HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-08-13 Board Packet 1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING DISTRICT BOARDROOM 2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY
January 8, 2013
2:30 P.M.
AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3. OATH OF OFFICE CEREMONY JOSE LOPEZ MARK ROBAK MITCHELL THOMPSON 4. PRESENTATION OF RECOGNITION PLAQUE TO BOARD PRESIDENT 5. RECESS FOR RECEPTION 6. RECONVENE OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING 7. ELECTION OF BOARD PRESIDENT As per Chapter 2, Section 1.03.B, Procedure for Election, of the District’s Code of Ordinances, the General Manager shall chair the proceedings for election of the President. The newly-elected President shall assume office immediately and shall chair the proceedings for the election of the Vice President and Treasurer. 8. ELECTION OF BOARD VICE PRESIDENT 9. ELECTION OF BOARD TREASURER 10. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 11. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA 12. RECESS OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING
2
13. CONVENE OTAY SERVICE CORPORATION BOARD MEETING 14. ROLL CALL 15. ELECTION OF OFFICERS a) PRESIDENT b) VICE-PRESIDENT c) TREASURER 16. APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS a) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR b) CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER c) SECRETARY 17. ADJOURN OTAY SERVICE CORPORATION BOARD MEETING 18. CONVENE OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD MEET-ING 19. ROLL CALL 20. RE-AFFIRM OFFICERS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHOR-ITY d) PRESIDENT e) VICE-PRESIDENT f) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR g) TREASURER/AUDITOR h) SECRETARY 21. ADJOURN OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING 22. RECONVENE OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING 23. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 9, 2012 AND NOVEMBER 7, 2012 CONSENT CALENDAR 24. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A PAR-TICULAR ITEM: a) APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $366,118.33 FOR THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) NEW VACTOR MODEL 2110 PLUS JET RODDER
3
b) APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT WITH GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,460 FOR THE CALAVO GARDENS SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECT c) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO BASILE CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE 12-INCH POTABLE WATER PIPELINE IN ORANGE AVE-NUE, I-805 CROSSING IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $872,000 ACTION ITEMS 25. BOARD a) APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT’S GENERAL MANAGER’S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT WITH NO CHANGES IN COM-PENSATION b) DISCUSSION OF 2013 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 26. THIS ITEM IS PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS: a) REPORT ON DIRECTOR’S EXPENSES FOR THE 1ST QUARTER OF FIS-CAL YEAR 2013 (BENHAM) b) INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE DISTRICT’S WATER AND SEWER RATE STUDY (BEACHEM/BELL) c) INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE ROSARITO DESALINATION PLANT AND THE OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION SYSTEM PROJECTS (KENNEDY) d) INFORMATIONAL REPORT REGARDING THE USE OF AS-NEEDED SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE DELIVERY OF THE DISTRICT’S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MARTIN) e) STATUS REPORT ON THE FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (MARTIN) REPORTS 27. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT a) SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE 28. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
4
29. PRESIDENT’S REPORT RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION 30. CLOSED SESSION a) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS [GOVERNMENT CODE §54957.6] AGENCY NEGOTIATORS: MARK WATTON, GENERAL MANAGER, AND GERMAN ALVAREZ, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION: OTAY WATER DISTRICT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION AND ALL REPRESENTED AND UNREPRESENTED PERSONNEL INCLUDING MANAGEMENT AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES b) CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS [GOVERNMENT CODE §54957.6] AGENCY NEGOTIATORS: DIRECTORS JOSE LOPEZ AND GARY CROUCHER WITH RESPECT TO THE GENERAL MANAGER’S CONTRACT c) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION [GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9] 1 CASE RETURN TO OPEN SESSION 31. REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION 32. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4207 TO EXTEND THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDER-STANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AND THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION AND APPROVE THE SAME PROVISIONS FOR MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXECUTIVE EM-PLOYEES 33. ADJOURNMENT
5
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board. The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website. Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280. If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at (619) 670-2280 at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Certification of Posting I certify that on January 4, 2013, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Government Code Section §54954.2). Executed at Spring Valley, California on January 4, 2013. /s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
1
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
October 9, 2012
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:31 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Gonzalez, Lopez, Croucher, Robak and Thompson
Directors Absent: None
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Asst. General Manager
German Alvarez, General Counsel Daniel Shinoff, Chief
Financial Officer Joe Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod
Posada, Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens,
Chief of Administration Rom Sarno, Chief of Water
Operations Pedro Porras and District Secretary Susan Cruz
and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Lopez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Croucher, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the agenda.
5. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 5, 2012 AND SPECIAL BOARD MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11,
2012
A motion was made by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Croucher, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
AGENDA ITEM 23
2
Absent: None
to approve the minutes of the regular board meeting of September 5, 2012 and the
special board meeting of September 11, 2012.
6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
CONSENT ITEMS
7. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST IS
MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
Director Robak requested that items 6e and 6f be pulled for discussion.
Upon a motion by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the following remaining consent calendar items:
a) APPROVE AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE WHEELING RATE FOR THE
DELIVERY OF TREATY WATER TO THE CITY OF TIJUANA TO $58.14
FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2013
b) ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 532 AMENDING THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF
ORDINANCES, SECTION 72, PENALTIES AND DAMAGES; APPENDIX A,
SETION 72.05.D.A WITH REFERENCE TO TYPE I AND TYPE II FINES;
AND CLARIFYING CUSTOMER REQUESTS FOR BOARD REVIEW
c) APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 535 AMENDING SECTION 6, CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE, OF THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF ORDINANCES TO
UPDATE THE GIFT LIMIT, THE DEFINITION OF PROHIBITED
INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITIES, EXPAND THE LIST OF POSITIONS
REQUIRED TO FILE A FORM 700, UPDATE/DELETE POSITION TITLES
THAT NO LONGER EXIST AND AMEND THE DISCLOSURE
CATEGORIES
3
d) CAST VOTES FOR A REGULAR DISTRICT MEMBER ON LAFCO’S
COMMISSION AND EIGHT (8) SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADVISORY
COMMITTEE MEMBERS IN THE LAFCO SPECIAL DISTRICTS 2012
ELECTION
g) APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO LAYFIELD
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION FOR THE FLOATING
COVER REPLACEMENT AT THE 624-1 RESERVOIR IN AN AMOUNT
NOT-TO-EXCEED $497,050
President Lopez presented Item 6e for discussion:
6e) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL AS-NEEDED CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES CONTRACT TO ALYSON
CONSULTING IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $350,000 FOR A
PERIOD OF THREE (3) FISCAL YEARS (FY 2013 TO FY 2015)
Director Robak indicated that he has noticed that the District has made a concerted
effort in the last few years to move to “as-needed” contracts for many services,
which he could see would make sense. He indicated that he is certain that there is
efficiency derived from doing so and inquired how staff determines that it is more
cost effective. He asked if there is some metric the District tracks which would help
determine cost efficiency. Staff indicated that within staffs’ report it notes the eight
or nine projects where the services of Alyson Consulting would be utilized. It was
indicated that if the District bid each of these projects separately, it would cost the
District much more in staff time. By combining smaller project needs into one
contract, it is much more efficient and savings are realized through the efficiency of
the process. The District also benefits through economy of scales as it is
contracting the services in “bulk.”
Director Robak indicated that he was interested in seeing how the numbers indicate
that by awarding an “as-needed” contract it is more cost effective. He stated that it
certainly makes sense, but he is interested in how the numbers work out. It was
discussed that there is number of different ways that this could be determined.
President Lopez suggested that this issue be agendized for discussion at a meeting
of the Engineering Operations and Water Resources Committee.
President Lopez then presented item 6f for discussion. Director Robak indicated
that he had the same concern with this contract as with item 6e.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Robak and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
4
Absent: None
to approve agenda items 6e and 6f as per staffs’ recommendation.
ACTION ITEMS
8. BOARD
a) APPOINT AN AD HOC EMPLOYEE NEGOTIATIONS COMMITTEE FOR
UPCOMING NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION
President Lopez indicated contract (Memorandum of Understanding [MOU]) with
District’s Employee Association (EA) will expires in June 2013 and the District must
start focusing on negotiations for a new contract. He stated that he would like to
start the negotiations process in November 2012 and would be appointing members
to an Ad Hoc Committee to begin the discussion and to get feedback from the
board. He stated that, at the moment, he is thinking of appointing Director Croucher
as he had served on the committee during the last negotiations process and he’d
like to have his experience on the committee.
The board had a discussion regarding the members and experience that they would
like to see serve on the committee. The members of the board also noted that they
would like to review the proposed agreement to the EA before it is presented to the
EA.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to initiate a board Ad Hoc Employee Negotiations Committee.
b) DISCUSSION OF 2012 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
It was discussed that the board had canceled the December board meeting in past
years and it was questioned whether the December meeting would be canceled this
year as well. General Manager Watton indicated that staff can be prepared if the
board decides to cancel the December board meeting. President Lopez indicated
that he would like to discuss this further at the November 7 board meeting.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
5
9. THE FOLLOWING ITEM IS PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA
ITEM:
a) UPDATE DIRECTORS’ EXPENSES FOR THE 4TH QUARTER OF FISCAL
YEAR 2012
A motion was made by Director Robak, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
that the board note and file the update report on the Board of Directors’ expenses
for the 4th Quarter Fiscal Year 2012.
b) STRATEGIC PLAN FISCAL YEAR-END 2012 UPDATE REPORT
Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens indicated that this is the first year of
the District’s three-year plan (2012 – 2014) approved by the Board in 2011. He
stated that the District’s Strategic Plan allowed the District to determine where it
was going as a business, to implement infrastructure and systems that would
enhance efficiency, and to refine/fine tune those realized efficiencies. He stated
that the District will begin to develop the 2015-2017 Strategic Plan in the next six (6)
to seven (7) months.
He presented the results of the year-end FY2012 Strategic Plan and indicated:
- 36 of the 42 objectives are complete, ahead of schedule or on target (or
86%); the target is 90%. (Objectives provide a guide to the direction of the
District.)
- 33 of the 43 performance measures are complete, ahead of schedule or on
target (or 77%); the target is 75%. (Performance measures indicate how the
District is doing in its day-to-day operations.)
He stated that staff works together and reviews and discusses the results of the
District’s Strategic Plan in detail and the reasons why specific items are not meeting
targets on a quarterly basis. This information is input into the Strategic Plan
System. He noted that the Strategic Plan information is available on the board
extranet and members may review the status of objectives and measures in detail.
Chief of Information Technology Stevens also presented Trend Analyses for both
the objectives and measures from FY 2007 through FY 2012 showing the District’s
6
performance for each fiscal year relative to the set targets. The District’s overall
performance has been above average over the last six years.
He indicated that the next steps in the Strategic Plan process are:
- Departments will be working on Strategy Maps. The maps lay out the
departments’ different strategies and looks at the inter-relationships between
them. The purpose is to help departments possibly determine where more
emphasis can be placed to improve/enhance outcomes. This process will
also provide a basis for discussion with the senior team and managers.
- Improve measures and targets.
- Continue to enhance communications and teamwork through the Strategic
Plan process.
It was discussed that AWWA may be discontinuing the Qualserv Survey. The
District will be contacting AWWA as it would be unfortunate to abandon the entire
benchmarking survey. The Qualserv Survey program is not what the utilities were
looking for, however, there are elements of the survey that is helpful and it is felt it
can be enhanced to make it more useful.
Director Robak inquired about the measure for total customer water saved (per
capita water use) indicating that he recalls that the District is ahead of its projection
for water savings and asked why the measure shows that the District is behind
schedule. Water Conservation Manager William Granger confirmed that the
District’s gallons per day (GPD) use is going down. He stated that this measure
indicates the success of the water conservation voucher program; customers’
installation of water conserving devices (i.e., water efficient clothes washers, water
smart irrigation controllers, etc.). Due to the economic downturn, customers are not
as willing to invest in new products even though they are provided incentives and
this is the reason the District is a little behind in meeting this measure’s target.
Director Robak indicated that people are utilizing their cell phones more to obtain
information and inquired if staff is looking to optimize the District’s webpage for
smart phone users. Chief of information Technology Stevens indicated that staff is
not currently looking to do so as there is concern of screen size and the size of the
message that can be viewed. The District has received positive customer feedback
through the customer survey and the number of customers utilizing the website for
billing purposes is increasing.
Director Thompson indicated that he believes that the Strategic Plan is the strength
of an organization. He complimented Chief of Information Technology Stevens and
staff for their work on the District’s Strategic Plan.
c) REPORT ON INVESTMENT PROCEDURES
7
Director Thompson indicated that the Finance Administration and Communications
Committee had asked that staff document the procedures for the investment
process as, while there is a process followed by staff, there were no written
procedures at that time. The committee is satisfied with the procedures presented
by staff.
REPORTS
10. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
General Manager Watton introduced new Finance Manager, Mr. Kevin Koeppen,
who has joined the District from Circle Foods. He stated that Circle Foods is one of
the District’s largest customers in the Otay Mesa area. Mr. Koeppen has been hired
to fill the seat vacated by Mr. James Cudlip who had retired from the District in June
2012.
He indicated that a memo has been provided each board member with an update
on the Rocking Horse Drive water main break in response to questions from
Director Robak. Director Robak indicated that he was happy to receive the memo
as it answered some of his questions.
General Manager Watton then highlighted information from his report that included
an update on the California Water Plan, employee picnic, water sales, water and
sewer rate study, North District-South District Interconnect Pipeline Project and
SDG&E’s proposed rate increase.
In response to an inquiry from Director Croucher, General Manager Watton
indicated that a report will be published by a consultant that will answer the power
question more fairly concerning the Poseidon Desalination Project. It is believed
that the report will show that the power rate will double over the next 10 - 15 years
which is different from what CWA’s consultant is showing. It provides a longer look
and was requested by the public power producers and other public agencies that
supply power. CWA’s staff is estimating an inflation rate of about 2.5% and it is
expected that the report will show a 5% increase.
General Manager Watton also shared that he met with the lessees of the District’s
Salt Creek Golf Course. He indicated that they have done over $1 million in
improvements on the golf course and it was looking very good. He stated they are
still working on a few improvements and they were getting the course back into
good condition. He also noted that the clubhouse had changed and that the food
was pretty good.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (CWA) UPDATE
8
General Manager Watton indicated that CWA is still discussing the Poseidon
Desalination Project. The rate structure is still in debate and Otay WD is requesting
that CWA perform a cost-of-service study. CWA will be holding a special board
meeting on Wednesday, October 11, where the CWA board will further discuss the
project documents. The Otay WD staff have been reviewing the documents and
formulating questions. CWA is looking at a 30-year multi-billion dollar contract that
could affect the District’s rate. Currently, CWA is projecting an increase of
approximately 12% in 2016. Otay WD is encouraging CWA’s board to have a more
in depth discussion on the rate structure. Should it be embedded into the various
CWA rate categories or should it be considered a supply source. After these
questions have been answered, then CWA should determine if it should move
forward with the project or not.
Director Thompson inquired if it was felt that the District had adequate resources to
analyze the proposed rates and to present the District’s case to assure that the
District’s ratepayers are fairly treated. General Manager Watton indicated that at
the contract level it is felt that the District has adequate resources. The District has
engaged Ms. Karyn Keese of Atkins Global to assist with the rate issues. The
District’s staff is utilizing its own rate modeling program to determine the impact to
the District’s rate. Director Thompson indicated that, as a member of the board, he
would like to make sure that the District devotes enough resources, whether internal
or external, to protect the District and its ratepayers’ interests. General Manager
Watton indicated that he appreciates Director Thompson’s comments and it is the
reason staff is putting great effort and resources into the analysis.
11. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
Director Robak indicated with regard to the Carlsbad Desalination Project, that he
has been clear that he did not support the Carlsbad Desalination Project for many
reasons. He indicated that if we were to analyze where we are at this point with the
project, he felt that it would be pretty clear that the project would not “pencil out.”
He stated that he had attended the public hearing on the Carlsbad Desalination
Project at CWA and the hearing was very well attended by the public. He stated
that he feels that everyone is just worn down after 12 years of trying to move this
project forward. He indicated that he feels the thought is, “yes, it is twice as
expensive, but we have to have it (the project).” It also seems that CWA’s Water
Planning Committee has already concluded that CWA will move forward with the
project. Though the District is making its concerns known, it is the majority that will
rule in the decision. Director Robak also commented on the Telegraph Canyon
Road main break and indicated that he did have an opportunity to speak with a
customer impacted by the break and that he would speak with General Manager
Watton later on his impressions concerning the break.
He lastly commented on the Avocado, Louisa, Calavo, etc., Sewer Replacement
Project. He stated that he had spoken with a customer impacted by the project and
wished to share with staff that the customer had indicated that he was very
9
appreciative of the contractor’s work. He stated that he is a contractor himself and
understands the challenges that contractors must address. The customer indicated
that he would be forwarding a letter regarding his appreciation. Director Robak
indicated that once he receives the letter, he would share a copy with the board and
staff.
Director Thompson indicated that he attended a couple meetings of the City of
Chula Vista’s Redevelopment Oversight Committee. The committee indicated that
an independent audit must be completed on the redevelopment funds. They are
replacing State funds for schools that were formerly going to the Chula Vista
Redevelopment Agency. He stated that the first fund that was audited is the
housing fund and a $1 million will be returned to the County which will be
earmarked for schools. He reminded the board that the District was asked to
appoint representatives to the Redevelopment Committee as it is the largest water
agency in Chula Vista, however, the District is almost not impacted by the actions of
the committee.
Director Gonzalez reported that he attended the Otay Mesa Chamber of Commerce
meeting attended by State Assemblymember Ben Hueso. Assemblymember Hueso
spoke about current water issues, the water projects that are being built in northern
California and the critical need to develop other water supply resources. He
indicated that it is great to have the support of a State representative on water
issues. He also stated that he attended, as alternate representative, the Metro
Commission meeting. At the meeting a conservation group spoke on focusing more
on recycle water supplies as opposed to desalination as they wished to protect and
conserve the ocean. They felt that the city should focus on utilizing recycled water
more. He also shared that he and his family attended and enjoyed the District’s
employee picnic.
Director Gonzalez inquired if it is possible for the board to be provided a briefing on
the water issues as there is a lot of issues in the industry right now. He stated that it
would be helpful to have the information when out in the public. President Lopez
indicated that he would speak with General Manager Watton about providing a
workshop.
12. PRESIDENT’S REPORT
President Lopez reported on meetings he attended during the month of September
2012 (a list of meetings he attended is attached). He indicated with regard to the
September 11 Special Board meeting that several items were tabled due to time
constraints, that he would like to see those items brought back at future meetings
since staff had already put the work into those items. He indicated with regard to
the Water Conservation Garden that he felt the Garden was moving in a positive
direction and that the new Garden Executive Director, Mr. John Bolthouse, is doing
an excellent job. He stated that he expected a positive report from him when he
presents his report at the District’s next board meeting. He also shared that he
10
attended the Bonita Festival on October 6 and that the District had strong interest
from its customers. He commended the staff volunteers – Armando Buelna, Bob
Kennedy, Dan Martin, Richard Namba and Marinelli McCormack – for their work in
staffing the District’s booth.
13. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the
meeting at 4:48 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
11
President’s Report
October 9, 2012 Board Meeting
A) Meetings attended during the Month of September 2012:
1) September 5: Attended the District’s Regular Board Meeting
2) September 11: Attended the District’s Board Workshop/Special
Board Meeting. The board received an update on legislative
matters.
3) September 12: Attended the Water Conservation Garden Board
Meeting (copy of agenda attached).
4) September 14: Committee Agenda Briefing. Met with General
Manager Watton to review items that will be presented at the
September Committee meetings.
5) September 17: Attended a meeting of the Finance,
Administration and Communications Committee.
a) Reviewed, discussed, and made recommendation on items
that will be presented at the October board meeting.
6) September 20: Met with Supervisor Greg Cox to discuss the
North/South District Interconnect Pipeline Project.
Attendees: Mark Watton, Rod Posada, Jeff Marchioro
7) September 22: Attended the District’s Employee Picnic.
8) October 1: Board Agenda Briefing. Met with General Manager
Watton and General Counsel Daniel Shinoff to review items
that will be presented at the October Board meeting.
1
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
November 7, 2012
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:36 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Gonzalez, Lopez, Croucher and Robak
Directors Absent: Thompson (out-of-town on prescheduled vacation)
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Asst. General Manager
German Alvarez, General Counsel Daniel Shinoff, Chief
Financial Officer Joe Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod
Posada, Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens,
Chief of Administration Rom Sarno, Chief of Water
Operations Pedro Porras and District Secretary Susan Cruz
and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Croucher and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Director Thompson
to approve the agenda.
5. WATER CONSERVATION GARDEN UPDATE (JOHN BOLTHOUSE, EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR, AND RICHARD WRIGHT, PRESIDENT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Mr. Richard Wright, President of the Water Conservation Garden (Garden) Board of
Directors, thanked the Otay Water District’s (OWD) Board for the invitation to
provide an update on the Garden. He introduced the Garden’s new Executive
Director, Mr. John Bolthouse.
Executive Director Bolthouse expressed his appreciation for the value that the
District, and its fellow member agencies,’ place in the Garden. Mr. Bolthouse
reported that within the next 3-6 months, the Garden will be drafting a new Strategic
AGENDA ITEM 23
2
Plan and once it is approved by the Garden’s governing board, it will be presented
to the JPA. He indicated that the Garden’s staff and co-owners of the property are
developing a facilities expansion plan and ideas for new programs. Expansion of
the building is needed for staff, volunteers and meeting space. There are additional
plans to enhance and expand current programs and look into botanical science,
which Mr. Bolthouse believes will widen the demographic and the geographic
appeal of the Garden beyond East County.
Mr. Bolthouse thanked William Granger, OWD’s Water Conservation Manager, for
his involvement with the Garden. He also invited the OWD board and staff
members to their Fall Garden Festival which is scheduled on November 10, 2012,
from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. He stated that there will be music and approximately
50-60 vendors.
President Lopez indicated that he attends the Garden’s Board meetings as a
member of the board and has witnessed President Wright’s passion for the Garden.
He thanked Mr. Bolthouse for providing an update and commended him on his
leadership and knowledge of the Garden. He indicated that he felt that the Garden
has a good team and invited Mr. Bolthouse back to the District in the future to
provide another update on the Garden’s progress.
6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
Mr. Al Alvarado of National City addressed the Board on behalf of his grandson who
owns a home within the District’s service area and discussed the situation of the
property. He indicated that the property is currently in foreclosing proceedings and
that the tenant had moved out in June 2012. However, the water fees continued to
accumulate though water was not being used, which he felt was unfair. He thanked
the board for the opportunity to share his concerns.
President Lopez referred Mr. Alvarado’s concerns to General Manager Watton.
District staff will contact Mr. Alvarado to address his concerns.
CONSENT ITEMS
7. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST IS
MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
Upon a motion by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
3
Absent: Director Thompson
to approve the following consent calendar items:
a) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4205 TO AUTHORIZE THE GENERAL
MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ PENSION REFORM ACT OF 2013, WHICH WILL
BECOME EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2013; AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO.
4206 TO AMEND RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS FOR UNREPRESENTED
EMPLOYEES HIRED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2013
b) ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 536 AMENDING THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF
ORDINANCES, SECTION 2.01, AUTHORITY OF THE GENERAL
MANAGER, TO FORMALIZE THE GENERAL MANAGER’S OR
DESIGNEE’S AUTHORITY TO MANAGE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES
c) APPROVE A 3-YEAR O&M AGREEMENT WITH SOFTCHOICE
CORPORATION FOR MICROSOFT SOFTWARE LICENSE SUPPORT IN
THE AMOUNT OF $250,638.00, CONSISTING OF THREE (3) ANNUAL
PAYMENTS OF APPROXIMATELY $83,546.00
d) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL AS-NEEDED GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $175,000 FOR A PERIOD OF THREE (3)
FISCAL YEARS (FY 2013 TO FY 2015)
e) APPROVE CREDIT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE EXISTING
CONTRACT WITH GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE
AMOUNT OF <$22,040.00> FOR THE CALAVO GARDENS SEWER
REHABILITATION PROJECT
ACTION ITEMS
8. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
a) APPROVE THE DISTRICT’S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS,
INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ UNQUALIFIED OPINION
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2012
Finance Manager Kevin Koeppen indicated that White Nelson Diehl Evans &
Company, LLP (WNDEC) completed the District’s audit for fiscal year ended June
30, 2012. He stated that this is the company’s third year performing the District’s
audit.
Overall District assets decreased by $6.3 million due to decreases of:
$3.2 million for payments on long-term debt
4
$1 million due to a reduction in grant funds received
$1.4 million due to the write-off of CIP expenses that were not capitalized for
various projects
Finance Manager Kevin Koeppen stated that the District’s Capital contributions for
FY 2012 was $6.8 million, where $2 million was from capital improvements from
permits, $3.5 million was contributed to fixed assets from developers, and $1.4
million was from capacity fees.
Mr. Koeppen indicated that operating revenue increased $5.2 million mainly due to
the overall increase in water rates. He noted that the overall debt service ratio, a
ratio used to analyze the District’s ability to meet its debt and interest payments,
was 132% for the fiscal year.
Mr. Nitin Patel, Auditor for White Nelson Diehl Evans & Company (WNDEC),
presented the findings of the District’s audit for FY 2012. He stated his
organization’s responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements of
the District. WNDEC’s audit of the District’s FY 2012 resulted in an unqualified
opinion. Mr. Patel indicated that the financial statement presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the District in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.
Mr. Patel indicated that his organization also issues a report on internal controls
over financial reporting and compliance, known as the Management Letter. He
stated that WNDEC did not identify any material weaknesses in internal controls.
Communication under Audit Standard No. 114, which discusses the Qualitative
Aspects of Accounting Practices, indicates WNDEC found no new accounting
policies that have been adopted and the application of existing policies were not
changed during the fiscal year. There were also no noted transactions entered into
by the District for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus.
Mr. Patel indicated that his firm did not have any difficulties in performing the audit.
The last report issued is the Independent Accountants’ Report on Applying Agreed-
Upon Procedures regarding the District’s investments. Mr. Patel indicated that
there were no findings to report and that the investments tested by WNDEC were in
compliance with the District’s Investment Policy.
Director Robak indicated that each year there is a special area of focus in the audit.
He inquired what the special area of focus was for the FY 2012 audit. Mr. Patel
indicated that WNDEC did not focus on a special area during the FY 2012 audit.
The audit did include a follow-up on suggested adjustments/improvements with
regard to credit card payments and capitalized assets that were identified in last
year’s audit and no issues were found.
5
Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem indicated that he does not believe there is an
inherent special area required in the audit. However, if the Board wished for the
District’s auditors to focus on a specific area, the auditors would be willing to do so.
Mr. Patel stated that the Board could provide a letter to the auditor indicating any
concerns that they would like WNDEC to focus on.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez and Robak
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Thompson
to approve the District’s audited financial statements, including the independent
Auditors’ unqualified opinion for fiscal year ended June 30, 2012.
9. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION OF 2012 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
The board canceled the December 5, 2012 board meeting and scheduled a special
board meeting on November 28, 2012 to discuss CWA’s intent to vote on a Water
Supply Agreement for desalinated water with Poseidon Resources.
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
10. THE FOLLOWING ITEM IS PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMATIONAL
PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING AGENDA
ITEM:
a) INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE EMERGENCY REPAIR COST FOR A
MAIN BREAK AT THE 1400 BLOCK OF TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
Chief of Operations Pedro Porras stated that in the early morning of October 24,
2012, a break occurred in a 24-inch asbestos cement water main (ACP) located
within the westbound lane of the 1400 block of Telegraph Canyon Road between La
Media Road and Paseo Rancho Road.
Mr. Porras stated that in accordance with District Code of Ordinances Article I,
Chapter 2, Section 2, Paragraph H, staff declared the break an emergency in order
to expedite the repair and prevent loss or impairment of essential public services. It
was indicated that if the District had not declared the repair an emergency, the
repair of the pipe would have been delayed for 90+ days as, per the District’s policy,
bids would need to be solicited for the repair of the pipe due to the cost associated
with the repair.
6
Mr. Porras indicated that there were three (3) main issues that necessitated that the
pipeline break be declared an emergency: 1) Materials for the repair were not
readily available; 2) A red flag warning was issued by the National Weather Service
increasing the possibility of fires which would place a demand on the District’s
system; and 3) The excavation required to continue the repair safely was beyond
the capabilities of the District’s equipment.
He indicated that the 24-inch pipeline in Telegraph Canyon Road is the primary feed
source to the southerly 624 pressure zone, and the entire 458 and 340 pressure
zones. With the primary pipeline down, District staff constructed high lines to feed
the meters located on Telegraph Canyon Road and activated the 711/624 pressure
reducing valve located on Heritage Road and Olympic Parkway. However, if the
temporary feed lines were to exceed their maximum capacity, leaks or breaks in the
624 pressure zone could occur which may leave customers with no water. He
indicated that the District coordinated with the City of Chula Vista and kept the City
informed of the repair status.
Mr. Porras stated that of the three (3) contractors who submitted bid proposals,
Cass Construction was selected to complete the emergency repair. He indicated
that the estimated cost is approximately $150,000, which included the additional
costs to immediately fabricate the custom repair couplings, expedite shipping from
Arkansas since materials were not commercially available, and extended time
duration to complete the repair. Mr. Porras noted that the emergency contract was
less than $250,000 and therefore was not subject to ratification by the Board. It was
also noted that the General Manager, as required, reported the emergency repair to
the Board within 48 hours following the emergency declaration.
General Manager Mark Watton commended District staff for their diligent efforts to
expedite the repair and minimize the impact to the community. He also
commended the City of Chula Vista’s staff for their outstanding level of cooperation
that assisted in expediting the emergency repair on Telegraph Canyon Road. The
District’s back-up systems for emergencies and the repair itself were successful.
Chief of Operations Pedro Porras commended Mr. Tadeo Vasquez, Utility
Maintenance Supervisor, who monitored the situation and performed the repair
throughout the night. It was also noted that Mr. Vasquez maintained
communications with his supervisor, Utilities Service Manager Jose Martinez, at all
times.
Director Croucher inquired about the history of the pipeline and the challenges of
ordering materials for it. Mr. Pedro Porras stated that the 24-inch asbestos cement
pipeline (ACP) was installed in 1999 and was commonly used at that time, but now
is no longer used. He stated that it was a challenge to find the adaptors for the
pipeline because they are no longer commercially available and indicated that staff
had to special order them.
7
Director Croucher inquired if cement pipelines are identified in the District’s as-built
system and if the District was aware other such pipelines in its service area. Chief
of Operations Pedro Porras stated that they are not identified in the District’s as-
built system, but the District is aware of approximately 400 miles of cement pipeline
in its jurisdiction.
Directors Croucher and Gonzalez inquired if there are current plans to inspect other
cement pipelines in the area to avoid another emergency repair. General Manager
Mark Watton stated that it would not be practical for the District to inspect other
cement pipelines at this time unless it was necessary. Mr. Watton indicated that
pipeline inspections involve excavation that takes up a significant amount of time
and labor. To avoid another emergency repair in the future, it was noted that staff
ordered two sets of materials for the cement pipelines to have them readily
available.
In response to a question from Director Robak, Chief of Operations Pedro Porras
indicated that staff had consulted with our sister-agencies to see if they had
materials the District could utilize to repair the pipeline. Since the agencies did not
have in materials in stock as well, District staff placed a special order.
b) INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON THE PROPOSED APPLICATION TO THE
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(CPUC) BY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC (SDG&E) FOR THE
AUTHORITY TO UPDATE MARGINAL COSTS, COST ALLOCATION, AND
ELECTRIC RATE DESIGN
Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy stated that on October 3, 2012, SDG&E filed an
amended application with the CPUC and if approved, there would be a direct impact
on District electric rates. He provided a PowerPoint presentation to the Board.
Mr. Kennedy indicated that the impacts include higher basic service fees, an
increase to the Power-Agriculture rate known as PA-T, shifting October from a
winter rate schedule to the higher summer rate schedule, and changing the rate
structure for solar, wind, and micro turbine projects.
He presented a 2012 calendar with the current summer/winter on-peak, semi-peak,
and off-peak time of use periods that showed the rate for power will vary with time
of use, peak periods have higher rates than off-peak periods, and summer rates are
higher than winter rates.
It was noted that one of the changes proposed is to shift October from a winter rate
schedule to a summer rate schedule, which will result in a higher October bill to the
District.
Senior Civil Engineer Kennedy indicated that the County Water Authority offered to
estimate the impact of the rate changes to the District. Mr. Greg Ortega from the
Authority took the electricity data from the District and applied the new propose
8
rates. The Authority estimates that the cost of electricity could increase the District’s
rate by 37%.
Mr. Kennedy stated that the California Center for Sustainable Energy estimated the
increase for Fallbrook and Valley Center and determined that their rate would
increase 34% to 52%.
Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy presented a slide showing some of the drivers
for the rate increase:
o To cover the wildfire cost of $1.1 billion
o The recent shutdown of San Onofre
o The deployment of Smart Grid technology (provides SDG&E the ability to
monitor use which allows them to bill accordingly)
o To increase reliability
o Consumer advocates pressuring the CPUC to have large users pay more for the
power they receive
Mr. Kennedy discussed Sustainable Energy and stated that over the last few years,
the District has looked at ways to decrease its dependency on SDG&E and develop
alternative sources for self-generated power. He indicated that in 2008, the District
entered into an agreement with the County of San Diego to purchase electricity
generated from methane gas produced from the landfill adjacent to the District’s
Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility. The project was partially funded
through the California Center for Sustainable Energy (CCSE) and from revenues
from the sale of the electricity.
At the beginning of the project, SDG&E imposed a $1,553 per month stand-by
demand charge. By the end of the agreement the stand-by demand charge had
increased to $2,014 per month. As a result of the increase in the stand-by charge, it
was no longer economical for the District to buy power generated from the County
of San Diego facility so the agreement was not renewed.
Mr. Kennedy stated that the District had also looked at solar power as a source for
self-generated power and contracted with the CCSE to perform an assessment on
several District owned property. He indicated that on May 6, 2011, CCSE
completed the “Otay Water District Self-Generation Assessment Report” and
concluded it is unlikely that these projects would result in any savings and the
financial performance of such systems would be poor at the current Power
Purchase Agreement prices.
Mr. Kennedy stated some concerns such as the rate changes proposed by SDG&E
that will target these systems and further lower their financial performance if
SDG&E’s rate structure is approved. It was noted that instability in the solar power
industry is also a concern, as the City of San Diego School District recently found
out. Faulty panels installed on 24 of their buildings in 2005 became corroded and
posed a possible fire risk. They then found that the company who built the panels
9
had filed for bankruptcy which left the company that sold the power directly to the
school district with no resources to service or maintain the solar panels.
Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy noted that the District is always looking for ways
to reduce power consumption through increased energy efficiency and also meet
the requirements of AB32. He indicated that there are three (3) CIP projects in the
FY 2013 budget which are expected to reduce the District’s power consumption:
o CIP projects P2502 and P2503 will result in significant electrical energy savings
due to increased available suction pressure (saving $85,000/year).
o CIP project R2091 pump station 927/944 upgrade will install more efficient
pumps resulting in energy savings.
