and District has approved and the authorized representative of District has executed this Agreement. i. Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the parties hereto represent and warrant that: (i) such party is duly organized and existing; (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party; (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of any other Agreement to which said is bound. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by District and by Developer as of the date first above written. OTAY WATER DISTRICT A California Municipal Water District By: _________________________________ General Manager Date: _________________________, 2012 Approved as to Form: _________________________________Attorney INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. A California Corporation By: _____________________________ David Wick Vice-President Date: _______________________, 2012 P:\WORKING\CIP R2077\Staff Reports\3-7-12-Exhibit A-1 OTAY WATER DISTRICTALTA ROAD - LONE STAR ROAD TO CALZADA DE LA FUENTELOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A -1 CIP R2077 ! VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE NTS ?ò ?ä ?Ë ;&s DIV 5 DIV 2 DIV 1 DIV 3 DIV 4 F F LONE STAR ROAD PASEO DE CALZADA DE LA FUENTE LA F U E N T E OTAY MESA ROAD ALTA ROAD 24" RECYCLED WATER STEEL PIPELINE NTS Exhibit A-2 Item No.Description Cost 1 Alta Consultants: Engineering design, construction, administration, and job closeout 21,745.00$ 2 JT Kruer & Company 3,000.00$ 3 Engineering Contingency 4,725.00$ 4 Basile Construction 886,492.16$ 5 Unknown Utility Allowance 15,000.00$ Total 930,962.16$ Reimbursement Estimate Amount:930,962.16$ Project No. CG-4754 24-Inch Steel CML&C Recycled Water Pipeline Project Name: Alta Road North of Lone Star Road Location: Alta Road, County of San Diego Project Engineer: Bartolome J. Pastor OWD CIP Project No. R2077 Date: March 2, 2012 OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY Policy Number Date Adopted Date Revised Subject DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS 26 2/10/93 7/05/06 PURPOSE This policy establishes guidelines for how the District will administer reimbursement agreements for facilities, both Master Plan and Non-Master Plan. It also describes when and how the District will participate in the cost of such facilities. BACKGROUND Policy 25 requires that development which creates the need for new facilities must bear all costs to construct and finance the on-site, in-tract and off-site water, wastewater, and recycled water systems. “On-site” facilities are defined as those pipelines, pump stations and reservoirs required within a developer’s project boundaries. “Off- site” facilities are those facilities located outside a project's boundary that are required to serve the project. “In-tract” facilities are defined as those non-regional facilities that serve only the project being constructed. These facilities are typically 6 inch through 12 inch pipelines. In-tract facilities are the sole responsibility of the developer/property owner until the facilities and all required property easements are dedicated to, and accepted by, the District pursuant to authority granted by the Board to the General Manager. The District's Master Plan includes all regional on-site and off-site facilities anticipated to be necessary to provide service throughout the District. The District's capacity fees have been calculated to pay for the cost of all the regional facilities identified in the Master Plan including the developer/property owner portion of such facilities. The District does not subsidize development but it does undertake responsibility to insure that those regional facilities necessary to serve a particular development are constructed and that the costs associated with the construction of said facilities is fairly distributed among all users. POLICY A. Master Plan Facilities-Reimbursement by the District: For facilities identified in the Master Plan, both on-site and off-site, the District may reimburse the developer for construction and design costs if the project meets the following guidelines: EXHIBIT B OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY Policy Number Date Adopted Date Revised Subject DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS 26 2/10/93 7/05/06 1. The project must be in the District’s approved five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) at the time of the request, and shall not exceed the CIP budget amount without prior Board approval. 2. The District has approved a Sub-Area Master Plan (SAMP) and any required maps, upon which the facilities are clearly described. 3. The developer makes an irrevocable offer to dedicate the facilities and any easements required for the operation and maintenance of the facilities to the District, which offer is accepted by the General Manager and all applicable language and documentation of the dedication(s) is prepared and recorded, all in the manner authorized by the Board. 4. The developer enters into an Agreement for Construction of a Water System with the District. 5. The developer/property owner obtains bids from qualified contractors and provides copies of the bids to the District. The developer/property owner is responsible for selecting the lowest responsive responsible bidder. The developer/property owner will be reimbursed for the CIP portions of the project based on the unit prices submitted with the lowest responsive responsible bid. 6. The cost of addressing environmental issues, such as burying a reservoir, shall not be reimbursable unless they are currently addressed in the District's Master Environmental Impact Report and CIP. 7. All soft costs, such as engineering, inspection, bonds, etc., will be included in the reimbursement cost at five percent of the construction costs. 8.Except as provided below, the District will pay 100 percent of the reimbursement cost after the General Manager accepts the project. 9. The District may elect to finance the facilities by borrowing if, after analysis by the Finance Department, it is determined that the borrowing fits into the District's financial plan as outlined in Policy 25. 10. If for any reason reimbursement funds are not vailable at the time the project is operationally complete, the District may elect to defer or a portion of the reimbursement the District determines is due the developer until the General Manager accepts Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT B OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY Policy Number Date Adopted Date Revised Subject DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS 26 2/10/93 7/05/06 the dedication of the project and until all liens, claims and/or bonds, as applicable, have been released in the manner provided under the Agreement for Construction of a Water System. 11. Funds for reimbursement shall be carried as a CIP until the reimbursement is made. 12. Each reimbursement agreement requires approval by the Board. A Staff Report will be prepared and reviewed with the Finance Department prior to presentation to the Board for approval. 13. This type of reimbursement agreement ends five (5) years after Board’s original approval. The reimbursement agreement may be terminated prior to said (5) year term by the General Manager upon a determination that the developer has failed to comply with its obligations under the Reimbursement Agreement or the Agreement for Construction of a Water System. 14. If the reimbursement agreement expires prior to the facilities by the District or prior to payment of reimbursement, the Developer shall no longer be entitled to reimbursement. The Developer may submit new documentation andrequest that the District enter into a new reimbursement agreement. If the District agrees to enter into a new reimbursement agreement for the facilities, however, the District may revise the terms and amounts of reimbursement at its discretion based on information available at the time of the request. 15. All reimbursement requests shall be submitted to the Board for consideration and shall not be processed without prior Board approval. B. Non-Master Plan Facilities-Reimbursement to Developer by Future Users: Occasionally, a developer/property owner requests the District to administer a reimbursement agreement to collect money from future customers who connect to the facility built by the developer/property owner. If the District agrees, the District collects the reimbursement amount from each customer connecting to the facility, together with any other District connection fees. The reimbursement portion of the customer’s payment is forwarded by the District to the developer/property owner as reimbursement. The District may administer this type of reimbursement agreement if the developer/property owner's project meets the following criteria and guidelines: Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT B OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY Policy Number Date Adopted Date Revised Subject DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS 26 2/10/93 7/05/06 1. The developer/property owner demonstrates the facilities to be constructed have adequate capacity to serve future customers. 2. The developer/property owner requests and executes a reimbursement agreement, which is presented to the Board for approval in conjunction with the presentation of an agreement to construct. 3. The property owner deposits with the District the estimated cost for District staff to prepare a nexus study and obtain Board approval for the reimbursement agreement. District staff will provide a written estimate of the required deposit to the property owner within 15 days of the property owner’s request. 4. The property owner provides three (3) bids from qualified contractors for the purpose of establishing the cost of the facilities and the portion of the reimbursement amount which is to be allocated to future connections. 5. A nexus study shall be performed by District staff to identify those who may benefit from the construction of the proposed facility and the amount they shall reimburse the developer/property owner who constructed the facility. 6. Prior to the public notice being sent to those property owners affected by the reimbursement agreement, an informational staff report will be presented to the Board. 7. The District shall notice all those property owners that will be subject to the reimbursement charge. These property owners will then be responsible to pay their fair share of the cost of the facilities at such time as they connect to the system. The fair share will be based on their Assigned Service Unit/Equivalent Dwelling Unit (ASU/EDU) contribution to the total projected ASU/EDU to use the system. The reimbursement charge will be in addition to any other fees a property owner would pay to the District to obtain service. 