HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-19-15 Board Packet 1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
TUESDAY
May 19, 2015
3:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
WORKSHOP
5. REVIEW THE DISTRICT’S FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 OPERATING AND CAPITAL
BUDGET AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF AS TO WHICH CONSERVA-
TION LEVEL SHOULD BE ASSUMED FOR THE BUDGET WHICH WILL BE
AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION AT THE JUNE 3, 2015 REGULAR BOARD MEET-
ING (BELL)
6. ADJOURNMENT
2
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the
District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at
the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website. Copies
of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by
contacting her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at 670-2280 at least 24 hours
prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on May 15, 2015, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the
regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at
least 24 hours in advance of the special meeting of the Board of Directors (Government
Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on May 15, 2015.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Special Board Meeting MEETING DATE: May 19, 2015
SUBMITTED BY: Rita Bell, Finance Manager PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Present for Review the FY 2015-2016 Operating and Capital
Budget and Obtain Direction to Set the Conservation Level for
the Final Budget
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
This is an informational item only.
PURPOSE:
To present for review the FY 2015-2016 Operating and Capital
Budget and to obtain the Board of Directors direction as to
which conservation level should be assumed for the budget which
will be available for adoption at the June 3, 2015 Board
meeting.
BACKGROUND:
Each year the District goes through a rate setting process with
new challenges. The process begins in January and ends with the
implementation of rates the following January.
The budget and rate setting process includes reviews of economic
factors; price increases; water use patterns; regulations;
infrastructure; and other cost driver changes. Additionally,
the rate setting process ensures the rate structure is in
compliance with Best Management Practices and industry standards
which bring equity to the rate structure.
This year, because of the drought and the Governor’s mandated
water conservation, an additional challenge has been added to
the budget process. The Governor has set the District’s
2
conservation target at 20% of the 2013 levels. This
conservation level is set to begin on June 1st and run for 270
days. District staff is doing all it can to meet this 20%
target. However, due to the very limited lead time, seasonality
of water sales, and the extensive conservation already achieved,
the 20% conservation will be very difficult to attain. Staff
performed a sensitivity analysis and recommends a 12%
conservation level for the purpose of setting water rates and
balancing the budget. The budget being presented uses a
conservation rate of 12% but allows for a range of conservation
up to 17% before further rate adjustments are required. The rate
adjustment would occur in the subsequent fiscal year’s budget
process. Again, staff is working to achieve the full 20% and
putting forth our best effort to accomplish this.
As a part of the normal budget process, staff has made every
effort to present the most realistic set of factors and
assumptions based on information received from various sources
including: the wholesale water suppliers, the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California (MWD), the San Diego County
Water Authority (CWA), the City of San Diego, vendors such as
SDG&E, and the economic report prepared by The London Group.
This information is used in addition to other economic
indicators affecting taxes and revenues such as inflation and
interest rates.
This year, the San Diego County Water Authority is raising
variable rates by 1.9% and establishing a new fixed Reliability
Charge of $950,000. The District’s water sales volume is
projected to be 8.6% less than last year’s budgeted volume based
on the 12% reduction from the FY 2013 levels. The 8.6%
reduction could be greater if it was not for the reduction in
water loss. Since 2011, the water loss percentage has decreased
from 5.8% to 3.2% a 45% decrease. Due to this and the
continuation of the leak detection program, staff has reduced
the budgeted water loss from 5% to 4%. Staff has prepared a
preliminary Operating and Capital Budget with the estimated
water and sewer rate increases.
DISCUSSION:
The challenges affecting water rates this year are:
The Governor’s mandate to conserve. (Due to significant
prior conservation efforts, the drought itself would have
almost no impact, except for the Governor’s mandate.)
Ongoing water cost increases by CWA and MWD.
3
Weather and economic uncertainties that lead to volatility
in water sales.
The need to maintain the District’s debt coverage ratios
and credit rating.
The funding of reserves and capital projects.
The Governor’s mandated conservation led the District to add
$150,000 for conservation outreach efforts and $300,000 to
complete the leak detection and repair program. The payback of
the leak detection program is seen in lower water loss, which in
turn contributes to the conservation efforts. The focus on the
sewer side is the funding of the Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) costs. The sewer replacement and rehabilitation costs
total $13.8 million over the next six years due to new
regulatory requirements and necessary repairs to the aging
system. The following discussion and the attached presentation
review the above issues.
Water Costs
Fiscal year 2016 has a number of challenges that have an impact
on water rates. The most significant challenges are the reduced
water sales and the CWA increase in the variable water rate of
1.9%, as well as a new Water Reliability Fixed Charge of
$950,400. The total MWD and CWA fixed charges are increasing an
additional $1.1 million. In future years, the reliability
charge will be $1.9 million annually. CWA has stated they will
rely on reserves instead of raising rates to deal with the
mandated conservation. This results in a lower rate increase
than would otherwise be anticipated. Another pressure on rates
is the debt service payments and related coverage requirements.
All of these factors play a significant role in the higher cost
of water to the District.
With water costs representing 53% of the District’s Operating
Budget, any change in the wholesale water price has a
significant impact on the overall Operating Budget. This is a
unique budget year with a net decrease in the budgeted potable
water cost of $1,179,000 due to the combined effect of the
reduction in water purchases and increased costs. On the
recycled side, the water costs increased by $104,300 due to the
contractual “take-or-pay” requirements.
Debt Coverage and Credit Ratings
The debt coverage ratio is a ratio of net revenues to debt
service. The District historically has a “growth” debt coverage
with a minimum of 125%. The “no growth” debt coverage ratio
excludes capacity fees from the net revenues used in the
4
calculation and the minimum for this ratio is 100%. The target
of the “no growth” ratio is 150%. With the 12% conservation
level, the “with growth” ratio drops to 141.1% and the “no
growth” ratio drops to 122.6%. Should this model be adopted for
the budget and if conservation were to exceed 17.2%, the growth
debt coverage ratio minimum would go below the 125% requirement
of the District’s debt covenants causing increased disclosures.
Also, the District would likely be put on credit watch by the
rating agencies. Should the debt coverage remain below the
coveted minimum for multiple years, it would cause a downgrade
of the District’s credit rating.
The District currently maintains a split AA/AA- credit rating
which is comprised of a ‘AA’ rating from Standard & Poor’s (S&P)
and a ‘AA-’ rating from Fitch Ratings (Fitch). In September
2008, the District received a rating upgrade from S&P to ‘AA’,
from ‘AA-’, as part of their global rating recalibration for
municipal agencies. In March 2012, Fitch lowered their credit
rating for the District from ‘AA’ to ‘AA-’, based on lower-than-
budgeted water revenues and a corresponding lower debt coverage
ratio. A credit rating is an overall rating that considers many
factors with debt coverage being one of the main financial
factors. These ratings are all related to the District’s water
side of the business. No credit rating is issued for the
District’s sewer system.
On March 5, 2014, Fitch reaffirmed the ‘AA-’ rating and issued a
“stable” rating outlook for the District. The rating is
sensitive to shifts in fundamental credit characteristics
including the improving debt service coverage. The “stable”
outlook reflects Fitch’s expectation that such shifts are
unlikely. Fitch cited cash reserves, recent rate increases and
improved financial margins as the District’s strengths. Those
strengths were partially offset by vulnerabilities related to
reliance on a single imported water supply source, growth
uncertainty, and “free cash flow” remaining weak. “Free cash
flow” is the amount of cash the District is able generate after
operating and capital related expenditures.
On August 1, 2014, S&P reaffirmed the ‘AA’ rating, but revised
their outlook for the District from “negative” to “stable.” The
revised outlook was based on the District’s financial
performance which improved during the last two fiscal years and
boosted debt coverage to a level they consider strong from a
level they consider only good. S&P also noted the stable
customer base, approved rate increases, and strong liquidity
position as credit strengths. These strengths are partly offset
5
in S&P’s view by the District’s reliance on expensive imported
water for potable supply.
At this time, neither the Fitch downgrade nor the S&P “stable”
outlook is expected to have a negative financial impact on the
District. Due to the estimated conservation associated with the
ongoing drought, the District anticipates the debt coverage
ratio, excluding growth, will decline from the budgeted FY 2015
level of 1.66 to 1.41 in FY 2016. However, with the projected
rate increases in fiscal years 2016-2018, this debt coverage
ratio will rebound back to above the 150% target. If the debt
service coverage ratio were to decline below the coveted ratio
of 125%, the District’s ‘AA’ ratings could be downgraded, which
would have a negative financial impact on the District’s
bondholders. It would also have an immediate but minor
financial impact on the District related to the variable rate
debt. There would be a greater long-term financial impact on
future debt and the cost of future letters of credit. The
District does not anticipate the need to issue debt in the next
six years and, using the current budget objectives, we project
the District’s financial performance will yield strong levels
prior to any debt being issued beyond six years.
Water sales is a variable affecting the District’s financial
standing and debt coverage ratio. Daily monitoring of sales is
a focus of the District to provide timely information that
enables the District to react as needed.
Financing Plan
The District uses a comprehensive approach to financing. The
Finance Policy provides guidance on debt issuances and
refinancing. The Reserve Policy provides guidance on both fund
transfers and reserve balances. With these policies, a six-year
financing plan is formulated that identifies the timing and
amounts of debt issuances, the level of rate increases, debt
coverage ratios, reserve balances, and necessary transfers.
At the current level of potable and recycled CIP expenditures,
it is not expected that the District will issue debt in the
coming six fiscal years. Future debt issuances are highly
dependent on the rate at which growth returns to the District
and how management responds to these variables. Growth is
expected to gradually return and provide funding for CIPs
through higher capacity fees. In FY 2016, the CIP is supported
by $10.6 million in transfers from operating revenues and $12.2
million of transfers between funds.
6
With the transfers and rate increases presented today, the
District will be able to maintain all reserve levels at or above
target levels in the coming fiscal years, except for the
replacement funds which will remain above the minimum levels.
The potable replacement fund reserve will drop $3.6 million
below the target in 2018, $5.3 below in 2019, and $2.7 below in
2020. The replacement reserve returns to target in 2021.
Without the temporary drawdown of the replacement reserve, staff
would be projecting a temporary need for additional debt.
However, to avoid the issuance and interest costs, staff is
projecting this temporary drawdown.
The borrowing will be paid back by FY 2021 at which time all
reserves would be back on target. As the time draws nearer,
staff will have a more firm idea of the projected capital
spending and connection fee revenues. At this time, staff will
again evaluate the best alternative which could be a temporary
borrowing internally or a short-term borrowing from an external
party.
Water Sales
Water sales volumes are based on a 12% reduction from the 2013
levels, adjusted for a reduction in water loss. There is modest
upward pressure on sales due to moderate levels of meter sales.
The meter sales estimates are provided by the Engineering
Department and an economic forecast from an economist.
Additionally, the District is projecting a normal rainfall year
with normal temperatures.
The January 1, 2016 proposed potable and recycled water
increases of 5.4% will generate additional revenue of $1.6
million. This, along with the prior year rate increase and
changes in budgeted water sales volume, increases the budgeted
water sales by a total of $2.6 million. The rate increase is
required to offset the rate increases from CWA, MWD, City of San
Diego, and SDG&E. In fact, 100% of the rate increase is due to
these increased costs. The District has been successful in
managing and reducing its own internal costs through strategic
planning initiatives.
Relative Position to Other Districts
The District performs an annual survey of the District’s rates
compared to other water providers in the county. For many years
the District has remained in the lower half of this comparison.
It is expected that all water providers in the county are facing
the same rate pressures brought on by the Governor’s mandate and
by purchasing water from CWA and MWD. Some agencies will see
7
greater impacts than others, depending on their relative
dependence on CWA water. At this time, our neighboring agencies
are still deciding how they will modify their rates to deal with
these pressures, therefore the chart normally provided is not
currently available.
Sewer Rates
There is no variable sewer rate increase proposed for this year
or any of the next 6 years. The only proposed increase in any
of the next 6 years is the FY 2016 year’s increase in the
monthly system fee for residential customers. This is an
increase approved as a part of the 2013 Cost of Service Study.
For a typical residential customer the monthly increase is
$1.30. With the increase in the system fee the District is the
seventh lowest provider of sewer services of the 28 agencies in
the region.
Strategic Planning and Internal Cost Cutting
In addition to the budget and rate setting process, the
District’s focus on strategic planning has played a positive
role in the financial strength of the District. By managing
staffing, automating processes, and implementing Best Management
Practices the District has become more efficient and cost
effective.
Operating Budget
The proposed FY 2015-2016 budget covers CWA’s increases in water
costs, supports the Capital Budget, and improves the District’s
financial position. The proposed budget presents an average
5.4% water rate increase for water customers. The rate model
projects the following increases for water in fiscal years 2016
through 2020: 5.4%, 5.4%, 3.8%, 3.8%, and 3.8%, respectively.
For sewer customers there is only the increase of the system fee
in FY 2016 and no increases thereafter.
Rate Implementation - Water
A rate increase of 5.4% is being presented for both potable and
recycled customers. This average increase is composed of a
number of changes to various rates in differing amounts. An
increase in the variable water rate of 1.9% is proposed for all
classes of potable customers. The energy charge for pumping is
proposed to increase by 37% to reflect the large rate increases
implemented by SDG&E since last fiscal year, and the anticipated
SDG&E rate increase of 3.5% in FY 2016. The MWD and CWA pass-
through fee is proposed to increase by 23.2% to ensure that
fixed revenue collected matches the fixed costs charged to the
District by our water providers. This is offset by a 4.7%
8
reduction in the District’s monthly system fee. The total
components of MWD and CWA fixed charges are shown below:
Customer Service Charge $1,931,400
Emergency Storage Charge $4,681,800
Infrastructure Access Charge $1,777,800
Reliability Charge $950,400
Capacity Reservation Charge $ 806,400
Readiness-to-Serve Charge $1,798,800
Total MWD & CWA Fixed Charges $11,946,600
In fiscal year 2016, and for the first time, the District
anticipates being above the fixed revenue limit of 30% (Best
Management Practices (BMP) 1.4). Exceeding this limit is
occurring because of the large decrease in the variable revenues
and the large increase in the MWD and CWA fixed costs. This is
despite the decrease in the District’s fixed system fee. It is
the District’s goal to remain close to this maximum in fixed
revenue, but with the Governor’s mandated conservation and the
new CWA Reliability Charge, it is not achievable this year.
The percentage increase of 1.9% is recommended for the variable
recycled water rate. The decrease of 4.7% in the recycled
system fee is the same as the potable system fee decrease.
Recycled water rates are set at 85% of the potable irrigation
rate in order to maximize the recycled rebates and in accordance
with our recycled rebate agreement with CWA. The individual
component rates discussed above have an average effect of
increasing the average water bill by 5.4%.
For a typical single-family residential customer using 14 units
per month, their monthly bill would increase from $81.67 to
$85.69, an increase of $4.02.
Rate Implementation - Sewer
In FY 2015, a 5.0% sewer rate increase was projected for FY 2016
based on cost estimates at that time. This year no rate
increase is necessary except for the adjustment to the system
fee. The primary cause of change is the lower cost of service
from both the City of San Diego - Waste Water Department and the
county. In addition, a refund from the City is anticipated this
year of $479,000 due to overcharges for treatment and disposal
of wastewater as well as lower labor costs. The combined effect
offsets unnecessary rate increases in FY 2016 and future years.
Budgeted Revenues
Projected water revenues, as compared to last year’s budget,
include an increase in potable water revenues of 3.9%. There is
9
also an increase in recycled water revenues of 3.2%. This
increase is due to the combination of the prior year’s 5.8% and
this year’s proposed rate increase. The change in sales volume
(decrease of 8.6% for potable and no change for recycled) has a
major effect on potable revenues.
The budgeted sewer revenues are projected to increase 11.8% over
last year’s budget due to the past year’s overall rate increase
of 5.0% plus the final phase-in of $1.30 for the residential
system fee. Sewer revenues are affected by customer’s water use
patterns and the need to fund reserves.
Other changes in the Operating Revenues include the following:
Property Tax Revenues are expected to increase by 4.4%
Capacity Fee Revenues funding operating expenses are
expected to decrease by 1.4% due to less work in the
planning areas as major planning projects are completed.
Betterment Fee Revenues will be eliminated due to the
shifting of these fees from betterment into the general
water rates.
Expenses
In the proposed budget, potable water costs are projected to
decrease $1,179,000 over last year’s budget. This decrease is
due to the volumetric sales decrease and the decrease in water
loss. This is offset by CWA’s January 1, 2016 price increase of
$22 per acre-foot as well as increases in fixed charges by MWD
and CWA of $1,010,400, mostly due to the new Reliability Charge
of $950,400. Recycled water variable costs are expected to
remain the same as last year due to no anticipated change in
volume or rate. The “take or pay” component of the contractual
agreement with the City of San Diego is expected to cost the
District an additional $104,300.
Sewer service provider costs are expected to decrease by a total
of $298,200 due to a $205,000 decrease in charges from the City
of San Diego – Wastewater Department, and $93,200 in charges
from the Spring Valley Sanitation District (County of San
Diego).
Power costs for water and sewer are budgeted to increase by
$274,400 or 9.7%. This rate increase was much larger than
anticipated, especially in light of the reduced water sales.
The District’s ongoing effort by staff to operate at non-peak
and semi-peak hours at lower rates will help manage energy costs
and offset some of the cost increases.
10
The District has, through strategic planning, reduced the FTE
count from 174.75 to 138 FTE or 21% since FY 2007, saving the
District $4,955,100 in FY 2016 alone. In addition, the District
will recognize future savings in pension costs with the reduced
staffing level. Labor and benefits costs are expected to
increase by $463,000 or 2.3%. These changes are due to the
following:
Reduction of two FTEs resulting in a decrease of $106,700.
Increase in staff advancements of $137,000.
Increase in health costs of $228,600.
Increase in other benefits of $65,300.
Decrease in temporary position wages of $98,500.
Increase in pension costs of $280,000.
Decrease in OPEB costs of $42,000.
Decrease in overtime, vacancy, and other of $153,100.
Increase in the salaries and benefits due to COLA and in-
range salary adjustments consistent with the Memorandum of
Understanding of $203,200.
Decrease of charges to CIP projects, shifting costs to the
operating budget increases costs by $50,800 for labor and
benefits and associated overhead allocation.
The funding of the OPEB (Other Post Employee Benefits) liability
was initiated with a transfer to the OPEB Trust in March 2008
and has since been funded at an accelerated rate by not only
paying the Annual Required Contribution (ARC) but also by paying
the retiree medical premiums. There are multiple benefits of
this practice which continues to be incorporated into the
proposed budget. First, the Trust has a greater rate of return
due to the longer investment time horizon. This reduces the
District’s overall financial burden. Second, the funding of the
Trust reduces the ARC expense, decreasing the need to raise
rates in order to maintain the District’s debt coverage
ratio. The funding of the retiree premiums has the net effect
of funding the Trust, as the Trust is relieved of the obligation
to cover that cost.
The administrative expenses budget will decrease by 0.6% or
$31,400 due to the following factors:
Increase in outside services for conservation outreach
efforts of $150,000.
Increase in the leak detection program of $107,500.
11
Decrease in legal expenses of $160,000.
Decrease in insurance costs of $45,000.
Decrease in equipment of $27,300.
Decrease in fees of $25,700.
Decrease in allocation to work orders of $19,900 related to
the reduced charges to CIP.
The materials and maintenance budget will experience an overall
decrease of 0.2% or $7,000. The major factors are:
Increase in Contracted Services of $107,200.
Increase in Safety Equipment by $83,100.
Increase in Other Materials and Supplies of $58,700.
Increase in Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies of
$96,300.
Decrease in Metro O&M of $205,300.
Decrease in Spring Valley (County) Sewer of $93,200.
Decrease in Fuel and Oil of $53,700.
Fund Transfers
The requested transfers serve the purpose of ensuring the
reserves are funded at target levels in accordance with the
Reserve Policy. There are two types of transfers the District
can make. The first is the use of operating revenues to fund
reserves which are shown in the operating budget. These
transfers total $10.6 million. One of these transfers repays
the loan made by the sewer funds to the potable funds in FY2009.
The second type of transfer is between funds meant to rebalance
funds to target levels. The fund to fund transfers that are
requested separately in this staff report total $12.6 million.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget
As a component of the annual budget development process, the
Engineering staff updates the Capital Improvement (CIP) Budget.
This year, the total six-year CIP Budget is decreasing by $7.4
million from last year. This decrease is a result of completing
many CIP projects, delays in developer projects, reprioritizing
some projects, and increasing emphasis upon water supply
projects. The following process is used to prepare the CIP
Budget:
12
CIP projects selected are based on the Water Resources
Master Plan (WRMP), the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP),
Sub Area Master Plan (SAMP), Integrated Water Resources
Plan (IRP), Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP), and other
focused or specific planning documents and reports.
The CIP goes through an iterative process to meet the
criteria of growth, service levels, supply targets, and
system requirements.
CIP target expenditures for the next six years are refined
and used in the rate model.
The following general criteria are used to determine the
reasonableness of a project before it is considered for
inclusion within the CIP Budget:
Existing facility conditions
Operating system conditions
Water and sewer system deficiencies
Regulatory and permitting requirements
Developer driven requirements
Economic outlook
Growth projections
Water supply diversification goals
Board and management directives
This year the CIP Budget includes the following amounts by
project category. Project details within each of the categories
are located in Exhibit I under the Capital Budget tab.
Capital Backbone $ 3.1
Developer Reimbursement 0.0
Replacement and Renewal 6.9
Capital Purchases 1.1
Total (millions) $11.1
There are a total of 80 projects in the current six-year CIP
plan. Each project is listed in the FY 2015-2016 Preliminary
Operating and Capital Budget (Attachment A). The total six-year
cost of the 80 projects plus 13 additional projects budgeted in
FY 2016 through FY 2021 is $96.2 million.
Sewer CIP includes $13.8 million of rehabilitation and main
replacement projects starting in FY 2016 and finishing in
FY 2021. In last year’s budget it was anticipated that the
Sewer Fund would need to issue debt beginning in FY 2016. With
13
the $3.5 million reduction in the six-year CIP, and the $2.4
million dollar decrease in operating expenses, this future
borrowing is no longer necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact.