Mr. Kennedy indicated that SDG&E and several stakeholders recently met and a
settlement was being drafted with buy-in largely from the City of San Diego and the
Farm Bureau. He stated that basically the settlement takes the PA-T rate out of the
Large Commercial & Industrial class and puts it in the Agricultural class which
composes a much smaller cost allocation than the Commercial & Industrial class.
Unfortunately, SDGE has not produced any illustrative rates, only percent
allocations. However, the settlement proposal was designed by Bill Monson (City of
San Diego consultant) and all of the interveners accepted this as a large win on the
PA-T rate. Mr. Kennedy noted that the so called ‘Solar Rate’ (DGR) will still need to
be resolved.
Mr. Kennedy stated that staff is working with the District’s customer service
representative at SDG&E to look at ways to restructure existing rate tariffs on
existing meters to get more economical rate structures applied to them. He
indicated that this last year, Operations staff had looked at five different meters and
the possibility of shifting the tariff rate from a PA-T1 rate schedule to a PA rate
schedule is being discussed to get a more beneficial rate at those facilities. It was
noted that this could result in an annual savings of $40,000.
Director Robak commented on the drivers of the rate increase and inquired if a Joint
Powers Agreement can be established to generate power. General Manager Mark
Watton stated that there are provisions to generate power but SDG&E has been
successful in making it unattractive, such as charging a wheeling rate which makes
it uneconomical.
REPORTS
11. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
General Manager Mark Watton highlighted information from his report that included
an update on the Conservation Program Activity, the increase in water sales, the
North District-South District Interconnect Pipeline Project, the 12-Inch Potable
Water Pipeline East Orange Avenue I-805 Crossing, and meter sales.
10
He stated that he and President Lopez attended a legislative session in Mexico, at
the invitation of former Otay Water District board member Jaime Bonilla. Mr.
Watton shared that Congressman Bonilla was elected to Mexico’s Congress where
500 members represent various regions across the country, much like the United
States. He indicated that Mexico’s President of the Chamber of Deputies
introduced Mr. Watton and President Lopez at the legislative session. Both were
also introduced to the Northern Board Commission that handles water issues
between the United States and Mexico. Mr. Watton indicated that the Governor of
the State of Baja, Mr. Jose Guadalupe Osuna Millán, Mexico’s State Senators and
former governors also attended the legislative session. Mr. Watton also reported
that he and President Lopez had the opportunity to speak with Mexico’s National
Water Committee President. He stated that it was a great opportunity to meet with
key players from Mexico’s government who are involved in water issues.
President Lopez expressed his appreciation for Congressman Bonilla’s
collaborative efforts. He stated that he is confident that the District will be working
with the right officials from Mexico. President Lopez indicated that United States
Senator Ben Hueso was also in attendance at the legislative session in Mexico and
is also involved in the water issues between the United States and Mexico.
General Manager Watton also presented a photo of Senator of Baja, Mr. Marco
Vasquez, and indicated that he also attended the committee meetings in Mexico.
He indicated that he was a former governor of Mexico and is familiar and
knowledgeable in water issues in the country.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (CWA) UPDATE
General Manager Watton indicated that CWA scheduled a special board meeting on
November 29, 2012 to take action on a proposed Water Supply Agreement with
Poseidon Resources. He stated that CWA has not yet determined the rate structure
for the water from the desalination project and they have not yet completed a cost-
of-service study. He stated that District staff has forwarded letters to CWA, and
plans to send more letters, to inform CWA of Otay WD’s concerns with the Project.
It was noted that staff plans to review CWA’s proposed desalination agreement and
will be formulating questions to submit to CWA.
General Manager Watton stated that the Otay WD’s November 28, 2012 special
board meeting is necessary to discuss CWA’s action to vote on the Poseidon
Desalination Project and to obtain the Board’s input. He also recommended that a
Closed Session be held to discuss Proposition 26 matters.
Director Croucher stated that he and General Manager Mark Watton both believe in
desalination as it is a reliable water resource. However, they are concerned with
the cost of the Poseidon Desalination Project and how its cost will be shared among
the member agencies.
12. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
11
Director Robak requested that a County Water Authority (CWA) representative be
present at the District’s special board meeting on November 28 to present on the
Poseidon Desalination Project and to answer any questions that the District may
have. Director Robak also shared information about a program that helps build
wells in third-world countries at a cost of $3,000 and indicated that if anyone would
like to participate in the program, he could be contacted for more information.
Director Gonzalez stated that he attended a Metro Commission meeting and a
conservation group was in attendance to advocate for recycled water and voice
their concerns regarding desalination. He indicated that the Commission decided
that recycled water and desalination are equal and are needed as alternate
resources. With regard to the Integrated Regional Water Management meetings,
Director Gonzalez indicated that Senior Civil Engineer Bob Kennedy was appointed
to represent the District at the meetings.
13. PRESIDENT’S REPORT
President Lopez reported on meetings he attended during the month of October
2012 (a list of meetings he attended is attached).
14. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the
meeting at 5:17 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
12
President’s Report
November 7, 2012 Board Meeting
A) Meetings attended during the Month of October 2012:
1) October 1: Board Agenda Briefing. Met with General Manager
Watton and General Counsel Daniel Shinoff to review items
that will be presented at the October Board meeting.
2) October 9: Attended the District’s Regular Board Meeting
3) October 11: Attended the Tijuana Innovadora 2012 Conference.
Attendees: Rod Posada and Jose Martinez
4) October 19: Committee Agenda Briefing. Met with General
Manager Watton to review items that will be presented at the
October Committee meetings.
5) October 23: Attended a meeting of the Finance,
Administration and Communications Committee.
a) Reviewed, discussed, and made recommendation on items
that will be presented at the November board meeting.
6) October 25: Attended the South County Economic Development
Council’s elected Officials Reception. Attendees: Mark
Watton, German Alvarez and Rod Posada
7) October 29: Board Agenda Briefing. Met with General Manager
Watton and Attorney Richard Romero to review items that will
be presented at the November Board meeting.
8) October 30 to Nov 1: Traveled to Mexico City, Mexico to meet
with Mexico Government Officials to discuss the Rosarito
Desalination Project.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: January 2, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Jose Martinez, Utility
Services Manager
W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
Pedro Porras,
Chief, Water Operations
APPROVED BY:
(Asst. GM):
German Alvarez,
Assistant General Manager
SUBJECT: Approval to Purchase Sewer Vactor Truck
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase
order to Haaker Equipment Company in the amount of $366,118.33
for the purchase of one (1) New Vactor Model 2110 Plus Jet
Rodder.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment “A”.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization to purchase a sewer Vactor truck.
ANALYSIS:
Included in the approved FY 2013 budget is one (1) new sewer
Vactor truck. The sewer Vactor truck is a replacement vehicle
for existing unit 110.
Currently, the District’s essential equipment includes one (1)
sewer Vactor truck. Unit 110 is a 1999 Vactor Jet Rodder
mounted on a Sterling chassis. This unit has 52,424 chassis
miles and 10,032 operational in service hours on it. Due to the
nature of the vehicles work, the useful in service life of this
machine is normally 7-10 years which has been exceeded. Funding
AGENDA ITEM 24a
for this sewer cleaner has been included in FY13 Capital
Purchases Budget, Project S2042.
During the last four fiscal years the District has incurred
$20,571.58 in corrective maintenance costs including structural
body repairs, corrosion repairs and failed engine components.
These repairs resulted in having this unit approximately 30 days
out of service.
An estimate to refurbish the jet rodder and debris body on Unit
110 was provided by Haaker Equipment Company at a cost of
$223,632.51 and would require to be out of service for 12 weeks
during which time a replacement unit would need to be rented.
Please note, this estimate did not include work associated with
the engine and/or the transmission which is near the end of
service life and likely to require rebuild or replacement.
The District has reviewed manufactures that provide vacuum truck
units. Based on the nature of the District’s sewer cleaning
operations, the District has specified equipment that is best
suited for use on narrow roads in high traffic and high speed
areas. Specifically, the District is requiring a unit with a
centrally located rodder spool as it provides for greater safety
and less impact to traffic when working in confined traffic
control areas. The central location of the unit’s spool reduces
operational costs associated with closing of additional lanes of
traffic, as flagging personnel will not be required in most
situations. Currently Vactor equipped units are the only ones
meeting this requirement.
The replacement of our existing sewer cleaning vacuum truck with
the specified Vactor unit model will provide consistency of
operation, mitigate additional training, and will be consistent
with other local municipalities that also own and operate Vactor
units, including Padre Dam, Sweetwater Authority, County of San
Diego, and the City of San Diego to assist in utilizing
equipment during a critical need as part of our shared services
agreement.
Based on system operation evaluations of work flow by the
Construction/Maintenance supervision and management, it is
recommended that one (1) new sewer Vactor Model 2110 Plus Jet
Rodder be purchased and the older sewer Vactor Unit 110 be
declared surplus with an estimated salvage value of $35,000.
In accordance with District policy, bids were solicited for the
sewer cleaner. Three (3) bids were received. Prices received
include all applicable fees and taxes and delivery.
Dealer Vehicle Bid Bid Price
Haaker Equipment Company
Vactor Model 2110 Plus
Jet Rodder.
$366,118.33
Owen Equipment
Vactor Model 2110 Plus
Jet Rodder.
$384,424.00
Legacy Equipment
Vactor Model 2110 Plus
Jet Rodder.
$388,085.33
FISCAL IMPACT:
The FY13 budget for this vehicle was originally $325,000.00 in
the Vehicle Replacement CIP S2042. The total purchase price is
now anticipated to be $366,200.00. However, since the
anticipated lead time is 9 to 12 months for delivery the actual
purchase will take place well into late 2013. Therefore, this
purchase will be re-budgeted for FY14 accordingly.
The Finance Department has determined that 100% of the funds are
available in the replacement fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Operate the system to meet demand twenty-four hours a day, seven
days a week.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
General Manager
Attachment “A”, Committee Action
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: Approval to Purchase a Purchase Sewer Vactor Truck
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on December 4, 2012 and the following comments
were made:
Staff is requesting that the board approve the issuance of a
purchase order to Haaker Equipment Company for the purchase of a
new sewer Vactor truck.
The purchase is presently approved in the Fiscal Year 2013
budget.
The new truck will replace an existing 1999 Vactor truck. The
normal life expectancy of such equipment is 7 to 10 years and the
existing Vactor truck is 13 years old.
The primary use of the sewer vactor truck is to clean and
maintain sewer equipment and clean sewage collection pipelines.
Staff reviewed several vacuum truck manufacturers and “Vactor”
was the manufacturer selected primarily because of the
configuration of the equipment and how it is best suited for use
on narrow roads. The vehicle has a centrally located rodder
spool which is a huge benefit for traffic control and provides
protection to the operator when working on narrow roads. Another
benefit is that it is also the same vacuum vehicle/equipment that
our sister agencies utilize which would mitigate the need for
training when sister agencies borrow equipment for critical needs
through the shared services agreement.
Per District policy, bids were solicited and three (3) bids were
received for identical sewer Vactor models. Haaker Equipment
Company was selected as the lowest responsive bidder. Staff
explained that manufacturers no longer carry inventory of such
equipment and now only produce a truck when it is ordered.
Consequently, the anticipated acceptance date will be in Fiscal
Year 2014. Accordingly, the purchase of the truck will be re-
budgeted for purchase in Fiscal Year 2014.
It was indicated that this item was pulled from last month’s
committee agenda mainly to include additional information for the
reason the District is proposing a sole source purchase.
The committee inquired if staff could also include a photo of the
equipment being proposed for purchase within the staff report for
their knowledge and information. Photos of the proposed Vactor
vehicle is attached to these notes.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated
that this Vactor truck would only be utilized on the sewer and
collection system so there is no cross-contamination. It was
additionally indicated that the District has another Vactor truck
that is only utilized for the potable system.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated
that they believe the Vactor truck is manufactured in Indiana
(the location has since been confirmed to be Illinois). All
maintenance is handled inhouse with the exception of any issues
that are covered by warrantee. It was noted that if there are
any warrantee issues, it generally occurs within the first three
(3) years of ownership. If the issue is under warrantee, the
dealer will handle the repair/maintenance.
Following the discussion, the Finance, Administration and
Communications Committee supported staffs’ recommendation and
presentation to the full board as a consent item.
2100 Series Vactor Sewer Cleaner
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: S2019-001103
S2020-001103
S2022-001103
S2026-001103
DIV. NO. 3
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with Garcia Juarez
Construction Inc. for the Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation
Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
approve Change Order No. 2 to the existing contract with Garcia
Juarez Construction, Inc. (GJC) in the amount of $22,460.00 for the
Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation Project (see Exhibit A for
Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to execute
Change Order No. 2 in the amount of $22,460.00 to the contract with
GJC for the Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation Project.
ANALYSIS:
At the February 1, 2012 Board Meeting, the Board awarded a
construction contract in an amount of $2,316,275.00 to GJC for the
Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation Project.
AGENDA ITEM 24b
2
Subsequently at the November 7, 2012 Board Meeting, the Board
approved a Credit Change Order in the amount of <$22,040.00> to the
contract for a new construction contract value of $2,294,235.00.
The Project consists of the replacement and capacity upgrades of
approximately 4,500 linear feet of 8-inch and 10-inch sewer in the
streets of Avocado Boulevard, Calavo Drive, Louisa Drive, Challenge
Boulevard, and Hidden Mesa Drive in the Rancho San Diego area. The
Project also includes a new flow control and diversion vault
structure for the Calavo Sewer Lift Station.
GJC has completed the sewer replacement in the streets of Calavo
Drive, Louisa Drive, Challenge Boulevard, Hidden Mesa Drive, and most
of Avocado Boulevard. GJC is approximately 60% complete overall with
the Project.
Change Order No. 2 (Exhibit B) includes a variety of items related to
a storm drain conflict that was discovered during construction and
required a redesign of the sewer main. The sewer line in question
was originally designed to be installed parallel with Avocado
Boulevard. However, the vertical location of the existing box
culvert storm drain prevented the contractor from installing the
sewer per plan. Therefore, the sewer was re-routed across Avocado to
allow for proper gravity flow. The costs associated with the
construction of this new sewer line re-routed line across Avocado are
$85,790.00.
The change order will also delete the original sewer line
installation in favor of the redesigned sewer main described above.
This deletion results in a credit of <$73,180.00>.
Lastly, Change Order No. 2 includes a redesign of the sewer main
located on the east side of Avocado Boulevard due to a conflict with
existing electrical lines. The redesign involved moving a planned
manhole, additional sewer pipe to support the new manhole location,
and provisions for a siphon to support the construction. The costs
associated with the construction of these items are $9,850.00
The following is a table summarizing the items in Change Order No. 2.
A more detailed description of each item is provided in Exhibit B.
The items below are located at Site 1 as shown in Exhibit A:
Item Description Amount
1 Re-route sewer line across Avocado Boulevard $85,790.00
2 Delete original sewer line work in Avocado
Boulevard
<$73,180.00>
3 Re-route sewer line due to electrical line $9,850.00
$22,460.00
3
In summary, the net increase to the Project for Change Order No. 2 is
$22,460.00.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Funding for the overall Project comes from four CIP projects - S2019,
S2020, S2022, and S2026. The total budget is $3,335,000.
The total budget for CIP S2019, as approved in the FY 2013 budget, is
$2,275,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, is $2,189,065. See Attachment B-1 for budget detail.
The total budget for CIP S2020, as approved in the FY 2013 budget, is
$600,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, is $595,576. See Attachment B-2 for budget detail.
The total budget for CIP S2022, as approved in the FY 2013 budget, is
$180,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, is $179,265. See Attachment B-3 for budget detail.
The total budget for CIP S2026, as approved in the FY 2013 budget, is
$280,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, is $279,279. See Attachment B-4 for budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that these budgets will be sufficient to support the
Project.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the
Betterment Fund for CIPs S2019 and S2022 and 100% of the funding is
available from the Replacement Fund for CIPs S2020 and S2026.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
4
DM:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP S2019, S2020, S2022 Avocado Sewer\Staff Reports\Change Order No. 2 to GJC\BD 01-08-2013, Change Order No 2 to Garcia Juarez Construction, (DM).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B-1 – S2019 Budget Detail
Attachment B-2 – S2020 Budget Detail
Attachment B-3 – S2022 Budget Detail
Attachment B-4 – S2026 Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Change Order No. 2
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S2019-001103
S2020-001103
S2022-001103
S2026-001103
Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with Garcia Juarez
Construction Inc. for the Calavo Gardens Sewer
Rehabilitation Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on December 10, 2012 and the following
comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board approve Change Order No. 2 to the
existing contract with Garcia Juarez Construction, Inc. (GJC) in
the amount of $22,460.00 for the Calavo Gardens Sewer
Rehabilitation Project.
The Project consists of the replacement and capacity upgrades to
approximately 4,500 linear feet of 8-inch and 10-inch sewer in
the Calavo Gardens community that is located near the Rancho San
Diego shopping center at the end of Avocado and Highway 94.
Staff noted that at the February 1, 2012 Board meeting, the Board
awarded a contract to Garcia Juarez in an amount of $2,316,275
for this project.
Subsequently at the November 7, 2012 Board meeting, the Board
approved Change Order number 1 for a credit amount of <$22,040>.
Staff stated that Change Order No. 2 reflects a variety of items
due to conflicts with an existing storm drain and existing
electrical lines discovered during construction. As a result,
the sewer was required to be redesigned to provide proper gravity
flow and avoid the conflicts. Change Order No. 2 results in a net
increase to the contract in the amount of $22,460.
Items in the Change Order include deleting the original sewer
alignment work, constructing a new sewer alignment across Avocado
Boulevard, and re-routing the planned sewer located on the west
side of Avocado Boulevard. Exhibit B provides the detail of the
nine (9) items included as part of this Change Order.
It was indicated that the overall progress of the work is
approximately 60% complete and that the contractor is on schedule
to complete all work within the contract time. Staff stated that
the remaining work includes a flow diversion and new sewer mains
in Avocado, in front of the Rancho San Diego shopping center and
the Calavo Sewer Life Station.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that due
to the complexity of constructing the new sewer alignment
associated with this change across Avocado Boulevard, the cost of
these elements of the project increased from $73,180 to $85,790.
The Committee inquired about the impact to the community and if
the District had received any feedback from them. Staff stated
that the work on Avocado Boulevard may take another week to
complete and that the community has submitted letters to the
District that provides positive feedback such as their
appreciation of traffic control in the area.
Following the discussion, the EO&WR Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B-1 – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S2019-001103
S2020-001103
S2022-001103
S2026-001103
Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with Garcia Juarez
Construction Inc. for the Calavo Gardens Sewer
Rehabilitation Project
Date Updated: November 15, 2012
Budget
2,275,000
Planning 001101
Labor 23,026 23,026 - 23,026
Settlements 2,100 2,100 - 2,100 GARY THOMAS JALATY
Office Supplies 14 14 - 14 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Consultant Contracts 11,287 11,287 - 11,287 LEE & RO INC
Total Planning 36,427 36,427 - 36,427
Design 001102
Labor 149,522 149,522 149,522
Settlements 5,500 5,500 - 5,500 JUAN NAVARRO
Settlements 5,900 5,900 - 5,900 LN REAL ESTATE LLC
Professional Legal Fees 2,632 2,632 - 2,632 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Other Agency Fees 27 27 - 27 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Other Agency Fees 3,460 3,460 - 3,460 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Consultant Contracts 4,900 4,900 - 4,900 SAN-LO AERIAL SURVEYS
Consultant Contracts 1,550 1,550 - 1,550 AFFORDABLE DRAIN SERVICE INC
Consultant Contracts 1,947 1,947 - 1,947 CPM PARTNERS INC
Consultant Contracts 60,264 60,264 - 60,264 LEE & RO INC
Consultant Contracts 13,000 13,000 - 13,000 MICHAEL D KEAGY REAL ESTATE
Consultant Contracts 8,830 8,830 - 8,830 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC
Consultant Contracts 8,204 8,204 - 8,204 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL
Consultant Contracts 525 525 - 525 MWH CONSTRUCTORS INC
Construction Contracts 17,933 17,933 - 17,933 LEE & RO INC
Service Contracts 672 672 - 672 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO
Total Design 284,866 284,866 - 284,866
Construction 001103
Labor 200,000 88,350 111,650 200,000
Settlements 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 KIM-THOA THI HOANG
Other Agency Fees 248 248 - 248 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - DPW
Consultant Contracts 120,000 108,048 11,952 120,000 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Consultant Contracts 6,030 6,030 - 6,030 MTGL INC
Consultant Contracts 5,806 5,806 - 5,806 LEE & RO INC
Consultant Contracts 4,000 4,000 - 4,000 RBF CONSULTING
Consultant Contracts 2,685 2,685 - 2,685 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC
Consultant Contracts 3,955 3,955 - 3,955 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC
Consultant Contracts 926 926 - 926 CPM PARTNERS INC
Consultant Contracts 157 157 - 157 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL
Construction Contracts 1,438,537 722,675 715,862 1,438,537 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC
(22,040) (22,040) - (22,040) Change Order No. 1
22,460 22,460 - 22,460 Change Order No. 2
Construction Contracts 2,979 2,979 - 2,979 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC
Construction Contracts 76,507 37,241 39,265 76,507 COMMUNITY BANK
Service Contracts 522 522 - 522 FAVELA PRINTING INC
Total Construction 1,867,772 989,042 878,729 1,867,772
Grand Total 2,189,065 1,310,335 878,729 2,189,065
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
S2019 - Avocado Boulevard 8-inch Sewer Main Impr
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
ATTACHMENT B-2 – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S2019-001103
S2020-001103
S2022-001103
S2026-001103
Change Order No. 1 to the Contract with Garcia Juarez
Construction Inc. for the Calavo Gardens Sewer
Rehabilitation Project
Date Updated: November 15, 2012
Budget
600,000
Planning 001101
Labor 5,352 5,352 - 5,352
Consultant Contracts 2,185 2,185 - 2,185 LEE & RO INC
Total Planning 7,537 7,537 - 7,537
Design 001102
Labor 24,159 24,159 - 24,159
Other Agency Fees 3,460 3,460 - 3,460 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Consultant Contracts 8,000 8,000 - 8,000 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC
Consultant Contracts 4,430 4,430 - 4,430 MTGL INC
Consultant Contracts 21,588 21,588 - 21,588 LEE & RO INC
Supplier Contracts 188 188 - 188 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Service Contracts 145 145 - 145 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Total Design 61,970 61,970 - 61,970
Construction 001103
Labor 45,000 37,576 7,424 45,000
Consultant Contracts 18,240 18,240 - 18,240 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Consultant Contracts 1,250 1,250 - 1,250 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC
Consultant Contracts 400 400 - 400 LEE & RO INC
Construction Contracts 433,271 170,172 263,099 433,271 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC
Construction Contracts 22,804 8,956 13,847 22,804 COMMUNITY BANK
Construction Contracts 1,865 1,865 - 1,865 HELIX WATER DISTRICT
Service Contracts 967 967 - 967 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
Service Contracts 735 735 - 735 AFFORDABLE DRAIN SERVICE INC
Service Contracts 1,505 1,505 - 1,505 HELIX WATER DISTRICT
Service Contracts 32 32 - 32 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Service Contracts - - - - MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
Total Construction 526,069 241,699 284,370 526,069
Grand Total 595,576 311,206 284,370 595,576
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
S2020 - Calavo Drive 8-inch Sewer Main Replacement
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
ATTACHMENT B-3 – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S2019-001103
S2020-001103
S2022-001103
S2026-001103
Change Order No. 1 to the Contract with Garcia Juarez
Construction Inc. for the Calavo Gardens Sewer
Rehabilitation Project
Date Updated: November 15, 2012
Budget
180,000
Planning 001101
Labor 1,321 1,321 - 1,321
Total Planning 1,321 1,321 - 1,321
Design 001102
Labor 22,637 22,637 - 22,637
Other Agency Fees 3,460 3,460 - 3,460 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Consultant Contracts 4,989 4,989 - 4,989 LEE & RO INC
Consultant Contracts 6,000 6,000 - 6,000 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC
Total Design 37,087 37,087 - 37,087
Construction 001103
Labor 29,000 28,381 619 29,000
Consultant Contracts 403 403 - 403 LEE & RO INC
Consultant Contracts 400 400 - 400 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC
Construction Contracts 104,522 103,571 951 104,522 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC
Construction Contracts 5,501 5,451 50 5,501 COMMUNITY BANK
Service Contracts 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
Service Contracts 32 32 - 32 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Total Construction 140,858 139,238 1,620 140,858
Grand Total 179,265 177,645 1,620 179,265
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
S2022 - Hidden Mesa Drive 8-inch Sewer Main Rehabiliation
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
ATTACHMENT B-4 – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S2019-001103
S2020-001103
S2022-001103
S2026-001103
Change Order No. 1 to the Contract with Garcia Juarez
Construction Inc. for the Calavo Gardens Sewer
Rehabilitation Project
Date Updated: November 15, 2012
Budget
280,000
Planning 001101
Labor 1,371 1,371 - 1,371
Total Planning 1,371 1,371 - 1,371
Design 001102
Labor 7,718 7,718 - 7,718
Other Agency Fees 3,460 3,460 - 3,460 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Consultant Contracts 9,581 9,581 - 9,581 LEE & RO INC
Consultant Contracts 4,800 4,800 - 4,800 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC
Consultant Contracts 4,000 4,000 - 4,000 MTGL INC
Total Design 29,560 29,560 - 29,560
Construction 001103
Labor 27,000 24,131 2,869 27,000
Consultant Contracts 270 270 - 270 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC
Construction Contracts 209,044 198,592 10,452 209,044 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC
Construction Contracts 11,002 10,452 550 11,002 COMMUNITY BANK
Service Contracts 1,000 1,000 - 1,000 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
Service Contracts 32 32 - 32 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Total Construction 248,348 234,477 13,871 248,348
Grand Total 279,279 265,408 13,871 279,279
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
S2026 - Challenge Blvd 8-Inch Sewer Main Repl
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
VICINITY MAP
IMPERIAL
CORONADO
CHULA
VISTA
EL CAJON
BEACH
LA MESA
PROJECT
SITES
CIP Title - Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation Project: S2019/S2020/S2022/S2026
Consultant/Contractor:Garcia Juarez Construction Subproject: 001103
APPROVED
C.O.AMOUNT BY DATE DESCRIPTION TYPE C.O.
1 ($22,040.00)Board 11/7/2012
Eight Items: Open Cut in lieu of jack & bore, delete MH
refurbishment, modify MH replacements, T&M settlement,
revised alignment, street light relocation, additional paving,
and unknown utilities
Owner
2 $22,460.00 Board
Nine Items: 8-inch siphon, 30LF of additional 8-inch sewer,
delete 164LF of 8-inch sewer, delete 33LF of steel casing,
add an additional manhole, additional potholing, casing
credit back to contractor, and additional cost for new 8-inch
sewer alignment.
Owner
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
3435
Total C.O.'s To Date: $420.00 0.0%
Original Contract Amount:$2,316,275.00
Current Contract Amount:$2,316,695.00
Month Net C.O.$Limit Authorization Absolute C.O.$ C.O. %
12/12 $22,460.00 $2,000 Insp 0.0%
$10,000 PM/Sr. Engr.0.0%
$20,000 DivM 0.0%
$25,000 Chief 0.0%
$35,000 AGM 0.0%
$50,000 GM 0.0%
>$50000 Board $22,460.00 1.0%
CHANGE ORDER LOG
P:\WORKING\CIP S2019, S2020, S2022 Avocado Sewer\Staff Reports\Change Order No. 2 to GJC\COLOG-No 2.xls1 12/5/2012
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin Cameron
Assistant Civil Engineer
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2513-
001103
DIV. NO. 2
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Increase the CIP Budget for CIP P2513 in an amount of $100,000
and Award of a Construction Contract to Basile Construction,
Inc. for the 12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline in Orange Avenue,
I-805 Crossing
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
authorize the increase in the CIP budget P2513 of $100,000 to an
overall budget of $1,300,000 and award a construction contract to
Basile Construction, Inc. (Basile) for the 12-Inch Potable Water
Pipeline in Orange Avenue, I-805 Crossing (Project) in an amount not-
to-exceed $872,000 (see Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board approval to increase the budget for CIP P2513 in an
amount not-to-exceed $100,000 and to obtain Board authorization for
the General Manager to enter into a construction contract with Basile
in an amount not-to-exceed $872,000.00 for the Project.
AGENDA ITEM 24c
2
ANALYSIS:
The District operates two (2) pipelines that cross Interstate 805 (I-
805) freeway; a 10-inch pipeline within the East Palomar Overpass,
and a 12-inch pipeline that runs under the freeway approximately 1300
feet south of East Palomar. These pipelines feed approximately 850
meters west of the freeway in the 458 pressure zone (see Exhibit B
for service area). Caltrans has prior rights for the Palomar
crossing which was installed in the bridge in 1998.
In November 2010, Caltrans notified the District about plans to
demolish and reconstruct the East Palomar Bridge Overpass. Caltrans
is planning to construct a Direct Access Route (DAR) carpool lane
that would begin at the East Palomar Bridge, then run north to the I-
805/I-15 interchange. The Palomar Bridge project is scheduled to
begin in Spring 2013. Caltrans and the City of Chula Vista (City)
elected to completely demolish the bridge in an effort to speed up
construction and reduce traffic concerns. With the bridge out, the
10-inch pipeline would also be out of service. Using hydraulic
analysis, Staff evaluated the District’s ability to meet projected
demands and fire flow requirements with only the 12-inch pipeline in
service. The results revealed that fire flow requirements would not
be met using only the 12-inch pipeline and a second source would be
required.
Staff and the District’s As-Needed Design Engineer, Lee & Ro, Inc.
(Lee & Ro), evaluated multiple options to meet the required demands.
Staff, along with input from Caltrans, decided that the easiest and
most cost effective solution would be to construct a permanent
pipeline across the East Orange Ave/Olympic Parkway Overpass. The
Orange Bridge has an existing empty utility corridor reserved for
future use. This third crossing would provide redundancy to the
service area and allow future maintenance on any one of the crossings
without interruption of service.
Lee & Ro provided the engineering design plans and the District’s As-
Needed Traffic Engineer, Darnell & Associates (Darnell), provided the
traffic control plans. The traffic control was especially
challenging since the pipeline alignment would cross the northbound
on-ramp and the southbound off-ramp of I-805 which would require
extensive detour routes and the plans would have to be approved by
both Caltrans and the City. During the plan review, both the City
and Caltrans required night work for the construction of the
pipeline. This would allow maximum working hours and minimal traffic
delays.
3
The District submitted the Project to Caltrans for review on
March 27, 2012. The initial design called for 12-inch steel pipe
within the bridge and PVC pipe in Caltrans’ Right-of-Way (ROW) and
the City’s ROW. However, late in the design review process and after
the budget had been approved for FY 2013, Caltrans requested that
steel pipe be used throughout their ROW. This design requirement
replaced approximately 800 feet of pipe from PVC to steel, and added
$220,000 to the construction cost.
The Project was advertised for bid on November 6, 2012. A Pre-Bid
Meeting was held on November 15, 2012 with eight (8) contractors in
attendance. Three (3) addenda were sent out to all plan holders and
plan houses to address contractors' questions asked during the
bidding period. Staff contacted several contractors during the bid
process to encourage them to submit a bid for the Project.
Seven (7) bids were received on November 29, 2012. The table below
provides the bid results:
CONTRACTOR
TOTAL BID
AMOUNT
CORRECTED BID
AMOUNT
1. Basile Construction, Inc. $ 872,000.00
2. TC Construction Company $ 916,570.00
3. Schilling Paradise Corporation $ 898,111.00 $ 918,111.00
4. Arrieta Construction, Inc. $ 977,119.00
5. Burtech Pipeline, Inc. $1,026,674.00
6. GRFCO, Inc. $1,172,700.00
7. CCL Contracting, Inc. $1,185,650.00
The Engineer's Estimate is $960,000.
The evaluation process included reviewing all bids submitted for
conformance to the contract documents. The lowest bidder, Basile,
submitted a responsible bid and holds a Class A Contractor’s license
which expires on April 30, 2013. Staff checked the references
provided with Basile’s bid, and the reference checks indicated a good
performance record by Basile on similar past projects.
Staff has verified that the bid bond provided by Western Surety
Company is valid. Once Basile signs the contract, they will furnish
the performance bond and labor and materials bond. Staff will verify
both bonds prior to executing the contract.
4
The budget increase is due to the added cost of steel pipe versus PVC
pipe in Caltrans’ ROW which was requested after the budget cycle was
approved. Caltrans also requested other miscellaneous design changes
which added minor costs to the project. The $100,000 increase
amounts to an 8.3% increase in the Project budget.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP P2513, as approved in the FY 2013 budget, is
$1,200,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, are $1,299,817.13. See Attachment B for budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budgets, the Project Manager
anticipates that with a budget increase of $100,000 the Project will
be completed within the new budget amount of $1,300,000.
As a part of the 2013 budget process, the reserve where this CIP is
funded from, Replacement Fund, will be assessed and will be allocated
the necessary funds at that time. It is anticipated that the actual
overall CIP expenditures will be well below the overall CIP budget
making sufficient reserves available to fund this budget increase.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
KC/RR:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2513 East Orange Ave I-805 Overcrossing\Staff Reports\BD 01-08-2013, Staff Report, Award of a Construction Contract to
Basile Const, (KC-RR).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Service Area Map
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2513-001103
Increase the CIP Budget for CIP P2513 in an amount of
$100,000 and Award of a Construction Contract to Basile
Construction, Inc. for the 12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline
in Orange Avenue, I-805 Crossing
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on December 10, 2012 and the following
comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board authorize the increase in the CIP
budget P2513 of $100,000 to an overall budget of $1,300,000 and
award a construction contract to Basile Construction, Inc.
(Basile) for the 12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline in Orange
Avenue, I-805 Crossing (Project) in an amount not-to-exceed
$872,000.
Staff indicated that the District currently operates two (2)
pipelines that cross the 805 freeway; a 10-inch pipeline within
the East Palomar Overpass, and a 12-inch pipeline that runs
under the freeway located approximately 1300 feet south of East
Palomar. It was noted that these pipelines feed approximately
850 meters west of the freeway in the 458 pressure zone.
Staff stated that Caltrans plans to demolish the overpass at
East Palomar, and construct a wider bridge with a Direct Access
Ramp to the new carpool lanes that will be constructed down the
center of the freeway. This will require the 10-inch pipeline
in the East Palomar Bridge to be out of service for an extended
period of time.
The Project will include constructing approximately 2,000 linear
feet of 12-inch pipe beginning at Melrose/Orange Ave
intersection, then east through the I-805 overpass, to the
Oleander/Olympic Parkway intersection. Staff indicated that
this will serve as a third feed across the 805 and allow future
maintenance on any of the crossings without interruption of
service.
Staff stated that the District advertised for bids on November
6, 2012 and that a pre-bid meeting was held on November 15, 2012
with eight (8) contractors in attendance. Seven (7) bids were
received and are detailed on page 3 of the staff report.
Staff stated that Basile Construction submitted the lowest
responsive bid. It was noted that the District contacted 4
references, and all indicated Basile had a good performance
record on similar projects. An internet “Google” search
revealed no outstanding issues with the company.
Staff indicated that after the Fiscal Year 2013 budget was
approved, Caltrans made a request to change the material of the
pipe to steel throughout their Right-of-Way (ROW). This
requirement replaced 800 linear feet of pipe from PVC to Welded
Steel, and increased the cost of the construction by $220,000.
