HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-02-12 Board Packet
1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY
May 2, 2012
3:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 4, 2012
AND SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 19, 2012
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
6. PRESENTATION OF THE 2012 OTAY PHOTO, VIDEO AND POSTER CON-
TEST AWARDS
ACTION ITEMS
7. BOARD
a. INTERVIEW APPLICANTS AND APPOINT A REPRESENTATIVE TO THE
DIVISION 2 SEAT ON THE DISTRICT’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR
THE REMAINING TERM OF FORMER DIRECTOR, JAIME BONILLA
i. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4196 OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT APPOINTING
________________ TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DIVISION
2, TO FILL THE VACANCY LEFT BY DIRECTOR BONILLA’S
RESIGNATION
b. SUPPORT STAFF’S RECOMMENDATION TO LEAVE INTACT THE LEAK
ADJUSTMENT PROVIDED THE COTTONWOOD MEADOWS
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
DISTRICT’S ESTABLISHED PRACTICE AND DENY ANY FURTHER
ADJUSTMENTS (MENDEZ-SCHOMER)
2
CONSENT CALENDAR
8. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
a) APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO 3T EQUIP-
MENT COMPANY, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $117,062.48 FOR THE
PURCHASE OF ONE (1) SEWER TELEVISING VAN
b) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL AS-NEEDED ELECTRICAL ENGINEER-
ING SERVICES CONTRACT TO BSE ENGINEERING, INC. IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $100,000 FOR FISCAL YEARS 2013 AND
2014
c) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL AS-NEEDED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
SERVICES CONTRACT TO DARNELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $125,000 FOR FISCAL YEARS 2013 AND
2014
d) APPROVE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH SILVA SIL-
VA INTERNATIONAL, LLC IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $104,000
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2012, 2013 AND 2014 (ENDING JUNE 2014) FOR
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING WORK RELATED TO THE OTAY MESA
DESALINATION FACILITY CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION SYS-
TEM PROJECT
e) APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 4194 TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS WITH
THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION FOR THE ANNEXA-
TION OF PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH, LLC PARCELS (APN NOs: 597-
070-02, 597-070-07 AND 597-050-13) TO THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
WATER AUTHORITY AND METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ACTION ITEMS
9. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION OF 2012 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
REPORTS
10. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
a) SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
11. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
12. PRESIDENT’S REPORT/REQUESTS
3
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
13. CLOSED SESSION
a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9(a)]
(I) INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING CORP. v. OTAY WATER
DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SUPERIOR COURT, CASE
NO. 37-2008-00093876-CU-BC-CTL
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
14. REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD
MAY ALSO TAKE ADDITIONAL ACTIONS ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN
CLOSED SESSION
15. ADJOURNMENT
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the
District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered
at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website.
Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District
Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at (619) 670-2280 at least
24 hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on April 27, 2012, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the
regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at
least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Government
Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on April 27, 2012.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
1
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
April 4, 2012
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:34 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Asst. General Manager
German Alvarez, General Counsel Daniel Shinoff, Chief
Financial Officer Joe Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod
Posada, Chief of Operations Pedro Porras, Chief of
Administration Rom Sarno, District Secretary Susan Cruz and
others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the agenda.
5. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 7, 2012
AND SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 14, 2012
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of March 7, 2012 and the special
meeting of March 14, 2012.
AGENDA ITEM 4
2
6. RECESS FOR A RECEPTION FOR DEPARTING BOARD MEMBER JAIME
BONILLA
The Otay Water District board meeting was recessed at 3:35 p.m. for a reception for
departing board member Jaime Bonilla.
The meeting was reconvened at 4:18 p.m.
7. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
CONSENT ITEMS
8. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST IS
MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
Director Mark Robak requested that Items 17b be pulled for discussion.
Upon a motion by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the following remaining consent calendar item:
a) DECLARE VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SURPLUS TO THE DISTRICT’S
NEEDS
President Lopez presented Item 7b for discussion.
b) APPROVE THE FUNDING FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF
A CONFINED SPACE TRAINING PROP AT THE HEARTLAND REGIONAL
FIRE AND PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY LOCATED ON THE
DISTRICT’S REGULATORY SITE IN THE AMOUNT OF $80,000
Director Robak inquired on an update on the development of the regulatory site for
a joint training facility. It was discussed that the facility is being developed in two (2)
phases. Environmental Compliance Specialist Lisa Coburn-Boyd indicated that
3
Phase I entails the grading of the site, the construction of walls, which include the
Trench Rescue Prop and the Bridge Overpass Prop, all utilities (water, sewer and
electrical), and an underground SDG&E Vault Prop (donated by SDG&E). Phase II
consists of the construction of all classroom and office facilities, a Multi-Story
Training Tower, a Reserve Apparatus Building which will hold a fire truck and
equipment, etc. It was discussed that the property is being leased to San Miguel
Consolidated Fire Protection District and that Otay is not involved in constructing or
operating the Training Facility. Otay would have access to the classrooms and
meeting rooms and would utilize the facility for trench rescue and confined space
training. It was also shared that Phase I is fully funded and that they are currently
working on the funding for Phase II.
General Manager Watton indicated that the District has met its needs for water
facilities on the property and felt that a shared Training Facility was an excellent use
of the land.
A motion was made by Director Robak, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
ACTION ITEMS
9. ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS
a) APPROVE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL
INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A 24-INCH RECYCLED WATER PIPELINE ON ALTA
ROAD, NORTH OF LONE STAR ROAD, FOR A PORTION OF THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT, RecPL-24-INCH 860
ZONE, ALTA ROAD/AIRWAY ROAD (R2077), IN THE AMOUNT OF
$930,962.16 (KENNEDY)
Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy indicated that staff is requesting that the board
approve a reimbursement agreement with International Industrial Park, Inc. for the
construction of a 24-inch recycled water pipeline for a portion of CIP R2077. He
noted that the project is located in Otay Mesa on Alta Road between Lone Star
Road and Calzada de la Fuente. The project will consist of the widening of the west
side of Alta Road. As part of the improvements, the developer has agreed to install
1500 lineal feet of 24-inch steel recycled water pipe. The District will reimburse the
Developer for the cost of the pipeline installation.
4
He stated, in compliance with Policy 26, District Administration of Reimbursement
Agreements, the Developer received five (5) responsive bids for the construction of
the pipeline (reference page 2 of the attached copy of staffs’ report for the list of
firms) and copies of the bids were submitted to the District. Staff evaluated and
certified that the bids were in compliance with Policy 26. Basile Construction was
selected as the lowest responsive bidder. Staff verified with the Contractors State
License Board that Basile Construction held a current license and also checked with
the Federal Excluded Parties List System which is now recommended by the recent
programs specific audit for United States Bureau of Reclamation funded projects.
He noted that Policy 26 provides for reimbursement of soft costs (5% of the
construction cost). This works well for PVC pipeline projects, however, steel
pipeline projects require special design features and inspection elements that are
not typical of PVC pipeline projects. For example the District had provided a
developer with cathodic design for their use during the design phase of a pipeline
project and the District will also be providing welding inspection services during
construction. For this reason, the District has agreed to use actual costs rather than
the typical 5% noted in Policy 26 and will reimburse the Developer progress
payments on a monthly basis. Exhibit A-2 within the agreement (attached to staffs’
report) identifies the total reimbursement as $930,962.16. This is the maximum
reimbursement amount for this project and includes the $29,470 of soft costs to be
reimbursed to the developer. The soft costs are approximately 3% of the total
project cost. Sr. Civil Engineer Kennedy indicated that the Federal Government will
be reimbursing a portion of the project’s costs and that Davis-Bacon compliance is
not required for Title XVI agreements.
In response to an inquiry from Director Robak, Senior Civil Engineer Kennedy
indicated that the District will pay the developer (Industrial Park, Inc.), then the
developer will pay Basile Construction for their services. With regard to the bid, the
Developer handled the bidding process, but the District had input on the
specifications for the steel pipe and the tape wrapping on the pipe. The Developer
was also provided a copy of Policy 26 to follow for the bidding process. They are
aware that they need to comply with WAS Standards, etc.
Director Croucher indicated that the District’s Engineering, Operations and Water
Resources Committee reviewed this item and discussed that the reimbursement
agreement is in alignment with other reimbursement projects in the past. The
committee was comfortable to move forward and supported staffs’ recommendation.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Lopez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
5
Absent: None
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
10. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION ON APPOINTMENT TO VACANCY ON THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS, DIVISION 2
General Counsel Daniel Shinoff indicated that there is a very specific protocol that
must be followed upon a board member’s resignation. The San Diego County
Registrar of Voters must be notified of the vacancy within 15 days of the
resignation. It was discussed that the effective date of the resignation is March 27,
2012. The board has two options in filling the seat: 1) appoint an individual; or 2)
through a special election. General Counsel Shinoff indicated that he
recommended that the seat be filled through the appointment process as a special
election is very costly. He also noted that the seat is up for elections in November
2012, the appointee can run for election in November if he/she is interested.
There was discussion regarding the appointment process which included a 15-day
posting period and an interview process with the board of directors. It was indicated
that should the District receive many applications, then an Ad Hoc Committee would
be appointed to screen the applications and make recommendation of candidates to
be interviewed by the full Board of Directors at a special meeting of the board. It
was noted that the appointment must be made within 60 days of the vacancy, May
25, 2012.
A motion was made by Director Gonzalez, seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Gonzalez, Croucher and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to utilize the same format of the Application utilized during the last vacancy in 2010
and, dependent upon the number of applications, the President of the Board will
determine if an Ad Hoc Committee should be appointed to screen the applications.
b) DISCUSSION OF 2012 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
There were no changes to the board meeting calendar.
REPORTS
11. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
6
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (CWA) UPDATE
General Manager Watton indicated that a copy of correspondence addressed to Mr.
John Foley, Chairman, Metropolitan Water District (MWD), has been provided the
board. The letter recommends that MET cap their water rate increase at 3%. He
noted that CWA has posted to its website a fact list on MWD. The website’s
objective is to address claims that are being made by MET and other agencies by
providing factual information. For instance, MET is claiming that CWA did not pay
annexation fees to join MET which is not true.
He also shared that CWA has issued public records requests to a number of the
MET member agencies. Some agencies have turned over 10,000 documents and
some released 100 documents. The City of Beverly Hills released approximately
6,000 and the City of Los Angeles released 300 documents. He stated that in the
emails released by the City of Beverly Hills, they referenced that the City of Los
Angeles received the same documents. The City of Los Angeles is claiming they’ve
released all responsive documents, so CWA sued the City of Los Angeles to
compel the City to comply with the law. It is hoped that the suit will also compel
Western MWD and Eastern MWD to comply with the Public Records Act as they
have yet to respond to the request for records. He stated that this will be a long
battle and will not be easy.
It was noted that CWA is currently in negotiations with employees for a two-year
contract and it was also shared that General Manager Watton and Director
Croucher will attend a meeting to discuss the Poseidon Desalination Project. CWA
will be agendizing a closed session discussion regarding the possible option to
purchase the plant and some of the pipelines involved in the project.
President Lopez commended Director Croucher and General Manager Watton for
their work as the District’s CWA representatives. He stated that he has heard
positive comments from some individuals at CWA.
GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
General Manager Watton highlighted information from his report that included an
update on school garden tours, upcoming events, such as the San Diego County
Garden Friendly Plant Fair to be held at the H Street Home Depot, the outsourcing
the hosting/maintenance of email, water sales, the Salt Creek Golf Course, the
Ralph Chapman Reclamation Plant, meter sales and water purchases. He noted
that Information Technology Chief Geoff Stevens was not in attendance at today’s
meeting as he is presenting a paper on the District’s structured asset management
program at the CA-NV AWWA Spring Conference in Santa Clara.
12. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
7
Director Robak indicated that Director Bonilla’s resignation has definitely ended an
era at the District. He stated that he and Director Bonilla had their differences, but
he does wish him well in his future endeavors. He also inquired if a response was
received to CWA’s correspondence to MWD Chairman Foley. General Manager
Watton indicated that a response was not received, but CWA’s delegates would be
speaking at the MWD committee meeting next Monday and board meeting on
Tuesday. Director Robak further inquired if anyone has asked Chairman Foley to
resign due to his “conflict of interest.” General Manager Watton indicated that there
are agencies in Orange County that are discussing that, but no one has asked for
his resignation.
Director Gonzalez indicated that he had attended District meetings which included
the March 7 Board of Directors meeting, the Finance, Administration and
Communications Committee meeting on March 19, and the Special Board Meetings
held on March 19 and on March 14 where he received AB1234 Ethics and Form
700 training. He stated that the training was very helpful.
13. PRESIDENT’S REPORT
President Lopez thanked General Counsel and his staff for providing the Ethics and
the Form 700 training. He reported on meetings he attended in March 2012 and
indicated that on March 6 he attending a meeting at CWA for a briefing meeting on
MWD’s hearing on rates. On March 12 he traveled to Los Angeles to attend and
participate in MWD’s rate hearing. He stated that he attended the District’s Special
Board Meeting on March 14 where members of the District were provided AB1234
Ethics and Form 700 training. On March 19 he attended the District’s Finance,
Administration and Communications Committee and a Special Meeting of the Board
of Directors where the development of the water sales forecast was discussed. He
stated that he met with Director Bonilla and General Manager Watton on March 23
to discuss Director Bonilla’s resignation from the District and on March 29 he met
with General Manager Watton and General Counsel Shinoff to discuss the April
board meeting agenda. He also shared that he attended the Water Conservation
Garden Board meeting on March 14 where they were provided a presentation by
the new Garden Executive Director, Mr. John Bolthouse, with regard to his plans for
the Garden in his first 90 days, six (6) months and twelve (12) months as Executive
Director.
President Lopez indicated that he would be reviewing the committee appointments
and speaking with directors about filling the committee seats that are open due to
Director Bonilla’s resignation.
14. ADJOURNMENT
Director Croucher announced that former Helix Water District board member, Mr.
Warren Buckner, had passed away at the age of 92. He stated that he was very
instrumental in many of the water issues throughout our region and in the Water
8
Conservation Garden. A succulent garden within the Water Conservation Garden,
funded by his son, is dedicated to Mr. Buckner. Director Croucher indicated that he
felt it was appropriate for the District to adjourn its meeting in memory of Mr.
Buckner.
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the
meeting at 5:17 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
1
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
March 19, 2012
1. The meeting was called to order by Vice President Gonzalez at 3:20 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Bonilla, Croucher, Gonzalez, Robak, and Lopez (arrived at 3:21
p.m.)
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Assistant General Manager
German Alvarez, General Counsel Daniel Shinoff, Chief of
Information Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief Financial Officer
Joe Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod Posada, Chief of
Operations Pedro Porras, Chief of Administration Rom Sarno,
District Secretary Susan Cruz and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by President Lopez and
unanimously carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Bonilla, Croucher, Gonzalez and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the agenda.
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
ACTION ITEMS
6. BOARD
AGENDA ITEM 4
2
a) RECEIVE NOMINATIONS AND APPOINT A MEMBER AND ALTERNATE
MEMBER TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY’S
OVERSIGHT BOARD
A motion was made by Director Bonilla, seconded by Director Croucher and
unanimously carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Bonilla, Croucher, Gonzalez and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to nominate and appoint Director David Gonzalez to the City of Chula Vista
Redevelopment Agency’s Oversight Board.
Director Croucher nominated Director Bonilla as the Alternate Member to the City of
Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency’s Oversight Board.
Director Bonilla respectfully declined the nomination and recommended that Director
Gonzalez have the ability to select an Alternate member to the City of Chula Vista
Redevelopment Agency’s Oversight Board.
A motion was made by Director Bonilla, seconded by Director Croucher and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Lopez, Bonilla, Croucher, Gonzalez and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to appoint Director Gonzalez as the Primary Board Representative to the City of Chula
Vista Redevelopment Agency’s Oversight Board and authorize him to select an
Alternate Representative to the Oversight Board.
WORKSHOP
7. REVIEW AND DISCUSS WATER SALES FORECASTING
a) PRESENTATION ON GROWTH AND THE ECONOMY
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem introduced speakers who would be participating
in the workshop and indicated that they would be discussing factors that help
determine the District’s budget for water sales. He first introduced Mr. Alan Nevin, an
Economist from the London Group.
3
Mr. Nevin provided a presentation to the Board concerning meter growth and the
economy. He discussed the national and San Diego County economic factors that
included unemployment, earnings, sales tax collections, and data on real estate. Mr.
Nevin indicated that there was a big difference between the report he provided the
District last year in comparison to this year. He stated that this year is far more
positive economically. Secondly, it is more specific, in that, a number of things that
was predicted to possibly come about, did in fact, occur. This information was used in
determining projections for the future.
Mr. Nevin discussed the economic recovery and noted that in a normal recovery there
would be 200,000 to 250,000 jobs added each month, which occurred in the last
couple months. However, he felt that we should be further ahead than we are now.
He stated, when times were good (early 2000), unemployment claims (those claiming
unemployment for the first time) was below 300,000 per month. Currently, the claim
level is near 350,000 per month which makes it difficult to say that we are seeing a
real recovery in the economy. Mr. Nevin stated that gas and oil prices will likely
decrease and that vehicle sales have increased since 2009. It is estimated that
approximately 14 million cars will be sold this year, which shows confidence in the
economy. When consumers start feeling confident in the economy, the first thing they
buy is a car and the next purchase is a house. Car and home sales are a good sign
for the economy.
Mr. Nevin indicated that San Diego’s population continues to grow approximately
30,000 each year and stated that in 2011 San Diego gained about 27,000 jobs, which
is a very positive sign. It is expected the same amount of population growth will occur
in 2012.
He stated that the unemployment rate was down approximately 1.2%, but this
percentage did not include the 105,000 people who cross the border for jobs. As for
manufacturing and construction, Mr. Nevin anticipates a positive increase in those
sectors. He also stated that each month, approximately 3,000 resale homes worth
more than $200,000 are being sold and that foreclosures are on a downward path.
Mr. Nevin stated that Otay previously had 13% of foreclosures and is currently at 9%.
Foreclosures are coming to a close and that is very positive. He noted that
commercial real estate in San Diego is not doing well and that there are many
vacancies in office and industrial sectors, but he did indicate that retail was doing well.
Mr. Nevin stated that there are currently 1,200 residential units being sold in the
District’s service area and anticipates that they will all be sold in less than a year.
However, there are no new units to replace the sold residential units because lots are
not being created. Mr. Nevin said that over a six-year period, the County averaged
approximately 7,000 new units per year of which the Otay Water District receives 25%
of those new residential units. He stated in 2013 this percentage will drop because no
new residential developments are planned. However, he stated that Villages 8 and 9
in the Otay Ranch area are currently beginning development and in 2014 it is
anticipated that a large supply of condominiums and homes will be built in the Otay
4
Water District’s service area. With this in mind, Mr. Nevin said that the District will
continue to hold 25% of the County’s new residential units.
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem indicated that Mr. Nevin’s economic report is
utilized in the District’s rate model to project meter sales and water usage, two
important aspects that significantly impact the District.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem introduced Dr. Steve Piper who has worked for the
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation for 22 years. He stated that Dr.
Piper is also the Lead Economist for the Bureau of Reclamation’s, “Rate Study: The
Effectiveness of Conservation Pricing in Reducing Water Demand.” Dr. Piper provided
a presentation to the Board regarding the price elasticity of water. He discussed the
Study which included variables such as the rate of unemployment, inflation, rate tier
structure, bill layout, rainfall, temperature, income levels, Otay’s specific rate structure,
and other local community profile data.
Dr. Piper provided the names of the eleven (11) participating agencies of the Study,
which included the Otay Water District. He also provided the participants’ list of
residential data and a list of additional data obtained by the Bureau of Reclamation by
zip code or community. He indicated that from 2000 to 2010, over 600,000 total
observations were conducted for single family residences in over 150 zip codes. The
basic question to be evaluated was, “What impact does the price of water and various
pricing structures have on the amount of water used?”
Dr. Steve Piper provided an example of price elasticity of demand whereas -0.50 was
used as an estimate for residential water. He stated that a 10% increase in price
would lead to a 5% decrease in the quantity demanded for residential water. He then
went on to explain long run versus short run elasticity. With short run elasticity,
consumers are less price elastic because time is needed to make adjustments to
water price changes. Long run elasticity allows consumers to invest in water saving
devices and technology to reduce their water use.
Dr. Piper discussed variables that affect residential water demand such as price,
income, climate and macroeconomic factors. He also talked about the correct price to
include in a model for water demand, which would be the price that individuals react to
(i.e. average price, marginal price, and lagged price). Dr. Piper also discussed real
versus nominal dollars and stated that most economists would argue that real value is
more indicative of economic price value. He also touched on unemployment as a
macroeconomic variable as it is an indicator of recession impacts. Unemployment
was used to account for the effects of the recession beyond the income effect. Dr.
Piper noted that income cannot be separated from recession.
Also discussed were climate variables in which Dr. Piper stated precipitation and
temperature were the best and most consistent climate variables for modeling water
demand.
5
Dr. Piper provided Otay Water District’s preliminary residential results that included a
total of 17,764 observations from 2003 to 2010 (Refer to page 7 in the attached
PowerPoint presentation for the full results). The results showed the District’s lag cost
coefficient to be -0.80355 which indicates that if there was a 10% increase in its water
rate, there would be an 8% decrease in water consumption. In addition, Dr. Piper
indicated that the District’s per capita income had a positive coefficient of 0.000019;
the higher the income, the higher water use.
Dr. Piper noted that the District’s results are preliminary (modifications will be made)
and that the elasticity estimates should be interpreted as long run. He said that the
results are based on historical data that corresponds to historical actions that may not
be repeated in the future. Past programs may be one-time events, so future water use
reductions cannot happen again.
It was discussed that the next step was to modify the current model to include a
seasonality variable, separate data into pre-recession and recession time periods
(2000-2007 and 2008-2010), and estimate best individual demand model for meta-
analysis. Dr. Piper indicated that the next step is anticipated to be completed by
May/June 2012.
Director Jaime Bonilla left at 4:29pm and returned at 4:31pm.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that the District’s Customer Service
Manager, Ms. Alice Mendez-Schomer, Customer Service staff, and the Information
Technology staff gathered the District’s customer data and provided the information to
the Bureau of Reclamation. He stated that the Bureau of Reclamation’s Study is a
valuable tool that shows how variables impact water use. It was indicated that
Consultant, Ms. Karen Keese of PBS&J, was in attendance of today’s meeting, had
helped create the District’s water rate model.
Director Bonilla stated that he believed the District’s water rates are appropriate and
that it is important to have a document that helps the public understand what factors
are used to help the District determine its water rates and maintain stability. He
thanked staff for conducting the research and indicated that the information provided
helps the Board make decisions on rates.
Director Croucher stated that the Bureau of Reclamation’s Study is a valuable tool that
is measurable as it can help determine how much water the District’s customers will
use to help develop the budget.
In response to a question by Director Robak, Dr. Piper stated that if the District
increased its water rates by 10%, it would result in an 8% water use decrease over the
long run (10 years) after inflation. Director Robak stated that if the District is using the
price elasticity model as a tool to help determine its budget, shouldn’t the affected
price show a correlation between actual water sales and per capita water use. Dr.
Piper stated that there should be a correlation, but the affected price is only one
6
variable in price elasticity and that elasticity in itself does not explain other variables
that must be considered over the long run, such as, changes in prices, income, and
climate/precipitation.
Director Bonilla left at 4:40pm.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem introduced Mr. Alexander Tardy who is the Warning
Coordination Meteorologist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
(NOAA). Mr. Tardy provided a presentation on water supply, temperature and
precipitation, historical patterns of rainfall and weather patterns of El Niño and La Niña,
and how forecasts are developed. He provided a background on NOAA and indicated
that there are 122 radar data collection-forecast offices across country.
Director Gary Croucher left at 4:49pm and returned at 4:53pm.
Meteorologist Tardy stated that the overall weather should be looked at globally then
reduced to a local view. He stated that weather statistics have been kept since 1937
and last year (2011) was a record wet season and that this year (2012) has been a dry
year. He indicated that rainfall is variable, as it can be somewhere between 25%-50%
of normal to 50%-75% of normal, and that it is difficult to make determinations on what
is “Normal” based on rainfall from one area. Mr. Tardy indicated that the norm for San
Diego is 56.1% and about 1 ½” below normal rainfall.
Director David Gonzalez left at 4:55pm and returned at 4:58pm.
Mr. Tardy discussed California’s water supply areas and provided slides that showed
San Diego’s service area, local water supply and reservoirs. He also talked about
snow pack/precipitation, seasonal forecast challenges, and the La Niña and El Niño
Pacific jet stream. He indicated that the La Niña is the strongest jet stream in the
world; it is very variable and points at California. He noted that in the early 1990s
NOAA believed it had a great handle on the global weather patterns, as La Niña meant
dry and El Niño meant wet, until the early 2000 when back-to-back La Niñas occurred.
Mr. Tardy stated that climate prediction forecast is difficult to determine and is highly
based on historical statistics.
Mr. Tardy stated that San Diego’s norm is 50%-70% of normal and indicated that the
city recently received up to 7” of rain. He stated that it rains in San Diego mainly in the
months of December, January and February and indicated that the City would be in
trouble if it had a significantly dry March. He stated that the normal rainfall for
Lindberg Field is 10.3” of rain and last year it received 12” of rain. He stated that
NOAA tries to forecast weather by looking at what has happened in the past, looking
at trends from as far back as records go, El Niño and La Niña weather patterns, status
of current conditions, and forecast conditions of the ocean’s sea surface temperatures
to get the actual values. Mr. Tardy talked about ENSO which is a combination of El
Niño and La Niña, and also discussed Equal Chances (EC) which is an equal
distribution of the 33% chance to be above normal, normal, and below normal.
7
Mr. Tardy said that, year after year, the weather has been warmer than usual, which
may be an indication of global warming. He believes that there will be higher than
normal temperatures coast to coast from July to September 2012.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that staff uses NOAA’s weather predictions
from 4-16 months as one of several factors that help determine the District’s budget.
Meteorologist Tardy discussed the value of weather predictions and indicated that
weather forecasts can be of some value if used appropriately, depending on what the
information would be used for and as long as the overall picture is being looked at.
General Manager Watton stated that he is not aware of any other agencies that
consult with meteorologists, but indicated that the District may start a trend to use
them as a consultant who provides information that would be used as a tool for the
development of the agency’s budget.
Finance Manager Rita Bell provided a presentation on the District’s historical sales.
She indicated that the District creates a baseline that starts with the most recent 12
months (i.e. April 2011 through March 2012) and includes the factors of weather,
economy, growth, conservation, and price elasticity as experienced by the District.
Ms. Bell stated that staff tracks sales by customer type, meter size and tiers and
indicated that single-family sales have dropped this past year. She also indicated that
growth factors are added to sales after a baseline is determined.
Finance Manager Bell stated that the District annually reviews weather patterns for the
past 12 months, and rainfall and temperature from the last 3 years, and also looks to
CWA to determine a “Normal” rainfall year. Ms. Bell indicated that staff used the 2010
rainfall year, as suggested by CWA, to help determined the District’s budget.
Ms. Bell provided a chart that showed the average sales per meter for single-family
residential in correlation with weather/rain, temperature, and elasticity rate for FYs
2007-2012. Another chart was shown to display the average monthly consumption in
correlation with average price/unit for FYs 2007-2012, which Ms. Bell indicated that
during that time span the consumption/units had dropped. However, Ms. Bell did
indicate that the District is back on track and is consistently moving up.
Provided was a chart that showed CWA’s Budget vs. Actual Sales for FYs 2007-2012.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem compared it to the Otay Water District’s chart and
noted that the District has been more accurate with its budget versus actual sales.
Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy presented the District’s methodology to develop
EDU’s and projections for FY 2013. He talked about how the economist data is
included in the development of projected meter sales and provided a slide that showed
a correlation between historic and projected meter sales. Mr. Kennedy indicated that
meter sales are looking positive and increasing up to the 2,000 levels.
8
William Granger, Water Conservation Manager, discussed factors that influence indoor
and outdoor water demand now and in the future (i.e. code changes and water smart
programs and products). Mr. Granger indicated that waterwise sprinklers increase
water efficiency by 10% and can significantly impact parcel lots over 3,000 square
feet. He reviewed a chart that showed Otay’s future demand trend for FY’s 2009-2018
which included unadjusted baseline demand in correlation with baseline demand
adjusted for plumbing code. He indicated that it is a tool to project Otay service area
demand. Water Conservation Manager Granger stated that customers are purchasing
Water Smart products that use 20% less water (i.e. toilets, showerheads, faucets, and
urinals). He also discussed the survey of the District’s top water conserving
customers, such as large HOAs who plan to participate in a turf grass replacement
program, golf courses that plan to shrink the amount of irrigated area, and 50% of the
District’s customers who are currently taking specific steps to conserve water due to
the increase of water rates.
Finance Manager Bell concluded the workshop by providing options for the District to
consider incorporating into its future water sales budgeting process to further enhance
the process. The options included budget growth by customer type, reexamine
percentages within the rate tiers, adjust future sales for weather in the upcoming year,
adjust future sales for price elasticity, and adjust future sales for continued
conservation.
Director Gonzalez thanked staff and speakers for conducting the workshop and stated
that it was nice to have documented factors that help with the District’s budget
process. He further indicated that it was nice to have the documentation on hand for
customers to review.
RECESSED TO CLOSED SESSION
8. CLOSED SESSION
The Board recessed to closed session at 5:53 p.m. to discuss the following matters:
a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9]
(I) SALT CREEK GOLF, LLC, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT,
CASE NO. 11-13898-LA11
b) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9]
1 MATTER
9
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
9. REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD MAY
ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
The Board reconvened at 6:23 p.m. General Counsel Dan Shinoff indicated that no
reportable actions were taken in closed session.
10. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the
meeting at 6:23 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
Application for Board of Director Appointment
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD
The appointee will hold office until the next director election, which occurs at the next Statewide
General Election on November 6, 2012.
This application must be received no later than April 23, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. Applications may
be completed on-line at or mailed, faxed or hand delivered to: District
Secretary, Otay Water District, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004,
Phone: (619) 670-2280, Fax: (619) 660-0829
(Please type or print):
Name ~JS~~~tkN~I ~l~t_4~M0~·~6~~-P~( ____________________________ ___
Address __ _
Telephone No. Home Business
Years of Residence in the Otay Water District _/£__4.~....--__,V'---=~::....::tfl-'--'---'L> ________ _
I
Why do you wish to serve on the Board of the Otay Water District? What do you hope to accomplish?
fletJ.rr:-~~~ at/~~~/.
Please attach a copy of your resume.
I certify I am at least 18 years of age, registered to vote, a U.S. citizen, a citizen of the state, a
resident within Division 2 of the Otay Water District and otherwise legally able to hold public
office. I attest the foregoing information is true to the best of my knowledge.
Information contained on this application may be subject to verification.
AGENDA ITEM 7a
..
Attachment to Application for Board of Director Appointmen~ Division 2, Otay Water District.
Brian Lightbody
Why do you wish to serve on the Board of the Otay Water District?
I believe that my experience within the water industry will be of value to the Board and
to the community the Otay Water District serves. I have been employed directly in the water
utility industry for almost 9 years in addition to my 25 years of extensive background in the
construction industry having performed work on many water and wastewater projects within the
Southern California region. I will bring valuable expertise to the Board and community.
1
I am interested in serving the public by serving on the Board. I can be a positive
advocate for infrastructure management and for preserving and maintaining the multi-millions of
dollars invested for the public good. I also serve our community by serving on the Board of
Directors of Crossroads II, a civic organization that focuses on land use issues.
I am aware of the challenges that water districts face. Conservation programs that save
water for the future adds to the misunderstanding of ratepayers who have to pay more for their
water use. I understand that water supply is critical and more local supplies must be developed to
lessen the reliance on out of the region water supplies.
I understand that while the economy has been on a downturn of late that recovery is just
around the comer and the demands on water supply locally and regionally, along with needed
infrastructure will need to be addressed. I believe I can offer my experience, expertise, and
passion for public service to the Board to accomplish the mission of the Otay Water District.
What do you hope to accomplish?
I would like to support the need for infrastructure management for the District as a whole
and specifically in Division 2 and the southwestern area of the District. The Otay Water District
recently celebrated its 50th anniversary and much of the infrastructure is in need of replacement
or refurbishment. We cannot rely on hope to keep the water safe and reliable for the community
the District serves.
The need for asset management and process documentation for future work and workers
is critical. Many predict that a massive "brain-drain" is eminent in the water utility industry.
Processes, plans, and procedures for the District must be kept current and available for new
workers in the Operations, Engineering and Administrative departments.
•
2
I would like to see the customer base for the Districts reclaimed water expand. I believe
alliances with the City of Chula Vista and other water agencies in the region should be
considered and plans developed for expansion of re-claimed water distribution to those areas that
currently are not served with this valuable resource.
Respectfully submitted,
Brian Lightbody
April20, 2012
...
Brian J. Lightbody
Continuing Improvement and Experienced Leader
Experienced Water Industry Leader
••. dedicated to the pubUc good.
Experienced leader with supervisory and project manager skills and certified Water Distribution Operator with a
BSB/PA coupled with over 30 years• exPerience in construction, water/wastewater distribution systems, control,
and operation.
SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS
• An enthusiastic and passionate leader who believes that water utility operations is a public trust
• Thirty years experience in industrial construction industry including water and wastewater construction,
modification, operations, supervision, and project management
• Leverage Resources / Strategic Collaborations who will work closdy with water and wastewater industry
leaders and community partners to encourage involvement and strong collaborative alliances.
PROFESSIONAL ExPERIENCE
Electrical/Electronic Supervisor, Technical Services, San Diego County Water Authority, 2006 to Present
Pump/Electrical Supervisor, Otay Water District, 2003 to 2006
Project Foreman, Superintendent, Project Manager, Baker Electric, Escondido, CA, 2001 to 2003
Apprentice, Journeyman, Forman, Project Manager, Local569 IDEW, San Diego 1978 to 2001
Instructor, San Diego Electrical Training Center, San Diego, 1997 to 2006
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Board Member, Crossroads II civic group, Chula Vista, CA
Cub Scouts Leader
AYSO Soccer
EDUCATION
2010-current
2001-2002
2007-2011
B.S., Business / Public Administration: University of Phoenix, 2011
A.A. Business: University of Phoenix, 2009
Graduate: National Electrical Apprenticeship and Training Instructors Program, University of Tennessee, 2001
Graduate: San Diego Electrical Apprenticeship Program, 1985
Certification: Water / Wastewater Technology, Distribution Systems, Cuyamaca College, 2005
ASSOCIATIONS & CERTIFICATIONS
California Water and Environment Association: Certification
California Department of Public Health: Certification
American Water Works Association: Member
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Member
Professional and Personal References Available Upon Request
AGENDA ITEM 7a
David W. Krogh
Regarding: Board of Directors Vacancy -Division 2
Community Volunteer Experience:
City of Chula Vista, California
Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC) member 2003-2012
Annual review and reporting on city quality oflife standards and performance
General Plan Update-"Visioneer"; Infrastructure & Social Svcs. Subcommittee 2002, 2003-04
Obtained community input; supported development of GPU "Vision 2020"
Southwestern College, Chula Vista, California
Proposition R Citizens Bond Oversight Committee member (CBOC) 2009-2011
Served during inaugural term establishing oversight committee operation, first reporting cycle
Sandag Regional Planning Stakeholders Working Group, San Diego County, California
RPSWG At-Large public representative-South San Diego County 2009-2011
Regional Transportation Plan Update and Comprehensive Plan working group -selected
from 70 applicants; was one of three South San Diego County at-large representatives.