STRATEGIC OUTLOOK:
The District ensures its continued financial health through
long-term financial planning and debt planning.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
A) Preliminary Operations and Capital Budget, FY 2015-2016
B) FY 2016 Budget Workshop Presentation
Intentionally Left Blank
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
11-Actual Budget Budget $%
REVENUES
#Potable Water Sales 71,272,396$ 71,959,100$ 69,641,100$ (2,318,000)$ (3.2%)
Recycled Water Sales 10,014,767 8,826,600 9,111,200 284,600 3.2%
#Sewer Revenues 2,757,867 3,007,700 3,206,300 198,600 6.6%
#Meter Fees 78,465 51,500 66,200 14,700 28.5%
#Capacity Fee Revenues 1,170,985 1,150,600 1,134,800 (15,800) (1.4%)
#Betterment Fees for Maintenance 485,738 301,800 - (301,800) 0.0%
Tax Revenues 3,624,363 3,763,700 3,897,900 134,200 3.6%
#Non-operating Revenues 2,057,519 1,947,800 1,873,600 (74,200) (3.8%)
#Interest 124,196 77,400 157,500 80,100 103.5%
O Transfer from OPEB Reserve 149,800 - - - (100.0%)
ExTransfer from Potable General Fund - 553,800 - (553,800) (100.0%)
General Fund Draw Down 214,400 - - - (100.0%)
TOTAL REVENUES 91,950,496$ 91,640,000$ 89,088,600$ (2,551,400)$ (2.8%)
EXPENDITURES
#Potable Water Purchases 36,151,147$ 34,521,500$ 32,332,100$ (2,189,400) (6.3%)
Recycled Water Purchases 1,661,887 1,601,500 1,705,800 104,300 6.5%
#CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,856,202 1,901,400 1,931,400 30,000 1.6%
#CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,753,840 1,792,200 1,777,800 (14,400) (0.8%)
CWA - Reliability Charge - - 950,400 950,400 0.0%
#CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,515,596 4,741,200 4,681,800 (59,400) (1.3%)
#MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 531,318 701,400 806,400 105,000 15.0%
#MWD - Net RTS and Standby Charge 1,740,511 1,800,000 1,798,800 (1,200) (0.1%)
Subtotal - Water Costs 48,210,501$ 47,059,200$ 45,984,500$ (1,074,700)$ (2.3%)
#Power 2,808,846$ 2,838,400$ 3,112,800$ 274,400$ 9.7%
#Labor and Benefits 18,876,033 19,747,600 20,381,000 633,400 3.2%
#Administrative Expenses 4,085,394 5,419,200 5,387,800 (31,400) (0.6%)
#Materials & Maintenance 3,157,876 3,619,800 3,612,800 (7,000) (0.2%)
Subtotal - Operations Costs 28,928,149$ 31,625,000$ 32,494,400$ 869,400$ 2.7%
#Expansion Reserve 3,428,000 2,538,900 2,691,000 152,100 6.0%
B Betterment Reserve 125,000 3,530,000 2,400,000 (1,130,000) (32.0%)
ReReplacement Reserve 4,230,000 3,270,200 3,278,400 8,200 0.3%
Transfer to Sewer General Fund 152,800 553,800 - (553,800) 0.0%
TOOPEB Trust 1,242,900 647,100 1,006,000 358,900 55.5%
Potable General Fund 1,913,000 1,583,800 - (1,583,800) (100.0%)
Sewer Replacement - 127,000 1,199,300 1,072,300 8.4
New Supply Reserve - 705,000 35,000 (670,000) (1.0)
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 11,091,700$ 12,955,800$ 10,609,700$ (2,346,100)$ (18.1%)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 88,230,350$ 91,640,000$ 89,088,600$ (2,551,400)$ (2.8%)
EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)3,720,146$ -$ -$ -$
Operating Budget Summary - General Fund
Budget to Budget
S-1
Operating Budget Summary - General Fund
Potable Water Sales 69,641,100$ 78.2%
Recycled Water Sales 9,111,200 10.1%
Sewer Revenues 3,206,300 3.6%
Meter Fees 66,200 0.1%
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,134,800 1.3%
Tax Revenues 3,897,900 4.4%
Non-operating Revenues 1,873,600 2.1%
Interest 157,500 0.2%
89,088,600$ 100.0%
Potable Water Purchases 44,278,700$ 49.7%
Recycled Water Purchases 1,705,800 1.8%
Power 3,112,800 3.5%
Labor and Benefits 20,381,000 22.9%
Administrative Expenses 5,387,800 6.0%
Materials & Maintenance 3,612,800 4.1%
Reserve Funding 10,609,700 11.9%
89,088,600$ 100%
FY 2016 Operating Revenues
FY 2016 Operating Expenditures
S-2
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
REVENUES
Water Sales 69,641,100$ -$ -$ 69,641,100$
Recycled Water Sales - 9,111,200 - 9,111,200
Sewer Revenues - - 3,206,300 3,206,300
Meter Fees 65,800 400 - 66,200
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,134,800 - - 1,134,800
B Betterment Fees for Maintenance - - - -
Tax Revenues 3,846,300 - 51,600 3,897,900
Non-operating Revenues 1,836,400 - 37,200 1,873,600
Interest 143,000 6,300 8,200 157,500
TF Transfer from Betterment - - - -
TOTAL REVENUES 76,667,400$ 9,117,900$ 3,303,300$ 89,088,600$
EXPENDITURES
Water Costs
Water Purchases 32,332,100$ 1,705,800$ -$ 34,037,900$
CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,931,400 - - 1,931,400
CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,777,800 - - 1,777,800
CWA - Reliability Charge 950,400 - - 950,400
CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,681,800 - - 4,681,800
MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 806,400 - - 806,400
MWD - Net RTS and Standby Charges 1,798,800 - - 1,798,800
Subtotal - Water Costs 44,278,700$ 1,705,800$ -$ 47,059,200$
Operations Costs
Power 2,372,400 563,600 176,800 3,112,800$
Labor and Benefits 18,518,100 1,181,600 681,300 20,381,000
Administrative Expenses 4,865,200 321,800 200,800 5,387,800
Materials & Maintenance 2,168,300 287,800 1,156,700 3,612,800
Subtotal - Operations Costs 27,924,000$ 2,354,800$ 2,215,600$ 31,625,000$
Reserve Funding
#Expansion Reserve - 2,691,000 - 2,691,000$
B Betterment Reserve - 1,945,000 455,000 2,400,000
ReReplacement Reserve 2,351,300 328,000 599,100 3,278,400
TOOPEB Trust 914,100 58,300 33,600 1,006,000
Sewer Replacement 1,199,300 - - 1,199,300
New Supply Reserve - 35,000 - 35,000
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 4,464,700$ 5,057,300$ 1,087,700$ 10,609,700$
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 76,667,400$ 9,117,900$ 3,303,300$ 89,088,600$
EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES) -$ -$ -$ -$
FY 2016 Operating Budget Summary by System
S-3
Intentionally Left Blank
S-4
REVENUES
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
Water/Sewer Rates 87,068,400 93,813,400 99,113,900 104,168,100 109,556,000
Meter Fees 71,500 76,700 78,700 81,800 85,400
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,140,500 1,151,900 1,163,400 1,175,000 1,186,800
Non-operating Revenues 1,903,100 1,934,200 1,967,200 2,002,000 2,037,500
Tax Revenues 3,998,300 4,103,400 4,214,000 4,401,100 4,598,900
Interest Income 202,100 259,200 297,600 337,800 383,100
TOTAL 94,383,900$ 101,338,800$ 106,834,800$ 112,165,800$ 117,847,700$
30,334,100$ 32,324,000$ 32,938,300$ 33,559,500$
EXPENDITURES AND TRANSFERS
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
Water Cost 50,115,400$ 54,801,700$ 58,873,100$ 63,386,700$ 68,229,200$
Power 3,308,000 3,526,000 3,692,900 3,878,400 4,077,600
Labor and Benefits 21,338,600 22,104,400 22,325,000 22,820,900 23,325,700
Administrative Expenses 5,395,200 5,555,000 5,481,600 5,649,900 5,823,800
Materials & Maintenance 3,729,200 3,887,800 4,045,200 4,209,300 4,379,900
Net Reserve Funding 10,497,500 11,463,900 12,417,000 12,220,600 12,011,500
TOTAL 94,383,900$ 101,338,800$ 106,834,800$ 112,165,800$ 117,847,700$
EXCESS REVENUES -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
General Fund Forecast - FY 2017 Through FY 2021
This forecast incorporates both cost increases for expenditures and rate increases for revenues, as well as
growth projections.
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
$9
4
$1
0
1
$1
0
7
$1
1
2
$1
1
8
$9
4
$1
0
1
$1
0
7
$1
1
2
$1
1
8
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Revenues and Expenditures Forecast
Revenues Expenditures
F-1
FUND FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
General Fund 20,977,400$ 22,480,400$ 23,606,000$ 24,991,600$ 26,463,000$
Betterment Fund 2,527,600 2,210,800 2,480,500 2,713,300 2,707,500
Replacement Fund 42,947,400 32,671,500 30,642,500 33,403,300 36,982,300
Expansion Fund 445,000 587,600 184,400 106,800 106,700
New Supply Fund 812,600 1,207,800 1,608,900 1,802,800 1,805,900
Debt Reserve 4,574,500 4,643,300 4,722,800 4,829,800 4,951,000
TOTAL 72,284,500$ 63,801,400$ 63,245,100$ 67,847,600$ 73,016,400$
(19,500) (19,754) (20,111) (20,411) (20,811)
Fund Balances - FY 2017 Through FY 2021
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021
Mi
l
l
i
o
n
s
Fund Balances Forecast
General Fund Betterment Fund Replacement Fund Expansion Fund Debt Reserve
F-2
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
11-Actual Budget Budget $%
REVENUES
#Water Sales 71,272,396$ 71,959,100$ 69,641,100$ (2,318,000)$ (3.2%)
#Meter Fees 77,503 51,100 65,800 14,700 28.8%
#Capacity Fee Revenues 1,167,405 1,150,600 1,134,800 (15,800) (1.4%)
#Betterment Fees for Maintenance 485,738 301,800 - (301,800) (100.0%)
Tax Revenues 3,580,042 3,712,100 3,846,300 134,200 3.6%
#Non-operating Revenues 2,024,615 1,914,000 1,836,400 (77,600) (4.1%)
#Interest 100,023 65,400 143,000 77,600 118.7%
OPTransfer from OPEB 149,800 - - - (100.0%)
TOTAL REVENUES 78,857,522$ 79,154,100$ 76,667,400$ (2,486,700)$ (3.1%)
EXPENDITURES
Potable Water Purchases 36,151,147 34,521,500 32,332,100 (2,189,400) (6.3%)
#CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,856,202 1,901,400 1,931,400 30,000 1.6%
#CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,753,840 1,792,200 1,777,800 (14,400) (0.8%)
#CWA - Reliability Charge - - 950,400 950,400 100.0%
#CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,515,596 4,741,200 4,681,800 (59,400) (1.3%)
#MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 531,318 701,400 806,400 105,000 15.0%
#MWD-Net RTS and Standby Charges 1,740,511 1,800,000 1,798,800 (1,200) (0.1%)
Subtotal - Water Costs 46,548,614$ 45,457,700$ 44,278,700$ (1,179,000)$ (2.6%)
#Power 2,057,945 2,188,400 2,372,400 184,000 8.4%
#Labor and Benefits 16,967,071 17,663,500 18,518,100 854,600 4.8%
#Administrative Expenses 3,616,667 4,927,100 4,865,200 (61,900) (1.3%)
#Materials & Maintenance 1,654,641 1,921,800 2,168,300 246,500 12.8%
11-Subtotal - Operations Costs 24,296,324$ 26,700,800$ 27,924,000$ 1,223,200$ 4.6%
#Expansion Reserve 3,418,000 - - - (100.0%)
Be Betterment Reserve - 2,805,000 - (2,805,000) (100.0%)
Re Replacement Reserve - 675,000 2,351,300 1,676,300 248.3%
sw Transfer to Sewer General Fund 152,800 553,800 - (553,800) 0.0%
TOTransfer to OPEB 1,114,600 546,000 914,100 368,100 67.4%
GFTransfer to General Fund Reserve 1,913,000 1,583,800 - (1,583,800) (100.0%)
SwTransfer to Sewer Replacement - 127,000 1,199,300 1,072,300 844.3%
NSTransfer to New Supply Fund - 705,000 - (705,000) (100.0%)
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 6,598,400$ 6,995,600$ 4,464,700$ (2,530,900)$ (36.2%)
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 77,443,338$ 79,154,100$ 76,667,400$ (2,486,700)$ (3.1%)
EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)1,414,184$ -$ -$ -$
Operating Budget Summary - Potable
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-1
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Water Sales 46,856,253$ 42,668,000$ 41,344,900$ (1,323,100)$ -3.1%
System Fees 11,152,291 11,184,200 13,151,300 1,967,100 17.6%
Energy Fees 2,114,844 1,958,100 2,311,300 353,200 18.0%
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees 10,309,983 10,399,700 11,946,600 1,546,900 14.9%
Penalties 839,025 823,500 887,000 63,500 7.7%
Total Water Sales 71,272,396$ 67,033,500$ 69,641,100$ 2,607,600$ 3.9%
Water Sales 41,344,900$ 59.0%
System Charges 13,151,300 19.0%
MWD and CWA Fixed Charges 11,946,600 17.0%
Energy Charges 2,311,300 3.0%
Penalties 887,000 2.0%
Total 69,641,100$ 100.0%
Water Rates: Rates vary among classes of service and are charged per unit of water. A unit of water is equal
to 100 cubic feet. On January 1, 2009, the District implemented a tiered rate structure for all customer types
to encourage conservation and bring equity among the classes.
System Fees: Each water service customer pays a monthly system charge for water system replacement,
maintenance, and operation expenses. The charge is based on the size of the meter.
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees: These pass-through charges are calculated to recover the MWD's and CWA's
fixed annual costs including the construction, operation and maintenance of aqueducts, and emergency
storage projects. These fixed charges are based on the size of the meter.
Energy Fees: The energy pumping fee is $ .072 per 100 cubic feet of water for each 100 feet of lift above the
elevation of 450 feet. All water customers are in one of 29 zones based on elevation.
Penalties: Charges and penalties are imposed on customer accounts for late payments and returned checks.
Classification of Water Sales - Potable
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-2
Current Proposed*Accounts Units Amount
Residential 45,078 6,954,400 23,198,800$
Conservation Tier (< 5 hcf)1.95$ 1.99$
6 - 10 3.04 3.10
11 - 22 3.95 4.03
over 23 hcf 6.08 6.20
Master Meter 809 1,326,700 4,631,000
0 - 4 3.00 3.06
5 - 9 3.89 3.96
over 10 hcf 6.00 6.12
Public and Commercial 1,469 1,802,500 5,895,300
Tier I 3.21 3.27
Tier II 3.26 3.32
Tier III 3.31 3.37
Agriculture, Landscaping, and Construction 1,348 1,620,500 7,176,300
Tier I 4.37 4.45
Tier II 4.42 4.50
Tier III 4.47 4.56
Total 48,704 11,704,100 40,901,400$
Government Fee 0.32 0.37 - - 443,500
Total Water Sales 48,704 11,704,100 41,344,900$
Residential 6,954,400 60%
Master Meter 1,326,700 10%
Public and Commercial 1,802,500 20%
Agricultural and Landscaping 1,620,500 10%
11,704,100 100%
Water Sales Summary by Service Class - Potable
FY 2016 Sales BudgetWater Rates
FY 2016 Unit Sales by Service Class
*Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2016.
R-3
Budget Budget
Customer Class FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Residential 7,486,069 7,507,214 7,836,873 8,050,828 7,674,100 6,954,400
Master Meters 1,389,616 1,409,515 1,495,057 1,536,902 1,427,500 1,326,700
Public and Commercial 1,771,396 1,859,571 2,031,253 2,056,075 1,853,100 1,802,500
Agricultural and Landscaping 1,537,304 1,581,243 1,723,839 1,931,856 1,590,400 1,529,900
Temporary and Fire Services 179,472 153,351 102,020 144,458 171,300 90,600
Total Unit Sales 12,363,857 12,510,894 13,189,042 13,720,119 12,716,400 11,704,100
Budget Budget
Customer Class FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Residential 43,903 44,396 44,670 44,826 44,945 45,078
Master Meters 797 799 800 798 798 809
Public and Commercial 1,434 1,433 1,493 1,449 1,439 1,470
Agricultural and Landscaping 1,223 1,227 1,227 1,229 1,232 1,228
Temporary and Fire Services 797 810 772 846 843 869
Total Unit Sales 48,154 48,665 48,962 49,148 49,257 49,454
Unit Sales History and Meter Count by Customer Class - Potable
Unit Sales (in thousand) and Meter Count Trends
Unit Sales History (in hcf)
Meter Count
Actual
Actual
5,000
15,000
25,000
35,000
45,000
55,000
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
Potable Meters Potable Unit Sales
R-4
System Fees - Potable
Meter FY 2016 Current Proposed*FY 2015 FY 2016
Size Meter
Count Rates Rates Budget Budget $%
All Service Types
0.75 43,794 19.39$ 18.50$ 9,340,100$ 9,939,000$ 598,900$ 6.41%
1.00 2,433 27.39 26.14 725,600 781,400 55,800 7.69%
1.50 940 47.40 45.23 491,400 522,200 30,800 6.27%
2.00 1,082 71.39 68.13 850,500 905,800 55,300 6.50%
3.00 75 135.41 129.22 107,300 117,600 10,300 9.60%
4.00 184 207.43 197.95 405,600 445,300 39,700 9.79%
6.00 16 407.50 388.88 71,800 76,500 4,700 6.55%
8.00 3 647.56 617.97 21,400 22,800 1,400 6.54%
10.00 5 927.63 885.24 51,100 54,400 3,300 6.46%
Sub-total 48,532 12,064,800 12,865,000 800,200 65.81%
Fire Services
0.63 691 25.32 24.16 190,700 205,100 14,400 7.55%
0.75 9 25.32 24.16 2,500 2,700 200 8.00%
1.00 26 25.32 24.16 7,500 7,700 200 2.67%
2.00 16 25.32 24.16 6,000 4,800 (1,200) -20.00%
3.00 - 25.32 24.16 - - -
4.00 - 34.12 32.56 - - -
10.00 - 34.12 32.56 - - -
Sub-total 742 206,700 220,300 13,600 -1.78%
Turn Over Fees 10.00 10.00 66,000 66,000 -
Total 49,274 12,337,500$ 13,151,300$ 813,800$ 6.60%
*Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2016.
Historical System Fees, in millions ($)
Budget to Budget
Variance
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-5
Meter FY 2016 Current Proposed*FY 2015 FY 2016
Size Meter Count Rates Rates Budget Budget $%
0.75 43,796 13.67$ 16.84$ 7,379,700$ 8,004,300$ 624,600$ 8.46%
1.00 2,572 25.35 31.24 749,900 873,300 123,400 16.46%
1.50 935 57.35 70.66 662,200 717,800 55,600 8.40%
2.00 1,083 97.53 120.17 1,300,000 1,414,600 114,600 8.82%
3.00 76 207.44 255.60 184,300 208,800 24,500 13.29%
4.00 98 332.20 409.32 387,600 432,200 44,600 11.51%
6.00 16 680.02 837.89 134,300 145,700 11,400 8.49%
8.00 3 1,098.15 1,353.09 40,700 44,100 3,400 8.35%
10.00 5 1,580.67 1,947.62 97,500 105,800 8,300 8.51%
-
Total 48,584 10,936,200$ 11,946,600$ 1,010,400$ 9.24%
*Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2016.
Note: Contruction meters, Fire Services, and Recycled Meters are exempt from MWD and CWA Fixed Fees.
