HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-07-15 Board Packet 1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY
January 7, 2015
3:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETINGS OF OCTO-
BER 1, 2014 AND SPECIAL MEETING OF DECEMBER 5, 2014
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
a) APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF A SCREENINGS COMPACTOR FROM
ENVIRO-CARE FOR THE DISTRICT’S RALPH W. CHAPMAN WATER
RECLAMATION FACILITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $69,451.56
b) APPROVE THE RE-CERTIFICATION OF THE FIVE-YEAR UPDATE OF
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT’S SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL WASTE
DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS
c) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CORA CONSTRUCTORS,
INC. FOR THE RALPH W. CHAPMAN WATER RECLAMATION FACIL-
2
ITY (RWCWRF) RETURN ACTIVATED SLUDGE (RAS) PUMPS RE-
PLACEMENT PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED
$315,315.00
d) AWARD A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT TO
R. F. YEAGER ENGINEERING, LLC FOR AS-NEEDED CORROSION
ENGINEERING AND RESERVOIR COATING INSPECTION SERVICES
FOR CALENDAR YEARS 2015 AND 2016 (ENDING DECEMBER 31,
2016) IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $175,000
e) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO TC CONSTRUCTION CO.,
INC. FOR THE SR 11/125/905 CONNECTOR RAMPS BLOW OFF RE-
LOCATION PROJECT
f) IMPOSE A $1,000 FINE FOR METER TAMPERING AT 1785 TRESEDER
CIRCLE IN EL CAJON
g) APPROVE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN DI-
EGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE OTAY WATER DIS-
TRICT FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SOUTH
BAY BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT; INCREASE THE CIP BUDGET
FOR P2539 BY $525,000 (INCREASE THE OVERALL CIP BUDGET
FROM $375,000 TO $900,000)
h) ADOPT THE 2015 OTAY WATER DISTRICT LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
GUIDELINES
i) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4246 SUPPORTING THE PADRE DAM MU-
NICIPAL WATER DISTRICT’S ADVANCED WATER PURIFICATION
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
ACTION ITEMS
7. GENERAL MANAGER
a) CONSIDER CASTING VOTES FOR A REGULAR DISTRICT MEMBER
AND AN ALTERNATE DISTRICT MEMBER ON LAFCO’S COMMISSION
IN THE LAFCO SPECIAL DISTRICT’S ELECTIONS (WATTON)
8. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION OF THE 2015 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
9. THE FOLLOWING ITEM IS PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMA-
TIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING
AGENDA ITEM:
3
a) FIRST QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PRO-
GRAM REPORT (MARTIN)
REPORTS
10. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
a) SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
11. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
12. PRESIDENT’S REPORT/REQUESTS
13. ADJOURNMENT
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the
District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered
at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website.
Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District
Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at (619) 670-2280 at least
24 hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on January 2, 2015, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near
the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time be-
ing at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Gov-
ernment Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on January 2, 2015.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
1
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
October 1, 2014
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:38 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Croucher, Gonzalez (arrived at 3:48 p.m.), Lopez and
Thompson
Directors Absent: Robak (out-of-town)
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, General Counsel Daniel
Shinoff, Asst. GM German Alvarez, Chief of Engineering
Rod Posada, Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem, Chief
of Information Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief of
Operations Pedro Porras, Asst. Chief of Administration and
Information Technology Adolfo Segura, Asst. Chief of
Operations Jose Martinez, District Secretary Susan Cruz
and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
President Lopez indicated that he would like to move item 7a, ADOPT
RESOLUTION NO. 4243 SUPPORTING THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO’S
NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM PERMIT AS
PART OF A LONG-RANGE REGIONAL WATER REUSE PLAN WITH THE
GOAL OF REALIZING A SECONDARY EQUIVALENT POINT LOMA
WASTEWATER TREATMENT, to be presented prior to the consent calendar.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, and seconded by Director Thompson
and carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Directors Gonzalez and Robak
to approve the agenda.
5. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETINGS OF JULY 2,
2014
2
A motion was made by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Directors Gonzalez and Robak
to approve the minutes of the regular board meetings of July 2, 2014.
6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
ACTION ITEMS
7. ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
a) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4243 SUPPORTING THE CITY OF SAN
DIEGO’S NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
PERMIT AS PART OF A LONG-RANGE REGIONAL WATER REUSE
PLAN WITH THE GOAL OF REALIZING A SECONDARY EQUIVALENT
POINT LOMA WASTEWATER TREATMENT
Mr. Scott Tulloch of Atkins Global and a consultant to the Metro Wastewater Joint
Powers Authority (Metro JPA), indicated that the Metro JPA is requesting the
support of each of its members for the permit application that will be brought
before the San Diego City Council later in the month. The City staff will be
making a recommendation on the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant
(PLWTP) and would like the Metro JPA to support those recommendations.
He provided some background information on the Metro JPA and indicated that
the twelve (12) member agencies (Metro JPA; see attached presentation for list
of members) make up 35% of the flow and cost of the SD Metro Wastewater
system with Otay WD being one of the member agencies. He presented a slide
showing the San Diego Metro Sewer System which consists of the PLWTP (240
MGD), North City Water Reclamation Plant (30MGD), South Bay Water
Reclamation Plant (15 MGD), Metro Biosolids Center, Point Loma Ocean Outfall,
South Bay Ocean Outfall and the Metro Wastewater Pump Stations/Pipelines.
He indicated that the PLWTP is the backbone of the sewer system and is a
chemically enhanced advanced primary treatment plant. The plant has a 4.5
mile long ocean outfall line (310 feet in depth) that provides superior dispersion
with a high degree of dilution. He stated the plant has been in operation for a
long time and there has been extensive ocean monitoring and no negative
3
impacts have been identified to marine organisms surrounding the outfall. The
plant operates with a modified 301(h) permit or waiver from secondary standards
that has been renewed every five (5) years. The current permit expires on July
31, 2015.
Mr. Tulloch indicated that the PLWTP is the last major advanced primary
treatment plant in the U.S. The plant has received a great deal of scrutiny
because it is not a secondary treatment plant and it has been legally challenged
in the past by the environmental community. There is political pressure and the
regulatory agencies are also not supportive of the plant staying at the advanced
primary treatment level. He stated that it is difficult for the City to plan for its
ratepayers and infrastructure when it is unclear if the plant will receive a renewal
of its permit.
He stated though the PLWTP has been able to demonstrate that it does not
impact the environment, there is still pressure to spend $2.1 billion to convert the
plant to a secondary treatment plant. He indicated that the City of San Diego is
proposing a solution that makes more sense economically for the region. The
PLWTP is a 240 MGD plant and it is proposed that 100 MGD be diverted to
potable reuse plants, which would bring down the treatment at the PLWTP to 140
MGD. By reducing the amount of wastewater treated at the plant, the mass
emissions (solids that are sent to the ocean) would be the same as if the City
spent the $2.1 billion to convert the plant to secondary treatment. This region will
also get an additional source of water; 83 MGD of Indirect Potable Reuse (IPR).
In 2012 the City of San Diego prepared a Recycled Water Study and the study
proposed that the City look at a 20-year program to build 83 MGD of IPR. He
noted that the proposal spoke of IPR as opposed to Direct Potable Reuse (DPR)
as the State was not advanced enough for DPR at the time the study was written.
He stated that though the study discussed IPR it does not preclude the City from
switching over to DPR when the program is actually executed. If the City
produces IPR, the intent is to place the water into the San Vicente and Otay
Water reservoirs. He indicated that this would significantly reduce planned
wastewater flows to the PLWTP and would be the basis for identifying the
PLWTP as secondary equivalent. He explained that this combination is what the
City is calling “Pure Water San Diego.”
He stated in order to protect the region’s ratepayers, this concept of “Pure Water
San Diego” must be codified in the Clean Water Act. The City is proposing that
the Ocean Pollution Reduction Act (OPRA) be amended with this concept and
title it OPRA II. By amending the Act, it would allow the City to go forward in the
future as an Advanced Primary Treatment Plant and it would not need to request
a modified permit when the permit is renewed. The City would be able to submit
a normal permit application every five (5) years.
The proposed enforceable provisions under the modified permit are:
4
The PLWTP would remain an Advanced Primary Treatment Plant
The TSS would be capped at 12,000 metric tons/year starting December
31, 2015 (currently it is capped at 13,500 metric tons/year). The plant
currently releases into the ocean about 6,500 metric tons/year.
Prepare Pure Water environmental documents
Complete the design for at least the first 15 MGD of potable reuse
The goal of the Pure Water Program is to build three (3) plants and by the end of
20 years (December 31, 2035), the region would have 83 MGD of potable reuse
water supply through diverting flow from the PLWTP. As the City builds facilities,
the agreement is to reduce the mass emissions cap. As flow is diverted from the
PLWTP, the cap will decrease until the TSS cap is at 9,942 metric tons/year,
which is secondary equivalency. Mr. Tulloch indicated that these are just goals
and there is no financial commitment. The City is just communicating their plan
to the EPA and Congress, so that when the legislation is brought forward next
year they are aware of what the goals are of the Pure Water Program.
The Metro Commission is meeting on October 16 to consider a resolution
supporting the Point Loma permit application. He noted that the Otay WD’s staff
has been assisting in moving this project forward for the last year and half and
the last item is to get the Federal legislation approved.
Director Croucher inquired with the failure of the “Toilet to Tap” project some
years ago, what protests/criticisms the city is hearing with regard to potable
reuse. Mr. Tulloch indicated that the city of San Diego has been working to
educate the public. He indicated that this is a well-developed technology and it is
utilized all over the world. It has a lot of safeguards and today, public acceptance
of potable reuse is 75%.
General Manager Watton indicated that Otay WD’s customer surveys show that
same level of support from its customers. There are cities that are already doing
potable reuse and, now that it is already being done, it is easier to introduce to
the public now.
Director Thompson inquired if there was a concept yet determined on how the
costs would be allocated. Mr. Tulloch indicated that the JPA members have
been working on a number of alternative ways of looking at how costs can be
allocated. He indicated that if there are any new primary, secondary facilities that
needs to be built, it would be associated with wastewater cost. Anything beyond
tertiary, the cost would be associated with water. On the water side, you are
looking at an alternative to buying water or producing your own water.
Director Croucher indicated that the cost sharing should be worked out ahead of
time. He stated that a lesson can be learned from the South Bay Water
Reclamation Plant issues. He commented that working out an equitable
agreement ahead of time is key to the success of the Pure Water Program.
Director Croucher indicated that he was appreciative that Mr. Tulloch is still
5
involved in the water industry as he brings a lot of knowledge, expertise and
historical value to this project.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Directors Robak
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
8. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
Director Thompson pulled item 6e, APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
EXISTING CONTRACT WITH AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. FOR THE
DESIGN OF THE OTAY MESA DESALINATION CONVEYANCE AND
DISINFECTION SYSTEM PROJECT DECREASING THE CONTRACT BY
$364,774 RESULTING IN A LOWER CONTRACT AMOUNT WITH AECOM OF
AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $3,681,932, for discussion.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Directors Robak
to the following consent calendar items:
a) APPROVE AMENDMENTS TO THE DISTRICT’S PURCHASING
MANUAL SECTION 12, DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS PROPERTY, IN
ORDER TO STREAMLINE AND EXPEDITE THE DISPOSAL PROCESS,
PROVIDE CLARITY TO INTENT, AND TO ALIGN DISPOSAL
PROCEDURES WITH DISTRICT POLICY
b) APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH OLYMPUS &
ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE 944-1, 944-2 & 458-2 RESERVOIR
INTERIOR/EXTERIOR COATINGS AND UPGRADES PROJECT IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $1,206,008
6
c) APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH RAP ENGINEERING,
INC. FOR THE 870-1 RESERVOIR ACCESS ROAD PAVING PROJECT
IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $207,362.02
d) APPROVE UTILITY AGREEMENT NO. 33622 WITH CALTRANS FOR
ROUTES 11/125/905 CONNECTOR RAMPS BLOW OFF RELOCATION
PROJECT
President Lopez presented item 6e for discussion:
e) APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT WITH
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE
OTAY MESA DESALINATION CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM PROJECT DECREASING THE CONTRACT BY $364,774
RESULTING IN A LOWER CONTRACT AMOUNT WITH AECOM OF AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $3,681,932
Director Thompson indicted that he understands that staff is amending the scope
of work for the EIR and removing the construction services portion of the
contract. He stated that the decrease in the contract of $364,774 is for
construction services and inquired if this was part of the original budget. He also
inquired with regard to the State Department’s requirement to comply with the
regulations of the Council for Environmental Quality, which states that there can’t
be any suggestion of financial interest in the construction of the project by the
firm that is completing the project’s environmental work, if the District has had
both services under one contract in the past and if this is advisable.
Environmental Compliance Specialist Coburn-Boyd indicated that the decrease
in the contract cost ($364,774) is specifically for design services for the
construction of the project. Ms. Coburn-Boyd indicated that the State
Department is very strict with their conflict of interest requirements and the State
Department Attorney’s opinion was that it would be most efficient for the District
to remove the services so there would be no question at all of conflict. If the
District did not remove the services, the Attorney for the State Department
indicated that she would need to consult with the Attorney for the Council of
Environmental Quality which would delay the District’s EIR and EIS. Because of
this, staff is recommending that the District amend AECOM’s contract as
suggested by the State Department’s Attorney. Director Thompson indicated
that he was supportive of staffs’ recommendation and just felt it was worth noting
the State Department’s opinion on the possible conflict with AECOM performing
the EIR/EIS and the design services. Ms. Coburn-Boyd indicated that the District
does have agreements where a separate consultant is performing the
environmental work and contracts where it includes both the design contract and
environmental work. She stated it depends if the design consultant has the
environmental expertise. It was discussed that there has not been an instance,
locally, of an EIR/EIS being challenged because the contractor was also
performing the design work, but it could have occurred in another part of the
Country.
7
A motion was made by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Directors Robak
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
ACTION ITEMS
9. ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
b) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH PIPELINE
INSPECTION & CONDITION ANALYSIS CORPORATION FOR
INSPECTION AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF THE RALPH W.
CHAPMAN WATER RECYCLING FACILITY 14-INCH FORCE MAIN IN
AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $302,092
Senior Civil Engineer Jeff Marchioro indicated that staff is requesting the board’s
authorization to execute an agreement with Pipeline Inspection & Condition
Analysis Corporation (PICA) for the inspection and condition assessment of the
Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF) 14-inch Force Main in
an amount not-to-exceed $302,092. The District owns and operates the 14-inch
Force Main, which is approximately three (3) miles long, and the main has been
in service for 34 years. This is about half its 75 year life expectancy.
He stated that staff would like to gain a better understanding of the condition of
the main and its actual remaining life expectancy for a few reasons:
District staff had recently repaired two (2) leaks, on an emergency basis,
in the upper portions of the steel force main. It was found that the backfill
was improperly placed causing corrosion on the outside which worked its
way to the inside of the pipe. On either side of the repair, the pipe
appeared to be in good shape.
Approximately 5 years ago, the District replaced all air-vac and in-line
valves and the replaced valves were found to be severely corroded.
The consequence of failure is high. The entire force main traverses an
environmental preserve which drains to the Sweetwater Reservoir.
Please reference the Committee Action notes (Attachment A) attached to staffs’
report for the details of Mr. Marchioro’s report.
Director Gonzalez noted that the Engineering, Operations and Water Resources
Committee reviewed this item and it was discussed that the large price difference
8
between the companies is due to technology that only PICA could provide. PICA
was the only respondent that could provide an assessment of the remaining life
of the pipe based on the remaining wall thickness of the steel pipe. Director
Croucher noted that this is an area where the District must be extremely cautious
with the environment as it is a riparian area and the area drains into the
Sweetwater Reservoir. He stated that moving forward with the inspection is an
absolute must for the District.
General Manager Watton indicated that the water business is changing and
technology is vastly improving. In the past, the remaining thickness of a pipe
could not be determined and so it was more cost effective to just replace the
entire pipeline. With new technology, the remaining thickness of the pipe can be
determined throughout the full length of the pipe which then helps identify where
repairs need to be made. The life expectancy of a pipe is generally 75 years, but
now it can possibly last another 75 years with this new technology. This is also
true with the sewer pipelines and the new CCTV technology. With CCTV
technology, dips and sags in the sewer pipe can be determined which identifies
which areas of the pipe need repairs. This provides savings as it avoids the
replacement of the entire pipeline.
In response to an inquiry from Director Thompson, staff indicated that PICA’s
SeeSnake technology is superior to the SmartBall technology as it can detect the
thickness of the pipe every 1/4 inch of the line. It can also pinpoint defects within
an hour accuracy and within two (2) inches along the length of the pipe.
It was discussed that due to the high chlorine content of recycled water, there is
concern that the life expectancy of the force main pipeline may be shortened.
Staff has noticed corrosion at some air-vac sites and the pipeline is getting old,
so staff wishes to inspect the line to assure there are no weak/corroded points
needing repair/replacement. The thickness of the metal of the pipeline will
indicate whether it requires repairs.
A motion was made by Director Gonzalez, seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: Directors Robak
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
10. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION OF THE 2014 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
There were no changes to the board meeting calendar.
9
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
11. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE
FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS:
a) ANNUAL DIRECTOR’S EXPENSE REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2014
Director Thompson commented that he had done some research on the web and
found that the Otay WD’s board expenses are 40% of the cost of other agencies
of comparable size. Director Croucher also noted that in 2001 the Otay WD’s
board expenses was over $100,000 and that cost has been reduced by nearly
75%.
b) FISCAL YEAR-END 2014 STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE PLAN REPORT
Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens indicated that this item was
reviewed in detail with the committees and that he would be presenting a quick
review of the 2014 year-end performance. Please reference the Committee
Action notes (Attachment A) attached to staffs’ report for the details of Mr.
Steven’s report.
Director Croucher indicated that the committee had suggested that staff not
change the deliverables too much so that when they are measured from year-to-
year, they are true measures from the baseline to date. He stated that if
measures require changing in order to get the information we need, that it is fine,
but not to change measures just to change them.
REPORTS
12. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
General Manager Watton presented information from his report that included
information on small, minority and disadvantaged business outreach; the
employee recognition luncheon; implementation of the new MOU; August water
use; and the Rosarito Beach Desalination Project. He indicated that the rate
increase notices (approximately 55,000) have all been mailed to customers. The
District has received about six (6) calls to date regarding the notices. All the
callers, with the exception of one, inquired how much the increase would be for
them and the one caller complained about the amount of the sewer increase.
General Manager Watton indicated that there are handouts for the board on the
dias. The handouts are from the County Water Authority (CWA) and they
provide an update on water supply and drought management, the Carlsbad
Desalination Project, and CWA’s preliminary 2015 water supply outlook. He
noted on page four (4) of the 2015 water supply handout, slide number seven (7),
10
shows scenarios if MWD implemented allocations. Should MWD implement
allocations next year, he explained that there is no need for a city to tell MWD
that they are invoking their preferential rights as MWD will fulfill any water
requests that are within a particular city’s preferential rights. San Diego’s
consumption is currently under its preferential rights (San Diego has cut its water
use by 30%) and if MWD implements allocations, the CWA may choose to buy
more water from MWD as the allocations are based on past water use.
He noted that he had an opportunity to visit the Carlsbad Desalination Project
and that it was very impressive. He stated the contractor is doing a great job and
the project is ahead of schedule at 65% completion. The plant is expected to go
online in the fourth quarter of 2015. The original schedule was in the first quarter
of 2016.
In response to an inquiry from Director Croucher, General Manager Watton
confirmed that the sewer complaint was from a District customer and was not a
sewer customer of the City of Chula Vista. He noted that if the District does
receive a call from a City of Chula Vista customer, the District directs those calls
to the City.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
Director Croucher indicated a key issue occurring at the CWA impacting Otay
WD is the slate of officers. He stated Mark Weston was elected Chair, Mark Muir
was elected Vice-Chair and Jim Madaffer was elected Secretary. The slate of
officers is positive for the District as our agencies have similar interests. General
Manager Watton added that the District has been working to oppose CWA’s
current proposed fiscal sustainability study on rate structures and it is felt under
the new slate of officers, the District will get a more open look at the fiscal
sustainability study/rate structures. This will be very positive for the District.
Director Croucher stated he represented CWA and Otay WD before the
Legislative Advocates in Sacramento. CWA will be presenting next month a
recommendation of which advocates they would like to use. The Carlsbad
Desalination Project is ahead of schedule which is good news for the region as
the drought continues. The region has been putting a lot of effort in conservation
as well and CWA wishes to assure that the conservation message is hitting all
groups in our region; all ethnicity, children to the elderly, etc.
He indicated that the Water Conservation Garden will be holding their Fund
Raising Gala on October 18 and asked that the District support the event and
encourage others to support the event. In response to an inquiry from Director
Thompson, Director Croucher indicated that though there is more participation in
the rebate programs, it is not expected that the funding for the programs will run
out. The focus is to encourage conservation and they will continue to fund the
programs. He indicated that he had two flyers which lists all the commercial and
11
residential rebate programs and that he would provide District Secretary Susan
Cruz copies that can be shared with the board.
He also shared that the water bond is getting positive support throughout the
State. In San Diego it’s getting about 50% support from the voters and 60% to
70% throughout the State.
He noted that Mr. Vincent Mudd stepped down from the CWA board and Ms. Yen
Tu has been appointed to his seat on MWD’s board. CWA’s representatives to
MWD are now Ms. Fern Steiner, Mr. Mike Hogan and Mr. Keith Lewinger.
13. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
Director Croucher shared that he attended the YMCA Branding Event and it was
very well attended.
Direct Thompson inquired about the potable water sales and purchases
presented in the financials of the General Manager’s Report; why they did not
track more closely. He stated that the financials show that the District is
$146,458 ahead of the budget on sales (revenue) and $400,100 more expensive
on purchases (expense). Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that the
District bills throughout the month for water that is used by customers for the last
30 days, so there is a timing issue with the accrual of water sales. He indicated
that he had asked staff to review the report and see if there is a way to report the
numbers so they track more closely.
14. PRESIDENT’S REPORT
President Lopez reported on meetings he attended during the month of October
2014 (a list of meetings he attended is attached).
15. CLOSED SESSION
The board recessed to closed session at 5:15 p.m. to discuss the following
matter:
a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9]
1 CASE
16. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
The board reconvened from closed session at 5:30 p.m. and General Counsel
Dan Shinoff indicated that the board met in closed session and took no
reportable actions.
12
17. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned
the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
13
President’s Report
October 1, 2014 Board Meeting
A) Meetings attended during the Month of September 2014:
1) September 3: Attended the District’s Regular Board Meeting.
2) September 10: Committee Agenda Briefing. Met with General
Manager Watton and Asst. General Manager Alvarez to review
items that will be presented at the September committee
meetings.
3) September 11: Attended a meeting of the Metro Commission
(see attached agenda)
4) September 16: Attended the District’s Finance,
Administration and Communications Committee. Reviewed,
discussed, and made recommendation on items that will be
presented at the October board meeting.
5) September 18: Attended the South County Economic
Development Council’s 10th Annual Elected Officials
Reception. Attendees: Directors Gonzalez and Thompson and
Communication Officer Buelna.
6) September 24: Attended the District’s Employee Recognition
Luncheon.
7) September 26: Board Agenda Briefing. Met with General
Manager Watton and General Counsel Dan Shinoff to review
items that will be presented at the October Board Meeting.
1
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT and OTAY SERVICE CORPORATION
December 5, 2014
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:42 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, Asst. General Manager
German Alvarez, Attorney Richard Romero, Chief Financial
Officer Joe Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod Posada,
Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief of
Water Operations Pedro Porras, Asst. Chief of Information
Technology and Administrative Services Adolfo Segura,
Asst. Chief of Water Operations Jose Martinez and District
Secretary Susan Cruz and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. OATH OF OFFICE CEREMONY
District Secretary Susan Cruz administered the oath of office to re-elected
Director Gary Croucher, and newly elected director, Timothy Smith. Director
Croucher was re-elected to Division 2 and Director Smith was elected to Division
1 in the November 2014 elections.
5. PRESENTATION OF RECOGNITION PLAQUE TO BOARD PRESIDENT
Treasurer Thompson presented a recognition plaque on behalf of the Board of
Directors and staff to Board President Lopez to thank him for his excellence in
public service and outstanding leadership as president of the Otay Water
District’s board of Directors during the past year. The plaque noted that Director
Lopez served as president of the Otay WD board of directors in 2002, 2003,
2006, 2012, 2013 and 2014.
Director Thompson indicated that he wished to thank President Lopez for his
service not only on behalf of the board of directors, but also on the behalf of the
employees and the public. He stated that the past year has been a great year for
the District and his leadership is very much appreciated. Director Lopez thanked
Director Thompson and indicated that when he took the role as President, he did
not see it as a position of leadership, but as a facilitator. He stated that in his
long career in public service (fire department, city schools, and at UCSD), he
2
found himself in similar roles and it is a role he cherishes. He shared that he
strives to do the best he can to serve the public and it all comes to fruition when
he receives this kind of recognition.
6. RECESS FOR RECEPTION
The board recessed at 3:42 p.m. for a reception to congratulate Directors Croucher and
Smith for their election to the Otay WD board of directors.
7. RECONVENE OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING
The board reconvened at 4:05 p.m.
8. ELECTION OF BOARD PRESIDENT
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to re-elect Director Lopez as President.
9. ELECTION OF VICE PRESIDENT
A motion was made by Director Lopez, seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to elect Director Thompson as Vice President.
10. ELECTION OF BOARD TREASURER
A motion was made by Director Lopez, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
3
to elect Director Robak as Treasurer.
11. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Thompson, seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the agenda.
12. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
13. RECESS OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING AND CONVENE A
MEETING OF THE OTAY SERVICE CORPORATION
The Otay Water District board meeting was recessed at 4:09 p.m. and a meeting
of the Otay Service Corporation board was convened.
14. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
15. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: PRESIDENT, VICE-PRESIDENT AND
TREASURER
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to elect Director Lopez as President, Director Thompson as Vice President,
Director Robak as Treasurer.
4
16. APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER AND SECRETARY
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Lopez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to appoint General Manager Watton as Executive Director, Joe Beachem as
Chief Financial Officer and District Secretary Susan Cruz as Secretary.
17. ADJOURN OTAY SERVICE CORPORATION BOARD MEETING AND
CONVENE THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD
MEETING
President Lopez adjourned the Otay Service Corporation board meeting at
4:10p.m. and convened the Otay Water District Financing Authority board
meeting.
18. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
19. RE-AFFIRM OFFICERS OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT FINANCING
AUTHORITY
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Thompson and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to elect Director Lopez as President, Director Thompson as Vice-President,
General Manager Watton as Executive Director, Chief Financial Officer Joe
Beachem as Treasurer/Auditor, and District Secretary Susan Cruz as Secretary.
20. ADJOURN OTAY DISTRICT FINANCING AUTHORITY BOARD MEETING AND
CONVENE THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT BOARD MEETING
President Lopez adjourned the Otay District Financing Authority board meeting at
4:12 p.m. and reconvened the Otay Water District board meeting.
5
21. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned
the meeting at 4:13 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Gary Stalker,
Water Systems Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. 3
APPROVED BY:
Pedro Porras, Chief Water Operations
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF A SCREENINGS COMPACTOR FOR THE
DISTRICT’S TREATMENT PLANT.
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
To approve the purchase of a screenings compactor from Enviro-Care
in the amount of $69,451.56.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment “A.”
PURPOSE:
To provide redundancy to the existing screenings compactor at
the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF).
ANALYSIS:
Prior to installing a screenings compactor at the Headworks of the
RWCWRF, the District sent the screening solids (rags, debris,
etc.)removed from the rotating bar screens to the Spring Valley
Sanitation District (SVSD), including about 23 million gallons per
year of wastewater. In June, 2013, a screenings compactor was
installed at the plant which compacts the solids from the bar
screens, dewatering them in the process, and dumping them into a
dumpster to be hauled off to a local landfill. Three standard
size dumpsters are filled and sent to the Otay Landfill each week
at a cost of $2,300/year. The District saves approvimately
$138,000 per year for the reduced wastewater flow and solids sent
to the City of San Diego for disposal. In addition, approximately
23 million gallons of wastewater previously sent to the SVSD with
the solids is now treated and added to the recycled water supply.
When the screenings compactor was initially installed, the back-
up plan, if it failed, was to send the solids to the SVSD again.
Hoewever, in order for the compactor to dewater the solids
properly, a design change was made removing the option of sending
the solids to the SVSD. It was then that money was added to the
CIP budget for a second compactor to be installed as a back-up.
Use of the two compactors will be rotated so both are used for a
similar amount of time.
The existing screenings compactor is a Flow Wash Press Model FWP2.
Therefore, in order to ensure the new compactor works with the
existing screenings conveyer, staff’s preference is to purchase a
second Flow Wash Press Model FWP2. However, to make sure their bid
is competitive, staff obtained quotes from three manufacturers for
compactors with screenings handling capacities similar to the
existing model.
The three quotes obtained for a screenings compactor, not including
sales tax, were:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL AMOUNT
1. Enviro-Care, $64,307
Rockford, IL
2. Vulcan Industries, Inc., $71,724
Walnut Creek, CA
3. Parkson Corporation, $81,110
Vernon Hills. IL
Enviro-Care submitted the low bid, as it did when the existing
compactor was purchased. The existing compactor has met our
expectations and has been reliable. We have had no maintenance
problems with it in the 6 months that it has been in service.
Staff is recommending the approval of this purchase to Enviro-
Care in the amount of $69,451.56, which includes $64,307.00 for
the compactor and $5,144.56 for sales tax.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP R2107, as approved in the FY 2015
budget, is $85,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding
commitments and forecast including this contract, is estimated
to be $83,500.
The project manager has determined that the remaining budget is
sufficient to complete the CIP.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available
from the Replacement Fund for CIP R2107.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This purchase supports the Business Processes Strategy to
“Maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of important business
processes”.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
General Manager
Attachment “A”, Committee Action
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: Purchase of a Screenings Compactor
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on December 9, 2014, and the following
comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board approve the purchase of a
screenings compactor from Enviro-Care in the amount of
$69,451.56.
The purpose of the purchase is to provide redundancy to the
existing screening compactor at the Ralph W. Chapman Water
Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF).
Staff stated that in June 2013, a screenings compactor was
installed at the RWCWRF which compacts the solids from the bar
screens, dewatering them in the process, which are then hauled
off to a local landfill.
It was noted that the District saves approximately $138,000
annually for the reduced wastewater flow and solids sent to the
city of San Diego for disposal. Approximately 23 million gallons
of wastewater previously sent to the Spring Valley Sanitation
District (SVSD) with the solids is now treated and added to the
Otay Water District’s recycled water supply.
In order for the compactor to properly dewater solids, a design
change was made removing the option of sending solids to the
SVSD. Funds were added to the District’s CIP budget for a second
compactor to be installed as a back-up. Use of both compactors
will be rotated so both are used for a similar amount of time.
Staff discussed the bid process, which is detailed on Page 2 of
the staff report. Staff determined that Enviro-Care submitted
the low bid of $64,307, as it did when the existing compactor was
purchased.
Staff noted that the existing compactor has met the District’s
expectations and has been reliable. There are no maintenance
problems with it in the six (6) months that it has been in
service.
Staff stated that a back-up screening compactor will save time
and money for the District. If the primary compactor was down
and there was no back-up, District staff would need to manually
remove solids and monitor the process twenty-four hours a day,
seven days a week to ensure there wasn’t an over-flow in the
Sweetwater Watershed.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that the
screening compactor and installation fee will cost approximately
$75,000. Training is not needed since staff were already trained
when the first screening compactor was installed. It was noted
that there is $85,000 in the CIP budget to cover this cost.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that the
sewer bills from the city of San Diego is based on the strength
of the sewage it receives from the District. This fee has
increased over the years and therefore staff is recommending that
the Board approve the purchase of a second screening compactor to
help decrease the solids going to the City.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
Environmental Compliance
Specialist
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT/
SUBPROJECT: S1210-
025000
DIV. NO.
3,5
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary
Sewer Systems – Re-certification of the Five Year Update of
the Otay Water District’s Sewer System Management Plan
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District’s (District) Board of Director’s approve
the re-certification of the five (5) year update of the District’s
Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP). See Exhibit A for a map of the
District’s existing sewer system.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
The California State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2006-
003-DWQ, Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary
Sewer Systems requires a 5-year update and re-certification of the
SSMP developed for the District under the Order.
ANALYSIS:
On May 2, 2006, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
issued Order No. 2006-003, the Statewide General Waste Discharge
Requirements (WDRs) for sanitary sewer systems. These WDRs are the
regulatory mechanism for all agencies that own or operate sanitary
sewer collection systems greater than one-mile in length that collect
and/or convey untreated or partially treated wastewater to a
publicly-owned treatment facility. The ultimate goal of the WDRs is
to reduce the frequency and volume of sanitary sewer overflows (SSO)
by requiring Districts, sewer agencies, cities, and other entities to
properly operate, maintain, and manage their wastewater collection
system.
According to the WDRs, each agency must develop and implement a
system-specific SSMP. The District’s SSMP was finalized in 2009 and
approved by the Board on July 1, 2009. The WDRs also require bi-
annual audits of the SSMP to ensure that it is kept up to date as
well as a formal update of the SSMP every five years. The most
recent audit was completed in August and the SSMP has been updated.
The most significant update is the inclusion of the 2013 update of
the Monitoring and Reporting Program and the revision of the
District’s SSO response plan to include this updated information.
Staff recommends that the Board approve the 2014 update of the
District’s SSMP and direct staff to re-certify the SSMP with the
State as required by the referenced WDRs. The updated SSMP is
included as Attachment B.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
LCB/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP S1210 (SSMP & WWMP)\Subproject 025000 - SSMP\Staff Reports\SSMP 01-07-15\BD 01-07-2015_SSMP Update Staff Report.docx
Attachments: Exhibit A – OWD Sewer System Map
Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – 2014 SSMP Update
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S1210-025000
Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements for Sanitary
Sewer Systems – Re-certification of the Five Year Update of
the Otay Water District’s Sewer System Management Plan
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 9, 2014, and the
following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the board approve the re-certification of
the five (5) year update of the District’s Sewer System
Management Plan (SSMP).
Staff indicated that in May of 2006, the State Water Resources
Control Board issued Order No. 3, the Statewide General Waste
Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for sanitary sewer systems. The
WDRs are the regulatory tool that applies to all agencies that
own or operate sanitary sewer collection systems greater than
one-mile in length that collect and/or convey untreated or
partially treated wastewater to a publicly owned treatment
facility.
The ultimate goal of the WDRs is to reduce the frequency and
volume of sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs) by requiring districts,
sewer agencies, cities, and other entities to properly operate,
maintain and manage their wastewater collection system.
Staff noted that the WDRs require that each agency develop and
implement a system specific SSMP. The District’s SSMP was
finalized and certified by the Board in 2009.
The WDR require bi-annual audits of the SSMP and a formal update
every five years. The most recent audit of the SSMP was
completed in August 2014 and the plan was updated after the
completion of the audit.
Staff stated that the most significant update is the inclusion of
the State Water Resources Control Board 2014 update of the
Monitoring and Reporting Program and the revision of the
District’s SSO response plan to include this updated information.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
the District’s reclamation facility is producing about one third
of the total reclaimed water. If the reclamation facility were
to expand, it could produce approximately 2.6 MGD. The Committee
inquired if that was the amount of sewage available to treat.
Staff said no because the basin is too small and not quickly
growing due to water conservation. In 2007, the basin produced
approximately 2 MG of wastewater a day and is now producing
approximately 1.7 MGD.
The Committee commented that the city of San Diego plans to
establish its Pure Water Program in the South Bay area, which can
impact the District’s recycled water program. Staff stated that
they are aware of the City’s program and has met with City staff
to discuss their plan. It is indicated in the city of San
Diego’s Recycled Water Study that it would reserve/provide
recycled water to the District in addition to the City’s Pure
Water Program. District staff is unsure of what the City’s
intentions are with the program and recycled water and will
continue to monitor this situation.
The Committee inquired if District staff is working on trying to
establish a new form of agreement with the city of San Diego to
tie into the City’s expansion and Pure Water Program. Staff
stated yes and as the city of San Diego is planning to establish
their Pure Water Program, District staff is researching the South
Bay’s ability to absorb pure water and is also looking into what
the City’s demands would be. In the South Bay area, the city of
Imperial Beach has already stated that it does not want
additional outflow through its sewer system; however, the city of
San Diego’s plant will need some expansion for their overall
program. This leaves District staff to believe that recycled
water will be available. As the city of San Diego goes through
the environmental impact report process, District staff will get
a better idea of the program and then negotiate a new form of
agreement with the city of San Diego.
The Committee inquired if it was possible for the District to
increase its recycled water supply. Staff indicated that the
County of San Diego is one alternative to increasing the
District’s recycled water supply. The County is researching the
possibility of developing a reclamation plant in the South Bay
area and is looking for customers to purchase the recycled water
it will be producing. Other agencies, such as the Padre Dam
Municipal Water District and the city of Chula Vista are also
looking into other alternatives for recycled water to avoid
paying for the city of San Diego’s Pure Water Program. The IBWC
plant in the South Bay is also a potential source of recycled
water for the District.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff indicated
that the County is looking for a feasible basin in the Spring
Valley area where I-54 and I-125 meet. The Committee also
inquired if the District has had any sewer spills; staff stated
no.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN (SSMP)
for the
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 91978-2004
www.otaywater.gov
July 1, 2009
Revised April, 2013
Updated September, 2014
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Stephen Beppler
Senior Civil Engineer
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: R2111-
001103
DIV. NO.: 5
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to Cora Constructors, Inc. for
the RWCWRF RAS Pumps Replacement Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a construction contract to Cora Constructors, Inc. (Cora
Constructors) and to authorize the General Manager to execute an
agreement with Cora Constructors for the Ralph W. Chapman Water
Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF) Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Pumps
Replacement Project in an amount not-to-exceed $315,315.00 (see
Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
construction contract with Cora Constructors for the RWCWRF RAS Pumps
Replacement Project in an amount not-to-exceed $315,315.00.
2
ANALYSIS:
The upgrade of the RWCWRF in 2012, to improve nitrogen removal of the
plant, did not thoroughly consider the potential range of operation
for the return and waste sludge pumps. Plant personnel have found
that optimal operating of the biological process and the wasting of
sludge exceeds the capacity of the current RAS pumps and piping
system. District staff reviewed the system operations and determined
that new larger pumps, combined with a portion of new parallel
piping, would provide the flows desired. The Project was designed
in-house by District staff and as-needed electrical consultant.
The Project consists of removal and replacement of the existing 5
(five) horsepower (HP) RAS pumps with upgraded 20 HP units,
construction of new pressure piping, removal and replacement of
variable frequency drives and electrical circuit breakers with
upgraded equipment, new wiring and conduits, and new pressure
monitoring equipment.
The Project was advertised on October 13, 2014 on the District’s
website and several other publications including the San Diego Daily
Transcript. A non-mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting was held on October 30,
2014, which was attended by six (6) contractors, subcontractors, and
suppliers. One (1) addendum was sent out to all bidders and plan
houses to address questions and clarifications to the contract
documents during the bidding period. Bids were publicly opened on
November 13, 2014, with the following results:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID AMOUNT
1 Cora Constructors, Inc.
Palm Desert, CA $315,315.00
2 Ahrens Mechanical
San Diego, CA $364,000.00
3 MMC, Inc.
La Palma, CA $479,000.00
The Engineer’s Estimate is $350,000.00.
Staff reviewed the bids submitted for conformance with the contract
requirements and determined that Cora Constructors was the lowest
responsive and responsible bidder. Cora Constructors holds a Class A
Contractor’s License, which meets the contract document’s
requirements, and is valid through March 31, 2015. The reference
checks indicated an excellent performance record on similar projects.
An internet background search of the company was performed and
revealed no outstanding issues with this company. Cora Constructors
has not previously worked for the District.
3
District staff received a bid protest from the second low bidder,
Ahrens Mechanical (Exhibit B), claiming that Cora Constructors’ bid
was unresponsive. Their bid protest claimed two specific items:
failure to visit the site for purpose of this Project prior to
submitting bid and failure to submit Written System Certification per
Section 17000, Paragraph 1.04. District staff and general counsel
analyzed the protest and determined that the protest was not valid.
The District’s response to the bid protest is provided as Exhibit C.
Staff verified that the bid bond provided by Cora Constructors is
valid. Staff will also verify that Cora Constructors’ Performance
Bond and Labor and Materials Bond are valid prior to execution of the
contract.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP R2111, as approved in the FY 2015 budget, is
$650,000.00. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, are $469,276.99. See Attachment B for the budget detail
for CIP R2111.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget is sufficient to support the Project.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the
Replacement Fund for CIP R2111.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
SB:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP R2111 RWCWRF - RAS Pump Replacement\Staff Reports\BD 01-07-15, Staff Report, RWCWRF RAS
Pumps, Award Construction To Cora (SB-BK-RP).Docx
4
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Bid Protest from Ahrens Mechanical
Exhibit C – District Response to Bid Protest
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2111-001103 Award of a Construction Contract to Cora Constructors, Inc.
for the RWCWRF RAS Pumps Replacement Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 9, 2014, and the
following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board award a construction contract to
Cora Constructors, Inc. (Cora Constructors) and to authorize the
General Manager to execute an agreement with Cora Constructors
for the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF)
Return Activated Sludge (RAS) Pumps Replacement Project in an
amount not-to-exceed $315,315.00.
It was discussed that the upgrade of the RWCWRF in FY 2012 to
improve the nitrogen removal did not thoroughly consider the
potential range of operation for the RAS pumps that handle both
return and waste sludge. Staff indicated that the optimal return
sludge rates for operating the biological process plus the
wasting of sludge exceeds the capacity of the current system.
District staff determined that new larger pumps combined with
piping improvement would provide the flows desired. This project
was designed in-house by District staff and the District’s as-
needed electrical consultant.
