HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-07-13 Board Packet 1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY
August 7, 2013
3:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 3, 2013
AND SPECIAL MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2013
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM: a) APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT
WITH LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION FOR A
CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF <$39,618.43> FOR THE 624-1 RESER-
VOIR FLOATING COVER REPLACEMENT PROJECT b) AWARD A PROFESSIONAL CONTRACT FOR AS-NEEDED PLAN RE-
VIEW, INSPECTION, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO
AEGIS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, INC. FOR DEVELOPER POTA-
BLE AND RECYCLED WATER PROJECTS IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-
2
EXCEED $350,000 FOR A PERIOD OF TWO (2) FISCAL YEARS (FYs 2014 AND 2015)
c) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL COATING INSPECTION SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH HARPER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC. IN
AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $75,160 FOR A PERIOD OF ONE (1) YEAR (AUGUST 2013 THROUGH JULY 2014)
d) APPROVE TWO (2) AGREEMENTS WITH BMB TOWER HOLDINGS,
LLC, AN OKLAHOMA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, FOR THE IN-
STALLATION OF A COMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES AT THE 485-1 AND 458-1 RESERVOIR SITES
e) DECLARE THE IDENTIFIED VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AS SUR-
PLUS TO THE DISTRICT’S NEEDS
f) APPROVE A ONE-YEAR FIXED WITH FOUR OPTION YEAR RENEW-
ALS (FIVE-YEAR TERM) AGREEMENT WITH PAYMENTUS TO PRO-
VIDE PHONE PAYMENT SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED
$250,000 ($50,000 ANNUALLY)
ACTION ITEMS
7. ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS
a) APPROVE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH GOAL RE-
PORT (PHG) THAT NO FURTHER ACTIONS ARE NECESSARY TO
REDUCE THE LEVELS OF THE SEVEN CONSTITUENTS LISTED IN THE REPORT TO LEVELS AT OR BELOW THE PHG’s (STALKER)
8. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION OF 2013 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
REPORTS
9. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
a) SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
10. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS 11. PRESIDENT’S REPORT/REQUESTS
3
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
12. CLOSED SESSION
a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9]
1 CASE
b) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION [GOV-
ERNMENT CODE §54956.9(a)]
THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING COALITON OF SAN DIEGO CO. v. SAND-OVAL, et. al.; CASE NO. 34-2012-80001158-CU-WM-GD
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
13. REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
14. ADJOURNMENT
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered
at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website.
Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District
Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at (619) 670-2280 at least
24 hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on August 2, 2013, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the
regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Government
Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on August 2, 2013.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
1
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
July 3, 2013
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:46 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak, and Thompson
Directors Absent: Director Croucher
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Attorney Richard Romero,
Asst. GM German Alvarez, Chief Financial Officer Joe
Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod Posada, Chief of
Information Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief of
Administration Rom Sarno, Chief of Water Operations
Pedro Porras and District Secretary Susan Cruz and others
per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak, and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Director Croucher
to approve the agenda.
5. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 5, 2013
AND SPECIAL MEETING OF MAY 14, 2013
A motion was made by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak, and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Director Croucher
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of June 5, 2013 and special
meeting of May 14, 2013.
AGENDA ITEM 4
2
6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
CONSENT CALENDAR
7. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
Director Robak pulled Items 6c, APPROVE THE WATER SUPPLY
ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION REPORT DATED MAY 2013 FOR THE
OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA 12 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL PROJECT, for
discussion.
Upon a motion by Director Gonzalez, seconded by Director Robak and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Director Croucher
to approve the following consent calendar items:
a) APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT
WITH BASILE CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $19,289.50
FOR THE 12-INCH POTABLE WATER PIPELINE IN ORANGE AVENUE
I-805 CROSSING PROJECT
b) APPROVE UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 33592 WITH CALTRANS FOR
SR-11, SEQUENCE I UTILITY RELOCATIONS PROJECT
d) APPROVE LEASE AMENDMENTS WITH SPRINT PCS ASSETS, LLC, A
DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (SPRINT PCS) FOR
MODIFICATIONS TO SIX (6) EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS
FACILITIES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE DISTRICT
e) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4211 TO CONTINUE WATER AND SEWER
AVAILABILITY CHARGES FOR DISTRICT CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2013-2014 TO BE COLECTED THROUGH PROPERTY TAX
BILLS
f) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4212 TO ESTABLISH THE TAX RATE FOR
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 27 AT $0.005 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-
2014
3
g) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4215 FOR THE ELECTION OF FOUR (4)
CANDIDATES FOR THE SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK MANAGEMENT
AUTHORITY’S (SDRMA) BOARD OF DIRECTORS
h) APPROVE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONTRACTS FOR PHONE
SERVICES, MANAGED SERVICES FOR THE DATA CENTER AND GPS
TRACKING
President Lopez presented item 6c for discussion:
c) APPROVE THE WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION
REPORT DATED MAY 2013 FOR THE OTAY RANCH PLANNING AREA
12 FREEWAY COMMERCIAL PROJECT
Engineering Manager Kennedy presented the Water Supply Assessment and
Verification Report dated May 2013 for the Otay Ranch Planning Area 12
Freeway Commercial Project for the Board’s approval. Please reference the
Committee Action notes (Attachment A) attached to staffs’ report for the details of
his report.
Director Robak commented on the variance between the District’s original
demand estimate and current demand estimate. Mr. Kennedy stated that
although the demand for this Project is 127 AFY, which is higher than the
demand estimate in the District’s 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP),
the increase is accounted for through the Accelerated Forecasted Growth
demand increment of the San Diego County Water Authority’s (CWA) 2010
UWMP. It was noted that based on the findings from the District’s and CWA’s
2010 UWMPs, this Project will result in no unanticipated demands.
In response to a question from Director Robak, Mr. Kennedy stated that the
Rosarito Desalination Project and the Rancho del Rey Groundwater Well Project
are not factored into the District’s water supply mix at this time. Both Projects are
included in the District’s 2010 UWMP, but only to provide an update on their
status. General Manager Watton stated that as projects get closer to completion
and are more defined, they are considered “fully entitled” and are then factored
into the water supply mix.
Director Thompson inquired with regard to the Carlsbad Desalination Project, if a
financial commitment determines a project’s inclusion in the supply mix. Mr.
Kennedy stated that all of the environmental documents approved related to the
Carlsbad Desalination Project have been approved. Therefore, it was felt that
the project was far enough along to be included in CWA’s 2010 UWMP supply
portfolio. General Manager Watton stated that a financial commitment to a
project does not determine if the project should be included in a supply mix, a
project just needs to be identified as a supply resource.
Director Robak inquired about the water supply plans for the next 20 years and
industry discussions regarding the uncertainty of water supply for California in the
future. General Manager Watton stated that California’s water supply from the
4
Colorado River is pretty much secure through transfer rights that include water
supply from a reliable source, the Imperial Irrigation District. As to Director
Robak’s concerns with climate impacts that may affect water supply, General
Manager Watton stated that there will likely be more agriculture to urban
transfers in the future. He believes that 20 years of water supply is secure as
CWA, MWD, and other resources from water districts in the region are prepared
to provide supply.
Upon a motion by Director Robak, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Croucher
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
ACTION ITEMS
8. ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS
a) APPROVE THE ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE REGULATORY SITE ACCESS ROAD
IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
Environmental Compliance Specialist Lisa Coburn-Boyd provided a report on the
Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Regulatory Site Access Road
Improvements Project. Please reference the Committee Action notes
(Attachment A) attached to staffs’ report for the details of her report.
General Manager Watton indicated that the District had quite a bit of interaction
with the Valle de Oro Planning group regarding the project and had addressed
their concerns. Mr. Watton also indicated that the District plans to pay a portion
of the MND costs from its Mitigation Bank allocation.
Legal Counsel Richard Romero indicated that at the June 19, 2013 Engineering,
Operations and Water Resources Committee meeting, Director Croucher
recused himself from discussing this item because of his employment with the
San Miguel Fire Protection District (SMFPD) and the agency’s involvement with
the Regulatory Site Access Road Improvement Project.
General Manager Watton indicated that SMFPD plans to fund the access road
once it is approved by all parties involved with this Project. He stated that the
road will provide better access for District staff as it will not require staff to make
a u-turn in order to access the regulatory site.
In response to a question from Director Robak, General Manager Watton stated
that the construction of the access road will be placed on hold until SMFPD is
5
able to fund it. SMFPD is looking for charitable contributions that will go towards
the construction of the access road.
In response to several questions from Director Robak, Environmental
Compliance Specialist Lisa Coburn-Boyd stated that although SMFPD did not
participate in the cost for the preparation of the MND, they plan to pay for the
remaining construction of the access road. Ms. Coburn-Boyd stated that
construction of the access road has also been delayed to avoid disturbing
migrating birds during the nesting season.
Upon a motion by Director Gonzalez, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Croucher
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
b) APPROVE THE WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT AND VERIFICATION
REPORT DATED MAY 2013 FOR THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO OTAY
MESA COMMUNITY PLAN UPDATE
Engineering Manager Kennedy provided a report on the Water Supply
Assessment and Verification Report dated May 2013 for the City of San Diego
Otay Mesa Community Plan Update. Please reference the Committee Action
notes (Attachment A) attached to staff’s report for the details of his report.
In response to Director Robak’s inquiry about shifting water use from single-
family to multi-family units, Mr. Kennedy stated that SANDAG maintains its
projections for each planning area and also assigns density to each community.
It is not certain what the water use is for Multi-family, but the District’s per capita
use is approximately 135. Director Robak indicated he believes that the District’s
projection is generous and stated that he felt the figures were good because it is
better to calculate more than less with the uncertainty of the future projection for
the number of people residing in a household.
Director Thompson indicated that he agreed with Director Robak that it is better
to be generous with the District’s per capita use estimates to assure that the
District meets water supply needs. He inquired if estimated projections are
updated at some point in time to reflect actual water usage. Mr. Kennedy stated
that the District updates project estimates in its Water Resources Master Plan
every 5 years and makes adjustments based on development. He also shared
that the District revisits population data as well.
In response to several inquiries from Director Robak, General Manager Watton
stated that the Otay Water District would be the responsible party to construct the
pipelines and provide water service to the Otay Mesa Community Plan Area . He
6
indicated that there was a possibility that the City of San Diego could acquire the
District’s jurisdictional boundary after the District has constructed its portion of
the infrastructure. However, such action would be time-consuming as it would
need to go through LAFCO for approval and would involve de-annexing from the
District and annexing to the City. He noted that there are areas in Otay Mesa (in
the area of Brownfield) that the District is providing water service to the City of
San Diego through a mutual agreement as the City did not have adequate water
supplies. The City then serves this water to their customers and handles the
billing services.
Upon a motion by Director Robak, seconded by Director Gonzalez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Croucher
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
c) CERTIFY THE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT (SPEIR) FOR THE 2013 WASTEWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN (WWMP) AND FIND THAT THE POTENTIALLY
SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE DISTRICT’S WWMP WILL BE
AVOIDED THROUGH THE ADOPTION OF FEASIBLE MITIGATION
MEASURES SHOWN IN THE SPEIR; AND APPROVE THE 2013 WWMP
AS A FINAL PLAN AND DOCUMENT
Both Environmental Compliance Specialist Lisa Coburn-Boyd and Engineering
Manager Bob Kennedy provided a report on this agenda item. Please reference
the Committee Action notes (Attachment A) attached to staffs’ report for the
details of their report.
Ms. Coburn-Boyd noted that the District decided to perform a Supplemental PEIR
for the 2009 WRMP because the planning area for the WWMP was covered in
the previous PEIR plan and the environmental impacts analyzed in that plan
have not changed, however, it required coverage for the waste water projects
that were identified in the WWMP. Thus, most of the existing PEIR is
incorporated by reference in the Supplemental PEIR. The changes are in the list
of projects in the waste water collection and treatment projects.
Director Thompson had several inquiries regarding the partnership with the City
of Chula Vista and the possibility of a regional Water Reclamation Facility as an
option for potential additional recycled water supply. In response, Mr. Kennedy
stated that the District and the City of Chula Vista have equally contributed to the
cost of drafting a study for a potential 2MG/day MBR Plant that would provide
recycled water supplies to the District and provide additional capacity to the City
of Chula Vista. General Manager Mark Watton indicated that the City of Chula
Vista’s original purpose for considering the MBR Plant was to obtain additional
7
capacity for increasing development years ago. Now that development has
slowed, the City wants to preserve the option to use it as a potential resource.
He stated the City of Chula Vista’s preferred option is to have additional capacity
in the City of San Diego’s Metro system. The Otay WD then would get additional
recycled water capacity from the City of San Diego’s South Bay Water
Reclamation Plant. Mr. Watton stated that if the preferred option did not work
out, then Plan B is the MBR Plant. In order for the MBR Plant to be feasible, it
would need to produce 4 MGD. The water produced would go into the District’s
existing recycled distribution system and the additional capacity for sewer
processing would be provided to the City of Chula Vista. Currently, recycled
water is used by new development in the City of Chula Vista and it is anticipated
that it will be used by future new development in the City of Chula Vista and
recycled services would be expanded to the Otay Mesa area. In summary,
General Manager Watton stated that the City of Chula Vista is researching the
cost for additional capacity from the Metro system versus the cost of establishing
a new MBR Plant. The nexus/partnership between the City and the Otay Water
District is the possibility of utilizing the recycled water from the new MBR Plant in
the District’s service area.
Director Thompson commented that the District’s projection for water supply
included a conservation estimate and inquired if recycled water was included in
that estimate. Engineering Manager Kennedy stated that conservation is
considered to be more of an offset and structural element that forces customers
to use less water. However, the District is considering the use of recycled water
at institutional establishments for toilet/urinal flushing which will offset potable
water use.
Director Robak indicated that he reviewed the District’s WWMP options and
commented that, at one point in time, he thought there was discussion of pushing
at the state level the possibility of Direct Potable Reuse (DPR). He stated that he
was disappointed that this possibility was not considered as a supply option in
the District’s WSA. Mr. Kennedy stated that there is an incremental cost each
time you treat IPR and DPR water. He stated that if the water will be utilized
outside for landscaping purposes, it is much less expensive to take it off tertiary
treated water than to treat it through an RO system, etc. to potable level. It would
be best to utilize the water through the recycled system as it would save a lot of
money. General Manager Watton also noted that the region does not have the
facilities to distribute DPR and if an IPR pipe is connected to San Vicente, it
would cost approximately $200 million. Director Robak indicated that such a pipe
would be a waste of money. It would be more cost effective to distribute DPR
water directly into the raw water system.
Director Thompson inquired about the purpose of DPR when there is a demand
for recycled water. He stated that he felt it would be more cost effective to use
purple pipelines. Director Robak indicated that it is anticipated that purple pipes
will go away in the future and that he felt that there was no need for the District to
continue building them. He stated he believes that the District should start
8
looking into DPR as an option as it is heading in that direction in the future.
Eventually it will become all one system.
General Manager Watton stated that in the South Bay area, the opportunity to go
to an IPR or DPR system is much more limited for the foreseeable future.
Continuing to construct purple pipe and utilize recycled water still make sense.
In the North City area, the City of San Diego wishes to build a 15 million gallon
system, and the region is suggesting 80 million gallon system.
Upon a motion by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Lopez and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: Director Robak
Abstain: None
Absent: Director Croucher
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
9. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE, FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
a) RECEIVE THE DISTRICT’S INVESTMENT POLICY (POLICY 27) FOR
REVIEW, AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4213 AMENDING THE
POLICY AND RE-DELEGATING AUTHORITY FOR ALL INVESTMENT
RELATED ACITIVITIES TO THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION §53607
Finance Manager Kevin Koeppen provided a report for this agenda item. Please
reference the Committee Action notes (Attachment A) attached to staff’s report
for the details of his report.
Mr. Koeppen indicated that at the last Finance, Administration and
Communications (FA&C) Committee meeting, there was a discussion to consider
if the District should implement a restriction for government agencies (section
8.03) whose government implied guarantee has been reduced or eliminated.
Subsequently, staff recommended adding the following statement to the District’s
Policy 27 in relation to government agencies (section 8.03):
“Government agencies whose implied guarantee has been reduced or
eliminated shall require an “A” rating or higher by a nationally recognized
statistical rating organization.”
It was noted that the condition requiring an “A” rating or higher is
consistent with the limitations governing commercial paper and medium-
term notes set forth in California Government Code Section §53601
Mr. Koeppen noted that a slide was added to staff’s PowerPoint presentation with
information about investments allowed/not allowed under the District’s current
Policy (California Government Code vs. OWD).
9
Mr. Kevin Koeppen shared that the FA&C Committee discussed the possibility of
reducing the short-term commercial debt limit to 10% (the current limit is 15%)
and review all limitations for their alignment with Management’s current practice.
In response to the Committee’s comments, staff added two alternative options for
investment limits:
Alternative Option A: Reduce the allowable investment in commercial
notes and debt categories to 10%
Alternative Option B: Remove commercial notes and debt instruments as
allowable investments (Policy Section 8.05 and
8.06)
Director Thompson indicated that the FA&C Committee felt that the risk in
investing in commercial notes is higher than other investment options and
recommended that the District’s allowable investment in commercial notes be
reduced to a level that is lower than what is allowed by State Code (State Code
allows 15%) as the Committee believes that the District should be more
restrictive. Director Thompson also shared that the Committee and staff
discussed concerns with government sponsored enterprises (GSE) investments
which the Federal Government does not support. With the Federal Government
considering reducing guarantees and partial guarantees, and weaning itself off
the GSE investments, the Committee and staff felt the need to look into
alternative investment options. If the Federal Government reduced its
guarantees, it is believed that the District would still maintain its investment
objectives and a good credit rating. Director Thompson thanked staff for their
alternative option that makes sense for the District’s investment policy.
With no further discussion by the Board, staff recommended the following:
1) Select Alternative Option A (Reduce the allowable commercial notes
and debt categories to 10%)
2) Adopt Resolution No. 4213 to amend Investment Policy No. 27 using
the selected Alternative Option A
3) Re-delegate authority for all investment related activities to the Chief
Financial Officer
Upon a motion by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Director Croucher
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
10
10. BOARD
a) CONSIDER CASTING A VOTE TO ELECT A MEMBER TO THE
CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION’S BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
General Manager Mark Watton provided a report on this item and indicated that
the Finance, Administration and Communications Committee recommended that
the District’s vote be cast for Mr. George McManigle, a Rainbow Municipal Water
District board member.
Upon a motion by Director Gonzalez, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: Director Robak
Absent: Director Croucher
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
b) DISCUSSION OF 2013 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
There were no changes to the board meeting calendar.
REPORTS
11. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
General Manager Mark Watton shared that there were discussions in
Sacramento as to how the water bond should be configured. He stated that
CWA drafted its 2014 Water Bond Priorities and a copy has been provided to
each member of the board. He suggested that the board support CWA’s Water
Bond Priorities.
General Manager Watton provided an update on the latest City of San Diego
Recycled Water Cost of Service Study (COSS) which was released on June 20,
2013 without notice from city staff. The study was reviewed at an IROC
Committee meeting held June 24, 2013. He stated that District staff had a limited
review of the COSS and drafted a list of comments which was brought to the
IROC Committee meeting. Mr. Watton indicated that the IROC Committee made
a motion for the COSS to be brought back at a later time for further review. The
COSS will also be considered at a meeting of the City of San Diego Committee
on Natural Resources and Culture (NRC) on July 10, 2013. District staff plans to
bring forth the District’s issues with the COSS at that meeting as well. Mr.
Watton stated that it was a surprise to District staff that the City did not honor its
promise to allow time for review and comments by affected parties; it was also a
surprise that the COSS was not done at industry standard level. Mr. Watton
11
indicated that the COSS was completed by Raftelis Financial Consultants. He
stated that the City is proposing a recycled rate increase of 180%, effective
January 1, 2014; which means the District would see its recycled services rate
increase from $350 to $1,500 in a year’s time. It is likely that this proposed rate
increase will encourage less recycled water use. Mr. Watton also shared, to
further complicate this issue, that Mr. Roger Bailey, the City’s Director of Public
Utilities, will be leaving the City to take another position.
In response to a question from Director Robak, General Manager Watton stated
that the District would prefer to work through the necessary steps prior to taking
any legal actions concerning the COSS.
In response to a question from Director Thompson, General Manager Watton
stated that the following individuals are on the NRC Committee: City
Councilmembers David Alvarez, Scott Sherman, Lorie Zapf, and Marti Emerald.
General Manager Watton presented additional information from his report that
included the District’s Landscape Contest, 2012 CAFR Award, and that the
California Water Environment Association (CWEA) – San Diego Section had
hosted a meeting at the Otay WD on June 20, 2013. He indicated Otay WD staff
provided several presentations to CWEA on several of the District’s projects and
also provided a tour of the Chapman Facility to its members.
General Manager Watton stated that CWA is continuing with routine business,
and is starting to move forward with contracts and activities related to the
Poseidon Desalination Project. He reminded the board that the District had
taken a “no” position on the Project and that he and Director Croucher would like
to be consistent with the District’s decision. As the minority on CWA’s board with
regard to this project, both have decided to leave CWA meetings prior to voting
on the Project’s contracts to avoid any discord.
12. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
Director Robak commented on the low pressure incident in his Division and
thanked staff for resolving the incident. He also inquired about the copy of the
Proposition 218 Notice provided to the board on the dias, which Communications
Officer Armando Buelna stated was an additional Notice sent to individuals who
own land within the District’s service area, but who do not currently have an
account, but may potentially have one in the future. Mr. Buelna also indicated
that at the request of the board, additional information was added to the Notices
to include conservation information and impacts (i.e. Carlsbad Desalination
Project) that impacted the District’s rates.
Director Thompson thanked staff for the facilities tour held last month and for all
their efforts and good work.
Director Gonzalez reported that he attended a Metro Commission meeting where
they discussed potable water alternatives. He stated that the meeting was very
informative and he anticipates positive outcomes from the meeting.
12
President Lopez requested a briefing on the Metro Commission meeting the
Director Gonzalez attended.
13. PRESIDENT’S REPORT
President Lopez reported on meetings he attended during the month of June
2013 (a list of meetings he attended is attached).
He also noted that he attended a Water Conservation Garden Board Meeting on
June 12, 2013, where they considered the Garden’s financials for FY 2014. He
shared that one of the agencies has indicated that they may terminate their
membership with the Garden. President Lopez stated that the Garden is a great
institution that is prioritizing its long-term strategic plan.
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
14. CLOSED SESSION
The board recessed to closed session at 5:42 p.m. to discuss the following
matter:
b. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9]
1 CASE
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
15. REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD
MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
The board reconvened at 6:37 p.m. and Attorney Richard Romero indicated that
no reportable actions were taken in closed session.
16. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned
the meeting at 6:39 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
13
President’s Report
July 3, 2013 Board Meeting
A) Meetings attended during the Month of June 2013:
1) June 5: Attended the District’s Regular Board Meeting
2) June 12: Water Conservation Garden Board Meeting
3) June 13:
a. Special Board Meeting. The members of the board were
provided a tour of the Ralph W. Chapman Water
Recycling Facility and the Hillsdale and Copps Lane
Pump Stations.
b. Committee Agenda Briefing. Met with Director Thompson
and General Manager Watton to review items that will
be presented at the June Committee meetings.
4) June 24: Attended the District’s Finance, Administration
and Communications Committee. Reviewed, discussed, and
made recommendation on items that will be presented at the
June Committee Meetings.
5) June 25:
a. Attended the District’s Desalination Project Committee
Meeting. Discussed the Rosarito Desalination Project.
Also in attendance were the various consultants for
the project:
i. Dr. Michael Welch who is a prominent expert on
water quality
ii. Mr. Pete Silva, Silva-Silva International, former
Presidential appointee to the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). He also has connections
with the International Boundary and Water
Commission (IBWC) and will assist the District
with the Federal permitting process.
iii. Mr. Dan McFarlan, AECOM Project Manager, who is
involved with the planning and design of the
District’s facilities in the United States, the
permitting process, and preparation of Project
Environmental Impact Report.
14
b. Board Agenda Briefing. Met with Director Thompson,
General Manager Watton, General Counsel Dan Shinoff
and Attorney Richard Romero to review items that will
be presented at the July Board Meeting.
6) June 26: Completed a Webinar on Sexual Harassment
Training. The District is working to attain the
designation as a “District of Distinction” from the Special
District Leadership Foundation. One of the criteria is all
board members must receive Sexual Harassment Training. All
board members have been tasked to take the online training.
1
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
June 13, 2013
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 9:04 a.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak (met the group at the Ralph W.
Chapman Water Recycling Facility at 9:40 a.m.) and
Thompson
Directors Absent: Croucher (due to a work commitment)
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, General Counsel Dan
Shinoff, Asst. GM German Alvarez, Chief of Operations,
Pedro Porras, Chief of Engineering Rod Posada, System
Operations Manager Gary Stalker, District Secretary Susan
Cruz and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Gonzalez, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Director Croucher and Robak
to approve the agenda.
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
AGENDA ITEM 4
2
TOUR
6. TOUR OF RALPH W. CHAPMAN WATER RECYCLING FACILITY
Upon arrival at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility, the tour group was
asked to sign the visitor sign-in log sheet. Chief of Operations Pedro Porras then
introduced the recycling facility staff members who included Mr. Gene Palop,
Reclamation Plant Supervisor; Mr. Damon Newman, Lead Reclamation Plant
Operator; Mr. E.J. Colia, Reclamation Plant Operator III; Rob Leigh, Reclamation
Plant Operator III; and Ms. Alma Ortega-Carrillo, Laboratory Analyst. As standard
procedure, the group was provided a review of safety and evacuation procedures
prior to the tour. The review is mandatory should an emergency occur during the
tour.
Staff toured the group through the Water Testing Laboratories for both potable and
recycled. They also demonstrated the SCADA System and how it is utilized to
monitor the District’s sewer system. It was indicated that should the District’s
reclamation plant be shut down for any reason, the sewage flow would be pumped
to the City of San Diego’s Metro System for processing.
Staff then took the group through the treatment plant and explained the treatment
process from sewage to recycled water and the recently completed upgrades to the
facility. It was indicated that it takes approximately 20 hours to treat sewer water to
the level of recycled water from inlet to outlet. The water is then utilized to irrigate
commercial and public landscape areas within the eastern areas of the City of
Chula Vista and the Otay Mesa.
7. TOUR OF THE HILLSDALE AND COPPS LANE PUMP STATIONS
The group then toured the Hillsdale and Copps Lane pump stations within the
District’s Regulatory Site. Chief of Operations Porras introduced Operations staff
members Mr. Don Henderson, Pump/Electrical Supervisor, and Mr. Jake Vaclavek,
Water Systems Supervisor. Staff indicated that treated water comes into the
District’s system through its Regulatory Site. It is then pumped throughout the
District’s northern distribution system. Mr. Vaclavek walked the group through the
pump stations including the pump stations’ control room and back-up power
generation facilities.
Director Robak departed at 11:20 a.m.
It was discussed that a new access road is also being considered to the Regulatory
Site. The access road point of entry is located at the traffic light near Skyline
Church and will pass the new Sherriff’s substation. This will provide better access
and District staff will no longer need to u-turn at the Jamacha Road and Campo
Road intersection to access the Regulatory Site.
3
8. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the
meeting at 11:44 a.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2477-
001103
DIV. NO. 1
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approve Change Order No. 3 to the Contract with Layfield
Environmental Systems Corporation for the 624-1 Reservoir
Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
approve Change Order No. 3 to the existing contract with Layfield
Environmental Systems Corporation (Layfield) for a credit in the
amount of <$39,618.43> for the Floating Cover Replacement at the 624-
1 Reservoir Project (see Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to approve
Change Order No. 3 (see Exhibit B) to the existing contract with
Layfield for a credit in an amount of <$39,618.43> for the Floating
Cover Replacement at the 624-1 Reservoir Project.
ANALYSIS:
At the October 9, 2012 Board Meeting, the Board awarded a
construction contract in an amount not-to-exceed of $497,050 to
Layfield to replace the 624-1 Reservoir floating cover and protect,
clean, and inspect the existing liner for this 12.0 MG reservoir.
AGENDA ITEM 6a
2
Since the award of the construction contract, two contract change
orders have been approved. The Board approved contract change order
No. 1 in the amount of $183,026.00 to replace the existing liner
which was found to be unsuitable for reuse during construction.
Change Order No. 2 was a no cost change and was approved to reconcile
time associated with the liner replacement.
Change Order No. 3 (Exhibit B) which serves as a close-out Change
Order for the contract, consists of credit items including
reconciling unused allowances associated with Allowance Bid Item 7
“Repair Existing Liner” and Item 8 “Replace rather than reuse BID
ITEM #2 components” and a credit for the re-use of existing vent
screens determined suitable for re-use. Additionally, Change Order
No. 3 provides for a reimbursement of lost water costs associated
with a leaking underwater fitting until the Contractor corrected the
problem with a diver. A complete breakdown of these credit and
reimbursement items is included in Exhibit B.
Change Order No. 3 also adds 3 calendar days due to the weather
impacts on the Project’s progress. In summary, Change Order No. 3
results in a credit in the amount of <$39,618.43> and adds 3 days
time for a total contract amount of $640,457.57 with a contract
duration of 211 calendar days.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The Fiscal Year 2014 budget for CIP P2477 is $1,000,000. Total
expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and forecast, including
this contract change order, are $906,967. See Attachment B for
budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that these budgets will be sufficient to support the
Project.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the
Replacement Fund for CIP P2477.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
3
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
D M/RP:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2477 Reservoir Cover Replacement\Staff Reports\CO #3\BD 8-7-13, Staff Report, 624-1 Res Floating Cvr Repl CO #3.docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Change Order No. 3
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2477-001103
Approve Change Order No. 3 to the Contract with Layfield
Environmental Systems Corporation for the 624-1 Reservoir
Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 24, 2013,
and the following comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board approve Change Order No. 3 to the
existing contract with Layfield Environmental Systems
Corporation (Layfield) for a credit in the amount of
<$39,618.43> for the Floating Cover Replacement at the 624-1
Reservoir Project.
Staff provided a background of the Project and indicated that
two contract change orders have been approved since the award of
the contract. Details of the two change orders are provided on
page 2 of the staff report.
Staff indicated that Change Order No. 3 serves as a close-out
Change Order for the contract and consists of credit items that
are listed on page 2 of Attachment B. Staff noted that Change
Order No. 3 also adds 3 calendar days due to weather impacts.
In summary, Change Order No. 3 results in a credit amount of
<$39,618.43> and adds 3 days time for a total contract amount of
$640,457.57 with a contract duration of 211 calendar days.
In response to a question by the Committee regarding project
contingency, staff stated that Change Order No. 3 included
credits for the unused bid items and that Change Order No. 1
that was approved by the Board expended the construction
contract contingency.
Following the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2477-001103
Approve Change Order No. 3 to the Contract with Layfield
Environmental Systems Corporation for the 624-1 Reservoir
Project
Date Updated: 6/28/2013
Budget
1,000,000
Planning
Regulatory Agency Fees 50 50 - 50 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Service Contracts 4,000 4,000 - 4,000 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CO
Standard Salaries 18,083 18,083 - 18,083
Total Planning 22,133 22,133 - 22,133
Design 001102
Consultant Contracts 70,620 70,620 - 70,620 ATKINS
1,810 1,810 - 1,810 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC
Service Contracts 84 84 - 84 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
1,823 1,547 276 1,823 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
1,062 1,062 - 1,062 LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
Standard Salaries 45,175 45,175 - 45,175
Total Design 120,574 120,298 276 120,574
Construction
Consultant Contracts 26,400 6,450 19,950 26,400 ALYSON CONSULTING
195 195 - 195 ATKINS
Professional Legal Fees 1,883 1,883 - 1,883 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Service Contracts 2,000 2,000 - 2,000 DIVE/CORR INC
696,180 645,010 51,170 696,180 LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS
(39,618) (39,618) (39,618) Change Order No. 3
Standard Salaries 77,221 67,221 10,000 77,221
0 - - - - 0
0 - - - - 0
Total Construction 764,261 722,759 41,502 764,260
Grand Total 906,967 865,189 41,778 906,967
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
p2477-Res - 624-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT NO./
SUBPROJECT: P1438-
010000
DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of As-Needed Plan Review, Inspection, and Project
Management Services for Developer Potable and Recycled Water
Projects Contract for Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a professional As-Needed Plan Review, Inspection, and Project
Management Services for Developer Potable and Recycled Water Projects
contract to Aegis Engineering Management, Inc. (AegisEM) and
authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with AegisEM in
an amount not-to-exceed $350,000, for a period of two (2) fiscal
years (FY 2014, FY 2015).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
professional As-Needed Plan Review, Inspection, and Project
Management Services for Developer Potable and Recycled Water Projects
agreement with AegisEM in an amount not-to-exceed $350,000, for a
period of two (2) fiscal years (FY 2014, FY 2015).
AGENDA ITEM 6b
2
ANALYSIS:
The District will require the services of a consulting firm in
support of developer projects to provide professional services for
Plan Review, Inspection, and Project Management for Developer Potable
and Recycled Water Projects. The Consultant assists the Public
Services Division of the Engineering Department in processing and
performing plan check review, approvals, inspection, and project
close-out for both developer and retrofit projects. The inspection
services require the Consultant to be a Cross-Connection Control
Specialist certified through the American Water Works Association
(AWWA) or American Backflow Prevention Association (ABPA). Proof of
certification was required at the time of proposal. The inspection
services shall coordinate coverage testing as well as cross-
connection tests, as mandated by the California Department of Public
Health. It is anticipated that the Consultant will review and
inspect approximately fifty (50) projects or more. Over the same
period, staff estimates the cost to perform this responsibility will
not exceed $350,000.
On February 6, 2013, the District initially solicited for Plan Review
Inspection and Project Management Services for Developer Potable and
Recycled Water Projects by placing an advertisement on the District’s
website and several other publications, including the San Diego Daily
Transcript. Eleven (11) firms submitted a letter of interest and a
statement of qualifications. The Request for Proposal (RFP) for Plan
Review, Inspection, and Project Management Services for Developer
Potable and Recycled Water Projects was sent to the eleven (11) firms
resulting in four (4) proposals received by March 13, 2013 from the
following firms:
AEGIS Engineering Management
Krazan & Associates
Brady
Atkins
The seven (7) firms that chose not to propose are Valley Cooper &
Associates, Jacobs, PSOMAS, J.C. Heden & Associates, Nuera
Contracting and Consulting, The “G” Crew, and Alyson Consulting. Of
the four (4) proposals received, only one (1) was found to be
responsive with respect to the District’s requirement for AWWA or
ABPA cross-connection control specialist certification. The
remaining seven (7) declined to propose due to various reasons
including expressing difficulty with finding inspectors with AWWA or
ABPA certified cross-connection control specialist certifications.
3
As a result, staff decided to strengthen the procurement outreach and
re-advertize.
On April 8, 2013, the District re-solicited Plan Review Inspection
and Project Management Services for Developer Potable and Recycled
Water Projects by placing an advertisement on the District’s website
and several other publications, including the East County Gazette and
San Diego Daily Transcript. Staff also reached out to firms to
notify them of the contracting opportunity. Additionally, the
advertisement included notification of the AWWA or ABPA certified
cross-connection control specialist certification requirement. Six
(6) firms submitted a letter of interest and a statement of
qualifications. The Request for Proposal (RFP) for Plan Review,
Inspection, and Project Management Services for Developer Potable and
Recycled Water Projects was sent to six (6) firms resulting in three
(3) proposals received by May 13, 2013 from the following firms:
AEGIS Engineering Management
Brady
Atkins
The three (3) firms that chose not to participate were Wallace and
Associates Consulting, Alyson Consulting, and PSOMAS.
In accordance with the District’s Policy 21, Staff evaluated and
scored all written proposals and interviewed the three (3) firms on
June 17 and June 18, 2013. AegisEM received the highest score for
their services based on their experience, understanding of the scope
of work, proposed method to accomplish the work, and their composite
hourly rate. AegisEM was the most qualified with the best overall
rating or ranking. A summary of the complete evaluation is shown in
Attachment B.
AegisEM submitted the Company Background Questionnaire, as required
by the RFP, and staff did not find any significant issues. Staff
checked their references and performed an internet search on the
company. Staff found the references to be excellent and did not find
any outstanding issues with the internet search.
AegisEM’s project manager and inspector listed in the proposal are
AWWA or ABPA certified cross-connection control specialists and have
vast plan checking, inspection, and retrofitting experience.
Staff estimated that an average of $7,000 will be needed per project
to perform the plan check review and inspections. The District
recuperates these funds by billing directly to the developer.
4
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Plan check and inspection services are an on-going effort provided by
the District to developers. This particular expense is completely
funded by developer deposits and does not affect the District’s
operating budget.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM/RP:jf
P:\Public-s\STAFF REPORTS\2013\BD 08-07-13\As-Needed Plan_Inspect_PM for Recycled\BD 08-07-13, Staff
Report, Award Contract for Plan Check Inspection (Recy-Pot-Retro).doc
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Summary of Proposal Rankings
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P1438-010000
Award of As-Needed Plan Review, Inspection, and Project
Management Services for Developer Potable and Recycled
Water Projects Contract for Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 24, 2013 and the following
comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board award a professional As-Needed Plan
Review, Inspection, and Project Management Services for Developer
Potable and Recycled Water Projects contract to Aegis Engineering
Management, Inc. (AegisEM) and authorize the General Manager to
execute an agreement with AegisEM in an amount not-to-exceed
$350,000, for a period of two (2) fiscal years.
Staff indicated that the Consultant would assists Public Services
Division of the Engineering Department in processing and performing
plan check review, approvals, inspection, and project close-out for
developer projects.
Staff stated that the inspection services shall coordinate coverage
testing as well as cross-connection tests, as mandated by the
California Department of Public Health. It was noted that
inspection services require the Consultant to be a Cross-Connection
Control Specialist certified through the American Water Works
Association (AWWA) or the American Backflow Prevention Association
(ABPA).
Staff stated that it is estimated that the Consultant will review
and inspect approximately fifty (50) projects over the term of this
contract.
Staff provided a background of the Request for Proposal process that
was originally advertised on February 6, 2013. With only one firm
found to be responsive with respect to the District’s requirement
for AWWA or ABPA cross-connection control specialist certification,
staff decided to strengthen the procurement outreach and re-
advertise.
Staff stated that the District re-advertised a Request for Proposal
on April 8, 2013 that included notification of the AWWA or ABPA
certified cross-connection control specialist certification
requirement. Results of the April 8, 2013 Request for Proposal are
shown in Attachment B of the staff report.
Staff indicated that AegisEM received the highest score for their
services based on experience, understanding of the scope of work,
proposed method to accomplish work, and their composite hourly rate.
AegisEM was the most qualified with the best overall rating or
ranking. Staff checked their references and performed an internet
search on the company and found their references to be excellent and
did not find any outstanding issues with the internet search.
Following the discussion, the committee supported staffs’ recommendation
and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
Qualifications of
Team
Responsiveness, Project Understanding
Technical and Management Approach
INDIVIDUAL SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
AVERAGE SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
Proposed Rates*Consultant's Commitment to DBE
AVERAGE TOTAL
WRITTEN
Additional Creativity
and Insight
Strength of Project
Manager
Presentation, Communication Skills
Quality of Response to Questions
INDIVIDUAL
TOTAL - ORAL
AVERAGE TOTAL
ORAL
30 25 30 85 85 15 Y/N 100 15 15 10 10 50 50 150 Poor/Good/ Excellent
BOB KENNEDY 27 22 27 76 14 14 9 9 46
JEFF MARCHIORO 28 23 28 79 14 14 9 9 46
ROGER HOLLY 28 24 28 80 15 14 9 9 47
JOSE MARTINEZ 27 23 28 78 14 13 9 8 44
BRANDON DIPIETRO 27 24 26 77 15 14 9 9 47
BOB KENNEDY 25 20 24 69 12 12 7 7 38
JEFF MARCHIORO 25 19 25 69 11 11 8 6 36
ROGER HOLLY 22 21 22 65 11 11 7 7 36
JOSE MARTINEZ 23 21 23 67 11 13 7 5 36
BRANDON DIPIETRO 25 22 22 69 12 14 7 7 40
BOB KENNEDY 26 21 26 73 13 13 8 8 42JEFF MARCHIORO 27 22 25 74 11 12 9 7 39ROGER HOLLY 24 23 23 70 12 12 7 8 39JOSE MARTINEZ 25 23 25 73 13 12 9 7 41BRANDON DIPIETRO 26 22 23 71 13 14 8 8 43
*The fees were evaluated by comparing rates for seven positions. The sum of these seven rates are noted on the table to the left.
Consultant Proposed Rates Position Score Note: The Review Panel does not see or consider rates when scoring other categories. Rates are scored by the PM, who is not on the Review Panel.
Aegis $700 lowest 15
Brady $800 8
Atkins $900 highest 1
72 1 Y
93 46 139
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RANKINGS
RATES SCORING CHART
ATTACHMENT B
AS-NEEDED PLAN REVIEW, INSPECTION, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CONSULTING SERVICES
WRITTEN ORAL
Atkins
37 113
TOTAL SCORE REFERENCES
MAXIMUM POINTS
Aegis 78 15 Y
Brady 68 8 Y
Excellent
73 41 114
76
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin Cameron
Assistant Civil Engineer II
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2493-001103
P2535-001103
DIV. NOs.: 2,4
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award a Professional Services Agreement with Harper &
Associates Engineering, Inc. for Coating Inspection Services
on the 624-2 and 458-2 Reservoir Coating Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a professional Coating Inspection Services contract to Harper &
Associates Engineering, Inc. (Harper) and to authorize the General
Manager to execute an agreement with Harper in an amount not-to-
exceed $75,160 for a period of one (1) year (August 2013 through July
2014)(see Exhibits A-1 & A-2 for Project locations).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
professional services agreement with Harper in an amount not-to-
exceed $75,160 for a period of one (1) year (August 2013 through July
2014) for coating inspection services on the 624-2 Reservoir
Interior/Exterior Coating (CIP 2493) and the 458-2 Reservoir Interior
Coating (CIP P2535) Projects.
AGENDA ITEM 6c
2
ANALYSIS:
In June 2013, the District’s corrosion consultant, V&A Consulting
Engineers, completed a Corrosion Control Program (CCP) that addressed
the installation, maintenance, and monitoring of corrosion protection
systems for the District’s steel reservoirs and buried metallic
piping. The CCP included a reservoir maintenance schedule that
showed the 624-2 Reservoir is due to be recoated on both the interior
and exterior surfaces, and the 458-2 Reservoir is due to be recoated
on the interior only. The exterior coating of the 458-2 was replaced
in 2004.