Agriculture
Historical MWD and CWA Fixed Fees, in millions ($)
Budget to Budget
Variance
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees (Pass-Through) - Potable
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-6
Meter Meter Installation Meter Total Budgeted
Size Sales Fee Fee Fees Amount
0.75 162 102.56$ 216.13$ 318.69$ 51,600$
1.00 - 102.56 278.89 381.45 -
1.50 1 102.56 453.31 555.87 600
2.00 - 102.56 649.55 752.11 -
3.00 2 617.51 2,024.25 2,641.76 5,300
4.00 2 617.51 3,515.80 4,133.31 8,300
6.00 - 975.40 6,072.73 7,048.13 -
8.00 - 1,495.69 7,587.43 9,083.12 -
10.00 - 1,495.69 10,912.14 12,407.83 -
Total 167 65,800$
Meter Fees:
Meter Fees - Potable
Meter Fees are charges collected for new water service connections. Fees vary depending upon
Historical Meter Count
-
15,000
30,000
45,000
60,000
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-7
Budget Budget
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Water Sales 32,236,451$ 35,615,558$ 40,845,630$ 46,856,253$ 42,668,000$ 41,344,900$
System Fees 9,490,904 9,583,563 10,315,199 11,152,291 11,184,200 13,151,300
Energy Fees 1,693,186 1,881,776 1,964,062 2,114,844 1,958,100 2,311,300
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees 7,421,386 9,000,267 9,747,977 10,309,983 10,399,700 11,946,600
Penalties 665,931 703,081 796,426 839,025 823,500 887,000
Total Potable Revenues 51,507,858$ 56,784,245$ 63,669,294$ 71,272,396$ 67,033,500$ 69,641,100$
Revenue History - Potable
Actual
Revenue History - Potable, in millions ($)
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
Water Sales System Fees Energy Fees MWD & CWA Fixed Fees Penalties
R-8
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
$ %
Potable Water Purchases (CWA):
Rate Effective January 1,143.00$ 1,253.00$ 110.00$ 9.62%
Budgeted Sales 29,192.4 26,868.7 32,710,200$ 30,968,000$ (1,742,200)$ -5.33%
District & Unbilled Usage 61.2 61.2 69,100 70,800 1,700 2.46%
Water Loss 1,539.7 1,122.1 1,725,300 1,293,300 (432,000) -25.04%
Total Water Purchases - Potable
Budgeted Sales (CSD)- - 16,900 - (16,900) 0.00%
Total Variable Charges 30,793.3 28,052.0 34,521,500$ 32,332,100$ (2,189,400)$ -6.34%
CWA and MWD Fixed Charges:
CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,901,400$ 1,931,400$ 30,000$ 1.58%
CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,792,200 1,777,800 (14,400) -0.80%
CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,741,200 4,681,800 (59,400) -1.25%
CWA - Reliability Fixed Charge - 950,400 950,400 100.00%
MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 701,400 806,400 105,000 14.97%
MWD - Readiness-to-Serve Charge 1,800,000 1,798,800 (1,200) -0.07%
Total Fixed Charges 10,936,200$ 11,946,600$ 1,010,400$ 9.24%
Total Variable and Fixed Charges 45,457,700$ 44,278,700$ (1,179,000)$ -2.59%
Average Cost Per Acre-Foot 1,476$ 1,578$
Budget to Budget
Variance
Acre Feet
Water Purchases and Related Costs - Potable
Purchase Costs
-
10,000.0
20,000.0
30,000.0
40,000.0
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
Historical Potable Water Purchases, in acre-feet
R-9
Power Costs - Potable
Budget Budget
FY 2015 FY 2016 $ %
189,600$ 225,700$ 36,100$ 19.0%
Potable Transmission 1,998,800 2,146,700 147,900 7.4%
Total Potable Power Costs 2,188,400$ 2,372,400$ 184,000$ 8.4%
Budget Budget
Historical Power Costs FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Administrative and Operations
Buildings 158,657$ 165,099$ 164,785$ 179,919$ 189,600$ 225,700$
Potable Transmission 1,468,322 1,463,075 1,610,428 1,878,026 1,998,800 2,146,700
Total Potable Power Costs 1,626,979$ 1,628,174$ 1,775,213$ 2,057,945$ 2,188,400$ 2,372,400$
Actual
Historical Power Costs, in thousands ($)
Budget to Budget
Variance
Administrative and Operations Buildings
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
Potable Transmission Administrative and Operations Buildings
R-10
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Administrative Expenditures
Directors' Fees 19,834$ 30,000$ 30,000$ -$ -
Travel and Meetings 147,068 207,700 214,400 6,700 3.2%
Conservation and Outreach 136,743 174,900 176,900 2,000 1.1%
General Office Expense 258,732 280,800 284,700 3,900 1.4%
Equipment 942,826 1,133,300 1,106,500 (26,800) (2.4%)
Fees 489,867 498,700 470,900 (27,800) (5.6%)
Services 1,286,792 2,042,300 2,224,600 182,300 8.9%
Training 65,818 123,500 99,000 (24,500) (19.8%)
Utilities 12,929 14,000 14,900 900 6.4%
Bad Debt Expense 149,213 148,000$ 148,000 - 0.0%
Total 3,509,822$ 4,653,200$ 4,769,900$ 116,700$ 2.5%
Less: Overhead Allocation (737,254) (767,100) (740,700) 26,400 0.0%
Subtotal 2,772,568$ 3,886,100$ 4,029,200$ 143,100$ 3.7%
General Expenses 844,099 1,041,000 836,000 (205,000) (19.7%)
Total Expenditures 3,616,667$ 4,927,100$ 4,865,200$ (61,900)$ (1.3%)
4,403,925$ ######## 5,605,900$
Directors' Fees 30,000$ 0.5%
Travel and Meetings 214,400 3.8%
Conservation and Outreach 176,900 3.2%
General Office Expense 284,700 5.1%
Equipment 1,106,500 19.7%
Fees 470,900 8.4%
Services 2,224,600 39.7%
Training 99,000 1.8%
Utilities 14,900 0.3%
Miscellaneous 148,000 2.6%
General Expenses 836,000 14.9%
Subtotal 5,605,900$ 100.0%
Less: Overhead Allocation (740,700)
Total Administrative Expenses 4,865,200$
Administrative Expenditures - Potable
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2016 Administrative Expenditures - Potable
R-11
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Potable
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Materials and Maintenance
Fuel and Oil 187,861$ 289,300$ 235,600$ (53,700)$ (18.6%)
Meters and Materials 63,345 113,100 113,100 - 0.0%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 111,271 128,400 127,400 (1,000) (0.8%)
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 358,877 367,900 433,500 65,600 17.8%
Chemicals 208,743 223,500 225,500 2,000 0.9%
Safety Equipment 31,888 41,300 126,300 85,000 205.8%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 35,057 35,000 31,000 (4,000) (11.4%)
Other Materials and Supplies 126,227 126,300 185,200 58,900 46.6%
Building and Grounds Materials 55,608 46,500 47,900 1,400 3.0%
Contracted Services 475,764 550,500 642,800 92,300 16.8%
Total Expenditures 1,654,641$ 1,921,800$ 2,168,300$ 246,500$ 12.8%
Fuel and Oil 235,600$ 10.9%
Meters and Materials 113,100 5.2%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 127,400 5.9%
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 433,500 20.0%
Chemicals 225,500 10.4%
Safety Equipment 126,300 5.9%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 31,000 1.4%
Other Materials and Supplies 185,200 8.5%
Building and Grounds Materials 47,900 2.2%
Contracted Services 642,800 29.6%
2,168,300$ 100.0%
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2016 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Potable
R-12
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
31-Actual Budget Budget $ %
REVENUES
saWater Sales
#Recycled Water Sales 10,014,767$ 8,826,600$ 9,111,200$ 284,600$ 3.2%
#Meter Fees 962 400 400 - 0.0%
#Interest 16,001 7,400 6,300 (1,100) (14.9%)
General Fund Draw Down 61,600 - - - 0.0%
TOTAL REVENUES 10,093,330$ 8,834,400$ 9,117,900$ 283,500$ 3.2%
EXPENDITURES
Recycled Water Purchases 1,661,887$ 1,601,500$ 1,705,800$ 104,300$ 6.5%
#Power 591,883 469,400 563,600 94,200 20.1%
#Labor and Benefits 1,144,717 1,181,800 1,181,600 (200) (0.0%)
#Administrative Expenses 298,562 285,600 321,800 36,200 12.7%
#Materials & Maintenance 282,827 295,900 287,800 (8,100) (2.7%)
11 Subtotal - Operations Costs 3,979,876$ 3,834,200$ 4,060,600$ 226,400$ 5.9%
#Expansion Reserve 10,000 2,538,900 2,691,000 152,100 6.0%
B Betterment Reserve 125,000 725,000 1,945,000 1,220,000 168.3%
ReReplacement Reserve 4,230,000 1,679,000 328,000 (1,351,000) (80.5%)
TOTransfer to OPEB 66,900 57,300 58,300 1,000 1.7%
N Transfer to New Supply Fund - - 35,000 35,000 1.0
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 4,431,900$ 5,000,200$ 5,057,300$ 57,100$ 1.1%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,411,776$ 8,834,400$ 9,117,900$ 283,500$ 3.2%
1,681,554$ -$ -$ -$ EXCESS REVENUES/
(EXPENDITURES)
Operating Budget Summary - Recycled
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-13
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Water Sales 7,416,631$ 6,506,000$ 6,694,500$ 188,500$ 2.9%
System Fees 356,806 438,600 459,500 20,900 4.8%
Energy Fees 383,513 322,300 399,200 76,900 23.9%
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,828,134 1,522,800 1,522,900 100 0.0%
Penalties 29,682 36,900 35,100 (1,800) -4.9%
Total Recycled Water Sales 10,014,767$ 8,826,600$ 9,111,200$ 284,600$ 3.2%
Water Sales 6,694,500 73%
System Charges 459,500 5%
Energy Charges 399,200 4%
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,522,900 17%
Penalties 35,100 1%
Total 9,111,200 100%
Water Rates: Rates vary among classes of service and are charged per unit of water. A unit of water is equal to 100
cubic feet of water. On January 1, 2009, the District implemented a tiered rate structure for all customer types to
encourage conservation and bring equity among the classes.
System Fees: Each water service customer pays a monthly system charge for water system replacement, maintenance,
and operation expenses. The charge is based on the size of the meter.
Energy Fees: The energy pumping fee is $ .072 per 100 cubic feet of water for each 100 feet of lift above the elevation
of 450 feet. All water customers are in one of 29 zones based on elevation.
MWD and CWA Rebates: Incentive from MWD and CWA for providing recycled water. The District receives $200
from CWA and $185 from MWD for every acre-foot (AF) of recycled water sold.
Penalties: Charges and penalties are imposed on customer accounts for late payments and returned checks.
Classification of Water Sales - Recycled
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-14
Fiscal Year 2016 Sales Budget
Current Proposed*Accounts Units Amount
101 49,300 186,900$
Tier I 3.73$ 3.80$
Tier II 3.79 3.86
Tier III 3.84 3.91
591 1,253,400 4,751,000
Tier I 3.73 3.80
Tier II 3.79 3.86
Tier III 3.84 3.91
Recycled 3.0" and 4.0" Meter 11 87,100 329,800
Tier I 3.73 3.80
Tier II 3.79 3.86
Tier III 3.84 3.91
1 281,300 1,073,200
Tier I 3.73 3.80
Tier II 3.79 3.86
Tier III 3.84 3.91
1 37,900 104,700
Tier I 2.72 2.77
Tier II 2.77 2.82
Tier III 2.81 2.86
1 14,100 39,100
Tier I 2.72 2.77
Tier II 2.77 2.82
Tier III 2.81 2.86
706 1,723,100 6,484,700$
Government Fee 0.32 0.34 - - 209,800
Total Water Sales 706 1,723,100 6,694,500$
*Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2016.
Water Rates
Total
Water Sales Summary by Meter Size - Recycled
Recycled .75" and 1.0" Meter
Recycled 1.5" and 2.0" Meter
Recycled more than 6.0" Meter
Recycled Commercial <10" Meter
Recycled Commercial >10" Meter
R-15
Budget Budget
Customer Class FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Recycled .75" & 1.0" Meter 46,328 47,699 59,698 68,523 60,075 49,300
Recycled 1.5" & 2.0" Meter 1,220,953 1,201,012 1,366,238 1,474,879 1,333,479 1,253,400
Recycled 3.0" & 4.0" Meter 74,444 93,899 100,991 134,386 97,951 87,100
Recycled > 6.0" Meter 333,866 310,223 352,023 390,542 242,753 281,300
Recycled Commercial<10" Meter - - - - 37,850 37,900
Recycled Commercial>10" Meter - - - - 14,140 14,100
Total Unit Sales 1,675,591 1,652,833 1,878,950 2,068,330 1,786,248 1,723,100
Budget Budget
Customer Class FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Recycled .75" & 1.0" Meter 95 101 103 100 100 101
Recycled 1.5" & 2.0" Meter 576 581 587 588 591 591
Recycled 3.0" & 4.0" Meter 11 11 11 11 11 11
Recycled > 6.0" Meter 4 3 3 3 1 1
Recycled Commercial<10" Meter - - - - 1 1
Recycled Commercial>10" Meter - - - - 1 1
Total Meter Count 686 696 704 702 705 706
Unit Sales (in thousands) and Meter Count Trends
Actual
Actual
Unit Sales History and Meter Count by Customer Class - Recycled
Unit Sales History (in hcf)
Meter Count
675
700
725
100
500
900
1,300
1,700
2,100
2,500
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
Meter Count Recycled Unit Sales
R-16
System Fees - Recycled
Meter
Meter
Count Current Proposed* FY 2015 FY 2016
Size Budget Rates Rates Budget Budget $%
0.75 2 19.39$ 18.50$ 400$ 500$ 100$ 20%
1.00 99 27.39 26.14 30,200 31,800 1,600 5%
1.50 396 47.40 45.23 206,700 220,100 13,400 6%
2.00 195 71.39 68.13 153,300 163,200 9,900 6%
3.00 4 135.41 129.22 6,000 6,400 400 6%
4.00 7 207.43 197.95 18,300 17,000 (1,300) -8%
6.00 2 407.50 388.88 13,500 9,600 (3,900) -41%
8.00 - 647.56 617.97 - - - 0%
10.00 1 927.63 885.24 10,200 10,900 700 6%
Total 706 438,600$ 459,500$ 20,900$ 5%
*Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2016.
Budget to Budget
Variance
Historical System Fees, in thousands ($)
-
100
200
300
400
500
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-17
Meter Meter Installation Meter Total Total
Size Sales Fee Fee Fees Amount
0.75 - 100.05$ 210.84$ 310.89$ -$
1.00 1 100.05 272.07 372.12 400
1.50 - 100.05 442.23 542.28 -
2.00 - 100.05 633.66 733.71 -
3.00 - 602.41 1,974.74 2,577.15 -
4.00 - 602.41 3,429.81 4,032.22 -
6.00 - 951.55 5,924.22 6,875.77 -
8.00 - 1,459.11 7,401.87 8,860.98 -
10.00 - 1,459.11 10,645.27 12,104.38 -
Total 1 400$
Meter Fees:
Meter Fees - Recycled
Historical Meter Count
Meter Fees are charges collected for new water service connections. Fees vary depending upon
meter size and type of service. The costs associated with meter installations are included in the
Operating Expenses section of the budget. These charges are funded by developers.
-
200
400
600
800
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-18
Budgeted Budgeted
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Water Sales 4,645,719$ 4,999,441$ 6,148,619$ 7,416,631$ 6,506,000$ 6,694,500$
System Fees 266,547 268,937 292,201 356,806 438,600 459,500
Energy Fees 274,608 303,867 346,064 383,513 322,300 399,200
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,482,019 1,413,335 1,660,736 1,828,134 1,522,800 1,522,900
Penalties 93,146 33,323 40,867 29,682 36,900 35,100
Total Recycled Revenue 6,762,039$ 7,018,903$ 8,488,487$ 10,014,767$ 8,826,600$ 9,111,200$
Revenue History - Recycled
Revenue History - Recycled, in millions ($)
Actual
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
Water Sales System Fees Energy Fees MWD and CWA Rebates Penalties
R-19
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
$ %
SBWRP Recycled Water Purchases
Rate Effective January 350.00$ 350.00$
Recycled Water Purchases 2,906.4 2,906.4 1,017,200$ 1,017,200$ -$ 0.0%
Meter Fee $1,646.50 monthly - - 19,800 19,800 - 0.0%
Take-or-pay contract (1)1,612.8 1,910.8 564,500 668,800 104,300 18.5%
Total 4,519.2 4,817.2 1,601,500$ 1,705,800$ 104,300$ 6.5%
Average Cost Per Acre-Foot (Effective Rate)551.02$ 586.92$
(1) This is the anticipated take-or-pay amount to be paid to the City of San Diego. The contract requires
the purchase of a minimum volume of water. The District does not anticipate meeting the
minimum, therefore a payment would be due to the City of San Diego.
Water Purchases - Recycled
HISTORICAL RECYCLED WATER PURCHASES, IN ACRE-FEET
Purchase CostsAcre Feet
Budget to Budget
Variance
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-20
Power Costs - Recycled
Budget Budget
FY 2015 FY 2016 $ %
469,400$ 563,600$ 94,200$ 20.1%
Budget Budget
Historical Power Costs FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Treatment and Recycled
Transmission 462,031$ 440,069$ 471,139$ 591,883$ 469,400$ 563,600$
Historical Power Costs, in thousands ($)
Budget to Budget
Variance
Actual
Treatment and Recycled Transmission
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Budget
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-21
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Administrative Expenditures
Travel and Meetings 42$ -$ - -$ -
Equipment 327 1,300 1,300 - -
Fees 27,046 24,000 25,600 1,600 6.7%
Services 70,021 65,100 105,200 40,100 61.6%
Total 97,436$ 90,400$ 132,100$ 41,700$ 46.1%
Add: Overhead Allocation 201,126 195,200 189,700 (5,500) (2.8%)
Total Expenditures 298,562$ 285,600$ 321,800$ 36,200$ 12.7%
Equipment 1,300$ 0.4%
Fees 25,600 8.0%
Services 105,200 32.7%
Overhead Allocation 189,700 58.9%
321,800$ 100.0%
FY 2016 Administrative Expenditures - Recycled
Administrative Expenditures - Recycled
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-22
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Materials and Maintenance
Fuel and Oil 11,336$ 15,000$ 15,000$ -$ 0.0%
Meters and Materials 2,793 700 700 - 0.0%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 85,660 87,500 72,000 (15,500) (17.7%)
Chemicals 160,146 169,100 170,600 1,500 0.9%
Safety Equipment - 1,000 1,000 - -
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 3,945 4,000 4,000 - -
Other Materials and Supplies 7,056 5,300 5,200 (100) (1.9%)
Contracted Services 11,891 13,300 19,300 6,000 45.1%
Total Expenditures 282,827$ 295,900$ 287,800$ (8,100)$ (2.7%)
Fuel and Oil 15,000$ 5.2%
Meters and Materials 700 0.2%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 72,000 25.0%
Chemicals 170,600 59.3%
Safety Equipment 1,000 0.3%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 4,000 1.4%
Other Materials and Supplies 5,200 1.8%
Contracted Services 19,300 6.7%
287,800$ 100.0%
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Recycled
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2016 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Recycled
R-23
Intentionally Left Blank
R-24
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
21-Actual Budget Budget $ %
REVENUES
4200 Sewer Revenues 2,757,867$ 3,007,700$ 3,206,300$ 198,600$ 6.6%
4136 Capacity Fee Revenues 3,580 - - - (100.0%)
Tax Revenues 44,321 51,600 51,600 - 0.0%
4400 Non-operating Revenues 32,904 33,800 37,200 3,400 10.1%
4510 Interest 8,172 4,600 8,200 3,600 78.3%
TF Bett Transfer from Potable General Fund - 553,800 - (553,800) (100.0%)
General Fund Draw Down 152,800 - - - (100.0%)
TOTAL REVENUES 2,999,644$ 3,651,500$ 3,303,300$ (348,200)$ (9.5%)
EXPENDITURES
5411 Power 159,018$ 180,600$ 176,800$ (3,800)$ (2.1%)
5110 Labor and Benefits 764,245 902,300 681,300 (221,000) (24.5%)
5200 Administrative Expenses 170,165 206,500 200,800 (5,700) (2.8%)
5300 Materials & Maintenance 1,220,408 1,402,100 1,156,700 (245,400) (17.5%)
11-1311 Subtotal - Operations Costs 2,313,836$ 2,691,500$ 2,215,600$ (475,900)$ (17.7%)DS
Bett ResBetterment Reserve - - 455,000 455,000 100.0%
Repl ResReplacement Reserve - 916,200 599,100 (317,100) (34.6%)
TOPEB Transfer to OPEB 61,400 43,800 33,600 (10,200) (23.3%)
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 61,400$ 960,000$ 1,087,700$ 127,700$ 13.3%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,375,236$ 3,651,500$ 3,303,300$ (348,200)$ (9.5%)
624,408$ -$ -$ -$ EXCESS REVENUES (EXPENDITURES)
Operating Budget Summary - Sewer
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-25
FY 2016 FY 2015 FY 2016
Accounts Current Proposed(1)Budget Budget $%
Single-Family 4,545 2.46$ 2.46$ 1,572,800$ 1,672,800$ 100,000$ 6%
Multi-Family 50 2.46 2.46 187,700 190,100 2,400 1%
Commercial
Low Strength 55 2.46 2.46 53,300 54,900 1,600 3%
Medium Strength 13 3.53 3.53 33,600 34,000 400 1%
High Strength 7 5.63 5.63 17,500 39,200 21,700 55%
Schools 109,900 96,700 (13,200) -14%
Churches 8,500 9,900 1,400 14%
Total Sewer Charges 4,670 1,983,300$ 2,097,600$ 114,300$
(1)Proposed rates for sewer service beginning in January 2016.
Single-Family 1,672,800$ 80.0%
Multi-Family 190,100 9.0%
Commercial 234,700 11.0%
2,097,600$ 100.0%
Sewer Charges by Service Class FY 2016
Sewer Charges Summary by Service Class
Usage Fee
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-26
FY 2016 Current Proposed*FY 2015 FY 2016
Meter size Accounts Rates Rates Budget Budget $%
Single-Family 4,545 15.89$ 17.19$ 824,900$ 901,800$ 76,900$ 8.5%
Non-Residential
0.75 22 27.07 27.07 6,700 6,800 100 1.5%
1.00 5 39.89 39.89 2,800 2,800 - 0.0%
1.50 20 71.82 71.82 16,800 17,200 400 2.3%
2.00 63 110.17 110.17 81,400 83,400 2,000 2.4%
3.00 6 199.66 199.66 14,000 14,400 400 2.8%
4.00 6 327.51 327.51 23,000 23,600 600 2.5%
6.00 1 647.12 647.12 7,600 7,800 200 2.6%
8.00 - 1,030.67 1,030.67 - - -
10.00 1 14,778.12 1,478.12 17,300 17,800 500 2.8%
Total Sewer Fixed Fee 4,669 994,500$ 1,075,600$ 81,100$
*Proposed rates for sewer service beginning in January 2016. Proposed Residential rate includes $1.30 re-capture rate.