This project consists of removal and replacement of existing 5
horsepower (HP) RAS pumps with 20 HP units and replacement
variable frequency drives, new circuit breakers, wiring,
conduits, new pressure piping and pressure monitoring equipment.
Staff discussed the bid process and indicated that three (3) bids
were submitted to the District. Details of the bids are provided
on Page 2 of the staff report.
Staff reviewed the submitted bids for conformance with the
contract requirements and determined that Cora Constructors was
the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
The District has not previously worked with Cora Constructors,
but their references are excellent and the company is readily
available to provide the services required.
It was noted that District staff received a bid protest (Exhibit
B) from the second low bidder, Ahrens Mechanical, claiming that
Cora Constructors’ bid was unresponsive. District staff and
General Counsel analyzed the protest and determined that the
protest was not valid. A response to Ahrens Mechanical’s protest
is attached (Exhibit C) to the staff report.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
the Project was advertised on the District’s website and several
other publications including the San Diego Daily Transcript.
Approximately twenty (20) firms showed interest in the Project,
but only three (3) firms submitted bids. It was indicated that
District staff does reach out to contractors when projects become
available, but many of them indicate that they are not readily
available to accept projects.
The Committee inquired if Ahrens Mechanical was satisfied with
the District’s response to their protest. Staff stated that they
believe the company is satisfied with the District’s response as
the District has not heard back from them.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2111-001103 Award of a Construction Contract to Cora Constructors, Inc.
for the RWCWRF RAS Pumps Replacement Project
5Project
- Level Title1 Committed Expenditures Outstanding
Commitment
Projected Final
Cost
Vendor
Design Consultant
Contracts
$12,339.62 $12,339.62 $0.00 $12,339.62 BSE ENGINEERING
INC
Service
Contracts
$1,946.60 $1,366.60 $580.00 $1,946.60 MAYER
REPROGRAPHICS
INC
$122.10 $122.10 $0.00 $122.10 SAN DIEGO DAILY
TRANSCRIPT
Standard
Salaries
$19,553.67 $19,553.67 $0.00 $19,553.67
Total $33,961.99 $33,381.99 $580.00 $33,961.99
Construction Consultant
Contracts
$20,000.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 ALYSON
CONSULTING
Construction
Contract
$315,315.00 $0.00 $315,315.00 $315,315.00 CORA
CONSTRUCTORS
INC
Standard
Salaries
$100,000.00 $75,565.09 $24,434.91 $100,000.00
Total $435,315.00 $75,565.09 $359,749.91 $435,315.00
Budget $650,000.00
Total to Date $469,276.99 $108,947.08 $360,329.91 $469,276.99
8/27/2014
OTAY WATER DISTRICTRWCWRF RAS PUMPS REPLACEMENTLOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT A
CIP R2111F
P:\WORKING\CIP R2111 RWCWRF RAS Pump Replacement\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\Exhibit A - Staff Report
CHARING
CROSS
BONITA
W HIP P LETREE
LN
ETO
N
GR
EENS
C
T.
RD.
CALL
E
LOS
AR
B
O
LE
S
RD.
VIA
VIA
DR.
DELRIORD.
VIA
JULIE
LN.
DORSIE
LN.
VIACARLOTTA
VIAISABEL
VIANICOLE
AVENID A M A RCELLA
VIA
VIA ELENA
VIA
VIA
ST.
CUYAMACACOLL.DRIVEW.
CHARWOODCT.
PASEOSEQUIEROS
1 2BLUEOAKCT.
RD.
DR.
RD
CALLE LOS ARBOLES
4
R
D.
5
HO B B L E LN.
BAR
BIT
RD.
RD.
WAGONWHE EL DRIVE
WAGON
WHEELCT
DR.
DR.
RD.
1. GOLDEN OAK WAY2. ALANWOOD CT3. ANAWOOD CT4. ELM TREE CT5. ALWOOD CT
LN.
JUAN
FU
RY
LA
N
E
BUGGYWHIP
BLVD
CAMPO
C
A
M
P
O
CAMPO
V ERD E
PASEO
OROZCO
CALLE
TEZAC
PASEO
PASEO
ZUNIGA
PASEO
TAMAYO
VIA LIN DA
VISTA
CALLE
PALMA
CALLE
CAL
LE
CALLE LABEATA
CALLE
FREDERICO
COACH
TRACE
CIR
AVENIDATHOMAS
ESCUDA VIAESCUDA
HANSOM LN
SIN GER
AVENIDACATHERINA
AVENIDA
ROBERTA
AVO
CADO
VILLAGE CT
PIC
A
N
T
E
AVENIDA
JOHANNA
AVENIDA
AVENIDA
JOHANNA
RAPATEE
VIA F E LICIA
AV
E
NID
A
AVENIDA
BRABHAM
CHELSEA PARK
JAMACHA
3
VIA MICA
HWY.94
BENJAMIN
ANGELICA
H A CIE N DA
A
P
OLINA
RI
A
C
A
SILIN
A
C
U
Y
A
MACACOLL.DRIVEE.
VIA ANNA
CASTANADA
DO
UBL
ET
R
E
E
FURY LANE
TRACE RD.
HANSOMLN.
VIA DIANA
VIA
H
A
CIENDA
VIA R A N C H O
VIA DEL SOL
VIA MERIDA
VIA MER
CA
DO
FURY
LANE
VIAJA C Q UELINA
VISTA DEL SUR
VIA TIMOTEO
SINGLETREELN.
FURY LN.
LORRAINE ANNCARPENTER LN.
AVOCADO SCHOOL RD.
PASEO
SALAMON ER
WIE GHO RST W AY
CHIPWOODCT.
JA M A C H A RD.
FURY LANE
CAMPO
R
D
H
W
Y
94
LALANIDR
ELMTREECT.
GOLDENOAKWY.
A N A WOODWY.ALANWO O D CT.
RANCHWOOD DR.
ALWOODCT.
SR-94/CAMPO RD
JA M ACH A BLVD
F
U
R
Y L
N
SR-94/CAMPO RD
J A M A C H A R D
!\
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
?ò
Aä%&s
?p
?Ë
F
0 1,000500
Feet
PROJECT SITE
Ahrens Mechanical
5959 Mission Gorge Road, Ste #204
San Diego, CA 92120
Ph: 619.487.9036, Fx: 619.487.9195, Cell: 619.840.2734
AhrensMechanical@gmail.com
Certified DVBE and SB - State of California #1544620
Certified SDVOSB - Department of Veteran Affairs
Certified SLBE City of San Diego - #12AM0557
CSLB #957287 / A, B, C4, C10, C16, C20, C34, C36 and C46
14 November 2014
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
Attention:Steve Beppler
Steve.Beppler@otaywater.gov
Ph: 619.670.2009
Subject :RAS Pumps Replacement
RW Chapman Water Reclamation Facility
Reference :Possible issues with Cora Constructors’ bid
The Otay Water District received bids for RAS Pumps Replacement on 13 November 2014. The
preliminary bid results are
Cora Constructors $ 315,315.00
Ahrens Mechanical $ 364,000.00
MMC $ 479,000.00
Ahrens Mechanical believes Cora Constructions bid is non-responsive for two reasons.
1. Failure to visit the site for purpose of this project prior to submitting bid.
2. Failure to submit Written System Certification per Section 10700 para 1.04
1. The third paragraph of the Invitation to Bid is as follows. Similar language appears in the
Advertisement to Bid.
A prebid meeting will be held at 10:00 A.M. on OCTOBER 30, 2014 at the Otay
Water District (District), 2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard, Spring Valley,
California 91978-2004. A site visit will be conducted by the District
immediately following the meeting. Prospective bidders, contractors, and
subcontractors are highly encouraged but not required to attend the prebid
meeting. Note that prospective bidders are required to visit the site and that
access to the facility is restricted.
Since access to the site is restricted, the only way to visit the site was to attend the pre-bid
meeting. Attached is the signed attendance for the pre-bid visit. Notice that Cora Constructors
did not attend the site visit and therefore Cora Constructors’ bid should be declared un-
responsive.
SECTION 00030
INVITATION TO BID
OCTOBER 2014
RWCWRF RAS PUMPS REPLACEMENT Invitation To Bid
CIP R2111 00030 – Page 1 of 3
Sealed bids addressed to the Board of Directors, Otay Water District, will be received at the
office of the Otay Water District, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard, Spring Valley, California
91978-2004, until 4:00 P.M., local time, on Thursday, NOVEMBER 13, 2014 and at that time
bids will be publicly opened and read for performing the work indicated below. The date and
time of the bid opening, RWCWRF RAS PUMPS REPLACEMENT, and bidder’s name must be
identified on the bid envelope. Unsealed bids and bids submitted by telephone, telegraph, fax,
or e-mail will not be considered regardless of reason. Similarly, late bids will not be considered
regardless of postmark or reason. Late bids will be returned to the bidder unopened.
Bids are invited for the work consisting of performing all operations and furnishing of all labor,
materials, tools, and equipment necessary for the general scope of work. The Work generally
consists of removal and replacement of return activated sludge pumps with upgraded
equipment; construction of new pressure piping; removal and replacement of variable
frequency drives and electrical circuit breakers with upgraded equipment; new pressure
monitoring equipment; new wiring and conduits; and appurtenant and associated Work
in accordance with the Contract Documents.
A prebid meeting will be held at 10:00 A.M. on OCTOBER 30, 2014 at the Otay Water District
(District), 2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard, Spring Valley, California 91978-2004. A site
visit will be conducted by the District immediately following the meeting. Prospective
bidders, contractors, and subcontractors are highly encouraged but not required to attend the
prebid meeting. Note that prospective bidders are required to visit the site and that access to the
facility is restricted.
The contractor shall be licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division 3, of
the Business and Professions Code.
Additionally, the District reminds all contractors and subcontractors of the adoption of SB 854
and encourages all contractors and subcontractors to ensure that they are familiar with and
comply with the recently enacted requirements. Such requirements include, but are not limited
to, the requirement that contractors and subcontractors register with the Department of
Industrial Relations, State of California (DIR), pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5, beginning
July 1, 2014.
Beginning on March 1, 2015, in compliance with SB 854, the District will require all contractors
and subcontractors to be registered with the DIR prior to submitting a bid on any District project.
Bids from contractors or subcontractors that are not currently registered as required will be
deemed nonresponsive. Further, beginning on April 1, 2015, the District will not award a
contract to and no contractor or subcontractor will be allowed to work on a District project unless
they are registered with the DIR pursuant to Labor Code section 1725.5. Please consult with
your respective counsel for further information.
This project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR.
Otay Water District is using Mayer Reprographics for the storage and retrieval of plans and
specifications for this project. Contract documents, including plans and specifications, may be
accessed via its web site, www.mayer.com or via phone, 619-295-4112. The project information
can be found by clicking the Current Projects Bidding icon on their website. In this folder, find
and click on the project name. The Contract Documents can be ordered by filling out and faxing
ADVERTISEMENT TO BID
Sealed bids addressed to the Board of Directors,Otay Water District (District),will be
received for the RWCWRF RAS PUMPS REPLACEMENT (CIP R2111)at the office of
the District,2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard,Spring Valley,California 91978-2004,
until 4:00 PM local time,on November 13,2014,and at that time bids will be publicly
opened and read.
The general scope of work includes construction of:
Removal and replacement of return activated sludge pumps with upgraded equipment,
construction of new pressure piping,removal and replacement of variable frequency
drives and electrical circuit breakers with upgraded equipment,new pressure monitoring
equipment,new wiring and conduits,and appurtenant and associated work in
accordance with the Contract Documents.
A Pre-Bid Meeting will be held at 10:00 AM on October 30,2014 at the Otay Water
District,followed immediately by a visit to the project site.Prospective bidders,
contractors,and subcontractors are highly encouraged,but not required,to attend the
Pre-Bid Meeting.Note that prospective bidders are required to visit the site and that
access to the facility is restricted.The engineer's estimate is $350,000.
The District is using Mayer Reprographics (Mayer)for distribution of Contract
Documents,including plans and specifications.Electronic copies may be downloaded
without fee through http://www.mayer.com.Hard copies may be obtained for a fee
through any Mayer office or by calling Mayer at (619)295-4112.The amount paid for
hard copies is not refundable.Technical questions regarding the Contract Documents
should be referred to the District's Project Manager,Stephen Beppler,at (619)670-
2209.
Dated this 13th day of October,2014.
Rod Posada,P.E.,PLS,CCM
Chief,Engineering
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
P:\WORKING\CIP R2111 RWCWRF -RAS Pump Replacement\Design\Bid Phase\Advertisement to Bid -RAS Pumps -Oct 2014.docx
10/16/2014 iSqFt 77738 Flora Road Palm Desert CA 92211 Jessica Pool 800-364-2059 8665708187 sandiego@isqft.com
10/16/2014 Otay Water District 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd Spring Valley CA 91978 Stephen Beppler 619-670-2209 6196708920
steve.beppler@otaywater.
gov
10/16/2014 MISCOwater 27101 Burbank Suite B Foothill Ranch CA 92610 tom roberson 949-458-5555 9494585500
troberson@miscowater.
com
10/16/2014 NEWest Construction Co., Inc.9235 Trade Place, Ste. A San Diego, CA CA 92126 Brian Jennette 858-537-0774 8585379653 bjennette@newestco.com
10/16/2014 AGC Plan Room 6212 Ferris Sq San Diego CA 92121 Lisa 858-874-8560 858-874-8569 lisa@agcsd.org
10/16/2014 Evans Hydro, Inc 18128 S santa Fe Ave
Rancho
Dominguez CA 90221 Kim Dixon 310-608-5801 310-608-6936 kdixon@evans-hydro.com
10/17/2014 SCW Contracting Corp.2525 N. Old Hwy 395 Fallbrook CA 92028 Peter Kogler 7607281308 7607282517
pkogler@scwcompanies.
com
10/17/2014 Cortech Engineering 22785 Savi Ranch Parkway Yorba Linda CA 92887 Joey Ennis 714-779-0911 7146931715 jennis@cortecheng.com
10/20/2014 Schuler Engineering 564 Bateman Circle Corona CA 92880 Kevin 951-738-9215 951-738-0162
bids@schulerengineering.
com
10/20/2014 Gierlich-Mitchell 10533 Progress Way #A Cypress CA 90630 Ron Winters 714-236-6070 7142366080 info@gierlich-mitchell.com
10/20/2014 Sloan Electromechanical 3520 Main Street San Diego CA 92113 Mark Bowers 619-239-5174 619-239-8410
mbowers@sloanelectric.
com
10/21/2014 MMC,Inc.5901 fresca dr.la palma CA 90623 jay mehta 714-521-2022 714-521-2440 jay@aboutmmc.com
10/21/2014 MMC,Inc.5901 fresca dr.la palma CA 90623 jay mehta 714-521-2022 714-521-2440 jay@aboutmmc.com
10/21/2014 Califonia Pipe Fabricators 7277 Chevron Way Dixon CA 95620 Jeanne Smith 707-678-3069 7076786513 jeannes@calpipefab.com
10/21/2014 Flo-Systems, Inc.3010 Floyd Street Burbank CA 91504 Cindy Turner 818-562-5282 8188423217 sales@flo-systems.net
10/22/2014 Control Systems Engineering, Inc PO Box 128 Murrieta CA 92564 Eric Blom (951)696-3689 (888)398-2734
eric@controlsystemseng.
com
10/22/2014 Bid America 41085 Elm Street Murrieta CA 92562 Tom Davis 9512903648 9516000615 planroom@bidamerica.com
10/23/2014 Flygt Pump - Xylem 11161 Harrel St Mira Loma CA 91752 Alan Dahlqvist 951-553-1493 951-332-3679
alan.dahlqvist@xyleminc.
com
10/23/2014 AGC Plan Room 6212 Ferris Sq San Diego CA 92121 Lisa 858-874-8560 858-874-8569 lisa@agcsd.org
10/24/2014 Sloan Electromechanical 3520 Main Street San Diego CA 92113 Jerry Gray
619-515-9691
x311 6192395086 jgray@sloanelectric.com
10/24/2014 Ahrens Mechanical 5959 Mission Gorge Rd #204 San Diego CA 92120 Gregory Ahrens 619-487-9036 6194879195
ahrensmechanical@gmail.
com
10/27/2014 Flo-Systems, Inc.3010 Floyd Street Burbank CA 91504 Cindy Turner 818-562-5282 8188423217 sales@flo-systems.net
10/28/2014 California Comfort Systems USA 7740 Kenamar Ct San Diego CA 92121 Paul Needham 619-392-9551 8585641101 pneedham@calcsusa.com
10/28/2014 Telliard construction 740 Amiford dr San Diego CA 92107 Chris 619-778-1083 6193346586 ctelliard5@gmail.com
10/29/2014 Performance Mechanical 401 West 5th. Street Holtville CA 92250 Ted Sweet 760-356-4815 760-356-4187 ted@pmc-us.com
10/29/2014 Telliard Const.740 AmifoDr.San Diego CA 92107 David Telliard Sr.619-224-4725 619-224-0159 dtelliard@cox.net
10/30/2014 Arrieta Construction 1215 N. Marshall Avenue El Cajon CA 92021 Buzz 619-448-7683 619-448-1287 buzz@arrietaconst.com
10/31/2014 Superior Storage Tanks 14700 Industry Circle LaMirada CA 90638 Terri Stock 7142261914 7147394425 terri@superior-tanks.com
11/3/2014 Bid America 41085 Elm Street Murrieta CA 92562 Tom Davis 9512903648 9516000615 planroom@bidamerica.com
11/4/2014 pacific winds building 19 hammond #504 irvine CA 92618 tim loser 949-916-8317 949-916-8267 timloser@pacwinds.com
11/4/2014 pacific winds building 19 hammond #504 irvine CA 92618 tim loser 949-916-8317 949-916-8267 timloser@pacwinds.com
11/6/2014 Alyson Consulting 9968 Hibert Street San Diego CA 92131 Melissa Kessler 6193339735 111-111-1111
melissa@alysonconsulting.
com
11/6/2014 Industrial Power & Automation 31805 temecula pkwy temecula CA 92592 pat acomb 951-764-7107 none
ipa.automation@yahoo.
com
11/6/2014 IPA 31805 temecula pkwy temecula CA 92592 pat acomb 951-764-7107 none
ipa.automation@yahoo.
com
11/6/2014 Industrial Power & Automation 31805 temecula pkwy temecula CA 92592 pat acomb 951-764-7107 none
ipa.automation@yahoo.
com
11/11/2014 CMD 30 Technology Pkwy South Norcross GA 30092 Mary Mathis 770-209-3816 6786800624
mmathis@reedbusiness.
com
11/11/2014 MAG Systems 846 S. Myrtle #2 Monrovia CA 91016 Steve Jensen 626-359-8868 626-359-6847 sales@mag-systems.net
11/11/2014 MAG Systems 846 S. Myrtle #2 Monrovia CA 91016 Steve Jensen 626-359-8868 626-359-6847 sales@mag-systems.net
Timestamp Company Address City State ZIP Contact Phone Number Fax Number E-Mail
OCTOBER 2014
RWCWRF RAS PUMPS REPLACEMENT INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROLS
CIP R2111 SECTION 17000 - 2 of 13
B. Instrumentation Society of America (ISA) Publications:
1. S5.4 - Instrument Loop Diagrams
2. S20 - Specification Forms for Process Measurement and Control Instruments,
Primary Elements and Control Valves.
1.03 I&C SYSTEM INTEGRATOR QUALIFICATIONS
A. QUALIFICATIONS: Experience in furnishing and installing municipal
instrumentation and control systems. The integrator shall have total responsibility
for all the work specified in Division 17.
B. The System Integrator shall be responsible for the correct installation of all
hardware and systems specified in this Division. Certain primary elements, final
control elements, etc., although provided as part of this Division, may be installed in
the process lines under other Divisions of the contract. The installation of all
specified instrumentation shall be under the direct supervision of the system
integrator.
C. The complete control system shall be furnished by a single integration firm who
shall assume total responsibility for the satisfactory performance of the complete
system.
E. The criteria for evaluating the system Integrator’s qualifications will be based on the
following:
1. Documentation of the System Integrator’s ability to successfully complete
projects of similar size and scope in the municipal market. Provide references
(including Districts name and phone number) for a minimum of three projects
where the following tasks were performed by personnel directly employed by
your firm as a system supplier: project management, system design,
preparation of shop drawings, wiring diagrams, schematics, PLC programming,
field testing, startup and training. Work performed by your subcontractors and
work performed by employees with less than one-year full time employment
status will not be acceptable. For employees with one year or more of full time
employment status their experience with other firms may be included for
consideration.
2. Provide the name and a complete resume of the employee with primary
responsibility for engineering, project management, field testing, calibration, job
site coordination and schedule. References provided in Item 1 shall include
previous projects completed by this employee.
1.04 SYSTEM CERTIFICATION
A. Included with the bid package shall be a written certification of intent to assume full
responsibility for the complete requirements of the Contract Documents. A signed
copy thereof shall be supplied by each prospective system integrator. The
certification shall be on the corporate letterhead, it shall be signed by a corporate
officer and shall include the following statements:
1. The Contractor responsible for this section hereby certifies intent to assume
and execute full responsibility to furnish, supervise installation and connection,
...^Dedicated to Community fie/ti/ice
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD,SPRINGVALLEY,CALIFORNIA 91978-2004
TELEPHONE:670-2222, AREACODE619 www.Oteywater.goi'
November21,2014 ProjectNo.:R2111-001102
Mr.Gregory S.Ahrens,P.E.
Ahrens Mechanical
5959 Mission Gorge Road,Suite 204
San Diego,CA 92120
SUBJECT:RWCWRF RAS Pumps Replacement;
Possible Issues with Cora Contractors'Bid
Dear Mr.Ahrens:
Thank you for your interest in the subject project and for bringing your concerns
regarding the responsiveness of Cora Constructors' (Cora) bidto our attention. The
Otay Water District (District)takes any inquiries seriously.While we appreciated your
attention and responsiveness to this matter,the District considers Cora's bid responsive
and will be moving forward with the recommendation to award the contract at the
January 7,2015 Board meeting.
Alleged Failure to Visit the Site
The first issue you raised expressed concerns about Cora's alleged failure to visit the
site priorto submitting a bid, citing language in the Invitation to Bid and the
Advertisement to Bid which requires propective bidders to visit the site:
A prebid meeting will be held at 10:00 A.M. on OCTOBER 30,2014 at the
Otay Water District (District),2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard,Spring
Valley,California 91978-2004.A site visit will be conducted by the District
immediately following the meeting.Prospective bidders,contractors,and
subcontractors are highly encouragedbutnot required toattendthe prebid
meeting.Note that prospective bidders are required to visit thesite and that
access to the facility is restricted.
You represent that Cora did not attend the prebid meeting and assume that they did
not,therefore,visit the site at all.Youalso contend that a private viewing would offer
an unfair advantage as such an option was not announced publicly.However,this
protest issueisbased on both a mistaken factual assumption and a misinterpretation of
the bid documents.First,and crucially,Cora did in fact visit the site priorto bidding.A
representative ofCora visited the site on November 12,2014. Second, the above
language does notstate that a bidder cannotarrange for a site visit otherthan at the
Gregory S.Ahrens,P.E.
RWCWRF RAS Pumps Replacement;Possible Issues with Cora Contractors'Bid
November 21,2014
Page 2 of 3
prebid meeting, which was not mandatory. The fact that the Invitation to Bid expressly
states that the prebid meeting is not mandatory but nonetheless requires that all
prospective bidders are required to visitthe site necessarily implies that there are
alternatives for visiting the site besides attending the voluntary prebid meeting.The
District did not receive any other inquiries for visiting the site but, ifwe had, we would
have afforded the same courtesy to them.There was no additional information
providedto Cora during the site visitand thus no unfair advantage to them.
Acquisition of Bid Documents
Asto yourconcerns regarding Cora not downloading the bid documents from the Mayer
website, that ignores and neglects to take intoaccount that there are other outlets
available to bidders to view and receive copies of the bid documents.Cora's
submission ofthe appropriate bid documents and acknowledgement of the addendum
indicates that they had access to them.Because their bidwas responsive, speculating
as to how they reached responsiveness is inappropriate.
Written System Certification
The final issue raised pertains to Technical Specifications Section 17000,Paragraph
1.04,regarding providing a written certification of intent to assume full responsibility for
the completerequirements ofthe Contract Documents with the bid package. This
requirement was removed from the Bid Requirements byAddendum 1,Meeting
Minutes, Item 5,Bid Requirements.The items required inthe bid are only those
indicated therein,which provided,in relevant part,as follows:
5.Bid Requirements
•The Contractor shall complete Forms A-H per the Bidders Checkliston
00300-1.
o Bid Proposal (FormA)
o Bid Bond or other Security (Form B)
o Noncollusion Affidavit (Form C)
o Contractors License Affidavit (Form D)
o List of Subcontractors/Subconsultants (Form E)
o List of References (Form F)
o CompanyBackgroundQuestionnaire (Form G)
o Company Safety Questionnaire (Form H)
• Acknowledge Addenda (Section 00400,Page 2)
Gregory S.Ahrens,P.E.
RWCWRF RAS Pumps Replacement;Possible Issues with Cora Contractors'Bid
November 20,2014
Page 3 of 3
The bid from Cora contained the above required information and was thus responsive.
Again,please note that Addenda take precedence over the Technical Specifications per
the Order of Precedence established for the Contract Documents,as indicated in
Section 00700,General Conditions,Paragraph 3.2,excepted herein for your reference:
3.2 Order of Precedence
Anydiscrepancies or omissions foundinthe contractdocuments shall be
reported to the Engineer immediately.TheEngineer will clarify discrepancies or
omissions in writing,within a reasonable time.In resolving inconsistencies
among two ormore sections of the contract documents,precedence shallbe
given in the following order:
1. Permits from other agencies as may be required by law
2.Change orders
3.Agreement
4.Addenda
5.Contractor's bid (bid form)
6.Invitation to Bid
7.Instruction to Bidders
8.Supplementary General Conditions
9.General Conditions
10.California Departmentof Transportation Plans and Specifications
11. Technical Specifications (Division 1 through 17)
Again,weappreciate yourconcerns and attention to this matter,butCora Constructors'
bid is responsive notwithstandingthe issues you raised. To reiterate, Cora did visit the
site and their bid included all the required components.As such,the District intends to
submit Cora Constructors'bid for Board consideration at their January 7,2015 meeting.
Should you have any questions or comments,please contact the Project Manager,
Stephen Beppler,at (619)670-2209.
Sincerely,
OTAY WAT DjS
Robert Kennedy,P.E.
Engineering Manager
RK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP R2111 RWCWRF -RAS Pump Replacement\Design\Correspondence\Ahrens -Response ToBid Protest (S0210576).Doc
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Jeff Marchioro
Senior Civil Engineer
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P1043-
009000
DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Professional Engineering Services Contract to
RFYeager Engineering, LLC for As-Needed Corrosion Engineering
and Reservoir Coating Inspection Services
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a professional services contract to RFYeager Engineering, LLC
(RFYeager) and authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement
with RFYeager for As-Needed Corrosion Engineering and Reservoir
Coating Inspection Services for calendar years 2015 and 2016 (ending
December 31, 2016) in an amount not-to-exceed $175,000.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
professional engineering services contract with RFYeager for As-
Needed Corrosion Engineering and Reservoir Coating Inspection
Services for calendar years 2015 and 2016 (ending December 31, 2016)
in an amount not-to-exceed $175,000.
2
ANALYSIS:
The District will require the services of a professional corrosion
engineering design and inspection consultant in support of the
District’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). It is more efficient
and cost effective to issue an as-needed contract for Corrosion
Engineering Services which will provide the District with the ability
to obtain consulting services in a timely and efficient manner. This
concept has also been used in the past for other disciplines such as
engineering design, construction management, geotechnical,
electrical, and environmental services.
The District will issue task orders to the consultant for specific
projects during the contract period. The consultant will then
prepare a detailed scope of work, schedule, and fee estimate for each
task order assigned under the contract. Upon written task order
authorization from the District, the consultant shall then proceed
with the project as described in the scope of work.
The anticipated CIP projects that are estimated to require corrosion
engineering design and/or inspection services for the duration of
RFYeager’s contract are listed below:
CIP DESCRIPTION
ESTIMATED
COST
P2267
36-Inch Main Pumpouts and Air/Vacuum
Ventilation Installations $5,000
P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations $5,000
P2508 Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement
Program $100,000
P2529 711-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating $5,000
P2530 711-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating $5,000
P2542 850-3 Reservoir Interior Coating $30,000
TOTAL: $150,000
The corrosion engineering design and/or inspection services scopes of
work for the above projects are estimated from preliminary
information and past projects. Therefore, staff believes that a
$175,000 cap on the As-Needed Corrosion Engineering and Reservoir
Coating Inspection Services contract is adequate, while still
providing additional capacity for unforeseen support needs by the
District.
The As-Needed Services does not commit the District to any
expenditure until a task order is approved to perform work on a CIP
project. The District does not guarantee work to the consultant, nor
3
does the District guarantee that it will expend all of the funds
authorized by the contract on professional services.
In accordance with the Board of Directors Policy Number 21, the
District initiated the consultant selection process on October 17,
2014, by placing an advertisement in the San Diego Daily Transcript
and on the District’s website for Professional Engineering Services.
The advertisements attracted Letters of Interest and Statements of
Qualifications from six (6) consulting firms. A Pre-Proposal Meeting
was held on October 29, 2014. Five (5) people representing five (5)
prime consulting firms attended the meeting.
On November 12, 2014, proposals were received from the following five
(5) consulting firms:
1. Corrpro Companies, Santa Fe Springs, CA
2. HDR Engineering, San Diego, CA
3. JDH Corrosion Consultants, Concord, CA
4. V&A Consulting Engineers, San Diego, CA
5. RFYeager Engineering LLC, Lakeside, CA
Columbia Corrosion Control, located in South Carolina, submitted a
letter of interest, but did not propose.
After the proposals were evaluated and ranked by a five-member review
panel consisting of District Engineering, Operations, and I.T. staff,
it was determined that RFYeager had the best approach to the Project
and provided the best overall value to the District. RFYeager’s
references were excellent. A summary of the complete evaluations is
shown in Exhibit A.
RFYeager submitted the Company Background Questionnaire, as required
by the RFP, and staff did not find any significant issues. In
addition, staff checked their references and performed an internet
search on the company. Staff found the references to be excellent
and did not find any outstanding issues with the internet search.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
This contract is for professional services based on the District’s
need and schedule, and expenditures will not be made until individual
main tasks or task orders under the as-needed portion of this
contract are authorized by District Staff. This contract will be
funded by specific CIP budgets detailed above.
The Project Manager anticipates that the FY 2015 budget is sufficient
to support the professional services planned for the remainder this
fiscal year. The Project Manager also anticipates that FY 2016 and
4
FY 2017 budgets, if approved, will be sufficient to support the
future professional services required.
Finance has determined that, with approval of the future budgets,
funding will be available from the General, Expansion, Betterment,
and Replacement funds, as outlined in the individual CIP project
budgets described above.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
JM/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P1043 (Cathodic)\Sub 009000\Staff Report\BD 01-07-15 Staff Report, Award
Engineering Contract to Yeager, (JM-BK).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Exhibit A – Summary of Proposal Rankings
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P1043-009000
Award of a Professional Engineering Services Contract to
RFYeager Engineering, LLC for As-Needed Corrosion
Engineering and Reservoir Coating Inspection Services
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 9, 2014,
and the following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board award a professional services
contract to RFYeager Engineering, LLC (RFYeager) and authorize
the General Manager to execute an agreement with RFYeager for
As-Needed Corrosion Engineering and Reservoir Coating Inspection
Services for calendar years 2015 and 2016 (ending December 31,
2016) in an amount not-to-exceed $175,000.
Staff discussed that the District’s Cathodic Protection Program
(Program) was implemented more than a decade ago to provide the
long-term benefit of preserving the life expectancy of steel
reservoir and pipeline facilities.
The District regularly awards two-year duration professional
services contracts in support of the Program. Currently, HDR
holds the current contract through December 2015. This award to
RFYeager is needed to supplement HDR’s existing contract.
In accordance with the District’s Policy 21, staff advertised a
Request for Proposal on November 12, 2014. Six (6) firms
submitted a letter of interest, five (5) firms submitted a
proposal. It was noted that interviews were not conducted.
Five (5) staff members ranked the proposals and the results of
the analysis are shown in Exhibit A of the staff report.
Staff indicated that RFYeager received the highest score. Staff
checked the company’s references, reviewed their Company
Background Questionnaire form, and performed an internet search
on the company and did not find any significant issues.
The Committee inquired if the District employs a corrosion
engineer staff member. Staff has not hired employees with
corrosion engineering expertise. Staff believes that it is more
efficient to issue an as-needed Corrosion Engineering contracts
compared to hiring a full-time employee.
In response to a comment by the Committee, staff indicated that
HDR currently holds a separate contract to provide routine
pipeline and reservoir cathodic protection system testing
services. This award to RFYeager is only for as-needed
corrosion engineering design and inspection. HDR submitted a
proposed fee for this award, but it was significantly higher
than RFYeager.
In response to a question from the Committee regarding the
District’s ranking process, Legal Counsel stated that pricing
can be a factor, but not the key factor, when selecting a
consultant. Pricing proposals are submitted in a separate
envelope and opened after a five-member review panel reviews
proposals and determines which firm has the best approach to a
project and would provide the best overall value to the
District.
The Committee inquired about the scoring process for pricing.
Staff stated that the process for scoring pricing is based on a
weighting of each fee proposal where the highest score of 15
went to the firm with the lowest hourly rates, the lowest score
of 1 went to the firm with the highest hourly rates, and a
prorated score was given to firms in between; it was noted that
hourly rates were evaluated on seven (7) typical position titles
listed in the RFP. Staff indicated that this scoring process
has been modified over the years.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
Qualifications of
Team
Responsiveness
and Project
Understanding
Technical and
Management
Approach
INDIVIDUAL
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
AVERAGE
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
Proposed Fee*
Consultant's
Commitment to
DBE
TOTAL
SCORE
30 25 30 85 85 15 Y/N Y/N Poor/Good/
Excellent
Dan Martin 26 22 28 76
Steve Beppler 25 21 26 72
Howard Almgren 27 23 27 77
Michael Kerr 27 23 24 74
Don Anderson 25 21 25 71
Dan Martin 23 23 24 70
Steve Beppler 26 21 26 73
Howard Almgren 26 22 25 73
Michael Kerr 28 24 26 78
Don Anderson 25 25 20 70
Dan Martin 24 22 24 70
Steve Beppler 26 18 24 68
Howard Almgren 23 21 24 68
Michael Kerr 22 20 23 65
Don Anderson 21 22 25 68
Dan Martin 22 22 24 68
Steve Beppler 24 22 26 72
Howard Almgren 24 21 24 69
Michael Kerr 26 24 24 74
Don Anderson 23 20 22 65
Dan Martin 27 23 28 78
Steve Beppler 25 23 26 74
Howard Almgren 27 22 26 75
Michael Kerr 25 22 27 74
Don Anderson 25 22 25 72
Firm Corrpro HDR JDH V&A Yeager
Fee**$900 $1,182 $930 $1,142 $770
Score 11 1 10 2 15
RATES SCORING CHART*
70 2 Y 72
Y75
REFERENCES
73 1
781068
EXHIBIT A
Summary of Proposal Rankings for Corrosion Engineering Services
WRITTEN
15
74
Yeager
HDR
Excellent
Y
Y
*Note: The fees were evaluated by comparing rates for seven positions. The sum of these rates are
noted on the table to the left. Review Panel does not see or consider proposed fee when scoring other
categories. The proposed fee is scored by the PM, who is not on Review Panel.
MAXIMUM POINTS
11Corrpro 85
90
YJDH
74
V&A
P:\WORKING\CIP P1043 (Cathodic)\Sub 009000\Staff Report\Summary of Proposal Rankings.xls
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Jeff Marchioro
Senior Civil Engineer
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2453-
003102
DIV. NO. 2
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to TC Construction Co., Inc.
for SR 11/125/905 Connector Ramps Blow Off Relocation Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a construction contract to TC Construction Co., Inc. (TC
Construction) for the SR 11/125/905 Connector Ramps Blow Off
Relocation Project in an amount not-to-exceed $73,750 (see Exhibit A
for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
construction contract with TC Construction in an amount not-to-exceed
$73,750 for the SR 11/125/905 Connector Ramps Blow Off Relocation
Project.
2
ANALYSIS:
The District entered into a Utility Agreement with Caltrans on
October 10, 2014 which included a $74,000 reimbursement to the
District to relocate an existing 6-inch potable water blow off to
accommodate a new overpass at Otay Lakes Road. The agreement was
approved at the District Board Meeting on October 1, 2014. The
utility agreement started the second round of potable water utility
relocations associated with the SR-11 freeway. Caltrans required a
new/separate utility agreement to comply with Caltrans’ funding
requirements.
The District has prior and superior rights for the blow off
relocation. Caltrans will reimburse the District the total planning,
design, inspection, and closeout costs incurred by the District minus
depreciation of the existing blow off asset.
The blow off relocation will be constructed through a construction
contract administered by the District separately from Caltrans’
freeway construction projects.
District staff prepared the bid documents in-house. Mayer
Reprographics (Mayer) distributed the bid documents electronically
through Mayer’s online planroom.
Staff contacted several contractors that have successfully completed
similar District projects in the past prior to the bid process to
encourage them to submit a bid. The Project was publicly advertised
for bid on October 23, 2014 on the District’s website and several
other publications including the San Diego Daily Transcript. A Pre-
bid Meeting was held on October 30, 2014, which was attended by a
single prime contractor. A single addenda was sent out to all
bidders and plan houses on the same day of the Pre-bid Meeting to
provide meeting minutes and address contractors' questions asked
during the bidding period.
Three (3) bids were received on November 13, 2014. The table below
provides the bid results.
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
1. TC Construction Co. Inc., Santee, CA $73,750
2. Ahrens Mechanical, San Diego, CA $85,425
3. Transtar Pipeline, Inc., San Diego, CA $122,025
The Engineer's Estimate is $50,000.
3
The evaluation process included reviewing all bids submitted for
conformance to the contract documents. The lowest bidder, TC
Construction, submitted a responsible bid and holds a Class A
Contractor’s license which expires on April 30, 2015 (staff will
reconfirm that TC Construction’s license is still valid at the time
of award). Staff checked the references provided with TC
Construction’s bid indicating a good performance record on similar
past projects. Staff has verified the bid bond provided by Liberty
Mutual Insurance Company is valid. Staff will also verify that TC
Construction’s performance bond is valid prior to execution of the
contract. The proposed Project Manager has experience throughout
southern California on similar projects and received good references.
A background search of the company was performed on the internet and
revealed no outstanding issues. TC Construction submitted the
Company Background and Company Safety Questionnaires as required by
the Contract Documents. TC Construction has previously worked with
the District on the 450-1 Reservoir/680-1 Pump Station, the 16-inch
and 30-inch 803/850 Transmission Mains, and the La Presa System
Improvements projects.
An amendment to the Caltrans Utility Agreement will be processed in
the future since the difference between the low bid ($74K) and the
Engineer’s Estimate ($50K) exceeds 25% of the estimated cost of the
executed Utility Agreement.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP P2453, as approved in the FY 2015 budget, is
$2,250,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, accounting for relocations currently in construction and
the blow off relocation, is $1,516,751. See Attachment B for budget
detail.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget for CIP P2453 is sufficient to support
the Project.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the
Replacement Fund for CIP P2453.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
4
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
JM/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations\Staff Reports\BD 01-07-15 Staff Report SR-11 TC
Construction.docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2453-003102 Award of a Construction Contract to TC Construction Co.
Inc. for SR 11/125/905 Connector Ramps Blow Off Relocation
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on December 9, 2014,
and the following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board award a construction contract
to TC Construction Co., Inc. (TC Construction) for the SR
11/125/905 Connector Ramps Blow Off Relocation Project in an
amount not-to-exceed $73,750.
Staff indicated that an existing 6-inch blow off at the current
terminus of the SR125 freeway along Otay Mesa Road must be
relocated to accommodate a new freeway overpass. This would be
the second round of potable water utility relocations associated
with the SR11 freeway.
In October 2014, the District entered into a Utility Agreement
with Caltrans to relocate the blow off. The District has prior
and superior rights for the blow off location.
It was noted that District staff prepared the bid documents in-
house and that staff reached out to several contractors to
encourage them to submit a bid.
The Project was advertised for bid on October 23, 2014, and a
Pre-bid meeting was held on October 30, 2014, which was attended
by a single prime contractor. The District received three (3)
bids on November 13, 2014, all of which were deemed responsive.
Staff indicated that TC Construction submitted the lowest
responsive bid. Staff checked TC’s references, reviewed their
Company Background and Company Safety Questionnaire forms, and
performed an internet search on the company and did not find any
significant issues.
Staff stated that TC Construction has successfully completed
previous District construction projects including 450-1
Reservoir/680-1 Pump Station, the 16-inch and 30-inch 803/850
Transmission Mains, and the La Presa System Improvements
projects.
Staff noted that an amendment to the Caltrans Utility Agreement
will be processed in the future since the current total project
cost estimates exceeds 25% of the executed Agreement amount.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that
the District keeps track of the number of hours spent on each
utility agreement separately. The first and second round of SR-
11 Relocations are part of the same CIP; however, each
relocation is tracked through different phase/sub-project
numbers within the District’s accounting system.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2453-003102 Award of a Construction Contract to TC Construction Co.