Work Experience:
Cubic Defense Applications, Inc., San Diego, California
Sr. Program Financial Analyst, Program Financial Operations Dept. 2003-present
Support financial and line management as Communications & Electronics program administrator
Cubic Corporation, San Diego, California
Business System Architect, IT Dept. 1999-2003
Business Application Program Manager, Mfg. (ERP System), MIS Dept. 1992-1999
Project Leader (Financial System), MIS Dept. 1990-1992
Senior Systems Analyst (Financial System), MIS Dept. 1987-1990
Senior Auditor, Internal Audit Dept. 1981-1987
Designed, developed, implemented and supported fmancial, manufacturing, and enterprise-wide
computer systems, including technical, interdepartmental, and supplier cross-functional teams.
Price Waterhouse & Co., San Diego, California-Financial Auditor 1979-1981
Organizations, Professional Standing, Recognition, Honors:
Junior Achievement-JA San Diego County Student Company Program judge 2009
"JA Titan" program instructor-Patrick Henry HS (county champions Dec. 2008) 2008-2009
Also Hilltop HS, CV, 2009; class team went on to be JA Student Company of the Year (2010)
Volunteer-Hilltop Middle School, CV; Ira Harbison Elementary School, Nat'l City 2002-2004
JA San Diego County -student Treasurer of the Year, and Executive of the Year 1975
Student participant-Treasurer, Metro Enterprises, Del Rey Center, Chula Vista 197 4-197 5
Clairemont High School Academy of Business & Technology (AOBT) mentor program 2010-2011
Certified Public Accountant, State of California, CPA33465 1981-2000
San Diego State University Outstanding Graduate Award, Accounting 1979
Education:
BS, Business Administration (Accounting), San Diego State University, 1979 1975-1979
Graduated with Highest Honors, with Distinction in Business Administration (Accounting)
Major: Accounting Minors: Geography, Information Systems GPA: 3.95
References: Available upon request.
AGENDA ITEM 7a
F.dunrdo Reves
EXPEIUENCE
Assistnnt Principal, Hilltop High School, foebnmry 2009-Present
• In charge of CIS programs and budgets
• Coord inate all CTE classes and acndem ies
• Assist with classilied and certificntcd evnluations
• Oversee a11endance program
• In charge of English. EL, foreign language and VAPA departments
• Coordinate standardized testing including CST's. GATE, and EAP
• In charge of ensuring compliance with Williams Act and CP~ audits
County Dcroocrnti c Co mmittee ~I emb er. January 20 II -December 2013
• State Delegate for State Democratic Convention 2012
• Active voting member for San Diego County
• Endorse selected candidates to run for public office
• Provide leadership and support for Democratic party
Spcaltcr 11nd Consultant, OUSLA.mx. Tijuana, Mex.ico. July 2008 -present
OUSIA.mx is a Child. Adolescent, and Family Counselin g of'llce. Work as speaker. consultant and presenter
in the following areas:
• Prevention {addictions, bullying, child abuse, domestic violence, and violence specific towards women)
• Pedagogical services for schools including training for teachers and administrators
• Building healthy relationships
• Presenter and consultant for public. private and government agencies
• Author and Co-author of publications and programs: "Toma las Rieodas" "Act Now Program .. , ''Mujer
Segura Program", '':VIujer lnformada -!Iogar Seguro Program". "Quiercs ser mi Novia?", "Libro de
Valores", "Farnilias Seguras''
Progrnm Mnun ger, Regionaf Occupational Program (ROP), January 2006 -February 2009.
• In charge of coordinating Technology. Medical, Business. ;md General programs.
• Created pilot programs to incorponue erE classes lor RSP and SOC students in specific m·cns.
• Supervise teachers and conduct classroom observations.
• Provide in-service opportunities for sta!T on: lesson plnnnir1g, teaching methodologies. developing srudents'
critical thinking skills, cross-curricular lessons. how to deal with change, classroom management and other topics
related to best teaching practices.
• Responsible for master schedule for ROP center and ROP classes in 12 higb schools.
• Coaching new teachers on teaching srratcgies.
• Assist tbe Director of ROP with personnel issues
• Worked closely with high school principals on the ROP mOSler schedule of tbeir sites.
Principal I Founder, Holy Cross Eleme111mJ'Instilute. January 2005 -June 2008
• Coordinated the process of opening n K-6 Private school in Tijuana, Mc~ico, in its emirety including the purchase
of the land. construction, financing, licensing. hiring personnel and purchasing all of the supplies and equipment.
• Developed tbc MJss ion, Vision, goals, and objectives of the school.
• Developed rules. regulations. rights, and responsibilities for staff, parents. nod students.
• Fom1ed partnerships with community, government, religious, and industry entities.
• Founded and directed a non-profit corporation -Roly Cross Foundation ...
• Develop the master schedule and responsible for developing and mainL1ining nil budgetS.
• Oversee payroll, conrrncts with outside vendors, tmd JlUblishcrs.
• Select textbooks fo r all grades and subjects.
• Hire all tenchers and clcricnl staff (school has 25 employees).
• Incorporate a dual-language system in all the grades.
• Develop n climate and culture consistent wi1h !he Ylission and Vision of the school through studenl, staff, parent,
and conununily involvement.
• Evaluate teachers and support staff providing montbly staff development workshops.
• Develop and coordinate nfler school programs including rnusic, fine arts. and spans.
lntersession Principal, Sau Ysidro High School, ScJJtember 2002 -September 2004
• Responsible for rnaster schedule for credit and tutorial classes.
• Responsible fo r hiring teachers and suppon staff. Conducted elnssroorn observntions.
• Conducting meetings with site principle and counselors to determine classes needed.
• Managed imersession budget.
o Developed activities for students to promote anendance.
Assistant Principal, Sa11 Ysidro High School, September 2001-June 2005.
• Coordinated the ope ning of the School including facilities. ordering equipment. and hiring staff.
• Assisted in developing, nnd implementing school site goals and objectives: recommended and administered
policies and procedures; worked with stafl' on curricular. instructional, and personnel issues.
• Administered curriculum. instructional approaches, strategies and materials, and current trends in alternative nnd
non-traditional educational settings.
• Responsible for teclmology, facilities, and room usage.
• IJJ charge of overseeing special education. science, Eng Ush, nnd math departments.
• Coordinated !he OJ>ening of the Assoc iated St11dent Body offi ce. including all activities and athletics.
• Coordinated Ute creation of the ftrst School Site Plan and its revisions during consecutive yenrs.
• In charge of safety, emergency preparedness, and in-servicing staff.
• Coordinated GATE, CAT6. SABE, STAR. End of Course Exnms, CELDT. nnd CAHSEE.
• Assisted in hiring certificated and classitied smt'f.
• Assisted in developing the master schedule nod curriculum development.
• Coordinated !he CCR review for SYHS. In charge of GATE and ELD programs.
• Coordinated !he Categorical Program fro m July 2002 -Mn.rch 2003.
• Trained and monitored new teachers on instructional delivery and adherence to curricular guidelines.
Adjunct Pr·ofessor, University of Phoenix. March 2002 -September 2003
o f amily & Communi ty Involvement In Education Programs
• Theories and Educational Approaches to llumnn Developmem
Assistant Principal, Southwest Junior High School. August 1998 -Sept. 200 I
o Managed student intervention. discipline. attendance and alternative placement.
• Assisted with master scbcdule.
• Hi.rcd. SuJ>ervised. evaluated, and mentorcd teachers and clerical office staff.
• Developed and coordinate administrative co-curricular supervision schedule.
• Revised and coordinated Disaster Preparedness and Safe School Action Plan.
• Coord inated GATE, SA T9, and SABE exams.
T eacher, Chula Vista Adult School. June 1993 -August 1998.
• Taught English as a Second Language, bilingual GI!D preparation. Business Manogemem. Taekwondo.
Kickboxing, and physical fitness classes
• Served as a member of Faculty Advisory Committee (FA C)
• Member of the School Site Council (SSC)
Adjunct Professor, CETYS University, September 1997 -July 1998 .
• Taught upper division Bilingual International lnvesuncnt classes at private university in Tijuana, Mc.~ico, including:
International Investment Cash Flow Analysis. and f inancial Forecasting.
Finnncial Analyst, ITT Financial Co1p, January 1989 -November 1993.
• In charge of financial projects including fmnnc inl and risk analysis.
• Evaluation of llnnncial datu, for the implementation or short and long term financing.
• Evaluating fmancialleveragc. cast inflation impact, ca.sh budgeting fulute and cost benefits and the company's trade-
off between profitability and risk.
• Business fimmcinl consulting. planning and negotiation of nccounts.
• Developed strategic plans nnd programs for business. including the design and implementation of cash flow models.
MEMBERSHlPS
• Member of Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, San D iego
• Past President -Professional Adults in Continuiog Education
• Former Legislative Representative • California Council io Adult Educatioo
• Member ofLATF (Lebanese-American Taekwondo Federation)
EDUCATION
Educarional Leaders/tip Doctoral DegNc
San Diego State University. Expected completion date: June 1014
Educa1ion Specialist Degree
Point L{)ma Nazarene Universiry, June 1998 .
. Master '.f in Business Administration
National Univer>ity. June 1991.
Bocltclors in Business Administrmiou with emphasis in Marketing
National University. October 1988.
April 18, 2012
President Jose Lopez &
Honorable Members of the Board of Directors,
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Road
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
Dear President Lopez and Honorable Board Members:
SUBJECT:Application and Request for Consideration of Appointment to Division
Seat 2 of the Otay Water District Board of Directors
Thank you for the opportunity to be considered for interim appointment to Divisional
Seat 2 of the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District. It is with great respect and
humility that I submit my application. I believe, if appointed, that I have the time
commitment, the energy and the necessary background and talents to effectively and
cooperatively work with all of you collectively, and each of you individually as well as the
loyal and hardworking staff at the District. I believe that I can bring my unique
background and experience -— as all of you do— to the Board, and that our collective
experiences and knowledge will successfully guide the District’s immediate future. I
stand ready to participate in the selection process and will faithfully answer any
questions you might have to the best of my ability. I trust in your judgment to select the
best candidate for this interim position.
Again, thank you for this opportunity. Attached please find the requested submission
items:
1. Completed Application
2. Statement as to why I wish to serve & what I would hope to accomplish?
3. Resume
If you have any questions or need further information or clarification, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
.
Sincerely,
Mitch Thompson
Enclosures (3)
AGENDA ITEM 7a
Otay Water District
Application for Board of Director Appointment
THIS APPLICATION IS A PUBLIC RECORD The appointee will hold office until the next director election, which occurs at the next Statewide General Election on November 6, 2012.
This application must be received no later than April 23, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. Applications may be completed on-line at www.otaywater.gov or mailed, faxed or hand delivered to: District Secretary, Otay Water District, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004,
Phone: (619) 670-2280, Fax: (619) 660-0829
(Please type or print): Name Mitchell L. Thompson
Address
Telephone No. Home Business
Years of Residence in the Otay Water District 5 in District, over 30 years in the Southbay
Why do you wish to serve on the Board of the Otay Water District? What do you hope to accomplish?
Please see the attached statement. Please attach a copy of your resume. I certify I am at least 18 years of age, registered to vote, a U.S. citizen, a citizen of the state, a resident within Division 2 of the Otay Water District and otherwise legally able to hold public
office. I attest the foregoing information is true to the best of my knowledge.
4-18-2012 Signature of Applicant Date
Information contained on this application may be subject to verification.
Applicant Statement for Mitch Thompson
1. Why do you wish to serve on the Board of the Otay Water District?
Qualifications: I have been a very active and involved member of the Southbay community for approximately 25 years. I have served on a number of boards and commissions over those
years that demonstrate my commitment. Those past and present public sector board
positions include: the Chula Vista City Councilmember; Chula Vista Planning Commissoner;
Chair, Chula Vista’s General Plan Update Committee; Chula Vista Housing Advisory Committee; Southbay Community Services Board Member; MAAC Project Board Member; City-County Reinvestment Task Force Member, Chair, Chula Vista City Manager’s Council of
Economic Advisors, among others. I also have extensive public sector and private sector
business experience that contributes toward my being qualified to serve including being the housing and development manager for the County of San Diego, housing coordinator for the City of Chula Vista, Senior Vice President for Bank of America overseeing commercial real estate lending throughout the Southwestern United States, Western US Senior Manager of a
Real Estate Investment Firm, and local Real Estate Developer, among others.
Interest in Water and Infrastructure and its Role in Development of Local Prosperity : Over the last 10 years, with my interest in local planning and economic development, I have followed the many issues related to the provision of safe water to residents and businesses. To that end, I have toured the CWA’s Colorado River Tour. I have also participated in several
focus groups on issues related to local media coverage of the District—the three primary
issues being: 1) the desalinization plant in Mexico; 2) questions related to the provision of lifetime healthcare benefits to long-term District employees, and; 3) the media questions regarding the media covered theoretical links between the healthcare coverage costs and recent rate increases (which were predominantly driven by increases in wholesale water costs.
Overall Ability to Serve Well: I believe I am reasonably informed, understand very well the demands of decision making positions of elected officials such as this, have good credibility with the public and media, know the communities well that we cover, have a wealth of related
background as a basis for contributing to quality board decision making, am a quick study on
issues I do not know well, and would respectfully and constructively serve alongside the existing board members for the benefit of our constituents and the public as a whole.
2. What do you hope to accomplish as a Member of the Board of Directors?
• Work with other Board members on the day to day oversight of District affairs.
• Represent Voters and Constituents of the District and respond to their inquiries.
• Enhanced public credibility (unfairly tarnished) to the good job being done by the District.
• Work on any committee assignments delegated by the Board.
• Ask the question no one thought of asking but that should have been asked.
• Act as a good ambassador on behalf of the District in the community.
• Understand all aspects of district business.
• Add my unique background and experience to that of other board members to ensure
the best decision making possible by the Board.
• Further the existing strategic plan and add my perspective on any possible adjustments to said plan at the appropriate scheduled times for review and adjustment.
• Consider the possibility of running in November election to continue Board work.
MITCHELL L. THOMPSON
PROFESSIONAL & RELATED OBJECTIVES
To remain active in civic issues of importance that affect the community I live in. To use my many years of experience in finance and
development to assist quality real estate redevelopment and affordable housing organizations to further their corporate, public and
charitable missions through the acquisition, development and operation of quality real estate developments. To make a significant
contribution and difference in the field of redevelopment and community & economic development. To mentor young professionals in the
field of housing and community economic development and spur their future contributions to the field.
EXPERIENCE
Council Member, City of Chula Vista August 2009-
July 2010
Appointed to serve the remaining term for Council Member John McCann, who was called to military duty by the United Sates Navy.
Erving as a member of the Public Safety Subcommittee and Western Reviatalization Subcommittee.
Principal, Thompson Consulting April 2004-
Present
Real estate development, financing and management consulting for affordable housing developers, non-profit housing and community
development agencies and local government agencies in California. Clients include: California Community Economic Development
Association, Casa Familiar, Los Angeles Housing Partnership, Concerned Citizens of South Central Los Angeles, Wesley House Student
Housing, Inc. (affiliated with the United Methodist Church), Southern California Housing Development Corporation, New Capital Corp.,
New Economics for Women, San Diego Community Housing Corporation, San Diego Interfaith Housing, Pan Asian Consortium for
Employment, Cabrillo Community Economic Development Corporation, San Diego Urban League, City of Chula Vista, Coachella Valley
Housing Coalition, Visionary Homebuilders of America, Fresno West Coalition for Economic Development, LINC Housing Corporation,
Steadfast Residential Development, Southbay Community Services, McMillin Development Co., among others. Closed over twenty
transactions in first four years of operation.
Executive Vice President/Development, Acquisition & Finance Director April 2004-
New Capital, Inc. May, 2005
Responsible for overseeing real estate financing, acquisition and development for one of the prominent non-profit developers in the greater
Los Angeles area. NEW owns and manages nearly 700 units of affordable housing and has commercial development experiences as well.
Accomplishments included the successful financial restructuring of two projects in default, completion of construction on three tax credit
projects, acquisition of two new development properties, completion of two innovative joint venture partnerships with for-profit developers,
merger with another non-profit, financing of one office/retail project, among others.
Senior Vice President/ Executive Director, Housing & Community Development December 2001-
MAAC Project March 2004
Responsible for managing a staff of 55 responsible for development and management of all housing and community development
programs and projects for one of the largest non-profits in San Diego County. Accomplishments during my tenure include the
following: increased staffing from 15 to 55; started a property management company which has done extremely well and which won four
San Diego Apartment Association Awards; purchased two new apartment complexes; expanded MAAC's resident services particularly in
the area of computer technology (providing residents with wireless internet access); completed the first New Markets Tax Credit financing
plan in San Diego County for a 115,000 foot Latino supermarket shopping center; acquired two development sites, a mixed use seniors
housing site and the shopping center site; successfully started a first-rate bilingual single family homeownership and counseling program;
started a small business technical assistance program in the Logan area that helped a number of local businesses; completed a mixed use
Charter School/commercial development in Chula Vista where now 250 young men and women are attending an alternative high
school--and excelling; completed strategic planning for a comprehensive program for Logan called California Works for Better Health,
which included a community based workforce training center; was selected as one of two development finalists for the San Diego School
District's 22nd and Commercial property.
Vice President/ Western States Regional Manager February 2001-
National Equity Fund December 2001
Responsible for originations and asset management for the largest syndicator of low-income housing tax credits in the U.S. Managerial
responsibility included a staff of 18 in five offices covering from the Rockies to the west coast including Texas. The portfolio included
approximately 200 project investments. The western states annual originations totaled approximately 35 projects and $140 million in
investments.
Senior Vice President/ Western Regional Manager for Community Development Equity May 1998-
Bank of America Community Development Corporation February 2001
Responsible for start-up operations on the West Coast for Bank of America Community Development Corporation (BACDC). BACDC is
a non-banking affiliate responsible for carrying out joint venture real estate developments with local CBO’s. Successfully opened and
staffed four offices in Seattle, Bay Area, Los Angeles and San Diego. Within 18 months we were able to have ten developments underway.
Also responsible for development and implementation of the Bank’s comprehensive America Block by Block Program in two of the four
1999 targeted communities within the Bank’s 19 state franchise.
Senior Vice President/ National Product Development and Loan Administration Manager May 1997-
Bank of America Community Development Bank April 1998
Managed a staff of 50 in affordable housing product development and loan administration functions for Bank of America Community
Development Bank. Functions included portfolio and conduit term lending functions; tax exempt bonds, special programs as well as our
internal documentation and loan administration functions. Successfully negotiated agreements with Fannie Mae, SAMCO and Century
Housing Corporation, among others. Successfully led a Bank team that negotiated a 10-year Community Development Plan with the
California Reinvestment Committee. The Plan was the result of community pressures in California that came out of the 1998 Bank of
America/NationsBank Merger.
Vice President/ Southwest Regional Lending Manager January 1996-
Bank of America Community Development Bank May 1997
Managed seven loan production offices in Southern California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas for Bank of America Community
Development Bank, and Bank of America, FSB Community Development Division. Opened two new offices and more than doubled loan
production over prior year.
Vice President/ San Diego Field Office Manager October 1989-
Bank of America Community Development Bank December 1995
Manage the San Diego loan production office for Bank of America Community Development Bank, a newly formed state-chartered
community development bank providing development, construction and permanent financing for non-profit and other affordable housing
and economic development projects in California. Responsibilities include: supervise staff of three; credit analysis and administration for
commercial financing requests for affordable housing projects; housing program loan product development and marketing for bank. The
Bank opened for business in April 1990.
Significant Accomplishments:
x Personally financed over $50 Million in Affordable Housing Loans since inception of Bank. Loan sizes ranged from $115,000 to
$11,000,000.
x Was among original eight staff hired to start the Bank. Bank's assets have grown from $4MM to $80MM in five years.
x Named "Lender of the Year" in October, 1994 by the Non-profit Federation for Housing and Community Development of San
Diego County
Housing Coordinator December 1988-
City of Chula Vista October 1989
Supervised a staff of three which managed the City's Housing & Community Development Programs including the following: Community
Development Block Grant Program; Neighborhood Revitalization Program; Administration of the Redevelopment Agency Low-Income
Housing Set Aside Funds; Mobilehome Space Rent Arbitration Ordinance; Mobilehome Relocation Ordinance; Inclusionary Housing
Programs; Acquisition and Management of City owned Affordable Housing; Rental Rehabilitation Program; Land Banking Program.
Housing Development and Finance Manager July 1979-
Housing & Community Development Department, County of San Diego December 1988
Supervised a staff of six responsible for the administration of housing development and financing programs for the County of San Diego.
Responsibilities included: management of $5 million CDBG Housing Development Fund; Public Housing Development Program;
Mobilehome Occupant Assistance Program; Administration of County and Various Smaller City Density Bonus Programs; Single Family
Bond Program; Multifamily Bond Program; Industrial Development Bond Program.
Significant Accomplishments:
x Provided $62 million in bond financing which produced 1500 multifamily units in the unincorporated area and smaller cities in
San Diego County.
x Provided $31.8 million in tax-exempt bond financing to provide below-market rate loans to 375 first-time homebuyers in 13 new
housing developments in San Diego County
x Entered into regulatory agreements with developers of 25 different rental housing developments consisting of approximately
2,000 units under various local density bonus programs
x Implemented the first of its kind "Mobilehome Occupant Assistance Program" to provide equity sharing loans to lower-income
residents in mobilehome parks converting to resident ownership. The program assisted in the conversion of twelve mobilehome
parks, including over 2,000 spaces, to resident ownership. Secured two-thirds of all funding available under the State's
Mobilehome Park Assistance Program. Received a U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development National Recognition
Award in 1987.
x Completed the County's first Industrial Development Bond Sale
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts, University of California, San Diego, 1977 Double degree in Political Science and Urban Studies. Magna Cum Laude.
VOLUNTEER, PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS AND CERTIFICATES
x Chairman, Chula Vista City Manager’s Council of Economic Advisors (2010-Present)
x Licensed Real Estate Agent, Neighborhood Real Estate Services (2006- Present)
x Member, City of Chula Vista Mobilehome Rent Review Commission (2010-Present)
x Member, San Diego City-County Reinvestment Task Force (2010-Present)
x Planning Commissioner, City of Chula Vista (2009-2010)
x Active California Real Estate License, Member San Diego Association of Realtors (2006-present)
x Member, National Association of Realtors (2006-present)
x Advisory Committee Member, Chula Vista Taxpayers Association (2008-present)
x Member, Crossroads II Community Planning Group (2008-2010)
x Member, Northwest Civic Association (2007- present)
x Member Southwest Civic Association (2007- present)
x Chairman, General Plan Update Committee, City of Chula Vista (2003 to 2006)
x Member & Secretary, South Bay Forum Political Action Committee (2001 to present)
x Speaker, Speaker/Trainer California Revitalization Initiative, CCEDA, OCC & Federal Reserve (2005 to Present)
x Treasurer, San Diego Capital Collaborative (2003 to 2005)
x Founding Member, San Diego Housing Federation (1992-2005)
x Member, Board of Directors, California Community Economic Development Association (2002 to 2005)
x Member, Board of Directors, South Bay Community Services (1997 to 2002)
x Member, Board of Directors, San Diego Neighborhood Funders (1999 to 2001)
x Member, Board of Directors, MAAC Project, San Diego, California (1998 to 2001)
x Member, Local Initiative Support Corp San Diego Advisory Committee, Chair, Loan and Grants Subcommittee (1990 to 2001)
x Member, UCSD Undergraduate Scholarship Council (1997 to 2001)
x Founding Chair, San Diego Foundation Non-profit Core Operating Support Program (1991 to 1998)
x Founding Board Member, San Diego Federation for Non-profit Housing & Community Development (1992 to 1997)
x Vice Chairman, San Diego County Housing & Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee by Supervisor Brian
Bilbray (1988 to 1994)
x Mayoral Appointee, City of Chula Vista Housing Advisory Committee (1989 to 1994)
x Member, City of San Diego Housing Trust Fund Advisory Committee (1990)
x Member, Southern California Association of Non-Profit Housing (1990 to 2007)
x Volunteer, San Diego/Tijuana Chapter, Habitat for Humanity: Site Selection Committee on an ongoing basis; House Leader,
Jimmy Carter Work Project, June, 1990 in Tijuana, Mexico (1990 to 1993)
x Member, National Association of Housing & Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO, 1981 to 1987)
x Public Housing Manager Certification, NAHRO (1984)
x Member, San Diego Apartment Association (SDAA) (1979 to 1988)
x Instructor, SDAA, Government Housing, Certified Apartment Manager Program (DRE Approved, 1983-1988)
x Lecturer, at conferences and workshops offered by the following organizations: US Federal Reserve; Calif. Community &
Economic Development Assoc.; National Council of La Raza; Calif. Assoc. of Realtors; Golden State Mobilehome Owners
League; National Assoc. of Housing and Redevelopment Officials; US Dept of Housing and Urban Development; Chula Vista
Mobilehome Issues Committee; San Diego Housing Commission, and; the San Diego Apartment Assoc.
x Authored the following Reports/Publications: Options for Land Dedication for University Housing in the Eastern Territories of
Chula Vista (2006); San Diego County Housing Element of the General Plan, 1985-90 (contributor); San Diego County Housing
Authority 1983 Public Housing Development Proposal; San Diego County Housing Authority Grievance Procedures; San
Diego County Housing Authority Policies Regarding Admissions and Occupancy of Assisted Housing ; 1982-85 & 1985-88
Housing Assistance Plan for San Diego Urban County; 1985 San Diego County Annual Policy Report Under Section 103A of
the Internal Revenue Code; 1985 San Diego County Mobilehome Survey; The Impact of Local Growth Control Measures on
Affordable Housing in San Diego County
REFERENCES
Available upon request.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4196
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
APPOINTING ________________
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DIVISION 2,
TO FILL THE VACANCY LEFT BY
DIRECTOR BONILLA’S RESIGNATION
WHEREAS, on March 27, 2012, a vacancy occurred on the Board of Directors
(“Board”), Division 2, of the Otay Water District, as defined in Government Code section
1770(c); and
WHEREAS, section 30504 of the California Water Code provides that “all vacancies
occurring in the office of director shall be filled pursuant to section 1780 of the Government
Code”; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 1780(b), elections officials and the
Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego were timely notified that the vacancy occurred;
and
WHEREAS, the District posted public notice and invited applications as required by
Government Code section 1780; and
WHEREAS, the District has received applications from four (4) individuals who meet the
criteria to represent Division 2; and
WHEREAS, the board has interviewed each applicant and has deliberated regarding the
most qualified candidate for appointment; and
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that ________________ is the most qualified
candidate for the position;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water
District that the Board hereby appoints ________________ as Director of Division 2 of the
Board of Directors of the Otay Water District.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board Secretary shall transmit this resolution and
all other information necessary to complete the appointment process pursuant to Government
Code section 1780 and Water Code section 30504.
The foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting of the
Board of Directors of the Otay Water District, held on the 2nd day of May 2012 by the following
vote of the Board:
AGENDA ITEM 7.a.i
2
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________
President
ATTEST:
_________________________
District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED BY:
Alicia Mendez-Schomer
Customer Service Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Leak Adjustment for the Cottonwood Meadows Homeowners
Association (HOA)
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board support staff’s recommendation to leave intact the
adjustments provided the Cottonwood Meadows Homeowners Association
(HOA), in accordance with the District’s established practice, and
deny any further adjustments.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To leave intact the adjustments totaling $504.50 which includes the
leak and penalty adjustments provided the Cottonwood Meadows HOA, as
it is consistent with the District’s established practice for leak
adjustments.
ANALYSIS:
The Cottonwood Homeowners Association has a total of five accounts
with Otay. All the accounts are irrigation accounts serving the
common areas within the development.
As part of our monthly meter reading process, on 3/5/12 our meter
reader took a read of 9909 units on the irrigation AMR meter at this
property. Once the daily reads were downloaded into our billing
system, staff noticed the higher than expected usage and initiated a
AGENDA ITEM 7b
reread for the next day, 3/6/12. When our field staff arrived at the
premises to check the meter on 3/6/12 they noticed the meter spinning
which indicates a large leak, and placed a call to the Otay office
informing the billing staff of their findings. Within an hour of
getting the information, our Customer Service staff called and spoke
with Arlene at the HOA informing her of the situation.
On 3/12/12, the Customer Service Manager was forwarded a call from
Scott Duckrow of the Cottonwood Meadows HOA who inquired about a leak
adjustment. At the verbal request of Scott Duckrow of the Cottonwood
Meadows HOA, Otay staff calculated and applied a leak adjustment in
the amount of $191.57 on 3/14/12. Field staff took additional meter
readings on 3/15 and 3/22 to assist the HOA in accessing further
water loss. The read on 3/15 showed 10234 and that the usage had
been significant between the read on 3/5 and 3/15, an additional 325
units. The read on 3/22 showed no additional usage. Mr. Duckrow was
offered a payment arrangement of six months (without interest) to pay
the outstanding bill of $6,578.49, after the adjustment of $191.57
was applied, but he declined this offer. The late penalty of $312.93
which was added to the April 9th bill was reversed, as a courtesy, and
brings the total adjustments to $504.50.
On 3/21/12, a payment was received and applied to the HOA’s account
in the amount of $320.00 leaving a balance of $6,258.49.
To arrive at the credit amount of $191.57, the total water usage was
recalculated at the lowest tier, from $3.66 per unit to $3.53, and
the difference was credited to their water account.
Reducing bills to the lowest tier is fair, to be responsive to
customers with an extraordinary loss while minimizing financial
impact to the District. The District is sensitive to the HOA’s
situation and believes that they would benefit from interest free
terms for 6 months. Terms have also been offered up to 12 months
with no interest.
Leak adjustments, by practice, have been applied to residential
accounts. Years later, this was expanded to include commercial
accounts. Adjustments are limited to one per year. Otay has not
routinely applied leak adjustments to irrigation accounts, but has
done so on a case-by-case basis.
For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, Otay granted leak
adjustments for 216 customers totaling $35,368.65. Of these, 211
were residential accounts. Of the remaining accounts, there were 3
commercial accounts totaling $862.60 and 2 commercial irrigation
accounts totaling $1,569.03.
In this fiscal year to date, Otay has granted and applied 250
residential leak adjustments totaling $42,996.43. In addition, 3
commercial accounts totaling $708.50 and 3 commercial irrigation
accounts, including this one totaling $994.07, have been granted leak
adjustments.
Staff recommends that the Board support and leave intact the $504.50
leak and penalty adjustments granted to the Cottonwood Meadows HOA as
it is consistent with prior leak adjustments. Staff does not
recommend any additional adjustment for the HOA. Altering the
methodology to provide a greater adjustment would have a negative
effect on revenue. It would place District ratepayers in a position
of subsidizing others that may not be maintaining systems or
otherwise experiencing water loss on private property, and would be
inconsistent with the District’s established practice.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The existing adjustment would have no fiscal impact, which would
deviate from standard operating procedures. To date, the total
amount of leak adjustments for this fiscal year is $44,699.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Maintain the District’s established practice for leak adjustments for
all customers.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments: Attachment A - Committee Action
Attachment B - Cottonwood HOA Letter
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Leak Adjustment for the Cottonwood Meadows Homeowners
Association (HOA)
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Administration, Finance and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on April 19, 2012 and the following comments
were made:
Staff indicated that the Cottonwood HOA had a large leak in their
irrigation system. The District became aware of this leak when
field staff read their meter on March 5 and noted much higher
usage than normal. As is practice, staff scheduled a reread the
following day to ensure that the read was correct before any
action is taken. On March 6 when the meter was reread by field
staff, it was noted that the meter dial was spinning. The staff
person immediately contacted the District office and spoke with a
customer service representative. The customer service
representative then contacted the customer, Cottonwood HOA, and
advised them of the possible leak.
On March 12, District staff spoke with the HOA and the HOA
inquired about a leak adjustment. The HOA was billed
approximately $6,500 which was reduced by a leak adjustment of
$191.57. As a courtesy, the District also reversed late fees.
This is consistent with how past leak adjustments have been
handled for all customer accounts (residential, commercial and
irrigation).
Staff shared that leak adjustments are determined by taking the
customer’s total usage and calculating it at the lowest tier rate
for the customer account type (residential, commercial or
irrigation). Because the spread between the tiers for commercial
accounts is very small, the adjustment is a small dollar amount.
The spread between residential tier rates is much larger and,
thus, adjustments are a higher dollar value.
The District understands that this is an extraordinary loss for
the HOA and has offered a six-month no interest payment plan.
The HOA declined the payment plan and asked to address their
matter with the District’s board. They are requesting a higher
adjustment, but have not yet indicated the amount they are
requesting. The bill is approximately $6,000 above their normal
March monthly rate.
It was indicated that the District is sensitive to such
unexpected incidences and does provides some credit adjustment.
However, the District still must cover the base cost for the lost
water. If the District reduces the bills for customers who have
leaks or some other extraordinary use, the cost of the lost water
is spread to the District’s other ratepayers which, in effect, is
a subsidy.
It was noted that if the HOA had acted more quickly in fixing the
irrigation leak, the water loss and water bill would have been
significantly less. The HOA was notified within one (1) day of
field staff detecting the leak. Field staff took a total of
three meter reads to assist the HOA and noted with the first two
meter readings that there was still movement on their meter. By
the third meter reading, no movement of the meter was detected.
It appears the HOA delayed taking action until eight (8) days
after they had been made aware of the leak.
It was discussed that the leak adjustment provided the Cottonwood
HOA is consistent with past practice. Customers in a similar
situation were provided a leak credit adjustment and the
customers have paid their water bill less the adjustment.
Following the discussion, the Committee asked that the item be placed
on the action calendar for the full board’s consideration and to
provide the HOA has an opportunity to address the board.
COTTONWOOD MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
c/o BRICKROW PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC.
400 MILE OF CARS WAY, SUITE C
NATIONAL CITY CA 91950
(619) 477-3133 / fax 619-477-3758
March 20, 2012
Susan Cruz
Otay Water District
El Cajon, CA 92020
Dear Ms. Cruz:
On March 6, 2012, Brickrow Property Management, Inc. received a courtesy call from
Otay Water District regarding the meter reading for our Association. Gia, the customer
service representative, informed us that the irrigation meter at 2184 Greencrest Drive
was reading at 1,715 units, when the normal average for this meter is 58 units. She
informed us that the technician was sent back out two days later and the meter went
up another 259 units, thus suggesting a major leak in our irrigation system. Our
landscapers were notified immediately and the water was shut off within the hour.
After completing a check of the irrigation system, our landscapers determined that the
underground leak was caused by a break in a two inch main water line that was
damaged by a tree root. The area of the leak was not visible, as it was located on an
embankment behind a stucco wall. Furthermore, our landscapers are only scheduled
for two days a week and have to maintain our thirteen acres in sections, so the area of
the leak had not yet been visited.
The Board of Directors humbly requests that the Otay Water District make
adjustments to the water bills that reflect the excessive water usage due to the leak.
Our March 8, 2012 water bill was $6,770.06, which is $6451.63 more than February’s
bill. The April bill will reflect the 259 units from the second reading, as well as
additional units from the time of the reading to when the water was shut off by our
landscapers.
We are an Association with a budget that barely covers our general operations. We are,
however, currently working with Cuyamaca College Landscape and Low Water Usage
Garden to implement a water conservation program within the next five years. The cost
of the leak would set our project back at least two years.
We would appreciate your consideration in approving the adjustments to our water
bills. The Association’s Landscaping Committee Chairperson, Deborah Haynes, has
requested to attend the Otay Water District Board of Directors Meeting on April 4,
2012, in order to represent Cottonwood Meadows HOA regarding this request.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
COTTONWOOD MEADOWS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
MR:ac
Attachment B
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED BY:
Frank Anderson, Utility
Services Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO.
APPROVED BY:
Pedro Porras, Chief, Water Operations
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approval to Purchase Sewer Televising Van
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase
order to 3T Equipment Company Inc. in the amount of $117,062.48
for the purchase of one (1) Sewer Televising Van.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment “A”.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization to purchase a Sewer Televising
Van.