The coating replacement on steel reservoirs requires specialty
inspection to ensure the application is applied according to the
manufacturer’s specifications and complies with state health
regulations. In the past, the District has used the as-needed
corrosion engineer to perform coating inspection, and many of the
corrosion engineers have to sub-contract the work of coating
inspection. By contracting directly with the coating inspector, the
District is expected to get the best value for each dollar spent.
The District solicited coating inspection services by placing an
advertisement on the Otay Water District’s website on May 13, 2013
with various other publications including the San Diego Daily
Transcript. Eight (8) firms submitted a letter of interest and a
statement of qualifications. The Request for Proposal (RFP) for
Coating Inspection Services was sent to the eight (8) firms resulting
in four (4) proposals received by June 18, 2013 from the following
firms:
• Bay Area Coating Consultants, Inc.
• Corrpro Companies, Inc.
• CSI Services
• Harper & Associates Engineering, Inc.
The four (4) firms that chose not to propose were HDR, MCS Inspection
Group, Shawn Pablo, and Tank Industry Consultants.
In accordance with the District’s Policy 21, staff evaluated and
scored all written proposals. Harper received the highest score for
their services based on their experience, understanding of the scope
of work, proposed method to accomplish the work, and their hourly
rate. Harper was the most qualified consultant with the best overall
rating or ranking score. A summary of the complete evaluation is
shown in Exhibit B.
3
Harper submitted the Company Background Questionnaire as required by
the RFP and staff did not find any outstanding issues. In addition,
staff checked their references and performed an internet search on
the company. Staff found the references to be excellent and did not
find any outstanding issues with the internet search. Staff has
worked with Harper on numerous occasions over the last twenty years,
and they have performed at a high level.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP P2493, as approved in the FY 2014 budget, is
$1,950,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, are $1,883,726.
The total budget for CIP P2535, as approved in the FY 2014 budget, is
$425,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, are $401,434.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that both budgets are sufficient to support the Project.
See Attachment B-1 for the budget detail for CIP P2493 and Attachment
B-2 for the budget detail for CIP P2535.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the
Replacement Fund for both CIP P2493 and CIP P2535.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
KC/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2493 & P2535 624-2 & 458-2 Reservoir Coating\Staff Reports\BD 08-07-13, Staff Report,
Coating Inspection Services for 624-2 & 458-2 Reservoirs (KC-BK).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B-1 – Budget Detail for CIP P2493
Attachment B-2 – Budget Detail for CIP P2535
Exhibit A-1 – Location Map for CIP P2493
Exhibit A-2 – Location Map for CIP P2535
Exhibit B – Summary of Proposal Rankings
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2493-001103
P2535-001103
Award a Professional Services Agreement with Harper &
Associates Engineering, Inc. for Coating Inspection
Services on the 624-2 and 458-2 Reservoir Coating Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 24, 2013 and
the following comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board award a professional Coating
Inspection Services contract to Harper & Associates Engineering,
Inc. (Harper) and to authorize the General Manager to execute an
agreement with Harper in an amount not-to-exceed $75,160 for a
period of one (1) year (August 2013 through July 2014).
Staff indicated that the District’s 2013 Corrosion Control
Program (CCP) shows the 624-2 Reservoir is due to be recoated in
the interior and exterior surfaces and the 458-2 Reservoir is
due to be recoated on the interior surface. The existing
coatings on both tanks are 20 years old and at the end of their
useful life. The exterior coating of the 458-2 Reservoir was
replaced in 2004 and it is not needed to be rehabilitated at
this time.
Staff noted that the coating replacement on steel reservoirs
requires specialty inspection to ensure the application is in
accordance to the manufacturer’s specifications and the process
complies with all State health regulations. The inspector
ensures that the coatings are mixed properly, applied at the
specified thicknesses, and allowed the appropriate times to
cure.
Staff discussed the selection process and indicated that the
process was performed in accordance of the District’s Policy 21.
Results of the analysis are shown in Attachment B of the staff
report. Staff indicated that Harper received the highest score.
Staff performed a reference check and internet search on Harper
and did not find any significant issues. Staff indicated that
the District has successfully worked with Harper in the past and
noted that the company has performed multiple steel tank
evaluations over the last 20 years.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff indicated that
the 458-1 Reservoir tank was last coated (interior) in 2008.
Replacement coatings for both 458-1 and 458-2 Reservoir tanks
are done staggered because it is more efficient as it allows the
District to maintain water supply in one tank while the other
one is being maintained.
Following the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B-1 – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2493-001103
P2535-001103
Award a Professional Services Agreement with Harper &
Associates Engineering, Inc. for Coating Inspection
Services on the 624-2 and 458-2 Reservoir Coating Project
ATTACHMENT B-2 – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2493-001103
P2535-001103
Award a Professional Services Agreement with Harper &
Associates Engineering, Inc. for Coating Inspection
Services on the 624-2 and 458-2 Reservoir Coating Project
Gotham St
Lakeshore Dr
Lakeridge Cir
Lehigh Ave
B
ro
o
k
sto
n
e
R
d
Crosscreek Rd
Lafayette Pl
M a r q u e t t e R d
Woodspring Dr
Creekwood Way
Kent St
Du k e S t
Clearbrook Dr
Wildbrook Pl Mead
owb
r
ook LnColdbrook Ct
Willowbrook Ct
130
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
P:\WORKING\CIP P2493 & P2535 624-2 & 458-2 Reservoir Coating\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\624-2 Location.mxd
OTAY WATER DISTRICT624-2 Reservoir Interior/ExteriorCoating and Upgrades
EXHIBIT A-1 CIP P2493
624-2 Tank8.0 MG Steel Reservoir
O l y m p i c P k w y
Morro Point Dr
Point Barrow Dr
Point la Jolla Dr
W
e
s
t
P
o
i
n
t
D
r
P
o
i
n
t
D
e
f
i
a
n
c
e
C
t
Laguna Point Ct
Malibu Point Ct
Diablo Point Ct
San Pedro Point Ct
O l y m p i c P k w y
066065
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
P:\WORKING\CIP P2493 & P2535 624-2 & 458-2 Reservoir Coating\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\458-2 Location.mxd
OTAY WATER DISTRICT458-2 Reservoir Interior Coating and Upgrades
EXHIBIT A-2 CIP P2535
458-2 Tank1.75 MG Steel Reservoir
P:\WORKING\CIP P2493 & P2535 624-2 & 458-2 Reservoir Coating\Agreements-Contracts-RFPs\Coating Inspection\Selection Process\Summary of Proposal Rankings.xls
Qualifications of
Team
Responsiveness
and Project
Understanding
Technical and
Management
Approach
INDIVIDUAL
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
AVERAGE
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
Proposed Rates*
Consultant's
Commitment to
DBE
TOTAL
SCORE
30 25 30 85 85 15 Y/N 100 Poor/Good/
Excellent
Dan Martin 26 23 28 77
Bob Kennedy 26 23 28 77
Brandon DiPietro 28 23 26 77
Jeff Marchioro 29 20 23 72
Kevin Schmidt 24 22 25 71
Dan Martin 24 22 24 70
Bob Kennedy 24 22 25 71
Brandon DiPietro 25 22 24 71
Jeff Marchioro 26 18 23 67
Kevin Schmidt 22 20 23 65
Dan Martin 25 22 25 72
Bob Kennedy 21 20 21 62
Brandon DiPietro 25 22 25 72
Jeff Marchioro 24 22 26 72
Kevin Schmidt 24 21 21 66
Dan Martin 27 23 29 79
Bob Kennedy 26 23 28 77
Brandon DiPietro 27 23 25 75
Jeff Marchioro 27 23 27 77
Kevin Schmidt 24 23 26 73
Consultant Rate Position Score
Bay Area Consultants $105.70 highest 1
Corrpro $100.00 4
CSI Services $86.50 12
Harper & Associates $82.00 lowest 15
*The fees were evaluated by comparing hourly rates for NACE Level III Coating
Inspector position. The sum of these rates are noted in the above table.
Note: Review Panel does not see or consider rates when scoring other categories.
Rates are scored by the PM, who is not on Review Panel.
EXHIBIT B
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RANKINGS
Coating Inspection Services For the 624-2 & 458-2 Reservoir Coating (P2493 & P2535)
RATES SCORING CHART
WRITTEN
Y
MAXIMUM POINTS
Bay Area Coating
Consultants 76
CSI Services 69 12
Y
75
Harper & Associates
81
76 15 91
REFERENCES
1
Y
Y
Corrpro 69 4 73
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT/
SUBPROJECT:
AS588-
CS0001
&
AS588-
CS0002
DIV. NO. 2,
4
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Request to Approve Two (2) Agreements with BMB Tower Holdings,
LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, for the
Installation of a Communications Facility at the 485-1 & 458-1
Reservoir Sites
GENERAL MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
authorize the General Manager to execute two (2) agreements with BMB
Tower Holdings, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, (BMB) for
the installation of a communications facility at the 485-1 & 458-1
Reservoir Sites (see Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board approval authorizing the General Manager to execute
two (2) agreements (see Attachments B-1 and B-2) with BMB that allows
the installation of a communications facility at the 485-1 & 458-1
Reservoir Sites. The agreement will grant BMB the right to use
approximately 177 square feet of leased area at the 458-1 Reservoir
Site and approximately 147 square feet of leased area at the 485-1
Reservoir Site.
AGENDA ITEM 6d
2
ANALYSIS:
The District currently has two lease agreements with BMB, as
reflected in Exhibit A:
1. Point Barrow Drive (458-1 Reservoir)
2. East H Street (485-1 Reservoir)
The original leases for the sites were signed in September 2006
between the District and Cricket Communications (Cricket).
Subsequently, in April 2011 the leases were assigned from Cricket to
Global Tower Partners, LLC (GTP). Lastly, in June 2011, the leases
were assigned from GTP to BMB.
In June 2012, the District was made aware that BMB was subleasing
both the Point Barrow Drive site and the East H Street site back to
Cricket. The agreements that BMB assumed under the assignment
specifically prohibit subleasing of the sites without the District’s
prior written consent. As a result, letters were sent to BMB
notifying them of the default of the agreement for each site along
with a request to cure.
As a requirement to cure the agreements, the District has requested
that BMB enter into new lease agreements for the both sites. The new
agreements will memorialize the change in ownership, provide for a
sublease only to Cricket, and strengthen the terms of the existing
leases with language that reflects the current District lease terms.
The language in the proposed lease agreements includes terms for the
following:
Security Deposit equal to the sum of two months’ rent.
Elimination of pro-rating language to simplify the billing
process.
20 percent penalties for late payment.
Non-curable Event of Default for failure to pay rent.
Magnetic mount or other non-destructive alternative attachment
requirement.
Utilities and back-up power provisions.
New Assignment of Lease requirement to assist in documenting
change of ownership.
Assessment of a one-time payment of $1,000.00.
As part of the lease agreements, the Rent shall be increased on each
calendar anniversary of the Commencement Date at a rate of four
percent (4%) per annum. At the beginning of an extension term or
3
additional term the rent will be adjusted to the rate of four percent
(4%) per annum or the annual Consumer Price Index change (“CPI”),
whichever is greater.
The lease agreements also include a non-refundable administrative fee
of $4,500 for each amendment that will be due within (30) days of the
date of execution of the lease agreements by both parties to
reimburse the District for administrative expenses and costs related
to the District's supervision and assistance of the lease default
cure.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joseph Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The District will continue to receive rent which will now be subject
to an annual inflation adjustment of four percent effective upon the
execution of the lease agreements.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The District ensures its continued financial health through long-term
financial planning, formalized financial policies, enhanced budget
controls, fair pricing, debt planning, and improved financial
reporting.
LEGAL IMPACT:
The agreement has been reviewed and approved by District General
Counsel for content and form.
DJM/RP:jf
P:\WORKING\CELLULAR LEASE FILE\BMB, Tower Holdings LLC\Staff Report\BD 08-07-13\BD 08-07-13, Staff
Report, BMB @ 485-1 and 458-1 Res Sites, (DM).docx
Attachments: Exhibit A – Location Map
Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B-1 – 458-1 Reservoir Agreement
Attachment B-2 – 485-1 Reservoir Agreement
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
AS588-CS0001
AS588-CS0002
Request to Approve Two (2) Agreements with BMB Tower
Holdings, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Company, for
the Installation of a Communications Facility at the 485-1
& 458-1 Reservoir Sites
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 23, 2013 and the
following comments were made:
Staff is requesting that the Board approve two (2) agreements with
BMB Tower Holdings, LLC for communications facilities at the 485-1
and 458-1 Reservoir Sites.
The original leases for the sites were signed in September 2006
between the District and Cricket Communications (Cricket). In
April 2011 the leases were assigned from Cricket to Global Tower
Partners, LLC (GTP) and in June 2011, the leases were assigned from
GTP to BMB Tower Holdings, LLC.
In June 2012, the District became aware that BMB was subleasing
both sites back to Cricket. The agreement that BMB had assumed
under the assignment specifically prohibits the subleasing of the
sites without the District’s prior written consent. As a
requirement to “cure” the existing agreements, the District
requested that BMB enter into new lease agreements for both sites
which will memorialize the change in ownership, provide for a
sublease only to Cricket, and strengthen the terms of the existing
leases with language that reflects the District’s current lease
terms as discussed in staffs’ report.
The District will continue to receive rent which will now be
subject to an annual inflation adjustment of four (4) percent or
the annual Consumer Price Index change (“CPI”), whichever is
greater, effective upon the execution of the lease amendments.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated that
Cricket had sold off some of its lease sites. BMB is the current
owner and is subleasing the sites back to Cricket. This provided
an opportunity to negotiate a new lease with the latest lease
terms. It was noted that Otay’s attorney has reviewed the latest
agreement language.
Staff indicated in response to another inquiry from the committee,
that they became aware of the subleasing agreement between BMB and
Cricket through the vendor’s request for access to the sites for
maintenance purposes. This triggered an investigation into the
lease ownership.
Upon completion of the discussion, the Committee supported
presentation to the full Board as a consent item.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN BMB TOWER HOLDINGS,
LLC AND OTAY WATER DISTRICT TO LOCATE A
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT OTAY'S 458-1
RESERVOIR SITE
(651 Pt.Barrows Drive,Chula Vista CA,91911)
This Telecommunication Facility Agreement (the "Agreement")is entered into and
effective on the date specified in the signature page (the "Commencement Date"),by and
between the Otay Water District,a municipal water district organized and operated pursuant to
the Water Code Section 71000,et seq.("Otay"),and BMB Tower Holdings,LLC ("Tenant").
Special terms and conditions are set forth on Exhibit A.
RECITALS
A.Otay owns a site on which it has constructed water facilities known as the "458-1
RESERVOIR SITE,"as depicted on Attachment A to Exhibit B (the "Reservoir Site").
B.On September 14,2006,Otay entered into that certain lease agreement (the
"Original Lease")with Cricket Communications,Inc.,a Delaware corporation for the Reservoir
Site.
C.On or about April 14,2011 Otay consented to an assignment of the Original
Lease from Cricket Communications Inc.to Global Tower Partners,LLC ("GTP").
D.On or about June 6,2011 Otay consented to an assignment of the Original Lease
from GTP Communications Inc.to BMB Tower Holdings,LLC ("BMB").
E.On or before April 19,2012 BMB subleased of a portion of the Original Lease
space without Otay's consent and failed to pay rent in a timely manner in violation of the terms
of the Original Lease and subsequent assignments.
F.Tenant has cured the Original Lease defaults including a one-time payment to
Otay of $1,000.00.
G.Tenant has requested Otay to allow it to continue the use of the Property for
location of a communications facility and transmitting and receiving antennas at the Reservoir
Site pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
H.Otay is willing to allow Tenant to locate the Facilities (defined below)at the
Reservoir Sites pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
AGREEMENT
For good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged,Otay and Tenant agree as follows:
1.Premises.Otay owns the real property described in Attachment B to Exhibit B
(the "Property").Otay agrees to lease to Tenant,for the installation of antennas and related
telecommunications equipment within the Property,as more particularly described on
Attachment C to Exhibit B (the "Premises").
2.Grant of Non-Exclusive Trench and Utility Easements).Upon written request
from Tenant,Otay agrees to grant a non-exclusive easement,as legally described and depicted in
Exhibit C to this Agreement (the "Easement"),for certain agreed-upon portions of the Property
for the purpose of trenching and for the installation and maintenance of the Otay approved
utilities needed by Tenant for the Facilities.It is expressly agreed that any such Easement shall
Telecommunication Facilities Agreement Page I Form:10-10
AGREEMENT BETWEEN BMB TOWER HOLDINGS,
LLC AND OTAY WATER DISTRICT TO LOCATE A
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT OTAY'S 485-1
RESERVOIR SITE
(996 East H Street,Chula Vista,CA 91910)
This Telecommunication Facility Agreement (the "Agreement")is entered into and
effective on the date specified in the signature page (the "Commencement Date"),by and
between the Otay Water District,a municipal water district organized and operated pursuant to
the Water Code Section 71000,et seq.("Otay"),and BMB Tower Holdings,LLC ("Tenant").
Special terms and conditions are set forth on Exhibit A.
RECIIALS
A.Otay owns a site on which it has constructed water facilities known as the "485-1
RESERVOIR SITE,"as depicted on Attachment A to Exhibit B (the "Reservoir Site").
B.On September 14,2006,Otay entered into that certain lease agreement (the
"Original Lease")with Cricket Communications,Inc.,a Delaware corporation for the Reservoir
Site.
C.On or about April 14,2011 Otay consented to an assignment of the Original
Lease from Cricket Communications Inc.to Global Tower Partners,LLC ("GTP").
D.On or about June 6,2011 Otay consented to an assignment of the Original Lease
from GTP Communications Inc.to BMB Tower Holdings,LLC ("BMB").
E.On or before April 19,2012 BMB subleased of a portion of the Original Lease
space without Otay's consent and failed to pay rent in a timely manner in violation of the terms
of the Original Lease and subsequent assignments.
F.Tenant has cured the Original Lease defaults including a one-time payment to
Otay of $1,000.00.
G.Tenant has requested Otay to allow it to continue the use of the Property for
location of a communications facility and transmitting and receiving antennas at the Reservoir
Site pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
H.Otay is willing to allow Tenant to locate the Facilities (defined below)at the
Reservoir Sites pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
AGREEMENT
For good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged,Otay and Tenant agree as follows:
1.Premises.Otay owns the real property described in Attachment B to Exhibit B
(the "Property").Otay agrees to lease to Tenant,for the installation of antennas and related
telecommunications equipment within the Property,as more particularly described on
Attachment C to Exhibit B (the "Premises").
2.Grant of Non-Exclusive Trench and Utility Easementfs).Upon written request
from Tenant,Otay agrees to grant a non-exclusive easement,as legally described and depicted in
Exhibit C to this Agreement (the "Easement"),for certain agreed-upon portions of the Property
for the purpose of trenching and for the installation and maintenance of the Otay approved
utilities needed by Tenant for the Facilities.It is expressly agreed that any such Easement shall
Telecommunication Facilities Agreement Page 1 Form:10-10
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Stephen Dobrawa
Purchasing Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rom Sarno, Chief of Administrative Services
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board declare the identified vehicles and equipment as
surplus to the District’s needs.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See “Attachment A”.
PURPOSE:
To present a list of vehicles and equipment and obtain Board
declaration that the items identified on the list are surplus to the
District’s needs.
ANALYSIS:
Listed below are various vehicles and equipment that have been
determined by the user departments to be of no use, obsolete (spare
parts and service not available), beyond useful life, and/or not
cost-effective to repair or operate and therefore, surplus to the
District’s needs.
AGENDA ITEM 6e
2
Vehicles Identified as Surplus
Item Qty Description Reason for Declaration
1 1
Unit 135, 2001 Ford Expedition,
FA#8135, VIN 1FMPU16L11LB51855,
126,700 miles
No longer cost-effective
to maintain and operate.
Vehicle is no longer
required.
2 1
Unit 134, 2002 Ford F-250 Utility
Truck, FA#8134, VIN 1FTNF20L02EA58304,
51,000 miles
No longer cost-effective
to maintain and operate.
Vehicle is no longer
required.
3 1
Unit 115, 2000 Ford Ranger Pickup
Truck, FA#8115, VIN 1FTYR14X8YPA21493,
50,000 miles
No longer cost-effective
to maintain and operate.
Vehicle is no longer
required.
Equipment Identified as Surplus
Item Qty Description Reason for Declaration
4 4
Chlorinators, Pennwalt Wallace &
Tiernan, SN’s An-16274, AN-16299,
AK-16113, AL-16304
No longer supported by
the manufacturer, no
longer cost-effective to
maintain and operate,
and is no longer
required.
5 4
Chlorine Analyzers Pennwalt Wallace
& Tiernan, SN’s AL-28284, AK-15975,
AN-16304, AN-16303
No longer supported by
the manufacturer, no
longer cost-effective to
maintain and operate,
and is no longer
required.
6 1
Survey Base Station FA# 3987,
consisting of Trimble 4800 receivers
SN 220179258 and SN 220156335,
Trimble Trimmark IIE Base and
Repeater SN 220154847, Trimble TSCI
Data Collector SN 220149134, and
associated wires and antennas
No longer required.