Inc. for SR 11/125/905 Connector Ramps Blow Off Relocation
Date Updated: 11/17/2014
Budget
2,250,000
Planning/Design/Construction - Sequence 1
Standard Salaries 192,792 172,792 20,000 192,792 STAFF LABOR
Consultant Contracts 80,450 62,879 17,571 80,450 ATKINS
2,763 2,763 - 2,763 V & A CONSULTING ENGINEERS
970 970 - 970 ALTA LAND SURVEYING INC
4,901 4,901 - 4,901 NARASIMHAN CONSULTING SERVICES
2,561 2,561 - 2,561 CPM PARTNERS INC
30,000 11,550 18,450 30,000 ALYSON CONSULTING
Professional Legal Fees 121 121 - 121 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Service Contracts 1,382 1,382 - 1,382 US BANK
1,382 1,382 - 1,382 US BANK CORPORATE PAYMENT
2,985 2,985 - 2,985 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
84 84 - 84 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Construction Contract 992,380 84,263 908,117 992,380 COFFMAN SPECIALTIES
49,619 4,435 45,184 49,619 REGENTS BANK
24,063 - 24,063 24,063 CLOSEOUT
Total - Sequence 1 1,386,453 353,068 1,033,386 1,386,453
Planning/Design/Construction - 6-inch Blow Off
Standard Salaries 32,356 24,856 7,500 32,356 STAFF LABOR
Consultant Contracts 4,000 3,066 934 4,000 ICF JONES & STOKES INC
13,840 - 13,840 13,840 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES
3,500 - 3,500 3,500 ALYSON CONSULTING
Parking and Tolls 12 12 - 12 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Professional Legal Fees 120 120 - 120 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Service Contracts 1,805 1,223 582 1,805 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
96 96 - 96 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Construction Contract 818 818 - 818 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
73,750 - 73,750 73,750 TC CONSTRUCTION
Total - 6-inch Blow Off 130,298 30,191 100,106 130,298
Grand Total 1,516,751 383,259 1,133,492 1,516,751
Reinbursement Agreements (961,521) - (961,521) (961,521) CALTRANS UTILITY AGREEMENT
(386,453) (386,453) (386,453) FUTURE CALTRANS AMENDMENT
(74,000) - (74,000) (74,000) CALTRANS UTILITY AGREEMENT
(49,298) - (49,298) (49,298) FUTURE CALTRANS AMENDMENT
Grand Total (1,471,272) - (1,471,272) (1,471,272)
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
p2453-SR-11 Utility Relocations
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
Committed Expenditures Outstanding
Commitment &
Projected Final
Cost Vendor/Comments
?ò
Aä
Sanyo Ave
Otay Mesa Rd
Airway Rd
Piper Ranch Rd
Harvest Rd Otay Mesa Rd
!VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTS
?ò
Aä
?Ë
;&s
DIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
?p F
P:\WORKING\CIP P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\Exhibit A, Blowof Relocation-Location Map.mxd
OTAY WATER DISTRICTPOTABLE 6-INCH BLOW OFF RELOCATIONLOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT A CIP P2453F
0 650325Feet
EXISTING BLOW OFF
RELOCATEDBLOW OFF
PROPOSEDSR-11
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Alicia Mendez-Schomer,
Customer Service Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Impose a $1,000 Fine for Meter Tampering
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board uphold staff’s recommendation to impose a $1,000 fine
for meter tampering at 1785 Treseder Circle in El Cajon.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To ensure the District continues to protect the water supply and
applies violations consistent with the Code of Ordinances.
ANALYSIS:
The District began installing AMR Master Meters in 2004. In early
2013 an upgrade to the reading software, Master Links, gave meter
readers the ability to detect tamper alerts. By Master Meter’s
definition, a tamper alert “will appear on your screen when a meter
is tampered with a magnet.”
On October 16th a staff member responded to a tamper alert at 1785
Treseder Circle in El Cajon. During the course of the investigation
2
the meter box was opened and revealed a magnet attached to the water
meter. The magnet caused the volume of water going through it to be
inaccurately measured, which resulted in the customer being under
billed. The magnet also disabled the meter to the point that it
cannot be repaired or reused.
A review of the data from the Master Links system shows prior tamper
alerts at this property from March 6, 2013 to present. Staff
investigated the property a total of 4 times prior to this latest
incident. These prior investigations did not yield any additional
evidence of meter tampering, such as a magnetic device. Not until
the latest tamper alert and investigation did District staff find an
actual magnetic device attached to the meter.
Meter tampering is a Type II violation of the District’s Code of
Ordinances and carries a maximum fine of $5,000 per occurrence as
outlined in Section 72.06. “Additionally, tampering may be
prosecuted as a crime under Section 498 of the California Penal Code,
as set forth in Section 73.01 of this Code.”
Staff is recommending that the owners of the property, Kornelia and
Arkaguiz Kopec, be fined $1,000 with this charge to be put on their
next water bill, which then becomes an inseparable part of that bill.
If the charges remain unpaid, the District may disconnect water
service, lien the delinquent real property, and may access damages
and penalties established by the District or otherwise authorized by
law. Applying the fine to the property owners, Kornelia and Arkaquiz
Kopec, is consistent with the Code of Ordinances Section 72.01 which
states “Each person receiving service, or that owns a property that
receives service, agrees to pay the District any applicable fees and
charges. Such persons are also responsible for all costs and damages
in connection with any violation of this Code relating to their
service.”
The District has had one other incident where a magnet was discovered
inside a meter box in close proximity to the water meter. In that
case the customer was fined $1,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The fiscal impact is limited to the amount of the fine assessed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Enforce the District’s Code of Ordinances and protect the public
water supply.
3
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Letter to Property Owner with 3 Pictures
Attachment C – Code of Ordinances Section 72
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Impose a $1,000 Fine for Meter Tampering
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on December 8, 2014 and the following comments
were made:
Staff indicated on October 16, 2014 a District staff member
responded to a meter “tamper” alert at 1785 Treseder Circle, El
Cajon, and found a magnet attached to the water meter for the
property. The intent of the magnet was to disable the meter and
cause it to under register the amount of water running through
it. The magnet was removed and the meter was replaced the
following day.
The data from the meter was reviewed and the District had
investigated the same property four (4) times due to tamper
alarms. This was the first time a magnet was found attached to
the meter.
This violation falls under a Type II violation (the violation
could cause harm to the District or the customer) per the
District’s Code of Ordinances. Under Type II violations, the
District could impose a fine of $1000 to $5000. It was noted
that a Type I category violation are actions that are more
administrative in nature and do not cause or have a potential to
cause any harm to either the customer or the public water supply
system.
Staff is recommending a $1000 fine, which is consistent with what
the District has done in the past. The District had another
instance where a magnet was found attached to a customer’s meter
and in this incident the District had imposed a $1000 fine.
The fine will be added to the customer’s next water bill should
the board support staffs’ recommendation to impose the fine. It
was indicated that the total charge to the customer is $1,690.32
which includes administrative costs, costs to investigate the
violation and the cost of a new replacement meter.
Staff indicated that prior to the implementation of AMR
technology, the District’s staff would visit meters just once a
month for the purpose of reading the meter. With the institution
of AMR technology in 2004 throughout the District, meters are now
read several times throughout the month as many of the District’s
vehicles are outfitted with laptops that can collect meter
reading data as they drive by. Because of this, the District can
catch meter alarms much more easily as meter alarms are also
transmitted with water use data. Before AMR meters, tampering
could only be caught when a staff member goes out to read the
meter.
The AMR meters will also send alerts when a meter has been
running for more than 24 hours.
It was indicated in response to an inquiry from the committee
that staff has changed the process in how customer service
responds to alerts. When a tamper alert is received, staff will
visit the meter within 48 hours. In the past, staff may not have
visited the alarm site as quickly and may be the reason that the
magnet was not found in the four (4) prior investigations.
In response to another inquiry from the committee, staff
indicated that staff attempts to impose a fine amount that would
act as a deterrent to discourage the customer from doing the
violation again. To date, the District has not had a second
offense when a fine has been imposed.
It was indicated that the customer sent a letter to the District
(copy attached) indicating that they felt that their neighbor may
have placed the magnet on their meter as they have been in a
dispute with the neighbor. It was discussed, however, even if
their claim were true, they are still the owner and are
responsible for the meter. Also, the District has received
several tampering alarms from the property, thus, it is felt that
the $1000 fine is appropriate in this situation.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
November 26, 2014
Dear Board of Directors,
This letter is a response to the Notice of Meter Tempering letter which was sent to us the last week of
October 2014. Me and my husband purchased the house in 2011 and we never had the need to access
the water meter at any time since our purchase. I have no knowledge of what the device in the picture
is or when and how it was placed, other than the reported information from the letter we received. The
meter is located off the street and anyone who wishes, can have access to it.
Our water bills have always been reasonable ever since we moved in and I cannot think of a reason to
be tampering with the meter. We do not have any grass of plants which require much watering, we are
very water conserving conscious and support the efforts of the County to save water. We also do not
wash our cars in the drive way (as it is illegal). Please compare our bills from prior to finding the device
and afterwards which would indicate if such device was utilized.
We do have malicious neighbors however who have been of concern to us and we have installed a
monitoring system. I feel we have been accused of something we have not done in the case of the meter
tempering. These people have broken into our garage in the past, removed multiple property from our
garage, cut down trees on our property, left aggressive notes for us in the mailbox, and have been
reporting us to every possible authority in the city and County for fictional reasons. We spoke to an
attorney and will be filing a restraining order against them.
We would like to appeal the fine of $1,000 and already take steps to inform Susan Cruz for this issue to
be addressed in the next board meeting.
Kornelia and Arkadiusz Kopec
l
SECTION 72 PENALTIES AND DAMAGES
72.01 GENERAL
A. User and Owner Responsibility. Each person receiving service, or that
owns a property that receives service, agrees to pay the District any applicable fees and charges. Such persons are also responsible for all costs and damages in connection with any violation of this Code relating to their service.
B. District Not Liable. The District shall bear no liability for any cost,
damage, claim or expense incurred by District or any responsible party or third party on
behalf of the District arising from or related to any violation, including, but not limited to, costs, damages, claims or expenses arising from any corrective action of the District. Such corrective actions include, but are not limited to, the removal, confiscation,
disposition or use of any device, equipment, improvement or material encroaching on any
District property or used in connection with any other violation.
C. District Obligation to Collect Damages. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.6, the District shall take all practical and reasonable steps, including appropriate legal action, if necessary, to recover civil damages for the negligent, willful,
or unlawful damaging or taking of property of the District.
D. Assessment of Damages. Actual damages resulting from any violation,
including late payment or failure or refusal to pay for service and any interest thereon, may be assessed and collected as part of a customer’s monthly bill to the extent allowed by law. The District will separately invoice any actual damages not assessed on a
monthly bill, including any damages assessed against any responsible person who is not a
customer.
E. Unpaid or Partially Paid Bills. Bills issued by the District are due in full as provided in such bills. Failure to timely pay bills in full may lead to a reduction, suspension, or termination of service, as provided in Section 72.02(B), below, in Section
34 of this Code, or pursuant to other provisions of this Code or applicable law. In
addition, if bills remain unpaid, in full or in part, the District may lien the delinquent real
property and may assess damages and penalties established by District or otherwise authorized by law.
72.02 VIOLATIONS AND GENERAL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS
A. Notice of Violation. Notice and a reasonable period of time to
correct a violation will be given prior to the termination, reduction or suspension of
service or the imposition of any administrative fine. However, the District may, without notice, correct any condition or violation that endangers the health or safety or impairs
any District service, facility or property or is otherwise determined by the District to
require immediate action.
1. Investigative Procedures. If a possible violation is identified, observed or reported, the District will contact the allegedly
responsible party to investigate. If the violation is in fact occurring, District staff will
issue a notice of violation or otherwise inform the responsible party that corrective
actions must be taken within a period of time deemed reasonable by the District, taking into consideration the nature of the violation and the potential damage that can arise if the violation continues.
2. Content of Notice of Violation. The notice will describe the
violation, indicate the actions that must be taken, and indicate the date by which those
actions must be taken. Unless immediate action is required, the notice will provide a reasonable time for the violation to be corrected. The notice will also specify the amount of any delinquency, actual damages or other amounts due the District, if any, and the
telephone number of a representative of the District who can provide additional
information.
3. No Notice Required; District Action. If the District determines that immediate or prompt correction of the violation is necessary to prevent waste or to maintain the integrity of the water supply, systems or facilities of the District, or for the
immediate protection of the health, safety or welfare of persons or property, or for any
other compelling reason, the District will take any action deemed necessary (including
suspension, reduction or termination of service; locking or removal of meters; or repairs of any improvements) and a notice will be left at the affected parcel specifying any further corrective actions required. Any costs incurred by District and any applicable
fines will be the responsibility of the responsible party.
4. Notice; Failure to Comply. The responsible party will be given an
opportunity to correct the violation and to provide verbal, written and pictorial exculpatory evidence. If such evidence does not exonerate the responsible parties and if the violation(s) are not corrected to the satisfaction of the District within the time
provided, the District may assess cost and penalties, administrative fines and may take
any other action or pursue any other remedy available. Furthermore, if the violation
concerns any service requirement or facility, or to prevent waste or protect the integrity of the system or the health and safety of the public, the District may suspend, reduce or
terminate service to the extent permitted by law.
B. Service Termination, Suspension or Reduction; Removing or
Locking Meters. Service may be reduced, suspended or terminated for failure to pay for
service or in connection with a violation of this Code or applicable law. Termination, suspension or reduction of service will proceed as follows:
1. Notice Prior to Termination, Suspension or Reduction of Service.
Except as provided in Paragraph A, above, or in other provisions of this Code or
applicable law, not less than ten (10) days notice will be given prior to the date service is
reduced, suspended or terminated; provided that, where service is terminated due to failure to comply with the terms of an amortization agreement, under Section 34 of this
Code, only forty-eight (48) hours prior notice is required. The notice will be delivered to
the affected parcel and, if the owner of record does not reside in the affected parcel, a copy of the notice will be forwarded to the owner’s address on record
with the assessor’s office via any available means, such as personal delivery, certified
mail return receipt requested, email, fax or fed-ex.
2. Termination for failure to pay for service. The District may discontinue any or all service due to failure to pay the whole or any part of a bill issued by the District. In connection with termination of water service, the provisions of Section
60373 of the Government Code, or any other appropriate provision of law, or as set forth
in Section 34 of this Code of Ordinance, will be followed. In connection with sewer,
Section 71672 of the California Water Code or other applicable requirements will be followed.
C. Reconnection or Reinstatement of Service, Unlocking or
Reinstalling Meters. If service is reduced, suspended or terminated for any reason, each
of the following conditions applicable to the situation must be satisfied or arrangements
satisfactory to the General Manager or a designee must be made before service is reinstated:
1. Outstanding amounts for service bills, including any service
charges for benefits derived from the violation, must be paid;
2. All required deposits (including any security deposits), actual
damages, fines, costs, charges and penalties must be paid;
3. Any amounts due for the removal, locking, servicing, repair or replacement of meters or other facilities required for service must be paid at the rates in
effect at the time of reinstatement, as set forth on Appendix A to this Code or other
schedule of fees then in effect;
4. All violations and related damages or conditions must have been corrected and/or repaired and evidence satisfactory to the District to that effect and demonstrating that it is safe to reinstate service, must have been provided to and
approved by the District; and
5. If the service was originally in the name of a tenant, the District
may require the owner of the parcel to request the service account under his or her name and responsibility.
D. Owner Responsibility for Account. In addition to owners’
obligations under subsection (A) of section 72.01 and subsection (C)(5) of Section 72.02,
above, and any other remedies provided by this Code or by applicable law, Owners may
be required to deliver to the District a form of acknowledgement or authorization for service to a tenant. In addition, if (i) a tenant engages in any violation, (ii) if the District
has reduced, suspended or terminated any service to a tenant three (3) times within any
twenty-four (24) month period or (iii) the tenant has failed or refuses to comply with the
terms of payment arrangements with the District four (4) times, the District reserves the
right to demand that the property owner take responsibility for services to the tenant-
occupied parcel. The General Manager or a designee shall develop procedures to implement these requirements.
E. Right of Access to Customer’s Premises; Interference. If any
person refuses to consent to an investigation of a possible violation, or prevents or refuses
to allow access to District staff or authorized representatives to any premises or facility during an investigation or in connection with any termination, reduction or suspension of service, the District may seek an injunction or a warrant, as provided in Section 71601 of
the Water Code.
F. Other Remedies. In addition to the actions contemplated in this
Section, the District may seek other remedies authorized or required by any applicable law, including imposing an administrative fine, pursuant to Section 72.06, or pursuing other available civil or criminal remedies.
72.03 CERTAIN SPECIFIC OPERATIONAL VIOLATIONS
A. Unauthorized Connections. The District shall bear no cost or liability for
any unauthorized connection. In addition to other remedies, any unauthorized connection is subject to a Type II fine, pursuant to Section 72.06 depending upon the severity, duration and reoccurrence of the violation and any other factors the District may
reasonably take into consideration.., Further, the District may demand that the
unauthorized connection be immediately disconnected. In the alternative, if the customer
refuses to take immediate action, or if immediate actions is necessary as set forth in Section 72.02(A)(3), above, the District may immediately disconnect, remove, confiscate, destroy or dispose of any parts installed or used for the unauthorized connection, all at the
expense of the customer and any other responsible party. To the extent allowed by law,
the District may also, immediately or as otherwise deemed advisable by the District,
terminate service to any parcel and any person that allows, uses or benefits from such unauthorized connection.
B. Water waste. No customer shall knowingly permit leaks or other wastes
of water, including, but not limited to, allowing runoff on any portion of his or her
property, engaging in non-permitted uses of water, or failing to take corrective action
after notice of any leaks or water waste is given. If the District determines that water waste is occurring, the District will:
1. Notify the customer that they are in violation of the District’s Code
of Ordinances.
2. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the District may, without prior
notice, repair or replace any District controlled facilities at the cost of the person identified as the responsible party, if any.
3. If the water waste is due to a condition within the customer’s
property or facilities, the District may (i) require the customer to repair or replace the
affected facilities, immediately or within a reasonable time, depending on the situation; or
(ii) if necessary to prevent further waste, adjust, lock or remove the meter. If any repair
or replacement required is not completed in a timely manner, the District may perform the repair or replacement at the cost of the customer or may
terminate service without further notice.
C. Meter Tampering. In addition to other remedies, tampering is subject to a
Type II fine pursuant to Section 72.06 depending upon the severity, duration and reoccurrence of the violation and any other factors the District may reasonably take into consideration. Additionally, tampering may be prosecuted as a crime under Section 498
of the California Penal Code, as set forth in Section 73.01 of this Code.
D. Fire Service Violation. Fire service is subject to compliance with all
provisions of this Code and the law concerning water service, and failure to comply with such provisions may result in the reduction, suspension, termination or disconnection of water service for fire protection, without any liability to District. Furthermore, illegal
connections or other violations relating to fire service are subject to either a Type I or
Type II fine, at the option of the District, and may be prosecuted as crimes.
E. Backflow prevention, screens and other safety devices. If service requirements include the installation, testing and maintenance of backflow prevention devices (Section 23.04 of this Code), screens or other safety operational items, in addition
to, or in lieu of, other remedies provided herein, the District may apply any of the
remedies under Section VI and VII of the District’s Ordinance No. 386, as amended or
renumbered. Furthermore, violations relating to backflow testing may be prosecuted as set forth in Section 73.01 of this Code. Violations of backflow requirements or knowingly filing a false statement or report required by a local health officer are subject
to either a Type I or Type II fine, at the option of the District, pursuant to Section 72.06,
below.
F. Violation Concerning Recycled Water Service. In addition to any fine, revocation, suspension or penalty imposed under Section 26 in connection with any violation of said Section, including permit suspension or revocation under Section
26.07.C, the District may (i) suspend or terminate water and or sewer service to the
property, the owner and/or the operator; (ii) require payment by the owner for any
damage to the District facilities, reimbursement to District of costs and expenses, or fines imposed on the District in connection with such violation; or (iii) prosecute the
responsible party under any applicable provision of this Code, the Water Code or the
Penal Code. Additionally, any violation concerning recycled water service is subject to
either a Type I or Type II fine, at the option of the District, pursuant to Section 72.06,
below.
G. Violation Concerning Sewer Service. In addition to any other remedy,
fine or penalty provided by this Code or applicable law, failure to comply with any
requirements of sewer service, including requirements for the preservation of public
health, safety and welfare and including, but not limited to, the requirements established
under Article II, Chapter 2, Sections 50 to 56.04 of this Code, as hereafter amended or as supplemented by other District Rules and Regulations for Sewer Service, the California
Health and Safety Code, the California Code of Regulations, Titles 17 and 22, and Water
Agency Standards. Furthermore, may be prosecuted as set forth in Section 73.01 of this Code. Additionally, any violation concerning sewer service is
subject to a Type I or Type II fine, at the option of the District, pursuant to Section 72.06,
below.
H. Theft, Fraud, or Misappropriation. In addition to any other remedy, fine or penalty provided by this Code or applicable law, any violation involving theft, fraud or misappropriation of District water, services, or property is subject to a Type I or Type II
fine, at the option of the District, pursuant to Section 72.06, below.
72.04 VIOLATIONS OF CONSERVATION OR OTHER WATER USE
RESTRICTION PROVISIONS
The District has established and published conservation measures set forth in Section 39 of the Code. Commencing with declared Level 2 conditions, the District may
assess water shortage rates and charges previously adopted. In addition, after notice of
the declared water shortage level is given as required by law, any person who uses,
causes to be used, or permits the use of water in violation of such requirements (other than a person who qualifies for an applicable exemption, if any) may be assessed damages, penalties and fines.
A. Additional provisions concerning use restriction violations. In addition to
payment of actual damages, the following may apply to a violation of any water
conservation or water use restriction measure:
1. A change on the account holder shall not cause the account to revert to pre-violation status unless the new account holder provides evidence that
it is not related to the violator and had no responsibility for the prior account.
2. The District may reduce, suspend or terminate service to any
parcel immediately and without further notice if the violation involves or results in water waste, as set for in Section 72.03(B), above.
3. Willful violations of mandatory conservation measures described
in Section 39 of this Code may be enforced by terminating service to the property
at which the violation occurs, as provided by Section 356 of the California Water
Code.
B. Prosecution for violations of conservation measures. Pursuant to Section
377 and 71644 of the California Water Code, each violation of the District’s
Conservation Ordinance, set fort in Section 39 of this Code, may be prosecuted as a
misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment in the County jail for no more than thirty (30)
days or by a fine, as set forth in subsection (C), below.
C. Assessment of fines for violations of conservation or water use restriction
provisions. Any responsible party who fails to comply with any conservation or use
restriction measure is subject to the assessment of an administrative Type I fine, added to
account, pursuant to Section 72.06, below.
72.05 VIOLATIONS INVOLVING DISTRICT REAL PROPERTY
A. Removal, Disposition and Costs. The District has absolute discretion to
determine the corrective action required in connection with any violation involving
District real property, including requiring the owner of any unauthorized encroachment or improvement to remove it or taking action to remove it immediately and without notice. Any improvements or uses placed within or on any District property or right of way are
subject to the following:
1. Costs and Damages. All costs and damages shall be the
responsibility of the customer and any other responsible party. Furthermore, the District shall not be liable for costs to repair or replace any unauthorized encroachment or improvement, or any property, improvement or thing used in connection with, supported
by or attached thereto.
2. Burden of proof. The burden shall be on the user to prove to the
District’s satisfaction, the authority, scope and extent of any right to access, improve or use the District’s property. Only written evidence in the form of an agreement, deed, statute, recorded or official map or plat, governmental regulation or other right may be
used to establish such claim of right.
B. Notice. In connection with any improvement or use that does not
constitute a health hazard and does not interfere with the District’s use of its property, the District will give written notice of up to sixty (60) days, at the discretion of the General Manager, to cease, terminate, eliminate or remove the offending improvement, structure
or use. Any written notice will be given to the responsible party or posted at the property
where the trespass or encroachment occurs. If the responsible party is not the owner of
any real property affected by the violation, the District will also give notice to the owner of record at the address on record with the assessor’s office via personal delivery, certified mail return receipt requested or via Fed-Ex.
C. Immediate action. In connection with any improvement that constitutes a
health hazard or interferes with the District’s use of any District property, the District will
take any immediate action deemed necessary by the General Manager.
D. Fines. In addition to all other remedies provided under this Article or
under applicable law, the District may impose a fine as provided in Section 72.06.
Additionally, the District may impose a fine up to either the amount specified on any
sign, or a Type I or Type II fine, at the option of the District, in connection with any
trespass on District property in violation of a sign prohibiting trespassing, pursuant to Section 72.06, below.
E. Separate violation. A separate violation will accrue for each day after the
deadline to cease, terminate, eliminate or remove the trespass or encroachment, as set
forth in the notice.
72.06 ADMINISTRATIVE FINES
Any administrative fines established herein shall be in the nature of civil penalties
and shall be additional and cumulative to any other fines, damages or any other charges
established by the District and are also separate from and cumulative to any other civil or
criminal penalty, fine or remedy. In connection with each violation, the District may assess a fine up to the amount specified in the schedule of fines for the type of fine being imposed.
Each day during which a violation is in effect constitutes a separate violation and
violations are cumulative while the account is in the name of the original violator or any
person that participated in or benefited from the violation. Except where the violation creates an immediate danger to health or safety, the person responsible for the continuing violation will be provided a reasonable period of time to correct or otherwise remedy the
violation(s) prior to the imposition of administrative fines.
A. Assessment of Fines for Technical Violations of Other Code Provisions.
Any person who engages in a violation of any provision of this Code is subject to the assessment of a separate administrative Type I Fine, unless subject to a more severe fine as set forth in this Code.
B. Assessment of Separate Fines.
Nothing in this code or the limits specified per violation shall prevent the
imposition of separate fines for each separate violation committed during a single act. For example, in connection with a violation concerning sewer service that involves a trespass on any portion of the District’s real property, separate fines may be assessed for
the trespass, the damage to District personal property, the damage to District real
property; the damage to the sewer system and the activity resulting on all the damages.
C. Types of Fines. The amount for each type of fine specified below may increase automatically to reflect any higher amount authorized by law or regulation. The District has determined to establish two types of fines based on the nature of the
violation, as follows:
1. Type I Fine. Any violation that does not have the potential to
endanger the health or safety of the public. The fine will not exceed the amount specified in the Section 36900(b) of the California Government Code or
Appendix A for a first, second, third or each additional violation of that same
ordinance or requirement within a twelve-month period.
2. Type II Fine. Any violation that has the potential to endanger the
health or safety, including, but not limited to, unauthorized or illegal connections, meter tampering, water theft, or knowingly filing a false statement or report
required by a local health officer. The fine will not exceed the amount specified
on Appendix A per each day the violation is identified or continues.
D. Collection of Fines. Any fines assessed by the District are payable directly to the District, are due upon issuance or as otherwise
indicated on the notice or bill, and are delinquent 30 calendar days from the due date.
E. Notice of Administrative Fine; Content. Notice of an administrative fine
pursuant to this section will contain the following information: (i) a brief description of the violation(s); (ii) the date and location of the violation(s); (iii) a brief description of corrective action(s) required, as appropriate; (iv) a statement explaining that each day the
violation continues constitutes a new violation; (v) in the case of violations creating an
immediate danger to health or safety, the amount of civil penalty assessed or, in all other
cases, the amount of civil penalty to be assessed if the violation(s) are not corrected within the time provided by the notice; (vi) a statement of the procedure for payment and the consequences of failure to pay; (vii) contact information for the District employee
that should be contacted to discuss the notice and provide evidence of compliance; and
(viii) a brief statement describing the responsible party’s right to request further review,
pursuant to subsection (F), below.
F. Option for Board Review . Persons receiving a Notice of Administrative Fine may request Board review. The request for Board consideration must be in writing,
must be received by the District Secretary within ten (10) calendar days from the date of
the notice and must include contact information, an explanation of the basis for the
request, and any supporting documentation said person(s) wish to provide to the Board for review and consideration. District staff will review the petitioner’s request and will make a recommendation to the Board in light of its investigation. The District will
provide notice of the date, time and place for Board consideration by electronic means,
facsimile or first class mail sent to the return addressee indicated on the written request.
G. Any fines assessed pursuant to the Notice of Administrative Fines must be
timely paid notwithstanding the filing of a request for Board review.
At the time of Board review, the petitioner may, address the Board and respond to
the charges to show good cause why the fine should not be imposed; however, the
customer is not entitled to a full judicial-type hearing with cross examination, sworn
testimony, etc. In accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 53069.4, the Board’s determination shall be final and conclusive, and shall be deemed confirmed,
if not appealed within 20 calendar days to the Superior Court of the County of San Diego.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin Cameron
Assistant Engineer II
PROJECT: P2539-
001102
DIV. NOS. 4 & 1
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Authorization to Execute a Reimbursement Agreement Between the
San Diego Association of Governments and the Otay Water District
for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board):
1. Authorize the General Manager to execute an Agreement between
the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and the
District for reimbursement to SANDAG for construction costs
associated with the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project (see
Exhibit A for Project location).
2. Increase the CIP budget for P2539 by $525,000 (increase the
overall CIP budget from $375,000 to $900,000).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to execute an
Agreement (Exhibit B) with SANDAG for costs associated with
construction of the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The
Agreement provides that the District will deposit an amount to SANDAG
within thirty (30) calendar days of SANDAG awarding a Construction
Agreement for the BRT Project for the cost to relocate District
facilities. The deposit amount must be equal to one hundred (100)
2
percent of the bid amount attributable to the relocation of District
facilities, ten (10) percent contingency, and eighteen (18) percent
for construction management services. It is expected the project
will be bid in January and by May 2015 SANDAG will request a deposit
amount estimated to be $736,000.
ANALYSIS:
The South Bay BRT project will include stations along a 21-mile BRT
route, connecting residents to employment and activity centers in
downtown and the South Bay. The South Bay BRT will serve offices,
shopping centers, recreational facilities, transit-oriented
residential communities, schools, and Park & Ride lots, as well as
the U.S.-Mexico port of entry at Otay Mesa, California.
The Franchise Agreement between the District and the City of Chula
Vista (City) requires the District to relocate and adjust its
facilities within the City’s right-of-way at the District’s cost.
For purposes of the SANDAG BRT Improvements only, the City has
delegated said authority to SANDAG, who is exercising such rights on
behalf of City with the understanding that City will not further
exercise such rights against the District or require further
relocation or adjustments related to the SANDAG Improvements. The
correspondence from the City to District, dated September 25, 2014,
describing such requirements, is attached to the Agreement (Exhibit
B) as Exhibit A.
In order to minimize impacts to the Chula Vista community,
District staff and SANDAG are coordinating their efforts to
combine the contract documents for the utility relocations and the
BRT Project work into one bid package. SANDAG will pay for the
utility relocation design and incorporate the District's utility
relocations into their bid package and bid their project and the
District's as one project. SANDAG anticipates they will advertise
the "Project" in January and provide bid support during the bid
period. District staff will assist SANDAG where needed. SANDAG
anticipates awarding the Project in May 2015. SANDAG needs to have a
reimbursement agreement in place with the District prior to awarding
the Project for construction.
The Project consists of constructing the BRT in the median of East
Palomar Street (between Oleander and Magdalena Avenues) and from
Magdalena Avenue easterly across SR-125 and Town Center Drive and
then southerly to Birch Road (adjacent to Otay Ranch Town Center
Mall). These improvements include, but are not limited to, roadway
widening, new guideway pavement, construction of curb, gutter,
sidewalk, and median islands, construction of retaining walls,
3
relocation of utilities, and new traffic signals and street lighting.
The water infrastructure work consists of relocating existing
recycled and potable water facilities including meters and
appurtenances to support the BRT Project work. The construction cost
associated with the utility relocations is estimated at $575,000 with
a ten (10) percent contingency of $57,500. SANDAG’s Construction
Management Cost estimate is $103,500 for a total engineer’s
construction estimate of $736,000. The attached agreement (Exhibit
B) provides for reimbursement to SANDAG to cover the actual “as-bid”
construction costs, the 10% contingency for unforeseen issues
confronted during construction, and 18% for construction management.
With the exception of emergencies, prior to the approval of any
construction change or change order affecting the District, SANDAG
will obtain the written consent of the District.
Originally, the District was planning to solicit proposals from
engineering consultants for the design of the utility relocations.
The selected consultant would be presented to the Board for an award
of an engineering consultant agreement. This process typically takes
4-5 months. Once designed, the project would go out to bid, and
subsequently, the Board would award a construction contract to the
lowest responsible bidder. Staff estimates that this process would
have taken 18-21 months to coordinate the design with SANDAG and
other utilities along with the bidding process. SANDAG needed the
design completed sooner, and worked with the District to come up with
a solution that was amicable to both parties.
To accelerate the project schedule, on November 13, 2013, SANDAG and
the City agreed to pay Kimley-Horn Engineering to perform the design
work for the District’s utility relocations. The City/SANDAG design
was put on hold for a few weeks and on March 31, 2014 Kimley-Horn
notified the District they have initiated the design. An engineer’s
cost estimate was submitted to the District in July 2014, about the
same time a draft of the reimbursement agreement was provided to the
District for review and comment. The reimbursement agreement
requires the District to deposit with SANDAG one hundred (100)
percent of the bid amount attributable to the relocation and
adjustment of District facilities. Until the project has been bid,
the exact amount of this deposit amount will not be known.
The $525,000 budget increase is needed to account for the following:
SANDAG accelerated the design to meet their funding deadline,
but an estimate of the cost for the relocation wasn’t known
until July 2014.
SANDAG is requiring a ten (10) percent contingency which was
not expected.
4
SANDAG is requiring an eighteen (18) percent deposit for
Construction Management which was not expected.
Because the ultimate amount of the bid is unknown, a sufficient
contingency is needed in order to meet the reimbursement
requirement to provide a deposit to SANDAG within 30 calendar
days of awarding the bid.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joseph Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The FY 2015 budget for CIP P2539 is $375,000. Total expenditures,
plus outstanding commitments and forecast, including this agreement,
are $883,488. See Attachment B for budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that with a budget increase of $525,000, the Project will
be completed within the new budget amount of $900,000.
The Finance Department has determined that 100% of the funding is
available from the Replacement Fund for CIP P2539.
As a part of the 2015 budget process, the reserve where this CIP is
funded from will be assessed and will be allocated the necessary
funds at that time. It is anticipated that the actual overall CIP
expenditures will be approximately 70 percent of the overall CIP
budget making sufficient reserves available to fund this budget
increase.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
The District’s General Counsel, SANDAG, and the City’s City Attorney
have reviewed and accepted the agreement as to form and legality.
KC:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2539 - South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)\Staff Reports\BD 01-07-2015, Staff Report,
South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (SBBRT) Reimbursement Agreement (KC-BK).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – P2539 Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Agreement
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2539-001102
Authorization to Execute a Reimbursement Agreement Between
the San Diego Association of Governments and the Otay Water
District for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on December 8, 2014 and the following comments
were made:
Staff is requesting that the board authorize an agreement with
the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) for
reimbursement of costs associated with the construction of the
South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project and increase the CIP
budget for P2539 from $375,000 to $900,000.
The District has facilities within the City of Chula Vista’s
public streets that need to be relocated per the terms of the
franchise rights agreement between the City and the District.
This requires the District to relocate existing water facilities
to clear the proposed City/SANDAG BRT project.
In order to minimize impacts to the Chula Vista community,
District staff and SANDAG are coordinating their efforts to
combine the contract documents for the utility relocations and
the BRT Project work into one bid package.
The water infrastructure work consists of relocating existing
recycled and potable water facilities including meters and
appurtenances.
A traditional utility relocation project is a design-bid-build
process that can take several years to complete.
SANDAG and the City needed the design to be completed sooner, and
worked with the District to come up with a solution that was fair
to both parties.
To accelerate the project schedule, on November 13, 2013, SANDAG
and the City agreed to pay Kimley-Horn Engineering to perform the
design work for the District’s utility relocations.
The City/SANDAG design was put on hold for a few weeks and on
March 31, 2014 Kimley-Horn notified the District that they have
initiated the design phase. An engineer’s cost estimate was
submitted to the District in July 2014, about the same time a
draft of the reimbursement agreement was provided to the District
for review and comment, but it was too late to update the CIP
budget for the current FY2015 budget by that time.
The reimbursement agreement requires the District to deposit with
SANDAG one hundred (100) percent of the bid amount attributable
to the relocation and adjustment of the District facilities.
Until the project has been bid, the exact amount of this deposit
amount will not be known. It is expected the project will be bid
in January 2015 and by May 2015 SANDAG will request a deposit
amount estimated to be approximately $736,000.
The $525,000 budget increase is needed to account for the
following:
The cost of the accelerated design phase to meet SANDAG’s
funding deadline
To include the estimated cost for the relocation which
wasn’t known until July 2014
To provide a ten (10) percent contingency as required by
SANDAG
To provide an eighteen (18) percent deposit for Construction
Management as required by SANDAG
The District’s Attorney noted that Otay WD’s franchise rights are
with the City of Chula Vista and not with SANDAG. The District
had inquired with SANDAG if the City of Chula Vista should be a
party to the agreement as the relocations are being done under
the City’s rights. The District wished to ensure that the
facilities would not have to be relocated again in the future for
the City of Chula Vista. The City indicated that they did not
wish to be part of the agreement as SANDAG was doing all the
work. The City did provide a letter to Otay acknowledging that
they had delegated their rights to SANDAG and they have no
intention of requiring the District to relocate the facilities
once again. This letter is an exhibit to the reimbursement
agreement.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, it was indicated
that in the future, if the City were to request that the
facilities be relocated again, per the Reimbursement Agreement,
the District would not be obligated to do so.
Staff indicated in response to another inquiry from the committee
that annually, during budget preparations, staff looks at the
different fund balances and, based on projected expenditures in
each CIP by Replacement, Betterment and Expansion, the annual and
six (6) year rolling CIP budgets are developed. Staff accounts
for expenditures that are planned in each year and any shortfalls
during the fiscal year that require financing are funded through
the general fund. In the next budget process, the unanticipated
expenditures will be allocated funds which will be presented for
the board’s approval. It was noted that there is no concern that
funds are not available. While the unanticipated costs exceeded
the project CIP budget for this fiscal year, the overall CIP
budget will not be exceeded.
It was discussed that this is the first Reimbursement Project
with SANDAG and they have different requirements than other
agencies. SANDAG has requested the contingency funding up front.
It was indicated that if the funds are not utilized, they will be
returned to the District.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2539-001102
Authorization to Execute a Reimbursement Agreement Between
the San Diego Association of Governments and the Otay Water
District for the South Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project
Date Updated: 11/19/14
Budget
375,000
Planning
Standard Salaries - - - -
Total Planning - - - -
Design
Standard Salaries 54,938 50,938 4,000 54,938
Equipment Charge 50 50 - 50
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Total Design 54,988 50,988 4,000 54,988
Construction
Standard Salaries 80,000 - 80,000 80,000
Construcion Contract 575,000 - 575,000 575,000 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR (ESTIMATE)
103,500 - 103,500 103,500 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (18%)
Professional Legal Fees 2,500 - 2,500 2,500 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Project Closeout 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 CLOSEOUT
Project Contingency 57,500 - 57,500 57,500 10% CONTINGENCY
Total Construction 828,500 - 828,500 828,500
Grand Total 883,488 50,988 832,500 883,488
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
P2539 - South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Committed Expenditures Outstanding
Commitment &
Projected Final
Cost
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ProjectLocation Map
EXHIBIT A
CIP P2539
F
P:\WORKING\CIP P2539 - South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\BRT Location Map Exhibit
ROAD
TELEGR A P H C A N Y ON RO A D
E A S T P A L O M A R S T R E E T
·|}þ125
OTAY LAKES
O T A Y L A K E S
R O A D
L
A
R
O
A
D
M
E
D
I
A
P A R K W A Y
OLY M PIC
E
A
S
T
L
A
K
E
P
A
R
K
W
A
Y%&'(805
BRANDYWINE
AVENUE
B O N I T A
ROAD
E A S T H S T R E E T
B I R C H ROAD
O U T S I D E D I S T R I C T
·|}þ54
DIV. 2
DIV. 1
DIV. 4
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
?ò
Aä%&s
?p
?Ë
!\
F
0 3,1001,550
Feet
PROJECT EXTENTSPROJECT EXTENTS
EXHIBIT B
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF COSTS OF RELOCATION
AND ADJUSTMENT OF CERTAIN WATER FACILITIES BY AND BETWEEN
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
AND SANDAG IN CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
(SOUTH BAY BRT PROJECT SEGMENTS #1 & #2)
THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PAYMENT OF COSTS FOR
RELOCATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT FACILITIES (the
“Reimbursement Agreement” or “Agreement”), dated ____________________, 2014, is
entered into by and between the Otay Water District (“District”) and the San Diego
Association of Governments (“SANDAG”) to establish terms and conditions pursuant to
which SANDAG will design, bid and cause to be constructed certain District Facilities,
defined herein below, and District will reimburse SANDAG for all expenses related thereto,
with the exception of design costs. District and SANDAG may be referred to herein
individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
RECITALS
WHEREAS, District has approved, within its Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”),
the relocation and adjustment of certain existing, reclaimed and potable water facilities
(referred to herein as “Existing District Facilities”, and further defined below) within the City
of Chula Vista (“City); and
WHEREAS, District is authorized, pursuant to applicable laws, to contract and to pay
for all or part of the cost of the installation, relocation, adjustment, and construction of any
building, facility, structure or other improvements required by District in connection with a
District service; and
WHEREAS, SANDAG is constructing a new Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Guideway in
the median of East Palomar Street (between Oleander and Magdalena Avenues) and from
Magdalena Avenue easterly across SR-125 and Town Center Drive and then southerly to
Birch Road (adjacent to Otay Ranch Town Center Mall). These improvements include, but
are not limited to, roadway widening, new guideway pavement, construction of curb, gutter,
sidewalk, and median islands, construction of retaining walls, relocation of utilities, and new
traffic signals and street lighting (referred to herein as “SANDAG Improvements”, and
further defined below); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the franchise agreement between the District and City, City
may require District to relocate and adjust its facilities at the District’s cost and, for purposes
of the SANDAG Improvements only, has delegated said authority to SANDAG, who is
exercising such rights on behalf of City with the understanding that City will not further
exercise such rights against the District or require further relocation or adjustments related to
the SANDAG Improvements, to the extent set forth in correspondence from the City to
District, dated September 25, 2014, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”; and
WHEREAS, the relocation and adjustment of Existing District Facilities (referred to
herein as the “District Project”, and further defined below) concurrently with SANDAG
Improvements would constitute a substantial benefit to District and the City, which benefits
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 2
include, but are not limited to, reductions or savings in terms of time, money, construction
hazards, and traffic impacts; and
WHEREAS, in order to achieve such benefits, District desires that SANDAG
incorporate the relocation and adjustment of Existing District Facilities into the construction
documents and contract for the SANDAG Improvements; and
WHEREAS, SANDAG is willing to incorporate the District Project into the contract
for SANDAG Improvements, provided District agrees to reimburse SANDAG for all
associated costs; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, it is
agreed by and between the Parties hereto, as follows:
ARTICLE I. DEFINITIONS
1.1 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section 1
shall, for all purposes of this Reimbursement Agreement and of any amendment hereto,
and of any certificate, opinion, estimate or other document herein mentioned, have the
meanings herein specified.