ANALYSIS:
Included in the approved FY 2012 budget is one (1) new Sewer
Televising Van.
The Sewer Televising Van is a new vehicle scheduled to be
utilized by the Utility Maintenance Staff.
In 2006, the State Water Resources Control Board adopted a State
General Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR) for any agency that
owns and operates a sanitary sewer system. A component of the
WDR requires a Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) that
AGENDA ITEM 8a
emphasizes “Routine Condition Assessment” of the sewer system.
Part of this assessment includes sewer line televising that
ensures proper investigation, maintenance and repair of the
sanitary sewer system. This would be consistent with the SSMP
that requires that each collection system agency identify and
prioritize structural deficiencies.
In addition, the televising of the District’s collection system
is a functional assessment of current conditions of sewer pipes
in regards to maintenance and cleaning. Common factors that
compromise the integrity of the gravity sewer system includes
sags in pipes, tree root intrusion, the introduction of cooking
grease from commercial and residential customers along with
other miscellaneous items introduced into the sewer system.
Consequently, common sewer maintenance practice includes the
cleaning of sewer lines with above mentioned issues and prompt
follow-up televising to ensure the line(s) were properly cleaned
and free of obstructions. These obstructions could cause a sewer
back-up into commercial and residential customers’ private sewer
laterals and/or sewer overflows from District sewer mains that
discharge into the environment. Sewer overflows are prohibited
by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San
Diego Section.
Over the past three years, prior contracts to televise and
document the wastewater collection system totaled $685,100. Cost
per-foot prices ranged from $1.41 per foot to $3.50 per foot.
This cost was for scheduled sewer televising work with, at times
delays of numerous days before work was performed. Televising
reports from the contractor were delivered with requested
maintenance and cleaning actions that were already completed.
Current televising costs by a contractor with a 48-hour response
is about $2.75 per lineal foot.
Currently, our sewer system is approximately 82 miles of sewer
lines at $2.75 per foot equates to 1.19 million dollars to
inspect the entire sewer system. Additional efficiency benefits
include one-day turnaround of televising affected sections of
the wastewater collection system that includes in-house staff
televising costs of $1.26 per foot. The process of cleaning and
televising sewer lines will allow for regulatory WDR and SSMP
compliance with the District emphasis of zero overflows.
In-house sewer televising will also greatly benefit sewer line
CIP replacement projects as internal video inspection allows for
precise replacement forecasts.
Purchase price before taxes includes vehicle $24,500.00,
televising equipment, delivery, warranty and training totals of
$84,143.14 for a total purchase price of $108,643.14. Attached
are pictures of the van and televising equipment.
The sewer televising equipment package includes sewer camera,
camera transporter, 1,000 feet of single conductor-steel armored
cable, portable generator to reduce fuel consumption, computer
and computer related sewer inspection software that is
compatible with the District’s software.
The warranty includes two years on the camera and transporter, a
five-year warranty of the reel and cable with a lifetime
warranty on the camera LED lighting. 3-T equipment company also
provides a free lifetime loaner program when televising
equipment is being serviced. Their service location is in
Montclair near Ontario, CA.
3-T supplies on-site training of three days if needed with as
many Otay staff members as the District selects. The training
cost is inclusive in the total bid cost. Training includes
maintenance and operation of the televising equipment.
Maintenance usually consists of cleaning, inspecting, tightening
of connectors and lubrication of moving parts. We expect to
train four staff members which include one crew leader, two Sr.
Utility/Equipment Operators and one Utility Worker. Normal
staffing for televising of the sewer system should consist of
one Sr. Utility/Operator and one Utility Worker.
In accordance with District policy, bids were solicited for the
Sewer Televising Van. Three bids were received. Prices received
include all applicable fees and taxes and delivery.
Dealer Vehicle Bid Bid Price
3-T Equipment Company F-350 Class Sewer
Televising Van $117,062.48
Mission Valley Trucks F-350 Class Sewer
Televising Van $118,471.12
RST Technical Services F-350 Class Sewer
Televising Van $132,655.44
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Projected purchase budget for this vehicle is $130,000. The
purchase of this vehicle will cost $117,062.48 which will be
charged against the Vehicle Replacement CIP p2282. The total
cost in this account will not exceed budgeted funding.
The total FY12 project budget for the CIP p2282 Vehicle
Replacement is $395,000. Existing expenditures and current
encumbrances for the CIP, including the vehicle purchased under
this request if approved, are $324,754.44. This will complete
the purchases from this account for this fiscal year.
Based on the Utility Service Manager’s evaluation, the CIP 2282
budget is sufficient to complete the budgeted purchase.
The Finance Department has determined that 100% of the funds are
available from the sewer betterment and sewer replacement funds.
Expenditure Summary:
FY12 Vehicle Replacement CIP 2282 Budget: $395,000.00
FY12 Expenditures and Encumbrances to Date:
Vehicle Replacement of existing fleet.
$207,691.96
Proposed Vehicle Purchase: $117,062.48
Projected Expenditures of Vehicle
Replacement FY12 CIP 2282 Budget: $324,754.44
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Operate the system to meet demand twenty-four hours a day, seven
days a week.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment “A”, Committee Action
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: Approval to Purchase a Class 4 Service Line Truck
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on April 18, 2012 and the following
comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board authorize the General Manager to
issue a purchase order to 3T Equipment Company, Inc. in the
amount of $117,062.48 for the purchase of one (1) Sewer
Televising Van.
Staff indicated that in 2006, the State Water Resources Control
Board adopted a State General Waste Discharge Requirement (WDR)
for agencies that owns and operates a sanitary sewer system. A
component of the WDR requires a Sewer System Management Plan
(SSMP) that emphasizes a “Routine Condition Assessment” which
includes sewer line televising to ensure proper investigation,
maintenance and repair of the sanitary sewer system.
Staff discussed the common factors that compromise the integrity
of the gravity sewer system and also discussed the importance of
common sewer maintenance practice.
Staff stated that over the past three years, prior contracts to
televise and document the wastewater collection system totaled
$685,000. Staff discussed several challenges that the District
experienced while contracting out sewer televising services,
which is detailed on page 2 of the staff report.
Staff talked about the efficiency benefits for the District to
purchase its own Sewer Televising Van and train its staff to
perform the process of cleaning and televising sewer lines. It
was noted that in-house sewer televising will also greatly
benefit sewer line CIP replacement projects as internal video
inspection allows for precise replaclement forecasts.
It was noted that purchase price before taxes includes vehicle
$24,500.00, televising equipment, delivery, warranty and training
totals of $84,143.14 for a total purchase price of $108,643.14.
Warranty details are provided on page 3 of the staff report.
Staff indicated that four existing District staff members, one
crew leader, two Sr. Utility/Equipments Operators and one Utility
Worker will be included in the training process. Staff also noted
that the sewer televising will be performed by two (2) existing
sewer maintenance staff and incorporated into their current
inspection and maintenance activities. No additional staff will
be required for this task.
Staff discussed the bid process and stated that the District
received three bids in which 3-T Equipment Company, Inc.
submitted the lowest bid. Results of the bids are listed on page
3 of the staff report.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
the purpose of the sewer replacement reserve is to replace things
that are broken or has exceeded its useful life and to maintain
the existing level of service, whereas the betterment reserve is
to fund facilities that improve or enhance the level of existing
service. Staff also indicated that these funds are generated from
the District’s sewer fees.
Staff believes that buying a Sewer Televising Van is a justified
purchase as it will save a significant amount of money when
District staff takes over the cleaning and televising sewer lines
process. Also, in-house sewer televising would provide a rapid
response and avoid any delays.
In response to a question from the Committee, it was indicated
that staff does not have to be certified prior to receiving
training from the vendor. Staff can perform the routine
condition assessment of the District’s sewer system once they are
trained by the vendor.
Staff stated that the Sewer Televising Van will be used by the
District approximately 20%-40% of the time and that it is
possible to work with other agencies who require cleaning and
sewer line televising services.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED BY:
Daniel Kay
Associate Civil Engineer
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief of Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of As-Needed Electrical Engineering Services Contract
for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
awards a professional As-Needed Electrical Engineering Services
contract to BSE Engineering, Inc. and authorizes the General Manager
to execute an agreement with BSE Engineering in an amount not-to-
exceed $100,000 for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
professional As-Needed Electrical Engineering Services agreement with
BSE Engineering in an amount not-to-exceed $100,000 for Fiscal Years
2013 and 2014. The termination date for the professional services
agreement will be June 30, 2014.
AGENDA ITEM 8b
2
ANALYSIS:
The District will require the services of a professional electrical
engineering consultant to provide electrical and instrumentation
designs in support of CIP projects for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014.
It is more efficient and cost effective to issue an as-needed
contract for the electrical engineering services which will provide
the District with the ability to obtain consulting services in a
timely and efficient manner. This concept has also been used in the
past for other disciplines such as civil engineering, geotechnical,
traffic, and environmental services.
The District will issue task orders to the consultant for specific
projects during the contract period. The consultant will then
prepare a detailed scope of work, schedule, and fee estimate for each
task order assigned under the contract. Upon written task order
authorization from the District, the consultant shall then proceed
with the project as described in the scope of work.
The anticipated CIP projects that are estimated to require electrical
engineering services for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014 are listed below:
CIP DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED
COST
P2083 870-2 Pump Station Replacement $30,000
P2190 10-Inch, 1485 Zone Jamul Highlands Pipeline $5,000
P2518 803-3 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
(Electrical Upgrades) $5,000
P2519 832-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
(Electrical Upgrades) $5,000
R2048 Otay Mesa Distribution Pipelines $20,000
S2023 Sewer System Improvements at Various
Locations $5,000
TBD 30-Inch Potable Water Pipeline Manifold $20,000
TOTAL: $90,000
The contract is for an amount not-to-exceed $100,000 for all task
orders. Fees for professional services will be charged to the CIP
projects for which the electrical engineering services are performed.
The electrical engineering services’ scopes of work for the above
projects are estimated from preliminary information and past
projects. Therefore, staff believes that a $100,000 cap on the As-
Needed Electrical Engineering Services contract is adequate, while
still providing for any unanticipated work that may become necessary.
3
This As-Needed Electrical Engineering Services contract does not
commit the District to any expenditure until a task order is approved
to perform work on a CIP project. The District does not guarantee
work to the consultant, nor does the District guarantee that it will
expend all of the funds authorized by the contract on professional
services.
The District solicited electrical engineering services by placing an
advertisement on the Otay Water District’s website and the San Diego
Daily Transcript on February 23, 2012. Six (6) firms submitted a
letter of interest and a statement of qualifications. The Request
for Proposal (RFP) for As-Needed Electrical Engineering Services was
sent to all six (6) firms resulting in four (4) proposals received on
March 15, 2012. They are as follows:
Engineering Partners Inc.
BSE Engineering Inc.
Elen Consulting
Lee & Ro Inc.
G4 Engineering and Turpin & Rattan chose not to propose.
In accordance with the District’s Policy 21, staff evaluated and
scored all written proposals. BSE Engineering received the highest
score for their services based on their experience, understanding of
the scope of work, proposed method to accomplish the work, and their
composite hourly rate. BSE Engineering was the most qualified
consultant with the best overall proposal. They are a highly rated
company and are readily available to provide the services required.
A summary of the complete evaluation is shown in Attachment B. BSE
Engineering also completed the Company Background Questionnaire which
showed no outstanding issues. The Questionnaire is shown in
Attachment C.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The funds for this contract will be expended from a variety of
projects, as previously noted above. The fees for professional
services requested herein are available in the authorized CIP project
budgets. This contract is for as-needed professional services based
on the District's need and schedule, and expenditures will not be
made until a task order is approved by the District for the
consultant's services on a specific CIP project.
Based on a review of the financial budgets, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budgets will be sufficient to support the
4
professional as-needed consulting services required for the CIP
projects noted above.
The Finance Department has determined that the funds to cover this
contract are available as budgeted for these projects.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
customers with the best quality water, wastewater, and recycled water
service in a professional, effective, and efficient manner.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DK/RR:jf
P:\WORKING\As Needed Services\Electrical\FY 2013-2014\Staff Report\BD 05-02-12, Staff Report, As-Needed Electrical Engineering Services,
(DK-RR).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Summary of Proposal Rankings
Attachment C – Company Background Questionnaire
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Various Award of As-Needed Electrical Engineering Services Contract
for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on April 18, 2012 and the following
comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board awards a professional As-Needed
Electrical Engineering Services contract to BSE Engineering, Inc.
and authorizes the General Manager to execute an agreement with
BSE Engineering in an amount not-to-exceed $100,000 for Fiscal
Years 2013 and 2014.
Staff stated that with the existing as-needed electrical contract
expended through this fiscal year, and with the upcoming CIP for
fiscal years 2013 and 2014, there were some District projects that
require support for electrical engineering design. Details of
these projects are provided on page 2 of the staff report.
Staff provided a background of the as-needed services and noted
that the contract does not commit the District to any expenditure
until a task order is approved to perform work on a CIP project.
It was indicated that staff followed Policy 21 and advertised a
Request for Proposal on February 23, 2012. Staff stated that six
(6) firms submitted a letter of interest and indicated that four
(4) firms submitted a proposal by the deadline of March 15, 2012.
The proposals were reviewed by staff and the results of the
analysis are shown in Attachment B of the staff report.
Staff stated that BSE Engineering, Inc. received the highest
score. It was noted that staff performed a Google search on BSE
that revealed no outstanding issues and that a background
questionnaire (see Attachment C) was implemented and did not
reveal any outstanding issues. Staff also checked references and
found them to be an excellent rated company.
In response to a question by the Committee with regards to the
contract period and covering costs, staff indicated that although
the proposed contract will expire on June 30, 2014, the General
Manager has certain authority to extend the contract period and
can also increase the budgeted amount if the $10,000 buffer does
not cover costs.
Upon the Committee’s inquiry of awarding 3-5 year contracts for
vendors who provide good services, staff stated that it is better
maintain 2-year contracts because it allows the District to
observe the market every two years and compare bids.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
Qualifications of
Staff
Understanding of
Scope, Schedule
and Resources
Soundness and
Viability of
Proposed Project
Plan
INDIVIDUAL
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
AVERAGE
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
Proposed Rates*
Consultant's
Commitment to
DBE
TOTAL
SCORE
30 25 30 85 85 15 Y/N 100
Poor/Good/
Excellent
WRITTEN
MAXIMUM POINTS
REFERENCES
ATTACHMENT B
As-Needed Electrical Design
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RANKINGS
Ron Ripperger 26 23 25 74
Jeff Machioro 27 24 26 77
Kevin Cameron 28 24 26 78
Brandon DiPietro 28 24 26 78
Don Anderson 25 22 25 72
Ron Ripperger 26 23 23 72
Jeff Machioro 27 23 25 75
Kevin Cameron 27 24 28 79
Brandon DiPietro 26 22 27 75
Don Anderson 28 22 27 77 Consultant Rate Position Score
Ron Ripperger 25 23 23 71 Elen Consulting $680 lowest 15
Jeff Machioro 22 22 24 68 BSE Engineering $720 13
Kevin Cameron 25 22 25 72 Engineering Partners $751 11
BSE Engineering 13 Y
Engineering Partners Y
Elen Consulting
11 87
1571
89
Y 86
76
76 EXCELLENT
RATES SCORING CHART
Brandon DiPietro 27 21 26 74 Lee & Ro Inc.$963 highest 1
Don Anderson 26 22 24 72
Ron Ripperger 28 23 25 76
Jeff Machioro 28 24 28 80
Kevin Cameron 28 23 27 78
Brandon DiPietro 28 22 27 77
Don Anderson 26 23 27 76
Lee & Ro, Inc.Y77 1 78
*Review Panel does not see or consider rates when scoring other
categories. Rates are scored by the PM, who is not on Review Panel.
The fees were evaluated by comparing rates for seven positions. The
sum of these seven rates are noted on the table above.
P:\WORKING\As Needed Services\Electrical\FY 2013-2014\Selection Process\Summary of Proposal Rankings - Rates and No Interview
ATTACHMENT C
COMPANY BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE
Company Name: BSE Engineering. Inc.
Person Completing Form (Print):,.._,!,A,!!;Ia~n~J:.....:. B~r~o~w~n~-------------
Signaturc: ~ -/if: ~Date:---=3::.._/1~50!..../1.!..!2=-----------
Title: Vice President!CFO Phone Number: 858-279-2000
IMPORTANT: Falsifying information or failure to provide known information could jeopardize or
delay award of a contract.
1. COMPANY HISTORY
Yes
1. Have there been any previous changes to the company name or changes in
ownership that have occurred within the past ten (1 0) years?
2. Has any owner or officer of the company operated as a consultant under any
other name or license number in the last ten ( 1 0) years?
3. Is your company a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another
company?
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to,
previous company name and/or number, date of name change, date of change in ownership.
No
X
X
X
2. COMPANY FINANCIAL RECORD
Yes
1. Was your company in bankruptcy at any time during the last ten (10) years or
currently filing for bankruptcy?
If 'Yes' to the above provide details on the lines below including, but not limited to, case number,
bankruptcy court, and the date the petition was filed.
3. CIVIL COURT ACTIONS
No
X
Yes No
1. Has your company, or any owner or officer of your company, ever been found
liable in a civil suit?
2. Have there been any judgments against your company or any owner or officer of
your company within the past ten ( 1 0) years?
3. In the past ten (1 0) years, has your company or any owner or officer of your
company made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner and filed
that claim in court or arbitration?
4. In the past ten (1 0) years, have there been any claims in excess of $50,000 that
have been filed in court or arbitration against your company?
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to, project
name, date of the claim, name of the claimant, name of the entity (or entitles) against whom the claim
was filed, brief description of the claim, the court and case number, if applicable, brief description of the
status (i.e. pending, resolved, a description of the resolution, etc.).
X
X
X
X
4. CRIMINAL ACTIONS
Yes
1. Has your company or any owner or officer of your company ever been convicted
of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?
2. Has your company or any owner or officer of your company ever been found
guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material
misrepresentation to any public agency or entity?
3. Has any state or local agency taken any disciplinary action against your
company or any owner or officer of your company?
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to, the
person or persons convicted, the name of the victim, the date of conviction, the court and case number,
the crime and year convicted.
5. CONTRACT AWARD
Yes
1. Has your company ever been denied an award of a public works contract based
on a finding by a public agency that your company was not a responsible
bidder?
2. In the past ten (10) years, has your company or any owner or officer of your
company been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from
bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for
any reason?
No
X
X
X
No
X
X
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to, year of
the event, the owner, the project, entity denying the award, the basis for the finding by the public agency,
name of the organization debarred.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin Cameron
Assistant Civil Engineer
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief of Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of As-Needed Traffic Engineering Services Contract for
Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
awards a professional As-Needed Traffic Engineering Services contract
to Darnell & Associates, Inc. (Darnell) and authorizes the General
Manager to execute an agreement with Darnell in an amount not-to-
exceed $125,000 for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
professional As-Needed Traffic Engineering Services agreement with
Darnell in an amount not-to-exceed $125,000 for Fiscal Years 2013 and
2014. The termination date for the professional services agreement
will be June 30, 2014.
AGENDA ITEM 8c
2
ANALYSIS:
The District will require the services of a professional traffic
engineering consultant to provide as-needed traffic control plans,
traffic signal modification plans, striping plans, and traffic
control permit work in support of the CIP projects for Fiscal Years
2013 and 2014. It is more efficient and cost effective to issue an
as-needed contract for the traffic engineering services which will
provide the District with the ability to obtain consulting services
in a timely and efficient manner. This concept has also been used in
the past for other disciplines such as civil engineering,
geotechnical, electrical, and environmental services.
The District will issue task orders to the consultant for specific
projects during the contract period. The consultant will then
prepare a detailed scope of work, schedule, and fee estimate for each
task order assigned under the contract. Upon written task order
authorization from the District, the consultant shall then proceed
with the project as described in the scope of work.
The anticipated CIP projects that are estimated to require traffic
engineering services for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014 are listed below:
CIP DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED
COST
S2024 Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement $35,000
S2028 Explorer Way 8-inch Sewer Main Replacement $5,000
S2029 Chase Avenue 8-inch Sewer Main Replacement $10,000
S2030 Avocado Blvd 8-Inch Sewer Main Replacement $10,000
S2031 Julianna Street 8-inch Sewer Main Replacement $10,000
S2032 Puebla Drive 8-inch Sewer Main Replacement $10,000
S2033 Sewer System Various Locations Rehabilitation $20,000
TOTAL: $100,000
The contract is for an amount not-to-exceed $125,000 for all task
orders. Fees for professional services will be charged to the CIP
projects for which the traffic engineering services are performed.
The traffic engineering services’ scopes of work for the above
projects are estimated from preliminary information and past
projects. Therefore, staff believes that a $125,000 cap on the As-
Needed Traffic Engineering Services contract is adequate, while still
providing for any unanticipated work that may become necessary.
This As-Needed Traffic Engineering Services contract does not commit
the District to any expenditure until a task order is approved to
perform work on a CIP project. The District does not guarantee work
3
to the consultant, nor does the District guarantee that it will
expend all of the funds authorized by the contract on professional
services.
The District solicited traffic engineering services by placing an
advertisement on the Otay Water District’s website and the San Diego
Daily Transcript on February 23, 2012. Nine (9) firms submitted a
letter of interest and a statement of qualifications. The Request
for Proposal (RFP) for As-Needed Traffic Engineering Services was
sent to all nine (9) firms resulting in eight (8) proposals received
on March 20, 2012. They are as follows:
KOA Corporation
Darnell & Associates, Inc.
Minagar & Associates, Inc.
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Rick Engineering Company
RBF Consulting
Lin Consulting
Iteris
One firm, VRPA Technologies, Inc., received the RFP, but elected not
to propose.
In accordance with the District’s Policy 21, staff evaluated and
scored all written proposals. Darnell received the highest score for
their services based on their experience, understanding of the scope
of work, proposed method to accomplish the work, and their composite
hourly rate. Darnell was the most qualified consultant with the best
overall proposal. They are a highly rated company and are readily
available to provide the services required. A summary of the
complete evaluation is shown in Attachment B. Darnell also completed
the Company Background Questionnaire which showed no outstanding
issues. The Questionnaire is shown in Attachment C.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The funds for this contract will be expended from a variety of
projects, as previously noted above. The fees for professional
services requested herein are available in the authorized CIP project
budgets. This contract is for as-needed professional services based
on the District's need and schedule, and expenditures will not be
made until a task order is approved by the District for the
consultant's services on a specific CIP project.
4
Based on a review of the financial budgets, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budgets will be sufficient to support the
professional as-needed consulting services required for the CIP
projects noted above.
The Finance Department has determined that the funds to cover this
contract are available as budgeted for these projects.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
customers with the best quality water, wastewater, and recycled water
service in a professional, effective, and efficient manner.” This
Project fulfills the District’s Strategic Goal No. 1: CUSTOMER -
Deliver high quality services to meet customer needs, and increase
confidence of the customer in the value the District provides.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
KC/RR:jf
P:\WORKING\As Needed Services\Traffic Engineer\FY12-FY14\Staff Report\BD 05-02-12, Staff Report, As-Needed Traffic Engineering Services,
(KC-RR).doc
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Summary of Proposal Rankings
Attachment C – Company Background Questionnaire
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Various Award of As-Needed Traffic Engineering Services Contract
for Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on April 18, 2012 and the following
comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board award a professional As-Needed
Traffic Engineering Services contract to Darnell & Associates,
Inc. (Darnell) and authorize the General Manager to execute an
agreement with Darnell in an amount not-to-exceed $125,000 for
Fiscal Years 2013 and 2014.
Staff stated that the proposed contract will provide the District
with the ability to obtain professional consulting services for
traffic engineering in a timely and efficient manner on an as-
needed basis. The anticipated CIP projects and estimated costs
requiring traffic engineering services are listed on page 2 of
the staff report.
Staff discussed the advertising and Request for Proposal process
and indicated that the District received eight (8) proposals by
the March 20, 2012 deadline. In accordance with the District’s
Policy 21, staff evaluated and scored all proposals. Attachment
B of the staff report shows how each firm was scored.
Staff indicated that Darnell received the highest overall score
and noted that a Google search of the company revealed no
outstanding issues or concerns. In addition, staff implemented a
background questionnaire (see Attachment C) that also did not
reveal any outstanding issues.
Staff noted that the District has previously worked with Darnell
on numerous projects and was satisfied with their services. The
projects included the 36” Jamacha Pipeline, 30” Dairymart
Recycled Pipeline, and Avocado Sewer Pipeline Replacement.
The Committee inquired if Darnell could review the District’s
emergency traffic control plan to help reduce the District’s
liability. Staff stated that Operations staff is well versed in
setting up traffic control as they use the Work Area Traffic
Control (WATCH) Manual that was developed by the State of
California and is the standard used throughout the state.
However, it was indicated that the District can consult with
Darnell about its traffic plan, if necessary. This will not
shift liability, but show further evidence that the District did
due diligence in providing traffic control. Staff will consult
with legal counsel and return to the Committee at a later date
with more detail on this matter.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
P:\WORKING\As Needed Services\Traffic Engineer\FY12-FY14\Selection Process\Summary of Proposal Rankings - Rates and No Interview.xls
Qualifications of
Staff
Understanding of
Scope, Schedule
and Resources
Soundness and
Viability of
Proposed Project
Plan
INDIVIDUAL
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
AVERAGE
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
Proposed Rates*
Consultant's
Commitment to
DBE
TOTAL SCORE
30 25 30 85 85 15 Y/N 100 Poor/Good/
Excellent
Bob Kennedy 24 20 24 68
Rick Acuna 25 21 22 68 Consultant Rate Position Score
Ron Ripperger 26 23 27 76 Minagar & Associates Inc.$444 lowest 15
Jeff Marchioro 26 23 28 77 KOA Corporation $460 14
Daniel Kay 27 24 28 79 Rick Engineering $485 13
Bob Kennedy 29 24 29 82 LLG Engineers $495 12
Rick Acuna 29 24 26 79 Darnell & Associates, Inc.$510 11
Ron Ripperger 28 24 28 80 Lin Consulting, Inc.$510 11
Jeff Marchioro 28 23 27 78 Iteris $590 7
Daniel Kay 28 23 27 78 RBF Consulting $700 highest 1
Bob Kennedy 21 20 20 61
Rick Acuna 26 23 25 74
Ron Ripperger 26 20 25 71
Jeff Marchioro 27 15 26 68
Daniel Kay 24 22 25 71
Bob Kennedy 25 21 25 71
Rick Acuna 27 23 25 75
Ron Ripperger 28 24 28 80
Jeff Marchioro 25 20 25 70
Daniel Kay 28 23 27 78
Bob Kennedy 26 22 26 74
Rick Acuna 27 22 27 76
Ron Ripperger 26 23 26 75
Jeff Marchioro 26 22 26 74
Daniel Kay 27 24 27 78
Bob Kennedy 27 23 27 77
Rick Acuna 27 20 25 72
Ron Ripperger 26 23 26 75
Jeff Marchioro 25 20 26 71
Daniel Kay 26 24 29 79
Bob Kennedy 22 20 22 64
Rick Acuna 26 20 25 71
Ron Ripperger 26 20 25 71
Jeff Marchioro 26 21 25 72
Daniel Kay 23 21 25 69
Bob Kennedy 23 20 23 66
Rick Acuna 23 23 25 71
Ron Ripperger 27 22 26 75
Jeff Marchioro 27 23 26 76
Daniel Kay 26 23 26 75
74
79
Y
Excellent
REFERENCES
The fees were evaluated by comparing rates for five positions.
The sum of these five rates are noted on the table above.
14
11 Y
RATES SCORING CHART
84
88
ATTACHMENT B
As-Needed Traffic Engineering
69
90
15
KOA Corporation Y
WRITTEN
MAXIMUM POINTS
Minagar &
Associates, Inc.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RANKINGS
Darnell &
Associates, Inc.
Y 88
73
69
7 Iteris
75 12
Y
87
Rick Engineering
Company 75 13
RBF Consulting
Y
Y 80
*Review Panel does not see or consider rates when scoring
other categories. Rates are scored by the PM, who is not on
Review Panel.
Y 76
80
75 1
Linscott, Law &
Greenspan, (LLG)
Engineers
Lin Consulting, Inc.11
ATTACHMENT C
COMPANY BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE
CompanyName:~~~~c~~~~~~~~~~· (~\~~~~~~-$~~~~~~ ~~~· ~~~~~~~~(~~~~~~
Person Completing 'form (Print)r·-~-~~--ir-=-___:C~.--~.L.._~(_.£..--=a:....:_\1_!1\_.:_e-=-(---.!(l__ __
Signature:_..::::_~~~~~B;;~~~:K_-oate:~~~~3_./~1~9--=---~-/~2-~0~· ~l~'Z-~-
Title:_~<+1_f'-e___,S=-. ....:....lt c0"""'---.;-e;:_v~<f'-=· ·:~------~Phone Number: ~ l Of -"Z-3 3 -4 31 3
IMPORTANT: Falsifying information or failure to provide known information could jeopardize or
delay award of a contract.
1. COMPANY HISTORY
Yes
1. Have there been any previous changes to the company name or changes in
ownership that have occurred within the past ten (10) years?
2. Has any owner or officer of the company operated as a consultant under any
other name or license number in the last ten (10) years?
3. Is your company a subsidiary, parent, holding company or affiliate of another
company?
No
-~
X
~
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to, previous
company name and/or number, date of name change, date of change in ownership.
28
2. COMPANY FINANCIAL RECORD
1. Was your company in bankruptcy at any time during the last ten (1 0) years or
currently filing for bankruptcy?
If 'Yes' to the above provide details on the lines below including, but not limited to, case number,
bankruptcy court, and the date the petition was filed.
3. CIVIL COURT ACTIONS
1. Has your company, or any owner or officer of your company, ever been found
liable in a civil suit?
2. Have there been any judgments against your company or any owner or officer of
your company within the past ten (1 0) years?
3. In the past ten (1 0) years, has your company or any owner or officer of your
company made any claim in excess of $50,000 against a project owner and filed
that claim in court or arbitration?
4. In the past ten (1 0) years, have there been any claims in excess of $50,000 that
have been filed in court or arbitration against your company?
Yes No
)<:
Yes No
~
)C.
,?(.
;x
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to, project
name, date of the claim, name of the claimant, name of the entity (or entities) against whom the claim was
filed, brief description of the claim, the court and case number, if applicable, brief description of the status
(i.e. pending, resolved, a description of the resolution, etc.).
29
4. CRIMINAL ACTIONS
Yes
1. Has your company or any owner or officer of your company ever been convicted
of a federal or state crime of fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?
2. Has your company or any owner or officer of your company ever been found
guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation
to any public agency or entity?
3. Has any state or local agency taken any disciplinary action against your company
or any owner or officer of your company?
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to, the
person or persons convicted, the name of the victim, the date of conviction, the court and case number,
the crime and year convicted.
5. CONTRACT AWARD
Yes
1. Has your company ever been denied an award of a public works contract based
on a finding by a public agency that your company was not a responsible bidder?
2. In the past ten (10) years, has your company or any owner or officer of your
company been debarred, disqualified, removed or otherwise prevented from
bidding on, or completing, any government agency or public works project for any
reason?
No
'X
X
X
No
((
X:
If 'Yes' to any of the above provide details for each on the lines below including, but not limited to, year of
the event, the owner, the project, entity denying the award, the basis for the finding by the publfc agency,
name of the organization debarred.
30
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
PROJECT: P2451-
001101
DIV. NO. 2
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Consulting Services Contract for Professional
Consulting Work Related to the Otay Mesa Conveyance and
Disinfection System Project for Fiscal Years 2012, 2013, and
2014
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
authorizes the General Manager to execute a Consulting Services
Agreement with Silva Silva International LLC (SSI) in an amount not-
to-exceed $104,000 for Fiscal Years 2012, 2013, and 2014 (ending June
2014) for professional consulting work related to the Otay Mesa
Desalination Facility Conveyance and Disinfection System Project (see
Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
Consulting Services Agreement with SSI for professional consulting
work related to the Otay Mesa Desalination Facility Conveyance and
Disinfection System Project in an amount not-to-exceed $104,000 for
Fiscal Years 2012, 2013, and 2014 (ending June 2014).
ANALYSIS:
The District is working with a private developer and several
binational governmental agencies to support the design, build, and
AGENDA ITEM 8d
2
operation of a sea-water desalting facility in the area of Rosarito,
Baja California. The Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System
Project (Project) will provide a potable water transmission pipeline
and pump station to convey the desalinated water from the border of
Mexico to Roll Reservoir on Otay Mesa. The primary purpose of the
Project is to provide water service at a potable level to customers
in both the U.S. and Mexico.
Given the many challenges in advancing this Project, Peter Silva, the
principal of SSI, is uniquely positioned to provide technical,
regulatory, and policy assistance in water and wastewater matters.
Mr. Silva has 34 years of experience in the water and wastewater
fields. Additionally, Mr. Silva has worked on U.S.-Mexico border
issues for over 30 years. SSI’s extensive experience in the U.S.
includes the Regional Water Quality Control Board in Los Angeles and
San Diego, the California Water Resources Control Board, the State
Department of Health Services, the State Fish and Game, the U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation, and the Environmental Protection Agency in
Washington, DC. plus, Mexican agencies and officials at the state
level, i.e., Governor Osuna Millan, the Secretaria de Infraestructura
y Desalloro Urbano, the Comision Estatal de Agua, and the Comision
Estatal del Servicios Publicos de Tijuana y Rosarito (CESPT) and the
Federal agencies which include Comision Nacional de Agua, and the
Comision Internacional de Limites y Aguas.
Under a $50,000 agreement and a First Amendment to Agreement, signed
under the signature authority of the General Manager and extending
the agreement to May 2012, SSI has been providing consulting services
to the District since March 17, 2011.
Based on past work between the District and SSI, the District feels
SSI is uniquely qualified to best meet the District’s needs for
technical, regulatory, and policy expertise to advance this Project
(see Exhibit B for Scope of Work).
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP P2451, as approved in the FY 2012 budget, is
$30,000,000. Expenditures to date are $1,004,184. Total
expenditures, plus outstanding commitments, including this contract,
totals $5,040,666.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget is sufficient to support this Project
(see Attachment B).
3
Finance has determined that 40% of the funding is available from the
Expansion Fund and 60% of the funding will be available from the
Betterment Fund after Board approval of the FY 2013 fund transfers.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District's Mission statement, "To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater services to the customers of
Otay Water District, in a professional, effective, and efficient
manner" and the District's Strategic Goal, "To satisfy current and
future water needs for potable, recycled, and wastewater services."
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
RP:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2451 Desalination Feasibility Study\Staff Reports\Board 05-02-12\BD 05-02-12, Staff Report, Award of Consulting Services Contract to SSI, (RP).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Scope of Work
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2451-001101
Award of a Consulting Services Contract for Professional
Consulting Work Related to the Otay Mesa Conveyance and
Disinfection System Project for Fiscal Years 2012, 2013,
and 2014
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on April 18, 2012 and the following
comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board authorize the General Manager to
execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Silva Silva
International, LLC (SSI) in an amount not-to-exceed $104,000 for
Fiscal Years 2012, 2013, and 2014 (ending June 2014) for
professional consulting work related to the Otay Mesa
Desalination Facility Conveyance and Disinfection System
Project.
Staff stated that the Otay Mesa Desalination Facility Conveyance
and Disinfection System Project will expand for another year or
two and indicated that a Professional Consultant is needed to
provide technical, regulatory, and policy assistance in water
and wastewater matters.
Staff provided a background of Mr. Peter Silva of SSI and stated
that he has worked with the District since March 17, 2011. It
was noted that SSI is qualified to best meet the District’s
needs for the Project. Further details of Mr. Silva’s
qualifications are provided on page 2 of the staff report.