This amount was more that the budget could accommodate, and
therefore, Staff is requesting a budget increase of $100,000.
Staff requested that the Committee support the recommendation to
increase the budget of P2513 by $100,000 dollars for a project
total of $1,300,000 dollars, and award a construction contract
to Basile Construction in the amount of $872,000 for the subject
project.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
the life span of PVC is approximately 50 years and steel is 75
to 100 years. Staff indicated that the reason Caltrans requested
steel was because PVC pipe has rubber seals at the joints. In
Caltrans’ opinion these seals have a greater potential to leak
versus a welded steel joint. Caltrans also requested steel for
purple piping that is used for reclaimed water.
Staff stated that the District had to comply with Caltrans’
request because they have prior rights in the ROW.
The Committee inquired about Schilling Paradise Corporation’s
corrected bid amount from $898,111.00 to $918,111.00. Staff
indicated that Addendum No.3 added a bid item. Schilling
acknowledged that they received Addendum No.3, however they
failed to include the added bid item in their bid.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
a Proposal Ranking Summary sheet was not included in the staff
report because construction contracts have to be awarded to the
lowest responsive bidder.
Following the discussion, the EO&WR Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2513-001103
Increase the CIP Budget for CIP P2513 in an amount of
$100,000 and Award of a Construction Contract to Basile
Construction, Inc. for the 12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline
in Orange Avenue, I-805 Crossing
I-805 S
I-805 N
O
l
e
a
n
d
e
r
A
v
e
E O r a n g e A v e
N
a
c
i
o
n
Av
e
M
e
lr
o
s
e
A
v
e
R i v e r a S t
L
a
u
r
e
l
A
v
e
Spruce St
L
il
a
c
A
v
e
R
a
v
e
n
A
v
e
W i s t e ri a S t
A z a l e a S t
O
ri
o
l
e
P
l
Ocala Ave
E P a l o m a r S t
E R i e n s t r a S t
Slate St
N
o
l
a
n
A
v
e
O
c
a
l
a
C
t L
a
n
t
a
n
a
A
v
e
P a r k D r
Oak Pl
J a s m i n e S t
Q u ail P l
S a n d s t o n e S t Sonora Dr
Q u i n c e P l
P e a rl w o o d S t
J u n i p e r S t
P
e
c
a
n
P
l
P o i n s e t ti a S t
Brandywine Ave
R i v e r a C t
O r i o l e C t
G e or g eto w n Pl
Q u a il C t
Hibiscus Ct
R i e n s tr a C t
S l a t e C t
M
a
r
l
C
t
Pine Ct
Senna Way
U S AUSA
M E X I C OMEXICO
P:\WORKING\CIP P2513 East Orange Ave I-805 Overcrossing\Staff Reports\Exhibit A.mxd
OTAY WATER DISTRICT12-INCH POTABLE WATER PIPELINE INORANGE AVENUE, I-805 CROSSINGEXHIBIT A
PROJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP NTS
DIV. 5
DIV. 2
DIV. 1
DIV. 3
DIV. 4
5
8
8
805
11
9454
94
125
905
125
905
125
NEW 12-INCHPOTABLE WATERPIPELINE
EASTPALOMAROVERPASSO
W
D
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
I-805 S
I-805 N
M
e
lr
o
s
e
A
v
e
Oleander Ave
M
a
x
A
v
e
E O r a n g e A v e
Main StBrandywine Ave
E P a l o m a r S t
N
a
c
i
o
n
A
v
e
M
o
n
s
e
r
a
t
e
A
v
e
E R i e n s tr a S t
E O x f o r d S t
Sequoia St
N
o
l
a
n
A
v
e
Marl Ave
Loma Ln
R
a
v
e
n
A
v
e
R i v e r a S t
Walnut Dr
Malta Ave
Diamond Dr
S i p e s C ir
Palm Rd
E Q u i n t a r d S t
L
a
u
r
e
l
A
v
e
J
u
d
s
o
n
W
a
y
Spruce StE P a i s l e y S t
L
il
a
c
A
v
e
Lotus Dr
E O rl a n d o S t
Ewing DrO
w
e
n
D
r
Ocala Ave
Spruce Rd
Maple Dr
Talus St
Medical Center Dr
W i s t e ri a S tAzalea S t
Olive Ave
T h r u s h S t
Slate St
O
ri
o
l
e
P
l
F
i
n
c
h
P
l
N
a
p
a
A
v
e
O
c
a
l
a
C
t
Venters Dr
M
y
r
a
C
t
Lee Cir
Auto Park Dr
L
a
r
k
h
a
v
e
n
D
r
Lantana Ave
O l y m p i c P k w y
N
e
p
t
u
n
e
D
r
Orange Dr
P
a
r
k
D
r
S a n d s t o n e S t
N a n t u c k e t D r
Oak Pl
J a s m i n e S t
Marble Ct
Q u ail P l
Point la Jolla Dr
Alber St
Rainier Ct
Topaz Ct
Sonora Dr
N
il
e
A
v
e
M e n d o c i n o D r
Point Arguello Dr
R e d w i n g R d
A
r
i
e
s
C
t
Q u i n c e P l
E E m e r s o n S t
Tanbark St
M
i
s
s
i
o
n
A
v
e
J u n i p e r S t
Tourmaline Ct
P
e
c
a
n
P
l
Q u a i l D r
T i m b e r S t
P o i n s e t t i a S t
T a m a r a c k S t
Point Estero Dr
Kelso Ct
L
o
m
a
C
t
T e s o t a C t
C h e r y l P lM
y
r
a
A
v
e
T a r a t a C t
Long Point Ct
E O x f o r d S t
Myra Ct
U S AUSA
M E X I C OMEXICO
P:\WORKING\CIP P2513 East Orange Ave I-805 Overcrossing\Staff Reports\Exhibit A.mxd
OTAY WATER DISTRICT12-INCH POTABLE WATER PIPELINE INORANGE AVENUE, I-805 CROSSINGEXHIBIT B
PROJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP NTS
DIV. 5
DIV. 2
DIV. 1
DIV. 3
DIV. 4
5
8
8
805
11
9454
94
125
905
125
905
125
NEW 12-INCHPOTABLE WATERPIPELINE
EAST PALOMAROVERPASS10-INCH PIPELINETO BE TEMPORARILYOUT OF SERVICE
O W D B O U N D A R Y
12-INCH PIPELINEUNDER I-805
Service Area Affected byCaltrans Work in the458 Pressure Zone
SWEETWATERAUTHORITY O W D B O U N D A R Y
Potable Pipelines458 Pressure Zone
0 1,000500Feet
458-1 & 458-2TANKS
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: REGULAR BOARD
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Richard E. Romero, Asst.
General Counsel
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: AMENDING AND EXTENDING GENERAL MANAGER’S CONTRACT
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board amend and extend the General Manager’s contract to
July 1, 2016.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
This item was not taken to Committee.
PURPOSE:
To recommend that the Board amend the General Manager’s contract,
extending the term to July 1, 2016 along with a few other minor
amendments but with no changes to the General Manager’s compensation.
ANALYSIS:
The General Manager’s current contract, as amended in August of 2010,
is set to expire on July 1, 2014. In recognition of the quality of
Mr. Watton’s service, the current amendment would extend the term of
his contract to July 1, 2016. Additionally, as part of the periodic
review of the contract, the contract is also being amended to correct
some drafting issues and to ensure compliance of the severance
provision with Government Code section 53260. No changes are being
made to the General Manager’s compensation. The revised contract is
attached. (Attachment A)
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
AGENDA ITEM 25a
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Provide the leadership to ensure high value water and wastewater
services to the customers of the Otay Water District, in a
professional, effective and efficient manner.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Attachment A – Amended and Restated Employment Contract Between the
Otay Water District and Mark Watton, General Manager
AMENDED AND RESTATED
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AND
MARK WATTON, GENERAL MANAGER
This Employment Contract (the “Contract”) is made and entered into this 8th day of
January, 2013 by and between the Otay Water District (“District”), a municipal water district
(“District”), and Mark Watton (“Watton”) for the position of General Manager of the District.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, representations and mutual
promises contained herein, and for other valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, District and Watton agree as follows:
1. PRIOR AGREEMENTS. This Contract supersedes all prior employment contracts and
agreements between Watton and District, and Watton relinquishes his rights thereunder, except
as expressly set forth herein.
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Contract shall commence on the 8th of January 2013 and
shall remain in effect to July 1, 2016 (the “Term”), unless earlier terminated by either party in
accordance with the provisions of this Contract. Nothing in this Contract shall prevent, limit or
otherwise interfere with the right of the District’s Board of Directors (“Board”) to extend this
Contract by written agreement of the parties.
3. AT WILL STATUS. Notwithstanding the term of this Contract, Watton holds his
position at the pleasure of the Board and is an “at will employee,” as that term is commonly
understood. Subject to the termination provisions set forth herein, the Board may, therefore,
elect to terminate Watton’s employment at any time, for any reason or no reason, as long as there
is no violation of law or of the public policy of the State of California.
4. POSITION AND DUTIES. The Board hereby appoints Watton as the General Manager
of the District to perform, on a full-time basis, the duties and functions specified in the California
Water Code, the District’s Code of Ordinances, policies, ordinances, resolutions and any other
provisions of District applicable to the General Manager position, as well as any other legally
permissible functions and duties as the Board shall from time to time assign to Watton. Pursuant
to all applicable laws, the Board shall have the authority to determine the specific duties and
functions that Watton shall perform. The Board shall from time to time evaluate Watton’s
performance, including the means and manner that he uses to perform his duties, including, but
not limited to, an annual evaluation as set forth in Section 7 herein. Watton shall devote all his
business time, skill, attention and best efforts to the discharge of his duties and functions as
General Manager of District.
5. OUTSIDE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES. Notwithstanding Section 4, above, Watton
may participate in and carry out any business or professional activities he deems appropriate,
including activities for which he may receive compensation, as long as such activities are
performed during his off-duty hours and provided that such activities do not interfere with his
duties as established hereunder and do not represent a conflict of interest as to District.
Employment Contract – General Manager
2 | P a g e
6. COMPENSATION AND FRINGE BENEFITS. District shall compensate Watton during
the Term and provide Watton with all fringe benefits provided to other management employees
of the District (as may be amended from time to time by the Board), as further described in this
section.
a. Base salary. Base annual salary of $215,213 for services rendered from the date
hereof. Said compensation shall be paid bi-weekly.
b. Medical/Dental Benefits. Watton shall receive medical and dental benefits through
District’s medical plan for Watton and any dependents to the same extent as provided
to other District management/executive employees. In consideration of Watton’s
prior service to the District as a member of the Board of Directors, these benefits will
be calculated as if Watton had commenced employment with the District beginning
January 1, 1983.
c. Sick Leave and Vacation. Watton shall be entitled to 30 vacation and 15 sick days
per year.
d. Public Employees Retirement System. District shall enroll Watton in the Public
Employee’s Retirement System (PERS) under the same terms provided to other
District management/executive employees, including the requirement that, pursuant
to Board Resolution No. 4182, effective July 1, 2012, such employees pay 8%
towards their employee’s contribution to PERS.
e. Life Insurance. Watton shall receive the same life insurance benefits provided to
other District management/executive level employees.
f. Automobile. Watton’s duties require the use of an automobile. Watton shall provide
said automobile and pay all costs for operation, maintenance, repair or replacement
required for such automobile. In addition, Watton shall maintain all liability,
property damage and other insurance as required by law. However, Watton may be
reimbursed for mileage traveled as part of his duties at the then-applicable Internal
Revenue Service rate.
g. Electronic Devices. Watton requires the use of a portable electronic communication
device for electronic correspondence or other non-telephonic purposes. District shall
provide such a device as well as services equivalent to those provided to other District
management/executive level employees.
h. Memberships and Subscriptions. District shall budget and pay professional dues and
subscriptions on behalf of Watton which are reasonably necessary for Watton’s
continued participation in national, regional, state or local associations and
organizations necessary and desirable for Watton’s continued professional
Employment Contract – General Manager
3 | P a g e
participation, growth and advancement or for the good of the District. District shall
budget and pay for the professional dues and subscriptions to such additional
organizations as approved by the Board.
i. Travel Expenses. District shall budget and pay travel and subsistence expenses of
Watton for official travel, meetings and occasions reasonably adequate to continue
the professional development of Watton and reasonably pursue necessary official and
other functions for the District, as approved by the Board.
j. Reimbursement/Other Fringe Benefits. District shall also reimburse Watton for all
other reasonable business expenses incurred by him on behalf of the District. Watton
shall be entitled to maintain a District credit card for District expenses.
k. Additional Contribution to 457 Retirement Account. The District shall contribute to a
Section 457 retirement account designated by Watton an annual amount equal to one
percent (1%) of Base Salary. Said contribution shall be made in monthly
installments.
7. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. The Board may conduct an evaluation of Watton’s
performance at any time. However, it shall be Watton’s responsibility to schedule a performance
evaluation to be conducted on or around July 1st of every calendar year while this Contract
remains in effect. At the conclusion of each performance evaluation held on or about July 1st,
the Board may consider a one year extension to this Contract by written amendment.
8. SEVERANCE OF THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP.
a. Termination by Mutual Consent. This Contract may be terminated at any time by
mutual agreement of the parties, as evidenced by a separate written agreement.
b. Termination At Will. District may terminate this Contract “at-will” for any reason or
no reason. Any such termination shall be in writing with at least thirty (30) days
notice to Watton.
Watton may voluntarily terminate this Contract at any time, for any reason or no
reason; provided that he shall give the President of the Board no less than 60 days
written notice prior to the effective date of termination and, further provided that
Watton shall continue to fulfill his duties until a replacement has been appointed by
the Board.
Upon termination, either voluntary or involuntary, Watton shall continue to receive
compensation and fringe benefits due under the Contract through the effective date of
termination, plus any accrued and unused sick and vacation days consistent with
District Policies. Severance payments, if any, shall be at the discretion of the Board.
Employment Contract – General Manager
4 | P a g e
9. SEVERANCE PAYMENT. In the event District terminates Watton’s employment, other
than for misconduct as described in further detail below, Watton shall be compensated as
follows, subject to the provisions of Government Code section 53260:
a. Severance compensation equal to 12 months of the annual salary then in effect will be
paid by District in same manner as if Watton was still employed by District, provided
that, if the remaining term of Watton’s Contract is less than 12 months, the maximum
severance compensation that Watton may receive shall be an amount equal to
Watton’s monthly salary multiplied by the number of months left on the unexpired
term of the Contract.
b. Watton shall continue to accrue, for the same time period for which Watton may
receive severance compensation, per subsection (a), above, medical, dental and
insurance benefits, as if Watton was still employed by District. All other benefits
terminate effective the date of termination.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Contract, Watton shall not be entitled to
Severance or any other payment if the District terminates this Contract due to Watton’s
misconduct. Misconduct means, for purposes of this Contract, violation of any criminal law
committed at any time (except minor traffic offenses), any act of gross negligence or
malfeasance. If Watton terminates his employment, the District shall not make any severance
payment to Watton.
10. INDEMNIFICATION. District agrees to defend, hold harmless and indemnify Watton
from any demands, claims, actions, suits, or legal proceedings brought against Watton for any
incident arising out of the course and scope of his employment provided, however, that if the
District is providing defense for Watton on a matter which the Board deems in the best interest
of the District to settle, Watton agrees to assume full responsibility for his own defense should he
pursue the matter further. This indemnification provision shall not apply to any action brought
against Watton for a breach of or dispute arising out of this Contract, nor to willful and wanton
conduct giving rise to civil or criminal liability, or any violation of federal, state, county, or local
laws or regulations. This indemnification provision shall be interpreted consistent with state
laws restricting the indemnification of public officials.
11. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENT. This Contract is the full and complete
Agreement between the parties hereto. Any amendment, modifications or variations from the
terms of this Contract shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon the approval of the
Board and execution by Watton.
12. GOVERNING LAW. This Contract will be governed and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of California.
Employment Contract – General Manager
5 | P a g e
13. NO WAIVER. No failure, by either party, to enforce any provision(s) of this Contract
will be construed in any way as a waiver of such provision(s), nor prevent that party from
enforcing each and every other provision hereof.
14. SAVINGS CLAUSE. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision(s) of this
Contract will not affect the validity or enforceability of the other provision hereof.
15. HEADINGS. Paragraph headings used in this Contract are for convenience only and
shall not be considered part of the terms of this Contract.
16. COUNTERPARTS. District and Employee may execute this document in separate
counterparts. Should that occur, this Contract is as valid and binding as if it was executed on a
single copy.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we affix our signatures to this Contract as the full and
complete understanding of the relationship between the parties.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
PRESIDENT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS
MARK WATTON
GENERAL MANAGER
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel R. Shinoff
General Counsel
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board Meeting MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton,
General Manager
W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO.
APPROVED BY:
Susan Cruz, District Secretary
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Board of Directors 2013 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board, the attached Board of Director’s meeting
calendar for 2013 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to review the 2013 Board of Director’s meeting calendars
and amend the schedule as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments: Calendar of Meetings for 2013
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar 1-8-13.doc
AGENDA ITEM 25b
Page 1 of 1
Board of Directors, Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2013
Regular Board Meetings:
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 2, 2013
February 6, 2013
March 6, 2013
April 3, 2013
May 1, 2013
June 5, 2013
July 3, 2013
August 7, 2013
September 4, 2013
October 2, 2013
November 6, 2013
December 4, 2013
January 16, 2013
February 20, 2013
March 20, 2013
April 17, 2013
May 15, 2013
June 19, 2013
July 17, 2013
August 21, 2013
September 18, 2013
October 16, 2013
November 20, 2013
SPECIAL BOARD MEETINGS:
BOARD WORKSHOPS:
Budget Workshops:
Board Workshop:
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar Attach A 1-8-13.doc
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Wales Benham
Senior Accountant
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Director’s Expenses for the 1st Quarter of Fiscal Year 2013
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To inform the Board of the Director’s expenses for the 1st quarter of
Fiscal Year 2013.
ANALYSIS:
The Director’s expense information is being presented in order to
comply with State law. (See Attachment B for Summary and C-H for
Details.)
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
AGENDA ITEM 26a
2
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Prudently manage District funds.
LEGAL IMPACT:
Compliance with State law.
Attachments: Attachment A Committee Action
Attachment B Director’s Expenses and per Diems
Attachment C-H Director’s Expenses Detail
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Director’s Expenses for the 1st Quarter of Fiscal Year 2013
COMMITTEE ACTION:
This item was presented to the Finance, Administration and
Communications Committee at a meeting held on December 4, 2012. The
expenses for each director from July 1, 2012 thru September 30, 2012
was presented. It was indicated that directors’ expenses totaled
$4,209.13 for the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2013 and it is
projected that directors expenses for Fiscal Year 2013 would total
approximately $16,830 based on the first quarter of actual expenses.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated that
agencies are required to report Director’s expenses at least annually.
The District had considered moving to reporting Directors’ expenses
once a year to match the requirements of the law, but decided to
continue to report expenses quarterly. The committee received staffs’
report and recommended presentation to the full board as an
informational item.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS’
EXPENSES AND PER-DIEMS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
January 8, 2013
ATTACHMENT B
Policy 8 requires that staff present the Expenses and
Per-Diems for the Board of Directors on a Quarterly
basis:
•Fiscal Year 2013, 1st Quarter.
•The expenses are shown in detail by Board
member, month and expense type.
•This presentation is in alphabetical order.
•This information was presented to the Finance,
Administration, and Communications Committee
on December 4, 2012.
Board of Directors’ Expenses and Per-Diems
Fiscal Year 2013 Quarter 1 (Jul 2012- Sep 2012)
Director Croucher $660.00
Director Gonzalez $610.00
Director Lopez $1,396.02
Director Robak $442.20
Director Thompson $1,100.91
Total $4,209.13
Director Croucher
Fiscal Year 2013 Quarter 1
Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep 2012
Business Meetings 0.00 25.00 35.00
Director’s Fees 100.00 300.00 200.00
Mileage Business 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seminars 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00
Monthly Totals 100.00 325.00 235.00
Quarterly Total $660.00
Fiscal Year-to-Date 2012 (Jul 2012-Sep 2012) $660.00
Director Croucher serves on all
District Committees (6)
Meetings Attended 1 3 2
Meetings Paid 1 3 2
Director Gonzalez
Fiscal Year 2013 Quarter 1
Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep 2012
Business Meetings 0.00 0.00 10.00
Director’s Fees 100.00 200.00 300.00
Mileage Business 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seminars 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00
Monthly Totals 100.00 200.00 310.00
Quarterly Total $610.00
Fiscal Year-to-Date 2012 (Jul 2012-Sep 2012) $610.00
Meetings Attended 1 2 5
Meetings Paid 1 2 3
Director Lopez
Fiscal Year 2013 Quarter 1
Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep 2012
Business Meetings 0.00 0.00 0.00
Director’s Fees 300.00 400.00 600.00
Mileage Business 0.00 5.55 12.77
Mileage Commuting 22.20 22.20 33.30
Seminars and Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00
Monthly Totals 322.20 427.75 646.07
Quarterly Total $1,396.02
Fiscal Year-to-Date 2012 (Jul 2012-Sep 2012) $1,396.02
Meetings Attended 5 4 7
Meetings Paid 3 4 6
Director Robak
Fiscal Year 2013 Quarter 1
Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep 2012
Business Meetings 0.00 0.00 20.00
Director’s Fees 100.00 100.00 200.00
Mileage Business 3.33 3.33 6.66
Mileage Commuting 2.22 2.22 4.44
Seminars and Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00
Monthly Totals 105.55 105.55 231.10
Quarterly Total $442.20
Fiscal Year-to-Date 2012 (Jul 2012-Sep 2012) $442.20
Meetings Attended 5 2 5
Meetings Paid 1 1 2
Director Thompson
Fiscal Year 2013 Quarter 1
Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep 2012
Business Meetings 0.00 0.00 0.00
Director’s Fees 400.00 300.00 200.00
Mileage Business 108.78 0.00 0.00
Mileage Commuting 28.86 34.41 28.86
Seminars and Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00
Monthly Totals 537.64 334.41 228.86
Quarterly Total $1,100.91
Fiscal Year-to-Date 2012 (Jul 2012-Sep 2012) $1,100.91
Meetings Attended 4 3 2
Meetings Paid 4 3 2
Board of Directors’ Expenses and Per Diems
Fiscal Year 2013 to Date (Jul 2012- Sep 2012)
Director Croucher $660.00
Director Gonzalez $610.00
Director Lopez $1,396.02
Director Robak $442.20
Director Thompson $1,100.91
Total $4,209.13
Board of Directors’ Expenses and Per Diems
Fiscal Year 2013 Projected (July 2012- June 2013)
Director Croucher $2,640.00
Director Gonzalez $2,440.00
Director Lopez $5,580.00
Director Robak $1,770.00
Director Thompson $4,400.00
Total $16,830.00
Based on three months of actuals
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Rita Bell, Finance Manager PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Water and Sewer Rate Study Informational Report
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To inform the Board of the objectives and status of the current water
and sewer rate study that is being performed by Karyn Keese of Atkins
Global.
BACKGROUND:
Typically, rate studies are performed every three to five years
depending on changes in economic factors, price increases, water use
patterns, regulations, infrastructure, and other cost driver changes.
It has been four years since the District’s last water and sewer rate
study. This cost of service study is an important tool when setting
retail rates because as water use and cost drivers change over time,
imbalances may occur in the equity of how various customer classes
pay for water.
There are several purposes of performing a rate study. The first is
to maintain equity among the customer classes based on the cost of
service study. The second is to bring financial stability to the
agency by balancing fixed and variable charges so it can survive
swings in water sales volume. Finally, encouraging conservation can
be achieved by adjusting the tiered water rate structure and
adjusting the strength and flow rate structure for sewer customers.
When performing a rate study it is important to note that revenue
neutrality is maintained. This means that an agency collects the
AGENDA ITEM 26b
same amount of total revenue through fees and charges, but the
individual customer bill may vary based on the rate structure
changes. Customers that drive costs higher pay more and customers
that keep cost low pay less. It also means that specific cost
drivers such as energy for pumping should match the revenue collected
through energy fees charged to customers. Once the rate structure is
set by the findings of the rate study, higher budgeted costs such as
water and power along with sales volume changes determine the
necessary rate increases.
To understand what changes might result from the upcoming rate study,
below are changes that resulted from the 2009 water rate study. The
following adjustments were made to the rate structure to improve the
equity between the various customer classes, promote revenue
stability, and achieve greater conservation:
Established new tiers by meter size and customer class.
Eliminated the unit charge per dwelling for multi-residential
customers.
Increased the government rate to offset the taxes that non-
government customers pay.
Raised the fixed charges closer to the 30% allowable by Best
Management Practice (BMP 4).
Established commercial tiers and adjusted residential tiers to
further encourage conservation.
Set the recycled water rate to 85% of the potable irrigation
rate.
Increased the energy charge to match the pumping costs.
The 2008 sewer rate study changed the methodology for residential
customers from a flat sewer rate to a charge based on their winter-
average water consumption. This was a revenue neutral change that
brought equity to the sewer charges and encouraged water
conservation.
The current rate study will examine equity and assign costs to the
various customer types. Financial stability will be a factor in
setting fixed and variable charges as well as best management
practices. Additionally, a rate structure that continues to
encourage conservation is a goal of the study. Some of the factors
to be examined include:
Simplifying the District’s rate structure, where possible.
Evaluate the water tiered rate structure(s).
Evaluate cost allocation to various customer classes.
Evaluate the fixed vs. variable approach (both water and sewer).
Evaluate the equity of fire service billing.
Evaluate the option of a commercial recycled rate that will
address anticipated future customers.
Evaluate the assignment of pressure zones to fairly charge
energy costs related to pumping.
Allocate cost based on sewage strengths for non-residential
customers vs. residential customers.
Evaluate water meter equivalencies using AWWA hydraulic capacity
factors for water customers.
On August 31, 2012, staff requested proposals from six consulting
firms to perform a water and sewer rate study. Three proposals were
received and Atkins Global was selected to perform the study. Karyn
Keese is the primary consultant on this study. She performed the
last water rate study and is very familiar with the District.
The team consisting of Karyn Keese of Atkins Global, Finance, IT and
Engineering staff held a kick-off meeting to discuss the purpose of
the study and the necessary information that is required for the
analysis. Assignments were made to staff members and data was
collected and submitted to Ms. Keese. At this point in time, staff
is preparing to meet with Ms. Keese to discuss preliminary findings
and recommendations.
The next step is to bring the recommended rate structure changes to
the Board, asking to incorporate these changes into the FY 2014 rate
model. With this direction staff will then prepare the FY 2014 rate
model and budget. In May of 2013, staff will request the Board to
approve the budget and to move forward with the Proposition 218
process. Only after the Proposition 218 hearing can the Board
approve the rates and rate structure changes.
In 2009 the District did a five-year Proposition 218 notice. The
District as well as many other agencies has used this five-year
process with very positive results. Staff will again recommend a
five-year Proposition 218 notice. A Proposition 218 hearing will be
held in the summer of 2013 to adopt a five year pass-through of
supplier cost and approval of increases for internal costs. After
the Proposition 218 hearing the rates will be adopted for a January
2014 rate increase.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The District ensures its continued financial health through sound
policies and procedures.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A) Committee Action Form
B) Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Water and Sewer Rate Study Informational Report
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 4, 2012 and the
following comments were made:
Staff indicated that the last Water and Sewer Rate Study
was conducted in 2008 and was implementd in 2009. Rate
studies are conducted every three (3) to five (5) years and
staff is currently conducting another study. The purpose
of this year’s rate study is to maintain equity between
customer classes based on a cost of service study (COSS),
promote financial stability (assuring that there is a
balance between fixed and variable charges), and to
encourage conservation through tiered rate structures for
water and a strength and flow rate structure for sewer.
Ms. Karyn Keese, Atkins Global, the District’s consultant
for the Water and Sewer Rate Study was in attendance. The
District has worked with her many times in the past and she
is very familiar with the District. She explained that a
COSS looks at how customers use water and sewer which is
called “Cause Costitive.” If the customer is causing the
District to incur cost, then they must pay their
proportional share of that cost. For example:
If a customer is using more water, then they would
need to pay more.
Because restaurants’ sewer discharge is lower
quality – as their sewage contains more fats, oils
and grease – it cost more to treat. So the District
allocates the cost for treatment on a higher basis
to restaurants than it would to residential
customers.
Ms. Keese indicated that she would be providing the board
more information at a future workshop that would include
more details about the COSS once it has been completed.
The District then looks at financial stability by assuring
a balance between fixed and variable charges. On the water
side there is a water system fee charged to all customers,
then customers are charged a tiered rate structure based on
their water usage. Sewer charges are based on the strength
and flow of a customer’s sewer discharge.
Staff also tries to match certain costs. For example, the
energy cost incurred for pumping is matched to energy fees
collected through customer charges.
The following adjustments were made following the 2009
Water Rate Study:
Established new rate tiers by meter size and
customer class, including commericial, based on
their usage (the District was the first agency in
the region to establish a tiered rate structure for
commercial customers at this time), to encourage
conservation.
Eliminated the unit charge for multi-residential
customers.
Increased the government rate to equal the taxes
that non-government customers were paying, such as,
property taxes, water/sewer availability fees, etc.
Raised fixed charges so they are closer to the 30%
allowed by Best Management Practice 1.4 (BMP 1.4);
BMP 1.4 indicates that fixed charges should not be
more than 30% of total water sales revenue.
Set the recycled water rate to 85% of the potable
irrigation rate; this change was a policy
requirement related to the District’s agreement with
San Diego County Water Authority (CWA) allowing the
District to maximize the incentives it receives from
CWA.
Increased the energy charge to match the District’s
energy cost.
The sewer rate study of 2008 precipitated the following
change:
Established a new methodology for determining sewer
charge which was based on customers’ winter average
water consumption (January to April of of each
year). This encourages customers to save water as
that savings reduces their sewer charges.
The objectives of the 2013 rate study are:
Evaluate tiered water rate structures
Evaluate cost allocation to various water and sewer
customer classes
Evaluate fixed versus variable approach for both
water and sewer
Evaluate the equity of water fire service billing
o The City of Chula Vista’s Fire Marshall is
mandating for fire flow that new residential
homes, equipped with fire sprinklers, have 1”
meters versus the normal ¾” meters (upsized for
fire flow only). Staff will need to determine
how to charge equitably for the required fire
service flow as commercial customers are
required to have a separate connection for fire
service and are charged a separate monthly fee.
Evaluate the option of a commercial recycled water
rate. The District’s irrigation rate is much higher
than the commercial rate because they peak, to a
greater extent, more than other users. The District
is anticipating a new recycled customer (a Power
Plant) and this customer wouldn’t “peak” like an
irrigation customer, they would use water
consistently throughout the day, week, and year.
Staff wishes to look at a rate that ties the
recycled rate (85% of potable) to the commercial
rate instead of the irrigation rate.
Evaluate the assignment of pressure zones used for
water energy charges. The District currently
charges an energy fee for every 100’ of lift. A
customer’s charge is based on what elevation they
receive their water from and staff will review if
this charge is still equitable.
Allocate cost based on sewage strength for non-
residential sewer customers versus residential
customers.
Evaluate water meter equivalencies; the District’s
capacity fee is based on meter size. Staff wishes
to verify if this is an AWWA standard and the
accurate way to determine this fee.
The team members involved in the Rate Study include Karyn
Keese, Atkins Global, and staff from the divisions of
Finance, Information Technology and Engineering.
Staff indicated that a water capacity study was completed
approximately two (2) years ago. Sewer was not included at
that time as staff was waiting on the completion of the
Sewer Master Plan. Now that the draft Sewer Masterplan has
been completed, staff is now aware of what should be input
into the sewer capacity fee study. Staff plans to perform
a sewer capacity fee study, separate from the rate study,
and plans to roll the findings into the rate model and
include it in the Proposition 218 notice.
The committee inquired why the District selected
consultant, Atkins Global, to perform the District’s rate
study. It was indicated that Atkins Global was selected
through an RFP process. An RFP was forwarded to six (6)
firms and the District received three (3) responses. Staff
noted that two (2) of the six (6) firms could not fit the
District’s rate study into their schedule as they had other
work lined up and one (1) never responded. A panel
consisting of Joe Beachem, Steve Dobrawa and Rita Bell
reviewed the three (3) submitted proposals. The
consultants were evaluated based on the following:
Their experience: who they have worked for and the
types of studies they have done
Familiarity with Otay WD and the San Diego Region
Their understanding of Conservation Issues
Their references
At the committee’s request, staff has provide additional
information on the consultant’s qualifications for the
public’s benefit (please see attached memo to these notes).
It was discussed that staff has an expert understanding of
rate studies and is not solely relying on the expertise of
the consultant. Staff noted that this is one of the most
important projects as it determines the rates the
District’s customers pay. The objective of the study is to
assure that all customers are paying equitably for the
District’s services.
The committee indicated that water agencies play a role in
a region’s prosperity. The number one requirement for a
business to thrive is the availability of water to the
business. A goal of the City of Chula Vista is to attract
businesses to the South Bay Region so that it becomes more
economically self-sufficient. However, it has been
difficult to attract major businesses to relocate within
the region.
The committee inquired on the possibility of implementing a
new start-up business water rate. Staff indicated that one
of the issues with providing such a rate is that businesses
water use varies (food manufacturers versus a business that
sells services). Also, the District must assure that its
rates comply with the regulations of Proposition 26.
There was discussion regarding the elements that go into
the decision making process when a business decides where
to locate their business. It was mentioned during a
presentation at an AWWA conference that capacity fees are a
small part of the start up cost for businesses. Thus,
reducing the District’s capacity fee would not provide
enough of an incentive to attract new businesses to the
District’s service area. Attached is a copy of AWWA’s
presentation. Please reference page 12, “Final
Considerations and Misconceptions.”
Staff also contacted Mr. Alan Nevin of The London Group and
inquired if lowering the capacity fees would incentivize
businesses to move to the District’s service area. Mr.
Nevin indicated that it likely would not as the capacity
fee is a very small part of the overall cost of business
development. He additionally commented that Otay WD is
only one of the many agencies that the developer would have
to work with to establish business and Otay WD is perhaps
the easiest agency to work with versus the City or County.
There was discussion regarding encouraging the use of
recycled water to help reduce the cost of water. Staff
indicated that the District has a pilot program to convert
multi-family residential complexes to utilize recycled
water in their landscapes. Staff will bring back to
committee an update on the status of the pilot program.
Staff has provided Atkins Global the requested data to
perform the rate study. Atkins Global is in the process of
analyzing the data and is preparing the preliminary
findings which will be discussed by the rate study team
members.
Staff will then determine recommendations and present them
to the board for discussion. Staff will ask the Board to
direct staff to use the new rate structures in the
development of the Fiscal Year 2014 Rate Model and Budget.
The Fiscal Year 2014 Budget will then be presented to the
board. It was noted that staff will request that the board
approve the proposed budget, but not the new rates.
The new rates will be presented for approval following a
Proposition 218 hearing as per State law. Staff will be
requesting at that time that the board approve a five-year
rate notice that authorizes the pass-through of the
District’s wholesale suppliers’ rate increases and an “up
to percentage” increase for District internal cost
increases. By requesting a five-year notice, it provides
cost savings as the District will not be required to hold a
Proposition 218 hearing every year which is a long and
costly process. The District will, however, continue to
provide notice to its customers of any proposed rate
increases prior to their implementation.