“District” means the Otay Water District, a municipal water district duly organized and
existing under the Municipal Water District Law of 1911, as set forth in the California
Water Code.
“SANDAG” means the San Diego Association of Governments, a regional government
agency in the State of California.
“City” means the City of Chula Vista, California, a chartered municipal corporation duly
organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and laws of the State of
California.
“SANDAG Improvements” means, collectively, the new BRT Guideway and associated
improvements to East Palomar Street (between Oleander and Magdalena Avenues) and
the new BRT Guideway from Magdalena Avenue to Birch Road (South Bay BRT
Segments #1 & #2 – SANDAG CIP 1280504).
“District Costs” means the total dollar amount of costs associated with the District
Project, including, but not limited to, costs of materials, labor, oversight, bidding,
permits, change orders, and the fair share of Joint Costs.
“District Project” means the relocation and adjustment of District’s potable and recycled
water facilities within the limits of the SANDAG Improvements.
“Existing District Facilities” means the following potable and recycled water facilities to
be relocated or adjusted:
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 3
Potable & Recycled Water Improvements Total Quantity
Furnish & install new 1" air release valve 9
Furnish & install new 2" air release valve 11
Furnish & install new 4" air release valve 4
Furnish & install new 2" blowoff valve 15
Furnish & install new 4" blowoff valve 3
Furnish & install new 6" blowoff valve 3
Relocate existing 2" lateral (LF) 106
Relocate existing 4" lateral (LF) 36
Relocate existing 6" lateral (LF) 37
Construct Thrust Block Per W.A.S. (All types) 15
Construct Anchor Block Per W.A.S. (All types) 30
Relocate existing water meter 17
Furnish and install new water meter box 17
Furnish and install new water test station 3
Furnish and install new water valve 1
Furnish and install new fire hydrant and extend lateral 4
Furnish and install new fire hydrant assembly 1
Construct new water vault Per W.A.S. 1
“Joint Costs” means those costs of relocations and adjustment of the Project, which, due
to their nature, cannot be attributed solely to District Project or SANDAG Improvements,
yet from which both derive benefit or those costs that both Parties would have incurred
had their respective facilities been constructed independently of each other (e.g. slurry
seal would have been necessary to cover the District’s trench and would also have been
required for the City street).
“Project” means, collectively, District Facilities and SANDAG Improvements.
ARTICLE II. PRECONSTRUCTION
2.1 Design and Specifications - Generally. Prior to advertisement of a Request for Proposals
(“RFP”) for the construction and installation of Project, District shall submit designs and
all associated plans and specifications (collectively “Construction Documents”) for the
District Project to SANDAG.
2.1.1 Approval. Prior to submission, an authorized representative of District shall
approve the Construction Documents, submittal of which shall indicate such
approval and grant to SANDAG permission to include the Construction
Documents in the RFP.
2.1.2 Design and Preparation Costs. All costs associated with design and the
preparation of Construction Documents shall be borne solely by SANDAG.
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 4
2.1.3 Bidding and Award – SANDAG shall be responsible for all aspects of bidding
and award of a contract for the construction and installation of the Project
(“Construction Agreement”).
2.1.3.1 Bid Package. SANDAG shall be responsible for preparing and
circulating the bid package.
2.1.3.2 Meetings. SANDAG shall organize all pre-bid meetings and shall
inform the District of the time and date of such meeting, so that a
representative of the District may be present to clarify any issues
related to and prepare addenda for the construction of the District
Facilities.
a. Additional Costs. Any additional costs associated with the failure of
District to attend meetings, clarify issues, or submit addenda to
SANDAG for distribution shall be the obligation of the District.
2.1.3.3 Selection of Lowest Responsible Bidder. SANDAG, at its sole
discretion, shall determine the lowest responsible bidder, which
determination shall be binding on the District. Accordingly, SANDAG
shall be solely responsible for handling and responding to any bid
protests or other bid-related disputes
2.1.3.4 Execution of Construction Agreement. SANDAG shall be responsible
for executing the Construction Agreement on behalf of itself and the
District and for ensuring that the District is identified as a third-party
beneficiary of such agreement with the same rights and remedies as
SANDAG.
ARTICLE III. CONSTRUCTION
3.1 Compliance with Specifications. SANDAG will include provisions in the Construction
Agreement that require that the relocations and adjustments associated with the District
Project by SANDAG’s contractor shall be in strict compliance with the approved plans
and specifications provided by District, that all materials furnished by SANDAG’s
contractor shall conform to District’s approved material list, and that any and all
deviations from said plans and specifications must be approved by District, in writing,
prior to being incorporated into the work.
3.1.1 Right to Enforce. District shall have the right to enforce the terms of Section 3.1
against SANDAG’s contractor in the same manner as SANDAG, and pursuant to
Section 11.17 such rights shall be written into the Construction Agreement.
3.2 Project Completion and Warranty. District and SANDAG anticipate that Project will be
completed on or about July 31, 2016. Project, however, will not be deemed completed or
accepted until both SANDAG and District have accepted their respective facilities or
improvements. SANDAG’s contractor shall warrant all work for a period of no less than
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 5
one year from the date of acceptance, which shall be deemed to be the latter of the dates
District and SANDAG accept their work performed and facilities constructed pursuant to
the Construction Agreement. Acceptance will be evidenced by the filing of a Relief of
Maintenance by SANDAG. The Construction Agreement shall include this definition of
project completion and acceptance.
ARTICLE IV. REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
4.1 Deposit Account. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the Construction Agreement
award, District shall deposit with SANDAG an amount equal to one hundred (100)
percent of the bid amount attributable to the relocation and adjustment of District
Facilities, plus a ten (10) percent contingency (“District Deposit”) for the purpose of
reimbursing SANDAG for progress payments made by SANDAG to SANDAG’s
contractor associated with the District Project.
4.2 Invoice. SANDAG shall invoice the District for District Costs (“SANDAG Invoice”)
following the receipt of an invoice from SANDAG’s contractor on which such District
Costs appear. The SANDAG Invoice shall:
4.2.1 Include a copy of the contractor’s invoice.
4.2.2 Identify those costs attributable to the District’s Project.
4.2.3 Show calculations apportioning the District’s fair share of Joint Costs.
4.2.3.1 Apportionment of Joint Costs. Joint Costs may be apportioned as
follows:
a. When a percentage of use can be determined, Joint Costs shall be
apportioned based on the respective percentages of use.
b. When work is equally necessary for both the installation and
construction of SANDAG Improvements and the District Project,
Joint Costs shall be divided equally.
c. Based on the respective percentages of Total Project Costs.
d. Other methods to which the Parties mutually agree.
4.2.4 Provide a net total charge payable by District.
4.3 District Approval. District shall review and approve the SANDAG Invoice within thirty
(30) calendar days of its receipt (“Review Period”). If District determines that all
relevant documents have not been submitted, District shall inform SANDAG of the need
for additional information and specify the documents/information necessary to permit
review and approval.
4.3.1 Failure to Approve. If District fails to approve the SANDAG Invoice or requests
additional information within the Review Period, the charges on the SANDAG
Invoice shall be deemed approved.
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 6
4.4 Reimbursement. Following District approval of a SANDAG Invoice, SANDAG shall
deduct the invoice amount from the District Deposit for the purpose of reimbursing
SANDAG for District Costs invoiced by and paid to SANDAG’s contractor. District
approval of a SANDAG Invoice shall be deemed District’s authorization for such
reimbursement in the amount of the SANDAG Invoice.
4.5 Use of Project Contingency. The Project Contingency may be used for unforeseen
changes in work; however, it shall not be used for: (i) work required due to contractor’s
failure to perform work or services according to the terms of the Construction Agreement
and/or in compliance with the Construction Documents; or (ii) uninsured losses resulting
from the negligence of contractor.
ARTICLE V. CHANGE ORDERS
5.1 Written Approval of Construction Changes and Change Orders. With the exception of
Emergencies, defined below, prior to the approval of a construction change or change
order concerning or affecting District Project, including any changes to SANDAG
Improvements that might affect District Project in any way, SANDAG shall obtain the
written consent of District.
5.1.1 Approval of Change Orders. District shall respond to a change order request
within five (5) working days of the date it is received by District.
5.1.2 Additional Costs. District will bear any increased costs due to a delay in
approving a properly submitted construction change and/or change order request.
5.2 Changes in Emergencies. SANDAG may authorize contractor to proceed with any
proposed construction changes and/or change orders, without consulting with District or
obtaining the District’s written approval, if failure to act immediately would pose a
danger to the public, as determined in the sole discretion of SANDAG, or result in delays
and cost overruns (collectively “Emergency” or “Emergencies”); however, SANDAG
shall use best efforts to immediately, or as soon as reasonably possible, inform the
District of the changes. The District shall be responsible for any increased costs of
construction of their portion of Project due to an Emergency.
5.3 Errors and Omissions. SANDAG shall not make payment to contractor or charge
District for any costs or expenses of a Change Order resulting from an error or omission
for which the contractor is solely responsible.
ARTICLE VI. INSPECTION
6.1 Inspection Team. District shall appoint an individual or team responsible for inspections
and approving installation of District Facilities.
6.2 Inspection Stages and Obligations. District shall have the right to conduct inspections of
the District Project and construction methods pertaining thereto as deemed necessary by
District. District shall provide copies of all District inspections to SANDAG within five
(5) working days of an inspection. District shall be responsible for verifying that all
work on District Project is completed in accordance with the approved plans and
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 7
specifications. It is specifically understood that District’s inspectors shall have the
authority to enforce District’s plans and specifications for District Project, which
authority shall include the authority to require that any and all unacceptable materials,
workmanship, and/or installation be replaced, repaired, or corrected by SANDAG’s
contractor without cost to District and/or City.
6.3 Inspection Costs. All inspection costs incurred by District will be borne by District.
6.4 Notification. The Parties agree to develop mutually acceptable procedures for
notification of inspections required or deemed necessary by either Party.
ARTICLE VII. INSURANCE
7.1 Contractor’s Insurance. SANDAG shall ensure that its contractor provides evidence of
insurance coverage, as required by SANDAG, for the entire construction and, if
applicable, warranty period. Such insurance shall, at a minimum, include a
comprehensive general liability policy in an amount sufficient to cover all contractual
obligations of the contractor under the construction contract, and no less than
$2,000,000. The policy of insurance shall name District and SANDAG, and their
respective employees, officers, governing body members, and agents as additional
insureds, require a waiver of subrogation, and be primary insurance. Furthermore,
SANDAG shall obtain evidence that the contractor maintains worker’s compensation
insurance in accordance with applicable requirements of law.
7.2 Parties’ Insurance. District and SANDAG shall maintain insurance as customary in
connection with their respective facilities.
ARTICLE VIII. INDEMNITY
8.1 Indemnity. Each Party hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless
(“Indemnitor”) the other Party, its agents, officers, and employees (“Indemnitees”) from
and against any and all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to
any property or person, including death or dismemberment, which arise from or are
caused by the negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of the Indemnitor’s
agents, officers or employees, in performing the work or services herein and all expenses
of investigation and defending against same; provided, however, that each Party's duty to
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other shall not include any claims or liability
arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the other Indemnitee, its agents,
officers or employees. District and SANDAG agree that in the event of any joint or
concurrent negligence, they will apportion any established or agreed upon liability
proportionate to their respective degree of fault. For the purposes of this provision,
SANDAG’s contractor shall not be considered an agent of SANDAG or District. Claims
related to the actions or omissions of SANDAG’s contractor shall be addressed through
provisions in the Construction Agreement, which provisions shall include indemnity,
defense, and hold harmless provisions from SANDAG’s contractor in favor of both
SANDAG and District.
8.2. Enforcement Costs. Indemnitor agrees to pay any and all costs SANDAG incurs
enforcing the indemnity and defense provisions set forth in Article V.
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 8
8.3. Survival. Indemnitor’s obligations under Article V shall survive the termination of this
Agreement.
ARTICLE IX. RECORDS
9.1 Retention of Records. SANDAG shall require contractor to maintain data and records
related to this Construction Agreement for a period as defined in the SANDAG contract.
9.2 Audit of Records. SANDAG shall make available and shall require that its contractor
make available to District for examination at reasonable locations within the County of
San Diego and at any time during normal business hours and as often as the District
deems necessary, all of the data and records with respect to all matters covered by this
Agreement and the Construction Agreement. SANDAG and contractor will permit the
District to make audits of all invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel, and other
data and media relating to all matters covered by this Agreement and the Construction
Agreement.
ARTICLE X. NOTICES
10.1 Writing. Any demand upon or notice required or permitted to be given by one Party to
the other Party shall be in writing.
10.2 Effective Date. Except as otherwise provided by law, any demand upon or notice
required or permitted to be given by one Party to the other Party shall be effective: (i)
on personal delivery, (ii) on the second business day after mailing by certified or
registered U.S. Mail, return receipt requested, (iii) on the succeeding business day after
mailing by Express Mail or after deposit with a private delivery service of general use
(e.g., Federal Express) postage or fee prepaid as appropriate, or (iv) upon successful
transmission of facsimile.
10.3 Recipients. All demands or notices required or permitted to be given shall be sent to all
of the following:
10.3.1 District:
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, California 91978
Fax: 619-670-8920
Attention: District Project Manager
10.3.2 SANDAG:
SANDAG
401 B Street, Suite 800
San Diego, California 92101
Fax: (619) 699-1905
Attention: South Bay BRT Project Manager
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 9
10.4 Change of Address(es). Notice of change of address shall be given in the manner set
forth in this Article.
ARTICLE XI. MISCELLANEOUS
11.1 Headings. All article headings are for convenience only and shall not affect the
interpretation of this Agreement.
11.2 Gender & Number. Whenever the context requires, the use herein of (i) the neuter
gender includes the masculine and the feminine genders and (ii) the singular number
includes the plural number.
11.3 Reference to Paragraphs. Each reference in this Agreement to a section refers, unless
otherwise stated, to a section of this Agreement.
11.4 Incorporation of Recitals. All recitals herein are incorporated into this Agreement and
are made a part hereof.
11.5 Covenants and Conditions. All provisions of this Agreement expressed as either
covenants or conditions on the part of SANDAG or the District, shall be deemed to be
both covenants and conditions.
11.6 Integration. This Agreement and the exhibits and references incorporated into this
Agreement fully express all understandings of the Parties concerning the matters
covered in this Agreement. No change, alteration, or modification of the terms or
conditions of this Agreement, and no verbal understanding of the Parties, their officers,
agents, or employees shall be valid unless made in the form of a written change agreed
to in writing by both Parties or an amendment to this Agreement agreed to by both
Parties. All prior negotiations and agreements are merged into this Agreement.
11.7 Severability. The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision of this
Agreement shall not render any other provision of this Agreement unenforceable,
invalid, or illegal.
11.8 Drafting Ambiguities. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to
be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms and conditions of this
Agreement, and the decision of whether or not to seek advice of counsel with respect to
this Agreement is a decision that is the sole responsibility of each Party. This
Agreement shall not be construed in favor of or against either Party by reason of the
extent to which each Party participated in the drafting of the Agreement.
11.9 Conflicts Between Terms. If an apparent conflict or inconsistency exists between the
main body of this Agreement and the exhibits, the main body of this Agreement shall
control. If a conflict exists between an applicable federal, state, or local law, rule,
regulation, order, or code and this Agreement, the law, rule, regulation, order, or code
shall control. Varying degrees of stringency among the main body of this Agreement,
the exhibits, and laws, rules, regulations, orders, or codes are not deemed conflicts, and
the most stringent requirement shall control. Each Party shall notify the other
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 10
immediately upon the identification of any apparent conflict or inconsistency
concerning this Agreement.
11.10 Prompt Performance. Time is of the essence of each covenant and condition set forth in
this Agreement.
11.11 Good Faith Performance. The parties shall cooperate with each other in good faith,
and assist each other in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement.
11.12 Further Assurances. SANDAG and District each agrees to execute and deliver such
additional documents as may be required to effectuate the purposes of this Agreement.
11.13 Exhibits. Each of the following Exhibits is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference:
Exhibit “A”: correspondence from David E. Miller to Dan Martin, dated September
25, 2014, confirming limited delegation of franchise rights to SANDAG.
11.14 Controlling Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern and control the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
11.15 Jurisdiction and Venue. The venue for any suit or proceeding concerning this
Agreement, the interpretation or application of any of its terms, or any related disputes
shall be in the County of San Diego, State of California.
11.16 Agency/Municipal Powers. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as
a limitation upon the powers of the District as a municipal water district or SANDAG
as a regional government agency in the State of California.
11.17 Third Party Relationships. Nothing in this Agreement shall create a contractual
relationship between SANDAG or District and any third party; however, SANDAG
shall ensure that the District is an intended third party beneficiary of the Construction
Agreement and shall share all of the rights and benefits of SANDAG with respect to
the contractor.
11.18 Limitation on District Remedies and Waiver of Claims. District understands that the
sole purpose of this Agreement is to establish a method to reimburse SANDAG for
obligations of the District for payment of the costs of the installation and construction
of District Facilities, which costs would otherwise be due directly to SANDAG
contractor. In accordance with such purpose, the District agrees that its sole remedy
for construction defects, breach by SANDAG contractor, damage to property or
persons, including death, to District personnel or any third parties, or other claims
arising out of or related to the work performed to install and/or construct District
Facilities shall be against SANDAG’s contractor or its subcontractors and agents, and,
hereby, waives any and all claims it may hereafter have against SANDAG, arising out
of the same, except for those claims arising out of the sole negligence or sole willful
misconduct of SANDAG or covered by the indemnity provisions of Section 8.1.
11.19 Non-Assignment. Except as relates to the Construction Agreement, SANDAG shall
not assign the obligations under this Agreement.
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 11
11.20 Successors in Interest. This Agreement and all rights and obligations created by this
Agreement shall be in force and effect whether or not any Parties to the Agreement
have been succeeded by another entity, and all rights and obligations created by this
Agreement shall be vested and binding on any Party's successor in interest.
11.21 No Waiver. No failure of either SANDAG or the District to insist upon the strict
performance by the other of any covenant, term or condition of this Agreement, nor
any failure to exercise any right or remedy consequent upon a breach of any covenant,
term, or condition of this Agreement, shall constitute a waiver of any such breach of
such covenant, term or condition. No waiver of any breach shall affect or alter this
Agreement, and each and every covenant, condition, and term hereof shall continue in
full force and effect to any existing or subsequent breach.
11.22 Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures. No suit or arbitration arising out
of this Agreement shall be brought against SANDAG, unless a claim has first been
presented in writing and filed with SANDAG and acted upon by SANDAG. Upon
request by SANDAG, District shall meet and confer in good faith with SANDAG for
the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. Similarly, no
suit or arbitration arising out of this Agreement shall be brought against the District
unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the District and acted
upon by the District in accordance with the procedures set forth in the California
Government Code and Otay Water District Policy No. 29, as same may from time to
time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully
set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the District in the
implementation of same. Upon request by District, SANDAG shall meet and confer in
good faith with District for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this
Agreement.
11.23 Dispute Resolution. If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, or the
breach thereof, the Parties agree to engage in good faith negotiations to attempt to
resolve the dispute. In the event of any action at law or in equity, including an action
for declaratory relief, between the Parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement,
then the prevailing party in such action will be entitled to recover from the other party
a reasonable sum as attorneys’ fees and costs. The prevailing party will be determined
in accordance with Civil Code Section 1717(b)(1) or any successor statute. The
prevailing party will also be entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in any
post-judgment proceedings to collect or enforce the judgment. This provision is
separate and will survive the merger of this Agreement into any judgment on this
Agreement.
11.24 Administration of Contract. SANDAG hereby designates Bruce Schmith, Principal
Civil Engineer, as SANDAG Project Manager for the construction of Project and as
the primary contact for all matters relating to this Agreement, including the submittal
of SANDAG invoices for reimbursement.
District hereby designates ____________________ as District Project Manager for
District Facilities and as the primary contact for all matters relating to this Agreement,
including the processing, documenting, and approval of SANDAG invoices.
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 12
11.25 Signing Authority. The representative for each Party signing on behalf of such Party
hereby declares that authority has been obtained to sign on behalf of SANDAG and/or
District, as applicable and agrees to hold the other Party or Parties hereto harmless if it
is later determined that such authority does not exist.
Reimbursement Agreement for Relocation & Adjustment of Certain Water Facilities by and between
the Otay Water District and SANDAG in Chula Vista for South Bay BRT Project Segments #1 & #2
Stutz Law San Diego/4344/2/K/S0210400.DOC 13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SANDAG and District have executed this Agreement
thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and
complete consent to its terms:
SANDAG Otay Water District
Dated: _________________________ Dated: _________________
By: ___________________________ By: ____________________
Gary L. Gallegos, Executive Director
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
____________________________________ ___________________________
Office of General Counsel District Counsel
Dated: ________________________ Dated:______________________
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Armando Buelna,
Communications Officer
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: 2015 Legislative Program Guidelines
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors adopt the 2015 Otay Water District
Legislative Program Guidelines.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To provide direction to staff and the District’s Legislative
Advocates in the formulation of the District’s response to
legislative initiatives on issues affecting the District during the
2015 legislative session.
ANALYSIS:
Otay Water District maintains a set of legislative policy guidelines
to direct staff and legislative advocates on issues important to the
District. The legislative guidelines are updated annually with the
proposed updates presented to the Otay Water District’s Board of
Directors for review, comment and adoption. The attached 2015
Legislative Program represents policy positions on legislation for
the Board’s consideration.
2
Each legislative session, representatives to the California
Legislature sponsor some 2,000 or more bills or significant
resolutions. While many bills fail to make it out of their house of
origin, many others go on to be signed by the governor and become
law. These new laws can affect special districts in substantive ways.
The same is true with each session of the House of Representatives
and the U.S. Senate.
The 2015 Legislative Program establishes guidelines and policy
direction that can be used by staff when monitoring legislative
activity to facilitate actions that can be taken quickly in response
to proposed bills. The guidelines provide a useful framework for
staff when evaluating the potential impact of state or federal
legislation on the District. This is particularly helpful when a
timely response is necessary to address a last minute amendment to
legislation and should calls or letters of support or opposition be
needed.
Legislation that does not meet the guidelines as set forth or that
has potentially complicated or varied implications will not be acted
upon by staff or the legislative advocates, and will instead be
presented to the Board directly for guidance in advance of any
position being taken.
The 2015 Legislative Guidelines presents staff’s initial
recommendations for the Board’s review, and seeks the Board’s
recommendations for any additional modifications. Staff will then
incorporate feedback into the final document.
In general, the guidelines look to protect the District’s interest in
a reliable, diverse and affordable water supply. Moreover, they seek
to maintain local control over special district actions to protect
your Board’s discretion and ratepayer interests, and maintain the
ability to effectively and efficiently manage District operations. In
addition they express the District’s ongoing support for water
conservation, recycled water, ocean water desalination, capital
improvement project development, organization-wide safety and
security, binational cooperation, as well as the equitable
distribution of water bond proceeds.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
3
LEGAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – 2015 Otay Water District Legislative
Program
Attachment C - 2015 Otay Water District Legislative
Program Redline
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
2015 Legislative Program Guidelines
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on December 8, 2014 and the following comments
were made:
Otay Water District maintains a set of legislative policy
guidelines to direct staff and its legislative advocates on
issues important to the District. The legislative guidelines
were first developed in 2003 and are updated annually. The
proposed updates for 2015 are being presented for the committee’s
review and input before being presented to the full board.
The guidelines are used by staff in monitoring legislative
activity and are a useful tool when evaluating the potential
impact of state or federal legislation on the District. They are
particularly helpful when a timely response is necessary to
address a last minute amendment to a piece of legislation and
when calls or letters of support or opposition must to be sent to
the legislature or committees in Sacramento or potentially
Washington.
It was noted that any legislation that is not within the
guidelines will not be acted upon by staff or the legislative
advocates. Such legislation, as well as sensitive or
controversial policy matters, will always be brought to the full
Board for its deliberation and direction.
The guidelines look to protect the District’s varied interests in
a reliable, diverse and affordable water supply. They also seek
to maintain local control over special district affairs, as well
as the board’s discretion and ability to protect ratepayer
interests and effectively and efficiently run the District.
The proposed changes this year are minor and are tailored to suit
Otay’s interests. Items have been added or changed to keep Otay
in alignment with the Water Authority, and other San Diego water
agencies on topics of importance to the region.
The committee noted that all the agencies are putting water into
the sewer and the question is, “Who owns that water as it relates
to potable reuse?” The committee inquired if the agency whose
customers are putting water into the sewer, if they shouldn’t
have first priority ownership of that water (the right to recycle
that water and utilize it in their service area). It was
indicated that the agencies do, but there needs to be a balance
as the region does require the Metro System. It was indicated
that the Otay WD and the City of Chula Vista had performed a
feasibility study approximately five (5) or six (6) years ago to
determine if the City of Chula Vista could handle its own sewer
processing through the Main Street treatment plant to avoid
purchasing additional capacity from the Metro System due to
growth. The study indicated that it could be done, however, it
was not yet determined if it would be cost effective for the City
of Chula Vista to do so.
The committee inquired if there is any legislation that
encourages multi-agency cooperation and results in an increase in
availability or use of recycled water. Staff indicated that
there is an item in the Guidelines under Financial, item d, which
indicates, “Provide incentives for local agencies to work
cooperatively, share costs or resources.” It was suggested that
a similar statement could be added to the Recycled Water
guidelines.
The Committee suggested that under Recycled Water, item j, be
amended to read, “Create federal and state incentives to promote
recycled water use and production.”
In response to a comment by the Committee, staff indicated that
the water bond was approved, so the verbiage within the
Guidelines under Water Bonds was changed to ensure that the
Region would get its fair share of the bond proceeds. The
Committee suggested that the title “Water Bonds” be changed to
“State Water Bonds” within the Guidelines.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
1 | Page
Effective Date: 01/07/2015
Legislative Policy Guidelines
The Otay Water Legislative Policy Guidelines for the 2015 Legislative Session includes the
following:
Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta (Bay-Delta)
Support efforts to:
a. Finalize and implement the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan to address Bay-Delta environmental
and water quality issues.
b. Analyze or support a “Portfolio Approach”, “Around-the-Delta”, “right-sized”, or other
alternatives that feature smaller conveyance facilities as a way to improve water quality, water
transport, and reduce the possibility or impacts of levee failure, lower costs to water users and
the public, reduce the level of environmental impacts, while potentially facing fewer legal and
political challenges.
c. Finalize Bay-Delta planning work and ongoing studies of new water storage facilities, and
support efforts to promote additional surface and underground water storage infrastructure
that are cost effective ensure water availability and quality.
d. Resolve conflicts between urban and rural water users, water management and the
environment in the Bay-Delta.
e. Provide ongoing federal and state funding for the Bay-Delta, and those which focus attention
to Bay-Delta financing, affordability, commitments to pay, and the demand for Bay-Delta
water.
f. Equitably allocate costs of the Bay-Delta solution to all those benefiting from improvements
in proportion to the benefits they receive.
g. Fast-track design, permits and construction for pilot projects in the Bay-Delta to create
barriers to keep fish away from Bay-Delta water pumps, improve water quality and supply
reliability.
h. Provide deliberative processes that are designed to ensure meaningful dialogue with all
stakeholders in an open and transparent process in order to reduce future conflicts and
challenges in implementing a Bay-Delta solution.
i. Provide a Bay-Delta solution that acknowledges, integrates and supports the development of
water resources at the local level.
j. Improve the ability of water-users to divert water from the Bay-Delta during wet periods
when impacts to fish and the ecosystem are lower and water quality is higher.
k. Improve the existing Bay-Delta water conveyance system to increase flexibility and enhance
water supply, water quality, levee stability and environmental protection.
l. Evaluate long-term threats to the Bay-Delta levees and conveyance system and pursues
actions to reduce risks to the state’s water supply and the environment.
m. Improve coordination of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project Operations.
n. Provide a Bay-Delta solution and facilities that are cost-effective when compared with other
water supply development options for meeting Southern California’s water needs.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
2 | Page
o. Identify the total cost or perform appropriate cost studies to estimate consumer financial
impact as well as the expected yield of any Bay-Delta solution before financing and funding
decision are made to determine whether the solution is worth the expense.
p. Provide the State Water Project (SWP) with more flexibility to operate their systems to
maximize water deliveries while avoiding unacceptable impacts to third parties, habitat or the
environment.
q. Require a firm commitment and funding stream by all parties to pay for the proportional
benefits they will receive from a Bay-Delta solution through take-or-pay contracts or the legal
equivalent, and identify the impact to the remaining contractors if one or more contractors
default or back out.
r. Provide “right-sized” facilities to match firm commitments to pay for the Bay-Delta solution.
s. Provide SWP contractors and their member agencies access to all SWP facilities to facilitate
water transfers.
t. Continue state ownership and operation of SWP as a public resource.
u. Improve efficiency and transparency of all SWP operations.
v. Focus on statewide priorities, including construction of an approved method of conveyance of
water through or around the Delta that provides water supply reliability to the Delta water
uses, promotion of greater regional and local self sufficiency, surface storage and promotion
of water use efficiency.
w. Provides for the state’s share of funding for Bay-Delta conveyance projects.
x. Consider complementary investments in local water supply sources, regional coordination,
and south of Delta storage as part of an overall comprehensive Bay-Delta solution.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Require additional reviews or approvals of Delta conveyance options beyond those provided
by SBX7-1 (2009).
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
3 | Page
Recycled Water
Support efforts to:
a. Reduce restrictions on recycled water usage or promote consistent regulation of recycled
water projects to reduce impediments to the increased use of recycled water.
b. Reduce restrictions on injecting recycled water into basins where there is no direct potable
use.
c. Provide financial incentives for recharge of groundwater aquifers using recycled water.
d. Make recycled water regulations clear, consolidated, and understandable to expedite related
project permitting.
e. Promote recycled water as a sustainable supplemental source of water.
f. Allow the safe use of recycled water.
g. Facilitate development of technology aimed at improving water recycling.
h. Increasing funding for water recycling projects.
i. Increase awareness of the ways recycled water can help address the region’s water supply
challenges.
j. Create federal and state incentives to promote recycled water use and production.
k. Establish federal tax incentives to support U.S. companies in the development of new water
technologies that can lower productions costs, address by products such as concentrates, and
enhance public acceptance of recycled water.
l. Establish a comprehensive national research and development, and technology demonstration,
program to advance the public and scientific understanding of water recycling technologies to
encourage reuse as an alternative source of water supply.
m. Provide incentives for local agencies to work cooperatively, share costs or resources to
promote or expand the use of recycled water.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Restrict use of recycled water for groundwater recharge.
b. Establish new water or recycled water fees solely to recover State costs without also
providing some benefit.
c. Create regulatory schemes that alter or limit the existing authority to reuse and recycle water.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
4 | Page
Water Services
Support efforts to:
a. Provide funding to implement actions identified in the California Water Action Plan to lay a
solid fiscal foundation for implementing near-term actions, including funding for water
efficiency projects, wetland and watershed restoration, groundwater programs, conservation,
flood control, and integrated water management and result in a reliable supply of high-quality
water for the San Diego region.
b. Provide financial support to projects designed to mitigate the potential negative impacts of
Global Climate Change on water supply reliability.
c. Promote the coordination and integration of local, state and federal climate change policies
and practices to the greatest extent feasible.
d. Support ongoing implementation of the Quantitative Settlement Agreement.
e. Provide reliable water supplies to meet California’s short and long-term needs.
f. Support legislation that reduces impediments for willing sellers and buyers to engage in water
transfer agreements.
g. Promote desalination pilot studies and projects.
h. Encourage feasibility studies of water resource initiatives.
i. Increase funds for infrastructure and grant programs for construction, modernization or
expansion of water, wastewater treatment, reclamation facilities and sewer systems including
water recycling, groundwater recovery and recharge, surface water development projects and
seawater desalination.
j. Mandate uniform or similar regulations and procedures by state agencies in the processing
and administering of grants and programs.
k. Streamline grant application procedures.
l. Promote or assist voluntary water transfers between willing buyers and willing sellers and
move those transactions through without delay.
m. Streamline the permitting and approval process for implementing water transfers.
n. Establish reasonable statewide approaches to sewer reporting standards.
o. Generate greater efficiencies, better coordinate program delivery, and eliminate duplication in
programs for source water protection without lessening the focus on public health of the
state’s Drinking Water Program.
n. Target efforts to fix specific issues with water supplies within the state’s Drinking Water
Program.
o. Establish federal tax incentives to support U.S. companies in the development of new
desalination technologies that can lower productions costs, eliminate or reduce impingement
or entrainment, reduce energy use, and enhance public acceptance of desalinated water.
p. Establish a comprehensive national research and development, and technology demonstration
program to advance the scientific understanding of desalination to expand its use as an
alternative source of water supply.
q. Require the State Water Resources Control Board to exercise its authority to fund and
implement the Salton Sea mitigation and restoration plan, meet state obligations, and work
with QSA stakeholders to find workable solutions to ensure the continuation of IID water
transfers.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
5 | Page
Oppose efforts that:
a. Make urban water supplies less reliable or substantially increase the cost of imported water
without also improving the reliability and/or quality of the water.
b. Create unrealistic or costly water testing or reporting protocol.
c. Disproportionately apportion the cost of water.
d. Create undo hurtles for seawater desalination projects.
e. Create unreasonable or confusing sewer reporting standards.
f. Create administrative or other barriers to sales between willing buyers and willing sellers that
delay water transfers.
g. Create a broad-based user fee that does not support a specific program activity; any fee must
provide a clear nexus to the benefit the fee would provide.
h. Create unrealistic or costly to obtain water quality standards for potable water, recycled water
or storm water runoff.
i. Change the focus of the state’s Drinking Water Program or weaken the parts of the program
that work well.
j. Lessen the focus on public health of the state’s Drinking Water Program.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
6 | Page
Financial
Support efforts to:
a. Require the federal government and State of California to reimburse special districts for all
mandated costs or regulatory actions.
b. Give special districts the discretion to cease performance of unfunded mandates.
c. Provide for fiscal reform to enhance the equity, reliability, and certainty of special district
funding.
d. Provide incentives for local agencies to work cooperatively, share costs or resources.
e. Provide for the stable, equitable and reliable allocation of property taxes.
f. Continue to reform workers compensation.
g. Authorize financing of water quality, water security, and water supply infrastructure
improvement programs.
h. Promote competition in insurance underwriting for public agencies.
i. Establish spending caps on State of California overhead when administering voter approved
grant and disbursement programs.
j. Require disbursement decisions in a manner appropriate to the service in question.
k. Encourage funding infrastructure programs that are currently in place and that have been
proven effective.
l. Produce tangible results, such as water supply reliability or water quality improvement.
m. Provide financial incentives for energy projects that increase reliability, diversity, and reduce
green house gasses.
n. Continue energy rate incentives for the utilization of electricity during low-peak periods.
o. Provide loan or grant programs that encourage water conservation for water users who are
least able to pay for capital projects.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Impose new, unfunded state mandates on local agencies and their customers.
b. Undermine Proposition 1A - Protection of Local Government Revenues – and the
comprehensive reform approved by voters in 2004.
c. Reallocate special district reserves in an effort to balance the state budget.
d. Reallocate special district revenues or reserves to fund infrastructure improvements or other
activities in cities or counties.
e. Usurp special district funds, reserves, or other state actions that force special districts to raise
rates, fees or charges.
f. Complicate or deter conservation-based rate structures.
g. Establish funding mechanisms that put undue burdens on local agencies or make local
agencies de facto tax collectors for the state.
h. Complicate compliance with SB 610 and SB 221.
i. Adversely affect the cost of gas and electricity or reduce an organization’s flexibility to take
advantage of low peak cost periods.
j. Add new reporting criteria, burdensome, unnecessary or costly reporting mandates to Urban
Water Management Plans.
k. Add new mandates to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to review and approve
Urban Water Management Plans beyond those already addressed in DWR guidelines.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
7 | Page
l. Mandate that water agencies include an embedded energy calculation for their water supply
sources in Urban Water Management Plans or any other water resources planning or master
planning document.
m. Weaken existing project retention and withholding provisions that limit the ability of public
agencies to drive contractor performance.
n. Establish change order requirements that place an unreasonable burden on local agencies, or
raise financial risk associated with public works contracts.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
8 | Page
Governance/Local Autonomy
Support efforts to:
a. Expand local autonomy in governing special district affairs.
b. Promote comprehensive long-range planning.
c. Assist local agencies in the logical and efficient extension of services and facilities to promote
efficiency and avoid duplication of services.
d. Streamline the Municipal Service Review Process or set limits on how long services reviews
can take or cost.
e. Establish clear and reasonable guidelines for appropriate community sponsorship activities.
f. Reaffirm the existing “all-in” financial structure, or protect the San Diego County Water
Authority voting structure based on population.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Assume the state legislature is better able to make local decisions that affect special district
governance.
b. Create one-size-fits-all approaches to special district reform.
c. Unfairly target one group of local elected officials.
d. Usurp local control from special districts regarding decisions involving local special district
finance, operations or governance.
e. Limit the board of directors’ ability to govern the district.
f. Create unfunded local government mandates.
g. Create costly, unnecessary or duplicative oversight roles for the state government of special
district affairs.
h. Create new oversight roles or responsibility for monitoring special district affairs.
i. Change the San Diego County Water Authority Act regarding voting structure, unless it is
based on population.
j. Shift the liability to the public entity and relieve private entities of reasonable due diligence in
their review of plans and specifications for errors, omissions and other issues.
k. Place a significant and unreasonable burden on public agencies, resulting in increased cost for
public works construction or their operation.
l. Impair the ability of water districts to acquire property or property interests required for
essential capital improvement projects.
m. Increase the cost of property and right-of-way acquisition, or restricts the use of right-of-
ways.
n. Work to silence the voices of special districts and other local government associations on
statewide ballot measures impacting local government policies and practices, including
actions that could prohibit special districts and associations from advocating for positions on
ballot measures by severely restricting the private resources used to fund those activities.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
9 | Page
Conservation
Support efforts to:
a. Provide funding for water conservation programs.
b. Encourage the installation of water conserving fixtures in new and existing buildings.
c. Promote the environmental benefits of water conservation.
d. Enhance efforts to promote water awareness and conservation.
e. Offer incentives for landscape water efficiency devices such as ET controllers and soil
moisture sensors.
f. Develop landscape retrofit incentive programs and/or irrigation retrofit incentive programs.
g. Permit or require local agencies to adopt ordinances that require or promote water wise
landscape for commercial and residential developments.
h. Create tax incentives for citizens or developers who install water wise landscapes.
i. Create tax incentives for citizens who purchase high efficiency clothes washers, dual flush
and high-efficiency toilets and irrigation controllers above the state standards.
j. Expand community-based conservation and education programs.
k. Develop incentives for developers and existing customers to install water wise landscape in
existing developments or new construction.
l. Encourage large state users to conserve water by implementing water efficient technologies in
all facilities both new and retrofit.
m. Create higher incentives for solar power.
n. Encourage large state water users to conserve water outdoors.
o. Educate all Californians on the importance of water, and the need to conserve, manage, and
plan for the future needs.
p. Encourage technological research targeted to more efficient water use.
q. Give local agencies maximum discretion in selecting conservation programs that work for
their customers and the communities they serve.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Weaken federal or state water efficiency standards.
b. Introduce additional analytical and reporting requirements that are time-consuming for local
agencies to perform and result in additional costs to consumers, yet yield no water savings.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
10 | Page
Safety, Security and Information Technology
Support efforts to:
a. Provide funding for information security upgrades to include integrated alarms, access/egress,
and surveillance technology.
b. Provide incentives for utilities and other local agencies to work cooperatively, share costs or
resources.
c. Provide funding for communication enhancements, wireless communications, GIS or other
technological enhancements.
d. Encourage or promote compatible software systems.
e. Fund infrastructure and facility security improvements that include facility roadway access,
remote gate access and physical security upgrades.
f. Protect state, local and regional drinking water systems from terrorist attack or deliberate acts
of destruction, contamination or degradation.
g. Provide funds to support training or joint training exercises to include contingency funding for
emergencies and emergency preparedness.
h. Equitably allocate security funding based on need, threats and/or population.
i. Encourage or promote compatible communication systems.
j. Encourage and promote funding of Department of Homeland Security Risk Mitigation
programs.
k. Recognizes water agencies as emergency responders to damage and challenges caused by
wildfires, earthquakes, and other natural disasters, as well as terrorist and other criminal
activities that threaten water operations, facilities and supplies.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Create unnecessary, costly, or duplicative security mandates.