Sewer Fixed Fee Summary by Meter Size
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-27
Budget Budget
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Sewer Charges 2,363,313$ 2,368,192$ 2,588,991$ 2,736,867$ 2,977,900$ 3,173,000$
Penalties 23,287 27,173 29,300 21,000 29,800 33,300
Total 2,386,600$ 2,395,365$ 2,618,291$ 2,757,867$ 3,007,700$ 3,206,300$
Penalties
Revenue History - Sewer
Revenue History - Sewer, in thousands ($)
Actual
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
Sewer Charges Penalties
R-28
Power Costs - Sewer
Budget Budget
FY 2015 FY 2016 $ %
180,600$ 176,800$ (3,800)$ -2.1%
Budget Budget
Historical Power Costs FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Sewer Lifts Station 81,347$ 70,431$ 184,108$ 159,018$ 180,600$ 176,800$
Actual
Budget to Budget
Variance
Treatment and Recycled Transmission
Historical Power Costs, in thousands ($)
$0
$40
$80
$120
$160
$200
FY 2011
Actual
FY 2012
Actual
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Budget
FY 2016
Budget
R-29
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Administrative Expenditures
Equipment -$ 5,000 4,500 (500)$ (10.0%)
Fees 292 2,000 2,500 500 25.0%
Services 30,664 44,900 80,000 35,100 78.2%
Bad Debt Expense 5,380 7,000 7,000 - 0.0%
Total 36,336$ 58,900$ 94,000$ 35,100$ 59.6%
Add: Overhead Allocation 133,829 147,600 106,800 (40,800) (27.6%)
Total Expenditures 170,165$ 206,500$ 200,800$ (5,700)$ (2.8%)
Equipment 4,500$ 2.2%
Fees 2,500 1.2%
Services 80,000 39.9%
Bad Debt Expense 7,000 3.5%
Overhead Allocation 106,800 53.2%
200,800$ 100.0%
Administrative Expenditures - Sewer
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2016 Administrative Expenditures - Sewer
R-30
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Materials and Maintenance
Fleet Parts and Equipment 1,006 1,500 1,500 - -
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 51,627 69,600 115,800 46,200 66.4%
Chemicals 3,705 4,500 4,500 - -
Safety Equipment 77 1,900 - (1,900) (100.0%)
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 4,936 5,000 5,000 - -
Other Materials and Supplies 198 200 100 (100) (50.0%)
Contracted Services 36,335 24,500 33,400 8,900 36.3%
Materials and Maintenance 97,884$ 107,200$ 160,300$ 53,100$ 49.5%
Sewer Charges
Metro O&M Costs 1,021,724$ 1,020,300$ 815,000$ (205,300)$ (20.1%)
Spring Valley Sewer Charge 100,800 274,600 181,400 (93,200) (33.9%)
Total Sewer Charges 1,122,524 1,294,900 996,400 (298,500) (23.1%)
Total Expenditures 1,220,408$ 1,402,100$ 1,156,700$ (245,400)$ (17.5%)
Fleet Parts and Equipment 1,500$ 0.100%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 115,800 10.000%
Chemicals 4,500 0.400%
Laboratory Equipment & Supplies 5,000 0.400%
Other Materials and Supplies 100 0.000%
Contracted Services 33,400 2.900%
Metro O&M Costs 815,000 70.500%
Spring Valley Sewer Charge 181,400 15.700%
1,156,700$ 100.0%
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Sewer
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2016 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Sewer
R-31
Intentionally Left Blank
R-32
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Fee Revenues
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,170,985$ 1,150,600$ 1,134,800$ (15,800)$ (1.4%)
Betterment Fees for Maintenance 485,738 301,800 - (301,800) (100.0%)
Subtotal Fee Revenues 1,656,723 1,452,400 1,134,800 (317,600) (21.9%)
Tax Revenues
1% General Tax 2,894,402 3,077,900 3,213,000 135,100 4.4%
Availability Fees 729,961 685,800 684,900 (900) (0.1%)
Subtotal Tax Revenues 3,624,363 3,763,700 3,897,900 134,200 3.6%
General Revenues 5,281,086$ 5,216,100$ 5,032,700$ (183,400)$ (3.5%)
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Property Rental 1,317,736$ 1,302,500$ 1,269,800$ (32,700) (2.5%)
Sewer Billing Fees 372,473 372,400 375,500 3,100 0.8%
Set-up Fee for Lease Site 22,500 - - - 0.0%
Grants 40,867 - - - 0.0%
Revenue from Shared Facility 32,152 33,800 37,200 3,400 10.1%
Miscellaneous 271,791 239,100 191,100 (48,000) (20.1%)
Non-Operating Revenues 2,057,519$ 1,947,800$ 1,873,600$ (74,200)$ (3.8%)
General and Non-Operating Revenues by Business
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
Fee Revenues
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,134,800$ -$ -$ 1,134,800$
Betterment Fees for Maintenance - - - -
Total Fee Revenues 1,134,800 - - 1,134,800
Tax Revenues
1% General Tax 3,213,000 - - 3,213,000
Availability Fees 633,300 - 51,600 684,900
Total Tax Revenues 3,846,300 - 51,600 3,897,900
Non-Operating Revenues
Property Rental 1,269,800 - - 1,269,800
Sewer Billing Fees 375,500 - - 375,500
Revenue from Shared Facility - - 37,200 37,200
Miscellaneous 191,100 - - 191,100
Total Non-Operating Revenues 1,836,400 - 37,200 1,873,600
Total General and Non-Operating Revenues 6,817,500$ -$ 88,800$ 6,906,300$
Note: For General and Non-Operating Revenues, the Potable Fund serves as the District's General Fund for accounting purposes.
FY 2016 Budget
General Revenues
Budget to Budget
Variance
Non-Operating Revenues
Budget to Budget
Variance
R-33
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Administrative Expenditures
Legal Fees 280,069$ 410,000$ 250,000$ (160,000)$ (39.0%)
General Insurance 549,869 631,000 586,000$ (45,000) (7.1%)
Fees 14,161 - - - 0.0%
Training 2,566 - - - 0.0%
Total Expenditures 846,665 1,041,000 836,000 (205,000) (19.7%)
Benefits
Benefits (1)1,367,499 1,290,800$ 1,183,400$ (107,400) (8.3%)
Total General Expense 2,214,164$ 2,331,800$ 2,019,400$ (312,400)$ (13.4%)
General Expense
Budget to Budget
Variance
(1) Benefits include District-wide labor and benefit costs not attributable to any one department,
such as the effect of cost of living raises on accrued leave liabilities or the Other Post Employment
Benefit (OPEB) Costs. These costs are netted against the District's anticipated Vacancy Factor.
The Vacancy Factor for FY 2015 and FY 2016 is $185,600 and $338,300 respectively. Additionally, the
labor and benefits shown on this schedule are those related to operating costs and does not
include CIP labor and benefit costs.
R-34
FY 2015 FY 2016
Budget Budget $%
Labor Costs 11,337,400$ 11,487,900$ 150,500$ 1.3%
Benefits
Pension 3,596,600 3,885,300 288,700 8.0%
Employee Assistance Program 4,000 4,000 - 0.0%
Workers' Compensation 267,300 260,000 (7,300) -2.7%
Health/Dental/Life Insurance/OPEB 3,825,600 4,012,200 186,600 4.9%
Social Security/Medicare 945,200 948,200 3,000 0.3%
Salary Continuation Insurance 65,000 67,800 2,800 4.3%
State Unemployment Insurance 60,000 30,000 (30,000) -50.0%
Vacation/Sick/Holiday/Other Leave 2,103,800 2,195,300 91,500 4.3%
Total Fringe Benefits 10,867,500 11,402,800 535,300 4.9%
Total Labor and Benefits 22,204,900 22,890,700 685,800 3.1%
Less: Non-Operating Labor and Benefits
Labor Costs 1,001,100 1,048,100 47,000 4.7%
Fringe Benefits Allocation 729,200 700,500 (28,700) -3.9%
Total Work Order Allocation 1,730,300 1,748,600 18,300 1.1%
Operating Labor & Benefits 20,474,600 21,142,100 667,500 3.3%
Total Overhead Allocation 1,151,300 1,205,300 54,000 4.7%
Less: Overhead Allocation Personnel Portion 727,000 761,100 34,100 4.7%
Admin Portion of Overhead (36.85%)424,300 444,200 19,900 4.7%
Net Operating Labor and Benefits 19,747,600$ 20,381,000$ 633,400$ 3.2%
Labor and Benefits
Budget to Budget
Variance
140
138
0 40 80 120 160
Total
Full-Time Equivalent (FTE)
Comparison by Department
FY 2016 FY 2015
D-1
Potable Sewer Recycled
Developer
Reimbursed-
CIP Total
Operating Labor Costs 9,740,000$ 252,100$ 447,700$ -$ 10,439,800$
Benefits 10,047,500 246,100 408,700 - 10,702,300
Overhead Allocation-Personnel (1,269,300) 183,100 325,100 - (761,100)
Total Operating Labor and Benefits 18,518,200 681,300 1,181,500 - 20,381,000
CIP Labor Costs 561,000 152,200 138,000 196,900 1,048,100
Benefits 371,800 95,400 91,500 141,800 700,500
Overhead Allocation-Personnel 407,400 110,500 100,200 143,000 761,100
Total CIP Labor and Benefits 1,340,200 358,100 329,700 481,700 2,509,700
Total Labor and Benefits 19,858,400$ 1,039,400$ 1,511,200$ 481,700$ 22,890,700$
Potable-Operating 18,518,200$ 80.9%
Potable-CIP 1,340,200 5.8%
Sewer-Operating 681,300 3.0%
Sewer-CIP 358,100 1.6%
Recycle-Operating 1,181,500 5.2%
Recycle-CIP 329,700 1.4%
Develeper Reimbursed-CIP 481,700 2.1%
22,890,700$ 100.0%
Labor and Benefits by Fund - Fiscal Year 2016
D-2
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
General Manager:
General Manager 1 1 1
Assistant General Manager 1 1 1
District Secretary 1 1 1
Sr. Confidential Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Communications Officer 1 1 1
General Manager 5 5 5
Total - General Manager Department 5 5 5
FTE 5 5 5
Administrative Services:
Chief, Administrative Services 1 1 0
Assistant Chief, Administrative Services 0 0 1
Confidential Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Confidential Secretary 1 1 1
Administrative Services 3 3 3
Human Resources:
Human Resources Manager 1 1 1
Senior Human Resources Analyst 1 1 1
Human Resources Analyst 1 1 1
Human Resources Technician 1 0 0
Human Resources 4 3 3
Purchasing:
Purchasing and Facilities Manager 1 1 1
Senior Buyer 1 1 1
Assistant Buyer 1 1 1
Lead Warehouse/Facilities Worker 1 1 0
Warehouse/Delivery Worker 1 1 1
Facilities Maintenance Technician 2 2 2
Purchasing 7 7 6
Safety:
Safety & Security Specialist 1 1 1
Safety 1 1 1
Conservation:
Sr. Water Conservation Specialist 1 0 0
Conservation 1 0 0
Total Administrative Services Department 16 14 13
FTE 16 14 13
Position Count by Department
D-3
Controller and Budgetary Services:
Chief Financial Officer 1 1 1
Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Secretary 1 1 1
Finance Manager, Controller and Budget 1 1 1
Senior Accountant 2 2 2
Accountant 1 1 1
Accounting Technician 1 1 1
Controller and Budgetary Services 8 8 8
Treasury and Accounting Services:
Finance Manager, Treasury and Accounting 1 1 1
Senior Accountant 2 2 2
Accountant 2 2 2
Accounting Technician 1 1 1
Treasury and Accounting Services 6 6 6
Customer Service:
Customer Service Manager 2 2 2
Lead Customer Service Representative 2 2 2
Customer Service Representative I, II, III 7 7 6
Lead Customer Service Field Representative 1 1 1
Customer Service Field Representative I and II 3 3 2
Customer Service 15 15 13
Conservation:
Sr. Water Conservation Specialist 0 1 1
Conservation 0 1 1
Meter Maintenance
Lead Cross Connection/Meter Maintenance Worker 0 1 1
Meter Maintenance Worker I & II 0 3 3
Meter Maintenance 0 4 4
Total Finance Department 29 34 32
FTE 29 34 32
D-4
Information Technology (IT) and Strategic Planning:
Chief Information Officer 1 1 1
IT Manager 1 1 1
GIS Manager 1 1 1
GIS Programmer/Analyst 1 1 1
GIS Analyst 1 1 1
GIS Technician 1 1 1
Network Engineer 1 1 1
Database Administrator 1 1 1
Data Systems Technician 0 0 1
Lead Business System Analyst 1 1 0
System Support Analyst 0 0 1
Business System Analyst I and II 2 2 2
Network Analyst 1 1 1
Total 12 12 13
Total IT and Strategic Planning Department 12 12 13
FTE 12 12 13
Operations Management:
Chief, Water Operations 1 1 1
Assistant Chief, Water Operations 0 0 1
Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Operations Management 2 2 3
Water System Operations:
System Operations Manager 1 1 1
Water Systems Supervisor 1 1 1
Recycled Water Systems Supervisor 1 1 1
Lead Water Systems Operator 2 2 2
Water Systems Operator I, II, and III 9 9 8
Valve Maintenance Worker 1 1 0
Sr. Disinfection Technician 2 2 2
Recycled Water Distribution Operator 4 4 4
Lead Cross Connection/Meter Maintenance Worker 1 0 0
Meter Maintenance Worker I & II 4 0 0
Water System Operations 26 21 19
Utility Maintenance/Construction:
Utility Services Manager 1 1 0
Utility Maintenance Supervisor 2 2 2
Utility Crew Leader 3 3 3
Utility Workers I and II 8 8 8
Senior Utility/Equipment Operator 3 3 3
Valve Maintenance Worker 0 0 2
Pump Electricial Supervisor 1 1 1
Electrician I and II 2 2 2
Pump Mechanic I and II 2 2 2
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 1 1 1
Equipment Mechanic I and II 3 3 3
Utility Maintenance/Construction 26 26 27
D-5
Collection/Treatment/Reclamation Operations:
Reclamation Plant Supervisor 1 1 1
Lead Reclamation Plant Operator 1 1 1
Reclamation Plant Operator I, II, III 2 2 2
Senior SCADA Instrumentation Technician 1 1 2
SCADA Instrumentation Technician 1 1 0
Laboratory Analyst 1 1 1
Collection/Treatment/Reclamation Operations 7 7 7
Total Operations Department 61 56 56
FTE 61 56 56
Engineering Management:
Chief, Engineering 1 1 1
Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Secretary 1 1 1
Engineering Management 3 3 3
Engineering:
Engineering Manager 2 2 2
Senior Civil Engineer 2 2 2
Construction Management Specialist 1 0 0
Associate Civil Engineer 0 0 1
Assistant Civil Engineer I and II 1 1 0
Environmental Compliance Specialist 1 1 1
Permit Technicians 2 2 2
Senior Engineering Technician 2 2 2
Field Services Manager 0 0 1
Inspection Supervisor 1 1 0
Lead Construction Inspector 0 0 1
Construction Inspectors I and II 3 3 2
Supervising Land Surveyor 1 1 1
Assistant Survey Technician 1 1 1
Engineering 17 16 16
Total Engineering Department 20 19 19
FTE 20 19 19
District Total Position Count 143 140 138
FTE 143 140 138
D-6
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Water Conservation Technician 1 0 0
Senior Civil Engineer 0 1 0
Total Contract/Temporary Employees 1 1 0
Contract / Temporary Employees
4%
9%
23%
9%
41%
14%
Position Count
General Manager
Administrative Services
Finance
Information Technology and
Strategic Planning
Operations
Engineering
D-7
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Budget to
Budget
Actual Budget Budget Variance
Departmental Expenditures
B Board of Directors 100,367$ 115,100$ 107,100$ (8,000)$
GGeneral Manager 1,353,831 1,562,300 1,605,900 43,600
GGeneral Expense 2,214,164 2,331,800 2,019,400 (312,400)
A Administrative Services 2,915,571 2,995,600 3,070,500 74,900
F Finance 5,463,210 5,816,700 6,128,400 311,700
IT IT and Strategic Planning 3,021,303 3,373,800 3,610,600 236,800
WWater Operations 10,314,869 11,384,100 11,663,400 279,300
E Engineering 1,827,709$ 2,358,500$ 2,381,600$ 23,100
T Total Departmental Expenditures 27,211,024$ 29,937,900$ 30,586,900$ 649,000$
Less: Overhead Allocation (1,091,721) (1,151,300) (1,205,300) (54,000)
Net Departmental Expenditures 26,119,303$ 28,786,600$ 29,381,600$ 595,000$
Non-Departmental Expenditures
Water Purchases 48,209,099$ 47,059,200$ 45,984,500$ (1,074,700)$
Power 2,808,846 2,838,400 3,112,800 274,400
Expansion Reserve - 2,538,900 2,691,000 152,100
Betterment Reserve 125,000 3,530,000 2,400,000 (1,130,000)
Replacement Reserve 4,230,000 3,270,200 3,278,400 8,200
Transfer to Sewer General Fund 152,800 553,800 - (553,800)
Transfer to General Fund Reserve 1,913,000 1,583,800 - (1,583,800)
Transfer to Sewer Replacement - 127,000 1,199,300 1,072,300
Transfer to OPEB 1,242,900 647,100 1,006,000 358,900
Transfer to New Supply Reserve - 705,000 35,000 (670,000)
Total Non-Departmental Expenditures 58,681,645$ 62,853,400$ 59,707,000$ (3,146,400)$
Total Operating Expenditures 84,800,948$ 91,640,000$ 89,088,600$ (2,551,400)$
Operating Expenditures by Department
D-8
Operating Expenditures by Object
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget Variance
Departmental Expenditures
Labor and Benefits 19,565,455$ 20,474,600$ 21,142,100$ 667,500$
Director's Fees 19,834 30,000 30,000 -
Travel and Meetings 147,110 207,700 214,400 6,700
Conservation and Outreach 136,743 174,900 176,900 2,000
General Office Expense 258,732 280,800 284,700 3,900
Equipment 943,153 1,139,600 1,112,300 (27,300)
Fees 1,361,304 1,565,700 1,335,000 (230,700)
Services 1,387,477 2,152,300 2,409,800 257,500
Training 65,818 123,500 99,000 (24,500)
Materials & Maintenance 2,035,352 2,324,900 2,616,400 291,500
Power and Utilities 12,929 14,000 14,900 900
Sewer Charges 1,122,524 1,294,900 996,400 (298,500)
Bad Debt Expense 154,593 155,000 155,000 -
Total Departmental Expenditures 27,211,024$ 29,937,900$ 30,586,900$ 649,000$
Less: Overhead Allocation (1,091,721) (1,151,300) (1,205,300) (54,000)
Net Departmental Expenditures 26,119,303$ 28,786,600$ 29,381,600$ 595,000$
Non-Departmental Expenditures
Water Purchases 48,209,099$ 47,059,200$ 45,984,500$ (1,074,700)$
Power 2,808,846 2,838,400 3,112,800 274,400
Expansion Reserve - 2,538,900 2,691,000 152,100
Betterment Reserve 125,000 3,530,000 2,400,000 (1,130,000)
Replacement Reserve 4,230,000 3,270,200 3,278,400 8,200
Transfer to Sewer General Fund 152,800 553,800 - (553,800)
Transfer to General Fund Reserve 1,913,000 1,583,800 - (1,583,800)
Transfer to Sewer Replacement - 127,000 1,199,300 1,072,300
Transfer to OPEB 1,242,900 647,100 1,006,000 358,900
Transfer to New Supply Fund - 705,000 35,000 (670,000)
Total Non-Departmental Expenditures 58,681,645$ 62,853,400$ 59,707,000$ (3,146,400)$
Total Operating Expenditures 84,800,948$ 91,640,000$ 89,088,600$ (2,551,400)$
Budget to
Budget
D-9
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Administrative Expenditures
Directors' Fees 19,834$ 30,000$ 30,000$ -$ -
Travel and Meetings 147,110 207,700 214,400 6,700 3.2%
Conservation and Outreach 136,743 174,900 176,900 2,000 1.1%
General Office Expense 258,732 280,800 284,700 3,900 1.4%
Equipment 943,153 1,139,600 1,112,300 (27,300) (2.4%)
Fees 517,205 524,700 499,000 (25,700) (4.9%)
Services 1,387,477 2,152,300 2,409,800 257,500 12.0%
Training 65,818 123,500 99,000 (24,500) (19.8%)
Utilities 12,929 14,000 14,900 900 6.4%
Bad Debt Expense 154,593 155,000 155,000 - 0.0%
Total 3,643,594 4,802,500 4,996,000 193,500 3.0%
Less: Overhead Allocation (402,299) (424,300) (444,200) (19,900) -
Subtotal 3,241,295 4,378,200 4,551,800 173,600 4.0%
General Expenses 844,099 1,041,000 836,000 (205,000) (19.7%)
Total Expenditures 4,085,394$ 5,419,200$ 5,387,800$ (31,400)$ (0.6%)
4,702,612$ 5,605,400$ 5,832,000$
Directors' Fees 30,000$ 0.5%
Travel and Meetings 214,400 3.7%
Conservation & Outreach 176,900 3.0%
General Office Expense 284,700 4.9%
Equipment 1,112,300 19.1%
Fees 499,000 8.6%
Services 2,409,800 41.3%
Training 99,000 1.7%
Utilities 14,900 0.3%
General Expense 836,000 14.3%
Bad Debt Expense 155,000 2.6%
5,832,000 100.0%
Less: Overhead Allocation (444,200)
Total Administrative Expenses 5,387,800$
Administrative Expenditures - Total
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2016 Total Administrative Expenditures, in thousands ($)
D-10
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget $%
Materials and Maintenance
Fuel and Oil 199,197$ 304,300$ 250,600$ (53,700)$ (17.6%)
Meters and Materials 66,138 113,800 113,800 - 0.0%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 112,277 129,900 128,900 (1,000) (0.8%)
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 496,164 525,000 621,300 96,300 18.3%
Chemicals 372,594 397,100 400,600 3,500 0.9%
Safety Equipment 31,965 44,200 127,300 83,100 188.0%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 43,938 44,000 40,000 (4,000) (9.1%)
Other Materials and Supplies 133,481 131,800 190,500 58,700 44.5%
Building and Grounds Materials 55,608 46,500 47,900 1,400 3.0%
Contracted Services 523,990 588,300 695,500 107,200 18.2%
Materials and Maintenance 2,035,352$ 2,324,900$ 2,616,400$ 291,500$ 12.5%
Sewer Charges
Metro O&M Costs 1,021,724$ 1,020,300$ 815,000 (205,300)$ (20.1%)
Spring Valley Sewer Charge 100,800 274,600 181,400 (93,200) (33.9%)
Total Sewer Charges 1,122,524$ 1,294,900$ 996,400$ (298,500)$ (23.1%)
Total Expenditures 3,157,876$ 3,619,800$ 3,612,800$ (7,000)$ (0.2%)
Fuel and Oil 250,600$ 6.9%
Meters and Materials 113,800 3.1%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 128,900 3.6%
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 621,300 17.2%
Chemicals 400,600 11.1%
Safety Equipment 127,300 3.5%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 40,000 1.1%
Other Materials and Supplies 190,500 5.3%
Building and Grounds Materials 47,900 1.3%
Contracted Services 695,500 19.3%
Sewer Charges 996,400 27.6%
3,612,800$ 100.0%
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Total
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2016 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures
D-11
Intentionally Left Blank
D-12
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Benefits 71,935$ 68,500$ 61,600$
Director's Fees 19,834 30,000 30,000
Travel and Meetings 7,798 16,600 15,500
Training 800 - -
Total 100,367$ 115,100$ 107,100$
Board of Directors
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
$-
$30
$60
$90
$120
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
10
7
11
2
10
9
11
5
10
7
75
87
10
0
Budget Actual
D-13
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 71,935$ 68,500$ 61,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 1,727 3,000 2,500
Travel Expenses 3,372 7,800 7,800
Conferences and Seminars 2,140 4,000 4,000
Business Meetings 559 1,800 1,200
Membership and Dues - - -
General Training 800 - -
Director's Fees 19,834 30,000 30,000
Total Administrative Expenses 28,432$ 46,600$ 45,500$
Total Expenses 100,367$ 115,100$ 107,100$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 1111 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-14
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits 1,112,599$ 1,128,400$ 1,199,600$
Travel and Meetings 42,804 54,600 54,600
Conservation and Outreach 3,421 7,000 6,000
General Office Expense 3,164 5,300 1,700
Equipment 2,700 4,000 3,000
Fees 47,303 64,000 48,000
Services 141,689 199,000 193,000
Materials & Maintenance - 100,000 100,000
Miscellaneous 151 - -
Total 1,353,831$ 1,562,300$ 1,605,900$
General Manager
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
$1,000
$1,300
$1,600
$1,900
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1,
7
2
1
1,
4
8
8
1,
4
4
5
1,
5
6
2
1,
6
0
6
1,
6
6
9
1,
4
1
9
1,
3
5
4
Budget Actual
D-15
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 797,970$ 810,200$ 860,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 2,752 3,000 3,000
Travel Expenses 2,628 5,000 5,000
Conferences and Seminars 2,277 5,000 5,000
Business Meetings 9,738 10,000 10,000
Membership and Dues 25,350 28,000 28,000
Public Recognition Awards 3,421 7,000 6,000
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 1,113 800 1,200
Office Supplies 139 - -
Postage 1,912 4,500 500
Maintenance and Parts 2,700 4,000 3,000
Regulatory Agencies Fees 47,303 64,000 48,000
Outside Services 101,047 199,000 193,000
Temporary Employment Services 40,642 - -
Bad Debt 151 - -
Total Administrative Expenses 241,173$ 330,300$ 302,700$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Contracted Services - 100,000 100,000
Total Materials and Maintenance Expenses -$ 100,000$ 100,000$
Total Expenses 1,039,143$ 1,240,500$ 1,263,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 1211 - GENERAL MANAGER
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-16
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 314,629$ 318,200$ 339,000$
Administrative Expenses
Travel Expenses - 1,500 1,500
Conferences and Seminars - 2,000 2,000
Business Meetings 59 100 100
Total Administrative Expenses 59$ 3,600$ 3,600$
Total Expenses 314,688$ 321,800$ 342,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 1211 - ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-17
Intentionally Left Blank
D-18
