HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-04-15 Board Packet 1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
WEDNESDAY
March 4, 2015
3:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF NOVEM-
BER 5, 2014
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
a) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO FORDYCE CONSTRUC-
TION, INC. (FORDYCE) FOR THE 450-1 DISINFECTION FACILITY RE-
HABILITATION PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $128,350
b) APPROVE A NEW AGREEMENT FOR THE TEMPORARY DELIVERY
OF EMERGENCY WATER TO MEXICO
c) APPROVE THE DISTRICT CONTINUING ITS BANKING SERVICES RE-
LATIONSHIP WITH UNION BANK AND DIRECT STAFF TO REVIEW
BANKING SERVICES IN FOUR (4) YEARS WITH THE PERFORMANCE
OF A PRICING REVIEW IN TWO (2) YEARS
2
d) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4267 TO REVISE BOARD POLICY NO. 47,
POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT AND COM-
PLAINT PROCEDURE, OF THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF ORDINANCES
ACTION ITEMS
7. GENERAL MANAGER
a) DISCUSSION OF WATER CONSERVATION GARDEN FUNDING (WAT-
TON)
8. FINANCE, ADMINISTRATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
a) ADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF INTENTIONS, NOS. 4247, 4248, 4249,
4250, 4251, 4252, 4253 AND 4254, 4255, AND 4256 TO INITIATE THE
PROCESS FOR THE EXCLUSION OF PARCELS WITHIN WATER IM-
PROVEMENT DISTRICTS (IDs) 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 AND 20, AND SEWER
IDs 4 AND 14; CONCURRENT WITH SAID ACTION, ADOPT RESOLU-
TIONS OF INTENTION, NOS. 4257, 4258, 4259, 4260, 4261, 4262, 4263,
4264, 4265, AND 4266 TO INITIATE THE PROCESS FOR THE ANNEX-
ATION OF THE EXCLUDED PARCELS IN WATER IDs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10
AND 20 AND SEWER IDs 4 AND 14 INTO WATER ID 22 AND SEWER
ID 18, RESPECTIVELY (BELL)
9. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION OF THE 2015 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
10. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMA-
TIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING
AGENDA ITEMS:
a) UPDATE REPORT ON THE FINANCING OF THE CAMPO ROAD
SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT THROUGH CALIFORNIA’S
CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (CWSRF) (KOEPPEN)
b) SECOND QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2015 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM REPORT (MARTIN)
c) MID-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEW (STEVENS)
REPORTS
11. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
a) SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
3
12. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
13. PRESIDENT’S REPORT/REQUESTS
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
14. CLOSED SESSION
a) PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: PERIODIC AND
CUSTOMARY REVIEW IN DUE COURSE [GOVERNMENT CODE
§54957.6]
TITLE: GENERAL COUNSEL
15. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD
MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
16. ADJOURNMENT
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the
District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered
at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website.
Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District
Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at (619) 670-2280 at least
24 hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on February 27, 2015, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near
the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time be-
ing at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Gov-
ernment Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on February 27, 2015.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
1
MINUTES OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING OF THE
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
November 5, 2014
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:35 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Directors Absent: None
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, General Counsel Richard
Romero, Asst. GM German Alvarez, Chief of Engineering
Rod Posada, Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem, Chief
of Information Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief of
Operations Pedro Porras, Asst. Chief of Administration and
Information Technology Adolfo Segura, Asst. Chief of
Operations Jose Martinez, District Secretary Susan Cruz
and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Croucher, and seconded by Director Thompson
and carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the agenda.
5. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR BOARD MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 3, 2014
A motion was made by Director Robak, seconded by Director Croucher and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the minutes of the regular board meetings of September 3, 2014.
2
6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
CONSENT CALENDAR
7. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Robak and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the following consent calendar items:
a) APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH ARRIETA
CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR THE CALAVO BASIN SEWER
REHABILITATION - PHASE 1 PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-
EXCEED $529,490
b) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH CAROLLO
ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE 2015 INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES
PLAN UPDATE IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $99,993
c) APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
CONTRACT WITH HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL FOR THE MAINTENANCE
AND MONITORING OF THE SAN MIGUEL HABITAT MANAGEMENT
AREA AND CIP-ASSOCIATED MITIGATION PROJECTS FOR
CALENDAR YEARS 2015, 2016, AND 2017 IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-
EXCEED $476,173
d) ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 548 AMENDING SECTION 6, CONFLICT OF
INTEREST CODE, OF THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF ORDINANCES
e) APPROVE THE DISTRICT BECOMING A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL
JOINT POWERS ALLIANCE, WHICH WOULD ENABLE THE DISTRICT
TO ACCESS THE SUNLIFE POOL FOR SHORT AND LONG TERM
DISABILITY; AND APPROVE THE DISTRICT JOINING THE CSAC EIA
POOL FOR DENTAL THIRD PARTY ADMINISTRATOR SERVICES
3
f) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4245 TO REVISE BOARD POLICY NO. 47,
POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT AND
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
g) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4244 AMENDING POLICY NO. 25,
RESERVE POLICY, OF THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF ORDINANCES
ACTION ITEMS
8. ADMINISTRATION, FINANCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
a) APPROVE THE DISTRICT’S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENT,
INCLUDING THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ UNQUALIFIED OPINION,
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
Senior Accountant Marissa Dychitan indicated that staff is requesting that the
board approve the District’s audited financial statements, including the
Independent Auditors’ unqualified opinion for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2014. Please reference the Committee Action notes (Attachment A) attached to
staffs’ report for the details of Ms. Dychitan’s report. Ms. Dychitan introduced
Senior Auditor Joshua Calhoun and Sr. Partner Rich Teaman from Teaman
Ramirez & Smith, Inc.
Mr. Rich Teaman indicated that it is his firm’s first year auditing the District’s
financials since their previous engagement as auditors for the District. He
indicated that typically, the first year of auditing is the most difficult in that
additional procedures are required, such as, gaining familiarity with the
organization, its individuals, the organization’s process, and contacting the
previous auditor to obtain the organization’s records. Mr. Teaman stated that this
auditing process with the District ran smoothly for his firm. He noted that his firm
met with the District’s Finance Committee on October 21st where the District’s
financials were reviewed in detail. He indicated that his firm will be issuing a
clean unqualified opinion, which is the highest level opinion that can be received
on an audit. Please reference the Committee Action notes (Attachment A)
attached to staffs’ report for further details of Mr. Teaman’s report.
Director Robak inquired what items are included in the category of non-operating
revenues. Mr. Teaman indicated that the non-operating revenues include billing
for Chula Vista Sewer, the BAB subsidy that the District receives from the 2010
bonds on the interest payments, and a portion of the OPEB funding for retiree
medical as the District does not request reimbursements of the premiums for
retiree medical. He stated that there is a portion of the annual cost that returns
as an OPEB asset because the District is funding it at a quicker rate. The
expense goes through the regular expenses and the re-class goes through the
other non-operating income. Mr. Teaman stated that there are other expenses
that relates to costs associated with CIP projects that don’t qualify for
capitalization, such as, costs for planning, decision alternatives, and
environmental studies. These are all required costs for doing a capital project,
4
but under accounting rules they cannot be capitalized. So when these costs are
expensed, the expense go through miscellaneous expenses or your non-
operating expenses, and the offsetting revenues will be categorized as non-
operating revenues as well.
Director Croucher indicated that fire districts received notification that their PERS
contribution is increasing as much as 20%. He inquired if the Otay Water District
received a similar notification, and if so would the District’s payment contribution
help offset the increase.
Mr. Teaman stated that the District is funding the required ARC annually and is
meeting the actuarial requirements for funding. He noted that PERS costs for fire
districts is higher than water districts as they fall under the safety category of
PERS. Staff indicated that the District typically receives notification from PERS
in October or November each year and is expecting to receive it soon.
Director Robak commented that every year in the past, auditing firms have had a
particular emphasis/focus on the District’s audit. He inquired if Teaman Ramirez
& Smith Inc. focused on any particular area this year. Mr. Teaman stated that his
firm reviewed almost everything and focused on the District’s investment area
because of the agreed upon procedures from last year. He indicated that the
firm was satisfied with the overall audit of the District.
In response to a question from Director Croucher, Mr. Teaman discussed the
State Controller’s report that agencies are required to submit annually. Mr.
Teaman indicated that the District’s report has been filed with the State and
believes that the District’s numbers are pretty accurate and there is no need to
adjust those numbers.
Director Thompson thanked Teaman Ramirez & Smith, Inc. for their work this
past year. He indicated that he believes that the District had a better audit report
and outcome this year and stated that the audit was a testament to all staff who
were involved with working on the District’s finances. He commented that it is
the first leg, so to speak, of the District being a sound institution. Director
Thompson noted that ratepayers are not having to bear the brunt of any past
mistakes of the District, which is great for Director Gonzalez as he leaves the
District on a perfect audit report. Director Thompson shared that an inquiry was
asked at the Finance, Administration and Communications Committee meeting,
inquiring where the District stands among other agencies on its pension as the
Otay Water District is 70% funded. He stated that the response from the auditors
was that the District is standing head and shoulders above many of its counter-
parts throughout the state. This is a good reflection of how the District is
representing its ratepayers.
President Lopez stated that he is pleased that District staff worked well with
Teaman Ramirez & Smith, Inc. He stated that the District thrives to achieve
positive audit results and the District’s financial status has always been very
important to the board.
5
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve staffs’ recommendation.
9. BOARD
a) DISCUSSION OF THE 2014 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
President Lopez indicated that it was previously decided that District staff would
bring forward all required business before the end of the calendar year to the
November board meeting, which would allow for the cancellation of the
December 3rd board meeting. However, it was brought to his attention that there
are changes to State law that requires newly elected board members to be sworn
in by the first Friday in December.
General Manager Watton shared that irrigation districts have always sworn in
their newly elected members on the first Friday of December, and municipal
water districts swore in their new members in the first meeting in January. State
law has changed this year that agencies shall swear in their new members on the
first Friday of December, which this year would be December 5th.
District Secretary Susan Cruz noted that newly elected board member, Mr. Tim
Smith, will not be able to attend the January 7, 2015 board meeting as he has
pre-scheduled vacation during that time.
Legal Counsel Richard Romero indicated that new board members must be
sworn in on December 5th at noon or after.
President Lopez indicated that the District should call a Special Meeting on
December 5, 2014 to swear in its newly elected board member, Mr. Tim Smith;
elect board officers; and appoint board members to committees.
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Gonzalez and
carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Gonzalez, Lopez, Robak and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
6
to schedule a Special Board Meeting on December 5, 2014, at 3:30pm to swear
in newly elected board member, Tim Smith; elect board officers; and appoint
board members to committees.
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
10. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ARE PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE
FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEMS:
a) UPDATE ON THE DISTRICT’S PLACEMENT OF A TEMPORARY
MORATORIUM ON THE INSTALLATION OF NEW RECYCLED WATER
FACILITIES ON OTAY MESA
Public Services Engineering Manager Dan Martin provided an update on the
status of activities that have occurred subsequent to the placement of the
temporary moratorium on the installation of new recycled water facilities in the
Otay Mesa. Please reference the Committee Action notes (Attachment A)
attached to staffs’ report for the details of Mr. Martin’s report.
General Manager Watton indicated that the Finance, Administration and
Communications Committee requested that Director Thompson be included in
subsequent meetings with District staff and the Otay Mesa Property Association.
He stated that the District met with the Association and provided information on
the total amount of recycled water that can potentially be used in the Otay Mesa
area. It is estimated that the area would use approximately 1,000 AF at build-out
in 2025 to 2030 and the required recycled infrastructure would cost
approximately $24 million.
General Manager Watton stated that in reviewing the incremental cost of
recycled water from the City of San Diego, it seemed to be tremendously
expensive. He indicated, at the request of the Association, staff will be providing
the Association with an excel spreadsheet which includes information on future
proposed recycled water capital expenses in the Otay Mesa area and the
incremental cost of water. General Manager Watton also shared with the
Association information on the City of San Diego’s Pure Water project, which he
anticipates will be coming to the South Bay as part of the City of San Diego’s
metro sewer program. He indicated that District staff is continuing to
communicate with the Association and has indicated that the moratorium is a
temporary decision and a permanent decision has not yet been made. He stated
that staff will continue to provide the board information on this issue and
eventually will request that they take action on this issue. General Manager
Watton indicated that he believes that the communications with the Association
has satisfied them for the moment, pending the additional information they had
requested.
Director Thompson shared that he recently attended an Otay Mesa Chamber
function and engaged in some discussions about the moratorium. He stated that
7
he had directed some individuals to read staff’s report thoroughly and to
challenge the assumptions. He commented that he did not have the historical
framework of the recycled program, but found it interesting to know that at build-
out the amount of usage is not enough to justify $24 million in capital expenses.
Director Thompson questioned the economic impact to the Otay Mesa area if
recycled water was not available. He indicated that he is looking forward to
receiving more information from staff and participating in the dialog to ensure that
the District vents all of the private sector’s input as the District has a very
essential function in the largest area of economic development in the County of
San Diego. He indicated with all of the projects happening on the border, it is
really a part of the whole region’s future economic prosperity. He shared some
of his concerns about prolonging the decision and indicated that ultimately it is
the ratepayers who will pay for the capital expenses that should not have been
made.
General Manager Watton indicated that the temporary moratorium will only be in
effect for one year. He noted that if the District extends the moratorium, then it
may become more problematic. He shared that in discussions with the Pio Pico
Power Plant regarding the moratorium, they had indicated that they get so many
cycles when cooling with recycled water. If they cooled with potable water they
would get more cycles. Thus, while it may be cheaper for them to use recycled
water, the additional cycles they get with potable more or less evens the cost out.
General Manager Watton also explained that the recycled water program was
instituted in the 1980’s and the decision to mandate purple pipes was not
popular. However, when water became more of an issue in the expansion of
development, developers were more than willing to put in the purple pipes as it
was believed that development in the Otay Mesa area was going to happen
quickly and it would be built out by the 1990’s. The District received the grants
and rebates available for the recycled program, however, when the grants and
other financial incentives began to run out, the financial analysis of the program
showed that for a 70-year annualized schedule, the infrastructure would be
expended before it is paid for.
In response to comments by Director Thompson, General Manager Mark Watton
stated that the majority of the purple pipe in the central area that Director
Thompson was referring to is already in place and fell under existing rebates.
The expansion there will be paid for by developers, so the District does not have
that capital expenditure. For this reason, it looks a little different as opposed to
putting all of the capital expenditures into the backbone system of the Otay Mesa
area that is not covered by rebates. General Manager Watton stated that staff
has been reviewing the City’s Pure Water Program and determining how much of
the water from the Pure Water Program can be used in the South Bay and what
is left in the production of recycled water. Preliminary discussions are being held
concerning the positioning of the South Bay Plant to ensure that there is some
recycled water production beyond the Pure Water Program. It is preliminary, but
staff feels that it will happen.
8
Director Thompson commented that discussions regarding the Temporary
Moratorium has raised the issue and he believes that the City now has to attend
to them. He is hopeful that the issues will get clarified so that District staff can
determine the appropriate amendments to its contracts with the City.
Director Robak commented that he understands that cost effectiveness is the
goal of the District. He shared that some of the construction completed around
Cuyamaca College and Jamacha Blvd. involved the installation of a recycled
water system so that if recycled water was ever available in Rancho San Diego,
they would be able to connect to the system. He inquired if staff had discussed
having the recycled system underground even if it is not being utilized.
General Manager Watton indicated that to require something that the District
does not foresee a use for would likely be questioned. He clarified that the
District requested in the Rancho San Diego and Highway 94 project that they
install a sprinkler system that could be converted to recycled. He stated that they
did not build a redundant system, they just used valves, heads, etc. that would
accept recycled water in the future if needed. In the Otay Mesa area, the District
would be installing mains at a cost $30-$40 million dollars and we would be
asking developers to install recycled facilities as well. He stated that the District,
however, would not want to do that and not use it; it would create a financial
debate. It is difficult to tell developers we are planning for a 20-year horizon as
the horizons are becoming a little different now.
Director Thompson commented that because the District is installing all the
purple pipe and having it connected to its potable system, there are probably one
in a half times the length of potable water pipes to maintain. He stated that there
is a cost for everything and the system will become part of your capital
maintenance program.
General Manager Watton indicated that the capital expense goal is to bring water
to the Otay Mesa area. Staff has had some discussion on the potable and some
of the redundancy, and the initial discussion is that as the potable or recycled
system need replacement or repair, we would, over time, join the systems up and
abandon some of the links by capping them off and eventually only retaining the
essential systems. He stated it would probably take over 20-30 years to
complete this task.
Director Robak inquired about the status of the City of San Diego’s response to
the letter the District sent in August. General Manager Watton stated that the
District received a limited response from the City of San Diego and the City
proposed settling some of the issues that are outstanding. District staff is
working on a response to the City. The contract issues are still outstanding, but
there is an expression of willingness from the City to discuss these matters. This
past October, the City settled a long standing dispute on Lake Hodges with a
couple of the North County agencies. That issue being resolved is pretty
significant. Mr. Watton stated that it gives the District the optimism that its
9
matters will be settled as well. He commented that it appears to be moving in the
right direction, but it is moving at a very slow pace.
b) UPDATE ON THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT’S WATER USE TO DATE
AND THE VARIOUS PROGRAMS AND SERVICES OFFERED
THROUGH THE DISTRICT’S CONSERVATION DIVISION
Customer Service Manager Andrea Carey provided an update on the District’s
historical water use, an overview of the water conservation program history and
current water conservation actions. Please reference the Committee Action
notes (Attachment A) attached to staffs’ report for the details of Ms. Carey’s
report.
Director Gonzalez inquired if the San Diego County Water Authority (CWA)
provided a rebate for turf removal. Customer Service Manager Andrea Carey
stated that, at this time. CWA does not plan to include artificial turf in its rebate
program, but is looking at vendors who would provide artificial turf at a discount.
Director Robak inquired about the District’s current residential Gallons per Capita
per Day (GPCD). General Manager Watton provided a handout in response to
Director Robak’s inquiry. The handout indicated that the District had the second
lowest GPCD in the County (67). Director Robak was very pleased with learning
this and indicated that the numbers were really remarkable.
Mr. Watton indicated that the State requested that the District calculate the
GPCD a little differently. He said that Ms. Carey provided information that
provides the average GPCD for all the District’s different customer classes
combined. The handout provides the GPCD for the District’s residential
customers only. He noted that the District has been submitting to the State its
water use in acre-feet (AF) since June. Then in September, the State requested
the District’s water use in GPCD for residential only. He indicated that he was
not certain what the reason is for the State’s change in reporting.
In response to a comment from Director Robak, General Manager Mark Watton
stated that the Otay Water District is very competitive when comparing its GPCD
numbers to other water agencies. He noted that the numbers may change
though because the Otay Water District is not fully built-out, whereas its sister
agencies are. He indicated that the City of Chula Vista has taken a very
aggressive approach by requiring new homes to include energy and water saving
devices; the City is requesting that developers design a very different water use
pattern. In addition, the housing stock that’s being built is quite different as it is
more dense and has a lot more open space. Mr. Watton believes that the
District’s trend line will decrease because of the type of products and homes that
are being marketed compared to some years ago.
In response to a question from Director Robak, Senior Water Conservation
Specialist Richard Namba stated that the District’s first quarter GPCD was
approximately 172. He noted that it was the summer quarter, which is always the
10
highest in GPCD because customers are watering their yards to the maximum to
sustain their landscaping. He stated that GPCD numbers are much lower during
the second and third quarter. The number he provided (172 GPCD) is the total
production; the total District’s production by the population, divided by the total
number of days in the first quarter results in approximately 172 gallons per
person. This includes parks and gun space.
Director Thompson stated that his division and Director Croucher’s division may
be leading the edge on the per capita because of their lower income
demographic. He shared that in his division, there are so many homes where
people have just stopped watering their lawns because they can’t afford them.
Director Gonzalez shared that he attended a Chamber of Commerce tour in
Eastlake, Chula Vista and learned that basins were being installed to catch and
clean water runoff. He inquired if General Manager Mark Watton had any
information about the basins.
General Manager Watton responded that that is a different type of a program and
is very expensive. He indicated that there is no way for the City of Chula Vista to
collect taxes to fund such a program. The process responds to urban runoff and
the bacteria count in the ocean. The City essentially traps runoff water, lets it
settle, then somehow treats the water before it goes down the drainage system.
In response to another question from Director Gonzalez, General Manager
Watton stated that the ability to capture runoff water in Chula Vista is limited as
there are no aquifers that the water can flow into. He stated that there is
discussion to pump the runoff water towards the Bay and then pumping it back
up to a reservoir, but that would be very expensive. He indicated that he does
not believe the program is practical at this time. He stated that basically, what
the City of Chula Vista is doing is concentrating more on filtering the water
(getting the trash out) and having it cleaned up before it runs into the Bay.
Director Thompson indicated that he appreciated receiving the statistics on the
number of District customers that are participating in the water conservation
programs. He commented that some of the programs are new and, thus, there is
little participation at this time. He mentioned CWA’s turf replacement program
and noted that the program is gaining momentum as participation is increasing
year to year. He indicated that Otay Water District is proposing a Demonstration
Garden that would be located more centrally within the District’s service area as
it is felt the Water Conservation Garden is not accessible to a majority of the
District’s customers. He stated that he has some trepidations about the
proposed site of the Demonstration Garden as he feels it is still in an out-of-the-
way location. He stated that the District has $100,000 allocated for this project
and he would like staff to also look at possible alternative programs. He
indicated that he would like to refer discussions on the Demonstration Garden
(Agenda Item 9c) back to committee.
Director Thompson also recommended that staff review water conservation
programs for commercial customers; he believes that there are a lot of HOAs
11
under commercial and that the District has to do better at replacing more than
one turf for commercial. This information was indicated in the handout that was
provided to the board.
President Lopez concurred with Director Thompson’s recommendation to refer
Agenda Item 9c, Update on Potential Demonstration Garden to be Located at the
Otay Ranch Town Center, back to the Finance, Administration and
Communications Committee to discuss possible other alternatives before moving
forward with the demonstration garden.
c) UPDATE ON POTENTIAL DEMONSTRATION GARDEN TO BE
LOCATED AT THE OTAY RANCH TOWN CENTER
President Lopez indicated that considering Director Thompson’s comments
concerning the proposed demonstration garden, the board waived staff’s
presentation and recommended that this item be referred back to the Finance,
Administration and Communications committee to discuss other alternatives for
incentive programs before moving forward with the proposed demonstration
garden program.
REPORTS
11. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
General Manager Watton presented information from his report that included
New Hires/Promotions where he shared that Mr. Gary Stalker will be retiring at
the end of December and that Mr. Jake Vaclavek will be taking his place as
System Operations Manager. General Manager Watton also reported on Fiscal
Sustainability, Water Use Declines, and Recycled Water Purchases. General
Manager Watton also shared that the District received a letter from Mr. Hector
Mares expressing his appreciation with working for the District and assisting with
projects over the years.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
General Manager Mark Watton indicated that there are new officers at the CWA
and that there will also be new committee assignments. He stated that with the
new officers comes new direction in certain areas, which he believes will be
positive for Otay. He expects that both he and Director Croucher will have good
committee assignments where they could be involved in legislative and imported
water issues. General Manager Watton shared that the main focus at CWA,
currently, is fiscal sustainability and the proposed revision to their rates and fixed
charges. He stated that both he and Director Croucher have been focused on
having CWA’s fixed charges to commensurate more with the Otay Water
District’s fixed charges. He stated that CWA needs some assurances on
minimum purchases for the water that they have under contract (take or pay
contracts). He shared that the Poseidon Project is going well and is expected to
deliver water by the end of 2015. General Manager Watton also indicated that
12
the Metropolitan Water District will likely implement allocations next year;
possibly up to 20% cutback which could translate into about a 6% cutback to San
Diego. He stated because our region has spent money on storage and water
supply, we are in a better position than we were in 1989-1991.
Director Croucher commented with regard to CWA that he believes that they are
in good shape in terms of the drought issues as there was a lot of planning and
vision in preparing for times of drought. He stated he understands that there has
been a lot of frustration from Otay Water District’s customers with regard to their
water bills still going up though they are increasing their conservation efforts. He
indicated that, unfortunately, this is the reality due to the drought and he believes
customers are beginning to understand this. With regard to discussions
concerning rate stabilization, Director Croucher indicated that he participated in
the committee that discussed this issue. He stated that he believes the
committee was successful in bringing the issue back to committee for further
discussion and was able to point out issues and red flags before moving it
forward to the full board for consideration. He noted that CWA is staying active
on all fronts, including with LAFCO, SANDAG, and in particular, the Water
Conservation Garden. He stated CWA continues to support the Water
Conservation Garden and is receiving great benefits as they continue to work
through the Garden with some of the agencies’ customers, such as, Home
Depot. Director Croucher lastly discussed CWA’s Conservation Action
Committee which is working specifically with multi-residential customers and
HOAs to encourage conservation. He stated that they have been a major benefit
to CWA.
12. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
Director Robak reported that he attended a CSDA Annual Conference where the
San Diego Chapter received the Chapter of the Year Award. He also reported
that he attended the Water Conservation Garden’s Gala Event with President
Lopez and Director Gonzalez. He indicated that he was on the Garden’s board
for a number of years and one of the Garden’s objective was to make it more
appealing to people who can give significant contributions to the Garden. He felt
that the Gala event had that appeal and he believes that this is important in order
to get to the next level in terms of attracting funding for the Garden.
Director Thompson indicated that the District’s Desalination Project is moving
along well. He stated that he, President Lopez, and District staff members had a
very good meeting with Mexico’s Consul General in San Diego. He stated that
outreach is important to provide updates to the community on the desalination
project. He indicated that he very much enjoyed working with Director Gonzalez.
He commended Director Gonzalez’s willingness to contribute 4 years to the
District, especially during a time when he has a young family and is building a
business. He indicated that it was admirable that he still manages to find the
time to give back to the community. Director Thompson also indicated that he
hoped Director Gonzalez learned a lot from serving on the District’s board and
that he would consider serving again in the future.
13
Director Gonzalez thanked Directors and Staff for a great term and stated that he
learned a lot during his time as a member of the District’s board.
13. PRESIDENT’S REPORT
President Lopez reported on meetings he attended during the month of October
2014 (a list of meetings he attended is attached). He indicated that there will be
an upcoming South Bay Joint Agency meeting. He also thanked Director
Gonzalez for his services to the District.
14. CLOSED SESSION
The board recessed to closed session at 5:50 p.m. to discuss the following
matter:
a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9]
15. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
The board reconvened from closed session at 6:18 p.m. and Assistant General
Counsel Richard Romero indicated that the board met in closed session and took
no reportable actions.
16. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned
the meeting at 6:18 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
14
President’s Report
November 5, 2014 Board Meeting
A) Meetings attended during the Month of October 2014:
1) October 1: Attended the District’s Regular Board Meeting.
2) October 6: Met with City Mayor Faulconer. Provided a
briefing on the Rosarito Desalination Project and discussed
Otay WD matters. Attendees: General Manager Watton
3) October 9: Attended the District’s Desalination Project
Committee. Received an update report on the project’s
progress and status.
4) October 10: Committee Agenda Briefing. Met with General
Manager Watton to review items that will be presented at
the October committee meetings.
5) October 13: Attended Padre Dam MWD’s Advanced Water
Purification Demonstration Project Commemoration.
Attendees: General Manager Watton
6) October 16: Attended a meeting of the Metro Commission
(see attached agenda)
7) October 18: Attended the Water Conservation Garden
Enchanted Garden Event. Attendees: Directors Gonzalez and
Robak
8) October 21: Attended the District’s Finance, Administration
and Communications Committee. Reviewed, discussed, and
made recommendation on items that will be presented at the
November board meeting.
9) October 22: Attended Bud Pocklington’s Retirement
Reception. Attendees: Directors Gonzalez and Robak and
General Manager Watton.
10) October 27: Met with Mexico Consul General Gómez Arnau.
Provided a briefing on the Rosarito Desalination Project.
Attendees: Director Thompson, General Manager Watton, and
Public Relations Consultant Susana Villegas.
11) October 31: Board Agenda Briefing. Met with General
Manager Watton and General Counsel Dan Shinoff to review
items that will be presented at the November Board Meeting.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin Cameron
Associate Engineer
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: R2112-001103
DIV. NO.: 2
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to Fordyce Construction, Inc.
for the 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a construction contract to Fordyce Construction, Inc. (Fordyce)
and to authorize the General Manager to execute a construction
contract with Fordyce for the 450-1 Disinfection Facility
Rehabilitation Project in an amount not-to-exceed $128,350 (see
Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
construction contract with Fordyce for the 450-1 Disinfection
Facility Rehabilitation Project in an amount not-to-exceed $128,350.
2
ANALYSIS:
Currently, the District receives recycled water at the 450-1
Reservoir from the City of San Diego's (City) South Bay Water
Reclamation Plant (SB Plant). This reservoir, along with the 680-1
Pump Station (located at the same site), provides recycled water to
the existing 680 and 927 Pressure Zones within the District's Central
Area System. The 450-1 Disinfection Facility was constructed within
the 680-1 Pump Station in 2008 to allow the District to boost the
chlorine residual in the recycled water.
In November 2013, one of the two sodium hypochlorite holding tanks at
the Disinfection Facility developed a crack on the interior tank at
the outlet, and according to the manufacturer, was not repairable.
Furthermore, since the second tank is near the end of its useful life
(8-10 years), it is advisable that both tanks be replaced. The new
tanks are designed with a flexible outlet so that the same type of
failure cannot occur. Other upgrades to the project include
relocating the chemical feed pumps to the containment area where
potential spills can be confined and replacing of the louver opening
with a roll-up door to ease future maintenance.
The design for this Project was completed in-house, and the Project
was advertised on January 8, 2015 on the District’s website and
several other publications including the San Diego Daily Transcript.
A Pre-Bid Meeting was held on January 20, 2015 which was attended by
three (3) contractors. Four (4) addenda were sent out to all bidders
and plan houses to address questions and clarifications to the
contract documents during the bidding period. Bids were publicly
opened on January 29, 2015, with the following results:
CONTRACTOR
TOTAL BID
AMOUNT
1 Fordyce Construction, Inc.
Santee, CA $128,350
2 Cora Constructors, Inc.
Palm Desert, CA $133,277
3 Telliard Construction
San Diego, CA $146,400
4 Tharsos, Inc.
La Mesa, CA $153,800
5 NEWest Construction Company, Inc.
San Diego, CA $156,600
The Engineer’s Estimate is $130,000.
3
Staff reviewed the submitted bids for conformance with the contract
requirements and determined that Fordyce was the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder. Fordyce holds a Class A, General
Engineering, Contractor’s License, which meets the contract
document’s requirements, and is valid through October 31, 2015.
Three (3) references were contacted and all indicated Fordyce had a
good performance record on similar projects. An internet background
search of the company was performed and revealed no outstanding
issues with this company.
Cora Constructors submitted a bid protest on February 4, 2015,
claiming Fordyce is not performing 50% of the bid price with their
own forces, and they do not have the required experience to perform
this work. Fordyce submitted a response to the bid protest on
February 5, 2015, stating the subcontract value is 22% of the work,
which coincides with their bid. Fordyce also stated the assertion
that, “Fordyce does not have the required experience to perform the
work” is vague with no substance. Staff concurred that their project
experience is sufficient. In Fordyce’s opinion, the bid protest is
without merit and substance, and Staff concurs.
Staff has verified that the bid bond provided by Fordyce is valid.
Staff will also verify that Fordyce’s Performance Bond and Labor and
Materials Bond are valid prior to execution of the contract.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP R2112, as approved in the FY 2015 budget, is
$190,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, are $189,310. See Attachment B for the budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget is sufficient to support the Project.
Finance has determined that 100% of the funding is available from the
Replacement Fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
4
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
KC/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP R2112 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation\Staff Reports\BD-03-04-15,Staff Report -
450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehab(KC-BK).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2112-001103
Award of a Construction Contract to Fordyce Construction,
Inc. for the 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation
Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on February 17,
2015, and the following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board award a construction contract
to Fordyce Construction, Inc. (Fordyce) and to authorize the
General Manager to execute a construction contract with Fordyce
for the 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation Project in an
amount not-to-exceed $128,350.
It was discussed that the existing 450-1 reservoir receives
recycled water from the City of San Diego’s South Bay Water
Reclamation Plant and that this reservoir, along with the 680-1
Pump Station, provides recycled water to the Central Area
system.
The 450-1 Disinfection Facility allows the District to monitor
and make adjustments to the amount of chlorine residual in the
recycled water received from the City of San Diego.
Staff noted that in November 2013, one of the two sodium
hypochlorite holding tanks developed a crack on the inner tank
near the outlet, and was not repairable.
The project will replace both tanks, since the second tank is
near the end of its useful life. Other upgrades include
relocating the chemical feed pumps, and adding a rolling door to
the louver opening.
Staff discussed the selection process and indicated that the
District received 5 bids and that the results of the process are
shown in the table on page 2 of the staff report.
It was indicated that Fordyce Construction submitted the lowest
bid. Staff reviewed the bid for conformance and checked
references which showed a good overall performance record.
After the review, it was determined that Fordyce submitted a
responsive bid.
Staff noted that Cora Construction sent in a bid protest
claiming that Fordyce is not performing 50% of the bid price
with their own force, and that Fordyce is not qualified to
perform the work.
According to Fordyce’s bid, the company is only sub-contracting
22% of the work. With regards to experience, Fordyce stated
that the claim was vague with no substance. Staff reviewed the
references supplied with the bid which showed a wide range of
rehabilitation projects agreed with Fordyce’s response.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff indicated that
the warranty on the tanks were five (5) years and that the
existing tanks were outside of the warranty period when the
crack was noticed.
The Committee inquired about Fordyce’s experience. Staff
indicated that Fordyce has worked with local schools, the Padre
Dam Municipal Water District, and seems to be well experienced
in rehabilitation work.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that
the District’s Legal Counsel did review Cora Construction’s bid
protest against Fordyce. Legal Counsel stated to the Committee
that the bid was vague and had no substance.
The Committee inquired if the District has ever worked with Cora
Construction. Staff indicated that at the January 7, 2015
regular board meeting, the Board awarded a construction contract
to Cora Constructors, Inc. for the Ralph W. Chapman Water
Reclamation Facility Return Activated Sludge Pumps Replacement
Project.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2112-001103
Award of a Construction Contract to Fordyce Construction,
Inc. for the 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation
Project
Date Updated: 1/27/15
Budget
190,000
Planning
Standard Salaries 2,972 2,972 - 2,972
Total Planning 2,972 2,972 - 2,972
Design
Standard Salaries 32,445 30,945 1,500 32,445
Total Design 32,445 30,945 1,500 32,445
Construction
Standard Salaries 17,500 - 17,500 17,500
Construcion Contract 128,350 - 128,350 128,350 FORDYCE CONSTRUCTION, INC
Service Contracts 125 - 125 125 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Project Closeout 1,500 - 1,500 1,500 CLOSEOUT
Project Contingency 6,418 - 6,418 6,418 5% CONTINGENCY
Total Construction 153,893 - 153,893 153,893
Grand Total 189,310 33,917 155,393 189,310
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
R2112 - 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation
Committed Expenditures Outstanding
Commitment &
Projected Final
Cost
OTAY WATER DISTRICT450-1 DISINFECTION FACILITY REHABILITATIONLOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT A
CIP R2112F
P:\WORKING\CIP R2112 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\Exhibit A.mxd
PROJECTSITE
%&s
!\
PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD
BRANDYWINE AVE
E P A L O M A R S T
E O R A N G E A V E
MAXWELL RD
MAIN ST
MAIN ST
OLYMPIC PKWYVICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTSDIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
?ò
Aä%&s
?p
?Ë
!\
F
0 1,000500
Feet
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Pedro Porras, Chief Water
Operations
PROJECT: DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: New Agreement for Temporary Emergency Delivery of
Water to Mexico
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board authorize the General Manager to execute the proposed
(Attachment B) “Agreement for Temporary Emergency Delivery of a
Portion of the Mexican Treaty Waters of the Colorado River to the
International Boundary in the Vicinity of Tijuana, Baja California,
Mexico, and for Operation of Facilities in the United States.”
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this report is to request authorization to execute the
proposed agreement to deliver the Mexican Treaty Waters during
emergencies.
ANALYSIS:
During the Board of Directors’ Meeting held on February 5, 2014,
under agenda item 7e, the General Manager was authorized to execute
“Amendment No. 2 to Agreement for Temporary Emergency Delivery of a
Portion of the Mexican Treaty Waters of the Colorado River to the
2
International Boundary in the Vicinity of Tijuana, Baja California,
Mexico, and for the Operation of Facilities in The United States.”
On May 19, 2014, prior to the execution of the proposed Amendment,
the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) recommended to reformat this
Amendment in an effort to better reflect past practices and to
simplify it. Consequently, the U.S. agencies involved in delivering
water to Mexico introduced several changes to the formatting and a
few words were changed as well. Its content basically remained the
same with all of our original changes and comments in it.
Nonetheless, because of the time that has elapsed and form/structural
changes on Amendment No. 2 previously submitted to the Board, Staff
is resubmitting this item to the Board. The form of the original
document has changed from an Amendment to a new agreement. In
addition, there are some structural changes to what the Board saw
last February, such as; the Emergency Repair and Planned Project
funds being combined instead of being separate funds, clarification
on how to be compensated during an emergency and the addition to
perform meter calibration.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
As mentioned in the February 5, 2014 Board of Directors’ Meeting, no
fiscal impact is anticipated with the adoption of this wheeling
agreement. On January 21, 2015 the Board approved the new wheeling
rate that covers all District expenses. The rate is now $70.37 per
acre foot for Mexico water wheeled to Mexico for calendar year 2015.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Deliver high quality services to meet customer needs and increase
confidence of the customer in the value the District provides.
LEGAL IMPACT:
No legal impact is anticipated at this time.
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – New Proposed Agreement
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
New Agreement for Temporary Emergency Delivery of
Water to Mexico
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations and Water Resources Committee reviewed
this item on February 17, 2015, and the following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board authorize the General Manager to
execute the proposed (Attachment B) “Agreement for Temporary
Emergency Delivery of a Portion of the Mexican Treaty Waters of
the Colorado River to the International Boundary in the Vicinity
of Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, and for Operation of
Facilities in the United States.”
It was discussed that in 2003, a five-year (5) agreement was
executed for a connection from Otay Water District to Tijuana in
Otay Mesa. In 2008, when the agreement expired, Amendment No. 1
was executed and expired in 2013. U.S. Agencies have since then
been working on Amendment No. 2 to the agreement.
Staff noted that the District’s board approved Amendment No. 2 to
the agreement at its regular board meeting on February 5, 2014.
However, on May 19, 2014, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
recommended to reformat Amendment No. 2 in an effort to better
reflect past practices and to simplify it.
Staff noted all agencies involved with the agreement; the
International Boundary Commission, both United States and Mexico,
United States Bureau of Reclamation, Metropolitan Water District,
San Diego County Water Authority, and Otay Water District.
The Uniited States Bureau of Reclamation is the lead agency for
this particular agreement. Staff noted that it took one (1) year
to reformat, reflect past practices, and simplify Amendment No.
2. Because of the time that elapsed and form/structural changes
to the original document, the form has changed from an Amendment
to a new agreement.
Staff noted that in addition to changing the format of the
agreement, the following were included: Combined Emergency Repair
and Planned Project funds, clarification on how to be compensated
during an emergency, and performing meter calibration.
Legal Counsel stated that every content of the agreement that the
Board approved of at its February 5, 2014, board meeting are
still included in the new agreement.
The Committee commented that it takes time to prepare an
agreement such as this one and inquired if the same could happen
with the agreement for the Rosarito Desalination Project. Staff
stated that it depends on how long it would take to get a
Presidential Permit for the project, which staff is well-engaged
with. Another factor is who would provide the Off-Take
Agreement; would it come from the State of Baja Mexico or the
private contractor.
The Committee inquired if Mexico would still need water supply
from the United States once the Rosarito Desalination Project is
established. Staff stated yes because Mexico is only using this
connection on an emergency basis.
In response to a question by the Committee, the District’s
Wheeling Rate includes administrative and water loss costs.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
ATTACHMENT B
DRAFT
AGREEMENT FORTEMPORARYEMERGENCY DELIVERYOF A PORTIONOF
THE MEXICAN TREATY WATERS OF THE COLORADO RIVER TO THE
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY INTHE VICINITY OF TIJUANA,BAJA CALIFORNIA,
MEXICO,AND FOR OPERATION OF FACILITIES INTHE UNITED STATES
This Agreement for Temporary Emergency Delivery ofa Portion ofthe Mexican Treaty
Watersof the ColoradoRiver to the InternationalBoundaryin the Vicinity ofTijuana,Baja
California,Mexico,and forthe Operation of Facilities inthe United States ("Agreement")is
becomes effective onthe day of ,2015 ("Effective Date")andwill terminate,except
as provided inArticle 18(a),onthe day of ,2020 ("Termination Date"),pursuant to
the Act of Congress approved June 17,1902 (32 Stat.388),and Acts amendatory thereof or
supplementary thereto,including but not limited to the Boulder Canyon Project Act,enacted
December 21,1928 (45 Stat.1057),allof which are commonly known and referred toas Federal
Reclamation law,by and among the United States of America ("United States"),acting byand
through the United States Commissioner,International Boundary and Water Commission,United
States andMexico ("UnitedStates Commissioner"),andthe Secretary of the Interior,acting by
andthrough the Department ofthe Interior,Bureau of Reclamation ("Reclamation");The
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ("Metropolitan"),a public corporation of the
Stateof California;the SanDiegoCountyWater Authority ("Authority"),a public corporation of
the State of California; and the Otay Water District ("OWD"),a public corporation ofthe State
of California.Metropolitan,Authority, and OWDare sometimescollectively referredto as
"California Agencies."