The Committee commended staff for presenting this item and
stated that it provides the public a transparency of who the
District is hiring. The Committee noted that Mr. Silva is
highly qualified for the Project and recommended that staff
invite Mr. Silva to the May 2, 2012 Board meeting to be
available to answer any questions that the Board may have.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2451-001101
Award of a Consulting Services Contract for Professional
Consulting Work Related to the Otay Mesa Conveyance and
Disinfection System Project for Fiscal Years 2012, 2013,
and 2014
Date Updated: March 27, 2012
Budget
30,000,000
Planning 001101
Labor 373,029 373,029 373,029 Printing 61 61 - 61 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
Mileage Reimbursement 138 138 - 138 PETTY CASH CUSTODIANParking and Tolls 80 80 - 80 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Parking and Tolls 45 45 - 45 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENTParking and Tolls 21 21 - 21 WATTON, MARK
Airfare and Transportation 40 40 - 40 PETTY CASH CUSTODIANAirfare and Transportation 8,717 8,717 - 8,717 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Airfare and Transportation 78 78 - 78 WATTON, MARK
Lodging 3,262 3,262 - 3,262 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Lodging 1,590 1,590 - 1,590 WATTON, MARK
Lodging 729 729 - 729 BONILLA, JAIME
Lodging 472 472 - 472 CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY
Meals and Incidentals 249 249 - 249 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Meals and Incidentals 38 38 - 38 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Meals and Incidentals 194 194 - 194 WATTON, MARK
Meals and Incidentals 395 395 - 395 CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY
Business Meetings 180 180 - 180 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Business Meetings 949 949 - 949 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Insurance 26 26 - 26 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Insurance 27 27 - 27 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Professional Legal Fees 43,175 43,175 - 43,175 SOLORZANO CARVAJAL GONZALEZ Y
Professional Legal Fees 15,853 15,853 - 15,853 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Professional Legal Fees 152,066 152,066 - 152,066 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLP
Other Legal Expenses 9,975 9,975 - 9,975 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLP
Other Legal Expenses 38 38 - 38 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFFConsultant Contracts 98,577 98,577 - 98,577 CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC
Consultant Contracts 47,515 47,515 - 47,515 MARSTON+MARSTON INCConsultant Contracts 12,200 12,200 - 12,200 REA & PARKER RESEARCH
Consultant Contracts 4,173 4,173 - 4,173 SALVADOR LOPEZ-CORDOVAConsultant Contracts 58,066 44,066 14,000 58,066 SILVA-SILVA INTERNATIONAL
Consultant Contracts 70,200 28,800 41,400 70,200 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIOConsultant Contracts 32,340 32,340 - 32,340 BROWNSTEIN
Consultant Contracts 7,000 7,000 - 7,000 BUSTAMANTE104,000 104,000 104,000 SILVA SILVA INTERNATIONAL
Service Contracts 500 500 - 500 REBECA SOTURA NICKERSON
Service Contracts 106 106 - 106 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Total Planning 1,046,104 886,704 159,400 1,046,104
Design 001102Labor65,450 65,450 65,450
Meals and Incidentals 14 14 - 14 PETTY CASH CUSTODIANConsultant Contracts 5,535 5,535 - 5,535 MICHAEL R WELCH PHD PE
Consultant Contracts 3,910,297 33,215 3,877,082 3,910,297 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INCConsultant Contracts 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 ATKINS
Consultant Contracts 7,923 7,923 - 7,923 CPM PARTNERS INC
Service Contracts 343 343 - 343 SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE LLC
Total Design 3,994,562 117,480 3,877,082 3,994,562
Construction 001103Labor - - -
Total Construction - - - -
Grand Total 5,040,666 1,004,184 4,036,482 5,040,666
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water DistrictP2451 - Rosarito Desalination Facility Conveyance
Committed Expenditures Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
EXHIBIT B
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2451-001101
Award of a Consulting Services Contract for Professional
Consulting Work Related to the Otay Mesa Conveyance and
Disinfection System Project for Fiscal Years 2012, 2013,
and 2014
SCOPE OF WORK.
~lllffl n rna ona
April 4, 2012
Mr. Mark Watton, GM
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley, CA 91978
Dear Mr. Watton:
This letter will serve as a proposal for an extension of my current contract with Otay Water
District (District). My work up to now has been associated with the proposed binational
desalination plant (Project) that the District is pursuing. With this letter I will present a proposal
to assist your agency in advancing the Project by providing my services through my consulting
company, Silva-Silva International (SSI).
As I have worked with the District to this point, the Project purpose has remained the same.
The intent is to advance the construction of a sea-water desalting plant in the area of Rosarito,
Baja California. The plant will then provide water treated to a potable level to both Mexican
agencies and the District. Given the complexity of the Project, it will face many challenges at
the engineering, regulatory, financing and policy levels.
Given the many potential challenges for the Project, I believe I am uniquely qualified to provide
both technical and policy assistance to the District. I have extensive experience regarding water
policy and regulatory issues at the local, state and federal levels. I also have over 30 years of
experience regarding water resources issues along the U.S.-Mexico border. I have attached a
copy of my company profile that details my professional experience.
For better management of my work effort related to this contract, I am breaking out my
proposal in the following task orders that describe the various types of functions I will be
performing for the District. As the Project advances, the next steps will likely be in the policy
and regulatory issues. The trans-boundary flow of water will require extensive effort with the
regulatory bodies at the state and federal levels. Additionally, extensive policy work will be
need to be done in both countries to obtain support for the Project and explore the potential
for funding and perhaps partnerships in use of the new potable water supply.
(c)619.980.'j8JJ psilvape@~ahoo.com
TASK ORDER 1: WORK IN U.S. ON TECHNICAL, REGULATORY & MISC. ISSUES
This task order will cover work with U.S. agencies for technical and regulatory issues. These
agencies include, but are not limited to, the State Department of Health Service (DHS), the San
Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) and the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB). Additional agencies could include the State Fish and Game as well as federal
agencies such as the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), the International Boundary and Water
Commission {IBWC) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
There will also likely be contacts required with local agencies such as the City and County of San
Diego and other local water agencies.
TASK ORDER 2: WORK IN MEXICO ON TECHNICAL, REGULATORY & MISC. ISSUES
This task order will provide for work with Mexican agencies and officials as necessary. At the
state level this will include the Governor's office and his staff, the "Secretaria de lnfrastructura y
Desarollo Urbano (Secretariat of Infrastructure and Urban Development)", the "Comision
Estatal de Agua (State Water Commission)" and the "Comision Estatal de Servicios Publicos de
Tijuana y Rosarito (CESPT)". At the federal level, the key agencies are the "Comision
lnternacional de limites y Aguas (IBWC) and "Comision Nacional del Agua (National Water
Commission)". Both of these federal agencies have offices in Mexicali, Baja California.
TASK ORDER 3: WORK IN U.S. AND MEXICO ON POLICY MATTERS
This task order will cover work necessary to advance the Project through the broader policy
level discussions at the local, state, federal and binational levels. This could include work
necessary for market development with local water agencies as well as the San Diego County
Water Authority. It could also include policy discussions at the state level and at the Colorado
River seven-states forum that could bring in the federal agencies such as the BOR as potential
funding partners. Another important element is required discussions at the binational level
between the states of California and Baja California. Additionally, the Project may require an
IBWC minute and discussions with the required entities will be crucial.
These task order are intentionally broad and can serve to guide my effort as I assist the District
in its work on the Project.
With respect to a billing rate, I am proposing that the current level continue into the new
contract. That is, based on my billing rate of $250.00 per hour and a level of effort of 16 hours
per month, the monthly contractual amount will continue at $4000.00 per month. This does
not include additional costs incurred, such as travel expenses.
I have enjoyed the opportunity to provide my professional services to the District for the past
year and I look forward to working with you on this exciting project for the next two years
under this contract.
Please let me know if you require any additional informational and thank you again for this
great opportunity.
Sincerely,
ter S. Silva, PE
Sil a-Silva International
19 7 Corte Escena
Chula Vista, CA 91914
Attachment
~ducation;
B.S. Civil Engineering
Cal-Poly, Pomona (1977)
"'
Ucen~:
•Professional Engineer (CE)
in Calif. since 1980
+Board Certified Env. Engr.
May, 2011
Appointments:
•By President Clinton
Board Member. BECC
•'By CA Gov. Gray Davis
Board Member. CA SWRCB
•By CA Gov. A. Schwarzenegger
Board Member. CA SWRCB
' •By President Obama
EPA Asst. Admin. For Water
Expertise:
•U.S.-Mexico Affairs
•Water & WW Regulations
•SRF Funding
•Water Resources
•Water & WW Operations
•Desalination
• Tribal affairs
•Environmental Justice
Peter S. Silva
President, Silva-Silva International
psilvape@yahoo.com
(c) 619-980-5877
Peter S. Silva, PE BCEE
Mr. Silva is President of Silva-Silva International (SSI), a consulting firm specializ-
ing in water resources management and regulatory issues. SSI also specializes in
water issues related to the U.S.-Mexico border. With 34 years of experience in the
local, city, regional, state, federal and international levels of the public sector, Mr.
Silva brings a wealth of experience to assist both public and private sector clients
in need of professional expertise in managing existing water resources or develop-
ing new sources. Additionally, Mr. Silva can provide technical and policy advice on
a myriad of regulatory issues related to operating a public or private sector enter-
prise.
Before establishing the firm of SSI, Mr. Silva was Assistant Administrator for Water
at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in Washington DC. Having been
appointed by President Barack Obama and confirmed by the U.S. Senate, Mr. Silva
worked with EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson on major national water issues. Prior
to EPA, Mr. Silva was a Senior Policy Advisor for the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California, where he worked with the GM and Board on issues related to
the lower Colorado River, including binational issues with Mexico.
Prior to MWD, Mr. Silva spent six years as vice-chair of the California Water
Resources Control Board, having been appointed by Governors Gray Davis and
Arnold Schwarzenegger. There he led Board efforts on water rights and water
quality issues such as storm water permits, power plant regulations and watershed
planning. While at the SWRCB, Mr. Silva also focused on the U.S.-Mexico border
issues, SRF funding , tribal affairs and environmental justice.
Mr. Silva's experience also includes extensive binational experience. In 1995, he
, was appointed by President Clinton to the Board of the Border Environment Coop-
eration Commission (BECC). From May, 1997 to May, 2000 he served as the
Assistant GM for the BECC, which is based in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. The BECC ,
created as part of the NAFTA Agreement, provides technical assistance and
funding to U.S. and Mexican border communities for building water and wastewater
infrastructure. As part of his international experience, Mr. Silva was also in charge
of the San Diego office of the International Boundary and Water Commission for
four years.
Mr. Silva's broad experience also includes the planning, design and operation of
water and wastewater systems. While with the City's Clean Water Program, he
was on the management team for the billion dollar planning and design effort of 100
mgd secondary and tertiary wastewater plants. On the operations side, he ran the
City of San Diego's water treatment plants (300 mgd) for five years.
With his broad technical and policy experience, Mr. Silva brings a unique set of
skills and knowledge that provides a high level of expertise to SSI clients. He can
use his broad base of contacts at the local, state, federal and international level to
tailor the appropriate solution to water resources or water quality issues.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED BY: Bob Kennedy
Sr. Civil Engineer
PROJECT NO./
SUBPROJECT: D0400-
xx9560
DIV. NO. 5
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Requesting the Local Agency Formation Commission to
Initiate Proceedings for Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Resolution No. 4194 (Attachment B), for the Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO) to initiate proceedings for the Peaceful
Valley Ranch Annexation to the San Diego County Water Authority
(SDCWA) and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(MWD)(see Exhibits A and B for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
The purpose of the proposed annexation is to provide imported water
to serve Assessor Parcel Numbers 597-070-02, 597-070-07, and 597-050-
13 to be developed by Peaceful Valley Ranch LLC.
ANALYSIS:
The proposed Peaceful Valley Ranch project is a 181.3 acre
residential development, of which 28.9 acres are already within the
SDCWA and MWD service area. The entire 181.3 acre development is
already located within the Otay Water District (District) service
area. The property is located in the County of San Diego off Campo
Road and Melody Road in the community of Jamul.
AGENDA ITEM 8e
2
On September 3, 2003, the Otay Water District Board (Board) adopted
Resolution No. 3992, requesting concurrent annexation of the Peaceful
Valley Ranch property to SDCWA and MWD (Attachment C). The
annexation process was delayed due to the need for the property owner
to complete the environmental documents needed to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and by the SDCWA until
Annexation Policy #2 was adopted, as explained below. The table
below summarizes the steps that have been taken and those that are
still needed in order to annex the Peaceful Valley Ranch property.
Annexation Summary
Major Steps for Concurrent Annexation to
Water Authority and MWD
Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation Status
Otay adopts resolution requesting
concurrent annexation to the Water
Authority and MWD.
September 3, 2003
See Attachment C.
MWD Board adopts resolution granting
conditional approval and intent to levy
standby charges.
May 10, 2005
SDCWA Board establishes preliminary
informal terms and conditions, and
requests MWD grant conditional approval
and give notice of intent to impose water
standby charges.
June 23, 2005
County of San Diego filed a Notice of
Determination (NOD) that they had
prepared a Final EIR certified pursuant
to CEQA.
July 28, 2008
In response to an extended drought and
regulatory restrictions on pumping on the
State Water Project, SDCWA adopted
Annexation Policy #2, Protection of
Member Agency Supply Reliability. This
allows the annexation to move forward.
April 22, 2010
SDCWA Board establishes preliminary
informal terms and conditions, and
requests MWD grant conditional approval
and give notice of intent to impose water
standby charges.
July 22, 2010
MWD Board adopts resolution granting
conditional approval and intent to levy
standby charges.
July 12, 2011
SDCWA Board adopts resolution requesting
MWD set formal terms and conditions.
August 25, 2011
3
Annexation Summary
Major Steps for Concurrent Annexation to
Water Authority and MWD
Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation Status
MWD Board adopts resolution, providing
consent for the concurrent annexation,
fixing terms and conditions, and levying
standby charge.
December 13, 2011
See Attachment D for
terms and conditions.
SDCWA Board set final terms and
conditions and approval of annexation.
January 26, 2012
See Attachment E for
terms and conditions.
Otay adopts resolution of application
requesting LAFCO to take proceedings for
annexation.
May 2, 2012
Recommended action of
the Otay Board.
San Diego Local Agency Formation
Commission files notice of completion
after the terms and conditions of MWD,
Water Authority, and Otay are satisfied.
Future proposed
action. Deadline is
December 31, 2012.
The applicant is requesting annexation to provide imported water to
serve the property. The property owner anticipates meeting demands
of the Peaceful Valley Ranch property with a combination of imported
water and local groundwater. The District estimates that the average
water demand on the SDCWA from the proposed Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation is approximately 70 acre-feet per year (AFY), with a
projected maximum daily demand on the Water Authority of 0.16 cubic
feet per second.
Groundwater quality in the area is not well suited for domestic use,
due to elevated total dissolved solids concentrations beyond the
maximum contaminant level, or MCL, of 1,000 mg/L. The owner plans to
continue to use groundwater to the extent practicable. Under the
Major Use Permit from the county of San Diego for the project,
groundwater extraction is limited to a maximum of 22 AFY when the
development is complete.
Historically, the owners used the property mainly for dry farming.
The proposed annexation is for an estate residential development,
including equestrian uses and amenities. Peaceful Valley Ranch LLC
proposes to develop 52 estate residential units on lots ranging in
size from two to five acres. The annexation includes a private
equestrian facility, with horse stables and a polo-training field.
The Polo field would be the only portion of the project using
groundwater as a water supply source.
The property, if annexed, will create windows within the SDCWA’s
service area. A window is an un-annexed area surrounded by annexed
territory. A window within a service area leads to inefficient
4
supply management and facility planning, and could increase the
potential for water use outside the service area, either directly or
indirectly. One way to avoid formation of windows is for the member
agency to request annexation of the window areas in addition to the
original annexation request. District staff surveyed the landowners
to determine their interest in annexing. One landowner, Stoddard,
who was included in Otay’s original Peaceful Valley Ranch annexation
request remains interested in annexing, but at a later date. The
eight-acre Stoddard property is shown on the legal description and
plat within Attachment C. Staff also contacted the remaining five
landowners; however, none are interested in annexing at this time.
These results are consistent with the landowner survey staff
conducted in 2004 when the annexation request was initially made to
the SDCWA. The SDCWA cannot require property owners to annex,
especially taking into account annexation requirements under the
current supply situation. The District has made an effort to
eliminate the formation of windows through contacting the landowners.
The majority of the annexing property is coterminous to the Water
Authority service area. In addition, to prevent use of imported
supplies outside the SDCWA and MWD’s service areas that could occur
with the creation of windows, the District has stated that they
conduct continuous monitoring of their facilities to preclude illegal
tapping of mains.
The Board of Directors of the MWD on December 13, 2011 adopted
Resolutions 9133 and 9134 consenting to the annexation, fixed terms
and conditions, and adopted a water standby charge for the Peaceful
Valley Ranch Annexation (see Attachment D).
The Board of Directors of the SDCWA on January 26, 2012 adopted
Resolution No. 2012-01 setting final terms and conditions, approving
the concurrent annexation of territory to said agencies and making
environmental findings relating to the Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation (see attachment E).
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None known at this time.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District's Mission Statement, "To provide
the best quality of water and wastewater service to the customers of
the Otay Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient
manner," and the District's strategic goal, "To satisfy current and
future water needs for potable, recycled, and wastewater services."
5
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
BK/RP:jf
P:\WORKING\WO D0400-Peaceful Valley Annex\Staff Report\BD 5-2-12, Staff Report, Peaceful Valley Ranch Resolution.doc
Attachments: Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Location Map
Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Resolution
Attachment C – OWD Referenced Resolution
Attachment D – MWD Referenced Resolution
Attachment E – SDCWA Referenced Resolution
ÃÅ94
P:\WORKING\WO D0400-Peaceful Valley Annex\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\Exhibit A - Peaceful Valley Ranch Parcel Annexation.mxd
OTAY WATER DISTRICTPEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH PARCEL ANNEXATIONLOCATION MAPEXHIBIT A WO D0400
!
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTS
?ò
?ä
?Ë
;&s
DIV 5
DIV 2
DIV 1
DIV 3
DIV 4
F
F
Legend
Peaceful Valley Ranch Parcels to be Annexed
CWA/MWD Service Area
Otay Water District Service Area
C
A
M
PO R
D
0 0.5 1Miles
MELODY RD
C
A
M
P
O
SR
9
4
LAS PALMAS RD
R
D
VALLEY RANCH RD
PEACEFUL
P:
\
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
\
W
O
D
0
4
0
0
-
P
e
a
c
e
f
u
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
A
n
n
e
x
\
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
-
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
B
-
P
e
a
c
e
f
u
l
V
a
l
l
e
y
R
a
n
c
h
P
a
r
c
e
l
A
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
OTAY WATER DISTRICTPEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH PARCEL ANNEXATIONLOCATION MAPEXHIBIT B WO D0400
!
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTS
?ò
?ä
?Ë
;&s
DIV 5
DIV 2
DIV 1
DIV 3
DIV 4
FF
Legend
Peaceful Valley Ranch Parcels to be Annexed
Future CWA/MWD Annexation
Stoddard Property - Future CWA/MWD Annexation
0 400 800Feet
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
D0400-xx9560
Resolution Requesting the Local Agency Formation Commission
to Initiate Proceedings for Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on April 18, 2012 and the
following comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board approve Resolution No. 4194
for the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to
initiate proceedings for the Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA)
and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(MWD).
Staff indicated that the proposed annexation is for an
estate residential development, including equestrian uses
and a polo field. The Polo field will be the only portion of
the project using groundwater as a water supply source.
Staff stated that the property owner will meet demands of
the Peaceful Valley Ranch property with a combination of
imported water and local groundwater. The District
estimates that the average water demand to serve the
proposed Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation is 70 acre-feet
per year.
It was indicated that on September 3, 2003, the Otay Water
District Board adopted Resolution No. 3992 that requested
concurrent annexation of the Peaceful Valley Ranch property
to the SDCWA and MWD.
Staff noted that the environmental documentation needed to
comply with CEQA and that the SDCWA adoption of Annexation
Policy #2 delayed the project. The steps taken during this
annexation process is summarized on page 2 of the staff
report.
Staff stated that the annexation will create windows within
the SDCWA’s and MWD’s service areas as shown on Exhibits A
and B. Staff indicated that a window is an un-annexed area
surrounded by annexed territory, and to avoid formation of
windows District staff surveyed the landowners to determine
their interest in annexing.
It was indicated that one landowner (Stoddard), who was
included in Otay’s original Peaceful Valley Ranch annexation
request, remains interested in annexing but at a later date.
Staff noted that the eight-acre Stoddard property is shown
on Exhibit B as the area in yellow.
Staff also contacted the neighboring landowners; however,
none are interested in annexing at this time. These results
are consistent with the landowner survey staff conducted in
2004 when the annexation request was initially made to the
SDCWA. It was noted that the SDCWA cannot require property
owners to annex. The District has made an effort to
eliminate the formation of windows through contacting the
landowners.
The Committee inquired about the benefits for each landowner
if they were to annex their property. Staff stated that it
would be beneficial for landowners to annex their property
at this time to reduce processing costs by sharing in the
larger fees of the Peaceful Valley Ranch annexation.
The Committee inquired about the total cost of agency fees
for the annexation for the Stoddard parcel. Staff indicated
that the Peaceful Valley Ranch annexation cost is estimated
to be $7,540 per acre and that the annexation cost for the
8.3-acre Stoddard parcel, if it were to be annexed with
Peaceful Valley Ranch, is estimated to be $62,500 (see
Attachment A-1).
It was noted that Dennis Moser of Moser Ventures, the
owner’s representative, would be at the May 2, 2012 Board
meeting to speak on behalf of the annexation project and to
answer any questions the Board may have.
The Committee indicated that the Peaceful Valley Ranch area
is already within the District’s boundaries, but that the
SDCWA and MWD had not completed their requirements for the
annexation. Now that the two agencies have completed their
portion, the Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation project can
move forward.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent
item.
Cost Unit Acreage Subtotal Annexation Total Yearly Fee
MWD
Administrative Fee 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
Annexation Fee 4,037.00$ Per Acre 152.45 615,440.65$ 620,440.65$
Standby Availability Charge 11.51$ Per Acre 152.45 1,754.70$ 1,754.70$
SDCWA
Administrative Fee 3,000.00$
Annexation Fee 2,928.00$ Per Acre 152.45 446,373.60$ 446,373.60$
Standby Availability Charge 10.00$ Per Parcel 47 470.00$ 470.00$
OWD
Administrative Fee 709.00$ 709.00$
Annexation Fee 1,511.00$ Per EDU 47 71,017.00$ 71,726.00$
LAFCO
Processing Fee 9,060.00$ 9,060.00$
DFG EIR 2,919.00$ 2,919.00$ 11,979.00$
State Board of Equalization
Filing Fee 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$
Total 1,152,519.25$ 2,224.70$
Cost per Acre 7,559.98$
If Annexed with PVR 62,747.85$
If Annexed Separately
Cost Unit Acreage Subtotal Annexation Total Yearly Fee
MWD
Administrative Fee 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$
Annexation Fee 4,037.00$ Per Acre 8.3 33,507.10$ 38,507.10$
Standby Availability Charge 11.51$ Per Acre 8.3 95.53$ 95.53$
SDCWA
Administrative Fee 3,000.00$
Annexation Fee 2,928.00$ Per Acre 8.3 24,302.40$ 24,302.40$
Standby Availability Charge 10.00$ Per Parcel 1 10.00$ 10.00$
OWD
Administrative Fee 709.00$ 709.00$
Annexation Fee 1,511.00$ Per EDU 1 1,511.00$ 2,220.00$
LAFCO
Processing Fee 9,060.00$ 9,060.00$
DFG EIR 2,919.00$ 2,919.00$ 11,979.00$
State Board of Equalization
Filing Fee 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$
Total 79,008.50$ 105.53$
Cost per Acre 9,519.10$
Peaceful Valley Ranch Fee Estimate
Stoddard Fee Estimate (8.3 Acres)
ATTACHMENT B
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 4194
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR
THE PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors of the
Otay Water District, that
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District (District)
desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese/Knox/Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Section
56000 of the California Government Code, for the Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation, Assessor Parcel Numbers 597-070-02, 597-070-07, and 597-050-
13;and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1 O(d) of the County Water Authority Act,
the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District on September 3, 2003 adopted
Resolution No. 3992, requesting concurrent annexation to the San Diego County
Water Authority and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California of the
lands described in Resolution 3992, and know as the Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation (see Attachment C); and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Water
Authority on July 22, 2010 adopted Resolution No. 2010-11 that granted
preliminary informal terms and conditions for the Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation, and requested Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
grant conditional approval and give notice of intent to impose water standby
charges; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District on
July 12, 2011 granted conditional approval and by Resolution 9124 gave notice
of intent to impose water standby charges for the Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Water
Authority on August 25, 2011 adopted Resolution No. 2011-17 requested
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California adopt formal terms and
conditions for the Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California on December 13, 2011 adopt Resolutions 9133 and 9134
consenting to the annexation, fixed terms and conditions, and adopted a water
standby charge for the Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation (see Attachment D);
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Water
Authority on January 26, 2012 adopted Resolution No. 2012-01 setting final
terms and conditions, approving the concurrent annexation of territory to said
agencies and making environmental findings relating to the Peaceful Valley
Ranch Annexation (see Attachment E); and
WHEREAS, the reason(s) for the proposed change(s) of organization
is/are as follows: to provide water service to the territory to be annexed.
WHEREAS, the territory subject to the proposed change(s) of organization
is uninhabited, and a description of the external boundary of the territory is set
forth in Exhibit "A and B," attached hereto and by this reference incorporated
herein; and
WHEREAS, the District requests that the proposed change(s) of
organization be subject to the following terms and conditions:
1 . That the owner for said annexation shall pay all costs for the
Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation including the following:
(a) Standard District Administration fee in the amount of
$709.00;
(b) State Board of Equalization filing fees;
(c) An Annexation fee of $1,511 per EDU to be collected at the
time the meter is purchased;
(d) Other meter-related costs; and
(e) All other applicable local or state agency fees;
(f) The property to be annexed shall be subject to taxation after
annexation thereof for the purposes of the improvement
district, including the payment of principal and interest on
bonds and other obligations of the improvement district,
authorized and outstanding at the time of annexation, the
same as if the annexed property had always been a part of
the improvement district.
2. That subject to the following terms and conditions, to grant the
application of the Otay Water District for consent to annex the Peaceful Valley
Ranch to the San Diego County Water Authority and the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California and to establish the following conditions of such
annexation:
(a) That the terms and conditions as ordered by Board of
Directors of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California shown on Attachment D be conditioned for the
concurrent annexation to said Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California and the San Diego County Water
Authority, of the Peaceful Valley Ranch, as described in
Otay Water District Resolution No. 3992, excluding the 8.3
acre parcel, which is a portion of Parcel 4 of Parcel Map No.
16190.
(b) Pursuant to Section 5.2 of the County Water Authority Act,
the San Diego County Water Authority shall impose standby
charges to the properties to be annexed and the property
owners shall sign a consent agreement regarding the
payment of standby charges.
(c) That the property owner acknowledges and agrees to
participate in any required Proposition 218 action, and will
not oppose the imposition of any special taxes, fees,
charges, and assessments currently applicable to the San
Diego County Water Authority and any applicable service
area.
NOW, THEREFORE, this Resolution of Application is hereby approved
and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District. The Local
Agency Formation Commission of San Diego County is hereby requested to take
proceedings for the proposed change(s) of organization that include(s) the
territory as described in Exhibit "A and B," excluding the 8.3 acre parcel which is
a portion of Parcel 4 pf Parcel Map. No. 16190 according to the terms and
conditions stated above and in the manner provided by the
Cortese/Knox/Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
Passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of May 2012 by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
I EXHIBIT AI
ANNEXATION NO.
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION PARCEL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That certain parcel of land in the County of San Diego, State of California being
a portion of Fractional Section 10, Township 17 South, Range 1 East, San
Bernardino Meridian according to Official Plat thereof described as follows:
COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said Fractional Section 10; thence southerly
along the easterly line thereof
COURSE 1. South 00°24'58" East 1312.81 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING being
the northeast corner of Parcel Map 16190 recorded in the office of the County
Recorder of said county August 16, 1990 as file no. 90-450825 of official records;
thence continuing southerly along said easterly line of Fractional Section 10
being also the easterly line of said Parcel Map the following courses:
COURSE 2. South 00°24'58" East 1312.81 feet to an angle point; thence,
COURSE 3. South 00°02'56 " East 1806.43 feet to the southeast corner of said Parcel
Map 16190; thence leaving said easterly line and westerly along the southerly line
of said Parcel Map,
COURSE 4. North 88°42'00 " West 3115.99 feet to the southwest corner of Parcel 2 of
said Parcel Map; thence leaving said southerly line and northerly along the
westerly line of said Parcel 2,
COURSE 5. North 02°09'30 " East 688.81 feet to a point on the northerly line of
said Parcel 2 being also the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave
northwesterly and having a radius of 725.00 feet, a radial line to said point
bears South 06°58'01 " East; thence leaving said westerly line and easterly along
said northerly line the following courses:
COURSE 6. northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 27 °15'42" an
arc length of 344.96 feet; thence tangent from said curve,
COURSE 7. North 55°46'17 " East 68.41 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve
concave southeasterly and having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence
COURSE 8. northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 31 °13'13" an
arc length of 163 .47 feet; thence leaving said northerly line and non-tangent from
said curve,
Page 1 of2
COURSE 9. North 02°09'30u East 602.47 feet to the northerly line of said Parcel
Map; thence easterly , northerly and northeasterly along said northerly line of
Parcel Map the following courses:
COURSE 10. North 84°45'02u East 1010.71 feet to an angle point; thence,
COURSE 11. North 00 °42'22u East 1293.00 feet to an angle point; thence,
COURSE 12. North 83°49'47u East 1512.40 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING: 152.45 Acres, more or less.
For assessment purposes only. This description of land is not a legal property
description as defined in the Subdivision Map Act and may not be used as a basis for
an offer for sale of the land described.
Gregory A. Helmer LS 5134
April 3, 2012
RBF JOB NO. 25-105463
Page 2 of2
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
ANNEXATION PARCEL
, .. r"' r"' • • • ,, ,, ""'• .. ., .. , 11\1 I,. ...... ,, I I\ II t '41' '"
----
LOCATION MAP -N. T.S.
GREGORY A. HELMER, LS 5134
DISCLAIMER:
·.· .. ·•·. ·:-·. ·:-· .. ·. ·. ·:-· .. ·.· .. ·. · ..
• 0 •••• • ••••• • ••
T.P.O.B.
P.O.C.
LEGEND
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
BOUNDARY
EXISTING SDCWA BOUNDARY
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
DO COURSE NUMBER
SDCWA SAN DIEGO COUNTY
WATER AUTHORITY
PM 16190 PARCEL MAP 16190
597-070-02 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER
SHEET INDEX
SHEET 1: TITLE SHEET, LEGEND , VICINITY MAP
SHEET 2: MAP SHEET
"FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT BE
USED AS THE BASIS OF AN OFFER FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED".
ASESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS: LAFCO RESOL. NO. ACREAGE DATE SCALE
597-070-02; 597-070-07; 597-050-13 152 .45 AC 4/3/2012 1"=800'
ANNEXATION NO . ___ _
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION PARCEL
BEING A PORTION OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 10,
T-17-S , R-1-E , SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN,
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CONSULTING
SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS
RBF JN 25-105463
H:\PDATA\25105463\CADD\MAPPING\EXHIBITS\5463ANNEXPLAT01 .DWG DEBIE MARSOLINI 4/3/2012 10:20 AM
[I] COURSES
1-s oo·24'58» E 1312.81'
2-s oo·24'58" E 1312.81'
3 -s oo·o2'56" E 1806.43'
4 - N 88.42'00" W 3115.99'
5 - N 02 • 09 ' 30 » E 688 . 81 '
6-R=725.00' D=27.15'42" L=344.96'
7-N 55.46'17" E 68.41'
8-R=300.00' D=31.13'13" L=163.47'
9 -N 02.09'30" E 602.47'
10-N 84.45'02" E 1010.71'
11 - N oo·42'22" E 1293.oo·
12 - N 83.49'47» E 1512.40'
152.45 Acres -Gross Area
N
P.O.C.
NE CORNER
FRAC. SEC.
w REMAINDER z ...... PARCEL _j
ITTI>-597-050-13
_j z s # .$>
--
PARCEL 2
597-070-02
~ PARCEL 3
· .. · .. · .. · .. ·.
SLY LINE PM 16190
sw CORNER GO
PARCEL 2
0 800 1600 2400 jl----~~~~1 -~1 RANCHO JAMUL
SCALE: 1 "=800'
rn
[I]
NE CORNER
PM 16190
0 m .-
CD .-
::::iE 0..
w z ......
...J
>-_j w
. SE CORNER fl :M 16190
I ~LLg
_JQ(/')
ANNEXATION NO.-----SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION PARCEL
BEING A PORTION OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 10,
T-17-S, R-1-E, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN,
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CONSULTING
RBF JN 25-105463
H: \PDATA\25105463\CADD\MAPPING\EXHIBITS\5463ANNEXPLAT01 .DWG DEBIE MARSOLINI 4/3/2012 10:
ATTACHMENT C
Otay Water District Referenced Resolution
•• r
RBSOLOTION NO. 3992
A RBSOLU'l'IOR OP TBB B01dtD OP DIRBC'l"'RS OP
OTAY 1IATBR PISTRIC'l PIXDIG TBRMS AND
CONDITIOBS I'OR TBB ANNBXATIOR' 10 OTAY 1IATBR
DfSTRicr IMPJtOVBMBH"r DISTRICT 1m. 9 OJ! TBOSB
LARDS DBSCIUBBD AS •PD•'BPOL VALLBY RANCH
ANNBXATIOIT• AND ARHBXD1G SAID PROPBRT!' '1'0
OTAY 1IATBR DISTRICT IMPROVBMBHT DISTRICT NO.
9 (110 9560/DIV. S) .
1IBBRBAS 1 a request bas been made by the owners and parties
tha~ have an interest in the land described in Bxtdbit •A. •
attached hereto 1 for annexation of said land to Otay Water
District Improvement District Jlo 9 of the Otay Water District
pursuant to California Water Code Section 72670 et. seq. ; and
WHBRBAS1 pursuant to Section 72680.1 of said Water Code,
the Board of Directors may proceed and act thereon without
DOtice and hearing.
NOW, 'l"BBRBFORB, BB IT RBSOLVBD aa follows:
1 A description of the area proposed co be annexed is
set forth on a map filed with t:he Secretary of the District
which .. p shall ~ovarn for all details aa to the area proposed
to be annexed.
2. The purpose of the proposed annexation is to provide
water servic:a to the territoxy to be annexed.
3 • The Board of Directors hereby finds and determines
that the area proposed to be annexed to Otay Water Dist:rict and
Improvement Dist:rict. No 9 will be benetit.ed thereby and that
Otay Wat.er District Ia~provement. Dist.rict. No t will also be
· benefit.ed and not. injured by such annexation because the
1
259 of564
v
property to be annexed will benefit from the water facilities in
Improvement District No. 9 and the property. already within
Improvement District No. 9 will now have a larger base to
finance the water improvements.