7 3 GPS Receiver, Geo Explorer XT, SN’s
4511E00029, 4423E00088, 4423E00179
Inoperable, no longer
supported by
manufacturer, and no
longer serviceable.
8 3 GPS Receiver, Geo Explorer XH, SN’s
4625482501, 4626483207, 4623478371 No longer required.
9 3 Right Angle Gear Drives, SN’s
154977, 154975, 154974 No longer required.
3
10 2 Caterpillar Diesel Engines, Model
No. 3406, FA #1512, and SN 17727
No longer supported by
manufacturer, no longer
cost-effective to
maintain and operate.
Engines no longer meet
APCD requirements.
11 1 Auto Crane Brand Truck Mounted
Crane, SN 320304-228BT-0598 No longer required.
12 2 Lamson Process Air Blower, SN’s
911825, 911810
Broken and inoperable
and no longer required.
13 1 NEC PBX phone system, hand sets, and
associated hardware and cables
No longer required,
replaced.
Before vehicles and equipment (where the individual acquisition cost
exceeded $5,000) can be disposed of, the Board must first declare the
items as surplus (ref: Purchasing Manual, Section 12).
The District’s Purchasing Manual identifies the process for disposing
of material, equipment, and supplies that have been declared surplus.
Typically, items declared surplus are disposed of by sale through
public auction.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The salvage value and associated gain or loss on items is not
determined until their disposal. Therefore, the fiscal impact of the
recommended action is not known at this time.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This action supports the District’s goal to ensure financial health
through efficient operations.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Attachment A – Committee Action Report
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: DECLARATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 23,
2013 and the following comments were made:
Staff presents annually a list of vehicles and equipment that
has been identified as surplus to the District’s needs.
Staff is requesting that the board declare the listed vehicles
and equipment on pages two (2) and three (3) of staffs’ report
as surplus.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated
that about the same amount of vehicles is being surplused this
year as last year. It is felt that there will be less
vehicles surplused next year as the District tends to rotate
vehicles. The District has reduced the amount of staff in
some areas like the treatment plant, but some vehicles will
still need to be replaced. Staff indicated that the number of
surplused vehicles will not always be the same. It is
dependent on need as staffing is adjusted.
Upon completion of the discussion, the Committee supported
presentation to the full Board as a consent item.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Andrea Carey
Customer Service Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Authorize the General Manager to Negotiate and Enter into an
Agreement with Paymentus for Phone Payment Services
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter
into a one-year fixed with four option year renewals (five-year term)
agreement with Paymentus to provide phone payment services in an
amount not to exceed $250,000 ($50,000 annually).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To authorize the General Manager to negotiate and enter into an
agreement with Paymentus to provide phone payment services.
ANALYSIS:
The District accepts approximately 2,000 payments per month through
the automated phone system. In 2010, the District began offering
customers the option to pay by phone at no charge to the customer.
Prior to that, the cost to the customer was a $4.80 flat fee per
phone payment transaction. The decision to absorb the cost of this
service was made to provide a greater range of free payment methods
to customers and to take advantage of credit card discount programs
through Visa and MasterCard. The District receives approximately
$1,000,000 in Visa and MasterCard payments per month through the
District’s web payment portal, the phone payment service and the
AGENDA ITEM 6f
front desk. Visa and MasterCard each offer a utility discount to
qualified businesses. This discount reduces the fees charged by Visa
and MasterCard to the District from an average of 1.8% to
approximately 1%. In order to receive the discounted rate, the
District cannot charge a convenience fee to its customers for
initiating a payment through any payment portal (i.e. web, phone,
front desk). The discounted rates from Visa and MasterCard save the
District approximately $8,000 per month in credit card fees;
outweighing the costs incurred by the District to offer payment over
the phone at no charge. In order to evaluate the cost effectiveness
of our current vendor, HP Enterprises, Inc., a request for proposal
(RFP) to provide phone payment services for the District was sent to
seven vendors.
The District received proposals from three vendors. Evaluation
criteria consisted of the vendor’s ability to meet District
specifications; number of years experience in this type of business
with accounts similar to Otay in size; competence and customer
service; on time experience in delivery of comparable goods and
services; financial stability; and cost.
The phone payment services listed below are based on 30,000 credit
card payments per year. This number reflects a higher average than
the current 2,000 phone transactions processed monthly. This higher
number reflects the historical annual increases in phone payments and
the added option to pay using a bank account which is not currently
available to customers.
Vendor Annual Price
Paymentus $49,500
Billtrust $55,200
Alacriti $59,400
Otay is currently paying HP Enterprises, Inc. approximately $2.40 per
phone payment. With Paymentus, Otay will pay approximately $1.65 per
phone payment, resulting in a 30% cost savings to the District. The
savings may be greater as the cost to the District is less if
customers use their bank account or a debit card instead of credit
card to pay.
Paymentus handles payment processing for over 60 utilities in
California, including Sweetwater Authority. District staff contacted
three current Paymentus customers and all had positive feedback on
their relationship with Paymentus and the services offered.
The proposed agreement will ensure that Paymentus is unable to raise
prices for five years and that the District is able to terminate for
cause, at any time. Additionally, after the initial one-year period,
the District will have the option not to renew should opportunities,
circumstances or business practices change.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The annual cost for Paymentus services will be approximately $50,000
per year. Based on the current volume of payments, the expected
savings will be approximately $18,000 annually.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Evaluate the most cost effective and efficient processes and tools to
communicate service related issues to customers.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Attachment A - Committee Action
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Authorize the General Manager to Negotiate and Enter into
an Agreement with Paymentus for Phone Payment Services
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 23, 2013 and the
following comments were made:
Staff is requesting that the board approve a one (1) year agreement
with four (4) option year renewals (a five-year term) with Paymentus
to provide phone payment services in an amount not-to-exceed
$250,000 ($50,000 annually).
The District has provided the option for bill payment via the phone
since 2008. The District currently accepts 2,000 payments per month
through the automated phone system.
In 2010 the District began to offer the option to pay by phone at no
charge to the customer. Prior to that, the cost was $4.80 per
transaction. Staff indicated the reason the District decided to
absorb the cost of the service was to provide customers a greater
range of free payment options and to take advantage of credit card
discount programs (utility discount) through Visa and Mastercard.
The District currently receives, on average, $8,000 per month in
savings through the utility discount. The savings offsets credit
card fees and costs incurred by the District to offer payment over
the phone service at no charge.
It was discussed that the more payment options the District can
provide its customers, the easier it is for customers to pay their
bills. This reduces the number of late payments/collection
activities and assists customers who are behind to bring their
account current.
The District wished to evaluate the cost effectiveness of its
current vendor, HP Enterprises, Inc., for phone payment services and
sent seven vendors a request for proposal. The District received
three (3) proposals. The proposals were evaluated and staff is
recommending that Paymentus be awarded a one (1) year fixed
agreement with four (4) option year renewals (a five-year term).
Paymentus provides services to many utilities in Southern California
including Sweetwater Authority, Helix Water District and Olivenhain
MWD.
Paymentus costs are significantly lower than the District’s current
vendor, HP Enterprises, Inc. The District’s current cost is
approximately $2.40/phone transaction which will be reduced to
$1.65/phone transaction with Paymentus. It was noted that there may
be additional cost savings as the District will also be offering
customers the ability to utilize their debit cards and bank accounts
as well.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated that
the District has a sixty (60) day cancellation requirement with its
current vendor, HP Enterprises, Inc. This will provide the time
needed to make the transition to Paymentus.
The committee observed that by reducing the phone payment services
cost, it will provide a positive impact to the Fiscal Year 2014
budget as the District will be reducing its costs for the service.
Staff indicated that it is projected that the District will save
approximately $18,000 annually. It was noted that, with the
addition of the debit card payment option, the savings may be higher
than $18,000 because use of the service will likely increase.
Staff indicated in response to another inquiry from the committee
that the District will continue to take all four credit cards (VISA,
MasterCard, American Express and Discover) via the phone payment
services. Payments made on the District’s website may only be made
using VISA or MasterCard. Customers are made aware that they may
utilize their American Express or Discover cards through the phone
payment service.
It was stated that the phone payment services is very easy to
utilize and provides customers the ability to pay their water bills
anytime during the day or night. It was indicated that District
staff has access to view payments made over the phone or website and
can get payment information fairly quickly. This is helpful,
especially when a customer has been locked for non-payment. Staff
can view a customer’s payment and schedule/dispatch a staff member
to unlock their meter once they confirm that the customer has made a
payment.
Upon completion of the discussion, the Committee supported
presentation to the full Board as a consent item.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY:
Gary Stalker
Water Systems Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Pedro Porras, Chief, Water Operations
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approval of Public Health Goal Report Recommendations
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors
(Board) approve the recommendations in the Public Health Goal
(PHG)Report to take no further action in reducing the levels of
the seven constituents listed in the report to levels at or
below the PHGs.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment “A”.
PURPOSE:
To present the PHG Report to the Board and to obtain approval
for the recommendation that no action be taken to reduce the
levels of the seven constituents listed in the report to the PHG
or below. The Board meeting will also meet the requirement to
have a public hearing to accept and respond to public comment.
ANALYSIS:
California Health and Safety Code §116470 specifies that larger
(>10,000 service connections) water utilities prepare a special
report by July 1, 2013 if their water quality measurements have
exceeded any Public Health Goals (PHGs). PHGs are non-
enforceable goals established by the Cal-EPA’s Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). The law also
requires that where OEHHA has not adopted a PHG for a
constituent, the water suppliers are to use the Maximum
AGENDA ITEM 7a
2
Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) adopted by USEPA. Only
constituents which have a California primary drinking water
standard and for which either a PHG or MCLG has been set are to
be addressed.
Staff completed this special report before July 1, 2013 (see
Attachment B) and staff’s recommendation is that no action be
taken for the District to install RO treatment or request
suppliers to install RO treatment for the following reasons:
Water served by the District during this three year period
met all CDPH and USEPA drinking water standards set to
protect public health. CDPH considers water that meets all
standards as safe to drink.
To further reduce the levels of the constituents identified
in this report that are already significantly below the
health-based MCLs established to provide “safe drinking
water”, costly treatment processes would be required,
translating to an average monthly cost increase of $26.10 -
$50.18 per District customer.
The effectiveness of the treatment processes to provide any
significant reductions in constituent levels to the PHGs is
difficult, if not impossible to determine since the
analytical DLR is much higher than the PHG in most cases.
The health protection benefits of these further
hypothetical reductions are not at all clear and may not be
quantifiable.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
PHGs are based solely on public health risk considerations.
None of the practical risk-management factors that are
considered by the USEPA or the California Department of Public
Health (CDPH) in setting Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) are
considered in setting the PHGs. These factors include
analytical detection capability, available treatment technology,
benefits and costs. The PHGs are not enforceable and are not
required to be met by any public water system. MCLGs are the
federal equivalent to PHGs.
If a constituent was detected in the District’s distribution
system or in the treated water the District purchases from other
agencies, between 2010 and 2012, at a level exceeding an
applicable PHG or MCLG, the PHG report provides the information
required by the regulation. Included is the numerical public
health risk associated with the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
and the PHG or MCLG, the category or type of risk to health that
could be associated with each constituent, the best treatment
3
technology available that could be used to reduce the
constituent level, and an estimate of the cost to install that
treatment if it is appropriate and feasible.
The purpose of the report is to provide customers with
information on health-related contaminants detected in the water
supply, even when detected below the enforceable MCLs, so
customers are aware of whatever risks might be posed by the
presence of these contaminants. MCLs are set at very
conservative levels that provide very low to negligible risk and
are considered the regulatory definition of what is “safe”.
PHGs and MCLGs are set at the theoretical level where there is
no health risk. MCLGs are set at zero for many contaminants,
such as total coliforms, E. coli, and carcinogens, even though
it is understood that zero is an unattainable goal and cannot be
measured analytically. Most PHGs and MCLGs are set far below
the required Detection Levels for Reporting (DLR) which is the
minimum level that CDPH has determined can be accurately
reported.
Below is a table summarizing the seven constituents detected
above the PHG or MCLG in calendar years 2010, 2011, and/or 2012.
More detail for each is provided in the attached PHG Report.
Constituent Units MCL PHG/MCLG DLR Levels Detected
Coliforms % Positive 5.0 0 NA 0 – 1.4
Arsenic ppb 10 0.004 2 ND - 3.6
Gross Alpha pCi/L 15 0 3 ND - 9.2
Gross Beta pCi/L 50 0 4 ND – 8.8
Uranium pCi/L 20 0.43 1 ND – 4.1
Bromate ppb 10 0.1 5.0 ND – 6.5
Copper ppm 1.3 0.3 0.05 0.32 – 0.33
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
PHG = Public Health Goal
MCLG = Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
DLR = Detection Limits for Reporting
Levels Detected = Levels detected either in the Otay
distribution system (coliforms and copper only) or in water
supplied to the District for 2010 through 2012.
NA = Not Applicable
ND = Not Detected at or above the DLR
4
This table shows that the PHG or MCLG for five out of seven of
the constituents is much lower than the DLR. This means that
even if additional treatment is performed to reduce the levels
of these constituents, the effectiveness of the treatment to
reduce the levels to the PHG or MCLG cannot be accurately
determined by analytical methods.
The regulation also requires a cost estimate of using the Best
Available Technology (BAT) for reducing the level of the
constituents to below the PHGs. For coliforms, the BAT is to
meet disinfection requirements, which is already done, so no
further action is required. For copper, which can leach into
the water from plumbing fixtures or copper lines, the BAT is
optimized corrosion control, which is also already done, so no
further treatment is required.
The BAT for the other five constituents is reverse osmosis (RO).
According to the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA)
Cost Estimates for Treatment Technology BAT, it would cost
approximately $1.56 - $2.99 per 1000 gallons to further remove
these constituents using RO treatment. The District’s average
annual demand for the three year period was 9,964 million
gallons per year. Therefore, RO treatment installed and
operated by the District or the District’s water suppliers to
meet the District’s water demands would cost from $15 to $30
million per year, which translates to an average monthly cost
increase of $26.10 - $50.18 per District customer (using the
July 2012 meter count of 49,493 meters). These estimates
include all costs including capital, land, construction,
engineering, planning, environmental, contingency and O&M costs
for the life of the facilities.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None
STRATEGIC GOAL:
To meet the District’s Mission of providing high value water and
wastewater services to the customers of the Otay Water District,
in a professional, effective and efficient manner.
5
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment “A”, Committee Action
Attachment “B”, Otay Water District Public Health Goals Report
on Water Quality
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: Approval of Public Health Goal Report Recommendations
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 24, 2013, and the
following comments were made:
Staff requested that the Board approve the recommendations
in the Public Health Goal (PHG) Report to take no further
action in reducing the levels of the seven constituents
listed on page 3 of the staff report to levels at or below
the PHGs.
Staff indicated that the California Health and Safety Code
§116470 required a special report to be prepared by larger
water utilities if their water quality measurements
exceeded any Public Health Goals (PHGs).
Staff noted that PHGs are non-enforceable goals established
by the Cal-EPA’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment (OEHHA) and are not required to be met by any
public water system. If OEHHA has not adopted a PHG for a
constituent, water suppliers must use the Maximum
Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) adopted by USEPA.
It was discussed that staff completed the special report
before July 1, 2013 (See Attachment B) and recommended that
no action be taken for the reasons indicated on page 2 of
the staff report.
Staff stated that the purpose of the special report is to
provide customers with information on health-related
contaminants detected in the water supply, even if the
contaminants are detected below the MCLs.
Staff indicated that the PHG or MCLG for five out of seven
of the constitutents is much lower than the Detection
Limits for Reporting (DLR). The five contituents are
Arsenic, Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Uranium, and Bromate.
Staff highlighted that there is no public health issue for
the District and that all water served by the District met
all State of California, Department of Public Health and
USEPA drinking water standards.
The Committee suggested that staff revise their
recommendation to state the following:
“That the Otay Water District (District)
Board of Directors approve the recommendations
in the Public Health Goal (PHG) Report and that
no further actions are necessary to reduce the
levels of the seven constituents listed in the
report to levels at or below the PHGs.”
In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated
that the District’s seven constituents are similar to those
reported by other local agencies due to a common water
supply for the region.
Following the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as an action
item.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Public Health Goals
Report on Water Quality
June 2013
2
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
PUBLIC HEALTH GOALS REPORT ON WATER QUALITY
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................... 3
History: .................................................................................................................................... 3
What Are Public Health Goals (PHGs)? ..................................................................................... 3
Reporting Requirements: ......................................................................................................... 3
Water Quality Data Considered: .............................................................................................. 4
Best Available Treatment Technology and Cost Estimates: ....................................................... 4
SECTION 2: CONSTITUENTS DETECTED THAT EXCEED A PHG ................. 4
Arsenic:................................................................................................................... 5
Bromate: ................................................................................................................. 6
Coliform Bacteria: .................................................................................................................... 6
Copper: ................................................................................................................... 7
Radiological: Gross Alpha & Uranium: ..................................................................................... 8
Radiological: Gross Beta: ......................................................................................................... 8
SECTION 3: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION ......................... 9
3
SECTION 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Background
California Health and Safety Code Health and Safety Code §116470 specifies that
larger (>10,000 service connections) water utilities prepare a special report by July
1, 2013 if their water quality measurements have exceeded any Public Health Goals
(PHGs). PHGs are non-enforceable goals established by the Cal-EPA’s Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). The law also requires that
where OEHHA has not adopted a PHG for a constituent, the water suppliers are to
use the Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) adopted by USEPA. Only
constituents which have a California primary drinking water standard and for which
either a PHG or MCLG has been set are to be addressed.
The Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) formed a workgroup which
prepared guidelines for water utilities to use in preparing these required reports.
The ACWA guidelines were used in the preparation of our report. No guidance was
available from state regulatory agencies.
If a constituent was detected in the Otay Water District’s (District’s) distribution
system or in the treated water the District purchases from other agencies, between
2010 and 2012 at a level exceeding an applicable PHG or MCLG, this report provides
the information required by the law. Included is the numerical public health risk
associated with the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and the PHG or MCLG, the
category or type of risk to health that could be associated with each constituent, the
best treatment technology available that could be used to reduce the constituent
level, and an estimate of the cost to install that treatment if it is appropriate and
feasible.
What Are Public Health Goals
PHGs are set by California OEHHA, which is part of Cal-EPA and are based solely on
public health risk considerations. None of the practical risk-management factors
that are considered by the USEPA or the California Department of Public Health
(CDPH) in setting drinking water standards (MCLs) are considered in setting the
PHGs. These factors include analytical detection capability, available treatment
technology, benefits and costs. The PHGs are not enforceable and are not required
to be met by any public water system. MCLGs are the federal equivalent to PHGs.
Reporting Requirements
The purpose of this report is to inform consumers of District’s drinking water PHGs
that were exceeded during 2010, 2011 and 2012, pursuant to California Health and
Safety Code Section 116470(b). In addition, this report provides information about
the cost of achieving a water quality level that does not exceed the PHGs. For
4
general information about the quality of the water delivered by the District, please
refer to the Consumer Confidence Report, also known as the Annual Water Quality
Report. An online version of these annual reports can be found at
www.otaywater.gov.
Included in this report is information regarding the public health risk associated
with the MCL and the PHG, such as the possible type of health risk associated with
each constituent, the best available treatment technology that may reduce the
constituent level, and an estimate of the cost to install such treatment.
Water Quality Data Considered
All of the water quality data collected by our water system between 2010 and 2012
for purposes of determining compliance with drinking water standards was
considered. This data was summarized in our 2010, 2011, and 2012 Consumer
Confidence Reports which are mailed to all of our customers annually in June.
For each regulated contaminant, DHS establishes Detection Limits for the purposes
of Reporting (DLR). DLRs are the minimum levels at which any analytical result
must be reported to California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Results
indicated below the DLRs cannot be quantified with any certainty. In some cases,
PHGs are set below the DLRs. Any contaminant reported below the DLR will be
considered zero for the purpose of this report, which is accepted by the California
Department of Public Health.
Best Available Treatment Technology and Cost Estimates
Both the USEPA and CDPH adopt what are known as Best Available Technologies
(BATs), which are the best methods of reducing contaminant levels to the MCL.
Costs can be estimated for such technologies. However, since many PHGs and
MCLGs are set much lower than the MCL, it is not always possible nor feasible to
determine what treatment is needed to further reduce a constituent downward to
or near the PHG or MCLG, many of which are set at zero. Estimating the costs to
reduce a constituent to zero is difficult, if not impossible because it is not possible to
verify by analytical means that the level has been lowered to zero. In some cases,
installing treatment to try and further reduce very low levels of one constituent may
have adverse effects on other aspects of water quality.
SECTION 2: CONSTITUENTS DETECTED THAT EXCEED A PHG
The following is a discussion of constituents that were detected in the Districts
distribution system, or one or more of our drinking water treated water sources at
levels above the PHG, or MCLG (if no PHG has been established).
5
Arsenic
Arsenic is a naturally occurring element in the earth's crust and is very widely
distributed in the environment. All humans are exposed to microgram quantities of
arsenic (inorganic and organic) largely from food (25 to 50 μg/day) and to a lesser
degree from drinking water and air. In certain geographical areas, natural mineral
deposits may contain large quantities of arsenic and this may result in higher levels
of arsenic in water. Waste chemical disposal sites may also be a source of arsenic
contamination of water supplies. The main commercial use of arsenic in the U.S. is in
pesticides, mostly herbicides and in wood preservatives. Misapplication or
accidental spills of these materials could result in contamination of nearby water
supplies. Arsenic does not have a tendency to accumulate in the body at low
environmental exposure levels.