The International Boundary and Water Commission,United States and Mexico, hereafter
referred to as the "Commission,"or "IBWC,"is comprised of two sections - the United States
Section, International Boundary and Water Commission ("USIBWC"),headed by the United
States Commissioner,andthe Mexican Section,International Boundary andWaterCommission
("Mexican Section"),headed by the Mexican Commissioner,International Boundary and Water
Commission,United States and Mexico ("Mexican Commissioner").
A history ofthe development ofthisAgreement anda statement ofthe intent ofthe
parties to this Agreement are attached hereto as Appendix A,which is incorporated as part ofthis
Agreement.
DEFINITIONS
The following definitions apply herein:
A. TheCityof Tijuana,Baja California,Mexico,andits surrounding area,arehereafter
referred to as "Tijuana."
B. The "United States-Mexico Treatyfor Utilization of Waters ofthe Colorado and
Tijuana Rivers and ofthe Rio Grande,"Feb.3,1944,T.S.994 is hereafter referred toasthe
"1944 Treaty."
C. The United States Commissioner and the Mexican Commissioner signed
MinuteNo. 32X(ExhibitA), dated [day,month] ,2015,of the International Boundaryand
Water Commission (hereinafter referred to as "IBWC Minute") for Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuanafor a period ending no later than , 2020, at the samepoint of deliveryas Minute
No.310.
D.The total amount ofthe waters ofthe Colorado River allotted annually to Mexico
by the 1944Treaty will hereafter be referred to as "Treaty Water"; the amount ofsuch Treaty
Water to be diverted from the Colorado River above Parker Dam for subsequent emergency
delivery for Tijuana will hereafter be referred to as "Portion ofTreaty Water";and the
emergency deliveries attheinternational boundary near Tijuana will hereafter be referred to as
"Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana."
E. An obligation of Mexico shall be deemed to mean"an obligation of Mexico as
agreed to in Minute 32X."
F. The facility,throughwhich Emergency Deliveries forTijuanaare delivered atthe
international boundary about 1.1 mileseastofthe OtayMesaBorder Crossing,is hereafter
referred to as the "Service Connection SD-TJ."
G. The Comision Estatal De Servicios Publicos De Tijuana,the Mexican agency
receivingthe Treaty Water, is hereinafter referred to as "CESPT."
PROCEDURES
The following procedures shall be used to implement this Agreement:
A. When Mexico requests deliveries, the USIBWC will secure from the Mexican
Section ofthe IBWC ("Mexican Section") an annual schedule ofrequests (hereinafter referred to
as "Schedule ofRequests")for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana. The Schedule of Requests will
set forth an annual schedule ofdeliveries ofTreaty Water,broken down by month;the
EmergencyDeliveries for Tijuana must be within the projected available capacities ofthe
distribution system facilities in the United States at volumes no greater than 1,200 acre-feet (1.5
million cubic meters)/monfh.The Schedule ofRequests will show by month (1) the total request
for Treaty Water, (2) the deliveries requested in the limitrophe section ofthe Colorado River, (3)
the deliveries requested at the land boundary between the United States and Mexico near San
Luis,Arizona,and (4) the Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana requested to be made at Service
Connection SD-TJ at the international boundary,together with associated conveyance losses as
calculated pursuant to Article 16 ofthis Agreement,to reflect the charge against Mexico's
allotment provided in Article 10(a)ofthe 1944 Treaty.The quantities ofwater that would
otherwise be delivered to Mexico inthe limitrophe section willbe reduced bythe amount of
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana and associated conveyance losses,ascalculated pursuant to
this Agreement.
B.Upon receipt USIBWC will review the annual Schedule of Requests for
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana and transmit it to Reclamation and the California Agencies,
whichwilldeterminewhether all or a portionof suchrequestscan be met for that year.
C. The USIBWC will ascertain from the Authority whether such requests can be met
or to what extent a limitation ofdeliveries is foreseen in said year.
D. The Authority shall coordinate the necessary functions ofthe California Agencies
in regard to charges and payments for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana.The format for the
charges is reflected in Exhibit B,attached hereto andincorporated aspartofthis Agreement.
E. The California Agencies acknowledge that due to unforeseen circumstances,
Mexico may onrare occasions request changes to Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana.The
California Agencies shallcooperatein goodfaithto effectsuch deliveries,if distribution system
and treatment plant capacity are deemed available pursuant to Article 3 ofthis Agreement and,
uptothe volume established in Article 8ofthis Agreement andunderthe sametermsand
conditions provided in this Agreement.
F. During any month that water is delivered through the Service Connection SD-TJ,
anyparty involvedin this Agreementmay requestadditionalinformationor a meetingto verify
meter readings, receive reports on the procedures for deliveries and handling of funds received
from Mexico and exchange information,as well as jointly address any unforeseen situations that
may arise regarding this matter.
NOW,THEREFORE,in consideration ofthe mutual covenants herein contained,itis
agreed as follows:
ARTICLE 1.PERFORMANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA AGENCIES
The California Agencieswill actasthe operation agencies fortheUnitedStates
Commissioner for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana under theterms and conditions ofthis
Agreement,pursuant to terms oftheIBWC Minute.A true copy ofthe English textof the IBWC
Minute is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated as a part hereof.
ARTICLE 2.TIMING FOR THE SUBMISSION OF THE SCHEDULE OF REQUESTS
Forthe initialemergencydeliveryofwaterunderthis MinuteNo. 320,the United States
Commissioner will submit to the California Agencies and Reclamation a schedule ofthe
requested emergency water deliveries broken downbymonthat least45dayspriorto the
delivery startdate.Forany subsequentyear,anannual schedule willbe submittedby September
15 ofthe preceding year..The Schedule of Requests willreflectrequestedwater deliveries for
each month ofthe annual period for which the request is made, within the limitations set out in
Article 8 ofthis Agreement. With each Schedule of Requests, the United States Commissioner
shall include the progress report received from Mexico on plans and other actions to securea
firm water supply for Tijuana.
ARTICLE 3.CAPACITY DETERMINATION BY CALIFORNIA AGENCIES
Upon receipt ofa Schedule of Requests, the California Agencies shall determine in their
sole discretion whether capacity is available in their water distribution systems and at
Metropolitan's Robert A.Skinner Treatment Plant for all or a portion ofthe requested
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana,and shall provide that determination to the Authority,which
in turn will provide it to the Commission by October 15,or in the case of initial deliveries under
this Agreement,within 30 days of receipt of the Schedule of Requests.Ifthe California
Agencies determine that capacity is not available for acalendar year,this Agreement shall not be
operative for that calendar year.However,aSchedule of Requests for subsequent calendar years
may be submitted.
ARTICLE 4. TIMINGAND COMPONENTS OFTHE SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
Timing of Schedule of Charges:The Authority shall provide an itemized Schedule of
Charges consistent with the California Agencies'United States rate setting practices in Southern
California ("Schedule ofCharges")tobepaid by Mexico for the amount of Emergency
Deliveries for Tijuana that are to be accomplished based on the determination performed in
Article 3of this Agreement.The charges included inthe Schedule ofCharges shall be
determined by October 15 ofthe year preceding deliveries and shall remain constant until
changed by one or more ofthe California Agencies except for charges associated with the cost of
energy,which shall be estimated and updated for each quarterly period,in which deliveries are
scheduled,in accordance with thisArticle.The Authority shall provide the United States
Commissioner the Schedule of Charges by October 15 oftheyear preceding deliveries and
thereafter,provide a quarterly update 45 days prior to the beginning of each quarterly period.On
a quarterly basis,when deliveries are scheduled,the Agencies shall update the Schedule of
Charges to reflect energy costs for the subsequent quarter."Quarter"or "quarterly"shall mean
thefour consecutive increments of three-month periodseachcalendaryear,beginning withthe
first month ofthe calendar year;quarterly requirements hereinshallonlybe required for quarters
in which scheduled deliveries occur.In the case of initial deliveries to Mexico under this
Agreement,the Authority shall within 30 days of receipt ofthe Schedule of Requests,provide a
Schedule of Chargesfor deliveriesthroughthe end of the initial quarter.
6
In addition to the Schedule ofCharges and quarterly updates,the Authority shall,by
October 15 of the year preceding deliveries,provide the United States Commissioner a
determination as to whether payment into the Energy Reserve Fund-and the Planned Project and
Emergency Repair Reserve Fund,established pursuant to Article _5_,is required and,if so,the
amount of such payment(s).
Components of Schedule of Charges:The Schedule of Charges shall include:(a)Base
Cost ofDeliveries;(b)Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund;and (c)Energy
Reserve Fund.Each component is calculated as follows:
(a)The Base Cost ofDeliveries includes:
(1)The charge for the use of the existing diversion and conveyance works of
Metropolitan and the treatment charge for such water at rates consistent with the California
Agencies'United States rate setting practices in Southern California,plus the average monthly
energy cost,including foregone sales and exchanges,incurred by Metropolitan to convey the
incremental amount ofMexico's water through the Colorado River Aqueduct,the loss of
Metropolitan's share ofenergy generated at Parker Dam Power Plant,and any other Colorado
River Aqueduct energy cost or loss ofenergy that results from such Emergency Deliveries.An
estimated charge for electric energy and losses shall be provided for quarterly,which will be
reflected in the quarterly update ofthe Schedule ofCharges.Actual charges for electric energy
and losses shall be provided by Metropolitan in its monthly invoice to the Authority pursuant to
Article 7 ofthe Agreement.
(2)The charge for the use ofthe existing conveyance works ofthe Authority for Emergency
Deliveries for Tijuana at rates consistent with the California Agencies'United States rate setting
practices in Southern California.
(3) The charge for use ofconveyance facilities ofOWD, including distribution system
facilities used for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana at rates consistent with the California
Agencies' United States rate setting practices in Southern California.
(b)Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund.
(1) An annual charge in an amount determined as provided in Article 5(b) for deposit in the
Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund. The annual charge shall be invoiced and
paid before the beginning ofeach calendar year.
(2) OWD may withdraw funds from the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve
Fund for emergency work on the equipment or facilities used for the purpose ofdelivering
waters to Tijuana for operations,safety, or security purposes.Emergency repairs shall proceed
as stipulated in Article 5(b)ofthis Agreement.
(3) OWD may withdraw funds from the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve
Fund for planned purchase,installation,construction,repair or replacement ofequipment or
facilities used for the purpose of Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana or for improvements for the
purpose ofthe security ofsuch facilities (each a "Planned Project").OWD,upon receipt ofa
Schedule ofRequests for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana,shall perform meter calibration of
Service Connection SD-TJ in order to guarantee flow accuracy to Mexico.OWD shall be
reimbursed for any cost incurred from the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund
for this initial work.Any other planned project shall only proceed upon authorization by CESPT,
the Mexican agency receiving the Treaty water. OWD shall provide a description ofthe Planned
Project and the estimated expenditures to the Authority.The Authority shall submit the
description and estimated expenditures to the United States Commissioner.Upon Mexico's
approval of the Planned Project and the associated estimated expenditures,the OWD may
withdraw funds from the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund.
(4)When the Authority withdraws funds from the Planned Project and the Emergency
Repair Reserve Fund,the United States Commissioner shall obtain from the Mexican
Section funds necessary toreplenish the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve
Fund tothelevel established on October 15 ofthe preceding year orfor theinitial
delivery period.The United States Commissioner shall make all such funds received
from Mexico available by depositing said funds with the Authority.
(5)Upon completion ofaPlanned Project,OWD shall submit a final cost accounting to the
Authority and the Authority will transmit the cost accounting to the United States Commissioner.
(6)In the event the actual costs ofaPlanned Project or an Emergency Project exceed the
Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund,OWD shall submit an invoice to the
Authority for such excess costs.The Authority will forward the invoice and the OWD's final
cost accounting to the United States Commissioner for collection from Mexico ofpayment for
the excess costs and the funds necessary to replenish the Planned Project and Emergency Repair
Reserve Fund to the requisite level.The United States Commissioner shall transmit such funds
to the Authority for deposit inthe Authority Account.The Authority shall pay OWD's invoice
forexcess costsupondepositof such funds inthe Authority Account.
(c)Energy Reserve Fund.-An Energy Reserve Fund shall be established to cover additional
charges due to the fluctuations inenergy costs.The dollar amount required for the
Energy Reserve Fund shall be estimated on a quarterly basis before each quarterly
delivery period and it shall not be-greater than FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND U.S.
DOLLARS ($500,000).
(d)The charges,including the estimated energy charges,described in Article 4 (a)and (c),
shallbestatedas chargesperacre-footof Emergency Deliveries forTijuana,including volumes
statedinacre-feetto be charged by each agencyas conveyancelosses pursuant to Article 16 of
this Agreement.
ARTICLE 5.PAYMENT ACCOUNT FOR WATER DELIVERIES AND RESERVE FUNDS
(a) The Authority shallestablisha separate accountwithintheAuthority's accounting system
("Authority Account")forthe purpose of accounting forreceiptand disbursement of funds for
payment for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana pursuant tothisAgreement.As described inthis
Article 5, funds that are received from Mexico through the United States Commissioner for
payment of estimated chargesfor deliveries as setforthinthe Schedule of Charges,including,
deposits intothePlannedProjectand Emergency Repair Reserve Fundand Energy Reserve Fund
if required bytheCaliforniaAgenciesto providepaymentinthe eventthat actualcharges for
deliveries exceed estimated charges due to fluctuations in energy charges. Funding for
implementation of a planned project, and/or implementationof an emergency repair shallbe
maintained in and paid from the Authority Account. When Metropolitan provides a quarterly
estimated energy charge,pursuant to Article 4,Metropolitan shall also provide a determination
to the Authority as to whether payment into the Energy Reserve Fund is required for the
following quarter.
(b)Within the Authority Account,a Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund
shall be established for the purpose ofaccounting for, receipt, and disbursement offunds for
payment for the actual cost incurred by OWD for emergency purchases,installation,
construction,repair or replacement ofequipment or facilities used for the purpose ofEmergency
Deliveries for Tijuana or for emergency improvements for the purpose ofthe security ofsuch
10
facilities ("Emergency Projects")or for planned purchases,installation,construction,repair or
replacement of equipment or facilities used for the purpose of Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana
or for planned projects for the purpose ofthe security ofsuch facilities ("Planned Projects").The
amount ofthe Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund shall be determined by
OWD annually,in consultation with the Authority,based on historical data for such Emergency
Projects and Planned Projects and shall reflect the amount deemed reasonably necessary to cover
the costs ofEmergency Projects and Planned Projects in the next calendar year.The minimum
Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund balance shall be no less than SEVENTY
THOUSAND U.S.DOLLARS ($70,000)and the maximum balance no greater than TWO
HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND U.S. DOLLARS ($250,000).
OWD shall,by October 10 of each year,submit its determination of the annual charge to be
collected for and deposited in the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund under
Article 4(b).Upon execution of this Agreement,OWD shall provide within thirty (30)days a
determination ofthe charge tobe initially collected and deposited inthe Planned Project and
Emergency Repair Reserve Fund under Article 4(b).Before the initial delivery period and
thereafter at the beginning of each calendar year,theUnited States Commissioner shall collect
such funds as specified in Article 4(b)and provide them totheAuthority for deposit into the
Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund established by Article 4 (b).
To access the Planned Project and Emergency
Repair Reserve Fund in the event ofanemergency,OWD shall immediately respond and
perform any work necessary to maintain the appropriate level ofsafety and security ofthe site
and shall notify USIBWC and CESPT of said initial work as soon as practicable following the
occurrence ofthe emergency.OWD shall be reimbursed foranycost incurred from the Planned
11
Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund for this initial response.Any additional emergency
repairs,necessary to restore the proper operation of the facility,shall proceed upon authorization
by CESPT,the Mexican Agency receiving the Treaty water,when it is practical to obtain such
authorization prior to the final emergency repair.Upon OWD receiving Emergency Project
authorization from CESPT through USIBWC,the final repairs shall be performed by OWD.
Upon completion of an Emergency Project,OWD shall submit afinal cost accounting to the
Authority and the Authority will forward such cost accounting to the United States
Commissioner for transmittal to Mexico.The Authority may draw from the Planned Project and
Emergency Repair Reserve Fund to pay OWD for the Emergency Project.In the event that an
Emergency Project is not authorized by CESPT through USIBWC,the Service Connection SD-
TJ will be deemed inoperable and the Commission shall determine the termination ofthis
Agreement as stipulated in Article 18 of this Agreement.In the event the Planned Project and
Emergency Repair Reserve Fund is insufficient or is depleted after commencement of aproject,
the United States Commissioner shall obtain additional funds from Mexico and transfer those
funds to the Authority at the time ofdepletion to complete the project and to replenish the
reserves to the amount determined by OWD for that calendar year.Inthe event the actual costs
of an Emergency Project exceed the reserves,OWD shall submit an invoice to the Authority for
such unpaid costs and replenishment of the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve fund.
The Authority will forward the invoice to the United States Commissioner for collection of funds
from Mexico for transmittal of such funds to the Authority for deposit intheAuthority Account.
The Authority will pay OWD the unpaid costs upon receipt ofsuch funds from the United States
Commissioner.
12
(c)Payment for the charges referred to in Article 4(a)and (c)will be made on a quarterly
basis.Each quarterly payment will be for the Base Cost ofDelivery for the corresponding
quarterly period in which Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana are to be made,and for Energy
Reserve Funds as determined byMetropolitan.The United States Commissioner shall determine
the availability of funds provided by Mexico 15 days before the beginning ofthe corresponding
quarter during which deliveries shall be made or,for initial deliveries,15 days before the
beginning ofthe delivery.The United States Commissioner shall make all such funds received
from Mexico available by depositing said funds with the Authority.Funds forinitial deliveries
pursuant to this Agreement shall be established prior to initiation ofthe Emergency Deliveries
for Tijuana.The amount of funds provided by Mexico through the United States Commissioner
shall be calculated bythe Authority andshall be equal tothe estimated total charge ofthe
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana tobeprovided for thecorresponding quarterly period,
determined bythe volume ofthe Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana together withassociated
conveyance losses,atarateper acre-foot totaling thesumof charges referred toin Article 4(a)
and(c)for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana,lessany amount estimated bythe Authority that
willremaininthe accountfrom previouspaymentsby Mexicoafter deduction of paymentsfor
the previous quarter,andafteraccounting for the Planned Project and Emergency Repair
Reserve Fund and Energy Reserve Fund, if required, as provided below.
Inasmuch as delivery costs may change during the term ofthis Agreement, they will be
set forth in an Exhibit B as formulated or modified as necessary,except for estimated charges
associatedwith the cost ofenergy, which shall be provided for quarterly, and which shall be
indicatedas actual energy charges in each monthly invoice. Exhibit B is attached hereto, and is
13
incorporated intothis Agreement in accordancewith its respectiveprovisions until superseded by
a subsequent Exhibit B.
(d) The Authority shall maintain an Energy Reserve Fund in the Authority Account in excess
of estimatedquarterly charges. The purpose ofthe Energy Reserve Fund is to provide payment
of actual energy charges for deliveries that may be in excess ofestimated energy charges. The
amount ofthe Energy Reserve Fund shall be determined by Metropolitan, and shall reflect the
amount deemed reasonably necessary by Metropolitan to cover potential discrepancies between
estimated and actual charges due to fluctuations in energy costs. Energy Reserve Funds in the
AuthorityAccountshall not exceed FIVE HUNDREDTHOUSANDDOLLARS ($500,000).In
the event that Energy Reserve Funds are depleted or are forecasted to be depleted in any quarter,
when payment ofestimated charges for the next quarter are provided, the United States
Commissioner shall obtain from Mexico a payment to maintain the Energy Reserve Fund at the
requisite level for the next quarter. In the event Energy Reserve Funds exceed the amount
determined by Metropolitan,such excess amount shall be applied to payment ofestimated
charges for the next quarterly period,or upon the written instruction ofthe United States
Commissioner,shall remain in the Energy Reserve Fund.
(e) The Authority shall credit the Authority Account for interest earned on the account based
on the average monthly interest as reported on the Authority's Monthly Treasurer's Report for
the Authority Operating Fund,and will be calculated at the end of each month.Interest earned
shall be treated as payments from Mexico through the United States Commissioner.The
Authority shall notify the other California Agencies,after receiving notice from the United States
Commissioner,when funds for each quarter have been received from Mexico and transferred to
the Authority.
14
ARTICLE 6.UNANTICIPATED ADDITIONAL EMERGENCY DELIVERIES OR
REDUCTIONS IN DELIVERIES
(a)Additional Deliveries Requested by Mexico.During any quarterly period,Mexico may
request,through the United States Commissioner,unanticipated additional Emergency Deliveries
for Tijuana from the California Agencies.Ifthe California Agencies agree to additional
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana,the California Agencies shall calculate a Schedule ofCharges
for such deliveries in accordance with Article 4,herein,andanyadditional request for Energy
Reserve Funds in accordance with Article 5herein.The Authority shall inform theUnited States
Commissioner of the extent to which theCalifornia Agencies have agreed to such unanticipated
additional Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana and the amount ofadditional funds that shall be
deposited into the Authority Account.The United States Commissioner shall notify Mexico and
secure from Mexico the additional funds within 15 days of notifying Mexico.TheCalifornia
Agencies may,in their sole discretion and under extraordinary circumstances,agree to make
additional Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana prior to receiving payment as provided inthis
Article.However,in such case,the United States Commissioner shall secure payment from
Mexico for such deliveries immediately,and if such payment isnot made immediately,the
California Agencies may draw on any available funds in the Authority Account as payment for
suchEmergencyDeliveriesfor Tijuana.
(b)Reductions inDeliveries Requested by Mexico.Mexico may,during the course ofa
calendar year,request reductions in the amount of Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana that had
been determined according tothe procedures in Articles 2 and 3ofthis Agreement.The
Authority,inconsultation with the other California Agencies,shall comply with an appropriate
request for reductions unless a California Agency determines,inits sole discretion that such
15
reductions would result in a financial loss to that agency.In the event that a reduction in
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana is requested by Mexico pursuant to this Article,any payments
that have previously been made by Mexico,through the United States Commissioner to the
Authority for such Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana shall be retained in the Authority Account
and applied to payment for future Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana.
(c)Except in extraordinary circumstances,Mexico may not submit any request for
unanticipated additions or reductions in Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana for any time period
that is covered in any previous request for unanticipated additions or reductions pursuant to this
Article.
ARTICLE 7.COORDINATION OF PAYMENTS AND CHARGES
The California Agencies shall coordinate the charges and payments and like matters
pertaining to Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana as follows:
(a)IBWC shall certify delivery amounts through monthly meter readings at Service
Connection SD-TJ for themonths thatEmergency Deliveries for Tijuana are made,and forward
a written certification to the Authority by 5:00 p.m.onthe first working day after the end ofthe
month in which the delivery was made.
(b)Contingent on timely receipt from IBWC,the Authority will then prepare itemized
statements ofcosts orcharges,based onthe certified monthly meter readings,in the form
attached as ExhibitBhereto,and forward such statements,alongwiththe certifiedmeter
readings to OWD,Metropolitan,Reclamation,and the United States Commissioner before 3:30
p.m.on the third working day after the end ofthe month in which the Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana were made.
16
(c)Metropolitan's monthly invoice to the Authority,which contains an accounting of
charges for Metropolitan water deliveries to the Authority including Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana,shall include:(1)A treated water credit to the Authority at Metropolitan's full service
rate for the amount of water delivered as calculated on Line 8 of Exhibit B for the current billing
month;(2)A charge tothe Authority,as calculated on Line 16of Exhibit B,for Metropolitan's
costs associated with providing the Emergency Deliveries forTijuanaduring the current billing
month;(3)Acreditequalto Metropolitan's estimated energy charge as shownonthe invoice for
the previous month billing of Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana;and(4)A charge equal to
Metropolitan's actual energycostsforthe previous month billing of Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana.
(d) TheAuthority's monthlyinvoiceto OWD,which contains an accounting of charges for
Authority water deliveries to OWD including Emergency Deliveries forTijuana,shall include:
(1)Atreatedwatercredit to OWD at the Authority's full servicerate for the amountof water
delivered as calculated on Line 3 ofExhibit B for the current billing month;and (2) A credit to
OWD as calculated on Line 5 ofExhibit B for OWD's costs associated with providing the
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana for the current-billing month.
(e) The Authority shall withdraw funds monthly from the Authority Account for payment to
the Authority based on the Authority's costs as calculated on Line 10 ofExhibit B.
(f) Within 30 working days after the end ofthe month in which Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana were made,Metropolitan shall inform the Authority in writing or by electronic mail of
its actual energy charge per acre-foot for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana for that month.
(g) The Authority shall provide a quarterly report for quarters when no deliveries are made
and a monthly report for periods when deliveries aremade,onor about the 20th day ofthe
17
month,tothe United States Commissioner for submittal to Mexico,which shall include an
itemized listofthe costs to or charges ofeachCalifornia Agency forthe Emergency Deliveries
for Tijuana made during the previous month,total funds withdrawn from Mexico's account,the
interest earned on the funds in the account, and the balance remaining in the account. The
Authority shall retain appropriate vouchers to support the itemized statements ofcosts orcharges
in accordance with the provisions ofthis Article.
(h)IBWC may request clarifications tothemonthly report from the Authority within 60
days.Inthe event ofa dispute regarding a statement of costs and charges submitted inthe
Authority Monthly Reportto the United States Commissioner,theUnited States Commissioner
andthe General Managerof the Authority shall immediately take actionto resolvethe matter.If
the United States Commissioner does not object to information contained in the Monthly Report
withinsixty(60)daysof itsreceiptfromthe Authority,it shallbe conclusively determined that
the United States Commissioner and Mexico agree with the information contained in such report.
(i) Upontheterminationofthis Agreement,theAuthorityshallsettleand reconcile
all the actual charges for said Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana and liquidate the corresponding
fundsprovided for their payment. The Authority shall prepare a final balance sheet covering
actual costs for the delivered waters and submit such final settlement to the United States
Commissioner for review and approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. The United
States Commissioner shall return his approval or objections ofthe Authority's final settlement of
the Authority Account,including the Planned Project and Emergency Repair Reserve Fund and
the Energy Reserve Fund, to the Authority within sixty (60) days after their receipt by the United
States Commissioner.The United States Commissioner shall make a final settlement to Mexico
and shall return to Mexico any remaining funds including interest earned,and the Authority shall
18
close the Authority Account.In the event funds are not sufficient to cover charges upon final
settlement,Mexico shall within 15 days of notification by the United States Commissioner
provide additional funds in that amount,which shall be transferred to the Authority,for
disbursement to the appropriate agencyor agencies.
(j)The Authority shall retain detailed records offunds received and disbursements made
pursuant to this Article for a period ofthree years after the final settlement offund
administration.
ARTICLE 8.SCHEDULES AND VOLUMES OF DELIVERIES
Mexico's annual Schedule of Requests for Emergency Deliveries forTijuana shall bein
volumes per month and shall be subject to the availability ofdelivery capacity ofthe California
Agencies.The maximum monthly volume of the Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana atService
Connection SD-TJ shallbeno greaterthanthe available capacity of approximately 1,200 acre-
feet.The annual volume ofthe Emergency Deliveries forTijuanashallbe no greater thanthe
available capacity of approximately 14,400 acre-feet.Mexico recognizes thatthe California
Agencies'distribution system facilities are utilized first to meet water demands oftheir existing
and future customers, which in time may decrease the maximum capacity of 1,200 acre-feet per
month.The actual capacity willbe determined bythe California Agencies as stipulated in Article
3 ofthis Agreement.
ARTICLE 9.DECREASE OR SUSPENSION BY CALIFORNIA AGENCIES
Emergency Deliveries forTijuanadescribed hereinmaybe decreased or suspended
temporarily atanytime,either inthe event ofa disruption ofthe distribution system,or,iffor
other reasons,anyof the California Agencies is temporarily unableto supplyin its system the
capacity orenergynecessaryforthe conveyance ortreatmentof the Portionof TreatyWater.In
19
the event that the California Agencies are not able to make the water deliveries because of
capacity limitations,service interruptions or other emergencies,the California Agency or the
California Agencies not able to make the water deliveries will notify the USIBWC before any
suspension is implemented,except during unforeseeable emergencies when the Authority and the
USIBWC will be notified assoon aspracticable as stipulated inArticle 5(b)and Article 10 of
this Agreement.In the event that the California Agencies suspend or decrease water supply for
reasons otherthanthose mentioned above,the Authority willreturnto the USIBWC for payment
to Mexico funds equivalent to the cost or charges ofsuspended deliveries that Mexico may have
paid in advance.
ARTICLE 10.SHUTDOWNS AND EMERGENCIES
Asset forth in Article 9 ofthis Agreement,Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana may be
decreased or suspended temporarily when sufficient surplus capacity does not exist inthe
distribution system facilities,orsufficient energy is not available,to be used hereunder to permit
delivery ofEmergency Deliveries for Tijuana at Service Connection SD-TJ without creating an
undue burden upon fulfilling the obligations of the California Agencies to their respective
customers.In accordance therewith,since regular shutdowns of aqueducts and distribution and
treatment facilities occur for inspection andmaintenance,andmayoccurbecause of unforeseen
repair requirements or emergencies,the California Agencies shall not be responsible to make the
Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana previously agreed upon except when itis reasonably practical
todosoinviewoftheir existing capabilities andobligations totheirrespective customers.The
Authority from time to time andas necessary will communicate through the United States
Commissioner to Mexico regarding aqueduct shutdowns,limitations of available capacity orany
other circumstances pertaining toanyofsaid California Agencies which may cause restrictions
20
ofwater deliveries to a rate of flow less than the amount previously determined pursuant to
Article 3of this Agreement.In the case that the water deliveries were suspended by the
Authority for reasons other than capacity limitations,service interruptions or other emergencies,
the Authority shall withdraw funds from the Authority Account equivalent to the cost of
suspended Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana and provide such funds to the United States
Commissionerfor payment to Mexico.
ARTICLE 11.COMMITMENTS BY RECLAMATION TO METROPOLITAN
Reclamation,inconsideration ofthe obligations undertaken by Metropolitan in this
Agreement,agrees with Metropolitan that the Portion of Treaty Water actually diverted by
Metropolitan pursuant to this Agreement shall not be charged against Metropolitan's right to the
delivery by Reclamation ofwaters from the Colorado River for Metropolitan's own use and that
the charge of25 cents per acre-foot made by Reclamation for water intended for use within
Metropolitan shall not be applied to the Portion ofTreaty Water diverted.For purposes of
implementing the agreements with Metropolitan stated above,Reclamation shall utilize the
monthly records ofEmergency Deliveries for Tijuana prepared in accordance with this
Agreement.
ARTICLE 12.TRANSPORTATION AND DELIVERY OFWATERBY METROPOLITAN
(a)Metropolitan,upon notification by Authority that funds for Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana for the next quarterly period have been received,will transport waters for Emergency
Deliveries for Tijuana in accordance with the Schedule ofRequests from Mexico and the annual
determination by the California Agencies.The Portion ofTreaty Water will be transported from
Lake Havasu through its aqueduct,and appurtenant facilities,and distribution system,and
delivered,after deducting losses,tothe Authority at the terminus of Metropolitan's distribution
21
system in San Diego County,apoint approximately six miles south of the northern boundary of
San Diego County.
(b)Metropolitan shall be reimbursed in accordance with Exhibit Bfor:use of its existing
diversion and conveyance works,electric energy,loss ofenergy generated at Parker Dam Power
Plant,any other Colorado River Aqueduct energy cost or loss ofenergy that results from
Emergency Deliveries,water treatment charges,and other expenses at a rate per acre-foot
determined,on the basis ofinvoices to the Authority prepared in accordance with Article 7of
this Agreement.
(c)In the interest ofinternational comity and recognizing that Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana are necessary for the health and welfare ofthe people ofTijuana,Reclamation agrees
that inorder to maximize use of available capacity,inany calendar year during the term ofthis
Agreement when Metropolitan has surplus capacity temporarily available in its aqueduct,
Reclamation upon demand by Metropolitan shall permit Metropolitan to divert additional
quantities ofwater at its point ofdiversion from the Colorado River over and above both its right
to delivery by Reclamation ofwater from the Colorado River for Metropolitan's own use in that
year and the quantities making up the Portion ofTreaty Water being diverted for delivery in that
year,up to aquantity equivalent to the estimated requirement for the Portion ofTreaty Water for
the succeeding calendar year,such water to be stored inreservoirs within boundaries of
Metropolitan rather than in Lake Mead,for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana inthe following
year.Reclamation shall not charge such stored quantity ofwater against Metropolitan's right to
delivery by Reclamation ofwater from the Colorado River for Metropolitan's own use inthat
year,but shall charge it against Treaty Water inthe year the emergency deliveries are made for
Tijuana.All charges related to such stored water shall be made intheyear such Emergency
22
Deliveries forTijuanaare made.At thetimeofthe termination of this Agreement,if
Metropolitan has any water in storage within the Metropolitanservice area that had been
intendedfor future delivery to Mexico pursuant to this subsection, the amount of such water shall
be determinedto be a delivery from Reclamation to Metropolitan of Metropolitan's Colorado
River entitlement for the next succeeding calendar year, and Metropolitan shall have no
obligationto deliversuch waterto Mexico. Metropolitanshall provide, in its monthly
accountingreport to Reclamation, a report ofits diversions from Lake Havasu for Mexico's use
at Tijuanaduringthe month for whichthe report is beingsubmitted,and any diversionsmadefor
Mexico in excess of Mexico's need for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana during the month for
which the report is being submitted.
(d) In months when Metropolitan would operate its aqueduct at full capacity for its own use,
the transportation for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana will displace water which, in the absence
ofthis Agreement, would be transported for Metropolitan. In such event,transportation of
Colorado River water for Metropolitan's use will be deferred (hereafter referred to as "Deferred
Water") and must be pumped later in the calendar year or a succeeding year if and when
economical power and aqueduct transporting capacity is available.Iffor any reason economical
power or aqueduct transporting capacity in Metropolitan's aqueduct is not available during any
calendar year ofthe term ofthis Agreement to transport the Deferred Water for Metropolitan's
use,Reclamation,in order to make Metropolitan whole,shall deliver to Metropolitan during the
next succeeding calendar year when economical power and aqueduct transporting capacity is
available at Metropolitan's point of diversion from the Colorado River,a quantity ofwater equal
to the amount ofany undelivered Deferred Water,which Metropolitan was unable to transport,
during a previous calendar year by reason oftransporting Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana.
23
(e)In the event ofunavailability ofpower for pumping the Portion ofTreaty Water for
delivery to the Service Connection SD-TJ Metropolitan shall be relieved ofits obligations under
this Agreement for the periods ofunavailability.In the event the Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana utilize power ordinarily scheduled for use in pumping Metropolitan's Colorado River
water which pumping has been deferred until later in the calendar year in order to permit the
pumping ofthe Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana in the expectation ofsubsequently receiving
supplemental capacity and energy from any source for pumping,and such Deferred Water and
the required power are not provided or available as expected,Metropolitan shall be relieved ofits
obligation to make the Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana for the period or periods during which
suchDeferred Waterhas not been delivered.Deferred Watershallbethe firstwaterdelivered in
the following calendar year.
(f)In no event shall the pumping ofwater for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana result in any
effect onMetropolitan's use of energy pursuant toits contractual rights to federally generated
hydroelectric power.
ARTICLE 13.TRANSPORTATION AND DELIVERY OF WATER BY AUTHORITY
The Authority shall receive delivery from Metropolitan of Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana,transport the water through itsdistribution system facilities,and deliver itto OWD at
Service Connection No.13.Authority shallbe reimbursed fordeliverychargesandother
expenses as specified in Article 7(d)atthe rate peracre-foot determined for that year,onthe
basisof statementsprepared in accordancewithArticle 7 of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 14.TRANSPORTATION AND DELIVERY OF WATER BY OWD
OWDshallreceive delivery of the EmergencyDeliveriesfor Tijuana fromthe
Authority's Service Connection No.13.OWD shall transport and deliver such water through its
24
distribution system facilities,including distribution system facilities constructed by separate
agreement for connection with the Mexican water distribution system at Service Connection SD-
TJ.OWD shall be reimbursed for delivery charges and other expenses as specified in Article
7(d)at the rate per acre-foot determined for that year,on the basis ofstatements prepared in
accordance with Article 7ofthisAgreement.It shall render monthly statements tothe Authority
as provided in Article 7 ofthis Agreement.
ARTICLE 15.ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
The USIBWC actedas lead agency for compliance withall Federal lawsand regulations
necessary to implement the Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana,including compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Actof 1969,as amended,andthe Federal Endangered Species
Actof 1973,as amended.Authority acted aslead agency for compliance withall State of
California laws and regulations necessary to implement the Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana,
including compliance with theCalifornia Environmental Quality Act and the California
Endangered Species Act of 1984,as amended.In both the federal and state environmental
processes,it was determined that diverting,conveying,and treating the Emergency Deliveries
for Tijuana^will not have an environmentalimpact.
ARTICLE 16.COMMINGLING OF WATER AND CONVEYANCE LOSSES
Water may be commingled within the systems oftheCalifornia Agencies and accounted
for according to usual water accounting practices,with theconveyance losses credited to each of
the parties according tothe following percentages ofthevolumes of Emergency Deliveries for
Tijuana:Metropolitan 3.6%;Authority 1.0%;and OWD 3.0%.In determining the number of
acre-feetto which the rates and charges by each ofthe California Agencies shall apply, each
California Agency shalladdthe sumofthe actual volume of Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana
25
at ServiceConnection SD-TJ, and the percentage of conveyance losses of the actual volume
attributable to that California Agency expressed as a volume, and the percentage of conveyance
lossesof CaliforniaAgencies associatedwiththe EmergencyDeliveries for Tijuanabetweenthat
CaliforniaAgencyand Service Connection SD-TJexpressedas a volume. The meansof
determining assignmentof conveyancelossesis depictedin Exhibit B, attached heretoand
incorporated hereinas a partof this Agreement.All Emergency DeliveriesforTijuanaat Service
Connection SD-TJ shall be measured using the flow metering device installed and said deliveries
shallbe reported to the Commission.For inclusion in its annualArticleV. Decree Accounting
Report,donepursuantto the U.S. SupremeCourt ConsolidatedDecree in Arizona v.California,
547 U.S. 150 (2006),Reclamation shall utilize the record ofmonthly deliveries at Service
Connection SD-TJ,and include the above described losses.Record ofdeliveries to Mexico at
the international boundary near Tijuana shall be reported separately from deliveries to the
northerly international boundary ("NIB"),the southerly international boundary ("SIB") near
Yuma, and in the limitrophe section ofthe Colorado River.
ARTICLE 17.CALCULATION OF SALINITY
The United States Commissioner will charge Colorado River waters delivered under this
Agreement, including system conveyance losses, as a portion ofMexico's allotment of Colorado
River waters provided for in Article 10(a)ofthe 1944 Treaty. For the purpose ofcompliance by
the United States with Minute No. 242, during the period ofEmergency Deliveries for Tijuana,
the difference in salinity between Imperial Dam and the NIB with Mexico described in
Resolution 1.a ofMinute No.242 shall be calculated as ifthe water delivered for use in Tijuana
was delivered in the Colorado River at the NIB from Imperial Dam.
ARTICLE 18.TERMINATION
26
(a)This Agreement shall terminate and be no longer effective for any purpose,except for
final payment for Emergency Deliveries for Tijuana at Service Connection SD-TJ and final
liquidation of funds provided by Mexico,upon the occurrence ofany one of the following
conditions,unless otherwise agreed tobythe parties by amendment to this Agreement:
(1)Upon the Termination Date noted in the first sentence ofthis Agreement.
(2)Whenever any ofthe funds to be provided by Mexico pursuant to this
Agreement have notbeenso provided.
(3)Ifthe Service Connection SD-TJ is deemed inoperable by the Commission
(b)Upon the termination ofthe period during which this Agreement is in effect,or
any subsequent extensions thereto,the materials,equipment,and facilities within OWD
constructed pursuant to this Agreement,including distribution system facilities constructed by
separate agreement for connection with the Mexican water distribution system at Service
Connection SD-TJ,and considered by OWD tobeintegral to the ongoing operations of OWD
shall become orremain the property of OWD.OWD may remove orcause toberemoved any
non-integral materials,equipment,and facilities and restore OWD's facilities to the condition
which would exist if such materials,equipment,and facilities hadnotbeen constructed.