4. The Board of Directors hereby declares that the
annexation of said property is subject to owner first meeting
the fol~owing terms and conditions:
(a) Final annexation by San Diego County Water
Aut~ority "'SDCWA• and Metropolitan Water District of
Southern california "'MWD•)
260of564
(b) That the owners for said annexation ~hall pay to
Otay Water District the following:
(1: Standard District Administration fee in the
amount of $593.00;
(2) State Board of Equalization filing fees in
the amount of $2,500.00 ($2,000 tor the
Streeter property -152.4 acres and $500 for
the Stoddard property-8.3 acres);
(3) An Annexation fee of $1, 154· per EDU to be
collected at the time the meter is
purchased;
(4) Other meter-related costs; and
(5) All other applicable local or. state agency
fees
(c) The property to be annexed shall be subject to
taxation after annexation thereof for the
purposes of the improvement district, including
2
the payment of principal and interest on bonds
other obligations of the improvement
district, authori~ed and outstanding at the time
annexation, the same as if the annexed
property had always been a part of the
improvement district
s. The Board of Directors of the Otay Water District does
hereby declare the property described in Exhibit "A" to be
annexed t~ Improvement District No. 9 of the Otay Water Dis-
trict, conditioned upon final annexation by SDCWA and MWO.
6. The Board of Directors further finds and determines
that there are no exchanges of property tax revenues to be made
pursuant to Cal-ifornia Revenue and Taxation Code Section 95 et·
seq., as a result of such annexation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Director-s of
the Otay Water District at a regular meeting held this 3m day of
September, 2003
AYES: Directors Breitfelder, Bonilla, Lopez, Croucher and Levis
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
President
ATTEST:
3
261 of564
v
STATB OF CALIFORNIA
as
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
:t, connie Rathbone, Assistant District Secretary of.
the OTAY WATER DISTRICT do hereby certify that the
foregoing is a true and correct copy of Resolution No . .
3992, duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the OTAY
WATER DISTRICT at a Board meeting, held the 3rd day of
September, 2003
262 of564
~~~
Assistant District Secretary· of
the Otay Water District and the
Board of Directors Thereof
J UF CONSuLnN& L
9155 Cla1re~ant Mesa lqulevard. Sutt• 100
S.n Diego. ~ltfornia 9Zl24
EXHIBIT •A•
L£&AL DESCIImOII
ANNEXATION PARCEL
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
~UfUSt 14. 2~3
.JN ZS-1007'91.001
Page 1 of 1
That certain parcel of land fn the County of San Diego. State of Cali.fornfa being a I partfon of Fractional Section 10. Township 17 South. Range 1 East. S~~ Bernardino
Meridian· ac:c:ordi ng to Offi c:i a 1 Plat thereof desc:r1 bed as fa 11 ows: · : ·
COMMENCIN& at the northeast earner of safd Fractional Section 10; thence along the
easterly line of safd Section South ·OP0 24'58• East 1312.81 feet to the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNIIIfi; thence continuing along said easterly line of. s'aid · Section
South oo•24'58• West 1312 .. 81 feet; thence continuing along said easterly line
South oo•zs•s6• East 1806.43 feet; thence along the southerly line of Parcels Z and
3 of Parcel Map No. 16190. filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County on August 16. 1990. North 88°42'00" West 3115.99 feet; thence along the
westerly line of Parcels Z and 4 of said Parcel Map North oz•o9'3o· East ~-81 feet
·~·the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave northwesterly and havfng a radius of
725.00 feet. a radial line of said curve from said point bears North o6•Ja•oo· West;
thence leaving said westerly line along sa;a curve easterly and northeasteriy 3~.io
feet through a central angle of 27.15'44"; thence tangent f~ said curve
. ~h 55°46 • 15.. East 68.41 feet to the beg; nni ng of a tangent curve concave
southeasterly and having a radius of 300.00 feet; thence along said curve
northeasterly and easterly 163.46 feet through a central angle of 31.13'10-; thence
non-tangent from said curve North oz•og•Jo~ East 602 .46 feet to the northerly line
of said Parcel 4; thence along said northerly line North 84.45'02" East 1010.71 feet~
thence North ao•4Z'2Z• East 1293.00 feet: thence North 83.49'37-East 1512.40 feet
ta the TRUE POINT OF IEGINNINS
CONTAININC: 152.4 Acres Gross and Net.
SUBJECT TO al CoYenants. Rights. Rights-of·Way and Easements of Record
EXHIBIT •a• attached and ~Y tnts reference ~de a ,art hereof
P~d ~y oe r~ unde~ my d1 rect10n
~;@. --
263 of564
64 of564
......_ (_j
. '(' .I()_
<< \
\
EXHIBIT 'B'
ANNEXATION PARCEL
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
, .... ltiiD
tAKA a ,..._ 11110
~-... II
---------· -----·-·,..·-·--. .
-....
I
a
r
·~ 1::
t.
RBF CONSULTIN& l
9755 Clafreaont "-s4 Boulevard. Suite 100
San 01 ego. ca 1 f forni & 9%124
EXHIBIT "A•
LEGAL DESCRimDN
ANNEXATION PARCEL
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
August 14. Z003
JN ZS-1007M.001
hgelO'ft
That certain parcel, .of land in the County of San Diego. State of California being
a portion of Fractional Section 10. Township 17 South. Range lEast. San Bernardino
Meridian according to Official Plat thereof de~cribed as follows:
COMMENCIN& at the northeast corner of said Fractional Section 10; thence along the
easterly line 'of• said' Section South oo•Z4'58" East 26Z5.6Z feet;·. thence
South 84.40'09" West .-1535.75 feet; thence South 84°45'02~ west 1010.71 feet to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South oz•o9'30".West 602.46 feet to a point on a
non-·tangent curve concave southeasterly and having a radius of 300.00 'feet, a
radial line of said.durve' from said point bears South OJ•oo•35"~East; thence along
-said curve westerly 16i.46 feet through a central angle of '3l.l3'10"; thence
tangent from said curve South 55.46'15" West 68.41 .feet to the beginning of a
unqent curve concave norti1westerly and having a radius of 725.00 feet; thence
along said curve westerly 344.97 feet through a central angle of 27.15'44"; thence
non-tangent from said curve North oz•og• 30" East 764.74 feet; thence
North 84.45'02• East East 525.53 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNIN&
CONTAINING: 8.3 Acres Gross and Net
SUBJECT TO all Covenants. Rights. Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record.
EXHIBIT •a•-attac~ed and by this ~eference made a par~ hereof
Prepared by~ or ~nder my direction.
r
Stegnen ~-Hawxhurst. LS TJSS
265 of564
FR;\ c:.
PARCEL .2
P.M. I 6190
EXHIBIT 'B'
ANNEXATION PARCEL
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
SEC~fJOJ\J ·1 0
·~~ ' '"' ,·. ~i~ s·L ~~
. ,~ .........• :"!'! .J .. ' .. :4.! • .. : • .. ' I
... ' • • • ~!" .. •
:..·.-,;· ... " 41
l
i t
"
. ... . . .. '·.• ·.~~ ,. ·· ..
.::,, . '·:"':.~ .. ". .:· .·:.:-'·:"'· ;:t-'-.. ·,:
' '-1 • D > •
~ -...
I a
3
{
I ,..
!
--
ATTACHMENT D
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Referenced Resolutions
RESOLUTION 9133
RESOLUTION OF THE.BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
CONSENTING TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY'S
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION
AND FIXING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID ANNEXATION TO
THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
A. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the San' Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA), a
municipal water district, situated in the county of San Diego, state of California, pursuant to Resolution
No. 2010-11, in accordance with the provisions of the Metropolitan Water District Act, has applied to the Board
of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) for consent to annex
thereto certain uninhabited territory situated in the county of San Diego referred to as Peaceful Valley Ranch
Annexation, more particularly described in an application to the San Diego County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO), concurrently with the annexation thereof to SDCWA, such annexation to Metropolitan to
be upon such terms and conditions as may be fixed by the Board of Directors of Metropolitan; and
B. WHEREAS, completion of said annexation shall be conditioned upon approval by LAFCO; and
C. WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
County of San Diego Board of Supervisors, acting as Lead Agency, certified the Peaceful Valley Ranch Project
(Project) Final Environmental Impact Report (Fina~ EIR), adopted the Findings ofF act (finding;), Statement of
Overriding Considerations (SOC), and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and approved the
Project on July 10, 2008, for the development of the proposed annexation parcel(s). Metropolitan, as
Responsible Agency under CEQ A, is required to certify that it has reviewed and considered the information
contained in the Final EIR and MMRP. and adopt the Lead Agency's findings and SOC prior to approval of the
formal tenns and conditions for the Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation; and
D. WHEREAS, it appears to this Board of Directors that such application should be granted, subject
to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and
E. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of Metropolitan, acting as
Responsible Agency, has reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR, findings, SOC, and MMRP
and adopted the Lead Agency's findings and SOC prior to approval of the final terms and conditions for the
Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation; and subject to the following terms and conditions, does hereby grant the
application of the governing body of the San Diego County Water Authority for consent to annex the Peaceful
Valley Ranch Annexation to Metropolitan and does hereby fix the terms and conditions of such annexation;
F. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of Metropolitan, subject to the
following terms and conditions, does hereby grant the application of the governing body ofSDCWA for consent
to annex Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation to Metropolitan and does hereby fix the terms and conditions of
such annexation:
Section 1. The annexation of said area to SDCW A shall be made concurrently with the
annexation thereof to Metropolitan, and all necessary certificates, statements, maps, and other documents
required to be filed by or on behalf of SDCW A to effectuate the annexation shall be filed on or before
December 31,2012. ·
-l-
267 of 564
Section 2. Prior to filing a request for a Certificate of Completion of the annexation proceedings
with LAFCO, SDCWA shall submit a certified copy ofLAFCO's resolution approving the annexation to the .
member agency, and shall pay to Metropolitan in cash approximately ~20,238.80, if the annexation is completed
by December 31,2011. The annexation fee of$5,000 for processing this annexation was received prior to
approval. The annexation charge is calculated by the per-acre method based on the net acreage. If the
annexation is completed during the 2012 calendar year, the annexation charge will be calculated based on the
then current rate, in accordance with Metropolitan's Administrative Code Section 3300.
Section 3. a. Metropolitan shall be under no obligation to provide, construct, operate, or
maintain feeder pipelines,.structures, connections, and other facilities required for the delivery of water to said
area from works owned or operated by Metropolitan.
. b. SDCW A shall not be entitled to demand that Metropolitan deliver water to
SDCW A for use, directly or indirectly, within said area, except for domestic or municipal use therein.
c. The delivery of all water by Metropolitan, regardless of the nature and time of
use of such water shall be subject to the water service regulations, including rates promulgated from time to time
by Metropolitan.
d. Except upon the terms and conditions specifically approved by the Board of
Directors of Metropolitan, water sold and delivered by Metropolitan shall not be used in any manner which
intentionally or avoidably results in the direct or indirect benefit of areas outside Metropolitan, including use of
such water outside Metropolitan or use thereof within Metropolitan in substitution for other water outside
Metropolitan. ·
Section 4. The area within the newly created window area, in accordance to MWD
Administrative Code Section 3201, shall be monitored by the local water purveyor, currently Otay Municipal
Water District, for illegal connections or other illicit use of water outside of the service area boundaries.
G. BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that the Board Executive Secretary is directed to transmit
forthwith to the governing body of SDCW A a certified copy of this resolution.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true, and correct copy of a resolution adopted
by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California at its meetin~ held
December 13, 2011.
268 ot564
Board Executive Secretary
The Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California ·
·2 -
Section 8. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take all necessary
action to secure the collection of the water standby charges by the appropriate county officials, including
payment of the reasonable cost of collection.
Section 9. That the General Manager and General Counsel are hereby authorized to do all things
necessary and desirable to accomplish the purposes of this resolution, including, without limitation, the
commencement or defense of litigation.
Section 10. That if any provision of this resolution or the application to any member agency,
property or person whatsoever is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or applications
of this resolution which can be given effect without the invalid portion or application, and to that end the
provisions of this resolution are severable.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted
by the Board of Directors of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, at its meeting held on
December 13, 2011.
.·
269 of564
~~
Board Executive Secretary
The Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California
3
RESOLUTION 9134
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
FIXING AND ADOPTING WATER STANDBY CHARGE
CONTINGENT UPON SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY'S
PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 9124, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California's ("Metropolitan") Resolution of Intention to Impose Water Standby Charge, adopted by the Board of
Directors (the "Board") of Metropolitan at its meeting held July 12, 2011, the Board gave notice to the public and
to each member public agency of Metropolitan of the intention ofthe Board to consider and take action on the
General Manager's recommendation to impose a water charge for fiscal year2011/12 on the property described
in the Engineer's Report, dated April2011 (the "Engineer's Report''), which was prepared by a registered
professional engineer certified by the state of California and was attached to Resolution 9124;
WHEREAS, the owner of the parcel identified in the Engineer's Report has applied for
annexation into the San Diego County Water Authority ("SDCWA") and Metropolitan;
WHEREAS, upon annexation, Metropolitan water will be available to such property and such
parcels will receive the benefit of the projects provided in part with proceeds of Metropolitan water standby
charges, as described in the Engineer's Report;
WHEREAS, SDCW A has requested that Metropolitan impose water standby charges on such
property at the rate specified in the Engineer's Report and provided herein, following annexation of such
property into Metropolitan;
WHEREAS, Resolution 9124 provided that the Board would meet in regular session to hold a
public protest hearing at which interested parties could present their views regarding the proposed water standby
charges and the Engineer's Report;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of Resolution 9124, the Board Executive Secretary provided
written notice in accordance with the requirements of Article :xm D, Section 4 of the California Constitution of
the proposed water standby charge by mail to the record owner of the property identified in the Engineer's Report
of such public hearing, and the notice included an assessment ballot whereby the owner could indicate his or her
name, reasonable identification of his or her parcel, and his or her support for or opposition to the proposed water
standby charge;
WHEREAS, the Board conducted in conformance with Resolution 9124 a public hearing. The
hearing was held August 16, 2011, at which interested parties were given the opportunity to present their views
regarding the proposed water standby charge and the Engineer's Jteport and to protest the charges, if they so
desired, and the Board duly considered any such protests and other views presented to it at the public hearing;
and
1
270of·564
WHEREAS, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing the Board Executive Secretary
reviewed the assessment ballots submitted, and it was found that no majority protest (as defined in
Article XIII D, Section 4 of the California Constitution) exists;
NOW TIIEREFORE, the Board of Directors ofThe Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California does hereby resolve, detennine and order as follows:
Section 1. That the Board of Metropolitan, pursuant to the Engineer's Report, fmds that the land
described in said Engineer's Report upon annexation to Metropolitan will be benefited as described in such
report and on that basis, hereby fixes and adopts a water standby charge for fiscal year 2011/12 on such lands to
which Metropolitan water is made available for any purpose, whether water is actually used or not.
Section 2. That the water standby charge per acre of land, or per parcel of land less than an acre,
as shown in the Engineer's Report, shall be $11.51 which is equal to the amount of Metropolitan's existing water
standby charge on other properties located within the territory of SDCW A.
Section 3. That no water standby charge on any parcel exceeds the reasonable cost of the
proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel, as shown in the Engineer's Report. The Engineer's Report
separates the special benefits from the general benefits and identifies each of the parcels on which a special
benefit is conferred.
Section 4. That the water standby charge shall be collected on the tax rolls, together with the
ad valorem property taxes, which are levied by Metropolitan for the payment of pre-1978 voter-approved
indebtedness. Any amounts so collected shall be applied as a credit against SDCWA's obligation to pay its
readiness-to-serve charge for fiscal year 2011112. After such member agency's readiness-to-serve charge
allocation is fully satisfied, any additional collections shall be credited to other outstanding obligations of such
member agency to Metropolitan or future readiness-to-serve obligations of such agency.
Section 5. That the water standby charge is fiXed and adopted contingent upon completion of
annexation of the land described in the Engineer's Report. If such annexation is not completed in time to permit
imposition of standby charges for fiscal year2011/12, Metropolitan may levy standby charges at the rate stated in
this resolution beginning in a subsequent flScal year.
Section 6. That in the event that the water standby charge, or any portion thereof, is determined
to be an unauthorized or invalid fee, charge or assessment by a fmal judgment in any proceeding at law or in
equity, which judgment is not subject to appeal, or if the collection ofthe water standby charge shall be
permanently enjoined and appeals of such injunction have been declined or exhausted, or if Metropolitan shall
detennine to rescind or revoke the water standby charge, then no further water standby charge shall be collected
within the territory described in the Engineer's Report and SDCWA shall pay its readiness-to-serve charge
obligation to Metropolitan in full, as if imposition of such water standby charges had never been sought.
Section 7. That pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors, acting as Lead Agency, certified a Final Environmental Impact
Report (Final EIR) and approved the project on July 10, 2008, for the development of the proposed annexation
parcel(s) (i.e., Peaceful Valley Ranch Project), and that the Board ofDirectors of Metropolitan, as Responsible
Agency under CEQA, has certified that it reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR
and in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and has adopted the Lead Agency's Finding of Fact
and Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approval of fiXing and adopting water standby charges for
the Peaceful Valley Ranch Annexation. ·
2 ·-·-----
271 of564
Policy
No.
I
1
1 .
2
3A
Water Authority
Annexation Policy
Relationship to San
Diego Local Agency
Formation Commission
(LAFCO) and
Metropolitan Water
District of Southern
California (Metropolitan)
Policies
Protection of Member
Agency Supply
Reliability
Conservation and Local
Supply Use Requirements
272of564
Attachment 2
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policies
January 18, 2012
Summary of Policy
Any annexation shall be in accordance with the County
Water Authority Act and applicable provisions of the
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of2000 (California Government
Code Section 56000 et seq.). Annexation shall not
conflict with Metropolitan Administrative Code,
Division ill.
The Water Authority shall evaluate the adequacy of
water supplies and facilities to meet the needs of the
proposed annexed territory based on adopted Water
Authority facilities and supply plans, including without
limitation the 2004 Water Facilities Master Plan and
the 2005 Urban Water Management Plan.
The Board may condition an annexation to require
developments and development projects in the annexed
territory to:
1. Utilize recycled water in accordance with
California Water Code;
2. Incorporate water conserving design and
improvements within subdivisions, both residential
and commercial and;
3. Incorporate water conserving design and
improvements in building, grading, landscaping,
and other similar development and construction
plans;
4. Require maintenance of water conserving
landscape through CC&Rs.
Page 1 of5
Water Authority Staff Evaluation
Has Policy Been Satisfied?
(If "no", potential condition has been identified)
Yes No (Include as final condition)
Compliance is met through the following actions:
1. Water Authority approval in accordance with the County Water
Authority Act.
2. MWD approval in accordance with the Metropolitan
Administrative Code, Division Ill.
3. LAFCO approval in accordance with applicable provisions of
the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act
oL2000 (CalifQrnia Government Code Section 56000 et seq.).
Yes X No (Refer to Attachment 3 to the Board memo,
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policy #2).
YesX No
Recycled water is not available in the region of the project and
there are no plans to extend recycled water infrastructure to the
region, thus making the use of recycled water impractical.
Otay's Code of Ordinances section 27.05, related to conservation
and local supply use requirements, is consistent with this policy
(Attachment 4 to Board memo, section 27.05 Conservation and
Local Supply Use Requirements). The owner/applicant for the
proposed annexation has committed to complying with the
proposed conditions by way of a letter dated June 15, 2010
(Attachment 5 to Board memo).
Attachment 2
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policies
Policy Water Authority Summary of Policy Water Authority Staff Evaluation
No. Annexation Policy Has Policy Been Satisfied?
(If "no", potential condition has been identified)
3B Conservation and Local Member agency with jurisdiction over the proposed Yes X No
Supply Use Requirements annexation shall submit evidence of the following prior 1. On January 6, 2010, Otay amended section 27 of their Code of
! to Board approval: Ordinances related to conservation and local supply use
1. Regulatory plan to require all new developments requirements consistent with Water Authority policy
within proposed annexing territories and member (Attachment 4 to Board memo).
agency's service area to incorporate water 2. Recycled water is not available in the region of the project and
I conserving design and improvements based on there are no plans at this time to extend recycled water
current Water Authority water-use-efficiency infrastructure to the region, thus making the use of recycled
policies. water impractical.
2. Regulatory plan to require all new developments
within proposed annexing territories to use
recycled water, or explain why such use in
infeasible.
3B Conservation and Local Member agency with jurisdiction over the proposed Yes X No
Supply Use Requirements annexation shall submit evidence of the following prior Otay became a signatory to the MOU in September 1991 , and is in
to Board approval: Member agency is signatory to and substantial compliance with the MOU.
in substantial compliance with the (CUWCC)
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
273 of564 Page 2 of5
Attachment 2
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policies
Policy Water Authority Summary of Policy Water Authority Staff Evaluation
No. Annexation Policy Has Policy Been Satisfied?
(If "no", potential condition has been identified)
r-jB Conservation and Local Member agency with jurisdiction over the proposed Yes X No
Supply Use Requirements annexation shall submit evidence of the following prior Otay relies on imported water to satisfy all of its potable water
to Board approval: demands and much of its non-potable demands. There is no surface
i 1. Member agency has accounted for groundwater water available in Otay's service area. According to Otay's 2010
1
and surface water supplies available to the Urban Water Management Plan and its 2007 Integrated Resources
annexing territory in water management plans. Plan, Otay is investigating the potential for developing local
: 2. Member agency is maximizing recycled water use groundwater supplies.
and groundwater throughout is service area or has
' conducted feasibility studies that have determined Under a Major Use Permit from the County of San Diego for the I recycled water infeasible. proposed project, limited groundwater will be permitted to irrigate
the private equestrian field. (22 AFY at build-out) The
owner/applicant for the proposed annexation committed to use
' groundwater to the extent practicable by way of a letter on June 15,
2010 (Attachment 5 to Board memo).
Otay is working to expand recycled water use in its service area.
Ultimately, recycled water is expected to represent about 15 percent
of the Otay's total water supply.
3B Conservation and Local Member agency with jurisdiction over the proposed Yes X No
Supply Use Requirements annexation shall submit evidence of the following prior Otay co-funds and participates in Water Authority and
to Board approval: Metropolitan sponsored water conservation programs that are
1. Member agency is offering Water Authority and available to existing and new developments.
Metropolitan sponsored water conservation
I programs to new development and encouraging
participation.
4
I
Annexation Fee Annexing territory shall pay an annexation fee in an Yes No (Include as final condition)
amount set by the Board. Payment of annexation fee will be established aS final condition
associated with approval of annexation.
5 Priority given to Priority shall be given to proposals for annexation to an Yes X No
Annexations to Member existing member agency. The proposed annexation is to the Otay, which is an existing Water
I Agency Authoritymember agency.
274of564 Page 3 of5
Attachment 2
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policies
Policy Water Authority Summary of Policy Water Authority Staff Evaluation
No. Annexation Policy Has Policy Been Satisfied?
(If "no", potential condition has been identified)
6 Concurrent annexation to Proposals for annexation to a member agency shall be Yes X No
Metropolitan, Water processed concurrently with an application for The property is already within Otay's service area. Otay Resolution
Authority and Member annexation to the Water Authority and Metropolitan. No. 3992 states that annexation to Otay's Improvement District No
I Agency 9 to receive water service is conditioned upon final annexation by
both the Water Authority and MWD (Attachment l.A to Board
I memo).
7 Facilities necessary to Facilities and works necessary to connect annexed Yes X No
connect annexing territory or new member agency to Water Authority Otay Resolution No. 3992 states that facilities necessary to connect
Territory or New Member facilities and works shall be provided at the cost of the annexed territory to Water Authority facilities shall be provided at
I Agericy annexed territory or new member agency, as the cost of the annexing territory.
determined by the Board.
8 Environmental Annexation to the Water Authority is a project subject Yes X No
Compliance to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As the lead agency for the project, the County of San Diego
Department of Planning and Land Use (County) filed a Notice of
Determination (NOD) that a Final Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) was prepared and certified pursuant to CEQA provisions.
The County determined that the project will have a significant
impact on the environment and mitigation measures were made a
condition of the project approval. As a Responsible Agency under
CEQA, the Board may rely on this environmental review as part of
final approval of the annexation. A copy of the Final EIR and
associated documents will be submitted to the Board for their review
prior to final approval of the annexation.
9 Consistent with Land-Use The member agency with jurisdiction over the Yes X No
Approvals annexing territory shall provide certification from the The Peaceful Valley Ranch is located in an unincorporated area of
city with jurisdiction over the annexing territory that San Diego County. On July 23, 2008, the County adopted a
the annexation is consistent with and supports the resolution conditionally approving the Peaceful Valley Ranch
I ! timing, location, and development intensity of the project's Tentative Map No. 534RPL consistent with the San Diego
I city's general plan and applicable specific plans. Countv General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
10 Total annexation of All parcels within an area proposed for annexation Yes X No
Ownership Lands under single ownership or development control shall be The entire approximately 152.4-acre territory is being annexed
I
annexed concurrently unless the member agency and concurrently.
city with jurisdiction over the annexing territory
provide evidence that partial annexation is consistent
with land use policies of the city.
275 of564 Page 4of5
Attachment 2
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policies
Policy Water Authority Summary of Policy Water Authority Staff Evaluation
No. Annexation Policy Has Policy Been Satisfied?
(If "no", potential condition has been identified)
11 Avoid formation of Unless the Board determines that Water Authority's Yes X No
Islands/Windows interests would not be adversely affected, ''windows" The proposed annexation would result in creation of window areas
and "islands" shall not be created by an annexation. within the Water Authority and Metropolitan service area. The
areas that would create windows are under different ownership
from the applicant. The Stoddard property is interested in
annexation at a later time. Back in July 2004, the applicant
' contacted the other property owners that would result in creation of I windows to inform them of the request to annex, and none of the ' owners were interested in annexation at that time. In July 2010,
Otay contacted the property owners, who are still not interested in
annexation of their lands.
! Staff is recommending that a determination be made that the
creation of window areas within the Water Authority's service area
would q.ot adversely affect the Water Authority's interests. Otay
bas made an effort to eliminate the formation of windows through
contacting the landowners. The majority of the annexing property is
co-terminus to the Water Authority service area. In addition, to
prevent use of imported supplies outside the Water Authority's
service area that could occur with the creation of windows, Otay
has stated that they conduct continuous monitoring of their facilities
to preclude illegal tapping of mains.
12 Administrative Costs Prior to acceptance by the Water Authority of an Yes X No
application for annexation, the applicant shall deposit The administrative fee of$3,000 was provided to the Water
an administrative fee to cover costs incurred by the Authority.
Water Authority as a result of annexation proceedings.
13: Annexation of Tribal Indian tribal lands may be annexed in compliance with Not Applicable
Lands Water Authority annexation policies. In addition, a
i contract shall be entered into and additional conditions
I may apply.
276 of564 Page 5 ofS
Potential Regional
Adverse Effect
Annexing territory demands
not included in the Water
Authority's UWMP
Actual de;mands exceeding
forecasted UWMP demands
Water Shortage and
Drought Response Plan
activated, due to uncertain
supplies or shortages
Existing facilities
insufficient to provide
average annual and peak
deliveries
277 of564
Attachment 3
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policy# 2
January 18, 2012
Reason for Potential Regional Adverse
Effect and Possible Mitigation Measures
Supplies have not been planned in UWMP to
meet annexation demands. IfWater
Authority cannot identify additional supplies,
member agency develops supplies,
potentially offset project.
Supplies may not be adequate to meet
demands of annexation and region. If Water
Authority cannot identify additional supplies,
member agency develops supplies,
offset
Increasing demands due to annexation may
cause further member agency cuts or
exceedance of allocation from MWD.
Member agency allocation base period
demand would not be increased due to
annexation.
Increasing demands due to annexation
further jeopardizes system reliability.
Identified on case-by case basis.
Is there a Potential Regional Adverse Effect?
Yes NoX
The 70 acre-feet/year projected water demands associated with the
proposed annexation was included in the 2010 UWMP as a potential near
term annexation.
Yes NoX
Actual demands are not exceeding forecasted UWMP demands.
Yes No X
The Water Authority Water Shortage and Drought Response Plan
(WSDRP) is not activated.
Yes NoX
Existing facilities are sufficient to provide average annual and peak
deliveries.
/.
Potential Regional
Adverse Effect
Annexing territory demands
not included in the Water
Authority's UWMP
Actual demands exceeding
forecasted UWMP demands
Water Shortage and
Drought Response Plan
activated, due to uncertain
supplies or shortages
Existing facilities
insufficient to provide
average annual and peak
deliveries
278of564
Attachment 3
Compliance with Water Authority Annexation Policy# 2
January 18, 2012
Reason for Potential Regional Adverse
Effect and Possible Mitigation Measures
Supplies have not been planned in UWMP to
meet annexation demands. If Water
Authority cannot identify additional supplies,
member agency develops supplies,
potentially offset project.
Supplies may not be adequate to meet
demands of annexation and region. If Water
Authority cannot identify additional supplies,
member agency develops supplies,
potentially offset project.
Increasing demands due to annexation may
cause further member agency cuts or
exceedance of allocation from MWD.
Member agency allocation base period
demand would not be increased due to
annexation.
Increasing demands due to annexation
further jeopardizes system reliability.
Identified on case-by case basis.
Is there a Potential Regional Adverse Effect?
Yes NoX
The 70 acre-feet/year projected water demands associated with the
proposed annexation was included in the 2010 UWMP as a potential near
term annexation.
Yes NoX
Actual demands are not exceeding forecasted UWMP demands.
Yes No X
The Water Authority Water Shortage and Drought Response Plan
(WSDRP) is not activated.
Yes NoX
Existing facilities are sufficient to provide average annual and peak
deliveries.
SECTION 27REOUIREMENTS AND LIMITATIONS FOR OBTAINING WATER
SERVICE ·
27.01 REQUIREMENT FOR WATER/SEWER PERMIT AND PAYMENT OF
FEES, CHARGES, AND DEPOSITS
A. Requirement for Water/Sewer Permits. Water meters
shall not be installed nor water service furnished until an
application, in the form of a water/sewer permit, has been
executed by the customer at the District office.
B. Requirement for Payment of Fees, Charges and
Deposits. Payment of all required fees, charges and depos-
its shall be made by the customer at the time the water
meter is purchased. A customer requesting water service
shall pay the fees, charges, and deposits as set forth in
Section 28 of this Code.
C. Requirement for a Building Permit. A customer
requesting permanent water service shall be required to
present a valid building permit for the property issued by
the appropriate governmental agency, except that a building
permit is not required by a customer requesting permanent
water service to: 1) install and maintain landscaping prior
to the construction of a building; 2) perform mass grading
operations; or 3) to satisfy conditions imposed by other
government agencies, including a single meter for grading
for four lots or less which are part of the same parcel map.
Government agencies shall be exempt from the requirement of
presenting a valid building permit.
D. Reauirement for a Service Lateral. The customer
requesting water service shall either have an existing
service lateral or purchase a new lateral installation at
the time of the meter purchase.
E. Commercial Parcels -5,000 square feet or Larger
Irrigated Landscape. When a customer requests water service
on a parcel of land with irrigated landscape equal to 5,000
square feet or more, a separate meter will be required for
irrigation purposes on the site.
F. Reclaimed Water Service Areas. In areas
designated as reclaimed water service areas, the customer
shall be required to install a separate reclaimed water
service lateral and meter to supply irrigation to the
parcel.
G. Second Meter For Indoor Use. Any customer who
obtained a single meter prior to October 17, 1990, a second
meter for indoor use may be obtained, without paying water
capacity fees, San Diego County Water Authority fees and
applicable zone charges on the ·second meter, if the
following criteria are met:
27-L
279of 564
27.02
1. The additional meter is solely for the
purpose of isolating current domestic (indoor)
water use from that used for outdoor landscaping.
The additional meter shall be on a separate
lateral.
2. All costs of on-site plumbing changes,
including approved back-flow prevention devices,
will be the responsibility of the customer.
3. The customer acknowledges that adding a
second meter will result in a second water bill
and associated monthly system fee.
4. The customer will be required to pay all
fees and charges prior to meter installation.
SIZE OF WATER METER
A water meter shall be sized to ensure that the maximum
demand (in gallons per minute) will not exceed 80% of the
manufacturer's recommended maximum flow rate, as shown in
Section 27.03. In no case shall the water meter size be
less than ~-inch. The size of the water meter and service
lateral required for water service shall be determined by
the General Manager as follows:
A. Detached Single-Family Residential Dwelling Unit.
The customer may submit calculated maximum demand (in
gallons per minute), provided that maximum demand must be
more than twenty four (24) gallons per minute.
B. Apartments, Condominiums, Mobile Home Parks and
other Multiple Family Residential Dwelling Units with
Individual Meters. The calculated maximum demand shall be
per Section 27.02A.
C. Business, Commercial, Industrial, Apartments,
Condominiums, Mobile Home Parks and other Multiple-Family
Residential Dwelling Units. The customer shall submit
building plans signed by a licensed building architect. The
plans shall list the number of fixture units, the parcel
size (in acres), and the calculated maximum demand (in
gallons per minute) to be placed on each water meter.
D. Irrigation. The customer shall submit irrigation
plans signed by a licensed landscape architect. The plans
shall indicate the calculated maximum demand (in gallons per
minute) to be placed on each water meter and the total area
to be irrigated (in square feet). The plans must also be in
compliance with the requirements -of Section 27.05.
E. Other. In the case of other types of service not
included above, the customer shall submit information as
27-2
280 of564
requested by the General Manager. Any customer may request
and purchase a separate meter to isolate landscaping from
indoor use.
F. Requirement for Multiole Meters. The General
Manager may require multiple meters when it is in the best
interest of the District.
27.03 MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM FLOW RATE FOR
DISTRICT METERS
Customers are cautioned to control the rates of flow of
water through District meters. Operation of a meter at
flows in excess of the manufacturer's recommendations will
cause severe damage to operating parts. Rated capacities
for meters used in this District are as follows:
27.04
Meter Size
In Inches
3/4
1
1-1/2
2
3
4
6
8
10
2
3
4
6
ORDINARY METERS
Manufacturer's Recommended
Maximum Rate in U. S. Gallons
per Minute
30
50
160
530
1350
2700
3500
6500
COMPOUND METERS
(Multi-family, Apartments etc.)
285
480
750
1700
100
USE OF SUBMETERS FOR RESALE OR DISTRIBUTION OF WATER
Owners or operators of mobil e home parks, apartments,
condominium complexes, industrial complexes and land used
for agricultural purposes may resell water furnished by the
District through the use of a submetering system under the
following conditions: (1) owners and operators shall comply
with State law (California Code of Regulations Section 4090)
prohibiting any surcharge on the water rate; (2) the water
system on the private property side of the master meter,
including the submeters, shall be solely the responsibility
of the owner or operator; and (3) the owner or operator
shall clearly delineate on the bill that any cost associated
27 ...:3
281 of 564
with the submeters is a cost imposed by the property owner
or operator and not by Otay Water District.
27.05 CONSERVATION AND LOCAL SUPPLY USE REQUIREMENTS
The requirements below apply to all new residential and
commercial developments or redevelopments. The landscape
requirements also apply to any re-landscaping that is
subject to review by the District, the County of San Diego,
City of Chula Vista or the City of San Diego.
1. Indoor Fixtures and Appliances. All water fixtures and
appliances installed, including the ones in the following
list, must be high-efficiency:
• Toilets and urinals
• Faucets
• Showerheads
• Clothes Washers
Dishwashers
"High-efficiency" means fixtures and appliances that comply
with the most efficient specifications under the EPA
WaterSense® or Energy Star programs,1 as in effect at the
time installation commences.
2. Landscape requirements. Only "Smart" irrigation
controllers2 may be installed and only low-water use plants
may be used in non recreational landscapes. All landscapes
must also be designed and managed consistent with
requirements of the local agency within which the property
is located, be it the County of San Diego, the City of Chula
Vista or the City of San Diego.
a. Installed smart irrigation controllers shall be
properly programmed/scheduled according to the
manufacturer's instructions and/or site specific conditions
based on soil type, plant type, irrigation type, weather
and/or reference evapotranspiration data.
b. Two irrigation schedules shall be prepared, one for
the initial establishment period of three months or until
summer hardened, and one for the established landscape,
which incorporates the specific water needs of the plants
and turf throughout the calendar year. The schedules shall
be continuously available on site to those responsible for
the landscape maintenance and posted at the smart
controller.