Studies in humans have shown considerable individual variability in arsenic toxicity.
The levels of arsenic that most people ingest in food and water (up to 50 μg/day)
have not usually been considered to be of health concern for non-cancer effects.
The MCL for arsenic is 10 parts per billion (ppb), the PHG and MCLG for arsenic is
0.0004 ppb. The DLR, which is the lowest level that CDPH has determined can be
measured with certainty, is 2 ppb. Arsenic levels in water that the District purchases
from other agencies from 2010 – 2013 ranged from <2 ppb – 3.6 ppb. The health
risk associated with arsenic, and the reason that a drinking water standard was
adopted for it, is that people who drink water containing Arsenic above the MCL
throughout their lifetime could experience an increased risk of getting cancer. The
PHG of 0.0004 ppb is based on a level that will result in not more than 1 excess
cancer in 1 million people who drink 2 liters daily of this water for 70 years. The
actual cancer risk may be lower or zero. Because the DLR for arsenic (2 ppb) is
greater than the PHG (0.0004 ppb), it would be difficult to assess the effectiveness of
RO treatment on reaching the PHG level.
The best available technology (BAT) cited in literature to remove arsenic is reverse
osmosis. All costs including capital, land, construction, engineering, planning,
environmental, contingency and O&M costs are included but only general
assumptions can be made for these items. According to the Association of California
Water Agencies (ACWA) Cost Estimates for Treatment Technology BAT, it would
cost approximately $1.56‐$2.99 per 1000 gallons to treat bromate using RO
treatment. The District’s average annual demand for the three year period was
9,964 million gallons per year. Therefore, RO treatment installed and operated by
the District’s water suppliers to meet the District’s water demands would cost from
$15 to $30 million per year, which translates to an average monthly cost increase of
$26.10 - $50.18 per District customer.
6
Bromate
Bromate in water is formed when water containing naturally occurring bromide is
disinfected with ozone. Bromate also has a long history of use as a food additive [at
levels up to 75 parts per million (ppm) in flour], where it is largely converted to
bromide in the baking process.
The MCL for bromate is 10 ppb, the PHG is 0.1 ppb and the MCLG is zero based on a
running annual average (RAA). The DLR is 5 ppb. The RAA of bromate levels in
water that the District purchases from other agencies from 2010 – 2013 ranged
from <5 ppb to 6.5 ppb.
The CDHS and USEPA have determined that bromate is a health concern at certain
levels of exposure. The category of health risk associated with bromate, and the
reason that a drinking water standard was adopted for it, is that some people who
drink water containing bromate in excess of the MCL over many years may have an
increased risk of getting cancer. The numerical health risk for the MCLG of zero
mg/L is zero. CDHS and USEPA set the drinking water standard for bromate at 10
mg/L to reduce the risk of cancer or other adverse health effects.
One of the most effective Best Available Treatment (BAT) technologies for bromate
reduction is reverse osmosis (RO). RO treatment reduces the natural occurring
bromide in source water, therefore reducing bromate formation when ozone is
applied. Because the DLR for bromate (5 ppb) is greater than the PHG (0.1ppb), it
would be difficult to assess the effectiveness of RO treatment on reaching the PHG
level. According to the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) Cost
Estimates for Treatment Technology BAT, it would cost approximately $1.56‐$2.99
per 1000 gallons to treat bromate using RO treatment. The District’s average annual
demands for the three year period were 9,964 million gallons per year. Therefore,
RO treatment installed and operated by the District’s water suppliers to meet the
District’s water demands would cost from $15 to $30 million per year, which
translates to an average monthly cost increase of $26.10 - $50.18 per District
customer.
Coliform Bacteria
During 2010, 2011, and 2012, the District collected between 132 and 165 samples
each month for total coliform analysis. On rare occasions, a sample was found to be
positive for coliform bacteria but follow-up check samples were negative. These
were not a violation of state standards. A maximum of 0.6% of these samples were
positive in any month. Normally the total coliform was zero and it is likely that the
positive samples were due to debris entering the sample at the sample station. E.
Coli was not detected in any samples.
The MCL for coliform is 5% positive samples of all samples per month and the MCLG
is zero. The reason for the coliform drinking water standard is to minimize the
7
possibility of the water containing pathogens which are organisms that cause
waterborne disease. Because coliform is only a surrogate indicator of the potential
presence of pathogens, it is not possible to state a specific numerical health risk.
While USEPA normally sets MCLGs “at a level where no known or anticipated
adverse effects on persons would occur”, they indicate that they cannot do so with
coliforms.
Coliform bacteria are indicator organisms that are ubiquitous in nature and are not
generally considered harmful. They are used because of the ease in monitoring and
analysis. If a positive sample is found, it indicates a potential problem that needs to
be investigated and follow-up sampling done. It is not at all unusual for a system to
have an occasional positive sample. It is difficult, if not impossible to assure that a
system will never get a positive sample.
Important measures that we have implemented include: an effective cross-
connection control program; maintenance of a disinfectant residual throughout our
system; an effective monitoring and surveillance program; maintaining positive
pressure in our distribution system; implementation of a rigorous pipeline
disinfection procedure for in-line repair and construction; training in proper
sampling techniques to prevent false positives; and replacement of system piping to
reduce pipe failures. Our system has already taken all of the steps described by
California Department of Public Health as “best available technology” for coliform
bacteria in Section 64447, Title 22, CCR.
Copper
There is no MCL for copper. Instead the 90th percentile value of all samples from
household taps in the distribution system cannot exceed an Action Level of 1.3 part
per million (ppm). The PHG for copper is 0.30 ppm and the DLR is 0.05 ppm. The
category of health risk for copper is gastrointestinal irritation. Numerical health risk
data on copper has not yet been provided by OEHHA, the State agency responsible
for providing that information.
Based on extensive sampling of our distribution system in 2011, our 90th percentile
value for copper was 0.32 ppm. Our water system is in full compliance with the
Federal and State copper regulation and we are deemed by CDHS to have “optimized
corrosion control” for our system. In general, optimizing corrosion control is
considered to be the best available technology to deal with corrosion issues and
with any copper findings.
Since the water distributed by the District meets the “optimized corrosion control”
requirements, it is not prudent to initiate additional corrosion control treatment as
it involves the addition of other chemicals and there could be additional water
quality issues raised. Therefore, no estimate of cost has been included.
8
Radiological: Gross Alpha & Uranium
Gross alpha particle activity detections are typically due to uranium. Uranium is a
naturally-occurring radioactive element that is ubiquitous in the earth’s crust.
Uranium is found in ground and surface waters due to its natural occurrence in
geological formations. The national average uranium concentration in surface,
ground and domestic water are 1, 3, and 2 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L), respectively.
The requirement for radiological monitoring, including uranium, is four consecutive
quarters every four years. The California MCL for uranium is 20 pCi/L. Uranium
levels in water that the District purchases from other agencies from 2010 – 2013
ranged from <1 pCi/L – 3.6 pCi/L.
The Public Health Goal for uranium is 0.43 pCi/L and the DLR is 1 pCI/L. The
numerical health risk for uranium based on the California PHG is 1 x 10-6. This
means one excess cancer case per million population. The health risk category for
uranium is carcinogenicity; chronic toxicity (cancer, human data; kidney toxicity).
Carcinogenic risk means capable of producing cancer. Chronic toxicity risk means
there may be adverse effects that usually develop gradually from low levels of
chemical exposure and that persist for a long time.
The best available technology (BAT) cited in literature to remove gross alpha
particle activity and uranium is reverse osmosis. All costs including capital, land,
construction, engineering, planning, environmental, contingency and O&M costs are
included but only general assumptions can be made for these items. According to
the Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA) Cost Estimates for Treatment
Technology BAT, it would cost approximately $1.56‐$2.99 per 1000 gallons to treat
Alpha and Uranium using RO treatment. The District’s average annual demands for
the three year period were 9,964 million gallons per year. Therefore, RO treatment
installed and operated by the District’s water suppliers to meet the District’s water
demands would cost from $15 to $30 million per year, which translates to an
average monthly cost increase of $26.10 - $50.18 per District customer.
Gross Beta
Certain minerals are radioactive and may emit a form of radiation known as photons
and beta radiation. The MCL is 50 pCi/L and the DLR is 4 pCi/L. There is no PHG for
gross beta particle activity and the MCLG is zero pCi/L.
Uranium levels in water that the District purchases from other agencies from 2010 –
2013 ranged from <1 pCi/L – 3.6 pCi/L. The CDPH and USEPA, which set drinking
water standards, have determined that gross beta particle activity is a health
concern at certain levels of exposure. This radiological constituent is a naturally
occurring contaminant in some groundwater and surface water supplies. The
category of health risk associated with gross beta particle activity, and the reason
that a drinking water standard was adopted for it, is that some people who drink
9
water containing beta and photon emitters in excess of the MCL over many years
may have an increased risk of getting cancer. The numerical health risk for the
MCLG of zero pCi/L is zero. CDHS and USEPA set the drinking water standard for
gross beta particle activity at 50 pCi/L to reduce the risk of cancer or other adverse
health effects.
The Best Available Technologies (BATs) identified to treat gross beta particle
activity are ion exchange and reverse osmosis (RO). The most effective method to
consistently remove beta and photon emitters to the MCLG is to install RO
treatment. All costs including capital, land, construction, engineering, planning,
environmental, contingency and O&M costs are included but only general
assumptions can be made for these items. According to the Association of California
Water Agencies (ACWA) Cost Estimates for Treatment Technology BAT, it would
cost approximately $1.56‐$2.99 per 1000 gallons to treat Gross Beta using RO
treatment. The District’s average annual demands for the three year period were
9,964 million gallons per year. Therefore, RO treatment installed and operated by
the District’s water suppliers to meet the District’s water demands would cost from
$15 to $30 million per year, which translates to an average monthly cost increase of
$26.10 - $50.18 per District customer.
SECTION 3: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION
All water served by the District met all State of California, Department of Public
Health and USEPA drinking water standards set to protect public health during this
three year period. CDPH considers water that meets all standards as safe to drink.
To further reduce the levels of the constituents identified in this report that are
already significantly below the health-based Maximum Contaminant Levels
established to provide “safe drinking water”, additional costly treatment processes
would be required, translating to an average monthly cost increase of $26.10 -
$50.18 per District customer.
The effectiveness of the treatment processes to provide any significant reductions in
constituent levels to the PHGs is difficult, if not impossible to determine since the
analytical DLR is much higher than the PHG in most cases. The health protection
benefits of these further hypothetical reductions are not at all clear and may not be
quantifiable. Therefore, no further actions is recommended. are necessary to reduce
the levels of the seven constituents to the PHG or below.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board Meeting MEETING DATE: August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton,
General Manager
W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO.
APPROVED BY:
Susan Cruz, District Secretary
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Board of Directors 2013 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board, the attached Board of Director’s meeting
calendar for 2013 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to review the 2013 Board of Director’s meeting calendars
and amend the schedule as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments: Calendar of Meetings for 2013
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar 8-7-13.doc
AGENDA ITEM 8a
Board of Directors, Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2013
Regular Board Meetings:
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 8, 2013
February 6, 2013
March 6, 2013
April 3, 2013
May 1, 2013
June 5, 2013
July 3, 2013
August 7, 2013
September 4, 2013
October 2, 2013
November 6, 2013
December 4, 2013
January 16, 2013
February 20, 2013
March 20, 2013
April 17, 2013
May 15, 2013
June 19, 2013
July 17, 2013
August 21, 2013
September 18, 2013
October 16, 2013
November 20, 2013
SPECIAL BOARD MEETINGS:
BOARD WORKSHOPS:
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:
Regular Board
MEETING
DATE:
August 7, 2013
SUBMITTED
BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
W.O./G.F.
NO:
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: General Manager’s Report
GENERAL MANAGER:
Jamul Water Main Break: The Department of Fish and Game (DFG)
notified the District on July 15th that water was surfacing in
the vegetated area south of Campo Road and just west of the 944
Pump Station in Jamul. Staff determined there was approximately
15 gpm of potable water surfacing near the District’s 16-inch
steel main that supplies water to most of Jamul. Due to the
main being down a steep bank from the road in a highly
vegetated area, Operations determined the District did not have
the proper equipment to make the repair and a contractor would
need to be retained. Since there is no redundant feed to Jamul,
Operations recommended that the General Manager declare an
emergency so repairs could be expedited. Since it is an
environmentally sensitive area, the District retained a
biologist to monitor the work. The District also coordinated
with Cal-Trans since repairs were made within their right-of-
way. No customers were affected during the one day shutdown.
The contractor discovered a small hole in the top of the main
at a joint caused by a root damaging the mortar, allowing the
steel to corrode. The rest of the pipe was in good condition
and the pipe was repaired and placed back into service on July
23rd. Operations staffs’ estimate for the repairs was
approximately $30,000. DFG and Cal-Trans were satisfied with
the District’s and the contractor’s efforts to minimize impacts
during the repairs.
AGENDA ITEM 9
2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Purchasing, Facilities, and Water Conservation:
Purchase Orders – There were 167 purchase orders processed in
July 2013 for a total of $24,177,811.32.
o PO #717051 in the amount of $946,900 was issued for the
803-3 and 832-2 reservoir interior/exterior coatings and
upgrades project, for the period of February 25, 2013 to
July 25, 2013.
Residential and Commercial Landscape Surveys Provided by
Mission Resources Conservation District – District customers
requesting water conservation assistance are provided free
residential surveys and commercial audits by Mission Resources
Conservation District (MRCD). Customers contact MRCD and an
appointment is scheduled at their convenience. MRCD is CWA’s
countywide consultant providing residential surveys, commercial
audits and additional field services to District sites. The
District is invoiced $62.50 per residential survey and $42.50
per acre for commercial audits with CWA providing a matching
amount. In FY 2013, MRCD staff provided 118 residential
surveys and one commercial audit.
Water Conservation Garden – The Garden has contracted with the
University of San Diego to prepare a long-range master plan to
identify avenues for financial support that will cover future
capital improvement projects. A draft version titled, “Re-
Imagining Our Relationship with Water: The Water Conservation
Garden Capital and Endowment Campaign Case for Support,” is
being circulated among Garden stakeholder groups for input.
Human Resources: Upcoming Employee Programs – The Employee Picnic will be held
on Saturday, September 7, 2013, from 11:00 am – 4:00 pm at
Santee Lakes. The Employee Recognition Luncheon will be held
on Wednesday, September 25, 2013, from 12:00 pm – 1:30 pm.
Recruitments – HR is in the process of recruiting for
Construction Inspector and Equipment Mechanic II, and preparing
to recruit for a Water Systems Operator I/II/III.
New Hires – There were two new hires in the month of July:
Utility Worker I and Safety & Security Specialist.
3
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:
System Replacements - Request for proposals (RFP’s) for the
Work Management and the SCADA system replacement have been
released for vendor bids. Both systems are at end of life and
in need of replacement. As is common with system replacements,
the new system will continue to provide the necessary
functionality, but also allow a significant upgrade in
capabilities as the technology has evolved significantly in the
last 10 years. The District anticipates a vendor selection in
the next four months.
Communications Systems Upgrades – Day Wireless was selected as
the vendor, and implementation of quality control review of the
wireless system in the North District has begun. This will
assure that both the hardware is reliable and that the design
has an appropriate level of redundancy. The wireless system is
necessary to support the new SCADA environment and will provide
opportunities to support our security systems as a secondary
benefit. This effort is being led by Operations with
significant technical support from IT. Once complete, IT will
take over the primary support responsibilities for the wireless
network providing communication services to Operations for
SCADA and other uses.
ESRI – International Users Conference in San Diego - Staff
(Ming Zhao and Geoff Stevens) provided a presentation at the
2013 ESRI International User Conference on July 11th focusing on
the relationship between GIS and Asset Management and
highlighting some of the benefits the District will achieve
from the combination of these efforts. The conference draws
approximately 15,000 GIS professionals to San Diego every year.
Phone Vendor Support - As part of the annual process of
reviewing contracts and service levels, staff is changing phone
vendors from American Telesource Inc. (ATI) to Advanced Call
Processing, Inc. (ACP). ACP has demonstrated a stronger local
base of support for our Interactive Intelligence (I3) phone
system.
Software Replacement for Viewing GIS Maps in the Field - IT
staff is in the process of replacing our Field Mapplet software
for newer and more functional software from Iwater. This
software provides the GIS interface for field workers to
enhance their ability to execute work orders as well as take
advantage of GIS information. The new system is fully
integrated with GIS and Cityworks, which will be our new work
order system.
4
Asset Management Workshop - IT, Operations, Engineering and
Finance staff participated in a workshop on July 16th and 17th
to further review Otay’s Asset Management Program. The content
of the workshop was excellent. It was hosted at the Orange
County Sanitation District. The general advice from other
practitioners confirmed that the enterprise approach that Otay
is taking is the most effective direction based upon industry
best practice. Integrating this effort into other operational
priorities is always a challenge but can be achieved with
careful planning and teamwork. The broad base of support from
all departments highlighted Otay’s management commitment to
achieve these objectives while still fulfilling day-to-day
operational priorities. The product of this workshop and
subsequent team review will be a revised and better-integrated
project plan for asset management.
FINANCE:
Fiscal Year-End Answer Rate - The Customer Service department
finished the fiscal year with an average answer rate of 98.9%.
This accomplishment was the result of many years’ worth of
dedicated staff innovation, time-saving measures and process
improvements. This very visible measure demonstrates the
District’s commitment to customer-centered service.
2013 Financial Audit – Staff is currently closing the books for
the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013 and preparing for the
fiscal 2013 annual financial audit, which will be performed by
White, Nelson, Diehl, Evans LLP. The auditors have completed
their preliminary audit procedures and final fieldwork is
scheduled to be completed in September. Under California
Government Code section 26909, the District is required to have
a financial audit performed annually.
Financial Reporting:
o For the twelve months ended June 30, 2013, there are total
revenues of $84,761,554 and total expenses of $82,609,401.
The revenues exceeded expenses by $2,152,153.
o The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the
Investment Portfolio Details as of June 30, 2013 total
$82,719,671.01 with an average yield to maturity of 0.350%.
The total earnings year-to-date are $340,168.23.
5
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
Regulatory Site Access Road: This project will improve the
existing access road from the Sheriff substation to the
reservoir site. The San Miguel Fire Department (Fire
Department) is negotiating with the County to accept this
access road as a substitute for the Campo Road deceleration
lane requirement in their Major Use Permit. Staff continues
working with the County to develop the easement documents.
Easements will describe access rights and responsible parties
for future maintenance of the entire road alignment from the
Jamacha/SR-94 intersection, entrance to the Regulatory Site,
and the current access off the SR-94. With the acceptance of
the MND by the Board in July, staff will be applying for a
grading permit with the County and a Joint Use Agreement with
the Water Authority for the road encroachment within their
easement. An unresolved item is the Fire Department does not
have funding in place for the construction of the road, or for
the maintenance of the Skyline Church entrance. (P2504)
North District – South District Interconnection System: This
project consists of installing approximately 5.2 miles of 30-
inch diameter pipe from H Street in Chula Vista to Paradise
Valley Road in Spring Valley. The Draft Environmental Impact
Report was issued for public comment on June 12, 2013. The 45-
day public comment period ended July 26, 2013. Staff is
working with Sweetwater Authority concerning conflicts with
their pipelines. (P2511)
30-Inch, 980 Zone, Hunte Parkway – Proctor Valley/Use Area:
This project consists of the installation of approximately
2,240 linear-feet of 30-inch steel pipe and appurtenances on
Hunte Parkway at Proctor Valley Road, at the entrance to the
Salt Creek Golf Course, in the City of Chula Vista. The
contract has been accepted and the Notice of Completion was
filed with the County of San Diego on July 8, 2013. Sepulveda
submitted additional change requests for extended overhead and
traffic control delays on the project. Staff has evaluated
these requests and has provided an initial determination of “no
merit” on these requests based on the information submitted.
The Project is within budget and construction is completed.
(P2514)
944‐1R Recycled Water Pump Station Upgrades and System
Enhancement: This project consists of the installation of a new
pump, reconfiguration of the suction header piping, upgrades to
the instrumentation, SCADA system, and equipment at the 944-1R
pump station. The project also includes the installation of
6
three (3) Pressure Reducing Stations (PRS) on Olympic Parkway,
Eastlake Parkway, and Otay Lakes Road. Staff will be bringing a
Change Order to the Board for consideration as part of the
closing out this project. The Project is within budget and
construction is anticipated to be completed in August 2014.
(R2091)
Avocado, Louisa, Calavo, Challenge, Hidden Mesa Sanitary Sewer
Replacement: This project consists of replacing approximately
4,500 linear-feet of sewer pipeline in Avocado Boulevard and
neighboring residential streets. The contract has been accepted
and the Notice of Completion was filed with the County of San
Diego on July 2, 2013. The Project is within budget. (S2019,
S2020, S2022, S2026)
624-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement: This project consists of
replacing the floating cover on the 624-1 Reservoir. The
existing cover is at the end of its useful life and in need of
replacement. The contract has been accepted and the Notice of
Completion was filed with the County of San Diego on July 2,
2013. The Project is within budget. (P2477)
12-Inch Potable Water Pipeline, East Orange Avenue, I-805
Crossing: This project consists of the installation of
approximately 1,915 linear-feet of 12-inch steel and PVC pipe
along with the associated appurtenances from the intersection
of Melrose Avenue and Orange Avenue, east across the I-805
overpass, to the intersection of Olympic Parkway and Oleander
Avenue in Chula Vista. This new pipeline is needed to meet
fire flow requirements while Caltrans reconstructs the Palomar
Bridge overpass, which contains a 10-inch pipeline that will be
temporarily out of service. The water line was put into
service on July 1, 2013. The remaining work of the project
consists of final paving and punch list items. The Project is
within budget and anticipated to be completed in August 2013.