USIBWC shall obtain from Mexico and transfer tothe Authority funds tocoverthe full cost of
any removal and disposal ofsuch non-integral materials,equipment,and facilities,and the
estimated cost of restoring OWD's facilities to the condition which would exist if such materials,
equipment,and facilities had not been constructed.Notwithstanding the foregoing,subject to
approval ofthe Governments ofthe United States and Mexico,through IBWC,the local
authorities in the two countries have the authorityto agreeupon and effect a different
arrangement for the disposition of such materials,equipment,and facilities.
27
ARTICLE 19.FEDERAL LAW
(a) This Agreement is made upon the express condition, and with the express understanding,
that all rights hereunder shall be subject to and controlled by (1) the Colorado River Compact,
dated November 24, 1922,which was approved in Section 13(a)ofthe Boulder Canyon Project
Act dated December 21, 1928 (45 Stat. 1057), (2) the Boulder Canyon Project Act, dated
December 21, 1928, (3) the Consolidated Decree entered by the U.S.Supreme Court in the case
ofArizona v.California (547 U.S. 150) (2006), and (4) the 1944 Treaty.
(b) This Agreement is considered to be a renewal ofthe June 14,1972 contract as amended,
the August 1,1990 letter agreement, the January 27, 1993 letter agreement, and the September
29, 2003 agreement as amended on November 26, 2008 for delivery ofpart ofMexico's
Colorado River water entitlements to Tijuana.However,this Agreement constitutes the entire
agreement among the parties regarding the subject matter herein, and any agreements,
documents, or understandings previously entered into,including the aforesaid June 14,1972
contract as amended,shall be superseded by this Agreement.
ARTICLE 20.CONTINGENT UPON APPROPRIATION OR ALLOTMENT OF FUNDS
The expenditure or advance of any money or the performance of any obligation ofthe
United States under this Agreement shall be contingent upon appropriation or allotment of funds.
No liability shall accrue to the United States in case funds are not appropriated or allotted.
ARTICLE 21.NOTICE PROCEDURE
Anynotice, demand, or request provided in this Agreement shall be deemed properly
served,given, or made ifsent by electronic mail, delivered in person, or sent by registered or
certified mail,postage prepaid,to the persons specified below.
28
International Boundary and Water Commission
United States Section
United States Commissioner
4171 N.Mesa
Suite 100,Building C
EI Paso,TX 79902
Bureau ofReclamation
Regional Director
Lower Colorado Region
P.O.Box 61470
Boulder City, NV 89006-1470
Metropolitan Water District ofSouthern California
General Manager
P.O.Box 54153
Los Angeles,CA 90054-0153
officeofthegeneralmanager2(a),rnwdh2o.com
San Diego County Water Authority
General Manager
4677 Overland Ave
San Diego,CA 92123
Otay Water District
General Manager
2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd.
Spring Valley,CA 91978
ARTICLE 22.OFFICIALS NOT TO BENEFIT
No Member of or Delegate to the Congress, Resident Commissioner,or official of
Metropolitan, the Authority, and OWD shall benefit from this Agreement other than as a water
user or landowner in the same manner as other water users or landowners.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto, by their officers thereunto duly authorized,
have executed this Agreement,and this Agreement shall take effect,on the day and year first
above written.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BY:
29
Edward Drusina
Commissioner
United States Section
International Boundary and Water
Commission
United States and Mexico
Terrance J.Fulp,Ph.D.
Regional Director
Lower Colorado Region
U.S.Bureau ofReclamation
Approved as to form:
Katherine Ott Verburg
For the Intermountain Region
Regional Solicitor
THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
By:
Jeffrey Kightlinger
General Manager
Approved as to form:
Marcia L.Scully
General Counsel
SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
By:
Maureen A.Stapleton
General Manager
Approved as to form:
Daniel S.Hentschke
General Counsel
30
By:
Mark Watton
General Manager
Approved as to form:
General Counsel
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
31
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin Koeppen, Finance Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Banking Services Review
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board approve staff’s recommendation to continue the banking
services with Union Bank. Staff will update the banking services
review in 4 years with a pricing review performed in 2 years.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the cost of banking services to ensure the District’s
banking fees are competitive with current market rates.
ANALYSIS:
The Board has requested that staff perform a review of banking
services on a recurring basis, considering the changing economy and
business competition within the banking and financial industries. On
March 5, 2008 and February 3, 2010, staff performed banking services
reviews and in both instances recommended to the Board that the
District maintain its banking services relationship with Union Bank
2
based on their competitive pricing, range of banking services, and
overall highly satisfactory performance. This report presents an
update of staff’s recommendation based on the most recent review of
the District’s banking services.
Staff is recommending the District continue to utilize Union Bank for
its banking services. Based on the analysis performed Union Bank is
the best value and least expensive provider when considering multiple
factors including: annual banking fees, internal costs associated
with changing banks, customer disruption and potential service risks
associated with a banking change. In addition, a change in banking
relationships carries a possibility that the District would need to
look for a new letter of credit when the current letter of credit,
held by Union Bank, expires on June 29, 2017.
QUOTATION PROCESS: Staff requested quotes from six banking
institutions. The table below summarizes the institutions that the
District sought quotes from and a brief statement regarding each
institution’s response:
Institution Response
Union Bank Complete response and quote was
received by the District.
U.S. Bank Complete response and quote was
received by the District.
J.P. Morgan Chase Complete response and quote was
received by the District.
Wells Fargo Bank Declined to quote, but provided
verbal response stating Union
Bank’s fees for services were
competitive with Wells Fargo.
Bank of the West Bank of the West’s policy states
they cannot respond to a request
if a particular service is not
offered by the bank. Bank of the
West does not offer bill
concentration services;
therefore, they were unable to
respond to the request for quote.
Bank of America Did not respond to the request
for quote.
Staff performed the following evaluations of services based on the
responses received from Union Bank, U.S. Bank, and J.P. Morgan Chase.
AVAILABLE SERVICES: Staff performed a review of banking services
offered by each institution to ensure each candidate was able to
3
meet, at a minimum, the District’s current servicing needs. All of
the institutions responding to the District’s request offer services
consistent with those currently being performed by Union Bank. Each
institution provides a full range of banking services including:
account reconciliation, account analysis, lockbox, checking, web
services, wire transfers, availability of funds, payroll, payroll
tax, check fraud, daylight overdraft protection, and debt services.
BANKING FACILITIES: Union Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase both have
physical locations within the District’s boundaries. U.S. Bank’s
nearest physical location is 15 miles from the District’s office.
CURRENT STAFF SATISFACTION: Staff who work with Union Bank on a
repetitive basis were asked if they were dissatisfied or had any
unresolved issues. This included Customer Service, Payroll, Accounts
Payable, Information Technology, and Investment personnel. Responses
were positive as any issues were minor in scope and Union Bank has
been quick to respond and remediate issues as they arise. Staff is
also very pleased with Union Bank’s services and personnel contacts.
BANKING FEES: Staff performed an analysis based on each
institution’s quote to determine their estimated annual fees.
Institution
Estimated
Annual Fees
Union Bank $72,200
U.S. Bank $65,500
J.P. Morgan Chase $148,000
The impact of the Union Bank’s fees and proposed service charges
result in a net annual reduction in banking related fees of
approximately $11,200(14.7%) versus current fees. The reduction is a
result of two main factors. Union Bank has reduced their fee for
armored car services and increased the earnings credit floor from
.25% to .40%, which results in an overall net bank fee reduction of
$3,400 per year. In addition, staff and Union Bank reviewed the
existing services and identified changes to services which would
generate an additional $7,800 in savings. All anticipated savings
are reflected in the estimated annual fees above. Staff has moved
forward with the implementation of identified changes which should be
completed by the end February, 2015. Additionally, the proposed
pricing from Union Bank shall be fixed for a period of four years.
U.S. Bank’s annual fees are estimated to be $65,500 which is $6,700
lower than Union Bank. On a fee basis, U.S. Bank was favorable by
$1,700 per year compared to Union Bank; however, their quote included
an annual transition bonus in the amount of $5,000 to be awarded each
year of the initial contract term and any subsequent contract
4
extension. Pricing would be fixed for the initial contract period.
When combining the costs and risks associated with a banking change
and the possible cost associated with obtaining a new letter of
credit, the $6,700 annual savings did not provide a benefit adequate
enough to justify changing banks.
The main factor causing J.P. Morgan Chase’s annual fees to be greater
than the other institutions were higher fees for lockbox services.
RISK OF CHANGING BANKING SERVICE PROVIDERS: Banking services are
intertwined with many of the financial processes of the District and
require significant efforts to change. Based on the cost quotes,
staff performed additional procedures to assess the costs and risks
associated with a change in banking services including a review of
U.S. Bank’s customer service structure, lockbox operating
environment, and reference contacts. The internal costs to change
banks included internal resources from Finance, Information
Technology and Customer Service. In addition, there were also third
party costs from providers of payment services. The costs of these
items exceeded the fee savings.
Staff also reviewed the internal risks and costs associated with a
banking change including the internal costs of changing banks and the
impact on customers.
No risk assessment was performed on J.P. Morgan Chase due to their
quoted fees being substantially greater than both Union Bank and U.S.
Bank.
ADDITIONAL RISKS: In addition to standard banking services, Union
Bank also provides the District with debt related services including:
trustee, letter of credit, and remarketing. On April 8, 2014, the
Board of Directors approved the extension of the District’s letter of
credit with Union Bank. Under that extension Union Bank reduced the
letter of credit rate by 15 basis points. This rate reduction
reduced the District’s debt service costs by approximately $11,000
per year and is included in this staff report as an example of Union
Bank serving as a good financial partner to the District. It is
typical for banks to give priority access to credit to its own
clients. The District’s letter of credit is a very small credit,
which adds to the limited interest a bank would have in maintaining a
credit with a non-client. If the District were to change banking
services there is the real risk that the District would find itself
looking for a new letter of credit. The current letter of credit
will expire on June 29, 2017 and issuing a new letter of credit is a
costly endeavor. The District’s incurred approximately $150,000 of
costs when a new letter of credit was issued in 2011. At that time,
5
Union Bank was the only bank willing to offer a letter of credit to
the District. The District will be required to have a letter of
credit until the related debt matures in 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The District’s ongoing banking fees would be reduced from the current
annual fees by approximately $11,200. Based on the analysis
performed, staff estimates the total annual banking service fees from
Union Bank to be $72,200.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The District ensures its continue financial health through long-term
financial planning, formalized financial policies, enhanced budget
controls, fair pricing, debt planning, and improved financial
reporting.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A) Committee Action
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Banking Services Review
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on February 18, 2015 and the following comments
were made:
Staff is recommending the District continue banking services with
Union Bank. In addition, staff will review banking services every
4 years with a pricing study performed in 2 years.
In 2008, because of the changing economy and the business
competition within the banking industry, the Board had requested
that staff perform periodic reviews of the District’s banking
services.
Staff performed reviews of the District’s banking services in 2008
and 2010 and recommended that the District continue to utilize Union
Bank.
During this year’s evaluation staff considered the following
items:
o Available services that are meeting the District’s needs
o Banking facilities in relation to the District
o Staff satisfaction
o Banking service fees, including the internal costs of
changing financial institutions
o Risk of changing providers, potential customer disruption and
service risks associated with changing banks
o Debt related services, most notably the District’s Letter of
Credit
Based on these factors staff has determined that Union Bank is the
best value and least expensive provider of banking services.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, staff indicated that
the current pricing agreement with Union Bank is expiring in
February 2015. This new proposed agreement is for fixed pricing
for a term of 4 years.
Director Thompson indicated, for the record, that he owns two (2)
financial institution stocks, Bank of America and City Corp. Bank,
and since neither company is a finalist in the selection process,
the District’s Counsel has confirmed that he has no conflict of
interest with this item.
It was discussed that staff did ask Union Bank if they could get
their total fees down to match U.S. Bank’s pricing and they did
reduce some of their fees and increased the floor of the District’s
earnings credit (interest that the District earns). Staff will
continue to evaluate new services to better leverage technology to
reduce the fees even more.
At the committee’s request, staff indicated that they would ask
Union Bank once again if they could reduce their fees even further.
Staff again negotiated with Union Bank. While Union Bank was unable
to provide any additional fee discount, staff and Union Bank were
able to identify a substitution in the existing services that would
save the District an estimated additional $4,500 per year and reduce
the pricing differential versus U.S. Bank by $1,200.
Following discussion, the Committee supported staff’s recommendation and
presentation to the full board as a consent item.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
PROJECT: DIV. NO. ALL
SUBMITTED BY: Kelli Williamson
Human Resources Manager
APPROVED BY:
Adolfo Segura, Assistant Chief, Admin & IT Services
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPT RESOLUTION #4267 TO REVISE THE POLICY AGAINST
DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE (BOARD
POLICY #47)
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board adopt Resolution #4267 to revise Board Policy #47, Policy
Against Discrimination and Harassment and Complaint Procedure.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see “Attachment A”.
PURPOSE:
To request that the Board adopt Resolution #4267 and approve revisions
to Board Policy #47, Policy Against Discrimination and Harassment and
Complaint Procedure (Attachment C).
ANALYSIS:
Consistent with the District’s Strategic Plan, the District regularly
reviews policies and procedures to ensure they are streamlined and are
clear and consistent with applicable laws.
After consultation with General Counsel, District staff is recommending
revisions to the attached policy. Updates deemed appropriate at this
time are detailed below and revisions are shown in the attached strike-
through versions of the policy (Exhibit 1).
Policy Against Discrimination and Harassment and Complaint Procedure
(Board Policy #47)
Based on recent legislative updates, District staff is recommending minor
revisions to the attached policy to include unpaid interns and volunteers
as protected members.
Based on the above, it is requested that the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution #4267 in support of the proposed revisions.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Optimize the District’s Operating Efficiency.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment A – Committee Action Report
Attachment B – Resolution #4267
Exhibit 1 – Draft Copy, Policy Against Discrimination
and Harassment and Complaint Procedure (Board Policy #47)
Attachment C – Proposed Copy, Policy Against Discrimination and
Harassment and Complaint Procedure (Board Policy #47)
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
ADOPT RESOLUTION #4267 TO REVISE THE POLICY AGAINST
DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE (BOARD
POLICY #47)
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on February 18, 2015 and the following comments
were made:
Staff is requesting that the board approve Resolution No. 4267
revising Board Policy No. 47, Policy Against Discrimination and
Harassment and Complaint Procedure, to include unpaid interns and
volunteers as protected members.
The proposed changes are to update the policy so it is in compliance
with new law that went into effect early this year.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, it was indicated that
the District does not have volunteers or interns at this time, but
it does periodically have interns on staff including the District’s
participation in the CWA Intern Program. It was also noted that
when the District oversaw the Water Conservation Garden, it did
have volunteers on staff working at the Garden.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staff’s recommendation
and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4267
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT TO
REVISE DISTRICT POLICY
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Otay Water District
have established policies, procedures, ordinances, and
resolutions for the efficient operation of the District; and
WHEREAS, it is the policy of the District to establish
procedures to review policies, procedures, ordinances, and
resolutions periodically to ensure they are current and
relevant; and
WHEREAS, District staff has identified Board Policy #47,
Policy Against Discrimination and Harassment and Complaint
Procedure, as requiring revisions as per the attached strike-
through copies.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of
Directors of the Otay Water District amends the Board
Policies indicated above in the form presented to the Board
at this meeting.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of
the Otay Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th of
March, 2015.
__________________________
President
ATTEST:
___________________________
Secretary
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 11/5/14
3/4/15
Page 1 of 6
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to (i) advise all employees, unpaid
interns, and volunteers that the Otay Water District (“District”)
disapproves of and will not tolerate unlawful discrimination or
harassment of its employees, unpaid interns or volunteers, or
retaliation against those who report such behavior, and (ii) set
forth a procedure for investigating and resolving internal
complaints of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.
POLICY
The District is committed to providing a work environment free of
unlawful discrimination, harassment, or retaliation against those
who report discrimination or harassment. Discrimination or
harassment based on sex (including gender, gender identity, gender
expression, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition),
race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, physical or
mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital
status, age, sexual orientation, military or veteran status or any
other basis protected by federal, state or local law is prohibited.
Discrimination or harassment based on the perception that a person
has any of those characteristics, or is associated with a person who
has or is perceived as having any of those characteristics, is
prohibited. Retaliation against any person who complains of
unlawful discrimination or harassment or who provides evidence
relating to such a complaint, is prohibited.
This Policy applies to all terms and conditions of employment,
including, but not limited to: hiring, placement, advancement,
promotion, disciplinary action, layoff, recall, transfer, leave of
absence, compensation and training. It applies to each District
employee, member of the Board of Directors, unpaid interns,
volunteers and to all vendors conducting business with the District.
Similarly, the District will not tolerate discrimination or
harassment by its employees, unpaid interns, or volunteers of non-
employees with whom the District employees, unpaid interns or
volunteers have a business, service or professional relationship.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 11/5/14
3/4/15
Page 2 of 6
The District will also attempt to protect employees, unpaid interns,
and volunteers from harassment by non-employees in the workplace.
DEFINITIONS
Discrimination – Any decision or action that is based on an
individual’s status as a member of a protected class that adversely
affects a District employee, unpaid intern or volunteer, or the
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s work conditions, terms
of employment, or work environment.
Harassment – Any decision or action that is based on a District
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s status as a member of a
protected class, made for the purpose or having the effect of
adversely affecting that employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s
work conditions, terms of employment, or work environment.
Harassment may include, but is not limited to:
Verbal conduct such as epithets, derogatory jokes or
comments, slurs, or unwelcome sexual advances, invitations or
comments;
Visual displays such as derogatory and/or sexually-oriented
posters, photography, cartoons, drawings or gestures;
Physical conduct including assault, unwanted touching,
intentionally blocking normal movement or interfering with
work;
Threats and demands to submit to sexual requests as a
condition of continued employment or to avoid an adverse
consequence, and offers of employment benefits in return for
sexual favors.
Such conduct constitutes harassment when (1) submission to the
conduct is made either an explicit or implicit condition of
employment; (2) submission or rejection of the conduct is used as
the basis for an employment decision; or (3) the harassment
interferes with an employee’s work performance or creates an
intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 11/5/14
3/4/15
Page 3 of 6
Protected Class – Any class of persons who share a common sex ,
race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, physical or
mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital
status, age, sexual orientation, military or veteran status or any
other “protected class” recognized by federal, state or local laws.
For purposes of this definition, “sex” includes gender, gender
identity, gender expression, pregnancy, childbirth, or a pregnancy-
or childbirth-related medical condition.
Retaliation – Any decision or action that is based on the fact that
a District employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer has previously
complained of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation prohibited
by this Policy (regardless of whether a formal complaint has been
made) or has provided evidence in the investigation of another
District employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s complaint under
this Policy, made for the purpose of adversely affecting the
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s conditions of
employment, terms of employment, or work environment.
Sexual Harassment – A form of harassment that is based on an
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s gender but which
objectively and subjectively creates an adverse impact on the
employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer regardless of the purpose or
intent of the alleged harasser.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
An employee, unpaid intern, volunteer, or job applicant who believes
he or she has been the victim of discrimination, harassment, or
retaliation by a District employee, a member of the Board of
Directors, or a vendor may make a complaint verbally, or in writing
by completing the District’s Discrimination and Harassment Complaint
Form. An employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer may make a complaint
to any of the following:
Human Resources;
Any supervisor, manager, Assistant Department Chief,
Department Chief, Assistant General Manager, or General
Manager;
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 11/5/14
3/4/15
Page 4 of 6
Complaints against the General Manager should be directed to
the President of the Board of Directors.
Applicants may make a complaint to any of the following:
Human Resources or;
General Manager.
Any person described above shall forward each written discrimination
complaint to the General Manager or designee immediately of
receiving the complaint or having knowledge of the complaint. If a
complaint is made verbally, the person receiving the complaint shall
notify Human Resources immediately.
Every reported complaint of discrimination, harassment or
retaliation will be investigated thoroughly and promptly. If any
manager, supervisor, Assistant Department Chief, Department Chief,
or Assistant General Manager becomes aware of or suspects
discrimination, harassment, or retaliation against a District
employee, unpaid intern, volunteer, or applicant, or any allegation
thereof, he/she must immediately notify the Human Resources Manager
of the relevant facts and circumstances.
The General Manager or designee may conduct the investigation of
alleged discrimination, harassment, or retaliation, or may delegate
responsibility for the investigation to another District management
employee. If the complaint is against the General Manager, the
President of the Board of Directors shall be responsible for
conducting the investigation, assigning another management employee,
or outside investigator and overseeing the investigation. If the
complaint is against the Board of Directors, the General Manager
shall be responsible for contracting with an outside investigator to
conduct the investigation. The Board will take appropriate action
based on the findings.
During its investigation, the District shall take appropriate steps
to protect the privacy of all parties involved. However, this shall
not be construed to justify refusing to inform a person who has been
accused of violating this Policy of the identity of the complainant
and witnesses against him/her. Reports of discrimination,
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 11/5/14
3/4/15
Page 5 of 6
harassment, or retaliation may not be made anonymously, but
information regarding any report and subsequent investigation will
be disseminated on a “need to know” basis.
In the event that an investigation will take longer than 60 calendar
days to complete, the investigator must notify the complainant of
this fact prior to the expiration of 60 days and provide an
anticipated completion date, in writing.
If a finding is made that discrimination, harassment, or retaliation
has occurred, the District shall take remedial action appropriate to
the circumstances, which may include disciplinary action up to and
including termination for an employee, separation from the
internship or volunteer opportunity for an unpaid intern or
volunteer who has violated this Policy, or sanctions for a vendor
who has violated this Policy.
Every District employee, unpaid intern, and volunteer has a duty to
participate in good faith in any investigation conducted under this
Policy. Failure to participate in good faith is a ground for
disciplinary action appropriate to the circumstances. All
employees, unpaid interns, and volunteers are encouraged to report
in good faith discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. The
District will not tolerate retaliation against any employee, unpaid
intern, or volunteer making a good faith complaint of
discrimination, harassment or retaliation, or for cooperating in an
investigation. However, reports made maliciously or in bad faith
may subject an employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer to disciplinary
action appropriate to the circumstances up to and including
termination or separation from the internship or volunteer
opportunity.
The action of making a complaint does not preclude a complainant
from filing a complaint with the appropriate State or Federal
agency. For information as to where to file a claim, an employee
may contact the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission at
www.eeoc.gov or(213) 894-1000 or the Department of Fair Employment
and Housing at www.dfeh.ca.gov or(800) 884-1684.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 11/5/14
3/4/15
Page 6 of 6
POLICY HISTORY
Human Resources Policy and Procedure, Effective August 4, 1993.
Board Policy adopted October 11, 2005.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 3/4/15
Page 1 of 5
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to (i) advise all employees, unpaid
interns, and volunteers that the Otay Water District (“District”)
disapproves of and will not tolerate unlawful discrimination or
harassment of its employees, unpaid interns or volunteers, or
retaliation against those who report such behavior, and (ii) set
forth a procedure for investigating and resolving internal
complaints of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation.
POLICY
The District is committed to providing a work environment free of
unlawful discrimination, harassment, or retaliation against those
who report discrimination or harassment. Discrimination or
harassment based on sex (including gender, gender identity, gender
expression, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition),
race, color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, physical or
mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital
status, age, sexual orientation, military or veteran status or any
other basis protected by federal, state or local law is prohibited.
Discrimination or harassment based on the perception that a person
has any of those characteristics, or is associated with a person who
has or is perceived as having any of those characteristics, is
prohibited. Retaliation against any person who complains of
unlawful discrimination or harassment or who provides evidence
relating to such a complaint, is prohibited.
This Policy applies to all terms and conditions of employment,
including, but not limited to: hiring, placement, advancement,
promotion, disciplinary action, layoff, recall, transfer, leave of
absence, compensation and training. It applies to each District
employee, member of the Board of Directors, unpaid interns,
volunteers and to all vendors conducting business with the District.
Similarly, the District will not tolerate discrimination or
harassment by its employees, unpaid interns, or volunteers of non-
employees with whom the District employees, unpaid interns or
volunteers have a business, service or professional relationship.
The District will also attempt to protect employees, unpaid interns,
and volunteers from harassment by non-employees in the workplace.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 3/4/15
Page 2 of 5
DEFINITIONS
Discrimination – Any decision or action that is based on an
individual’s status as a member of a protected class that adversely
affects a District employee, unpaid intern or volunteer, or the
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s work conditions, terms
of employment, or work environment.
Harassment – Any decision or action that is based on a District
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s status as a member of a
protected class, made for the purpose or having the effect of
adversely affecting that employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s
work conditions, terms of employment, or work environment.
Harassment may include, but is not limited to:
Verbal conduct such as epithets, derogatory jokes or
comments, slurs, or unwelcome sexual advances, invitations or
comments;
Visual displays such as derogatory and/or sexually-oriented
posters, photography, cartoons, drawings or gestures;
Physical conduct including assault, unwanted touching,
intentionally blocking normal movement or interfering with
work;
Threats and demands to submit to sexual requests as a
condition of continued employment or to avoid an adverse
consequence, and offers of employment benefits in return for
sexual favors.
Such conduct constitutes harassment when (1) submission to the
conduct is made either an explicit or implicit condition of
employment; (2) submission or rejection of the conduct is used as
the basis for an employment decision; or (3) the harassment
interferes with an employee’s work performance or creates an
intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.
Protected Class – Any class of persons who share a common sex, race,
color, religious creed, national origin, ancestry, physical or
mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital
status, age, sexual orientation, military or veteran status or any
other “protected class” recognized by federal, state or local laws.
For purposes of this definition, “sex” includes gender, gender
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 3/4/15
Page 3 of 5
identity, gender expression, pregnancy, childbirth, or a pregnancy-
or childbirth-related medical condition.
Retaliation – Any decision or action that is based on the fact that
a District employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer has previously
complained of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation prohibited
by this Policy (regardless of whether a formal complaint has been
made) or has provided evidence in the investigation of another
District employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s complaint under
this Policy, made for the purpose of adversely affecting the
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s conditions of
employment, terms of employment, or work environment.
Sexual Harassment – A form of harassment that is based on an
employee’s, unpaid intern’s, or volunteer’s gender but which
objectively and subjectively creates an adverse impact on the
employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer regardless of the purpose or
intent of the alleged harasser.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
An employee, unpaid intern, volunteer, or job applicant who believes
he or she has been the victim of discrimination, harassment, or
retaliation by a District employee, a member of the Board of
Directors, or a vendor may make a complaint verbally, or in writing
by completing the District’s Discrimination and Harassment Complaint
Form. An employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer may make a complaint
to any of the following:
Human Resources;
Any supervisor, manager, Assistant Department Chief,
Department Chief, Assistant General Manager, or General
Manager;
Complaints against the General Manager should be directed to
the President of the Board of Directors.
Applicants may make a complaint to any of the following:
Human Resources or;
General Manager.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 3/4/15
Page 4 of 5
Any person described above shall forward each written discrimination
complaint to the General Manager or designee immediately of
receiving the complaint or having knowledge of the complaint. If a
complaint is made verbally, the person receiving the complaint shall
notify Human Resources immediately.
Every reported complaint of discrimination, harassment or
retaliation will be investigated thoroughly and promptly. If any
manager, supervisor, Assistant Department Chief, Department Chief,
or Assistant General Manager becomes aware of or suspects
discrimination, harassment, or retaliation against a District
employee, unpaid intern, volunteer, or applicant, or any allegation
thereof, he/she must immediately notify the Human Resources Manager
of the relevant facts and circumstances.
The General Manager or designee may conduct the investigation of
alleged discrimination, harassment, or retaliation, or may delegate
responsibility for the investigation to another District management
employee. If the complaint is against the General Manager, the
President of the Board of Directors shall be responsible for
conducting the investigation, assigning another management employee,
or outside investigator and overseeing the investigation. If the
complaint is against the Board of Directors, the General Manager
shall be responsible for contracting with an outside investigator to
conduct the investigation. The Board will take appropriate action
based on the findings.
During its investigation, the District shall take appropriate steps
to protect the privacy of all parties involved. However, this shall
not be construed to justify refusing to inform a person who has been
accused of violating this Policy of the identity of the complainant
and witnesses against him/her. Reports of discrimination,
harassment, or retaliation may not be made anonymously, but
information regarding any report and subsequent investigation will
be disseminated on a “need to know” basis.
In the event that an investigation will take longer than 60 calendar
days to complete, the investigator must notify the complainant of
this fact prior to the expiration of 60 days and provide an
anticipated completion date, in writing.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY
Subject: POLICY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION AND
HARASSMENT AND COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Policy
Number
Date
Adopted
Date
Revised
47 10/11/05 3/4/15
Page 5 of 5
If a finding is made that discrimination, harassment, or retaliation
has occurred, the District shall take remedial action appropriate to
the circumstances, which may include disciplinary action up to and
including termination for an employee, separation from the
internship or volunteer opportunity for an unpaid intern or
volunteer who has violated this Policy, or sanctions for a vendor
who has violated this Policy.
Every District employee, unpaid intern, and volunteer has a duty to
participate in good faith in any investigation conducted under this
Policy. Failure to participate in good faith is a ground for
disciplinary action appropriate to the circumstances. All
employees, unpaid interns, and volunteers are encouraged to report
in good faith discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. The
District will not tolerate retaliation against any employee, unpaid
intern, or volunteer making a good faith complaint of
discrimination, harassment or retaliation, or for cooperating in an
investigation. However, reports made maliciously or in bad faith
may subject an employee, unpaid intern, or volunteer to disciplinary
action appropriate to the circumstances up to and including
termination or separation from the internship or volunteer
opportunity.
The action of making a complaint does not preclude a complainant
from filing a complaint with the appropriate State or Federal
agency. For information as to where to file a claim, an employee
may contact the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission at
www.eeoc.gov or(213) 894-1000 or the Department of Fair Employment
and Housing at www.dfeh.ca.gov or(800) 884-1684.
POLICY HISTORY
Human Resources Policy and Procedure, Effective August 4, 1993.
Board Policy adopted October 11, 2005.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Rita Bell, Finance Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Resolutions of Intention to Consolidate Water Improvement
Districts (IDs) 1,2,3,5,7,9,10 and 20 into ID 22 and Sewer IDs
4 and 14 into ID 18; Authorizing Advertising of these
Resolutions as Required by the both the Water and Government
Codes; Obtain Approval of Proposition 218 Availability Fee
Change Notices; and Direct Staff to Mail Notices
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board approve the attached Resolutions of Intention, Nos.
4247, 4248, 4249, 4250, 4251, 4252, 4253 and 4254, 4255, and 4256
that are necessary to initiate the process for the exclusion of
parcels within Water Improvement Districts (IDs) 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10
and 20, and Sewer IDs 4 and 14. Concurrent with said action, that
the Board also approve the attached Resolutions of Intention, Nos.
4257, 4258, 4259, 4260, 4261, 4262, 4263, 4264, 4265 and 4266 that
are necessary to initiate the process for the annexation of the
excluded parcels in Water IDs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20 and Sewer
IDs 4 and 14 into Water ID 22 and Sewer ID 18, respectively.
Approve the attached Proposition 218 notices of the public hearing
with proposed changes in availability fees for water and sewer
customers and direct staff to mail notices.
PURPOSE:
That the Board authorize and initiate the process for the exclusion
of parcels within Improvement Districts Water (IDs) 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10 and 20 and Sewer IDs 4 and 14 to be annexed into Water ID 22 and
Sewer 18, respectively.
Authorize staff to advertise as required by Government Code Section
6066, the attached Resolutions of Intention 4257, 4258, 4259, 4260,
4261, 4262, 4263, 4264, 4265, and 4266 for a period of two weeks.
Once this requirement has been met, a second set of resolutions will
be presented to confirm the exclusions and annexations. Direct staff
to submit the appropriate maps to the County of San Diego that would
exclude parcels within Water IDs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, and 20 and
Sewer IDs 4 and 14 to be annexed into Water ID 22 and Sewer ID 18,
respectively. A subsequent action will request that Water IDs 1, 2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20 and Sewer IDs 4 and 14 be dissolved effective
July 1, 2015.
In compliance with the Proposition 218 requirements, notices will
sent to all owners of record to inform them of their option to
protest the availability rate changes. (Note: Only 121 parcels
within ID 1 and 9 parcels within ID 5 will see a change to their
availability fee assessed on the tax roll.) The required public
hearing is set for the May 6, 2015 Board Meeting where the Board will
be able to consider protests.
ID Parcels
Water 1 6,631
Water 2 965
Water 3 2,389
Water 5 1,066
Water 7 991
Water 9 1,810
Water 10 4,232
Water 20 5,552
Sewer 4 365
Sewer 14 1,148
Total 25,149
BACKGROUND:
History:
Improvement Districts were originally created by the District for the
purpose of obtaining the lowest cost funding possible for projects
and they were not intended to separate customers by geographical area
for any other reason than securing debt. With the passage of
Proposition 13 in 1978, creating IDs for the purpose of issuing debt
became an obsolete financing tool because it requires a two thirds
vote by the people to put debt on the tax roll. Once the existing
debt for each ID was paid there was no other reason to maintain
separate IDs. A 1992 Capital Projects Financing Study by Fieldman,
Rolapp & Associates recognized that the District could annex all
areas of the Otay Water District into one overall ID.
Today, the only fees collected by ID are the water and sewer
availability fees. Current legislation (Water Code Section 71631.6)
provides that amounts in excess of $10 shall only be used for the
original purpose of such improvement district. Research revealed the
original purpose of each ID was for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water or sewer improvements and works. The payment of
debt was made for the slated purpose. Therefore, as long as the
restricted portion of the availability fees goes to this purpose,
there is no ongoing reason to keep these funds separate to be in
compliance with Water Code Section 71631.6.
In addition to the above mentioned IDs, there is one ID (27) that is
associated with General Obligation bonds. ID 27 is independent from
all of the other IDs. It has a geographic area defined by those
customers served by the 624-3 30mg reservoir. Each year, the Board
sets a tax rate via a resolution for ID 27 and the county adds this
to the tax role based on the assessed valuation. In 2023 when the
debt is paid off ID 27 will no longer be required. Currently, all of
ID 27 resides in ID 22, but not all of ID 22 is in ID 27. No change
is recommended for ID 27 at this time.
Availability Fees:
Currently, all IDs have the same availability fee of $10 per parcel
or $30 per acre except for Water IDs 1 and 5 which charge $10 per
parcel or $10 per acre for parcels over one acre. Similarly, all IDs
except IDs 1 and 5 have exemptions for items such as easements,
agricultural reserves, flood plains, and slopes exceeding 30%. Staff
researched the variances and could find no other reason why the fees
are different.
The difference in fees and exemptions can lead to inequity between
parcels in different IDs. For example, the District’s administration
building is in ID 1 and the operations building is in ID 20. If
these parcels were owned by a private business instead of the
District, the availability fee for the administration building would
be $10 per acre and the fee for the operations building would be $30
per acre, yet the services and benefits available to these two
parcels are the same. A consolidation will eliminate the differences
in fees. On May 7, 2013, the Board approved a similar consolidation
process for IDs 19 and 25 into IDs 22 and 20 without protest.
ANALYSIS:
Because there are no specific rules for water and sewer to perform a
consolidation, parcels must detach from their existing ID and be
attached or annexed into the new ID. The annexing into the new ID is
considered a new fee for the affected parcels and therefore, a
Proposition 218 hearing is required. For all but 131 parcels in IDs
1 and 5, there is no change to their availability fees.
Notices of a Proposition 218 hearing will be mailed to 22,730 owners
of parcels within IDs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20 and to 1,436 sewer
owners of parcels within IDs 4 and 14. The estimated cost to print
and mail the notices is $7,491.
Because the District maintains separate IDs the tracking and
accounting causes an unnecessary complexity. This consolidation will
mainly benefit CIP Project managers, Finance staff, and IT staff, by
reducing the 9 Water and 3 Sewer IDs down to one ID each for water
and sewer. Staff has identified savings of 118 hours annually should
the ID consolidation happen. The estimated savings in labor,
benefits, and overhead is $17,057. While this savings may not be
realized immediately in reduced labor costs it does pave the way for
labor savings to be realized sooner, and also allows staff
productivity to increase.
With the consolidation of IDs this will simplify the interaction with
other agencies such as LAFCO, the State Board of Equalization, and
the County Assessor and Auditors office. This will allow agencies
such as the County’s Auditors office to eliminate unnecessary funds,
simplifying their accounting systems.
This action is the first of two necessary steps to complete this
consolidation. Once the exclusion and annexation are initiated by the
Board, staff will publish the resolutions as required by statute and
then the Board will have the ability to confirm the exclusion and
annexation at a subsequent meeting. The exclusion will then become
effective on the 31st day after completion of the publication and
posting of the resolutions to exclude. The annexations become
effective after the date of the adoption of the resolutions approving
the annexation.
The availability charges and water rates and charges are identical
for all IDs except 1 and 5. There are 80 parcels that are larger than
one acre in ID 1. (Staff has identified 7 parcels that may qualify
for an exemption and will be sending a letter to the owners). If
none of these parcels qualify for the new exemptions as allowed in
other IDs, then these parcels would pay a combined total of $6,458 in
additional availability fees annually. In ID 5 there are 9 parcels
larger than one acre and their estimated increase in fees would be
$376 annually.
Because the proposed consolidation technically imposes a “new” charge
on customers, in compliance with the Proposition 218 requirements,
notices will be sent to all owners of record within these IDs to
inform them of their option to protest rate changes. The required
public hearing will take place at the May 6, 2015 Board meeting
where, if after the Board determines there is not a majority protest
for any of the IDs, the Board can vote to complete the consolidation
of the IDs.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
It is estimated that there will be savings to the District of 118
staff hours estimated at a cost of $17,057. Additionally, the
increase in the availability fees collected in IDs 1 and 5 would be
approximately $6,834 should none of the parcels quality for the newly
allowed exemptions for these parcels.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Through well-established financial policies and wise management of
funds, the District will continue to guarantee fiscal responsibility
to its ratepayers and the community at large.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A) Committee Action
B) Water ID Consolidation Map
C) Sewer ID Consolidation Map
D) Resolution No. 4247
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 1
E) Resolution No. 4248
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 2
F) Resolution No. 4249
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 3
G) Resolution No. 4250
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 5
H) Resolution No. 4251
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 7
I) Resolution No. 4252
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 9
J) Resolution No. 4253
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 10
K) Resolution No. 4254
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 20
L) Resolution No. 4255
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 4
M) Resolution No. 4256
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 14
N) Resolution No. 4257
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 1
O) Resolution No. 4258
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 2
P) Resolution No. 4259
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 3
Q) Resolution No. 4260
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 5
R) Resolution No. 4261
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 7
S) Resolution No. 4262
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 9
T) Resolution No. 4263
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 10
U) Resolution No. 4264
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 20
V) Resolution No. 4265
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 4
W) Resolution No. 4266
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 14
X) Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 1
Y) Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 2
Z) Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 3
AA)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 5
BB)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 7
CC)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 9
DD)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 10
EE)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 20
FF)Proposition 218 Notice Sewer ID 4
GG)Proposition 218 Notice Sewer ID 14
HH)Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Resolutions of Intention to Consolidate Water Improvement
Districts (IDs) 1,2,3,5,7,9,10 and 20 into ID 22 and Sewer
IDs 4 and 14 into ID 18; Authorizing Advertising of these
Resolutions as Required by the both the Water and
Government Codes; Obtain Approval of Proposition 218
Availability Fee Change Notices; and Direct Staff to Mail
Notices
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on February 18, 2015 and the following comments
were made:
Staff is requesting that the board approve the consolidation of
water and sewer Improvement Districts (IDs). Currently, the
District has 9 water IDs and staff is recommending that water ID’s
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20, be consolidated into ID 22. The
District also has 3 sewer IDs and is recommending that IDs 4 and
14 be consolidated into ID 18.
The IDs were originally created by the District as a means to
obtain the lowest cost of funding for projects. With the passage
of Proposition 13 in 1978 this financing mechanism became obsolete
as it now requires a 2/3 vote to place an item on the tax roll.
The existing debt for these IDs have been paid off, thus, the IDs
are no longer needed as they no longer serve a purpose.
To consolidate IDs, parcels within an existing ID must be detached
from the ID and annexed into the new ID. The process requires
that the District first declare and publish resolutions of
intention to detach and annex and then confirm the detachments and
annexations.
Staff will be requesting that the Board declare its intention to
detach and annex the parcels within the identified IDs at the March
4, 2015 board meeting. At the May 6, 2015 board meeting, staff
will be requesting that the board take action to confirm the
detachments and annexations.
Staff indicated that all the debt has been paid off within the IDs
and the only impact to the parcels is availability fees.
Currently, the District charges for all IDs, with the exception of
IDs 1 and 5, $10 per parcel or $30 per acre with exemptions for
parcels located in flood plains or with slopes exceeding 30%. The
fee for IDs 1 and 5 is $10 per parcel or $10 per acre with no
exemptions.