1 Certified EPA WaterSense products, and Energy Star products, are at
least 20% more efficient than the applicable federal standards. 1 Smart Irrigation Controller means a controller that uses real time,
soil moisture or weather data to automatically adjust irrigation run-
times. Furthermore, to qualify as a Smart Irrigation Controller, the
device must be certified by the Irrigation Association and/or the EPA
WaterSense program.
282 of564
c. Any Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs)
pertaining to a new subdivision/development shall not limit
or prohibit the use and maint~nance of low water use plant
materials and the use of artificial turf, and shall require
property owners to design and maintain their landscapes
consistent with the applicable City and County's
regulations.
d. Dedicated irrigation meters shall be installed in:
All parks and common areas with 5,000 square
feet or more of irrigated landscape
• Commercial sites with 5,000 square feet or
more of irrigated landscape
e. In compliance with Section 23.03 of this Code of
Ordinance, pressure regulators must be installed when and
where appropriate to maximize the life expectancy and
efficiency of the irrigation system.
5. New commercial developments must install separate,
dual-distribution systems for potable and recycled water.
6. The requirements of this Section shall not be
interpreted in any way to limit the owner's obligation to
comply with any other applicable federal, state, or local
laws or regulations.
283 of564
June 15,2010
Mr. Robert Kennedy
Associate Civil Engineer
Otay Water District
OTAY YIATER otSTRlCT pFr r.ntEO
2fl1U JUN \ 8 PK 2: 08
2554 Sweetwater Springs Road
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
MOSER VENTURES, Inc
3802 Quarter Mile Drive
San Diego, CA 92130
Tel: (858) 414-9928
dmoser@moserventures.com
RE: PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION
Dear Bob:
As project manager for and on behalf of Peaceful Valley Ranch LLC (PVR LLC), owner
of the Peaceful Valley Ranch project, this letter is to confirm the commitment ofPVR
LLC to fully meet the Otay Water District's ordinance on coriservation and local supply
use requirements as described in section 27.05 of the Otay Water District Code of
Regulations.
Additionally, Peaceful Valley Ranch LLC will utilize ground water to the fullest extent
practical, within the limitations of the Peaceful Valley Ranch Major Use Permit.
Sincerely,
MOSER VENTURES INC.
For and on behalf of Peaceful Valley Ranch LLC
President
cc: Streeter Parker, PVR LLC
284of5M
ATTACHMENT E
San Diego County Water Authority Referenced
Resolution
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-o 1
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SAN DIEGO
COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY SETTING FINAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
AND APPROVING THE CONCURRENT ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
SAID AGENCIES AND MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS RELATING
THERETO (PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION)
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1 0( d) of the County Water Authority Act, the Board of
Directors of the Otay Water District adopted Resolution No. 3992, requesting concurrent
annexation from the San Diego County Water Authority and Metropolitan Water District of the
lands described in Resolution No. 3992, and knoWn as the PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
ANNEXATION; and
WHEREAS, a copy of Otay Water District Resolution No. 3992, is attached (Attachment
1.A); and
WHEREAS, the land description contained in Otay Water District Resolution No. 3992
contains a 8.3 acre parcel (portion ofparcel4 ofParcel Map No. 16190) that is not part of the
Peaceful Valley Ranch development and will be processed for annexation under separate action
at a later date; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 1 0( d) of the County Water Authority Act, the Board of
Directors of the San Diego County Water Authority may grant or deny the application and, in
granting the application, may fix terms and conditions upon which the territory may be annexed
to the San Diego County Water Authority; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Water Authority adopted
Annexation Policies in February 2006 that provide criteria for the evaluation of potential
annexations and conditions that may be applied; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the San Diego County Water Authority approved
Procedures for Implementation ofthe San Diego County Water Authority's Annexation Policy
#2: Protection of Member Agency Supply Reliability in April 2010 that provide guidance and
direction in determining if approval of a proposed annexation will have an adverse effect on
member agency supply reliability; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2010-11, adopted July 22, 2010, the Board of Directors
of the San Diego County Water Authority granted preliminary informal terms and conditions for
the PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION, and requested Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California grant conditional approval and give notice of intent to impose water
standby charges; and
255 of564
WHEREAS, on July 12, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Water District
granted conditional approval and by Resolution 9124 gave notice of intent to impose water
standby charges for the PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH ANNEXATION; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2011-17 on August25, 2011, the Board of Directors of
the San Diego County Water Authority requested Metropolitan Water District of Southern
· California adopt formal terms and conditions for the PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
ANNEXATION; and
WHEREAS, by Resolutions 9133 and 9134 on December 13, 2011, the Board of
Directors of the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California consented to the annexation,
fixed terms and conditions, and adopted a water standby charge for the PEACEFUL VALLEY
RANCH ANNEXATION (Attachment l.B); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the state CEQA Guidelines, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, acting as
Lead Agency, prepared and processed a Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the
proposed PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH MAJOR SUBDIVISION project. The Final EIR was
certified and the project approved by the Lead Agency on July 24, 2008. The Lead Agency also
approved the Findings of Fact, the Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC) and the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). The San Diego County Wat~r
Authority Board of Directors, as a Responsible Agency under CEQA, is required to certify that it
has reviewe4 and considered the information contained in the certified Final EIR, Findings of
Fact, SOC and MMRP prior to approval of the formal terms and conditions for the annexation;
and
WHEREAS, it is in the interests of the San Diego County Water Authority to set formal
terms and conditions provided by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for the
annexation of the properties described in Attachment l.A.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors RESOLVES the following:
1. That it has considered the information provided in the certified Final EIR,
Findings of Fact, SOC, and MMRP and finds that no further environmental analysis is required
for the action of the San Diego County Water Authority, and hereby adopts the Lead Agency's
Findings of Fact, SOC, and MMRP for all impacts related to the annexation.
2. That subject to the following terms and conditions, to grant the application of the
governing body of Otay Water District for consent to annex the PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH
to the San Diego County Water Authority and to establish the following conditions of such
annexation:
256 of 564
a. That the terms and conditions as ordered by Board of Directors of the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California shown on Attachment l.B,
be a condition for the concurrent annexation to said Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California and the San Diego County Water Authority, of
the PEACEFUL VALLEY RANCH, as described in Otay Water District
Resolution No. 3992, excluding 8.3 acre parcel which is portion ofparcel4 of
Parcel Map No. 16190 (Attachment l.A).
b. All necessary certificates, statements, maps, and other documents required to
be filed by or on behalf of the Otay Water District to effectuate the annexation
shall be filed on or before December 31 , 2012.
c. Prior to filing a request for a Certificate of Completion of the annexation
proceedings with San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission, Otay
Water District shall submit a certified copy of the San Diego Local Agency
Formation Commission's resolution approving the annexation to the San
Diego County Water Authority, and shall pay to the San Diego County Water
Authority the sum of $446,379.06, along with the annexation charge for the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, calculated based on the
current rate, in accordance with Metropolitan's Administrative Code Section
3300.
d. Pursuant to Section 5.2 of the County Water Authority Act, the San Diego
County Water Authority shall impose standby charges to the properties to be
annexed and the property owners shall sign a consent agreement regarding the
payment of standby charges.
e. That the property owner acknowledges and agrees to participate in any
required Proposition 218 action, and will not oppose the imposition of any
special taxes, fees, charges, and assessments currently applicable to the San
Diego County Water Authority and any applicable service area.
3. That the General Manager is authorized and directed to forward certified copies of
this resolution to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, and Otay Water
District.
4. That the General Manager be directed to file a Notice of Determination as provided in
Section 15096 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED on this twenty-sixth day of January 2012.
Ayes: Unless otherwise noted, all Direetors present voted aye.
Noes: None
Abstain: Directors Croucher and Watten abstained.
Absent: Arant, .Boyle, Heidel, Linden (p), Mcintosh, Morriso~, Price and Tu
257 of564
~~# chardK. sm· .
Secretary
I, Doria F. Lore, Clerk of the Board of the San Diego County Water Authority, certify that the
vote above is correct and this Resolution No. 2012-___Ql__ was duly adopted at the meeting of the
Board of Directors on the date stated above.
258 of564
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board Meeting MEETING DATE: May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton,
General Manager
W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO.
APPROVED BY:
Susan Cruz, District Secretary
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Board of Directors 2012 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board, the attached Board of Director’s meeting
calendar for 2012 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to review the 2012 Board of Director’s meeting calendars
and amend the schedule as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments: Calendar of Meetings for 2012
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar 5-2-12.doc
AGENDA ITEM 9a
Page 1 of 1
Board of Directors, Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2012
Regular Board Meetings:
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 4, 2012
February 1, 2012
March 7, 2012
April 4, 2012
May 2, 2012
June 6, 2012
July 11, 2012
August 1, 2012
September 5, 2012
October 3, 2012`
November 7, 2012
December 5, 2012
January 18, 2012
February 15, 2012
March 21, 2012
April 18, 2012
May 16, 2012
June 20, 2012
July 18, 2012
August 15, 2012
September 19, 2012
October 17, 2012
November 21, 2012
SPECIAL BOARD MEETING:
Special Meeting (Reserved if Necessary for the Appointment of the Division 2 Director):
May 8, 2012 at 3:30 p.m.
BOARD WORKSHOPS:
Budget Workshops:
March 19, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.
May 15, 2012 at 4:00 p.m.
Board Workshop: TBD
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar Attach A for 2012 5-2-12.doc
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:
Regular Board
MEETING
DATE:
May 2, 2012
SUBMITTED
BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
W.O./G.F.
NO:
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: General Manager’s Report
GENERAL MANAGER:
Salt Creek Golf Course
The bankruptcy for the Salt Creek lessee resulted in a new
lessee taking possession of the lease on March 22, 2012. Otay
has recovered all amounts owing through the bankruptcy leaving
the district whole, or not experiencing a loss for any rent or
water charges owed by the former lessee.
The new lessee is an experienced operator of hotel and golf
course properties and has initiated measures to bring the
course back to a premium standard. There is ongoing work on
deferred maintenance and certain improvements that are
projected to increase play and revenues. The principles of the
new lessee are excited to have control of the course and are
committing time and money to the success of the operation.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Water Conservation and School Education:
Student Photo, Poster and Video Contests - The District
received a number of quality entries from students this year
for the photo, poster and video contests. Winners will be
recognized at the May Board meeting as part of Water Awareness
Month. Water Awareness Month is a long running statewide
campaign to educate Californians on the value of water and
using it wisely.
AGENDA ITEM 10a
2
Outreach Events - The District staffed booths both at the San
Diego County Garden Friendly Plant Fair at the Home Depot off
“H” Street in Chula Vista on April 14th, and multiple booths at
the Water Conservation Garden’s Spring Garden Festival on April
28th. The Plant Fair event was lightly attended, primarily due
to inclement weather.
School Garden Tours - Through the end of April, 28 tours were
completed and another five are scheduled to be completed before
the end of the school year at the Water Conservation Garden.
There were four tours conducted in April, involving 130 1st and
3rd graders, and 40 parents from Eastlake and Loma Elementary
Schools.
California Friendly Landscape Contest - The regional contest
deadline was April 6, 2012. Eleven water agencies are
participating in this year’s contest. Each agency’s Best-in-
District winner will be recognized at a special ceremony on May
19th, at 10:00 a.m., at the Garden amphitheatre.
Safety and Security:
Training – Staff attended the following:
o “Disaster Management for Water and Wastewater Utilities-
MGT 343” at the San Luis Rey Sewer Treatment Facility in
Oceanside on April 24-25. This course provided training
to Water and Wastewater professionals on the following
issues:
threats/mitigating threats, and responding to threats
to water and wastewater facilities and systems
major legislative requirements
recovery from disasters
Human Resources:
Employee Information Meeting – The District held Employee
Information meetings on April 25th. These meetings are held
every six months to provide employees with relevant information
regarding key District projects and updates. Some of the items
covered at this meeting included updates on
equipment/facilities upgrades, various IT projects, and Otay’s
website, including the joining of Otay on Facebook, Twitter,
and YouTube. Employees appreciate this forum to keep updated
on current events within the District.
RFP/Broker Services – The District has been with our current
health benefits broker for four years. HR has sent requests
for proposals and is currently in the review process. A final
recommendation will be brought to the FA&C Committee meeting in
May. The new contract will take effect July 1, 2012.
3
“Take Our Daughters & Sons to Work Day” – The District hosted
“Take Our Daughters & Sons to Work Day” on April 26th.
Employees had the opportunity to show their child how their
work makes an impact at Otay Water District.
Recruitments – We are currently recruiting for the following
positions: Engineering Manager, Senior Engineer, IT Manager,
Construction Inspector II, Safety and Security Administrator,
and Water Systems Operator.
New Hires/Promotions – There were no new hires in the month of
April.
Purchasing and Facilities:
Purchase Orders – There were 78 purchase orders processed in
April 2012 for a total of $2,038,103.29.
o Please note that PO #715949 in the amount of
$1,212,257.13, was issued to Sepulveda Construction, Inc.,
for the 30-inch Potable Water Pipeline on Hunte Parkway,
for the period of April 11, 2012 - December 31, 2012, as
per the staff report dated March 7, 2012.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:
Cashier Upgrade – On March 21st, the Cashier (Core) system was
upgraded. This Eden system upgrade ensures that the District
is payment card industry (PCI) compliant.
IT Asset Inventory Business Process Evaluation - The evaluation
of IT asset inventory business process has been started. Staff
documented the current process of requesting, receiving,
tracking and disposing of IT assets, such as computers,
printers, faxes, etc. Currently, the RFID application is used
to receive and track these assets. Staff is in the process of
evaluating the RFID application and identifying areas for
improvement. After suggested improvements are implemented,
staff should be able to generate a real-time report of all IT
assets inventory with their locations and tracking information.
GIS New Web Viewer – GIS staff has been working on a new
viewer, “Operation Dashboard”, to replace the current Mapplet
viewer. The performance and functionalities are increasingly
improved. Staff is at the last testing stage before the
release, which is expected to be released in the beginning of
June. This new application will save $8,300 annually in
license fees.
CCTV Videos on GIS - GIS staff completed the configuration,
programming, downloading and uploading of the closed-circuit
television (CCTV) of our sewer pipes. The CCTV videos can be
4
viewed on the current GIS Mapplet viewer and the upcoming
Dashboard viewer.
FINANCE:
AMR Meter Change-Outs – The last phase of manual to AMR change
outs began on April 9, 2012. At the end of this cycle of
change-outs, the District will have successfully completed the
10-year AMR project.
Phone Enhancements – Staff will begin work with the phone
support vendor to identify areas for enhancements. Those being
considered within the Call Center include “phone pops”, which
will identify the caller and account information prior to
speaking to a Customer Service Representative.
Upcoming FY 2012 Interim Audits – An audit team from White
Nelson Diehl Evans LLC will be at the District the week of May
7-11, reviewing results of the first nine months of FY 2012
(July 2011 – March 2012). This is predominantly the compliance
portion of the audit, to provide audit assurance for the year-
end audit concerning the accuracy of the District’s financial
and operational data and reporting structure.
Update on Meter Fees, Backflow Fees, and Fees for Damaged
Meters to Reflect Current Costs – These fees have not been
updated in several years, therefore, an update is necessary to
ensure the cost to purchase and install the meters is recovered
through those fees. In this fee review, the backflow fees and
fees to replace damaged meters will be assessed and updated as
well.
Financial Reporting:
o For the nine months ended March 31, 2012, there are total
revenues of $55,581,706 and total expenses of $56,670,388.
The expenses exceeded revenues by $1,088,682. The
shortfall is primarily due to the lower than budgeted
water sales, especially in the first quarter of the year
when the District experienced cooler weather than normal
and earlier rainfall than normal.
o The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the
Investment Portfolio Details as of March 31, 2012, total
$89,357,535.36 with an average yield to maturity of
0.531%. The total earnings year-to-date are $465,225.30.
5
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
City of Chula Vista Acquisition of Additional Wastewater
Capacity Project: RMC Water and Environment completed this
feasibility study for the City and the Otay Water District to
increase the City’s wastewater treatment and disposal capacity
with a new City owned facility and to provide the Otay Water
District with an additional supply of Title 22 recycled water.
The City requires an additional six (6) MGD of wastewater
treatment and disposal capacity and has two options, purchase
additional capacity or build and operate a new City owned
facility. The study estimates the City will need additional
capacity in 15 to 20 years, based on the recent rate of
development. The study concludes that it will take 5 to 10
years to plan, permit, design, construct, and start-up a new
recycled water facility. This provides the City of Chula Vista
with an alternate plan should the City of San Diego fail to get
another waiver of secondary treatment at the Point Loma
Wastewater Treatment Plant in 2015. (R2093)
Rancho del Rey Groundwater Well Development: Tetra Tech is
wrapping up the 90% construction drawing submittal based on an
amendment that was executed on April 11th. A draft sewer
agreement was sent to the City of Chula Vista on February 22nd,
a revised draft Industrial User Discharge Permit application
was sent to the City of San Diego on April 17th, and a Hazardous
Materials Business Plan was sent to the County on April 20th.
Additional activities are underway to secure a power supply
from SDG&E and a storm drain connection for discharges into the
storm drain system. Staff is preparing a request for a grant
from the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR).
Potentially 25% of the cost of the project could be offset if
the funds are granted. (P2434)
North District – South District Interconnections System: This
project consists of installing approximately 5.2 miles of 30-
inch diameter pipe from H Street in Chula Vista to Paradise
Valley Road in Spring Valley. The project currently has two
preferred alignments (Proctor Valley Road and Corral Canyon
Road). Staff is currently working on a study to demonstrate
“good cause” to the SDCWA for the parallel encroachment along
the Proctor Valley Road. Staff presented to the Sweetwater
Valley Civic Association on March 7. The Bonita Highlands
Homeowner’s Association (BHHA) provided a letter in support of
the Proctor Valley Road alignment March 27th. In the letter,
BHHA proposed a new alignment that is a combination of Proctor
Valley and Corral Canyon Road. A meeting was held in the field
with USF&WS and Caltrans to observe a portion of the alignment
6
proposed by BHHA on April 24th. Staff is scheduled to present
to BHHA on May 8th. (P2511)
La Presa System Improvements: This project consists of
demolishing the facilities at the La Presa Pump Station Site,
constructing an 850/657 Pressure Reducing Station, demolishing
the Dorchester Reservoir site, and installing several
interconnections in the 640 Zone. In addition, sixty-three
(63) homes surrounding the Dorchester Reservoir site will incur
a pressure increase due to the demolition of the reservoir.
Staff created a rebate program on installation of new and
upgraded water pressure regulators for the 63 homeowners
associated with the Dorchester Project and the program is
approximately 100% complete. The pressure has been increased
and the tie-in is complete. The contractor, TC construction,
completed the interconnection on Paradise Valley Road and has
paved the La Presa site. Project is on budget and anticipated
to be completed in July 2012. (P2370)
944-1R Recycled Water Pump Station Upgrades & Enhancements:
This project consists of upgrading the 944-1R Pump Station with
new pumps, new pipe configurations, and electrical upgrades to
keep up with current and future recycled water demands. The
contractor, Sepulveda Construction, Inc., continues to install
the instrumentation, pump station piping and construction of
three (3) pressure reducing stations. Project is on budget and
anticipated to be completed in June 2012. (R2091)
Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility Upgrade: This
project consists of an upgrade to the treatment plant to reduce
the nitrogen levels in the plant effluent. The upgrade includes
modifications to the aeration basins, the addition of energy-
efficient turbo blowers and replacement of corroded air piping,
a new cover for the filter backwash storage tank, a new filter
air scour system, and automation enhancements. The treatment
plant was shut down on January 14, 2012 and is scheduled to come
back on-line by mid-May. NEWest has completed all major
components of construction. Staff is scheduled for training and
plant operation in the month of May. Project is on budget and
construction is anticipated to be completed in June 2012.
(R2096)
30-Inch, 980 Zone, Hunte Parkway – Proctor Valley/Use Area:
This project consists of the installation of approximately
2,399 linear-feet of 30-inch steel pipe and appurtenances on
Hunte Parkway between Proctor Valley Road and the entrance to
the Salt Creek Golf Course in the City of Chula Vista. The
pipeline will increase total water delivery to reduce pressure
losses experienced during periods of high demand. Sepulveda
Construction, Inc. is the contractor. The Pre-Construction
7
Meeting was held on 4/18/12. The Notice to Proceed was
delivered to Sepulveda on 4/18/12. Mobilization is expected in
July due to the long lead time for valve and pipe delivery.
Project is on budget and construction is anticipated to be
completed in November 2012. (P2514)
Avocado, Louisa, Calavo, Challenge, Hidden Mesa Sanitary Sewer
Replacement: This project consists of replacing approximately
4,500 ft. of sewer pipeline in Avocado Blvd. and neighboring
residential streets. The contractor, Garcia Juarez, continues
the sewer replacement on Louisa Dr. Project is on budget and
construction is anticipated to be completed in May 2013.
(S2019, S2020, S2022, S2023, S2026)
850-3 Reservoir Exterior Coating & Upgrades: This project
consists of replacing the exterior coating of the 3.0 MG 850-3
Reservoir, along with providing structural upgrades to ensure
the tank complies with both State and Federal OSHA standards, as
well as American Water Works Association and County Health
Department standards. The contractor, Advanced Industrial
Services, Inc., will mobilize on-site on April 30, 2012.
Project is anticipated to be completed in July 2012. (P2491)
For the month of March 2012, the District sold 45 meters (88
EDUs) generating $796,752 in revenue. Projection for this
period was 23 meters (36.7 EDUs) with budgeted revenue of
$307,729. Projected revenue from July 1, 2011 through June 30,
2012 is $3,376,200 against a budget of $3,173,092.
For the month of March 2012, staff reviewed two (2) potential
easement encroachments and will be gathering all the necessary
information prior to informing customers of the removal of the
encroachments. The above is part of an on-going program of
easement monitoring.
The following table summarizes Engineering's project purchases
and Change Orders issued during the period of February 14, 2012
through April 21, 2012 that were within staff signatory
authority:
Date
Action
Amount
Contractor/
Consultant Project
2/14/12 P.O. $2,330 Harper & Assoc
Engineering Inc
980-2 Reservoir – Corrosion
evaluation (P2382)
4/9/12 Check
Request $66,800 City of Chula Vista Recycled Water Supply Link
Easement (R2087)
4/10/12 P.O. $2,100 Perry Electric Olympic Pkwy & Otay Lakes
(R2091)
8
Water Operations:
The City of San Diego experienced a break on Cal American’s
supply line on March 9, 2012. At Cal American’s request, the
District supplied them water intermittently for four days. The
total water supplied to Cal American during the four days was
1.32 million gallons.
The Treatment Plant will be offline for facility upgrades
beginning January 14, 2012 with a tentative restart date of May
1, 2012.
Total number of potable water meters is 48,667.
The March potable water purchases were 1,916.8 acre feet which
is 57.4% above the budget of 1,217.8 acre feet. The cumulative
purchases through March is 22,487.7 acre feet which is 7.2%
below the cumulative budget of 23,477.8 acre feet.
9
The March recycled water purchases and production was 132.6
acre feet which is 79.5% above the budget of 73.9 acre feet.
The cumulative production and purchases through March is
2,697.5 acre feet which is 8.9% below the cumulative budget of
2,959.4 acre feet.
Recycled water consumption for the month of March is as
follows:
Total consumption was 159.3 acre-feet or 51,905,216 gallons and
the average daily consumption was 1,674,362 gallons per day.
Total number of recycled water meters is 700.
Total recycled water consumption as of March for FY 2012 is
2,901.9 acre-feet.
Wastewater flows for the month of March were as follows:
Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,784,729.
Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per
day: 530,611.
10
Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 1,070,728.
Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling
Facility, gallons per day: 0.
Flow to Metro from Otay Water District, gallons per day:
1,254,118.
By the end of March there were 6,082 wastewater
connections/EDUs.
REVENUES:
Water Sales $
Energy Charges
System Charges
MWD & CW A Fixed Charges
Penalties
Total Water Sales
Reclamation Sales
Sewer Charges
Meter Fees
Capacity Fee Revenues
Bettennent Fees for Maintenance
Non-Operating Revenues
Tax Revenues
Interest
Transfer from OPEB
Transfer from Bettennent Reserve
Transfer from Replacement
General Fund Draw Down
Transfer from General Fund
Total Revenues $
EXPENSES:
Potable Water Purchases $
Recycled Water Purchases
CW A-Infrastructure Access Charge
CW A-Customer Service Charge
CWA-Emergency Storage Charge
MWD-Capacity Res Charge
MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge
Subtotal Water Purchases
Power Charges
Payroll & Related Costs
Material & Maintenance
Administrative Expenses
Legal Fees
Expansion Reserve
Replacement Reserve
Transfer to Sewer Fund Reserve
Transfer to General Fund Reserve
Transfer to Sewer Replacement
Transfer to New Supply Reserve
Total Expenses $
EXCESS REVENUES(EXPENSE) $
F:/MORPT/FS2012-0312
OTAY WATER DISTRJCT
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
FOR NfNE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012
Annual YTD YTD
Budget Actual Budget
36,598,100 $ 25,719,812 $ 28,026,400
1,874,000 1,428,693 1,439,400
9,542,100 7,184,148 7,155,000
8,981,500 6,517,235 6,489,300
913,100 550,086 650,600
57,908,800 41,399,973 43,760,700
7,395,500 5,143,061 5,397,600
2,336,000 1,764,125 1,747,000
82,000 96,383 61,500
1,044,000 898,103 818,000
628,600 553,578 471,500
2,021,600 1,501 ,776 1,489,600
3,839,600 2,175,617 2,269,700
158,300 63,190 118,700
1,380,000 1,035,000 1,035,000
30,000 22,500 22,500
120,000 90,000 90,000
522,800 392,100 392,100
595,000 446,300 446,300
78,062,200 $ 55,581,706 $ 58,120,200
27,793,100 $ 20,248,869 $ 21,132,200
I ,452,800 I ,292,626 I ,077,050
1,756,900 1,307,517 1,307,700
1,562,600 1,140,518 I, 144,800
3,585,800 2,549,646 2,589,600
603,900 463,375 468,000
1,488,600 1,110,908 1,116,300
38,243,700 28,113,459 28,835,650
2,440,900 1,658,921 I ,797,000
18,119,600 13,333,552 13,810,892
4,300,000 2,680,372 2,805,749
4,180,700 2,757,715 2,964,111
380,000 328,270 285,000
555,000 416,300 416,300
3,330,000 2,497,500 2,497,500
786,800 590,100 590,100
2,420,500 1,815,400 1,815,400
I ,720,000 1,290,000 1,290,000
1,585,000 1,188,800 1,188,800
78,062,200 $ 56,670,388 $ 58,296,502
$ (1 ,088,6822 $ {176,3022
Exhibit A
YTD
Variance Var%
$ (2,306,589) (8.2%)
(10,707) (0.7%)
29,148 0.4%
27,935 0.4%
~100,5142 ( 15.4%2
~2,360, 7272 (5.4%)
(254,539) (4.7%)
17,125 1.0%
34,883 56.7%
80,103 9.8%
82,078 17.4%
12,176 0.8%
(94,083) (4.1%)
(55,51 0) (46.8%)
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
$ (2,538,494) (4.4%)
$ 883,331 4.2%
(215,576) (20.0%)
183 0.0%
4,282 0.4%
39,954 1.5%
4,625 1.0%
5,392 0.5%
722,191 2.5%
138,079 7.7%
477,340 3.5%
125,378 4.5%
206,396 7.0%
(43,270) (15.2%)
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
$ 1,626,114 2.8%
$ (912,3802
4/23/2012 7 57 AM
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW
MARCH 31,2012
INVESTMENT OVERVIEW & MARKET STATUS:
The federal funds rate has remained constant now for over 39-months. On December 16, 2008, at the Federal Reserve Board's regular
scheduled meeting, the federal funds rate was lowered from 1.00% to "a target range of between Zero and 0.25%" in response to the
nation's ongoing financial crisis, as well as banking industry pressure to ease credit and stimulate the economy. This marked the ninth
reduction in a row since September 18, 2007, when the rate was 5.25%. There have been no further changes made to the federal funds
rate at the Federal Reserve Board's subsequent regular scheduled meetings, the most recent of which was held on March 13, 2012.
They went on to say: "The Committee currently anticipates that economic conditions--including low rates of resource utilization and a
subdued outlookfor inflation over the medium run--are likely to warrant exceptionally low levelsfor thefederalfunds rate at least
through late-2014.
Despite the large drop in available interest rates, the District's overall effective rate of return at March 31st was 0.52%, which was a
decrease of 6 basis points (0.06%) from the prior month. At the same time the LAIF return on deposits has fluctuated slightly over the
last several months, reaching an average effective yield of0.38% for the month of March 2012. Based on our success at maintaining a
competitive rate of return on our portfolio during this extended period of interest rate declines, no changes in investment strategy are
being considered at this time.
In accordance with the District's Investment Policy, all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives, in priority
order, of safety, liquidity, and return on investment.
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE: March 31, 2012
Investment State Limit Otai Limit Otai Actual
8.01: Treasury Securities 100% 100% 0
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations) $50 Million $50 Million $18.39 Million
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds). 100% 100% 4.56%
8.03: Federal Agency Issues 100% 100% 46.78%
8.04: Certificates of Deposit 30% 15% 0.09%
8.05: Short-Term Commercial Notes 25% 15% 0
8.06: Medium-Term Commercial Debt 30% 15% 0
8.07: Money Market Mutual Funds 20% 15% 0
8.08: San Diego County Pool 100% 100% 24.76%
12.0: Maximum Single Financial Institution 100% 50% 3.19%
Target: Meet or Exceed 100% of LAIF
G)
E Gl E 10 t .E
c::: 0
c::: ... :I ; a:
Performance Measure F-12
Return on Investment
Month
•LAIF •otay DDifference
$41,734,789
46.78% Otay Water District
Investment Portfolio: 3/31/12
----------
$2,927,688
3.28%
$44,544,507
49.93%
C Banks (Passbook/Checking/CO) •Pools (LAIF & County) CAgencies & Corporate Notes
Investments
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
San Diego County Pool
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
March 31
Par
Value
41,737,000.00
81,326.80
22,456,373.88
22,088,133.03
86,362,833.71
2,846,361.21
89,209,194.92
Month Ending
41,342.12
92,837,201.66
0.52%
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
March 31, 2012
Market Book
Value Value
41,747.276.26 41 ,734,789.45
81,326.80 81,326.80
22,483.571 .09 22,456,373.88
22,199,000.00 22,088,133.03
86,511 '17 4.15 86,360,623.16
2,846,361 .21 2,846,361.21
89,357,535.36 89,206,984.37
Fiscal Year To Date
465,225.30
97,745,152.62
0.63%
%of
Portfolio
48.33
0.09
26.00
25.58
100.00%
Term
829
731
402
402
Days to
Maturity
653
661
317
317
YTM YTM
360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
0.642 0.651
0.280 0.284
0.378 0.383
0.477 0.484
0.531 0.538
0.073 0.074
0.531 0.538
I hereby certify that the investments contained in this report are made in accordance with the District Investment Policy Number 27 adopted by the Board of Directors on September 6, 2006. The
market value information provided by Interactive Data Corporation. The investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow requirements of the District for the next six months of
expenditures.