(P2513)
803-3 & 832-2 Reservoirs Interior/Exterior Coatings and
Upgrades: This project consists of removing and replacing the
interior and exterior coatings of the 803-3 Reservoir 2.0 MG and
the 832-2 MG Reservoir 2.0 MG, along with providing structural
upgrades to ensure the tanks comply with both State and Federal
OSHA standards as well as American Water Works Association and
County Health Department standards. The Contractor, Advanced
Industrial Services (AIS), is nearing completion on the 803-3
Reservoir. The remaining work at this location consists of
disinfection, filling the reservoir, and testing to put the 803-
3 reservoir in service. Work is nearing completion at the 832-2
Reservoir. The remaining work at this location consists of
disinfection, filling the reservoir, and testing to put the 832-
7
2 reservoir in service. The Project is within budget and is
anticipated to be completed in August 2013. (P2518 & P2519)
For the month of June 2013, the District sold 6 meters (6 EDUs)
generating $54,923 in revenue. Projection for this period was
27.6 meters (36.6 EDUs) with budgeted revenue of $331,005.
Total revenue for Fiscal Year 2013 through June 2013 is
$3,242,833 against the annual budget of $3,972,064.
The following table summarizes Engineering's project purchases
issued during the period of June 1, 2013 through July 15, 2013
that were within staff signatory authority:
Date
Action
Amount
Contractor/
Consultant Project
7/10/13 P.O. $15,000 Clarkson Lab &
Supply, Inc.
Various CIP and
developer projects
for Fiscal Year
2014
Water Operations:
Total number of potable water meters is 49,087.
The June potable water purchases were 3,220.0 acre-feet which
is 15.6% above the budget of 2,786.6 acre-feet. The cumulative
purchases through June is 32,058.6, acre-feet which is 5.1%
above the cumulative budget of 30,514.0 acre-feet.
8
The June recycled water purchases and production was 524.6
acre-feet which is 12.8% above the budget of 465.1 acre-feet.
The cumulative production and purchases through June is 4,392.0
acre-feet which is 12.3% above the cumulative budget of 3,911.2
acre-feet.
Recycled water consumption for the month of June is as follows:
Total consumption was 583.6 acre-feet or 190,086,248 gallons
and the average daily consumption was 6,336,208 gallons per
day.
Total recycled water consumption as of June for FY 2013 is
4617.2 acre-feet.
Total number of recycled water meters is 708.
Wastewater flows for the month of June were as follows:
Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,728,568.
Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per
day: 572,581.
Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 1,155,610.
Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling
Facility, gallons per day: 1,148,018.
Flow to Metro from Otay Water District, gallons per day:
7,969.
By the end of June there were 6,083 wastewater EDUs.
Check Total
2,562.50
494,190.00
40,716.83
10,899.92
4,726.82
5,405.84
245.29
3,461.90
595.87
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2037375 06/26/13 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3753 04/19/13 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (4/4/13-4/18/13)1,437.50
3809 05/28/13 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (5/11/13-5/17/13)1,125.00
2037674 07/24/13 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 3832 06/18/13 PROGRAMMING SERVICES (5/22/13-6/10/13)1,500.00 1,500.00
2037675 07/24/13 13901 ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SVCS INC 2A 06/26/13 UPGRADES FOR RES 803-3 / 832-2 (ENDING 5/31/13)255,597.50
3A 06/27/13 UPGRADES FOR RES 803-3 / 832-2 (ENDING 6/30/13)238,592.50
2037676 07/24/13 12006 ADVANCED WEB OFFSET INC 131607 06/03/13 2013 SPRING NEWSLETTER 2,889.00 2,889.00
2037376 06/26/13 12174 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 6 05/29/13 DISINFECTION SYSTEM (ENDING 5/3/13)46,810.00 46,810.00
2037547 07/10/13 12174 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 7 06/21/13 DISINFECTION SYSTEM (ENDING 5/31/13)45,579.71 45,579.71
2037548 07/10/13 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1202 06/14/13 AS NEEDED DESIGN SVCS (5/4/13-5/31/13)31,942.00
1130 06/16/13 DEVELOPER PLANCHECKS (5/5/13-5/31/13)5,214.49
1042 06/13/13 PLAN CHECKING (5/5/13-5/31/13)3,560.34
2037677 07/24/13 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1131 07/02/13 DEVELOPER PLANCHECKS (6/1/13-6/28/13)8,664.99
1043 07/02/13 PLAN CHECKING (6/1/13-6/28/13)2,234.93
2037377 06/26/13 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131290770 05/28/13 AQUA AMMONIA 3,126.99
131290769 05/28/13 AQUA AMMONIA 1,599.83
2037633 07/17/13 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131293711 06/19/13 AQUA AMMONIA 3,054.33
131293710 06/19/13 AQUA AMMONIA 2,351.51
2037378 06/26/13 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9016234945 05/28/13 BREATHING AIR 206.04
9910077704 05/31/13 BREATHING AIR 39.25
2037549 07/10/13 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9016763059 06/12/13 BREATHING AIR 206.04 206.04
2037678 07/24/13 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9910812638 06/30/13 BREATHING AIR 41.75 41.75
2037550 07/10/13 14811 ALARMS UNLIMITED INC 151631 06/24/13 LOBBY MONITOR 3,080.90
151533 06/13/13 RFID DIAGNOSTIC 381.00
2037679 07/24/13 14811 ALARMS UNLIMITED INC 152422 06/27/13 GATE REPAIR (6/25/13)449.00 449.00
2037488 07/03/13 14977 ALEXANDRA VINSON Ref002429007 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000195965 14.30 14.30
2037680 07/24/13 02362 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES # 509 0509005222308 06/25/13 TRASH SERVICES (JULY 2013)530.33
0509005223979 06/25/13 TRASH SERVICES (JULY 2013)65.54
2037551 07/10/13 12911 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC 27 06/20/13 SURVEY SERVICES (5/15/13-6/14/13)6,945.00 6,945.00
Page 1 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
49,170.00
5,246.51
2,346.69
2,337.06
64.24
2037681 07/24/13 12911 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC 28 06/30/13 SURVEY SERVICES (ENDING 6/30/13)1,240.00 1,240.00
2037379 06/26/13 14462 ALYSON CONSULTING CM201307 06/05/13 CONST MGMT / INSP - EMERG REPAIRS (5/31/13)880.00 880.00
2037682 07/24/13 14462 ALYSON CONSULTING CM201311 06/30/13 CONST MGMT / INSPECTION (3/1/13-6/30/13)14,670.00
CM201310 06/30/13 CONST MGMT / INSPECTION (3/1/13-6/30/13)14,250.00
CM2013008 06/30/13 CONST MGMT / INSPECTION (3/1/13-6/30/13)11,700.00
CM201309 06/30/13 CONST MGMT / INSPECTION (3/1/13-6/30/13)8,550.00
2037380 06/26/13 11590 AMERICAN DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHY 18986 05/30/13 LICENSE RENEWAL (5/30/13-5/29/14)11,800.00 11,800.00
2037489 07/03/13 14975 AMERICAN EAGLE REAL ESTATE Ref002429005 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000194816 41.11 41.11
2037552 07/10/13 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570NG 07/01/13 PAGER SERVICES (JUNE 2013)217.42 217.42
2037381 06/26/13 06165 ANITA FIRE HOSE COMPANY ETC 19905 06/05/13 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 1,785.51 1,785.51
2037382 06/26/13 00002 ANSWER INC 8494 06/22/13 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY)1,100.00 1,100.00
2037553 07/10/13 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41146 06/25/13 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (JULY 2013)316.66 316.66
2037383 06/26/13 03357 APEX ADVERTISING INC 158051 06/05/13 ANNUAL UNIFORM T-SHIRTS 4,385.45
158071 06/05/13 ANNUAL UNIFORM SWEATSHIRTS AND CAPS 861.06
2037554 07/10/13 03357 APEX ADVERTISING INC 158081 06/06/13 ANNUAL UNIFORM SWEATSHIRTS AND CAPS 2,081.64
160621 06/24/13 ANNUAL UNIFORM T-SHIRTS 265.05
2037384 06/26/13 01509 ARC ERGONOMICS 38145 06/07/13 ROLLER MOUSE 751.52 751.52
2037555 07/10/13 01509 ARC ERGONOMICS 38257 06/19/13 KEYBOARD TRAY 304.51 304.51
2037683 07/24/13 01509 ARC ERGONOMICS 38407 07/03/13 KEYBOARD TRAY 316.44 316.44
2037385 06/26/13 13171 ARCADIS US INC 0522495 06/03/13 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT (ENDING 5/26/13)4,998.92 4,998.92
2037634 07/17/13 11282 ASHTON, PATRICK 071013 07/10/13 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT (6/1/13)180.00 180.00
2037386 06/26/13 01884 ASSN OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROF'LS 26225360513 05/31/13 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 150.00 150.00
2037387 06/26/13 05758 AT&T 33784130450613 06/07/13 PHONE SERVICES (6/7/13-7/6/13)31.71 31.71
2037556 07/10/13 05758 AT&T 0821645728062513 06/25/13 PHONE SERVICES (6/25/13-7/24/13)2,275.35
61942256050613 06/20/13 PHONE SERVICES (6/20/13-7/19/13)61.71
2037557 07/10/13 05758 AT&T 61967053090613 06/15/13 PHONE SERVICES (MONTHLY)32.12
61969851400613 06/24/13 PHONE SERVICES (MONTHLY)32.12
2037388 06/26/13 07785 AT&T 000004405632 06/02/13 PHONE SERVICES (5/2/13-6/1/13)5,667.95
Page 2 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
5,683.57
5,688.02
2037388 06/26/13 07785 AT&T 000004405632 06/02/13 PHONE SERVICES (5/2/13-6/1/13)5,667.95
000004407850 06/02/13 PHONE SERVICES (5/2/13-6/1/13)15.62
2037684 07/24/13 07785 AT&T 000004490323 07/02/13 PHONE SERVICES (6/2/13-7/1/13)5,672.40
000004492540 07/02/13 PHONE SERVICES (6/2/13-7/1/13)15.62
2037389 06/26/13 08330 AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 854782625 06/11/13 INTERNET BANDWIDTH (5/21/13-6/20/13)2,028.00 2,028.00
2037558 07/10/13 08330 AT&T INTERNET SERVICES 8547826250613 06/22/13 INTERNET BANDWIDTH (MONTHLY)1,622.40 1,622.40
2037390 06/26/13 12810 ATKINS 1169650 06/11/13 WATER & SEWER RATE STRUCTURE (4/1/13-6/2/13)784.00 784.00
2037685 07/24/13 12810 ATKINS 1171077 06/26/13 DESIGN SERVICES (ENDING MAY 2013)65.00 65.00
2037559 07/10/13 14985 AZTEC FENCE CO II INC AZ659 06/18/13 FENCE REPAIR 1,880.00 1,880.00
2037686 07/24/13 14985 AZTEC FENCE CO II INC 672E 06/27/13 REPLACE MAGLOCK 860.00 860.00
2037490 07/03/13 14964 BARBARA GALANGUE Ref002428994 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000159628 23.20 23.20
2037560 07/10/13 06285 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 13308 06/11/13 ACTUARIAL SERVICES (MAY 2013)1,165.00 1,165.00
2037687 07/24/13 06285 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC 13357 06/26/13 ACTUARIAL SERVICES (JUNE 2013)3,400.00 3,400.00
2037491 07/03/13 14963 BASEMA MELKONLAN Ref002428993 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000146345 28.19 28.19
2037561 07/10/13 14577 BASILE CONSTRUCTION INC 5 06/12/13 ORANGE AVE / 805 12' PIPELINE (ENDING 5/31/13)273,575.08 273,575.08
2037688 07/24/13 14577 BASILE CONSTRUCTION INC 6 06/27/13 ORANGE AVE / 805 12" PIPELINE (ENDING 6/30/13)12,024.47 12,024.47
2037391 06/26/13 01630 BEARCOM 4209922 06/05/13 REPLACEMENT RADIOS 4,200.00 4,200.00
2037492 07/03/13 01630 BEARCOM 4191652 03/22/13 REPLACEMENT RADIOS 24,855.32 24,855.32
2037493 07/03/13 06520 BENSKIN, RONALD 004380 06/27/13 SAFETY BOOTS 147.14 147.14
2037494 07/03/13 14972 BRANDY BALLAS Ref002429002 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000188882 12.93 12.93
2037392 06/26/13 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI311435 06/04/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,452.82
BPI312756 06/07/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,230.42
BPI309206 05/28/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,562.18
BPI310288 05/31/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,403.34
BPI313339 06/10/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 961.85
BPI312223 06/06/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 832.57
BPI309205 05/28/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 767.95
BPI308722 05/28/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 760.28
Page 3 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
13,780.28
14,366.33
12,664.92
BPI311433 06/03/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 754.81
BPI311434 06/03/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 718.65
BPI313129 06/10/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 697.83
BPI310287 05/30/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 637.58
2037562 07/10/13 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI315544 06/17/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,525.11
BPI316949 06/20/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,313.68
BPI314625 06/13/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,199.75
BPI317928 06/24/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,850.30
BPI313338 06/11/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,256.54
BPI316948 06/20/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,036.34
BPI317927 06/24/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,002.38
BPI315543 06/17/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 876.40
BPI315542 06/17/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 702.21
BPI314626 06/13/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 603.62
2037689 07/24/13 10970 BRENNTAG PACIFIC INC BPI320681 07/01/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,461.43
BPI319884 06/28/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,135.12
BPI321648 07/05/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,600.26
BPI321650 07/03/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,588.26
BPI318319 06/25/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,381.43
BPI321649 07/05/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,037.77
BPI320682 07/01/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 877.53
BPI320874 07/02/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 855.72
BPI319065 06/27/13 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 727.40
2037393 06/26/13 14855 BROWN FIELD TECHNOLOGY PRK LLC 004365 06/21/13 W/O REFUND D0192-060032 665.09 665.09
2037635 07/17/13 08156 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 536184 06/17/13 GOVERNMENT RELATIONS COUNSEL (MAY 2013)292.50 292.50
2037636 07/17/13 11461 BUSINESS PRINTING CO INC 106721 07/04/13 2013 CONSUMER CONFIDENCE RPT PRINTING 6,505.35 6,505.35
2037563 07/10/13 05620 C & I EQUIPMENT CO 12341 06/18/13 TANK TRAILER 9,650.00 9,650.00
2037564 07/10/13 02920 CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL 128879 06/14/13 ASPHALT 2,255.30 2,255.30
2037394 06/26/13 14365 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL 5779 05/30/13 APCD RETROFIT 15,213.60 15,213.60
2037637 07/17/13 01432 CALIFORNIA URBAN WATER 2013G1179 02/14/13 MEMBERSHIP DUES 2,334.68 2,334.68
2037395 06/26/13 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 316194 05/28/13 GT BATTERY/ WINDSOCK 182.58
Page 4 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
305.05
4,032.27
1,258.00
1,878.00
2,545.73
743.60
316193 05/28/13 GT BATTERY/ WINDSOCK 122.47
2037396 06/26/13 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7676 06/01/13 DOCUMENT SERVICES (5/1/13-5/24/13)2,799.53
7675 06/01/13 RECORDS MGMT SVCS (5/3/13-5/28/13)851.28
7674 06/01/13 DOCUMENT SERVICES (5/9/13)278.64
7677 06/05/13 DOCUMENT SERVICES 102.82
2037690 07/24/13 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7684 07/01/13 RECORDS MGMT SERVICES (6/1/13-6/28/13)3,569.70 3,569.70
2037691 07/24/13 13389 CAYETANO, TITA 072313 07/23/13 COMPUTER LOAN 867.97 867.97
2037692 07/24/13 14673 CGR MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS LLC103160313 06/30/13 SCADA SYSTEM SOFTWARE 18,046.84 18,046.84
2037397 06/26/13 00446 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DE24160613 06/24/13 PLAN CHECK DEP TO ACCT # DE-2416 4,695.08 4,695.08
2037398 06/26/13 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 67597 05/31/13 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 450.00
67594 05/31/13 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 412.00
67596 05/31/13 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 396.00
2037693 07/24/13 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 67719 06/30/13 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 801.00
68109 06/30/13 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 408.00
67817 06/30/13 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 373.00
68108 06/30/13 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING 296.00
2037694 07/24/13 14928 COASTAL IGNITION & CONTROLS 9212 06/28/13 REPAIR PART 17,075.60 17,075.60
2037399 06/26/13 13900 COMMUNITY BANK 13 06/05/13 RETENTION / GARCIA JUAREZ (ENDING 5/31/13)3,037.50 3,037.50
2037695 07/24/13 13900 COMMUNITY BANK 14 06/20/13 RETENTION / GARCIA JUAREZ (ENDING 6/30/13)623.10 623.10
2037400 06/26/13 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 15026800 05/29/13 TONER 2,305.97
15025690 05/29/13 TONER 239.76
2037696 07/24/13 03624 COPY LINK INC AR155380 06/27/13 SHARP COPIER MAINTENANCE (FY 2014)371.80
AR155381 06/27/13 SHARP COPIER MAINTENANCE (FY 2014)371.80
2037401 06/26/13 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1257735 05/31/13 TAPE STORAGE (MAY 2013)373.57 373.57
2037697 07/24/13 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1258315 06/30/13 TAPE STORAGE (JUNE 2013)375.23 375.23
2037638 07/17/13 02612 COUNCIL OF WATER UTILITIES 071113 07/11/13 MEETING REGISTRATION (7/16/13)25.00 25.00
2037565 07/10/13 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DPWAROTAYMWD051306/18/13 EXCAVATION PERMITS (4/25/13-5/31/13)2,288.66 2,288.66
2037402 06/26/13 00134 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 004373 06/25/13 FILING FEE 3,045.25 3,045.25
2037403 06/26/13 00134 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 004372 06/25/13 FILING FEE 2,206.25 2,206.25
Page 5 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
851.00
284.00
4,804.00
486.00
3,000.00
2037403 06/26/13 00134 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 004372 06/25/13 FILING FEE 2,206.25 2,206.25
2037639 07/17/13 00134 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 12475 07/09/13 ELECTRONIC MAPS (ANNUAL)32.00 32.00
2037404 06/26/13 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH2010HUPFP21281806/06/13 PERMIT RENEWAL (4/30/13-4/30/14)446.00
DEH2002HUPFP13213906/19/13 PERMIT RENEWAL (5/31/13-5/31/14)405.00
2037566 07/10/13 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH130439D11 06/30/13 SHUT DOWN TEST (5/20/13)142.00
DEH130447D11 06/20/13 SHUT DOWN TEST (5/14/13)142.00
2037698 07/24/13 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH2002HUPFP12089107/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)2,201.00
DEH2009HUPFP21035107/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)446.00
DEH2009HUPFP21029407/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)405.00
DEH2004HUPFP20316907/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)292.00
DEH2009HUPFP21029507/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)292.00
DEH2009HUPFP21029607/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)292.00
DEH2009HUPFP21029707/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)292.00
DEH2009HUPFP21040507/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)292.00
DEH2010HUPFP21278607/03/13 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/13-6/30/14)292.00
2037495 07/03/13 02122 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2013042505668 04/25/13 PERMIT FEES # 05668 (JULY 2013-2014)356.00
2013051309283 05/13/13 PERMIT FEES # 04544 (DEC 2013-2014)130.00
2037405 06/26/13 07494 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 12D1101539820513 06/04/13 PLAN CHECK/REVIEW TA # 12D110153982 213.18 213.18
2037640 07/17/13 07494 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 12D1101539820613 07/04/13 INSPECTION CHARGES (6/19/13)70.20 70.20
2037641 07/17/13 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS SAN DIEGO 27170613 06/29/13 INTERNET SERVICES (6/29/13-7/28/13)1,500.00
28810613 06/29/13 INTERNET SERVICES (6/29/13-7/28/13)1,500.00
2037567 07/10/13 04443 CSI SERVICES INC 5239 06/18/13 RESERVOIR INSPECTION 5,430.00 5,430.00
2037642 07/17/13 14989 DAVID PHETEPLACE Ref002429291 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000032093 79.13 79.13
2037406 06/26/13 14362 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS {20}36750 05/31/13 NETWORK CABLING 4,715.00 4,715.00
2037568 07/10/13 03744 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 980617 06/30/13 FINGERPRINTING SERVICES (JUNE 2013)147.00 147.00
2037569 07/10/13 14988 DIANA ROSAS 004386 07/03/13 CUSTOMER REFUND 167.95 167.95
2037496 07/03/13 03417 DIRECTV 20724867188 06/19/13 SATELLITE TV (6/19/13)6.00 6.00
2037570 07/10/13 11371 DOCUFLOW SOLUTIONS INC 8242 05/20/13 FAX MAINTENANCE (FY 2014)1,235.89 1,235.89
2037497 07/03/13 14966 DONALD CUDDINGTON Ref002428996 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000168260 62.65 62.65
Page 6 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
3,200.00
1,665.00
1,565.00
80,089.24
890.00
8,377.87
2037407 06/26/13 14643 ECHO LABS LLC 20131333 06/07/13 ENERGY MANAGEMENT 4,500.00 4,500.00
2037571 07/10/13 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 1554580613 06/30/13 RECYCLING SERVICES (JUNE 2013)95.00 95.00
2037498 07/03/13 14959 EDWARD HENRY Ref002428988 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000073973 53.91 53.91
2037499 07/03/13 14974 EMILIA QUINTERO Ref002429004 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000193294 36.47 36.47
2037699 07/24/13 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 0061313IN 06/30/13 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (JUNE 2013)687.50 687.50
2037700 07/24/13 03765 ENGINEERING PARTNERS INC, THE 1713281 06/28/13 LA PRESA PRS REVIEW OF ELECTRICAL DRAWING 2,000.00
1813283 06/28/13 AS-BUILT DRAWING PREPARATION 1,200.00
2037408 06/26/13 14602 ENVIRO-CARE CO EC2120371 05/31/13 GRIT WASHER / COMPACTOR 6,675.16 6,675.16
2037409 06/26/13 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 3050915 05/28/13 RECYCLED WATER ANALYSIS (5/10/13-5/17/13)645.00
3060398 06/03/13 RECYCLED WATER ANALYSIS (5/18/13-5/22/13)510.00
3060563 06/10/13 RECYCLED WATER ANALYSIS (5/23/13-5/29/13)510.00
2037572 07/10/13 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 3060757 06/17/13 RECYCLED WATER ANALYSIS (5/30/13-6/6/13)800.00
3060960 06/24/13 RECYCLED WATER ANALYSIS (6/7/13-6/13/13)765.00