b. Require expanded water system descriptions or additional public disclosure of public water
systems details for large water suppliers in Urban Water Management Planning documents,
potentially compromising public water systems and creating a conflict with the Department of
Homeland Security’s recommendation to avoid reference to water system details in plans
available to the general public.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
11 | Page
Optimize District Effectiveness
Support efforts to:
a. Give utilities the ability to avoid critical peak energy pricing or negotiate energy contracts that
save ratepayers money.
b. Develop reasonable Air Pollution Control District engine permitting requirements.
c. Reimburse or reduce local government mandates.
d. Allow public agencies to continue offering defined benefit plans.
e. Result in predictable costs and benefits for employees and taxpayers.
f. Eliminate abuses.
g. Retain local control of pension systems.
h. Be constitutional, federally legal and technically possible.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Restrict the use of, or reallocate, district property tax revenues to the detriment of special
districts.
b. Create unrealistic ergonomic protocol.
c. Micromanage special district operations.
d. Balance the state budget by allowing regulatory agencies to increase permitting fees.
e. Tax dependent benefits.
f. Require new reporting criteria on emergency intensity involved in water supply.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
12 | Page
Bi-National Initiatives
Support efforts to:
a. Promote and finance cross-border infrastructure development such as water pipelines,
desalination plants or water treatment facilities to serve the border region.
b. Develop cooperative and collaborative solutions to cross-border issues.
c. Develop and enhance communications and understanding of the interdependence of
communities on both sides of the border with the goal of improved cross-border cooperation.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Usurp local control over the financing and construction of water supply and infrastructure
projects in the San Diego/Baja California region.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
13 | Page
State Water Bonds
Support efforts to:
a. Ensure San Diego County receives an equitable share of funding from Proposition 1 (2014)
with major funding categories being divided by county and funded on a per-capita basis to
ensure bond proceeds are distributed throughout the state in proportion to taxpayers’
payments on the bonds.
b. Ensure funding for water infrastructure projects help to resolve conflicts in the state’s water
system and provide long-term benefits to statewide issues including water supply, reliability,
water quality, and ecosystem restoration.
c. Ensure primary consideration is given to funding priorities established by local and regional
entities through their IRWM planning process.
d. Ensure that the application process for funding is not unnecessarily burdensome and costly,
with an emphasis on streamlining the process.
e. Fund emergency and carryover storage projects including those in San Diego County.
f. Consolidate administration of all voter-approved water-related bond funding in one place,
preserves existing expertise within the state bureaucracy to manage bond funding processes,
and provide consistent application and evaluation of bond funding applications.
g. Expedite the funding for projects that advance the achievement of the co-equal goals of
water supply reliability and Delta ecosystem restoration.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Change the share of funding to make San Diego County’s share less equitable, not based on
the San Diego County taxpayers’ proportional contribution to repayment of the bonds, or
change the understanding that all beneficiaries pay an equitable share.
b. Do not provide funding for infrastructure that resolves statewide or regional conflicts of water
supplies.
c. Do not provide funding that result in net increases in real water supply and water supply
reliability.
d. Commit a significant portion of bond funding to projects that do not result in net increases in
real water supply or water supply reliability.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
1 | Page
Effective Date: 01/07/2015
Legislative Policy Guidelines
The Otay Water Legislative Policy Guidelines for the 2015 Legislative Session includes the
following:
Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta (Bay-Delta)
Support efforts to:
a. Finalize and implement the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan to address Bay-Delta environmental
and water quality issues.
b. Analyze or support a “Portfolio Approach”, “Around-the-Delta”, “right-sized”, or other
alternatives that feature smaller conveyance facilities as a way to improve water quality, water
transport, and reduce the possibility or impacts of levee failure, lower costs to water users and
the public, reduce the level of environmental impacts, while potentially facing fewer legal and
political challenges.
c. Finalize Bay-Delta planning work and ongoing studies of new water storage facilities, and
support efforts to promote additional surface and underground water storage infrastructure
that are cost effective ensure water availability and quality.
d. Resolve conflicts between urban and rural water users, water management and the
environment in the Bay-Delta.
e. Provide ongoing federal and state funding for the Bay-Delta, and those which focus attention
to Bay-Delta financing, affordability, commitments to pay, and the demand for Bay-Delta
Wwater.
f. Equitably allocates costs of the Bay-Delta solution to all those benefiting from improvements
in proportion to the benefits they receive.
g. Fast-track design, permits and construction for pilot projects in the Bay-Delta to create
barriers to keep fish away from Bay-Delta water pumps, improve water quality and supply
reliability.
h. Provide deliberative processes that are designed to ensure meaningful dialogue with all
stakeholders in an open and transparent process in order to reduce future conflicts and
challenges in implementing a Bay-Delta solution.
i. Provide a Bay-Delta solution that acknowledges, integrates and supports the development of
water resources at the local level.
j. Improve the ability of water-users to divert water from the Bay-Delta during wet periods
when impacts to fish and the ecosystem are lower and water quality is higher.
k. Improve the existing Bay-Delta water conveyance system to increase flexibility and enhance
water supply, water quality, levee stability and environmental protection.
l. Evaluate long-term threats to the Bay-Delta levees and conveyance system and pursues
actions to reduce risks to the state’s water supply and the environment.
m. Improve coordination of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project Operations.
n. Provide a Bay-Delta solution and facilities that are cost-effective when compared with other
water supply development options for meeting South
o.n.ern Southern California’s water needs.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
2 | Page
p.o.Identify the total cost or perform appropriate cost studies to estimate consumer financial
impact as well as the expected yield of any Bay-Delta solution before financing and funding
decision are made to determine whether the solution is worth the expense.
q.p.Provide the State Water Project (SWP) with more flexibility to operate their systems to
maximize water deliveries while avoiding unacceptable impacts to third parties, habitat or the
environment.
r.q. Require a firm commitment and funding stream by all parties to pay for the proportional
benefits they will receive from a Bay-Delta solution through take-or-pay contracts or the legal
equivalent, and identify the impact to the remaining contractors if one or more contractors
default or back out.
s.r. Provide “right-sized” facilities to match firm commitments to pay for the Bay-Delta solution.
t.s. Provide SWP contractors and their member agencies access to all SWP facilities to facilitate
water transfers.
u.t. Continue state ownership and operation of SWP as a public resource.
v.u.Improve efficiency and transparency of all SWP operations.
w.v. Focus on statewide priorities, including construction of an approved method of
conveyance of water through or around the Delta that provides water supply reliability to the
Delta water uses, promotion of greater regional and local self sufficiency, surface storage and
promotion of water use efficiency.
x.w. Provides for the state’s share of funding for Bay-Delta conveyance projects.
y.x.Consider complementary investments in local water supply sources, regional coordination,
and south of Delta storage as part of an overall comprehensive Bay-Delta solution.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Require additional reviews or approvals of Delta conveyance options beyond those provided
by SBX7-1 (2009).
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
3 | Page
Recycled Water
Support efforts to:
a. Reduce restrictions on recycled water usage or promote consistent regulation of recycled
water projects to reduce impediments to the increased use of recycled water.
b. Reduce restrictions on injecting recycled water into basins where there is no direct potable
use.
c. Provide financial incentives for recharge of groundwater aquifers using recycled water.
d. Make recycled water regulations clear, consolidated, and understandable to expedite related
project permitting.
e. Promote recycled water as a sustainable supplemental source of water.
f. Allow the safe use of recycled water.
g. Facilitate development of technology aimed at improving water recycling.
h. Increasing funding for water recycling projects.
i. Increase awareness of the ways recycled water can help address the region’s water supply
challenges.
j. Create federal and state incentives to promote recycled water use and production.
k. Establish federal tax incentives to support U.S. companies in the development of new water
technologies that can lower productions costs, address by products such as concentrates, and
enhance public acceptance of recycled water.
l. Establish a comprehensive national research and development, and technology demonstration,
program to advance the public and scientific understanding of water recycling technologies to
encourage reuse as an alternative source of water supply.
Provide incentives for local agencies to work cooperatively, share costs or resources to promote or
expand the use of recycled water.
m.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Restrict use of recycled water for groundwater recharge.
b. Establish new water or recycled water fees solely to recover State costs without also
providing some benefit.
c. Create regulatory schemes that alter or limit the existing authority to reuse and recycle water.
c.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
4 | Page
Water Services
Support efforts to:
a. Provide funding to implement actions identified in the for a comprehensive state
waterCalifornia Water Action Plan to lay a solid fiscal foundation for implementing near-term
actions, including funding for water efficiency projects, wetland and watershed restoration,
groundwater programs, conservation, flood control, and integrated water management and
that balances California’s competing water needs, achieves the co-equal goals of water supply
reliability and environmental restoration, and results in a rresult in a reliable supply of high-
quality water for the San Diego region.
b. Provide financial support to projects designed to mitigate the potential negative impacts of
Global Climate Change on water supply reliability.
c. Promote the coordination and integration of local, state and federal climate change policies
and practices to the greatest extent feasible.
d. Support ongoing implementation of the Quantitative Settlement Agreement.
e. Provide reliable water supplies to meet California’s short and long-term needs.
f. Support legislation that reduces impediments for willing sellers and buyers to engage in water
transfer agreements.
g. Promote desalination pilot studies and projects.
h. Encourage feasibility studies of water resource initiatives.
i. Increase funds for infrastructure and grant programs for construction, modernization or
expansion of water, wastewater treatment, reclamation facilities and sewer systems including
water recycling, groundwater recovery and recharge, surface water development projects and
seawater desalination.
j. Mandate uniform or similar regulations and procedures by state agencies in the processing
and administering of grants and programs.
k. Streamline grant application procedures.
l. Promote or assist voluntary water transfers between willing buyers and willing sellers and
move those transactions through without delay.
m. Streamline the permitting and approval process for implementing water transfers.
n. Establish reasonable statewide approaches to sewer reporting standards.
o. Generate greater efficiencies, better coordinate program delivery, and eliminate duplication in
programs for source water protection without lessening the focus on public health of the
state’s Drinking Water Program.
i.n. Target efforts to fix specific issues with water supplies within the state’s Drinking Water
Program.
o. Establish federal tax incentives to support U.S. companies in the development of new
desalination technologies that can lower productions costs, eliminate or reduce impingement
or entrainment, reduce energy use, and enhance public acceptance of desalinated water.
p. Establish a comprehensive national research and development, and technology demonstration
program to advance the scientific understanding of desalination to expand its use as an
alternative source of water supply.
p.q. Require the State Water Resources Control Board to exercise its authority to fund and
implement the Salton Sea mitigation and restoration plan, meet state obligations, and work
with QSA stakeholders to find workable solutions to ensure the continuation of IID water
transfers.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
5 | Page
Oppose efforts that:
a. Make urban water supplies less reliable or substantially increase the cost of imported water
without also improving the reliability and/or quality of the water.
b. Create unrealistic or costly water testing or reporting protocol.
c. Disproportionately apportion the cost of water.
d. Create undo hurtles for seawater desalination projects.
e. Create unreasonable or confusing sewer reporting standards.
f. Create administrative or other barriers to sales between willing buyers and willing sellers that
delay water transfers.
g. Create a broad-based user fee that does not support a specific program activity; any fee must
provide a clear nexus to the benefit the fee would provide.
h. Create unrealistic or costly to obtain water quality standards for potable water, recycled water
or storm water runoff.
i. Change the focus of the state’s Drinking Water Program or weaken the parts of the program
that work well.
j. Lessen the focus on public health of the state’s Drinking Water Program.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
6 | Page
Financial
Support efforts to:
a. Require the federal government and State of California to reimburse special districts for all
mandated costs or regulatory actions.
b. Give special districts the discretion to cease performance of unfunded mandates.
c. Provide for fiscal reform to enhance the equity, reliability, and certainty of special district
funding.
d. Provide incentives for local agencies to work cooperatively, share costs or resources.
e. Provide for the stable, equitable and reliable allocation of property taxes.
f. Continue to reform workers compensation.
g. Authorize financing of water quality, water security, and water supply infrastructure
improvement programs.
h. Promote competition in insurance underwriting for public agencies.
i. Establish spending caps on State of California overhead when administering voter approved
grant and disbursement programs.
j. Require disbursement decisions in a manner appropriate to the service in question.
k. Encourage funding infrastructure programs that are currently in place and that have been
proven effective.
l. Produce tangible results, such as water supply reliability or water quality improvement.
m. Provide financial incentives for energy projects that increase reliability, diversity, and reduce
green house gasses.
n. Continue energy rate incentives for the utilization of electricity during low-peak periods.
o. Provide loan or grant programs that encourage water conservation for water users who are
least able to pay for capital projects.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Impose new, unfunded state mandates on local agencies and their customers.
b. Undermine Proposition 1A - Protection of Local Government Revenues – and the
comprehensive reform approved by voters in 2004.
c. Reallocate special district reserves in an effort to balance the state budget.
d. Reallocate special district revenues or reserves to fund infrastructure improvements or other
activities in cities or counties.
e. Usurp special district funds, reserves, or other state actions that force special districts to raise
rates, fees or charges.
f. Complicate or deter conservation-based rate structures.
g. Establish funding mechanisms that put undue burdens on local agencies or make local
agencies de facto tax collectors for the state.
h. Complicate compliance with SB 610 and SB 221.
i. Adversely affect the cost of gas and electricity or reduce an organization’s flexibility to take
advantage of low peak cost periods.
j. Add new reporting criteria, burdensome, unnecessary or costly reporting mandates to Urban
Water Management Plans.
k. Add new mandates to the Department of Water Resources (DWR) to review and approve
Urban Water Management Plans beyond those already addressed in DWR guidelines.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
7 | Page
l. Mandate that water agencies include an embedded energy calculation for their water supply
sources in Urban Water Management Plans or any other water resources planning or master
planning document.
m. Weaken existing project retention and withholding provisions that limit the ability of public
agencies to drive contractor performance.
k.n. Establish change order requirements that place an unreasonable burden on local agencies, or
raise financial risk associated with public works contracts.\
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
8 | Page
Governance/Local Autonomy
Support efforts to:
a. Expand local autonomy in governing special district affairs.
b. Promote comprehensive long-range planning.
c. Assist local agencies in the logical and efficient extension of services and facilities to promote
efficiency and avoid duplication of services.
d. Streamline the Municipal Service Review Process or set limits on how long services reviews
can take or cost.
e. Establish clear and reasonable guidelines for appropriate community sponsorship activities.
f. Reaffirm the existing “all-in” financial structure, or protect the San Diego County Water
Authority voting structure based on population.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Assume the state legislature is better able to make local decisions that affect special district
governance.
b. Create one-size-fits-all approaches to special district reform.
c. Unfairly target one group of local elected officials.
d. Usurp local control from special districts regarding decisions involving local special district
finance, operations or governance.
e. Limit the board of directors’ ability to govern the district.
f. Create unfunded local government mandates.
g. Create costly, unnecessary or duplicative oversight roles for the state government of special
district affairs.
h. Create new oversight roles or responsibility for monitoring special district affairs.
i. Change the San Diego County Water Authority Act regarding voting structure, unless it is
based on population.
j. Shift the liability to the public entity and relieve private entities of reasonable due diligence in
their review of plans and specifications for errors, omissions and other issues.
k. Place a significant and unreasonable burden on public agencies, resulting in increased cost for
public works construction or their operation.
l. Impair the ability of water districts to acquire property or property interests required for
essential capital improvement projects.
m. Increase the cost of property and right-of-way acquisition, or restricts the use of right-of-
ways.
n. Work to silence the voices of special districts and other local government associations on
statewide ballot measures impacting local government policies and practices, including
actions that could prohibit special districts and associations from advocating for positions on
ballot measures by severely restricting the private resources used to fund those activities.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
9 | Page
Conservation
Support efforts to:
a. Provide funding for water conservation programs.
b. Encourage the installation of water conserving fixtures in new and existing buildings.
c. Promote the environmental benefits of water conservation.
d. Enhance efforts to promote water awareness and conservation.
e. Offer incentives for landscape water efficiency devices such as ET controllers and soil
moisture sensors.
f. Develop landscape retrofit incentive programs and/or irrigation retrofit incentive programs.
g. Permit or require local agencies to adopt ordinances that require or promote water wise
landscape for commercial and residential developments.
h. Create tax incentives for citizens or developers who install water wise landscapes.
i. Create tax incentives for citizens who purchase high efficiency clothes washers, dual flush
and high-efficiency toilets and irrigation controllers above the state standards.
j. Expand community-based conservation and education programs.
k. Develop incentives for developers and existing customers to install water wise landscape in
existing developments or new construction.
l. Encourage large state users to conserve water by implementing water efficient technologies in
all facilities both new and retrofit.
m. Create higher incentives for solar power.
n. Encourage large state water users to conserve water outdoors.
o. Educate all Californians on the importance of water, and the need to conserve, manage, and
plan for the future needs.
p. Encourage technological research targeted to more efficient water use.
p.q.Give local agencies maximum discretion in selecting conservation programs that work for
their customers and the communities they serve.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Weaken federal or state water efficiency standards.
b. Introduce additional analytical and reporting requirements that are time-consuming for local
agencies to perform and result in additional costs to consumers, yet yield no water savings.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
10 | Page
Safety, Security and Information Technology
Support efforts to:
a. Provide funding for information security upgrades to include integrated alarms, access/egress,
and surveillance technology.
b. Provide incentives for utilities and other local agencies to work cooperatively, share costs or
resources.
c. Provide funding for communication enhancements, wireless communications, GIS or other
technological enhancements.
d. Encourage or promote compatible software systems.
e. Fund infrastructure and facility security improvements that include facility roadway access,
remote gate access and physical security upgrades.
f. Protect state, local and regional drinking water systems from terrorist attack or deliberate acts
of destruction, contamination or degradation.
g. Provide funds to support training or joint training exercises to include contingency funding for
emergencies and emergency preparedness.
h. Equitably allocate security funding based on need, threats and/or population.
i. Encourage or promote compatible communication systems.
j. Encourage and promote funding of Department of Homeland Security Risk Mitigation
programs.
k. Recognizes water agencies as emergency responders to damage and challenges caused by
wildfires, earthquakes, and other natural disasters, as well as terrorist and other criminal
activities that threaten water operations, facilities and supplies.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Create unnecessary, costly, or duplicative security mandates.
b. Require expanded water system descriptions or additional public disclosure of public water
systems details for large water suppliers in Urban Water Management Planning documents,
potentially compromising public water systems and creating a conflict with the Department of
Homeland Security’s recommendation to avoid reference to water system details in plans
available to the general public.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
11 | Page
Optimize District Effectiveness
Support efforts to:
a. Give utilities the ability to avoid critical peak energy pricing or negotiate energy contracts that
save ratepayers money.
b. Develop reasonable Air Pollution Control District engine permitting requirements.
c. Reimburse or reduce local government mandates.
d. Allow public agencies to continue offering defined benefit plans.
e. Result in predictable costs and benefits for employees and taxpayers.
f. Eliminate abuses.
g. Retain local control of pension systems.
h. Be constitutional, federally legal and technically possible.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Restrict the use of, or reallocate, district property tax revenues to the detriment of special
districts.
b. Create unrealistic ergonomic protocol.
c. Micromanage special district operations.
d. Balance the state budget by allowing regulatory agencies to increase permitting fees.
e. Tax dependent benefits.
f. Require new reporting criteria on emergency intensity involved in water supply.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
12 | Page
Bi-National Initiatives
Support efforts to:
a. Promote and finance cross-border infrastructure development such as water pipelines,
desalination plants or water treatment facilities to serve the border region.
b. Develop cooperative and collaborative solutions to cross-border issues.
c. Develop and enhance communications and understanding of the interdependence of
communities on both sides of the border with the goal of improved cross-border cooperation.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Usurp local control over the financing and construction of water supply and infrastructure
projects in the San Diego/Baja California region.
Otay Water District Legislative Program 2015
13 | Page
State Water Bonds
Support efforts to:
a. Ensure Provide San Diego County receives an equitable share of funding to San Diego
County,from Proposition 1 (2014) with major funding categories being divided by county
and funded on a per-capita basis to ensure bond proceeds are distributed throughout the state
in proportion to taxpayers’ payments on the bonds.
b. Ensure Provide funding for water infrastructure projects that help to resolves conflicts in the
state’s water system and provides long-term benefits to statewide issues including water
supply, reliability, wwater quality, and ecosystem restoration.
c. Ensure Give primary consideration is given to funding priorities established by local and
regional entities through their IRWM planning process.
d. Ensure that the application process for funding is not unnecessarily burdensome and costly,
with an emphasis on streamlining the process.
e. Fund emergency and carryover storage projects including those in San Diego County.
f. Consolidate administration of all voter-approved water-related bond funding in one place,
preserves existing expertise within the state bureaucracy to manage bond funding processes,
and provides consistent application and evaluation of bond funding applications.
g. Provides the state’s share of Expedite the funding for projects that advance the achievement
of the co-equal goals of water supply reliability and Delta ecosystem restoration.
Oppose efforts that:
a. Change the Do not provide an equitable share of funding to make San Diego County’s share
less equitable,, not based on the San Diego County taxpayers’ proportional contribution to
repayment of the bonds, or change the understanding that all beneficiaries pay an equitable
share.
b. Do not provide funding for infrastructure that resolves statewide or regional conflicts of water
supplies.
c. Do not provide funding that result in net increases in real water supply and water supply
reliability.
d. Commit a significant portion of bond funding to projects that do not result in net increases in
real water supply or water supply reliability.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Mark Watton,
General Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Joe Beachem,Chief Financial Officer
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 4246 Supporting Padre Dam Municipal Water
District’s Advanced Water Purification Demonstration Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolution No. 4246 supporting Padre Dam Municipal Water
District’s Advanced Water Purification Demonstration Project.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To present for the Board of Directors’ consideration a resolution
supporting the Padre Dam Municipal Water District’s Advanced Water
Purification Demonstration Project.
ANALYSIS:
Padre Dam Municipal Water District is requesting that San Diego
County cities and agencies formally provide their support to their
Advanced Water Purification Project by taking action to adopt a
Resolution of support. The project broke ground in October 2014 and
is funded through a three million dollar Proposition 50 grant from
the Department of Water Resources. The project is in the testing
phase and the grant will fund the planning, design, installation and
operation of the demonstration plant.
2
Work on the project began in the fall of 2013, with construction of
the facility breaking ground in October 2014. The project is
expected to be completed in the summer of 2016. Should the
demonstration project be successful and move forward, it would
provide up to 2,000 to 3,000 acre feet per year of drinking water to
Padre Dam customers. This is approximately 15 percent of Padre Dam’s
current drinking water demand.
San Diego relies heavily on imported water and with the State of
California now entering its fourth year of extremely dry conditions,
this project will provide for a new potable local water resource
through recycling. Recycling and reusing water is drought proof and
further diversifies our water supplies and, thus, reducing our
region’s reliance on imported water.
Staff recommends that the board adopt Resolution No. 4246 supporting
Padre Dam Municipal Water District’s Advanced Water Purification
Project.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Resolution supports the District’s Mission statement, “To
provide high value water and wastewater services to the customers of
the Otay Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient
manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is
innovative in providing water services at affordable rates, with a
reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Resolution No. 4246
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Adopt Resolution No. 4246 Supporting Padre Dam Municipal
Water District’s Advanced Water Purification Demonstration
Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on December 8, 2014 and the following comments
were made:
Staff indicated that Padre Dam MWD is initiating an Advanced
Water Purification Program and is requesting that agencies
provide their formal support to their project.
This request is very similar to the resolution the District
adopted for the City of San Diego to support their Pure Water
Program.
The project would entail a study of Padre Dam MWD initially
treating 5 MGD of the city of Santee’s sewer and injecting the
water into a basin for Indirect Potable Reuse. The ultimate goal
is to treat up to 20 MGD of sewer water and progress to Direct
Potable Reuse in the future.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated
that Padre Dam MWD recently broke ground on the Advanced Water
Purification Treatment test plant at Santee Lakes. They
currently have a sewer treatment plant near Santee Lakes and the
Advanced Water Purification Treatment Project would be added at
their sewer treatment facilities.
Staff is recommending that the the District adopt Resolution No.
4246 supporting Padre Dam MWD’s Advance Water Purfication
Demonstration Project.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
RESOLUTION NO. 4246
A RESOLUTION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SUPPORTING PADRE DAM MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT’S
ADVANCED WATER PURIFICATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, Padre Dam Municipal Water District is requesting San Diego County
cities’ and agencies’ formal support of their Advanced Water Purification Project; and
WHEREAS, water re-purification is a safe, cost-effective and environmentally
responsible source of new water for the region; and
WHEREAS, the State of California is entering its fourth year of extremely dry
conditions; and
WHEREAS, San Diego relies heavily on imported water; and
WHEREAS, this project will provide for a new potable local water supply resource
through recycling; and
WHEREAS, recycling and reusing water provides for a drought proof resource and will
further diversify our water supplies to reduce this regions’ dependence on imported water;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District that it supports Padre Dam Municipal Water District’s commitment to diversify
water supplies and increase the region’s independence from imported water.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District on the 7th day of January, 2015.
Attachment B
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
__________________________
President
ATTEST:
_____________________________
District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Mark Watton,
General Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) Special Districts 2014
Election
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board consider casting votes for a Regular District Member and
an Alternate District Member on LAFCO’s Commission in the LAFCO Special
Districts 2014 Election.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To present for the Board’s consideration the LAFCO Special Districts
2014 Election ballots.
ANALYSIS:
In August 2014, LAFCO solicited nominations for a Regular District
Member and an Alternate District Member to serve on their Commission.
They received two (2) nominations for the Regular Member and three (3)
nominations for the Alternate Member. Following the nominations, two
(2) withdrew from the LAFCO elections because they were not reelected
to their respective boards. The Regular Member seat is currently held
by Ms. Jo MacKenzie, Vista Irrigation District, and the Alternate
Member seat is held by Mr. Edmund K. Sprague, Olivenhain Municipal
Water District.
The District received the ballots for the elections along with the
Nominating Committee’s report and recommendations, and the candidates’
nomination forms (please see attached). The incumbents names appear in
italics on the ballots. The ballots must be submitted to LAFCO by
January 16, 2015.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Participating would support the strategic goal of maintaining effective
communications with other cities, special districts, State and Federal
governments, community organizations and Mexico.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
LAFCO Correspondence
LAFCO Nominating Committee Report and Ballots
Candidates’ Nomination Forms
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board Meeting MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton,
General Manager
W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO.
APPROVED BY:
Susan Cruz, District Secretary
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Board of Directors 2015 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board, the attached Board of Director’s meeting
calendar for 2015 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to review the 2015 Board of Director’s meeting calendar
and amend the schedule as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment: Calendar of Meetings for 2015
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar 1-7-15.doc
Board of Directors, Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2015
Regular Board Meetings:
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 7, 2015
February 4, 2015
March 4, 2015
April 1, 2015
May 6, 2015
June 3, 2015
July 1, 2015
August 5, 2015
September 2, 2015
October 7, 2015
November 4, 2015
December 2, 2015
January 20, 2015
February 18, 2015
March 18, 2015
April 15, 2015
May 20, 2015
June 17, 2015
July 15, 2015
August 19, 2015
September 16, 2015
October 21, 2015
November 18, 2015
December 16, 2015
SPECIAL BOARD MEETINGS:
BOARD WORKSHOPS:
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief of Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Informational Item – First Quarter Fiscal Year 2015 Capital
Improvement Program Report
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation. This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To update the Board about the status of all CIP project expenditures
and to highlight significant issues, progress, and milestones on
major projects.
ANALYSIS:
To keep up with growth and to meet our ratepayers' expectations to
adequately deliver safe, reliable, cost-effective, and quality water,
each year the District staff prepares a Six-Year CIP Plan that
identifies the District’s infrastructure needs. The CIP is comprised
of four categories consisting of backbone capital facilities,
replacement/renewal projects, capital purchases, and developer's
reimbursement projects.
The First Quarter Fiscal Year 2015 update is intended to provide a
detailed analysis of progress in completing these projects within the
allotted time and budget of $10.6 million. Expenditures through the
First Quarter totaled approximately $1.3 million. Approximately 12%
of the Fiscal Year 2015 expenditure budget was spent (see Attachment
B).
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact as this is an informational item only.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The Capital Improvement Program supports the District’s Mission
statement, “To provide high value water and wastewater services to
the customers of the Otay Water District, in a professional,
effective, and efficient manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, “A
District that is at the forefront in innovations to provide water
services at affordable rates, with a reputation for outstanding
customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM/RP:jf
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q4\Staff Report\BD 01-07-15, Staff
Report, First Quarter FY 2015 CIP Report, (DM-RP).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B - Fiscal Year 2015 First Quarter CIP
Expenditure Report
Attachment C – Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Various
Informational Item – First Quarter Fiscal Year 2015 Capital
Improvement Program Report
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a Committee Meeting held on December 9, 2014,
and the following comments were made:
Staff provided a PowerPoint presentation to the Committee and
indicated that the expenditures through the first quarter of
FY 2015 totaled approximately $1.3 million, which is about 12%
of the District’s fiscal year budget.
Staff indicated that the District’s FY 2015 CIP budget consists
of 73 projects that total $10.6 million and is divided into
four categories:
o Capital Facilities= $3.1 million
o Replacement/Renewal= $6.7 million
o Capital Purchases= $.7 million
o Developer Reimbursement= $0.1 million
The PowerPoint presentation included the following:
o Total Life-to-Date Expenditures
o CIP Budget Forecast vs. Expenditures
o Major CIP Projects
o CIP Projects in Construction
o Construction Contract Status of projects, contract amount
with allowances, net change orders, and percent of project
completion
o Consultant Contract Status of contract amounts, approve
payments to date, change orders, dates when contracts were
signed and the end date of contracts
Staff provided an update of the following:
o 624-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades
(P2493) that is located in Chula Vista and was completed
in August 2014.
o SR-11 Utility Relocations Sequence I (P2453). It was noted
that the District’s project is being coordinated with the
delivery of the Caltrans freeway construction project.
The District’s project includes additional contract time
to ensure coordinated implementation.
Staff highlighted that the Change Orders with Allowance Credit
equaled to -2.9%.
In response to an inquiry from the Committee, Staff stated that
in the last five years, expenditures for CIP projects have
ranged between approximately 60%-80% of the budgeted forecast.
It was discussed that it is a challenge to reconcile actual
expenditures with budgeted forecasts as many of the CIP
projects are impacted by external agencies and circumstances
beyond the District’s control. It was noted that any project
impacts are brought to the Board’s attention.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as an informational
item.
FISCAL YEAR 2015
1st QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 9/30/2014)
($000)
ATTACHMENT B
2015 09/30/14
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2015
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Comments
CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS -
P2083 PS - 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Marchioro 650$ 126$ 524$ 19%16,500$ 1,054$ 15,446$ 6%
Pace slowed slightly as 3D model was added to
project scope.
P2267 36-Inch Main Pumpouts and Air/Vacuum Ventilation Installations Vasquez 195 - 195 0%435 234 201 54%No expenditures planned for Q1.
P2434 Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Well Development Marchioro 75 3 72 4%3,705 3,609 96 97%Design on hold; closing out consultant's contract.
P2451 Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and Disinfection System Kennedy 1,000 184 816 18%30,000 2,744 27,256 9%
Design delayed to keep pace with NSC Agua
progress.
P2466 Regional Training Facility Coburn-Boyd 3 - 3 0%300 285 15 95%
No expenditures planned in FY 2015; project on
hold.P2486 Asset Management Plan Condition Assessment and Data Acquisition Zhao 75 7 68 9%1,090 825 265 76%On budget. Balance to be spent in 4th quarter.
P2511 Otay Interconnect Pipeline Marchioro 100 24 76 24%2,005 2,005 - 100%
On target - EIR certification scheduled for
February Board Meeting. Design on hold.
P2537 Operations Yard Property Acquisition Improvements Almgren 100 22 78 22%350 59 291 17%This project is expected to be built this fiscal year.
P2541 624 Pressure Zone PRSs Marchioro 425 3 422 1%600 210 390 35%
Construction postponed until FY 2016. Will be
bid together with R2110.
P2547
District Administration Building Main Breaker Installation and Vehicle
Charging Stations Anderson 45 1 44 2%50 1 49 2%No expenditures planned for Q1.
P2548 Sump Pump Installation at the 980-1 & 2 Reservoirs Anderson 35 - 35 0%35 - 35 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
P2549 Fuel system upgrade Payne 30 - 30 0%30 - 30 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
P2551 Blossom Lane Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection Beppler 5 - 5 0%400 - 400 0%Expected expenditures for FY2015 = $40,000
P2552 South Barcelona Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection Beppler 5 - 5 0%400 - 400 0%Expected expenditures for FY2015 = $40,000
R2048 RecPL - Otay Mesa Distribution Pipelines and Conversions Martin 1 - 1 0%555 475 80 86%No expenditures planned for Q1.R2058 RecPL - 16-Inch, 860 Zone, Airway Road - Otay Mesa/Alta Martin 1 - 1 0%1,406 1,340 66 95%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2077 RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta Gate/Airway Beppler 25 - 25 0%4,500 2,804 1,696 62%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2087 RecPL - 24-Inch, 927 Zone, Wueste Road - Olympic/Otay WTP Cameron 5 - 5 0%7,000 1,032 5,968 15%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2107 RWCWRF Screening Compactor and Chlorine Injectors Enclosure Stalker 85 - 85 0%215 101 114 47%
Parts on order. Completion in Qtr. 4 for budgeted
amount.
R2108 Res - 927-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement Marchioro 50 10 40 20%1,400 1,073 327 77%On target for upcoming warranty inspection.
R2110 RecPS - 944-1 Optimization and Pressure Zone modifications Marchioro 50 2 48 4%200 64 136 32%
Construction (PRS Vault 3 retrofit) postponed
until FY 2016. Will be bid together with P2541.
R2114 Large Recycle Pump Replacement at the RWCWRF 927-1 Pump Station Anderson 100 - 100 0%100 - 100 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2117 RWCWRF Contact Basin Expansion Project Beppler 20 1 19 5%1,500 1 1,499 0%Expected expenditures for FY 2015 = $100,000
S2043 RWCWRF Sludge Handling System Beppler 5 - 5 0%1,500 37 1,463 2%No expenditures planned for FY 2015.
Total Capital Facility Projects Total:3,085 383 2,702 12%74,276 17,953 56,323 24%
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS
P2366 APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits Rahders 5 16 (11) 320%3,488 2,529 959 73%
Will be expending $13,500 ($8,500 over the
approved FY 2015 budget) to replace the APCD
emissions analyzer at the end of Q2 FY 2015.
P2382 Safety and Security Improvements Ramirez 192 18 174 9%3,222 2,036 1,186 63%
Improvement projects occur throughout the year.
Currently, expect to be at budgeted portion by
year end.
P2440 I-905 Utility Relocations Marchioro 5 1 4 20%1,600 1,585 15 99%
Staff anticipates that Caltrans will issue an
additional $33,493 credit to Otay; however, the
$33K credit on hold pending Caltrans' receipt of
final accounting numbers from the City of San
Diego's sewer contractor. P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations Marchioro 600 131 469 22%2,250 364 1,886 16%On target.
P2477 Res - 624-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement Marchioro 5 3 2 60%1,000 930 70 93%On target for upcoming warranty inspection.
P2485 SCADA Communication System and Software Replacement Stalker 655 44 611 7%1,974 1,212 762 61%
Expect to spend $540,000 due to delay in
installing wireless radio system.
P2493 624-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 50 49 1 98%1,950 1,516 434 78%
Planned expenditures for FY 2015 may exceed
the budget for security upgrades to the site.
P2494 Multiple Species Conservation Plan Coburn-Boyd 90 1 89 1%950 811 139 85%
Work beginning in Dec/Jan on this project,
expect to use most of the budget.
P2495 San Miguel Habitat Management/Mitigation Area Coburn-Boyd 180 18 162 10%2,100 1,050 1,050 50%
Greater expenses will occur in the second half of
FY 2015; expect to use most of budget.
P2496 Otay Lakes Road Utility Relocations Martin 5 1 4 20%325 301 24 93%Project Acceptance pending final work by City.
P2504 Regulatory Site Access Road and Pipeline Relocation Cameron 20 1 19 5%900 329 571 37%No expenditures planned for Q1.
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 09/30/14 LIFE-TO-DATE, 09/30/14
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q1\Expenditures\Copy of FY15 1st qtr exp (FINAL) incls REVS.xlsx Page 1 of 3 12/4/2014
FISCAL YEAR 2015
1st QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 9/30/2014)
($000)
ATTACHMENT B
2015 09/30/14
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2015
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 09/30/14 LIFE-TO-DATE, 09/30/14
P2507 East Palomar Street Utility Relocation Cameron 175 13 162 7%940 633 307 67%
CALTRANS driven project. Construction has
been delayed and expenditures may be lower
than planned.
P2508 Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement Program Marchioro 125 7 118 6%300 55 245 18%
On target as final design scheduled to be
completed second half of FY 2015.
P2515 870-1 Reservoir Paving Cameron 415 55 360 13%550 208 342 38%Project is in construction.
P2518 803-3 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 30 4 26 13%700 629 71 90%Project is on budget.
P2519 832-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 30 5 25 17%700 650 50 93%Project is on budget.
P2520 Motorola Mobile Radio Upgrade Martinez 50 - 50 0%135 77 58 57%No expenditures planned for Q1 or Q2.
P2529 711-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%760 - 760 0%Expenditures are planned for Q3.
P2530 711-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 10 - 10 0%940 - 940 0%Expenditures are planned for Q3.
P2531 944-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 190 2 188 1%240 9 231 4%Project is in construction.
P2532 944-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 900 10 890 1%950 18 932 2%Project is in construction.
P2533 1200-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%365 - 365 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2534 978-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%270 - 270 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2535 458-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating & Upgrades Cameron 585 16 569 3%640 30 610 5%Project is in construction.
P2538
Administration and Operations Building Fire Sprinkler Replacement
Program Cameron 65 24 41 37%110 46 64 42%Project is on budget.
P2539 South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Utility Relocations Cameron 30 17 13 57%375 46 329 12%SANDAG driven project. P2542 850-3 Reservoir Interior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%480 - 480 0%Expenditures are planned for Q3.
P2543 850-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%460 - 460 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2544 850-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Reservoir Coating Cameron - - - 0%940 - 940 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.P2545 980-1 Reservoir Interior Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%1,250 - 1,250 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2546 980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%1,250 - 1,250 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2550 Fuel Island Upgrade Payne 75 - 75 0%75 - 75 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.P2553 Heritage Road Bridge Replacement and Utility Relocation Cameron 5 - 5 0%1,200 - 1,200 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2109
Sweetwater River Wooden Trestle Improvement for the Recycled Water
Forcemain Beppler 50 17 33 34%600 49 551 8%On schedule.
R2111 RWCWRF - RAS Pump Replacement Beppler 310 27 283 9%650 84 566 13%
Construction will carry over into Q1 of FY2016, so
expect half of it to be billed this fiscal year.
R2112 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation Cameron 150 - 150 0%190 - 190 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2113 Chlorine 1-ton Cyliner Emergency Close Valve Stalker 37 - 37 0%37 - 37 0%
Parts received, Qtr. 3 completion for budgeted
amount.
R2116 RecPL - 14-Inch, 927 Zone, Forcemain Assessment and Repair Marchioro 100 29 71 29%1,500 29 1,471 2%
Accelerated schedule. $302K
inspection/condition assessment contract
scheduled to be completed FY 2015.
S2012
San Diego County Sanitation District Outfall and RSD Outfall
Replacement Kennedy 150 - 150 0%2,760 834 1,926 30%
Invoice for FY 2015 expenditures planned for late
Q4.
S2024 Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement Beppler 600 79 521 13%5,500 260 5,240 5%On schedule.
S2027 Rancho San Diego Pump Station Rehabilitation Beppler 150 5 145 3%3,500 62 3,438 2%
Invoice for FY 2015 expenditures planned for late
Q4.
S2033 Sewer System Rehabilitation Beppler 675 85 590 13%6,000 692 5,308 12%Plan to exceed FY budget by estimated $100,000.
Total Replacement/Renewal Projects Total:6,724 678 6,046 10%54,126 17,074 37,052 32%
CAPITAL PURCHASE PROJECTS
P2282 Vehicle Capital Purchases Rahders 105 - 105 0%5,021 2,900 2,121 58%
Expense of $33K at end of Q2 FY 2015. Due to
staff reduction's, there will be a savings of $35K.
P2285 Office Equipment and Furniture Capital Purchases Payne 15 - 15 0%589 524 65 89%No expenditures planned for Q1.
P2286 Field Equipment Capital Purchases Rahders 65 - 65 0%1,758 1,291 467 73%
$18K to be expended by end of Q2 FY 2015. By
end of year there should be a savings of $3K.
P2469 Information Technology Network and Hardware Segura 175 170 5 97%2,509 1,845 664 74%No new spending anticipated in FY 2015.
P2470 Financial System Enhancements Segura 100 4 96 4%2,265 1,675 590 74%Anticipate being $35K under budget by Q4 end.
P2540 Work Order Management System Replacement Stevens 300 42 258 14%700 159 541 23%Expect significant expenditures in Q2 and Q3.
Total Capital Purchase Projects Total:760 216 544 28%12,842 8,394 4,448 65%
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT PROJECTS
R2028 RecPL - 8-Inch, 680 Zone, Heritage Road - Santa Victoria/Otay Valley Martin 1 - 1 0%600 - 600 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2042 RecPL - 8-Inch, 927 Zone, Rock Mountain Road - SR-125/EastLake Martin 1 - 1 0%140 - 140 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2047 RecPL - 12-Inch, 680 Zone, La Media Road - Birch/Rock Mountain Martin 1 - 1 0%450 - 450 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q1\Expenditures\Copy of FY15 1st qtr exp (FINAL) incls REVS.xlsx Page 2 of 3 12/4/2014
FISCAL YEAR 2015
1st QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 9/30/2014)
($000)
ATTACHMENT B
2015 09/30/14
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2015
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 09/30/14 LIFE-TO-DATE, 09/30/14
R2082 RecPL - 24-Inch, 680 Zone, Olympic Parkway - Village 2/Heritage Martin 1 - 1 0%1,747 - 1,747 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2083 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, Heritage Road - Village 2/Olympic Martin 1 - 1 0%400 - 400 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2084 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, Village 2 - Heritage/La Media Martin 1 - 1 0%970 1 969 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
R2085 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, La Media - State/Olympic Martin 1 - 1 0%600 - 600 0%No expenditures planned for Q1.