Jos~fficer ¥-?-"3-J;;z_
Reporting period 03/0112012-0313112012
Run Date: 04/17/2012 -16:43
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2012
Average Purchase
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31331KZFO 2219 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/23/2011 3,000.000.00 2,993,370.00
313378BR1 2230 Federal Home Loan Bank 02128/2012 3,000,000.00 2,996,160.00
313378DB4 2231 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/12/2012 3,000,000.00 3,000,300.00
313378KU4 2233 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/1212012 3,000,000.00 2,995,320.00
3137EACK3 2146 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 05/28/2010 2,000,000.00 2,005,960.00
3137EACK3A 2148 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 05/27/2010 1,030,000.00 1,033,069.40
3137EACK3B 2149 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 05/27/2010 2,707,000.00 2,715,066.86
3134G22H4 2223 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 11/04/2011 2,000,000.00 2,000,560.00
3134G23NO 2225 Federal Home loan Mortgage 11/0212011 3,000,000.00 3,000,840.00
3134G3AC4 2226 Federal Home loan Mortgage 12106/2011 3,000,000.00 2,998,950.00
3134G3AQ3 2227 Federal Home loan Mortgage 11/30/2011 2,000,000.00 2,001.460.00
3134G3BN9 2228 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 12105/2011 2,000,000.00 2,003, 760.00
3134G3SSO 2232 Federal Home loan Mortgage 03/2212012 3,000,000.00 2,997,720.00
3135GODR1 2221 Federal National Mortage Assoc 10/03/2011 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
3135GOJG9 2234 Federal National Mortage Assoc 03/26/2012 3,000,000.00 3,004,380.00
3135GODV2 2275 Federal National Mortage Assoc 10/18/2011 3,000,000.00 3,000,360.00
Subtotal and Average 42,929,509.98 41,737,000.00 41,747,276.26
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
2050003183-5 2229 California Bank & Trust 01/22/2012 81 .326.80 81 ,326.80
Subtotal and Average 81,326.80 81,326.80 81,326.80
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 18,392,617.15 18,414,892.69
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/21/2010 4,063, 756.73 4,068,678.40
Subtotal and Average 24,685,406.14 22,456,373.88 22,483,571.09
San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County 07/01/2004 22,088,133.03 22,199,000.00
Subtotal and Average 22,088,133.03 22,088,133.03 22,199,000.00
Run Date: 04/17/2012-16:43
Stated
Book Value Rate
2,999,424.07 0.481
3,000,000.00 0.500
3,000,000.00 0.500
3,000,000.00 0.500
1,999,857.05 1.125
1,030,000.00 1.125
2,707,000.00 1.125
2,000,000.00 0.700
3,000,000.00 0.700
3,000,000.00 0.600
2,000,000.00 0.710
2,000,000.00 0.770
3,000,000.00 0.540
3,000,000.00 0.500
2,998,508.33 0.520
3,000,000.00 0.550
41 '734, 789.45
81 .326.80 0.280
81,326.80
18,392,617.15 0.383
4,063, 756.73 0.383
22,456,373.88
22,088,133.03 0.484
22,088,133.03
Page 1
YTM Days to Maturity
S&P 360 Maturity Date
AA 0.486 631 12123/2013
0.493 879 08/28/2014
0.493 710 03/1212014
0.493 894 09/1212014
AAA 1.154 117 07/27/2012
AAA 1.109 117 07/27/2012
AAA 1.109 117 07/27/2012
AA 0.690 582 11104/2013
AA 0.690 760 05/01/2014
0.592 614 12/06/2013
AA 0.700 789 05/30/2014
AA 0.759 795 06/05/2014
0.533 904 09/2212014
AAA 0.493 550 10/03/2013
0.533 908 09/26/2014
AA 0.542 565 10/18/2013 ---------
0.642 653
0.280 661 01/22/2014 ---------
0.280 661
0.378
0.378 ---------
0.378
0.477 ---------
0.477
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
CUSIP Investment#
Run Date: 04/17/2012 -16:43
Issuer
Total and Average
Average
Balance
92,837,201.66
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
March 31, 2012
Purchase
Date Par Value
86,362,833.71
Market Value
86,511,174.15
Stated
Book Value Rate S&P
86,360,623.16
Page 2
YTM Days to
360 Maturity
0.531 317
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7 .3.0
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
March 31, 2012
Average Purchase
CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 2,011,379.80
PETTY CASH 9003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 2,950.00
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 736,382.69
PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07/01/2004 24,100.32
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/20/2010 688.02
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/20/2010 417.23
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/20/2010 48,994.10
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 01101/2011 21,449.05
Average Balance 0.00
Total Cash and Investments 92,837,201.66 89,209,194.92
Run Date: 0411712012 -16:43
Market Value Book Value
2,011,379.80 2,011,379.80
2,950.00 2,950.00
736,382.69 736,382.69
24,100.32 24,100.32
688.02 688.02
417.23 417.23
48,994.10 48,994.10
21,449.05 21,449.05
89,357,535.36 89,206,984.37
Stated
Rate S&P
O.Q10
0.250
0.001
0.147
YTM
360
0.010
0.000
0.247
0.000
0000
0.001
0.145
0.000
0.531
Page 3
Days to
Maturity
317
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment#
Issuer: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002
UNION OPERATING 9004
PAYROLL 9005
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014
Issuer
Percent
of Portfolio
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF
LAIF BABS 2010
9001
9012
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer: California Bank & Trust
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
2050003183-4
2050003183-5
2121
2229
Issuer Subtotal 28.363%
California Bank & Trust
California Bank & Trust
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 0.091%
Issuer: Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31331KZFO
31331KG79
31331KG79
Run Date: 04/17/2012-16:43
2219
2222
2222
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
OTAY
Activity Report
Sorted By Issuer
July 1, 2011 -March 31, 2012
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
964,254.08
35,820,150.35
36,784,404.43
79,108.00
79,108.00
0.010
0.250
0.001
0.147
0.383
0.383
1.380
0.280
0.481
0.625
01/22/2012
01/22/2012
09/23/2011
10/24/2011
02102/2012
_________ _,__,.Par_.Yalu:;.;:e ___________ _
Purchases or
Deposits
112,768,937.81
6,621,314.25
1,002,352.58
5,793.75
15,228.09
48,942.21
100,096.15
120,562,664.84
55,024,303.76
12,681 .09
55,036,984.85
175,599,649.69
0.00
81,326.80
81,326.80
81,326.80
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
110,767,614.50
6,771 ,573.26
1,002,036.97
13,489.32
35,453.80
0.00
90,389.86
118,680,557.71
68,400,672.73
88.59
68,400,761 .32
187,081,319.03
79,108.00
0.00
79,108.00
79,108.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
Ending
Balance
2,846,361.21
22,456,373.88
25,302,735.09
81,326.80
81,326.80
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7 2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
July
Par Value
Percent Beginning
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio Balance
Subtotal and Balance 0.00
Issuer Subtotal 3.363% 0.00
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
313371MR4 2174 Federal Home Loan Bank
313373CWO 2193 Federal Home Loan Bank
3133731<27 2194 Federal Home Loan Bank
313373MC3 2195 Federal Home Loan Bank
313373QJ4 2196 Federal Home Loan Bank
313373UD2 2197 Federal Home Loan Bank
313373V25 2198 Federal Home Loan Bank
313373WVO 2199 Federal Home Loan Bank
313374ELO 2201 Federal Home Loan Bank
3133747H7 2202 Federal Home Loan Bank
313374G46 2203 Federal Home Loan Bank
313374G46 2203 Federal Home Loan Bank
313374T83 2208 Federal Home Loan Bank
313374T83 2208 Federal Home Loan Bank
313374ZW3 2209 Federal Home Loan Bank
313374ZW3 2209 Federal Home Loan Bank
3133755W3 2210 Federal Home Loan Bank
3133755W3 2210 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375E29 2212 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375E29 2212 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375H59 2213 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375H59 2213 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375HZ3 2216 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375HZ3 2216 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375ZS9 2224 Federal Home Loan Bank
313375ZS9 2224 Federal Home Loan Bank
313378BR1 2230 Federal Home Loan Bank
313378DB4 2231 Federal Home Loan Bank
313378KU4 2233 Federal Home Loan Bank
Subtotal and Balance 19,775,000.00
Run Date: 04/17/2012-16:43
OTAY
Activity Report
1, 2011-March 31, 2012
Current Transaction
Rate Date
0.700 08/22/2011
1.375 07/25/2011
1.200 08/12/2011
1.200 08/12/2011
1.125 11/25/2011
1.050 12/1212011
0.875 09/06/2011
1.100 07/06/2011
0.875 03/30/2012
0.875 09/27/2011
1.000 07/08/2011
08/08/2011
0.900 07/28/2011
10/28/2011
0.650 08/08/2011
01/30/2012
0.700 08/23/2011
02/23/2012
0.625 09/07/2011
02/14/2012
0.550 09/16/2011
02/13/2012
0.650 09/19/2011
02/14/2012
0.625 11/07/2011
02/07/2012
0.500 02/28/2012
0.500 03/12/2012
0.500 03/12/2012
Purchases or
Deposits
5,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
25,000,000.00
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,775,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
35,775,000.00
Page 2
Ending
Balance
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
9,000,000.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
OA (PRF _OA) 7.2.0
Repon Ver. 7.3.3b
July
Par Value
Percent Beginning
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio Balance
Issuer Subtotal 10.089% 19,775,000.00
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3134G1MD3 2153 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G1PK4 2158 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G1Y40 2183 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G13K8 2185 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G12U7 2186 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G14B7 2187 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G15C4 2188 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G17L2 2190 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2MC3 2200 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2PE6 2204 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2PE6 2204 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2QPO 2205 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2QPO 2205 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2RKO 2206 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2RKO 2206 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2NR9 2207 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2NR9 2207 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2VD1 2211 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2VD1 2211 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2B92 2217 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G2B92 2217 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G22H4 2223 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G23NO 2225 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G3AC4 2226 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G3AQ3 2227 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G3BN9 2228 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G3SSO 2232 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Subtotal and Balance 23,737,000.00
Issuer Subtotal 23.245% 23,737,000.00
Issuer: Federal National Mortage Assoc
Run Date: 04/1712012 -16:43
OTAY
Activity Report
1, 2011-March 31, 2012
Current Transaction Purchases or
Rate Date Deposits
25,000,000.00
1.100 07/2212011 0.00
1.000 08/11/2011 0.00
1.100 02/15/2012 0.00
1.000 08/24/2011 0.00
0.750 08/23/2011 0.00
1.350 08/23/2011 0.00
1.250 09/07/2011 0.00
1.350 09/23/2011 0.00
0.800 09/27/2011 0.00
1.000 07/08/2011 2,000,000.00
09/08/2011 0.00
1.000 07/27/2011 2,000,000.00
01/27/2012 0.00
1.000 07/28/2011 2,000,000.00
10/28/2011 0.00
0.750 07/13/2011 2,000,000.00
09/06/2011 0.00
0.750 08/24/2011 2,000,000.00
02124/2012 0.00
0.500 09/13/2011 2,000,000.00
03/13/2012 0.00
0.700 11/04/2011 2,000,000.00
0.700 11/0212011 3,000,000.00
0.600 12/06/2011 3,000,000.00
0.710 11/30/2011 2,000,000.00
0.770 12105/2011 2,000,000.00
0.540 03/2212012 3,000,000.00
27,000,000.00
27,000,000.00
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
35,775,000.00
2.000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2.000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2.000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
30,000,000.00
30,000,000.00
Page 3
Ending
Balance
9,000,000.00
20,737,000.00
20,737,000.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
July
Par Value
Percent Beginning
CUSIP Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance
Issuer: Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3136FPQG5 2171 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3136FPSK4 2172 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3136FP5X1 2182 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3136FRFMO 2192 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GOCW1 2214 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GOCW1 2214 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODB6 2215 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODB6 2215 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODK6 2218 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODK6 2218 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODNO 2220 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODNO 2220 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODR1 2221 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GOJG9 2234 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3135GODV2 2275 Federal National Mortage Assoc
Subtotal and Balance 5,635,000.00
Issuer Subtotal 10.089% 5,635,000.00
Issuer: San Diego County
San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Balance 17,013,171.57
Issuer Subtotal 24.760% 17,013,171.57
Total 100.000% 103,023,684.00
Run Date: 0411712012 -16:43
OTAY
Activity Report
1, 2011-March 31,2012
Current Transaction Purchases or
Rate Date Deposits
0.850 10/26/2011 0.00
0.675 07/29/2011 0.00
0.860 07/28/2011 0.00
2.000 10/27/2011 0.00
0.500 09/06/2011 2,000,000.00
03/06/2012 0.00
0.600 09/12/2011 2,000,000.00
03/12/2012 0.00
0.600 09/27/2011 2,000,000.00
03/27/2012 0.00
0.500 09/26/2011 3,000,000.00
03/26/2012 0.00
0.500 10/03/2011 3,000,000.00
0.520 03/26/2012 3,000,000.00
0.550 10/18/2011 3,000,000.00
18,000,000.00
18,000,000.00
0.484 5,080,244.29
5,080,244.29
5,080,244.29
255,761 ,220. 78
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
635.000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1 ,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14,635,000.00
14,635,000.00
5,282.83
5,282.83
5,282.83
269,575,709.86
Page 4
Ending
Balance
9,000,000.00
9,000,000.00
22,088,133.03
22,088,133.03
89,209,194.92
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
CUSIP Investment#
Fund: Treasury Fund
lAIF 9001
UNION MONEY 9002
PETIY CASH 9003
UNION OPERATING 9004
PAYROLL 9005
SD COUNTY POOL 9007
2050003183~ 2121
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010
RESERVE-1 0 BABS 9011
lAIF BABS 2010 9012
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013
3137EACK3 2146
3137EACK3A
3137EACK3B
3134G1MD3
3134G1PK4
3136FPQG5
3136FPSK4
313371MR4
3136FP5X1
3134G1Y40
3134G13K8
3134G12U7
3134G14B7
3134G15C4
UBNA-FLEX ACCT
3134G17L2
3136FRFMO
313373CWO
313373K27
2148
2149
2153
2158
2171
2172
2174
2182
2183
2185
2186
2187
2188
9014
2190
2192
2193
2194
Run Date: 04117/2012 -16:44
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Investment
Class
Fair Value
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Fair Value
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Fair Value
Amortized
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Amortized
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Maturity
Date
01/22/2012
07/27/2012
07/27/2012
07/27/2012
01/2212013
02/11/2013
07/26/2013
04/29/2013
05/22/2013
01/28/2013
08/15/2013
05/24/2013
11/23/2012
08/23/2013
06/07/2013
09/23/2013
04/27/2016
10/25/2013
08/12/2013
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
July 1, 2011 -March 31, 2012
Beginning
Invested Value
31 ,819,068.97
10,056.49
2,950.00
886,641.70
23,784.71
16,992,478.65
79,108.00
8,383.59
20,642.94
4,057,550.77
5189
2,015.920.00
1,038.198.80
2,728,547.72
2,000,960.00
2,001 ,820.00
636,270.00
2,000,780.00
1,998,980.00
2,000,760.00
2,009,100.00
2,002,200.00
2,001,040.00
2,002,820.00
2,003.600.00
11,742.76
2,004,420.00
1,006,570.00
2,001,520.00
2,001,920.00
Purchase
of Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Addition
to Principal
55,024,303.76
112,768,937.81
0.00
6,621,314.25
1,002,352.58
5,080,244.29
0.00
5,793.75
15,228.09
12,681.09
48,942.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100,096.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Redemption
of Principal
68,400,672.73
110,767,614.50
0.00
6,771,573.26
1,002,036.97
5,282.83
79,108.00
13,489.32
35,453.80
88.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
635,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
90,389.86
2,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Adjustment In Value
Amortization
Adjustment
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Change in
Market Value
-27,807.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
131,559.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
-1,464.87
0.00
-9.960.00
-5,129.40
-13,480.86
-960.00
-1,820.00
-1.270.00
-780.00
1,020.00
-760.00
-9,100.00
-2,200.00
-1 ,040.00
-2,820.00
-3,600.00
0.00
~.420.00
-6,570.00
-1,520.00
-1,920.00
Ending
Invested Value
18,414,892.69
2,011 ,379.80
2,950.00
736,382.69
24,100.32
22,199,000.00
0.00
688.02
417.23
4,068,678.40
48,994.10
2,005,960.00
1,033,069.40
2,715,066.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
21,449.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Portfolio OT A Y
AP
GO (PRF _GO) 7.1.1
Repol1 Ver. 7.3.3b
CUSIP Investment #
Fund: Treasury Fund
313373MC3 2195
313373QJ4 2196
313373UD2 2197
313373V25 2198
31'3373\NVO 2199
3134G2MC3 2200
313374ELO 2201
313374G46 2203
3134G2PE6 2204
3134G2QPO
3134G2RKO
313374T83
313374ZW3
3133755W3
3134G2VD1
313375E29
313375H59
3135GOCW1
3135GODB6
313375HZ3
3134G2B92
3135GODK6
31331KZFO
3135GODNO
3135GODR1
3135GODV2
31331KG79
3134G22H4
313375ZS9
3133747H7
3134G2NR9
3134G23NO
3134G3AC4
3134G3AQ3
3134G3BN9
2050003183-5
2205
2206
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2275
2222
2223
2224
2202
2207
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
Run Date: 04/17/2012 -16:44
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Investment
Class
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Amortized
Maturity
Date
11/12/2013
11/25/2013
12/09/2013
09/06/2013
12/06/2013
09/27/2013
12/30/2013
01/08/2014
01/08/2014
01/27/2014
01/27/2014
01/28/2014
08/08/2013
08/23/2013
02/24/2014
03/07/2014
09/16/2013
09/06/2013
09/12/2013
03/19/2014
03/13/2013
09/27/2013
12/23/2013
09/26/2013
10/03/2013
10/18/2013
01/24/2014
11/04/2013
11/07/2013
12/27/2013
07/05/2013
05/01/2014
12/06/2013
05/30/2014
06/05/2014
01/22/2014
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund-Fund
Beginning
Invested Value
1,776,810.50
2,006,360.00
2,005,440.00
2,002,080.00
2,000,220.00
1 '996, 780.00
1,993,300.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Purchase
of Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,999,250.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
81,326.80
Addition
to Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Redemption
of Principal
1,775,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
000
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Adjustment in Value
Amortization
Adjustment
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Change in
Market Value
-1,810.50
-6,360.00
-5,440.00
-2,080.00
-220.00
3,220.00
6,700.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-5.880.00
0.00
0.00
360.00
0.00
560.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
840.00
-1,050.00
1,460.00
3,760.00
0.00
Page 2
Ending
Invested Value
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,993,370.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,360.00
0.00
2,000,560.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,000,840.00
2,998,950.00
2,001,460.00
2,003, 760.00
81,326.80
Portfolio OT A Y
AP
GD(PRF_GD)7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase
CUSIP Investment# Fund Class Date Invested Value of Principal
Fund: Treasury Fund
313378BR1 2230 99 Fair Value 08/28/2014 0.00 3,000,000.00
313378084 2231 99 Fair Value 03/12/2014 0.00 3,000,000.00
3134G3SSO 2232 99 Fair Value 09/22/2014 0.00 3,000,000.00
313378KU4 2233 99 Fair Value 09/12/2014 0.00 3,000,000.00
3135GOJG9 2234 99 Fair Value 09/26/2014 0.00 2,998,500.00
Subtotal 103,148,877.49 75,079,076.80
Total 103,148,877.49 75,079,076.80
Run Date: 04/17/2012 -16:44
Addition Redemption
to Principal of Principal
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
180,679,893.98 269,575,709.86
180,679,893.98 269,575,709.86
Adjustment in Value
Amortization Change in
Adjustment Market Value
0.00 -3,840.00
0.00 300.00
0.00 -2,280.00
0.00 -4,680.00
0.00 5,880.00
0.00 25,396.94
0.00 25,396.94
Page 3
Ending
Invested Value
2,996,160.00
3,000,300.00
2,997,720.00
2,995,320.00
3,004,380.00
89,357,535.36
89,357,535.36
Portfolio OTAY
AP
GD (PRF _GD) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7 .3.3b
Security ID Investment# Fund
3137EACK3 2146
3134G23NO 2225
3134G3SSO 2232
3134G22H4 2223
3137EACK3B 2149
3137EACK3A 2148
3134G3AQ3 2227
3134G3BN9 2228
3134G3AC4 2226
3135GODR1 2221
3135GOJG9 2234
3135GODV2 2275
313378BR1 2230
313378DB4 2231
313378KU4 2233
31331KZFO 2219
2050003183-5 2229
tAIF COPS07 9009
tAIF 9001
LAIF BABS 2010 9012
SDCOUNTY 9007
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 03/31/2012
Issuer
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
California Bank & Trust
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
San Diego County
Investment
Class
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Amort
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Report Total
Book
Value
1,999,857.05
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,707,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000.000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,998,508.33
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,999,424.07
81,326.80
0.00
18,392,617.15
4,063, 756.73
22,088,133.03
86,360,623.16
Par
Value
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2, 707,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
81,326.80
0.00
18,392,617.15
4,063,756.73
22,088,133.03
86,362,833.71
t = Duration can not be calculated on these investments due to incomplete Market price data.
Run Date: 04/17/2012 -16:45 Page 1
Market Current
Value Rate
2,005,960.00 1.125000
3,000,840.00 . 7000000
2,997,720.00 .5400000
2,000,560.00 .7000000
2, 715,066.86 1.125000
1,033,069.40 1.125000
2,001 ,460.00 .7100000
2,003, 760.00 . 7700000
2,998,950.00 .6000000
3,000,000.00 .5000000
3,004,380.00 .5200000
3,000,360.00 .5500000
2,996,160.00 .5000000
3,000,300.00 .5000000
2,995,320.00 .5000000
2.993,370.00 .4812160
81,326.80 .2800000
0.00 1.530000
18,414,892.69 .3830000
4,068,678.40 .3830000
22,199,000.00 .4840000
86,511,174.15
YTM Current
360 Yield
1.154
0.690
0.533
0.690
1.109
1.109
0.700
0.759
0.592
0.493
0.533
0.542
0.493
0.493
0.493
0.486
0.280
1.509
0.378
0.378
0.477
0.527
0.686
0.571
0.682
0.200
0.200
0.676
0.683
0.621
0.500
0.461
0.542
0.554
0.495
0.564
0.610
0.280
1.530
0.383
0.383
0.484
0.486
Maturity/ Modified
Call Date Duration
07/27/2012
05/01/2014
09/22/2014
11/04/2013
07/27/2012
07/27/2012
05/30/2014
06/05/2014
12/06/2013
10/03/2013
09/26/2014
10/18/2013
08/28/2014
03/12/2014
09/12/2014
12/23/2013
01/22/2014
0.320
2.058
2.454
1.576
0.321
0.321
2.139
2.151
1.666
1.494
2.467
1.535
2.388
1.934
2.427
1.715
1.802 t
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
o.856t
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF _DU) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7 .3.3b
Run Date: 04/1712012-16:43
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Interest Earnings Summary
March 31, 2012
CO/Coupon/Discount Investments:
Interest Collected
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period
Interest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Periods
Pass Through Securities:
Interest Collected
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Purchase During Period
Interest Earned during Period
Adjusted by Premiums and Discounts
Adjusted by Capital Gains or Losses
Earnings during Periods
Cash/Checking Accounts:
Interest Collected
Plus Accrued Interest at End of Period
Less Accrued Interest at Beginning of Period
Interest Earned during Period
Total Interest Earned during Period
Total Adjustments from Premiums and Discounts
Total Capital Gains or Losses
Total Earnings during Period
March 31 Month Ending
4,375.00
114,529.68
95,183.30)
0.00)
23,721.38
73.07
0.00
23,794.45
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
431.44
465,496.49
448,380.26)
17,547.67
41,269.05
73.07
0.00
41,342.12
Fiscal Year To Date
312,289.85
114,231.21
123,552.33)
0.00)
302,968.73
515.14
400.00
303,883.87
0.00
0.00
0.00)
0.00)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
169,279.45
465,496.49
473,434.51)
161,341.43
464,310.16
515.14
400.00
465,225.30
Page 1
Portfolio OT A Y
AP
PM (PRF _PM6) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
TYPE MEETING:
SUBMITIED BY:
STAFF REPORT
Regular Board
Sean Prendergast , Finance ~
Supervisor, Payroll & AP
MEETING DATE:
W.O./G.F. NO :
APPROVEDBY: Joseph Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
(Chief)
APPROVEDBY: German Alvarez, As sistant General Manager
(Asst. GM):
SUBJECT: Accounts Payable Demand List
PURPOSE:
May 2 , 2012
DIV. NO.
Attached is the list of demands for the Board's information .
FISCAL IMPACT:
SUMMARY
CHECKS (2032 754-2033112 )
VOID CHECK (1)
TOTAL CHECKS
WIRE TO :
CALPERS -OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS (MONTHLY)
CITY TREASURER -RECLAIMED WATER PURCHASE (MONTHLY)
DELTA DENTAL OF CALIF -DENTAL & COBRA CLAIMS (MONTHLY)
JP MORGAN -REMARKETING FEE (QUARTERLY)
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER CAP FEES (QUARTERLY)
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER WATER DELIVERIES (MONTHLY)
SPECIAL DIST RISK MGMT AUTH -INSURANCE PREM (MONTHLY)
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION -SALES USE TAX (QUARTERLY)
UNION BANK -CERT OF PARTICIPATION 1996 (MONTHLY)
UNION BANK -CERT OF PARTICIPATION 1996 (QUARTERLY)
UNION BANK -PAYROLL TAXES (MONTHLY)
TOTAL CASH DISBURSEMENTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
That the Board receive the attached list of demands .
Jb/Attachment
NET DEMANDS
$ 3 ,082 ,030 .51
$ (75 .37)
$ 3 ,081 ,955.14
$ 163,000.00
$ 92 ,440.74
$ 21 ,347 .80
$ 2 ,439 .10
$ 404,280.00
$ 2 ,435,061 .33
$ 237 ,824.11
$ 1 ,085.00
$ 1 ,408 .50
$ 31,134 .73
$ 276,407 .34
$ 6,748,383.79
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032904 04/18/12 06839 A GLASCO 68980 04/03/12 WINDOW COVERS 1,450.00 1,450.00
2032754 04/04/12 13903 A W HALL PLUMBING 003597 04/02/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032905 04/18/12 13903 A W HALL PLUMBING 003645 04/16/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032755 04/04/12 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 897328 03/15/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,804.20
897174 03/12/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 657.04
897012 03/08/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 605.47
897492 03/19/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 590.89
897173 03/12/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 568.47
896884 03/12/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 560.62
897491 03/19/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 488.86
897327 03/15/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 349.82
897326 03/15/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 263.49 6,888.86
2032906 04/18/12 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 898313 04/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,357.96
897613 03/22/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,776.04
898319 04/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,332.03
898136 04/02/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 659.28
897779 03/26/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 454.10
898137 04/02/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 451.86
897780 03/26/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 426 0789778003/26/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 426.07
898317 04/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 363.28
897944 03/29/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 344.22
897612 03/22/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 294.88
898318 04/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 177.16 8,636.88
2032756 04/04/12 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3194 03/20/12 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (3/5/12-3/18/12) 7,140.00 7,140.00
2032907 04/18/12 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3207 04/03/12 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (3/19/12-3/30/12) 7,225.00 7,225.00
2032908 04/18/12 00179 ACRO INSTRUMENT CO 12630 03/29/12 CALIBRATION SERVICE 245.00 245.00
2032757 04/04/12 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1115 03/08/12 DEVELOPER PLANCHECKS (2/5/12-3/2/12) 7,250.13
1028 03/08/12 PLAN CHECKING (2/5/12-3/2/12) 1,198.76 8,448.89
2032758 04/04/12 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00806643 03/15/12 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (2/28/12-3/2/12) 1,287.00
OE00805021 03/08/12 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (2/20/12-2/25/12) 1,136.85 2,423.85
2032830 04/11/12 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE00797161B 01/21/12 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT 120.00 120.00
2032759 04/04/12 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131235404 03/16/12 AQUA AMMONIA 953.68
131235403 03/16/12 AQUA AMMONIA 194.88
131235402 03/16/12 AQUA AMMONIA 2,774.24
131235401 03/16/12 AQUA AMMONIA 2,626.40 6,549.20
2032909 04/18/12 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9901852952 03/31/12 BREATHING AIR 34.49 34.49
Page 1 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2033022 04/25/12 13990 ALEGRIA REAL ESTATE FUND II Ref002421137 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186433 90.77 90.77
2033023 04/25/12 13999 ALEXA HELWA 003651 04/19/12 PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 200.00 200.00
2032910 04/18/12 01463 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 9000301308 03/26/12 HOUR METERS 152.40 152.40
2032831 04/11/12 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES # 509 0509004731349 03/25/12 TRASH SERVICES TP (APR 2012) 200.38 200.38
2032911 04/18/12 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES # 509 0509004729533 03/25/12 TRASH SERVICES (APR 2012) 1,110.89 1,110.89
2033024 04/25/12 13978 ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS Ref002421124 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184669 12.78 12.78
2033025 04/25/12 13975 ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS INC Ref002421121 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183937 111.34 111.34
2033026 04/25/12 13981 ALTISOURCE SOLUTIONS INC Ref002421127 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185144 106.78 106.78
2033027 04/25/12 13600 ALVINA ALEXANDER Ref002421112 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000169563 172.20 172.20
2033028 04/25/12 11590 AMERICAN DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHY 18340 03/15/12 MAP LICENSE 12,700.00 12,700.00
2032832 04/11/12 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570MD 04/01/12 PAGER SERVICES (MAR 2012) 165.99 165.99
2033029 04/25/12 00107 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN 7000446877 01/31/12 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 98.00 98.00
2033030 04/25/12 00002 ANSWER INC 6569 04/23/12 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY) 1,000.00 1,000.00
2032833 04/11/12 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41040 03/23/12 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE (APR 2012) 323.35 323.35
2033031 04/25/12 13984 ANTHONY MAIO JR Ref002421130 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185345 300.07 300.07
2032912 04/18/12 13171 ARCADIS US INC 0441737 04/04/12 WASTEWATER MGMT (2/20/12-3/25/12) 42,591.63 42,591.63
2032913 04/18/12 13957 ART SANCHEZ 003646 04/10/12 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 2,888.00 2,888.00
2032760 04/04/12 02651 ART'S TRENCH PLATE & 38116 03/14/12 TRENCH PLATE SERVICE 1,120.24 1,120.24
2032914 04/18/12 02651 ART'S TRENCH PLATE & 38218 03/28/12 STEEL PLATES TREATMENT 1,224.28
38267 04/05/12 TRENCH PLATES SERVICE 555.48
38269 04/05/12 SHORING REPAIRS 103.69 1,883.45
2033032 04/25/12 13966 ASMAA ALZAYADI Ref002421111 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000163330 25.11 25.11
2032834 04/11/12 05758 AT&T 61942256050312 03/20/12 PHONE SERVICE (3/20/12-4/19/12) 45.58 45.58
2032835 04/11/12 05758 AT&T 61969851400312 03/24/12 PHONE SERVICE (MONTHLY) 32.52 32.52
2032915 04/18/12 05758 AT&T 082164572803251203/25/12 INTERNET BANDWIDTH (3/25/12-4/24/12) 2,322.63 2,322.63
Page 2 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032916 04/18/12 05758 AT&T 33784130450412 04/07/12 PHONE SERVICE (4/7/12-5/6/12) 31.43 31.43
2032917 04/18/12 07785 AT&T 000003261906 04/02/12 PHONE SERVICES (3/2/12-4/1/12) 5,751.46
000003264124 04/02/12 PHONE SERVICES (3/2/12-4/1/12) 15.44 5,766.90
2033033 04/25/12 05758 AT&T 61967053090412 04/15/12 PHONE SERVICE (MONTHLY) 32.38 32.38
2032918 04/18/12 08330 AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 8547826250312 03/22/12 INTERNET BANDWIDTH (3/21/12-4/20/12) 2,028.00 2,028.00
2032761 04/04/12 12810 ATKINS 1135799 03/08/12 DESIGN SERVICES (2/1/12-2/26/12) 4,241.00 4,241.00
2032919 04/18/12 07730 AZTEC FENCE CO INC AZ455 03/29/12 RAILING 1,620.00 1,620.00
2033034 04/25/12 11285 AZTEC FIRE & SAFETY INC 47533 04/03/12 FIRE ALARM SERVICE 693.24 693.24
2032762 04/04/12 08024 BACKGROUND PROFILES INC 3965 03/30/12 BACKGROUND CHECK 28.00 28.00
2032920 04/18/12 00145 BARRETT ENGINEERED PUMPS 080221 04/02/12 ADAPTER 491.90
080220 04/02/12 SEAL KIT 488.69 980.59
2032921 04/18/12 02977 BROWN, VINCENT 003639 04/17/12 LICENSE RENEWAL 39.00 39.00
2033035 04/25/12 13967 BYRON COTNEY Ref002421113 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000173656 24.08 24.08
2032922 04/18/12 00906 C & M CRANE RENTAL INC 30630 03/29/12 CRANE RENTAL 684.80 684.80
2032923 04/18/12 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 41647 03/29/12 CRUSHED ROCK 212.14 212.14
2032763 04/04/12 11044 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 06 02/29/12 RETENTION / NEWEST (PERIOD ENDING 2/29/12 54,762.36 54,762.36
2032924 04/18/12 08966 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 4A 04/04/12 RET / TC CONST LA PRESA (3/1/12- 3/31/12) 18,824.11 18,824.11
2033036 04/25/12 11044 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 07 03/31/12 RETENTION / NEWEST (ENDING 3/31/12) 39,796.09 39,796.09
2032925 04/18/12 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 113972 03/29/12 ASPHALT 1,140.68 1,140.68
2032764 04/04/12 00192 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT 003604 03/28/12 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 660.00 660.00
2032765 04/04/12 01243 CALIFORNIA-NEVADA SECTION 019020412 04/03/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 100.00 100.00
2032766 04/04/12 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 098903 03/13/12 EYEWASH PARTS 509.01
098937 03/08/12 SHADE COVERS 507.01
098603 03/13/12 HARNESS LANYARDS 369.45
098936 03/08/12 SHADE COVERS 153.47 1,538.94
2033037 04/25/12 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 099265 03/21/12 SENSOR 184.86 184.86
Page 3 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2033038 04/25/12 13991 CAMILLE BRUNO Ref002421138 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186439 26.38 26.38
2033039 04/25/12 13995 CARLO FIORILLO 003658 04/19/12 VIDEO CONTEST WINNER 250.00 250.00
2032836 04/11/12 13926 CARLOTA NARCHE Ref002420841 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000143246 86.93 86.93
2032767 04/04/12 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7479 03/14/12 RECORDS CONVERSION (3/1/12-3/8/12) 9,857.24 9,857.24
2032926 04/18/12 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7486 04/01/12 RECORDS MGMT SERVICES 216.25
7487 04/01/12 RECORDS MGMT SVCS 24.50 240.75
2032837 04/11/12 13932 CARYNNE HANSEN Ref002420847 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000162107 40.45 40.45
2033040 04/25/12 13969 CASEY DUNN Ref002421115 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176544 14.83 14.83
2032927 04/18/12 09801 CENTERBEAM INC 146862 04/01/12 NETWORK MONITORING & SUPP (APR 2012) 1,786.00 1,786.00
2033041 04/25/12 09801 CENTERBEAM INC 16151 03/30/12 TEMPORARY LABOR 10,088.00 10,088.00
2033042 04/25/12 04349 CHAMBERS, JONATHAN 003653 04/17/12 TUITION 130.00 130.00
2033043 04/25/12 13971 CHANTELL ROJAS Ref002421117 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000182347 143.94 143.94
2032838 04/11/12 13927 CHRISTOPHER ELWOOD Ref002420842 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000143677 7.44 7.44
2032928 04/18/12 02026 CHULA VISTA ELEM SCHOOL DIST AR040170 03/14/12 GARDEN TOURS 270.00
AR040294 03/21/12 GARDEN TOURS 220.00
AR040291 03/20/12 GARDEN TOURS 210.00 700.00
2032839 04/11/12 13946 CITY OF CHULA VISTA 003621 04/09/12 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 66,800.00 66,800.00
2032929 04/18/12 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 60801 03/31/12 BACTERIOLOGICAL SVCS (3/7/12-3/10/12) 417.00 417.00
2032930 04/18/12 11520 CLINICAL LABORATORY OF 920355 03/27/12 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 53.00 53.00
2032768 04/04/12 13900 COMMUNITY BANK 1 03/08/12 RETENTION / GARCIA JUAREZ (ENDING 2/29/12) 7,446.45 7,446.45
2033044 04/25/12 11056 CONCHAS, FREDERICK 003663 04/25/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 90.00 90.00
2032840 04/11/12 11510 CONFERENCE CALL.COM 2670834696 03/31/12 CONFERENCE CALLING SERVICE (MAR 2012) 132.11 132.11
2032841 04/11/12 13928 CONSUELO ESTRADA Ref002420843 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000144891 74.90 74.90
2032769 04/04/12 03706 CONSUMERS PIPE & SUPPLY S1190245002 03/12/12 ADAPTERS 70.20 70.20
2032931 04/18/12 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1249830 03/31/12 BACKUP TAPE STORAGE (MAR 2012) 314.99 314.99
2032932 04/18/12 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH120373D11 04/10/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (2/15/12) 852.00 852.00
Page 4 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032842 04/11/12 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - DPW 153208 02/29/12 EXCAVATION PERMITS (FEB 2012) 2,676.08 2,676.08
2032843 04/11/12 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS SAN DIEGO 28810312 03/30/12 INTERNET SERVICES (3/29/12-4/28/12) 1,500.00
27170312 03/30/12 INTERNET SERVICES (3/29/12-4/28/12) 1,500.00 3,000.00
2032933 04/18/12 11286 CPM PARTNERS INC 12030 03/31/12 SCHEDULING SERVICES (3/1/12-3/31/12) 3,580.00 3,580.00
2032844 04/11/12 13919 DEBORA LEDESMA-RIVERA Ref002420834 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000070178 42.99 42.99
2032845 04/11/12 07680 DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS IVC05676 03/30/12 CLAIM SERVICES (MAR 2012) 500.00 500.00
2032846 04/11/12 13933 DENISE YAMAGATA Ref002420848 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000172000 49.20 49.20
2033045 04/25/12 03744 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 903192 04/05/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 49.00 49.00
2032934 04/18/12 00319 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 1250518 03/23/12 WATER SYSTEMS FEES #3710034 5,216.40 5,216.40