The availability fees for IDs 1 and 5 will be changed to match all
other IDs; $10 per parcel or $30 per acre with exemptions for
parcels located in flood plains or with slopes exceeding 30%. This
change will make all fees the same and bring equity among
customers.
Staff noted that there are 80 parcels in ID 1 which will be impacted
by the change in the availability fee and 7 of these parcels may
qualify for the exemptions. There are also 9 parcels in ID 5 that
will be impacted by the change.
In order to consolidate the IDs, the District will need to have a
Proposition 218 hearing as the availability fee is considered a
“new” fee, even if it is the same as the old fee, when they are
annexed into the new ID.
Staff is proposing that a hearing be held at the May 6, 2015 board
meeting.
The District will mail Proposition 218 notices to all 25,149
parcels affected by the consolidation. The notices must be mailed
to residents within the affected IDs 45 days prior to the hearing
on May 6.
Staff indicated that the benefits by consolidating the IDs include:
o Reduces the number of IDs from 9 water and 3 sewer to one ID
each.
o Reduces staff time by 118 hours annually (a savings of $17,000
in labor and benefits annually).
o Simplifies interaction with outside agencies (SD County
Assessor’s Office, State Board of Equalization, LAFCO, etc.),
customers, and internally.
o Streamlines accounting, tracking and mapping within the
District.
o Supports the District Strategic Plan goals, such as,
streamlining the District’s reserve accounting for IDs. The
District will no longer need to keep reserves for each ID.
Staff presented maps showing the location of each of the impacted
water and sewer IDs within the District’s service area and a map
showing IDs 22 and 18 once all the IDs are consolidated (see
attached copy of presentation).
Staff noted that the District will still need to track if a parcel
is within the water or sewer ID as the fees may vary, especially
on the sewer side as the capacity fee is different based on whether
the customer was in the ID and paid or was outside an ID and has
not paid their share of the sewer debt.
In response to another inquiry from the committee, staff indicated
that last year when the rate increase notices were forwarded to
the District’s customers, the District received approximately 35
calls concerning the rate increase notices (none were regarding
the ID consolidations). It was noted that the largest customer
impacted by the ID consolidations would receive an increase of
approximately $800 on his/her property tax bill.
Staff indicated for those parcels not receiving water or sewer
services, the owner could sign an agreement with the District to
waive the availability fee charges to their property for 10 years.
However, the customer would need to warrant that they will not
develop/require water to the property during the 10-year agreement
period. It was stated that some parcel owners do execute this
agreement with the District.
Staff indicated in response to another inquiry from the committee,
that those parcels already in ID 22 would not receive a notice,
however, because the District is required to publish notices within
the ID, they may see the notices at various locations within ID22
(libraries, fire station, etc.) or on the District’s website.
Staff also noted that customers with more than one parcel within
an impacted ID will receive one notice only.
The committee suggested that the verbiage within the Proposition
218 notices be changed so it states in bold lettering something to
the effect of, “…the new fee that will be imposed is identical to
the eliminated fee.” It was also suggested for the 80 parcels
larger than 1 acre in ID 1, that a cover letter be provided along
with the Proposition 218 notice, explaining the increase in their
availability fee.
It was discussed that there will be two water IDs (IDs 22 and 27)
remaining after the water IDs are consolidated; ID 27 is a subset
of ID 22. Once the GO bonds are paid off in 2023 for ID 27, the
ID will also be eliminated leaving only ID 22 for water.
Following discussion, the Committee supported staff’s recommendation
and presentation to the full board as an action item.
OTAY WATER DISTRICTCONSOLIDATION OF WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
P:
\
D
R
A
F
T
I
N
G
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
\
I
n
f
o
f
o
r
O
t
h
e
r
s
\
O
W
D
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
\
W
a
t
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
W
a
t
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ905 ÃÅ905
§¨¦8
§¨¦805
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
1 1
2
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SAN
DIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ54
SAN
DIEGO
MEXICO
3
7
9
20
2
3
1
10
22
20
2
10
5
3
1
10
1
5
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Improvement District 1
Improvement District 2
Improvement District 3
Improvement District 5
Improvement District 7
Improvement District 9
Improvement District 10
Improvement District 20
Improvement District 22
Non-Annexed Areas
FEBRUARY 2015
EXISTING WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ905 ÃÅ905
§¨¦8
§¨¦805
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SAN
DIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ54
SAN
DIEGO
MEXICO
22
22
10
22
10
PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION OFWATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Improvement District 22 (Consolidated)
Non-Annexed Areas
0 21
Miles
F
0 21
Miles
F
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
E. H Street
Lyons Val
l
e
y
R
d
Hillsdale Rd
Olympic
P
k
w
y
Otay Mesa Rd
Airway Rd
Ca
c
t
u
s
R
d
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
E. H Street
Lyons Vall
e
y
R
d
Hillsdale Rd
Olympic
P
k
w
y
Otay Mesa Rd
Airway Rd
Ca
c
t
u
s
R
d
Otay Lakes Rd Otay Lakes Rd
OTAY WATER DISTRICTCONSOLIDATION OF SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
P:
\
D
R
A
F
T
I
N
G
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
\
I
n
f
o
f
o
r
O
t
h
e
r
s
\
O
W
D
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
\
S
e
w
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
S
e
w
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ94
§¨¦8
EL CAJON
JAMUL
18
18
14
18
4
4
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
Hillsd
a
l
e
R
d
Av
o
c
a
d
o
B
l
v
d
Fury Lane
C
h
a
s
e
A
v
e
Jamach
a
B
l
v
d
4
18
18
1818
18
18
Willow Gl
e
n
D
r
Wi
l
l
o
w
G
l
e
n
D
r
Dehes
a
R
d
Sw
e
e
t
w
a
t
e
r
Sp
r
i
n
g
s
B
l
v
d
St
e
e
l
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
Fur
y
L
a
n
e
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Sewer Improvement District 4
Sewer Improvement District 14
Sewer Improvement District 18
Non-Annexed Sewer Areas
FEBRUARY 2015
EXISTING SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
0 0.50.25
Miles
F^_
VICINITY MAP
NTS
?ò
Aä%&s
?Ë
F
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SANDIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
SANDIEGO MEXICO
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ94
§¨¦8
EL CAJON
JAMUL
18
18
18
18
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
Hillsd
a
l
e
R
d
Av
o
c
a
d
o
B
l
v
d
Fury Lane
C
h
a
s
e
A
v
e
Jamach
a
B
l
v
d
18
18
18
18
18
18
Willow Gl
e
n
D
r
Wi
l
l
o
w
G
l
e
n
D
r
Dehes
a
R
d
Sw
e
e
t
w
a
t
e
r
Sp
r
i
n
g
s
B
l
v
d
St
e
e
l
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
Fur
y
L
a
n
e
PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION OFSEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
^_
VICINITY MAP
NTS
?ò
Aä%&s
?Ë
F
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SANDIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
SANDIEGO MEXICO
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Sewer Improvement District 18 (Consolidated)
Non-Annexed Sewer Areas
0 0.50.25
Miles
F
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4247
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1
WHEREAS, on January 27th, 1958 by Resolution No. 32, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 1 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 1 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 80 parcels larger than one acre in ID 1
for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 1 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 1 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 1, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
Attachment D
2
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 1 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 1 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 1 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 1, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 1 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 1, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 1 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 1 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 1 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4247
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,177 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4248
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2
WHEREAS, on June 17th, 1958 by Resolution No. 40, the Otay Water District Board of
Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 2 for the purpose of incurring necessary
bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and completion of water improvements
and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction, and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 2 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate these
parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 2 into ID 22 it would streamline
the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to exclude
parcels in ID 2 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye towards annexing
the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its intention
to exclude parcels within ID 2, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 2 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment E
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 2 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 2 will not be levied upon taxable property
in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 2, is on file with the Secretary of the
District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said map shall
govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and the
effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 2 and the territory to be excluded. At
such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning property in the Otay
Water District or in ID 2, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude pursuant to
and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water
District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 2 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 2 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 2 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4248
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 4,073 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4249
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3
WHEREAS, on November 18th, 1958 by Resolution No. 51, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 3 for the purpose of incurring
necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and completion of water
improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction, and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 3 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate these
parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 3 into ID 22 it would streamline
the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to exclude
parcels in ID 3 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye towards annexing
the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its intention
to exclude parcels within ID 3, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 3 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment F
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 3 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 3 will not be levied upon taxable property
in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 3, is on file with the Secretary of the
District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said map shall
govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and the
effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 3 and the territory to be excluded. At
such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning property in the Otay
Water District or in ID 3, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude pursuant to
and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water
District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 3 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 3 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 3 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4249
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,907 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4250
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5
WHEREAS, on November 28th, 1960 by Resolution No. 123, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 5 for the purpose
of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 5 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 9 parcels larger than one acre in ID 5
for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 5 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 5 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 5, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
Attachment G
2
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 5 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 5 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 5 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 5, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 5 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 5, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 5 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 5 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 5 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4250
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 487 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4251
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7
WHEREAS, on March 27th, 1961 by Resolution No. 142, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 7 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 7 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 7 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 7 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 7, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 7 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment H
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 7 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 7 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 7, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 7 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 7, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 7 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 7 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 7 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4251
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,622 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4252
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9
WHEREAS, on July 24th, 1961 by Resolution No. 153, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 9 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 9 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 9 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 9 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 9, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 9 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment I
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 9 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 9 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 9, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 9 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 9, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 9 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 9 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 9 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4252
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,075 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4253
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10
WHEREAS, on February 11th, 1963 by Resolution No. 266, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 10 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction
and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 10 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 10 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 10 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 10, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 10 will not be levied
upon taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment J
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 10 and, therefore, taxes for the payment
of principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 10 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 10, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 10 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 10, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 10 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 10 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 10
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4253
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,007 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4254
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20
WHEREAS, on April 19th, 1971 by Resolution No. 874, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 20 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 20 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 20 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 20 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 20, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 20 will not be levied
upon taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment K
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 20 and, therefore, taxes for the payment
of principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 20 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 20, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 20 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 20, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 20 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 20 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 20
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4254
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 6,859 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4255
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4
WHEREAS, on August 4th, 1959 by Resolution No. 83, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 4 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 4 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 4 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 4 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 18; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 4, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 4 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment L
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 4 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 4 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 4, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 4 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 4, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 4 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 4 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED
INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 4 INTO
EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4255
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 348 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4256
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14
WHEREAS, on June 10th, 1968 by Resolution No. 586, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 14 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 14 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 14 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 14 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 18; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 14, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 14 will not be levied
upon taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment M
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 14 and, therefore, taxes for the payment
of principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 14 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 14, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 14 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 14, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 14 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 14 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 14
INTO EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4256
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 644 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4257
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on January 27th, 1958 by Resolution No. 32, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 1 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 1 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 80 parcels larger than one acre in ID 1
for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 1 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 1, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 1, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 1, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
Attachment N
Page 2 of 3
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 1 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
Page 3 of 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 1 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 1 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 1 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4257
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,177 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4258
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on June 17th, 1958 by Resolution No. 40, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 2 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 2 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 2 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 2, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 2, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 2, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment O
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 2 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 2 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 2 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 2 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4258
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 4,073 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4259
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on November 18th, 1958 by Resolution No. 51, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 3 for the purpose
of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 3 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 3 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 3, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 3, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 3, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment P
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 3 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 3 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 3 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 3 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4259
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,907 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4260
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on November 28th, 1960 by Resolution No. 123, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 5 for the purpose
of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 5 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 9 parcels larger than one acre in ID 5
for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 5 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 5, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 5, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 5, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
Attachment Q
Page 2 of 3
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 5 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
Page 3 of 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 5 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 5 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 5 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4260
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 487 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4261
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on March 27th, 1961 by Resolution No. 142, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 7 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 7 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 7 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 7, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 7, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 7, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment R
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 7 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 7 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 7 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 7 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4261
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,622 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4262
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on July 24th, 1961 by Resolution No. 153, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 9 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 9 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 9 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 9, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 9, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 9, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment S
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 9 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 9 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 9 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 9 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4262
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,075 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4263
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on February 11th, 1963 by Resolution No. 266, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 10 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction
and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 10 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 10 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 10, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 10, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 10, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels
in IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the
Otay Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment T
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 10 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 10 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 10 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 10
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4263
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,007 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4264
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on April 19th, 1971 by Resolution No. 874, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 20 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 20 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 20 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 20, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 20, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 20, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels
in IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the
Otay Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment U
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 20 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 20 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 20 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 20
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4264
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 6,859 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4265
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18
WHEREAS, on August 4th, 1959 by Resolution No. 83, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 4 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 4 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 4 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 4, if approved, into ID 18, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 4, if
approved, into ID 18, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 4, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment V
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 4 and 18 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment C filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 4 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 4 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED
INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 4 INTO
EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4265
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 348 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4266
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18
WHEREAS, on June 10th, 1968 by Resolution No. 586, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 14 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 14 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 14 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 14, if approved, into ID 18, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 14, if
approved, into ID 18, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 14, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels
in IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the
Otay Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment W
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 14 and 18 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment C filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 14 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 14 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 14
INTO EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4266
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 644 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 1 (ID‐1) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
For parcels less than one acre, the fees in ID‐1, where properƟes are being excluded, are idenƟcal to the fees in
ID‐22, where properƟes are being annexed. Annexing ID‐1 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng
and administraƟon currently required. The exclusion of territory from ID‐1 and annexaƟon to ID‐22 will increase the
water availability fees for 80 parcels that are larger than 1 acre. The change would make the fees consistent with all
other parcels in IDs within the Otay Water District boundaries.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐1 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐1 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 1 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐1 for parcels less than 1 acre. Oral comments at the public hearing will not
qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen
protests against the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or
customers of record of the idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be
authorized to adopt the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐1 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
1 $10.00 $10.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment X
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 2 (ID‐2) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐2 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐2 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐2 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 2 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐2. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐2 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
2 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment Y
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 3 (ID‐3) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐3 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐3 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐3 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 3 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐3. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐3 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
3 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment Z
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 5 (ID‐5) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees for the two improvement districts are the same for parcels less than 1 acre. Annexing ID‐5 to ID‐22 would
improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently required. The exclusion of territory from ID‐5 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22 will increase the water availability fees for 9 parcels that are larger than 1 acre. The change
would make the fees consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐5 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐5 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 5 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐5 for parcels less than 1 acre. Oral comments at the public hearing will not
qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen
protests against the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or
customers of record of the idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be
authorized to adopt the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐5 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
5 $10.00 $10.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 7 (ID‐7) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐7 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐7 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐7 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 7 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐7. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐7 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
7 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment BB
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 9 (ID‐9) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐9 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐9 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐9 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 9 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐9. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐9 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
9 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment CC
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 10 (ID‐10) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐10 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐10 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐10 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 10 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐10. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐10 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
10 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment DD
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 20 (ID‐20) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐20 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐20 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐20 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 20 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐20. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐20 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
20 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment EE
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 4 (ID‐4) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18
(ID‐18), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐4 to ID‐18 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐4 and annexaƟon to ID‐18, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐4 and
annexaƟon to ID‐18) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 4 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐18 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐4. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐4 and annexaƟon to ID‐18.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
4 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
18
Attachment FF
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 14 (ID‐14) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18
(ID‐18), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐14 to ID‐18 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐14 and annexaƟon to ID‐18, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐14 and
annexaƟon to ID‐18) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 14 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐18 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐14. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐14 and annexaƟon to ID‐18.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
14 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
18
Attachment GG
Improvement
District
Consolidation
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
MARCH 4, 2015
Attachment HH
Consolidate Water IDs 1,2,3,5,7,9,10 & 20
into ID 22 and Sewer IDs 4 & 14 into ID 18
History
Process
Availability Fees
Proposition 218
Benefits
Maps
History of Improvement Districts
IDs were originally created by the District as a
means to obtain the lowest cost of funding for
projects
With Proposition 13 in 1978 this financing
mechanism became obsolete
Once existing debt was paid off, IDs no longer
served a purpose
Process to Consolidate
Because no specific rules exist for water
agencies to perform a consolidation, parcels
must detach from their existing ID and be
annexed into the new ID
First publishing the resolutions of intention to detach
and annex
Second to confirm the action
Availability Fees
All IDs except 1 & 5 have the same availability fee of $10
per parcel or $30 per acre and exemptions for items
such as flood plains or slopes exceeding 30%
IDs 1 & 5 fees are $10 per parcel or $10 per acre with no
exemptions
This change will make all fees the same bringing equity
among customers
80 parcels in ID 1 will be affected (7 may qualify for exemptions)
9 parcels in ID 5 will be affected
Proposition 218
Proposition 218 considers the availability fees as
a “new” fee (even if they are the same as the
old fee) when they are annexed into the new ID
Proposition 218 notices will be mailed to all 25,149
parcels affected
A Proposition 218 hearing will take place at the May 6,
2015 board meeting
Benefits
Reduce the number of IDs from 9 water & 3 sewer down
to one each
Reduce staff time by 118 hours annually (savings $17,000
in labor and benefits annually)
Simplify interaction with outside agencies, customers,
and internally
Streamline accounting, tracking and mapping within the
District
Supports Strategic Plan
Questions???
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Rita Bell, Finance Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Resolutions of Intention to Consolidate Water Improvement
Districts (IDs) 1,2,3,5,7,9,10 and 20 into ID 22 and Sewer IDs
4 and 14 into ID 18; Authorizing Advertising of these
Resolutions as Required by the both the Water and Government
Codes; Obtain Approval of Proposition 218 Availability Fee
Change Notices; and Direct Staff to Mail Notices
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board approve the attached Resolutions of Intention, Nos.
4247, 4248, 4249, 4250, 4251, 4252, 4253 and 4254, 4255, and 4256
that are necessary to initiate the process for the exclusion of
parcels within Water Improvement Districts (IDs) 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10
and 20, and Sewer IDs 4 and 14. Concurrent with said action, that
the Board also approve the attached Resolutions of Intention, Nos.
4257, 4258, 4259, 4260, 4261, 4262, 4263, 4264, 4265 and 4266 that
are necessary to initiate the process for the annexation of the
excluded parcels in Water IDs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20 and Sewer
IDs 4 and 14 into Water ID 22 and Sewer ID 18, respectively.
Approve the attached Proposition 218 notices of the public hearing
with proposed changes in availability fees for water and sewer
customers and direct staff to mail notices.
PURPOSE:
That the Board authorize and initiate the process for the exclusion
of parcels within Improvement Districts Water (IDs) 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9,
10 and 20 and Sewer IDs 4 and 14 to be annexed into Water ID 22 and
Sewer 18, respectively.
Authorize staff to advertise as required by Government Code Section
6066, the attached Resolutions of Intention 4257, 4258, 4259, 4260,
4261, 4262, 4263, 4264, 4265, and 4266 for a period of two weeks.
Once this requirement has been met, a second set of resolutions will
be presented to confirm the exclusions and annexations. Direct staff
to submit the appropriate maps to the County of San Diego that would
exclude parcels within Water IDs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, and 20 and
Sewer IDs 4 and 14 to be annexed into Water ID 22 and Sewer ID 18,
respectively. A subsequent action will request that Water IDs 1, 2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20 and Sewer IDs 4 and 14 be dissolved effective
July 1, 2015.
In compliance with the Proposition 218 requirements, notices will
sent to all owners of record to inform them of their option to
protest the availability rate changes. (Note: Only 12162 parcels
within ID 1 and 96 parcels within ID 5 will see a change to their
availability fee assessed on the tax roll.) The required public
hearing is set for the May 6, 2015 Board Meeting where the Board will
be able to consider protests.
ID Parcels
Water 1 6,631
Water 2 965
Water 3 2,389
Water 5 1,066
Water 7 991
Water 9 1,810
Water 10 4,232
Water 20 5,552
Sewer 4 365
Sewer 14 1,148
Total 25,149
BACKGROUND:
History:
Improvement Districts were originally created by the District for the
purpose of obtaining the lowest cost funding possible for projects
and they were not intended to separate customers by geographical area
for any other reason than securing debt. With the passage of
Proposition 13 in 1978, creating IDs for the purpose of issuing debt
became an obsolete financing tool because it requires a two thirds
vote by the people to put debt on the tax roll. Once the existing
debt for each ID was paid there was no other reason to maintain
separate IDs. A 1992 Capital Projects Financing Study by Fieldman,
Rolapp & Associates recognized that the District could annex all
areas of the Otay Water District into one overall ID.
Today, the only fees collected by ID are the water and sewer
availability fees. Current legislation (Water Code Section 71631.6)
provides that amounts in excess of $10 shall only be used for the
original purpose of such improvement district. Research revealed the
original purpose of each ID was for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water or sewer improvements and works. The payment of
debt was made for the slated purpose. Therefore, as long as the
restricted portion of the availability fees goes to this purpose,
there is no ongoing reason to keep these funds separate to be in
compliance with Water Code Section 71631.6.
In addition to the above mentioned IDs, there is one ID (27) that is
associated with General Obligation bonds. ID 27 is independent from
all of the other IDs. It has a geographic area defined by those
customers served by the 624-3 30mg reservoir. Each year, the Board
sets a tax rate via a resolution for ID 27 and the county adds this
to the tax role based on the assessed valuation. In 2023 when the
debt is paid off ID 27 will no longer be required. Currently, all of
ID 27 resides in ID 22, but not all of ID 22 is in ID 27. No change
is recommended for ID 27 at this time.
Availability Fees:
Currently, all IDs have the same availability fee of $10 per parcel
or $30 per acre except for Water IDs 1 and 5 which charge $10 per
parcel or $10 per acre for parcels over one acre. Similarly, all IDs
except IDs 1 and 5 have exemptions for items such as easements,
agricultural reserves, flood plains, and slopes exceeding 30%. Staff
researched the variances and could find no other reason why the fees
are different.
The difference in fees and exemptions can lead to inequity between
parcels in different IDs. For example, the District’s administration
building is in ID 1 and the operations building is in ID 20. If
these parcels were owned by a private business instead of the
District, the availability fee for the administration building would
be $10 per acre and the fee for the operations building would be $30
per acre, yet the services and benefits available to these two
parcels are the same. A consolidation will eliminate the differences
in fees. On May 7, 2013, the Board approved a similar consolidation
process for IDs 19 and 25 into IDs 22 and 20 without protest.
ANALYSIS:
Because there are no specific rules for water and sewer to perform a
consolidation, parcels must detach from their existing ID and be
attached or annexed into the new ID. The annexing into the new ID is
considered a new fee for the affected parcels and therefore, a
Proposition 218 hearing is required. For all but 13168 parcels in
IDs 1 and 5, there is no change to their availability fees.
Notices of a Proposition 218 hearing will be mailed to 22,730 owners
of parcels within IDs 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20 and to 1,436 sewer
owners of parcels within IDs 4 and 14. The estimated cost to print
and mail the notices is $7,491.
Because the District maintains separate IDs the tracking and
accounting causes an unnecessary complexity. This consolidation will
mainly benefit CIP Project managers, Finance staff, and IT staff, by
reducing the 9 Water and 3 Sewer IDs down to one ID each for water
and sewer. Staff has identified savings of 118 hours annually should
the ID consolidation happen. The estimated savings in labor,
benefits, and overhead is $17,057. While this savings may not be
realized immediately in reduced labor costs it does pave the way for
labor savings to be realized sooner, and also allows staff
productivity to increase.
With the consolidation of IDs this will simplify the interaction with
other agencies such as LAFCO, the State Board of Equalization, and
the County Assessor and Auditors office. This will allow agencies
such as the County’s Auditors office to eliminate unnecessary funds,
simplifying their accounting systems.
This action is the first of two necessary steps to complete this
consolidation. Once the exclusion and annexation are initiated by the
Board, staff will publish the resolutions as required by statute and
then the Board will have the ability to confirm the exclusion and
annexation at a subsequent meeting. The exclusion will then become
effective on the 31st day after completion of the publication and
posting of the resolutions to exclude. The annexations become
effective after the date of the adoption of the resolutions approving
the annexation.
The availability charges and water rates and charges are identical
for all IDs except 1 and 5. There are 8062 parcels that are larger
than one acre in ID 1. (Staff has identified 7 parcels that may
qualify for an exemption and will be sending a letter to the owners).
If none of these parcels qualify for the new exemptions as allowed in
other IDs, then these parcels would pay a combined total of
$6,458$5,585 in additional availability fees annually. In ID 5 there
are 96 parcels larger than one acre and their estimated increase in
fees would be $376$303 annually.
Because the proposed consolidation technically imposes a “new” charge
on customers, in compliance with the Proposition 218 requirements,
notices will be sent to all owners of record within these IDs to
inform them of their option to protest rate changes. The required
public hearing will take place at the May 6, 2015 Board meeting
where, if after the Board determines there is not a majority protest
for any of the IDs, the Board can vote to complete the consolidation
of the IDs.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
It is estimated that there will be savings to the District of 118
staff hours estimated at a cost of $17,057. Additionally, the
increase in the availability fees collected in IDs 1 and 5 would be
approximately $6,834$5,888 should none of the parcels quality for the
newly allowed exemptions for these parcels.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Through well-established financial policies and wise management of
funds, the District will continue to guarantee fiscal responsibility
to its ratepayers and the community at large.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A) Committee Action
B) Water ID Consolidation Map
C) Sewer ID Consolidation Map
D) Resolution No. 4247
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 1
E) Resolution No. 4248
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 2
F) Resolution No. 4249
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 3
G) Resolution No. 4250
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 5
H) Resolution No. 4251
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 7
I) Resolution No. 4252
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 9
J) Resolution No. 4253
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 10
K) Resolution No. 4254
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 20
L) Resolution No. 4255
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 4
M) Resolution No. 4256
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 14
N) Resolution No. 4257
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 1
O) Resolution No. 4258
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 2
P) Resolution No. 4259
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 3
Q) Resolution No. 4260
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 5
R) Resolution No. 4261
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 7
S) Resolution No. 4262
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 9
T) Resolution No. 4263
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 10
U) Resolution No. 4264
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 20
V) Resolution No. 4265
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 4
W) Resolution No. 4266
Exhibit A – Legal Description ID 14
X) Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 1
Y) Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 2
Z) Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 3
AA)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 5
BB)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 7
CC)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 9
DD)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 10
EE)Proposition 218 Notice Water ID 20
FF)Proposition 218 Notice Sewer ID 4
GG)Proposition 218 Notice Sewer ID 14
HH)Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Resolutions of Intention to Consolidate Water Improvement
Districts (IDs) 1,2,3,5,7,9,10 and 20 into ID 22 and Sewer
IDs 4 and 14 into ID 18; Authorizing Advertising of these
Resolutions as Required by the both the Water and
Government Codes; Obtain Approval of Proposition 218
Availability Fee Change Notices; and Direct Staff to Mail
Notices
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on February 18, 2015 and the following comments
were made:
Staff is requesting that the board approve the consolidation of
water and sewer Improvement Districts (IDs). Currently, the
District has 9 water IDs and staff is recommending that water ID’s
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10 and 20, be consolidated into ID 22. The
District also has 3 sewer IDs and is recommending that IDs 4 and
14 be consolidated into ID 18.
The IDs were originally created by the District as a means to
obtain the lowest cost of funding for projects. With the passage
of Proposition 13 in 1978 this financing mechanism became obsolete
as it now requires a 2/3 vote to place an item on the tax roll.
The existing debt for these IDs have been paid off, thus, the IDs
are no longer needed as they no longer serve a purpose.
To consolidate IDs, parcels within an existing ID must be detached
from the ID and annexed into the new ID. The process requires
that the District first declare and publish resolutions of
intention to detach and annex and then confirm the detachments and
annexations.
Staff will be requesting that the Board declare its intention to
detach and annex the parcels within the identified IDs at the March
4, 2015 board meeting. At the May 6, 2015 board meeting, staff
will be requesting that the board take action to confirm the
detachments and annexations.
Staff indicated that all the debt has been paid off within the IDs
and the only impact to the parcels is availability fees.
Currently, the District charges for all IDs, with the exception of
IDs 1 and 5, $10 per parcel or $30 per acre with exemptions for
parcels located in flood plains or with slopes exceeding 30%. The
fee for IDs 1 and 5 is $10 per parcel or $10 per acre with no
exemptions.
The availability fees for IDs 1 and 5 will be changed to match all
other IDs; $10 per parcel or $30 per acre with exemptions for
parcels located in flood plains or with slopes exceeding 30%. This
change will make all fees the same and bring equity among
customers.
Staff noted that there are 8062 parcels in ID 1 which will be
impacted by the change in the availability fee and 7 of these
parcels may qualify for the exemptions. There are also 96 parcels
in ID 5 that will be impacted by the change.
In order to consolidate the IDs, the District will need to have a
Proposition 218 hearing as the availability fee is considered a
“new” fee, even if it is the same as the old fee, when they are
annexed into the new ID.
Staff is proposing that a hearing be held at the May 6, 2015 board
meeting.
The District will mail Proposition 218 notices to all 25,149
parcels affected by the consolidation. The notices must be mailed
to residents within the affected IDs 45 days prior to the hearing
on May 6.
Staff indicated that the benefits by consolidating the IDs include:
o Reduces the number of IDs from 9 water and 3 sewer to one ID
each.
o Reduces staff time by 118 hours annually (a savings of $17,000
in labor and benefits annually).
o Simplifies interaction with outside agencies (SD County
Assessor’s Office, State Board of Equalization, LAFCO, etc.),
customers, and internally.
o Streamlines accounting, tracking and mapping within the
District.
o Supports the District Strategic Plan goals, such as,
streamlining the District’s reserve accounting for IDs. The
District will no longer need to keep reserves for each ID.
Staff presented maps showing the location of each of the impacted
water and sewer IDs within the District’s service area and a map
showing IDs 22 and 18 once all the IDs are consolidated (see
attached copy of presentation).
Staff noted that the District will still need to track if a parcel
is within the water or sewer ID as the fees may vary, especially
on the sewer side as the capacity fee is different based on whether
the customer was in the ID and paid or was outside an ID and has
not paid their share of the sewer debt.
In response to another inquiry from the committee, staff indicated
that last year when the rate increase notices were forwarded to
the District’s customers, the District received approximately 35
calls concerning the rate increase notices (none were regarding
the ID consolidations). It was noted that the largest customer
impacted by the ID consolidations would receive an increase of
approximately $800 on his/her property tax bill.
Staff indicated for those parcels not receiving water or sewer
services, the owner could sign an agreement with the District to
waive the availability fee charges to their property for 10 years.
However, the customer would need to warrant that they will not
develop/require water to the property during the 10-year agreement
period. It was stated that some parcel owners do execute this
agreement with the District.
Staff indicated in response to another inquiry from the committee,
that those parcels already in ID 22 would not receive a notice,
however, because the District is required to publish notices within
the ID, they may see the notices at various locations within ID22
(libraries, fire station, etc.) or on the District’s website.
Staff also noted that customers with more than one parcel within
an impacted ID will receive one notice only.
The committee suggested that the verbiage within the Proposition
218 notices be changed so it states in bold lettering something to
the effect of, “…the new fee that will be imposed is identical to
the eliminated fee.” It was also suggested for the 80 parcels
larger than 1 acre in ID 1, that a cover letter be provided along
with the Proposition 218 notice, explaining the increase in their
availability fee.
It was discussed that there will be two water IDs (IDs 22 and 27)
remaining after the water IDs are consolidated; ID 27 is a subset
of ID 22. Once the GO bonds are paid off in 2023 for ID 27, the
ID will also be eliminated leaving only ID 22 for water.
Following discussion, the Committee supported staff’s recommendation
and presentation to the full board as an action item.
OTAY WATER DISTRICTCONSOLIDATION OF WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
P:
\
D
R
A
F
T
I
N
G
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
\
I
n
f
o
f
o
r
O
t
h
e
r
s
\
O
W
D
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
\
W
a
t
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
W
a
t
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ905 ÃÅ905
§¨¦8
§¨¦805
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
1 1
2
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SAN
DIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ54
SAN
DIEGO
MEXICO
3
7
9
20
2
3
1
10
22
20
2
10
5
3
1
10
1
5
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Improvement District 1
Improvement District 2
Improvement District 3
Improvement District 5
Improvement District 7
Improvement District 9
Improvement District 10
Improvement District 20
Improvement District 22
Non-Annexed Areas
FEBRUARY 2015
EXISTING WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ905 ÃÅ905
§¨¦8
§¨¦805
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SAN
DIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
ÃÅ125
ÃÅ54
SAN
DIEGO
MEXICO
22
22
10
22
10
PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION OFWATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Improvement District 22 (Consolidated)
Non-Annexed Areas
0 21
Miles
F
0 21
Miles
F
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
E. H Street
Lyons Val
l
e
y
R
d
Hillsdale Rd
Olympic
P
k
w
y
Otay Mesa Rd
Airway Rd
Ca
c
t
u
s
R
d
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
E. H Street
Lyons Vall
e
y
R
d
Hillsdale Rd
Olympic
P
k
w
y
Otay Mesa Rd
Airway Rd
Ca
c
t
u
s
R
d
Otay Lakes Rd Otay Lakes Rd
OTAY WATER DISTRICTCONSOLIDATION OF SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
P:
\
D
R
A
F
T
I
N
G
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
\
I
n
f
o
f
o
r
O
t
h
e
r
s
\
O
W
D
\
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
\
S
e
w
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
S
e
w
e
r
I
D
C
o
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
m
x
d
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ94
§¨¦8
EL CAJON
JAMUL
18
18
14
18
4
4
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
Hillsd
a
l
e
R
d
Av
o
c
a
d
o
B
l
v
d
Fury Lane
C
h
a
s
e
A
v
e
Jamach
a
B
l
v
d
4
18
18
1818
18
18
Willow Gl
e
n
D
r
Wi
l
l
o
w
G
l
e
n
D
r
Dehes
a
R
d
Sw
e
e
t
w
a
t
e
r
Sp
r
i
n
g
s
B
l
v
d
St
e
e
l
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
Fur
y
L
a
n
e
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Sewer Improvement District 4
Sewer Improvement District 14
Sewer Improvement District 18
Non-Annexed Sewer Areas
FEBRUARY 2015
EXISTING SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
0 0.50.25
Miles
F^_
VICINITY MAP
NTS
?ò
Aä%&s
?Ë
F
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SANDIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
SANDIEGO MEXICO
^_
ÃÅ94
ÃÅ94
§¨¦8
EL CAJON
JAMUL
18
18
18
18
Ja
m
a
c
h
a
R
d
Hillsd
a
l
e
R
d
Av
o
c
a
d
o
B
l
v
d
Fury Lane
C
h
a
s
e
A
v
e
Jamach
a
B
l
v
d
18
18
18
18
18
18
Willow Gl
e
n
D
r
Wi
l
l
o
w
G
l
e
n
D
r
Dehes
a
R
d
Sw
e
e
t
w
a
t
e
r
Sp
r
i
n
g
s
B
l
v
d
St
e
e
l
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
Fur
y
L
a
n
e
PROPOSED CONSOLIDATION OFSEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
^_
VICINITY MAP
NTS
?ò
Aä%&s
?Ë
F
LA MESA
EL CAJON
JAMUL
SANDIEGO
BONITA
CHULA VISTA
SANDIEGO MEXICO
Legend
^_OWD Headquarters
OWD Boundary
Sewer Improvement District 18 (Consolidated)
Non-Annexed Sewer Areas
0 0.50.25
Miles
F
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4247
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1
WHEREAS, on January 27th, 1958 by Resolution No. 32, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 1 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 1 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 8062 parcels larger than one acre in ID
1 for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 1 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 1 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 1, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
Attachment D
2
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 1 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 1 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 1 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 1, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 1 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 1, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 1 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 1 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 1 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4247
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,177 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4248
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2
WHEREAS, on June 17th, 1958 by Resolution No. 40, the Otay Water District Board of
Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 2 for the purpose of incurring necessary
bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and completion of water improvements
and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction, and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 2 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate these
parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 2 into ID 22 it would streamline
the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to exclude
parcels in ID 2 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye towards annexing
the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its intention
to exclude parcels within ID 2, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 2 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment E
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 2 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 2 will not be levied upon taxable property
in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 2, is on file with the Secretary of the
District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said map shall
govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and the
effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 2 and the territory to be excluded. At
such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning property in the Otay
Water District or in ID 2, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude pursuant to
and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water
District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 2 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 2 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 2 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4248
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 4,073 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4249
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3
WHEREAS, on November 18th, 1958 by Resolution No. 51, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 3 for the purpose of incurring
necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and completion of water
improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction, and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 3 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate these
parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 3 into ID 22 it would streamline
the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to exclude
parcels in ID 3 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye towards annexing
the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its intention
to exclude parcels within ID 3, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 3 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment F
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 3 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 3 will not be levied upon taxable property
in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 3, is on file with the Secretary of the
District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said map shall
govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and the
effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 3 and the territory to be excluded. At
such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning property in the Otay
Water District or in ID 3, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude pursuant to
and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water
District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 3 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 3 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 3 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4249
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,907 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4250
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5
WHEREAS, on November 28th, 1960 by Resolution No. 123, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 5 for the purpose
of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 5 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 96 parcels larger than one acre in ID 5
for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 5 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 5 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 5, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
Attachment G
2
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 5 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 5 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 5 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 5, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 5 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 5, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 5 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 5 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 5 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4250
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 487 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4251
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7
WHEREAS, on March 27th, 1961 by Resolution No. 142, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 7 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 7 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 7 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 7 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 7, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 7 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment H
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 7 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 7 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 7, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 7 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 7, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 7 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 7 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 7 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4251
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,622 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4252
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9
WHEREAS, on July 24th, 1961 by Resolution No. 153, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 9 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 9 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 9 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 9 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 9, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 9 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment I
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 9 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 9 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 9, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 9 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 9, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 9 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 9 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 9 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4252
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,075 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4253
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10
WHEREAS, on February 11th, 1963 by Resolution No. 266, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 10 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction
and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 10 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 10 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 10 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 10, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 10 will not be levied
upon taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment J
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 10 and, therefore, taxes for the payment
of principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 10 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 10, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 10 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 10, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 10 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 10 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 10
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4253
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,007 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4254
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20
WHEREAS, on April 19th, 1971 by Resolution No. 874, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 20 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22 for
the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 20 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 20 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 20 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 22; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 20, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 20 will not be levied
upon taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment K
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 20 and, therefore, taxes for the payment
of principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 20 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 20, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 20 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 20, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 20 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 20 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 20
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4254
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 6,859 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4255
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4
WHEREAS, on August 4th, 1959 by Resolution No. 83, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 4 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 4 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 4 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 4 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 18; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 4, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 4 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment L
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 4 and, therefore, taxes for the payment of
principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 4 will not be levied upon taxable
property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 4, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 4 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 4, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 4 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 4 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED
INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 4 INTO
EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4255
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 348 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 4256
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXCLUDE PARCELS FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14
WHEREAS, on June 10th, 1968 by Resolution No. 586, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 14 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 14 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 14 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares, by its own motion, its intention to
exclude parcels in ID 14 pursuant to Water Code Sections 72080, et seq., with an eye
towards annexing the excluded parcels into ID 18; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, on its own motion, does hereby declare its
intention to exclude parcels within ID 14, as identified in Exhibit A to this resolution.
2. That the taxes for carrying out the purposes of ID 14 will not be levied
upon taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
Attachment M
2
3. That there is no bond debt on ID 14 and, therefore, taxes for the payment
of principal and interest on any outstanding bonds of ID 14 will not be levied upon
taxable property in the excluded territory following such exclusion.
4. That a map showing the exterior boundaries of the proposed territory to be
excluded, with relation to the territory remaining in ID 14, is on file with the Secretary of
the District and is available for inspection by any person or persons interested. Said
map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the proposed exclusion.
5. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. on the questions of the proposed exclusion and
the effect of such exclusion upon the Otay Water District, ID 14 and the territory to be
excluded. At such time and place, any person interested, including all persons owning
property in the Otay Water District or in ID 14, will be heard.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed exclusion and publish a copy of this Resolution of Intention to Exclude
pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
section 72084.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 14 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 14 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 14
INTO EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4256
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 644 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4257
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on January 27th, 1958 by Resolution No. 32, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 1 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 1 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 8062 parcels larger than one acre in ID
1 for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 1 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 1, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 1, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 1, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
Attachment N
Page 2 of 3
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 1 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
Page 3 of 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 1 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 1 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 1 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4257
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,177 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4258
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on June 17th, 1958 by Resolution No. 40, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 2 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 2 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 2 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 2, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 2, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 2, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment O
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 2 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 2 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 2 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 2 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4258
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 4,073 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4259
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on November 18th, 1958 by Resolution No. 51, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 3 for the purpose
of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 3 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 3 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 3, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 3, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 3, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment P
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 3 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 3 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 3 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 3 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4259
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,907 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4260
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on November 28th, 1960 by Resolution No. 123, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 5 for the purpose
of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 5 and 22 for
parcels less than one acre. However, there are 96 parcels larger than one acre in ID 5
for which the water availability fees will increase to make the fees consistent with all
other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 5 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 5, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 5, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 5, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
Attachment Q
Page 2 of 3
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 5 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
Page 3 of 3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 5 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 5 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 5 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4260
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 487 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4261
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on March 27th, 1961 by Resolution No. 142, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 7 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 7 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 7 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 7, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 7, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 7, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment R
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 7 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 7 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 7 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 7 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4261
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,622 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4262
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on July 24th, 1961 by Resolution No. 153, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 9 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 9 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 9 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 9, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 9, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 9, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment S
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 9 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 9 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 SHALL BE EXCLUDED FROM
EXISTING ID 9 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED INTO
EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 9 INTO EXISTING
ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY WATER
DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4262
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 7,075 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4263
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on February 11th, 1963 by Resolution No. 266, the Otay Water
District Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 10 for the
purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction
and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 10 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 10 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 10, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 10, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 10, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels
in IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the
Otay Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment T
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 10 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 10 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 10 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 10
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4263
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 2,007 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4264
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22
WHEREAS, on April 19th, 1971 by Resolution No. 874, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 20 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on June 5th, 1972 by Resolution No. 968, the Board formed ID 22
for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of water improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 20 and 22; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 20 into ID 22 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 20, if approved, into ID 22, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 20, if
approved, into ID 22, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 20, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels
in IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the
Otay Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment U
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 20 and 22 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment B filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 20 INTO ID 22
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 20 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 22. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 20
INTO EXISTING ID 22 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4264
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 6,859 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4265
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18
WHEREAS, on August 4th, 1959 by Resolution No. 83, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 4 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 4 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 4 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 4, if approved, into ID 18, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 4, if
approved, into ID 18, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 4, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels in
IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay
Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment V
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 4 and 18 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment C filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 4 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 4 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE ANNEXED
INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 4 INTO
EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4265
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 348 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4266
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ANNEX PARCELS EXCLUDED FROM IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 INTO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18
WHEREAS, on June 10th, 1968 by Resolution No. 586, the Otay Water District
Board of Directors (“Board”) formed Improvement District (“ID”) 14 for the purpose of
incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition, construction and
completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, on February 16th, 1970 by Resolution No. 758, the Board formed ID
18 for the purpose of incurring necessary bonded indebtedness for the acquisition,
construction, and completion of sewer improvements and works; and
WHEREAS, the availability charges are identical between IDs 14 and 18; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that there is no longer a reason to separate
these parcels; and
WHEREAS, by initiating proceedings to consolidate ID 14 into ID 18 it would
streamline the accounting and tracking of these parcels; and
WHEREAS, the Board hereby declares its intention to annex parcels excluded
from ID 14, if approved, into ID 18, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et seq.; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1. That the Board of Directors, pursuant to Water Code sections 72700, et
seq., does hereby declare its intention to annex the parcels excluded from ID 14, if
approved, into ID 18, as described in Exhibit A:
2. That the purpose of the proposed annexation, in conjunction with the
exclusion of parcels from ID 14, is to streamline the accounting and tracking of parcels
in IDs by making availability charges consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the
Otay Water District boundaries, thereby increasing efficiencies.
Attachment W
Page 2 of 3
3. A depiction of the area proposed to be annexed, and the boundaries of
IDs 14 and 18 following the annexation, is set forth on a map in Attachment C filed with
the Secretary of the District, which map shall govern for all details as to the area
proposed to be annexed.
4. That the annexation of said parcels is subject to the owners complying
with the following terms and conditions:
(a) Payment of yearly assessment fees of $30.00 per acre of land and
$10.00 per parcel of land less than one acre which will be collected
through the County Tax Assessor’s office.
(c) In the event that water service is to be provided, the payment of all
applicable water meter fees per Equipment Dwelling Unit (EDU) at
the time the meter is purchased.
(d) Payment of all other applicable local or state agency fees or
charges.
5. That the holders of title to any of the parcels to be annexed may file
written protests with the Secretary of the District regarding the annexation or the
annexation upon the terms and conditions identified above, to the following address:
District Secretary
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978
6. That notice is hereby given that a hearing shall be held by the Board on
Wednesday, May 6th, 2015 at 3:30 p.m. at which the Board will receive written protests
theretofore filed with the Secretary of the District, receive additional written protests, and
hear from any and all persons interested in the annexation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board directs staff to provide notice of the
proposed annexation and publish and post a copy of this Resolution of Intention to
Page 3 of 3
Annex pursuant to and consistent with Government Code section 6066 and Water Code
sections 72702 and 72703.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Otay
Water District at a regular meeting held this 4th day of March, 2015.
President
ATTEST:
__________________________________ District Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONSOLIDATION OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (ID)
ID 14 INTO ID 18
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE TERRITORY WITHIN THE EXISTING BOUNDARIES OF OTAY WATER
DISTRICT SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 SHALL BE EXCLUDED
FROM EXISTING ID 14 AND THE EXCLUDED PARCELS SHALL BE
ANNEXED INTO EXISTING ID 18. THE CONSOLIDATION OF EXISTING ID 14
INTO EXISTING ID 18 SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME THE OTAY
WATER DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS ADOPTS RESOLUTION NO. 4266
APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATIONS.
CONTAINING 644 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 1 (ID‐1) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
For parcels less than one acre, the fees in ID‐1, where properƟes are being excluded, are idenƟcal to the fees in
ID‐22, where properƟes are being annexed. Annexing ID‐1 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng
and administraƟon currently required. The exclusion of territory from ID‐1 and annexaƟon to ID‐22 will increase the
water availability fees for ϲϮ parcels that are larger than 1 acre. The change would make the fees consistent with all
other parcels in IDs within the Otay Water District boundaries.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐1 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐1 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 1 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐1 for parcels less than 1 acre. Oral comments at the public hearing will not
qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen
protests against the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or
customers of record of the idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be
authorized to adopt the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐1 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
1 $10.00 $10.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment X
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 2 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 2 (ID‐2) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐2 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐2 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐2 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 2 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐2. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐2 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
2 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment Y
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 3 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 3 (ID‐3) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐3 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐3 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐3 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 3 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐3. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐3 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
3 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment Z
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 5 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 5 (ID‐5) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees for the two improvement districts are the same for parcels less than 1 acre. Annexing ID‐5 to ID‐22 would
improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently required. The exclusion of territory from ID‐5 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22 will increase the water availability fees for ϲ parcels that are larger than 1 acre. The change
would make the fees consistent with all other parcels within IDs in the Otay Water District boundaries.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐5 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐5 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 5 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐5 for parcels less than 1 acre. Oral comments at the public hearing will not
qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen
protests against the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or
customers of record of the idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be
authorized to adopt the proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐5 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
5 $10.00 $10.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 7 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 7 (ID‐7) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐7 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐7 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐7 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 7 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐7. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐7 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
7 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment BB
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 9 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 9 (ID‐9) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐9 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐9 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐9 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 9 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐9. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐9 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
9 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment CC
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 10 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 10 (ID‐10) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐10 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐10 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐10 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 10 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐10. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐10 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
10 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment DD
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 20 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 22 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 20 (ID‐20) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22
(ID‐22), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐20 to ID‐22 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐20 and annexaƟon to ID‐22, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐20 and
annexaƟon to ID‐22) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 20 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 22.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐22 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐20. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐20 and annexaƟon to ID‐22.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
20 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
22
Attachment EE
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 4 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 4 (ID‐4) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18
(ID‐18), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐4 to ID‐18 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐4 and annexaƟon to ID‐18, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐4 and
annexaƟon to ID‐18) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 4 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐18 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐4. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐4 and annexaƟon to ID‐18.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
4 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
18
Attachment FF
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED EXCLUSION OF TERRITORY FROM
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 14 AND ANNEXATION TO IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 18 AND
THE RESULTING IMPACT ON FEES
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN the Otay Water District (the “District”) will hold a Public Hearing on May 6, 2015 at 3:30
p.m. in the Board of Directors MeeƟng Room, 2554 Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, to
consider the exclusion of territory from Improvement District 14 (ID‐14) and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18
(ID‐18), and the resulƟng impact of fees.
Fees in the annexing improvement district are idenƟcal to the fees in the excluding improvement district and are
shown below. Annexing ID‐14 to ID‐18 would improve the efficiency of accounƟng and administraƟon currently
required.
As the record owner or customer of record of a property idenƟfied to be subject to the exclusion of territory from
ID‐14 and annexaƟon to ID‐18, you may submit a wriƩen protest against the proposed acƟon. Provided, however, if
the idenƟfied property has more than one record owner and/or customer of record, only one wriƩen protest will be
counted. Each protest must be in wriƟng; state that the specific acƟon (exclusion of territory from ID‐14 and
annexaƟon to ID‐18) for which the protest is being submiƩed in opposiƟon; provide the locaƟon of the idenƟfied
property (by assessor’s parcel number or street address); and include the original signature of the record owner or
customer of record submiƫng the protest. Protests submiƩed by e‐mail, facsimile, or other electronic means will
not be accepted. WriƩen protests may be submiƩed by mail to the Board Secretary, Otay Water District, at 2554
Sweetwater Springs Blvd., Spring Valley, CA 91978, or in person at the public hearing, so long as they are received
prior to the conclusion of the public hearing.
Please idenƟfy on the front of the envelope for any protest, whether mailed or submiƩed in person to the Board
Secretary, that the enclosed leƩer is for the Public Hearing on the Exclusion of Territory from Improvement
District 14 and annexaƟon to Improvement District 18.
At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Directors will consider adopƟng the proposed exclusion and
annexaƟon. If adopted, the property annexed to ID‐18 shall be subject to a fee as shown in the table above, idenƟcal
to the fee previously charged for ID‐14. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless
accompanied by a wriƩen protest. If, at the close of the public hearing, wriƩen protests against the proposed
exclusion and annexaƟon are not presented by a majority of the record owners or customers of record of the
idenƟfied properƟes affected by the proposed acƟon, the Board of Directors will be authorized to adopt the
proposed exclusion and annexaƟon.
This noƟce is being provided to you by the District pursuant to the California ConsƟtuƟon ArƟcle XIIID (collecƟvely
know as “ProposiƟon 218”). Under terms of ProposiƟon 218, the District is required to noƟfy the record owner or
customer of record of proposed changes to property‐related services. This leƩer serves as a 45‐day noƟce that the
District will hold a public hearing to consider exclusion of territory from ID‐14 and annexaƟon to ID‐18.
Improvement District
Charge per year for a
parcel less than one
acre
Charge per year per
acre for parcels one
acre or more
14 $10.00 $30.00
$10.00 $30.00
Land outside an Improvement District $10.00 $10.00
Land outside an Improvement District and greater
than one mile from District faciliƟes $3.00 $3.00
18
Attachment GG
Improvement
District
Consolidation
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
MARCH 4, 2015
Attachment HH
Consolidate Water IDs 1,2,3,5,7,9,10 & 20
into ID 22 and Sewer IDs 4 & 14 into ID 18
History
Process
Availability Fees
Proposition 218
Benefits
Maps
History of Improvement Districts
IDs were originally created by the District as a
means to obtain the lowest cost of funding for
projects
With Proposition 13 in 1978 this financing
mechanism became obsolete
Once existing debt was paid off, IDs no longer
served a purpose
Process to Consolidate
Because no specific rules exist for water
agencies to perform a consolidation, parcels
must detach from their existing ID and be
annexed into the new ID
First publishing the resolutions of intention to detach
and annex
Second to confirm the action
Availability Fees
All IDs except 1 & 5 have the same availability fee of $10
per parcel or $30 per acre and exemptions for items
such as flood plain or slopes exceeding 30%
IDs 1 & 5 fees are $10 per parcel or $10 per acre with no
exemptions
This change will make all fees the same bringing equity
among customers
80 62 parcels in ID 1 will be affected (7 may qualify for
exemptions)
9 6 parcels in ID 5 will be affected
Proposition 218
Proposition 218 considers the availability fees as
a “new” fee (even if they are the same as the
old fee) when they are annexed into the new ID
Proposition 218 notices will be mailed to all 25,149
parcels affected
A Proposition 218 hearing will take place at the May 6,
2015 Board Meeting
Benefits
Reduce the number of IDs from 9 water & 3 sewer down
to one each
Reduce staff time by 118 hours annually (savings $17,000
in labor and benefits annually)
Simplify interaction with outside agencies, customers
and internally
Streamline accounting, tracking and mapping within the
District
Supports Strategic Plan
Questions???
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board Meeting MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton,
General Manager
W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO.
APPROVED BY:
Susan Cruz, District Secretary
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Board of Directors 2015 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board, the attached Board of Director’s meeting
calendar for 2015 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to review the 2015 Board of Director’s meeting calendar
and amend the schedule as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment: Calendar of Meetings for 2015
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar 3-4-15.doc
Board of Directors, Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2015
Regular Board Meetings:
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 7, 2015
February 4, 2015
March 4, 2015
April 1, 2015
May 6, 2015
June 3, 2015
July 1, 2015
August 5, 2015
September 2, 2015
October 7, 2015
November 4, 2015
December 2, 2015
January 21, 2015
February 18, 2015
March 18, 2015
April 15, 2015
May 20, 2015
June 17, 2015
July 15, 2015
August 19, 2015
September 16, 2015
October 21, 2015
November 18, 2015
December 16, 2015
SPECIAL BOARD MEETINGS:
May 19, 2015 Budget Workshop/Special Board Meeting 3:00 pm
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Kevin Koeppen,
Finance Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Financing the Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement Project
through California’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF)
Program
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To inform the Board of Directors of the financing of the Campo Road
Sewer Main Replacement Project (Campo Road Project) through the
CWSRF. Staff is currently completing the CWSRF financial assistance
application package related to the financing of the Campo Road
Project.
ANALYSIS:
As part of the annual budgeting process the District prepares a five-
year projection of rates, capital improvement projects (CIP) and
financing needs. As part of the fiscal year 2015 budget the District
identified the need for the sewer side of the District to borrow
2
approximately $3.8M for the funding of CIP projects for fiscal year
2016 and 2017. The District is in the process of developing the
fiscal year 2016 budget which includes updating the CIP budget.
Preliminary estimates performed by staff have identified a continuing
need for the sewer side of the District to obtain debt financing.
The CWSRF program is a state run program offering low cost financing
for sewer projects. The CWSRF uses federal and state funds to make
loans on a contract reimbursement basis to publicly-owned treatment
works for the construction of wastewater treatment and sewage
collection systems; water recycling facilities; the implementation of
nonpoint source water quality control projects; and other eligible
projects. The term of the financing for the District would be 20
years. The benefit of CWSRF is that it offers below-market rate
financing, i.e. half of the most recent General Obligation (GO) bond
rate at the time of funding approval. The current interest rate
published by CWSRF based on a bond sale date of November, 2014 is
1.5%. In addition, cost of issuance is estimated to be much lower
than issuing Certificates of Participation.
The District has identified the $5.5M Campo Road Project as a sewer
project that meets the eligibility requirements of the CWSRF. The
Campo Road project is for upgrading 11,550 feet of sewer main
capacity because the existing sewer main is under-sized. The project
spans a period of three years from FY2015 to FY2017, which aligns
with the budgeted timing of the borrowing. Also, the amount of the
project allows the District to apply under a single project, which
has some administrative efficiencies versus applying under multiple
projects.
The CWSRF process can take 9 months or longer and the initial
application should be completed about a year prior to the start of
construction. Therefore, the application process for the Campo Road
sewer main replacement project should begin in the spring of 2015
since the project is expected to begin in the spring of 2016.
Below is an estimated timeline of events for CWSRF process:
May 2015 CWSRF Application resolutions submitted to Otay
Water District Board of Directors
June 2015 Application submission to CWSRF
Summer 2016 Construction on Campo Road project begins
Summer 2016 Funding of project expenses begins
FY2017 Project completed
FY2018 Loan repayment begins
3
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Based on CWSRF current interest rate of 1.5% and a GO bond rate of
3.0% (CWSRF interest rate equals half of GO bond rate), for a $3.8
million loan with a 20-year term, it has the potential to save the
District $600,000 in interest costs versus a general obligation bond
issuance. Unlike financing through Certificates of Participation,
financing through the CWSRF does not require the services of a
Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel, and Disclosure Counsel but does
require a legal opinion as part of the application process. The
result is an additional savings versus issuing bonds of approximately
$100,000. Staff requested quotes from three legal firms and received
two responses. Based on cost and their knowledge of the District,
under the General Manager’s authority the District is engaging
Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth to perform the related legal
services.
Firm Amount
Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth Variable Fee $7,500 to $12,000
Norton, Rose, Fulbright LLP Fixed Fee $20,000
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The District ensures its continued financial health through long-term
financial planning and debt planning.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Attachment A – Committee Action
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Financing the Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement Project
through California’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund
(CWSRF) Program
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration and Communications Committee reviewed this
item at a meeting held on February 18, 2015 and the following comments
were made:
This is to provide the board a briefing on the staffs’ process to
obtain debt financing through the California’s Clean Water State
Revolving Fund and receive any comments or questions from the
board concerning the process.
During the FY 2015 budget process, staff identified the need to
borrow approximately $3.8 million for sewer.
The District is in the process of developing the FY 2016 Budget
and estimates that the funds will still need to be borrowed for
sewer.
The District is pursuing the state revolving fund financial
option as it provides for a:
o Low interest rate
o Low cost of issuance
Staff also sought the opinion of its Financial Advisor, who
confirmed that, based on the level of financing, the State
Revolving Fund would provide for a more cost effective debt
financing instrument.
The process for applying for the State Revolving Fund includes
identifying a project and completing the application.
Based on the project’s purpose, timing and cost, the District has
identified the Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement Project as a
project that would qualify for the fund and would meet the
District’s schedule and funding needs.
It was indicated that the application process can take nine (9)
months or longer, so it is recommended that the initial
application be completed about one (1) year prior to the start of
the project’s construction.
The District proposes beginning the application process in the
Spring of 2015 for this project. Construction of the project is
expected to begin in the spring of 2016.
Staff anticipates that the timing for submitting the resolutions
for the State Revolving Fund application to the Board for
approval should be no sooner than the Board workshop on the
proposed 2016 Budget.
The application is anticipated to be submitted to the State
Revolving Fund in June 2015 and funding of project expenses is
expected to begin in the Summer of 2016.
The project is budgeted to be completed in FY 2017 and repayment
of the loan will begin one (1) year following the completion of
the project, FY 2018.
In response to an inquiry from the committee, it was indicated that
the 1.5% interest rate is locked for the full 20 years. However,
the rate is set during the application process and it is
approximately one half the General Obligation (GO) bond rate.
The committee suggested that when submitting their recommendation
to the board, staff may wish to provide some flexibility in the
rate by stating as long as the rate does not exceed “X” percent,
staff is authorized to move forward with the application. Thus, if
the rate should increase slightly, staff will not need to bring
this item back to the board.
Staff indicated in response to an inquiry from the Committee that
the District would not need to get voter approval for this type of
financing. Staff explained that the Otay Water District Financing
Authority and the Otay Service Corporation are utilized currently
to issue bond debt. The Authority or Corporation issues the bonds
and the District pledges revenues to pay these bonds back. A State
Revolving Fund Loan is set up as an Installment Sale Agreement
between the State and the District. An Installment Sale Agreement
does not require voter approval because it is not the issuance of
bonds, but the exercise by the District of its power to acquire
property pursuant to the authority granted to it in the Water Code
of the State of California. Specifically, Water Code Section 71690
authorizes the District to purchase real and personal property.
There was discussion that staff did look at the possibility of
“water” loaning funding for this sewer infrastructure, but there
were some limitations as the water funds would drop below target
levels for approximately five (5) years. Staff recommends instead
of a loan from the “water” side, that the funds be borrowed through
the State Revolving fund as it is very inexpensive.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staff’s recommendation
and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief of Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Informational Item – Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2015 Capital
Improvement Program Report
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation. This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To update the Board about the status of all CIP project expenditures
and to highlight significant issues, progress, and milestones on
major projects.
ANALYSIS:
To keep up with growth and to meet our ratepayers' expectations to
adequately deliver safe, reliable, cost-effective, and quality water,
each year the District staff prepares a Six-Year CIP Plan that
identifies the District’s infrastructure needs. The CIP is comprised
of four categories consisting of backbone capital facilities,
replacement/renewal projects, capital purchases, and developer's
reimbursement projects.
The Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2015 update is intended to provide a
detailed analysis of progress in completing these projects within the
allotted time and budget of $10.6 million. Expenditures through the
Second Quarter totaled approximately $3.1 million. Approximately 30%
of the Fiscal Year 2015 expenditure budget was spent (see Attachment
B). As of the Second Quarter, total expenditures for the end of
Fiscal Year 2015 are estimated to be around 80% of the Fiscal Year
budget.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact as this is an informational item only.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
The Capital Improvement Program supports the District’s Mission
statement, “To provide high value water and wastewater services to
the customers of the Otay Water District, in a professional,
effective, and efficient manner” and the General Manager’s Vision, “A
District that is at the forefront in innovations to provide water
services at affordable rates, with a reputation for outstanding
customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM/RP:jf
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q2\Staff Report\BD 03-04-15, Staff
Report, Second Quarter FY 2015 CIP Report, (DM-RP).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B - Fiscal Year 2015 Second Quarter CIP
Expenditure Report
Attachment C – Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Various
Informational Item – Second Quarter Fiscal Year 2015
Capital Improvement Program Report
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a Committee Meeting held on February 17, 2015,
and the following comments were made:
Staff provided a PowerPoint presentation to the Committee and
indicated that the expenditures through the second quarter of
FY 2015 totaled approximately $3.1 million, which is about 30%
of the District’s fiscal year budget.
Staff indicated that the District’s FY 2015 CIP budget consists
of 73 projects that total $10.6 million and is divided into
four categories:
o Capital Facilities= $3.1 million
o Replacement/Renewal= $6.7 million
o Capital Purchases= $.7 million
o Developer Reimbursement= $0.1 million
The PowerPoint presentation included the following:
o Total Life-to-Date Expenditures
o CIP Budget Forecast vs. Expenditures. Staff noted that as
of the Second Quarter, total expenditures for the end of
Fiscal Year 2015 are estimated to be around 80% of the
Fiscal Year budget.
o Major CIP Projects
o CIP Projects in Construction
o Construction Contract Status of projects, contract amount
with allowances, net change orders, and percent of project
completion
o Consultant Contract Status of contract amounts, approve
payments to date, change orders, dates when contracts were
signed and the end date of contracts
Staff provided an update of the following construction projects
that were active during the second quarter:
o 870-1 Reservoir Access Road Paving (P2515)that is
anticipated to be substantially complete by January 2015
o 944-1, 944-2, and 458-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior
Coating and Upgrades (P2531, P2532, P2535) that are
anticipated to be substantially completed by June 2015.
o SR-11 Utility Relocations Sequence I (P2453) that is
anticipated to be completed by July 2015.
Staff highlighted that the Change Orders with Allowance Credit
equaled to -1.8%.
In response to an inquiry from the Committee, Staff stated that
two projects have been advanced forward to help reconcile
actual expenditures with budgeted forecasts. The Committee
approved one project, the 450-1 Disinfection Facility
Rehabilitation, at its February 17 meeting; and the second
project will be presented at the March Committee meeting for
consideration.
The Committee inquired that if funds are not spent as
anticipated, would it have an impact on rates; and what happens
to the unspent funds at the end of the fiscal year. Staff
responded that there is a slight impact on rates, but with the
very low cost of funds. Staff discussed that unspent CIP funds
roll over to the next fiscal year and remains in the District’s
reserves until they are needed to complete CIP projects. Every
fiscal year, a budget process is performed to review what
funding is required for the next six years. The goal of this
process is to adjust to the economy with “just in time”
delivery of facilities, be flexible to time sensitivity of
projects, and look at the overall budget.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as an informational
item.
FISCAL YEAR 2015
2nd QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 12/31/2014)
($ In Thousands)
2015 12/31/14
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2015
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance Comments
CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS -
P2083 PS - 870-2 Pump Station Replacement Marchioro 650$ 215$ 435$ 33%16,500$ 1,143$ 15,357$ 7%
Pace slowed slightly as 3D model was added to
project scope.
P2267 36-Inch Main Pumpouts and Air/Vacuum Ventilation Installations Thompson 195 7 188 4%435 241 194 55%
The majority of the $188K will be spent
throughout Q3 and Q4 FY 2015 completing
inspection and installation of 6" air vacs. We are
preparing budget to request additional funds and
years on this CIP to complete the raising of air
vacs above ground.
P2434 Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Well Development Marchioro 75 100 (25) 133%3,705 3,707 (2) 100%
Settlement to close out design consultant's
agreement slightly higher than anticipated.
P2451 Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and Disinfection System Kennedy 1,000 341 659 34%30,000 2,901 27,099 10%
The District has delayed the Design of this project
to keep pace with the progress in Mexico.
P2466 Regional Training Facility Coburn-Boyd 3 - 3 0%300 285 15 95%The $3K will not be expensed in FY 2015.
P2486 Asset Management Plan Condition Assessment and Data Acquisition Zhao 75 7 68 9%1,090 825 265 76%
On schedule to spend $60K by the end of Q4 FY
2015 for an asset management consultant and
InfoMaster software.
P2511 Otay Interconnect Pipeline Marchioro 100 36 64 36%2,005 2,017 (12) 101%
EIR certification on hold since pump station
parcels owned by Caltrans may have an open
space encumbrances. Design on hold.
P2537 Operations Yard Property Acquisition Improvements Kennedy 100 99 1 99%350 136 214 39%
This project is expected to be bid this Fiscal Year
for award early FY 2016.
P2541 624 Pressure Zone PRSs Marchioro 425 4 421 1%600 210 390 35%
Construction postponed until FY 2016. Will be
bid together with R2110.
P2547
District Administration Building Main Breaker Installation and Vehicle
Charging Stations Anderson 45 9 36 20%50 9 41 18%
This main breaker project was completed June
2014 and paid with the Safety budget. The
electric vehicle charging station is in early stages
of design.
P2548 Sump Pump Installation at the 980-1 & 2 Reservoirs Anderson 35 4 31 11%35 4 31 11%No change.
P2549 Fuel system upgrade Payne 30 - 30 0%30 - 30 0%In process; to be completed by June 30, 2015
P2551 Blossom Lane Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection Beppler 5 3 2 60%400 3 397 1%
P2552 South Barcelona Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection Beppler 5 3 2 60%400 3 397 1%
R2048 RecPL - Otay Mesa Distribution Pipelines and Conversions Martin 1 - 1 0%555 475 80 86%No expenditures planned for Q2.
R2058 RecPL - 16-Inch, 860 Zone, Airway Road - Otay Mesa/Alta Martin 1 - 1 0%1,406 1,340 66 95%No expenditures planned for Q2.
R2077 RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta Gate/Airway Beppler 25 - 25 0%4,500 2,805 1,695 62%
Paving of surface road required to finish
improvements per the reimbursement agreement
with developer.
R2087 RecPL - 24-Inch, 927 Zone, Wueste Road - Olympic/Otay WTP Cameron 5 - 5 0%7,000 1,032 5,968 15%
Project on hold due tol recycled water
moratorium.
R2107 RWCWRF Screening Compactor and Chlorine Injectors Enclosure Vaclavek 85 - 85 0%215 101 114 47%
PO for compactor has been issued. Completion of
project expected in FY 2015 Q4. with all funds
utilized. Project 20% complete at this time.
R2108 Res - 927-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement Marchioro 50 12 38 24%1,400 1,075 325 77%On target for upcoming warranty inspection.
R2110 RecPS - 944-1 Optimization and Pressure Zone modifications Marchioro 50 2 48 4%200 65 135 33%
Construction (PRS Vault 3 retrofit) postponed
until FY 2016. Will be bid together with P2541.
R2114 Large Recycle Pump Replacement at the RWCWRF 927-1 Pump Station Anderson 100 51 49 51%100 51 49 51%
We have purchased one pump and currently
working on purchasing the second pump.
R2117 RWCWRF Contact Basin Expansion Project Beppler 20 13 7 65%1,500 13 1,487 1%
Study should be completed by June; consultant
fee is $77,402; in-house costs should take it to
about $90,000.
S2043 RWCWRF Sludge Handling System Beppler 5 3 2 60%1,500 40 1,460 3%No additional billings expected.
Total Capital Facility Projects Total:3,085 909 2,176 29%74,276 18,481 55,795 25%
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 12/31/14 LIFE-TO-DATE, 12/31/14
Helix WD led project; design costs (about
$25,000) expected to be billed by June (combined
P2551 & P2552).
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q2\Expenditures\FY15 2nd qtr exp-MARISSA-FINAL.xlsx Page 1 of 4 2/10/2015
FISCAL YEAR 2015
2nd QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 12/31/2014)
($ In Thousands)
2015 12/31/14
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2015
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 12/31/14 LIFE-TO-DATE, 12/31/14
P2366 APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits Rahders 5 16 (11) 320%3,488 2,529 959 73%
There may be an expenditure of up to $13,500
($8,500 over the budget) of a replacement
emissions analyzer for FY 2015. Staff has
performed a temporary repair to the District's
APCD emissions analyzer. If the repair continues
to hold, we will make the replacement of the
analyzer a FY 2016 budget item.
P2382 Safety and Security Improvements Ramirez 192 55 137 29%3,222 2,074 1,148 64%
Expenditures will occur throughout the remaining
Fiscal Year. Expect to be at budgeted point by
end of Fiscal Year 2015.
P2440 I-905 Utility Relocations Marchioro 5 3 2 60%1,600 1,587 13 99%
Staff anticipates that Caltrans will issue an
additional $33,493 credit to Otay; however, the
$33K credit is on hold pending Caltrans' receipt of
final accounting numbers from the City of San
Diego's sewer contractor.
P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations Marchioro 600 510 90 85%2,250 743 1,507 33%
Construction contract ahead of schedule.
Positioned to spend $1.2M rather than $0.6M.
P2477 Res - 624-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement Marchioro 5 3 2 60%1,000 930 70 93%On target for upcoming warranty inspection.
P2485 SCADA Communication System and Software Replacement Vaclavek 655 112 543 17%1,974 1,281 693 65%
Expect to spend only $540,000 during FY 2015
due to a delay in the installation of the wireless
radio system install.
P2493 624-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 50 59 (9) 118%1,950 1,526 424 78%
Construction is complete, project is in the
warranty period.
P2494 Multiple Species Conservation Plan Coburn-Boyd 90 3 87 3%950 813 137 86%
Expect to spend $60-$70,000 during the second
half of FY 2015.
P2495 San Miguel Habitat Management/Mitigation Area Coburn-Boyd 180 42 138 23%2,100 1,074 1,026 51%
Expect to spend at least $100,000 the second
half of FY 2015.
P2496 Otay Lakes Road Utility Relocations Martin 5 1 4 20%325 301 24 93%Project Acceptance pending final work by City.
P2504 Regulatory Site Access Road and Pipeline Relocation Cameron 20 1 19 5%900 329 571 37%Project on hold.
P2507 East Palomar Street Utility Relocation Cameron 175 29 146 17%940 649 291 69%
Caltrans driving project. Utility agreements are in
place for reimbursement. Contractor is 6 months
behind schedule, anticipated completion in
December 2015.
P2508 Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement Program Marchioro 125 26 99 21%300 75 225 25%
On target as final design scheduled to be
completed second half of FY 2015.
P2515 870-1 Reservoir Paving Martin 415 299 116 72%550 452 98 82%Project is in construction and is on track.
P2518 803-3 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 30 6 24 20%700 632 68 90%
Construction is complete, project is in the
warranty period.
P2519 832-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron 30 9 21 30%700 654 46 93%
Construction is complete, project is in the
warranty period.
P2520 Motorola Mobile Radio Upgrade Martinez 50 - 50 0%135 77 58 57%
We are planning on utilizing the remaining budget
to install VHF radios at all facilities.P2529 711-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 5 - 5 0%760 - 760 0%Expenditures are planned for Q3.
P2530 711-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron 10 - 10 0%940 - 940 0%Expenditures are planned for Q3.
P2531 944-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Martin 190 3 187 2%240 9 231 4%Project is in construction and is on track.P2532 944-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Martin 900 96 804 11%950 104 846 11%Project is in construction and is on track.
P2533 1200-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%365 - 365 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2534 978-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%270 - 270 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.P2535 458-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating & Upgrades Martin 585 33 552 6%640 47 593 7%Project is in construction and is on track.
P2538
Administration and Operations Building Fire Sprinkler Replacement
Program Cameron 65 24 41 37%110 46 64 42%
Expenditures are planned for Q3. Project is on
budget.
P2539 South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Utility Relocations Cameron 30 25 5 83%375 54 321 14%SANDAG driven project. Project is on budget.
P2542 850-3 Reservoir Interior Coating Cameron 5 2 3 40%480 2 478 0%Expenditures are planned for Q3.
P2543 850-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%460 - 460 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2544 850-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Reservoir Coating Cameron - - - 0%940 - 940 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2545 980-1 Reservoir Interior Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%1,250 - 1,250 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2546 980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating Cameron - - - 0%1,250 - 1,250 0%No expenditures planned in FY 2015.
P2550 Fuel Island Upgrade Payne 75 - 75 0%75 - 75 0%In process; to be completed by June 30, 2015.
P2553 Heritage Road Bridge Replacement and Utility Relocation Cameron 5 - 5 0%1,200 - 1,200 0%
City of Chula Vista driven project. Project is on
budget.
R2109
Sweetwater River Wooden Trestle Improvement for the Recycled Water
Forcemain Beppler 50 32 18 64%600 64 536 11%
Design ($20,000 plus in-house costs of about
$8,000) should be completed by June. $60,000
total this FY
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q2\Expenditures\FY15 2nd qtr exp-MARISSA-FINAL.xlsx Page 2 of 4 2/10/2015
FISCAL YEAR 2015
2nd QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 12/31/2014)
($ In Thousands)
2015 12/31/14
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2015
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 12/31/14 LIFE-TO-DATE, 12/31/14
R2111 RWCWRF - RAS Pump Replacement Beppler 310 63 247 20%650 120 530 18%
Will see some construction costs before June
(maybe a third of the $315,315 contract amount),
but majority will likely not be invoiced until FY
2016.
R2112 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation Cameron 150 24 126 16%190 24 166 13%
Design is complete. Construction planned for Q4.
Project is on budget.
R2113 Chlorine 1-ton Cyliner Emergency Close Valve Vaclavek 37 30 7 81%37 30 7 81%
Equipment received and 90% installed.
Installation should be complete near the end of
Q3 or beginning of Q4. All funds will be utillized
by completion date.
R2116 RecPL - 14-Inch, 927 Zone, Forcemain Assessment and Repair Marchioro 100 64 36 64%1,500 64 1,436 4%
Accelerated schedule. $100K insepction/
condition assesment work will be completed FY
2015. Proceeding with design of blow off
improvements.
S2012
San Diego County Sanitation District Outfall and RSD Outfall
Replacement Kennedy 150 - 150 0%2,760 834 1,926 30%
No spending is expected this Fiscal Year. This is
a County reimbursement and invoice will not be
received until the end of the year.
S2024 Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement Beppler 600 172 428 29%5,500 353 5,147 6%
Estimating between $500,000 to $600,000 this
Fiscal Year; design services will continue into
Fiscal Year 2016.
S2027 Rancho San Diego Pump Station Rehabilitation Beppler 150 6 144 4%3,500 62 3,438 2%
Design will be completed this Fiscal Year;
contract with County estimated to be around
$400,000 on the District.
S2033 Sewer System Rehabilitation Beppler 675 154 521 23%6,000 761 5,239 13%
Construction ($530,000) plus admin and in-
house; next design phases (another $35,000)
expected to be completed this Fiscal Year for
total of $720,000.
Total Replacement/Renewal Projects Total:6,724 1,902 4,822 28%54,126 18,300 35,826 34%
CAPITAL PURCHASE PROJECTS
P2282 Vehicle Capital Purchases Rahders 105 - 105 0%5,021 2,900 2,121 58%
There is a PO issued for $29,330 for one
replacement pick up. Due to staffing reduction’s
there will be a savings of $38,700 with no further
expenses in this area.
P2285 Office Equipment and Furniture Capital Purchases Payne 15 - 15 0%589 524 65 89%Anticipate spending in Q4 FY 2015.
P2286 Field Equipment Capital Purchases Rahders 65 13 52 20%1,758 1,303 455 74%
Staff is anticipating an expense of $21,000 by
end of the Q3 FY 2015 (and should expect a
savings of $3,000).
P2469 Information Technology Network and Hardware Kerr 175 170 5 97%2,509 1,845 664 74%
Staff has expenditures of approximately $42,000
for hardware and anticipates that no additional
items will be hitting this CIP this Fiscal Year. (We
will utilize next year's assigned budgetary
numbers for hardware ($150,000-$160,000). We
will be over the $100,000 assigned threshold, but
will seek to close out the CIP shortly thereafter.)
P2470 Financial System Enhancements Kerr 100 5 95 5%2,265 1,677 588 74%
Staff anticipates the spending for add-on
components to our existing ERP solutions with
purchases of items totaling $50,000.
P2540 Work Order Management System Replacement Kerr 300 137 163 46%700 255 445 36%
Staff is currently working with the consultants and
anticipates additional expenditures of $75,000 to
close out FY 2014/2015.
Total Capital Purchase Projects Total:760 325 435 43%12,842 8,504 4,338 66%
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT PROJECTS
R2028 RecPL - 8-Inch, 680 Zone, Heritage Road - Santa Victoria/Otay Valley Martin 1 - 1 0%600 - 600 0%No expenditures planned for Q2.
R2042 RecPL - 8-Inch, 927 Zone, Rock Mountain Road - SR-125/EastLake Martin 1 - 1 0%140 - 140 0%No expenditures planned for Q2.
R2047 RecPL - 12-Inch, 680 Zone, La Media Road - Birch/Rock Mountain Martin 1 - 1 0%450 - 450 0%No expenditures planned for Q2.
R2082 RecPL - 24-Inch, 680 Zone, Olympic Parkway - Village 2/Heritage Martin 1 - 1 0%1,747 - 1,747 0%No expenditures planned for Q2.
R2083 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, Heritage Road - Village 2/Olympic Martin 1 - 1 0%400 - 400 0%No expenditures planned for Q2.
R2084 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, Village 2 - Heritage/La Media Martin 1 - 1 0%970 1 969 0%No expenditures planned for Q2.
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q2\Expenditures\FY15 2nd qtr exp-MARISSA-FINAL.xlsx Page 3 of 4 2/10/2015
FISCAL YEAR 2015
2nd QUARTER REPORT
(Expenditures through 12/31/2014)
($ In Thousands)
2015 12/31/14
CIP No.Description
Project
Manager
FY 2015
Budget Expenses Balance
Expense to
Budget %Budget Expenses Balance Comments
FISCAL YEAR-TO-DATE, 12/31/14 LIFE-TO-DATE, 12/31/14
R2085 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, La Media - State/Olympic Martin 1 - 1 0%600 - 600 0%No expenditures planned for Q2.
Total Developer Reimbursement Projects Total:7 - 7 0%4,907 1 4,906 0%
GRAND TOTAL 10,576$ 3,136$ 7,440$ 30%146,151$ 45,286$ 100,865$ 31%
P:\Forms\D-Construction\CIP Quarterly Reports\CIP Qtr Reports\FY 2015\Q2\Expenditures\FY15 2nd qtr exp-MARISSA-FINAL.xlsx Page 4 of 4 2/10/2015
Otay Water District
Capital Improvement Program
Fiscal Year 2015
Second Quarter
(through December 31, 2014)
Attachment C
870-1 Reservoir Access Road
Asphalt Concrete Paving Operation
12-01-2014
Background
The approved CIP Budget for Fiscal Year 2015 consists of
73 projects that total $10.6 million. These projects are
broken down into four categories.
1.Capital Facilities $ 3.1 million
2.Replacement/Renewal $ 6.7 million
3.Capital Purchases $ 0.7 million
4.Developer Reimbursement $ 0.1 million
Overall expenditures through the Second Quarter of
Fiscal Year 2015 totaled $3.1 million, which is
approximately 30% of the Fiscal Year budget.
2
Fiscal Year 2015
Second Quarter Update
($1,000)
CIP
CAT Description FY 2015
Budget
FY 2015
Expenditures
%
FY 2015
Budget
Spent
Total Life-to-
Date Budget
Total
Life-to-Date
Expenditures
%
Life-to-
Date
Budget
Spent
1 Capital
Facilities $3,085 $909 29%$74,276 $18,481 25%
2 Replacement/
Renewal $6,724 $1,902 28%$54,126 $18,300 34%
3 Capital
Purchases $760 $325 43%$12,842 $8,504 66%
4 Developer
Reimbursement $7 $0 0%$4,907 $1 0%
Total:
$10,576 $3,136 30%$146,151 $45,286 31%
3
Fiscal Year 2015
Second Quarter
CIP Budget Forecast vs. Expenditures
4
District Map of Major CIP Projects
5
CIP Projects in Construction
870-1 Reservoir Access Road Paving (P2515)
Install New Asphalt Concrete Paved Perimeter Access Road for the Reservoir.