8. Each reimbursement agreement requires approval by the Board. Prior to presenting a reimbursement agreement to the Board, staff must obtain two originals signed by an authorized representative of the developer/property owner. A Staff Report must then be prepared and reviewed with the Finance Department prior to presentation to the Board for approval. Page 4 of 7 EXHIBIT B OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY Policy Number Date Adopted Date Revised Subject DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS 26 2/10/93 7/05/06 9. This type of reimbursement agreement shall be valid for 10 years from the date of Board approval. After the 10 year period has lapsed the collection of the reimbursement amount by the District shall cease. 10. Concurrently with submission of a signed reimbursement agreement, the developer/property owner must pay an administrative fee to the District to defray costs related to the review of the request and the negotiation and execution of the reimbursement agreement. The amount of the administrative fee will be calculated at the staff rate existing at the time of said submission. 11. In addition, concurrently with payment of the fee described above, developer must pay a fee to defray costs estimated to be incurred per each connection to be established during the term of the reimbursement agreement. The amount of this fee will be calculated based on an estimated 6 man hours per connection. The staff rate in existence at the time the reimbursement agreement is executed will be used as a base and it will be projected to change each year to account for changes in the COLA, as determined by the District’s finance department. 12. The District will not distribute any reimbursement funds to the developer/property owner until the project has been accepted by the Board. The distribution of reimbursement funds will occur as the District collects the funds from new customers who connect to the facility, but not more frequently than once per year. 13. District staff shall collect the reimbursement amount due at the same time the standard District capacity fees for the new service are collected. 14. If the reimbursement agreement expires prior to the facilities by the District or prior to payment of reimbursement, the Developer shall no longer be entitled to reimbursement. The Developer may submit new documentation andrequest that the District enter into a new reimbursement agreement. If the District agrees to enter into a new reimbursement agreement for the facilities, however, the District may revise the terms and amounts of reimbursement at its discretion based on information available at the time of the request. 15. All reimbursement requests shall be submitted to the Board for consideration and shall not be processed without prior Board approval. Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT B OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY Policy Number Date Adopted Date Revised Subject DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS 26 2/10/93 7/05/06 C. Non-Master Plan Facilities-Reimbursement to Developer by the District: Normally the District would not participate in the cost of facilities which are not identified in the Master Plan. These facilities are of benefit only to the adjoining property and should ordinarily be financed solely by the developer/property owner proposing the new facility. Nonetheless, there may be circumstances where the General Manager determines that it is appropriate for the District to participate in the cost of a non-Master Plan facility. Typical reasons would be in order to accommodate future growth or betterment of the system. In these instances, the District may establish special fees to recover the reimbursement costs from benefiting property owners as they connect to the system. The District may reimburse the developer/property owner for construction costs if the project meets the following criteria and guidelines: 1. The General Manager has determined that it is appropriate for the District's customers to participate in the construction of the project. 2. The developer/property owner shall obtain three (3) bids from qualified contractors and provide copies of the initial bids to the District. The developer/property owner is responsible for selecting the lowest responsive bidder. The developer/property owner will be reimbursed for the CIP portions of the project based on the unit prices submitted with the lowest responsive bid. 3. A nexus study will be performed by the District to identify those property owners who may benefit from the construction of the proposed facility. 4. Prior to the public notice being sent to those property owners affected by the reimbursement agreement, an informational Staff Report shall be presented to the Board. 5. The District shall notice all those property owners which will be subject to the reimbursement charge. These properties will then be responsible to pay their fair share of the cost of the facilities, plus interest, at such time as they connect to the system. 6. The developer/property owner shall request and execute the reimbursement agreement with the District prior to awarding any contracts for construction. Page 6 of 7 EXHIBIT B OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY Policy Number Date Adopted Date Revised Subject DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS 26 2/10/93 7/05/06 7. Each reimbursement agreement requires approval by the Board. A Staff Report shall be prepared and reviewed with the Finance Department prior to presentation to the Board for approval. 8. Except as provided below, the District will pay 100 percent of the reimbursement cost after the General Manager accepts the project. 9. The District may elect to finance the facilities by borrowing, if it is determined that borrowing is in the best interest of the District's customers. 10. If for any reason reimbursement funds are not available at the time the project is operationally complete, the District may elect to defer the reimbursement until the General Manager determines that it is appropriate to make payments. 11. Funds for reimbursement shall be carried as a CIP until the reimbursement has been made. 12. This type of reimbursement agreement contains no end date for the collection by the District of its contributed share of the cost, and shall be the responsibility of all current and subsequent property owners. 13. District staff shall collect the reimbursement amount due at the same time the standard District capacity fees for the new service are collected. 14. If the reimbursement agreement expires prior to the facilities by the District or prior to payment of reimbursement, the Developer shall no longer be entitled to reimbursement. The Developer may submit new documentation andrequest that the District enter into a new reimbursement agreement. If the District agrees to enter into a new reimbursement agreement for the facilities, however, the District may revise the terms and amounts of reimbursement at its discretion based on information available at the time of the request. 15. All reimbursement requests shall be submitted to the Board for consideration and shall not be processed without prior Board approval. Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT B OTAY WATER DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Construction of approximately 9,300 feet 24-inch pipeline within the 860 Pressure Zone in Alta Road from the Alta Gate location to Airway Road. This project will be constructed as part of the Otay Mesa recycled water system. EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1000): PRIOR YEARS: TOTAL $624 FY FY FY FY FY FY 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $1,750 $2,121 $5 TOTAL $4,500 FUND DETAIL: FUNDING SOURCE: Recycled 100%100% Expansion Betterment Replacement Total TOTAL 100%100% JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT: This project will provide transmission capacity for development of Otay Mesa and link the planned 860-1 Reservoir with the recycled water transmission system in Otay Mesa. n/a RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta Gate/Airway WORK ORDER NO: PROJECT TITLE: 5/23/2006ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: R2048, R2058, R2087, R2088 RELATED CIP PROJECTS: KennedyPROJECT MANAGER: 2DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1PRIORITY $4,500,000BUDGET AMOUNT: 7I.D. LOCATION: COMMENTS: Funding opportunity is the United States Bureau of Reclamation Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, Title XVI of P.L. 102-575. R2077CIP Number: OTAY WATER DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Bob Kennedy 2/19/2010Date:Submitted By: CIP Number:R2077 PROJECT SCHEDULE:ESTIMATED START DATE: ESTIMATED FINISH DATE: PROJECT PHASE: PLANNING: CONSTRUCTION: 07/01 01/10 07/11 06/13 12/09 06/11DESIGN: PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATION EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($): FY FY FY FY FY FY 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $3,200 $3,300 $3,400 PROJECT LOCATION:1332Thomas Bros. Map:OWD Map Book:39 STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING: Regular Board Meeting MEETING DATE: April 4, 2012 SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton, General Manager W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO. APPROVED BY: Susan Cruz, District Secretary Mark Watton, General Manager SUBJECT: Board of Directors 2012 Calendar of Meetings GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION: At the request of the Board, the attached Board of Director’s meeting calendar for 2012 is being presented for discussion. PURPOSE: This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the opportunity to review the 2012 Board of Director’s meeting calendars and amend the schedule as needed. COMMITTEE ACTION: N/A ANALYSIS: The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar schedule and amend it as needed. STRATEGIC GOAL: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: None. LEGAL IMPACT: None. Attachments: Calendar of Meetings for 2012 G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar 4-4-12.doc AGENDA ITEM 9b Page 1 of 1 Board of Directors, Workshops and Committee Meetings 2012 Regular Board Meetings: Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted) January 4, 2012 February 1, 2012 March 7, 2012 April 4, 2012 May 2, 2012 June 6, 2012 July 11, 2012 August 1, 2012 September 5, 2012 October 3, 2012` November 7, 2012 December 5, 2012 January 18, 2012 February 15, 2012 March 21, 2012 April 18, 2012 May 16, 2012 June 20, 2012 July 18, 2012 August 15, 2012 September 19, 2012 October 17, 2012 November 21, 2012 Board Workshops: Budget Workshops: March 19, 2012 at 3:00 p.m. May 15, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. Board Workshop: TBD G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar Attach A for 2012 4-4-12.doc STAFF REPORT TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: March 7, 2012 SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton General Manager W.O./G.F. NO: N/A DIV. NO. N/A APPROVED BY: Mark Watton, General Manager SUBJECT: General Manager’s Report ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: Water Conservation and School Education:  Student Photo, Poster and Video Contests - The District has been actively promoting the contests to schools in our service area and plans to present the contest winners at the May Board meeting. The Photo Contest deadline was March 26th, while the Student Poster and Video contest deadlines were April 2nd.  