2037701 07/24/13 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 3061094 06/27/13 RECYCLED WATER ANALYSIS (6/14/13-6/19/13)690.00 690.00
2037702 07/24/13 12134 ENVIRONMENTAL LAB ACCR PROG BR 072313 07/23/13 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FEE 2,359.00 2,359.00
2037703 07/24/13 03725 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH92670505 06/26/13 GIS SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 53,989.24
92670787 06/27/13 ESRI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,500.00
92670504 06/26/13 ESRI PRODUCTION MAPPING 2,600.00
2037500 07/03/13 02939 ESCARCEGA, LUIS 004377 06/26/13 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 90.00 90.00
2037410 06/26/13 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0124763 06/04/13 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (5/14/13)750.00 750.00
2037573 07/10/13 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0126984 06/21/13 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (6/3/13)375.00
L0126664 06/19/13 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (6/3/13)260.00
L0126735 06/19/13 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (6/4/13-6/5/13)255.00
2037411 06/26/13 00645 FEDEX 230487352 06/14/13 MAIL SERVICES (6/6/13)6.30 6.30
2037412 06/26/13 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0437387 05/29/13 INVENTORY 3,751.92
0438880 06/17/13 INVENTORY 2,908.75
0439726 06/07/13 INVENTORY 1,717.20
2037574 07/10/13 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0439461 06/17/13 24" BUTTERFLY VALVE 602.04 602.04
Page 7 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
456.69
205.86
304.41
1,892.19
2037643 07/17/13 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0441409 07/02/13 INVENTORY 2,296.38 2,296.38
2037704 07/24/13 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0439464 06/28/13 24" BUTTERFLY VALVE 777.60 777.60
2037413 06/26/13 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 9003400513 05/31/13 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (MAY 2013)99.00 99.00
2037705 07/24/13 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 9003400613 06/30/13 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (JUNE 2013)99.00 99.00
2037414 06/26/13 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 000788 05/29/13 COFFEE SUPPLIES 407.36 407.36
2037575 07/10/13 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 001787 06/12/13 COFFEE SUPPLIES 1,068.22 1,068.22
2037576 07/10/13 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 8291874 06/13/13 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 415.02
8394239 06/17/13 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 41.67
2037706 07/24/13 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 9117568 07/05/13 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 1,336.11 1,336.11
2037415 06/26/13 02591 FITNESS TECH 8530 06/01/13 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2013)135.00 135.00
2037416 06/26/13 11962 FLEETWASH INC X132264 05/31/13 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 140.16
X135274 06/07/13 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 65.70
2037577 07/10/13 11962 FLEETWASH INC x137880 06/14/13 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 243.09
x140389 06/21/13 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 61.32
2037707 07/24/13 11962 FLEETWASH INC x142923 06/28/13 VEHICLE/FLEET WASHING SERVICE 41.61 41.61
2037501 07/03/13 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2429101 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 90.00 90.00
2037644 07/17/13 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2429409 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 1,032.65 1,032.65
2037502 07/03/13 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2429107 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
2037645 07/17/13 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2429415 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
2037417 06/26/13 07224 FRAZEE INDUSTRIES INC 9530271442640 05/30/13 PAINT 1,840.52
9530271442650 05/30/13 PAINT 51.67
2037503 07/03/13 02254 FRY'S ELECTRONICS INC 004376 06/26/13 COMPUTER LOAN 757.92 757.92
2037418 06/26/13 13716 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC 13 05/31/13 CALAVO GARDENS (ENDING 5/31/13)57,712.50 57,712.50
2037708 07/24/13 13716 GARCIA JUAREZ CONSTRUCTION INC 14 06/20/13 CALAVO GARDENS (ENDING 6/30/13)11,838.90 11,838.90
2037646 07/17/13 14997 GARY KENT TEAM Ref002429299 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000199214 19.86 19.86
2037419 06/26/13 10817 GEXPRO 580337304 06/03/13 PLC SOFTWARE 4,300.72 4,300.72
2037504 07/03/13 12673 GONZALEZ, DAVID 17960413 04/30/13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (APR 2013)117.52 117.52Page 8 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
590.76
1,590.83
3,052.75
2,693.13
7,200.00
362.92
2037504 07/03/13 12673 GONZALEZ, DAVID 17960413 04/30/13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (APR 2013)117.52 117.52
2037420 06/26/13 00101 GRAINGER INC 9152351434 05/28/13 BLUE PAINT 241.06
9159971507 06/05/13 SURVEY PAINT 209.69
9160022043 06/05/13 BATTERIES 116.94
9161057881 06/06/13 SURVEY PAINT 23.07
2037578 07/10/13 00101 GRAINGER INC 9176160647 CREDIT MEMO -402.08
9173215139 06/20/13 FLUORESCENT LINEAR LAMPS 1,281.03
9175961912 06/24/13 TOOLS (INSPECTION DIVISION)711.88
2037505 07/03/13 14981 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Ref002429011 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000198862 1,173.80 1,173.80
2037421 06/26/13 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 10865 05/30/13 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (MAY 2013)8,650.00 8,650.00
2037709 07/24/13 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 10980 07/02/13 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (JUNE 2013)8,650.00 8,650.00
2037422 06/26/13 14952 GSA 004367 06/21/13 W/O REFUND D0891-090142 1,602.25 1,602.25
2037423 06/26/13 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 35612 06/01/13 NETWORK SERVICES (JUNE 2013)2,289.00
35592 05/31/13 NETWORK SERVICES (MAY 2013)763.75
2037710 07/24/13 03773 GTC SYSTEMS INC 35793 06/28/13 NETWORK SERVICES (JUNE 2013)412.50 412.50
2037647 07/17/13 08968 GURROLA, MICHAEL 071113 07/11/13 SAFETY BOOTS 150.00 150.00
2037579 07/10/13 00174 HACH COMPANY 8358212 06/24/13 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 1,542.38
8345511 06/14/13 TURBIDITY METER 1,150.75
2037711 07/24/13 00174 HACH COMPANY 8371148 07/02/13 WIMS SUPPORT (6/15/13-6/14/14)2,682.00 2,682.00
2037424 06/26/13 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE Ben2428817 06/20/13 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 5,161.59 5,161.59
2037712 07/24/13 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE Ben2429395 07/18/13 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 5,161.59 5,161.59
2037713 07/24/13 05986 HAVS INCORPORATED 70061 07/01/13 REPAIR SERVICES (5/28/13 & 6/27/13)372.06 372.06
2037580 07/10/13 04472 HECTOR I MARES-COSSIO 99 06/28/13 BI-NATIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES (MAY 2013)3,600.00
100 06/28/13 BI-NATIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES (JUNE 2013)3,600.00
2037425 06/26/13 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 004375 06/20/13 SEWER ACCOUNTS 409.24 409.24
2037506 07/03/13 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 178540010613 06/11/13 WATER PURCHASE (4/4/13-6/6/13)322.82
174639860613 06/11/13 WATER PURCHASE (4/5/13-6/6/13)40.10
2037426 06/26/13 14951 HERITAGE BUILDING & DEVT 004368 06/21/13 W/O REFUND D0894-090149 3,169.81 3,169.81
2037427 06/26/13 04209 HIDDEN VALLEY PUMP 000278800000 06/19/13 PUMP AND MOTOR REBUILD FOR 944-1 P/S 18,226.48 18,226.48Page 9 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
5,933.68
23,164.68
21,723.62
1,675.60
1,885.75
2037427 06/26/13 04209 HIDDEN VALLEY PUMP 000278800000 06/19/13 PUMP AND MOTOR REBUILD FOR 944-1 P/S 18,226.48 18,226.48
2037428 06/26/13 12335 HP ENTERPRISE SERVICES LLC U3079453 06/10/13 IVR PAYMENT SERVICES (MAY 2013)1,856.30 1,856.30
2037714 07/24/13 01649 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 269867942 07/05/13 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 4,633.43
269867943 07/05/13 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 1,300.25
2037429 06/26/13 08969 INFOSEND INC 69268 05/31/13 POSTAGE (MAY 2013)12,922.68
69384 06/03/13 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (MAY 2013)5,220.80
69267 05/31/13 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (MAY 2013)5,021.20
2037715 07/24/13 08969 INFOSEND INC 70018 06/28/13 POSTAGE (JUNE 2013)11,717.77
70222 07/01/13 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (JUNE 2013)5,268.80
70017 06/28/13 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (JUNE 2013)4,737.05
2037430 06/26/13 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 4704 05/31/13 PLANT SERVICES (MAY 2013)205.00 205.00
2037431 06/26/13 13899 INTERMEDIA.NET INC 2013051399 06/01/13 EXCHANGE OUTSOURCING (5/2/13-6/1/13)3,486.06 3,486.06
2037716 07/24/13 13899 INTERMEDIA.NET INC 2013070106 07/01/13 EXCHANGE OUTSOURCING (6/2/13-7/1/13)3,486.06 3,486.06
2037717 07/24/13 03250 INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MGMT 071713 07/17/13 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS (7/1/13-6/30/14)165.00 165.00
2037581 07/10/13 02263 ITRON INC 292608 06/11/13 MAINTENANCE RENEWAL (ANNUAL)4,872.62 4,872.62
2037718 07/24/13 14737 IWATER INC 6318 07/05/13 INFRAMAP SOFTWARE 5,000.00 5,000.00
2037582 07/10/13 00646 JACKSON-HIRSH INC 0864367 06/18/13 LAMINATING SUPPLIES 83.52 83.52
2037432 06/26/13 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO05130171 05/01/13 JANITORIAL SERVICES (MAY 2013)1,119.82 1,119.82
2037719 07/24/13 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO06130168 06/01/13 JANITORIAL SERVICES (JUNE 2013)1,119.82 1,119.82
2037583 07/10/13 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 582997 CREDIT MEMO -3,000.00
585783 CREDIT MEMO -3,000.00
580442 CREDIT MEMO -2,000.00
582953 05/30/13 CHLORINE 4,837.80
585772 06/24/13 CHLORINE 4,837.80
2037507 07/03/13 14970 JESSICA GALVIN Ref002429000 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000187008 24.77 24.77
2037508 07/03/13 14978 JOEL JOHNSON Ref002429008 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000196171 31.23 31.23
2037584 07/10/13 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0094613 06/10/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (4/27/13-5/24/13)1,313.75
0094614 06/10/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (4/27/13-5/24/13)572.00
2037720 07/24/13 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0094923 07/05/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (4/27/13-6/30/13)5,477.50
Page 10 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
17,949.52
9,153.00
354.75
5,634.18
150.00
2037720 07/24/13 03172 JONES & STOKES ASSOCIATES INC 0094923 07/05/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (4/27/13-6/30/13)5,477.50
0094921 07/05/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (5/25/13-6/30/13)2,982.50
0094930 07/05/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (5/25/13-6/30/13)2,395.00
0094863 07/01/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (4/27/13-5/2/13)2,393.27
0094918 07/05/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (4/27/13-6/30/13)2,177.50
0094920 07/05/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (1/1/13-6/30/13)1,938.00
0094917 07/05/13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING (5/25/13-6/30/13)585.75
2037509 07/03/13 14960 KATHLEEN PICKARD TRUST Ref002428990 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000089932 29.62 29.62
2037648 07/17/13 14998 KEVIN ECKHAUS Ref002429300 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000199299 56.55 56.55
2037433 06/26/13 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5365 06/05/13 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 12,628.00 12,628.00
2037585 07/10/13 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5374 06/21/13 PAVING SERVICES 5,533.00
5373 06/21/13 PAVING SERVICES 3,620.00
2037434 06/26/13 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 141075 05/31/13 DELIVERY SERVICES (4/26/13-5/10/13)258.00 258.00
2037721 07/24/13 04996 KNOX ATTORNEY SERVICE INC 4000787 06/30/13 DELIVERY SERVICES (5/31/13-6/21/13)258.00
4004708 07/02/13 DELIVERY SERVICES (6/28/13)32.25
4004707 07/02/13 DELIVERY SERVICES (6/28/13)32.25
4004706 07/02/13 DELIVERY SERVICES (6/28/13)32.25
2037722 07/24/13 14808 KOEPPEN, KEVIN 18190713 07/22/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (7/16/13)143.33 143.33
2037435 06/26/13 12276 KONECRANES INC SDG00796786 05/29/13 CRANE INSPECTIONS (MAY 2013)400.00 400.00
2037436 06/26/13 14036 KRATOS / HBE 18040113 05/31/13 DOOR INTERCOM 2,032.33
180202132 05/31/13 REMOVE/REATTACH SECURITY TO RESERVOIRS 1,745.60
18010213 05/31/13 CIRCUIT BOARDS 1,620.00
SM42428 05/31/13 MOTION DETECTORS 236.25
2037586 07/10/13 14036 KRATOS / HBE SM42570 06/17/13 ALARM MONITORING (JUNE 2013)55.00
SM42569 06/17/13 ALARM MONITORING (JUNE 2013)55.00
SM42566 06/17/13 ALARM MONITORING (JUNE 2013)40.00
2037437 06/26/13 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 271157 06/04/13 LANDFILL 57.56 57.56
2037587 07/10/13 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 271489 06/17/13 LANDFILL 53.60 53.60
2037723 07/24/13 06497 LAKESIDE LAND COMPANY 271189 06/05/13 LANDFILL 30.64 30.64
2037510 07/03/13 14967 LAS PALMAS 56 DEVELOPMENT LLC Ref002428997 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000176820 1,678.02 1,678.02
Page 11 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
251,658.45
11,613.69
491.61
6,556.25
2037438 06/26/13 09511 LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS E04623 05/31/13 FLOATING RESERVOIR COVERS MAINT (MAY 2013)12,154.30 12,154.30
2037588 07/10/13 09511 LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 3 06/17/13 FLOATING COVER REPLACEMENT (ENDING 5/31/13)226,224.45
E04631 06/21/13 FLOATING RESERVOIR COVERS MAINT (6/1/13-6/15/13)25,434.00
2037649 07/17/13 09511 LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 00014361 06/24/13 RETAINAGE RELEASE 32,022.88 32,022.88
2037724 07/24/13 09511 LAYFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS 4 06/24/13 FLOATING COVER REPLACEMENT (ENDING 6/28/13)10,973.99
E60074 06/30/13 MAINT OF FLOATING RES COVERS - ADJ (MAY 2013)639.70
2037439 06/26/13 03607 LEE & RO INC LR15659 06/03/13 INTERCONNECTION (7/28/12-5/31/13)16,716.19 16,716.19
2037511 07/03/13 14982 LEVY ORTIZ Ref002429012 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000199030 37.53 37.53
2037512 07/03/13 14976 LEZAMA FAMILY TRUST Ref002429006 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000195701 207.70 207.70
2037513 07/03/13 14979 LILY ARTENSTEIN Ref002429009 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000198116 116.11 116.11
2037589 07/10/13 12910 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC 0214109IN 06/14/13 SURVEY SUPPLIES 362.03
0214317IN 06/20/13 SURVEY SUPPLIES 129.58
2037514 07/03/13 03019 LOPEZ, JOSE 70100513 06/20/13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (MAY 2013)55.94 55.94
2037440 06/26/13 06954 LUSARDI CONSTRUCTION CO 004371 06/19/13 REFUND 1,500.00 1,500.00
2037515 07/03/13 07591 MA, DONGXING 004370 06/27/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (3/25/13-3/28/13)659.34 659.34
2037725 07/24/13 07591 MA, DONGXING 17470713 07/22/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (7/8/13-7/11/13)60.00 60.00
2037590 07/10/13 01464 MAG SYSTEMS INC 195225532 06/18/13 FLOW TOTALIZER 302.78 302.78
2037441 06/26/13 14950 MAHER D YOUNAN / DALE R YOUNAN 004367 06/21/13 W/O REFUND D0896-090151 617.37 617.37
2037591 07/10/13 10512 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC OWD8278 06/28/13 CONSUMER CONF REPORT 2013 PROCESSING 2,314.20 2,314.20
2037726 07/24/13 10512 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC OWD8343 07/18/13 PROP 218 NOTICE PROCESSING 2,851.00 2,851.00
2037650 07/17/13 14992 MARIA FRANCO Ref002429294 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000155170 54.20 54.20
2037516 07/03/13 14969 MARIETTA SANTOS Ref002428999 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000181767 51.26 51.26
2037517 07/03/13 14962 MARIO GONZALEZ Ref002428992 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000141538 5.30 5.30
2037592 07/10/13 02902 MARSTON & MARSTON INC 201362 06/01/13 DESALINATION OUTREACH (5/1/13-5/30/13))2,182.50 2,182.50
2037727 07/24/13 02902 MARSTON & MARSTON INC 201371 07/01/13 COMMUNITY OUTREACH (JUNE 2013)5,000.00
201372 07/01/13 DESALINATION OUTREACH (6/1/13-6/28/13)1,556.25
2037728 07/24/13 05329 MASTER METER INC 109897 06/27/13 MASTERLINX MOBILE COLLECTOR 17,470.59 17,470.59Page 12 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
624.52
647.56
2037728 07/24/13 05329 MASTER METER INC 109897 06/27/13 MASTERLINX MOBILE COLLECTOR 17,470.59 17,470.59
2037518 07/03/13 14965 MAURICE WRIGHTEN Ref002428995 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000163073 6.26 6.26
2037442 06/26/13 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 52674071 05/29/13 BURLAP BAGS 351.75
52589790 05/28/13 SECURITY COVER 140.46
53132918 06/05/13 STRETCH WRAP 119.42
51127847 05/02/13 PIPE CLAMPS 12.89
2037593 07/10/13 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 53480477 06/11/13 SKIMMINGS DISCHARGE MATERIALS 521.80
54040792 06/20/13 CONDUIT STRAPS 125.76
2037519 07/03/13 14955 MCMILLIN Ref002428984 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000000718 3,382.94 3,382.94
2037520 07/03/13 14973 MICHAEL EDWARD Ref002429003 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000188911 41.38 41.38
2037729 07/24/13 09581 MICHAEL R WELCH PHD PE 71312 06/30/13 PLANNING SERVICES (4/1/13-6/28/13)1,080.00 1,080.00
2037651 07/17/13 14994 MICHELLE SLAPE Ref002429296 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000186800 34.22 34.22
2037443 06/26/13 00103 MILLER PAVING CORP 116541 06/20/13 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING 7,262.00 7,262.00
2037444 06/26/13 01577 MINARIK CORPORATION I1036115DD 05/29/13 PLC MODULES 4,743.36 4,743.36
2037445 06/26/13 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 36389900 05/30/13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 768.38 768.38
2037594 07/10/13 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 36548700 06/11/13 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,682.68 1,682.68
2037446 06/26/13 09227 MOORE INDUSTRIES-INTRNTL INC 588508 05/29/13 PID CONTROLLER 2,135.20 2,135.20
2037730 07/24/13 12016 MTGL INC 47140 06/27/13 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (6/1/13-6/30/13)7,615.00 7,615.00
2037521 07/03/13 14957 NANETTE DALL Ref002428986 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000058091 96.78 96.78
2037731 07/24/13 12908 NARASIMHAN CONSULTING SERVICES 039011 07/01/13 HYDRAULIC MODELING SERVICES (2/23/13-6/30/13)11,353.50 11,353.50
2037522 07/03/13 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIONBen2429099 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,707.61 8,707.61
2037652 07/17/13 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATIONBen2429407 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,707.61 8,707.61
2037732 07/24/13 13690 NEAL ELECTRIC CORP 59033 06/27/13 CONDUIT INSTALLATION 1,268.00 1,268.00
2037523 07/03/13 14968 NERYS USA INC Ref002428998 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000177661 137.20 137.20
2037733 07/24/13 08531 NEWEST CONSTRUCTION 201305 06/28/13 SKIMMINGS INSTALL 3,684.00 3,684.00
2037734 07/24/13 14118 NORTHSTAR COURIER INC 2599 07/19/13 COURIER SERVICE 76.34 76.34
2037447 06/26/13 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 661159541001 06/06/13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.06 4.06
Page 13 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
10,149.84
860.00
3,484.00
2037447 06/26/13 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 661159541001 06/06/13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 4.06 4.06
2037524 07/03/13 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 661158839001 06/10/13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 40.46 40.46
2037735 07/24/13 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 663988764001 07/03/13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 306.10 306.10
2037653 07/17/13 14990 OLGA CHAVEZ Ref002429292 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000071854 180.00 180.00
2037448 06/26/13 03149 ON SITE LASER LLC 47533 06/05/13 PRINTER SERVICES 91.80 91.80
2037736 07/24/13 03149 ON SITE LASER LLC 47747 06/28/13 PRINTER SERVICES 143.80 143.80
2037595 07/10/13 14947 OPTICAL SERVICES COMPANY 8041 06/20/13 MICROSCOPE REPAIR 120.00 120.00
2037449 06/26/13 02334 OTAY LANDFILL - 4531 0000013868 05/31/13 WASTE DISPOSAL 215.99 215.99
2037596 07/10/13 02334 OTAY LANDFILL - 4531 0000013942 06/15/13 WASTE DISPOSAL 313.31 313.31
2037597 07/10/13 01718 OTAY MESA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 004394 04/16/13 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL (JUNE 2013-JUNE 2014)600.00 600.00
2037450 06/26/13 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 160138 06/06/13 INVENTORY 5,832.00
160584 06/06/13 INVENTORY 4,317.84
2037598 07/10/13 14954 PACIFIC TRANS ENVIRONMENTAL 41555 06/20/13 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL 2,054.78 2,054.78
2037451 06/26/13 10419 PARADA PAINTING INC 15841 06/05/13 GRIT CHAMBER COATING 16,832.00 16,832.00
2037452 06/26/13 10419 PARADA PAINTING INC 15842TM 06/05/13 GRIT CHAMBER COATING 510.83 510.83
2037737 07/24/13 14812 PARKWAY SIGNS 13919 06/27/13 SINGER LANE GATE SIGN 194.79 194.79
2037453 06/26/13 05497 PAYPAL INC 24307873 05/31/13 PHONE PAYMENT SERVICES (MAY 2013)54.10 54.10
2037738 07/24/13 05497 PAYPAL INC 24936895 06/30/13 PHONE PAYMENT SERVICES (JUNE 2013)54.10 54.10
2037454 06/26/13 08398 PEERLESS MATERIALS COMPANY 31351 05/29/13 RAGS 388.80 388.80