2033046 04/25/12 00319 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 003665 04/25/12 CERTIFICATE FEE 80.00 80.00
2033047 04/25/12 13988 DEUTSCHE BANK Ref002421134 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185836 446.18 446.18
2032770 04/04/12 05959 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 23801141 03/08/12 PUMPING SERVICES 2 250 00 2 250 00203277004/04/12 05959 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 23801141 03/08/12 PUMPING SERVICES 2,250.00 2,250.00
2032935 04/18/12 01335 DICKSON COMPANY 863231 03/29/12 CHART RECORDERS 2,038.00 2,038.00
2032936 04/18/12 03417 DIRECTV 17497880545 04/05/12 SATELLITE TV (4/4/12-5/3/12) 18.00 18.00
2033048 04/25/12 13985 DIRK CAHAAN Ref002421131 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185462 23.16 23.16
2032937 04/18/12 00009 DMV RENEWAL 10M7700412 04/04/12 GREEN STICKER RENEWAL 52.00 52.00
2032847 04/11/12 13944 DONCHA CORP Ref002420860 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186281 79.45 79.45
2032848 04/11/12 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 1554580312 03/31/12 RECYCLING SERVICES (MAR 2012) 90.00 90.00
2033049 04/25/12 13980 EDWARD SULEIMA Ref002421126 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185057 65.34 65.34
2032938 04/18/12 13711 ELECTRO SPECIALTY SYSTEMS 12604 04/02/12 SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 14,108.54 14,108.54
2033050 04/25/12 13992 ELENI SALIM Ref002421139 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186510 55.27 55.27
2033051 04/25/12 07661 ELI RESEARCH INC 881228500412 04/17/12 SUBSCRIPTION 684.00 684.00
2033052 04/25/12 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 0056256IN 03/31/12 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (MAR 2012) 665.00 665.00
2032849 04/11/12 13918 ENRIQUE CURIEL Ref002420833 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000069409 61.95 61.95
Page 5 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032771 04/04/12 13908 ERIC DRAPEAU 003592 03/28/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032850 04/11/12 13940 ERIN RALSTON Ref002420856 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185445 29.43 29.43
2032939 04/18/12 03757 FANDEL ENTERPRISES INC 1492 04/02/12 CONSULTING SERVICES (MAR 2012) 3,510.00 3,510.00
2033053 04/25/12 13892 FAS-AHM UTILITIES LLC Ref002421135 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186031 26.86 26.86
2033054 04/25/12 13123 FAVELA PRINTING INC 542 03/05/12 POSTCARDS 521.95 521.95
2032851 04/11/12 13915 FE GOLETA Ref002420829 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000040960 30.29 30.29
2032772 04/04/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0401388 03/19/12 20" PIPE COUPLING 996.18 996.18
2032940 04/18/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0403431 03/29/12 INVENTORY 4,256.13
0403432 03/29/12 INVENTORY 1,144.31
03986102 03/22/12 INVENTORY 1,131.38
04035181 04/05/12 METER PARTS 930.90
0403518 03/28/12 METER PARTS 826.50
0403150 03/26/12 BOLTS & GASKETS 666.97
04031501 03/29/12 BOLTS & GASKETS 67.34 9,023.53
2033055 04/25/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0402963 04/03/12 3 PC MANHOLE 3 512 65 3 512 65203305504/25/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0402963 04/03/12 3 PC MANHOLE 3,512.65 3,512.65
2032941 04/18/12 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 90034032 03/31/12 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (MAR 2012) 99.00 99.00
2032773 04/04/12 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 170667 03/08/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 453.14 453.14
2032942 04/18/12 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 172173 03/22/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 446.56
174302 04/04/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 227.82 674.38
2032943 04/18/12 02591 FITNESS TECH 7805 04/01/12 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (APR 2012) 135.00 135.00
2032944 04/18/12 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3837023 03/23/12 VEHICLE WASH 131.40 131.40
2032852 04/11/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2420937 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 265.00 265.00
2032853 04/11/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2420947 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 366.56 366.56
2033056 04/25/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2421201 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 265.00 265.00
2033057 04/25/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2421209 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 366.56 366.56
2032945 04/18/12 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 118 04/04/12 GARDEN COSTS (4TH QTR FY2011-2012) 25,285.50 25,285.50
2032774 04/04/12 13716 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC 1 03/08/12 CALAVO GARDENS (ENDING 2/29/12) 141,482.45 141,482.45
2032946 04/18/12 13716 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC 2 04/05/12 CALAVO GARDENS (ENDING 3/31/12) 201,657.13 201,657.13
Page 6 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032947 04/18/12 12676 GEO IT RESOURCES INC 1107 03/31/12 PROJECT PLANNING (MAR 2012) 201.25 201.25
2032948 04/18/12 10817 GEXPRO 580176300 04/05/12 REMOTE BASE 527.01
580322284 03/29/12 EXPANSION CABLE 375.52 902.53
2032775 04/04/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9774993183 03/09/12 LOCKOUT KIT 437.04
9783257752 03/20/12 MAINTENANCE LIGHTING 259.90
97797671111 03/15/12 TOOLS 197.10
9780141975 03/15/12 LIGHT BULBS 57.68
9780016912 03/15/12 LITHIUM BATTERIES 42.90 994.62
2032949 04/18/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9793353377 04/02/12 COMBO LOCK 1,077.50
9793962300 04/03/12 SECURITY LIGHT 493.34
9793065666 04/02/12 SECURITY LIGHT 445.01
9788912740 03/27/12 STORAGE CABINET 264.46
9795395871 04/04/12 SECURITY LIGHT 197.34
9787234088 03/26/12 BATTERIES 113.06
9793962318 04/03/12 SECURITY LIGHT 98.67 2,689.38
2032950 04/18/12 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 8786 03/31/12 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (MAR 2012) 8,650.00 8,650.00
2032854 04/11/12 13930 GUILLERMINA DEGONZALEZ Ref002420845 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000147562 24 81 24 81203285404/11/12 13930 GUILLERMINA DEGONZALEZ Ref002420845 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000147562 24.81 24.81
2033058 04/25/12 00174 HACH COMPANY 7671082 03/19/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 3,726.01 3,726.01
2032951 04/18/12 02350 HARPER & ASSOCIATES ENG4460 04/02/12 CORROSION INVESTIGATION 2,330.00 2,330.00
2033059 04/25/12 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE Ben2421187 04/26/12 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 5,358.02 5,358.02
2032952 04/18/12 04472 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIO 84 04/17/12 CONSULTANT SERVICES (FEB 2012) 3,600.00
85 04/17/12 CONSULTANT SERVICES (MAR 2012) 3,600.00 7,200.00
2032953 04/18/12 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 178540010412 04/10/12 WATER BILL / AVOCADO BLVD 40.10
174639860412 04/10/12 WATER BILL / RUSSELL SQ 40.10 80.20
2032954 04/18/12 02096 HELIX WATER DISTRICT WO16096 04/06/12 CRANE RENTAL 154.97 154.97
2032955 04/18/12 02096 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 0000292400412 04/17/12 TEMPORARY METER 84.66 84.66
2032956 04/18/12 08610 HENRY BROS ELECTRONICS INC 18030112 03/23/12 SECURITY SERVICES 3,522.09
18030312 03/23/12 READER LICENSING 2,577.92
SM36982 03/23/12 SECURITY SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 753.15 6,853.16
2032957 04/18/12 13950 HERITAGE BLDG & DEVELOPMENT 003633 04/12/12 WORK ORDER REFUND D0724-090112 6,115.41 6,115.41
2032776 04/04/12 06843 HI-TECH AIR CONDITIONING 24897 03/21/12 AC MAINTENANCE 650.00 650.00
Page 7 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032958 04/18/12 06843 HI-TECH AIR CONDITIONING 24892 03/27/12 AC MAINTENANCE 668.21
26412 03/27/12 AC MAINTENANCE 106.55 774.76
2032959 04/18/12 06540 HORIZON CRANE SERVICE LLC 6078 01/30/12 CRANE RENTAL 580.00 580.00
2032777 04/04/12 06301 HVAC ENGINEERING INC 5896 03/13/12 HVAC SYSTEMS (PERIOD THROUGH 3/13/12) 1,497.00 1,497.00
2032778 04/04/12 03743 HYDROTEX 108731 03/16/12 OIL / SUPPLIES 3,210.68 3,210.68
2032855 04/11/12 11805 IDENTIFICATION SERVICES I088ILD118 04/02/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 20.00 20.00
2032960 04/18/12 08969 INFOSEND INC 57886 03/30/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (MAR 2012) 5,087.46 5,087.46
2033060 04/25/12 08969 INFOSEND INC 57887 03/30/12 POSTAGE - MARCH 2012 11,678.73 11,678.73
2032961 04/18/12 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 141 03/31/12 PLANT SERVICES (MAR 2012) 186.00 186.00
2032962 04/18/12 03368 INVENSYS SYSTEMS INC 92791242 03/22/12 LEVEL TRANSMITTERS 4,840.56 4,840.56
2032779 04/04/12 13909 JACOB RUSSELL 003591 03/28/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 325.00 325.00
2032856 04/11/12 12237 JACQUELINE CHRISTIAN Ref002420831 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000063979 80.75 80.75
2033061 04/25/12 13961 JAMES FRANCO Ref002421106 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000033532 93.82 93.82
2033062 04/25/12 13959 JAMES HOLLERAN Ref002421104 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000025747 70.01 70.01
2032963 04/18/12 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO03120181 03/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (MAR 2012) 1,101.10 1,101.10
2033063 04/25/12 13964 JOHN PACE Ref002421109 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000126197 37.96 37.96
2033064 04/25/12 13996 JOHN PAOLETTO 003657 04/19/12 VIDEO CONTEST WINNER 250.00 250.00
2033065 04/25/12 13997 JOHN PORTILLO 003656 04/19/12 VIDEO CONTEST WINNER 250.00 250.00
2032780 04/04/12 13904 JOLOISE T CALKINS 003596 03/28/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032781 04/04/12 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0085617 03/13/12 SAN MIGUEL HABITAT MGT (1/28/12-2/24/12) 7,950.00
0085614 03/13/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (1/1/12-2/24/12) 5,757.00
0085615 03/13/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (1/28/12-2/24/12) 1,957.74
0085612 03/13/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (1/28/12-2/24/12) 700.00
0085611 03/13/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (1/28/12-2/24/12) 390.00 16,754.74
2032782 04/04/12 13905 JOSE ORTEGA 003595 03/28/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032857 04/11/12 13939 JOSE PERAZA Ref002420855 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185212 61.61 61.61
2033066 04/25/12 13989 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK Ref002421136 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186369 69.45 69.45
Page 8 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032964 04/18/12 12639 KAPISH NORTH AMERICA LLC 3034 04/04/12 TRIM LICENSE & MAINTENANCE 2,400.00 2,400.00
2032783 04/04/12 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5044 03/21/12 PAVING SERVICES 4,959.75
5043 03/21/12 PAVING SERVICES 4,930.60
5045 03/21/12 PAVING SERVICES 1,006.70 10,897.05
2032965 04/18/12 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 678327 03/31/12 DELIVERY SERVICES (3/2/12- 3/16/12) 181.50 181.50
2032858 04/11/12 13931 KUN LI Ref002420846 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000161204 58.92 58.92
2032859 04/11/12 13917 LA MONT DAVIS Ref002420832 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000066554 50.23 50.23
2032860 04/11/12 13934 LA ROCA C.C. Ref002420849 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000173923 78.76 78.76
2032966 04/18/12 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 261044 03/29/12 LANDFILL 315.60
261131 03/29/12 LANDFILL 310.80 626.40
2032861 04/11/12 13470 LAS PALMAS 56 DEVELOPMENT LLC 003624 04/10/12 CUSTOMER REFUND 81.39 81.39
2033067 04/25/12 09880 LEIGH, ROBERT 003659 04/16/12 SAFETY BOOTS 137.00 137.00
2032862 04/11/12 07294 LLERENAS JESUS 003616 04/04/12 DRIVER LICENSE 66 00 66 00203286204/11/12 07294 LLERENAS, JESUS 003616 04/04/12 DRIVER LICENSE 66.00 66.00
2032967 04/18/12 13749 LONDON GROUP REALTY ADVISORS 003647 04/10/12 REGISTRATION FEE 20.00 20.00
2032863 04/11/12 03019 LOPEZ, JOSE 70100312 04/06/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (MAR 2012) 91.58 91.58
2032864 04/11/12 13942 LORRAINE RASMUSSEN Ref002420858 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186054 49.66 49.66
2032968 04/18/12 13951 LUTTEROTH FAMILY LP 003632 04/12/12 WORK ORDER REFUND D0737-090061 2,904.67 2,904.67
2033068 04/25/12 07591 MA, DONGXING 003662 04/23/12 TUITION 368.00
17470312 04/19/12 TRAVEL EXPENSES 618.20 986.20
2033069 04/25/12 13963 MARCO MARES Ref002421108 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000083614 94.21 94.21
2032865 04/11/12 13922 MARIA GARCIA Ref002420837 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000081343 60.91 60.91
2032969 04/18/12 13954 MARILYN DIMALANTA 003644 04/16/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032784 04/04/12 02902 MARSTON+MARSTON INC 201211 01/01/12 COMMUNITY OUTREACH 4,738.84
201221 02/01/12 COMMUNITY OUTREACH 940.00 5,678.84
2032866 04/11/12 02902 MARSTON+MARSTON INC 201231 03/01/12 COMMUNITY OUTREACH (FEB 2012) 1,662.50 1,662.50
2032970 04/18/12 02902 MARSTON+MARSTON INC 201241 04/01/12 COMMUNITY OUTREACH (MAR 2012) 6,987.50
201242 04/01/12 CONSULTING SERVICES (MAR 2012) 2,295.00 9,282.50
Page 9 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2033070 04/25/12 13965 MARTHA CHARLENE CAZAREZ Ref002421110 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000161951 98.27 98.27
2032867 04/11/12 13813 MARTHA MULVANY Ref002420850 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000175128 59.29 59.29
2032971 04/18/12 05329 MASTER METER INC 0199682IN 03/30/12 INVENTORY 160,555.59 160,555.59
2033071 04/25/12 05329 MASTER METER INC 0198720IN 03/14/12 SHROUD PINS 276.76 276.76
2032785 04/04/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 20734601 03/14/12 AIR-VAC UPDATE 521.91
18299357 02/16/12 6" BLANK FLANGE 275.81
20968551 03/16/12 TRAINING ROOM FLAGS 200.35 998.07
2032972 04/18/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 22734281 04/04/12 CCB HARDWARE 466.99
22662778 04/03/12 LAUNDER EPOXY 270.88
21727746 03/26/12 TRAINING ROOM FLAGS 200.09
22012816 03/28/12 ENCLOSURE & STUD ANCHORS 163.15 1,101.11
2033072 04/25/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 22263150 03/30/12 ENCLOSURE & STUD ANCHORS 462.92 462.92
2032973 04/18/12 11361 MCMILLIN LAND DEVELOPMENT 003629 04/12/12 WORK ORDER REFUND D0032-060016 7,383.82
003630 04/12/12 WORK ORDER REFUND D0032-010243 1,429.21 8,813.03
2032868 04/11/12 13938 MCMILLIN REALTY Ref002420854 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184926 77.98 77.98
2033073 04/25/12 13976 MCMILLIN REALTY Ref002421122 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183964 18.12 18.12
2033074 04/25/12 13968 MICHAEL HOLLAND Ref002421114 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176074 36.41 36.41
2033075 04/25/12 13977 MICHELE SEGALA Ref002421123 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184196 23.37 23.37
2033076 04/25/12 13970 MILLENIA REAL ESTATE SERV Ref002421116 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000181659 51.85 51.85
2032869 04/11/12 13924 MOHAMMAD KHAN Ref002420839 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000123166 6.15 6.15
2032870 04/11/12 13929 MOLLY MYERS Ref002420844 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000145051 92.04 92.04
2032871 04/11/12 11458 MOUNT MIGUEL COVENANT VILLAGE 003618 04/04/12 IRRIGATION UPGRADE PROGRAM 5,859.46 5,859.46
2032786 04/04/12 12016 MTGL INC 35418 03/08/12 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (1/1/12-1/31/12) 28,249.00 28,249.00
2032872 04/11/12 13914 MYRNA RIVERA Ref002420828 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000020108 34.96 34.96
2033077 04/25/12 12846 NATALIE HUNT 003654 04/19/12 PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 400.00 400.00
2032873 04/11/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2420933 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 10,663.15 10,663.15
2033078 04/25/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2421197 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 10,663.15 10,663.15
Page 10 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032974 04/18/12 13690 NEAL ELECTRIC CORP 56300 03/23/12 CAMERA WIRING 5,063.00 5,063.00
2032975 04/18/12 00745 NEWARK 21970864 04/04/12 MULTI-PAIR CABLE 3,738.21 3,738.21
2032787 04/04/12 08531 NEWEST CONSTRUCTION 06 02/29/12 RWCWR UPGRADE (PERIOD ENDING 2/29/12) 492,861.24
O0000000003 03/15/12 CONDUIT INSTALLATION 4,811.00
O0000000002 03/15/12 NEWEST CONDUIT 3,851.00 501,523.24
2033079 04/25/12 08531 NEWEST CONSTRUCTION 07 03/31/12 RWCWR UPGRADE (PERIOD ENDING 3/31/12) 358,164.81 358,164.81
2032874 04/11/12 13923 NICOLE ISON Ref002420838 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000086814 19.96 19.96
2032875 04/11/12 13920 NORMA ALATORRE Ref002420835 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000071510 82.36 82.36
2032876 04/11/12 03215 O'DONNELL, MICHAEL 003620 04/05/12 TUITION 415.00 415.00
2033080 04/25/12 03215 O'DONNELL, MICHAEL 003661 04/23/12 TUITION 415.00 415.00
2032788 04/04/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 602076388001 03/15/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135.46
601814973001 03/14/12 SUPPLIES 61.13 196.59
2032976 04/18/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 604426227001 04/05/12 TRIM SUPPLIES 562 19203297604/18/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 604426227001 04/05/12 TRIM SUPPLIES 562.19
603377040001 03/27/12 SUPPLIES 41.58 603.77
2033081 04/25/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 601373347001 03/09/12 FOOTREST 58.17 58.17
2033082 04/25/12 12845 OLIVIA THOMAS 003650 04/19/12 PHOTO CONTEST WINNER 200.00 200.00
2032789 04/04/12 03149 ON SITE LASER LLC 46527 03/14/12 PRINTER SERVICES 133.65 133.65
2032790 04/04/12 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S3741282002 03/21/12 PVC CONDUIT 82.20
S3741282001 03/21/12 PVC CONDUIT 24.00 106.20
2032977 04/18/12 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S3745646003 03/28/12 ELECTRICAL MATERIALS 78.16
S3745646001 03/28/12 ELECTRICAL MATERIALS 37.42
S3745646002 03/28/12 ELECTRICAL MATERIALS 2.37 117.95
2033083 04/25/12 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S3738789001 03/22/12 GLOVES 260.24 260.24
2032877 04/11/12 07496 ORTEGA-CARRILLO, ALMA PATRICIA 003619 04/05/12 TUITION 481.85 481.85
2032878 04/11/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2420929 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 686.00 686.00
2033084 04/25/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2421193 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 686.00 686.00
2032978 04/18/12 05118 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY SD04041312 02/20/12 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (MAR 2012) 458.58 458.58
Page 11 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032791 04/04/12 08891 PACIFIC METER SERVICES INC 288a 12/30/11 METER REPLACEMENT 15,109.82 15,109.82
2032792 04/04/12 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 152253 03/13/12 INVENTORY 15,368.08
152379 03/21/12 INVENTORY 6,260.28
151992 03/09/12 4" VIC ELBOWS 626.25 22,254.61
2032979 04/18/12 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 152262 03/27/12 STEM VALVES 4,245.35
152492 03/27/12 INVENTORY 1,967.52 6,212.87
2032879 04/11/12 13941 PATTY MCKELVY Ref002420857 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185730 94.44 94.44
2032980 04/18/12 05497 PAYPAL INC 16449700 03/31/12 PHONE PAYMENT SERVICES (MAR 2012) 54.10 54.10
2032981 04/18/12 00227 PELL MELL SUPPLY 62613 04/04/12 BOLTS 284.46 284.46
2032793 04/04/12 03457 PERSONAL TOUCH WEST 22452 03/20/12 OUTREACH MATERIALS 1,371.29
22447 03/13/12 OUTREACH MATERIALS 625.66 1,996.95
2032982 04/18/12 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 003637 04/17/12 PETTY CASH 349.40 349.40
2032880 04/11/12 13937 PGI INVESTMENTS Ref002420853 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184822 35.90 35.90
2032794 04/04/12 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 584568 03/08/12 MACHINE SUPPLIES 208 81 208 81203279404/04/12 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 584568 03/08/12 MACHINE SUPPLIES 208.81 208.81
2032881 04/11/12 07346 PRIME ELECTRICAL SERVICES INC 10100 02/29/12 CIRCUIT INSTALLATION 640.00 640.00
2032983 04/18/12 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 29765 03/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (MAR 2012) 3,504.00 3,504.00
2032795 04/04/12 06844 PROCESS MEASUREMENT & 075508 03/16/12 SUBMERSIBLE PROBE 836.74 836.74
2033085 04/25/12 13979 PROPERTY SALES II LLC Ref002421125 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184785 61.70 61.70
2032984 04/18/12 12135 PROPULSION CONTROLS 46415 02/24/12 MOTOR REMANUFACTURE 29,385.02 29,385.02
2032796 04/04/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30247412 03/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 422.36
30245969 03/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 349.87
30245968 03/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 197.34
30247411 03/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 197.34
30245970 03/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 164.69
30247413 03/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 164.69
30246813 03/13/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40
30248271 03/20/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40
30245971 03/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.03
30247414 03/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.03
30246812 03/13/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 51.74
30248270 03/20/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 49.74 1,930.63
2032985 04/18/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30248893 03/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 396.94
Page 12 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
30250360 03/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 367.42
30251863 04/05/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 359.42
30248892 03/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 197.34
30250359 03/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 197.34
30251862 04/05/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 197.34
30248894 03/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 164.69
30250361 03/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 164.69
30251864 04/05/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 164.69
30249751 03/27/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40
30251226 04/03/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 112.40
30250362 03/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 60.03
30248895 03/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.03
30251865 04/05/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.03
30249750 03/27/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 49.74
30251225 04/03/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 49.74 2,702.24
2032797 04/04/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2420663 03/29/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 146,860.19 146,860.19
2032986 04/18/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2420927 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 145,738.10 145,738.10
2033086 04/25/12 13252 PUENTES LATINOS 003664 04/20/12 GENERAL CONSULTING 4,000.00 4,000.00
2032798 04/04/12 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 29817401 03/09/12 TRUCK SAFETY SUPPIES 215 50203279804/04/12 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 29817401 03/09/12 TRUCK SAFETY SUPPIES 215.50
29809801 03/14/12 SAFETY SUPPLIES 181.02 396.52
2032987 04/18/12 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 29833100 03/26/12 CERTIFICATION 189.36
29862100 03/23/12 LEL SENSOR 179.94 369.30
2033087 04/25/12 13987 RANCHO BUENA VISTA REAL ESTATE Ref002421133 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185827 75.00 75.00
2032882 04/11/12 13935 RBD VENTURES Ref002420851 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000177715 57.97 57.97
2032883 04/11/12 13936 RBD VENTURES Ref002420852 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184363 56.31 56.31
2032988 04/18/12 00021 RCP BLOCK & BRICK INC 1283201 CREDIT MEMO (105.38)
4352013 CREDIT MEMO (105.38)
4352012 03/29/12 CONCRETE 983.54
1283200 03/29/12 CONCRETE 878.16 1,650.94
2032989 04/18/12 13956 REBECCA JOSEPH 003642 04/16/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032799 04/04/12 09993 REPROHAUS CORP 0000153816 03/21/12 REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 1,240.63 1,240.63
2032800 04/04/12 02513 REXEL 801510727 02/27/12 COMMUNICATION CARDS 5,656.88 5,656.88
2032884 04/11/12 00521 RICK POST WELDING & 9221 03/14/12 WET TAPPING SERVICES 1,090.00 1,090.00
2032990 04/18/12 04542 ROBAK, MARK 70140312 04/11/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (11/1/11-3/31/12) 23.31 23.31
Page 13 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2033088 04/25/12 14000 ROBERT GONZALEZ 003660 04/18/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 300.00 300.00
2033089 04/25/12 13960 ROGER FEECE Ref002421105 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000027480 25.92 25.92
2032801 04/04/12 13902 ROGER HANSEN 003602 03/28/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032802 04/04/12 13910 ROLANDO DRACHENBERG 003601 04/02/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032885 04/11/12 13925 ROSA MARIA RAMONETTI Ref002420840 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000139952 24.36 24.36
2032886 04/11/12 13921 ROSIE ZANDER Ref002420836 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000073131 64.20 64.20
2032803 04/04/12 02620 ROTORK CONTROLS INC CI04701 03/12/12 ROTORK-FILTER INF 6,396.04 6,396.04
2032991 04/18/12 02620 ROTORK CONTROLS INC 03058512 03/30/12 ROTORK-FILTER INF 125.00 125.00
2032804 04/04/12 00217 RW LITTLE CO INC 106976 03/19/12 POWDERCOAT 50.00 50.00
2033090 04/25/12 13986 RYAN REA Ref002421132 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185541 42.95 42.95
2032805 04/04/12 09148 S & J SUPPLY COMPANY INC S100008953001 03/15/12 INVENTORY 3,390.24
S100008953002 03/21/12 INVENTORY 176 71 3 566 95S10000895300203/21/12 INVENTORY 176.71 3,566.95
2032806 04/04/12 13204 SAIC ENERGY ENVIR & INFRAS LLC 05661 03/12/12 CONSTRUCTION MGT (PERIOD ENDING 2/24/12) 37,599.18 37,599.18
2032887 04/11/12 13943 SAMANTHA EIGARD Ref002420859 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186208 52.13 52.13
2032807 04/04/12 13907 SAMEA MATTAR 003593 03/28/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2032992 04/18/12 13952 SAN DIEGO ASSN OF GOVERNMENT 003631 04/12/12 WORK ORDER REFUND D0855-090111 8,276.86 8,276.86
2032808 04/04/12 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8297 03/08/12 EYE PLATES 1,040.00
8294 03/08/12 WELDING SERVICES 340.00 1,380.00
2032888 04/11/12 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8310 03/19/12 EYE PLATES 425.00 425.00
2032993 04/18/12 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8329 03/30/12 WELDING SERVICES 340.00 340.00
2032809 04/04/12 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 2011190 03/08/12 ASSESSOR DATA (MONTHLY) 125.00 125.00
2032810 04/04/12 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER 0000000486 03/18/12 SOCAL WATERSMART (JAN 2012) 3,586.30 3,586.30
2032994 04/18/12 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER 0000000504 04/04/12 SOCAL WATERSMART (FEB 2012) 1,284.98 1,284.98
2032811 04/04/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003600 03/28/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 41,653.63
003599 03/26/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 18,798.40
003583 03/20/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 16,109.53
Page 14 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
003598 03/23/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 669.09 77,230.65
2032995 04/18/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003611 04/03/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 42,994.02
003612 03/26/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 3,210.10 46,204.12
2033091 04/25/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003649 04/03/12 UTILITY EXPENSES 9,962.53 9,962.53
2032812 04/04/12 03273 SAN DIEGO READER 150457 03/08/12 JOB POSTING 110.15 110.15
2033092 04/25/12 13974 SAN DIEGO REALTY INC Ref002421120 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183923 16.61 16.61
2032813 04/04/12 03514 SANTOS, MARCIANO 003603 04/02/12 SAFETY BOOTS 145.44 145.44
2032996 04/18/12 07288 SCHMIDT FIRE PROTECTION CO INC 81052 03/23/12 ALARM MAINTENANCE 391.00 391.00
2032997 04/18/12 12904 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION INC 8 04/03/12 PUMP STATION UPGRADES (3/1/12- 3/31/12) 59,229.90 59,229.90
2033093 04/25/12 13993 SERGIO MARROQUIN Ref002421140 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000187047 56.30 56.30
2032998 04/18/12 13948 SHEA HOMES 003635 04/12/12 WORK ORDER REFUND D0237-010037 709.20 709.20
2032999 04/18/12 13955 SHERI & KELVIN HOPKINS 003643 04/16/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2033000 04/18/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900653791 03/22/12 ENCORE700 PARTS 2,638.16
900653792 03/22/12 MICRO2000 PARTS 2,565.92
900653793 03/22/12 MICRO2000 & ENCORE700 1,527.68 6,731.76
2033094 04/25/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900664270A 03/29/12 BIOXIDE TP 1,338.80
900615680 02/28/12 V-10 CHLORINATOR 7,436.43 8,775.23
2033001 04/18/12 13327 SILVA SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1204 04/10/12 CONSULTING SERVICES (MAR 2012) 4,000.00 4,000.00
2033095 04/25/12 13994 SKYLINE CHURCH Ref002421141 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000187624 4,436.30 4,436.30
2033096 04/25/12 05525 SOCAL EROSION CONTROL INC 497628 03/29/12 STRAW WADDLE 762.08 762.08
2033002 04/18/12 13949 SOUTH BAY EXPRESSWAY LP 003634 04/12/12 WORK ORDER REFUND D0545-010203 2,107.97 2,107.97
2032814 04/04/12 11618 SOUTH COAST COPY SYSTEMS AR103590 03/20/12 COPIER UPGRADE & MAINTENANCE 1,762.79 1,762.79
2033003 04/18/12 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING & C48226 03/13/12 AC MAINTENANCE (MAR 2012) 1,068.00 1,068.00
2033097 04/25/12 13754 SOUTHLAND WATER TECHNOLOGIES 032612126 03/26/12 MISSION COMMUNICATIONS 2,130.33 2,130.33
2032815 04/04/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 908657 03/09/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (3/9/12-4/5/12) 79.96
908658 03/09/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (3/9/12-4/5/12) 79.96
908659 03/09/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (3/9/12-4/5/12) 79.96
908776 03/12/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (3/10/12-4/6/12) 79.96 319.84
Page 15 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2032889 04/11/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 909548 03/21/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (321/12-4/17/12) 79.96 79.96
2033004 04/18/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 910335 03/29/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (3/29/12-4/25/12) 98.15 98.15
2032816 04/04/12 13913 SPECIAL DISTRICT LEADERSHIP 003605 04/02/12 APPLICATION FEE 1,000.00 1,000.00
2033005 04/18/12 10343 SPECIALTY DOORS AND AUTOMATION 37391SD 03/29/12 GATE SERVICE 596.43 596.43
2032817 04/04/12 10975 SPRING VALLEY COMMUNITY CENTER 003606 04/04/12 APPLICATION FEE 50.00 50.00
2032890 04/11/12 04843 SPRING VALLEY KIWANIS 003615 04/03/12 SPONSORSHIP 125.00 125.00
2033006 04/18/12 06290 STALKER, GARY 003638 04/16/12 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 105.00 105.00
2033007 04/18/12 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 16640 03/22/12 LABOR & MAINTENANCE 789.32
16657 03/26/12 LABOR & MAINTENANCE 220.04
16683 04/02/12 ALARM MAINTENANCE 192.15 1,201.51
2032818 04/04/12 07448 STANLEY STEEMER 1163873 03/09/12 CARPET CLEANING 412.00 412.00
2032819 04/04/12 13564 STAR-NEWS PUBLISHING CO, THE 00006157 03/09/12 JOB POSTING 103.50 103.50
2032891 04/11/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420945 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 415.38 415.38
2032892 04/11/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420935 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2032893 04/11/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420941 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15
2032894 04/11/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2420949 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 253.85 253.85
2033098 04/25/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2421207 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 415.38 415.38
2033099 04/25/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2421199 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2033100 04/25/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2421203 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15
2033101 04/25/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2421211 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 253.85 253.85
2033008 04/18/12 05755 STATE WATER RESOURCES 003640 04/16/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 170.00
003641 04/16/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 170.00 340.00
2033102 04/25/12 01460 STATE WATER RESOURCES SW0048382 04/10/12 ANNUAL PERMIT INDEX #157907 1,359.00 1,359.00
2032895 04/11/12 11749 STEPHEN V MCCUE 003613 04/04/12 LEGAL SERVICES (3/21/12-4/3/12) 29,540.00 29,540.00
2032820 04/04/12 06841 SUPERIOR ENVIRONMENTAL 1203015 03/14/12 CLEANING SERVICES (QUARTERLY) 600.00 600.00
Page 16 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2033009 04/18/12 01834 TC CONSTRUCTION INC 4A 04/04/12 LA PRESA SYSTEM (3/1/12- 3/31/12) 169,416.95 169,416.95
2032821 04/04/12 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2385 03/16/12 SCADA LABOR 607.50 607.50
2033103 04/25/12 13998 TERESA YUDITH VASQUEZ ALVIZO 003655 04/19/12 POSTER CONTEST WINNER 100.00 100.00
2032822 04/04/12 02975 TETRA TECH INC 50543495 03/08/12 WELL PROJECT (12/31/11-2/24/12) 3,957.75 3,957.75
2032823 04/04/12 13906 THOMAS GERETY 003594 03/28/12 VALVE REBATE PROGRAM 350.00 350.00
2033104 04/25/12 13972 TIM MCDOUGAL Ref002421118 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183501 1,398.52 1,398.52
2032824 04/04/12 11459 TRAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS 7008 03/16/12 SEWER INSPECTION (6/8/11-3/9/12) 30,202.44
7007 03/15/12 980-2 PS FAILURE (12/20/11-2/29/12) 4,000.00 34,202.44
2033105 04/25/12 13982 TREVIANA AT LOMAS VERDES LP Ref002421128 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185176 1,729.57 1,729.57
2033106 04/25/12 13983 TREVIANA AT LOMAS VERDES LP Ref002421129 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185178 1,952.26 1,952.26
2033010 04/18/12 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 320120470 04/01/12 UNDERGROUND ALERTS 249.00 249.00
2033011 04/18/12 08262 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 101927865001 03/22/12 CONCRETE 177.79
101931383001 03/22/12 CONCRETE 44 45 222 2410193138300103/22/12 CONCRETE 44.45 222.24
2032896 04/11/12 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2420943 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2033107 04/25/12 05417 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Ben2421205 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 100.00 100.00
2033012 04/18/12 00350 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 104339510412 04/17/12 PREPAID POSTAGE MACHINE 2,100.00 2,100.00
2032897 04/11/12 13426 UNITED STATES TREASURY Ben2420939 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 200.00 200.00
2033108 04/25/12 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 121160000043 04/25/12 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (MAY 2012) 5,548.37 5,548.37
2032898 04/11/12 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 003617 03/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 260.00
003627 03/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 28.92 288.92
2033013 04/18/12 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT 003628 03/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 1,067.74 1,067.74
2033109 04/25/12 07674 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT O0000000008 03/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES 18,531.67 18,531.67
2032825 04/04/12 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 0152581IN 03/09/12 INVENTORY 4,401.11
0152582IN 03/09/12 METER BOX LIDS 1,963.37 6,364.48
2033014 04/18/12 04345 US CONCRETE PRECAST GROUP 0152876IN 03/27/12 INVENTORY 9,969.55
0152930IN 03/29/12 INVENTORY 9,969.55 19,939.10
2033015 04/18/12 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 610815 03/29/12 SECURITY SERVICES 944.10 944.10
Page 17 of 18
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2032754 THROUGH 2033112
RUN DATES 4/4/2012 TO 4/25/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2033016 04/18/12 13048 V & A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 13287 03/30/12 CORROSION SERVICES (2/25/12-3/30/12) 10,154.00 10,154.00
2032899 04/11/12 01878 VACLAVEK, JACOB 003623 04/05/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 105.00 105.00
2033017 04/18/12 08028 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTSD100120 03/31/12 INSPECTION SERVICES (3/1/12-3/31/12) 28,045.00 28,045.00
2032900 04/11/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2420925 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,334.00 12,334.00
2032901 04/11/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2420931 04/12/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 3,435.58 3,435.58
2033110 04/25/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2421189 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,616.56 12,616.56
2033111 04/25/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2421195 04/26/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 2,480.58 2,480.58
2032826 04/04/12 13911 VEHICLE REGISTRATION COLL 43H39K2011 03/23/12 REGISTRATION FEE 75.00 75.00
2032902 04/11/12 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 10686586585 03/21/12 WIRELESS SERVICES (2/22/12-3/21/12) 5,183.63 5,183.63
2033112 04/25/12 13973 VERONICA LUTZ Ref002421119 04/23/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183629 24.07 24.07
2033018 04/18/12 10721 VIP RUBBER COMPANY INC 109632 04/05/12 METER GASKETS 1,141.93
109631 04/05/12 METER GASKETS 947 15 2 089 0810963104/05/12 METER GASKETS 947.15 2,089.08
2033019 04/18/12 03335 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 116617391 03/31/12 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE 369.56 369.56
2032827 04/04/12 07595 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 864384401 03/08/12 PIPE CLAMPS 64.65 64.65
2032828 04/04/12 00264 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 17912700312 03/27/12 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL #1791270 220.00 220.00
2032829 04/04/12 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 0113822IN 03/16/12 FUEL TANK INSPECTIONS 400.00 400.00
2033020 04/18/12 13483 WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP 123971 03/29/12 AUDIT SERVICES 4,500.00 4,500.00
2033021 04/18/12 02230 WILLIAMSON, KELLI 14730412 04/16/12 TRAVEL EXPENSES 130.72 130.72
2032903 04/11/12 13916 XAVIER VELASCO Ref002420830 04/09/12 UB Refund Cst #0000051120 27.58 27.58
GRAND TOTAL 3,082,030.51 3,082,030.51
Page 18 of 18