Cash-for-Water-Smart-Plants Program - To date, eight residential projects have been completed, involving a total of 14,000 square feet and 2 commercial/HOA projects, involving 12,000 square feet. Projects in progress include ten residential sites involving 9,000 square feet and six HOA projects involving more than 40,000 square feet.  School Garden Tours - Through the end of March, 26 tours were completed and another six are scheduled to be completed before the end of the school year at the Water Conservation Garden. There were three tours conducted in March, involving 135 third graders and 24 parents from Liberty Elementary School in Chula Vista.  California Friendly Landscape Contest - The regional contest deadline is on April 6, 2012, and staff has been promoting the contest to its customers. Contest winners will be recognized at a special ceremony held at the Garden on May 19th.  Upcoming Events - The District will be staffing booths, both at the San Diego County Garden Friendly Plant Fair at AGENDA ITEM 10 2 the Home Depot off “H” Street in Chula Vista on April 14th, from 9:00 am to 2:00 pm, and at the Water Conservation Garden’s Spring Garden Festival on April 28th, from 9:00 am to 4:00 pm. Safety and Security:  Security Upgrades – New cameras were installed in the Board Room, Training Room, and the Wellness Center, and a FOB reader was installed at the Board Room main door.  Fall Protection – A railing has been installed around the diesel tank at the Treatment Plant.  District Survey – SDRMA consultant, Bob Lapidus, was on site March 8th, 9th, and 15th, to conduct an employee and safety hazard identification survey of locations under the District’s jurisdiction where employees could possibly get injured. A survey report will be prepared and provided within 30 days.  Meetings/Training – Staff attended the following: o March 20th: Jerry Muñoz attended the Homeland Security training on Cyber Security. o March 22nd: New staff members received CPR/First Aid/AED training. Human Resources:  New Hires/Promotions - There were two new hires in the month of March: Pump Mechanic II and Network Engineer. Purchasing and Facilities:  Purchase Orders – There were 82 purchase orders processed in March 2012, for a total of $299,278.33. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:  Data Center Support Services – IT has negotiated two agreements that will significantly improve our data center support services, while lowering overall costs and expanding support. The first agreement will outsource the hosting of email, SharePoint, mobile phones, and our external website while adding “Lync” – a new messaging service. Email will be provided by an external vendor that manages email for over 5,000 other organizations. Secondly, we will be enhancing our network and hardware support services, whereby we will purchase maintenance and support of our existing systems, which will allow our internal resources to focus on projects that are more critical. Overall, this change will not cause any upward 3 pressure on the IT Operating budget but does allow us to reduce capital expenses by over $300,000 from last year and eliminate servers and hardware that will not need to be replaced.  Eden Upgrade to V.5.6.1.3 - The upgrade was implemented on February 29th successfully. So far, no major issues have been encountered. Even though this was not a major upgrade from the previous version (V.5.5.1.10), it did fix a few major issues with the billing scheduler. During the review of EDEN contract, staff identified various modules that do not need support. This reduced the contract amount to $120,000, with a savings of $10,000.  Redline Tickets – The GIS department has completed about 500 redline tickets for the past year. The corrections have been updated into the GIS database and GIS viewers. Staff also created a workflow to notify the person who submitted the redline ticket, to receive an update of the completion. This is a great way to communicate with the field staff to improve the data quality.  2012 CA-NV AWWA Spring Conference, Santa Clara, CA – On April 5th, Geoff Stevens will be conducting a presentation at the Spring AWWA Conference on the District’s effort to implement a structured asset management program. FINANCE:  Water Sales - In December, water sales were more than 10% below budget due to a cool summer and earlier than anticipated seasonal rainfall. As of March 25th, water sales are now 2.36% below budget. January and February were warmer and drier than normal, which contributed to the improvement in water sales. Staff will continue to watch these sales improvements and look to regain more of the loss of water sales as we move toward the end of the fiscal year.  Salt Creek Golf Course - The sale of the lease to Pacific Hospitality Group (PHG) closed on Wednesday, March 21st. PHG set up a new subsidiary, Highlands Golf Company, LLC, to run the golf course and assume the lease. The District received three checks totaling $398,992.55 for pre- and post-bankruptcy water and rent through the close of escrow, making the District whole.  Cashiering Upgrade - Staff successfully upgraded the cashiering module on March 22nd. This ongoing process ensures Otay stays up-to-date with the latest software and security features. This new upgrade enhances the District’s compliance with the Payment Card Industry (PCI) 4 guidelines, which further secures customer’s credit card transactions.  Payroll - W2’s and 1099’s have been filed and acknowledged by the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service as complete.  Financial Reporting: o For the eight months ended February 29, 2012, there are total revenues of $50,349,160 and total expenses of $50,678,584. The expenses exceeded revenues by $329,424. The shortfall is primarily due to the lower than budgeted water sales, especially in the first quarter of the year when the District experienced cooler weather than normal and earlier rainfall than normal. o The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the Investment Portfolio Details as of February 29, 2012, total $92,689,735.43 with an average yield to maturity of 0.544%. The total earnings year-to-date are $423,661.05. ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS: Engineering:  Rancho del Rey Groundwater Well Development: Tetra Tech is wrapping up the 90% construction drawing submittal based on architectural elevations presented to the Board on February 1st. A draft sewer agreement was sent to the City of Chula Vista on February 22nd and a draft Industrial User Discharge Permit application was sent to the City of San Diego on March 9th. Activities are underway to secure a power supply from SDG&E, a Hazardous Materials Business Plan from the County, and a storm drain connection for discharge of out-of-spec treated water. The design is anticipated to be completed in the fourth quarter of Fiscal Year 2012, with construction completed in the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2014. (P2434)  North District – South District Interconnections System: This project consists of installing approximately 5.2 miles of 30- inch diameter pipe from H Street in Chula Vista to Paradise Valley Road in Spring Valley. The project currently has two preferred alignments (Proctor Valley Road and Corral Canyon Road). The Proctor Valley Road alignment was presented to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) on February 7th and U.S. Fish and Wildlife on February 16th. Staff is currently working on a study to demonstrate “good cause” to the SDCWA for the parallel encroachment along the Proctor Valley Road. Staff presented to the Sweetwater Valley Civic Association on March 7. (P2511) 5  La Presa System Improvements: This project consists of demolishing the facilities at the La Presa Pump Station Site, constructing an 850/657 Pressure Reducing Station, demolishing the Dorchester Reservoir site, and installing several interconnections in the 640 Zone. In addition, sixty-three (63) homes surrounding the Dorchester Reservoir site will incur a pressure increase due to the demolition of the reservoir. Staff created a rebate program on installation of new and upgraded water pressure regulators for the 63 homeowners associated with the Dorchester Project and the program is approximately 50% complete. The contractor, TC construction, completed the piping for the Pressure Reducing Station at the La Presa site as well as three (3) interconnections on San Carlos Street. Project is on budget and anticipated to be completed in July 2012. (P2370)  944-1R Recycled Water Pump Station Upgrades & Enhancements: This project consists of upgrading the 944-1R Pump Station with new pumps, new pipe configurations, and electrical upgrades to keep up with current and future recycled water demands. The contractor, Sepulveda Construction, Inc., continues to install the new piping configuration and air exhaust system inside the pump station. Sepulveda also continues the construction of three (3) pressure reducing stations. Project is on budget and anticipated to be completed in June 2012. (R2091)  Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility Upgrade: This project consists of an upgrade to the treatment plant to reduce the nitrogen levels in the plant effluent. The upgrade includes modifications to the aeration basins, the addition of energy- efficient turbo blowers and replacement of corroded air piping, a new cover for the filter backwash storage tank, a new filter air scour system, and automation enhancements. The treatment plant was shut down on January 14, 2012 and is scheduled to come back on-line by early May. With the plant shut down, the contractor, NEWest Construction Company, Inc. (NEWest), completed the restoration of aeration basins 2 & 3. NEWest continues the upgrade of the instrumentation and blower systems. Project is on budget and construction is anticipated to be completed in June 2012. (R2096)  30-Inch, 980 Zone, Hunte Parkway – Proctor Valley/Use Area: This project consists of the installation of approximately 2,399 linear-feet of 30-inch steel pipe and appurtenances on Hunte Parkway between Proctor Valley Road and the entrance to the Salt Creek Golf Course in the City of Chula Vista. The pipeline will increase total water delivery to reduce pressure losses experienced during periods of high demand. Sepulveda was awarded the Contract at the March 7, 2012 Board Meeting. 