Once the rates are adopted, the new rates will be
implemented on January 1, 2014.
The committee observed that the rate tiers implemented in
2012 increase more steeply for residential customers
compared to the increase for commercial customers (there is
not much of a cost difference between the first gallon
versus the last gallon consumed by commercial customers).
The committee inquired if it is felt that the tiered
charges for commercial customers is too flat. It was
discussed as it was the first time a tiered rate structure
was implemented for commercial customers, staff wanted to
gradually implement the structure with a small differential
between the tiers. During the next rate study, staff would
then review this tiered structure again. The steep incline
for residential customers is to encourage these customers
to reduce outside irrigation which is where the majority of
residential water use occurs.
It was also noted that residential water use is basically
homogenous, whereas, commercial use varies based on the the
type of business. To have dramatic tiering would create an
equity issue as some businesses, such as food
manufacturing, utilize more water than a service type
business.
The District also wishes to keep the rate structures as
simplistic as possible due to billing. The more complex
the billing structure, the more the District is at risk for
errors in billing. It is also difficult to explain the
rates to customers who are not familiar with rate
structures. Otay has one of the most complex rate
structures in the County as it makes every reasonable
effort to assure equity among its ratepayers.
Following the discussion, the Finance, Administration and
Communications Committee supported presentation to the full
board as an informational item.
b5cabe91-df88-45b5-8879-11cb6482554e
MEMORANDUM
TO:
The Finance, Administration, and
Communications Committee
File
No.
FROM:
Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Rita Bell, Finance Manager
Date 12/20/12
SUBJ:
Selection of a Consultant to Perform the
District’s Rate Study
At the December 4th Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee
meeting, a question was asked about the District’s selection of Atkins Global
as the consultant to perform the District’s rate study and their
qualifications. This memo describes the process of issuing a Request for
Proposal (RFP) along with the selection of a consulting firm and their
qualifications.
In August 2012, an RFP was sent to six well-respected rate consulting firms
consisting of A&N Technical Services, Black & Veatch, CDM Smith, Atkins
Global, Malcolm Pirnie, and HDR. Of the requested firms, proposals were
received from CDM Smith, Atkins Global, and HDR. Steve Dobrawa, Joe Beachem,
and Rita Bell were on the committee responsible for reviewing the proposals
and rating each proposal based on the following criteria:
1. Understanding of the requested tasks in the Scope of Services.
20%
2. Ability to evaluate current water and sewer rate structures to make
recommendations and give guidance in the process.
20%
3. Experience of assigned staff in the development of water and sewer
rates. Also, experience reviewing all fee types and associated costs
to ensure equity and simplicity in the rate structures.
20%
4. Cost of service.
40%
Atkins Global was rated the most responsive bidder in all four categories and
was also the lowest priced bid. The experience of the Project Manager, Karyn
Keese, includes 29 years of expertise in public finance and management. In
addition to having the experience of performing the last cost of service
study for the District, she has also performed the latest capacity fee study
and has assisted on various as-needed services for the District. This gives
Ms. Keese an abundance of knowledge and experience working with the District.
b5cabe91-df88-45b5-8879-11cb6482554e
Of the three firms who responded, she has the most experience in the San
Diego region on both water and sewer rate studies. Some of the San Diego
County agencies she has performed consulting services for include Imperial
Beach, National City, Vallecitos, Olivenhain, Padre Dam, Rincon, Rainbow,
Sweetwater, San Diego County, Coronado, and Fallbrook. Additionally, she
serves at a technical advisor on two regional committees in San Diego which
are the Metro Wastewater JPA and the County of San Diego Stormwater Agencies.
Ms. Keese has completed more than 500 utility economic plans for public
utilities and is an expert in the development of financial models. She also
has more than 10 years of public finance experience as the Finance Manager
for two major California regional wastewater facilities.
Informational Report
January 8, 2013
Attachment B
Introduction
Last water rate study conducted in 2008 implemented in 2009
Perform every 3 to 5 years to respond to changes in the following:
Economic Factors
Price Increases (elasticity)
Water Use Patterns
Regulations
Infrastructure
Purpose of Current Study
Bring equity between customer classes
Based on cost-of-service
Financial stability
Fixed vs. variable charges
Encourage Conservation
Tiered rate structure for water
Strength and flow rate structure for sewer
Revenue Neutrality
Collect the same amount of revenue through fees and
charges
Customers that drive costs higher pay more
Customers that keep cost low pay less
Cost drivers
Energy cost for pumping = Energy fees collected
Once the rate structure is set by the findings of the rate
study, higher budgeted costs such as water and power
along with sales volume changes determine the necessary
rate increases.
Prior Rate Study Adjustments
2009 Water Rate Study
New tiers based on meter size and customer class
Elimination of unit charge for multi-residential
Increase in government rate
Increase in fixed rate to get closer to Best Management
Practice (BMP)
Commercial tiers and adjustment of residential tiers
Recycled water rate tied to potable irrigation (85%)
Increase energy charge
2008 Sewer Rate Study
Established a new methodology to charge residential
customers based on their winter-average water consumption
2013 Rate Study Objectives
Evaluate tiered water rate structure(s).
Evaluate cost allocation to various water & sewer customer
classes.
Evaluate fixed vs. variable approach for both.
Evaluate the equity of water fire service billing.
Evaluate the option of a commercial recycled water rate.
Evaluate the assignment of pressures zones used for water
energy charges.
Allocate cost based on sewage strength for non-residential
sewer customers vs. residential customers.
Evaluate water meter equivalencies.
Team
Study performed by Karyn Keese, Atkins Global
(formerly PBS&J)
Staff involvement
Finance
IT
Engineering
Progress to Date
Issued RFP and retained consultant
Held kick-off meeting with team
Gathered requested data and delivered to consultant
Consultant analyzed data
Consultant preparing preliminary findings to discuss
with team
Next Steps
Review preliminary findings with consultant
Determine staff recommendations
Bring recommendation rate structure changes to the
Board
Incorporate new rate structure into FY2014 Rate Model
Adopt FY2014 Budget
Bring new rates and charges to Proposition 218 hearing
Adopt a five year Proposition 218 set of rates and
charges
Adopt the FY 2014 rate increases
Questions???
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Bob Kennedy
Senior Civil Engineer
Ron Ripperger
Engineering Manager
CIP./G.F. NO: P2451-
001101
DIV. NO. 2
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Asst General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Informational Update for the Rosarito Desalination Plant and
the Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System Projects
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation. This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To update the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors
(Board) on the progress of the Rosarito Desalination Plant and
the Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System Projects
(Project)(see Exhibit A for Project location).
ANALYSIS:
The Project has two different components - the Rosarito
desalination plant in the Mexican side and the conveyance and
disinfection system in the United States’ (U.S.) side.
The desalination plant and the conveyance system south of the
border are being developed by NSC Agua S.A. de C.V. (NSC Agua),
a Mexican Corporation with various investors and Consolidated
Water Co. Ltd., a publicly-traded company that operates
desalination plants and water distribution systems in the
Caribbean basin and in Southeast Asia and Mexico.
AGENDA ITEM 26c
2
The Project is comprised of a 100 million gallon per day
seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant, together with a
pump station and pipeline to convey the water to Tijuana and
excess production water to the United States border with Mexico.
The primary purpose of the Project is to provide potable water
service to customers in Mexico and to provide a reliable supply
of excess production water to Otay in the U.S. To that effect,
the first step before the design and construction of the
desalination plant is to install a pilot plant to determine the
type of pre-treatment and plant design to be used.
NSC Agua has selected Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction
to build the pilot plant of the Rosarito Desalination Plant.
Doosan is one of the few companies in the world that has
proprietary technologies for all three major desalination types:
Multi Stage Flash, Multi Effect Distillation, and Reverse
Osmosis.
The Project will provide a potable water transmission pipeline
and pump station to convey the desalinated water from the border
between the U.S. and Mexico on Otay Mesa to Roll Reservoir on
Otay Mesa.
Given the many challenges in advancing this Project, the
District has retained specialty consultants to provide
technical, regulatory, bi-national, and policy assistance.
On March 15, 2012, Consolidated Water Co. LTD. announced that it
had acquired control of 75% of the shares of NSC Agua. With the
resolution of certain internal NSC Agua issues that delayed this
Project, the District has renewed the Letter of Intent with NSC
Agua. In December 2012, the Board Desal Committee discussed
with the General Manager the signing of a non-binding Letter of
Intent (LOI) with NSC Agua to negotiate a Water Purchase
Agreement for the purchase of desalinated water produced from
the Rosarito Desalination facility and delivered to the U.S.-
Mexico border at a point near the proposed Third Border Crossing
on Otay Mesa. This is the second LOI signed by the District and
NSC Agua. The previous LOI was signed on February 5, 2009.
NSC Agua is pursuing the purchase of two parcels of land in
Rosarito for the desalination plant that are adjacent to the
Presidente Juarez power plant. NSC Agua has secured the
purchase rights for these two parcels.
NSC Agua has also secured permission for the construction of the
pilot plant on the power plant site and is presently testing the
first treatment phase of the pilot plant. Negotiations with the
Comisión Federal de Electricidad (Federal Electricity
Commission), the Mexican state-owned electric utility widely
3
known as CFE, are progressing on the agreements to secure
permanent easements and rights to connect pipelines to and from
the desalination plant to the seawater intake and outlet
structures of the power plant. In celebration of these
significant milestones, NSC Agua is considering scheduling a
ribbon cutting ceremony at the pilot plant site early next year.
The United States and Mexico established the International
Boundary Commission in 1889. The Water Treaty of 1944 expanded
the duties and the responsibilities of this international body
and renamed it the International Boundary and Water Commission
(IBWC), or CILA for the Mexican section. Their jurisdiction
extends to the parts of the Colorado River that forms the land
boundary between the United States and Mexico and administers
the many boundary and water-rights treaties and agreements
between the two nations. Two years after the earthquakes in
2010 that damaged Mexico’s infrastructure south of Mexicali,
Minute Order 319 was signed on November 20, 2012. Minute Order
319 allows Mexico to store water in Lake Mead and includes a
five year test program between the United States and Mexico that
reduces deliveries under low reservoir levels at Lake Mead and
allows Mexico to share in increased surplus flows under high
reservoir conditions. The pact will also have Arizona and
Nevada water agencies pay for improvements to Mexico’s
infrastructure and to implement water conservation measures that
will generate an estimated 100,000 acre-feet of water over the
five years. Those agencies would split about half of that
water, with the rest going to Metropolitan Water District.
In Minute Order 319, desalination can be considered a
methodology to further conserve water for the environment, the
farmers, and relieve some of the pressure from the Colorado
River. The language allows a public-private partnership, that
NSC Agua project will be proposing, and has generated some
interest into how this Project would fit into Minute Order 319
or subsequent Minute Orders.
The November signing ceremony for Minute Order 319 and the
proposed ribbon cutting event at the Rosarito pilot plant site
along with securing the property for the desalination plant and
the pending agreement with the CFE are all indicators this
Project is moving forward. The District put all consultants on
hold about two years ago until certain milestones south of the
border have been reached. The District will need to re-initiate
the work on this side of the border to keep pace with the
project south of the border.
Concerning the facilities north of the border, the District
awarded a contract to AECOM Technical Services for the design of
4
a large diameter pipeline 3.5 miles long, a pump station, and a
disinfection facility on October 21, 2010. Part of the contract
also includes CEQA/NEPA compliance and other services to get
California Department of Public Health permitting. AECOM has
provided some preliminary studies, but hasn’t started yet the
bulk of the services until NSC Agua met some milestones such as
property acquisition, pilot plant installation, and securing
easements from CFE. Now that these milestones are met, staff
will issue a Notice to Proceed to AECOM.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No budget impacts. (See Attachment B Budget Detail).
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To
provide high value water and wastewater services to the
customers of the Otay Water District in a professional,
effective, and efficient manner” and the General Manager’s
Vision, “A District that is at the forefront in innovations to
provide water services at affordable rates, with a reputation
for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
BK/RR:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2451 Desalination Feasibility Study\Staff Reports\Board 01-02-13\BD 01-02-13, Staff Report, Rosarito Desal
Project Update Info Item, (BK-RR).doc
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2451-001101
Informational Update for the Rosarito Desalination Plant
and the Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System
Projects
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Desalination Project Committee reviewed this item at a
meeting held on December 19, 2012 and the following comments
were made:
Staff indicated that the purpose of this item is to provide an
update to the Board on the progress of both components of the
Rosarito Desalination Project:
The desalination plant on Mexico’s side of the border.
The pump station, conveyance pipeline and disinfection
system on the US side of the border.
The desalination plant and the conveyance pipeline south of
the border are being developed by NSC Agua, a Mexican
partnership between investors and Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.
Consolidated is a publicly-traded company that designs,
builds, and operates desalination plants in the Caribbean
basin and in Southeast Asia.
Staff indicated that on March 15, 2012, Consolidated Water
announced that it has acquired control of 75% of the shares of
NSC Agua which has resolved the internal NSC Agua issues that
had delayed the Project. Following the announcement, the
District renewed its Letter of Intent with NSC Agua. The
previous LOI was signed in 2009.
NSC Agua selected Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction to
build the pilot plant and the Desalination Plant. Doosan is
one of the few companies in the world that has proprietary
technologies for Reverse Osmosis.
Carollo Engineers has been engaged to do the civil engineering
and BNP Paribas is being considered as the bank that will
provide the funding for the Rosarito desalination project.
Bloomberg and Forbes recently ranked BNP Paribas as the third
largest bank in the world.
The Rosarito Desalination Plant will produce 100 million
gallons per day (MGD) of desalinated water. Tijuana/Rosarito
will potentially take 50 MGD or more and Otay Water District
and possibly other agencies will take the remaining water.
It was indicated that NSC Agua has secured permission for and
has constructed the first phase of the pilot plant on the
power plant site and is already testing the first pre-
treatment phase. Doosan’s practice is to build a pilot plant
in stages. After they understand how the pre-treatment is
performing, they will begin testing a second pre-treatment
train to remove other impurities they may find in the source
seawater. They will then add in a Reverse Osmosis (RO) train
on the pilot plant which will likely occur sometime mid-next
year. The pilot plant is producing approximately 15,000 GPD.
The Mexican federal-owned electric utility, widely known as
CFE, recently approved the agreements that secure permanent
easements and rights to connect pipelines to the seawater
intake and outlet structures of the power plant. The Mexican
National Water Commission, also known as CONAGUA, also
reviewed and approved the agreements. In celebration of these
significant milestones, NSC Agua is considering scheduling a
ribbon cutting ceremony at the pilot plant site early next
year.
Slides were presented showing the site plan, discharge
facilities and the proposed pipeline alignment through
Tijuana, Mexico to convey the water to the U.S. border. Staff
also noted the many agencies that would be involved in
bringing the plant to fruition (reference attached copy of
presentation).
The Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System Project was
placed on hold about two (2) years ago until the Rosarito
Desalination project attained certain milestones. As those
milestones have been achieved, staff plans to begin moving the
project forward again.
For the design of the conveyance and disinfection system to be
built in the U.S., the District awarded a contract to AECOM
Technical Services two years ago. AECOM will design a large
diameter pipeline (3.5 miles long), a pump station, and a
disinfection facility. The contract also includes CEQA/NEPA
compliance and other services to acquire the California
Department of Public Health permitting. AECOM, has provided
some preliminary studies to date, but has not yet started the
bulk of their contracted services.
Given the many challenges in advancing this Project, the
District has retained specialty consultants to provide
technical, regulatory, bi-national, and policy assistance
(reference attached copy of presentation for the list of
consultants retained to date).
The Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection Project will provide
for a potable water transmission pipeline and pump station to
convey the desalinated water from the border between the U.S.
and Mexico. The water will be conveyed to the District’s 36.7
MG reservoir known as Roll reservoir also known as the 571-1
reservoir.
To obtain the water quality needed to receive CDPH approval,
both Otay and NSC will need to work together to achieve an
affordable product for Otay customers. The project must also
meet environmental and federal requirements to allow the
pipeline to cross the international border.
The cost of the facilities on the U.S. side is estimated at
approximately $46.8 million if CDPH requests full treatment
after the water crosses the border. The District’s current
budget allocation for the facilities is $30 million which
includes the disinfection treatment, but not the cost of full
re-treatment.
It was discussed that the IBWC Minute 319 signing ceremony
held this past November and the proposed ribbon cutting event
at the Rosarito pilot plant site along with their success in
securing the property for the desalination plant and the
signed agreement with the CFE and CONAGUA are all indicators
that the desalination project is moving forward. The District
will need to re-initiate the work on this side of the border
to keep pace with the project south of the border.
It was indicated that Mayor Filner and former director, Mexico
Congressman Jaime Bonilla, have indicated their interest in
participating in the ribbon cutting ceremony for the
desalination project. Congressman Bonilla has plans to invite
the North Border Mexico Congressional Committee that oversees
the northern border issues. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has
also tentatively indicated interest in attending the ribbon
cutting event as well.
Staff has plans to meet with the District’s project
consultants in January 2013 to start moving the project
forward again. Staff is also looking to meet with NSC Agua
and their consultants on the direction of the project as it
relates to IBWC and CILA.
Staff has also briefed the commissioner and chief engineer of
the IWBC. They are supportive of the project.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated
that prior to the project going on hold, the District had been
presenting information to the public through community and
business groups. The project had received strong positive
responses from these groups.
The committee suggested that the District’s staff put together
information for the public that provides the cost of the
project, the impact of the Rosarito Desalination Project to
its ratepayers versus the impact of CWA’s recent Water Supply
Agreement with Poseidon Resources, the quality, reliability
and quantity of water that will be acquired from the Rosarito
project. It was discussed that the actual cost of the water
from the Rosarito project is not yet determined, but it is
believed to be quite close to the cost of imported water. The
goal is to at least come close to equaling the cost of
imported water and enhance the reliability of our resources.
The committee requested that staff keep the board updated on
the progress of the project and indicated that they would like
to provide this same information to the public. Staff
suggested that the powerpoint presentation on this project
could be made into a video that can be posted to the
District’s website for the public to view. The committee was
interested in doing this.
Following the discussion, the Desalination Project Committee
supported presentation to the full board as an informational
item.
ATTACHMENT B
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2451-001101
Informational Update for the Rosarito Desalination Plant
and the Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection System
Projects
Date Updated: November 16, 2012
Budget
30,000,000
Planning 001101
Labor 446,289 446,289 446,289
Printing 61 61 - 61 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC
Mileage Reimbursement 138 138 - 138 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Parking and Tolls 88 88 - 88 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Parking and Tolls 45 45 - 45 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Parking and Tolls 21 21 - 21 WATTON, MARK
Airfare and Transportation 40 40 - 40 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Airfare and Transportation 8,717 8,717 - 8,717 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Airfare and Transportation 78 78 - 78 WATTON, MARK
Lodging 3,262 3,262 - 3,262 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Lodging 1,590 1,590 - 1,590 WATTON, MARK
Lodging 729 729 - 729 BONILLA, JAIMELodging472 472 - 472 CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY
Meals and Incidentals 249 249 - 249 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Meals and Incidentals 38 38 - 38 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENTMeals and Incidentals 194 194 - 194 WATTON, MARK
Meals and Incidentals 395 395 - 395 CONSOLIDATED WATER COMPANY
Business Meetings 180 180 - 180 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Business Meetings 949 949 - 949 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Insurance 26 26 - 26 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Insurance 27 27 - 27 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
Professional Legal Fees 43,175 43,175 - 43,175 SOLORZANO CARVAJAL GONZALEZ Y
Professional Legal Fees 15,914 15,914 - 15,914 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Professional Legal Fees 152,066 152,066 - 152,066 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLP
Other Legal Expenses 9,975 9,975 - 9,975 GARCIA CALDERON & RUIZ LLPOther Legal Expenses 38 38 - 38 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Consultant Contracts 98,577 98,577 - 98,577 CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE INC
Consultant Contracts 48,654 48,654 - 48,654 MARSTON+MARSTON INCConsultant Contracts 12,200 12,200 - 12,200 REA & PARKER RESEARCH
Consultant Contracts 4,173 4,173 - 4,173 SALVADOR LOPEZ-CORDOVA
Consultant Contracts 152,066 72,066 80,000 152,066 SILVA SILVA INTERNATIONAL
Consultant Contracts 70,200 61,200 9,000 70,200 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIO
Consultant Contracts 7,000 7,000 - 7,000 BUSTAMANTE & ASSOCIATES LLC
Consultant Contracts 32,340 32,340 - 32,340 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER
Service Contracts 500 500 - 500 REBECA SOTURA NICKERSON
Service Contracts 106 106 - 106 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Total Planning 1,110,571 1,021,571 89,000 1,110,571
Design 001102
Labor 75,604 75,604 75,604
Meals and Incidentals 14 14 - 14 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Consultant Contracts 5,535 5,535 - 5,535 MICHAEL R WELCH PHD PE
Consultant Contracts 3,910,297 33,215 3,877,082 3,910,297 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC
Consultant Contracts 5,000 5,000 - 5,000 ATKINS
Consultant Contracts 8,818 8,818 - 8,818 CPM PARTNERS INC
Consultant Contracts 276 276 - 276 MARSTON+MARSTON INC
Service Contracts 343 343 - 343 SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE LLC
Total Design 4,005,887 128,805 3,877,082 4,005,887
Construction 001103
Labor 329 329 329
Total Construction 329 329 - 329
Grand Total 5,116,787 1,150,705 3,966,082 5,116,787
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
P2451 - Rosarito Desalination Facility Conveyance
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
571-136.7 MG
870-110.9 MG
OTAY MESA RD
EN
R
I
C
O
F
E
R
M
I
D
R
AL
T
A
R
D
DONOVAN STATEPRISON RD
DONOVAN STATEPRISON
G. F. BAILEYDETENTION FACILITY
!V!V
ÍÒ
PROPOSEDPUMP STATION A
PROPOSEDTREATMENTFACILITY
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
I
P
E
L
I
N
E
A
1.25 MILES
SA
N
Y
O
R
D
SR
-
1
1
FUTURE SR-11 FUT
U
R
E
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
I
P
E
L
I
N
E
B
!V!V
PROPOSEDPUMP STATION B
USAUSA
MEXICOMEXICO
OWD Boundary
OWD Boundary
P:\
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
\
C
I
P
P
2
4
5
1
D
e
s
a
l
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
S
t
u
d
y
\
G
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
\
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
-
F
i
g
u
r
e
s
|
E
x
h
i
b
i
t
A
.
m
x
d
F0 2,0001,000 Feet
OTAY WATER DISTRICTOtay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection Facility ProjectEXHIBIT A
§¨¦
§¨¦
§¨¦
§¨¦
ÃÅ ÃÅ
ÃÅ
ÃÅ
ÃÅ
ÃÅ
ÃÅ
ÃÅ
^_
PROJECTSITE
VICINITY MAP NTS
DIV. 5
DIV. 2
DIV. 1
DIV. 3
DIV. 4
5
8
8
805
11
9454
94
125
905
125
905
125
3.2 mi.3.7 mi.24 mi.
Existing OWD PipelinesProposed Pipeline AProposed Pipeline BMexico Pipeline
ROSARITO DESALINATION
PLANT AND THE OTAY MESA
CONVEYANCE AND
DISINFECTION SYSTEM
PROJECTS
(100 MGD)
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
January 8, 2013
Exhibit B
San Diego County Water Authority
TEAM MEMBERS
2
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Project Background
100 MGD desalination plant in Rosarito, Baja California, Mexico.
Adjacent to the existing power plant.
Use of existing ocean intake and cooling ocean water from the power
plant.
25 miles pipeline to the border.
One interconnection to “El Florido” Treatment Plant in Tijuana B.C.
50 MGD for Tijuana/Rosarito and the remainder for Otay Water District
or other agencies.
Water quality to meet International and CDPH standards.
Proposed facilities on the U.S. side include monitoring stations, UV
disinfection, and an existing storage tank (37 MGD).
All chemicals will be NSF certified.
NSC Agua has secured permission for the construction of the Pilot Plant
on the power plant site and is already testing the first treatment phase.
3
Otay Water District List of Consultants
CDM Consulting Engineer
Michael R. Welch, Ph.D., P.E. Consulting Engineer
AECOM Consulting Engineer
Salvador Lopez-Cordova Liaison for Mexican Federal, State &
Municipal including CESPT
Marston & Marston Inc. Public Relations - Public Outreach
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP Legislative & Legal Strategy
Silva-Silva International Legislative Advocacy
Solorzano Carvajal Gonzales Perez-Correa Attorney
Hector I Mares-Cossío Bi-National Advisor
Cruz Bustamante Governmental Affairs Advisor
Rea & Parker Research Survey/Market Research
Atkins Consulting Engineer
4
5
Facilities in Rosarito
6
7
8
Pipeline From Rosarito to
U.S. Border
Rosarito to El Florido ~ 17 Miles
El Florido to U.S. Border ~ 8 Miles
Total ~ 25 Miles
9
Counterpart Agencies in Mexico / U.S.
CILA
MEXICO USA
IBWC
NADB
SEMARNAT EPA
CONAGUA CDPH lead
EPA to some extent
PROFEPA EPA
Attorney’s office
CEA DWR to some extent
Water Districts to some extent
CESPT Otay Water District
SPA CalEPA
Bi-national
Federal
State
BECC/COCEF
Ayuntamiento City government Municipal
SSA CDPH lead
EPA to some extent
Some
functions are
conducted by
different
levels of
government
in each
country (e.g.,
Federal vs.
State, or State
vs. Local)
Bi-national
Federal
State
Municipal
10
11
IBWC - Minute 319
Allows Mexico to store water in Lake
Mead.
5-Year test program that reduces
deliveries to Mexico when reservoirs
are low and increases deliveries
when reservoirs levels are high.
Allows Nevada and Arizona to invest
in Mexico’s infrastructure to
conserve water to be shared with
many agencies.
Bi-national Desalination can be
considered methodology to further
conserve water for the environment
and for farmers.
12
Each Side of this Project Includes a Variety of
Critical Issues
Water
Quality
Water
Quality
CDPH
Approval CDPH
Approval
Optimized
Cost
Optimized
Cost
13
Environment
Environment Federal
Approval
Federal
Approval
14
Otay Mesa Conveyance and Disinfection Facility
COSTS OF FACILITIES
North of the Border
Treatment Scenario Capital Costs
A. Disinfection treatment only in U.S., with a
waiver of specific filtration req’s through
CDPH
± $800,000
B. Full filtration and disinfection in U.S ± $17,000,000
Conveyance
18,000 LF of a 54-inch pipeline ± $20,000,000
Pump Station ± $9,000,000
15
16
Project Study
Otay Mesa Conveyance and
Disinfection System Project –
White Paper:
Provides a summary of
actions and project
elements needed to
facilitate CDPD approval of project.
ROSARITO DESALINATION
PLANT AND CONVEYANCE
(100 MGD)
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Questions ?
17 San Diego County Water Authority
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Informational Item – As-Needed Services to support the
delivery of the Capital Improvement Program
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
receive as an informational item a report that presents information
on the use of As-Needed Services to support the delivery of the
District’s Capital Improvement Program.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To provide information to the Board on the role that As-Needed
Services play in the delivery of the District’s Capital Improvement
Program and how these Services contribute to attaining the District’s
Strategic Goals and Objectives.
ANALYSIS:
Background
During the October 9, 2012 District Board meeting, items were
presented by staff to award an As-Needed Construction Management and
Inspection Services (CMIS) contract for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 through
AGENDA ITEM 26d
2
FY 2015 and an As-Needed Engineering Design contract for FY 2013 and
FY 2014. During the presentations, Board members asked staff various
questions related to the use of As-Needed Services to support the
delivery of the District’s Capital Improvement Program and how these
services contribute to attaining the District’s Strategic Goals and
Objectives. The Board directed staff to present findings to the Otay
Water District Engineering, Operations & Water Resources Committee.
The following report provides an overview on why the District
contracts out for As-Needed Services, presents information on the
benefits to “bundling” the District’s engineering consultant service
needs into larger contracts with longer terms, and describes how
these services support the District’s Strategic Plan efforts.
Why do we contract out services for engineering, construction
management, and inspection services?
From FY 2006 to FY 2012, the Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
expenditures have ranged from $36.3 million in FY 2006 to $18.7
million in FY 2012. During this time the District has taken steps to
assure that the required level of resources are available to deliver
the CIP by using a combination of Full Time Employees (FTE) and
Consultants. Over the same period of time, the Engineering FTE
totals have gone from 28 positions to 21. The Engineering FTE total
included in the approved budget for FY 2013 is 19. The District has
taken care to effectively manage the number of Engineering FTE to
assure that the level of District staff is aligned with the program
need. The District’s Engineering staff focuses on the core business
of developing and delivering the CIP aligned with the District’s
Mission and Values. The District uses consultants to augment staff.
This practice has demonstrated the following benefits in the delivery
of the program:
Provides a resource to manage the workload peaks and valleys
that occur while delivering the CIP, while assuring that the
level of Engineering FTE is appropriate from one fiscal year to
another
Supplies additional professional expertise to the District’s
projects to complement the existing areas of expertise possessed
by staff
Provides a more diverse set of experience to successfully
deliver the CIP
Allows the District’s Engineering staff to concentrate on the
District’s core business of developing, managing, and delivering
the Six-Year CIP by tasking a portion of the technical
deliverables to consultants.
3
The District strikes a balance between levels of Engineering FTE and
consultants needed to deliver the Six-Year CIP. The District
contracts with consultants to provide the services and resources
needed to deliver the District’s program. Staff manages Consultant
costs and deliverables to assure that the District is getting high
value in the delivery of the District’s projects. In addition, the
District assures an appropriate level of FTE Staff to preserve
organizational knowledge to plan for the future. The result is an
effective, efficient program that provides savings to the District in
the form of hiring less FTE’s.
What are the benefits to “bundling” the District’s engineering
consultant service needs into larger contracts with longer terms?
The District has experienced several benefits to “bundling” the
District’s contracting needs including, but not limited to, the
following:
Contracts advertised with larger contract amounts generate a
greater interest by the professional consultant community. This
translates to a larger pool of potential professional
consultants who possess a greater degree of experience for the
District to choose from.
Rates from consultants potentially differ by length of
engagement. Short-term engagements will usually command a
higher hourly rate when compared to long-term work in order to
cover the direct fixed costs of running their respective
business. Long-term work represents less risk and thus lowers
the consultant’s expenses that influence their rates. The
District has taken a balanced approach to mitigate the potential
for rates influenced by short-term engagements by providing one
and two-year As-Needed Services contracts.
The estimated cost to complete procurement for a professional
consultant such as CMIS in accordance with the District’s Policy
Number 21 ranges from $4,500 to $9,000 depending on the value of
the procurement. By building an estimate of the District’s
consultant engineering service needs based on the CIP over a
two-year horizon and “bundling” these needs into a single
procurement the overall number of procurements performed by
staff is reduced which results in a savings to the District.
This was demonstrated on the recent CMIS procurement where nine
projects were bundled into a single procurement. The savings
associated with bundling these nine projects into a single
procurement in lieu of nine separate procurements is estimated
to be $36,000.
4
This “bundling” approach to contracting for services is balanced by
the use of As-Needed Services on a task order basis which assures
that the District only pays for consultant services when these
services are rendered to actively complete projects. In addition,
the length of a contract is limited to a one or two-year duration to
assure that the District is getting high value by receiving the
benefit of a competitive procurement on a planned strategic basis.
How do we measure if we are being successful using consultants?
While staff has not specifically developed a measurement strategy
related to the use of consultants, the use of consultants is a widely
employed industry practice due to the benefits described above. The
District realizes these benefits at the program level. Consultants
serve as an extension of District staff in the delivery of the CIP.
Through task orders issued by District staff, consultants are
responsible for delivering a variety of activities that move the
District’s projects forward to completion. These activities include,
but are not limited to, design engineering, construction management,
inspection, plan review for recycled water, development of master
plans, environmental support, survey, and utility mark-outs. These
activities and deliverables are represented as a component in the
District’s Strategic Plan Objectives and Performance Measures
including the following established for Engineering:
Plan Objectives
ID No. Description
3.1.1.1 Prepare and implement a Waste Water Management Plan
3.1.1.5 Work with the District’s largest potable water
customers to convert landscape and interior water use
to recycled water where fiscally feasible and safe
Performance Measures
ID No. Description
2.2.200 CIP Project Expenditures vs. Budget
2.2.201 Construction Change Order Incidence (without
allowances)
2.2.202 Mark-out Accuracy
2.2.203 Project Closeout Time
The performance of these Plan Objectives and Performance Measures is
reported to the Board each fiscal year on a quarterly basis. Staff
is responsible for the management of the consultants to achieve the
established measurement strategy or respective target.
5
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact as this is an informational item only.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This report supports the District’s Mission Statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM/RP:jf
P:\WORKING\As Needed Services\BD 01-08-13, Staff Report, Informational Item - As Needed Services for CIPs, (DM-RP).docx
Attachment: Attachment A – Committee Action
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Various
Informational Item – As-Needed Services to support the
delivery of the Capital Improvement Program
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on December 10, 2012 and the following
comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board receive as an informational item
a report that presents information on the use of As-Needed
Services to support the delivery of the District’s Capital
Improvement Program.
It was indicated that at the October 9, 2012 Board meeting, the
Board asked staff questions about the District’s As-Needed
contracts for Construction Management and Design services to
support the delivery of the CIP:
o Why do we contract out for engineering and construction
management consultant services?
o What are the benefits to “bundling” the consultant service
needs into larger contracts?
o How do we measure if we are being successful using consultants?
To answer the questions from the Board, staff stated that it is
important to provide some background that describes the
considerations the District has taken to assure that the required
level of resources are available to deliver the CIP. The key
considerations included:
o Keeping staff focused on the development and delivery of the
six-year CIP in keeping with the District’s Mission and Values
o Retaining core staff to preserve organizational knowledge
o Aligning the level of Full Time Employees (FTE) with the
program needs
It was discussed that from FY 2006 to FY 2012 expenditures for
the entire CIP ranged from $36.3 million to $18.7 million
respectively. The Engineering Department manages the portion of
the CIP associated with major Capital Facility Projects, major
Replacement/Renewal and Developer Reimbursement. The number of
Engineering (FTE) has gone from 28 positions to 21. In FY 2013,
the CIP Budget is $18.0 million and Engineering currently has 19
FTE.
Staff discussed why the District contracts out for engineering
and construction management consultant services. Staff believes
that it provides resources to manage the workload peaks, supplies
additional professional expertise (Geotech, Traffic, Electrical,
etc.). It also provides a more diverse set of experience and
allows District staff to concentrate on the core business. Staff
stated that the balance for this is that it maintains an
appropriate level of FTE staff to preserve organizational
knowledge and plan for the future while assuring high value in
the delivery of the program.
Staff discussed the benefits to “bundling” the consultant service
needs into larger contracts. It is believed that larger contract
amounts would generate greater interest from the professional
community (larger pool to choose from with greater degree of
experience), long-term work (1 and 2 year contracts) would
represent less risk and thus lowers expenses that influence their
rates, and a decrease in the overall number of procurements would
result in lower overall procurement costs. The balance for this
is that on As-Needed contracts, the District only pays for
services rendered while benefitting from a competitive
procurement on a planned strategic basis.
Staff discussed how the District determines its success of using
consultants. It was noted that consultants are an extension of
District staff and that the benefits of using consultants are
measured at the program level. Through task orders, consultants
are responsible for the delivery of a variety of activities
including but not limited to design, construction management,
inspection, plan review for recycled water, and USA mark out.