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits 2,027,956$ 2,044,500$ 2,065,700$
Travel and Meetings 5,052 16,700 17,300
General Office Expense 106,291 108,000 106,000
Equipment 64,074 75,500 81,000
Services 294,272 316,000 282,600
Training 41,446 92,600 70,000
Materials & Maintenance 363,551 328,300 433,000
Power and Utilities 12,929 14,000 14,900
TOTAL 2,915,571$ 2,995,600$ 3,070,500$
-$ -$
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
Administrative Services
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
3,
7
2
7
3,
6
7
9
3,
0
7
0
2,
9
9
6
3,
0
7
1
3,
3
4
5
2,
8
6
4
2,
9
1
6
Budget Actual
D-19
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 481,371$ 458,800$ 505,000$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage - 100 300
Travel Expenses - 1,000 1,000
Conferences and Seminars - 3,500 4,000
Business Meetings - 200 600
Membership and Dues - - 800
General Training - 200 -
Total Administrative Expenses -$ 5,000$ 6,700$
Total Expenses 481,371$ 463,800$ 511,700$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2211 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND IT CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-20
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 587,031$ 562,900$ 599,400$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 53 200 200
Travel Expenses 192 2,000 2,000
Conferences and Seminars 163 1,500 1,500
Business Meetings 1,660 2,000 2,000
Membership and Dues 864 1,100 1,100
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 625 1,100 1,300
Technology Hardware and Software 31 - -
Outside Services 46,837 36,500 11,500
Temporary Employment Services 26,871 30,000 50,000
Recruitment Expense 20,023 14,000 14,000
Tuition Reimbursement 10,819 20,000 15,000
General Training 5,150 6,000 6,000
Employee Programs 20,203 26,000 26,000
Total Administrative Expenses 133,491$ 140,400$ 130,600$
Total Expenses 720,522$ 703,300$ 730,000$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2221 - HUMAN RESOURCES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-21
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 831,503$ 876,000$ 798,300$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 22 - -
Travel Expenses - 1,000 1,000
Conferences and Seminars 150 300 300
Business Meetings 20 300 400
Membership and Dues 309 300 500
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 69 - -
Office Supplies 28,068 25,800 25,800
Postage 49,971 42,000 45,000
Printing Expenses 27,234 38,100 33,400
Maintenance and Parts 44,493 48,200 38,700
Rent and Leases 829 1,200 1,200
Office Furniture 1,279 6,500 6,500
Small Tools and Equipment 17,442 19,600 34,600
Outside Services 55,232 47,500 55,600
Uniforms 51,313 48,000 48,000
General Training - - 5,000
Sewer 4,303 4,500 4,500
Trash Services 8,626 9,500 10,400
Total Administrative Expenses 289,360$ 292,800$ 310,900$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Other Materials and Maintenance 75 - -
Building Ground and Materials 55,608 45,500 46,900
Contracted Services 275,980 241,500 259,800
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 331,663$ 287,000$ 306,700$
Total Expenses 1,452,526$ 1,455,800$ 1,415,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2231 - PURCHASING
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-22
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 128,051$ 146,800$ 163,000$
Administrative Expenses
Travel Expenses - 500 300
Conferences & Seminars 160 500 300
Business Meetings 624 1,200 500
Membership and Dues 835 1,000 500
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 304 1,000 500
Postage 20 - -
Outside Services 39,752 86,500 35,000
Security Services 40,204 39,000 44,000
Health Exams 14,040 14,500 24,500
Required Training 5,274 40,400 18,000
Total Administrative Expenses 101,213$ 184,600$ 123,600$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Safety Equipment 31,888 41,300 126,300
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 31,888$ 41,300$ 126,300$
Total Expenses 261,152$ 372,700$ 412,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2241 - SAFETY & SECURITY
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-23
Intentionally Left Blank
D-24
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits 4,374,755$ 4,567,800$ 4,687,100$
Travel and Meetings 14,990 25,100 26,100
Conservation and Outreach 133,322 167,900 170,900
General Office Expense 147,820 164,700 167,800
Equipment - 200 -
Fees 368,200 362,200 351,600
Services 171,379 237,900 432,500
Training - - 500
Materials & Maintenance 98,151 135,900 136,900
Bad Debt Expense 154,593 155,000 155,000
Total 5,463,210$ 5,816,700$ 6,128,400$
-$ -$
Finance
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
$2,500
$4,000
$5,500
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
4,
7
1
2
4,
8
8
7
5,
8
6
3
5,
8
1
7
6,
1
2
8
4,
5
4
0
5,
6
5
5
5,
4
6
3
Budget Actual
D-25
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 483,576$ 496,500$ 526,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 45 200 200
Travel Expenses - 100 100
Conferences and Seminars 1,295 2,000 1,500
Business Meetings 102 100 100
Membership and Dues 1,895 2,000 1,900
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 473 500 500
Postage - 100 100
Outside Services 15,911 15,600 13,600
Total Administrative Expenses 19,721$ 20,600$ 18,000$
Total Expenses 503,297$ 517,100$ 544,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2311 - FINANCE CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-26
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 780,819$ 808,800$ 863,000$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 51 300 300
Travel Expenses - 1,600 1,500
Conferences and Seminars 1,055 2,600 3,500
Business Meetings - 200 200
Membership and Dues 863 700 1,200
Office Supplies 1,247 1,100 1,100
Outside Services 36,563 12,300 12,500
Total Administrative Expenses 39,779$ 18,800$ 20,300$
Total Expenses 820,598$ 827,600$ 883,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2321 - CONTROLLER & BUDGETARY SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-27
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 875,002$ 926,300$ 970,800$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 4 100 100
Travel Expenses 143 500 500
Conferences and Seminars 673 1,000 1,000
Membership and Dues 495 600 200
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions - 100 200
Printing Expenses 216 600 300
Accounting Fees 30,500 26,000 29,400
Bank Fees 337,700 336,200 322,200
Outside Services 39,260 2,500 40,000
Total Administrative Expenses 408,991$ 367,600$ 393,900$
Total Expenses 1,283,993$ 1,293,900$ 1,364,700$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2331 - TREASURY & ACCOUNTING SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-28
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 1,674,893$ 1,745,900$ 1,705,800$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 20 100 200
Travel Expenses 2,300 3,100 3,100
Conferences and Seminars 2,915 1,300 1,500
Business Meetings 47 200 100
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions - 700 100
Postage 145,884 161,200 165,300
Small Tools and Equipment - 200 -
Outside Services 68,033 81,200 84,000
General Training - - 500
Bad Debt 154,593 155,000 155,000
Total Administrative Expenses 373,792$ 403,000$ 409,800$
Total Expenses 2,048,685$ 2,148,900$ 2,115,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2341 - CUSTOMER SERVICE
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-29
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 443,938$ 467,700$ 486,300$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage - 200 200
Travel Expenses - 1,500 1,500
Conferences and Seminars - 1,000 1,000
Membership and Dues - - 200
Total Administrative Expenses -$ 2,700$ 2,900$
Materials & Maintenance Expenses
Meters and Materials 64,122 108,300 108,300
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 8,151 5,000 5,000
Other Materials and Maintenance 22,578 7,600 18,600
Contracted Services 3,300 15,000 5,000
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 98,151$ 135,900$ 136,900$
Total Expenses 542,089$ 606,300$ 626,100$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2342 - METER SHOP
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-30
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 116,527$ 122,600$ 134,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage - 200 200
Travel Expenses - 1,200 1,200
Conferences and Seminars 30 800 800
Business Meetings - 200 200
Membership and Dues 3,057 3,300 3,600
Incentives 9,074 37,500 32,200
Public Recognition Awards 4,561 12,900 15,000
Conservation Garden 119,687 117,500 123,700
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions - 200 200
Office Supplies - 200 -
Outside Services 11,612 126,300 282,400
Total Administrative Expenses 148,021$ 300,300$ 459,500$
Total Expenses 264,548$ 422,900$ 594,100$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2343 - WATER CONSERVATION
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-31
Intentionally Left Blank
D-32
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits 2,056,743$ 2,042,200$ 2,326,900$
Travel and Meetings 20,276 26,700 32,700
General Office Expense 426 1,500 1,400
Equipment 844,062 1,017,700 983,600
Services 88,456 278,700 259,000
Training 11,340 7,000 7,000
Total 3,021,303$ 3,373,800$ 3,610,600$
IT and Strategic Planning
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
$1,000
$1,900
$2,800
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
3,
0
8
0
2,
9
9
6
3,
1
3
6
3,
3
7
4
3,
6
1
1
2,
8
7
2
2,
9
3
3
3,
0
2
1
Budget Actual
D-33
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 893,584$ 951,100$ 300,700$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 30 300 300
Travel Expenses 1,935 1,000 1,000
Conferences and Seminars 3,603 4,000 2,000
Business Meetings 768 600 600
Total Administrative Expenses 6,336$ 5,900$ 3,900$
Total Expenses 899,920$ 957,000$ 304,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2411 - IT CHIEF/APPLICATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-34
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 549,686$ 456,100$ 1,342,000$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 212 200 200
Travel Expenses 1,379 600 600
Conferences and Seminars 4,201 14,000 17,500
Business Meetings 86 300 300
Membership and Dues 400 600 300
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 39 500 600
Office Supplies 387 600 -
Communication 280,826 360,300 320,200
Technology Hardware and Software 457,705 390,200 479,200
Maintenance and Parts 3,852 - -
Outside Services 85,760 239,000 215,500
Required Training 180 - -
Total Administrative Expenses 835,027$ 1,006,300$ 1,034,400$
Total Expenses 1,384,713$ 1,462,400$ 2,376,400$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2421 - IT OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-35
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 613,473$ 635,000$ 684,200$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 368 300 300
Travel Expenses 3,673 900 1,000
Conferences and Seminars 3,577 3,300 8,000
Business Meetings 44 300 300
Membership and Dues - 300 300
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions - 400 800
Technology Hardware and Software 101,679 267,200 184,200
Outside Services 2,696 39,700 43,500
General Training 11,160 7,000 7,000
Total Administrative Expenses 123,197$ 319,400$ 245,400$
Total Expenses 736,670$ 954,400$ 929,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2431 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-36
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits (1)7,160,946$ 7,744,600$ 8,008,200$
Travel and Meetings 38,385 49,300 48,800
General Office Expense 74 300 300
Equipment 32,317 42,200 44,700
Fees 75,652 65,500 69,400
Services 301,853 415,600 540,100
Training 9,096 11,000 9,000
Materials & Maintenance 1,574,022 1,760,700 1,946,500
Sewer Charges 1,122,524 1,294,900 996,400
Total 10,314,869$ 11,384,100$ 11,663,400$
(1) Excludes CIP labor and benefits.
Water Operations
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
$-
$4,000
$8,000
$12,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
12
,
6
8
9
11
,
8
5
3
10
,
9
1
3
11
,
3
8
4
11
,
6
6
3
10
,
9
3
6
10
,
4
3
9
10
,
3
1
5
Budget Actual
D-37
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 403,777$ 415,800$ 422,700$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 385 200 300
Travel Expenses 2,913 3,500 4,500
Conferences and Seminars 3,671 6,500 5,000
Business Meetings 71 100 -
Membership and Dues 3,625 5,000 5,000
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 74 300 300
Outside Services 2,847 3,500 3,500
General Training 5,015 7,000 5,000
Required Certification 4,081 4,000 4,000
Total Administrative Expenses 22,682$ 30,100$ 27,600$
Total Expenses 426,459$ 445,900$ 450,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3211 - WATER OPERATIONS CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-38
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 218,336$ 262,200$ 219,600$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases 22,987 24,500 25,200
Regulatory Agencies Fees 58,473 50,000 54,200
Total Administrative Expenses 81,460$ 74,500$ 79,400$
Total Expenses 299,796$ 336,700$ 299,000$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3221 - WATER SYSTEM OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-39
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 1,848,190$ 1,929,000$ 1,804,300$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 127,201 143,100 271,000
Total Administrative Expenses 127,201$ 143,100$ 271,000$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 65,005 96,500 102,000
Chemicals 341,603 358,000 361,500
Other Materials and Maintenance 52 500 500
Contracted Services - 1,000 1,000
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 406,660$ 456,000$ 465,000$
Total Expenses 2,382,051$ 2,528,100$ 2,540,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3225 - WATER SYSTEM
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-40
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 672,026$ 713,900$ 743,300$
Administrative Expenses
Regulatory Agencies Fees 10,934 8,000 8,000
Outside Services 13,364 11,000 26,200
Total Administrative Expenses 24,298$ 19,000$ 34,200$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Meters and Materials 349 - -
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 225 500 500
Other Materials and Maintenance 72 200 200
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 646$ 700$ 700$
Total Expenses 696,970$ 733,600$ 778,200$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3226 - RECYCLED SYSTEM
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-41
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 176,490$ 284,400$ 307,000$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases 837 1,000 1,000
Outside Services 27,390 31,700 23,300
Temporary Employment Services - 62,400 62,400
Total Administrative Expenses 28,227$ 95,100$ 86,700$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 42,813 44,400 25,000
Other Materials and Maintenance 60 200 200
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 42,873$ 44,600$ 25,200$
Total Expenses 247,590$ 424,100$ 418,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3227 - SCADA
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-42
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 197,376$ 198,800$ 243,100$
Total Expenses 197,376$ 198,800$ 243,100$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3231 - UTILITY SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-43
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 1,756,491$ 1,957,800$ 2,268,200$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases 3,461 1,800 1,800
Total Administrative Expenses 3,461$ 1,800$ 1,800$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Meters and Materials 1,667 5,500 5,500
Fleet Parts and Equipment 214 - -
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 167,566 170,000 245,000
Other Materials and Maintenance 110,438 123,000 171,000
Contracted Services 201,467 200,000 284,000
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 481,352$ 498,500$ 705,500$
Total Expenses 2,241,304$ 2,458,100$ 2,975,500$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3232 - UTILITY MAINTENANCE
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-44
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 478,797$ 532,000$ 572,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 27,720 34,000 34,000
Communication 1,423 1,000 3,800
Technology Hardware and Software 2,924 2,900 2,400
Hazardous Waste Disposal 6,245 7,500 7,200
Outside Services 33,338 28,600 20,900
Total Administrative Expenses 71,650$ 74,000$ 68,300$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Fuel and Oil 187,861 289,300 235,600
Fleet Parts and Equipment 112,063 129,900 128,900
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 36,499 17,000 25,500
Other Materials and Maintenance 40 - -
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 336,463$ 436,200$ 390,000$
Total Expenses 886,910$ 1,042,200$ 1,030,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3233 - FLEET MAINTENANCE
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-45
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 678,246$ 689,600$ 627,900$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases 685 6,500 6,500
Outside Services 31,539 77,000 77,000
Total Administrative Expenses 32,224$ 83,500$ 83,500$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 127,820 135,500 135,500
Other Materials and Maintenance - 300 -
Building Ground and Materials - 1,000 1,000
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 127,820$ 136,800$ 136,500$
Total Expenses 838,290$ 909,900$ 847,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3236 - PUMP & ELECTRICAL
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-46
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Sewer Charges
Metro O&M Costs 1,021,724$ 1,020,300$ 815,000$
Spring Valley O&M Costs 100,800 274,600 181,400
Total Expenses 1,122,524$ 1,294,900$ 996,400$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3241 - COLLECTION/TREATMENT/RECYCLE OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-47
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 139,018$ 148,700$ 166,700$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 61,814 49,500 47,000
Total Administrative Expenses 61,814$ 49,500$ 47,000$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 43,938 44,000 40,000
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 43,938$ 44,000$ 40,000$
Total Expenses 244,770$ 242,200$ 253,700$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3243 - LABORATORY
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-48
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 592,199$ 612,400$ 632,800$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases - 4,500 4,000
Temporary Employment Services 4,360 8,800 8,800
Total Administrative Expenses 4,360$ 13,300$ 12,800$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Fuel and Oil 11,336 15,000 15,000
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 47,906 56,100 82,800
Chemicals 31,574 39,100 39,100
Safety Equipment 77 2,900 1,000
Other Materials and Maintenance 134 - -
Contracted Services 43,243 30,800 45,700
Total Materials and Maintenenance Expenses 134,270$ 143,900$ 183,600$
Total Expenses 730,829$ 769,600$ 829,200$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3244 - RECLAMATION PLANT
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-49
Intentionally Left Blank
D-50
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits (2)1,392,467$ 1,587,800$ 1,609,600$
Travel and Meetings 17,805 18,700 19,400
General Office Expense 957 1,000 7,500
Fees 26,050 33,000 30,000
Services 389,828 705,100 702,600
Training 570 12,900 12,500
Materials & Maintenance 32 - -
Total 1,827,709$ 2,358,500$ 2,381,600$
(2) Excludes CIP labor and benefits.
(2) Excludes CIP labor and benefits.
Engineering
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1,
8
3
7
1,
8
6
2
2,
0
2
6
2,
3
5
9
2,
3
8
2
1,
8
1
7
1,
8
1
7
1,8
2
8
Budget Actual
D-51
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 283,510$ 337,800$ 350,300$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 219 500 500
Travel Expenses 7,906 7,200 8,000
Conferences and Seminars 6,164 4,600 4,600
Business Meetings 922 2,500 2,500
Membership and Dues 2,594 3,900 3,800
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 957 1,000 7,500
Outside Services 148 1,500 1,000
General Training 175 10,400 10,000
Required Certification 395 2,500 2,500
Total Administrative Expenses 19,480$ 34,100$ 40,400$
Total Expenses 302,990$ 371,900$ 390,700$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3311 - ENGINEERING CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-52
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 276,498$ 315,300$ 293,500$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 221,068 520,000 515,000
Total Administrative Expenses 221,068$ 520,000$ 515,000$
Total Expenses 497,566$ 835,300$ 808,500$
Note: Engineering Services includes Planning, Design and Water Resources
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3321 - ENGINEERING SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-53
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 340,682$ 363,800$ 374,200$
Total Expenses 340,682$ 363,800$ 374,200$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3421 - PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-54
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor & Benefits 434,390$ 491,400$ 530,700$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 74,486 93,600 111,600
Total Administrative Expenses 74,486 93,600 111,600
Materials & Maintenance Expenses
Other Materials & Maintenance 32 - -
Total Materials & Maintenenance Expenses 32$ -$ -$
Total Expenses 508,908$ 585,000$ 642,300$
Note: Field Services includes Construction Services and Survey Services
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3431 - FIELD SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-55
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor & Benefits 57,387$ 79,500$ 60,900$
Administrative Expenses
Regulatory Agencies Fees 26,050 33,000 30,000
Outside Services 94,126 90,000 75,000
Total Administrative Expenses 120,176$ 123,000$ 105,000$
Total Expenses 177,563$ 202,500 165,900
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3451 - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-56
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits (1)1,367,499$ 1,290,800$ 1,183,400$
Fees 844,099 1,041,000 836,000
Training 2,566 - -
Total 2,214,164$ 2,331,800$ 2,019,400$
(1) Benefits include District-wide labor and benefit costs not attributable to any one department,
such as the effect of cost of living raises on accrued leave liabilities or the Other Post
Employment Benefit Costs (OPEB). These costs are netted against the District's anticipated
Vacancy Factor. The Vacancy Factor for FY 2015 and FY 2016 is $185,600 and $338,300
respectively. Additionally, the labor and benefits shown on this schedule are those related to
operating costs and does not include CIP labor and benefit costs.