6 Staff anticipates the project to begin in early April. Project is on budget and construction is anticipated to be completed in November 2012. (P2514)  Avocado, Louisa, Calavo, Challenge, Hidden Mesa Sanitary Sewer Replacement: This project consists of replacing approximately 4,500 ft. of sewer pipeline in Avocado Blvd. and neighboring residential streets. Staff sent out flyers notifying local residents of the upcoming construction effort. Garcia Juarez completed the work on Hidden Mesa, and began work on Louisa Dr. Project is on budget and construction is anticipated to be completed in May 2013. (S2019, S2020, S2022, S2023, S2026)  850-3 Reservoir Exterior Coating & Upgrades: This project consists of replacing the exterior coating of the 3.0 MG 850-3 Reservoir, along with providing structural upgrades to ensure the tank complies with both State and Federal OSHA standards, as well as American Water Works Association and County Health Department standards. The Board approved the award of a construction contract to Advanced Industrial Services, Inc. at the March Board Meeting. Project is anticipated to be completed in July 2012. (P2491)  For the month of February 2012, the District sold 14 meters (14 EDUs) generating $153,637 in revenue; which is 45% below the monthly projection. Projection for this period was 23 meters (36.7 EDUs) with budgeted revenue of $281,350. However, projected revenue from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012 is $3,376,200 against a budget of $2,376,840.  For the month of February 2012, staff reviewed one (1) potential easement encroachment and will be gathering all the necessary information prior to informing customers of the removal of the encroachments. The above is part of an on-going program of easement monitoring.  Approximately 1,927 linear-feet of both CIP and developer project pipeline was installed in February 2012. The Construction Division performed quality control for these pipelines. The following table summarizes Engineering's project purchases and Change Orders issued during the period of February 15, 2012 through March 22, 2012 that were within staff signatory authority: 7 Date Action Amount Contractor/ Consultant Project 2/22/12 C.O. #2 $25,000 Darnell & Assoc. Avocado Sewer Project (S2019, S2020, S2022, S2026) 3/2/12 Check Request $2,100 County of San Diego Dorchester Reservoir – Inspection/Permit for Rebate Program (P2370) 3/8/12 Check Request $1,865 Helix Water District Avocado Sewer Project – Temporary Construction Meter (S2020) 3/22/12 P.O. $4,200 San-Lo Aerial Surveys Britannia Blvd. & Cactus Road (R2048) Water Operations:  The Treatment Plant is currently offline for facility upgrades which began on January 14, 2012 with a tentative restart date of May 1, 2012.  Total number of potable water meters is 48,646.  The February potable water purchases were 1,818.5 acre feet which is 30.3% above the budget of 1,395.5 acre feet. The cumulative purchases through February is 20,570.9 acre feet which is 7.6% below the cumulative budget of 22,260.0 acre feet. 8  The February recycled water purchases and production was 137.9 acre feet which is 71.1% above the budget of 80.6 acre feet. The cumulative production and purchases through February is 2,564.9 acre feet which is 11.1% below the cumulative budget of 2,885.6 acre feet.  Recycled water consumption for the month of February is as follows:  Total consumption was 122.5 acre-feet or 39,886,352 gallons and the average daily consumption was 1,375,392 gallons per day.  Total number of recycled water meters is 698.  Total recycled water consumption as of February for FY 2012 is 2,742.6 acre-feet.  Wastewater flows for the month of February were as follows:  Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,749,459.  Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per day: 470,427. 9  Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 949,283.  Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility, gallons per day: 0.  Flow to Metro from Otay Water District, gallons per day: 1,279,031. By the end of February there were 6082 wastewater connections/EDUs. OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032553 03/21/12 13481 3-D ENTERPRISES INC 00013451 01/31/12 RETAINAGE RELEASE 5,641.88 5,641.88 2032411 03/07/12 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 896124 02/16/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,546.32 896013 02/13/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 626.77 896012 02/13/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 603.23 896385 02/23/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 556.13 896290 02/21/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 538.19 896125 02/16/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 438.40 896384 02/23/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 183.88 5,492.92 2032554 03/21/12 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 896705 02/29/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,769.45 896883 03/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 947.45 896882 03/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 526.98 896503 02/27/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 513.52 896504 02/27/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 357.68 896750 03/01/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 306.10 5,421.18 2032412 03/07/12 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3159 02/21/12 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (2/6/12-2/19/12) 5,780.00 5,780.00 2032555 03/21/12 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3178 03/06/12 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (2/21/12-3/2/12) 6,800.00 6,800.00 2032413 03/07/12 00179 ACRO INSTRUMENT CO 12484 02/23/12 CERTIFICATION 85.00 85.00 2032556 03/21/12 01975 ACUNA, RICHARD 003556 03/19/12 SAFETY BOOTS 96.96 96.96 2032489 03/14/12 13802 ADA ACOSTA Ref002420288 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000090677 79.37 79.37 2032665 03/28/12 13861 AE SOO LERCHE Ref002420548 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000155497 62.55 62.55 2032414 03/07/12 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00800345 02/16/12 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (1/30/12-2/3/12) 3,262.88 OE00801949 02/23/12 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (2/5/12-2/11/12) 3,258.75 6,521.63 2032557 03/21/12 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00803496 03/01/12 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (2/13/12-2/17/12) 3,345.38 3,345.38 2032415 03/07/12 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9901330904 01/31/12 BREATHING AIR 34.49 34.49 2032666 03/28/12 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9901589216 02/29/12 BREATHING AIR 34.49 34.49 2032490 03/14/12 13799 ALBERTO ALMUETE Ref002420284 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000058896 68.95 68.95 2032667 03/28/12 13881 ALEXANDRA VINSON Ref002420569 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184157 5.44 5.44 2032668 03/28/12 13897 ALICIA VIALPANDO 003586 03/27/12 CUSTOMER REFUND 75.19 75.19 2032558 03/21/12 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES # 509 0509004672666 02/25/12 TRASH SERVICES TP (MAR 2012) 170.43 170.43 2032669 03/28/12 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES # 509 0509004670842 02/25/12 TRASH SERVICES (MAR 2012) 1,101.35 1,101.35 Page 1 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032559 03/21/12 12911 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC 12228015 02/29/12 SURVEY SERVICES (2/15/12-2/23/12) 3,920.00 11220014 02/29/12 SURVEY SERVICES (1/30/12-2/24/12) 2,380.00 6,300.00 2032560 03/21/12 13836 ALVIN ROUSH 003565 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032416 03/07/12 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570MC 03/01/12 PAGER SERVICES (FEB 2012) 156.13 156.13 2032491 03/14/12 13801 ANDREW SELLERS Ref002420287 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000080110 12.50 12.50 2032670 03/28/12 13875 ANGELA GARCIA Ref002420562 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176808 24.53 24.53 2032417 03/07/12 06165 ANITA FIRE HOSE COMPANY ETC 16100A 02/20/12 HOSE REPAIR 242.59 242.59 2032561 03/21/12 06165 ANITA FIRE HOSE COMPANY ETC 16183 03/05/12 FIRE HOSE 540.27 540.27 2032492 03/14/12 13807 ANN AMARAL Ref002420294 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000155201 75.00 75.00 2032671 03/28/12 00002 ANSWER INC 6393 03/22/12 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY) 1,000.00 1,000.00 2032418 03/07/12 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41033 02/23/12 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE (MAR 2012) 321.12 321.12 2032419 03/07/12 13171 ARCADIS US INC 0434810 02/24/12 WASTEWATER MGMT (1/23/12-2/19/12) 32,232.90 32,232.90 2032493 03/14/12 13818 ARLEEN PYJAR Ref002420305 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183679 35.43 35.43 2032494 03/14/12 11282 ASHTON, PATRICK 003543 03/08/12 TUITION 60.00 60.00 2032420 03/07/12 05758 AT&T 61942256050212 02/20/12 PHONE SERVICE (2/20/12-3/19/12) 45.06 45.06 2032421 03/07/12 05758 AT&T 61969851400212 02/24/12 PHONE SERVICE (MONTHLY) 32.52 61967053090212 02/15/12 PHONE SERVICE (MONTHLY) 11.45 43.97 2032495 03/14/12 05758 AT&T 082164572802251202/25/12 INTERNET BANDWIDTH (2/25/12-3/24/12) 2,322.63 2,322.63 2032562 03/21/12 05758 AT&T 33784130450312 03/07/12 PHONE SERVICE (3/7/12-4/6/12) 31.43 31.43 2032563 03/21/12 07785 AT&T 000003182803 03/02/12 PHONE SERVICES (2/2/12-3/1/12) 6,384.79 000003185021 03/02/12 PHONE SERVICES (2/2/12-3/1/12) 15.44 6,400.23 2032672 03/28/12 05758 AT&T 61967053090312 03/15/12 PHONE SERVICE (MONTHLY) 32.52 32.52 2032422 03/07/12 08330 AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 8547826250212 02/22/12 INTERNET BANDWIDTH (2/21/12-3/20/12) 2,028.00 2,028.00 2032423 03/07/12 12810 ATKINS 1134371 02/17/12 DESIGN SERVICES (12/1/11-1/31/12) 5,937.50 5,937.50 2032424 03/07/12 07730 AZTEC FENCE CO INC AZ445446 02/17/12 GATES 1,900.00 1,900.00 2032425 03/07/12 08024 BACKGROUND PROFILES INC 3853 02/29/12 BACKGROUND CHECK 40.50 40.50 Page 2 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032673 03/28/12 13865 BALDWIN & SONS Ref002420552 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000163486 2,046.00 2,046.00 2032496 03/14/12 13817 BARBARA BENSON Ref002420304 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183429 23.14 23.14 2032426 03/07/12 00145 BARRETT ENGINEERED PUMPS 079678 02/23/12 SAMPLE PUMP 1,155.08 1,155.08 2032564 03/21/12 13834 BENJAMIN WEBER 003563 