These activities are represented as a component in the District’s
Strategic Plan Objectives and Performance Measures including
those listed on page 4 of the staff report. The performance of
these Plan Objectives and Performance Measures is reported to the
Board each fiscal year on a quarterly basis. Staff is
responsible for the management of the consultants to achieve the
established measurement strategy or respective target.
It was noted that the use of consultants is a widely used
practice in industry employed to establish efficiency and
flexibility in program delivery. Staff stated that the use of
consultants represents a management tool in the toolbox that
supports delivery of our program.
In response to a question by the Committee with regards to
changing consultants, staff stated that they would explore the
pros and cons of having 2-year As-Needed contracts versus longer
term contracts for consultants.
Following the discussion, the EO&WR Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as an informational
item.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief of Engineering
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Informational Item – First Quarter Fiscal Year 2013 Capital
Improvement Program Report
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
accept the First Quarter Fiscal Year 2013 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) Report for review and receives a summary via PowerPoint
presentation.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To update the Board about the status of all CIP project expenditures
and to highlight significant issues, progress, and milestones on
major projects.
ANALYSIS:
To keep up with growth and to meet our ratepayers' expectations to
adequately deliver safe, reliable, cost-effective, and quality water,
each year the District staff prepares a Six-Year CIP Plan that
identifies the District’s infrastructure needs. The CIP is comprised
of four categories consisting of backbone capital facilities,
replacement/renewal projects, developer's reimbursement projects, and
capital purchases.
AGENDA ITEM 26e
The First Quarter Fiscal Year 2013 update is intended to provide a
detailed analysis of progress in completing these projects within the
allotted time and budget of $18 million. Expenditures through the
First Quarter totaled approximately $2.7 million. Approximately 15%
of the Fiscal Year 2013 expenditure budget was spent.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact as this is an informational item only.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The Capital Improvement Program supports the District’s Mission
statement, “To provide high value water and wastewater services to
the customers of the Otay Water District, in a professional,
effective, and efficient manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, “A
District that is at the forefront in innovations to provide water
services at affordable rates, with a reputation for outstanding
customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM/RP:jf
P:\CIP\CIP Quarterly Reports\2013\Q1\Staff Report\BD 01-08-13, Staff Report, First Quarter FY 2013 CIP Report, (DM-RP).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B - Fiscal Year 2013 First Quarter CIP
Expense Report
Attachment C – Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Various
Informational Item – First Quarter Fiscal Year 2013 Capital
Improvement Program Report
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a Committee Meeting held on December 10, 2012 and the
following comments were made:
Staff provided a PowerPoint presentation to the Committee and
indicated that the expenditures through the first quarter of FY
2013 totaled approximately $2.7 million, which is about 15% of
the District’s fiscal year budget.
Staff indicated that the District’s FY 2013 CIP budget consists
of 70 projects that total $18 million and is divided into four
categories:
o Capital Facilities= $7.6 million
o Replacement/Renewal= $9.6 million
o Capital Purchases= $.8 million
o Developer Reimbursement= $0.0 million
The PowerPoint presentation included the following:
o Total Life-to-Date Expenditures
o CIP Budget Forecast vs. Expenditures
o Major CIP Projects
o CIP Projects in Construction
o Construction Contract Status of projects, contract amount
with allowances, net change orders, and percent of project
completion
o Consultant Contract Status of contract amounts, approve
payments to date, change orders, dates when contracts were
signed and the end date of contracts
Staff provided an update of the following:
o 944-IR Recycled Water Pump Project
o RWCRWF Upgrades Project
o La Presa System Improvements Project, Demolition of 850-1
and 657-1 Pump Stations and Forebay Reservoir, Demolition
of Dorchester Reservoir and Pressure Reducing Station.
o Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation Project
o Hunte Parkway 30-Inch Potable Pipeline
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as an informational
item.
Otay Water District
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Year 2013
First Quarter
(through September 30, 2012)
Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation
08/13/12
Attachment C
Background
The approved CIP Budget for Fiscal Year 2013 consists of
70 projects that total $18 million. These projects are
broken down into four categories.
1.Capital Facilities $ 7.6 million
2.Replacement/Renewal $ 9.6 million
3.Capital Purchases $ .8 million
4.Developer Reimbursement $ 0.0 million
Overall expenditures through the First Quarter Fiscal
Year 2013 totaled $2.7 million, which is 15% of the Fiscal
Year budget.
2
Fiscal Year 2013
First Quarter Update
($1,000)
CIP
CAT Description FY 2013
Budget
FY 2013
Expenditures
%
FY 2013
Budget
Spent
Total Life-to-
Date Budget
Total
Life-to-Date
Expenditures
%
Life-to-
Date
Budget
Spent
1 Capital
Facilities $7,588 $1,069 14% $111,138 $40,127 36%
2 Replacement/
Renewal $9,559 $1,433 15% $59,506 $26,741 45%
3 Capital
Purchases $794 $236 30% $14,222 $8,796 62%
4 Developer
Reimbursement $53 $0 0% $6,513 $1 0%
Total:
$17,994 $2,738 15% $191,379 $75,665 40%
3
Fiscal Year 2013
First Quarter
CIP Budget Forecast vs. Expenditures
4
$17,994,000
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
FISCAL YEAR PERIOD IN MONTHS
Expenditure Forecast
FY 2013 Expenditures
District Map of Major CIP Projects
5 5
CIP Projects in Construction
Phase I of 944-1R Recycled Water Pump Station Improvements (R2091)
Installation of New Pump
New Instrumentation
New Suction Header Piping
Three (3) New Pressure Reducing Stations
$1.88M Budget
Start: June 2011
Substantially Complete: 8/3/12
Above: New Pump No. 3 and Suction Header Piping at 944 Pump Station
6
07/02/12
CIP Projects in Construction
RWCRWF Upgrades (R2096)
New Aeration System, Blower System, and Electrical Instrumentation
$4.95M Budget
Start: July 2011
Substantially Complete: 7/31/12
Refurbished Aeration Basin under operation
06/28/12
7
CIP Projects in Construction
La Presa System
Improvements (P2370)
Demolition of 850-1 and
657-1 Pump Stations and
Forebay Reservoir
Multiple
interconnections
throughout Spring Valley
Demolition of
Dorchester Reservoir
and Pressure Reducing
Station
$1.43M Budget
Start: November 2011
Substantial Completion:
8/16/12
Completed PRV Station at La Presa Site
8
07/19/12
CIP Projects in Construction
Calavo Gardens Sewer Rehabilitation (S2019, S2020, S2022, S2026)
Replacement of 4,500 Linear Feet of Sewer
Manhole Rehabilitation/Replacement
Capacity Upgrades
New Flow Control and Diversion Vault for Calavo Lift Station
$3.35M Budget
Start: February 2012
Estimated Completion: May 2013
Compacting Trench in Avocado Boulevard
9
08/14/12
CIP Projects in Construction
10
Hunte Parkway 30-Inch Potable Pipeline (P2514)
Installation of 2,250 LF of Polyurethane Coated Steel Pipe
$1.55M Budget
Start: April 2012
Estimated Completion: January 2013
Dry grinding the road
11
Construction Contract Status
PROJECT
TOTAL %
R2091
944-1R
RecycledPump
Station Upgrade &
System
Enhancments
Sepulveda $1,099,423 $1,162,423 $0 0.0%
R2096 RWCWRF Upgrades Newest $3,349,000 $3,499,000 $72,807 2.2%
P2370 La Presa System
Improvements TC Construction $938,995 $978,995 $82,548 8.8%
S2019/S
2020/S2
022/S20
26
Calavo Gardens
Sewer Rehabilitation
Garcia Juarez
Construction $2,232,275 $2,316,275 $0 0.0%
P2491 850-3 Reservoir
Coating
Advanced Industrial
Services $273,300 $293,300 $400 0.1%
P2514
30-Inch Potable
Pipeline in Hunte
Parkway
Sepulveda $1,172,257 $1,212,257 $0 0.0%
TOTALS:$9,065,250 $9,462,250 $155,755 1.7%
*NET CHANGE ORDERS DO NOT INCLUDE ALLOWANCE ITEM CREDITS. IT'S A TRUE CHANGE ORDER PERCENTAGE FOR THE PROJECT
CIP NO.PROJECT TITLE CONTRACTOR BASE BID AMOUNT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT W/
ALLOWANCES
NET CHANGE
ORDERS LTD*
Consultant Contract Status
12
Consultant Contract Status
13
QUESTIONS?
14
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:
Regular Board
MEETING
DATE:
January 8, 2013
SUBMITTED
BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
W.O./G.F.
NO:
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: General Manager’s Report
GENERAL MANAGER:
Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP): Bay Delta water supply
reliability, earthquake danger and environmental concerns have
been a discussion item and subject of various state and federal
committees since the early 1990s. The most recent being the
Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force which, five years ago,
concluded that the time for action on the Delta is now! As a
result of collaboration with state and federal agencies and
Governor Brown’s administration focus on the matter, the Bay
Delta Conservation Plan is nearing completion. A draft plan
and environmental documents are slated to be released to the
public in the spring of 2013.
A key feature of the proposed plan is a tunneling project for a
9000cfs facility that will deliver water around the delta to
Southern California water agencies. This is reduced from a
proposed 15,000cfs facility. This focus, primarily on
facilities for moving water, has started the debate in Northern
California of who benefits, and the impacts on the local
economy and water rights, as it has in every study and debate
over the past 20 years. Not to mention the cost to water
ratepayers in Southern California and what MWD has stated they
are willing to do to have the facilities approved for
construction.
There may be emerging interest in setting up a discussion for a
more diversified approach to facilities in the delta,
environmental fixes and focus on local water supply solutions
that will reduce the dependence on delta supplies. I will keep
the board apprised of any developments in this regard and may
AGENDA ITEM 27
2
recommend that Otay take a position to encourage state and
federal entities to consider a range of potential solutions and
activities to reach a broader consensus on the delta fix.
Rate Increase Notices: All rate increase notices were mailed
in November. Customer Service had received approximately 30
calls about the notice. Those calls were inquiries about how
the change in rates would affect customer bill amounts,
comments about the receipt of the notice, or questions about
when to expect the increase. The General Manager’s office
received two phone calls, two emails, and one letter concerning
the notices. Administration also received one letter.
Holiday Food Drive: The Otay, Padre, Sweetwater, Helix, Bank
of Internet Federal Bank employees contributed over 1,500
pounds of food, personal care products, a turkey, $20 cash, and
$40 in food gift cards during the food drive. Five pickup truck
loads were needed to deliver the 13 large red barrels to the
San Diego Food Bank in November, each with an average weight of
118 pounds of food.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Water Conservation and School Education:
WaterSmart Landscape Programs - The Water Authority
administered the $1.50/square foot turfgrass rebate program,
which was launched on December 19th. The District is
highlighting the program on the District’s website, via
Facebook and Twitter, and via e-mails to District customers. In
early 2013, the District will send out targeted bill inserts
and highlight in the winter 2013 Pipeline newsletter.
More details on the Water Authority’s program can be found at
http://turfreplacement.watersmartsd.org.
School Education - Through the end of December, 24 Garden Tours
were completed and six more are scheduled to be completed
before the end of June 2013. See the attached for a listing of
completed and scheduled Garden Tours.
Knott’s Soak City - District staff has reached out to Sea World
regarding their recent acquisition of the former Knott’s Soak
City water park to see if there may be an opportunity to create
signage that promotes water conservation. Sea World staff
indicates that they are interested in meeting in early 2013 to
discuss.
3
Outreach Event - On November 10th, District staff and volunteers
were at two booths (water agency and water agency kid’s booth)
during the Fall Garden Festival. Approximately 1,000 people
attended the event.
Human Resources:
Recruitments – HR is currently preparing to recruit for
Construction Inspector II, Senior SCADA/SCADA Instrumentation
Technician, Engineering Manager, and two Water System Operator
positions.
New Hires – There were two new hires in the month of November
(Utility Worker II -- both in same position title), and four
new hires in the month of December (Customer Service Rep II --
two people in same position title, and Senior Accountant -- two
people in same position title).
Purchasing and Facilities:
Purchase Orders – There were 55 purchase orders processed in
November 2012 for a total of $1,048,874.25 (including one
purchase order for Aegis Engineering for $300,000, and another
one for Cass Construction for $109,039.28), and 53 purchase
orders in December 2012 for a total of $400,369.57.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:
Strategic Planning – Staff will be engaging in departmental and
team workshops regarding modifications to the 2014 Strategic
plan. Review of current achievements and both short and long
range goals will be discussed in preparation for next fiscal
year.
GPS Tracking – GIS has been informed that the Sprint based GPS
tracking system for District vehicles is becoming obsolete due
to spectrum changes. Staff will need to have a new system in
place in August 2013. Staff will be soliciting proposals from
vendors over the next quarter and will explore adding
additional functionality where appropriate.
Potential Sewer Sphere of Influence – GIS is working with the
Finance team to identify potential parcels that can be charged
with a sewer availability fee. In the potable system, there
are availability charges for all parcels that reside inside the
Water ID boundaries. Otay staff will further study this case
and report back.
CCTV Van and POSM Software Solution – The POSM software, which
works in conjunction with our CCTV van to collect sewer and
infrastructure video data, is now in production. Operations
4
field staff have collected new CCTV videos for maintenance use
and the data will then be analyzed by the Engineering team for
condition assessments. GIS staff is coordinating the effort of
customizing the field reports and data synchronization. The
goal is to associate the POSM data with the District’s sewer
asset management database.
Milestone Video Management Solution – During the past six
months, IT evaluated a number of video management softwares in
order to replace its existing legacy solution. Based on
performance, compatibility and budget factors, IT selected the
Milestone video management solution and conducted a 60 day
proof of concept (POC). With positive POC performance and
reliability results, including the leveraging of existing
camera equipment, IT has successfully deployed the Milestone
solution at the District’s Administrative and Operations
facilities. Deployment to remote sites and treatment
facilities is expected to be completed by February 1, 2013.
Benefits will include central administration, optimization of
video traffic and overall performance improvements.
Google Search Engine in Otay Website – IT recently incorporated
Google indexing and search engine capabilities on the
District’s website. Benefits include greater search accuracy
and performance, as well as information responses similar in
characteristic to those on the public Internet.
FINANCE:
System Testing for Rate Increases - As part of our standard
quality control process, staff has completed the testing of the
new rates. These rates will become effective, for most of our
customers, with their January bills.
Water Fees - The District sets its fixed portion of the water
bill at no more that 30% of total water sales revenue in
compliance with Best Management Practice (BMP 4). The MWD/CWA
portion of the fixed fee is a direct pass-through of the fixed
fees charged by MWD/CWA. The remaining portion of the fixed
fee is the District’s system fee, which is to pay for water
system replacement, maintenance and operations expenses. For
the typical residential customer, the MWD/CWA monthly fee will
be $13.28 and the system fee will be $16.74, effective January
1, 2013.
MasterLinx Meter Reading Upgrade - Staff will be going live
January 2nd with upgraded meter reading software. This new
software will allow Meter Readers to capture and download reads
through a web interface for more efficient consumption analysis
by office staff. In addition, office staff will have immediate
access to all data logs taken by Meter Shop staff. A data log
5
shows historical consumption on an hourly or daily basis, which
is extremely helpful when customers are concerned about a
possible leak or dispute their monthly water usage.
FY 2012 CAFR – The 2012 Comprehensive Annual Report (CAFR)
ending fiscal year June 30, 2012, has been completed and was
submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA)
for their Excellence in Financial Reporting Award.
The financial reporting for November 30, 2012 is as follows:
For the five months ended November 30, 2012, there are total
revenues of $37,586,798 and total expenses of $35,519,999. The
revenues exceeded expenses by $2,066,799.
The financial reporting for investments for November 30, 2012 is
as follows:
The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the
Investment Portfolio Details as of November 30, 2012 total
$82,932,130.45 with an average yield to maturity of 0.432%. The
total earnings year-to-date are $170,815.34.
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
Rancho del Rey Groundwater Well Development: The design
consultant (Tetra Tech) is proceeding to the 100% design level.
District staff will meet on January 17, 2013 with the City of
Chula Vista to discuss several items in the agreement.
Additional activities are underway to secure an Industrial User
Discharge Permit from the City of San Diego, a Hazardous
Materials Business Plan from the County, a power supply from
SDG&E, and a storm drain connection for discharges into the
storm drain system. Staff is preparing a request for a grant
from the United States Bureau of Reclamation. Potentially, 25%
of the cost of the project could be offset if the funds are
granted. Staff will make a formal update of this project at
the District’s January Committee Meeting/February Board
Meeting. (P2434)
North District – South District Interconnection System: This
project consists of installing approximately 5.2 miles of 30-
inch diameter pipe from H Street in Chula Vista to Paradise
Valley Road in Spring Valley. On December 10, 2012 a follow up
meeting was held with Supervisor Cox and the San Diego County
Water Authority (CWA) staff. It was decided that District
staff and CWA engineering staff will work together to reach a
technical consensus on whether or not the proposed parallel
6
encroachment meets technical requirements in CWA’s code;
however, administrative requirements in CWA’s code appeared to
remain a long-term hurdle. (P2511)
30-Inch, 980 Zone, Hunte Parkway – Proctor Valley/Use Area:
This project consists of the installation of approximately
2,240 linear-feet of 30-inch steel pipe and appurtenances on
Hunte Parkway at Proctor Valley Road, at the entrance to the
Salt Creek Golf Course, in the City of Chula Vista. The
pipeline will increase total water delivery to reduce pressure
losses experienced during periods of high demand. The
Contractor, Sepulveda Construction, began installing pipe at
the intersection of Proctor Valley Road and Hunte Parkway on
October 2, 2012. They have installed approximately 1,800
linear-feet of pipe. Project is within budget and construction
is anticipated to be complete in February 2013. (P2514)
Avocado, Louisa, Calavo, Challenge, Hidden Mesa Sanitary Sewer
Replacement: This project consists of replacing approximately
4,500 linear-feet of sewer pipeline in Avocado Boulevard and
neighboring residential streets. Work is ongoing in Avocado
Boulevard by Garcia Juarez Construction. Project is within
budget and anticipated to be complete in May 2013. (S2019,
S2020, S2022, S2026)
624-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement: This project consists of
replacing the floating cover on the 624-1 Reservoir. The
existing cover is at the end of its useful life and in need of
replacement. The Board awarded a contract to Layfield
Environmental Systems Corporation at the October 9, 2012 Board
Meeting. Project is within budget and anticipated to be
complete in April 2013. (P2477).
12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline, East Orange Avenue, I-805
Crossing: This project consists of the installation of
approximately 1,915 linear-feet of 12-inch steel and PVC pipe
along with the associated appurtenances from the intersection of
Melrose Avenue and Orange Avenue, east across the I-805
overpass, to the intersection of Olympic Parkway and Oleander
Avenue in Chula Vista. This new pipeline is needed to meet fire
flow requirements while Caltrans reconstructs the Palomar Bridge
overpass, which contains a 10-inch pipeline that will be
temporarily out of service. Bids were opened on November 29th,
and Basile Construction was the apparent low bidder. Project
will go to the January Board to increase the budget $100,000 to
$1,300,000, and to award a construction contract to Basile
Construction. Project is within budget with the approved
increase and anticipated to be complete in August 2013. (P2513)
7
803-3 & 832-2 Reservoirs Interior/Exterior Coatings and
Upgrades: This project consists of removing and replacing the
interior and exterior coatings of the 2.0 MG 803-3 Reservoir and
the 2.0 MG 832-2 MG Reservoir, along with providing structural
upgrades to ensure the tanks comply with both State and Federal
OSHA standards as well as American Water Works Association and
County Health Department standards. A Pre-Construction Meeting
was held on December 6, 2012, and the bid opening took place on
December 20, 2012. Project is within budget and anticipated to
be complete in August 2013. (P2518 & P2519)
For the months of October and November 2012, the District sold
35 meters (33.5 EDUs) generating $312,899 in revenue.
Projection for this period was 55.2 meters (67.2 EDUs) with
budgeted revenue of $662,010. Total revenue for Fiscal Year
2013 through November 2012 is $1,655,027 against the annual
budget of $3,972,064.
The following table summarizes Engineering's project purchases
issued during the period of November 8, 2012, through December
27, 2012 that were within staff signatory authority:
Date
Action
Amount
Contractor/
Consultant Project
11-08-12
Amended P.O
716429 (increased
to $4,150)
$1,425 Underground
Utilities
SR11 Utility Relocation
Project(P2453)
12-12-12 Check Request $5,000 City of Chula
Vista
12-Inch Pipeline in
Orange Avenue Bridge,
Crossing I-805 (P2513)
Water Operations:
As a follow-up to the staff report (Informational Item –
October 24, 2012 Telegraph Canyon Road Water Main Break and
Emergency Repair), the District has received the final costs
from the construction contractors including the general
services contractor, Cass Construction, and the District’s as-
needed paving contractor, Kirk Paving. The invoice from Cass
construction is for $107,685.73 and the remaining final paving
from Kirk Paving is for $31,428.00 resulting in a total of
$139,113.73 which was less than the estimated cost reported in
the aforementioned staff report of $150,000.00
Total number of potable water meters is 48,924.
8
The combined October and November potable water purchases were
2,645.8 acre-feet which is 6.2% above the budget of 2,492.2
acre-feet. The cumulative purchases through November is
15,551.9, acre-feet which is 0.4% below the cumulative budget
of 15,615.2 acre-feet.
The November recycled water purchases and production was 86.6
acre-feet which is 8.0% more than the budget of 82.9 acre-
feet. The cumulative production and purchases through November
is 2,475.1 acre-feet which is 3.2% above the cumulative budget
of 2,397.4 acre-feet.
9
Recycled water consumption for the month of October is as
follows:
Total consumption was 449.2 acre-feet or 146,332,736 gallons
and the average daily consumption was 4,720,411 gallons per
day.
Total recycled water consumption as of October for FY 2013 is
2168.7 acre-feet.
Recycled water consumption for the month of November is as
follows:
Total consumption was 367.8 acre-feet or 119,807,160 gallons
and the average daily consumption was 3,993,572 gallons per
day.
Total recycled water consumption as of November for FY 2013 is
2536.5 acre-feet.
Total number of recycled water meters is 704.
Wastewater flows for the month of October were as follows:
Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,723,903.
Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per
day: 568,165.
Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 1,146,886.
Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling
Facility, gallons per day: 1,047,496.
Flow to Metro from Otay Water District, gallons per day:
108,242.
In the month of September flow to Metro from Otay Water
District was calculated to be a negative number. This
indicated that the read from the County meter was incorrect.
Staff has been working with the County to help resolve the
Rancho San Diego Pump Station flow meter readings reported
and they have found that the actual total flow meter reading
was supposed to be 16.91 MG instead of 16.37MG and they
missed 2.3hrs of running the submersible pump that bypasses
the flow meter. Therefore, the total 16.91 MG plus .5304 MG
= 17.44 MG total Rancho San Diego Flow.
Wastewater flows for the month of November were as follows:
Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,666,348.
Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per
day: 549,919.
10
Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 1,110,056.
Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling
Facility, gallons per day: 940,425.
Flow to Metro from Otay Water District, gallons per day:
176,004.
By the end of November there were 6,084 wastewater
connections/EDUs.
OTAY TOURS AT THE GARDEN
2012-2013
2012 Name of School
AUGUST
Tour
Date
# of
Kids
# of
Adults
Grade
Level
Return
VisitorLIBERTY ELEMENTARY 21 45 10 3RDLIBERTY ELEMENTARY 22 45 10 3RDLIBERTY ELEMENTARY 30 25 8 3RD
SEPTEMBER
Tour
Date
# of
Kids
# of
Adults
Grade
Level
Return
VisitorSALT CREEK ELEMENTARY 7 62 12 5THSALT CREEK ELEMENTARY 12 62 12 5THSALT CREEK ELEMENTARY 13 31 6 5THDEHESA1450154-5TH YES
OCTOBER
Tour
Date
# of
Kids
# of
Adults
Grade
Level
Return
VisitorWOLF CANYON ELEMENTARY 16 31 10 4TH YESWOLF CANYON ELEMENTARY 17 31 10 4TH YESWOLF CANYON ELEMENTARY 18 31 10 4TH YESVISTA GRANDE ELEMENTARY 23 50 8 3RD YESDISCOVERY CHARTER SCHOOL 24 48 15 3RD YESVISTA GRANDE ELEMENTARY 25 50 8 3RD YESAVOCADO ELEMENTARY 26 35 7 3RD YESOLYMPIC VIEW 31 25 5 3RD
CORKY MCMILLIN ELEM SCHOOL 30 52 10 3RD
NOVEMBER
Tour
Date
# of
Kids
# of
Adults
Grade
Level
Return
VisitorWOLF CANYON ELEMENTARY 1 45 15 4TH YESOLYMPIC VIEW 6 50 10 3RDDISCOVERY CHARTER SCHOOL 7 48 15 3RD YESDISCOVERY CHARTER SCHOOL 8 24 10 3RD YESTIFFANY ELEMENTARY 15 44 10 2ND YESTIFFANY ELEMENTARY 29 44 10 2ND YES
DECEMBER
Tour
Date
# of
Kids
# of
Adults
Grade
Level
Return
VisitorCASILLAS ELEMENTARY 4 30 6 5TH YESCASILLAS ELEMENTARY 6 46 8 5THCASILLAS ELEMENTARY 11 30 6 5TH YES
2013 Name of School
JANUARY
Tour
Date
# of
Kids
# of
Adults
Grade
Level
Return
VisitorCORKY MCMILLIN ELEM SCHOOL 29 52 10 3RDCORKYMCMILLINELEMSCHOOL 30 52 10 3RDCORKY MCMILLIN ELEM SCHOOL 31 52 10 3RD
March
Tour
Date
# of
Kids
# of
Adults
Grade
Level
Return
VisitorLA PRESA ELEMENTARY 20 32 6 3RDLA PRESA ELEMENTARY 21 32 6 3RDLA PRESA ELEMENTARY 22 32 6 3RD
TOTALS 1234 284
Exhibit A
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
FOR FIVE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30,2012
REVENUES:
Water Sales
Energy Charges
System Charges
MWD & CWA Fixed Charges
Penalties
Total Water Sales
Recycled Water Sales
Sewer Charges
Meter Fees
Capacity Fee Revenues
Betterment Fees for Maintenance
Non-Operating Revenues
Tax Revenues
Interest
Transfer from OPEB
General Fund Draw Down
Transfer from General Fund
Total Revenues
EXPENSES:
Potable Water Purchases
Recycled Water Purchases
CWA-Infrastructure Access Charge
CWA-Customer Service Charge
CWA-Emergency Storage Charge
MWD-Capacity Res Charge
MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge
Subtotal Water Purchases
Power Charges
Payroll & Related Costs
Material & Maintenance
Administrative Expenses
Legal Fees
Expansion Reserve
Betterment Reserve
Replacement Reserve
Transfer to Sewer Fund Reserve
Transfer to General Fund Reserve
Transfer to Sewer Replacement
Total Expenses
EXCESSREVENUE~EXPENS~
Annual
Budget
$ 39,110,200
1,809,500
10,328,400
9,705,800
800,500
61,754,400
7,702,400
2,555,200
112,200
1,180,600
689,400
1,914,300
3,882,600
105,700
879,500
946,900
595,000
$ 82,318,200
$ 30,552,200
1,504,000
1,818,000
1,687,800
4,086,000
504,000
1,610,400
41,762,400
2,368,000
18,856,200
3,747,900
4,424,900
380,000
3,936,000
1,120,000
743,000
595,000
2,285,800
2,099,000
$ 82,318,200
$
YTD
Actual
$ 19,547,250 $
1,020,074
4,012,896
4,163,695
371,462
29,115,377
4,605,927
1,034,511
46,813
496,765
241,299
712,920
298,566
25,721
366,500
394,500
247,900
$ 37,586,798 $
$ 14,759,333 $
840,214
748,565
688,730
1,593,240
226,285
670,713
19,527,079
1,063,548
7,335,401
1,533,382
1,468,517
100,872
1,640,000
466,700
309,600
247,900
952,400
874,600
$ 35,519,999 $
$ 2,066,799 $
YTD YTD
Budget Variance Var%
19,125,900 $ 421,350 2.2%
981,400 38,674 3.9%
3,990,000 22,896 0.6%
4,132,000 31,695 0.8%
388,100 (16,638) (4.3%)
28,617,400 497,977 1.7%
4,555,300 50,627 1.1%
1,049,500 ( 14,989) ( 1.4%)
46,800 13 0.0%
491,900 4,865 1.0%
257,300 (16,001) (6.2%)
729,500 ( 16,580) (2.3%)
292,400 6,166 2.1%
34,000 (8,279) (24.4%)
366,500 0.0%
394,500 0.0%
247,900 0.0%
37,083,000 $ 503,798 1.4%
14,943,200 $ 183,867 1.2%
919,850 79,637 8.7%
748,500 (65) (0.0%)
688,500 (230) (0.0%)
1,593,000 (240) (0.0%)
226,500 215 0.1%
671,000 288 0.0%
19,790,550 263,471 1.3%
1,098,000 34,452 3.1%
7,607,111 271,710 3.6%
1,536,058 2,676 0.2%
1,717,548 249,030 14.5%
133,333 32,462 24.3%
1,640,000 0.0%
466,700 0.0%
309,600 0.0%
247,900 0.0%
952,400 0.0%
874,600 0.0%
36,373,800 $ 853,801 2.3%
709,200 $ 1,357,600
F:/MORPT/FS2013-1112 12/20/2012 1147 AM
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW
NOVEMBER 30,2012
INVESTMENT OVERVIEW & MARKET STATUS:
The federal funds rate has remained constant now for over 4 years. On December 16,2008, at the Federal Reserve Board's regular
scheduled meeting, the federal funds rate was lowered from 1.00% to "a target range ofbetween Zero and 0.25%" in response to the
nation's ongoing financial crisis, as well as banking industry pressure to ease credit and stimulate the economy. This marked the ninth
reduction in a row since September 18,2007, when the rate was 5.25%. There have been no further changes made to the federal funds
rate at the Federal Reserve Board's subsequent regular scheduled meetings, the most recent of which was held on September 13,2012.
They went on to say: "The Committee currently anticipates exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate are likely to be
warranted at least through mid-20J5. "
Despite the large drop in available interest rates, the District's overall effective rate of return at November 30th was 0.53%, which was
an increase of 10 basis points (0.10%) from the prior month. At the same time the LAIF return on deposits has fluctuated slightly over
the last several months, reaching an average effective yield of 0.324% for the month of November 2012. Based on our success at
maintaining a competitive rate of return on our portfolio during this extended period of interest rate declines, no changes in investment
strategy are being considered at this time.
In accordance with the District's Investment Policy, all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives, in priority
order, of safety, liquidity, and return on investment.
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE: November 30,2012
Investment State Limit Otar Limit Otar Actual
8.01: Treasury Securities 100% 100% o
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations) $50 Million $50 Million $15.6 Million
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds) 100% 100% 4.91%
8.03: Federal Agency Issues 100% 100% 48.31%
8.04: Certificates of Deposit 30% 15% 0.10%
8.05: Short-Tenn Commercial Notes 25% 15% o
8.06: Medium-Tenn Commercial Debt 30% 15% o
8.07: Money Market Mutual Funds 20% 15% o
8.08: San Diego County Pool 100% 100% 26.69%
12.0: Maximum Single Financial Institution 100% 50% 1.18%
Otay Water District
Investment Portfolio: 11/30/12
$1,063,344
$40,098,070
48.31%
1.280/0
$41,844,798
Total Cash and Investments: $82,311,849 50.41 %
DBanks (Passbook/Checking/CD) .Pools (LAIF & County) DAgencies & Corporate Notes
Performance Measure F-12
Return on Investment
Target: Meet or Exceed 100% of LAIF
0.80J! c
I J 0.70
0.60
0.50.5 c 0.400
E 0.30
:lI.. Gl 0.20
Ill::
0.10
0.00 . 3rd Qtr June
FYI2
4th Qtr
FYI2 Jul FYI3 Aug
FYI3
0.36 0.36 0.36 0.38
0.52 0.51 0.51 0.45
0.16 0.15 0.15 0.07
NovIstQtr 2nd Qtr Apr May
FYI2 FYI2 FYI2 FYI2
Sept 1st Qtr Oct
FYI3 FYI3 FYI3
0.35 0.36 0.34
0.49 0.48 0.43
0.14 0.12 0.09
FYI3
.LAIF
FYI2
0.39 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.320.36
.Otay 0.56 0.52 0.49 0.530.71 0.64
[J Differen.:e 0.18 0.150.32 0.25 0.13 0.21
Month
.LAIF _Olay [JDifference
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 2012
Investments Par
Value
Market
Value
Book
Value
%of
Portfolio Term
Days to
Maturity
YTM
360 Equiv.
YTM
365 Equiv.
Federal Agency Issues-Callable 40,095,000.00 40,121,423.90 40,098,070.66 48.89 881 723 0.491 0.498
Certificates of Deposit -Bank 81,326.80 81,326.80 81,326.80 0.10 731 417 0.280 0.284
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 19,691,486.84 19,717,362.87 19,691,486.84 2401 1 1 0.320 0.324
San Diego County Pool 22,153,311.58 22,030,000.00 22,153,311.58 27.01 1 1 0.426 0.432
Investments 82,021,125.22 81,950,113.57 82,024,195.88 100.00% 432 354 0.432 0.438
Cash
Passbook/Checking (not included in yiela calculations) 982,016.88 982,016.88 982,016.88 0.220 0.223
Total Cash and Investments 83,003,142.10 82,932,130.45 83,006,212.76 432 354 0.432 0.438
Total Earnings November 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 37,440.61 170,815.34
Average Daily Balance 85,792,761.12 85,983,266.94
Effective Rate of Return 0.53% 0.47%
I hereby certify that the investments contained in this report are made in accordance with the District Investment Policy Number 27 adopted by the Board of Directors on September 6, 2006. The
market value information provided by Interactive Data Corporation. The investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow requirements of the District for the next six months of
/;L-;L6-/~
Officer
-expenditures.