General Expense
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
79
2
2,
1
7
6
2,
1
5
0
2,
3
3
2
2,0
1
9
1,6
1
2
2,
3
4
4
2,
2
1
4
Budget Actual
D-57
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Budget
Total Labor & Benefits 1,367,499$ 1,290,800$ 1,183,400$
Administrative Expenses
Regulatory Agencies Fees 14,161 - -
General Training 2,566 - -
General Insurance 549,869 631,000 586,000
Legal Expenses 280,069 410,000 250,000
Total Administrative Expenses 846,665 1,041,000 836,000
Total Expenses 2,214,164 2,331,800 2,019,400
Legal Expenses 2,019,400
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 1311 - GENERAL EXPENSE (INCLUDES LEGAL)
FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET
D-58
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
P2040 Res - 1655-1 Reservoir 0.5 MG $ 25 $ 250 $ 900 $ 925 $ 100 $ - $ 2,200
P2083 PS - 870-2 Pump Station Replacement 350 5,000 5,000 3,350 - - 13700
P2267 36-Inch Main Pumpouts and Air/Vacuum Ventilation
Installations
50 200 55 - - - 305
P2285 Office Equipment and Furniture Capital Purchases 15 15 15 14 6 - 65
P2325 PL-10" to 12" Oversize, 1296 Zone, PB Road-Rolling
Hills Hydro PS/PB Bndy
1 20 - - - - 21
P2434 Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Well Development - - - - - - 0
P2451 Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and
Disinfection System
350 350 3,200 6,000 8,000 9,000 26900
P2466 Regional Training Facility 8 6 - - - - 14
P2469 Information Technology Network and Hardware 175 50 - - - - 225
P2470 Financial System Enhancements 100 - - - - - 100
P2486 Asset Management Plan Condition Assessment and
Data Acquisition
75 75 28 - - - 178
P2511 Otay Interconnect Pipeline 50 200 200 102 1 1 554
P2537 Operations Yard Property Acquisition Improvements 450 150 15 - - - 615
P2540 Work Order Management System Replacement 60 100 - - - - 160
P2541 624 Pressure Zone PRSs 525 5 - - - - 530
P2547 District Administration Vehicle Charging Stations 1 43 5 - - - 49
P2548 Sump Pump Installation at the 980-1 & 2 Reservoirs - - - - - - 0
P2549 Fuel System Upgrade 30 - - - - - 30
P2551 Blossom Lane Helix WD and Otay WD
Interconnection
150 13 - - - - 163
P2552 South Barcelona Helix WD and Otay WD
Interconnection
150 20 - - - - 170
P2554 640/340 PRS at Energy Way and Nirvana Avenue 1 1 50 250 75 23 400
P2555 Administration and Operations Parking Lot
Improvements
10 50 100 100 100 140 500
P2561 Res - 711-3 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 5 95 1,700 - - - 1800
P2562 Res - 571-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 1 9 10 90 2,490 - 2600
P2563 Res - 870-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 1 5 5 9 90 890 1000
P2568 Technology Business Processes Improvement 40 75 - - - - 115
CIP Projects ($1,000s)
The 2016 Fiscal Year CIP Budget contains 93 projects. The costs for the work planned for Fiscal Year 2016 is
$12.1 million. Of the 80 projects planned for Fiscal Year 2016, one is designated as reimbursable projects with
an estimated cost of $1 thousand. These projects are built by a developer and reimbursed by the District.
CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS
C-1
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
P2569 Metro Ethernet Implementation/ District Facilities -
Pilot
$ 100 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 100
P2570 SCADA Equipment & Infrastructure Enhancement - 100 100 100 - - 300
P2571 Datacenter Network Enhancement & Replacement
of Infrastructure Componets
- - - 100 100 - 200
P2572 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Replacement - - - - - 250 250
R2077 RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta
Gate/Airway
5 20 20 - - - 45
R2087 RecPL - 24-Inch, 927 Zone, Wueste Road -
Olympic/Otay WTP
- - - - - - 0
R2107 RWCWRF Screening Compactor and Chlorine
Injectors Enclosure
7 - - - - - 7
R2108 Res - 927-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement 10 - - - - - 10
R2110 RecPS - 944-1 Optimization and Pressure Zone
Modifications
25 5 92 - - - 122
R2113 Chlorine 1-ton Cylinder Emergency Close Valve - - - - - - 0
R2114 Large Recycle Pump Replacement at the RWCWRF
927-1 Pump Station
40 - - - - - 40
R2117 RWCWRF Disinfection System Improvements 110 1,100 1,100 100 - - 2410
R2118 Steele Canyon Sewer PS Chopper Pump 40 - - - - - 40
R2119 Treatment Plant Automation & Security Upgrades 50 50 50 50 - - 200
R2121 Res - 944-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 25 1,375 - - - - 1400
R2122 Emergency Recycled Water Fire Hydrant
Installations
75 - - - - - 75
S2043 RWCWRF Sludge Handling System 1 1 1 1 1 1 6
43 Total Capital Facility Projects $ 3,111 $ 9,383 $ 12,646 $ 11,191 $ 10,963 $ 10,305 $ 57,599
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
P2382 Safety and Security Improvements 300 250 - - - - 550
P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations 5 5 250 250 257 - 767
P2485 SCADA Communication System and Software
Replacement
75 35 150 150 150 160 720
P2493 624-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 55 50 - - - - 105
P2494 Multiple Species Conservation Plan 87 - - - - - 87
P2495 San Miguel Habitat Management/Mitigation Area 120 120 160 160 180 190 930
P2496 Otay Lakes Road Utility Relocations 20 5 - - - - $25
P2504 Regulatory Site Access Road and Pipeline
Relocation
50 365 135 20 - - $570
P2507 East Palomar Street Utility Relocation 25 120 110 - - - $255
CIP Projects ($1,000s)
CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS, CONTINUED
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS
C-2
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS, CONTINUED
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
P2508 Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement Program 150 300 50 47 - - $547
P2515 870-1 Reservoir Paving 15 - - - - - $15
P2518 803-3 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 20 45 - - - - $65
P2519 832-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 20 45 25 - - - $90
P2520 Motorola Mobile Radio Upgrade 30 14 - - - - $44
P2529 711-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 600 130 25 35 - - $790
P2530 711-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 800 200 15 25 - - $1,040
P2531 944-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 130 50 35 - - - $215
P2532 944-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 50 50 50 - - - $150
P2533 1200-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 5 490 35 35 - - $565
P2534 978-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating - 10 275 5 35 - $325
P2535 458-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating &
Upgrades
115 5 35 - - - $155
P2538 Administration and Operations Building Fire
Sprinkler Replacement Program
5 20 18 - - - $43
P2539 South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Utility
Relocations
100 100 100 40 - - $340
P2542 850-3 Reservoir Interior Coating 230 15 35 - - - $280
P2543 850-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating - 10 515 10 40 - $575
P2544 850-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Reservoir Coating 5 5 880 10 40 - $940
P2545 980-1 Reservoir Interior Exterior Coating 950 445 50 50 - - $1,495
P2546 980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating - - 10 1,390 10 40 $1,450
P2550 Fuel Island Upgrade 75 - - - - - $75
P2553 Heritage Road Bridge Replacement and Utility
Relocation
10 100 290 645 155 - $1,200
P2557 520 Res Recirculation Pipeline Chemical Supply
and Analyser Feed Replacement Project
1 29 65 5 - - $100
P2558 Additional pump station fuel storage 25 - - - - - $25
P2559 Pressure Vessel Repair and Replacement Program 50 250 - - - - $300
P2564 Administration Carpet Replacement Program 65 75 75 - - - $215
P2565 803-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating &
Upgrades
- - - 5 675 45 $725
P2566 520-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating &
Upgrades
- - - - 10 1,780 $1,790
P2567 1004-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating &
Upgrades
- - - - 10 555 $565
R2109 Sweetwater River Wooden Trestle Improvement for
the Recycled Water Forcemain
400 10 - - - - $410
R2111 RWCWRF - RAS Pump Replacement 250 - - - - - $250
R2112 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation 40 25 - - - - $65
CIP Projects ($1,000s)
C-3
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS, CONTINUED
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
R2116 RecPL - 14-Inch, 927 Zone, Forcemain Assessment
and Repair
225 1,000 150 50 - - $1,425
R2120 RWCWRF Filtered Water Storage Tank
Improvements
10 245 245 - - - $500
S2012 San Diego County Sanitation District Outfall and
RSD Outfall Replacement
50 150 150 200 250 300 $1,100
S2024 Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement 500 3,400 1,000 - - - $4,900
S2027 Rancho San Diego Pump Station Rehabilitation 320 1,000 1,000 915 - - $3,235
S2033 Sewer System Rehabilitation 900 800 800 800 800 500 $4,600
46 Total Replacements and Renewal Projects $ 6,883 $ 9,968 $ 6,733 $ 4,847 $ 2,612 $ 3,570 $ 34,613
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
P2282 Vehicle Capital Purchases 556 298 295 327 308 317 $2,101
P2286 Field Equipment Capital Purchases 50 100 83 68 16 105 $422
P2366 APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits 535 307 157 118 78 110 $1,305
3 Total Capital Purchase $1,141 $705 $535 $513 $402 $532 $3,828
.
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
P2556 HWY 94 Upsized Utility Relocations at Melody Lane 1 29 100 100 20 - $250
1 Total Reimbursement Projects $1 $29 $100 $100 $20 $0 $250
CIP No Description FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 Total
80 Total - FY 2016 Projects $11,136 $19,965 $19,114 $15,041 $13,117 $11,737 $90,110
13 Total - FY 2017 through FY 2021 Projects $0 $120 $900 $1,610 $880 $2,670 $6,180
93 Grand Totals $11,136 $20,085 $20,014 $16,651 $13,997 $14,407 $96,290
CAPITAL PURCHASE PROJECTS
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT PROJECTS
SUMMARY
CIP Projects ($1,000s)
C-4
Item#Amount
Grand Total :
P2286 Field 15,000$
P2282 Vehicle 590,500
P2366 APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits 534,500
1,140,000$
17 Two portable engine driven pumps 520,000
19 Valve machine 34,500
Total of Vehicles 556,000
9 Potable Vactor truck with 15-yeard debris body 405,000
Field Equipment
1,140,000$
21 One-ton service truck with engine driven
Hydraulic air compressor and 20-foot crane.
140,000
Vehicles
15,000
Engineering Planning
18 Replace truck bed for Unit No. 184 11,000
Operations
22 Portable Emissions Analyzer 14,500
Total of
Operations
584,000
FY 2016 Capital Purchases
Summary by Project
Capital purchases are non-recurring operating expense items for District-wide use that cost more
than $10,000 each and have an estimated useful life of two years or more. The Capital Purchase
Projects include Field Equipment, Office Equipment and Furniture, and Vehicle purchases.
Description
Field Equipment
Finance
3 Portable Meter Test Program/hardware
C-5
Intentionally Left Blank
C-6
P2040Res - 1655-1 Reservoir 0.5 MG
Kevin Cameron
8/19/1992
5
22
3
$2,200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Construction of a 0.5 million gallon reservoir and approximately 1,500 feet of 12-inch pipeline to connect to the existing system in
Prisilla Drive. These improvements are located within the Rancho Jamul Estates area.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The project will increase system reliability, increase service capabilities, and provide adequate fire protection for the Rancho
Jamul Estates area within the 1655 Pressure Zone. The existing system is currently served with a hydropneumatic pump station.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 50 %0 %0 %0 %50 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %50 %0 %0 %50 %
TOTAL:50 %50 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$25 $250 $900 $925 $100 $0 $2,200
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-7
P2040
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
7/1/2017 6/30/2018
$82
$226
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2018 6/30/2020 $1,892
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:310
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $50 $51 $52 $153
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-8
P2083PS - 870-2 Pump Station Replacement
Jeff Marchioro
5/17/1995
P2451
2
22
1
$15,000,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Construction of a new pump station to replace the existing Low Head and High Head pump stations.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The two existing pump stations have reached the end of their useful lives.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$350 $5,000 $5,000 $3,350 $0 $0 $15,000
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,300
C-9
P2083
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 9/1/2013
9/1/2013 6/30/2016
$700
$970
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 3/1/2019 $13,330
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:055
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-10
P226736-Inch Main Pumpouts and Air/Vacuum Ventilation Installations
Jeff Marchioro
6/3/1996
3
22
2
$735,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Installation of ventilation equipment on the existing pumpout and air/vacuum vaults on 36-inch transmission main from the San
Diego County Water Authority Otay FCF No. 11 to the Regulatory Site. This project also includes upsizing the existing 2-inch
air/vacuum valves to 6-inch.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The vault openings do not stay in place when refilling because they lack ventilation. By installing vents in these vaults, the lids
will stay in place, thus eliminating a safety hazard. Draining and filling the 36-inch main at higher flow rates is required to return
the system to service in shorter periods of time.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $200 $55 $0 $0 $0 $735
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$430
C-11
P2267
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
4/1/2015 6/30/2016
$0
$75
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 6/30/2018 $660
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:198
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-12
P2285Office Equipment and Furniture Capital Purchases
Kent Payne
6/3/1996
0
District Wide
1
$589,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for capital purchase of various office equipment and furniture items used for daily Otay Water
District functions.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Replacements or new acquisitions of office equipment and furniture will be used for operational and administrative functions
throughout the entire Otay Water District.
COMMENTS:
2016 - Projected expenditure for Customer Service workstation ergonomic upgrades.
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$15 $15 $15 $14 $6 $0 $589
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$524
C-13
P2285
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2000 6/30/2019 $589
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-14
P2325PL-10" to 12" Oversize, 1296 Zone, PB Road-Rolling Hills Hydro
PS/PB Bndy
Stephen Beppler
4
22
2
$22,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Construction of approximately 6.900 feet of 12-inch pipeline within the 1296 Pressure Zone, from the Rolling Hills
Hydropneumatic Pump Station to the future 1296 Reservoir. A portion of the project will be constructed by the developer and is
subject to reimbursement at actual cost for the oversize portion per Board policy.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The conversion from a hydropneumatic tank system to a reservoir includes the construction of a waterline from the current
system to the proposed tank location. Upsizing of the theoretically required 10-inch water main to a 12-inch line will provide the
District adequate water movement capabilities for future needs.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-15
P2325
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
$1
$1
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 6/30/2017 $20
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:160
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-16
P2434Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Well Development
Jeff Marchioro
5/21/2009
2
22
3
$8,700,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Production groundwater well development of approximately 400 gallons per minute for potable water use. The project includes
construction of a reverse osmosis treatment facility.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project is needed to meet the IRP water supply goals.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
New Water Supply Fee
Projects
0 %0 %0 %40 %40 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %60 %0 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:0 %60 %0 %40 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,711
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$3,711
C-17
P2434
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/1994 12/1/2010
1/1/2011 6/30/2023
$2,600
$1,200
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2023 6/30/2025 $4,900
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:127
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-18
P2451Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and Disinfection System
Rod Posada
5/23/2006
P2083
2
22
1
$30,000,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Otay Water District could potentially receive a potable water supply source from the planned Rosarito Desalination Facility
via a conveyance system, pumping facilities, and disinfection system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The concept could provide for an independent water source to the Otay Water District.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
New Water Supply Fee
Projects
0 %0 %0 %40 %40 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %60 %0 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:0 %60 %0 %40 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$350 $350 $3,200 $6,000 $8,000 $9,000 $30,000
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$3,100
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-19
P2451
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2006 6/30/2016
7/1/2016 6/30/2018
$3,500
$3,500
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2018 6/30/2022 $23,000
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 $20,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $55,000 $80,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-20
P2466Regional Training Facility
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
5/29/2007
P2504
5
22
1
$300,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The project is the construction of a Regional Training Facility at the Regulatory Site through a partnership with the San Miguel
Consolidated Fire Protection District.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The Otay Water District needs a training center to train staff on trenching, shoring, fire safety, rescue, and confined space. The
San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District has secured funding for this project and will be the lead agency in the
development of the training facility.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 40 %0 %0 %0 %40 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %60 %0 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:40 %60 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$8 $6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$286
C-21
P2466
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2007 6/30/2017 $300
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:343
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $4,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-22
P2469Information Technology Network and Hardware
Michael Kerr
6/23/2008
0
District Wide
1
$1,684,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will continue to upgrade the data center and networks and support operating system and security upgrades.
Specific projects include further enhancements to our virtualized server environment, power monitoring equipment and purchase
of necessary devices to support operations. Specific projects include:
1 Replacement of end-of-life servers with high capacity server enclosures ($100K).
2 Power and data center management and software ($25K).
3 Break-fix replacement for key data center items ($25kK).
4 Enhancement to District's disaster recovery computing environment ($25K).
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Enhance data center hardware and software to accommodate purchase of new and more efficient services to enhance capacity,
reliability, security, and disaster recovery. In addition, these funds will replace legacy end-of-life equipment.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %40 %0 %40 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %60 %0 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:0 %60 %40 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$175 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,684
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,459
C-23
P2469
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2008 6/30/2017 $1,684
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-24
P2470Financial System Enhancements
Michael Kerr
6/23/2008
0
District Wide
1
$1,765,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Develop enhancements, streamlining, and integration functionality for Eden to include Tyler Cashiering ($40K) and Eden Self-
Service Module (15K). These projects will commence during FY16. The initial cost proposal for the self-service components
came in lower than expected, therefore, the total CIP funding will be $55K to cover both projects.
Tyler Cashiering – Integration and centralization of payments based on customer payment type, collection process, and single
point of entry for data, billing data, payment processing, and reporting features.
Eden Payroll & Self-Service – Automation of employee self-service information, payroll processing, increase efficiency, on-line
access for District users.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This CIP funds the creation and enhancement and modifications of our existing financial information systems. Each year items
which require software and hardware changes and additions to these systems are prioritized, scoped, and funded with this CIP.
Funds are used for software development costs, software acquisition costs, consulting services, and associated new hardware.
1) Development with ESRI of GIS for Infrastructure Management ($80K).
2) Support for Eden modifications for Work Order, Purchasing, and Billing System Modifications ($50K).
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %60 %0 %60 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %40 %0 %0 %40 %
TOTAL:0 %40 %60 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,765
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,665
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-25
P2470
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2008 6/1/2016 $1,765
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-26
P2486Asset Management Plan Condition Assessment and Data
Acquisition
Ming Zhao
5/21/2009
0
District Wide
1
$1,015,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the development of an integrated Asset Management system. Funds in 2016 will be used to assign the
criticality to major facilities and testing of condition assessment methodologies. Implement the Asset Management software -
inforMaster. Explored the analytical capabilities to better use asset management information.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Implementation of an Asset Management Plan is best practice and will provide for a formal means of maintaining, replacing, and
funding the existing fixed assets. It is a strategic objective in the existing and new strategic plan.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 40 %0 %0 %0 %40 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %60 %0 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:40 %60 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$75 $75 $28 $0 $0 $0 $1,015
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$837
C-27
P2486
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2009 6/30/2018 $1,015
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-28
P2511Otay Interconnect Pipeline
Jeff Marchioro
5/17/2010
P2528
3
22
1
$37,300,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide for a 30-inch transmission main interconnection and pump station between the North District and South
District to transport 10,000 gallons per minute between the two systems in either direction. Also, the system will allow for the
ability to transfer water from the Sweetwater Authority Perdue Water Treatment Plant into either the North or South Districts.
This project was previously titled "North District - South District Interconnection System."
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The Integrated Water Resources Plan identifies the objective, goals, purpose, and benefits of interconnecting the North and
South Districts as well as for the need to diversify water resources for increased reliability.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 40 %0 %0 %0 %40 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %60 %0 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:40 %60 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $200 $200 $102 $1 $1 $2,601
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$2,047
C-29
P2511
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2010 6/1/2014
6/1/2013 6/30/2023
$1,250
$2,200
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2023 6/30/2025 $33,850
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:184
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-30
P2537Operations Yard Property Acquisition Improvements
Stephen Beppler
11/13/2008
P2479
4
22
1
$775,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The project will provide site improvements including fencing, grading, and paving for vehicle parking and equipment storage.
After the one year warranty is complete, the District's Administration and Operations parking lots will be slurry sealed and
restriped.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The site improvements are required to provide flexibility in operations and for future expansion purposes.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$450 $150 $15 $0 $0 $0 $775
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$160
C-31
P2537
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2008 6/30/2014
7/1/2018
$25
$135
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2015 6/30/2018 $615
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:318
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1 $0 $1
$0 $700 $725 $750 $775 $800 $3,750
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-32
P2540Work Order Management System Replacement
Michael Kerr
0
District Wide
1
$500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Replace existing work order system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The work order system will organize and track all activities associated with District assets. As part of the implementation of
enterprise asset management, the work order system will adopt a GIS centric architecture and integrate efficiently with other core
systems. In addition, it needs to be able to assist in all phases of asset creation, maintenance, replacement, and decommission.
The current system is at the end of its useful life and does not have the ability to be modified to meet these needs.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %60 %0 %60 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %40 %0 %0 %40 %
TOTAL:0 %40 %60 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$60 $100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$340
C-33
P2540
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2013 6/30/2017 $500
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/29/2015Rita Bell
C-34
P2541624 Pressure Zone PRSs
Jeff Marchioro
P2434
2
22
1
$750,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide two pressure reducing stations feeding the 458 and 485 Pressure Zones from the 624 Pressure Zone
(Sequoia & Brandywine 624/458 PRS and Terra Nova Drive 624/485 PRS, respectively).
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project would upgrade the 485 and 485 Pressure Zones to improve fire flow and enhance system reliability. The 624/485
PRS project will also improve blending and distribution of treated water from the future Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Well (CIP
P2434).