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032674 03/28/12 10811 BIO PROFIT SERIES 1 LLC Ref002420546 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000147710 131.05 131.05 2032565 03/21/12 13838 BLAKE PETERSON 003567 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032427 03/07/12 13293 BLAST PRINT & DESIGN LLC 3176 09/06/11 PRINTING SUPPLIES 1,231.58 1,231.58 2032428 03/07/12 12185 BONITA VIEW OFFICE PRTNRS LLC 003519 02/28/12 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 5,580.00 5,580.00 2032675 03/28/12 13860 BRENDAN SMITH Ref002420547 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000153632 7.45 7.45 2032676 03/28/12 13853 BRIAN HEARTON Ref002420537 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000063610 78.02 78.02 2032497 03/14/12 13824 BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DAILY 003539 03/12/12 WEBINAR REGISTRATION 197.00 197.00 2032429 03/07/12 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 41370 02/23/12 CRUSHED ROCK 210.58 210.58 2032566 03/21/12 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 41397 02/27/12 CRUSHED ROCK 315.43 41431 03/02/12 CRUSHED ROCK 274.25 589.68 2032430 03/07/12 11044 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 05 01/31/12 RETENTION / NEWEST (ENDING 1/31/112) 74,247.20 74,247.20 2032567 03/21/12 08966 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 3A 03/07/12 RET / TC CONST LA PRESA (2/1/12-2/29/12) 11,505.31 11,505.31 2032568 03/21/12 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 113095 03/02/12 ASPHALT 1,199.47 1,199.47 2032498 03/14/12 02989 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL 12022401 02/24/12 TAX PAYERS STATISTICS 600.00 600.00 2032499 03/14/12 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 096898 01/23/12 GASTECH SENSOR 184.90 095967 02/06/12 O2 SENSOR 184.43 369.33 2032569 03/21/12 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 098601 03/07/12 HARNESS LANYARDS 123.75 123.75 2032431 03/07/12 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7443 01/01/12 RECORDS SUPPORT (DEC 2011) 351.13 351.13 2032570 03/21/12 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7476 03/01/12 RECORDS CONVERSION (2/6/12-2/29/12) 4,047.53 7475 03/01/12 RECORDS MGMT SERVICES (FEB 2012) 254.75 7474 03/01/12 RECORDS SUPPORT (2/9/12-2/24/12) 154.55 4,456.83 2032500 03/14/12 13798 CARMEN CECENA Ref002420283 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000022383 104.72 104.72 Page 3 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032571 03/21/12 04653 CARO, PATRICIA 003551 03/14/12 TUITION 175.00 175.00 2032572 03/21/12 13841 CAROL MILLER 003570 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032432 03/07/12 13795 CARRILLO, MARY LEE 003530 03/06/12 EMPLOYEE PROGRAM 147.43 147.43 2032573 03/21/12 09801 CENTERBEAM INC 16077 02/28/12 TEMPORARY LABOR (FEB 2012) 16,296.00 145594 03/01/12 NETWORK MONITORING & SUPP (MAR 2012) 1,786.00 16076 02/28/12 TEMPORARY LABOR (FEB 2012) 97.00 18,179.00 2032574 03/21/12 09801 CENTERBEAM INC 144423 02/01/12 NETWORK MONITORING & SUPP (FEB 2012) 1,786.00 1,786.00 2032677 03/28/12 13779 CENTURY 21 1ST CHOICE Ref002420567 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183391 11.42 11.42 2032433 03/07/12 04349 CHAMBERS, JONATHAN 003524 03/03/12 SAFETY BOOTS 146.79 146.79 2032575 03/21/12 13848 CHARLINE FEESER 003577 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 250.00 250.00 2032576 03/21/12 01788 CHAVARELA, GERARDO 003550 03/13/12 SAFETY BOOTS 126.05 126.05 2032678 03/28/12 12130 CHAVEZ, KIM 003580 03/20/12 TUITION 40.00 40.00 2032577 03/21/12 13843 CHERRIE FLORES 003572 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032434 03/07/12 06966 CHEYENNE PRODUCTS INC 26855 02/23/12 LIFE RINGS 1,344.00 1,344.00 2032501 03/14/12 13804 CHRISTINE CARLOS Ref002420290 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000121671 61.05 61.05 2032435 03/07/12 08895 CITY OF LA MESA 14342 02/29/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 60.00 60.00 2032753 03/28/12 00234 CITY TREASURER 1000046001 02/01/12 RECLAIMED WATER PURCHASE 427,395.99 427,395.99 2032578 03/21/12 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 60350 02/29/12 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 443.00 60214 02/29/12 BACTERIOLOGICAL SERVICES 125.00 568.00 2032436 03/07/12 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE C13581640 CREDIT MEMO (22.21) 13628540 02/15/12 COPY PAPER 801.40 13632830 02/16/12 INK CARTRIDGE 81.84 13623530 02/15/12 REGISTER RIBBON 51.70 13580590 02/22/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18.31 931.04 2032579 03/21/12 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 13661870 02/28/12 TONER 1,574.21 13659970 02/28/12 TONER 306.01 13662350 02/28/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 82.36 13662351 02/29/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3.11 1,965.69 2032437 03/07/12 11056 CONCHAS, FREDERICK 003531 03/06/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 85.00 Page 4 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 003529 03/02/12 TUITION 40.00 125.00 2032679 03/28/12 11056 CONCHAS, FREDERICK 003581 03/22/12 SAFETY BOOTS 126.05 126.05 2032580 03/21/12 11510 CONFERENCE CALL.COM 2670824745 02/29/12 CONFERENCE CALLING SERVICE (JAN 2012) 550.81 2670778035 01/31/12 CONFERENCE CALLING SERVICE (JAN 2012) 96.50 647.31 2032680 03/28/12 13895 CONSUELO SIAZON 003579 03/21/12 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 254.00 254.00 2032502 03/14/12 03706 CONSUMERS PIPE & SUPPLY S1182991001 12/19/11 PVC PIPING 149.30 149.30 2032581 03/21/12 03706 CONSUMERS PIPE & SUPPLY S1189152005 02/29/12 PVC PIPES 666.32 S1189152006 03/01/12 CONSUMERS PIPE 311.48 S1189152007 03/05/12 CONSUMERS PIPE 173.78 1,151.58 2032681 03/28/12 03706 CONSUMERS PIPE & SUPPLY S1190245001 03/07/12 PVC SUPPLIES 890.18 890.18 2032582 03/21/12 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1248745 02/29/12 BACKUP TAPE STORAGE (FEB 2012) 315.56 315.56 2032583 03/21/12 02612 COUNCIL OF WATER UTILITIES 003554 03/14/12 MEETING REGISTRATION 50.00 50.00 2032438 03/07/12 02794 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 003525 03/02/12 PERMIT / INSPECTION FEE 2,100.00 2,100.00 2032584 03/21/12 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH120302D1103102/29/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (1/5/12) 1,526.50 1,526.50 2032503 03/14/12 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS SAN DIEGO 003546 03/04/12 INTERNET SERVICES (MONTHLY) 1,500.00 003547 03/04/12 INTERNET SERVICES (MONTHLY) 1,500.00 3,000.00 2032585 03/21/12 11286 CPM PARTNERS INC 12024 02/29/12 SCHEDULING SERVICES (2/1/12-2/29/12) 4,535.00 4,535.00 2032682 03/28/12 13872 DANIEL FINN Ref002420559 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000175687 41.34 41.34 2032586 03/21/12 13845 DARRYL FOUNTAIN 003574 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032439 03/07/12 01797 DELL ENTERPRISES 190143 03/01/12 EMPLOYEE PROGRAM 337.26 189959 01/25/12 EMPLOYEE PROGRAM 86.74 190075 02/16/12 PLAQUE 64.11 488.11 2032587 03/21/12 07680 DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS IVC05582 02/29/12 CLAIM SERVICES (FEB 2012) 500.00 500.00 2032683 03/28/12 13873 DENISE ROBERSON Ref002420560 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176001 71.07 71.07 2032588 03/21/12 13831 DENNIS MCLAUGHLIN 003560 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 250.00 250.00 2032589 03/21/12 03744 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 898566 03/06/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES (FEB 2012) 153.00 153.00 2032440 03/07/12 00319 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 67460312 03/06/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 90.00 277890312 03/06/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 90.00 180.00 Page 5 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032441 03/07/12 13793 DEXUS INDUSTRIAL SPE FINANCED 003518 02/28/12 IRRIGATION PROGRAM 6,319.35 6,319.35 2032590 03/21/12 03417 DIRECTV 17275681765 03/05/12 SATELLITE TV (3/4/12-4/3/12) 18.00 18.00 2032684 03/28/12 03417 DIRECTV 17380322298 03/19/12 SATELLITE TV (3/18/12-4/17/12) 6.00 6.00 2032504 03/14/12 13810 EASTLAKE DESIGN DISTRICT Ref002420297 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000169942 1,946.53 1,946.53 2032442 03/07/12 13796 EASTLAKE I COMMUNITY ASSN 003534 03/07/12 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 6,400.00 6,400.00 2032505 03/14/12 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 1554580212 02/29/12 RECYCLING SERVICES (FEB 2012) 90.00 90.00 2032591 03/21/12 13833 EDGAR GUNNLAUGSSON 003562 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032506 03/14/12 13805 EDITHA C GALVAN Ref002420291 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000122176 64.25 64.25 2032507 03/14/12 13815 EDWARD COX Ref002420302 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176741 46.57 46.57 2032592 03/21/12 13839 ELIZABETH LABADIE 003568 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032593 03/21/12 13829 ELODIA A HERNANDEZ 003558 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032594 03/21/12 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 0055923IN 02/29/12 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (FEB 2012) 657.50 657.50 2032508 03/14/12 13825 ENRIQUEZ, LUIS 003537 03/07/12 SAFETY BOOTS 150.00 150.00 2032443 03/07/12 02259 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE 641403 02/13/12 LABORATORY CERTIFICATION 739.67 739.67 2032685 03/28/12 13878 ESTANCIA SOUTHWEST LLC Ref002420565 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000182540 158.76 158.76 2032686 03/28/12 13874 EVELYN GONZALES Ref002420561 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176586 12.83 12.83 2032687 03/28/12 13886 EXECUTIVE REALTY GROUP Ref002420574 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184663 24.67 24.67 2032595 03/21/12 03757 FANDEL ENTERPRISES INC 1489 03/02/12 CONSULTING SERVICES (FEB 2012) 3,420.00 3,420.00 2032688 03/28/12 13892 FAS-AHM UTILITIES LLC Ref002420581 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186031 42.59 42.59 2032444 03/07/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0399483 02/13/12 METER PARTS 1,833.91 0399486 02/14/12 METER PARTS 1,383.51 0400500 02/23/12 IPS INSTATITE COUP 831.02 03994831 02/20/12 METER PARTS 631.42 0398359 02/14/12 VALVE EXTENSIONS 474.10 0400187 02/21/12 INVENTORY 373.35 0399491 02/14/12 METER PARTS 342.65 5,869.96 2032596 03/21/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0399820 02/27/12 COUPLINGS 2,512.60 Page 6 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 03979901 02/28/12 INVENTORY 637.88 3,150.48 2032689 03/28/12 13870 FIELD ASSET SERVICES INC Ref002420557 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000174602 52.13 52.13 2032597 03/21/12 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 