Replace Existing Dirt Road with New Paved Road. Construct New Entrance Gate.
$0.55M Budget
Start: October 2014
Estimated Completion: January 2015
6
870-1 Reservoir Slurry Seal Installation
12-05-2014
Asphalt Concrete Dike Installation
12-18-2014
CIP Projects in Construction
944-1, 944-2, & 458-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades (P2531, P2532, P2535)
Remove and Replace Deteriorating Reservoir Coatings.
Structural Modifications to Increase Service Life.
$1.83M Budget
Start: November 2014
Estimated Completion: June 2015
7
944-2 Reservoir -Cutting Door Sheet for Access
11-24-2014
944-2 Reservoir –Interior Sandblasting Operation
12-15-2014
CIP Projects in Construction
SR-11 Utility Relocations Sequence I (P2453)
Relocate Existing Water Facilities to support SR-11 Construction.
$2.25M Budget
Start: February 2014
Estimated Completion: July 2015
8
Fabricated 18” Steel Pipe Stored at
Northwest Pipe Company Adelanto CA Facility
10-30-2014
Construction Contract Status
8
PROJECT
TOTAL %
P2453
SR-11 Potable
Water Utility
Relocations -
Sequence 1
Coffman
Specialties, Inc.$947,380 $992,380 $16,047 1.7%$963,427 $431,335 -2.9%44.8%July 2015
P2493 624-2 Reservoir
Coating
Advanced
Industrial
Services
$1,169,000 $1,199,000 $0 0.0%$1,180,770 $1,180,770 -1.5%100.0%
Completed
August
2014
P2515 870-1 Reservoir
Access Road Paving
RAP
Engineering
Inc.
$205,566 $207,362 $9,611 4.7%$215,177 $196,557 3.8%91.3%January
2015
P2531
P2532
P2535
944-1, 944-2, & 458-
2 Reservoirs
Interior/Exterior
Coating & Upgrades
Olympus and
Associates Inc.$1,146,008 $1,206,008 $0 0.0%$1,179,944 $42,550 -2.2%3.6%June 2015
S2033
Calavo Basin Sewer
Rehabilitation
Phase 1
Arrieta
Construction
Inc.
$521,890 $529,490 $0 0.0%$521,890 $0 -1.4%0.0%July 2015
TOTALS:$3,989,844 $4,134,240 $25,658 0.6%$4,061,208 $1,851,211 -1.8%
CURRENT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT
TOTAL
EARNED
TO DATE
**THIS CHANGE ORDER RATE INCLUDES THE CREDIT FOR UNUSED ALLOWANCES
*NET CHANGE ORDERS DO NOT INCLUDE ALLOWANCE ITEM CREDITS. IT'S A TRUE CHANGE ORDER PERCENTAGE FOR THE PROJECT
CIP
NO.PROJECT TITLE CONTRACTOR BASE BID
AMOUNT
CONTRACT
AMOUNT W/
ALLOWANCES
% CHANGE
ORDERS W/
ALLOWANCE
CREDIT**
%
COMPLETE
EST.
COMP.
DATE
NET CHANGE
ORDERS LTD*
Consultant Contract Status
10
Consultant
CIP
No.Project Title
Original
Contract
Amount
Total
Change
Orders
Revised
Contract
Amount
Approved
Payment To
Date
%
Change
Orders
%
Project
Complete
Date of
Signed
Contract
End Date
of
Contract
PLANNING
ATKINS Varies 2015 WATER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN UPDATE $ 434,731.00 $ - $ 434,731.00 $ 110,923.38 0.0%25.5%1/28/2014 12/31/2016
CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC.VARIES
2015 INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES PLAN
UPDATE $ 99,993.00 $ - $ 99,993.00 $ - 0.0%0.0%11/17/2014 6/30/2016
WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC VARIES AS-NEEDED HYDRAULIC MODELING FY15/16 $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 $ 27,775.00 0.0%15.9%7/15/2014 6/30/2016
DESIGN
AECOM P2451
OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM (DESIGN ENGINEER) $ 3,910,297.00 $(228,365.00) $ 3,681,932.00 $ 953,503.52 -5.8%25.9%1/6/2011 6/30/2018
AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC Varies AS-NEEDED DESIGN SERVICES FY13-14 $ 300,000.00 $ - $ 300,000.00 $ 174,877.78 0.0%58.3%11/1/2012 6/30/2015
ARCADIS U.S., INC.
P2434,
P2511
VALUE ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIBILITY
REVIEW $ 153,628.00 $ - $ 153,628.00 $ 70,208.73 0.0%45.7%1/24/2012 6/30/2016
ARCADIS U.S. INC VARIES AS-NEEDED DESIGN FY 15-16 $ 300,000.00 $ - $ 300,000.00 $ - 0.0%0.0%9/11/2014 6/30/2016
ATKINS Varies
AS-NEEDED ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
FY12-13 $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 $ 155,536.56 0.0%88.9%10/26/2011 6/30/2015
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER
SCHRECK P2451
OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM (BINATIONAL WATER AND RELATED
ISSUES) $ 5,620.54 $ - $ 5,620.54 $ - 0.0%0.0%7/9/2013 6/30/2015
Consultant Contract Status
11
Consultant
CIP
No.Project Title
Original
Contract
Amount
Total
Change
Orders
Revised
Contract
Amount
Approved
Payment To
Date
%
Change
Orders
%
Project
Complete
Date of
Signed
Contract
End Date
of
Contract
DESIGN
BSE ENGINEERING INC Varies AS-NEEDED ELECTRICAL SERVICES $ 100,000.00 $ - $ 100,000.00 $ 27,117.62 0.0%27.1%7/1/2012 6/30/2015
CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC P2083 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION FOR 870-2 PS $ 624,910.00 $ 29,000.00 $ 653,910.00 $ 242,996.03 4.6%37.2%10/11/2013 12/31/2017
DARNELL & ASSOCIATES Varies AS-NEEDED TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES $ 125,000.00 $ - $ 125,000.00 $ 27,920.00 0.0%22.3%7/1/2012 6/30/2015
EPIC FIRE PROTECTION INC P2538 MIC TREATEMENT SYSTEM $ 20,300.00 $ - $ 20,300.00 $ 20,300.00 0.0%100.0%7/31/2014
8/20/2014
COMPLETE
HDR ENGINEERING INC Varies CORROSION SERVICES FY14-FY16 $ 684,750.00 $ - $ 684,750.00 $ 178,008.22 0.0%26.0%11/22/2013 12/31/2015
HECTOR MARES-COSSIO P2451
OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM (BINATIONAL WATER AND RELATED
ISSUES) $ 120,000.00 $ - $ 63,000.00 $ 63,000.00 0.0%100.0%4/1/2013
9/15/2014
COMPLETE
LEE & RO INC P2511 OTAY INTERCONNECT PIPELINE $ 2,769,119.00 $ - $ 2,769,119.00 $1,101,916.23 0.0%39.8%11/4/2010 12/31/2015
LEONDARD H VILLARREAL P2451
OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM (BINATIONAL WATER AND RELATED
ISSUES) $ 875.00 $ - $ 875.00 $ 875.00 0.0%100.0%3/21/2014 3/21/2015
MICHAEL D.KEAGY REAL ESTATE Varies AS-NEEDED APPRAISAL SERVICES FY13-14 $ 45,000.00 $ - $ 45,000.00 $ 31,000.00 0.0%68.9%9/17/2012 6/30/2015
PIPELINE INSPECTION & CONDITION
ANALYSIS CORPORATION R2116
INSPECTION AND CONDITION ASSESSMENT OF
THE RALPH W. CHAPMAN WATER RECYCLING
FACILITY 14-INCH FORCE MAIN $ 302,092.00 $ - $ 302,092.00 $ - 0.0%0.0%12/18/2014 4/30/2015
PSOMAS VARIES AS-NEEDED DESIGN FY 15-16 $ 300,000.00 $ - $ 300,000.00 $ - 0.0%0.0%9/11/2014 6/30/2016
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY S2024
CAMPO ROAD SEWER MAIN REPLACEMENT
PROJECT $ 805,705.00 $ - $ 805,705.00 $ 150,888.07 0.0%18.7%5/27/2014 12/31/2017
Consultant Contract Status
12
Consultant
CIP
No.Project Title
Original
Contract
Amount
Total
Change
Orders
Revised
Contract
Amount
Approved
Payment To
Date
%
Change
Orders
%
Project
Complete
Date of
Signed
Contract
End Date
of
Contract
DESIGN
SILVA SILVA CONSULTING P2451
OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM (BINATIONAL WATER AND RELATED
ISSUES) $ 115,000.00 $ - $ 115,000.00 $ 28,289.05 0.0%24.6%5/1/2014 6/30/2016
SIMON WONG ENGINEERING R2109 WOODEN TRESTLE IMPROVEMENT $ 26,790.00 $ - $ 26,790.00 $ 26,790.00 0.0%100.0%5/1/2014 12/31/2015
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL Varies GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FY13-15 $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 $ 57,010.81 0.0%32.6%12/10/2012 6/30/2015
STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF & HOLTZ P2451
OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM (BINATIONAL WATER AND RELATED
ISSUES) $ 780.00 $ - $ 780.00 $ 780.00 0.0%100.0%
TETRA TECH, INC P2434 RANCHO DEL REY WELL - PHASE 2 $ 724,493.50 $ 23,749.00 $ 748,242.50 $ 491,684.17 3.3%65.7%4/28/2011
12/31/2014
COMPLETE
(W)RIGHT ON COMMUNICATIONS,
INC.P2451
OTAY MESA CONVEYANCE AND DISINFECTION
SYSTEM (BINATIONAL WATER AND RELATED
ISSUES) $ 49,000.00 $ - $ 49,000.00 $ 26,325.95 0.0%53.7%5/1/2014 5/1/2015
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS Varies AS-NEEDED SURVEYING SERVICES FY 14-15 $ 175,000.00 $ - $ 175,000.00 $ 92,903.00 0.0%53.1%9/18/2013 6/30/2015
ALYSON CONSULTING Varies CONSTRUCTION MGMT/INSPECTION FY 13-15 $ 350,000.00 $ - $ 350,000.00 $ 206,645.00 0.0%59.0%10/24/2012 6/30/2015
HARPER & ASSOCIATES P2493
COATING INSPECTION SERVICES ON THE 624-2
& 458-2 RESERVOIR $ 75,160.00 $ - $ 75,160.00 $ 75,155.00 0.0%100.0%8/27/2013
7/3/2014
COMPLETE
RBF CONSULTING, INC P2083
870-2 PS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SERVICES $ 853,457.00 $ - $ 853,457.00 $ 15,742.00 0.0%1.8%7/30/2014 12/31/2017
ENVIRONMENTAL
HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL VARIES
MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING OF THE SAN
MIGUEL HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA AND CIP
ASSOCIATED MITIGATION PROJECTS $ 476,173.00 $ - $ 476,173.00 $ - 0.0%0.0%12/19/2014 12/31/2017
ICF INTERNATIONAL JONES &
STOKES INC VARIES
AS-NEEDED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FY
15/16/17 $ 375,000.00 $ - $ 375,000.00 $ 19,268.09 0.0%5.1%7/18/2014 6/30/2017
Consultant Contract Status
13
Consultant
CIP
No.Project Title
Original
Contract
Amount
Total
Change
Orders
Revised
Contract
Amount
Approved
Payment To
Date
%
Change
Orders
%
Project
Complete
Date of
Signed
Contract
End Date
of
Contract
ENVIRONMENTAL
MERKEL & ASSOCIATES Varies
SAN MIGUEL HABITAT MANAGEMENT AREA
AND CIP-ASSOCIATED MITIGATION PROJECTS $ 359,079.00 $ 26,750.00 $ 385,829.00 $ 385,829.00 7.4%100.0%12/20/2011
12/31/2014
COMPLETE
RECON P2494 PREPARATION OF THE SUBAREA PLAN $ 270,853.00 $ - $ 270,853.00 $ 193,262.61 0.0%71.4%3/28/2008 6/30/2015
WATER RESOURCES
MICHAEL R. WELCH Varies ENGINEERING PLANNING SVCS. $ 100,000.00 $ - $ 100,000.00 $ 8,250.00 0.0%8.3%4/9/2014 6/30/2019
PUBLIC SERVICES
AEGIS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT Varies AS-NEEDED DEVELOPER PROJECTS FY 14-15 $ 350,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 374,000.00 $ 269,889.86 6.9%72.2%8/26/2013 6/30/2015
TOTALS: $15,927,806.04 $(124,866.00) $15,745,940.04 $5,234,670.68 -0.8%
QUESTIONS?
14
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Geoff Stevens,
Chief Information Officer
PROJECT: Various DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
German Alvarez, Asst. General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: INFORMATIONAL ITEM – FISCAL YEAR 2015 MID-YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN
AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
No recommendation. This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See “Attachment A”.
PURPOSE:
To provide a mid-year report on the District’s Strategic Performance
Plan for FY2015.
ANALYSIS:
The District is in the first year of the FY2015-2018 Strategic Plan.
At the end of the second quarter of FY2015, the total results for both
the Strategic Objectives and the Performance Measures exceeded the
designated targets.
2
Strategic Plan Objectives
100% Of Strategic Plan Objectives On Schedule
Strategic Plan Objectives are designed to ensure the District, as a
whole, is making the appropriate high-level changes necessary to move
the agency in the planned direction to meet new challenges and
opportunities. The Strategic Objective results at mid-year were above
target with all 19 items (100%) completed or on schedule. The designated
target is 90%.
Performance Measures
85% Of Performance Measures On Target
Performance Measures are designed to track the day-to-day performance
of the District. These items measure the effectiveness and
efficiency of daily operations. Where possible, staff utilizes the
AWWA Qualserve Benchmarks as the basis for comparison. FY15 second
quarter results for measures were 39 of 46(85%)on or above target.
This exceeds the combined target of 75%.
3
Next Steps
Staff conducted a workshop with the Board on January 27, 2015, to gain
insight and support for the newly revised objectives for the FY16-
FY18 plan. Staff is finalizing these objectives and also revising the
targets for performance measures. The revised objectives and
performance measures will be presented to the Board as the initial
step of the FY16 budget approval process in May 2015.
Committee Reports – Slideshow
The Strategic Plan results are presented to both the Finance,
Administration and Communications Committee and the Engineering,
Operations and Water Resources Committee with a specific focus on the
most relevant information for each Committee.
Strategic Plan Available to Board from the Internet
All of the strategic plan results and associated details are provided
in an online web-based application available to the Board through a
VPN connection available from the District Secretary.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
Informational item only, no fiscal impact.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Strategic Plan and Performance Measures reporting is a critical
element in providing performance reporting to the Board and staff.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Strategic Plan Results Graphs Q2 FY2015
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
INFORMATIONAL ITEM – FISCAL YEAR 2015 MID-YEAR STRATEGIC
PLAN AND PERFORMANCE MEASURES REPORT
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations and Water Resources and the Finance,
Administration and Communications Committees reviewed this item at a
meeting held on February 17 and 18, 2015, respectively. The following
comments were made:
A PowerPoint presentation on the Strategic Plan FY 2015 Quarter 2
Results were provided to the Committee.
Staff indicated that 100% of the Strategic Objectives were above
target with all 19 items completed or on schedule. The target is
90%.
Staff discussed the Performance Measures of which 39 of 46 (85%)
were on or above target. The target was 70%.
Staff indicated that the Gallons Per Capita Per Day (1.3.103) is
on target, which is consistent with the weather. The District’s
target is to be below 172 Gallons Per Capita Per Day.
The Health & Safety Severity Rate (1.4.104, Qualserve) did not
meet its target. This objective is a ratio measure of the number
of lost time days over the number of total employee labor days.
It was indicated that this measure can easily be below target if
only one (1) employee is out for an extended period of time,
which is the reason this measure is below target.
The CIP Project Expenditure vs. Budget (2.2.200) is under target
due to unforeseen issues that are beyond the District’s control.
Staff noted during the CIP Quarterly Update that as of the Second
Quarter, total expenditures for the end of Fiscal Year 2015 are
estimated to be around 80% of the Fiscal Year budget.
There is no measurement this quarter for Project Closeout Time
(2.3.203) as no projects closed during the second quarter.
Bill Accuracy (QualServe) (3.2.302) was below target as the
District had an issue with an error in a billing table which led
to a billing error to some customers.
Overtime Percentage (3.2.303) is on target overall. The overtime
measure is set by budget.
Website Hits (4.4.402) significantly exceeded the District’s
target. Staff will likely adjust this target because when the
target was set, it was not anticipated that many of the visits to
the District’s website would be from customers wishing to pay
their bill.
The Planned Recycled Water Maintenance Ratio in $ (5.2.503) did
not meet the District’s target. Staff indicated that in the first
quarter, the District had a large break on the recycled system
which was very costly to fix (this repair was covered by
insurance). In the third and fourth quarter there was a leak on
the District’s forcemain. Because these issues increased the
District’s maintenance cost, the District did not meet the target
for this measure.
Leak Detection Program (5.2.520) is reported annually in the 3rd
quarter. Staff indicated that it will be on target when 20% of
the distribution system is surveyed for leaks.
Potable Water Distribution System Integrity (QualServe) 5.3.512
is measured to have no more than 16 leaks and breaks per 100
miles of distribution piping in a single year. During this
quarter, three (3) breaks occurred.
Planned Water Service Disruption Rate (QualServe) 5.3.513 is
consistent with the Potable Water Distribution System Integrity
measurement.
Emergency Facility Testing 5.3.519 is a new measurement that was
developed last year to have all District facilities tested per
year.
Critical Valve Exercising Program 5.3.525 is a new measurement
that was developed to have no less than 520 critical valves
exercised in a single year.
Staff indicated that this information is also available on the
District’s website where the actual quarterly entries made by the
District’s employees can be viewed.
Staff indicated that, in general, the District is above target in
both the measures and objectives.
It was shared that staff is working on finalizing the objectives
for FY 2016 and will be spending time reseting the targets for
the performance measures. Staff is also discussing developing a
“super” set of performance measures that may be more focused at
the enterprise level, such as, employees per customer which would
better document the District’s accomplishments.
Staff indicated that the Senior Team has scheduled three (3) more
meetings to closely review the Strategic Plan targets and to also
develop project plans. This will help in preparing for the
budget presentation in May 2015, which will include the FY
Strategic Plan for 2016-2018.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff stated that
information is entered into a data system by employees which is
then reviewed by the managers. The goal is to have the employees
who perform the work, enter the data themselves as much as
possible. It was noted that supervisors and managers share the
Strategic Plan’s performance and measurement results with their
employees and that Board members have access to the Strategic
Plan information via the extranet.
Staff indicated, in response to an inquiry from the committee,
that two (2) things impact overtime; hours worked and pay
increases. In the first quarter, the District was at or below
target in terms of hours worked. However, with the COLA pay
increase, there was a slight cost increase in overtime which
impacted the measure. It was indicated that staff manages
overtime actively to limit or eliminate the need for overtime
through the flexibility in scheduling. Staff noted that the
District does get exposed to unplanned overtime when there are
unplanned events, such as, pipeline breaks, etc.
Staff indicated in the FY 2015 plan the District implemented the
City Works System, SCADA, updated its Safety Programs, etc. In
FY 2016- 2018, the District will be using these systems to to
streamline and enhance business processes.
Staff indicated that the next step is to implement the FY 2016-
2018 Strategic Plan. In May 2015 staff will present the FY 2016
Strategic Plan as part of the FY 2016 Budget.
Following the discussion, the committees recommended presentation to
the full board as an informational item.
Strategic Plan
FY 2015 Quarter 2 Results
All Objectives Are on Schedule or Completed
85% of Performance Measures Meet the Target
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:
Regular Board
MEETING
DATE:
March 4, 2015
SUBMITTED
BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
W.O./G.F.
NO:
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: General Manager’s Report
GENERAL MANAGER:
The Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual San Diego CPI-U Less
Medical – This statistic was released the end of February which
the CPI is used to determine the COLA for 7/1/15. The figure
was 1.8%; however, in accordance with the MOU and Resolution,
“the minimum increase shall be two percent (2%)…” therefore,
employees will receive a 2% COLA effective 7/1/15 and this will
be included in the FY15-16 budget.
Effluent Force Main Repairs and Inspection - During the repairs
on the Effluent Force Main staff did not have to alter the
water order from the City of San Diego. In addition, the
Treatment Plant shutdown had no impact to the sewer system. All
sewer flows were handled by the County of San Diego’s Rancho
San Diego Pump Station to Metro. The Treatment Plant was
running to keep the microorganisms alive, but no discharge of
any effluent to the distribution system took place during these
events.
San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) Ten-day Shutdown – The
SDCWA’s ten-day shutdown was a success for the District. Water
system operations, in collaboration with other Operations
sections, did an outstanding job preparing and filling water
storage supplies and supplementing water demands via the Lower
Otay Pump Station. No customers were affected by the shutdown.
2
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Purchasing and Facilities:
Purchase Orders – There were 143 blanket and regular purchase
orders in effect during January with an adjusted total value of
$516,590. In addition, there were 143 Cal-Card transactions
totaling $82,679. By value, Cal-Card represents 14% of all
purchases; blanket orders 31%; and regular PO’s 56%.
Facility Alarm Monitoring – Facilities and Security staff have
determined that it is in the best interest of the District to
change its alarm-monitoring provider to The Watchlight
Corporation, an El Cajon based company. The decision is based
on a reduction of up to 35% per site in monthly fees, a 19%
reduction in hourly rates, a wider range of available services,
and Watchlight’s overall expertise and responsiveness.
Watchlight owns and operates an Underwriters Laboratories (UL)
listed Central Station and is a UL approved Installation
Company. An orderly transition of the District’s monitored
sites will be complete by March 31, 2015.
Human Resources:
Recruitments – HR is recruiting for or preparing to recruit
for: Systems Support Analyst, Utility Crew Leader, Utility
Worker I/II, and Reclamation Plant Operator I/II/III.
New Hires/Promotions – There was one new hire and two
promotions in the month of February:
o The Utility Maintenance Supervisor position was filled with
an internal applicant, Mike Plasterer. Mike has been with
the District for almost 20 years and held positions of
Utility Worker I, Senior Utility/Equipment Operator, and
Crew Leader.
o The Water System Operator positions (two) were filled with
one external and one internal candidate, DeAndre Savage.
DeAndre was a Utility Worker prior to the promotion to Water
Systems Operator.
Safety & Security:
Emergency Response Training – Staff completed onsite ICS-400
training in February. This is the last class of the series of
initial Emergency Response Training requirements. This
training was obtained from and paid for by the San Diego Urban
Safety & Security Training Initiative and saved the District
$16,000 in training costs.
All Hazards Preparedness Workshop - Staff attended the
workshop sponsored by Homeland Security and the San Diego Law
3
Enforcement Coordination Center and conducted by the Texas A&M
Engineering Emergency Response and Rescue Training Center.
WebEOC Training Exercise – Staff completed the monthly
exercise, which consisted of finding the tutorial for WebEOC
and e-mailing colvera@sdcwa.org.
Otay EOC – Review District’s EOC with attendees of the monthly
WebEOC Training Exercise. Shared the contents, pertinent
information, and initial steps to follow upon activation and
being the first respondent onsite.
Operations Electronic Annual Reporting System – Staff provided
Emergency Response Plan and Preparedness information to
Operations for inclusion as part of the annual electronic
water systems report.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:
District Boundaries - Worked with the Finance Department to
consolidate the Water and Sewer Improvement District (ID)
boundaries. GIS conducted slope analysis, flood plain analysis
and open space easement analysis for areas that need to be
clarified for the ID consolidation preparation. GIS also
provided the acreages for parcels and merged the parcels into
the new proposed ID.
Water Resource Master Plan - Worked with consultant, Atkin, on
the Water Resource Master Plan for data related subjects. GIS
provided a “checkout” version for Atkin to work on the water
modeling. In return, Atkin provided the feedback to GIS staff
and is now able to update the data into the GIS database to
improve data accuracy. The new business process helps improve
efficacy and data accuracy for both GIS data and model data.
FINANCE:
Finance Awards – For the 9th consecutive year, the District has
been awarded the Operating Budget Excellence Award for FY
2014-2015 by the California Society of Municipal Finance
Officers (CSMFO). In addition, the District has been awarded
the Capital Budget Excellence Award for the 10th consecutive
year. Both of these documents meet the established criteria
and serve as a valuable communications tool for the District.
AWWA Annual Conference - Shannon Coffin, Lead Meter
Maintenance/Cross Connection Worker, has been selected to
present at the annual AWWA conference held in Anaheim from
June 7-10 with 12,000 attendees expected. She will provide a
presentation on “AMR/AMI Leak Alarms Notification as part of
Water Conservation Solutions”, which is a method by which Otay
can share and highlight its successes with water
professionals.
4
Washer Rebate Program - SDG&E will be contributing $50.00 to
the High-Efficiency Washer (HEW) rebate program beginning
March 15th. By submitting just one application through the
SoCalWaterSmart website, District residents will be provided a
$185.00 HEW rebate; $50 from SDG&E, $85.00 from MWD, and $50
from the District’s rebate contributions.
Financial Reporting:
o For the seven months ended January 31, 2015, there are total
revenues of $54,703,550 and total expenses of
$53,561,674. The revenues exceeded expenses by $1,141,876.
o The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the
Investment Portfolio Details as of January 31, 2015 total
$84,619,940.24 with an average yield to maturity of 0.62%.
The total earnings year-to-date are $303,010.27.
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
927 Zone, Forcemain Assessment and Repair Project: This
Project consists of inspection, condition assessment, and
repair of the existing Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation
Facility (RWCWRF) 1980 era, 16,000 feet long, 14-inch diameter
steel force main. On October 1, 2014, the Board awarded a
professional services contract for inspection and condition
assessment of the forcemain to Pipeline Inspection & Condition
Analysis Corporation (PICA) based in Canada. PICA inspected
4,000 feet of the forcemain using their SeeSnake tool in early
January 2015. PICA identified eight localized defects, three
of which were field verified by District staff through
excavation and dissection of the pipe. The worst case defect,
accurately predicted by PICA (90-100% wall loss; possible
through-hole), was field verified by District staff and found
to be a very small, yet active, slow weeping leak. District
staff repaired the worst case defect before it could do damage
to the environmental preserve, Sweetwater watershed, and/or
District facilities. Based on the 4,000 feet inspected this
winter, the forcemain facility appears to be in good condition,
with the exception of the repairable localized defects. The
project is on schedule and within budget. (R2116)
SR-11 Potable Water Utility Relocations: This project consists
of two (2) groups of potable water relocations to accommodate
the construction of the future SR-11 right-of-way and connector
ramps. The first group includes relocation of existing
pipelines in Sanyo Avenue and utility easements and is
currently in the construction phase. The contractor, Coffman
Specialties Inc., has relocated the 10-inch and 12-inch mains
5
and is preparing to begin work to lower the District’s 18-inch
transmission main to accommodate the Caltrans freeway retaining
wall footings. The second group consists of relocating a 6-
inch blow off in Otay Mesa Road and is currently in the
construction phase. The contractor, TC Construction Co., Inc.,
is preparing to begin work to relocate a 6-inch blow off. The
overall project is on schedule and within budget. (P2453)
870-1 Reservoir Access Road Paving: This project consisted of
paving the existing perimeter dirt road around the 870-1
Reservoir. A construction contract was awarded by the Board on
October 1, 2014 to RAP Engineering, Inc. Substantial
completion for the project was issued effective January 22,
2015. Contract acceptance was issued on February 11, 2015.
This project was completed on schedule and within budget.
(P2515)
North-South District Interconnect Pipeline: This project
consists of installing approximately 5.2 miles of 30-inch
diameter pipe from H Street in Chula Vista to Paradise Valley
Road in Spring Valley. Staff has resumed evaluation of
alternative sites previously completed in Fiscal Year 2011.
(P2511)
944-1, 944-2, & 458-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coatings &
Upgrades: This project consists of removing and replacing the
interior and exterior coatings of the 944-1 0.3 MG Reservoir,
the 944-2 3.0 MG Reservoir, and the 458-2 1.8 MG Reservoir
along with providing structural upgrades to ensure the tanks
comply with both State and Federal OSHA standards as well as
American Water Works Association and County Health Department
standards. A construction contract was awarded by the Board on
October 1, 2014 to Olympus & Associates. The contractor has
completed the interior coating of the 944-2 Reservoir and will
begin the exterior coating work in March 2015. Notification of
the upcoming construction at the 458-2 Reservoir was mailed out
to residents on February 5 and the contractor began to mobilize
to the site on February 17, 2015. During March 2015 the
contractor is scheduled to remove the existing interior coating
and complete any required structural repairs at the 458-2
Reservoir. The overall project is on schedule and within
budget. (P2531, P2532, P2535)
Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF) Return
Activated Sludge (RAS) Pumps Replacement Project: This Project
consists of removal and replacement of the existing 5
horsepower (HP) RAS pumps with upgraded 20 HP units. On
January 7, 2015, the Board awarded a construction contract to
Cora Constructors, Inc. During February 2015 the contractor
initiated submittals for the project. It is anticipated that
6
the review and approval of submittals will be completed in
March 2015. The project is on schedule and within budget.
(R2111)
Calavo Basin Sewer System Rehabilitation: This project
consists of removing and replacing approximately 1,200 linear
feet of 8-inch PVC sewer pipeline and construction of 220 feet
of new 8-inch PVC sewer pipeline in the residential streets of
the Calavo Gardens area near Avocado Boulevard. A construction
contract was awarded by the Board on October 1, 2014 to Arrieta
Construction. Notification of the upcoming construction work
was mailed out to residents. Construction work was performed
on Fury Lane and Calle Verde during late February/early March
2015. The project is on schedule and within budget. (S2033)
850-3 Reservoir Interior Coatings: This project consists of
removing and replacing the interior coatings of the 850-3 3.0
MG Reservoir. The exterior was coated in 2012. The project
was advertised on January 7, 2015 and bids were opened on
January 28, 2015. Abhe & Svoboda was the low bidder. The
Painter & Allied Trades Union filed a bid protest claiming Abhe
& Svoboda was not a responsible bidder. Staff is evaluating
the validity of the protest and will make a recommendation to
the Board at the April 1, 2015 meeting. (P2542)
Rosarito Desalination:
Staff and representatives from NSC Agua, held telephone
conference calls on December 3, 2014, January 4, 2015, and
January 21, 2015 to discuss the project and coordinate on
complying with the California Water Resources Control Board
Drinking Water Program regulatory requirements. Draft sections
of the Environmental Impact Report are being prepared and staff
continues to coordinate with the U.S. State Department on NEPA
compliance. (P2451)
Regional Water Quality Control Board Region 9 (San Diego): The
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is proposing
modifications to the Basin Plan to revise their plans and
policies including the 2009 (as amended in 2013) Recycled Water
Policy. Eighteen (18) water agencies, including the Otay Water
District, had significant issues with what the RWQCB noted as
“minor corrections.” Working together, these agencies on
February 12, 2015 sent a draft of the Landscape Irrigation with
Recycled Water section of Chapter 4 (Implementation) for
consideration by the RWQCB. The recommendations are consistent
with the goals of the California Water Plan, would promote
recycled water use, while ensuring that nitrate loads
associated with recycled water are not unreasonably restricted.
See attached letter dated February 12, 2015 from the San Diego
County Water Authority.
7
Water Facilities Master Plan Update: This project will update
the District’s existing Water Resources Master Plan that was
previously updated in October 2008 and revised in May 2013.
The consultant (Atkins) is anticipated to provide a 60% draft
for staff review in April 2015. (P1210)
Integrated Resource Plan Update: On November 5, 2014 the Board
awarded a contract to Carollo Engineers, Inc., to prepare the
2015 IRP Update. Water demands for the District out to year
2050 have been developed for Carollo’s use in preparing the IRP
Update. (P1210)
Associated General Contractors of America and Water Agency
Standards Meeting: District staff and other Water Agency
Standards (WAS) Agencies have engaged with the contracting
community through the Associated General Contractors of America
(AGC). Meetings are held every six (6) months to discuss
issues of material supply, standards, and future projects the
District will be releasing to bid. These meetings are held to
increase communication with the Contracting community and to
gather feedback for the WAS Standards Committee.
For the month of January 2015, the District sold 19 meters (23
EDUs) generating $212,826 in revenue. Projection for this
period was 12.8 meters (15.3 EDUs) with budgeted revenue of
$140,758. Total revenue for Fiscal Year 2015 is $2,161,044
against the annual budget of $1,689,093.
The following table summarizes Engineering's project purchases
and amendments issued during the period of January 8, 2015
through February 18, 2015 that were within staff signatory
authority:
Date
Action
Amount
Contractor/
Consultant
Project
1/06/15 P.O. $16,390.00 A & D Fire
Sprinklers, Inc.
MIC Treatment System
Installation on the
Operations Building
(P2538)
1/08/15 P.O. $1,906.00 Mayer Reprographics,
Inc. 850-3 Reservoir (P2542)
2/9/15 P.O. $2,010.94 Mayer Reprographics,
Inc.
450-1 Disinfection
Facility Rehabilitation
(R2112)
2/11/15 P.O. $5,000.00 The Watchlight Corp. 870-2 Pump Station
(P2083)
2/18/15 Amendment $35,000.00 Alyson Consulting
Construction Management
and Inspection Services
(various)
8
Water Operations:
Total number of potable water meters is 49,338, which is four
(4) less from last month. The District pulled a total of eight
(8) meters last month and only set four (4) new ones. The
eight (8) meters pulled include five (5) temporary construction
meters, one (1) recycled meter per inspection waiting for the
recycled water permit to be approved and is expected to be
reset at a later date, one (1) meter via the Engineering Front
counter as it served a vacant lot; the owner is credited with 1
EDU credit towards a future meter purchase, and one (1) meter
associated with Jamul Indian Village’s request to use credits
from smaller meters towards a larger meter to accommodate an
expansion of their casino.
The January potable water purchases were 1,816.8 acre-feet
which is 10.2% below the budget of 2,023.5 acre-feet. The
cumulative purchases through January is 18,921.8 acre-feet
which is 2.1% below the cumulative budget of 19,326.7 acre-
feet.
The January recycled water purchases and production was 141.1
acre-feet which is 40.5% below the budget of 237.1 acre-feet.
The cumulative production and purchases through January is
2,684.5 acre-feet which is 4.6% above the cumulative budget of
2,565.5 acre-feet.
9
Recycled water consumption for the month of January is as
follows:
o Total consumption was 88.1 acre-feet or 28,689,540 gallons
and the average daily consumption was 925,469 gallons per
day.
o Total recycled water consumption as of January for FY 2015
is 2,797.9 acre-feet.
o Total number of recycled water meters is 707.
Wastewater flows for the month of January were as follows:
o Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,637,447.
o Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per
day: 542,099.
o Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 1,095,349.
o Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling
Facility, gallons per day: 518,964.
o Flow to Metro from Otay Water District was 576,385 gallons
per day.
By the end of December there were 6,090 wastewater EDUs.
Attachment: Letter from San Diego County Water Authority
Dated: February 12, 2015
Subject: “Comments on Proposed Basin Plan Amendments
Modification of Groundwater Nitrate Objectives and
Incorporation of the State Onsite Wastewater Treatment
System (OWTS) Policy”
MEMBER AGENCIES
Corfsbod
Municipal V\bter District
Ci!yof Del~
City of Escond1do
Ci!y of Notional City
City of Oceanside
CityofPowoy
City of Son Diego
Fallbrook
Public Utility Distr>-ct
Helix Woter District
Lakeside Water District
Olivenhoin
Municipal Water District
Otoy Water District
Padre Dom
Municipal Woter District
Comp Pendleton
Morine Corps Bose
Rainbow
Municipal Woter District
Romano
Municipal Woter District
Rincon del Dioblo
Municipal Water District
Son Dieguito Water District
Santo Fe Irrigation Distnct
South Boy Irrigation District
Vallecitos Water District
Volley Center
Municipal Woler Distrid
Vista Irrigation Dislrid
Yuimo
Municipal Water District
OTHER
REPRESENTATIVE
County of Son Diego
San Diego County Water Authority
4677 Overland Avenue • San Diego, California 92123-1233
(858) 522-6600 FAX (858) 522-6568 www.sdcwa.org
February 12, 2015
Regional Water Quality Control Board
San Diego Region
Ms. Jody Ebsen
2735 Northside Drive, Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92108-2700
ATTACHMENT TO GM REPORT
Subject: Comments on Proposed Basin Plan Amendments Modification of
Groundwater Nitrate Objectives and Incorporation of the State Onsite
Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Policy
Dear Ms. Ebsen:
The San Diego County Water Authority (Water Authority) and the recycled water
agencies in Region 9 that are signatory to this letter have reviewed the proposed Basin
Plan modifications which would:
1. Revise Chapter 3 (Water Quality Objectives) to establish the groundwater
quality objective for nitrate at 45 mg/1 as N03 for over 40 basins within the
San Diego Region.
2. Revise provisions of Chapter 4 (Implementation) to incorporate the State Water
Resources Control Board Onsite Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) Policy
into the Basin Plan and make minor corrections to other sections regarding
Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs ).
3. Revise Chapter 4 (Implementation) to add implementation provisions for the
nitrate groundwater quality objective to protect surface water quality where
groundwater and surface water are interconnected.
4. Revise Chapter 5 (Plans and Policies) to include descriptions of the 2012 State
Water Board OWTS Policy and 2009 (as amended in 2013) Recycled Water
Policy.
5. Delete the expired conditional waivers of waste discharge requirements from the
Basin Plan and make other minor non-substantive changes to the Basin Plan.
We support the Water Board's intent to modify the Basin Plan to address the 2012
OWTS Policy and 2009 Recycled Water Policy. We have significant issues, however,
with the proposed Basin Plan language changes within the "Landscape Irrigation with
Recycled Water" section of Chapter 4 (Implementation). While proposed modifications
to this landscape irrigation section are described within the Basin Plan modification
public notice as "minor corrections to other sections regarding Waste Discharge
A public agency providing a safe and reliable water supply to the San Diego region
PRINTED ON RECYCl£0 PAPER
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. J ody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page2
Requirements", we believe that the proposed modifications within the "Landscape
Irrigation with Recycled Water" section are problematic because they:
1. Do not reflect the actual potential recycled water irrigation impacts to
groundwater and incorrectly overstate the contribution of recycled water
irrigation to groundwater nitrate concentrations.
2. Do not reflect the groundwater quality issues or loads within the San Diego
Region, are inconsistent with the goals of the Recycled Water Policy, and are
inconsistent with findings presented within Salt and Nutrient Management Plans
prepared within the San Diego Region.
3. Would inappropriately result in increased regulation of nitrate loads from
recycled water irrigation (which has a minor, if any, influence on groundwater
nitrate concentrations) while at the same time resulting in decreased water
quality regulation of 0 WTS (which represent a greater threat to groundwater
nitrate quality than recycled water use).
4. Do not take into account typical professional practices or management actions
which result in nutrient loads from recycled water use (which is regulated by the
Regional Water Board) being no different from nutrient loads from potable
water irrigation (which is not regulated by the Regional Water Board).
5. Do not foster implementation of (and in fact represent potential impediments to)
recycled water goals and objectives established within the 2013 California
Water Plan, the 2009 Recycled Water Policy and the 2013 San Diego Water
Board Practical Vision.
Nitrate Loading Issues. Currently, Chapter 4 of the Basin Plan establishes criteria
under which the Regional Board can delegate review and approval of 0 WTS to the
appropriate county health officer. The proposed modifications would allow significant
greater OWTS flows without the need for Regional Water Board review or water
quality evaluation. Under these modifications, Tier 1 OWTS discharges of up to 3500
gallons per day (gpd) could be approved by the counties without the need for any water
quality assessment. (This is approximately triple the current 1200 gpd threshold OWTS
discharge limit addressed within the Basin Plan and the Regional Board delegation
agreements with the counties.)
As acknowledged within the OWTS Policy support documents, OWTS discharges
typically contain total nitrogen concentrations (comprised primarily of nitrate) of 50 to
90 mg/1.1 Because the OWTS discharges occur beneath the root zone, little or no
vegetative uptake of these nutrients occurs. Additionally, little nitrogen removal occurs
as water moves downward to groundwater, resulting in almost 100 percent of OWTS
nitrogen loads impacting groundwater quality. The OWTS Policy mitigates against
these potential impacts by imposing precipitation-based land density requirements in
1 As reported in Table 4-9 of the Onsite Wastewater System Policy, Final Substitute Environmental Document, approved by the
State Water Resources Control Board on June 19, 2012.
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. J ody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page 3
order to prevent OWTS loads from causing exceedance of a groundwater quality nitrate
objective of 45 mg/1 as N03 (1 0 mg/1 as nitrogen)?