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$525 $5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$220
C-35
P2541
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 8/1/2013
8/1/2013 7/1/2015
$2
$220
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016 $528
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:127
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-36
P2547District Administration Vehicle Charging Stations
Stephen Beppler
3
22
1
$60,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Construct four (4) electric vehicle charging stations at the lower Administration parking lot.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Alternative fueled vehicles are becoming more common, with electric only vehicles making up a significant portion of these. To
support the needs of these vehicles and their limited driving range, the District proposes installing vehicle charging stations to
allow employees to consider their use for their commute.
COMMENTS:
$1,000 for Permit
$14,600 for each Charging Station with dual power docks (2 total)
$15,000 Installation
$5,000 for Conduit
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 40 %0 %0 %0 %40 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %60 %0 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:40 %60 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $43 $5 $0 $0 $0 $60
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$11
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-37
P2547
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 6/30/2015
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
$10
$10
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 6/30/2018 $40
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:318
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $200 $200 $200 $200 $200 $1,000
$0 $500 $500 $500 $500 $500 $2,500
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-38
P2548Sump Pump Installation at the 980-1 & 2 Reservoirs
Don Anderson
5
22/27
1
$35,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Install power for sump pumps in two altitude valve vaults located at the 980-1 & 2 Reservoirs.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The vaults constantly fill up with ground water and staff needs to pump the water out, by adding an electric sump pump it will
pump the water out of the vaults automatically.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$5
C-39
P2548
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 9/30/2014
10/1/2014 3/31/2015
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
4/1/2014 6/30/2015 $35
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:172
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-40
P2549Fuel System Upgrade
Kent Payne
P2550
3
22
1
$30,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is to upgrade the Districts fuel system, both in the vehicles as well as the fuel island.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project will allow any employee to fill a District vehicle with no training. Authorizations and transactions will be done wireless
so electrical lines run through the fuel hoses or ground loops will be used and it will also allow Management tighter control on the
dispensing of fuel by placing limits on types of fueling and have better reporting features.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-41
P2549
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2015 7/31/2015
8/1/2015 9/30/2015
$1
$1
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2015 12/31/2015 $28
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:318
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-42
P2551Blossom Lane Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection
Stephen Beppler
P2552
3
22
2
$200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
To upgrade meter, vault, telemetry and other interconnection appurtenances to meet current standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Upgrade interconnection to current standards.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 1 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$150 $13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $193
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$30
C-43
P2551
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 6/1/2015
7/1/2015 3/1/2016
$5
$25
PROJECT PHASE:
3/1/2016 9/1/2016 $170
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:315
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-44
P2552South Barcelona Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection
Stephen Beppler
P2551
3
22
2
$200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
To upgrade the meter, telemetry, vault, and other interconnection appurtenances to current standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
To upgrade the existing interconnection to meet current standards.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$150 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$30
C-45
P2552
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 9/1/2014
7/1/2015 3/1/2016
$5
$30
PROJECT PHASE:
3/1/2016 9/1/2016 $165
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:317
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-46
P2554640/340 PRS at Energy Way and Nirvana Avenue
Jeff Marchioro
P2405
2
22
2
$400,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide a pressure reducing station near Energy Way and Nirvana Avenue. The PRS will feed the 340 Pressure
Zone from the 640 Pressure Zone. The existing Energy Way pipeline will be converted from the 340 pressure zone to the higher
640 pressure zone with the Village 3 North pipeline interconnection proposed for the intersection of Heritage Road and Energy
Way.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project would upgrade the 340 pressure to improve fire flow and enhance system reliability.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $1 $50 $250 $75 $23 $400
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-47
P2554
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2017
7/1/2017 6/30/2018
$20
$75
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2018 6/30/2020 $305
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:050
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-48
P2555Administration and Operations Parking Lot Improvements
Kevin Cameron
3
22
2
$500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
AC Pavement repairs, slurry seal, re-striping and update area lighting improvements to existing Administration and Operations
parking lots.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Parking lot needs to be re-striped and AC pavement needs to be resealed. Area lighting will be updated to more energy efficient
fixtures.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$10 $50 $100 $100 $100 $140 $500
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-49
P2555
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
7/1/2016 6/30/2018
$10
$75
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2018 6/30/2021 $415
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:318
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-50
P2561Res - 711-3 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement
Jeff Marchioro
5
22/27
2
$1,800,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$5 $95 $1,700 $0 $0 $0 $1,800
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-51
P2561
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2017
1/1/2017 9/30/2017
$10
$90
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2017 6/30/2018 $1,700
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:159
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-52
P2562Res - 571-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement
Jeff Marchioro
2
22
3
$2,600,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $9 $10 $90 $2,490 $0 $2,600
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-53
P2562
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2019
1/1/2019 9/30/2019
$10
$100
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2019 6/30/2020 $2,490
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:55
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-54
P2563Res - 870-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement
Jeff Marchioro
2
22
3
$1,000,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with a new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $5 $5 $9 $90 $890 $1,000
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-55
P2563
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2020
1/1/2020 9/30/2020
$10
$100
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2020 6/30/2021 $890
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:55
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-56
P2568Technology Business Processes Improvement
Michael Kerr
0
District Wide
2
$115,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Business Process Improvement -
Advance business processes and operational efficiencies through effective implementation of information technology with
assistance from integrated work flows tools, document management solutions and standardization.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
(YR1/YR2) - Redesign of Business Process Reengineering to streamline and/or sustain future demands and growth with existing
staff and enterprise integration enhancement.
(YR1) - InfoPath Forms - (designing, distributing, and submitting electronic forms) - Near end of life and will soon need to be
replaced. Staff will conduct analysis on software replacement. $20,000
(YR1) - Upgrade of the District's back-end Intranet structure (SharePoint) - Near end of life for support and will need to be
upgraded with new features to include BI (Business Intelligence) plug-in solution (Dashboard Designer) - $20,000
(YR2) - Enterprise Content Management and Document Management Solution. The District's current content management
solution requires adaptation and new features in keeping abreast with current technologies to include content strategies and a
standard taxonomy. The current solution also does not integrate well with SharePoint, the District's current Intranet back-end
technology solution, and other possible integration solutions. - $75,000
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$40 $75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-57
P2568
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2017 $115
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-58
P2569Metro Ethernet Implementation/ District Facilities - Pilot
Michael Kerr
0
District Wide
2
$100,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Implementation of Metro Ethernet to Otay Water District Facilities.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The District currently uses Firetide, Inc., as its wireless technology solution to provide data communication to monitor its
supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. The current environment is supported by a third party vendor, Day
Wireless. Currently, the District relies on this technology as its main source of information, however, this solution has been
inconsistent for the past 12 to 18 months, numerous manhours, extensive troubleshooting, and vendor involvement hve been the
key to maintaining the system with a Band-Aid approach.
Metro-E technology is cost-effective, consistent, scalable, and also has bandwidth management monitoring, thereby, minimizing
staff’s efforts in extensive troubleshooting. The design of the Metro-E solution will provide elevated security and offer continuous
availability for the District’s business continuity efforts. Data will be securely transported within a private network that will be
accessible by District staff only. This new wired technology will also minimize manhours necessary to support this solution and
give the District added value in reliability and sustainability. Other factors in requesting a change in technology in support of
SCADA includes, decrease maintenance costs, Quality of Service (QOS), increased utilization, limitation of vulnerabilities,
encryption of sensitive data and business continuity.
This project will span the course of 1 year with focus on the District's high priority facilities and other facilities necessary for a
successful project.
This CIP (Pilot) will cover 6 to 7 sites over a span of 1 year to determine future costs necessary for the project.
Cost - $100,000
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-59
P2569
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016 $0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016 $100
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-60
P2570SCADA Equipment & Infrastructure Enhancement
Michael Kerr
7/1/2017
0
District Wide
2
$300,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
SCADA Equipment & Infrastructure Enhancement.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
SCADA equipment and infrastructure requires replacement and enhancement to effectively manage the District's operational
facilities.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $100 $100 $100 $0 $0 $300
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-61
P2570
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 6/30/2019 $300
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/8/2015Rita Bell
C-62
P2571Datacenter Network Enhancement & Replacement of
Infrastructure Componets
Michael Kerr
7/7/2018
0
District Wide
2
$200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Data Center Network Enhancement & Replacement of Infrastructure Components.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Data center network infrastructure is reaching the end of its service life. This project plans for enhancement and replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $100 $100 $0 $200
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-63
P2571
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2018 6/30/2020 $200
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-64
P2572Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Replacement
Micheal Kerr
7/1/2020
0
District Wide
3
$500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Enterprise Resource Planning Replacement.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based on preliminary road maps from the current vendor, staff anticipates that the current ERP system, Eden will become
inflexible and constricted with new systems on the horizon. Staff is presently identifying key core business processes in
achieving improvements in productivity and quality. Staff also anticipates that the outcome of the workshops will recognize that
Eden will lack the necessary functionality, business agility, flexibility, and technology necessary for the District's overall growth.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250 $250
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-65
P2572
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2020 6/30/2022 $0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-66
R2077RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta Gate/Airway
Stephen Beppler
5/23/2006
R2048, R2058, R2087
2
22
4
$4,500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Construction of approximately 9,300 feet 24-inch pipeline within the 860 Pressure Zone in Alta Road from the Alta Gate location
to Airway Road. Portions of this project are being built by Developers through reimbursement agreements. The balance of this
project will be constructed as part of the Otay Mesa recycled water system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide transmission capacity for development of Otay Mesa and link the planned 860-1 Reservoir with the
recycled water transmission system in Otay Mesa. Funding opportunity is the United States Bureau of Reclamation Water
Reclamation and Reuse Program, Title XVI of P.L. 102-575.
COMMENTS:
Temporary moratorium enacted for Otay Mesa recycled water in July 2014, will be revisited in about a year. In the meanwhile,
putting a hold on all recycled water projects in Otay Mesa.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$5 $20 $20 $0 $0 $0 $2,850
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$2,805
C-67
R2077
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2001 12/1/2009
1/1/2010 6/30/2019
$164
$451
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2019 12/31/2020 $3,885
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:39
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-68
R2087RecPL - 24-Inch, 927 Zone, Wueste Road - Olympic/Otay WTP
Kevin Cameron
5/23/2006
R2048, R2058, R2077
1
22
1
$7,000,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Construction of approximately 15,100 feet of 24-inch pipeline within the 927 Pressure Zone in Wueste Road from Olympic
Parkway to near the existing City of San Diego Otay WTP. This project will be constructed as part of the Otay Mesa Recycled
Water System Supply Link.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide transmission capacity for development of Otay Mesa and is a part of the link to the 927 Pressure Zone
supply to the planned 860-1 Reservoir within the Otay Mesa recycled water system. Funding opportunity is the United States
Bureau of Reclamation Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, Title XVI of P.L. 102-575.
COMMENTS:
Temporary moratorium enacted for Otay Mesa recycled water in July 2014, will be revisited in about a year. In the meanwhile,
putting a hold on all recycled water projects in Otay Mesa.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,050
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,050
C-69
R2087
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
9/1/2006 12/1/2009
1/1/2010 6/30/2019
$180
$765
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 12/31/2022 $6,055
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:85
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-70
R2107RWCWRF Screening Compactor and Chlorine Injectors
Enclosure
Jake Vaclavek
5/15/2011
3
22
2
$215,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Install screening compactor at the RWCWRF headwork, repair concrete supports at headwork, and construct a 3-sided
enclosure around the chlorine injectors at the reclamation plant chlorine contact basin.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The screening compactor will remove waste material at the headwork to the RWCWRF and compact the material for disposal to
a landfill. This will result in reducing the amount of solids discharged back to Metro.
The PVC chlorine injectors at the chlorine contact basin at the reclamation plant need to be protected from sunlight.
COMMENTS:
Added $78,000 to FY15 for purchase and installation of a redundant compactor for reliability.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$7 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $215
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$208
C-71
R2107
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2012 12/31/2015 $215
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-72
R2108Res - 927-1 Reservoir Cover Replacement
Jeff Marchioro
5
22/27
1
$1,090,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with a new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,090
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,080
C-73
R2108
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 8/1/2013
7/1/2013 11/6/2013
$5
$75
PROJECT PHASE:
11/6/2013 6/30/2016 $1,010
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:172
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-74
R2110RecPS - 944-1 Optimization and Pressure Zone Modifications
Jeff Marchioro
R2091
1
22
1
$200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Improve the control strategy to increase pumping capacity and streamline operation of the pump station. As a result of this effort,
replacement of 5 service saddles on Clubhouse Drive will need to be replaced to higher pressure class saddles. Add sump
pump to an existing pressure reducing station vault located east of the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Hunte Parkway.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Revising the control strategy will increase pumping capacity and improve the District's ability to operate the pump station during
off-peak hours when electricity rates are low. Retrofitting the PRS vault with a sump pump will prolong the life expectancy of
existing pressure reducing station components.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$25 $5 $92 $0 $0 $0 $200
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$78
C-75
R2110
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 10/1/2013
10/1/2013 9/30/2015
$60
$25
PROJECT PHASE:
9/30/2015 6/30/2018 $115
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:115
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-76
R2113Chlorine 1-ton Cylinder Emergency Close Valve
Jake Vaclavek
3
22
1
$37,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Install emergency close valves on all (4) connected 1-Ton Chlorine Cylinder shutoff valves.
Shutoff condition to include any chlorine leak alarm, earthquake, fire, and manually from SCADA.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Enhance public safety and control release of chlorine gas into the atmosphere.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$3
C-77
R2113
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2014 12/31/2015 $37
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-78
R2114Large Recycle Pump Replacement at the RWCWRF 927-1 Pump
Station
Don Anderson
3
22
1
$120,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Replace large recycle pumps.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Pumps are old and corroded and have lost efficiency.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$40 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$80
C-79
R2114
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2014 6/30/2016 $120
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-80
R2117RWCWRF Disinfection System Improvements
Stephen Beppler
3
22
2
$2,500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The RWCWRF does not have adequate chlorine contact basin volume to meet the San Diego RWQCB requirement for chlorine
contact time (CT) for the recycled water produced from this facility, so it subsequently needs to use the 14-inch effluent force
main to obtain the required CT. It is believed that the high chlorine dosage needed with this arrangement is adversely impacting
the force main, its appurtenances, and the reservoir liners. If CT can be met within the plant, the chlorine residual leaving the
plant can be lowered substantially. Alternatives being evaluated include additional contact basin volume, changing to ultraviolet
(UV) disinfection and other options.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The District currently uses the existing 14-Inch CML force main to meet the required chlorine contact time resulting in a higher
corrosion rate for facilities on this pipeline. Increasing the size of the chlorine contact basin or switching to another disinfection
method at the RWCWRF will extend the useful life of the force main and reservoir liners.
COMMENTS:
Improvement options include changing to UV disinfection in addition to increasing contact time at the plant.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$110 $1,100 $1,100 $100 $0 $0 $2,500
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$90
C-81
R2117
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 12/31/2015
1/1/2016 12/31/2016
$100
$250
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2017 6/30/2019 $2,150
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-82
R2118Steele Canyon Sewer PS Chopper Pump
Stephen Beppler
3
18
1
$40,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Installation of a recirculating chopper pump in the Steele Bridge SPS wet well to protect the sewage pumps from assorted debris.
The existing pumps have been requiring a high frequency of repairs and replacement of parts due to rags, construction
materials, and other non-typical wastewater solids entering the pump station. The new chopper pump is designed to handle
these types of materials and will also eliminate the buildup of settled matter within the wet well.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The new chopper pump will result in few maintenance repairs and extend the life of the sewage pumps. Based upon the current
frequency and cost of maintenance of the sewage pumps, the chopper pump addition should pay for itself within a few years.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 18 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$40 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-83
R2118
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 7/31/2015
8/3/2015 9/30/2015
$2
$5
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2015 2/29/2016 $33
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:331
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-84
R2119Treatment Plant Automation & Security Upgrades
Stephen Beppler
3
22
0
$200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Identify and implement automation improvements at the RWCWRF to decrease operations staffing requirements and enhance
the plant security features.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
To reduce long-term operating costs of the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility, the District will implement automation
to streamline operator labor requirements. In addition to the ability to monitor the treatment processes, the automation will also
include security monitoring to ensure the protection of District facilities as well as ensure that future requirements associated with
the on-site storage of chlorine gas are met.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $50 $50 $50 $0 $0 $200
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-85
R2119
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
7/1/2016 6/30/2017
$50
$50
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2017 6/30/2019 $100
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-86
R2121Res - 944-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement
Jeff Marchioro
5
22
2
$1,400,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$25 $1,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,400
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-87
R2121
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
1/1/2016 9/30/2016
$10
$100
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2016 6/30/2017 $1,290
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:172
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/8/2015Rita Bell
C-88
R2122Emergency Recycled Water Fire Hydrant Installations
Kevin Cameron
7/1/2015
0
District Wide
1
$75,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will install 2-3 fire hydrants on the recycled water system for emergency fire suppression. The project includes
meeting Title 22 requirements, establishing protocol, and site selection.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Due to the Governor's mandate to reduce water use, CAL Fire has requested to use recycled water for emergency fire
suppression.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-89
R2122
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 9/30/2015
10/1/2015 3/31/2016
$15
$15
PROJECT PHASE:
4/1/2016 6/30/2016 $45
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/24/2015D Martin
C-90
S2043RWCWRF Sludge Handling System
Stephen Beppler
5/14/2013
R2096
3
18
3
$1,500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide funding for a Sludge Handling System at the RWCWRF to reduce the amount of solids the District sends
to Metro.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The District currently sends all sludge produced at RWCWRF to Metro for treatment. The District's Wastewater Management
Plan provided a preliminary estimate of the cost of handling sludge at the RWCWRF that is close to the cost Metro charges the
District for treatment of solids.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 18 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $47
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$41
C-91
S2043
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 6/30/2022
7/1/2022 6/30/2023
$75
$200
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2023 6/30/2024 $1,225
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-92
P2382Safety and Security Improvements
Oscar Ramirez
6/5/2002
0
District Wide
1
$2,667,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is to improve the security of the Otay Water District facilities by installing and upgrading to current standards the
hardware and software required to provide access control, video surveillance, intrusion detection and response. Fiscal Year 2016
will include initiating delivery of the following items:
1.- Operations bldg - installation of: gate, RFID and FOB access to separate and secure Ops/Shop areas from warehouse $50K.
Installation of protective gate at shops fuel truck area $20K.
2.-Installation and basic upgrade of District facilities physical security burglar alarm panels to Digital Monitoring Systems (DMP)
to ready sites for "ENTRE" enterprise security and access control management software $120K.
3.-Installation of additional outer cameras, lighting, and perimeter beams at shop's yard area $15K.
4.-Video verification systems upgrades from analog cameras to digital + add 1 Network Video Recorder $45K.
5.-Intrusion and physical access entry alarm system installation and integration at District facilities $50K.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Although existing facilities are relatively safe and secure, the Federal government has recommended that security to water
systems be improved. The project is required to fund needed changes and improvements to District facilities. General Fund at
40% expansion and 60% replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %60 %0 %60 %
Expansion 40 %0 %0 %0 %40 %
TOTAL:40 %0 %60 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$300 $250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,667
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$2,117
C-93
P2382
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2002 6/30/2017
9/1/2003 12/31/2017
$62
$231
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2004 6/30/2017 $2,374
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-94
P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations
Jeff Marchioro
5/23/2006
2
22
1
$2,250,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for all utility relocations required due to construction of SR-11 on the Otay Mesa. Facility relocations
vary in size from 8-inch to 24-inch. Both the potable and recycled water systems are impacted.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Caltrans will construct SR-11, which will result in utility conflicts with existing Otay Water District facilities at various locations. In
most cases, the Otay Water District does have prior and superior rights. The facilities must be relocated prior to Caltrans
construction of SR-11. The cost of the facilities relocations that have prior rights will be reimbursed by Caltrans.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$5 $5 $250 $250 $257 $0 $2,250
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,483
C-95
P2453
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2006 6/1/2016
7/1/2009 6/30/2015
$20
$350
PROJECT PHASE:
1/8/2014 6/30/2020 $1,880
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:5
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-96
P2485SCADA Communication System and Software Replacement
Jake Vaclavek
5/21/2009
0
District Wide
1
$2,014,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will replace the existing SCADA software and radio communication system and install fuel level transmitters on all
diesel fuel tanks. A Battery Backup System will be installed at remote SCADA/Radio sites without emergency power generators.
Money budgeted in FY 2016 and 2017 is for the replacement of PLC's in the field that will no longer be supported at that time.
$40K in FY 16 for the SCADA Roadmap Documentation.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The vendor will no longer be upgrading or supporting the existing system beginning 2012. The radio equipment needs
replacement to allow for increased bandwidth capability to increase security systems functionality. The fuel level transmitters on
all diesel fuel tanks and remote SCADA monitoring will provide supervisors with real time fuel levels to monitor available runtime
on stand-by engines during extended power outages. The battery backup system will provide continuous communications and
SCADA monitoring and control for 3 days if the District lost power at sites without emergency power generators.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$75 $35 $150 $150 $150 $160 $2,014
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,294
C-97
P2485
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2009 6/30/2021 $2,014
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-98
P2493624-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
5/21/2009
4
22
1
$1,675,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 624-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the most recent reservoir assessment report dated August 8, 2008 the 624-2 Reservoir interior coating is in
relatively poor condition and is in need of replacement. Based on the FY 2012 Corrosion Report for Reservoir Coatings, the
exterior was scheduled to be replaced in FY 2013.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$55 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,675
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,570
C-99
P2493
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2009 8/1/2010
9/1/2010 12/31/2013
$5
$95
PROJECT PHASE:
1/8/2014 6/30/2017 $1,575
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:130
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-100
P2494Multiple Species Conservation Plan
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
5/21/2009
P2495
0
District Wide
1
$950,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is to provide funding to develop a plan to streamline the environmental permitting processes for the capital
improvement program projects to be constructed.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The project will save time and money when compared to environmental permitting each capital improvement program project
individually.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$87 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$863
C-101
P2494
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2009 6/30/2016 $950
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:2/9/2015Lisa Coburn-Boyd
C-102
P2495San Miguel Habitat Management/Mitigation Area
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
5/21/2009
P2494
5
22
1
$2,100,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is to provide funding for the establishment and management of mitigation areas on capital improvement program
projects sites and at the San Miguel Habitat Management Area to offset environmental impacts due to construction activities.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The resource agencies (USFWS, CDFG, etc.) require areas of land to be set aside, established, managed, and maintained in
order to mitigate for impacts due to construction activities.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$120 $120 $160 $160 $180 $190 $2,100
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,170
C-103
P2495
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2009 6/30/2021 $2,100
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:159
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/29/2015Rita Bell
C-104
P2496Otay Lakes Road Utility Relocations
Dan Martin
5/21/2009
4
22
1
$325,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for all utility relocations required to accommodate the City of Chula Vista road improvement project
located along Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The Otay Water District will be required to relocate all conflicting systems at its own expense for the City of Chula Vista has prior
and superior rights.