Total Developer Reimbursement Projects Total:7 - 7 0%4,907 1 4,906 0%
GRAND TOTAL 10,576$ 1,277$ 9,299$ 12%146,151$ 43,422$ 102,729$ 30%
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q1\Expenditures\Copy of FY15 1st qtr exp (FINAL) incls REVS.xlsx Page 3 of 3 12/4/2014
Otay Water District
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Year 2015
First Quarter
(through September 30, 2014)
Attachment C
SR11 Utility Relocations
Removal of 12” line Sanyo Road
Background
The approved CIP Budget for Fiscal Year 2015 consists of
73 projects that total $10.6 million. These projects are
broken down into four categories.
1.Capital Facilities $ 3.1 million
2.Replacement/Renewal $ 6.7 million
3.Capital Purchases $ 0.7 million
4.Developer Reimbursement $ 0.1 million
Overall expenditures through the First Quarter of Fiscal
Year 2015 totaled $1.3 million, which is approximately
12% of the Fiscal Year budget.
2
Fiscal Year 2015
First Quarter Update
($1,000)
CIP
CAT Description FY 2015
Budget
FY 2015
Expenditures
%
FY 2015
Budget
Spent
Total Life-to-
Date Budget
Total
Life-to-Date
Expenditures
%
Life-to-
Date
Budget
Spent
1 Capital
Facilities $3,085 $383 12%$74,276 $17,953 24%
2 Replacement/
Renewal $6,724 $678 10%$54,126 $17,074 32%
3 Capital
Purchases $760 $216 28%$12,842 $8,394 65%
4 Developer
Reimbursement $7 $0 0%$4,907 $1 0%
Total:
$10,576 $1,277 12%$146,151 $43,422 23%
3
Fiscal Year 2015
First Quarter
CIP Budget Forecast vs. Expenditures
4
District Map of Major CIP Projects
5
CIP Projects in Construction
624-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades (P2493)
Remove and Replace Deteriorating Reservoir Coating
Structural Modifications Including Level Indicator Replacement and Anode Replacement
$1.95M Budget
Start: January 2014
Completed: August 2014
6
624-2 Reservoir
Completed Exterior Coating
CIP Projects in Construction
SR-11 Utility Relocations Sequence I (P2453)
Relocate Existing Water Facilities to support SR-11 Construction
$2.25M Budget
Start: February 2014
Estimated Completion: July 2016
7
7/16/14
Install new 12” valve -Sanyo Road
Construction Contract Status
8
PROJECT
TOTAL %
P2453
SR-11 Potable
Water Utility
Relocations -
Sequence 1
Coffman
Specialties, Inc.$947,380 $992,380 $0 0.0%$947,380 $88,698 -4.5%9.4%July 2016
P2493 624-2 Reservoir
Coating
Advanced
Industrial
Services
$1,169,000 $1,199,000 $0 0.0%$1,180,770 $1,180,770 -1.5%100.0%
Completed
August
2014
TOTALS:$2,116,380 $2,191,380 $0 0.0%$2,128,150 $1,269,467 -2.9%
**THIS CHANGE ORDER RATE INCLUDES THE CREDIT FOR UNUSED ALLOWANCES
*NET CHANGE ORDERS DO NOT INCLUDE ALLOWANCE ITEM CREDITS. IT'S A TRUE CHANGE ORDER PERCENTAGE FOR THE PROJECT
CIP
NO.PROJECT TITLE CONTRACTOR BASE BID
AMOUNT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT W/
ALLOWANCES
% CHANGE
ORDERS W/
ALLOWANCE
CREDIT**
%
COMPLETE
EST.
COMP.
DATE
NET CHANGE
ORDERS LTD*CURRENT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
TOTAL
EARNED
TO DATE
Consultant Contract Status
9
Consultant Contract Status
10
Consultant Contract Status
11
QUESTIONS?
12
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:
Regular Board
MEETING
DATE:
January 7, 2015
SUBMITTED
BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
W.O./G.F.
NO:
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: General Manager’s Report
GENERAL MANAGER:
San Diego County Water Authority Planned Treated Water Shutdown
- San Diego County Water Authority had a planned treated water
shutdown on Pipeline 4 from November 12 through November 21.
During this period, limited flows were available to District
connections off of Pipeline 4. The purpose of the shutdown was
for the State Route 76 realignment project and planned
maintenance on Pipeline 4. The limited flow that was available
was shared with Padre Dam Municipal Water District. The
District received between 50% and 85% of the total flows
available on Pipeline 4 for the duration of the shutdown, which
was enough to match usage in the Central District. Our North
District was unaffected by this shutdown, as there were no flow
restrictions on the Otay 14 connection. Full flows to all
connections were restored by 8 AM on November 21. During this
period no customers were affected by the shutdown.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Purchasing and Facilities:
Purchase Orders – There were 104 blanket and regular purchase
orders in effect during the month of November with an adjusted
total value of $252,170. Sixty-six percent of this value was on
blanket orders, exceeding Purchasing’s 15% strategic plan
objective. The jump in the percentage of blanket versus
regular purchase order value is due to a significant drop in
the number of regular purchase orders issued during November
when compared to previous months. The reduction is due in part
2
to a slowdown in the need for purchased items and, to a lesser
extent, the increased use of purchase cards.
Warehouse/Facilities Reduction in Workforce – The ‘‘Lead
Warehouse/Facilities Worker” position is being eliminated with
the retirement of its current holder effective January 5,
2015. Through the effective use of technology and changes in
procedures, many of the duties and responsibilities of that
position are no longer required or can be effectively managed
by the remaining warehouse and section personnel.
Human Resources: Manager Training - HR staff met with the managers and
supervisors during the month of November to review all updates
to the Memorandum of Understanding and Policies.
Benefits/Open Enrollment - HR is wrapping up Open Enrollment
and focusing on implementation of new Short and Long Term
Disability and Dental carriers.
Recruitments – HR is recruiting for Systems Support Analyst,
Water Systems Operator I/II/III and Utility Maintenance
Supervisor.
New Hires/Promotions – There was one new hire in the months of
November and December: Pump Mechanic I. There were four
promotions: Field Services Manager, Water Systems Supervisor
and Lead Water Systems Operator (two).
Brandon DiPietro was appointed to Field Services Manager.
Brandon has been with the District for 14 years. He began
as a Utility Worker I and has held positions as Water
Systems Operator I, Utility Worker II, Construction
Inspector I/II and Inspection Supervisor.
Charles Mederos was appointed to Water Systems Supervisor.
He has been with the District for almost 12 years. He began
as a Landscaper, moved to Water Systems Operator, and moved
through the series.
Marciano Santos and Brad Larson were appointed to Lead
Water Systems Operator. Marciano was hired as a Warehouse
Delivery Worker and Brad was hired as a Customer Service
Field Rep. Each transferred to Water Systems Operations and
moved through the series.
Safety & Security:
Emergency Response Training – The District hosted an onsite
emergency response training class for the Incident Command
System 300 (ICS-300) on December 9-11. This class was paid via
a grant from the San Diego Urban Security Safety Initiative,
which saved the District approximately $16,000 in training
costs. Staff has also secured the next training class in the
3
series of emergency response training, ICS-400, which will take
place on February 11-12, 2015. Again, this training will be at
no cost to the District and will save an additional $16,000 in
training costs.
Emergency WebEOC – Staff completed WEbEOC emergency incident
management system training exercises as part of the water
agencies emergency collaborative (WAEC). WebEOC is a crisis
information management system, which provides secure real-time
information and sharing during emergency conditions.
Emergency Response Tabletop Exercise - Staff completed an
introductory tabletop exercise. The scenario was based around
a SCADA cyber/hacker attack at the Regulatory site.
Alarm Security Testing and Inspection Update – Working with
Watchlight (a local alarm company out of El Cajon), on security
system automation enhancements for District facilities. The
657-1&2 Reservoir facility was selected and it is being used as
the Beta test and proof of concept site.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:
Internet Upgrade - IT staff completed the upgrade of the
District’s internet connection circuit. The District’s
bandwidth connection increased by 150%, thus increasing
application availability, resources, and ensuring ongoing and
faster access to internet services. In addition, no cost
increases were incurred as the existing services were
renegotiated.
CityWorks - IT staff began conducting workshops in preparation
for the implementation of the District’s new work order
system. Workshops were held for all applicable departments to
view the new system in a live environment and solicit feedback.
Executive Dashboard - IT staff has completed the prototype of
the Executive Dashboard conveying the District’s performance
and management metrics and targets to increase accountability
and transparency. Staff will meet with the Senior Management
Team for final feedback and implementation.
Emergency Phones - IT staff has completed the activation and
placement of nine (9) red emergency phones, which should be
used by personnel in case of emergencies should a total loss of
communication occur. The phones are placed throughout
District’s facilities.
FINANCE:
The Board of Directors’ expenses for the first quarter of FY
2015 is attached.
4
Large Meter Testing - As part of the District’s commitment to
ensure the accuracy of the large meters, staff has begun the
process of testing approximately 100 meters that are 3” or
larger over the next six months. Prior to this year the
testing had been outsourced, but this year the District
purchased equipment that allowed the testing to be done in
house at a significant cost savings to the program.
Additionally, with the process being done by staff, the
District has more discretion in scheduling the testing so it is
less disruptive to our customers.
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) – Staff has
completed the FY2014 CAFR, which was submitted to the
Government Finance Officers Association along with the
District’s application for the Certificate of Achievement in
Financial Reporting. This is the eleventh consecutive year
the District has applied for the Certificate. The ten
previous submissions have received the Certificate of
Achievement in Financial Reporting.
Oak Grove Middle School Turf Removal Project - On November 14th,
Oak Grove Middle School in Jamul had the groundbreaking
ceremony for an artificial turf sports field. The sports field
project qualified for a $162,000 MWD rebate by removing 81,000
square feet of grass. Additional funding for this project was
provided by grants from Supervisor Diane Jacob’s Neighborhood
Reinvestment Program and the Jamul Dulzura Community Planning
and Land Use Group. The long awaited sports field project will
be completed by January 1, 2015.
CWA Audit of Recycled Credits – Every three years, CWA performs
an audit of the recycled credits, which the District receives
for recycled water sold. Staff has prepared all of the
necessary documentation for Fiscal Years 2012 to 2014 and is
prepared for the audit. The audit should take place in the
next month or two. The past three audits have revealed 100%
compliance with the contract.
Assembly Bill 2747 - AB 2747 makes changes to Government Code
60371 to require the District to give 10 days’ notice of
delinquency to tenants when the owner is the customer of
record. Effective January 1, 2015, the written notice must be
provided in the following languages: English, Spanish, Chinese,
Tagalog, Vietnamese and Korean. Staff has created an automated
process to identify these tenants and have created letters for
mailing. Staff does not believe this change in the regulations
will have a large impact on staff time, as the amount of
delinquent customers that are owners not living in the property
are few.
State Water Resources Control Board Workshop - On December 17th,
staff attended the Urban Water Conservation Council public
5
workshop held at the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California in Los Angeles. The workshop was intended to
illicit feedback from governmental agencies, non-governmental
agencies, and the public on potential next steps and future
actions related to urban water conservation. The workshop
focused mainly on what additional support the State could give
water retailers to further reduce water consumption throughout
California, particularly Southern California.
MWD Rebate Budget Increase - Due to record activity levels, the
MWD’s Water Planning and Stewardship Committee on December 12,
2014, approved an increase of $40 million for conservation
incentives. The turf removal rebate has generated the most
interest with $72 million committed to pre-approved sites. The
biannual conservation budget will increase from $60 million to
$100 million for FY 2014/2015.
Banking Services Review – Staff is evaluating quotes for
banking services to assess the competitive pricing of the
existing banking services. It is the practice of the District
to periodically perform a review of banking costs to ensure the
District’s existing pricing is competitive in the current
market environment. The last review of banking services was
performed in February 2012.
Financial Reporting:
o For the five months ended November 30, 2014, there are total
revenues of $41,992,347 and total expenses of $40,592,234.
The revenues exceeded expenses by $1,400,113.
o The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the
Investment Portfolio Details as of November 30, 2014 total
$83,085,581.12 with an average yield to maturity of 0.60%.
The total earnings year-to-date are $207,783.54.15.
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
SR-11 Potable Water Utility Relocations: This project consists
of two (2) groups of potable water relocations to accommodate
the construction of the future SR-11 right-of-way and connector
ramps. The first group includes relocation of existing
pipelines in Sanyo Avenue and utility easements and is
currently in the construction phase. The contractor, Coffman
Specialties Inc., was awarded a construction contract at the
January 2015 Board Meeting and is preparing to begin work to
lower the District’s 18-inch transmission main to accommodate
the Caltrans freeway retaining wall footings. The project is
on schedule and within budget. (P2453)
6
870-1 Reservoir Access Road Paving: This project consists of
paving the existing perimeter dirt road around the 870-1
Reservoir. A construction contract was awarded by the Board on
October 1, 2014 to RAP Engineering, Inc. During the months of
November and December 2014 the contractor completed the roadway
grading work and installation of base and asphalt concrete for
the access road. The project is on schedule and within budget.
(P2515)
944-1, 944-2, & 458-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coatings &
Upgrades: This project consists of removing and replacing the
interior and exterior coatings of the 944-1 0.3 MG Reservoir,
the 944-2 3.0 MG Reservoir, and the 458-2 1.8 MG Reservoir
along with providing structural upgrades to ensure the tanks
comply with both State and Federal OSHA standards as well as
American Water Works Association and County Health Department
standards. A construction contract was awarded by the Board on
October 1, 2014 to Olympus & Associates. The contractor has
begun work on the interior of the 944-2 Reservoir. The current
work consists of removing the existing interior coating and
structural repairs to the roof support system. The project is
on schedule and within budget. (P2531, P2532, P2535)
Calavo Basin Sewer System Rehabilitation: This project consists
of removing and replacing approximately 1,200 linear feet of 8-
inch PVC sewer pipeline and construction of 220 feet of new 8-
inch PVC sewer pipeline in the residential streets of the
Calavo Gardens area near Avocado Boulevard. A construction
contract was awarded by the Board on October 1, 2014 to Arrieta
Construction. A pre-construction meeting was held in December
2014 and work on the contractor submittals is progressing. The
project is on schedule and within budget. (S2033)
Rosarito Desalination: On November 14, 2014, the State
Department published the Notice of Preparation/Notice of Intent
(NOP/NOI) and the date of the scoping meeting for the CEQA/NEPA
document was held on December 2, 2014. A copy of the NOP/NOI
is available for viewing on the project web site
address www.owd-desalconveyance.com. Staff, together with
District’s consultants and representatives from NSC Agua, held
a telephone conference call on December 3, 2014 to discuss the
project and coordinate on complying with the California Water
Resources Control Board Drinking Water Program regulatory
requirements. NSC Agua is continuing the seawater quality
testing. (P2451)
Water Facilities Master Plan Update: This project will update
the District’s existing Water Resources Master Plan that was
previously updated in October 2008 and revised in May 2013.
7
The consultant (Atkins) is anticipated to provide a 60% draft
for staff review in January 2015. (P1210)
Integrated Resource Plan Update: On November 5, 2014 the Board
awarded a contract to Carollo Engineers, Inc., to prepare the
2015 IRP Update. A Board workshop will be held early next year
to provide an overview of the current IRP and discuss
alternative supply portfolios that might guide future water
resources management decisions. (P1210)
For the months of October and November 2014, the District sold
27 meters (84 EDUs) generating $768,089 in revenue. Projection
for these periods was 25.6 meters (30.6 EDUs) with budgeted
revenue of $281,516. Total revenue for Fiscal Year 2015 is
$1,769,943 against the annual budget of $1,689,093.
Water Operations:
Total number of potable water meters is 49,331.
The November potable water purchases were 2,435.0 acre-feet
which is .5% below the budget of 2,422.4 acre-feet. The
cumulative purchases through November is 15,399.3 acre-feet
which is 1.1% above the cumulative budget of 15,226.8 acre-
feet.
8
The November recycled water purchases and production was 374.8
acre-feet which is 4.8% above the budget of 357.6 acre-feet.
The cumulative production and purchases through November is
2,484.6 acre-feet which is 14.0% above the cumulative budget of
2,179.0 acre-feet.
Recycled water consumption for the month of November is as
follows:
o Total consumption was 383.6 acre-feet or 124,940,684 gallons
and the average daily consumption was 4,164,689 gallons per
day.
o Total recycled water consumption as of November for FY 2015
is 2540.3 acre-feet.
o Total number of recycled water meters is 709.
Wastewater flows for the month of November were as follows:
o Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,582,654.
o Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per
day: 523,958.
o Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 1,058,693.
o Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling
Facility, gallons per day: 1,043,351.
o Flow to Metro from Otay Water District was 15,345 gallons
per day.
By the end of November there were 6,090 wastewater EDUs.
1st Quarter
(7/1/14 - 9/30/14)
YTD
(7/1/14 - 9/30/14)
CROUCHER, GARY 500.00$ 500.00$
GONZALEZ, DAVID 700.00 700.00
LOPEZ, JOSE 1,787.40 1,787.40
ROBAK, MARK 1,199.68 1,199.68
THOMPSON, MITCHELL 1,437.76 1,437.76
5,624.84$ 5,624.84$
FY2015
REVENUES:
Potable Water Sales $
Recycled Water Sales
Potable Energy Charges
Potable System Charges
Potable MWD & CW A Fixed Charges
Potable Penalties
Total Water Sales
Sewer Charges
Meter Fees
Capacity Fee Revenues
Betterment Fees for Maintenance
Non-Operating Revenues
Tax Revenues
Interest
Transfer from Potable General Fund
Total Revenues $
EXPENSES:
Potable Water Purchases $
Recycled Water Purchases
CWA-Infrastructure Access Charge
CWA-Customer Service Charge
CW A-Emergency Storage Charge
MWD-Capacity Res Charge
MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge
Subtotal Water Purchases
Power Charges
Payroll & Related Costs
Material & Maintenance
Administrative Expenses
Legal Fees
Expansion Reserve
Betterment Reserve
Replacement Reserve
New Supply Fee
Transfer toSewer General Fund
OPEB Trust
Potable General Fund
Sewer Replacement
Total Expenses $
EXCESS REVENUES(EXPENSE) $
F:IMORPT/FS2015-1114
OT A Y WATER DISTRICT
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
FOR FIVE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 30,2014
Annual
Budget Actual Budget
45,669,500 $ 22,789,198 $ 22,689,400
8,826,600 5,115,399 4,983,700
2,145,600 1,101,121 1,036,500
12,337,500 4,690,635 4,685,000
10,936,200 4,637,372 4,640,000
870,300 445,004 421,800
80,785,700 38,778,729 38,456,400
3,007,700 1,159,231 1,164,500
51 ,500 40,472 21,500
1,150,600 531 ,311 509,400
301 ,800 162,630 251 ,500
1,947,800 771,191 775,200
3,763 ,700 279,119 265,800
77,400 38,865 32,300
553,800 230,800 230,800
91 ,640,000 $ 41,992,347 $ 41 ,707,400
34,521 ,500 $ 16,985,428 $ 16,863,700
1,601,500 897,167 818,100
1,901 ,400 780,230 780,500
1,792,200 743,291 743,500
4,741 ,200 1,950,880 1,951 ,000
701 ,400 249,163 249,000
1,800,000 757,225 750,000
47,059,200 22,363,383 22,155,800
2,838,400 1,583,304 1,538,300
19,747,600 7,982,665 7,869,250
3,619,800 1,501 ,574 1,595,175
5,009,200 1,661,893 1,863,886
410,000 101,116 170,833
2,538,900 1,057,900 1,057,900
3,530,000 1,470,800 1,470,800
3,270,200 1,362,600 1,362,600
705,000 293,800 293,800
553,800 230,800 230,800
647,100 269,600 269,600
1,583,800 659,900 659,900
127,000 52,900 52,900
91,640,000 $ 40,592,234 $ 40,591 ,544
$ 1,400,113 $ 1,115,856
Exhibit A
YTD
Variance Var%
$ 99,798 0.4%
131 ,699 2.6%
64,621 6.2%
5,635 0.1%
(2,628) (0.1%)
23,204 5.5%
322,329 0.8%
(5,269) (0.5%)
18,972 88.2%
21,911 4.3%
(88,870) (35.3%)
(4,009) (0.5%)
13,319 5.0%
6,565 20.3%
0.0%
$ 284,947 0.7%
$ (121 ,728) (0.7%)
(79,067) (9.7%)
270 0.0%
209 0.0%
120 0.0%
(163) (0.1%)
{7,225) {1.0%~
{207,583) {0.9%~
(45,004) (2.9%)
(113,415) (1.4%)
93,601 5.9%
201 ,992 10.8%
69,718 40.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
$ (691 ) (0.0%)
$ 284,257
12/23/2014 8:24AM
Investments
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Certificates of Deposit · Bank
local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
San Diego County Pool
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Par
Value
47,735,000.00
8,000,000.00
81,784.76
11,778,519.69
12,282,933.41
79,878,237.86
3,235,812.66
83,114,050.52
November 30 Month Ending
41 ,045.29
82,255,995.80
0.61%
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
November 30, 2014
Market
Value
47,738,808.75
8,009,520.00
81,784.76
11,780,654.95
12,239,000.00
79,849,768.46
3,235,812.66
83,085,581.12
Fiscal Year To Date
207,783.15
82,480,446.17
0.60%
Book
Value
47,737,370.93
8,002,023.12
81,784.76
11,778,519.69
12,282,933.41
79,882,631.91
3,235,812.66
83,118,444.57
%of
Portfolio
59.76
10.02
0.10
14.74
15.38
100.00%
Term
995
925
730
688
688
Days to
Maturity
836
324
417
533
533
YTM YTM
360 Equiv. 365 Equlv.
0.832 0.844
0.395 0.400
0.030 0.030
0.257 0.261
0.488 0.495 --
0.650 0.659
0.093 0.095
0.650 0.659
I hereby certify that the investments contained in· this report are made in accordance with the District Investment Policy Number 27 adopted by the Board of Directors on May 7, 2014. The market
value information provided by lntera ive Data Corporation. The investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow requirements of the District for the next six months of expenditures.
Reporting period 11/01/2014-11/30/2014
Run Date: 12/16/2014 • 13:28
12-1 zr -;Lf J'
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM1 ) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW
November 30,2014
INVESTMENT OVERVIEW & MARKET STATUS:
The federal funds rate has remained constant now for over 5 years. On December 16, 2008, at the Federal Reserve Board's regular
scheduled meeting, the federal funds rate was lowered from 1.00% to "a target range of between Zero and 0.25%" in response to the
nation's ongoing financial crisis, as well as banking industry pressure to ease credit and stimulate the economy. This marked the ninth
reduction in a row since September 18, 2007, when the rate was 5.25%. There have been no further changes made to the federal funds rate
at the Federal Reserve Board's subsequent regular scheduled meetings, the most recent of which was held on December 17, 2014. In
determining how long to maintain the current 0 to Yt percent target range for the federal funds rate, they went on to say: "the Committee
will assess progress--both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment
will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and
inflation expectations, and readings on financial developments. Based on its current assessment, the Committee judges that it can be
patient in beginning to normalize the stance of monetary policy. The Committee sees this guidance as consistent with its previous
statement that it likely will be appropriate to maintain the 0 to Y, percent target range for the federal funds rate for a considerable time
following the end of its asset purchase program in October, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Committee's 2
percent longer-run goal, and provided that longer-term inflation expectations remain well anchored. "
Despite the large drop in available interest rates, the District's overall effective rate of return at November 30,2014 was 0.60%, which
remained unchanged from the previous month. At the same time the LAIF return on deposits also remained unchanged from the previous
month, staying at an average effective yield of0.261% for the month ofNovember 2014. Based on our success at maintaining a
competitive rate of return on our portfolio during this extended period of interest rate declines, no changes in investment strategy regarding
returns on investment are being considered at this time. This desired portfolio mix is important in mitigating any liquidity risk from
unforeseen changes in LAIF or County Pool policy.
In accordance with the District's Investment Policy, all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives, in priority order, of
safety, liquidity, and return on investment.
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE: November 30, 2014
Investment State Limit Ota:y Limit Ota:y Actual
8.01: Treasury Securities 100% 100% 0
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations) $50 Million $50 Million $11.78 Million
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds) 100% 100% 0
8.03: Federal Agency Issues 100% 100% 67.06%
8.04: Certificates ofDeposit 30% 15% 0.10%
8.05: Short-Term Commercial Notes 25% 10% 0
8.06: Medium-Term Commercial Debt 30% 10% 0
8.07: Money Market Mutual Funds 20% 10% 0
8.08: San Diego County Pool 100% 100% 14.78%
12.0: Maximum Single Financial Institution 100% 50% 3.89%
$55,739,394
67.1%
OtayWater District
Investment Portfolio: 11/30/2014
Total Cash and Investments: $83,118,444
$3,317,597
4.0%
C Banks (Passbook/Checking/CO) •Pools (LA IF & County) C Agencies & Corporate Notes
$24,061,453
28.9%
Target: Meet or Exceed 100% of LAIF
Ill 0.70 -c:
Cll E -Ill Cll > .=
c: 0
c: ...
::::J -Cll
0::
Performance Measure FY-15
Return on Investment
Month
&~LAIF •Otay c Difference
CUSIP Investment #
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3134G4PXO
3133EDKF8
3134G4UCO
3135GOXR9
3134G4WJ3
3133EECX6
3130A3FY5
3134G55T8
3130A25S1
3136G1XZ7
3134G5A47
3130A35R1
3134G55X9
3134G4WH7
3130A1SE9
3134G56A8
3134G56NO
3136G23GO
3130A1ZX9
3134G5BL8
3134G5LH6
3133EECG3
3133EECG3
3136G2A23
2277
2291
2305
2269
2284
2313
2309
2295
2299
2274
2301
2306
2298
2285
2288
2297
2300
2304
2296
2302
2307
2311
2312
2308
Issuer
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Fannie Mae
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Average
Balance
Subtotal and Average
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
49,049,846.32
3133EC6F6
3133EC7H1
3135GOYE7
2258
2260
2286
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
20500031 83-6 2283
Run Date: 12/16/2014 -13:28
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Subtotal and Average 8,002,070.06
California Bank & Trust ------
Subtotal and Average 81,784.76
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
November 30, 2014
Purchase
Date
12/27/2013
04/29/2014
09/08/2014
06/06/2013
03/19/2014
11/25/2014
11/28/2014
06/12/2014
06/19/2014
12/19/2013
06/30/2014
10/06/2014
06/10/2014
03/20/2014
05/19/2014
06/16/2014
06/26/2014
08/15/2014
05/22/2014
07/17/2014
10/30/2014
11/20/2014
11/20/2014
11/28/2014
12/05/2012
12/17/2012
04/01/2014
01/22/2014
Par Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
47,735,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
81 ,784.76
81,784.76
Market Value
1,997,540.00
1,997,620.00
2,002,620.00
1,999,600.00
2,000,480.00
1,999,720.00
2,001 ,320.00
2,000,380.00
2,000,220.00
2,000,420.00
2,001 ,580.00
2,001 '160.00
1 ,995,140.00
2,000,740.00
2,000,860.00
2,000,420.00
1 ,997,160.00
2,004,060.00
1,997,860.00
2,002,600.00
1,995,480.00
1,031 ,287.50
2,708,381.25
2,002,160.00
47,738,808.75
3,002,460.00
3,003,120.00
2,003,940.00
8,009,520.00
81 ,784.76
81,784.76
Stated
Book Value Rate
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,002,370.93
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
47,737,370.93
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,002,023.12
8,002,023.12
81,784.76
81,784.76
0.500
0.550
0.650
0.550
0.625
0.610
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.670
0.650
0.850
0.810
0.900
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.050
1.050
1.220
1.100
1.140
1.140
1.200
0.350
0.340
0.625
0.030
Page 1
YTM Days to Maturity
S&P 360 Maturity Date
0.493
0.542
0.570
AA 0.542
0.616
0.602
0.690
AA 0.690
0.690
0.661
0.641
0.838
0.799
0.888
0.986
0.986
0.986
1.036
1.036
1.203
1.085
1.124
1.124
1.184
0.832
AA 0.345
0.335
0.558
0.395
0.030
0.030
574 06/27/2016
606 07/29/2016
606 07/29/2016
645 09/06/2016
658 09/19/2016
725 11/25/2016
725 11/25/2016
742 12/12/2016
749 12/19/2016
749 12/19/2016
760 12/30/2016
767 01/06/2017
830 03/10/2017
840 03/20/2017
900 05/19/2017
928 06/16/2017
938 06/26/2017
988 08/15/2017
995 08/22/2017
1,051 10/17/2017
1,064 10/30/2017
1,085 11/20/2017
1,085 11/20/2017
1,093 11/28/2017
836
182 06/01/2015
259 08/17/2015
634 08/26/2016
324
417 01/22/2016
417
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
CUSIP Investment# Issuer
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LA IF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Average
San Diego County Pool
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
Run Date: 12116/2014 ·13:28
Average
Balance
12,758,519.69
10,682,933.41
82,255,995.80
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
November 30, 2014
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
11,778,519.69 11,780,654.95
07/01/2014 0.00 0.00
11,778,519.69 11 '780,654.95
12,282,933.41 12,239,000.00
12,282,933.41 12,239,000.00
79,878,237.86 79,849,768.46
Stated
Book Value Rate
11,778,519.69 0.261
0.00 0.261
11,778,519.69
12,282,933.41 0.495
12,282,933.41
79,882,631.91
Page 2
YTM Days to Maturity
S&P 360 Maturity Date
0.257
0.257 ---------
0.257
0.488 ---------
0.488
0.650 533
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment# Issuer
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PETTY CASH 9003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Average Balance
Total Cash and Investments
Run Date: 12/16/2014 -13:28
Average
Balance
0.00
82,255,995.80
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Cash
November 30, 2014
Purchase
Date Par Value
2,013,506.20
2,950.00
1,142,422.38
07/01/2014 27,891 .35
6,940.67
18,838.28
07/01/2014 0.00
07/01/2014 23,263.78
83,114,050.52
Market Value Book Value
2,013,506.20 2,013,506.20
2,950.00 2,950.00
1 '142,422.38 1 '142,422.38
27,891.35 27,891 .35
6,940.67 6,940.67
18,838.28 18,838.28
0.00 0.00
23,263.78 23,263.78
83,085,581.12 83,118,444.57
Stated
Rate S&P
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
Page 3
YTM Daysto
360 Maturity
0.010
0.000
0.247
0.000
0.010
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.650 533
Portfolio OTAY
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer
Security Type: Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3134G54N2 2293 99 FHLMC
3134G55T8
3134G4WH7
3134G4WJ3
3134G4PXO
3134G56A8
3134G55X9
3134G5LH6
3134G56NO
3134G4UCO
3134G5BL8
3134G5A47
3136G1XZ7
3136G2A23
3135GOYW7
3136G23GO
3130A25S1
3130A1Q84
3130A35R1
3130A2HW9
3130A3FY5
3130A1RB6
3130A1ZX9
3130A1RB6
313382YY3
3130AOVG2
3130A1SE9
3133EECG3
3133EECX6
2295
2285
2284
2277
2297
2298
2307
2300
2305
2302
2301
2274
2308
2276
2304
2299
2292
2306
2303
2309
2290
2296
2289
2268
2281
2286
2311
2313
Run Date: 12/16/2014 -13:31
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FHLMC
FNMA
FNMA
FNMA
FNMA
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FHLB
FFCB
FFCB
OTAY
Interest Earnings
Sorted by Security Type -Fund
November 1, 2014-November 30, 2014
Period Yield on Beginning Book Value
Ending
Par Value
Beginning
Book Value
Ending Maturity Current Yield This
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,002,469.67
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,002,014.57
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2, 705,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
Book Value Date Rate Period
0.00 11/28/2016
2,000,000.00 12/12/2016
2,000,000.00 03/20/2017
2,000,000.00 09/19/2016
2,000,000.00 06/27/2016
2,000,000.00 06/16/2017
2,000,000.00 03/10/2017
2,000,000.00 10/30/2017
2,000,000.00 06/26/2017
2,002,370.93 07/29/2016
2,000,000.00 10/17/2017
2,000,000.00 12/30/2016
2,000,000.00 12/19/2016
2,000,000.00 11/26/2017
0.00 11/25/2016
2,000,000.00 06/15/2017
2,000,000.00 12/19/2016
0.00 05/08/2017
2,000,000.00 01/06/2017
0.00 10/07/2016
2,000,000.00 11/25/2016
0.00 05/15/2017
2,000,000.00 06/22/2017
0.00 05/15/2017
0.00 02/22/2016
0.00 11/25/2016
2,000,000.00 05/19/2017
1,030,000.00 11/20/2017
2,000,000.00 11/25/2016
0.750
0.700
0.900
0.625
0.500
1.000
0.810
1.100
1.000
0.650
1.220
0.650
0.670
1.200
0.750
1.050
0.700
1.010
0.650
0.660
0.700
1.020
1.050
1.020
0.350
0.700
1.000
1.140
0.610
0.063
0.056
0.075
0.052
0.042
0.063
0.066
0.092
0.063
0.048
0.102
0.054
0.056
0.100
0.056
0.086
0.056
0.064
0.071
0.055
0.056
0.065
0.066
0.065
0.029
0.056
0.063
0.095
0.051
Adjusted Interest Earnings
Interest Amortization/ Adjusted Interest
Earned Accretion Earnings
1,125.00
1,166.66
1,500.00
1,041 .67
633.34
1,666.67
1,350.00
1,633.33
1,666.67
1,063.34
2,033.33
1,063.34
1,116.67
200.00
1,000.00
1,750.00
1,166.67
392.78
1,416.66
146.67
116.67
1,072.98
1,750.00
406.57
406.33
933.33
1,666.67
356.76
203.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-118.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-64.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,125.00
1,166.66
1,500.00
1,041 .67
633.34
1,666.67
1,350.00
1,633.33
1,666.67
964.40
2,033.33
1,083.34
1,116.67
200.00
935.01
1,750.00
1,166.67
392.76
1,416.66
146.67
116.67
1,072.98
1,750.00
406.57
408.33
933.33
1,666.67
356.76
203.33
Portfolio OTAY
AP
IE (PRF _IE) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
Ending
CUSIP Investment # Fund Issuer Par Value
Security Type: Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133EECG3 2312 99 FFCB 2,705,000.00
3133EDKF8 2291 99 FFCB 2,000,000.00
3135GOXR9 2269 99 FANM 2,000,000.00
Subtotal 47,735,000.00
Security Type: Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3135GOYE7 2286 99 FNMA 2,000,000.00
3133EC6F6 2258 99 FFCB 3,000,000.00
3133EC7H1 2260 99 FFCB 3,000,000.00
Subtotal 8,000,000.00 -----
Security Type: Certificates of Deposit -Bank
2050003183-6 2283 99 CB&T 81 ,784.76
Subtotal 81,784.76
Security Type: Union Bank
UNION OPERATING 9004 99 CA 1,142,422.38
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 99 CA 18,838.28
UNION MONEY 9002 99 CA 2,013,506.20
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 99 CA 6,940.67
Subtotal 3,181 ,707.53
Security Type: Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LA IF 9001 99 CA 11,778,519.69
Subtotal 11,778,519.69
Security Type: San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 99 SDC 12,282,933.41
Subtotal 12,282,933.41
Total 83,059,945.39
Run Date: 12/16/2014-13:31
OTAY
Interest Earnings
November 1, 2014-November 30, 2014
Beginning Ending Maturity Current Yield This
Book Value Book Value Date Rate Period
0.00 2, 705,000.00 11/20/2017 1.140 0.095
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 07/29/2016 0.550 0.046
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 09/06/2016 0.550 0.046
53,739,504.44 47,737,370.93 0.067
2,002,120.23 2,002,023.12 08/26/2016 0.625 0.047
3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/01/2015 0.350 0.029
3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 08/17/2015 0.340 0.028
8,002,120.23 8,002,023.12 0.033
81 ,784.76 81 ,784.76 01/22/2016 0.030 0.002
81 ,784.76 81,784.76 0.002
713,200.91 1,142,422.38 0.250 0.021
5,042.78 18,838.28 0.010 0.002
10,002.89 2,013,506.20 0.010 0.072
1,687.67 6,940.67 0.010 0.002
729,934.25 3,181,707.53 0.021 - -
10,978,519.69 11,778,519.69 0.261 0.025
10,978,519.69 11,778,519.69 0.025 ---
10,282,933.41 12,282,933.41 0.495 0.042
10,282,933.41 12,282,933.41 0.042
83,814,796.78 83,064,339.44 0.054
Interest
Earned
942.24
916.67
916.66
33,267.03
1,041 .66
875.00
850.00
2,766.66
2.04
2.04
149.49
0.09
7.24
0.04
156.86
2,736.97
2,736.97
4,346.35
4,346.35
43,275.91
Page 2
Adjusted Interest Earnings
Amortization/
Accretion
0.00
0.00
0.00
-183.93
-97.11
0.00
0.00
-97.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-281.04
Adjusted Interest
Earnings
942.24
916.67
916.66
33,083.10
944.55
875.00
850.00
2,669.55
2.04
2.04
149.49
0.09
7.24
0.04
156.86
2,736.97
2,736.97
4,346.35
4,346.35
42,994.87
Portfolio OTAY
AP
IE (PRF _IE) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
CUSIP Investment#
Issuer: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002
UNION OPERATING 9004
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014
Issuer
Percent
of Portfolio
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LA IF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 18.065%
Issuer: California Bank & Trust
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 0.098%
Issuer: Fannie Mae
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 2.406%
Issuer: Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133EECG3 2311
3133EECG3 2312
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Run Date: 12/16/2014 -13:32
OTAY
Activity Report
Sorted By Issuer
November 1, 2014-November 30, 2014
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
790,159.02
10,978,519.69
11,768,678.71
81,784.76
81,784.76
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
0.261
1.140
1.140
11/20/2014
11/20/2014
Purchases or
Deposits
8,033,882.87
2,286,994.97
5,253.00
13,795.50
0.00
10,339,926.34
5,000,000.00
5,000,000.00
15,339,926.34
0.00
0.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
6,030,379.56
1,857,773.50
0.00
0.00
6,119.64
7 ,894,272. 70
4,200,000.00
4,200,000.00
12,094,272.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ending
Balance
3,235,812.66
11,778,519.69
15,014,332.35
81,784.76
81,784.76
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
Percent
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio
Issuer: Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133EECX6 2313 Federal Farm Credit Bank
Subtotal and Balance
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 16.525%
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
313382YY3 2268 Federal Home Loan Bank
3130AOVG2 2281 Federal Home Loan Bank
3130A1RB6 2289 Federal Home Loan Bank
3130A1RB6 2290 Federal Home Loan Bank
3130A1Q84 2292 Federal Home Loan Bank
3130A2HW9 2303 Federal Home Loan Bank
3130A3FY5 2309 Federal Home Loan Bank
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 12.032%
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3134G54N2 2293 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 26.470%
Issuer: Federal National Mortage Assoc ---
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3135GOYW7 2276 Federal National Mortage Assoc
3136G2A23 2308 Federal National Mortage Assoc
Run Date: 12/16/2014 • 13:32
OTAY
Activity Report
November 1, 2014-November 30, 2014
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
0.610 11/25/2014
2,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
0.350 11/24/2014
0.700 11/25/2014
1.020 11/17/2014
1.020 11/17/2014
1.010 11/10/2014
0.660 11/05/2014
0.700 11/28/2014
19,735,000.00
19,735,000.00
0.750 11/28/2014
24,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
0.750 11/25/2014
1.200 11/28/2014
Par Value
Purchases or Redemptions or
Deposits Withdrawals
2,000,000.00 0.00
5,735,000.00 0.00
5,735,000.00 0.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 1 ,030,000.00
0.00 2,705,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
2,000,000.00 11 '735,000.00
2,000,000.00 11 '735,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
Page 2
Ending
Balance
7,735,000.00
6,000,000.00
13,735,000.00
10,000,000.00
10,000,000.00
22,000,000.00
22,000,000.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
Percent
CUSIP Investment # Issuer of Portfolio
Subtotal and Balance ---·----
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 9.625%
Issuer: San Diego County
San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 14.778%
Total 100.000%
Run Date: 1211612014-13:32
OTAY
Activity Report
November 1, 2014-November 30, 2014
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
6,000,000.00 ---~---
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
0.495
10,282,933.41
10,282,933.41
83,868,396.88
Par Value
Purchases or Redemptions or
Deposits Withdrawals
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
27,074,926.34 27,829,272.70
--
Page 3
Ending
Balance
6,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
12,282,933.41
12,282,933.41
83,114,050.52
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
CUSIP Investment#
Fund: Treasury Fund
3134G54N2
3134G55T8
3134G4WH7
3134G4WJ3
3134G4PXO
3134G56A8
3134G55X9
3134G5LH6
3134G56NO
3134G4UCO
3134G5BL8
3134G5A47
3136G1XZ7
3136G2A23
3135GOYW7
3136G23GO
3135GOYE7
3130A2551
3130A1Q84
3130A35R1
3130A2HW9
3130A3FY5
3130A1RB6
3130A1ZX9
3130A1RB6
313382YY3
3130AOVG2
3130A1SE9
PETTY CASH
PAYROLL
LA IF
2293
2295
2285
2284
2277
2297
2298
2307
2300
2305
2302
2301
2274
2308
2276
2304
2286
2299
2292
2306
2303
2309
2290
2296
2289
2268
2281
2288
9003
9005
9001
Run Date: 12/16/2014-13:31
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Investment
Class Maturity
Date
Fair Value 11/28/2016
Fair Value 12/12/2016
Fair Value 03/20/2017
Fair Value 09/19/2016
FairValue 06/27/2016
Fair Value 06/16/2017
Fair Value 03/10/2017
Fair Value 10/30/2017
Fair Value 06/26/2017
Fair Value 07/29/2016
FairValue 10/17/2017
Fair Value 12/30/2016
Fair Value 12/19/2016
Fair Value 11/28/2017
FairValue 11/25/2016
Fair Value 08/15/2017
Fair Value 08/26/2016
Fair Value 12/19/2016
Fair Value 05/08/2017
Fair Value 01/06/2017
FairValue 10/07/2016
Fair Value 11/25/2016
Fair Value 05/15/2017
Fair Value 08/22/2017
Fair Value 05/15/2017
Fair Value 02/22/2016
Fair Value 11/25/2016
FairValue 05/19/2017
Amortized
Amortized
Fair Value
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
November 1, 2014-November 30, 2014
Beginning
Invested Value
2,000,900.00
2,001 ,280.00
2,000,560.00
2,000,040.00
1,996,500.00
1,999,560.00
1,993,000.00
1,990,840.00
2,002,360.00
2,003,040.00
2,002,320.00
1,999,860.00
1,998,420.00
0.00
2,000,820.00
2,001 '140.00
2,002,160.00
1,998,320.00
1,999,600.00
1 ,999,160.00
2,000,060.00
0.00
2,705,730.35
1,994,760.00
1,030,278.10
1,998,320.00
2,000,720.00
1 ,999,140.00
2,950.00
27,891 .35
10,980,509.92
Purchase
of Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Addition
to Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5,000,000.00
Redemption
of Principal
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,705,000.00
0.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,200,000.00
Adjustment In Value
Amortization
Adjustment
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
~00
~00
~00
~00
~00
~00
~00
0~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