Reporting period 11/01/2012-11/30/2012 Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Dale: 1212612012 -11 :58 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
Portfolio Management Page 1
Portfolio Details -Investments
November 30, 2012
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Average
Balance
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value Book Value
Stated
Rate S&P
YTM Days to
360 Maturity
Maturity
Date
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133EAEG9 2241 Federal Farm Credit Bank 05/09/2012 1,360,000.00 1,361,441.60 1,360,000.00 0.550 0.542 818 02127/2015
3133EAU30 2253 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/26/2012 3,000,000.00 2,999,460.00 2,998,561.33 0.320 AA 0.336 831 03/1212015
3133EC2L7 2255 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/13/2012 3,000,000.00 3,003,810.00 3,000,000.00 0.440 AA 0.434 1,077 11/13/2015
313380AV9 2248 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/13/2012 3,000,000.00 3,000,540.00 3,000,000.00 0.450 0.444 804 02113/2015
313380AV9A 2249 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/13/2012 1,030,000.00 1,030,185.40 1,030,000.00 0.450 0.444 804 02/13/2015
313380AV9B 2250 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/13/2012 2,705,000.00 2,705,486.90 2,705,000.00 0.450 0.444 804 02113/2015
313380SU2 2252 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/15/2012 3,000,000.00 3,000,840.00 3,000,000.00 0.410 0.404 865 04/15/2015
3133762C8 2254 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/09/2012 3,000,000.00 3,004,590.00 3,004,509.33 0.375 AA 0.438 361 11/27/2013
3134G3AC4 2226 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 12/06/2011 3,000,000.00 3,000,030.00 3,000,000.00 0.600 0.592 370 12/06/2013
3134G3BN9 2228 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 12105/2011 2,000,000.00 2,000,040.00 2,000,000.00 0.770 AA 0.759 551 06/05/2014
3134G3SS0 2232 Federal Home Loan Mortgage 03/2212012 3,000,000.00 3,003,390.00 3,000,000.00 0.540 0.533 660 09/2212014
3135GOKL6 2238 Federal National Mortage Assoc 04/30/2012 3,000,000.00 3,001,620.00 3,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 698 10/30/2014
3135GOKS1 2240 Federal National Mortage Assoc 05/10/2012 3,000,000.00 3,003,150.00 3,000,000.00 0.560 0.552 801 02110/2015
3135GOLF8 2242 Federal National Mortage Assoc 05/24/2012 3,000,000.00 3,003,420.00 3,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 723 11/24/2014
3135GOLL5 2244 Federal National Mortage Assoc 06/04/2012 3,000,000.00 3,003,420.00 3,000,000.00 0.550 0.542 733 12104/2014--------
Subtotal and Average 40,030,273.63 40,095,000,00 40,121,423.90 40,098,070.66 0.491 723
Certificates of Deposit Bank
2050003183-5 2229 California Bank & Trust 01/2212012 81,326.80 81,326.80 81,326.80 0.280 0.280 417 01/2212014--------
Subtotal and Average 81,326.80 81,326.80 81,326.80 81,326.80 0.280 417 -
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 07101/2004 15,616,662.48 15,637,183.90 15,616,662.48 0.324 0.320
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 04/21/2010 4,074,824.36 4,080,178.97 4,074,824.36 0.324 0.320 --------
Subtotal and Average 20,498,153.51 19,691,486.84 19,717,362.87 19,691,486.84 0.320
San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County 07101/2004 22,153,311.58 22,030,000.00 22,153,311.58 0.432 0.426--------
Subtotal and Average 22,153,311.58 22,153,311.58 22,030,000.00 22,153,311.58 0.426
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date: 12126/2012 -11:58 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details -Investments
November 30,2012
Average Purchase Stated YTM Days to
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate S&P 360 Maturity
Total and Average 85,792,761.12 82,021,125.22 81,950,113.57 82,024,195.88 0.432 354
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Dale: 12/2612012 -11 :58 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
OlAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
Page 3
November 30,2012
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Average
Balance
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value Book Value
Stated
Rate S&P
YTM
360
Days to
Maturity
Union Bank
UNION MONEY
PETTY CASH
UNION OPERATING
PAYROLL
RESERVE-10 COPS
RESERVE-10 BABS
UBNA-2010 BOND
UBNA-FLEX ACCT
9002
9003
9004
9005
9010
9011
9013
9014
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
07/01/2004
07/01/2004
07/01/2004
07/01/2004
04/20/2010
04/20/2010
04/20/2010
01/0112011
10,005.08
2,950.00
831,679.98
27,971.60
6,484.01
17,650.98
70,015.05
15,260.18
10,005.08
2,950.00
831,679.98
27,971.60
6,484.01
17,650.98
70,015.05
15,260.18
10,005.08
2,950.00
831,679.98
27,971.60
6,484.01
17,650.98
70,015.05
15,260.18
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
0.147
0.010
0.000
0.247
0.000
0.010
0.010
0.145
0.000
Average Balance 0.00
Total Cash and Investments 85,792,761.12 83,003,142.10 82,932,130.45 83,006,212.76 0.432 354
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Dale: 1212612012 -11 :58 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
OlAY
Activity Report
Sorted By Issuer
July 1,2012 -November 30,2012
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Percent
of Portfolio
Par Value
Beginning
Balance
Current
Rate
Transaction
Date
Purchases or
Deposits
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
Ending
Balance
Issuer: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Union Bank
UNION MONEY
UNION OPERATING
RESERVE-10 COPS
RESERVE-10 BABS
UBNA-FLEX ACCT
9002
9004
9010
9011
9014
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance 1,445,116.45
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
54,464,540.34
3,800,556.89
1,035,795.99
2,722,233.75
21,000.00
62,044,126.97
54,464,541.17
4,259,845.33
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
47,840.04
62,507,226.54 982,016.88
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0.324
0.324
39,433,406.74
7,247.75
31,350,000.00
0.00
Subtotal and Balance 11,600,832.35 39,440,654.49 31,350,000.00 19,691,486.84
Issuer Subtotal 24.907% 13,045,948.80 101,484,781.46 93,857,226.54 20,673,503.72
Issuer: California Bank & Trust
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Subtotal and Balance 81,326.80 81,326.80
Issuer Subtotal 0.098% 81,326.80 0.00 0.00 81,326.80
Issuer: Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31331KZFO 2219 Federal Farm Credit Bank
3133EAU30 2253 Federal Farm Credit Bank
3133EC2L7 2255 Federal Farm Credit Bank
Subtotal and Balance 4,360,000.00
0.481
0.320
0.440
09/05/2012
10/26/2012
11/13/2012
0.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
3,000,000.00 7,360,000.00
Issuer Subtotal 8.867% 4,360,000.00 6,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 7,360,000.00
Run Date: 12/26/2012 -12:02
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF_DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
Page 2 Activity Report
July 1, 2012 -November 30, 2012
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Percent
of Portfolio
Par Value-----
Beginning
Balance
Current
Rate
Transaction
Date
Purchases or
Deposits
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
Ending
Balance
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
313378KU4
3133794G1
313379JC4
313379R84
313379SP5
313379UT4
313380AV9
313380AV9A
313380AV9B
313380BG1
313380BG1
313380SU2
3133762C8
2233
2239
2243
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2251
2252
2254
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
Federal Home loan Bank
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.450
0.500
0.450
0.450
0.450
0.500
0.410
0.375
09/1212012
07/15/2012
07/05/2012
07/13/2012
07/19/2012
07/27/2012
08/13/2012
08/13/2012
08/13/2012
08/13/2012
09/13/2012
10/15/2012
11/09/2012
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
3,000,000.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3.000.000.00
3.000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
Subtotal and Balance 18,000,000.00 15,735,000.00 21,000,000.00 12,735,000.00
Issuer Subtotal 15.343% 18,000,000.00 15,735,000.00 21,000,000.00 12,735,000.00
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3137EACK3
3137EACK3A
3137EACK3B
3134G3AQ3
2146
2148
2149
2227
Federal Home loan Mortgage
Federal Home loan Mortgage
Federal Home loan Mortgage
Federal Home loan Mortgage
1.125
1.125
1.125
0.710
07/27/2012
07/27/2012
07/27/2012
11/30/2012
000
0.00
000
0.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,707,000.00
2,000,000.00
Subtotal and Balance 15,737,000.00 0.00 7,737,000.00 8,000,000.00
Issuer Subtotal 9.638% 15,737,000.00 0.00 7,737,000.00 8,000,000.00
Issuer: Federal National Mortage Assoc
--
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3135GOJG9 2234 Federal National Mortage Assoc 0.520 09/26/2012 0.00 3.000.000.00
Subtotal and Balance 15,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 12,000,000.00
Issuer Subtotal 14.457% 15,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 12,000,000.00
Run Dale: 12/2612012 , 2:02
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF_DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
Activity Report
July 1, 2012 -November 30, 2012
Page 3
Par Value Par Value
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Percent
of Portfolio
Beginning
Balance
Current
Rate
Transaction
Date
Purchases or
Deposits
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
Ending
Balance
Issuer: San Diego County
San Diego County Pool
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Balance 22,109,219.22
0.432 44,092.36
44,092.36
0.00
0.00 22,153,311.58
Issuer Subtotal 26.690% 22,109,219.22 44,092.36 0.00 22,153,311.58
Total 100.000% 88,333,494.82 123,263,873.82 128,594,226.54 83,003,142.10
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date: 1212612012 -12:02 DA (PRF_DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
GASS 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
July 1,2012 -November 30,2012
Adjustment in Value
CUSIP Investment # Fund
Investment
Class Maturity
Date
Beginning
Invested Value
Purchase
of Principal
Addition
to Principal
Redemption
of Principal
Amortization
Adjustment
Change In
Market Value
Ending
Invested Value
Fund: Treasury Fund
LAIF 9001 99 Fair Value 7,542,443,62 0,00 39,433,406,74 31,350,000,00 0,00 11,333,54 15,637,183,90
UNION MONEY 9002 99 Amortized 10,005,91 0,00 54,464,540,34 54,464,541,17 0,00 0,00 10,005,08
PETTY CASH 9003 99 Amortized 2,950,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2,950,00
UNION OPERATING 9004 99 Amortized 1,290,968.42 0,00 3,800,556,89 4,259,845,33 0,00 0,00 831,679,98
PAYROLL 9005 99 Amortized 27,971,60 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 27,971,60
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 99 Fair Value 22,089,000,00 0,00 44,092,36 0,00 0,00 -103,092,36 22,030,000,00
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 99 Amortized 688,02 0,00 1,035,795,99 1,030,000,00 0.00 0,00 6,484,01
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 99 Amortized 417,23 0,00 2,722,233.75 2,705,000,00 0.00 0,00 17,650,98
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 99 Fair Value 4,072,537,60 0,00 7,247,75 0,00 0,00 393.62 4,080,178,97
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 99 Amortized 70,015,05 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 70,015,05
3137EACK3 2146 99 Fair Value 07/27/2012 2,001,300.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,300.00 0.00
3137EACK3A 2148 99 Fair Value 07/27/2012 1,030,669,50 0,00 0.00 1,030,000.00 0,00 ·669,50 0.00
3137EACK3B 2149 99 Fair Value 07/27/2012 2,708,759,55 0,00 0.00 2,707,000.00 0.00 -1,759.55 0.00
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 99 Amortized 42,100.22 0.00 21,000.00 47,840.04 0.00 0.00 15,260.18
31331KZFO 2219 99 Fair Value 12123/2013 3,000,030.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000,00 0.00 ·30,00 0.00
3134G3AC4 2226 99 Fair Value 12106/2013 3,000,600,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00 ·570,00 3,000,030.00
3134G3AQ3 2227 99 Fair Value 05/30/2014 2,001,980.00 0.00 0,00 2,000,000.00 0.00 -1,980,00 0.00
3134G3BN9 2228 99 Fair Value 06/05/2014 2,003,140.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 -3,100.00 2,000,040.00
2050003183-5 2229 99 Amortized 01/22/2014 81,326.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 81,326.80
3134G3SS0 2232 99 Fair Value 09/2212014 3,003,870.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -480.00 3,003,390.00
313378KU4 2233 99 Fair Value 09/12/2014 3,001,350,00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 -1,350.00 0.00
3135GOJG9 2234 99 Fair Value 09/26/2014 3,003,000.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 -3,000.00 0.00
3135GOKL6 2238 99 Fair Value 10/30/2014 2,993,970.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 7,650.00 3,001,620.00
3133794G1 2239 99 Fair Value 05/15/2014 2,998,560,00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0,00 1,440.00 0.00
3135GOKS1 2240 99 Fair Value 02110/2015 2,997,450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,700.00 3,003,150.00
3133EAEG9 2241 99 Fair Value 02127/2015 1,361,632.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ·190.40 1,361,441.60
3135GOLF8 2242 99 Fair Value 11124/2014 2,999,640.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,780.00 3,003,420.00
313379JC4 2243 99 Fair Value 06/05/2014 3,000,060.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0,00 -60.00 0.00
3135GOLL5 2244 99 Fair Value 12104/2014 2,999,340.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,080.00 3,003,420.00
313379R84 2245 99 Fair Value 06/13/2014 2,996,460.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,540.00 0.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Dale: 1212612012 -12:02 GO (PRF_GO) 7.1,1
Report Ver. 7.3,3b
OTAY
GASS 31 Compliance Detail Page 2
Sorted by Fund -Fund
Adjustment in Value
CUSIP Investment # Fund
Investment
Class Maturity
Date
Beginning
Invested Value
Purchase
of Principal
Addition
to Principal
Redemption
of Principal
Amortization
Adjustment
Change in
Market Value
Ending
Invested Value
Fund: Treasury Fund
313379SP5 2246 99 Fair Value 12/19/2013 2,996,610.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,390.00 0.00
313379UT4 2247 99 Fair Value 06/27/2014 2,998,230.00 0.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 1,770.00 0.00
313380AV9 2248 99 Fair Value 02113/2015 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 540.00 3,000,540.00
313380AV9A 2249 99 Fair Value 02113/2015 0.00 1,030,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 185.40 1,030,185.40
313380AV9B 2250 99 Fair Value 02113/2015 0.00 2,705,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 486.90 2,705,486.90
313380BG1 2251 99 Fair Value 02113/2015 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
313380SU2 2252 99 Fair Value 04/15/2015 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 840.00 3,000,840.00
3133EAU30 2253 99 Fair Value 03/1212015 0.00 2,998,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 960.00 2,999,460.00
3133762C8 2254 99 Fair Value 11/27/2013 0.00 3,004,788.00 0.00 000 0.00 -198.00 3,004,590.00
3133EC2L7 2255 99 Fair Value 11/13/2015 0.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,810.00 3,003,810.00
Subtotal 88,327,075.52 21,738,288.00 101,528,873.82 128,594,226.54 0.00 -67,880.35 82,932,130.45
Total 88,327,075.52 21,738,288.00 101,528,873.82 128,594,226.54 0.00 -67,880.35 82,932,130.45
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date: 1212612012 -12:02 GO (PRF_GO) 7.1.1
Report Ver 7.3.3b
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 11/30/2012
Investment Book Par Market Current YTM Current Maturityl Modified
Security ID Investment # Fund Issuer Class Value Value Value Rate 360 Yield Call Date Duration
3134G3BN9 2228 99 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Fair 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,040.00 .7700000 0.759 0.769 06/05/2014 1.493
3134G3SS0 2232 99 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,003,390.00 .5400000 0.533 0.477 09/2212014 1.796
3134G3AC4 2226 99 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,030.00 .6000000 0.592 0.599 12/06/2013 1.006
3135GOKL6 2238 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,001,620.00 .5000000 0.493 0.472 10/30/2014 1.902
3135GOLF8 2242 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,003,420.00 .5000000 0.493 0.442 11/24/2014 1.969
3135GOKS1 2240 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,003,150.00 .5600000 0.552 0512 02110/2015 2.171
3135GOLL5 2244 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,003,420.00 .5500000 0.542 0.493 12104/2014 1.989
313380AV9B 2250 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 2,705,000.00 2,705,000.00 2,705,486.90 .4500000 0.444 0.442 02113/2015 2.183
3133762C8 2254 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 3,004,509.33 3,000,000.00 3,004,590.00 .3750000 0.438 0.220 11/27/2013 0.986
313380AV9 2248 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,540.00 .4500000 0.444 0.442 02113/2015 2.183
313380SU2 2252 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,840.00 .4100000 0.404 0.398 04/15/2015 2.357
313380AV9A 2249 99 Federal Home Loan Bank Fair 1,030,000.00 1,030,000.00 1,030,185.40 .4500000 0.444 0.442 02113/2015 2.183
3133EC2L7 2255 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,003,810.00 .4400000 0.434 0.397 11/13/2015 2.927
3133EAU30 2253 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 2,998,561.33 3,000,000.00 2,999,460.00 .3200000 0.336 0.328 03/1212015 2.268
3133EAEG9 2241 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 1,360,000.00 1,360,000.00 1,361,441.60 .5500000 0.542 0.502 02127/2015 2.219
2050003183-5 2229 99 California Bank & Trust Amort 81,326.80 81,326.80 81,326.80 .2800000 0.280 0.280 01/2212014 1.140
LAIF COPS07 9009 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 0.00 0.00 0.00 1530000 1.509 1.530 0.000
LAIF 9001 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 15,616,662.48 15,616,662.48 15,637,183.90 .3240000 0.320 0.324 0000
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 4,074,824.36 4,074,824.36 4,080,178.97 3240000 0.320 0.324 0.000
SD COUNTY 9007 99 San Diego County Fair 22,153,311.58 22,153,311.58 22,030,000.00 .4320000 0.426 0.432 0.000
Report Total 82,024,195,88 82,021,125.22 81,950,113.57 0.417 0,963
Portfolio OTAY
AP
Run Date: 12126/2012 -12:03 Page 1 DU (PRF_DU) 7.11
Report VeL 7.3.3b
Check Total
5,505.92
550.97
65.30
5,764.07
3,719.46
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2035206 11/14/12 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3505 10/24/12 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (10/11/12-10/21/12) 776.25 776.25
2035303 11/28/12 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3522 11/06/12 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (10/28/12) 690.00 690.00
2035304 11/28/12 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1123 11/08/12 DEVELOPER PLANCHECKS (10/1/12-11/2/12) 19,218.65 19,218.65
2035207 11/14/12 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131264268 10/23/12 AQUA AMMONIA 3,075.16131264270 10/23/12 AQUA AMMONIA 1,306.16
131264267 10/23/12 AQUA AMMONIA 967.42131264269 10/23/12 AQUA AMMONIA 157.18
2035305 11/28/12 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9010153672 11/08/12 BREATHING AIR 206.64 206.64
2035161 11/07/12 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES # 509 0509004943353 10/25/12 TRASH SERVICES (11/1/12-11/30/12) 490.280509004945105 10/25/12 TRASH SERVICES (11/1/12-11/30/12) 60.69
2035208 11/14/12 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570MK 11/01/12 PAGER SERVICES (OCT 2012) 179.73 179.73
2035306 11/28/12 06165 ANITA FIRE HOSE COMPANY ETC 716772 11/07/12 10 FEET HOSES 601.28 601.28
2035209 11/14/12 00002 ANSWER INC 7347 10/22/12 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY) 1,100.00 1,100.00
2035307 11/28/12 00002 ANSWER INC 7485 11/21/12 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY) 1,100.00 1,100.00
2035162 11/07/12 05758 AT&T 61942256051012 10/20/12 PHONE SERVICES (10/20/12-11/19/12) 53.97 53.97
2035271 11/21/12 05758 AT&T 082164572810251 10/25/12 PHONE SERVICES (10/25/12-11/24/12) 2,312.78 2,312.78
2035272 11/21/12 05758 AT&T 61969851401012 10/24/12 PHONE SERVICES (MONTHLY) 32.6561967053091012 10/15/12 PHONE SERVICES (MONTHLY) 32.65
2035308 11/28/12 05758 AT&T 33784130451112 11/07/12 PHONE SERVICES (11/7/12-12/6/12) 31.76 31.76
2035309 11/28/12 07785 AT&T 000003825563 11/27/12 PHONE SERVICES (10/2/12-11/1/12) 5,748.36000003827781 11/02/12 PHONE SERVICES (10/2/12-11/1/12) 15.71
2035310 11/28/12 08330 AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 8547826251012 10/22/12 INTERNET BANDWIDTH (10/21/12-11/20/12) 2,028.00 2,028.00
2035210 11/14/12 12810 ATKINS 1152175 10/15/12 DESALINATION PROJECT (ENDING 9/30/12) 1,666.00 1,666.00
2035311 11/28/12 11285 AZTEC FIRE & SAFETY INC 48352 11/02/12 MIC TESTING 3,324.0048338 11/02/12 LOCKER MAINTENANCE 395.46
2035211 11/14/12 08024 BACKGROUND PROFILES INC 4759 11/01/12 BACKGROUND CHECK (10/17/12-10/24/12) 56.00 56.00
2035163 11/07/12 12684 BALDWIN & SONS LLC 003964 11/06/12 W/O REFUND D0740-090108 3,036.69 3,036.69
Page 1 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2,152.14
11,886.50
6,371.16
7,306.75
240.00
2035312 11/28/12 03526 BALDWIN COOKE 3364740 11/03/12 2013 PLANNERS 172.49 172.49
2035212 11/14/12 00145 BARRETT ENGINEERED PUMPS 082889 10/24/12 CUTTER BAR 1,562.38 1,562.38
2035164 11/07/12 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI244656 10/15/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,446.04BPI244655 10/15/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 487.49BPI244845 10/16/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 218.61
2035213 11/14/12 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI246055 10/18/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,262.63BPI248372 10/25/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,061.53BPI246801 10/22/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,422.01BPI247178 10/23/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,109.41BPI246053 10/18/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 973.88BPI248371 10/25/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 712.63BPI246054 10/18/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 662.36
BPI246800 10/22/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 499.51BPI247971 10/22/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 182.54
2035273 11/21/12 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI250518 11/01/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 3,120.54BPI249079 10/29/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,334.56
BPI249080 10/29/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 915.94BPI249385 10/30/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 672.21BPI249386 10/30/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 327.91
2035313 11/28/12 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI252281 11/08/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,894.29BPI252654 11/09/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,346.58
BPI251020 11/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,272.26BPI250519 11/01/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,003.37BPI251021 11/05/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 790.25
2035274 11/21/12 03450 BUELNA, ARMANDO 003986 11/06/12 REIMBURSE POSTAGE 163.80 163.80
2035214 11/14/12 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 43536 10/22/12 CRUSHED ROCK 101.14 101.14
2035215 11/14/12 03341 CA DEPT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 003979 11/07/12 LICENSE REQUEST FORM 245.00 245.00
2035216 11/14/12 00319 CA DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 209231112 11/07/12 APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATION 80.00 80.00
2035217 11/14/12 02401 CAJON VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DIST 11532 10/29/12 GARDEN TOUR 160.0011530 10/25/12 GARDEN TOUR 80.00
Page 2 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
683.49
4,473.00
2,485.00
13,782.76
2035218 11/14/12 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 121948 10/26/12 ASPHALT 1,919.16 1,919.16
2035314 11/28/12 05211 CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION ON THE 003991 11/12/12 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION FEE 3,000.00 3,000.00
2035219 11/14/12 00192 CALIFORNIA WATER ENVIRONMENT 040154081112 11/05/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 90.00 90.00
2035315 11/28/12 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7596 11/01/12 RECORDS MGMT SVCS (10/2/12-10/19/12) 414.70 414.70
2035220 11/14/12 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 14359960 10/26/12 PRINTERS 635.73 635.73
2035316 11/28/12 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 14389170 11/05/12 2013 CALENDARS 398.3514377910 10/31/12 2013 CALENDARS 285.14
2035165 11/07/12 06518 CORKY MCMILLIN CONSTRUCTION 003969 11/01/12 W/O REFUND D0032-010153 4,546.84 4,546.84
2035317 11/28/12 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1253710 10/31/12 TAPE STORAGE (OCT 2012) 328.39 328.39
2035221 11/14/12 02612 COUNCIL OF WATER UTILITIES 003974 11/07/12 MEETING REGISTRATION 25.00 25.00
2035222 11/14/12 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH130107D11 10/23/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (9/26/12) 994.00DEH130108D11 10/23/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (9/27/12) 923.00DEH130106D11 10/23/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (9/26/12) 923.00DEH130104D11 10/23/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (9/25/12) 923.00DEH130096D11 10/23/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (9/6/12) 710.00
2035318 11/28/12 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH130150D11 11/14/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (10/4/12) 923.00DEH130149D11 11/14/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (10/2/12) 710.00
DEH130151D11 11/14/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (10/2/12) 426.00DEH130143D11 11/14/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (10/18/12) 142.00DEH130144D11 11/14/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (10/24/12) 142.00DEH130145D11 11/14/12 SHUT DOWN TEST (10/18/12) 142.00
2035319 11/28/12 00206 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2282 10/15/12 ELECTION COSTS FOR DIV 5 7,956.002281 10/15/12 ELECTION COSTS FOR DIV 2 5,708.00
2347 10/26/12 ADS FOR GENERAL ELECTION 118.76
2035166 11/07/12 02122 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2012100802310S 10/08/12 ENGINEERING CHARGES 413.00 413.00
2035167 11/07/12 14472 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 003970 10/02/12 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT 47,370.00 47,370.00
2035168 11/07/12 14472 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 003966 11/01/12 W/O REFUND D0551-090084 4,968.63 4,968.63
2035223 11/14/12 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - DPW 160786 09/30/12 EXCAVATION PERMITS (SEPT 2012) 2,287.25 2,287.25
2035224 11/14/12 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS SAN DIEGO 27171012 10/30/12 INTERNET SERVICES (10/29/12-11/28/12) 1,500.00
Page 3 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
3,000.00
1,040.00
1,710.00
4,083.73
2,083.63
28811012 10/30/12 INTERNET SERVICES (10/29/12-11/28/12) 1,500.00
2035225 11/14/12 00693 CSDA, SAN DIEGO CHAPTER 003981 11/08/12 QUARTERLY MEETING 117.00 117.00
2035169 11/07/12 14471 CWC REGIONAL HOUSING Ref002424963 11/05/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193034 123.76 123.76
2035320 11/28/12 14008 DELL AWARDS 191486 11/09/12 RETIREMENT PLAQUE 64.11 64.11
2035275 11/21/12 03744 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 939645 11/06/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES (OCT 2012) 49.00 49.00
2035276 11/21/12 03417 DIRECTV 19058722835 11/05/12 SATELLITE TV (11/4/12-12/3/12) 36.90 36.90
2035170 11/07/12 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 1554581012 10/31/12 RECYCLING SERVICES (OCT 2012) 90.00 90.00
2035277 11/21/12 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 0058526IN 10/31/12 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (OCT 2012) 680.00 680.00
2035226 11/14/12 00331 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 925023841012 10/25/12 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (7/1/12-9/30/12) 7,776.00 7,776.00
2035321 11/28/12 03765 ENGINEERING PARTNERS INC, THE 111512602647 10/30/12 DESIGN SERVICES (4/24/12-10/30/12) 1,682.50 1,682.50
2035227 11/14/12 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 2100762 10/22/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (10/6/12-10/11/12) 555.002100611 10/15/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (10/2/12-10/5/12) 485.00
2035322 11/28/12 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 2110348 11/05/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (10/20/12-10/30/12) 710.002100917 10/29/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (10/12/12-10/19/12) 545.00
2110556 11/12/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (10/31/12-11/5/12) 455.00
2035228 11/14/12 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0102447 10/23/12 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 255.00 255.00
2035229 11/14/12 03757 FANDEL ENTERPRISES INC 1521 10/15/12 TELECOM CONSULTING (7/1/12-10/15/12) 4,980.00 4,980.00
2035323 11/28/12 13123 FAVELA PRINTING INC 806 11/05/12 BINDING 145.46 145.46
2035230 11/14/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0421136 10/26/12 INVENTORY 3,297.150420420 10/23/12 VALVE CAN 786.58
2035324 11/28/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0421317 10/30/12 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 940.040421321 11/07/12 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 523.230421781 11/07/12 INVENTORY 377.130421779 11/07/12 INVENTORY 197.72
0421319 10/30/12 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 45.51
2035325 11/28/12 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 900340102 10/31/12 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (10/1/12-10/31/12) 99.00 99.00
2035231 11/14/12 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 202080 10/19/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 509.03 509.03
Page 4 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
3,564.28
1,142.42
2035326 11/28/12 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 203678 11/02/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 396.51 396.51
2035232 11/14/12 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3963105 10/19/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 284.70 284.70
2035327 11/28/12 11962 FLEETWASH INC 3628888 07/15/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 574.883636942 07/22/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 455.523915688 07/20/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 349.313824946 03/02/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 337.263594657 06/03/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 291.27x57734 10/26/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 247.473752734 12/02/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 216.813975765 11/02/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 210.24
3869255 05/11/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 185.093670316 08/26/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 164.253826286 03/09/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 144.543710288 10/14/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 143.45
3642902 07/29/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 120.453930842 08/24/12 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 59.133710301 10/14/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 39.42
3654131 08/05/11 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 25.19
2035171 11/07/12 14469 FMRE LLC Ref002424961 11/05/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186887 42.30 42.30
2035172 11/07/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425061 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 90.00 90.00
2035278 11/21/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425241 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 90.00 90.00
2035173 11/07/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425067 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
2035279 11/21/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425247 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
2035233 11/14/12 07224 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC 9530271342150 10/15/12 ARO-PLATE 775.349530271347220 10/25/12 ARO-PLATE 367.08
2035328 11/28/12 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 147 11/01/12 GARDEN TOURS (OCT 2012) 4,960.00 4,960.00
2035329 11/28/12 03537 GHA TECHNOLOGIES INC 739397 10/30/12 COMPUTERS 9,774.00 9,774.00
2035234 11/14/12 00131 GOVERNMENT FIN OFFICERS ASSN 003982 11/08/12 APPLICATION FEE 505.00 505.00
2035235 11/14/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9953162865 10/16/12 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 527.559955271904 10/18/12 BALLAST IGNITORS 431.129955271912 10/18/12 FILTERS 379.51
Page 5 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2,423.51
1,448.44
6,163.60
24,343.41
9954857703 10/18/12 REPLACEMENT TOOLS 378.429959450397 10/24/12 FAN MOTOR/STARTER 229.649959524878 10/24/12 SAMPLING BUCKETS 146.01
9959524860 10/24/12 BLOWER / MOTOR 139.889954998382 10/18/12 FILTERS 85.389959450405 10/24/12 FAN MOTOR/STARTER 79.459959524852 10/24/12 SAMPLING BUCKETS 26.55
2035330 11/28/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9972208210 11/08/12 SUPPLIES 1,075.689972443825 11/08/12 SUPPLIES 256.89
9968354119 11/05/12 MEASURING WHEEL 74.829965350888 10/31/12 TOOLS 41.05
2035236 11/14/12 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 10099 10/26/12 TREE TRIMMING 3,650.00 3,650.00
2035331 11/28/12 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 10142 10/30/12 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (OCT 2012) 8,650.00 8,650.00
2035332 11/28/12 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 34364 11/01/12 NETWORK SERVICES (11/1/12-12/31/12) 3,173.00 3,173.00
2035333 11/28/12 00174 HACH COMPANY 8013631 11/01/12 HACH ANALYZERS 2,453.73 2,453.73
2035334 11/28/12 14481 HANNA MARIA LLC 003989 11/21/12 W/O REFUND D0474-090057 81.44 81.44
2035280 11/21/12 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE Ben2425225 11/21/12 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 5,428.92 5,428.92
2035281 11/21/12 05986 HAVS INCORPORATED 68771 11/14/12 AUDIO/VIDEO UPGRADE 4,142.56 4,142.56
2035335 11/28/12 06640 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 5683096 11/08/12 DMMR RECEIVER KIT 3,448.00 3,448.00
2035237 11/14/12 04472 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIO 91 11/09/12 CONSULTANT SERVICES (SEPT 2012) 3,600.0092 11/09/12 CONSULTANT SERVICES (OCT 2012) 2,563.60
2035238 11/14/12 04472 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIO 92a 11/09/12 PAYMENT OF LEVY 1,036.40 1,036.40
2035336 11/28/12 02096 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 0000292401112 11/13/12 TEMPORARY METER (9/27/12-10/30/12) 149.02 149.02
2035337 11/28/12 12335 HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES LLC U3008205 09/09/12 CREDIT CARD PYMT SVC (OCT 2012) 3,024.00 3,024.00
2035239 11/14/12 06511 HUDSON SAFE-T-LITE RENTALS 00012658 10/17/12 BARRICADE RENTALS 352.50 352.50
2035338 11/28/12 08969 INFOSEND INC 63035 10/31/12 POSTAGE (OCT 2012) 13,660.6163134 11/02/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (OCT 2012) 5,356.6063034 10/31/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (OCT 2012) 5,326.20
2035339 11/28/12 14324 INTELLECT IT LLC 6316 10/29/12 NETWORK ENGINEERING (10/6/12-10/17/12) 1,650.00 1,650.00
Page 6 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
225.20
4,977.53
29,860.50
129.32
2035340 11/28/12 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 2396 10/31/12 PLANT SERVICES (OCT 2012) 186.00 186.00
2035174 11/07/12 13899 INTERMEDIA.NET INC 12110087 11/01/12 EXCHANGE OUTSOURCING (10/2/12-11/1/12) 4,353.35 4,353.35
2035175 11/07/12 11514 INTERNATIONAL RIGHT OF WAY 243734 09/19/12 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 225.00 225.00
2035341 11/28/12 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO10120173 10/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (OCT 2012) 1,119.82 1,119.82
2035342 11/28/12 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 565496 CREDIT MEMO -3,000.00565303 11/01/12 CHLORINE 3,225.20
2035240 11/14/12 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0090103 10/16/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (5/15/12-9/30/12) 2,868.830090102 10/16/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (8/24/12-9/30/12) 1,804.500090101 10/16/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (7/28/12-9/30/12) 304.20
2035176 11/07/12 14473 JP MORGAN CHASE 003965 11/06/12 W/O REFUND D0225-060062 2,790.59 2,790.59
2035241 11/14/12 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5231 10/15/12 PAVING SERVICES 58,638.00 58,638.00
2035343 11/28/12 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5248 11/08/12 PAVING SERVICES 5,513.005246 11/08/12 PAVING SERVICES 4,780.505245 11/08/12 PAVING SERVICES 4,184.50
5244 11/08/12 PAVING SERVICES 3,980.005142 10/31/12 PAVING SERVICES 3,457.005141 10/31/12 PAVING SERVICES 3,394.505249 11/08/12 PAVING SERVICES 3,292.00
5247 11/08/12 PAVING SERVICES 1,259.00
2035344 11/28/12 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 111354 10/31/12 DELIVERY SERVICES (10/5/12-10/19/12) 181.50 181.50
2035242 11/14/12 12276 KONECRANES INC SDG00719111 10/18/12 HOIST REPAIR 400.00 400.00
2035345 11/28/12 14036 KRATOS / HBE SM39563 11/02/12 MAIN GATE REPAIR 280.00 280.00
2035346 11/28/12 14460 KUBE ENGINEERING TEQE578 10/30/12 ROYCE METER 1,443.37 1,443.37
2035347 11/28/12 01859 LA PRENSA SAN DIEGO 23955 11/06/12 JOB POSTING 36.00 36.00
2035348 11/28/12 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 266986 11/08/12 LANDFILL 51.36266988 11/08/12 LANDFILL 45.68266987 11/08/12 LANDFILL 32.28
2035177 11/07/12 14465 LARRY BAREIS Ref002424957 11/05/12 UB Refund Cst #0000002963 196.63 196.63
2035178 11/07/12 05632 LARSON, BRAD 003956 11/02/12 SAFETY BOOTS 137.00 137.00
Page 7 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2,707.72
1,526.45
2035243 11/14/12 03607 LEE & RO INC LR15099 08/02/12 DESIGN SERVICES (5/26/12-7/27/12) 9,781.07 9,781.07
2035349 11/28/12 03607 LEE & RO INC LR15100 11/09/12 INTERCONNECTION (5/26/12-7/27/12) 3,992.20 3,992.20
2035350 11/28/12 07784 LICON, HECTOR 003993 11/27/12 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 65.00 65.00
2035282 11/21/12 03019 LOPEZ, JOSE 70100912 11/13/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (SEPT 2012) 12.77 12.77
2035179 11/07/12 10512 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC 003958 11/06/12 POSTAGE FOR RATE INCREASE NOTICES 473.40 473.40