90034022 02/29/12 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (FEB 2012) 99.00 99.00 2032445 03/07/12 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 168487 02/22/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 505.45 505.45 2032446 03/07/12 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3815069 02/24/12 VEHICLE WASH 229.95 3802128 02/03/12 VEHICLE WASH 13.14 243.09 2032509 03/14/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2420360 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 265.00 265.00 2032510 03/14/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2420370 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 366.56 366.56 2032690 03/28/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2420673 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 265.00 265.00 2032691 03/28/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2420683 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 366.56 366.56 2032598 03/21/12 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 113 03/05/12 GARDEN TOURS (2/1/12-2/15/12) 1,860.00 1,860.00 2032511 03/14/12 13811 GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Ref002420298 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000174153 770.06 770.06 2032692 03/28/12 13857 GENEVA ROBINSON Ref002420543 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000143968 44.48 44.48 2032693 03/28/12 13890 GEORGE STATHORAKIS Ref002420579 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185937 31.53 31.53 2032599 03/21/12 13828 GERALYN ORCUTT 003552 03/13/10 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 1,707.00 1,707.00 2032447 03/07/12 10817 GEXPRO 580171505 02/24/12 PLC MODULES 4,577.79 4,577.79 2032512 03/14/12 13806 GORDON HENDERSON Ref002420293 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000155146 56.27 56.27 2032513 03/14/12 02634 GRACIA, GUSTAVO 003545 03/13/12 SAFETY BOOTS 97.64 97.64 2032448 03/07/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9762821875 02/23/12 PARTS 190.47 190.47 2032600 03/21/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9770651884 03/05/12 PARTS STORAGE 64.20 64.20 2032601 03/21/12 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 8720 03/01/12 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (FEB 2012) 8,650.00 8,650.00 2032694 03/28/12 13850 GUILERMINA SANDEZ Ref002420534 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000002602 43.89 43.89 2032695 03/28/12 13868 HAMANNS CONSTRUCTION Ref002420555 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000173153 1,797.69 1,797.69 2032696 03/28/12 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE Ben2420659 03/29/12 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 5,192.33 5,192.33 2032514 03/14/12 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 003538 03/08/12 TEMP CONST METER DEPOSIT 1,865.00 1,865.00 Page 7 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032449 03/07/12 08610 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC SM36435 02/15/12 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 1,540.13 1,540.13 2032450 03/07/12 08610 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC SM36436 02/15/12 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 347.89 347.89 2032602 03/21/12 08610 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC SM36710 03/07/12 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 280.00 280.00 2032603 03/21/12 08610 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC SM36664 03/01/12 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE (FEB 2012) 200.00 200.00 2032604 03/21/12 13837 HERBERT COOK 003566 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032451 03/07/12 12335 HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES LLC U2906267 02/15/12 CREDIT CARD SERVICES (JAN 2012) 2,283.40 2,283.40 2032605 03/21/12 12335 HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES LLC U2916586 03/07/12 CREDIT CARD SERVICES 2,216.20 2,216.20 2032452 03/07/12 06301 HVAC ENGINEERING INC 5889 02/15/12 HVAC SYSTEMS (PERIOD THRU 2/15/12) 1,498.00 1,498.00 2032515 03/14/12 13812 HYUN NAM Ref002420299 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000174636 75.00 75.00 2032453 03/07/12 01649 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 257469403 02/17/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 2,738.21 2,738.21 2032606 03/21/12 08969 INFOSEND INC 57159 02/29/12 POSTAGE (FEB 2012) 14,824.52 57158 02/29/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (FEB 2012)5 878 125715802/29/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (FEB 2012)5,878.12 57248 03/02/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (FEB 2012) 4,685.00 25,387.64 2032607 03/21/12 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 41053 02/29/12 PLANT SERVICES (FEB 2012) 186.00 186.00 2032697 03/28/12 13876 INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS Ref002420563 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176819 18.42 18.42 2032516 03/14/12 13814 JAIME PAEZ Ref002420301 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000175129 75.37 75.37 2032698 03/28/12 13856 JAMIL SALUM Ref002420542 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000092334 10.92 10.92 2032517 03/14/12 13708 JANET SMITH 003544 03/13/13 CUSTOMER REFUND 255.59 255.59 2032608 03/21/12 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO02120183 02/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (FEB 2012) 1,101.10 1,101.10 2032699 03/28/12 13891 JEFF WAGNER Ref002420580 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185974 62.18 62.18 2032518 03/14/12 13449 JEREMY LAUB Ref002420292 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000147603 50.00 50.00 2032700 03/28/12 13863 JESSICA FITZPATRICK Ref002420550 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000162284 6.40 6.40 2032609 03/21/12 13846 JIMMY AND BARBARA MARTIN 003575 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032519 03/14/12 13819 JOE SOUTHWICK Ref002420306 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184450 75.00 75.00 2032701 03/28/12 13859 JOEL TORRES Ref002420545 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000145166 64.37 64.37 Page 8 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032454 03/07/12 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0085151 02/21/12 SAN MIGUEL HABITAT MGMT (1/1/12-1/27/12) 12,265.00 0085150 02/21/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (1/1/12-1/27/12) 2,428.25 14,693.25 2032520 03/14/12 07069 JOSE CHAIDEZ Ref002420286 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000074515 60.14 60.14 2032702 03/28/12 13880 JUDY DELGADO Ref002420568 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183993 115.32 115.32 2032610 03/21/12 13842 KATHRYN JOHNSON 003571 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032455 03/07/12 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5030 02/23/12 PAVING SERVICES 4,938.15 4,938.15 2032611 03/21/12 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 672156 02/29/12 DELIVERY SERVICES (1/27/12-2/10/12) 363.00 363.00 2032612 03/21/12 12276 KONECRANES INC SDG00655621 03/06/12 HOIST INSPECTION 450.00 450.00 2032613 03/21/12 01859 LA PRENSA SAN DIEGO 23684 03/14/12 JOB POSTING 48.00 48.00 2032456 03/07/12 10330 LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT SALES & 105618 02/15/12 MAKISA MTX 70 3,147.81 3,147.81 2032614 03/21/12 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 260224 02/29/12 LANDFILL 283.60 283.60 2032521 03/14/12 13797 LAURA SANTOPIETRO Ref002420282 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000016371 71 07 71 07203252103/14/12 13797 LAURA SANTOPIETRO Ref002420282 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000016371 71.07 71.07 2032457 03/07/12 03607 LEE & RO INC LR14708 02/03/12 DESIGN SERVICES (1/1/12-1/27/12) 11,145.38 11,145.38 2032615 03/21/12 03607 LEE & RO INC LR14713 02/29/12 INTERCONNECTION (1/1/12-1/31/12) 27,658.40 LR14774 03/02/12 DESIGN SERVICES (1/28/12-2/24/12) 6,521.33 34,179.73 2032703 03/28/12 03607 LEE & RO INC LR14780 03/05/12 INTERCONNECTION (2/1/12-2/29/12) 5,076.98 5,076.98 2032458 03/07/12 06273 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 003533 03/06/12 AB 1028 WEBINAR 55.00 55.00 2032616 03/21/12 06263 LINTNER, JERRY 003549 03/14/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 60.00 60.00 2032704 03/28/12 13851 LIONEL MARK Ref002420535 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000038637 25.00 25.00 2032705 03/28/12 13864 LISA BANNON Ref002420551 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000163288 43.28 43.28 2032706 03/28/12 05220 LOGICALIS INTEGRATION SOLUTION S237971 02/29/12 DISASTER RECOVERY (1/16/12-2/6/12) 2,640.00 S237970 02/29/12 SUPPORT SERVICES (2/2/12-2/15/12) 1,137.50 3,777.50 2032459 03/07/12 13749 LONDON GROUP REALTY ADVISORS 575 02/29/12 ECONOMIC REPORT 2012-2018 8,750.00 8,750.00 2032617 03/21/12 13749 LONDON GROUP REALTY ADVISORS 585 03/19/12 ECONOMIC REPORT 2012-2018 8,750.00 8,750.00 2032618 03/21/12 03019 LOPEZ, JOSE 70100212 03/13/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (FEB 2012) 46.07 46.07 Page 9 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032707 03/28/12 13858 LUSCINDA HERMAN Ref002420544 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000144181 6.56 6.56 2032708 03/28/12 13867 LV-45 LLC Ref002420554 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000169837 2,060.71 2,060.71 2032709 03/28/12 13884 MANUEL ZAMBRANO Ref002420572 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184341 38.44 38.44 2032460 03/07/12 13794 MARIA C SCHNEIDER-VILLEGAS 003517 02/28/12 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 1,895.00 1,895.00 2032710 03/28/12 13855 MARTHA DANIELA ADAME Ref002420541 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000091746 112.03 112.03 2032522 03/14/12 13813 MARTHA MULVANY Ref002420300 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000175128 20.62 20.62 2032711 03/28/12 13871 MARYANN HILVERS AGUSTINE Ref002420558 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000174646 27.26 27.26 2032461 03/07/12 05329 MASTER METER INC 0197227IN 02/14/12 INVENTORY 3,982.44 3,982.44 2032619 03/21/12 05329 MASTER METER INC 0198034IN 02/29/12 INVENTORY 552,371.22 552,371.22 2032712 03/28/12 13852 MAUREEN BAILEY Ref002420536 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000042868 7.91 7.91 2032462 03/07/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 19488958 CREDIT MEMO (706.82) 19488959 CREDIT MEMO (101.85) 18195380 02/15/12 LEVEL MATERIALS 706 821819538002/15/12 LEVEL MATERIALS 706.82 18674841 02/21/12 AIR-VAC UPDATE 226.28 18756676 02/22/12 UNISTRUT CLAMPS 151.65 18299272 02/16/12 LEVEL MATERIALS 101.85 377.93 2032620 03/21/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 20025539 03/07/12 BOLTS AND RODS 1,487.61 19153333 02/27/12 BROOMS & SHOVELS 716.33 2,203.94 2032713 03/28/12 13888 MCMILLIN REALTY Ref002420577 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185024 20.96 20.96 2032714 03/28/12 01824 MERKEL & ASSOCIATES INC 12030703 03/07/12 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (2/1/12-2/29/12) 19,093.43 19,093.43 2032463 03/07/12 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 29195800 01/12/12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 948.01 948.01 2032621 03/21/12 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 29840900 02/27/12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,367.09 1,367.09 2032464 03/07/12 12016 MTGL INC 35384 02/20/12 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (1/1/12-1/31/12) 23,175.00 35385 02/20/12 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (1/1/12-1/31/12) 6,900.00 30,075.00 2032622 03/21/12 13827 NANCY MONTALVO 003553 03/15/12 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 1,289.00 1,289.00 2032523 03/14/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2420352 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,243.91 12,243.91 2032715 03/28/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2420669 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 11,397.76 11,397.76 2032623 03/21/12 09884 NATIONAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE INC 52660 02/29/12 RANDOM DRUG TESTING (FEB 2012) 825.32 825.32 Page 10 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032524 03/14/12 13808 NEW DAWN REALTY Ref002420295 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000163086 29.38 29.38 2032624 03/21/12 00745 NEWARK 21823195 03/01/12 MISC ELECTRICAL 606.07 21823197 03/01/12 MISC ELECTRICAL 52.71 21823196 03/01/12 MISC ELECTRICAL 25.65 684.43 2032465 03/07/12 08531 NEWEST CONSTRUCTION 05 01/31/12 RWCWR UPGRADE (PERIOD ENDING 1/31/12) 668,224.80 668,224.80 2032716 03/28/12 07488 NEWMAN, DAMON 003582 03/27/12 SAFETY BOOTS 150.00 150.00 2032625 03/21/12 13840 OFELIA TENORIO 003569 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032466 03/07/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 597909101001 02/13/12 INK CARTRIDGES 261.81 597768908001 02/10/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 77.22 598721634001 02/20/12 INK TANKS 51.80 390.83 2032626 03/21/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 600039859001 02/29/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 420.75 600112901001 02/29/12 RUBBER STAMPS 55.42 599653484001 02/27/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 36.34 512.51 2032627 03/21/12 03149 ON SITE LASER LLC 46479 03/07/12 PRINTER SERVICES 125.03 125.03 2032628 03/21/12 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S3725168001 02/29/12 RESPIRATOR CARTRIDGE 69.82 69.82 2032717 03/28/12 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S3712136001 03/05/12 SAFETY PIPE 369.00 369.00 2032525 03/14/12 13820 OSCAR ROBLEDO Ref002420307 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184482 39.20 39.20 2032467 03/07/12 02334 OTAY LANDFILL 011949 02/15/12 WASTE DISPOSAL 350.33 350.33 2032526 03/14/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2420354 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 686.00 686.00 2032718 03/28/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2420665 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 679.00 679.00 2032629 03/21/12 08891 PACIFIC METER SERVICES INC 00013391 03/02/12 RETAINAGE RELEASE 3,035.00 3,035.00 2032719 03/28/12 13885 PACIFIC REALTY Ref002420573 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184650 26.38 26.38 2032468 03/07/12 13710 PARTSMASTER 20546628 02/03/12 MISC PARTS 2,927.42 2,927.42 2032720 03/28/12 07334 PAUL PISTEY Ref002420539 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000083676 168.21 Ref002420538 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000083676 157.73 325.94 2032630 03/21/12 13832 PAUL RADKE 003561 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032631 03/21/12 13830 PAUL RUSSO 003559 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 225.00 225.00 Page 11 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032632 03/21/12 05497 PAYPAL INC 15959026 02/29/12 PHONE PAYMENT SERVICES (FEB 2012) 54.10 54.10 2032469 03/07/12 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 30124 02/13/12 SAW CUTTING SERVICES 315.00 315.00 2032633 03/21/12 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 30211 02/28/12 SAW CUTTING SERVICES 290.00 290.00 2032470 03/07/12 00593 PEPPER OIL COMPANY INC 619415 02/24/12 UNLEADED FUEL 27,536.97 619414 02/24/12 DIESEL FUEL 6,368.19 33,905.16 2032721 03/28/12 13866 PETER RONQUE Ref002420553 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000169227 41.68 41.68 2032527 03/14/12 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 003548 03/14/12 PETTY CASH 476.26 476.26 2032722 03/28/12 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 003584 03/27/12 PETTY CASH 318.36 318.36 2032723 03/28/12 13889 PGI INVESTMENTS LLC Ref002420578 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185430 54.93 54.93 2032634 03/21/12 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 412128 03/03/12 PSD RENTAL (4/1/12-6/30/12) 206.88 206.88 2032471 03/07/12 01733 PRICE TRONCONE & 12500 02/22/12 SITE RENTAL (APR-JUNE 2012) 4,128.00 4,128.00 2032635 03/21/12 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 29462 02/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (FEB 2012) 3,504.00 3,504.00 2032472 03/07/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30243029 02/23/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 355.52 30241240 02/16/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 344.52 30241239 02/16/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 197.34 30243028 02/23/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 176.41 30241241 02/16/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 164.69 30243030 02/23/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 133.29 30240643 02/14/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40 30242410 02/21/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40 30241242 02/16/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 65.97 30234765 01/17/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 58.20 30243031 02/23/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.03 30242409 02/21/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 53.74 30240642 02/14/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 50.20 1,878.71 2032636 03/21/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30244486 03/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 361.13 30244485 03/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 176.41 30244487 03/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 133.29 30243884 02/28/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40 30245344 03/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40 31003748 03/01/12 UNIFORM JACKET 75.42 30245343 03/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 57.74 30244488 03/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.03 30243883 02/28/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 51.74 1,134.56 2032473 03/07/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2420079 03/01/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 149,900.75 149,900.75 Page 12 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032637 03/21/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2420348 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 146,666.79 146,666.79 2032724 03/28/12 13252 PUENTES LATINOS 003585 03/22/12 GENERAL CONSULTING 4,000.00 4,000.00 2032474 03/07/12 10294 QWIKPRINTS 12611530 03/01/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICE 20.00 20.00 2032638 03/21/12 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 29817400 02/29/12 TRUCK SAFETY SUPPLIES 237.05 29809800 02/29/12 SAFETY SUPPLIES 213.02 450.07 2032475 03/07/12 00766 RANROY PRINTING COMPANY 015694 02/14/12 POSTCARD 1,309.16 015693 02/14/12 POSTCARD 334.03 1,643.19 2032528 03/14/12 13800 REMEGIO MACAOAY Ref002420285 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000066254 68.82 68.82 2032639 03/21/12 13835 ROBERT TILARO 003564 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032529 03/14/12 13809 ROBERTO FRANCO Ref002420296 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000168861 10.22 10.22 2032725 03/28/12 13862 RODOLFO LOPEZ Ref002420549 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000161091 5.70 5.70 2032640 03/21/12 13847 RONALD SUNDAHL 003576 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 700.00 700.00 2032530 03/14/12 13803 ROSA MACIAS Ref002420289 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000095169 55.69 55.69 2032726 03/28/12 13894 ROY ALLEN SLURRY SEAL INC Ref002420583 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186924 1,763.93 1,763.93 2032641 03/21/12 09148 S & J SUPPLY COMPANY INC S100008952 03/02/12 INVENTORY 276.71 276.71 2032531 03/14/12 13475 SAMANTHA BAZAN Ref002417931 11/08/11 UB Refund Cst #0000183185 20.28 20.28 2032476 03/07/12 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8208 12/29/11 WELDING SERVICES 510.00 8272 02/22/12 WELDING SERVICES 85.00 8261 02/21/12 WELDING SERVICES 85.00 680.00 2032642 03/21/12 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8279 02/28/12 WELDING SERVICES 1,700.00 8289 03/06/12 WELDING SERVICES 595.00 8278 02/28/12 WELDING SERVICES 170.00 2,465.00 2032477 03/07/12 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 294153 02/23/12 BID ADVERTISEMENT 86.90 294149 02/23/12 BID ADVERTISEMENT 80.70 167.60 2032478 03/07/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003523 02/27/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 29,852.89 003522 02/24/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 20,693.45 003520 02/23/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 7,208.51 003521 02/23/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 135.87 57,890.72 2032532 03/14/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003536 03/06/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 52,930.78 52,930.78 Page 13 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032643 03/21/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003557 02/28/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 4,951.64 4,951.64 2032644 03/21/12 13418 SAN DIEGO POWDER COATING 32339 03/07/12 POWDER COATING 496.00 496.00 2032533 03/14/12 13821 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002420308 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184715 139.19 139.19 2032727 03/28/12 13882 SAN DIEGO REALTY Ref002420570 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184199 46.05 46.05 2032645 03/21/12 07676 SAN MIGUEL FIRE PROTECTION 003515 02/28/12 TEMPORARY LABOR (JAN 2012) 6,664.23 6,664.23 2032728 03/28/12 07676 