2037455 06/26/13 03790 PENHALL COMPANY 33563 05/28/13 SAW CUTTING SERVICES 650.00
33562 05/28/13 SAW CUTTING SERVICES 210.00
2037456 06/26/13 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 004362 06/25/13 PETTY CASH 483.13 483.13
2037654 07/17/13 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 071613 07/16/13 PETTY CASH 295.95 295.95
2037457 06/26/13 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 779189 06/03/13 POSTAGE METER RENTAL 207.36 207.36
2037739 07/24/13 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 422848 07/01/13 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (8/1/13-7/31/14)3,178.00
422849 07/01/13 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (8/1/13-7/31/14)306.00
2037740 07/24/13 01715 PORRAS, PEDRO 13210713 07/24/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (7/14/13-7/16/13)481.05 481.05Page 14 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2,012.36
1,917.08
2037740 07/24/13 01715 PORRAS, PEDRO 13210713 07/24/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (7/14/13-7/16/13)481.05 481.05
2037458 06/26/13 03351 POSADA, ROD 004374 06/25/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (9/29/13-10/2/13)952.41 952.41
2037741 07/24/13 03351 POSADA, ROD 17130713 07/18/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (7/8/13-7/17/13)195.33 195.33
2037459 06/26/13 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 35047 05/01/13 JANITORIAL SERVICES (MAY 2013)3,504.00 3,504.00
2037742 07/24/13 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 35448 06/01/13 JANITORIAL SERVICES (JUNE 2013)3,504.00 3,504.00
2037460 06/26/13 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30343870 05/30/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 387.70
30345363 06/06/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 373.30
30343869 05/30/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 213.12
30345362 06/06/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 213.12
30343871 05/30/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 182.50
30345364 06/06/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 182.50
30343242 05/28/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 114.12
30344748 06/04/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 114.12
30345365 06/06/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 72.86
30343872 05/30/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 66.86
30343241 05/28/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 46.08
30344747 06/04/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 46.08
2037599 07/10/13 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30346872 06/13/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 373.26
30348391 06/20/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 371.26
30346871 06/13/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 213.12
30348390 06/20/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 213.12
30346873 06/13/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 182.50
30348392 06/20/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 182.50
30346243 06/11/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 114.12
30347765 06/18/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 114.12
30348393 06/20/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 60.92
30346242 06/11/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 46.08
30347764 06/18/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 46.08
2037655 07/17/13 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30346874 06/13/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 66.86 66.86
2037743 07/24/13 06641 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 30349734 06/27/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 371.26
30349733 06/27/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 213.12
30349735 06/27/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 182.50
Page 15 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
988.00
833.54
92.49
30349273 06/25/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 114.12
30349736 06/27/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 60.92
30349272 06/25/13 UNIFORMS, TOWELS & MATS 46.08
2037461 06/26/13 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2428821 06/20/13 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 150,562.38 150,562.38
2037600 07/10/13 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2429091 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 149,053.00 149,053.00
2037744 07/24/13 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2429399 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 156,463.32 156,463.32
2037601 07/10/13 10294 QWIKPRINTS 131821417 07/01/13 FINGERPRINTING SERVICE (6/19/13)20.00 20.00
2037602 07/10/13 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 31432900 06/12/13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 631.48
31406700 06/14/13 FACE MASK CERTIFICATION 202.06
2037603 07/10/13 00766 RANROY PRINTING COMPANY 018903 06/20/13 POSTCARDS 1,312.20 1,312.20
2037462 06/26/13 00021 RCP BLOCK & BRICK INC 4357515 05/30/13 CONCRETE 1,928.00 1,928.00
2037656 07/17/13 14995 REAL SOLUTION Ref002429297 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000197123 9.44 9.44
2037657 07/17/13 14996 REMAX ASSOCIATES Ref002429298 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000197369 8.93 8.93
2037604 07/10/13 00521 RICK POST WELDING &9492 06/12/13 WELDING & WET TAPPING 2,592.00 2,592.00
2037745 07/24/13 14255 RK CONTROLS INC 0062601 06/27/13 LOGO KIT 180.11 180.11
2037525 07/03/13 04542 ROBAK, MARK 70140613 06/15/13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (3/15/13-6/15/13)91.53
70140313A 03/15/13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT ADJ (1/1/13-3/18/13)0.96
2037526 07/03/13 14825 ROBERT CLARK Ref002428989 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000088644 60.00 60.00
2037527 07/03/13 14971 ROCIO GUERRERO Ref002429001 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000188101 27.79 27.79
2037528 07/03/13 14983 ROXANNE JONES Ref002429013 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000199230 30.80 30.80
2037658 07/17/13 14993 RUSLAN GRUB Ref002429295 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000176815 410.80 410.80
2037463 06/26/13 09148 S & J SUPPLY COMPANY INC S100025436001 06/11/13 INVENTORY 637.20 637.20
2037464 06/26/13 05130 SAFARI MICRO INC 230962 05/28/13 SO DIMM 4GB MEMORY 110.44 110.44
2037529 07/03/13 05130 SAFARI MICRO INC 231416 06/04/13 COMPUTERS 4,136.99 4,136.99
2037465 06/26/13 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 8927 06/04/13 WELDING SERVICES 1,390.00 1,390.00
2037605 07/10/13 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 20122240 06/12/13 ASSESSOR DATA 125.00 125.00
2037606 07/10/13 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH 0000000776 06/18/13 SOCAL WATERSMART (APR 2013)1,444.96 1,444.96
Page 16 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
328.80
54,742.79
151,456.92
69,040.33
2037606 07/10/13 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH 0000000776 06/18/13 SOCAL WATERSMART (APR 2013)1,444.96 1,444.96
2037607 07/10/13 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 376200 06/12/13 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY 164.40
374784 06/04/13 BID ADVERTISEMENT 164.40
2037466 06/26/13 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 004364 06/19/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)38,533.48
004363 06/05/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)16,209.31
2037608 07/10/13 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 004389 07/03/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)56,565.25
004382 06/25/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)52,297.78
004383 06/26/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)41,758.74
004381 06/24/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)746.34
004388 06/27/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)88.81
2037659 07/17/13 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC C1230713 07/08/13 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)22,391.70 22,391.70
2037467 06/26/13 12080 SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, THE 0010752104 06/07/13 NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY 646.80 646.80
2037530 07/03/13 14956 SAUL CONTRERAS Ref002428985 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000014913 180.43 180.43
2037468 06/26/13 12333 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION8103451554 05/01/13 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (MAY 2013)416.00 416.00
2037746 07/24/13 12333 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION8103473357 06/01/13 MONTHLY ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2013)416.00 416.00
2037531 07/03/13 14980 SDNY LLC Ref002429010 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000198132 129.69 129.69
2037747 07/24/13 15000 SEGURA, ADOLFO 17460713 07/18/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (7/16/13-7/17/13)165.16 165.16
2037748 07/24/13 12904 SEPULVEDA CONSTRUCTION INC 00013791 07/10/13 RETAINAGE RELEASE 64,544.05
15A 07/10/13 30 INCH POTABLE PIPELINE (ENDING 6/30/13)4,496.28
2037609 07/10/13 14785 SEW-EURODRIVE INC 862541 05/29/13 FILTER GEAR REDUCERS 7,774.29 7,774.29
2037610 07/10/13 00419 SHAPE PRODUCTS 162889 06/17/13 DITRIBUTION SUPPLIES 1,205.72 1,205.72
2037469 06/26/13 14949 SHARON BALLARD COX / CLAY COX 004370 06/21/13 W/O REFUND D0895-090150 617.37 617.37
2037470 06/26/13 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 901260649 06/01/13 ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCER 646.92 646.92
2037611 07/10/13 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 901286773 06/22/13 BIOXIDE FOR P/S 1,442.64 1,442.64
2037660 07/17/13 11516 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 900760235 06/01/12 PROCESSING TANK 120.00 120.00
2037749 07/24/13 13327 SILVA-SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1307 06/10/13 PROJECT CONSULTANT (JUNE 2013)4,000.00 4,000.00
2037750 07/24/13 14984 SOLARWINDS INC IN127011 06/27/13 NETWORK MAINTENANCE (6/27/13-6/27/14)10,000.00 10,000.00
2037471 06/26/13 14953 SOUTH BAY DISTRIBUTION LLC 004366 06/21/13 W/O REFUND D0685-060022 8,151.13 8,151.13
Page 17 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
1,273.00
1,273.00
319.92
602,176.16
1,752.50
2037471 06/26/13 14953 SOUTH BAY DISTRIBUTION LLC 004366 06/21/13 W/O REFUND D0685-060022 8,151.13 8,151.13
2037472 06/26/13 11618 SOUTH COAST COPY SYSTEMS AR129185 05/31/13 COPIER MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2013)1,682.59 1,682.59
2037532 07/03/13 11618 SOUTH COAST COPY SYSTEMS AR124576 03/19/13 STAPLES FOR COPIER 132.84 132.84
2037751 07/24/13 11618 SOUTH COAST COPY SYSTEMS AR130877 06/30/13 COPIER MAINTENANCE 1,682.59 1,682.59
2037612 07/10/13 02963 SOUTH COUNTY ECONOMIC 109713 06/12/13 MEMBERSHIP DUES (FY 2014)750.00 750.00
2037473 06/26/13 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C51146 05/21/13 AC MAINTENANCE (MAY 2013)1,068.00
C51147 05/21/13 AC MAINTENANCE (MAY 2013)205.00
2037752 07/24/13 03103 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C51390 06/14/13 AC MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2013)1,068.00
C51391 06/14/13 AC MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2013)205.00
2037474 06/26/13 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 951955 06/03/13 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/1/13-6/28/13)79.98
951483 05/31/13 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (5/31/13-6/27/13)79.98
951482 05/31/13 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (5/31/13-6/27/13)79.98
951481 05/31/13 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (5/31/13-6/27/13)79.98
2037613 07/10/13 03760 SPANKY'S PORTABLE SERVICES INC 952729 06/12/13 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/12/13-7/9/13)79.98 79.98
2037475 06/26/13 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK PD12130053810001 06/10/13 PROPERTY DEDUCTIBLE 500.00 500.00
2037533 07/03/13 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 43639 05/21/13 PROPERTY & LIABILITY PROGRAM (ANNUAL)545,537.16
43882 06/06/13 WORKERS' COMPENSATION (JULY-SEPT 2013)56,639.00
2037614 07/10/13 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 44252 07/01/13 PROPERTY/LIABILITY COVERAGE (2012-13)13.23 13.23
2037615 07/10/13 03484 SPECIALTY DOORS & AUTOMATION 39322SD 06/13/13 GATE REPAIR 258.89 258.89
2037616 07/10/13 01717 SPRING VALLEY CHAMBER OF 10440713 07/01/13 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL (2013-2014)550.00 550.00
2037753 07/24/13 02354 STANDARD ELECTRONICS 18573 06/07/13 SECURITY MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2013)1,352.50
18680 06/28/13 RELAY MODULE 400.00
2037534 07/03/13 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429105 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 919.03 919.03
2037661 07/17/13 06281 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429413 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 919.03 919.03
2037535 07/03/13 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429097 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2037662 07/17/13 06299 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429405 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 237.69 237.69
2037536 07/03/13 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429103 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 831.23 831.23
2037663 07/17/13 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429411 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 831.23 831.23
Page 18 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
809.30
322.11
338.04
2037663 07/17/13 06303 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429411 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 831.23 831.23
2037537 07/03/13 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429109 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 258.00 258.00
2037664 07/17/13 08533 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT Ben2429417 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 258.00 258.00
2037617 07/10/13 03738 STEVEN ENTERPRISES INC 0302630IN 06/12/13 INK CARTRIDGES 1,085.05 1,085.05
2037665 07/17/13 14999 STONE POINT - SWEETWATER HOA 23115 06/28/13 LANDSCAPE PROGRAM 11,685.00 11,685.00
2037618 07/10/13 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 92244 06/24/13 LEGAL SERVICES (MAY 2013)28,994.80 28,994.80
2037476 06/26/13 12223 SUNBELT RENTALS INC 40257113001 06/07/13 GENSET RENTAL 1,885.67 1,885.67
2037477 06/26/13 02750 SUPERIOR READY MIX LP 571168 06/06/13 CRUSHED ROCK 646.53
570116 06/03/13 CRUSHED ROCK 162.77
2037619 07/10/13 02750 SUPERIOR READY MIX LP 573021 06/17/13 CRUSHED ROCK 83.01 83.01
2037478 06/26/13 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2460 05/31/13 SCADA PROGRAMMING 11,587.00 11,587.00
2037620 07/10/13 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2464 06/20/13 SCADA PROGRAMMING 4,200.00 4,200.00
2037754 07/24/13 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2463 06/21/13 SCADA PROGRAMMING 12,320.00 12,320.00
2037538 07/03/13 08159 TORRES, LEONEL 17571112 07/01/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (11/8/12)127.87
17571212 07/01/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (12/5/12)113.44
17570513 07/01/13 TRAVEL EXPENSES (5/14/13)80.80
2037539 07/03/13 14543 TRACOM INC 17064 05/22/13 HIDDEN MOUNTAIN ENCLOSURE 28,099.00 28,099.00
2037666 07/17/13 14991 TRACY MARTINEZ Ref002429293 07/11/13 UB Refund Cst #0000126450 70.88 70.88
2037621 07/10/13 03261 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 04590619 06/11/13 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 5,762.81 5,762.81
2037667 07/17/13 03261 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 04590143 06/12/13 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 121,850.76 121,850.76
2037479 06/26/13 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 520130475 06/01/13 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MAY 2013)319.50 319.50
2037755 07/24/13 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 620130471 07/01/13 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (JUNE 2013)360.00 360.00
2037480 06/26/13 14181 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA)111714176001 06/10/13 CONCRETE 178.20 178.20
2037622 07/10/13 14181 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA)111788716001 06/12/13 CONCRETE 178.20
112027851001 06/21/13 CONCRETE 159.84
2037756 07/24/13 14181 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA)112327450001 07/03/13 CONCRETE 159.84 159.84
2037540 07/03/13 00335 UNITED STATES POSTMASTER 4429 07/01/13 POSTAGE FOR PROP 218 NOTICES 15,209.72 15,209.72
Page 19 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
41,878.16
5,157.57
68,638.08
461.45
2037540 07/03/13 00335 UNITED STATES POSTMASTER 4429 07/01/13 POSTAGE FOR PROP 218 NOTICES 15,209.72 15,209.72
2037668 07/17/13 00335 UNITED STATES POSTMASTER 4429 07/01/13 POSTAGE FOR PROP 218 NOTICES 12,260.07 12,260.07
2037669 07/17/13 07662 UNITEDHEALTHCARE SPECIALTY 1229 07/17/13 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (AUG 2013)5,617.56 5,617.56
2037481 06/26/13 07674 US BANK O0000000031 05/22/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)41,371.73
E000035 05/22/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)290.00
E000036 05/22/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)216.43
2037541 07/03/13 07674 US BANK 004385 05/22/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)52.40 52.40
2037623 07/10/13 07674 US BANK E000037 06/24/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)3,284.73
004393 06/24/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)1,469.37
E000038 06/24/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)403.47
2037670 07/17/13 07674 US BANK O00000032 06/24/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)55,936.72
A000045 06/24/13 CAL-CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)9,286.67
004390 05/22/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)2,375.77
004391 06/24/13 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)1,038.92
2037542 07/03/13 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 150138 05/31/13 SECURITY SERVICES (MAY 2013)263.65
113265 04/30/13 SECURITY SERVICES (APR 2013)197.80
2037482 06/26/13 11606 USA BLUE BOOK 976231 06/04/13 DIGITAL DISPLAYS 993.44 993.44
2037624 07/10/13 11606 USA BLUE BOOK 982879 06/11/13 SKIMMINGS DISCHARGE MATERIALS 61.80 61.80
2037483 06/26/13 13048 V & A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 14099 05/31/13 CORROSION SERVICES (5/1/13-5/31/13)14,751.50 14,751.50
2037757 07/24/13 13048 V & A CONSULTING ENGINEERS 14167R2 06/28/13 CORROSION SERVICES (6/1/13-6/28/13)30,000.02 30,000.02
2037484 06/26/13 03190 VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO INC 90221111 05/29/13 HACH PARTS 4,358.47 4,358.47
2037485 06/26/13 08028 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTSD100135 05/31/13 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (5/1/13-5/31/13)13,575.00 13,575.00
2037758 07/24/13 08028 VALLEY CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENTSD100136 06/30/13 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (6/1/13-6/30/13)7,900.00 7,900.00
2037543 07/03/13 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2429089 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,536.76 12,536.76
2037671 07/17/13 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2429397 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,532.19 12,532.19
2037544 07/03/13 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2429095 07/03/13 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 2,403.28 2,403.28
2037672 07/17/13 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2429403 07/18/13 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 2,203.28 2,203.28
2037625 07/10/13 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 9706954177 06/21/13 WIRELESS SERVICES (5/22/13-6/21/13)5,995.12 5,995.12
Page 20 of 21
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/20/2013 - 7/24/2013
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
365.00
535.00
1,356.75
56,845.49
2037626 07/10/13 01994 VORTEX 18523 06/19/13 FILTER DISPOSAL 80.00 80.00
2037627 07/10/13 03781 WATTON, MARK 17910613 07/02/13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (JUNE 2013)163.29 163.29
2037486 06/26/13 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 82508 05/28/13 BEE REMOVAL 250.00
82767 06/07/13 PEST CONTROL 115.00
2037628 07/10/13 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 82981 06/18/13 PEST CONTROL 995.00 995.00
2037673 07/17/13 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 82811 06/05/13 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
82810 06/05/13 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
82808 06/06/13 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
82716 06/04/13 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
83123 06/21/13 BEE REMOVAL 75.00
2037629 07/10/13 07780 WEBER SCIENTIFIC 602471 06/17/13 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 325.40 325.40
2037487 06/26/13 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC W19159 05/31/13 DUSTO INSPECTIONS 400.00 400.00
2037630 07/10/13 00125 WESTERN PUMP INC W19872 06/14/13 ANNUAL MONITORING 956.75
W20144 06/19/13 DUSTO INSPECTIONS 400.00
2037545 07/03/13 14961 WILLIAM MARTIN Ref002428991 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000127381 181.33 181.33
2037546 07/03/13 14958 WILLIAM PENETRANTE Ref002428987 06/26/13 UB Refund Cst #0000067120 157.44 157.44
2037631 07/10/13 03283 WILSON BOHANNAN PADLOCK CO 0100559IN 06/24/13 AIR-VAC LOCKS 1,853.72 1,853.72
2037632 07/10/13 14857 YSI INCORPORATED 529135 06/24/13 TSS METERS 49,959.53
Check Grand Total:4,095,224.80
528191 06/14/13 INF TSS METER 6,885.96
Page 21 of 21