2035283 11/21/12 10512 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC OWD7855 09/26/12 INFORMATIONAL POSTCARDS 256.74 256.74
2035180 11/07/12 14468 MALLINALLI SCHIEFERSTEIN Ref002424960 11/05/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184877 16.54 16.54
2035181 11/07/12 14467 MARIA PERSICHILLI Ref002424959 11/05/12 UB Refund Cst #0000157856 93.07 93.07
2035351 11/28/12 02902 MARSTON+MARSTON INC 2012111 10/31/12 COMMUNITY OUTREACH (OCT 2012) 5,000.00 5,000.00
2035244 11/14/12 05329 MASTER METER INC 0208559IN 10/17/12 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 12,169.41 12,169.41
2035352 11/28/12 05329 MASTER METER INC 0209863IN 11/12/12 INVENTORY 20,706.45 20,706.45
2035353 11/28/12 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0075917IN 11/09/12 REPROGRAPHICS SVCS 1,665.500075870IN 11/07/12 REPROGRAPHICS SVCS 538.750075867IN 11/07/12 REPROGRAPHICS SVCS 503.47
2035245 11/14/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 39553534 CREDIT MEMO -102.1539364808 10/18/12 PUSH BROOMS 636.5739296565 10/18/12 AIR COMPRESSOR 462.7339666945 10/24/12 PARTS/MATERIALS 307.09
39619565 10/23/12 AIR COMPRESSOR 144.7139161768 10/16/12 SURGE TANK PARTS 77.50
2035354 11/28/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 40085698 10/31/12 FLAGS 526.56 526.56
2035182 11/07/12 03745 MEDEROS, CHARLES 003957 11/02/12 SAFETY BOOTS 96.96 96.96
2035246 11/14/12 01824 MERKEL & ASSOCIATES INC 12101713 10/23/12 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (9/1/12-9/30/12) 3,580.54 3,580.54
2035355 11/28/12 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 33488900 10/31/12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 2,278.51 2,278.51
2035247 11/14/12 12016 MTGL INC 36721 10/19/12 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (9/1/12-10/31/12) 11,508.00 11,508.00
2035183 11/07/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2425057 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,338.15 8,338.15
2035284 11/21/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2425237 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,338.15 8,338.15
2035285 11/21/12 14118 NORTHSTAR COURIER INC 1620 11/09/12 COURIER SERVICES 30.25 30.25
Page 8 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
1,097.97
1,956.04
1,792.50
2035248 11/14/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 630060203001 10/24/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 56.99 56.99
2035249 11/14/12 03149 ON SITE LASER LLC 47132 10/17/12 PRINTER SERVICES 146.88 146.88
2035250 11/14/12 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S3876338001 10/19/12 CUTTING DIES 79.65 79.65
2035356 11/28/12 06856 ORPAK USA INC 42122 10/05/12 SOFTWARE UPGRADE & IT SUPPORT 1,100.00 1,100.00
2035184 11/07/12 06649 OTAY MESA PROPERTY LP 003967 11/01/12 W/O REFUND D0459-090007 35,319.92 35,319.92
2035185 11/07/12 14474 OTAY RANCH TWENTY ONE LLC 003960 11/06/12 W/O REFUND D0817-090086 3,379.17 3,379.17
2035186 11/07/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2425053 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 679.00 679.00
2035286 11/21/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2425231 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 686.00 686.00
2035251 11/14/12 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 156352 10/24/12 SERVICE SADDLE 809.20156402 10/24/12 TRUCK TOOLS 288.77
2035357 11/28/12 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 156400 11/06/12 INVENTORY 970.83156357 11/07/12 INVENTORY 760.18156794 11/09/12 TOOLS 145.46156575 11/06/12 TOOLS 79.57
2035252 11/14/12 08398 PEERLESS MATERIALS COMPANY 26972 10/15/12 WIPING RAGS 387.90 387.90
2035358 11/28/12 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 32059 10/30/12 SAW CUTTING SERVICES 210.00 210.00
2035359 11/28/12 02449 POLLARDWATER.COM I338499IN 10/31/12 D-CHLOR TABLETS 1,740.50I338500IN 10/31/12 TOOLS 52.00
2035360 11/28/12 01733 PRICE TRONCONE & 12610 11/09/12 ANTENNA SUBLEASE (JAN-MAR 2013) 4,128.00 4,128.00
2035361 11/28/12 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 32557 10/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (OCT 2012) 3,504.00 3,504.00
2035253 11/14/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30296179 10/25/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 392.3730294678 10/18/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 380.3730294677 10/18/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 207.9530296178 10/25/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 183.11
30294679 10/18/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 173.3330296180 10/25/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 126.8430294064 10/16/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 124.04
30295576 10/23/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 109.5331004727 10/26/12 UNIFORM JACKET 79.7430294680 10/18/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.37
Page 9 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
1,975.44
1,786.00
30296181 10/25/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.3730294063 10/16/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 44.7130295575 10/23/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 44.71
2035362 11/28/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30297696 11/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 386.3730299027 11/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 376.37
30297695 11/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 176.1830299026 11/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 176.1830297697 11/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 126.8430299028 11/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 126.84
30297073 10/30/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 109.5330298409 11/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 109.5330297698 11/01/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.3730299029 11/08/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.37
30297072 10/30/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 44.7130298408 11/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 44.71
2035254 11/14/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2425051 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 158,222.77 158,222.77
2035363 11/28/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2425229 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 158,598.59 158,598.59
2035255 11/14/12 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 30657600 10/24/12 SAFETY SUPPLIES 900.36 900.36
2035364 11/28/12 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 30703600 11/07/12 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1,010.91 1,010.91
2035287 11/21/12 00021 RCP BLOCK & BRICK INC 4354669 10/25/12 CONCRETE 191.94 191.94
2035365 11/28/12 00021 RCP BLOCK & BRICK INC 4354575 10/17/12 CONCRETE 1,070.11 1,070.11
2035288 11/21/12 14477 RICARDO MONTES 003984 11/15/12 CUSTOMER REFUND 1,000.00 1,000.00
2035256 11/14/12 04542 ROBAK, MARK 70140912 10/24/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (8/1/12-9/30/12) 9.99 9.99
2035187 11/07/12 14470 RUNGA LI Ref002424962 11/05/12 UB Refund Cst #0000192859 75.00 75.00
2035366 11/28/12 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8608 10/30/12 WELDING SERVICES 255.00 255.00
2035367 11/28/12 09586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION 003988 11/15/12 APPLICATION FEES FOR STANDBY ENGINES 4,570.00 4,570.00
2035368 11/28/12 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 2012105 11/06/12 ASSESSOR DATA 125.00 125.00
2035369 11/28/12 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER 0000000620 11/07/12 RESIDENTIAL SURVEYS 2,400.00 2,400.00
2035370 11/28/12 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 335230 11/06/12 BID ADVERTISEMENT 80.70 80.70
2035289 11/21/12 03231 SAN DIEGO EAST COUNTY 003985 11/06/12 2013 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 296.10 296.10
Page 10 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
111,811.83
2,818.50
77.26
1,273.00
319.84
2035188 11/07/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003953 10/24/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY) 63,254.89003952 10/23/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY) 47,753.64
003951 10/22/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY) 803.30
2035257 11/14/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003971 11/01/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY) 72,079.84 72,079.84
2035258 11/14/12 03273 SAN DIEGO READER 169887 11/08/12 JOB POSTING 68.15 68.15
2035371 11/28/12 12333 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION 8103311751 10/18/12 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (OCT 2012) 416.00 416.00
2035372 11/28/12 12421 SCS ENGINEERS 0199231 10/31/12 CALARP AUDIT 1,690.00 1,690.00
2035259 11/14/12 12904 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION INC 7A 10/27/12 30 INCH PIPELINE (ENDING 10/27/12) 376,218.44 376,218.44
2035373 11/28/12 14482 SHEA HOMES 003990 11/21/12 W/O REFUND D0237-010034 1,503.26 1,503.26
2035189 11/07/12 13948 SHEA HOMES LP 003963 11/06/12 W/O REFUND D0132-060067 569.86 569.86
2035260 11/14/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900961072 10/23/12 INJECTOR ASSEMBLY 1,899.64900954459 10/17/12 ENCORE 700 MOTOR 631.34900964214 10/25/12 CL2INJECTOR PARTS 287.52
2035374 11/28/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900984218 11/07/12 MAINTENANCE PARTS 393.28 393.28
2035375 11/28/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900936296 10/01/12 PROCESSING TANK (OCT-DEC 2012) 120.00 120.00
2035376 11/28/12 13327 SILVA SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1211 11/10/12 PROJECT CONSULTANT (OCT 2012) 4,000.00 4,000.00
2035261 11/14/12 12281 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING 3597 10/16/12 BUSINESS CARDS 38.63 38.63
2035377 11/28/12 12281 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING 3684 10/29/12 BUSINESS CARDS 38.633718 11/06/12 BUSINESS CARDS 38.63
2035378 11/28/12 00258 SLOAN ELECTRIC COMPANY 0061250 10/29/12 EFFLUENT#4 PUMP AND MOTOR 43,628.27 43,628.27
2035379 11/28/12 03592 SOFTCHOICE CORPORATION 3099575 07/25/12 MICROSOFT ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 83,546.14 83,546.14
2035380 11/28/12 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING & C49558 10/18/12 AC MAINTENANCE (OCT 2012) 1,068.00C49559 10/18/12 AC MAINTENANCE (OCT 2012) 205.00
2035262 11/14/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 929820 10/19/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (10/19/12-11/15/12) 79.96929821 10/19/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (10/19/12-11/15/12) 79.96929822 10/19/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (10/19/12-11/15/12) 79.96930159 10/22/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (10/20/12-11/16/12) 79.96
2035381 11/28/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 932030 11/09/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (11/8/12-12/5/12) 98.15
Page 11 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
178.11
12,816.00
930989 10/31/12 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (10/31/12-11/27/12) 79.96
2035382 11/28/12 10343 SPECIALTY DOORS AND AUTOMATION 38415SD 10/31/12 GATE REPAIR 278.39 278.39
2035290 11/21/12 06510 SPRINT NEXTEL 901500243074 11/12/12 WIRELESS SERVICES (10/9/12-11/8/12) 3,511.27 3,511.27
2035263 11/14/12 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 17219 08/07/12 SECURITY MONITORING (JUNE-AUG 2012) 4,057.50 4,057.50
2035383 11/28/12 13564 STAR-NEWS PUBLISHING CO, THE 00013342 11/09/12 JOB POSTING 105.00 105.00
2035190 11/07/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425065 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 415.38 415.38
2035291 11/21/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425245 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 175.00 175.00
2035191 11/07/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425059 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2035292 11/21/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425239 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2035192 11/07/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425063 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15
2035293 11/21/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425243 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15
2035193 11/07/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425069 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 498.92 498.92
2035294 11/21/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425249 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 498.92 498.92
2035295 11/21/12 00274 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 461451112 10/22/12 LICENSE RENEWAL 115.00 115.00
2035264 11/14/12 01460 STATE WATER RESOURCES WD000086182 10/23/12 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE INDEX # 182107 10,873.00WD0086283 10/23/12 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE INDEX # 182208 1,943.00
2035296 11/21/12 01460 STATE WATER RESOURCES WD0082137 10/23/12 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE INDEX # 178062 1,521.00 1,521.00
2035265 11/14/12 14475 STEVE SANGER 003973 11/13/12 CUSTOMER REFUND 806.31 806.31
2035384 11/28/12 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 89885 10/31/12 LEGAL SERVICES (SEPT 2012) 21,412.97 21,412.97
2035266 11/14/12 10339 SUPREME OIL COMPANY 378472 10/19/12 UNLEADED FUEL 22,002.61 22,002.61
2035194 11/07/12 10805 SVSC HOLDINGS LP 003968 11/06/12 W/O REFUND D0853-090109 4,835.83 4,835.83
2035195 11/07/12 10805 SVSC HOLDINGS LP 003961 11/06/12 W/O REFUND D0853-090122 1,159.81 1,159.81
2035196 11/07/12 14466 TINA LEMAY-BREWER Ref002424958 11/05/12 UB Refund Cst #0000041368 7.21 7.21
2035385 11/28/12 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 1020120469 11/01/12 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (OCTOBER 2012) 286.50 286.50
2035267 11/14/12 14181 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) 106167648001 10/08/12 RENTAL ASPHALT ROLLER 526.55 526.55
2035386 11/28/12 14181 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) 106928397001 11/05/12 CONCRETE 160.95
Page 12 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
299.95
914.47
106802111001 10/31/12 CONCRETE 139.00
2035297 11/21/12 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 123250000102 11/20/12 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (DEC 2012) 5,474.02 5,474.02
2035268 11/14/12 07674 US BANK 003983 10/22/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY) 146.24 146.24
2035298 11/21/12 07674 US BANK A000033 10/22/12 CAL-CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY) 6,632.37 6,632.37
2035387 11/28/12 07674 US BANK O0000000019 10/22/12 CAL-CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY) 24,545.14 24,545.14
2035197 11/07/12 12170 US OLYMPIC COMMITEE 003962 11/06/12 W/O REFUND D0866-090117 1,948.14 1,948.14
2035198 11/07/12 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 843101 09/30/12 SECURITY SERVICES (SEPT 2012) 461.20 461.20
2035388 11/28/12 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 880215 10/31/12 SECURITY SERVICES (OCT 2012) 219.75 219.75
2035269 11/14/12 11606 USA BLUE BOOK 786079 CREDIT MEMO -552.48798810 10/22/12 FIBERGLASS ENCLOSURE 1,466.95
2035199 11/07/12 04205 VACLAVEK, JOANNE 003955 10/31/12 ASCE MEMBERSHIP 265.00 265.00
2035389 11/28/12 08028 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SD100128 10/31/12 CONSTRUCTION MGMT (10/1/12-10/31/12) 1,620.00 1,620.00
2035200 11/07/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425049 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 14,941.09 14,941.09
2035299 11/21/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425227 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 14,908.23 14,908.23
2035201 11/07/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425055 11/08/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 1,289.00 1,289.00
2035300 11/21/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425233 11/21/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 1,569.00 1,569.00
2035301 11/21/12 12686 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425235 11/21/12 401A TERMINAL PAY 29,053.43 29,053.43
2035202 11/07/12 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 1130820680 10/21/12 WIRELESS SERVICES (9/22/12-10/21/12) 14,076.39 14,076.39
2035270 11/14/12 07595 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 327252700 10/22/12 GROUND WIRE 343.73 343.73
2035390 11/28/12 07595 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 875690000 11/01/12 GENSET MATERIAL 1,429.44 1,429.44
2035391 11/28/12 10093 WATEREUSE FOUNDATION 003992 11/07/12 2013 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 5,853.12 5,853.12
2035203 11/07/12 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 77147 08/08/12 BEE REMOVAL 75.00 75.00
2035204 11/07/12 11055 WESTERLY METER SERVICE CO 12974 10/04/12 LARGE METER TESTING 30,810.00 30,810.00
2035392 11/28/12 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC 0123158IN 10/30/12 DUSTO INSPECTIONS 400.00 400.00
2035205 11/07/12 13483 WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP 003949 10/30/12 TAX SEMINAR 550.00 550.00
2035302 11/21/12 13483 WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP 129217 10/31/12 AUDIT SERVICES (ENDING 10/31/12) 6,000.00 6,000.00
Page 13 of 14
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/1/2012 - 11/30/2012
Check # Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
Amount Pd Total: 1,812,977.29
Check Grand Total: 1,812,977.29232 Checks
Page 14 of 14
Page 1 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035611 12/26/12 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3570 12/05/12 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (11/20/12-12/4/12)2,673.75 2,673.75
2035612 12/26/12 14479 ADVANCED CALIBRATION DESIGNS 23653 11/29/12 CHLORINE GENERATOR 2,490.00 2,490.00
2035429 12/12/12 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131267649 11/19/12 AQUA AMMONIA 3,501.46 131267648 11/19/12 AQUA AMMONIA 1,717.36 5,218.82
2035393 12/05/12 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9905634097 10/31/12 BREATHING AIR 39.25 39.25
2035613 12/26/12 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9906241591 11/30/12 BREATHING AIR 39.25 39.25
2035430 12/12/12 14498 ALAN MURAD Ref002425571 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000123387 75.54 75.54
2035431 12/12/12 14520 ALEGRIA REAL ESTATE Ref002425593 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000187525 124.89 124.89
2035432 12/12/12 14531 ALEGRIA REAL ESTATE FUND III Ref002425604 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193863 83.07 83.07
2035433 12/12/12 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES # 509 0509005001844 11/25/12 TRASH SERVICES (DEC 2012)490.28 0509005003590 11/25/12 TRASH SERVICES (DEC 2012)60.69 550.97
2035614 12/26/12 12911 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC 23 12/07/12 SURVEY SERVICES (ENDING 12/7/12)13,040.00 13,040.00
2035434 12/12/12 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570ML 12/01/12 PAGER SERVICES 152.20 152.20
2035548 12/19/12 14557 ANDY GAST Ref002425697 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186944 39.46 39.46
2035549 12/19/12 14549 ANGEL JIMENEZ Ref002425689 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000126246 116.07 116.07
2035394 12/05/12 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41097 11/26/12 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (DEC 2012)332.27 332.27
2035435 12/12/12 14500 ANTONIO HERNANDEZ Ref002425573 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000142648 43.57 43.57
2035550 12/19/12 14547 ANWAR ATRUSHI Ref002425687 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000021820 42.68 42.68
2035551 12/19/12 12175 APPLE INC 004017 12/17/12 COMPUTER LOAN 1,407.67 1,407.67
2035615 12/26/12 12175 APPLE INC 004030 12/20/12 COMPUTER LOAN 1,297.92 1,297.92
2035436 12/12/12 14508 ARIANNA BANUELOS Ref002425581 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000174840 25.47 25.47
2035437 12/12/12 14489 ARNOLD MUSOLF Ref002425562 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000037388 134.43 134.43
2035552 12/19/12 12810 ATKINS 1156328 12/12/12 WATER & SEWER RATE STRUCTURE (THRU OCT)6,789.75 6,789.75
2035616 12/26/12 12810 ATKINS 1155171 11/26/12 DESIGN SERVICES (8/1/12-10/31/12)20,327.73 20,327.73
Page 2 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035438 12/12/12 14530 ATLAS EQUITY FUND II LLC Ref002425603 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193667 78.79 78.79
2035439 12/12/12 14525 BAC FIELD SERVICES CORP Ref002425598 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000189096 75.00 75.00
2035617 12/26/12 08024 BACKGROUND PROFILES INC 4865 11/30/12 BACKGROUND CHECK (11/15/12 & 11/26/12)98.00 98.00
2035553 12/19/12 14550 BERNADETTE BONGATO Ref002425690 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000128064 168.81 168.81
2035395 12/05/12 08144 BEST BUY 004002 11/29/12 COMPUTER LOAN 3,000.00 3,000.00
2035440 12/12/12 14526 BILL DE RIDDER Ref002425599 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000192625 27.46 27.46
2035441 12/12/12 14521 BLUE MOUNTAIN AIR Ref002425594 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000187848 97.30 97.30
2035554 12/19/12 14574 BONITA POINT PLAZA 004015 12/12/12 WATER SMART LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 9,000.00 9,000.00
2035442 12/12/12 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI254192 11/15/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,928.07 BPI254193 11/15/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,778.33 BPI255987 11/21/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,571.75 BPI253613 11/13/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,240.57 BPI254992 11/19/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,195.75 BPI256484 11/26/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,083.18 BPI255986 11/23/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,080.99 BPI253612 11/13/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 863.48 BPI254993 11/19/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 778.22 BPI255988 11/21/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 759.65 BPI255989 11/26/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 671.11 12,951.10
2035618 12/26/12 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI257633 11/29/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,970.78 BPI257433 11/29/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,141.20 BPI259777 12/06/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,230.72 BPI259057 12/03/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,082.08 BPI259776 12/06/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,067.87 BPI259056 12/04/12 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 939.99 9,432.64
2035443 12/12/12 14503 BRIAN D MOORE Ref002425576 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000158796 160.92 160.92
2035555 12/19/12 11170 BROOKFIELD OTAY R15/R16 LLC 004018 12/12/12 W/O REFUND D0438-010009 518.96 518.96
2035619 12/26/12 11461 BUSINESS PRINTING CO INC 103069 11/27/12 TAGS 743.69 743.69
2035620 12/26/12 00223 C W MCGRATH INC 43882 11/27/12 CRUSHED ROCK 209.38 209.38
2035444 12/12/12 00319 CA DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 1260516 09/25/12 WATER SYSTEMS FEES #3710034 12,269.22 12,269.22
2035621 12/26/12 11044 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 11 11/30/12 RETENTION / NEWEST (ENDING 7/30/12)3,789.21 3,789.21
Page 3 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035445 12/12/12 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 122641 11/15/12 ASPHALT 1,135.94 1,135.94
2035446 12/12/12 02989 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL 12110606 11/06/12 DEBT STATEMENT 475.00 475.00
2035447 12/12/12 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 309312 11/26/12 CAL-GAS & MPRO-SENSORS 332.15 332.15
2035622 12/26/12 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 309315 12/03/12 CAL-GAS & MPRO-SENSORS 805.39 3095621 12/05/12 EMERGENCY EYEWASH 647.76 309562 12/04/12 EMERGENCY EYEWASH 137.23 1,590.38
2035396 12/05/12 04071 CAPITOL WEBWORKS LLC 25073 10/31/12 ELECTRONIC FILING FEE (QUARTERLY)45.00 45.00
2035448 12/12/12 11374 CARLOS ORTIZ Ref002425556 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000007046 63.24 63.24
2035449 12/12/12 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7595 11/01/12 DOCUMENT SERVICES 57.00 57.00
2035623 12/26/12 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7606 12/01/12 RECORDS MGMT SVCS (11/2/12-11/9/12)251.25 7605 12/01/12 DOCUMENT SERVICES 57.00 308.25
2035450 12/12/12 00848 CASS CONSTRUCTION INC T121000006 10/31/12 EMERGENCY MAIN BREAK WORK 107,685.73 107,685.73
2035624 12/26/12 00848 CASS CONSTRUCTION INC T121100003 11/30/12 EMERGENCY MAIN BREAK WORK 1,353.55 1,353.55
2035556 12/19/12 14567 CHRISTINA R SANCHEZ Ref002425707 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194755 28.59 28.59
2035451 12/12/12 14516 CHRISTINE WHEELER Ref002425589 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186758 41.61 41.61
2035625 12/26/12 02026 CHULA VISTA ELEM SCHOOL DIST AR041211 12/11/12 GARDEN TOURS (10/23/12-10/24/12)440.00 AR040871 09/11/12 GARDEN TOURS (8/21/12)220.00 AR040872 09/11/12 GARDEN TOURS (8/22/12)220.00 AR040873 09/11/12 GARDEN TOURS (8/30/12)220.00 1,100.00
2035557 12/19/12 14572 CHULA VISTA R-14 LLC 004019 12/12/12 W/O REFUND D0636-010302 1,557.17 1,557.17
2035558 12/19/12 12631 CITY OF CHULA VISTA 004016 12/14/12 DEPOSIT FOR PERMIT 5,000.00 5,000.00
2035626 12/26/12 12631 CITY OF CHULA VISTA 004031 12/11/12 PLAN CHECK DEP TO ACCT # DE-2337 9,792.50 9,792.50
2035627 12/26/12 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 64345 11/30/12 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 141.00 141.00
2035559 12/19/12 14564 COAST HORIZON LP Ref002425704 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193231 276.76 276.76
2035452 12/12/12 13900 COMMUNITY BANK 7 11/14/12 RETENTION / GARCIA JUAREZ (ENDING 9/30/12)8,698.00 8,698.00
2035560 12/19/12 14566 COMMUNITY HOUSING WORKS Ref002425706 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194021 262.79 262.79
Page 4 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035453 12/12/12 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 14440100 11/20/12 2013 CALENDARS 398.61 14441350 11/21/12 FAX TONER 105.60 504.21
2035628 12/26/12 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE C14466370 CREDIT MEMO (48.46) 14466370 11/30/12 CALENDARS FOR 2013 1,555.61 14475790 12/04/12 TONER 729.74 14454350 12/07/12 ENVELOPES 465.48 14471360 12/04/12 CALENDARS FOR 2013 125.97 2,828.34
2035629 12/26/12 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1254281 11/30/12 TAPE STORAGE (NOV 2012)316.19 316.19
2035454 12/12/12 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HK182053491012 10/17/12 HAZMAT PERMIT (12/31/12-12/31/13)405.00 HK182053451012 10/17/12 HAZMAT PERMIT (12/31/12-12/31/13)292.00 HK182053461012 10/17/12 HAZMAT PERMIT (12/31/12-12/31/13)292.00 HK182053481012 10/17/12 HAZMAT PERMIT (12/31/12-12/31/13)292.00 HK182053511012 10/17/12 HAZMAT PERMIT (12/31/12-12/31/13)292.00 1,573.00
2035455 12/12/12 02122 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2012102309281 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09281 (DEC 2012-2013)8,625.00 2012102309276 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09276 (DEC 2012-2013)3,009.00 2012103001989 10/30/12 PERMIT FEES # 01989 (DEC 2012-2013)1,314.00 2012102303231 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 03231 (DEC 2012-2013)565.00 2012102309503 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09503 (DEC 2012-2013)514.00 2012102309291 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09291 (DEC 2012-2013)467.00 2012102309280 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09280 (DEC 2012-2013)298.00 2012102309285 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09285 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102309286 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09286 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102309287 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09287 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102309288 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09288 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102309290 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09290 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102310565 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 10565 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102300233 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 00233 (DEC 2012-2013)356.00 2012103009289 10/30/12 PERMIT FEES # 09289 (DEC 2012-2013)356.00 2012102304983 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 04983 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102309277 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09277 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102309279 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09279 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 2012102309283 10/23/12 PERMIT FEES # 09283 (DEC 2012-2013)309.00 18,594.00
2035561 12/19/12 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - DPW 161656 10/31/12 EXCAVATION PERMITS (OCT 2012)2,623.86 2,623.86
2035456 12/12/12 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS SAN DIEGO 28811112 11/30/12 INTERNET SERVICES (11/29/12-12/28/12)1,500.00 27171112 11/30/12 INTERNET SERVICES (11/29/12-12/28/12)1,500.00 3,000.00
2035457 12/12/12 14541 CURTIS A BROOKS 004007 12/06/12 REFUND TEMP METER DEPOSIT 1,453.40 1,453.40
2035458 12/12/12 14535 CWC REGIONAL HOUSING FUND 3 Ref002425608 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194725 23.99 23.99
Page 5 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035562 12/19/12 14563 DAISON LLC Ref002425703 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000188963 45.98 45.98
2035459 12/12/12 14485 DAPHNE WILLIAMS Ref002425558 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000024378 70.80 70.80
2035563 12/19/12 11150 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC 024299 11/14/12 TRAFFIC SERVICES (7/4/12-11/14/12)8,290.00 8,290.00
2035564 12/19/12 14575 DAWN COWLES 004023 12/17/12 CUSTOMER REFUND 4.12 4.12
2035460 12/12/12 03744 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 944874 12/06/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES (NOV 2012)147.00 147.00
2035630 12/26/12 00319 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH 247651212 12/19/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 140.00 360431212 12/19/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 90.00 285791212 12/19/12 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL 60.00 290.00
2035631 12/26/12 05959 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 32881031 10/31/12 PUMPING SERVICE 525.00 525.00
2035397 12/05/12 03417 DIRECTV 19164611338 11/19/12 SATELLITE TV (11/18/12-12/17/12)6.00 6.00
2035632 12/26/12 14374 DISCFLO CORPORATION 0033675IN 11/27/12 SKIMMINGS PUMP 19,772.14 19,772.14
2035565 12/19/12 14560 DOUGLAS WINTERS Ref002425700 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000188400 75.00 75.00
2035398 12/05/12 01926 EAST COUNTY URGENT CARE 004004 11/26/12 ON SITE FLU SHOTS (10/16/12)300.00 300.00
2035461 12/12/12 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 1554581112 11/30/12 RECYCLING SERVICES (NOV 2012)90.00 90.00
2035462 12/12/12 14504 EDMUND COOPER Ref002425577 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000159572 30.80 30.80
2035463 12/12/12 14514 ELENA ALICIA PALMA Ref002425587 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184758 10.41 10.41
2035566 12/19/12 14562 ELISA PESKIN Ref002425702 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000188593 37.85 37.85
2035464 12/12/12 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 2110755 11/19/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (11/6/12-11/13/12)545.00 2110874 11/26/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (11/14/12-11/16/12)135.00 680.00
2035633 12/26/12 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 2120320 12/03/12 RECYCLED WTR ANALYSIS (11/15/12-11/26/12)860.00 860.00
2035465 12/12/12 14522 EQUUISTRIA DEVELOPMENT INC Ref002425595 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000188773 1,705.29 1,705.29
2035634 12/26/12 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0106369 12/06/12 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 750.00 L0105705 11/29/12 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 225.00 L0105906 11/30/12 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 120.00 1,095.00
2035635 12/26/12 13123 FAVELA PRINTING INC 837 12/06/12 COVERS & BINDING - CAFR 280.15 280.15
Page 6 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035466 12/12/12 00645 FEDEX 112495900 11/26/12 MAIL SERVICES (11/16/12)27.02 27.02
2035467 12/12/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0421881 11/20/12 FLANGE COUPLING 2,960.97 2,960.97
2035636 12/26/12 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0420643 11/28/12 REPAIR PARTS 3,158.15 0424096 12/07/12 INVENTORY 2,476.59 0420867 11/28/12 4"AIR-VAC 1,390.73 7,025.47
2035637 12/26/12 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 900340112 11/30/12 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (11/1/12-11/30/12)99.33 99.33
2035468 12/12/12 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 206378 11/16/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 341.46 341.46
2035638 12/26/12 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 208130 12/04/12 COFFEE SUPPLIES 296.77 296.77
2035469 12/12/12 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 7156950 11/20/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 37.82 37.82
2035567 12/19/12 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 6409173 11/19/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 577.77 577.77
2035639 12/26/12 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 1982760 11/28/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 421.59 2560541 12/03/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 190.59 1150778 11/27/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 66.10 678.28
2035640 12/26/12 02591 FITNESS TECH 8221 12/01/12 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (DEC 2012)135.00 135.00
2035399 12/05/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425482 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 90.00 90.00
2035400 12/05/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425488 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
2035568 12/19/12 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425820 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 90.00 90.00
2035569 12/19/12 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2425826 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
2035570 12/19/12 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 150 12/11/12 TOSS THE TURF CLASS FEE 50.00 50.00
2035641 12/26/12 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 149 12/06/12 GARDEN TOURS (NOV 2012)3,720.00 3,720.00
2035642 12/26/12 03094 FULLCOURT PRESS 24827 11/28/12 FALL 2012 CUSTOMER NEWSLETTER 3,632.48 3,632.48
2035470 12/12/12 14537 GAGS AND GAMES INC Ref002425610 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194957 5.82 5.82
2035471 12/12/12 13716 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC 7 11/14/12 CALAVO GARDENS (ENDING 9/30/12)165,262.00 165,262.00
2035401 12/05/12 14480 GARCIA, GERMAN 004000 11/28/12 SAFETY BOOTS 150.00 150.00
2035643 12/26/12 14480 GARCIA, GERMAN 004029 12/19/12 DMV PHYSICAL 80.00 80.00
Page 7 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035472 12/12/12 14073 GARCIA, LAWRENCE 004002 12/05/12 COMPUTER LOAN 3,000.00 3,000.00
2035571 12/19/12 14565 GEOFFREY SMITH Ref002425705 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193467 22.86 22.86
2035473 12/12/12 14499 GLORIA LIZEAJA Ref002425572 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000124761 60.27 60.27
2035402 12/05/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9943022146 10/04/12 TRUCK TOOLS 735.67 9967814253 11/02/12 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 136.28 871.95
2035474 12/12/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9979452688 11/16/12 SUPPLIES 98.53 98.53
2035644 12/26/12 00101 GRAINGER INC 9007673016 11/29/12 CANVAS TOOL BAGS 835.61 9006813696 11/28/12 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 302.11 9006533799 11/28/12 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 93.88 1,231.60
2035645 12/26/12 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 10248 11/29/12 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (NOV 2012)8,650.00 8,650.00
2035572 12/19/12 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 34350 10/31/12 NETWORK SERVICES 390.00 390.00
2035646 12/26/12 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 34501 12/01/12 NETWORK SERVICES 3,173.00 34483 11/30/12 NETWORK SERVICES 195.00 3,368.00
2035475 12/12/12 14512 GUILLERMINA VIDRIO Ref002425585 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000182813 75.00 75.00
2035573 12/19/12 14551 GUILLERMO ORTEGON Ref002425691 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000159201 33.56 33.56
2035476 12/12/12 00174 HACH COMPANY 8039689 11/20/12 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 3,087.82 8041710 11/21/12 HACH APA6000 2,924.79 8032265 11/14/12 REPAIR HACH APA600 253.00 6,265.61
2035647 12/26/12 00174 HACH COMPANY 8047394 11/28/12 HACH APA6000 1,418.25 8058963 12/05/12 TURBIDIMETER REPAIR 733.00 8049173 11/29/12 HACH APA6000 236.78 2,388.03
2035477 12/12/12 14509 HAROLD CAMPBELL Ref002425582 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000175891 92.85 92.85
2035574 12/19/12 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE Ben2425806 12/20/12 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 5,428.92 5,428.92
2035478 12/12/12 14360 HATCH MOTT MACDONALD LLC 3150591 11/20/12 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTABILITY CONSULTING SVC 4,394.00 4,394.00
2035648 12/26/12 04472 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIO 93 12/18/12 CONSULTANT SERVICES (NOV 2012)2,563.62 2,563.62
2035649 12/26/12 04472 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 93a 12/18/12 TAX PAYMENT 1,036.38 1,036.38
2035479 12/12/12 02096 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 0000292401212 12/06/12 TEMPORARY METER (10/30/12-11/29/12)149.82 149.82
Page 8 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035650 12/26/12 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 174639861212 12/10/12 WATER PURCHASE (10/8/12-12/6/12)40.10 178540011212 12/10/12 WATER PURCHASE (10/4/12-12/6/12)40.10 80.20
2035575 12/19/12 14552 HILLARY DRAPAK Ref002425692 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000161417 5.42 5.42