SAN MIGUEL FIRE PROTECTION 003588 01/30/12 TEMPORARY LABOR (DEC 2011) 6,797.08 003589 12/29/11 TEMPORARY LABOR (NOV 2011) 6,775.99 13,573.07 2032729 03/28/12 13893 SARA SMITH Ref002420582 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186695 10.00 10.00 2032534 03/14/12 07783 SCRIPPS CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE 21880 02/14/12 EXECUTIVE HEALTH EXAM 2,297.40 2,297.40 2032730 03/28/12 13869 SD COASTLINE THREE LP Ref002420556 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000173299 27.72 27.72 2032731 03/28/12 13879 SDREOSOLD Ref002420566 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000182998 75.00 75.00 2032646 03/21/12 12904 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION INC 7 03/05/12 PUMP STATION UPGRADES (2/1/12 2/29/12)172 459 41 172 459 41203264603/21/12 12904 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION INC 7 03/05/12 PUMP STATION UPGRADES (2/1/12-2/29/12)172,459.41 172,459.41 2032732 03/28/12 01651 SHARP REES-STEALY MEDICAL CTRS 2461163738 03/17/12 PRE-PLACEMENT PHYSICALS 174.00 174.00 2032535 03/14/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900572048 01/30/12 WATER CHLORINE ANALYZERS 4,769.31 900572047 01/30/12 WATER CHLORINE ANALYZERS 4,721.67 9,490.98 2032647 03/21/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900569247 01/27/12 MAINTENANCE PARTS 4,706.99 4,706.99 2032648 03/21/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900619894 02/29/12 SFC-PC CONTROLLER 3,192.16 3,192.16 2032733 03/28/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900629851 03/02/12 COLUMN EXCHANGES 247.86 900627293 03/01/12 PROCESSING TANK 120.00 367.86 2032734 03/28/12 13327 SILVA SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1203 03/10/12 CONSULTING SERVICES (FEB 2012) 4,000.00 4,000.00 2032479 03/07/12 12281 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING 47296 02/21/12 BUSINESS CARDS- PRESIDENT LOPEZ 41.63 41.63 2032536 03/14/12 13482 SKYLINE SERVICES INC 00013481 01/06/12 RETAINAGE RELEASE 9,919.50 9,919.50 2032735 03/28/12 13898 SOLOMON WARD SEIDENWURM & Ref002420571 03/26/12 SALT CREEK DEPOSIT REFUND 24,653.02 24,653.02 2032649 03/21/12 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING & C48075 02/14/12 AC MAINTENANCE (FEB 2012) 1,068.00 1,068.00 2032480 03/07/12 13754 SOUTHLAND WATER TECHNOLOGIES 012212231 02/22/12 MISSION COMMUNICATIONS 7,906.26 7,906.26 Page 14 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032481 03/07/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 906043 02/10/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (2/10/12-3/8/12) 79.96 906042 02/10/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (2/10/12-3/8/12) 79.96 906180 02/13/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (2/11/12-3/9/12) 79.96 906044 02/10/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (2/10/12-3/8/12) 79.96 906968 02/22/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (2/22/12-3/20/12) 79.96 399.80 2032736 03/28/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 908148 03/02/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (3/1/12-3/28/12) 98.15 98.15 2032737 03/28/12 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 38781 03/08/12 WORKERS' COMPENSATION (4/1/12-6/30/12) 50,868.00 50,868.00 2032650 03/21/12 00590 SPECIALTY SEALS & ACCESSORIES 29921 02/27/12 MECHANICAL SEAL 507.07 507.07 2032651 03/21/12 06510 SPRINT NEXTEL 901500243066 03/12/12 WIRELESS SERVICES (2/9/12-3/8/12) 3,521.02 3,521.02 2032652 03/21/12 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 16572 03/06/12 ALARM MONITORING 5,544.00 5,544.00 2032738 03/28/12 13564 STAR-NEWS PUBLISHING CO, THE 1940312 03/14/12 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 35.00 35.00 2032537 03/14/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420368 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 415.38 415.38 2032538 03/14/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420358 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69 2032539 03/14/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420364 03/15/12 BI WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802 15 802 15203253903/14/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420364 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15 2032540 03/14/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420372 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 253.85 253.85 2032739 03/28/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420681 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 415.38 415.38 2032740 03/28/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420671 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69 2032741 03/28/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420677 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15 2032742 03/28/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420685 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 253.85 253.85 2032541 03/14/12 11749 STEPHEN V MCCUE 003542 03/05/12 LEGAL SERVICES (2/17/12-3/3/12) 40,664.30 40,664.30 2032743 03/28/12 11749 STEPHEN V MCCUE 003587 03/24/12 LEGAL SERVICES (MAR 2012) 42,755.00 42,755.00 2032653 03/21/12 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 87230 03/05/12 LEGAL SERVICES (JAN 2012) 25,673.03 25,673.03 2032482 03/07/12 02987 T M PEMBERTON 27974 02/23/12 CEMENT 456.24 456.24 2032654 03/21/12 09221 TACKETT, ZACHARY 003555 03/19/12 SAFETY BOOTS 116.35 116.35 2032655 03/21/12 01834 TC CONSTRUCTION INC 3A 03/07/12 LA PRESA SYSTEM (2/1/12-2/29/12) 103,547.76 103,547.76 2032483 03/07/12 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2377 02/16/12 FACTORYLINK LICENSES 16,076.73 16,076.73 Page 15 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032744 03/28/12 13785 TELECARE CORPORATION Ref002420576 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184733 33.58 33.58 2032656 03/21/12 13844 THOMAS SCHAEFFER 003573 03/19/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00 2032745 03/28/12 13887 TINA BALCH Ref002420575 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184712 382.90 382.90 2032542 03/14/12 13816 TOM ROTHSCHILD Ref002420303 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000181742 19.51 19.51 2032657 03/21/12 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 220120465 03/01/12 UNDERGROUND ALERTS 297.00 297.00 2032658 03/21/12 13047 UNION BANK NA 7687 02/29/12 COPS 2007 ADM FEES (2/29/12-2/28/13) 1,872.00 1,872.00 2032484 03/07/12 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 101402490001 02/15/12 CONCRETE 139.00 139.00 2032659 03/21/12 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 101582871001 02/28/12 CONCRETE 177.79 101684502001 03/06/12 CONCRETE 118.53 296.32 2032543 03/14/12 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2420366 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00 2032746 03/28/12 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2420679 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00 2032660 03/21/12 00350 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 104339510312 03/08/12 PREPAID POSTAGE MACHINE 2,100.00 2,100.00 2032544 03/14/12 13426 UNITED STATES TREASURY Ben2420362 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 200.00 200.00 2032747 03/28/12 13426 UNITED STATES TREASURY Ben2420675 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 200.00 200.00 2032748 03/28/12 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 120880000062 03/28/12 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (APR 2012) 5,561.15 5,561.15 2032485 03/07/12 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 003532 02/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 1,438.27 003526 02/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 283.51 003527 02/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 188.52 003528 02/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 55.00 1,965.30 2032661 03/21/12 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT O0000000001 02/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 17,088.73 A120000 02/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 9,133.66 26,222.39 2032486 03/07/12 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 0152354IN 02/24/12 METER BOX LIDS 3,208.36 3,208.36 2032662 03/21/12 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 0152466IN 03/02/12 METER BOX LIDS 696.07 0152481IN 03/02/12 HINGES 323.25 1,019.32 2032545 03/14/12 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 569862 02/23/12 SECURITY SERVICES (FEB 2012) 219.75 219.75 2032546 03/14/12 13048 V & A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 13241 02/24/12 CORROSION SERVICES (1/28/12-2/24/12) 11,308.00 11,308.00 2032547 03/14/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2420346 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,450.46 12,450.46 Page 16 of 17 OTAY WATER DISTRICT CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS 2032411 THROUGH 2032753 RUN DATES 3/7/2012 TO 3/28/2012 Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total 2032548 03/14/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2420356 03/15/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 6,031.29 6,031.29 2032549 03/14/12 12686 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2420350 03/15/12 401A TERMINAL PAY 27,128.70 27,128.70 2032749 03/28/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2420661 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,238.62 12,238.62 2032750 03/28/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2420667 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 4,439.92 4,439.92 2032487 03/07/12 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 1059749740 02/21/12 WIRELESS SERVICES (1/22/12-2/21/12) 5,080.02 5,080.02 2032488 03/07/12 07595 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 860983240 02/07/12 FREIGHT 42.07 42.07 2032751 03/28/12 13877 WESTERN DIRECT REALTY INC Ref002420564 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000181838 75.00 75.00 2032550 03/14/12 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 0111216IN 01/16/12 APCD TESTING 400.00 400.00 2032663 03/21/12 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 0112537IN 02/22/12 DUSTO INSPECTIONS 400.00 400.00 2032551 03/14/12 13822 WEST-TECH CONTRACTING INC Ref002420309 03/12/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186294 1,708.01 1,708.01 2032752 03/28/12 13854 WILLIAM STONE Ref002420540 03/26/12 UB Refund Cst #0000089353 81.79 81.79 2032664 03/21/12 09149 WILLIS RISK AND INSURANCE 0234932 03/01/12 BENEFITS CONSULTING (QUARTERLY)9 282 75 9 282 75203266403/21/12 09149 WILLIS RISK AND INSURANCE 0234932 03/01/12 BENEFITS CONSULTING (QUARTERLY)9,282.75 9,282.75 2032552 03/14/12 03423 WINZER CORPORATION 4197206 02/07/12 SHOP SUPPLIES 420.96 420.96 GRAND TOTAL 3,353,131.07 3,353,131.07 Page 17 of 17