Recycled water irrigation represents a much lower threat to groundwater nitrate quality
(if any) than OWTS discharges. First, total nitrogen concentrations in recycled water
are less than OWTS discharges, and typically range from 10 to 40 mg/1.3 More
importantly, unlike OWTS discharges, recycled water is applied to the land surface, and
irrigated nutrient demands of landscape irrigation can be equal or greater than the
available nitrogen concentrations in the irrigation supply. As a result, recycled water
users (particularly those removing cuttings) typically periodically apply fertilizers to
satisfy additional vegetation nutrient demands of the irrigated vegetation. Finally,
recycled water users are required to undergo training and are required to implement
professional management practices under adopted recycled water agency Rules and
Regulations established pursuant to county and Regional Water Board requirements. In
accordance with these required practices (and as a result of water conservation guidance
and directives issued by the state, county and local governments), recycled water
irrigation operations operate at a high irrigation efficiency, resulting in a minimal
amount of water and significantly reduced nutrient loads percolating downward to
groundwater.
While OWTS dischargers (along with agricultural fertilization) were identified as a
primary contributor to basin nutrient loads within San Diego region Salt and Nutrient
Management Plans (SNMPs) prepared pursuant to the 2009 Recycled Water Policy,
none of the SNMPs identified recycled water irrigation operations as representing a
threat to cause exceedance of Basin Plan nitrate groundwater objectives. Furthermore,
none of the SNMPs identified any recycled water management strategies or controls
(over and above those currently implemented) as being necessary to ensure compliance
with Basin Plan nitrate objectives.4
These SNMP findings are consistent with a half-century history of recycled water use
within the San Diego Region, in which not one instance has occurred where recycled
water irrigation has resulted in nitrate exceedance of the 45 mg/1 drinking water nitrate
objective in a downstream potable supply well. As an example of this lack of
significant impact, nitrate concentrations of 2.4 mg/1 were reported in 2014 at the
Carlton Oaks Golf course, which is immediately downstream and makes use of recycled
water discharged from the Padre Dam MWD Santee Lakes project that has been in
operation for more than 60 years. 5
2 See Table 1 of the OWTS Policy, Water Quality Policy for Siting, Design, Operation, and Maintenance ofOnsite Wastewater
Treatment Systems, adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board on June 19, 2012.
3 Typical range of total nitrate in recycled water supplies produced by Water Authority member agencies that produce disinfected
tertiary treated recycled water that conforms to criteria established in Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3 of the California Code of
Regulations.
4 Includes SNMPs submitted to the Regional Water Board for the San Juan Creek basin, Temecula basin, lower Santa Margarita
River basin, Escondido basin, San Pasqua! basin, Gower basin, and Santee basin.
5 See Chapter 5 of the Santee Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan, prepared by Montgomery Watson-Harza and submitted
by Padre Dam MWD to the Regional Water Board in 2014.
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. Jody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page4
All existing documented groundwater nitrate problems within the region (e.g. San
Pasqual Valley, Pauma Valley) are in areas where recycled water irrigation is minimal
or non-existent, and nitrate loads are dominated by agricultural irrigation and applied
fertilizers. Indeed, the Salt and Nutrient Management Plan for the San Pasqua! Valley
(one of the areas most impacted by groundwater nitrate concentrations), identified
recycled water as comprising less than one-half of one percent of the total basin-wide
nitrogen load. 6
Given this history, it is inconsistent for the Basin Plan to reflect a need for increased
regulation of nitrate loads in recycled water irrigation, while at the same time proposing
a reduction in Regional Board oversight and water quality regulation of OWTS
discharges (which represent a greater threat to groundwater quality than recycled water
irrigation in unsewered portions of the Region).
Trace Nutrients. In addition to addressing how nitrate within OWTS and recycled
water irrigation operations are to be regulated, it is worthwhile for the Basin Plan to
address the regulation of trace nutrients. Iron and manganese are two key trace
nutrients found both in recycled water supplies and OWTS discharges. Unlike nitrate,
which is a primary (health-based) drinking water standard, iron and manganese are
secondary (aesthetic) consumer acceptance standards established to minimize staining
in plumbing fixtures. Iron and manganese groundwater quality objectives are typically
established at the secondary consumer acceptance drinking water standards of 0.3 mg/1
and 0.05 mg/1 respectively.
Iron and manganese concentrations in OWTS wastewater and recycled water supplies
periodically exceed these limits. Unlike OWTS discharges which occur below the
ground surface and may directly impact groundwater quality, recycled water irrigation
operations result in vegetative uptake of iron, manganese and other trace nutrients,
reducing the impact on groundwater quality. As documented in numerous studies
conducted within the San Diego Region, this trace nutrient uptake limits the amount of
iron and manganese that is available for recharging groundwater.7 As a result, recycled
water effluent limits for iron and manganese can be established at levels that are slightly
higher than the corresponding groundwater quality objectives to account for the
assimilative capacity effects of trace nutrient uptake. The Basin Plan section on
"Landscape Irrigation with Recycled Water" should address this effect and how trace
nutrients in recycled water irrigation supplies are to be regulated.
6 See Chapter 3 of the San Pasqua/ Valley Groundwater Basin Salt and Nutrient Management Plan, prepared by CH2M Hill, and
submitted by the City of San Diego to the Regional Water Board in 2014.
7 See City of Carlsbad Report of Waste Discharge for Revised Iron and Manganese Limits (June 2011), City of Escondido Report
of Waste Discharge for Revised Waste Discharge Requirements, Hale Avenue Resource Recovery Facility (January 2003), City of
San Clemente Manganese Assessment, City of San Clemente Water Reclamation Facility (April 2002). Similar results are
reported in January 2015 by the City of San Diego in Draft Amendment to Report of Waste Discharge Permit 93-03 (North City
Water Reclamation Plant).
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. J ody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page 5
Proposed Basin Plan Revisions. As part of the "minor corrections to other sections"
identified in the Regional Water Board "Notice of Public Workshop" for the proposed
OWTS Basin Plan amendments, the Regional Water Board staff propose a complete
rewrite of the Chapter 4 section entitled "Landscape Irrigation with Recycled Water".
To address the above-discussed issues, the Water Authority, its member agencies, and
other impacted regional agencies propose an alternative version of the "Landscape
Irrigation with Recycled Water" section, with the intent of:
1. Better defining, prioritizing, and reflecting the relative threats that different
types of discharges present toward achieving compliance with Basin Plan
groundwater nutrient objectives.
2. Establishing the rationale for why professionally operated recycled water
irrigation operations do not represent a threat to cause exceedances to Basin Plan
groundwater quality objectives for nutrients.
3. Clearly establishing nitrogen management requirements that should be
incorporated into WDRs and water reclamation requirements to ensure that
recycled water operations are in keeping with protecting groundwater quality
and achieving Basin Plan groundwater quality objectives for nutrients.
4. Addressing effects of trace nutrients such as iron and manganese.
5. Establishing the rationale for why it is not necessary for the Regional Water
Board to establish numerical effluent concentration limits for nitrogen within
recycled water, except in special circumstances.
6. Identifying the special circumstances which may warrant Regional Board
attention in regulating sources of nutrients in applied recycled waters.
7. Encouraging the production and use of recycled water in Region 9 in
conjunction with stakeholders.
A proposed draft of the "Landscape Irrigation with Recycled Water" section of Chapter
4 (Implementation) is attached for your consideration which addresses these issues and
needs. The revisions to the "Landscape Irrigation with Recycled Water" section that we
propose herein is necessary to maintain existing recycled water use within the region
and to offer opportunities for expanded recycled water use that is consistent with
implementing Basin Plan water quality objectives for nutrients. The proposed Basin
Plan revisions we propose:
1. Are consistent with implementing goals of the California Water Plan, Recycled
Water Policy, and San Diego Water Board Practical Vision.
2. Would promote recycled water use by providing clear and unambiguous
direction to Regional Board staff and recycled water agencies on how recycled
water irrigation operations are to be regulated.
3. Would ensure that nitrate loads associated with recycled water irrigation
operations (which the Regional Board regulates) are not unreasonably restricted
to levels below nitrate loads associated with imported or potable water use
(which the Regional Water Board does not regulate).
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. Jody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page 6
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed Basin Plan modifications.
The Water Authority, its member agencies, and other regional agencies that purvey
recycled water are supportive of the Regional Water Board's intent of modifying the
Basin Plan to incorporate OWTS Policy recommendations and the 2009 Recycled
Water Policy, but have significant concerns that the currently proposed "Landscape
Irrigation with Recycled Water" section of Chapter 4 (Implementation) runs contrary to
the goal of promoting the use of recycled water.
We look forward to coordinating with the San Diego Water Board to ensure that
proposed Basin Plan modifications are consistent with promoting recycled water use
and implementing the goals set forth in the California Water Plan, Recycled Water
Policy, and San Diego Water Board Practical Vision.
Sincerely,
~~
Ken Weinberg
Director of Water Resources
San Diego County Water Authority
General Manager
Otay Water District
Brian Brady
General Manager
Fallbrook Public Utility District
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. Jody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page 7
~6)~
Mike Obermiller, P .E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
City of Poway
~ ~·---ksl!l~ff ~ ~~Manager
City of San Clemente
Wendy Chambers General Manager
Carlsbad Municipal Water District
cr~
Joone Lopez
General Manager
Moulton Niguel Water District
Marsi A. Steirer
Deputy Director
-
Long-Range Planning & Water Resources Division
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. Jody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page 8
/~~
Hector Ruiz, P .E.
General Manager
Trabuco Canyon Water District
t.::fforn
Interim Water Utilities Director
City of Oceanside
Greg Thomas
General Manager
Rincon del Diablo Municipal Water District
~_))~~
Dennis Sperino
Deputy Director/Utilities-Waste Water
City of Escondido
r 3:~~41
Ms. Betty Burnett
General Manager
South Orange County Wastewater Authority
Rincon
Water
34156 Del Obispo St.
Dana Point, CA. 92629
del
Diablo
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Ms. Jody Ebsen
February 12, 2015
Page 9
~~~---
RichardS. Williamson, Assistant General Manager
Rancho California Water District
Paul A. Cook, General Manager
Irvine Ranch Water District
Wastewater Operations Superintendent
Ramona Municipal Water District
L:WYL.~
Daniel R. F erons
General Manager
Santa Margarita Water District
~~4
General Manager
El Toro Water District
MM/tp
Attachment (1 ):
by email:
Recommended Basin Plan Revisions -Landscape Irrigation with
Recycled Water
Recommended Basin Plan Revisions
Landscape Irrigation with Recycled Water
Landscape Irrigation with Recycled Water
Attachment 1
It is the stated interest of the Regional Water Board to promote and encourage recycled water
use where such use is consistent with achieving applicable water quality standards. The State
Recycled Water Policy establishes goals for increasing state-wide recycled water use in a
manner that implements state and federal water quality laws. Consistent with the State Recycled
Water Policy, the San Diego Water Board Practical Vision establishes a policy of using the San
Diego Water Board's leadership and regulatory authority to encourage, promote, and facilitate
development of new and diverse sustainable local water supplies in an environmentally
responsible manner. The Practical Vision specifically lists supporting and encouraging direct
use of recycled water and indirect potable reuse as key elements of this sustainability strategy.
The use of tertiary treated recycled water within the San Diego Region dates back to the 1960s,
and recycled water is currently used within each of the eleven hydrologic units that comprise
the San Diego Region. A significant majority of this reuse is in the form of landscape
irrigation, and virtually all of this reuse involves disinfected tertiary recycled water, as defined
within Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 3, Section 60301.230 ofthe California Water Code.
Disinfected tertiary recycled water typically contains concentrations of total nitrogen that range
from approximately 10 mg/1 to 40 mg/1. Unlike OWTS discharges which contain higher
concentrations of nitrogen, which occur below the root zone, and can directly impact
groundwater quality, recycled water used for landscape irrigation is applied to the land surface
where primary nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and secondary nutrients such as iron
and manganese can be taken up by vegetation. Since recycled water used for landscape
irrigation typically contains less nitrogen than the nitrogen demands of the irrigated vegetation,
fertilization is required to ensure that sufficient nutrients are available to meet vegetation
demands. Recycled water concentrations of trace nutrients such as iron and manganese may
exceed vegetation nutrient demands, but vegetation uptake can reduce the degree to which such
trace nutrients can affect groundwater quality.
Proper, professional operation of recycled water landscape irrigation that includes (1)
maintaining high irrigation efficiencies appropriate to the vegetation and soil conditions, and (2)
reducing fertilizer use commensurate with the nutrient value of the recycled water, can ensure
that recycled water nutrient loads do not cause exceedance of Basin Plan water quality
objectives, and are equivalent to nutrient loads that would occur if potable water were to be
substituted for recycled water use. Demonstrating the effectiveness of this strategy, none of the
Salt and Nutrient Management Plans prepared for the San Diego Region has identified:
• Recycled water landscape irrigation as representing a threat to exceeding the 45 mg/1
(as N03) groundwater nitrate objective,
• Need for reducing nutrient concentrations in applied recycled water, or
• Need for implementation of nutrient management as part of recycled water landscape
irrigation use.
Additionally, historic groundwater concentrations downstream from long-operating recycled
water landscape irrigation projects within the Region demonstrate consistent compliance with
the 45 mg/1 (as N03) groundwater nitrate objective, and no instance has occurred within the San
Diego Region where recycled water irrigation use has resulted in groundwater nitrate
concentrations exceeding the 45 mg/1 (as N03) objective.
Attachment 1 cont' d
Establishing recycled water nitrogen effluent concentration limits in WDRs that would require a
reduction in nutrient concentrations in recycled water supplies would not lead to any discernible
groundwater quality improvement because this would lead irrigation users to simply increase
fertilizer applications to the site by a commensurate amount in order to satisfy vegetative
nutrient demands. Similarly, terminating recycled water operations at the site and substituting
potable water as the irrigation supply would not result in any discernible water quality
improvement, as fertilizer application rates would be commensurately increased.
Although recycled water nitrate concentration limits would not protect groundwater quality, the
professional management of recycled water operations can ensure that recycled water that
percolates past the landscape root zone is consistent with achieving applicable Basin Plan
groundwater quality objectives. As such, the following requirements shall be used by the
Regional Water Board in establishing landscape irrigation requirements within Waste Discharge
Requirements, Master Reclamation Permits, and Water Recycling Requirements:
• Recycled water purveying agencies must monitor nutrient levels in their recycled water
supplies, and annually notify recycled water users of the nutrient value of recycled
water.
• For recycled water use in a basin where a Salt and Nutrient Management Plan has been
adopted and incorporated into the Basin Plan by the Regional Board, recycled water
purveying agencies will implement any applicable nutrient management requirements
mandated within the Salt and Nutrient Management Plan.
• For recycled water use in a basin where a Salt and Nutrient Management Plan has been
adopted and incorporated into the Basin Plan by the Regional Board, recycled water
purveying agencies shall implement applicable nutrient management requirements that
pertain to them as stipulated within the Salt and Nutrient Management Plan.
Additionally, the Regional Board shall require other agencies or entities to implement
any applicable nutrient management requirements mandated by the Salt and Nutrient
Management Plan that pertain to these other agencies or entities.
• Recycled water site supervisors shall be responsible for determining onsite fertilizer
needs and shall complete training and education in compliance with recycled water
agency rules and regulations to: (1) Minimize the potential for runoff or over-irrigation
and, (2) Take into account the nutrient value of the recycled water.
In establishing applicable recycled water landscape irrigation effluent concentration limits for
iron and manganese, recycled water permits issued by the Regional Board shall take into
account the projected nutrient uptake of the irrigated vegetation and projected iron and
manganese loads. Where plant uptake is not adequate to reduce iron and manganese loadings to
an insignificant level, the Regional Board shall also consider beneficial uses and local
groundwater conditions, including existing groundwater quality and available assimilative
capacity.
REVENUES:
Potable Water Sales $
Recycled Water Sales
Potable Energy Charges
Potable System Charges
Potable MWD & CW A Fixed Charges
Potable Penalties
Total Water Sales
Sewer Charges
Meter Fees
Capacity Fee Revenues
Betterment Fees for Maintenance
Non-Operating Revenues
Tax Revenues
Interest
Transfer from Potable General Fund
Total Revenues $
EXPENSES:
Potable Water Purchases $
Recycled Water Purchases
CWA-Infrastructure Access Charge
CW A -Customer Service Charge
CWA-Emergency Storage Charge
MWD-Capacity Res Charge
MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge
Subtotal Water Purchases
Power Charges
Payroll & Related Costs
Material & Maintenance
Administrative Expenses
Legal Fees
Expansion Reserve
Betterment Reserve
Replacement Reserve
New Supply Fee
Transfer to Sewer General Fund
OPEB Trust
Potable General Fund
Sewer Replacement
Total Expenses $
EXCESS REVENUES(EXPENSE) $
F:/MORPT/FS2015-0115
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
FOR SEVEN MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31,2015
Annual
Budget Actual Budget
45,669,500 $ 27,660,308 $ 27,925,500
8,826,600 5,652,921 5,612,200
2,145,600 1,366,651 1,325,800
12,337,500 6,751,853 6,741,200
10,936,200 6,444,006 6,452,700
870,300 593,393 550,600
80,785,700 48,469,132 48,608,000
3,007,700 1,662,904 1,665,200
51,500 51,222 30,000
1,150,600 665,058 671,200
301,800 188,123 301,800
1,947,800 1,118,750 1,099,800
3,763,700 2,165,261 2,107,600
77,400 60,000 45,200
553,800 323,100 323,100
91,640,000 $ 54,703,550 $ 54,851,900
34,521,500 $ 20,944,079 $ 21,055,400
1,601,500 922,565 1,135,950
1,901,400 1,096,941 1,097,400
1,792,200 1,042,766 1,042,200
4,741,200 2,737,664 2,741,200
701,400 366,159 365,900
1,800,000 1,060,112 1,050,000
47,059,200 28,170,286 28,488,050
2,838,400 1,972,656 1,859,300
19,747,600 11,779,362 11,895,950
3,619,800 1,793,923 1,950,625
5,009,200 2,169,413 2,472,246
410,000 118,335 239,167
2,538,900 1,481,000 1,481,000
3,530,000 2,059,200 2,059,200
3,270,200 1,907,600 1,907,600
705,000 411,300 411,300
553,800 323,100 323,100
647,100 377,500 377,500
1,583,800 923,900 923,900
127,000 74,100 74,100
91,640,000 $ 53,561,674 $ 54,463,037
$ 1,141,876 $ 388,863
Exhibit A
YTD
Variance Var 0/o
$ (265,192) (0.9%)
40,721 0.7%
40,851 3.1%
10,653 0.2%
(8,694) (0.1 %)
42,793 7.8%
(138,868~ (0.3%~
(2,296) (0.1%)
21,222 70.7%
(6,142) (0.9%)
(113,677) (37.7%)
18,950 1.7%
57,661 2.7%
14,800 32.7%
0.0%
$ (148,350) (0.3%)
$ 111,321 0.5%
213,385 18.8%
459 0.0%
(566) (0.1%)
3,537 0.1%
(259) (0.1 %)
~10,112~ ~1.0%~
317,764 1.1%
(113,356) (6.1 %)
116,588 1.0%
156,702 8.0%
302,833 12.2%
120,832 50.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
$ 901,364 1.7%
$ 753,013
2/24/2015 3:18PM
Investments
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
San Diego County Pool
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking
(not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
Par
Value
57,735,000.00
8,000,000.00
81,784.76
4,685,947.78
13,294,298.31
83,797,030.85
823,526.84
84,620,557.69
Total Earnings January 31 Month Ending
Current Year 51 ,178.06
Average Daily Balance 86,994,423.15
Reporting period 01/01/2015-01/31/2015
Run Date: 02/17/2015-13:43
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
January 31, 2015
Market Book
Value Value
57,790,912.80 57,736,138.60
8,010,860.00 8,001,828.90
81 ,784.76 81,784.76
4,685,855.84 4,685,947.78
13,227,000.00 13,294,298.31
83,796,413.40 83,799,998.35
823,526.84 823,526.84
84,619,940.24 84,623,525.19
Fiscal Year To Date
303,010.27
83,362,117.20
::l-1('-/~
%of Days to
Portfolio Term Maturity
68.90 997 809
9.55 925 262
0.10 730 355
5.59 1 1
15.86 1 1
100.00% 776 583
1 1
776 583
YTM YTM
360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
0.869 0.881
0.395 0.400
0.030 0.030
0.258 0.262
0.474 0.481 ---
0.726 0.736
0.212 0.215 ---
0.726 0.736
Portfolio OT A Y
AP
PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW
January 31, 2015
INVESTMENT OVERVIEW & MARKET STATUS:
The federal funds rate has remained constant now for over 5 years. On December 16, 2008, at the Federal Reserve Board's regular
scheduled meeting, the federal funds rate was lowered from 1.00% to "a target range of between Zero and 0.25%" in response to the
nation's ongoing financial crisis, as well as banking industry pressure to ease credit and stimulate the economy. This marked the ninth
reduction in a row since September 18, 2007, when the rate was 5 .25%. There have been no further changes made to the federal funds rate
at the Federal Reserve Board's subsequent regular scheduled meetings, the most recent of which was held on January 28, 2015. In
determining how long to maintain the current 0 to lf4 percent target range for the federal funds rate, they went on to say: "the Committee
will assess progress--both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment
will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and
inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. Based on its current assessment, the Committee judges
that it can be patient in beginning to normalize the stance of monetary policy. However, if incoming information indicates faster progress
toward the Committee 's employment and inflation objectives than the Committee now expects, then increases in the target range for the
federal funds rate are likely to occur sooner than currently anticipated. Conversely, if progress proves slower than expected, then
increases in the target range are likely to occur later than currently anticipated. "
Despite the large drop in available interest rates, the District's overall effective rate of return at January 31,2015 was 0.62%, which was
one basis point above the previous month. At the same time the LAIF return on deposits has declined over the previous month, reaching
an average effective yield of0.262% for the month of January 2015. Based on our success at maintaining a competitive rate of return on
our portfolio during this extended period of interest rate declines, no changes in investment strategy regarding returns on investment are
being considered at this time. This desired portfolio mix is important in mitigating any liquidity risk from unforeseen changes in LAIF or
County Pool policy.
In accordance with the District's Investment Policy, all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives, in priority order, of
safety, liquidity, and return on investment.
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE: January 31, 2015
Investment State Limit Otay Limit Otay Actual
8.01: Treasury Securities 100% 100% 0
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations) $50 Million $50 Million $4.7 Million
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds) 100% 100% 0
8.03: Federal Agency Issues 100% 100% 77.68%
8.04: Certificates of Deposit 30% 15% 0.10%
8.05: Short-Term Commercial Notes 25% 10% 0
8.06: Medium-Term Commercial Debt 30% 10% 0
8.07: Money Market Mutual Funds 20% 10% 0
8.08: San Diego County Pool 100% 100% 15.71%
12.0: Maximum Single Financial Institution 100% 50% .97%
$65,73 7,968
77.7°/o
Otay Water District
Investment Portfolio: 01/31/2015
Total Cash and Investments: $84,623,525
$905,312
1.1 °/o
0 Banks (Passbook/Checking/CO) •Pools (LAIF & County) C Agencies & Corporate Notes
$17,980,246
21.2°/o
Target: Meet or Exceed 100% of LAIF
t/) 0.80 -c
(L)
E 0.70 -t/)
(L) 0.60 >
-= c 0.50 0 c ...
:::::1 -(L)
a::
Performance Measure FY-15
Return on Investment
Month
LA IF •Otay o Difference
CUSIP Investment#
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3134G4PXO
3133EDKF8
3134G4UCO
3135GOXR9
3134G4WJ3
3133EECX6
3130A3FY5
3134G55T8
3130A25S1
3136G1XZ7
3134G5A47
3130A35R1
3133EELR9
3134G55X9
3134G4WH7
3130A1SE9
3134G56A8
3134G56NO
3136G23GO
3130A1ZX9
3130A3MH4
3134G5BL8
3134G5LH6
3133EECG3
3133EECG3
3136G2A23
3134G5PP4
3130A3N59
31315PW88
2277
2291
2305
2269
2284
2313
2309
2295
2299
2274
2301
2306
2317
2298
2285
2288
2297
2300
2304
2296
2314
2302
2307
2311
2312
2308
2310
2315
2316
Issuer
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Fannie Mae
Average
Balance
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agricultura_I_M_o_rt_g~a....;g;...e ____ _
Subtotal and Average 55,607,995.75
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3133EC6F6
3133EC7H1
3135GOYE7
Run Date: 02/17/2015-13:43
2258
2260
2286
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details-Investments
January 31, 2015
Purchase
Date
12/27/2013
04/29/2014
09/08/2014
06/06/2013
03/19/2014
11/25/2014
11/28/2014
06/12/2014
06/19/2014
12/19/2013
06/30/2014
10/06/2014
01/27/2015
06/10/2014
03/20/2014
05/19/2014
06/16/2014
06/26/2014
08/15/2014
05/22/2014
12/29/2014
07/17/2014
10/30/2014
11/20/2014
11/20/2014
11/28/2014
12/12/2014
12/29/2014
01/08/2015
12/05/2012
12/17/2012
04/01/2014
Par Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
57' 735,000.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Market Value
1,997,920.00
1,999,180.00
2,003,360.00
1,998,800.00
1,999,900.00
2,001,780.00
2,000,700.00
2,001 ,320.00
2,001,440.00
2,001,420.00
2,003,620.00
2,000,060.00
1,998,400.00
2,000,260.00
2,001 ,940.00
2,000,680.00
2,001 ,920.00
2,001 ,120.00
2,002,140.00
2,000,080.00
2,009,880.00
2,004,000.00
2,003,280.00
1,034,614.40
2,717,118.40
2,004,680.00
2,002,320.00
1,996,040.00
2,002,940.00
57,790,912.80
3,001 ,860.00
3,002,520.00
2,006,480.00
Stated
Book Value Rate
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,002,133.04
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,999,005.56
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
57' 736,138.60
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,001 ,828.90
0.500
0.550
0.650
0.550
0.625
0.610
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.670
0.650
0.850
0.625
0.810
0.900
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.050
1.050
1.000
1.220
1.100
1.140
1.140
1.200
1.250
1.125
1.300
0.350
0.340
0.625
Page 1
YTM Days to Maturity
S&P 360 Maturity Date
0.493
0.542
0.570
AA 0.542
0.616
0.602
0.690
AA 0.690
0.690
0.661
0.641
0.838
0.616
0.799
0.888
0.986
0.986
0.986
1.036
1.036
0.986
1.203
1.085
1.124
1.124
1.184
1.233
1.110
1.282
0.869
AA 0.345
0.335
0.558
512 06/27/2016
544 07/29/2016
544 07/29/2016
583 09/06/2016
596 09/19/2016
663 11/25/2016
663 11/25/2016
680 12/12/2016
687 12/19/2016
687 12/19/2016
698 12/30/2016
705 01/06/2017
726 01/27/2017
768 03/1 0/2017
778 03/20/2017
838 05/19/2017
866 06/16/2017
876 06/26/2017
926 08/15/2017
933 08/22/2017
971 09/29/2017
989 10/17/2017
1,002 10/30/2017
1,023 11/20/2017
1,023 11/20/2017
1,031 11/28/2017
1,045 12/12/2017
1 ,062 12/29/2017
1,072 01/08/2018
809
120 06/01/2015
197 08/17/2015
572 08/26/2016
Portfolio OT A Y
AP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
CUSIP Investment# Issuer
Subtotal and Average
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
2050003183-6 2283 California Bank & Trust
Subtotal and Average
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LA IF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LAIF BASS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Average
San Diego County Pool
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
Run Date: 02/17/2015-13:43
Average
Balance
8,001 ,87 4.32
81,784.76
8,676,141.55
12,835,719.82
86,994,423.15
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details-Investments
January 31, 2015
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
8,000,000.00 8,010,860.00
01/22/2014 81,784.76 81,784.76
81,784.76 81,784.76
4,685,947.78 4,685,855.84
07/01/2014 0.00 0.00
4,685,947.78 4,685,855.84
13,294,298.31 13,227,000.00
13,294,298.31 13,227,000.00
83,797,030.85 83,796,413.40
Stated
Book Value Rate
8,001,828.90
81,784.76 0.030
81,784.76
4,685,947.78 0.262
0.00 0.267
4,685,947.78
13,294,298.31 0.481
13,294,298.31
83,799,998.35
Page 2
YTM Daysto Maturity
S&P 360 Maturity Date
0.395 262
0.030 355 01/22/2016 ---------
0.030 355
0.258
0.263 ---------
0.258
0.474 ---------
0.474
0.726 583
Portfolio OT A Y
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment# Issuer
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PETIY CASH 9003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-1 0 BASS 9011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Average Balance
Total Cash and Investments
Run Date: 02/17/2015 -13:43
Average
Balance
0.00
86,994,423.15
OTAY
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details-Cash
January 31,2015
Purchase
Date Par Value
10,001.18
2,950.00
708,072.37
07/01/2014 27,891 .35
6,944.04
18,846.88
07/01/2014 0.00
07/01/2014 48,821.02
84,620,557.69
Market Value Book Value
10,001.18 10,001 .18
2,950.00 2,950.00
708,072.37 708,072.37
27,891.35 27,891 .35
6,944.04 6,944.04
18,846.88 18,846.88
0.00 0.00
48,821.02 48,821.02
84,619,940.24 84,623,525.19
Stated
Rate S&P
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
Page 3
YTM Days to
360 Maturity
0.010
0.000
0.247
0.000
0.010
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.726 583
Portfolio OT A Y
AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment#
Fund: Treasury Fund
3134G55X9
3134G56A8
3134G56NO
3134G4PXO
3134G4WH7
3134G4WJ3
3134G5A47
3134G55T8
3134G5BL8
3134G4UCO
3134G5PP4
3134G5LH6
3136G2A23
3135GOYE7
3136G1XZ7
3136G23GO
3130A3MH4
3130A3N59
3130A3FY5
3130A35R1
3130A25S1
3130A1ZX9
3130A1SE9
2298
2297
2300
2277
2285
2284
2301
2295
2302
2305
2310
2307
2308
2286
2274
2304
2314
2315
2309
2306
2299
2296
2288
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011
UNION MONEY 9002
UNION OPERATING 9004
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010
LAIF 9001
3133EECG3 2311
Run Date: 02/19/2015 -16:24
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Security
Type
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
FAC
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
PA1
PA1
PA1
PA1
LA1
MC1
OTAY
Interest Earnings
Sorted by Fund -Fund
January 1, 2015 -January 31, 2015
Yield on Beginning Book Value
Ending
Par Value
Beginning
Book Value
Ending Maturity Current Annualized
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
18,846.88
10,001.18
708,072.37
6,944.04
4,685,947.78
1,030,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,002,251 .98
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,001,926.01
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
18,846.27
10,008.48
981,036.24
6,943.74
10,878,519.69
1,030,000.00
Book Value Date Rate Yield
2,000,000.00 03/10/2017
2,000,000.00 06/16/2017
2,000,000.00 06/26/2017
2,000,000.00 06/27/2016
2,000,000.00 03/20/2017
2,000,000.00 09/19/2016
2,000,000.00 12/30/2016
2,000,000.00 12/12/2016
2,000,000.00 10/17/2017
2,002,133.04 07/29/2016
2,000,000.00 12/12/2017
2,000,000.00 10/30/2017
2,000,000.00 11/28/2017
2,001 ,828.90 08/26/2016
2,000,000.00 12/19/2016
2,000,000.00 08/15/2017
2,000,000.00 09/29/2017
2,000,000.00 12/29/2017
2,000,000.00 11/25/2016
2,000,000.00 01/06/2017
2,000,000.00 12/19/2016
2,000,000.00 08/22/2017
2,000,000.00 05/19/2017
18,846.88
10,001.18
708,072.37
6,944.04
4,685,947.78
1,030,000.00 11/20/2017
0.810
1.000
1.000
0.500
0.900
0.625
0.650
0.700
1.220
0.650
1.250
1.100
1.200
0.625
0.670
1.050
1.000
1.125
0.700
0.850
0.700
1.050
1.000
0.010
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.262
1.140
0.795
0.981
0.981
0.491
0.883
0.613
0.638
0.687
1.197
0.567
1.226
1.079
1.177
0.556
0.657
1.030
0.981
1.104
0.687
0.834
0.687
1.030
0.981
0.010
0.140
0.395
0.010
0.209
1.119
Adjusted Interest Earnings
Interest Amortization/ Adjusted Interest
Earned Accretion Earnings
1,350.00
1,666.67
1,666.66
833.33
1,500.00
1,041.66
1,083.33
1,166.67
2,033.33
1,083.33
2,083.34
1,833.33
2,000.00
1,041.67
1 '116.66
1,750.00
1,666.67
1,875.00
1 '166.67
1,416.67
1,166.66
1,750.00
1,666.67
0.16
1.19
329.16
0.06
1,930.62
978.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-118.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
-97.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,350.00
1,666.67
1,666.66
833.33
1,500.00
1,041.66
1,083.33
1,166.67
2,033.33
964.39
2,083.34
1,833.33
2,000.00
944.56
1,116.66
1,750.00
1,666.67
1,875.00
1,166.67
1,416.67
1,166.66
1,750.00
1,666.67
0.16
1.19
329.16
0.06
1,930.62
978.50
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
IE (PRF _IE) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Security Ending
CUSIP Investment# Fund Type Par Value
Fund: Treasury Fund
3133EECX6 2313 99 MC1 2,000,000.00
3133EDKF8 2291 99 MC1 2,000,000.00
3133EC6F6 2258 99 FAC 3,000,000.00
3133EELR9 2317 99 MC1 2,000,000.00
3133EC7H1 2260 99 FAC 3,000,000.00
3133EECG3 2312 99 MC1 2,705,000.00
2050003183-6 2283 99 BCD 81,784.76
3135GOXR9 2269 99 MC1 2,000,000.00
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 99 LA3 13,294,298.31
31315PW88 2316 99 MC1 2,000,000.00
Subtotal 84,540,895.32
Total 84,540,895.32
Run Date: 02/19/2015-16:24
OTAY
Interest Earnings
January 1, 2015 -January 31, 2015
Beginning Ending Maturity Current Annualized
Book Value Book Value Date Rate Yield
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 11/25/2016 0.610 0.599
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 07/29/2016 0.550 0.540
3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 06/01/2015 0.350 0.343
0.00 1,999,005.56 01/27/2017 0.625 0.528
3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 08/17/2015 0.340 0.334
2,705,000.00 2,705,000.00 11/20/2017 1.140 1.119
81,784.76 81 ,784.76 01/22/2016 0.030 0.031
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 09/06/2016 0.550 0.540
12,282,933.41 13,294,298.31 0.481 0.503
0.00 2,000,000.00 01/08/2018 1.300 1.263
85,999,250.58 84,543,862.82 0.686
85,999,250.58 84,543,862.82 0.686
Interest
Earned
1,016.67
916.67
875.00
138.89
850.00
2,569.75
2.12
916.67
5,243.66
1,661 .11
51,388.55
51,388.55
Page2
Adjusted Interest Earnings
Amortization/
Accretion
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-210.49
-210.49
Adjusted Interest
Earnings
1,016.67
916.67
875.00
144.45
850.00
2,569.75
2.12
916.67
5,243.66
1,661 .11
51,178.06
51,178.06
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
IE (PRF _IE) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Percent
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio
Issuer: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-1 0 BABS 9011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LA IF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 6.511%
Issuer: California Bank & Trust
Certificates of Deposit-Bank
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 0.097%
Issuer: Federal Agricultural Mortgage
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
31315PW88 2316 Federal Agricultural Mortgage
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 2.363%
Issuer: Fannie Mae
Run Date: 02/17/2015-14:18
OTAY
Activity Report
Sorted By Issuer
January 1, 2015 -January 31, 2015
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
1,059,163.13
0.262
10,878,519.69
11,937,682.82
81,784.76
81,784.76
1.300 01/08/2015
0.00
0.00
Purchases or
Deposits
4,011,992.70
597,743.27
0.30
0.61
50,000.00
4,659,736.88
1,207,428.09
1 ,207,428.09
5,867' 164.97
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
4,012,000.00
870,707.14
0.00
0.00
12,666.03
4,895,373.17
7,400,000.00
7,400,000.00
12,295,373.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ending
Balance
823,526.84
4,685,947. 78
5,509,474.62
81,784.76
81,784.76
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Percent
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio
Issuer: Fannie Mae
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 2.363%
Issuer: Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133EELR9 2317 Federal Farm Credit Bank
Subtotal and Balance
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 18.595%
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 16.544%
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 28.362%
Issuer: Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Run Date: 02/17/2015-14:18
OTAY
Activity Report
January 1, 2015 -January 31, 2015
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.625 01/27/2015
7, 735,000.00
6,000,000.00
13,735,000.00
14,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
Par Value
Purchases or Redemptions or
Deposits Withdrawals
0.00 0.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
2,000,000.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Page 2
Ending
Balance
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
9,735,000.00
6,000,000.00
15,735,000.00
14,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
24,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Percent
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio
Issuer: Federal National Mortage Assoc ---
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 9.454%
Issuer: San Diego County
San Diego County Pool
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 15.710%
Total 100.000%
Run Date: 02/17/2015 -14:18
OTAY
Activity Report
January 1, 2015-January 31, 2015
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
0.481
12,282,933.41
12,282,933.41
86,037,400.99
Par Value
Purchases or Redemptions or
Deposits Withdrawals
0.00 0.00
1,011 ,364.90 0.00
1 ,011,364.90 0.00
1,011,364.90 0.00
10,878,529.87 12,295,373.17
Page 3
Ending
Balance
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
13,294,298.31
13,294,298.31
84,620,557.69
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
CUSIP Investment#
Fund: Treasury Fund
3134G55X9
3134G56A8
3134G56NO
3134G4PXO
3134G4WH7
3134G4WJ3
3134G5A47
3134G55T8
3134G5BL8
3134G4UCO
2298
2297
2300
2277
2285
2284
2301
2295
2302
2305
3134G5PP4 2310
3134G5LH6 2307
3136G2A23 2308
3135GOYE7 2286
3136G1XZ7 2274
3136G23GO 2304
3130A3MH4 2314
3130A3N59 2315
3130A3FY5 2309
3130A35R1 2306
3130A25S1 2299
3130A1ZX9 2296
3130A1SE9 2288
RESERVE-1 0 BASS 9011
UNION MONEY 9002
UNION OPERATING 9004
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010
PETTY CASH
PAYROLL
LAIF BASS 201 0
9003
9005
9012
Run Date: 02/17/2015 -14:20
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Investment
Class
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Fair Value
Maturity
Date
03/10/2017
06/16/2017
06/26/2017
06/27/2016
03/20/2017
09/19/2016
12/30/2016
12/12/2016
10/17/2017
07/29/2016
12/12/2017
10/30/2017
11/28/2017
08/26/2016
12/19/2016
08/15/2017
09/29/2017
12/29/2017
11/25/2016
01/06/2017
12/19/2016
08/22/2017
05/19/2017
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
January 1, 2015 -January 31, 2015
Beginning
Invested Value
1,989,940.00
1,994,880.00
1,991,600.00
1,992,440.00
1,997,140.00
1 ,995,520.00
1,996,540.00
1,997,560.00
2,000,500.00
1,997,160.00
1,996,340.00
1,989,760.00
1,993,120.00
1,999,600.00
1,994,440.00
1,995,540.00
2,000,100.00
1,996,060.00
1,995,360.00
1,995,560.00
1,994,400.00
1,990,140.00
1,994,280.00
18,846.27
10,008.48
981,036.24
6,943.74
2,950.00
27,891.35
0.00
Purchase
of Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Addition
to Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.61
4,011 ,992.70
597,743.27
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
Redemption
of Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,012,000.00
870,707.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Adjustment in Value
Amortization
Adjustment
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Change in
Market Value
10,320.00
7,040.00
9,520.00
5,480.00
4,800.00
4,380.00
7,080.00
3,760.00
3,500.00
6,200.00
5,980.00
13,520.00
11,560.00