2035651 12/26/12 08969 INFOSEND INC 63967 11/30/12 POSTAGE (NOV 2012)11,727.50 64078 12/04/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (NOV 2012)4,893.60 63966 11/30/12 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (NOV 2012)4,884.00 21,505.10
2035652 12/26/12 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 2741 11/30/12 PLANT SERVICES (NOV 2012)186.00 186.00
2035480 12/12/12 14056 INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK 2 11/13/12 REIMBURSEMENT/ALTA RD (7/13/12-10/31/12)424,569.46 424,569.46
2035653 12/26/12 14056 INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIAL PARK 3 12/10/12 REIMBURSEMENT/ALTA RD (7/13/12-10/31/12)170,392.57 170,392.57
2035654 12/26/12 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO11120170 11/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (NOV 2012)1,119.82 1,119.82
2035576 12/19/12 14558 JASON LINDSTROM Ref002425698 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000187596 46.03 46.03
2035481 12/12/12 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 566150 CREDIT MEMO (2,000.00) 566123 11/13/12 CHLORINE 4,837.80 2,837.80
2035482 12/12/12 14528 JENISE PASISIHAN Ref002425601 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193155 11.33 11.33
2035403 12/05/12 01735 JOHNSON, PAMELA 004003 11/29/12 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 80.00 80.00
2035404 12/05/12 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0090514 11/09/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (10/1/12-10/26/12)1,035.80 1,035.80
2035483 12/12/12 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0090703 11/14/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (10/1/12-10/26/12)994.50 994.50
2035655 12/26/12 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0091135 12/08/12 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULT (10/27/12-11/23/12)832.30 832.30
2035484 12/12/12 14501 JORGE MACIAS Ref002425574 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000143064 287.42 287.42
2035577 12/19/12 14568 JOSH KRALIK Ref002425708 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194933 66.14 66.14
2035578 12/19/12 14546 JOYCE ELEY Ref002425686 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000020987 132.97 132.97
2035485 12/12/12 14488 KELLEY BACON Ref002425561 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000033614 141.18 141.18
2035579 12/19/12 14554 KEYFI MUSTAFA Ref002425694 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183872 25.20 25.20
2035486 12/12/12 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5251 11/14/12 PAVING SERVICES 31,428.00 5260 11/16/12 PAVING SERVICES 4,448.40 5259 11/16/12 PAVING SERVICES 3,936.00 39,812.40
Page 9 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035656 12/26/12 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 115645 11/30/12 DELIVERY SERVICES (11/2/12-11/9/12)156.25 156.25
2035487 12/12/12 12276 KONECRANES INC SDG00727471 11/15/12 HOIST INSPECTION 500.00 SDG00727435 11/15/12 CRANE INSPECTIONS (NOV 2012)400.00 900.00
2035488 12/12/12 14036 KRATOS / HBE SM39493 10/30/12 ALARM REPAIR 320.00 320.00
2035580 12/19/12 14036 KRATOS / HBE 18080212 09/28/12 SECURITY UPGRADES 2,746.20 2,746.20
2035657 12/26/12 14036 KRATOS / HBE SM39686 11/16/12 ALARM MONITORING (OCT-NOV 2012)110.00 SM39685 11/16/12 ALARM MONITORING (OCT-NOV 2012)110.00 SM39684 11/16/12 ALARM MONITORING (OCT-NOV 2012)80.00 300.00
2035581 12/19/12 04863 KRISTINE SKOGLIN Ref002425685 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000017402 50.00 50.00
2035489 12/12/12 14515 KRYSTLE ABELE Ref002425588 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186637 62.64 62.64
2035658 12/26/12 01859 LA PRENSA SAN DIEGO 23998 12/08/12 JOB POSTING 48.00 48.00
2035659 12/26/12 05632 LARSON, BRAD 004026 12/19/12 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 340.00 340.00
2035490 12/12/12 14490 LAURA WRIGHT Ref002425563 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000063718 18.73 18.73
2035491 12/12/12 14513 LB CIVIL CONSTRUCTION Ref002425586 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000183717 275.40 275.40
2035660 12/26/12 07784 LICON, HECTOR 004027 12/18/12 COMPUTER LOAN 2,097.73 2,097.73
2035492 12/12/12 14510 LISTER CONSTRUCTION Ref002425583 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000176672 1,731.76 1,731.76
2035493 12/12/12 14486 LOURDES NUÑEZ-MARTINEZ Ref002425559 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000031228 49.02 49.02
2035582 12/19/12 14556 LUCIA BRAVO Ref002425696 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000185061 38.87 38.87
2035583 12/19/12 14571 MAKENA MEDICAL BUILDINGS 004020 12/12/12 W/O REFUND D0675-090088 3,757.86 3,757.86
2035584 12/19/12 14573 MANUEL MUNOZ 004024 12/18/12 RELEASE OF LIABILITY 300.00 300.00
2035494 12/12/12 14495 MARIA HERNANDEZ Ref002425568 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000073275 77.51 77.51
2035495 12/12/12 14484 MARIA HOQUE Ref002425557 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000021414 47.38 47.38
2035496 12/12/12 14533 MARIA NAVARRO Ref002425606 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194411 11.00 11.00
2035497 12/12/12 14542 MARISA JIMENEZ 004006 12/05/12 CUSTOMER REFUND 138.26 138.26
2035661 12/26/12 02902 MARSTON+MARSTON INC 2012121 11/30/12 COMMUNITY OUTREACH (NOV 2012)5,000.00
Page 10 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2012122 11/30/12 SPEC PROJ - COMMUNITY OUTREACH (NOV 2012)2,940.00 7,940.00
2035498 12/12/12 14511 MART SALES Ref002425584 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000178040 115.25 115.25
2035499 12/12/12 14494 MARTHA DELGADILLO Ref002425567 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000072157 45.38 45.38
2035500 12/12/12 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0076146IN 11/26/12 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 121.22 0076138IN 11/26/12 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 107.75 0076120IN 11/21/12 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 53.88 282.85
2035662 12/26/12 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0076332IN 12/05/12 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 1,747.52 1,747.52
2035405 12/05/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 38871544 10/10/12 MATERIALS 601.54 601.54
2035663 12/26/12 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 41561312 11/27/12 SPRAY HEADS 242.05 42089723 12/05/12 REFLECTIVE POST 171.55 413.60
2035501 12/12/12 14496 MEHELDINO SAULOG Ref002425569 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000089886 115.06 115.06
2035502 12/12/12 01824 MERKEL & ASSOCIATES INC 12111901 11/19/12 ENVIRONMENT SERVICES (10/1/12-10/31/12)4,962.69 4,962.69
2035503 12/12/12 14497 MICHAEL HOPKINS Ref002425570 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000092162 18.95 18.95
2035504 12/12/12 14038 MILLER SPATIAL SERVICES LLC 1021 11/13/12 MAP BOOKS UPDATE 1,260.00 1,260.00
2035505 12/12/12 14536 MING CHEN Ref002425609 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194839 33.94 33.94
2035406 12/05/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2425476 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,308.15 8,308.15
2035585 12/19/12 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2425816 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,203.15 8,203.15
2035586 12/19/12 14553 NENITA CHUA Ref002425693 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000173278 81.82 81.82
2035506 12/12/12 00745 NEWARK 22956590 11/14/12 5PIN RELAYS 94.47 94.47
2035664 12/26/12 08531 NEWEST CONSTRUCTION 11 11/30/12 RWCWR UPGRADE (ENDING 7/30/12)34,102.89 34,102.89
2035407 12/05/12 14118 NORTHSTAR COURIER INC 1704 12/01/12 COURIER SERVICE 59.40 59.40
2035408 12/05/12 07447 NTU TECHNOLOGIES INC 7951 10/31/12 POLYMER 908 6,561.98 6,561.98
2035409 12/05/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 628985877001 10/16/12 PRINTER CARTRIDGES 1,216.27 1,216.27
2035665 12/26/12 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 635261289001 12/05/12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 292.76 292.76
2035410 12/05/12 02077 OLVERA, ANGELICA 004001 12/03/12 COMPUTER LOAN 1,400.00 1,400.00
Page 11 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035411 12/05/12 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S3861325001 10/15/12 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 371.74 S3876338002 10/26/12 CUTTING DIES 141.37 513.11
2035507 12/12/12 14534 ORC DEVELOPMENT Ref002425607 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194527 6.42 6.42
2035508 12/12/12 14502 OTAY RANCH R-2B LLC Ref002425575 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000145002 773.97 773.97
2035587 12/19/12 14570 OTAY RANCH VILLAGE II-PC15 LLC 004021 12/12/12 W/O REFUND D0261-010177 1,991.16 1,991.16
2035412 12/05/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2425472 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 686.00 686.00
2035588 12/19/12 03101 OTAY WATER DISTRICT Ben2425812 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 665.00 665.00
2035509 12/12/12 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 156035 11/13/12 INVENTORY 5,102.70 5,102.70
2035666 12/26/12 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 156323 11/30/12 12" HY-CHECK VALVE 10,167.51 157060 11/28/12 INVENTORY 1,404.63 157057 11/28/12 RECLAIMED STATION PIPING 229.19 11,801.33
2035413 12/05/12 05497 PAYPAL INC 20724156 11/30/12 PHONE PAYMENT SERVICES (OCT-NOV 2012)108.20 108.20
2035667 12/26/12 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 32382 11/30/12 SAW CUTTING SERVICES 275.00 275.00
2035510 12/12/12 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 004012 12/11/12 PETTY CASH 275.32 275.32
2035511 12/12/12 14492 PHILIPP PRADO Ref002425565 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000071867 176.50 176.50
2035668 12/26/12 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 445797 12/03/12 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 206.88 206.88
2035512 12/12/12 06419 PLANT SOUP INC 845 10/28/12 PROFESSIONAL WRITING SERVICES 900.00 900.00
2035513 12/12/12 07602 PLUMBERS DEPOT PD19733 11/19/12 REPAIR PARTS 1,623.25 1,623.25
2035514 12/12/12 14532 PRIME ASSET MANAGEMENT Ref002425605 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000194313 59.20 59.20
2035669 12/26/12 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 32812 11/01/12 JANITORIAL SERVICES (NOV 2012)3,504.00 3,504.00
2035515 12/12/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30302186 11/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 397.98 30300715 11/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 371.98 30300714 11/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 193.75 30302185 11/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 193.75 30300716 11/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 173.33 30302187 11/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 173.33 30300046 11/13/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 109.53 30301525 11/20/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 109.53
Page 12 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
30302188 11/22/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 57.87 30300717 11/15/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 54.37 30301524 11/20/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 48.71 30300045 11/13/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 44.71 1,928.84
2035670 12/26/12 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30305265 12/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 565.73 30303749 11/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 400.54 30303748 11/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 193.75 30305264 12/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 193.75 30303750 11/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 173.33 30305266 12/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 173.33 30303122 11/27/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 109.53 30304658 12/04/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 109.53 30303751 11/29/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 53.87 30305267 12/06/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 53.87 30303121 11/27/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 44.71 30304657 12/04/12 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 44.71 2,116.65
2035516 12/12/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2425470 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 158,258.80 158,258.80
2035671 12/26/12 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2425810 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 153,291.13 153,291.13
2035414 12/05/12 10294 QWIKPRINTS 123361140 12/05/12 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES (11/16/12)20.00 20.00
2035517 12/12/12 14527 REAL SOLUTION Ref002425600 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193137 54.57 54.57
2035518 12/12/12 03525 REFRIGERATION ENGINEERING 44039 11/16/12 ICE MACHINE 241.77 241.77
2035589 12/19/12 04542 ROBAK, MARK 70141212a 12/18/12 TRAVEL EXPENSES (DEC 2012)53.86 70141212 12/18/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (OCT-DEC 2012)47.73 101.59
2035590 12/19/12 14559 ROBERT LAIRD Ref002425699 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000187963 31.54 31.54
2035519 12/12/12 14491 ROBERT RUIZ Ref002425564 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000071216 41.11 41.11
2035520 12/12/12 14517 SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES Ref002425590 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186845 77.69 77.69
2035521 12/12/12 14493 SAMUEL RAMOS Ref002425566 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000072121 56.25 56.25
2035522 12/12/12 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8620 11/08/12 WELDING SERVICES (11/6/12)340.00 8630 11/14/12 WELDING SERVICES (11/9/12)255.00 595.00
2035523 12/12/12 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 2012126 12/11/12 ASSESSOR DATA (MONTHLY)125.00 125.00
2035524 12/12/12 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER 0000000638 11/20/12 SOCAL WATERSMART (SEPT 2012)3,128.78 3,128.78
Page 13 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035672 12/26/12 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 339391 11/28/12 BID ADVERTISEMENT 90.00 90.00
2035525 12/12/12 14507 SAN DIEGO FAMILY HOUSING LLC Ref002425580 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000172572 1,938.87 1,938.87
2035415 12/05/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 003995 12/03/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)30,985.99 003999 10/30/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)15,073.30 003996 11/20/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)781.00 46,840.29
2035526 12/12/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 004011 11/25/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)59,182.69 004010 12/04/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)56,119.48 003997 11/21/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)44,584.19 003998 11/27/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)4,574.34 164,460.70
2035673 12/26/12 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 004025 12/03/12 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)10,800.24 10,800.24
2035527 12/12/12 14529 SANDY MILLER Ref002425602 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000193283 52.67 52.67
2035528 12/12/12 03514 SANTOS, MARCIANO 004013 12/10/12 SAFETY BOOTS 135.74 135.74
2035674 12/26/12 12333 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION 8103315785 11/01/12 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (NOV 2012)416.00 416.00
2035591 12/19/12 14548 SCOTT VINSON Ref002425688 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000028146 240.97 240.97
2035416 12/05/12 05512 SD COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL PROG SD100371012 10/24/12 VECTOR CONTROL PROGRAM 539.25 539.25
2035529 12/12/12 14523 SDREOS INC Ref002425596 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000188869 9.94 9.94
2035592 12/19/12 14561 SDREOS INC Ref002425701 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000188464 58.14 58.14
2035530 12/12/12 14519 SDREOSOLD Ref002425592 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000187247 55.63 55.63
2035531 12/12/12 12904 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION INC 8A 11/21/12 30 INCH PIPELINE (ENDING 11/21/12)4,948.90 4,948.90
2035593 12/19/12 12904 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION INC 9A 12/17/12 30 INCH PIPELINE (ENDING 12/10/12)199,539.43 199,539.43
2035594 12/19/12 14555 SHAWN CASEY Ref002425695 12/17/12 UB Refund Cst #0000184159 75.00 75.00
2035532 12/12/12 14524 SHERIELAINE ESQUILANG Ref002425597 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000188890 28.23 28.23
2035417 12/05/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900962581 10/24/12 VACUUM MAINTENANCE KIT 649.69 649.69
2035675 12/26/12 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900990688 11/13/12 BIOXIDE 1,590.40 1,590.40
2035595 12/19/12 13327 SILVA SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1212 12/10/12 PROJECT CONSULTANT (NOV 2012)4,000.00 4,000.00
2035418 12/05/12 12281 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING 3699 10/24/12 CARD SHELLS 232.76 232.76
Page 14 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035533 12/12/12 12281 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING 3763 11/15/12 BUSINESS CARDS 38.63 38.63
2035676 12/26/12 12281 SIR SPEEDY PRINTING 3874 12/07/12 BUSINESS CARDS 71.65 3850 12/05/12 BUSINESS CARDS 38.63 110.28
2035534 12/12/12 14540 SKYLINE WESLEYAN CHURCH Ref002425613 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000195722 1,174.46 1,174.46
2035535 12/12/12 14538 SKYLINE WESLEYAN CHURCH Ref002425611 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000195720 1,724.71 1,724.71
2035536 12/12/12 14539 SKYLINE WESLEYAN CHURCH Ref002425612 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000195721 1,782.62 1,782.62
2035537 12/12/12 03071 SOCO GROUP INC, THE 109261 11/26/12 MOTOR OIL 727.10 727.10
2035596 12/19/12 11618 SOUTH COAST COPY SYSTEMS AR116051 10/19/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (10/1/12-9/30/14)2,111.49 AR114929 09/28/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (SEPT 2012)1,698.46 AR117921 11/26/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (DEC 2012)1,680.96 AR116797 10/31/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (NOV 2012)1,680.96 AR116721 10/31/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (OCT 2012)1,680.96 AR113188 08/30/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (AUG 2012)1,243.98 AR111505 07/31/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (JUL 2012)1,189.61 AR114928 09/28/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (SEPT 2012)9.65 AR111213 07/30/12 COPIER MAINTENANCE (JUL 2012)9.01 11,305.08
2035677 12/26/12 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C49889 11/16/12 AC MAINTENANCE (NOV 2012)1,068.00 C49890 11/16/12 AC MAINTENANCE (NOV 2012)205.00 1,273.00
2035597 12/19/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 932761 11/16/12 TOILET RENTAL (11/16/12-12/13/12)79.96 933132 11/19/12 TOILET RENTAL (11/17/12-12/14/12)79.96 932759 11/16/12 TOILET RENTAL (11/16/12-12/13/12)79.96 932760 11/16/12 TOILET RENTAL (11/16/12-12/13/12)79.96 319.84
2035678 12/26/12 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 933810 11/28/12 TOILET RENTAL (11/28/12-12/25/12)79.96 79.96
2035538 12/12/12 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 41959 11/30/12 WORKERS' COMPENSATION (JAN-MAR 2013)56,877.00 56,877.00
2035598 12/19/12 06510 SPRINT NEXTEL 901500243075 12/12/12 WIRELESS SERVICES (11/9/12-12/8/12)3,511.43 3,511.43
2035539 12/12/12 14506 SSFT HOLDINGS Ref002425579 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000169346 64.44 64.44
2035679 12/26/12 13564 STAR-NEWS PUBLISHING CO, THE 00014173 12/07/12 JOB POSTING 123.50 123.50
2035419 12/05/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425486 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 249.39 249.39
2035420 12/05/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425478 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
Page 15 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035421 12/05/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425484 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15
2035422 12/05/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425490 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 756.92 756.92
2035599 12/19/12 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425824 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 415.38 415.38
2035600 12/19/12 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425814 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2035601 12/19/12 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425822 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 802.15 802.15
2035602 12/19/12 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2425828 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 258.00 258.00
2035680 12/26/12 01460 STATE WATER RESOURCES 004032 12/21/12 RDR GROUNDWATER WELL PROJ (CIP P2434)1,185.00 1,185.00
2035540 12/12/12 07678 STREAMLINE FORMS & GRAPHICS 38226 11/14/12 TAGS-COURTESY NOTICE 535.52 535.52
2035541 12/12/12 03263 STRUNKS JR, DALE 004008 12/04/12 SAFETY BOOTS 146.79 146.79
2035603 12/19/12 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 90113 11/27/12 LEGAL SERVICES (OCT 2012)32,132.67 32,132.67
2035681 12/26/12 02750 SUPERIOR READY MIX LP 539897 12/07/12 CRUSHED ROCK 227.26 227.26
2035542 12/12/12 14487 SUZANNE DUVALL Ref002425560 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000031616 33.49 33.49
2035423 12/05/12 02188 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS 10105452 10/11/12 ANTENNA STANDOFF 877.88 877.88
2035682 12/26/12 02188 TALLEY COMMUNICATIONS 10111446 12/04/12 ANTENNA CABLE 162.19 162.19
2035543 12/12/12 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2421 09/18/12 SOFTWARE SECONDARY 10,975.00 10,975.00
2035604 12/19/12 14177 THOMPSON, MITCHELL 18071212 12/18/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (DEC 2012)39.96 18071012 12/05/12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (OCT 2012)13.32 18071212A 12/17/12 TRAVEL EXPENSES (DEC 2012)10.00 63.28
2035544 12/12/12 14518 TINITA COORE Ref002425591 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000186986 77.20 77.20
2035683 12/26/12 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 1120120464 12/01/12 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (11/1/12-11/30/12)262.50 262.50
2035424 12/05/12 14181 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA)106974406001 11/07/12 CONCRETE 139.00 139.00
2035545 12/12/12 14181 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA)107183999001 11/15/12 CONCRETE 266.68 266.68
2035425 12/05/12 00350 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 104339511212 12/03/12 PREPAID POSTAGE MACHINE 6,000.00 6,000.00
2035605 12/19/12 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 123540000099 12/19/12 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (JAN 2013)5,442.07 5,442.07
Page 16 of 16
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CHECK REGISTER
FOR CHECKS 2035393 THROUGH 2035689
RUN DATES 12/5/2012 TO 12/26/2012
Check #Date Vendor Vendor name Invoice Inv Date Description Amount Paid Check Total
2035606 12/19/12 07674 US BANK E000021 11/23/12 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)267.00 267.00
2035684 12/26/12 03190 VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO INC 90204466 12/05/12 HACH PARTS 4,357.88 4,357.88
2035685 12/26/12 08028 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTSD100129 11/30/12 CONSTRUCTION MGMT (11/1/12-11/30/12)1,335.00 1,335.00
2035426 12/05/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425468 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 14,953.64 14,953.64
2035427 12/05/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425480 12/06/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 1,134.00 1,134.00
2035428 12/05/12 12686 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425474 12/06/12 401A TERMINAL PAY 5,759.94 5,759.94
2035607 12/19/12 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425808 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 14,700.99 14,700.99
2035608 12/19/12 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2425818 12/20/12 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 850.00 850.00
2035546 12/12/12 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 1139784397 11/21/12 WIRELESS SERVICES (10/22/12-11/21/12)4,806.31 4,806.31
2035609 12/19/12 14569 VIKTORIYA NAVARDAUSKAITE 004022 12/18/12 CUSTOMER REFUND 75.00 75.00
2035686 12/26/12 07595 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 327270701 12/04/12 CH POWER SUPPLY 4,487.79 4,487.79
2035547 12/12/12 14505 WENDE SHANNON Ref002425578 12/10/12 UB Refund Cst #0000168700 25.17 25.17
2035610 12/19/12 11055 WESTERLY METER SERVICE CO 13054 11/15/12 LARGE METER TESTING 3,466.79 3,466.79
2035687 12/26/12 02849 WHITAKER BROTHERS BUSINESS SRV075978 11/29/12 SVCE FOLDING MACHINE 160.00 160.00
2035688 12/26/12 13483 WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP 130034 11/30/12 AUDIT SERVICES (ENDING 11/30/12)700.00 700.00
2035689 12/26/12 03283 WILSON BOHANNAN PADLOCK CO 0095112IN 12/05/12 LOCKS 1,542.40 1,542.40
GRAND TOTAL 2,279,331.01 2,279,331.01
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: January 8, 2013
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. All
SUBMITTED BY: Kelli Williamson
Human Resources Manager
APPROVED BY:
Rom Sarno, Chief of Administrative Services
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION #4207 TO EXTEND THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AND THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (OWDEA), AND
APPROVE THE SAME PROVISIONS FOR MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIAL, AND
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board adopt Resolution #4207 to extend the terms of the
existing Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Otay Water
District and the Otay Water District Employees’ Association (OWDEA)
for one (1) year with no cost-of-living increase effective July 1,
2013 through June 30, 2014, for the Field Employees and
Administrative Employees Bargaining Units.
That the Board also approve applying the above provisions for
Management, Confidential and Executive employees.
In addition, the General Manager has the discretion to administer the
Pay-for-Performance program pursuant to Article 4, Section 4 of the
MOU and it is the intent of the General Manager that the Pay-for-
Performance program be suspended during this one (1) year period
(September 2013, based on July 1, 12 – June 30, 13 performance
reviews).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See “Attachment A”.
AGENDA ITEM 32
2
PURPOSE:
To request that the Board adopt Resolution #4207 (Attachment B) and
approve the extension of the terms of the existing MOU for one (1)
year with no cost-of-living increase for Represented employees and
apply the same provisions to Management, Confidential and Executive
staff.
ANALYSIS:
The District and the OWDEA reached a tentative agreement in late
November, on the following changes for a successor Memorandum of
Understanding:
One (1) year agreement
No cost-of-living increase
The OWDEA met on December 12, 2012, to conduct a ratification meeting
for Represented employees. The Association ratified the tentative
agreement (Attachment B, Exhibit 1). In addition, the OWDEA has been
informed of the General Manager’s intent to suspend the Pay-for-
Performance program for September 2013.
It is recommended that the Board apply the same provisions for
Management, Confidential and Executive employees.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
With the exception of allowing for in-range salary adjustments, this
is an agreement that maintains the status quo of salaries and
benefits. However, in order to maintain the status quo, some costs
are expected to increase such as Medical/Dental insurance, Social
Security matching, Workers’ Compensation insurance, CalPERS, and
various other benefit costs. The District’s latest budget process
anticipates these increases and therefore no unexpected or unplanned
changes are foreseen in the rates.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
4.A.4 – Negotiate a Successor Memorandum of Understanding for
represented employees in FY13.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action Report
Attachment B – Resolution #4207
Attachment B, Exhibit 1 – Side Letter Agreement
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
ADOPT RESOLUTION #4207 TO EXTEND THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT AND THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (OWDEA), AND
APPROVE THE SAME PROVISIONS FOR MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIAL,
AND EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Ad Hoc Negotiations Committee met on November 13 and November 26,
2012, to review this item. At the November 13th meeting, the Committee
suggested that staff approach the Employee Association to see if they
were interested in continuing the current Memorandum of Understanding
status quo with no cost-of-living increase for one (1) year. Staff
discussed this with the Association and reported back to Committee at
the November 26th meeting that the employees were interested. The
Committee supports presentation to the full Board in Closed Session
for their consideration.
ATTACHMENT B
RESOLUTION NO. 4207
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT TO EXTEND THE TERMS
OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE
REPRESENTED EMPLOYEES, AND APPROVE EXTENDING
THE SAME CHANGES FOR MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIAL
AND EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors set compensation and benefits
for all employees; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors wishes to extend the Memorandum
of Understanding with the Otay Water District Employees’ Association
for one (1) year with no cost-of-living adjustments and to apply the
same provisions for Management, Confidential and Executive employees;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the
Otay Water District as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors extend the existing Memorandum
of Understanding (MOU) from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 for
Represented employees with no cost-of-living adjustments (Exhibit 1)
and to apply the same provisions to Management, Confidential and
Executive employees;
2. The effective date of this resolution shall be January 8,
2013.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board authorizes and directs the
appropriate staff of the District to take any and all actions
necessary to implement the above-referenced changes.
ATTACHMENT B
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the
Otay Water District at a regular meeting held this 8th day of January,
2013.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
ATTACHMENT B - EXHIBIT 1
SIDE LETTER AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
AND
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCATION
TO EXTEND THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
The current five-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the period from July 1,
2007 through June 30, 2013, between the Otay Water District (District) and the Otay
Water District Employees’ Association (Association) is hereby amended as set forth
herein. District Management and Association employee representatives have met and
conferred and have agreed to the following additional provisions, which shall constitute
an amendment to the MOU effective January 8, 2013, as follows:
1. The District and the Association hereby enter into this Side Letter Agreement,
which shall be considered an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding
in effect from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2013. This Side Letter Agreement shall
expire June 30, 2014, with the Memorandum of Understanding.
2. Summary: Extend term of MOU for one (1) year with no cost of living increase.
3. The District submits the following proposal for Article 2 and Appendix A.
ARTICLE 2 - TERM
Upon adoption by the Board of Directors of the District, the provisions of this
Memorandum of Understanding shall be effective during the period commencing
at 8:00 a.m. on July 1, 2007 through 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 2014 for those
employees working in the Field and Administrative Units, subject to the
provisions of Article 14, Section 7: Implementation.
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF SALARY INCREASES:
Effective July 1, 2007 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2008 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2009 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2010 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2011 3.5%
Effective July 1, 2012 3.5%
Effective July 1, 2013 0.0%
ATTACHMENT B - EXHIBIT 1
GRADE MIN MID MAX MIN MID MAX MIN MID MAX
10 15.7243$ 17.6898$ 19.6553$ 2,725.55$ 3,066.23$ 3,406.92$ 32,706.54$ 36,794.78$ 40,883.02$
11 16.5105 18.5743 20.6381 2,861.82$ 3,219.55$ 3,577.26$ 34,341.84$ 38,634.54$ 42,927.18$
12 17.3360 19.5030 21.6700 3,004.91$ 3,380.52$ 3,756.13$ 36,058.88$ 40,566.24$ 45,073.53$
13 18.2028 20.4782 22.7535 3,155.15$ 3,549.55$ 3,943.93$ 37,861.82$ 42,594.66$ 47,327.21$
14 19.1130 21.5021 23.8911 3,312.92$ 3,727.03$ 4,141.13$ 39,755.04$ 44,724.37$ 49,693.57$
15 20.0686 22.5772 25.0857 3,478.56$ 3,913.38$ 4,348.19$ 41,742.69$ 46,960.58$ 52,178.25$
16 21.0721 23.7060 26.3400 3,652.50$ 4,109.04$ 4,565.60$ 43,829.97$ 49,308.48$ 54,787.16$
17 22.1257 24.8913 27.6570 3,835.12$ 4,314.49$ 4,793.88$ 46,021.46$ 51,773.90$ 57,526.52$
18 23.2320 26.1359 29.0398 4,026.88$ 4,530.22$ 5,033.57$ 48,322.56$ 54,362.67$ 60,402.85$
19 24.3936 27.4427 30.4918 4,228.22$ 4,756.73$ 5,285.25$ 50,738.69$ 57,080.82$ 63,422.99$
20 25.6132 28.8148 32.0164 4,439.62$ 4,994.57$ 5,549.51$ 53,275.46$ 59,934.78$ 66,594.14$
21 26.8939 30.2556 33.6172 4,661.61$ 5,244.30$ 5,826.99$ 55,939.31$ 62,931.65$ 69,923.85$
22 28.2386 31.7683 35.2981 4,894.69$ 5,506.51$ 6,118.34$ 58,736.29$ 66,078.06$ 73,420.04$
23 29.6505 33.3568 37.0630 5,139.42$ 5,781.85$ 6,424.25$ 61,673.04$ 69,382.14$ 77,091.04$
24 31.1330 35.0246 38.9161 5,396.39$ 6,070.93$ 6,745.47$ 64,756.64$ 72,851.17$ 80,945.59$
25 32.6897 36.7758 40.8620 5,666.21$ 6,374.47$ 7,082.74$ 67,994.58$ 76,493.66$ 84,992.87$
26 34.3242 38.6146 42.9051 5,949.53$ 6,693.20$ 7,436.88$ 71,394.34$ 80,318.37$ 89,242.51$
27 36.0404 40.5453 45.0503 6,247.00$ 7,027.85$ 7,808.72$ 74,964.03$ 84,334.22$ 93,704.64$
28 37.8424 42.5726 47.3028 6,559.35$ 7,379.25$ 8,199.16$ 78,712.19$ 88,551.01$ 98,389.87$
29 39.7345 44.7012 49.6680 6,887.31$ 7,748.21$ 8,609.11$ 82,647.76$ 92,978.50$ 103,309.37$
30 41.7212 46.9363 52.1514 7,231.67$ 8,135.63$ 9,039.57$ 86,780.10$ 97,627.50$ 108,474.83$
31 43.8073 49.2831 54.7589 7,593.27$ 8,542.40$ 9,491.55$ 91,119.18$ 102,508.85$ 113,898.58$
32 45.9977 51.7473 57.4969 7,972.93$ 8,969.53$ 9,966.13$ 95,675.22$ 107,634.38$ 119,593.50$
33 48.2976 54.3346 60.3717 8,371.58$ 9,418.00$ 10,464.43$ 100,459.01$ 113,015.97$ 125,573.14$
34 50.7124 57.0514 63.3903 8,790.15$ 9,888.91$ 10,987.65$ 105,481.79$ 118,666.91$ 131,851.82$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013
HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL
4. Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the MOU shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
Association:
Dale Strunks, Association President
Otay Water District Employees’ Association
Otay Water District:
Mark Watton, General Manager
Otay Water District
ATTACHMENT B - EXHIBIT 1
ARTICLE 2 - TERM
Upon adoption by the Board of Directors of the District, the provisions of this
Memorandum of Understanding shall be effective during the period commencing at 8:00
a.m. on July 1, 2007 through 5:00 p.m. on June 30, 2014 for those employees working
in the Field and Administrative Units, subject to the provisions of Article 14, Section 7:
Implementation.
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF SALARY INCREASES:
Effective July 1, 2007 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2008 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2009 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2010 3.0%
Effective July 1, 2011 3.5%
Effective July 1, 2012 3.5%
Effective July 1, 2013 0.0%
GRADE MIN MID MAX MIN MID MAX MIN MID MAX
10 15.7243$ 17.6898$ 19.6553$ 2,725.55$ 3,066.23$ 3,406.92$ 32,706.54$ 36,794.78$ 40,883.02$
11 16.5105 18.5743 20.6381 2,861.82$ 3,219.55$ 3,577.26$ 34,341.84$ 38,634.54$ 42,927.18$
12 17.3360 19.5030 21.6700 3,004.91$ 3,380.52$ 3,756.13$ 36,058.88$ 40,566.24$ 45,073.53$
13 18.2028 20.4782 22.7535 3,155.15$ 3,549.55$ 3,943.93$ 37,861.82$ 42,594.66$ 47,327.21$
14 19.1130 21.5021 23.8911 3,312.92$ 3,727.03$ 4,141.13$ 39,755.04$ 44,724.37$ 49,693.57$
15 20.0686 22.5772 25.0857 3,478.56$ 3,913.38$ 4,348.19$ 41,742.69$ 46,960.58$ 52,178.25$
16 21.0721 23.7060 26.3400 3,652.50$ 4,109.04$ 4,565.60$ 43,829.97$ 49,308.48$ 54,787.16$
17 22.1257 24.8913 27.6570 3,835.12$ 4,314.49$ 4,793.88$ 46,021.46$ 51,773.90$ 57,526.52$
18 23.2320 26.1359 29.0398 4,026.88$ 4,530.22$ 5,033.57$ 48,322.56$ 54,362.67$ 60,402.85$
19 24.3936 27.4427 30.4918 4,228.22$ 4,756.73$ 5,285.25$ 50,738.69$ 57,080.82$ 63,422.99$
20 25.6132 28.8148 32.0164 4,439.62$ 4,994.57$ 5,549.51$ 53,275.46$ 59,934.78$ 66,594.14$
21 26.8939 30.2556 33.6172 4,661.61$ 5,244.30$ 5,826.99$ 55,939.31$ 62,931.65$ 69,923.85$
22 28.2386 31.7683 35.2981 4,894.69$ 5,506.51$ 6,118.34$ 58,736.29$ 66,078.06$ 73,420.04$
23 29.6505 33.3568 37.0630 5,139.42$ 5,781.85$ 6,424.25$ 61,673.04$ 69,382.14$ 77,091.04$
24 31.1330 35.0246 38.9161 5,396.39$ 6,070.93$ 6,745.47$ 64,756.64$ 72,851.17$ 80,945.59$
25 32.6897 36.7758 40.8620 5,666.21$ 6,374.47$ 7,082.74$ 67,994.58$ 76,493.66$ 84,992.87$
26 34.3242 38.6146 42.9051 5,949.53$ 6,693.20$ 7,436.88$ 71,394.34$ 80,318.37$ 89,242.51$
27 36.0404 40.5453 45.0503 6,247.00$ 7,027.85$ 7,808.72$ 74,964.03$ 84,334.22$ 93,704.64$
28 37.8424 42.5726 47.3028 6,559.35$ 7,379.25$ 8,199.16$ 78,712.19$ 88,551.01$ 98,389.87$
29 39.7345 44.7012 49.6680 6,887.31$ 7,748.21$ 8,609.11$ 82,647.76$ 92,978.50$ 103,309.37$
30 41.7212 46.9363 52.1514 7,231.67$ 8,135.63$ 9,039.57$ 86,780.10$ 97,627.50$ 108,474.83$
31 43.8073 49.2831 54.7589 7,593.27$ 8,542.40$ 9,491.55$ 91,119.18$ 102,508.85$ 113,898.58$
32 45.9977 51.7473 57.4969 7,972.93$ 8,969.53$ 9,966.13$ 95,675.22$ 107,634.38$ 119,593.50$
33 48.2976 54.3346 60.3717 8,371.58$ 9,418.00$ 10,464.43$ 100,459.01$ 113,015.97$ 125,573.14$
34 50.7124 57.0514 63.3903 8,790.15$ 9,888.91$ 10,987.65$ 105,481.79$ 118,666.91$ 131,851.82$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT SALARY SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2013
HOURLY MONTHLY ANNUAL