~00
~00
~00
~00
~00
Change in
Market Value
-900.00
-900.00
180.00
440.00
1,040.00
860.00
2,140.00
4,640.00
-5,200.00
-420.00
280.00
1,720.00
2,000.00
2,160.00
-820.00
2,920.00
1,780.00
1,900.00
400.00
2,000.00
-60.00
1,320.00
-730.35
3,100.00
-278.10
1,680.00
-720.00
1,720.00
0.00
0.00
145.03
Ending
Invested Value
0.00
2,000,380.00
2,000,740.00
2,000,480.00
1,997,540.00
2,000,420.00
1,995,140.00
1,995,480.00
1,997,160.00
2,002,620.00
2,002,600.00
2,001 ,580.00
2,000,420.00
2,002,160.00
0.00
2,004,060.00
2,003,940.00
2,000,220.00
0.00
2,001,160.00
0.00
2,001,320.00
0.00
1,997,860.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,860.00
2,950.00
27,891 .35
11,780,654.95
Portfolio OTAY
AP
GD (PRF_GD)7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase
CUSIP Investment# Fund Class Date Invested Value of Principal
Fund: Treasury Fund
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 99 Fair Value 0.00 0.00
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 99 Amortized 29,383.42 0.00
UNION OPERATING 9004 99 Amortized 713,200.91 0.00
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 99 Amortized 5,042.78 0.00
UNION MONEY 9002 99 Amortized 10,002.89 0.00
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 99 Amortized 1,687.67 0.00
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 99 Amortized 0.00 0.00
3133EC6F6 2258 99 Fair Value 06/01/2015 3,003,060.00 0.00
3133EECG3 2311 99 Fair Value 11/20/2017 0.00 1,030,000.00
3133EECX6 2313 99 Fair Value 11/25/2016 0.00 2,000,000.00
3133EC7H1 2260 99 Fair Value 08/17/2015 3,003,870.00 0.00
3133EECG3 2312 99 Fair Value 11/20/2017 0.00 2,705,000.00
3133EDKF8 2291 99 Fair Value 07/29/2016 1,996,720.00 0.00
2050003183-6 2283 99 Amortized 01/22/2016 81,784.76 0.00
3135GOXR9 2269 99 Fair Value 09/06/2016 1,998,540.00 0.00
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 99 Fair Value 10,203,000.00 0.00
Subtotal 83,776,532.15 9,735,000.00
Total 83,776,532.15 9,735,000.00
Run Date: 12/1612014 -13:31
Adjustment in Value
Addition Redemption Amortization Change in
to Principal of Principal Adjustment Market Value
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 6,119.64 0.00 0.00
2,286,994.97 1,857,773.50 0.00 0.00
13,795.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
8,033,882.87 6,030,379.56 0.00 0.00
5,253.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 -600.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1,287.50
0.00 0.00 0.00 -280.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 -750.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 3,381.25
0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1,060.00
2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 36,000.00
17,339,926.34 27,829,272.70 0.00 63,395.33
17,339,926.34 27,829,272.70 0.00 63,395.33
Page 2
Ending
Invested Value
0.00
23,263.78
1 '142,422.38
18,838.28
2,013,506.20
6,940.67
0.00
3,002,460.00
1,031 ,287.50
1,999,720.00
3,003,120.00
2,708,381.25
1,997,620.00
81 ,784.76
1,999,600.00
12,239,000.00
83,085,581 .12
83,085,581.12
Portfolio OTAY
AP
GO (PRF _GD) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
Security ID
3134G4WH7
3134G55T8
3134G5LH6
3134G4WJ3
3134G5BL8
3134G56A8
3134G4PXO
3134G4UCO
3134G5A47
3134G56NO
3134G55X9
3136G23GO
3136G2A23
3136G1XZ7
3130A1SE9
3130A1ZX9
3130A25S1
3130A35R1
3130A3FY5
3133EECG3
3133EECX6
3133EECG3
3133EDKF8
3135GOXR9
Investment# Fund
2285
2295
2307
2284
2302
2297
2277
2305
2301
2300
2298
2304
2308
2274
2288
2296
2299
2306
2309
2311
2313
2312
2291
2269
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Run Date: 12/16/2014 -15:40
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 11/30/2014
Issuer
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Fannie Mae
Investment
Class
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Book
Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,002,370.93
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Page 1
Par
Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Market Current
Value Rate
2,000,740.00 .9000000
2,000,380.00 .7000000
1 ,995,480.00 1.100000
2,000,480.00 .6250000
2,002,600.00 1.220000
2,000,420.00 1.000000
1,997,540.00 .5000000
2,002,620.00 .6500000
2,001 ,580.00 .6500000
1,997,160.00 1.000000
1,995,140.00 .8100000
2,004,060.00 1.050000
2,002,160.00 1.200000
2,000,420.00 .6700000
2,000,860.00 1.000000
1,997,860.00 1.050000
2,000,220.00 . 7000000
2,001 '160.00 .8500000
2,001,320.00 .7000000
1,031,287.50 1.140000
1,999,720.00 .6100000
2, 708,381 .25 1.140000
1,997,620.00 .5500000
1,999,600.00 .5500000
YTM Current
360 Yield
0.888
0.690
1.085
0.616
1.203
0.986
0.493
0.570
0.641
0.986
0.799
1.036
1.184
0.661
0.986
1.036
0.690
0.838
0.690
1.124
0.602
1.124
0.542
0.542
0.884
0.691
1.179
0.612
1.174
0.992
0.579
0.571
0.612
1.056
0.918
0.974
0.983
0.660
0.982
1.090
0.695
0.822
0.666
1.097
0.617
1.097
0.622
0.590
Maturity/ Modified
Call Date Duration
03/20/2017
12/12/2016
10/30/2017
09/19/2016
10/17/2017
06/16/2017
06/27/2016
07/29/2016
12/30/2016
06/26/2017
03/10/2017
08/15/2017
11/28/2017
12/19/2016
05/19/2017
08/22/2017
12/19/2016
01/06/2017
11/25/2016
11/20/2017
11/25/2016
11/20/2017
07/29/2016
09/06/2016
2.270
2.006
2.856
1.785
2.815
2.492
1.559
1.646
2.058
2.519
2.239
2.653
2.933
2.026
2.429
2.671
2.025
2.071
1.965
2.911
1.968
2.911
1.647
1.750
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF _DU) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 11/30/2014
Investment Book Par
Securi!X ID Investment# Fund Issuer Class Value Value
3135GOYE7 2286 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,002,023.12 2,000,000.00
3133EC7H1 2260 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
3133EC6F6 2258 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
20500031 83-6 2283 99 California Bank & Trust Amort 81,784.76 81 ,784.76
LA IF 9001 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 11,778,519.69 11,778,519.69
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 0.00 0.00
SD COUNTY 9007 99 San Diego County Fair 12,282,933.41 12,282,933.41
Report Total 79,882,631.91 79,878,237.86
Run Date: 12116/2014-15:40 Page 2
Market Current YTM
Value Rate 360
2,003,940.00 .6250000 0.558
3,003,120.00 .3400000 0.335
3,002,460.00 .3500000 0.345
81 ,784.76 .0300000 0.030
11,780,654.95 .2610000 0.257
0.00 .2610000 0.257
12,239,000.00 .4950000 0.488
79,849,768.46
Current
Yield
0.511
0.132
0.186
0.030
0.261
0.261
0.495
0.641
Maturity/ Modified
Call Date Duration
08/26/2016 1.722
08/17/2015 0.710
06/01/2015 0.498
01/22/2016 1.142
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.437
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF _DU) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.3b
Check Total
7,890.40
12,585.68
12,230.61
4,806.60
AIR BOTTLES 221.53
131355797 10/08/14 AQUA AMMONIA 952.20
2041581 10/29/14 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9032320395 10/07/14
21,551.91 21,551.91
2041580 10/29/14 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131355798 10/08/14 AQUA AMMONIA 3,854.40
RETAINAGE RELEASE 59,038.49 59,038.49
2041695 11/12/14 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1314 10/14/14 DEVELOPER PROJECTS (9/6/14-10/10/14)
953960 10/03/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 266.80
2041579 10/29/14 13901 ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SVCS INC 00015341 08/01/14
954294 10/09/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 418.84
954052 10/06/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 409.03
954292 10/09/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 520.85
953850 10/02/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 466.90
953847 10/02/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 721.93
954448 10/10/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 675.83
953754 10/01/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,324.19
954522 10/13/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,096.62
954523 10/13/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,444.84
953959 10/03/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,372.25
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,010.80
954185 10/08/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,501.73
954734 10/16/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 291.32
2041578 10/29/14 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 954051 10/06/14
955197 10/23/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 438.45
954863 10/17/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 330.56
955124 10/22/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 966.17
955347 10/27/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 722.91
954732 10/16/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,004.42
954951 10/20/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 966.17
955348 10/27/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,451.70
955225 10/24/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,372.25
954643 10/15/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,555.68
954872 10/17/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,457.59
633.65 633.65
2041694 11/12/14 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 954948 10/20/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 2,028.46
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (SEPT 2014)420.00 420.00
2041742 11/19/14 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 955199 10/23/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE
12202221 09/30/14 COMMUNITY OUTREACH / DESAL (SEPT 2014)3,900.84
2041577 10/29/14 15416 24 HOUR ELEVATOR INC 14245 09/01/14
Amount
2041576 10/29/14 15645 (W)RIGHT ON COMMUNICATIONS INC 12202220 09/30/14 COMMUNITY OUTREACH (A) (SEPT 2014)3,989.56
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
Page 1 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
267.88
507.17
7,048.60
9,748.84
286.72 286.72
ELECTRICAL SERVICES (9/1/14-9/30/14)577.00 577.00
2041748 11/19/14 11461 BUSINESS PRINTING CO INC 114302 11/14/14 MAIL OUT
568654 06/18/14 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY (THRU 5/31/14)2,051.38
2041587 10/29/14 14112 BSE ENGINEERING INC 53020 10/09/14
53.58 53.58
2041652 11/05/14 08156 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 581991 10/27/14 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY (THRU 9/30/14)7,697.46
ETHERNET CONVERTER 380.21 380.21
2041747 11/19/14 15909 BLUE CENTURION HOMES LLC Ref002436888 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000207224
2041746 11/19/14 02434 BLACK BOX CORPORATION IN0173741 09/11/14
2,015.00
2041651 11/05/14 15883 BETTY THACKER Ref002436722 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000037184 66.00 66.00
106.09 106.09
2041697 11/12/14 03595 BENHAM, WALES 10271410311411/10/14 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT (10/27/14-10/31/14)2,015.00
LICENSE AGREEMENT (11/15/14-11/14/15)75,000.00 75,000.00
2041650 11/05/14 03526 BALDWIN COOKE 4099679 10/22/14 2015 PLANNER
00000589437511/01/14 TELEPHONE SERVICES (10/01/14-10/31/14)1,229.08
2041586 10/29/14 13392 AZTECA SYSTEMS INC 9926 10/02/14
316.66
2041745 11/19/14 07785 AT&T 00000589672111/02/14 TELEPHONE SERVICES (MONTHLY)5,819.52
1,110.00 1,110.00
2041649 11/05/14 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41260 10/24/14 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (NOV 2014)316.66
PAGERS (OCT 2014)203.82 203.82
2041585 10/29/14 00002 ANSWER INC 10682 10/22/14 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY)
2041696 11/12/14 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L11095700K 11/01/14
717.84
2041744 11/19/14 02934 ALLEN INSTRUMENTS & SUPPLIES 0140021IN 10/14/14 SURVEY EQUIPMENT 48.55 48.55
10.41 10.41
2041584 10/29/14 02934 ALLEN INSTRUMENTS & SUPPLIES 0139791IN 10/07/14 SURVEY EQUIPMENT 717.84
MONTHLY MONITORING (NOV 2014)1,407.00 1,407.00
2041743 11/19/14 15907 ALEXIS TUCKER Ref002436886 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000205840
2041648 11/05/14 14811 ALARMS UNLIMITED INC 167830 11/01/14
163986 07/15/14 MONITORING SVCS - 450-1/680 (6/6/14-7/31/14)53.17
162146 05/22/14 MONTHLY MONITORING - 944-1 & 2 (4/10/14-5/31/14)49.30
162148 05/22/14 MONTHLY MONITORING - 978-2 (4/4/14-5/31/14)74.10
163987 07/15/14 MONITORING SVCS - REG SITE (5/23/14-7/31/14)66.70
96.67
162149 05/22/14 MONTHLY MONITORING - 980-2 PS (2/24/14-5/31/14)91.83
162147 05/22/14 MONTHLY MONITORING - 978-1 (4/3/14-5/31/14)75.40
LAND SURVEYING (9/1/14-9/30/14)7,227.50 7,227.50
2041583 10/29/14 14811 ALARMS UNLIMITED INC 162150 05/22/14 MONTHLY MONITORING - CAPS PATZIG (2/19/14-5/31/14)
2041582 10/29/14 15024 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC 12 10/07/14
AIR BOTTLES 221.53
9921827588 09/30/14 AIR BOTTLES 46.35
2041581 10/29/14 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9032320395 10/07/14
Page 2 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
400.00
115.70
19,600.20
1,408.00
TONERS 2,642.35204159310/29/14 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 16542310 10/07/14
3,801.00
2041699 11/12/14 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 16530560 10/22/14 4/PART PAPER 1,458.00 1,458.00
1,496.83 1,496.83
2041754 11/19/14 12854 COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION SVCS 1339 11/11/04 CDL TRAINING 3,801.00
INTERNET CIRCUITS (NOV 2014)1,283.00 1,283.00
2041592 10/29/14 15616 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 0001100114 10/01/14 INTERNET CIRCUITS (SEPT-OCT 2014)
75390 09/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 154.00
2041753 11/19/14 15616 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 0001110114 11/01/14
75386 09/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 154.00
75388 09/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 154.00
446.00
75389 09/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 322.00
75391 09/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 178.00
AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (NOV 2014)4,335.89 4,335.89
2041591 10/29/14 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 75387 09/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES
2041752 11/19/14 15256 CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE / LINA 9267110114 11/10/14
48.86
2041657 11/05/14 15889 CHRISTOPHER HILL Ref002436728 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000193126 21.77 21.77
110.46 110.46
2041751 11/19/14 15906 CHRISTAIN CLAVIER Ref002436885 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000198394 48.86
UB Refund Cst #0000146509 101.07 101.07
2041656 11/05/14 15897 CHRIS HOLLINGSWORTH 6924103114 11/03/14 CUSTOMER REFUND
10/30/14 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 150.00
2041750 11/19/14 15903 CHEYANNE J YEATS Ref002436882 11/17/14
16,465.20
10316003 07/10/14 PROJECT MANAGEMENT (6/30/14)3,135.00
2041655 11/05/14 01788 CHAVARELA, GERARDO 102814
DESIGN FOR 870-2 PS (8/1/14-8/31/14)1,910.82 1,910.82
2041654 11/05/14 14673 CGR MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS LLC 10316004 07/10/14 PROJECT MANAGEMENT (2/28/14-6/30/14)
10/10/14 DESTRUCTION SERVICES (10/9/14)38.50 38.50
2041590 10/29/14 15177 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 0137653 10/13/14
77.50
7820 09/05/14 DESTRUCTION SERVICES (9/4/14)38.20
2041589 10/29/14 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7828
DEBT STATEMENT 500.00 500.00
2041698 11/12/14 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7829 10/20/14 DESTRUCTION SERVICES (10/17/14)
15181 10/23/14 GARDEN TOUR (10/14/14 & 10/23/14)160.00
2041588 10/29/14 02989 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL 14101004 10/10/14
87.90
2041749 11/19/14 02401 CAJON VALLEY UNION SCHOOL DIST 15182 10/28/14 GARDEN TOUR (10/21-23/2014)240.00
286.72 286.72
2041653 11/05/14 15896 CAH 2014-1 BORROWER LLC Ref002436735 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000212990 87.90
2041748 11/19/14 11461 BUSINESS PRINTING CO INC 114302 11/14/14 MAIL OUT
Page 3 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
3,094.33
5,278.50
355.00
12,796.00
845.00
890.00
604.80
186.06 186.06
2041601 10/29/14 13123 FAVELA PRINTING INC 1475 10/07/14 FY 2015 BUDGETS 604.80
LABORATORY SUPPLIES 597.78 597.78
2041600 10/29/14 15396 EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC 901900337 10/08/14 ENCORE700 PUMP
2041599 10/29/14 07596 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS INC 1000358874 10/06/14
10/20/14 LAB ANALYSIS (10/3/14-10/10/14)490.00
4101078 10/27/14 LAB ANALYSIS (10/11/14-10/16/14)400.00
445.00
4100740 10/13/14 LAB ANALYSIS (9/27/14-10/2/14)400.00
2041705 11/12/14 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 4100917
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (QUARTERLY)6,186.00 6,186.00
2041598 10/29/14 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 4100589 10/06/14 LAB ANALYSIS (9/20/14-9/26/14)
2041758 11/19/14 00331 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 9250238411201411/13/14
2,436.00
2041704 11/12/14 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 5458103114 10/31/14 RECYCLING SERVICES (OCT 2014)95.00 95.00
10.31 10.31
2041597 10/29/14 15855 DIG-SMART LLC 1195 10/07/14 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE (9/28/14-9/27/15)2,436.00
UB Refund Cst #0000183461 90.66 90.66
2041659 11/05/14 15887 DIANA PETERSEN Ref002436726 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000176325
2041757 11/19/14 15905 DELBERT TONEY Ref002436884 11/17/14
598.16
2041596 10/29/14 14362 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS {20}70530 10/06/14 FIRETIDE SUPPORT (8/14/14-9/30/14)10,500.00 10,500.00
132.56 132.56
2041595 10/29/14 11797 D & H WATER SYSTEMS INC 2014462 10/07/14 REGULATOR PM KIT 598.16
INTERNET SERVICES (10/29/14-11/28/14)600.00 600.00
2041658 11/05/14 15888 CWC REGIONAL HOUSING FUND LP Ref002436727 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000185812
2041703 11/12/14 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC 6701103114 10/31/14
OTHER AGENCY FEES 7,122.00
2597101014 10/10/14 OTHER AGENCY FEES 5,674.00
2041594 10/29/14 00206 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2596101014 10/10/14
SHUT DOWN TEST (10/14/2014)213.00
2003193E61037101411/13/14 SHUT DOWN TEST (10/21/2014)142.00
DPWAROTAYMWD0814a09/10/14 EXCAVATION PERMITS (AUG 2014)415.00
2041756 11/19/14 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2003193E60213101411/13/14
412.67
2041702 11/12/14 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DPWAROTAYMWD091410/07/14 EXCAVATION PERMITS (SEPT 2014)4,863.50
14,450.80 14,450.80
2041701 11/12/14 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1265221 10/31/14 TAPE STORAGE (OCT 2014)412.67
UB Refund Cst #0000214663 15.22 15.22
2041700 11/12/14 02643 CORE-ROSION PRODUCTS C2014473 10/30/14 NAOCL TANKS
2041755 11/19/14 15918 CONTRERAS MICHAEL Ref002436897 11/17/14
16542230 10/07/14 TONERS 142.70
16542312 10/10/14 TONERS 30.23
16542311 10/09/14 TONERS 279.05
Page 4 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
9,147.96
1,364.12
691.71
405.39
6,948.99 6,948.99
2041608 10/29/14 00101 GRAINGER INC 9555816280 09/30/14 SURVEY PAINTS 405.39
APPLICATION FEE 580.00 580.00
2041607 10/29/14 14948 GPS INSIGHT LLC 923558 08/01/14 GPS MODEMS
2041761 11/19/14 00131 GOVERNMENT FIN OFFICERS ASSN 2001111314 11/13/14
3,100.00
2041664 11/05/14 15852 GFS CHEMICALS INC 510330 10/13/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 662.19 662.19
81.00 81.00
2041709 11/12/14 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 221 10/24/14 GARDEN TOURS (10/14/14-10/23/14)3,100.00
BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
2041760 11/19/14 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2436988 11/20/14 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION
2041663 11/05/14 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2436790 11/06/14
655.93
2041708 11/12/14 03703 FORCE FLOW 26927 10/27/14 ULTRASONIC SENSOR 1,296.00 1,296.00
1,062.31 1,062.31
2041662 11/05/14 15894 FOCUS DC INC Ref002436733 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000208650 655.93
VEHICLE WASHING 113.27 113.27
2041661 11/05/14 15890 FOCUS DC INC Ref002436729 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000204247
2041759 11/19/14 11962 FLEETWASH INC x360066 10/24/14
x341859 09/19/14 VEHICLE WASHING 78.84
x335839 09/05/14 VEHICLE WASHING 75.00
x328707 08/22/14 VEHICLE WASHING 98.55
x338759 09/12/14 VEHICLE WASHING 92.86
x345984 09/26/14 VEHICLE WASHING 123.08
x295315 06/20/14 VEHICLE WASHING 98.55
13.02 13.02
2041660 11/05/14 11962 FLEETWASH INC x331769 08/29/14 VEHICLE WASHING 124.83
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (OCT 2014)135.00 135.00
2041707 11/12/14 11962 FLEETWASH INC x356690 10/17/14 VEHICLE WASHING
9666828 10/07/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 161.34
2041606 10/29/14 02591 FITNESS TECH 9260 10/01/14
266.95
2041605 10/29/14 00035 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 9511949 10/03/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 1,202.78
371.19 371.19
2041604 10/29/14 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 027532 10/02/14 COFFEE SUPPLIES 266.95
ONLINE DOCUMENTS (MONTHLY)99.00 99.00
2041706 11/12/14 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 028567 10/16/14 COFFEE SUPPLIES
04890071 10/03/14 UTILITY MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 194.40
2041603 10/29/14 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 9003400914 09/30/14
0489007 10/01/14 UTILITY MAINTENANCE MATERIALS 4,298.76
0491286 10/13/14 INVENTORY 265.68
2041602 10/29/14 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0491289 10/13/14 INVENTORY 4,389.12
Page 5 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
8,504.39
4,628.90
18,978.29
1,684.65
DUSTO INSPECTIONS (SEPT 2014)100.00 100.00
635587 10/15/14 CHLORINE TP 4,684.65
2041616 10/29/14 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 141883 09/30/14
JANITORIAL SERVICES (SEPT 2014)1,159.35 1,159.35
2041715 11/12/14 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 635612 CREDIT MEMO -3,000.00
2041615 10/29/14 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO0914014309/01/14
52.71
2041764 11/19/14 15908 JAMES WRIGHT Ref002436887 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000206592 89.79 89.79
5,282.35 5,282.35
2041665 11/05/14 15884 JAIME ENCARNACION Ref002436723 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000045655 52.71
PLANT SERVICES (SEPT 2014)205.00 205.00
2041714 11/12/14 13899 INTERMEDIA.NET INC 1411001606 11/01/14 EMAIL SERVICES (10/2/14-11/2/14)
84966 10/09/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (9/5/14)450.00
2041614 10/29/14 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 9381 09/20/14
84623 09/30/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (SEPT 2014)4,208.94
84769 10/02/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (SEPT 2014)1,922.21
192.17 192.17
2041613 10/29/14 08969 INFOSEND INC 84624 09/30/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (SEPT 2014)12,397.14
LABORATORY SUPPLIES 109.60 109.60
2041612 10/29/14 01649 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 282049512 10/03/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES
2041713 11/12/14 01649 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 282340439 10/14/14
0103778 10/21/14 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (8/5/14-9/30/14)975.00
0103779 10/21/14 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (8/1/14-9/30/14)588.00
46.06
2041712 11/12/14 15622 ICF JONES & STOKES INC 0103664 10/16/14 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (9/15/14-9/30/14)3,065.90
3,363.11 3,363.11
2041611 10/29/14 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 0341101314 10/13/14 WATER USAGE (8/7/14-10/8/14)46.06
MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 5,071.43 5,071.43
2041711 11/12/14 10973 HDR ENGINEERING INC 9 10/14/14 CORROSION SERVICES (8/24/14-9/27/14)
2041763 11/19/14 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE Ben2436974 11/20/14
9070386 10/13/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 441.94
9068410 10/10/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 120.96
9061940 10/07/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 3,063.70
9063157 10/07/14 REPAIR AUTO BURETTE MODULE 1,259.79
190.65 190.65
2041610 10/29/14 00174 HACH COMPANY 9069826 10/13/14 WIMS SUPPORT (6/15/14-6/14/15)3,618.00
LANDSCAPING SERVICES (SEPT 2014)8,909.50 8,909.50
2041762 11/19/14 15915 GUIA MORTAGAGE INC Ref002436894 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000213686
2041609 10/29/14 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 12396 09/30/14
405.39
2041710 11/12/14 01576 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 975388925 10/17/14 SUPPORT RENEWAL 594.00 594.00
2041608 10/29/14 00101 GRAINGER INC 9555816280 09/30/14 SURVEY PAINTS 405.39
Page 6 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
14,422.00
1,248.60
1,709.27
946.51
873.11
UB Refund Cst #0000213567 1,967.26 1,967.26204177011/19/14 15914 MCMILLIN HOMES CONSTRUCTION Ref002436893 11/17/14
FLAGS 730.86
13750245 09/30/14 ALUMINUM SLEEVE 142.25
15279008 10/21/14 BURLAP BAGS 353.15
2041621 10/29/14 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 13939977 10/02/14
1,163.85 1,163.85
2041718 11/12/14 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 15202598 10/20/14 BURLAP BAGS 593.36
REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 1,246.60 1,246.60
2041673 11/05/14 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 14018598 10/03/14 CLARIFIER BAFFLE MATERIALS
0089859IN 11/04/14 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 62.50
2041672 11/05/14 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0089483IN 10/15/14
REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 1,160.50
0089421IN 10/13/14 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 486.27
0089824IN 11/03/14 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 120.00
2041717 11/12/14 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0089688IN 10/27/14
49.87
2041769 11/19/14 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0089473IN 10/15/14 REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 1,128.60
1,721.60 1,721.60
2041671 11/05/14 15882 LYNN WELLING Ref002436721 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000034371 49.87
ATTORNEY SERVICES (THRU 9/30/14)2,467.35 2,467.35
2041670 11/05/14 15893 LUSARDI CONSTRUCTION CO Ref002436732 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000207119
2041620 10/29/14 06273 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1393994 09/30/14
1,986.00
2041768 11/19/14 15597 LEONARD H VILLARREAL 102014 10/20/14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,500.00 3,500.00
275.00 275.00
2041669 11/05/14 15895 LENNAR HOME OF CALIFORNIA INC Ref002436734 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000208923 1,986.00
INTERNSHIP AGREEMENT (10/20/14-10/26/14)275.00 275.00
2041767 11/19/14 12843 LAWTON GROUP, THE 51933 11/07/14 INTERNSHIP AGREEMENT (10/27/14-11/2/14)
2041668 11/05/14 12843 LAWTON GROUP, THE 51925 10/31/14
1,600.00
2041766 11/19/14 05632 LARSON, BRAD BL111814 11/18/14 EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT 270.00 270.00
500.00 500.00
2041619 10/29/14 15810 LANCE PICOTTE SAFETY CONSLTNG 1114100214 10/02/14 ACP TRAINING (10/1/14)1,600.00
TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (10/8/14-10/16/14)351.48 351.48
2041716 11/12/14 12276 KONECRANES INC SDG0095017410/24/14 HOIST INSPECTION
2041618 10/29/14 14808 KOEPPEN, KEVIN 10081410161410/24/14
AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES FY15 14,396.00
5703 10/08/14 AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES FY15 26.00
2041617 10/29/14 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5701 10/01/14
23.31
2041667 11/05/14 01735 JOHNSON, PAMELA 102714 10/30/14 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 150.00
8.03 8.03
2041765 11/19/14 15913 JESSE GARCIA Ref002436892 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000213466 23.31
2041666 11/05/14 15886 JENNIFER MOORE Ref002436725 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000176215
Page 7 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
1,224.94
1,114.88
195.14
2,498.17
349.01
OFFICE SUPPLIES 248.84
73267812700109/30/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 45.75
2041723 11/12/14 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 73612695300110/21/14
73322842600110/03/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 79.60
73351585600110/06/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 55.06
OFFICE SUPPLIES 85.82
73352834000110/06/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 82.78
JC645776 08/29/14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 499.63
2041624 10/29/14 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 73271546100109/30/14
7,403.27
2041623 10/29/14 14856 NEXUS IS INC JC645775 08/29/14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,998.54
7,403.27 7,403.27
2041674 11/05/14 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2436782 11/06/14 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 7,403.27
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT (5/14/14)250.00 250.00
2041774 11/19/14 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2436980 11/20/14 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN
S340209367 10/21/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 12.64
2041722 11/12/14 09587 NAMBA, RICHARD 051514 05/15/14
UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340207009 10/06/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
S340206111 10/07/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.52
2041773 11/19/14 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340208076 10/13/14
340206166 09/30/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
340207250 10/07/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
UNIFORM SERVICES 400.31
340206167 09/30/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 394.71
2041622 10/29/14 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340207251 10/07/14
340210246 10/27/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340209367 10/21/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 12.64
340209408 10/21/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
340209169 10/20/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
400.87
340208321 10/14/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 400.59
340208320 10/14/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 2,313.96 2,313.96
2041721 11/12/14 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340209409 10/21/14 UNIFORM SERVICES
2041720 11/12/14 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 43376900 10/21/14
51.41
2041719 11/12/14 14699 MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LLC 40027431 10/27/14 MISSION RADIO 550.00 550.00
12,496.83 12,496.83
2041772 11/19/14 15910 MIRANDA REAL ESTATE Ref002436889 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000207658 51.41
UB Refund Cst #0000213567 1,967.26 1,967.26
2041771 11/19/14 01824 MERKEL & ASSOCIATES INC 14102301 10/23/14 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (8/16/14-10/15/14)
2041770 11/19/14 15914 MCMILLIN HOMES CONSTRUCTION Ref002436893 11/17/14
Page 8 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
429.27
1,670.24
652.75
5,420.00
2041632 10/29/14 00021 RCP BLOCK & BRICK INC 30309685 10/03/14 CONCRETE 1,873.80 1,873.80
3,047.00 3,047.00
2041731 11/12/14 02041 RBF CONSULTING 889804A 10/08/14 INSPECTION SERVICES (9/1/14-9/28/14)5,420.00
UB Refund Cst #0000086175 11.29 11.29
2041631 10/29/14 02041 RBF CONSULTING 889804 10/08/14 INSPECTION SERVICES (9/1/14-9/28/14)
2041677 11/05/14 15885 RACHEL SILVERI Ref002436724 11/03/14
SAFETY SUPPLIES 585.14
32878902 10/03/14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 67.61
32979402 10/22/14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 41.05
2041630 10/29/14 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 32979400 10/10/14
MSA HARNESS 1,092.32
32979401 10/14/14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 536.87
2041730 11/12/14 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 33002800 10/24/14
180,114.24
2041729 11/12/14 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2436778 11/06/14 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 180,279.56 180,279.56
3,924.48 3,924.48
2041629 10/29/14 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2436580 10/23/14 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 180,114.24
OUTSIDE SERVICES 1,209.60 1,209.60
2041628 10/29/14 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 40888 09/01/14 JANITORIAL SERVICES (SEPT 2014)
2041728 11/12/14 03274 PREMIER PHOTOGRAPHY 10152014 10/15/14
277.20
2041627 10/29/14 03351 POSADA, ROD 10191410231410/27/14 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (10/19/14-10/23/14)891.28 891.28
981.75 981.75
2041676 11/05/14 03351 POSADA, ROD 101914102314a11/04/14 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (10/19/14-10/23/14)277.20
DE-GREASER 425.30 425.30
2041777 11/19/14 06419 PLANT SOUP INC 984 09/29/14 PROFESSIONAL WRITING SERVICES
2041626 10/29/14 15878 PIONEER RESEARCH 239503 10/27/14
85.00
2041727 11/12/14 15081 PINOMAKI DESIGN 4637 10/16/14 GRAPHIC DESIGN 212.50 212.50
753.37 753.37
2041625 10/29/14 15081 PINOMAKI DESIGN 4620 10/01/14 GRAPHIC DESIGN 85.00
RAGS 388.80 388.80
2041776 11/19/14 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 111814 11/18/14 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
2041726 11/12/14 08398 PEERLESS MATERIALS COMPANY 43325 10/23/14
831.63
2041675 11/05/14 05497 PAYPAL INC 35193025 09/30/14 PHONE PAYMENT SVCS (SEPT 2014)54.10 54.10
48.19 48.19
2041725 11/12/14 14812 PARKWAY SIGNS 14309 10/27/14 SIGNS 831.63
REPLACE AC UNIT 16,783.00 16,783.00
2041775 11/19/14 15917 PANDA REALTY Ref002436896 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000214366
2041724 11/12/14 15769 ONTARIO REFRIGERATION SVC INC SDJ1003201 10/15/14
73612648800110/21/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 42.47
73612695300210/23/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14.58
73630699800110/22/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 123.38
Page 9 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
333.30
112,620.70
139,433.46
23,272.21
10/17/14 OTHER AGENCY FEE 539.25 539.25
15,265.99
0188430IN 10/02/14 DIESEL FUEL 8,006.22
2041735 11/12/14 05512 SD COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL PROG SD10037101714
UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)354.79 354.79
2041638 10/29/14 14708 SC FUELS 0190017IN 10/02/14 UNLEADED FUEL
102214 10/22/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)949.59
2041784 11/19/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 110314 11/03/14
102414a 10/24/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)33,165.80
102314a 10/23/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)7,214.37
10/23/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)53,287.79
102414 10/24/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)44,815.91
107,301.68
102714 10/27/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)5,319.02
2041680 11/05/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 102314
UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)45,534.48 45,534.48
2041734 11/12/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 103114 10/31/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)
2041637 10/29/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 101714 10/17/14
122.10
469642 10/17/14 BID ADVERTISEMENT 115.50
470564 10/23/14 BID ADVERTISEMENT 95.70
BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 460.90 460.90
2041733 11/12/14 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 468916 10/14/14 BID ADVERTISEMENT
2041783 11/19/14 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2436986 11/20/14
125.00
2041679 11/05/14 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2436788 11/06/14 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 460.90 460.90
1,450.00 1,450.00
2041636 10/29/14 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 2014098 10/06/14 ASSESSOR DATA (MONTHLY)125.00
HEADSET & ATTACHMENTS 278.16 278.16
2041635 10/29/14 11596 SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTION WELDING 9558 10/08/14 WELDING SERVICES
2041634 10/29/14 05130 SAFARI MICRO INC 250462 10/01/14
207.42
2041782 11/19/14 02620 ROTORK CONTROLS INC CI09070 10/21/14 BW ACTUATOR 900.00 900.00
70.00 70.00
2041781 11/19/14 15901 ROSA TAPPER Ref002436880 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000070141 207.42
VAUGHAN CHOPPER 9,010.96 9,010.96
2041780 11/19/14 15834 ROGERS, TREVOR 111314 11/13/14 LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT
2041779 11/19/14 15729 ROCKWELL SOLUTIONS INC 1067 08/25/14
185.15
2041633 10/29/14 08972 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 0039274 10/10/14 CAMPO ROAD SUPPORT (8/30/14-9/26/14)13,058.18 13,058.18
7.23 7.23
2041778 11/19/14 15911 RICHARD REALTY GROUP, INC.Ref002436890 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000208547 185.15
TRASH SERVICES (NOV 2014)530.33 530.33
2041678 11/05/14 15891 RICHARD GASKILL Ref002436730 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000206214
2041732 11/12/14 15857 REPUBLIC SERVICES INC #509 050900577048910/25/14
2041632 10/29/14 00021 RCP BLOCK & BRICK INC 30309685 10/03/14 CONCRETE 1,873.80 1,873.80
Page 10 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
1,548.00
48,028.31
2041643 10/29/14 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 920140489 10/01/14 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)379.50 379.50
8.40 8.40
2041740 11/12/14 15764 TOUGHRUGGEDLAPTOPS.COM 100002746 08/12/14 TOUGHBOOKS 48,028.31
CUSTOMER REFUND 109.42 109.42
2041688 11/05/14 14177 THOMPSON, MITCHELL 09011409301410/14/14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (SEPT 2014)
2041687 11/05/14 15880 THAD ROTHROCK 4153102814 10/30/14
40.18
2041642 10/29/14 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2532 09/30/14 SCADA UPGRADES 10,250.00 10,250.00
75.79 75.79
2041791 11/19/14 15904 TANEKA HARPER Ref002436883 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000174750 40.18
LEGAL SERVICES (SEPT 2014)16,354.10 16,354.10
2041790 11/19/14 15916 SUSAN SROUR Ref002436895 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000214113
2041686 11/05/14 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 96319 10/27/14
579.54
2041739 11/12/14 07678 STREAMLINE FORMS & GRAPHICS 39623 10/17/14 COURTESY NOTICE 140.52 140.52
70.53 70.53
2041685 11/05/14 02656 STEVENS, GEOFFREY 10221410241410/28/14 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (10/22/14-10/24/14)579.54
RECYCLED WATER FEES (7/1/13-6/30/14)1,484.80 1,484.80
2041789 11/19/14 15902 STEPHEN MCCAULEY Ref002436881 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000084389
2041684 11/05/14 05755 STATE WATER RESOURCES RW1490075 10/27/14
982.80
2041788 11/19/14 05755 STATE WATER RESOURCES 26281111714 11/17/14 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 105.00 105.00
500.00 500.00
2041738 11/12/14 01324 STARK MFG CO 79771 09/16/14 DUMPSTER COVER 982.80
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (9/1/14-9/30/14)196.16 196.16
2041787 11/19/14 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 0001 11/03/14 PROPERTY DEDUCTIBLE
2041641 10/29/14 06853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL 368955 09/30/14
AC MAINTENANCE #1 (MONTHLY)1,068.00
C54542 10/15/14 AC MAINTENANCE #2 (MONTHLY)480.00
2041737 11/12/14 15176 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C54523 10/15/14
1,909.52
2041683 11/05/14 15881 SOLEDAD BLANCO Ref002436720 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000015452 6.11 6.11
3,390.00 3,390.00
2041786 11/19/14 15912 SMR CONTRACTING & PAVING Ref002436891 11/17/14 UB Refund Cst #0000213002 1,909.52
DESAL PROJ CONSULTANT (OCT 2014)4,000.00 4,000.00
2041640 10/29/14 03612 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING 17702 09/30/14 WOODEN TRESTLE IMPROVEMENT (ENDING 9/30/14)
2041736 11/12/14 13327 SILVA-SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1411 11/01/14
205.00
2041682 11/05/14 15892 SILVANO ESTRADA Ref002436731 11/03/14 UB Refund Cst #0000206979 75.05 75.05
205.00 205.00
2041681 11/05/14 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 4J30001 10/30/14 LABORATORY SERVICES (10/22/14)205.00
GEARDRIVE REPAIRS 197.97 197.97
2041785 11/19/14 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 4K12002 11/12/14 LABORATORY SERVICES (11/5/14)
10/17/14 OTHER AGENCY FEE 539.25 539.25
2041639 10/29/14 14785 SEW-EURODRIVE INC 169565 10/03/14
2041735 11/12/14 05512 SD COUNTY VECTOR CONTROL PROG SD10037101714
Page 11 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 10/23/2014 - 11/19/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
8,276.29
216.49
115.00 115.00
Amount Pd Total:1,417,119.98
Check Grand Total:1,417,119.98
HYDRAULIC MODELING (ENDING 9/30/14)3,785.00 3,785.00
2041647 10/29/14 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 92230 10/01/14 BEE REMOVAL
8059189949 10/07/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 55.02
2041693 11/05/14 15726 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1155 09/30/14
LABORATORY SUPPLIES 94.54
8059176435 10/06/14 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 66.93
2041646 10/29/14 03588 VWR INTERNATIONAL INC 8059210251 10/09/14
9734147009 10/21/14 WIRELESS SERVICES (9/22/14-10/21/14)1,815.69
9734147010 10/21/14 WIRELESS SERVICES (9/22/14-10/21/14)515.59
1,312.39 1,312.39
2041692 11/05/14 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 9734147005 10/21/14 WIRELESS SERVICES (9/22/14-10/21/14)5,945.01
BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 1,272.39 1,272.39
2041795 11/19/14 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2436984 11/20/14 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN
2041691 11/05/14 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2436786 11/06/14
12,968.94
2041794 11/19/14 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2436982 11/20/14 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 11,976.37 11,976.37
44.23 44.23
2041690 11/05/14 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2436784 11/06/14 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 12,968.94
SECURITY SERVICES (OCT 2014)131.95 131.95
2041793 11/19/14 11606 USA BLUE BOOK 463211 09/30/14 CIRCUIT BREAKER LOCKOUT
2041741 11/12/14 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 810599 10/31/14
679.96
2041792 11/19/14 07674 US BANK AD102214 10/22/14 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)22,867.46 22,867.46
31,189.74 31,189.74
2041689 11/05/14 07674 US BANK 8763102214 10/22/14 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)679.96
PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS 103.54 103.54
2041645 10/29/14 07674 US BANK AD092214 10/23/14 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)
2041644 10/29/14 15675 UNITED SITE SERVICES INC 1142385432 10/09/14
2041643 10/29/14 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 920140489 10/01/14 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)379.50 379.50
Page 12 of 12
Check Total
8,310.40
8,473.30
9,221.25
4,477.20
4,032.60
AIR BOTTLES 46.35 46.35
131361895 11/24/14 AQUA AMMONIA 789.60
2041898 12/10/14 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9922567710 10/31/14
AQUA AMMONIA 2,229.00
131361897 11/24/14 AQUA AMMONIA 1,014.00
131358310 10/29/14 AQUA AMMONIA 343.80
2041897 12/10/14 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131361896 11/24/14
AQUA AMMONIA 3,250.80
131358308 10/29/14 AQUA AMMONIA 882.60
2041801 11/25/14 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131358309 10/29/14
18,100.53
2041896 12/10/14 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1315 11/12/14 DEVELOPER PROJECTS (10/11/14-11/07/14)34,581.63 34,581.63
22,055.73 22,055.73