6,880.00
6,980.00
6,600.00
9,780.00
-20.00
5,340.00
4,500.00
7,040.00
9,940.00
6,400.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Ending
Invested Value
2,000,260.00
2,001 ,920.00
2,001 '1 20.00
1,997,920.00
2,001 ,940.00
1,999,900.00
2,003,620.00
2,001 ,320.00
2,004,000.00
2,003,360.00
2,002,320.00
2,003,280.00
2,004,680.00
2,006,480.00
2,001 ,420.00
2,002,140.00
2,009,880.00
1,996,040.00
2,000,700.00
2,000,060.00
2,001 ,440.00
2,000,080.00
2,000,680.00
18,846.88
10,001 .18
708,072.37
6,944.04
2,950.00
27,891 .35
0.00
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
GO (PRF _GO) 7.1 .1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
OTAY
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
Investment Maturity Beginning Purchase
CUSIP Investment# Fund Class Date Invested Value of Principal
Fund: Treasury Fund
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 99 Amortized 0.00 0.00
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 99 Amortized 11,487.05 0.00
LA IF 9001 99 Fair Value 10,880,491 .79 0.00
3133EECG3 2311 99 Fair Value 11/20/2017 1,026,456.80 0.00
3133EECX6 2313 99 Fair Value 11/25/2016 1,993,680.00 0.00
3133EDKF8 2291 99 Fair Value 07/29/2016 1,992,160.00 0.00
3133EC6F6 2258 99 Fair Value 06/01/2015 3,001,530.00 0.00
3133EELR9 2317 99 Fair Value 01/27/2017 0.00 1,999,000.00
3133EC7H1 2260 99 Fair Value 08/17/2015 3,001,290.00 0.00
3133EECG3 2312 99 Fair Value 11/20/2017 2,695,694.80 0.00
2050003183-6 2283 99 Amortized 01/22/2016 81,784.76 0.00
3135GOXR9 2269 99 Fair Value 09/06/2016 1,993,900.00 0.00
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 99 Fair Value 12,247,000.00 0.00
31315PW88 2316 99 Fair Value 01/08/2018 0.00 2,000,000.00
Subtotal 85,861,131.28 3,999,000.00
Total 85,861,131.28 3,999,000.00
Run Date: 02/17/2015 -14:20
Adjustment in Value
Addition Redemption Amortization Change in
to Principal of Principal Adjustment Market Value
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
50,000.00 12,666.03 0.00 0.00
1,207,428.09 7,400,000.00 0.00 -2,064.04
0.00 0.00 0.00 8,157.60
0.00 0.00 0.00 8,100.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 7,020.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 330.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 -600.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 1,230.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 21,423.60
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 4,900.00
1,011,364.90 0.00 0.00 -31 ,364.90
0.00 0.00 0.00 2,940.00
6,878,529.87 12,295,373.17 0.00 176,652.26
6,878,529.87 12,295,373.17 0.00 176,652.26
Page 2
Ending
Invested Value
0.00
48,821.02
4,685,855.84
1,034,614.40
2,001 ,780.00
1,999,180.00
3,001 ,860.00
1,998,400.00
3,002,520.00
2,717,118.40
81 ,784.76
1,998,800.00
13,227,000.00
2,002,940.00
84,619,940.24
84,619,940.24
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
GO (PRF _GO) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Security ID
3135GOXR9
3136G1XZ7
3134G4PXO
3134G4WJ3
3134G4WH7
3130A1SE9
3133EDKF8
3134G55T8
3130A1ZX9
3134G56A8
3134G55X9
3130A25S1
3134G56NO
3134G5A47
3134G5BL8
3136G23GO
3134G4UCO
3130A35R1
3134G5LH6
3136G2A23
3130A3FY5
3134G5PP4
3133EECG3
3133EECG3
3133EECX6
3130A3MH4
3130A3N59
31315PW88
3133EELR9
Investment# Fund
2269
2274
2277
2284
2285
2288
2291
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Run Date: 02/17/2015 -14:21
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 01/31/2015
Issuer
Fannie Mae
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agricultural Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Investment
Class
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Book
Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,002,133.04
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,999,005.56
Page 1
Par
Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Market Current
Value Rate
1,998,800.00 .5500000
2,001,420.00 .6700000
1,997,920.00 .5000000
1,999,900.00 .6250000
2,001,940.00 .9000000
2,000,680.00 1.000000
1 ,999,180.00 .5500000
2,001,320.00 .7000000
2,000,080.00 1.050000
2,001,920.00 1.000000
2,000,260.00 .8100000
2,001,440.00 .7000000
2,001,120.00 1.000000
2,003,620.00 .6500000
2,004,000.00 1.220000
2,002,140.00 1.050000
2,003,360.00 .6500000
2,000,060.00 .8500000
2,003,280.00 1.100000
2,004,680.00 1.200000
2,000,700.00 .7000000
2,002,320.00 1.250000
1,034,614.40 1.140000
2,717,118.40 1.140000
2,001,780.00 .6100000
2,009,880.00 1.000000
1,996,040.00 1.125000
2,002,940.00 1.300000
1,998,400.00 .6250000
YTM Current
360 Yield
0.542
0.661
0.493
0.616
0.888
0.986
0.542
0.690
1.036
0.986
0.799
0.690
0.986
0.641
1.203
1.036
0.570
0.838
1.085
1.184
0.690
1.233
1.124
1.124
0.602
0.986
1.110
1.282
0.616
0.670
0.632
0.574
0.628
0.854
0.985
0.578
0.664
1.048
0.959
0.804
0.662
0.976
0.555
1.145
1.007
0.537
0.848
1.039
0.730
0.681
1.209
0.978
0.978
0.561
0.812
1.194
1.249
0.666
Maturity/ Modified
Call Date Duration
09/06/2016
12/19/2016
06/27/2016
09/19/2016
03/20/2017
05/19/2017
07/29/2016
12/12/2016
08/22/2017
06/16/2017
03/10/2017
12/19/2016
06/26/2017
12/30/2016
10/17/2017
08/15/2017
07/29/2016
01/06/2017
10/30/2017
11/28/2017
11/25/2016
12/12/2017
11/20/2017
11/20/2017
11/25/2016
09/29/2017
12/29/2017
01/08/2018
01/27/2017
1.583
1.867
1.397
1.619
2.104
2.264
1.486
1.847
2.506
2.339
2.084
1.866
2.366
1.899
2.651
2.487
1.485
1.909
2.692
2.770
1.800
2.800
2.747
2.747
1.802
2.619
2.852
2.870
1.972
Portfolio OTA Y
AP
DU (PRF _OU) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
OTAY
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type-Investment Type
Through 01/31/2015
Investment Book Par
Securi~ ID Investment# Fund Issuer Class Value Value
3133EC6F6 2258 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
3133EC7H1 2260 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
3135GOYE7 2286 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair 2,001,828.90 2,000,000.00
2050003183-6 2283 99 California Bank & Trust Amort 81,784.76 81 ,784.76
LA IF 9001 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 4,685,947.78 4,685,947.78
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair 0.00 0.00
SO COUNTY 9007 99 San Diego County Fair 13,294,298.31 13,294,298.31
Report Total 83,799,998.35 83,797,030.85
Run Date: 02/17/2015-14:21 Page 2
Market Current YTM
Value Rate 360
3,001 ,860.00 .3500000 0.345
3,002,520.00 .3400000 0.335
2,006,480.00 .6250000 0.558
81,784.76 .0300000 0.030
4,685,855.84 .2620000 0.258
0.00 .2670000 0.263
13,227,000.00 .4810000 0.474
83,796,413.40
Current
Yield
0.226
0.172
0.418
0.030
0.262
0.267
0.481
0.691
Maturity/ Modified
Call Date Duration
06/01/2015 0.328
08/17/2015 0.543
08/26/2016 1.557
01/22/2016 0.973
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.576
Portfolio OTAY
AP
DU (PRF _DU) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Check Total
6,366.89
4,682.73
3,357.60
MGMT/INSP (10/15/14-1/12/15)10,270.00204228802/04/15 14462 ALYSON CONSULTING CM201505 01/16/15
4,547.50
2042390 02/18/15 14811 ALARMS UNLIMITED INC 170800 02/01/15 MONTHLY MONITORING (FEB 2015)1,534.00 1,534.00
46.35 46.35
2042287 02/04/15 15024 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC 15 01/08/15 LAND SURVEYING (12/1/14-12/31/14)4,547.50
AIR BOTTLES 46.35 46.35
2042286 02/04/15 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9924049769 12/31/14 AIR BOTTLES
2042389 02/18/15 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9924778757 01/31/15
131369500 01/21/15 AQUA AMMONIA 603.60
131369502 01/21/15 AQUA AMMONIA 246.00
23,203.38
2042388 02/18/15 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131369501 01/21/15 AQUA AMMONIA 2,508.00
54,870.49 54,870.49
2042285 02/04/15 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1317 01/15/15 DEVELOPER PROJECTS (12/6/14-1/9/15)23,203.38
SHAREPOINT SERVICES (12/3/14-12/21/14)1,937.50 1,937.50
2042284 02/04/15 12174 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES INC 24 01/16/15 DISINFECTION SYSTEM (ENDING 1/2/15)
2042283 02/04/15 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 4673 01/09/15
959044 01/22/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 210.89
959311 01/29/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 199.12
959314 01/29/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 404.12
959184 01/26/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 287.40
959439 02/02/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 441.40
959046 01/22/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 440.42
958942 01/20/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 490.44
959045 01/22/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 443.36
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 980.88
958943 01/20/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 784.70
958501 01/08/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 228.55
2042387 02/18/15 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 959438 02/02/15
958780 01/15/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 373.72
958353 01/06/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 371.75
957621 12/15/14 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 489.46
958503 01/08/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 408.05
958659 01/12/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 568.91
958777 01/15/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 527.71
958352 01/06/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,186.86
958502 01/08/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 605.20
420.00
2042282 02/04/15 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 958658 01/12/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 1,606.68
Amount
2042386 02/18/15 15416 24 HOUR ELEVATOR INC 17049 01/01/15 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (JAN 2015)420.00
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
Page 1 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
27,440.00
6,950.52
1,158.00
77391 01/30/15 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 192.00
BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 824.00
77390 01/30/15 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 438.00
2042398 02/18/15 04119 CLARKSON LAB & SUPPLY INC 77389 01/30/15
20,367.87
2042237 01/28/15 15256 CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE / LINA 9267011015 01/10/15 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (JAN 2015)4,388.47 4,388.47
38.50 38.50
2042397 02/18/15 15177 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 139493 01/20/15 870-2 PS (11/1/14-11/30/14)20,367.87
UB Refund Cst #0000011217 19.06 19.06
2042396 02/18/15 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7852 01/21/15 DESTRUCTION SERVICES (1/14/15)
012615HUDSON 01/26/15 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 492.00
2042236 01/28/15 15998 CARLOS CORTES II Ref002437815 01/26/15
963.88 963.88
2042235 01/28/15 08388 CALTRANS 012615HDR 01/26/15 ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 666.00
ELECTRICAL SERVICES (11/1/14-11/30/14)1,548.00 1,548.00
2042294 02/04/15 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 335568 12/15/14 MICRO MAX SENSORS
2042395 02/18/15 14112 BSE ENGINEERING INC 53145 01/20/15
70.48
2042394 02/18/15 16094 BRIAN JORDANO 4901021815 02/18/15 CUSTOMER REFUND 3,239.98 3,239.98
95.00 95.00
2042234 01/28/15 16006 BOBBY OLIVER Ref002437825 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000154773 70.48
W/O REFUND D0740-090207 6,209.98 6,209.98
2042233 01/28/15 15932 BART JARVIS Ref002437823 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000121291
000006208466 02/01/15 TELEPHONE SERVICES (1/1/15-1/31/15)1,229.08
2042293 02/04/15 12684 BALDWIN & SONS LLC 0740013015 01/30/15
5,791.55
2042393 02/18/15 07785 AT&T 000006211345 02/02/15 TELEPHONE SERVICES (1/2/15-2/1/15)5,721.44
9,921.33 9,921.33
2042292 02/04/15 07785 AT&T 000006102818 01/02/15 TELEPHONE SERVICES (12/2/14-1/1/15)5,791.55
AS-NEEDED DESIGN (ENDING 12/28/14)13,514.66 13,514.66
2042291 02/04/15 16033 ARSHAK KOULADJIAN 0903013015 01/30/15 W/O REFUND D0903-060106
2042392 02/18/15 13171 ARCADIS US INC 0639830 01/26/15
309.97
2042391 02/18/15 03492 AQUA-METRIC SALES COMPANY 0055097IN 01/23/15 MEASURING ELEMENT 1,364.44 1,364.44
1,110.00 1,110.00
2042290 02/04/15 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41281 01/26/15 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (FEB 2015)309.97
PAGERS (JAN 2015)257.94 257.94
2042343 02/11/15 00002 ANSWER INC 11098 01/23/15 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY)
CM201504 01/15/15 MGMT/INSP (10/7/14-12/31/14)2,100.00
2042289 02/04/15 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570PB 02/01/15
CM201502 01/15/15 MGMT/INSP (11/1/14-12/31/14)6,000.00
CM201501 01/15/15 MGMT/INSP (11/1/14-12/31/14)3,000.00
CM201503 01/15/15 MGMT/INSP (11/1/14-12/31/14)6,070.00
Page 2 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
2,152.00
5,499.77
3,640.32
LAB ANALYSIS (1/19/15-1/25/15)510.00204240502/18/15 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 5020302 02/02/15
2,584.00
2042349 02/11/15 16093 ENRIQUE O'CAMPO 0927020515 02/05/15 W/O REFUND D0927-090195 1,791.14 1,791.14
748.50 748.50
2042404 02/18/15 00331 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 925023840215 02/05/15 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE (QUARTERLY)2,584.00
RECYCLING SERVICES (JAN 2015)95.00 95.00
2042299 02/04/15 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 0067820IN 12/31/14 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (DEC 2014)
2042298 02/04/15 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 5458013115 01/31/15
224.00
2042348 02/11/15 14616 EAST COUNTY GAZETTE 2311 01/13/15 ADVERTISEMENT 234.00 234.00
3,277.59 3,277.59
2042347 02/11/15 13714 EAST COUNTY CALIFORNIAN, THE 00030657 01/22/15 ADVERTISEMENT 224.00
UB Refund Cst #0000215406 1,483.24 1,483.24
2042297 02/04/15 16032 DEEH LLC 0904013015 01/30/15 W/O REFUND D0904-060109
01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000208695 12.01 12.01
2042240 01/28/15 16028 DDM CONSTRUCTION CORP Ref002437847 01/26/15
3,018.75
120150022 01/09/15 CL2GAS REGULATORS 621.57
2042239 01/28/15 16017 DANA POBURSKY Ref002437836
SHUT DOWN TEST (1/13/15)355.00 355.00
2042296 02/04/15 11797 D & H WATER SYSTEMS INC 2014541 11/14/14 CHLORINE REGULATORS
2042403 02/18/15 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2003193E602500115 02/04/15
25.00
2042346 02/11/15 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DPWAROTAYMWD121401/31/15 EXCAVATION PERMITS (DEC 2014)1,199.60 1,199.60
412.32 412.32
2042402 02/18/15 02612 COUNCIL OF WATER UTILITIES COWU12015 01/01/15 BUSINESS MEETING 25.00
UB Refund Cst #0000012669 75.00 75.00
2042401 02/18/15 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1266469 01/31/15 TAPE STORAGE (JAN 2015)
16859520 01/22/15 MAIL SORTER 356.91
2042345 02/11/15 16088 CONNIE CHAVIRA Ref002438853 02/09/15
PLOTTER TONER 4,440.86
16892330 01/26/15 CHAIRS 702.00
2042400 02/18/15 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 16881720 01/22/15
1,764.00
2042295 02/04/15 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 16831200 01/09/15 CALENDARS 81.17 81.17
3,047.00 3,047.00
2042238 01/28/15 15616 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 0001010115 01/28/15 INTERNET CIRCUITS (01/01/15 - 01/31/15)1,764.00
SR-11 RELOCATIONS (ENDING 1/31/15)78,309.93 78,309.93
2042344 02/11/15 15616 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 0001020115 02/01/15 INTERNET CIRCUITS (FEB 2015)
77388 01/30/15 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 166.00
2042399 02/18/15 15395 COFFMAN SPECIALTIES INC 3 01/27/15
77393 01/30/15 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 174.00
77387 01/30/15 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 166.00
77392 01/30/15 BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING SERVICES 192.00
Page 3 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
910.00
1,315.00
40.00
5,132.13
579.37
362.21
309.87
GARDEN TOURS (JAN 2015)1,860.00 1,860.00204241102/18/15 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 230 01/26/15
81.00
2042355 02/11/15 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2438934 02/12/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00 81.00
350.00 350.00
2042243 01/28/15 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2437868 01/29/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 81.00
BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 350.00 350.00
2042354 02/11/15 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2438932 02/12/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION
01/16/15 VEHICLE WASHING 84.63 84.63
2042242 01/28/15 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2437866 01/29/15
158.84
x404166 01/02/15 VEHICLE WASHING 151.03
2042353 02/11/15 11962 FLEETWASH INC x409901
VEHICLE WASHING 130.20 130.20
2042303 02/04/15 11962 FLEETWASH INC x405421 01/09/15 VEHICLE WASHING
033627 01/20/15 COFFEE SUPPLIES 151.09
2042410 02/18/15 11962 FLEETWASH INC x414442 01/23/15
238.39 238.39
2042409 02/18/15 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 033854 01/30/15 COFFEE SUPPLIES 211.12
ONLINE DOCUMENTS (MONTHLY)99.00 99.00
2042302 02/04/15 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 033299 01/16/15 COFFEE SUPPLIES
2042408 02/18/15 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 9003400115 01/31/15
INVENTORY 424.39
0500686 01/20/15 14" BFV BOLT SETS 154.98
2042407 02/18/15 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0501826 02/02/15
0500387 01/16/15 14" PLATED BFV BOLT SETS 335.36
0500416 01/16/15 14" PLATED BFV BOLT SETS 189.49
1,153.44 1,153.44
2042301 02/04/15 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0500178 01/15/15 INVENTORY 4,607.28
UB Refund Cst #0000205911 27.96 27.96
2042352 02/11/15 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0499549 01/15/15 INVENTORY
L0201744 01/27/15 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (1/12/15)60.00
2042241 01/28/15 16015 FEBBYYANTHY WOODS Ref002437834 01/26/15
99.43 99.43
2042406 02/18/15 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0202046 CREDIT MEMO -20.00
LABORATORY SUPPLIES 238.93 238.93
2042351 02/11/15 16089 ERNEST MILLER Ref002438854 02/09/15 UB Refund Cst #0000021169
5010834 01/19/15 LAB ANALYSIS (12/17/14)105.00
2042350 02/11/15 02259 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE 743129 01/12/15
LAB ANALYSIS (12/23/14-12/31/14)790.00
5010674 01/12/15 LAB ANALYSIS (1/1/15-1/5/15)420.00
2042300 02/04/15 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 5010673 01/12/15
LAB ANALYSIS (1/19/15-1/25/15)510.00
5011012 01/26/15 LAB ANALYSIS (1/13/15-1/18/15)400.00
2042405 02/18/15 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 5020302 02/02/15
Page 4 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
7,004.37
1,678.18
7,505.65
17,427.63
1,684.65
DUSTO INSPECTIONS (JAN 2015)100.00 100.00
01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000026475 200.00 200.00
2042420 02/18/15 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 15298 01/30/15
-3,000.00
644459 01/27/15 CHLORINE TP 4,684.65
2042245 01/28/15 16000 JEFFERY WILSON Ref002437817
2042419 02/18/15 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 644483 CREDIT MEMO
18.23
2042418 02/18/15 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO01150144 01/01/15 JANITORIAL SERVICES (JAN 2015)1,159.35 1,159.35
5,345.31 5,345.31
2042244 01/28/15 16019 JAMES ALBRIGHT Ref002437838 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000212278 18.23
PLANT SERVICES (JAN 2015)205.00 205.00
2042358 02/11/15 13899 INTERMEDIA.NET INC 1502001637 02/01/15 EMAIL SERVICES (1/2/15-2/2/15)
2042417 02/18/15 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 10319 01/20/15
BILL PRINTING SERVICES (JAN 2015)12,995.09
88840 01/30/15 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (JAN 2015)4,432.54
284784182 01/12/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 118.02
2042416 02/18/15 08969 INFOSEND INC 88841 01/30/15
284697102 01/09/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 2,105.06
284784181 01/12/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 415.48
1,079.46 1,079.46
2042308 02/04/15 01649 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 284697103 01/09/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 4,867.09
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (12/19/14-12/31/14)3,016.26 3,016.26
2042307 02/04/15 01088 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 844679900 12/31/14 STRAW WADDLE
2042415 02/18/15 02008 HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL 51647 01/21/15
3,635.47
2042414 02/18/15 00174 HACH COMPANY 9204986 01/20/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 648.97 648.97
126.34 126.34
2042306 02/04/15 00174 HACH COMPANY 9198267 01/15/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 3,635.47
FIBER REPLACEMENT 1,705.50 1,705.50
2042413 02/18/15 08968 GURROLA, MICHAEL 020815 02/12/15 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT
2042357 02/11/15 15994 GROUND SERVICE TECHNOLOGY INC 31300 01/26/15
9640484466 01/15/15 TOOLS - INSPECTION 131.08
9642175278 01/16/15 MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 111.02
TOOLS - INSPECTION 1,025.36
9642175260 01/16/15 MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 410.72
933161 01/23/15 GPS MODEMS 306.21
2042305 02/04/15 00101 GRAINGER INC 9640484474 01/15/15
535.32
2042412 02/18/15 14948 GPS INSIGHT LLC 934232 02/01/15 GPS MODEMS 6,698.16
843.35 843.35
2042304 02/04/15 10817 GEXPRO S109639706001 01/07/15 PLC MODULES 535.32
GARDEN TOURS (JAN 2015)1,860.00 1,860.00
2042356 02/11/15 03094 FULLCOURT PRESS 28162 01/27/15 PRINTING SERVICES
2042411 02/18/15 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 230 01/26/15
Page 5 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
5,748.92
453.76
197.32
15.96 15.96
2042425 02/18/15 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0090929IN 02/12/15 REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 1,210.22
UB Refund Cst #0000010416 31.60 31.60
2042254 01/28/15 16014 MARWIN SAMONTE Ref002437833 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000205886
2042253 01/28/15 15997 MARILYN UNMACK Ref002437814 01/26/15
118.80
2042252 01/28/15 16004 MARGERIE LYNN Ref002437821 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000070920 25.11 25.11
1,818.72 1,818.72
2042251 01/28/15 07591 MA, DONGXING 012215 01/22/15 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (11/20/14)118.80
UB Refund Cst #0000214699 5.87 5.87
2042362 02/11/15 16091 LUSARDI CONSTRUCTION Ref002438856 02/09/15 UB Refund Cst #0000208656
2042250 01/28/15 16024 LOWELL FREUDENBERG Ref002437843 01/26/15
SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 137.32
5234020515 02/05/15 CERTIFICATION REIMBURSEMENT 60.00
2042361 02/11/15 06263 LINTNER, JERRY 020315 02/05/15
7,525.00
2042424 02/18/15 15947 LIFESAVER 2273 01/09/15 ERGONOMIC SERVICES 600.00 600.00
2,190.33 2,190.33
2042360 02/11/15 15597 LEONARD H VILLARREAL 1559092314 09/23/14 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (9/23/14)7,525.00
INTERNSHIP AGREEMENT (1/26/15-1/30/15)247.50 247.50
2042313 02/04/15 03607 LEE & RO INC LR16889 01/13/15 INTERCONNECTION (7/26/14-12/31/14)
2042423 02/18/15 12843 LAWTON GROUP, THE 52005 02/06/15
INTERNSHIP AGREEMENT (1/19/15-1/24/15)240.63
51996 01/23/15 INTERNSHIP AGREEMENT (1/12/15-1/16/15)213.13
2042312 02/04/15 12843 LAWTON GROUP, THE 52001 01/30/15
295.00
2042249 01/28/15 16003 LAURA GONZALEZ-SCOTT Ref002437820 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000069602 122.07 122.07
295.00 295.00
2042311 02/04/15 02063 LA MESA - SPRING VALLEY 3750 01/26/15 GARDEN TOUR (1/15/15)295.00
W/O REFUND D0902-060100 532.41 532.41
2042422 02/18/15 02063 LA MESA - SPRING VALLEY 3755 02/12/15 GARDEN TOUR
2042310 02/04/15 16034 KW OTAY LLC 0902013015 01/30/15
9.58
2042421 02/18/15 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5776 01/29/15 AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES FY15 26,644.50 26,644.50
32.59 32.59
2042248 01/28/15 16009 KEVIN CRISWELL Ref002437828 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000182758 9.58
CUSTOMER REFUND 93.85 93.85
2042247 01/28/15 15996 JOHN WILLIAMS Ref002437813 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000005671
01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000035857 402.27 402.27
2042359 02/11/15 15862 JODIE JENSEN 6918020915 02/09/15
4,128.27
0916013015 01/30/15 W/O REFUND D0916-060015 1,620.65
2042246 01/28/15 16001 JO ELLEN ZAYER Ref002437818
DUSTO INSPECTIONS (JAN 2015)100.00 100.00
2042309 02/04/15 16035 JJB SILVERHAWK LP 0685013015 01/30/15 W/O REFUND D0685-090027
2042420 02/18/15 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 15298 01/30/15
Page 6 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
1,410.22
1,479.70
1,120.89
1,275.06
169.86
UB Refund Cst #0000206455 45.88 45.88204225701/28/15 16016 NATHAN MASELLI Ref002437835 01/26/15
-12.64
340221179 01/05/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
340222242 01/12/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.25
S340222431 01/20/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 34.76
2042364 02/11/15 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE S340209367 CREDIT MEMO
340225506 02/02/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 100.95
340224436 01/26/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 95.21
340224668 01/27/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 117.28
340223555 01/20/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 117.28
UNIFORM SERVICES 404.79
340223556 01/20/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 404.79
2042428 02/18/15 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340224669 01/27/15
340223322 01/19/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 95.21
S340221381 01/06/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 34.76
340221429 01/06/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
340222476 01/13/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 114.17
UNIFORM SERVICES 381.64
340221430 01/06/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 380.94
2042318 02/04/15 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 340222477 01/13/15
18.14
2042317 02/04/15 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 44358300 01/08/15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1,269.37 1,269.37
22.32 22.32
2042256 01/28/15 15999 MICHELLE STEPHENS Ref002437816 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000016139 18.14
APPRAISAL SERVICES (ENDING 2/9/15)2,000.00 2,000.00
2042255 01/28/15 16018 MICHAEL SHENKMAN Ref002437837 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000208884
2042427 02/18/15 11876 MICHAEL D KEAGY REAL ESTATE 1122 01/09/15
1,208.94
2042316 02/04/15 00805 METRO JPA 192 01/12/15 ANNUAL DUES 1,653.00 1,653.00
1,052.27 1,052.27
2042315 02/04/15 01824 MERKEL & ASSOCIATES INC 15010701 01/07/15 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (10/16/14-12/31/14)1,208.94
BID PROJECT ON-LINE SETUP,120.00 120.00
2042426 02/18/15 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 21361763 01/22/15 CLARIFIER BAFFLE WALL MATERIALS
0091198IN 01/23/15 REPROGRAPHICS 87.50
2042363 02/11/15 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0091209IN 01/26/15
0091199IN 01/23/15 REPROGRAPHICS 97.50
0091070IN 01/19/15 BID PROJECT ON-LINE SETUP 92.50
REPROGRAPHICS SERVICES 1,087.20
0091185IN 01/23/15 BID PROJECT ON-LINE SETUP 115.00
2042314 02/04/15 02882 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC 0091195IN 01/23/15
0091215IN 01/26/15 REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 100.00
0091208IN 01/26/15 REPROGRAPHIC SERVICES 100.00
Page 7 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
495.03
409.57
398.54
7,434.18
3,636.59
42.50
19,504.80 19,504.80
2042323 02/04/15 15081 PINOMAKI DESIGN 4714 01/16/15 GRAPHIC DESIGN 42.50
PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 841.54 841.54
2042434 02/18/15 13122 PINNACLE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 35999 01/31/15 SQL SERVERS
2042322 02/04/15 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 020215 02/02/15
16,556.40
2042259 01/28/15 16013 PEDRO BONILLA Ref002437832 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000193640 53.31 53.31
54.10 54.10
2042433 02/18/15 15899 PCM SALES INC S89371150101 01/22/15 IT HARDWARE 16,556.40
CRANE SERVICE (12/23/14)225.00 225.00
2042432 02/18/15 05497 PAYPAL INC 38357418 01/31/15 PHONE PAYMENT SVCS (JAN 2015)
2042367 02/11/15 15972 PAUL'S CRANE SERVICE 3095 12/23/14
INVENTORY 3,605.36
301146 01/29/15 PULL-THRU ADAPTER 31.23
2042431 02/18/15 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 301470 01/29/15
301227 01/13/15 INVENTORY 515.97
301344 01/13/15 INVENTORY 515.97
INVENTORY 3,321.00
301237 01/06/15 14" BUTTERFLY VALVE 3,081.24
749897218001 01/15/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 100.18
2042321 02/04/15 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 301148 01/09/15
OFFICE SUPPLIES 181.96
748274982001 01/09/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 116.40
748765672001 01/06/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 33.65
2042366 02/11/15 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 750409293001 01/16/15
749586108001 01/14/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 80.24
748419448001 01/12/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 66.73
OFFICE SUPPLIES 140.10
742904846001 12/01/14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 88.85
752922679001 02/02/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 43.87
2042320 02/04/15 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 744328052001 12/08/14
216.01
751088210001 01/21/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132.09
752344215001 01/27/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 103.06
CUSTOMER REFUND 144.10 144.10
2042430 02/18/15 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 751094469001 01/21/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES
2042319 02/04/15 16031 NEREIDA SANCHEZ 8448012915 01/29/15
11,614.90
2042429 02/18/15 13690 NEAL ELECTRIC CORP 62386 01/26/15 CL2 ACTUATOR ELECTRICAL WORK 4,582.00 4,582.00
11,750.42 11,750.42
2042365 02/11/15 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2438920 02/12/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 11,614.90
UB Refund Cst #0000206455 45.88 45.88
2042258 01/28/15 03523 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION Ben2437854 01/29/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN
2042257 01/28/15 16016 NATHAN MASELLI Ref002437835 01/26/15
Page 8 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
304.73
10,015.00
723.04
2,160.00
24.06
2042262 01/28/15 16007 ROBERT PHELPS Ref002437826 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000158266 81.51 81.51
65.62 65.62
2042261 01/28/15 16005 ROBERT KAY Ref002437822 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000082205 24.06
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (11/16/14-1/15/15)13.71 13.71
2042371 02/11/15 16090 ROBERT COLOSIA Ref002438855 02/09/15 UB Refund Cst #0000196808
9879 01/06/15 WELDING SERVICES (12/31/14)420.00
2042370 02/11/15 04542 ROBAK, MARK 111614011515 01/20/15
21,486.38 21,486.38
2042329 02/04/15 00521 RICK POST WELD & WET TAPPING 9890 01/19/15 RICK POST WELDING 1,740.00
UB Refund Cst #0000051723 57.18 57.18
2042443 02/18/15 08972 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 0040868 01/26/15 CAMPO ROAD SUPPORT (11/29/14-12/31/14)
0509005899439 01/25/15 TRASH SERVICES (FEB 2015)192.71
2042260 01/28/15 16002 RICHARD CHRISTY Ref002437819 01/26/15
4,121.57 4,121.57
2042369 02/11/15 15857 REPUBLIC SERVICES INC #509 0509005897882 01/25/15 TRASH SERVICES (FEB 2015)530.33
ACCESS ROAD PAVING (12/6/14-1/24/15)19,395.20 19,395.20
2042442 02/18/15 15414 REGENTS BANK 3 01/27/15 RETENTION/COFFMAN (ENDING 1/31/15)
2042441 02/18/15 14578 RAP ENGINEERING INC 2 02/11/15
258.66
2042328 02/04/15 10244 RALPH BAEZ Ref002437824 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000144786 100.56 100.56
56.70 56.70
2042327 02/04/15 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 33209701 01/09/15 SAFETY SUPPLIES 258.66
FINGERPRINTING SERVICES 80.00 80.00
2042440 02/18/15 01342 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 33209702 01/23/15 SAFETY SUPPLIES
5857 01/28/15 PUMP EFFICIENCY TESTING 1,015.00
2042368 02/11/15 10294 QWIKPRINTS 15321024 02/09/15
PUMP EFFICIENCY TESTING 4,500.00
5849 01/14/15 PUMP EFFICIENCY TESTING 4,500.00
2042439 02/18/15 01409 PUMP CHECK 5847 01/13/15
177,149.86
2042326 02/04/15 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2437856 01/29/15 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 178,361.47 178,361.47
3,924.48 3,924.48
2042438 02/18/15 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2438922 02/12/15 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 177,149.86
BUSINESS CARDS 30.08 30.08
2042437 02/18/15 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 42371 01/01/15 JANITORIAL SERVICES (JAN 2015)
2042436 02/18/15 15642 PRINT BUTTON, THE 7706 02/02/15
244.57
7544 01/09/15 BUSINESS CARDS 30.08
7628 01/17/15 BUSINESS CARDS 30.08
TRAVEL EXPENSE (3/15/15-3/19/15)1,071.28 1,071.28
2042325 02/04/15 15642 PRINT BUTTON, THE 7526 12/27/14 CARD SHELLS
2042435 02/18/15 01715 PORRAS, PEDRO 031515031915 02/10/15
2042324 02/04/15 02449 POLLARDWATER.COM 0005140 01/14/15 DECHLOR TABLETS 1,794.00 1,794.00
Page 9 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
432.30
128,055.00
270.00
LABORATORY SERVICES (1/14/15)295.00 295.00
2042448 02/18/15 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 5B11044 02/11/15 LABORATORY SERVICES (2/3/15)
2042332 02/04/15 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 5A21007 01/21/15
347.04
2042271 01/28/15 16025 SHANA & WELCOME ABBOTT Ref002437844 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000214809 1,423.36 1,423.36
136.06 136.06
2042270 01/28/15 16012 SEOK KI SON Ref002437831 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000188655 347.04
UB Refund Cst #0000160642 30.35 30.35
2042269 01/28/15 03514 SANTOS, MARCIANO 011715 01/22/15 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT
012315 01/23/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)749.16
2042268 01/28/15 16008 SANDRA GERGEN Ref002437827 01/26/15
012615 01/26/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)46,172.28
012015a 01/20/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)21,633.05
95,003.73 95,003.73
2042375 02/11/15 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 012915 01/29/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)59,500.51
BID ADVERTISEMENT 128.70 128.70
2042447 02/18/15 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 020415 02/04/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)
484021 01/14/15 BID ADVERTISEMENT 89.10
2042446 02/18/15 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 486067 01/27/15
484160 01/15/15 BID ADVERTISEMENT 125.40
484022 01/14/15 BID ADVERTISEMENT 92.40
2,750.00
2042331 02/04/15 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 483229 01/08/15 BID ADVERTISEMENT 125.40
350.00 350.00
2042445 02/18/15 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH 0000001149 01/28/15 HOME WATER USE EVALUATION 2,750.00
BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 460.90 460.90
2042330 02/04/15 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH 0000001134 01/06/15 MWD SCWS-HEWS
2042374 02/11/15 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2438930 02/12/15
690.00
2042267 01/28/15 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2437864 01/29/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 460.90 460.90
99.00 99.00
2042444 02/18/15 06828 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OFFICE OF SL-14040 02/02/15 SPLASH LAB (2/17/15)690.00
UB Refund Cst #0000213705 32.67 32.67
2042373 02/11/15 12470 SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOURNAL SD124614 02/05/15 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
2042266 01/28/15 16020 SAMANTHA SCHEURN Ref002437839 01/26/15
43.47
2042265 01/28/15 16022 SABIHA KIZY Ref002437841 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000214079 1,758.27 1,758.27
118.66 118.66
2042264 01/28/15 16027 ROYAL CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC Ref002437846 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000215246 43.47
W/O REFUND D0935-090214 3,059.79 3,059.79
2042263 01/28/15 16023 ROSANA ALCARAZ Ref002437842 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000214107
2042372 02/11/15 16092 ROGER LUECHT 0935020515 02/05/15
2042262 01/28/15 16007 ROBERT PHELPS Ref002437826 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000158266 81.51 81.51
Page 10 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
540.00
1,548.00
940.31
20,109.59
11,000.00
ANNUAL FIRE ALARM TEST 2,991.00 2,991.00204227601/28/15 15995 TIME AND ALARM SYSTEMS 52207 01/22/15
79.35
2042275 01/28/15 16021 THREE FROGS INC.Ref002437840 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000214009 30.64 30.64
629.00 629.00
2042380 02/11/15 14177 THOMPSON, MITCHELL 010115013115 01/30/15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (JAN 2015)79.35
PUMP/MOTOR OIL 2,430.10 2,430.10
2042453 02/18/15 15807 THE WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION 412700 02/13/15 ALARM SYSTEM
2042337 02/04/15 03071 THE SOCO GROUP INC 718709 12/05/14
184.61
2042379 02/11/15 15926 TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT UNIT Ben2438936 02/12/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 184.61 184.61
3,850.00 3,850.00
2042274 01/28/15 15926 TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT UNIT Ben2437870 01/29/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 184.61
UB Refund Cst #0000214831 85.31 85.31
2042336 02/04/15 03608 TELLIARD CONSTRUCTION OWD72014 12/10/14 ROOF DRAIN
2042273 01/28/15 16026 TED WIERF Ref002437845 01/26/15
SCADA UPGRADES 10,000.00
2560 02/02/15 SCADA UPGRADES 1,000.00
2042452 02/18/15 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2559 02/02/15
407501 01/28/15 RED DYED DIESEL FUEL 3,807.01
407446 01/27/15 DIESEL FUEL 3,533.68
UNLEADED FUEL 6,476.92
407448 01/28/15 RED DYED DIESEL FUEL 6,291.98
2042451 02/18/15 10339 SUPREME OIL COMPANY 407445 01/27/15
W/O REFUND D0362-090143 522.06
0362021315 02/13/15 W/O REFUND D0362-090131 418.25
2042450 02/18/15 14902 SUNROAD OTAY PARTNERS LP 0362021315a 02/13/15
10,107.87
2042272 01/28/15 15974 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL Ben2437852 01/29/15 MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION TO LTD 4,885.59 4,885.59
115.00 115.00
2042378 02/11/15 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 97107 01/27/15 LEGAL SERVICES (DEC 2014)10,107.87
PROPERTY DEDUCTIBLE 500.00 500.00
2042449 02/18/15 00274 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8205021315 02/13/15 LICENSE RENEWAL
01/07/15 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (11/1/14-11/30/14)6,131.80 6,131.80
2042335 02/04/15 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 0001012715 01/27/15
1,068.00
C55242 01/15/15 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)480.00
2042334 02/04/15 06853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL 369594
DESAL PROJ CONSULTANT (JAN 2015)4,000.00 4,000.00
2042333 02/04/15 15176 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C55224 01/15/15 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)
02/09/15 LABORATORY SERVICES (1/26/15)270.00 270.00
2042377 02/11/15 13327 SILVA-SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1502 02/01/15
270.00
5A28001 01/28/15 LABORATORY SERVICES (1/21/15)270.00
2042376 02/11/15 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 5B09003
2042448 02/18/15 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 5B11044 02/11/15 LABORATORY SERVICES (2/3/15)
Page 11 of 12
Check Total Amount
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 1/22/2015 - 2/18/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description
21,841.82
25,937.05
7,192.57
19.80 19.80
Amount Pd Total:1,365,590.03
Check Grand Total:1,365,590.03
LABORATORY SUPPLIES 460.90 460.90
2042281 01/28/15 16011 YVONNE SOLORZANO Ref002437830 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000186671
2042342 02/04/15 07780 WEBER SCIENTIFIC 657740 01/15/15
283.84
2042456 02/18/15 07780 WEBER SCIENTIFIC 658872 01/28/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 283.96 283.96
165.60 165.60
2042341 02/04/15 03781 WATTON, MARK 120114123114 01/29/15 TRAVEL EXPENSE REIMB (DEC 2014)283.84
HYDRAULIC MODELING (ENDING 12/31/14)840.00 840.00
2042384 02/11/15 03781 WATTON, MARK 010115123115 02/05/15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (JAN 2015)
9739276567 01/21/15 WIRELESS SERVICES (12/22/14-1/21/15)184.38
2042280 01/28/15 15726 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1266 12/31/14
5,151.72
9739276565 01/21/15 WIRELESS SERVICES (12/22/14-1/21/15)1,362.22
9739276566 01/21/15 WIRELESS SERVICES (12/22/14-1/21/15)494.25
BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 11,982.95 11,982.95
2042340 02/04/15 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 9739276561 01/21/15 WIRELESS SERVICES (12/22/14-1/21/15)
2042279 01/28/15 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2437862 01/29/15
13,412.08
2042383 02/11/15 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2438928 02/12/15 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 10,988.25 10,988.25
13,334.22 13,334.22
2042382 02/11/15 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2438926 02/12/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 13,412.08
SECURITY SERVICES (JAN 2015)285.60 285.60
2042278 01/28/15 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2437860 01/29/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN
2042455 02/18/15 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 926226 01/31/15
CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)25,937.05204238502/11/15 07674 US BANK CC20150122141 01/22/15
21,841.82
UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)330.00 330.00
2042381 02/11/15 07674 US BANK CC20150122112 01/22/15 CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)
2042454 02/18/15 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 120150478 02/01/15
569.20
2042277 01/28/15 16010 TRISHA OSUNA Ref002437829 01/26/15 UB Refund Cst #0000185946 34.75 34.75
11,924.97 11,924.97
2042339 02/04/15 08159 TORRES, LEONEL 1757020215 02/02/15 TRAVEL ADVANCEMENT 569.20
2042338 02/04/15 15398 TIMMONS GROUP INC 166108 01/13/15 CONSULTANT SERVICES (THRU 12/31/14)
Page 12 of 12