2041800 11/25/14 12174 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 22 10/28/14 DISINFECTION SYSTEM (ENDING 9/26/14)18,100.53
SHAREPOINT SERVICES (9/11/14-10/30/14)2,312.50 2,312.50
2041895 12/10/14 12174 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 23 11/21/14 DISINFECTION SYSTEM (ENDING 10/31/14)
2041799 11/25/14 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 4544 11/10/14
956044 11/07/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 339.38
955981 11/07/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 316.82
955511 10/29/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 407.07
955579 10/30/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 387.45
956043 11/07/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 537.52
955582 10/30/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 483.57
956135 11/10/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 801.38
955919 11/05/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 733.70
955707 10/31/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 984.80
955923 11/05/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 967.15
956134 11/10/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,088.78
955504 10/29/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,044.64
420.00
2041798 11/25/14 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 955510 10/29/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,128.99
420.00 420.00
2041797 11/25/14 15416 24 HOUR ELEVATOR INC 14984 10/01/14 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (OCT 2014)420.00
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,375.00 3,375.00
2041993 12/22/14 15416 24 HOUR ELEVATOR INC 15657 11/01/14 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (NOV 2014)
2041894 12/10/14 15876 1903 SOLUTIONS LLC OWD141003DC 11/16/14
COMMUNITY OUTREACH (A) (NOV 2014)5,324.55
12202267 11/26/14 COMMUNITY OUTREACH / DESAL (NOV 2014)3,148.75
12202245 10/31/14 COMMUNITY OUTREACH / DESAL (OCT 2014)4,041.24
2041992 12/22/14 15645 (W)RIGHT ON COMMUNICATIONS INC 12202266 11/26/14
Amount
2041796 11/25/14 15645 (W)RIGHT ON COMMUNICATIONS INC 12202244 10/31/14 COMMUNITY OUTREACH (A) (OCT 2014)4,269.16
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
28.60
1,579.50
5,530.00
7,032.60
7,645.00
1,080.39 1,080.39
2041950 12/17/14 15570 BEYOND IDEAS LLC OWD03 12/01/14 CONSULTING SERVICES (9/2/14-11/25/14)7,645.00
UB Refund Cst #0000121291 704.75 704.75
2041807 11/25/14 03595 BENHAM, WALES 102614110114 11/24/14 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (10/26/14-11/1/14)
2041949 12/17/14 15932 BART JARVIS Ref002437290 12/15/14
445.16
2041997 12/22/14 00145 BARRETT ENGINEERED PUMPS 092663 12/05/14 SAMPLE PUMP 543.50 543.50
967.82 967.82
2041806 11/25/14 00145 BARRETT ENGINEERED PUMPS 092256 10/30/14 SAMPLE PUMP 445.16
2015 WFMP UPDATE (9/1/14-11/2/14)35,070.84 35,070.84
2041996 12/22/14 12468 ATLAS COPCO COMPRESSORS LLC 396582 11/26/14 BLOWER SERVICE
000006001726 12/01/14 TELEPHONE SERVICES (11/1/14-11/30/14)1,229.08
2041805 11/25/14 12810 ATKINS 1800436 11/04/14
6,264.00 6,264.00
2041948 12/17/14 07785 AT&T 000006004702 12/02/14 TELEPHONE SERVICES (11/2/14-12/1/14)5,803.52
METER TESTER 6,264.00 6,264.00
2041804 11/25/14 03492 AQUA-METRIC SALES COMPANY 0054036IN 10/29/14 METER TESTER
2041901 12/10/14 03492 AQUA-METRIC SALES COMPANY 0054336IN 11/18/14
1,110.00
2041947 12/17/14 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41267 11/24/14 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (DEC 2014)316.66 316.66
152.70 152.70
2041869 12/03/14 00002 ANSWER INC 10824 11/22/14 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY)1,110.00
PAGERS (NOV 2014)301.02 301.02
2041946 12/17/14 15938 AMMAR JAMIL Ref002437298 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000188065
2041900 12/10/14 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L11095700L 12/01/14
CM201431 11/15/14 MGMT/INSP (8/1/14-10/31/14)1,950.00
CM201432 11/15/14 MGMT/INSP (10/7/14-10/31/14)1,350.00
253.74 253.74
2041899 12/10/14 14462 ALYSON CONSULTING CM201433 11/15/14 MGMT/INSP (10/7/14-10/31/14)2,230.00
TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (12/7/14-12/11/14)1,230.48 1,230.48
2041945 12/17/14 15943 ALDINE CORPORATION Ref002437303 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000213949
2041944 12/17/14 06261 ALCANTARA, CYNTHIA 121514 12/15/14
MONTHLY MONITORING (DEC 2014)1,534.00
168793 11/26/14 MONTHLY MONITORING (11/26/14-12/31/14)45.50
2041868 12/03/14 14811 ALARMS UNLIMITED INC 168807 12/01/14
MONTHLY MONITORING (11/20/14-11/30/14)14.30
168076 11/20/14 MONTHLY MONITORING (11/20/14-11/30/14)14.30
2041803 11/25/14 14811 ALARMS UNLIMITED INC 168078 11/20/14
10,742.00
2041995 12/22/14 15024 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC 14 12/02/14 LAND SURVEYING (11/1/14-11/30/14)5,110.00 5,110.00
46.35 46.35
2041802 11/25/14 15024 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC 13 11/05/14 LAND SURVEYING (10/1/14-10/31/14)10,742.00
2041994 12/22/14 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9923305981 11/30/14 AIR BOTTLES
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
5,158.00
5,233.00
171.56 171.56
SR-11 RELOCATIONS (ENDING 11/30/14)325,505.26 325,505.26
2042004 12/22/14 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 16726450 12/04/14 CALENDARS
2042003 12/22/14 15395 COFFMAN SPECIALTIES INC 2 12/01/14
76371 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 174.00
76366 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 166.00
76367 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 192.00
76369 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 174.00
76377 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 380.00
76370 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 236.00
76373 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 602.00
76374 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 416.00
76375 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 688.00
75393 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 653.00
BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 854.00
76376 11/30/14 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 698.00
2042002 12/22/14 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 75394 11/30/14
1,080.00
2041953 12/17/14 15256 CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE / LINA 9267121014 12/10/14 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (DEC 2014)4,350.95 4,350.95
750.00 750.00
2041904 12/10/14 02026 CHULA VISTA ELEM SCHOOL DIST AR043795 11/17/14 GARDEN TOUR (9/10 & 11/ 14)1,080.00
UB Refund Cst #0000213791 118.48 118.48
2042001 12/22/14 01828 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY 00023293 12/02/14 TITLE REPORT
QX38198 11/24/14 CRADLEPOINT 460.00
2041952 12/17/14 15941 CENTRAL MORTGAGE Ref002437301 12/15/14
18,162.50
2041951 12/17/14 03232 CDW GOVERNMENT INC QW02305 11/19/14 CRADLEPOINT 4,698.00
25.30 25.30
2041903 12/10/14 15177 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 0138178 11/11/14 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION (10/1/14-10/31/14)18,162.50
ARC FLASH TRAINING (11/12/14)1,980.00 1,980.00
2042000 12/22/14 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7841 11/26/14 DESTRUCTION SERVICES (11/24/14)
2041999 12/22/14 15621 CAPSTONE FIRE MANAGEMENT INC 1298 12/01/14
214.00
2041809 11/25/14 04071 CAPITOL WEBWORKS LLC 103114 10/31/14 OUTSIDE SERVICES 45.00 45.00
482.00 482.00
2041998 12/22/14 15447 CANNON, LARRY 121714LC 12/17/14 SAFETY GLASSES 214.00
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 5,691.00 5,691.00
2041808 11/25/14 08388 CALTRANS 110614 11/06/14 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
2041902 12/10/14 00557 CALIFORNIA SPECIAL DISTRICTS 60610115 12/04/14
7,645.00
2041870 12/03/14 08156 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 583780 11/13/14 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY (OCT 2014)1,900.00 1,900.00
2041950 12/17/14 15570 BEYOND IDEAS LLC OWD03 12/01/14 CONSULTING SERVICES (9/2/14-11/25/14)7,645.00
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
1,573.00
19,267.00
TAX FORMS 165.53 165.53204190912/10/14 04073 DATA BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 100950 11/13/14
4,567.00
2041908 12/10/14 11797 D & H WATER SYSTEMS INC 2014568 11/20/14 MICRO 2000 CHLORINE ANALYZER 8,816.04 8,816.04
600.00 600.00
2041907 12/10/14 15898 D & D WILDLIFE HABITAT 53579 12/09/14 VEGETATION MAINTENANCE 4,567.00
INTERNET SERVICES (12/3/14-12/28/14)80.00 80.00
2041906 12/10/14 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC 2881112914 11/29/14 INTERNET SERVICES (11/29/14-12/28/14)
2042006 12/22/14 02756 COX COMMUNICATIONS INC 6701120914 12/09/14
2014091709277 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09277 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709280 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09280 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)298.00
2014091704983 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #04983 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709290 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09290 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709288 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09288 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091710565 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #10565 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709286 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09286 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709287 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09287 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709279 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09279 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709285 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09285 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)309.00
2014091709291 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09291 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)467.00
2014091809289 09/18/14 PERMIT FEES #09289 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)356.00
2014091709503 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09503 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)514.00
2014091709283 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09283 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)514.00
2014091703231 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #03231 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)565.00
2014091700233 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #00233 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)561.00
8,625.00
2014091709276 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #09276 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)3,272.00
2014091701989 09/17/14 PERMIT FEES #01989 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)1,314.00
SHUT DOWN TEST (11/24/2014)923.00 923.00
2041871 12/03/14 02122 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 201492209281 09/22/14 PERMIT FEES #09281 (DEC 2014-DEC 2015)
5351112014 11/20/14 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (12/31/14 - 12/31/15)292.00
2041955 12/17/14 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2003193E60249111412/04/14
5346112014 11/20/14 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (12/31/14 - 12/31/15)292.00
5348112014 11/20/14 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (12/31/14 - 12/31/15)292.00
UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (12/31/14 - 12/31/15)405.00
5345112014 11/20/14 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (12/31/2014 - 12/31/2015)292.00
2041905 12/10/14 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 5349112014 11/20/14
5,730.70
2041954 12/17/14 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DPWAROTAYMWD101411/06/14 EXCAVATION PERMITS (OCT 2014)3,685.10 3,685.10
2042005 12/22/14 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DPWAROTAYMWD111412/04/14 EXCAVATION PERMITS (NOV 2014)5,730.70
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
890.00
955.00
845.00
1,005.00
14,250.60
246.35
COFFEE SUPPLIES 118.40 118.40
11/14/14 COFFEE SUPPLIES 300.25 300.25
2042013 12/22/14 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 030704 12/01/14
211.55
029801 10/31/14 COFFEE SUPPLIES 34.80
2041912 12/10/14 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 030096
ONLINE DOCUMENTS (MONTHLY)99.00 99.00
2041815 11/25/14 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 029132 10/30/14 COFFEE SUPPLIES
0492109 11/04/14 16" ROLL STEEL 2,243.16
2042012 12/22/14 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 9003401114 11/30/14
4,689.36
0493224 10/30/14 INVENTORY 4,607.28
0491284 10/29/14 INVENTORY 2,710.80
INVENTORY 2,076.84 2,076.84
2041814 11/25/14 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0492812 10/29/14 INVENTORY
L0194955 12/03/14 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (11/4/14)255.00
2042011 12/22/14 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0495391 11/25/14
255.00 255.00
2042010 12/22/14 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0194266 11/26/14 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (11/12/14)750.00
ENTERPRISE ADVANTAGE PROGRAM (8/6/14-8/5/15)25,000.00 25,000.00
2041813 11/25/14 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0190601 10/29/14 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (10/7/14)
2041812 11/25/14 03725 ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH 92890824 10/31/14
LAB ANALYSIS (11/14/14-11/20/14)445.00
4120522 12/08/14 LAB ANALYSIS (11/21/14-11/26/14)400.00
2042009 12/22/14 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 4120348 12/02/14
11/24/14 LAB ANALYSIS (11/7/14-11/13/14)510.00
4110871 11/17/14 LAB ANALYSIS (10/31/14-11/6/14)445.00
490.00
4110692 11/10/14 LAB ANALYSIS (10/25/14-10/30/14)400.00
2041911 12/10/14 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 4111047
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (OCT 2014)726.00 726.00
2041811 11/25/14 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 4110525 11/03/14 LAB ANALYSIS (10/17/14-10/24/14)
2041958 12/17/14 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 0067075IN 10/31/14
150.00
2041957 12/17/14 15936 ELVIA REAL Ref002437294 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000182236 10.11 10.11
95.00 95.00
2041910 12/10/14 14323 EDWARDS, JEFFREY 112514 12/08/14 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 150.00
UB Refund Cst #0000175885 16.08 16.08
2041872 12/03/14 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 5458113014 11/30/14 RECYCLING SERVICES (NOV 2014)
2041956 12/17/14 15935 DYLAN DOXEY Ref002437293 12/15/14
420.00
2042008 12/22/14 01797 DELL ENTERPRISES 196460 12/08/14 RETIREMENT PLAQUE 64.26 64.26
5,110.00 5,110.00
2042007 12/22/14 14362 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 71868 11/27/14 FIRETIDE SUPPORT (10/31/14-11/19/14)420.00
2041810 11/25/14 14362 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 71346 10/31/14 FIRETIDE SUPPORT (10/18/14)
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
425.04
271.68
4,448.26
8,737.53
272.46
888.26
901.27
LANDSCAPING SERVICES (OCT 2014)8,909.50 8,909.50204182111/25/14 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 12490 10/29/14
12/03/14 PAINT 496.76
9608684826 12/02/14 INVENTORY 404.51
723.57
9586334808 11/04/14 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES 164.69
2042018 12/22/14 00101 GRAINGER INC 9609752374
GPS MODEMS 7,176.60 7,176.60
2041820 11/25/14 00101 GRAINGER INC 9586334816 11/04/14 WAREHOUSE SUPPLIES
2041819 11/25/14 14948 GPS INSIGHT LLC 928869 11/01/14
11/26/14 RX3I PLCS OUTPUT MODULE 170.67
S109475219001 12/08/14 PLC MODULES 101.79
7,896.99
S109228639002 11/10/14 RX3I PLCS 840.54
2042017 12/22/14 10817 GEXPRO S109228639008
RX3I PLCS 825.47 825.47
2041818 11/25/14 10817 GEXPRO S109228639001 11/06/14 RX3I PLCS
S109228639006 11/19/14 RX3I PLCS OUTPUT MODULE 439.59
2041961 12/17/14 10817 GEXPRO S109228639005 11/18/14
S109228639007 11/19/14 RX3I PLCS SLOT BACKPLANE 1,175.73
S109228639003 11/13/14 RX3I PLCS 637.76
19.63
2041915 12/10/14 10817 GEXPRO S109228639004 11/13/14 RX3I PLCS 2,195.18
1,240.00 1,240.00
2041960 12/17/14 13890 GEORGE STATHORAKIS Ref002437297 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000185937 19.63
GARDEN TOURS (11/12/14 & 11/13/14)1,240.00 1,240.00
2041817 11/25/14 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 216 09/22/14 GARDEN TOURS (9/10/14-9/11/14)
2042016 12/22/14 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 223 11/25/14
81.00
2041873 12/03/14 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2437178 12/04/14 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
3,957.50 3,957.50
2041959 12/17/14 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2437378 12/18/14 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00
VEHICLE WASHING 121.95 121.95
2041914 12/10/14 03703 FORCE FLOW 27023 11/21/14 MOTHERBOARD & CABLE
2042015 12/22/14 11962 FLEETWASH INC x384636 12/05/14
VEHICLE WASHING 141.48
x363255 10/31/14 VEHICLE WASHING 130.20
x352636 10/10/14 VEHICLE WASHING 58.59
2041816 11/25/14 11962 FLEETWASH INC x367275 11/07/14
x350897 10/03/14 VEHICLE WASHING 123.69
x335836 09/05/14 VEHICLE WASHING 111.69
135.00 135.00
2041913 12/10/14 11962 FLEETWASH INC x372411 11/14/14 VEHICLE WASHING 131.07
2042014 12/22/14 02591 FITNESS TECH 9344 12/02/14 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (DEC 2014)
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
99.14
2,130.49
18,246.80
16,601.57
3,030.01
CLAIM SETTLEMENT 150.00 150.00204196412/17/14 15944 JAMES J PASCARELLA 121514 12/15/14
205.00
2041920 12/10/14 13899 INTERMEDIA.NET INC 1412001671 12/01/14 EMAIL SERVICES (11/2/14-12/2/14)5,312.12 5,312.12
205.00 205.00
2041827 11/25/14 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 9584 10/20/14 PLANT SERVICES (OCT 2014)205.00
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 5,100.00 5,100.00
2042021 12/22/14 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 9632 11/20/14 PLANT SERVICES (NOV 2014)
2041826 11/25/14 13644 INNOVYZE INC 20489AM 01/15/14
PRINTING SERVICES (8/14/14)2,701.38
86271 10/31/14 PRINTING SERVICES (8/14/14)328.63
86900 12/02/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (NOV 2014)1,933.15
2041875 12/03/14 08969 INFOSEND INC 86270 10/31/14
BILL PRINTING SERVICES (NOV 2014)11,067.23
86748 11/30/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (NOV 2014)3,601.19
85884 11/04/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (OCT 2014)1,942.41
2042020 12/22/14 08969 INFOSEND INC 86749 11/30/14
BILL PRINTING SERVICES (OCT 2014)12,356.66
85722 10/31/14 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (OCT 2014)3,947.73
0104267 11/14/14 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (10/1/14-10/24/14)240.00
2041825 11/25/14 08969 INFOSEND INC 85723 10/31/14
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (9/1/14-10/24/14)1,170.00
0104346 11/18/14 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (10/01/14-10/24/14)720.49
0341120914 12/09/14 WATER USAGE (10/8/14-12/5/14)43.36
2041919 12/10/14 15622 ICF JONES & STOKES INC 0104268 11/14/14
2,400.00 2,400.00
2041963 12/17/14 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 9980120914 12/09/14 WATER USAGE (10/8/14-12/5/14)55.78
CUSTOMER REFUND 1,164.67 1,164.67
2041918 12/10/14 05986 HAVS INCORPORATED 111814 11/20/14 OUTSIDE SERVICES
2041824 11/25/14 15920 HARVEST RIDGE APARTMENTS 7916111014 11/19/14
92.32
2041917 12/10/14 02795 HARTFORD INSURANCE CO, THE 0417010115 12/04/14 INSURANCE PREMIUM 750.00 750.00
1,615.71 1,615.71
2041962 12/17/14 15929 HALLI ALSTON Ref002437287 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000014490 92.32
APA6000 MODULE REPAIR 1,259.79 1,259.79
2041823 11/25/14 15370 HALAX2 INC 104 10/31/14 SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING (10/22/14)
2041916 12/10/14 00174 HACH COMPANY 9125976 11/19/14
245.06
2041822 11/25/14 00174 HACH COMPANY 9094560 10/29/14 SCADA INTERFACE 2,600.00 2,600.00
8,909.50 8,909.50
2041874 12/03/14 15915 GUIA MORTAGAGE INC Ref002437134 12/01/14 UB Refund Cst #0000213686 245.06
LANDSCAPING SERVICES (OCT 2014)8,909.50 8,909.50
2042019 12/22/14 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 12578 11/25/14 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (NOV 2014)
2041821 11/25/14 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 12490 10/29/14
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
1,684.65
UNIFORM SERVICES 389.67204183511/25/14 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340211609 11/04/14
12.35
2041834 11/25/14 14699 MISSION COMMUNICATIONS LLC 40027544 11/10/14 MISSION BATTERIES 128.00 128.00
9.33 9.33
2041879 12/03/14 15922 MIRTHA MARTINEZ Ref002437131 12/01/14 UB Refund Cst #0000161034 12.35
ENGINEERING SERVICES (6/1/14-11/7/14)6,450.00 6,450.00
2041878 12/03/14 15924 MIKE ILLEMAN Ref002437135 12/01/14 UB Refund Cst #0000213727
2041833 11/25/14 09581 MICHAEL R WELCH PHD PE 7.1.4-2 11/07/14
66.81
2041969 12/17/14 03268 MERCHANT, MARCIANO 121514 12/15/14 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 150.00
26.25 26.25
2041968 12/17/14 15939 MATTHEW EDWARDS Ref002437299 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000199367 66.81
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (OCT 2014)72.80 72.80
2041967 12/17/14 15937 MARGARITA ARAGON Ref002437296 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000184625
2041832 11/25/14 03019 LOPEZ, JOSE 100114103114 11/13/14
147.81
2041877 12/03/14 15925 LOGAN FAMILY PROPERTIES Ref002437136 12/01/14 UB Refund Cst #0000214473 81.98 81.98
26.64 26.64
2041831 11/25/14 12843 LAWTON GROUP, THE 51943 11/14/14 INTERNSHIP AGREEMENT (11/3/14-11/9/14)147.81
SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 137.32 137.32
2041966 12/17/14 15930 LAWRENCE RANEY Ref002437288 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000056399
2042026 12/22/14 05632 LARSON, BRAD 121314 12/18/14
10,271.50
2041922 12/10/14 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5734 11/21/14 AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES FY15 11,831.25 11,831.25
7,994.50 7,994.50
2041876 12/03/14 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5725 11/07/14 AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES FY15 10,271.50
WELDING SERVICES 520.00 520.00
2042025 12/22/14 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5746 12/08/14 AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES FY15
2041830 11/25/14 15900 KARTCHNER MOBILE WELDING 640 11/13/14
100.00
2041965 12/17/14 15931 JULIA REY Ref002437289 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000073795 50.00 50.00
100.00 100.00
2041829 11/25/14 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 142113 11/07/14 DUSTO INSPECTIONS (OCT 2014)100.00
DUSTO INSPECTIONS (11/20/14 & 11/26/14)1,743.97 1,743.97
2042024 12/22/14 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 142313 11/26/14 DUSTO INSPECTIONS (NOV 2014)
638292 11/12/14 CHLORINE TP 4,684.65
2042023 12/22/14 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 142352 12/02/14
1,159.35
2041921 12/10/14 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 638337 CREDIT MEMO -3,000.00
1,159.35 1,159.35
2042022 12/22/14 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO11140143 11/01/14 JANITORIAL SERVICES (NOV 2014)1,159.35
2041828 11/25/14 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO10140142 10/01/14 JANITORIAL SERVICES (OCT 2014)
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
1,211.24
1,218.52
1,162.54
739541109001 11/10/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159.82
739283039001 11/07/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93.70
736985153002 10/30/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 186.36
738737026001 11/05/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 180.07
736985153001 10/29/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 681.53
737086251001 11/03/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 662.55
7,478.27 7,478.27
2041836 11/25/14 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 737933820001 10/30/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 727.32
BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 7,478.27 7,478.27
2041881 12/03/14 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2437170 12/04/14 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN
2041973 12/17/14 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2437370 12/18/14
9.55
2041880 12/03/14 15923 NATHAN GRIFFING Ref002437133 12/01/14 UB Refund Cst #0000208077 32.65 32.65
149.36 149.36
2041972 12/17/14 15942 NASHAT MATI Ref002437302 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000213812 9.55
UB Refund Cst #0000212992 28.47 28.47
2041971 12/17/14 15933 MOHAMMED TALUKDER Ref002437291 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000143131
2041970 12/17/14 15940 MOHAMMAD RAHIMI Ref002437300 12/15/14
340215789 12/01/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340216850 12/08/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340214915 11/25/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
340216034 12/02/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
UNIFORM SERVICES 380.72
340216035 12/02/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 370.98
S340213977 11/18/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 57.64
2042027 12/22/14 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340214916 11/25/14
340213540 11/17/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340214662 11/24/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340212697 11/11/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
340213774 11/18/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
UNIFORM SERVICES 375.42
340212698 11/11/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 374.62
S340211573 11/04/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 21.20
2041923 12/10/14 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340213775 11/18/14
340211349 11/03/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340212456 11/10/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340210496 10/28/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
340211608 11/04/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
340210497 10/28/14 UNIFORM SERVICES 389.53
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
2,778.01
878.74
298.20
17,035.49
7,848.58
77.44
3,924.48 3,924.48
BUSINESS CARDS 30.08 30.08
2042032 12/22/14 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 41665 11/01/14 JANITORIAL SERVICES (NOV 2014)
7296 11/07/14 BUSINESS CARDS 38.72
2041839 11/25/14 15642 PRINT BUTTON, THE 7285 11/07/14
4,335.00 4,335.00
2041925 12/10/14 15642 PRINT BUTTON, THE 7327 11/18/14 BUSINESS CARDS 38.72
TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (11/12/14-11/14/14)674.59 674.59
2042031 12/22/14 01733 PRICE TRONCONE &12903 11/18/14 ANTENNA SUBLEASE (JAN-MAR 2015)
2041976 12/17/14 03351 POSADA, ROD 111214111414 12/09/14
3,597.00
2041975 12/17/14 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 121514 12/15/14 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 1,361.48 1,361.48
54.10 54.10
2041924 12/10/14 15899 PCM SALES INC S88941950101 11/17/14 ADOBE LICENSES 3,597.00
PHONE PAYMENT SVCS (NOV 2014)54.10 54.10
2041838 11/25/14 05497 PAYPAL INC 36077260 10/31/14 PHONE PAYMENT SVCS (OCT 2014)
2042030 12/22/14 05497 PAYPAL INC 36832103 11/30/14
INVENTORY 5,149.66
301058 12/03/14 INVENTORY 2,698.92
2042029 12/22/14 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 300862 12/03/14
INVENTORY 14,381.93
168734 11/06/14 INVENTORY 2,653.56
743663806001 12/03/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.67
2041837 11/25/14 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 300811 10/31/14
742696967001 11/27/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.99
742904951001 12/03/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14.64
743663607001 12/03/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 49.74
738737931001 11/07/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 25.91
OFFICE SUPPLIES 93.38
742615551001 11/25/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 79.87
737086986001 11/03/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 39.20
2042028 12/22/14 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 743797602001 12/03/14
740920931001 11/17/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 55.04
737073538001 11/03/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 52.06
738981213001 11/06/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 144.71
741623572001 11/20/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 81.43
-35.05
742017027001 11/21/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 307.79
737086251002 11/04/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 233.56
2041974 12/17/14 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 744171388001 CREDIT MEMO
738981642001 11/06/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 76.56
737934308001 11/01/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.10
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
391.02
728.91
16,861.67
125.00
125.00 125.00
2041928 12/10/14 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 2014118 11/13/14 ASSESSOR DATA 125.00
CLAIM SETTLEMENT 150.00 150.00
2041980 12/17/14 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 2014132 12/09/14 ASSESSOR DATA (MONTHLY)
2041979 12/17/14 15928 SABINA HERNANDEZ 121114 12/11/14
S100046690001 11/04/14 INVENTORY 1,346.90
S100044106001 10/28/14 INVENTORY 770.05
6,156.00
S100044631001 10/28/14 INVENTORY 4,901.60
S100044106002 10/31/14 INVENTORY 3,687.12
BW FILTER ACTUATOR 4,186.84 4,186.84
2041846 11/25/14 09148 S & J SUPPLY COMPANY INC S100043001001 10/31/14 AIR & VACUUM VALVES
2042037 12/22/14 02620 ROTORK CONTROLS INC CI09254 12/01/14
84.00
2041978 12/17/14 15945 ROCCAZZELLA FAMILY TRUST 0931121514 12/15/14 W/O REFUND D0931-090202 1,543.96 1,543.96
3,300.00 3,300.00
2041882 12/03/14 04542 ROBAK, MARK 091614111514 11/21/14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (9/16/14-11/15/14)84.00
CAMPO ROAD SUPPORT (9/27/14-10/31/14)37,939.54 37,939.54
2041845 11/25/14 00521 RICK POST WELD & WET TAPPING 9829 10/29/14 WELDING SERVICES (10/16/14)
2042036 12/22/14 08972 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 0040194 12/08/14
TRASH SERVICES (DEC 2014)530.33
0509005830916 11/25/14 TRASH SERVICES (DEC 2014)198.58
2041927 12/10/14 15857 REPUBLIC SERVICES INC #509 0509005829350 11/25/14
TRASH SERVICES (OCT 2014)198.31
0509005772065 10/25/14 TRASH SERVICES (NOV 2014)192.71
2041844 11/25/14 15857 REPUBLIC SERVICES INC #509 0509005764235 09/25/14
17,131.86
2041977 12/17/14 15934 RENUKA MCGOVERN Ref002437292 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000155444 102.24 102.24
2,660.00 2,660.00
2042035 12/22/14 15414 REGENTS BANK 2 12/01/14 RETENTION/COFFMAN (ENDING 11/30/14)17,131.86
INSPECTION SERVICES (9/29/14-11/2/14)1,254.00 1,254.00
2042034 12/22/14 02041 RBF CONSULTING 894373 12/04/14 INSPECTION SERVICES (11/3/14-11/30/14)
2041843 11/25/14 02041 RBF CONSULTING 891964 11/06/14
178,986.78
2041842 11/25/14 00766 RANROY PRINTING COMPANY 021738 11/10/14 POSTCARDS 1,312.20 1,312.20
180,840.13 180,840.13
2042045 12/23/14 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2437366 12/18/14 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 178,986.78
BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 180,665.40 180,665.40
2041841 11/25/14 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2436976 11/20/14 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION
2041926 12/10/14 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2437166 12/04/14
3,924.48
2042033 12/22/14 07860 PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE CO 102788121014 12/10/14 LIFE INSURANCE 8,433.50 8,433.50
3,924.48 3,924.48
2041840 11/25/14 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 41272 10/01/14 JANITORIAL SERVICES (OCT 2014)3,924.48
2042032 12/22/14 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 41665 11/01/14 JANITORIAL SERVICES (NOV 2014)
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
141,888.41
86,781.85
435.00
1,068.00
DESAL PROJ CONSULTANT (NOV 2014)4,000.00 4,000.00
2041935 12/10/14 15176 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C54775 11/12/14 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)
2041934 12/10/14 13327 SILVA-SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1412 12/01/14
LABORATORY SERVICES (11/19/14)230.00
4K05011 11/05/14 LABORATORY SERVICES (10/29/14)205.00
2041885 12/03/14 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 4K26004 11/26/14
205.00
2041853 11/25/14 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 4K20008 11/20/14 LABORATORY SERVICES (11/13/14)205.00 205.00
205.00 205.00
2041933 12/10/14 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 4L05003 12/05/14 LABORATORY SERVICES (11/26/14)205.00
DISTRIBUTION SUPPLIES 1,397.58 1,397.58
2041982 12/17/14 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 4L10009 12/10/14 LABORATORY SERVICES (12/3/14)
2042039 12/22/14 00419 SHAPE PRODUCTS 179651 12/05/14
278.48
2041852 11/25/14 14785 SEW-EURODRIVE INC 182640 10/31/14 FILTER FLOCCULATION MIXER 4,048.21 4,048.21
150.00 150.00
2041851 11/25/14 15000 SEGURA, ADOLFO 111614111914 11/16/14 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (11/16/14-11/19/14)278.48
SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 150.00
2041850 11/25/14 15086 SAVAGE, DEANDRE 111614 11/20/14 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT
11/14/14 NOTICE OF INTENT 685.20 685.20
2041932 12/10/14 06280 SANCHEZ, OMAR 120114 12/08/14
82,716.85
120314a 12/03/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)4,065.00
2041931 12/10/14 12080 SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, THE 0010883273
UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)26,127.70 26,127.70
2041930 12/10/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 120314 12/03/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)
2041849 11/25/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 111814 11/18/14
112514a 11/25/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)8,565.87
112114 11/21/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)792.95
70,625.82
112414 11/24/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)51,486.29
111714 11/17/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)10,417.48
UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)45.34 45.34
2041884 12/03/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 112514 11/25/14 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)
2042038 12/22/14 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 120414 12/04/14
1,668.75
2041929 12/10/14 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 474609 11/14/14 NOTICE OF PREPARATION 184.80 184.80
460.90 460.90
2041848 11/25/14 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH 0000001103 10/31/14 HOME WATER USE EVALUATION 1,668.75
BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 460.90 460.90
2041883 12/03/14 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2437176 12/04/14 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION
2041981 12/17/14 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2437376 12/18/14
125.00
2041847 11/25/14 06828 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF SL-14 019 10/08/14 SPLASH LAB (11/13/14)690.00 690.00
2041928 12/10/14 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 2014118 11/13/14 ASSESSOR DATA 125.00
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
1,753.00
19,013.00
22.32
UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)400.50 400.50204186011/25/14 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 1020140482 11/01/14
131.00
2042043 12/22/14 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 1120140475 12/01/14 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)370.50 370.50
20,153.06 20,153.06
2041888 12/03/14 15842 TONI BROOKS Ref002437132 12/01/14 UB Refund Cst #0000177005 131.00
SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 126.34 126.34
2041938 12/10/14 15398 TIMMONS GROUP INC 164748 11/11/14 CONSULTANT SERVICES (THRU 10/31/14)
2041937 12/10/14 14251 THORNTON, ZACHARY 120614 12/08/14
110114113014 12/02/14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (NOV 2014)6.72
120114123114 12/10/14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (DEC 2014)5.60
47.04 47.04
2042042 12/22/14 14177 THOMPSON, MITCHELL 100114103114a 12/04/14 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT (OCT 2014)10.00
ALARM REMOVAL 680.00 680.00
2041859 11/25/14 14177 THOMPSON, MITCHELL 100114103114 10/30/14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (OCT 2014)
2041887 12/03/14 15807 THE WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION 86664 11/10/14
184.61
2041986 12/17/14 15926 TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT UNIT Ben2437380 12/18/14 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 184.61 184.61
14,985.00 14,985.00
2041886 12/03/14 15926 TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT UNIT Ben2437180 12/04/14 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 184.61
WELL PROJECT (3/31/12-8/23/13)72,254.00 72,254.00
2042041 12/22/14 02975 TETRA TECH INC 50867468 12/17/14 WELL PROJECT (FINAL INVOICE)
2041985 12/17/14 02975 TETRA TECH INC 50722013 09/27/13
117.70
2041858 11/25/14 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2538 10/28/14 ETHERNET CONVERSIONS 2,240.00 2,240.00
10,405.27 10,405.27
2041857 11/25/14 09221 TACKETT, ZACHARY 111514 11/20/14 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 117.70
LEGAL SERVICES (OCT 2014)17,019.64 17,019.64
2041936 12/10/14 10339 SUPREME OIL COMPANY 404962 11/24/14 UNLEADED FUEL
WD0106099 11/12/14 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE (7/1/14 - 6/30/15)1,996.00
2041984 12/17/14 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 96664 12/02/14
ANNUAL PERMIT FEE (7/1/2014 - 6/30/2015)14,929.00
WD0104402 11/12/14 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE (7/1/2014 - 6/30/2015)2,088.00
2041856 11/25/14 01460 STATE WATER RESOURCES WD0104178 11/12/14
65,407.00
2042040 12/22/14 13564 STAR-NEWS PUBLISHING CO, THE 0203113014 11/30/14 ADVERTISING 185.00 185.00
500.00 500.00
2041983 12/17/14 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 49717 12/03/14 2014-15 WORKERS' COMPENSATION (1/1/14-3/31/14)65,407.00
AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)205.00 205.00
2041855 11/25/14 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 5926-0001 11/18/14 PROPERTY DEDUCTIBLE
2041854 11/25/14 15176 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C54533 10/15/14
1,068.00
C54793 11/12/14 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)480.00
C54783 11/12/14 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)205.00
2041935 12/10/14 15176 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C54775 11/12/14 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
578.15
320.02
30,584.33
6,543.25
W/O REFUND D0907-090171 2,116.46 2,116.46204186411/25/14 15829 W L BUTLER CONSTRUCTION INC 0907111914 11/19/14
9735853787 11/21/14 WIRELESS SERVICES (10/22/14-11/21/14)1,411.03
9735853788 11/21/14 WIRELESS SERVICES (10/22/14-11/21/14)1,199.10
1,187.39
2041942 12/10/14 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 9735853783 11/21/14 WIRELESS SERVICES (10/22/14-11/21/14)3,933.12
1,122.25 1,122.25
2041892 12/03/14 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2437174 12/04/14 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 1,187.39
BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 15,259.90 15,259.90
2041990 12/17/14 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2437374 12/18/14 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN
2041989 12/17/14 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2437372 12/18/14
27.76
2041891 12/03/14 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2437172 12/04/14 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 15,343.40 15,343.40
219.75 219.75
2041988 12/17/14 14402 VALORIE HALLOCK Ref002437295 12/15/14 UB Refund Cst #0000183863 27.76
CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)4,193.47 4,193.47
2041941 12/10/14 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 845667 11/30/14 SECURITY SERVICES (NOV 2014)
GM102214 10/22/14 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)35.54
2041890 12/03/14 07674 US BANK OP082213 11/26/14
CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)28,203.53
SC102214 10/22/14 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)2,345.26
2041863 11/25/14 07674 US BANK OP111814 11/20/14
24.44
2041940 12/10/14 07674 US BANK 3090112414 11/24/14 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)88,987.72 88,987.72
6,000.00 6,000.00
2041862 11/25/14 03212 UNUM LIFE INSURANCE 00565403110714 11/07/14 FICA TAXES 24.44
PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (11/26/14-12/23/14)79.98 79.98
2041889 12/03/14 00350 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 104339511214 12/01/14 PREPAID POSTAGE MACHINE
2041987 12/17/14 15675 UNITED SITE SERVICES INC 1142506603 11/30/14
1142491764 11/15/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (11/14/14-12/11/14)79.98
1142491763 11/15/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (11/15/14-12/12/14)79.98
PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (11/14/14-12/11/14)80.08
1142491765 11/15/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (11/14/14-12/11/14)79.98
2041939 12/10/14 15675 UNITED SITE SERVICES INC 1142491766 11/15/14
1142435770 10/31/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (10/29/14-11/25/14)79.98
1142403629 10/19/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (10/18/14-11/14/14)79.98
1142403540 10/17/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (10/17/14-11/13/14)79.98
1142403541 10/17/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (10/17/14-11/13/14)79.98
98.17
1142403542 10/17/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (10/17/14-11/13/14)80.08
1142384540 10/01/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (10/1/14-10/28/14)79.98
UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)400.50 400.50
2041861 11/25/14 15675 UNITED SITE SERVICES INC 1142465039 11/08/14 PORTABLE TOILET RENTALS (11/6/14-12/3/14)
2041860 11/25/14 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 1020140482 11/01/14
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 11/20/2014 - 12/23/2014
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
690.00
590.00 590.00
Amount Pd Total:2,219,973.67
Check Grand Total:2,219,973.67
BEE REMOVAL 115.00 115.00
2041893 12/03/14 13483 WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP 111814 11/20/14 TAX SEMINAR
92925 10/31/14 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
2041867 11/25/14 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 92984 11/06/14
92546 10/14/14 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
92924 10/30/14 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
115.00
92435 10/13/14 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
92441 10/13/14 BEE REMOVAL 115.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (OCT 2014)192.08 192.08
2041943 12/10/14 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 93287 11/20/14 BEE REMOVAL
2041866 11/25/14 03781 WATTON, MARK 100114103114 11/20/14
5,853.12
2041991 12/17/14 03781 WATTON, MARK 120914 12/09/14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (NOV 2014)151.20 151.20
9,952.50 9,952.50
2042044 12/22/14 10093 WATEREUSE FOUNDATION 2015121814 12/18/14 WateReuse 2015 Membership Renewal 5,853.12
W/O REFUND D0907-090171 2,116.46 2,116.46
2041865 11/25/14 15726 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1197 10/31/14 HYDRAULIC MODELING (ENDING 10/31/14)
2041864 11/25/14 15829 W L BUTLER CONSTRUCTION INC 0907111914 11/19/14