COMMENTS:
Work under construction.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$20 $5 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$300
C-105
P2496
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2009 8/1/2009
9/1/2009 12/1/2009
$4
$11
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2010 6/30/2017 $310
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:113
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-106
P2504Regulatory Site Access Road and Pipeline Relocation
Kevin Cameron
5/17/2010
P2466
5
22
1
$900,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Improve the existing access road from the proposed sheriff substation site to the Regulatory Reservoir Site.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Improving the existing access road will provide for increased safety and all weather permanent access to the Regulatory
Reservoir Site.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %50 %0 %50 %
Betterment ID 22 0 %50 %0 %0 %50 %
TOTAL:0 %50 %50 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $365 $135 $20 $0 $0 $900
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$330
C-107
P2504
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2010 9/1/2010
10/1/2010 12/31/2015
$85
$275
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2016 6/30/2019 $540
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:331
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-108
P2507East Palomar Street Utility Relocation
Kevin Cameron
5/17/2010
2
22
2
$940,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the necessary utility relocations due to construction improvements to I-805 near East Palomar Street. Both the
existing potable and recycled water systems will be impacted.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Caltrans will be making improvements to I-805 that will result in conflicts with existing pipelines. Project funds reimbursement to
Caltrans.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$25 $120 $110 $0 $0 $0 $940
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$685
C-109
P2507
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2010 12/1/2010
1/1/2011 12/1/2012
$5
$245
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2013 6/30/2018 $690
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:80
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-110
P2508Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement Program
Jeff Marchioro
5/17/2010
0
District Wide
1
$725,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the replacement and repairs of existing cathodic protection systems on various pipelines.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The ongoing cathodic protection program efforts have identified various pipelines for anode replacement, cathodic test station
repair, installation of isolation kits, and repair of existing anode beds.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$150 $300 $50 $47 $0 $0 $725
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$178
C-111
P2508
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2010 6/30/2016
7/1/2014 6/30/2016
$50
$100
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2015 6/30/2019 $575
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-112
P2515870-1 Reservoir Paving
Stephen Beppler
5/16/2011
2
22
2
$510,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for repaving the existing perimeter road around the 870-1 Reservoir and add roadway paving to the reservoir.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing perimeter reservoir roadway is at the end of its useful life and access to the reservoir is limited in the winter months
and unsafe.
COMMENTS:
Project is complete. Warranty work and miscellaneouseous security improvements will be added.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $510
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$495
C-113
P2515
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2011 12/1/2011
1/1/2012 12/31/2014
$50
$75
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2015 6/30/2016 $385
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:55
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-114
P2518803-3 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
5/15/2012
5
22
2
$700,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 803-3 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2010 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 803-3 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Project complete. Project to be suspended until warranty inspection in 2016.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$20 $45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$635
C-115
P2518
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2011 9/1/2012
10/1/2012 12/1/2013
$10
$65
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2013 7/31/2016 $625
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:370
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-116
P2519 832-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
5/15/2012
5
22
2
$750,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 832-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2010 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 832-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Project under construction.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$20 $45 $25 $0 $0 $0 $750
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$660
C-117
P2519
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2011 9/1/2012
10/1/2012 12/1/2013
$10
$50
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2013 7/31/2016 $690
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:332
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-118
P2520Motorola Mobile Radio Upgrade
Jose Martinez
5/16/2011
0
District Wide
1
$135,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for Motorola radio upgrades which involves three components, radio repeater upgrade, portable and base unit
upgrades, and vehicle mobile radio upgrades.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing Motorola radio equipment is an essential part of the District's Emergency Response Program. A recent assessment
of the radio equipment has determined that the equipment has reached the end of its useful life and needs upgrades.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$30 $14 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$91
C-119
P2520
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
8/1/2011 6/30/2017 $135
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/29/2015Rita Bell
C-120
P2529711-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
P2530
1
22
2
$790,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 711-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 711-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$600 $130 $25 $35 $0 $0 $790
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-121
P2529
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2015 8/31/2015
9/1/2015 12/31/2015
$10
$95
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2016 8/1/2018 $685
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:131
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/29/2015Rita Bell
C-122
P2530711-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
P2529
1
22
2
$1,040,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 711-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 711-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$800 $200 $15 $25 $0 $0 $1,040
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-123
P2530
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2015 8/31/2015
9/1/2015 12/31/2015
$10
$65
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2016 8/1/2018 $965
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:131
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/29/2015Rita Bell
C-124
P2531944-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
P2532
5
22
1
$315,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 944-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 944-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$130 $50 $35 $0 $0 $0 $315
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$100
C-125
P2531
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
5/1/2014 6/30/2014
7/1/2014 10/31/2014
$10
$40
PROJECT PHASE:
12/31/2014 6/30/2017 $265
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:322
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-126
P2532944-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
P2531
5
22
2
$895,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 944-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 944-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 $895
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$745
C-127
P2532
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
5/1/2014 6/30/2014
7/1/2014 10/31/2014
$10
$75
PROJECT PHASE:
12/31/2014 12/31/2017 $810
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:322
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-128
P25331200-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
5
22
2
$565,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 1200-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the
facility will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 1200-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$5 $490 $35 $35 $0 $0 $565
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-129
P2533
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2016 9/30/2016
10/1/2016 12/31/2016
$5
$60
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2017 6/30/2019 $500
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:369
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-130
P2534978-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
5
22
2
$325,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 978-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 978-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $10 $275 $5 $35 $0 $325
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-131
P2534
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/2/2016 9/30/2016
10/1/2016 12/31/2016
$10
$40
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2017 6/30/2019 $275
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:378
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-132
P2535458-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating & Upgrades
Kevin Cameron
5/15/2012
2
22
2
$660,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 458-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 458-2 Reservoir interior coating is in relatively poor condition and is in
need of replacement. The exterior coating on the roof is failing and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$115 $5 $35 $0 $0 $0 $660
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$505
C-133
P2535
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2013 9/30/2013
10/1/2013 12/31/2014
$5
$65
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2015 6/30/2017 $590
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:66
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-134
P2538Administration and Operations Building Fire Sprinkler
Replacement Program
Kevin Cameron
5
22
1
$110,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
A licensed fire sprinkler designer is required to prepare plans and specifications for the work and obtain all permits and approvals
before the project can be competitively bid by contractors.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Inspections of the Administration building and the Operations building fire sprinkler systems are performed to NFPA-25,
California Code of Regulations, Title 19 and Local Fire Department requirements annually. A recent inspection of the fire
sprinkler system has identified corrosion throughout the systems as the cause for leaks the District experienced last year and is
recommending the replacement of the existing fire sprinkler systems piping.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$5 $20 $18 $0 $0 $0 $110
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$67
C-135
P2538
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
12/1/2012 7/1/2013
7/1/2013 3/1/2014
$0
$40
PROJECT PHASE:
3/1/2014 6/30/2018 $70
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:318
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-136
P2539South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Utility Relocations
Kevin Cameron
1
22/27
1
$940,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for all utility relocations required due to construction of South Bay BRT. Facility relocations vary in
size and they impact both the potable and recycled water systems.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Project improvements will affect the locations of some OWD facilities in streets in Chula Vista. Engineering/staff time will be
needed to review the design drawings and identify any OWD facilities which will need relocation or vertical adjustment. A
construction budget is also needed for the work in relocating and adjusting these facilities.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$100 $100 $100 $40 $0 $0 $940
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$600
C-137
P2539
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 6/30/2014
7/1/2014 6/30/2015
$15
$90
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2019 $835
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:80-82, 97-99,
113 &
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/29/2015Rita Bell
C-138
P2542850-3 Reservoir Interior Coating
Kevin Cameron
5
22
2
$530,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior coating of the 850-3 Reservoir.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The interior coating is in poor condition and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$230 $15 $35 $0 $0 $0 $530
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$250
C-139
P2542
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
5/5/2015 7/31/2015
8/1/2015 10/31/2015
$10
$60
PROJECT PHASE:
11/3/2015 6/30/2018 $460
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:355
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-140
P2543850-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
3
22
2
$575,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 850-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the current Cathodic Assessment Report, the interior and exterior coatings on the 850-1 Reservoir are nearing the
end of their useful life and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $10 $515 $10 $40 $0 $575
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-141
P2543
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2018 6/29/2018
7/2/2018 11/7/2018
$10
$40
PROJECT PHASE:
11/8/2018 6/1/2022 $525
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:304
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-142
P2544850-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Reservoir Coating
Kevin Cameron
3
22
2
$940,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 850-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the current Cathodic Assessment Report, the interior and exterior coatings on the 850-2 Reservoir are nearing the
end of their useful life and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$5 $5 $880 $10 $40 $0 $940
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-143
P2544
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2018 6/29/2018
7/2/2018 11/7/2018
$10
$65
PROJECT PHASE:
11/8/2018 6/1/2020 $865
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:317
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-144
P2545980-1 Reservoir Interior Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
P2546
5
22
2
$1,495,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 980-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 980-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are nearing the end of
their useful life and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$950 $445 $50 $50 $0 $0 $1,495
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-145
P2545
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
1/1/2015 6/30/2015
7/1/2015 9/15/2015
$10
$85
PROJECT PHASE:
2/15/2016 6/30/2018 $1,400
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:172
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/5/2015Jolene Fielding
C-146
P2546980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
Kevin Cameron
P2545
5
22
2
$1,450,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 980-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the current Cathodic Assessment Report, the interior and exterior coatings on the 980-2 Reservoir are nearing the
end of their useful life and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $10 $1,390 $10 $40 $1,450
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-147
P2546
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
3/4/2019 6/3/2019
6/4/2019 8/15/2019
$10
$40
PROJECT PHASE:
8/16/2019 7/15/2021 $1,400
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:172
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:2/17/2015Kevin Cameron
C-148
P2550Fuel Island Upgrade
Kent Payne
P2549
3
22
1
$75,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is to upgrade the District's fuel system, both in the vehicles as well as the fuel island dispensers, sumps, and island.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This work is needed to comply with County requirements for the operation of the fuel island.
This project will allow any employee to fill a District vehicle with no training. Authorizations and transactions will be done wireless
so electrical lines run through the fuel hoses or ground loops will be used and it will also allow Management tighter control on the
dispensing of fuel by placing limits on types of fueling and have better reporting features.
COMMENTS:
Work to improve the secondary containment and dispensing equipment in accordance with District/County Settlement agreement.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-149
P2550
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2015 7/31/2015
8/1/2015 9/30/2015
$5
$10
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2015 12/31/2015 $60
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:318
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-150
P2553Heritage Road Bridge Replacement and Utility Relocation
Kevin Cameron
2
22
2
$1,200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The existing 16-Inch potable water pipeline to Sleep-Train Amphitheatre and Aquatica Seaworld’s Waterpark was built under the
Otay River.
The City of Chula Vista is planning to replace the Heritage Road Bridge (Project No. STM-364). The District has requested the
City reserve room in the bridge for a 16-inch steel pipeline for potable use and an 8-inch pipeline for future recycled water use. In
addition to the bridge crossing, approximately 1,600 linear feet of 16-inch potable water pipeline is required. An existing 16-inch
ACP pipeline in Otay River will be abandoned or converted to recycled water use.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
A new bridge crossing of the Otay River at Heritage Road provides an opportunity for the District to relocate a pipeline out of the
river into a more secure location and also provides an economical way to build a recycled water pipeline to these commercial
customers.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 40 %0 %0 %0 %40 %
Replacement 0 %0 %60 %0 %60 %
TOTAL:40 %0 %60 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$10 $100 $290 $645 $155 $0 $1,200
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-151
P2553
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 6/30/2015
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
$50
$150
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 6/30/2020 $1,000
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:50 & 51
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-152
P2557520 Res Recirculation Pipeline Chemical Supply and Analyzer
Feed Replacement Project
Stephen Beppler
5
22
1
$100,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The existing chemical feed lines are cast/black iron and need to be replaced with new dual wall CPVC chemical feed lines.
Other miscellaneous improvements needed. Length approximately 150 feet.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing chemical feed lines for the 520 Reservoir are experiencing deterioration and not designed to current code for
providing chemical containment.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $29 $65 $5 $0 $0 $100
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-153
P2557
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
7/1/2016 6/30/2017
$5
$25
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2017 6/30/2019 $70
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:343
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-154
P2558Additional pump station fuel storage
Doug Rahders
255
22
1
$25,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Purchase and install two additional bulk diesel fuel storage tanks for the 1004-2 pump station and 1100-1 hydro station.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based on an emergency diesel fuel storage study, during an extended emergency power outage current fuel storage at both the
1004-2 p/s and 1100-1 h/s offers less than a day's worth of fuel usage. District staff will add in one above ground diesel fuel
storage tank at each site to provide double the run time of the emergency standby gensets during a power outage.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-155
P2558
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016 $25
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:302 & 160
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-156
P2559Pressure Vessel Repair and Replacement Program
Jeff Marchioro
0
District Wide
2
$300,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
An assessment of thirteen existing steel pressure vessels, including five hydropneumatic and eight surge tanks of various ages,
is needed to determine the remaining useful life of each facility. Pressure vessel interiors and exteriors and appurtenances will
be repaired, coated, and/or replaced entirely.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Pressure vessels are a key component of thirteen existing District pump stations. Routine inspection by qualified professionals,
and follow up repair and/or replacement, is needed to preserve the life expectancy of each pressure vessel and associated pump
station facilities.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-157
P2559
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 12/31/2016
1/1/2016 12/31/2016
$10
$50
PROJECT PHASE:
3/1/2016 6/30/2017 $240
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-158
P2564Administration Carpet Replacement Program
Kent Payne
3
22
2
$215,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Covers material and labor costs for a phased replacement of the existing carpet in the following areas and in order of need:
Customer Service; Finance; GM Suite; Admin Services; Engineering; and Training Room. Materials specified include
commercial grade carpet tile and broadloom. Installation has little to no impact on daily operations with cubicle lift-in-place
technologies and night/weekend work.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing carpet was installed in 1997 during the Headquarters expansion and remodel. Normal carpet lifespan is 10-12
years; at 18 years, Admin carpet is 150-180% lifespan and shows its age including deep wear patterns with areas of backing
separation, indelible stains and extreme fading as noted with recent cubicle removal and planned removal due to downsizing.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$65 $75 $75 $0 $0 $0 $215
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-159
P2564
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2018 $215
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:318
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-160
P2565803-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades
Kevin Cameron
5
22
2
$725,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 803-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 803-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are near the end of their
useful life and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $5 $675 $45 $725
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-161
P2565
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
1/1/2019 6/30/2019
7/1/2019 10/1/2019
$5
$70
PROJECT PHASE:
10/2/2019 6/30/2020 $650
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:357
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-162
P2566520-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades
Kevin Cameron
5
22
3
$1,790,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 520-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 520-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are at the end of their
useful life and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $10 $1,780 $1,790
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-163
P2566
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
1/4/2021 6/30/2021
7/1/2021 9/30/2021
$10
$90
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2021 6/30/2022 $1,690
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:343
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-164
P25671004-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades
Kevin Cameron
3
22
3
$565,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 1004-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the
facility will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 1004-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are at the end of their
useful life and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $10 $555 $565
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-165
P2567
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
1/4/2021 6/30/2021
7/1/2021 9/30/2021
$10
$65
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2021 6/30/2022 $490
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:316
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-166
R2109Sweetwater River Wooden Trestle Improvement for the Recycled
Water Forcemain
Stephen Beppler
5/14/2014
3
22/27
2
$600,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Modification of the wooden trestle to reduce the potential damage of a wildfire event to the structure.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing wooden trestle over the Sweetwater River supports a 14-inch steel force main for recycled water. The 200 foot long
wooden trestle was built in 1980 and a recent assessment has recommended a brush management plan be prepared to extend
into the adjacent San Diego National Wildlife Refuge. The report also recommends the installation of a heat shield, installation of
a fire suppression system, or modification of the existing structure to reduce the threat of wildfire to the structure.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$400 $10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $516
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$106
C-167
R2109
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 6/30/2015
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
$100
$100
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 6/30/2017 $400
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-168
R2111RWCWRF - RAS Pump Replacement
Stephen Beppler
5/14/2013
R2096
3
22
1
$600,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Replace and upgrade the RAS pumps to 360 GPM to improve process control of the plant.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
These improvements are needed due to increased pumping requirements of the new process. The existing pumps were installed
in 1992 and are reaching the end of their useful life.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$350
C-169
R2111
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 6/30/2014
7/1/2014 6/30/2015
$10
$75
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016 $515
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-170
R2112450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation
Kevin Cameron
2
22
1
$265,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Replace the two (2) existing sodium hypochlorite tanks, relocate and replace the valves and piping on the existing sodium
hypochlorite feed system, remove existing acoustic louver and replace with roll-up door.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
One of the existing sodium hypochlorite tanks has failed and is in need of replacement. The other is approaching the end of its
useful life. The sodium hypochlorite feed system has faulty valves the are no longer available. The acoustic louver was installed
for a diesel generator which is no longer needed. A roll-up door will ease future replacement of equipment.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$40 $25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$200
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-171
R2112
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 6/30/2014
7/1/2014 6/30/2015
$5
$50
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2016 6/30/2017 $200
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:66
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-172
R2116RecPL - 14-Inch, 927 Zone, Forcemain Assessment and Repair
Jeff Marchioro
3
22
1
$1,750,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
An assessment of the existing 16,000 L.F. 14-Inch CML forcemain built in 1978 is needed to determine the remaining useful life
of the facility. The forcemain will be repaired and any corroded appurtenances will be replaced.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
A leaking section of the pipeline was replaced and a condition assessment of this pipeline is recommended.
COMMENTS:
Assume 20% of the pipeline must be replaced or repaired.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$225 $1,000 $150 $50 $0 $0 $1,750
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$325
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-173
R2116
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2014 3/31/2017
1/1/2015 6/30/2017
$500
$200
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2015 6/30/2019 $1,050
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:186, 200, 304,
318,
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/12/2015Rita Bell
C-174
R2120RWCWRF Filtered Water Storage Tank Improvements
Stephen Beppler
R2096
3
22
2
$500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Seal and recoat interior and exterior of steel tank walls and concrete floor. Construct improvements to facilitate operation and
maintenance activities and compliance with all applicable codes and OSHA standards. Salvage or replace and improve existing
floating cover.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
HDR Engineering’s Inspection and Condition Assessment Report dated May 2015 recommended structural improvements,
replacement of interior and exterior coatings, and replacement of the cathodic protection system. The coatings are in relatively
poor condition and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$10 $245 $245 $0 $0 $0 $500
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
C-175
R2120
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 2/1/2016
1/1/2016 10/31/2016
$10
$40
PROJECT PHASE:
10/1/2016 3/1/2018 $450
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-176
S2012 San Diego County Sanitation District Outfall and RSD Outfall
Replacement
Stephen Beppler
6/4/2003
3
18
1
$3,550,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the Otay Water District proportionate share of the San Diego County Sanitation District total
costs for replacement of various system components of the existing Spring Valley and Rancho San Diego Outfall Systems per
terms of an existing agreement with the SVSD. The reimbursement also includes a proportionate share of operating and
maintenance costs.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Various components of the San Diego County Sanitation District Spring Valley Outfall and the Rancho San Diego Outfall are in
very bad condition and are in need of repair and/or replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $150 $150 $200 $250 $300 $1,935
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$835
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-177
S2012
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2003 6/30/2025 $3,550
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/11/2015Jolene Fielding
C-178
S2024Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement
Stephen Beppler
5/17/2010
3
18
2
$5,500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funds to upgrade the sewer main capacity of approximately 11,050 feet of existing 10-inch PVC sewer
main, 450 feet of 10-inch reinforced polymer mortar pipe sewer main, and 50 feet of 15-inch sewer main. The project location
begins at the south end of Avocado Blvd, through the Rancho San Diego Village Shopping Center, paralleling SR-94/Campo
Road in the adjacent open space.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing sewer main is under sized and must be replaced to increase capacity. Portions of the sewer main are located in
areas of sensitive habitat making it difficult to access for maintenance.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 18 0 %50 %0 %0 %50 %
Replacement 0 %0 %50 %0 %50 %
TOTAL:0 %50 %50 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$500 $3,400 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,500
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$600
C-179
S2024
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2010 6/1/2014
1/1/2015 4/1/2016
$100
$900
PROJECT PHASE:
4/1/2016 6/30/2018 $4,500
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:330
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/6/2015Jolene Fielding
C-180
S2027Rancho San Diego Pump Station Rehabilitation
Stephen Beppler
5/16/2011
3
18
1
$3,500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for the rehabilitation of the Rancho San Diego Pump Station located near Singer Lane.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing sewer pump station is over 20 years old and the pumps have reached the end of their useful lives. The pump station
also needs improvements to bring the station up to current OSHA requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$320 $1,000 $1,000 $915 $0 $0 $3,500
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$265
C-181
S2027
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2011 7/1/2013
7/1/2013 6/30/2015
$50
$500
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2015 6/30/2019 $2,950
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:331
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/27/2015Rita Bell
C-182
S2033Sewer System Rehabilitation
Stephen Beppler
5/16/2011
5
18
1
$6,000,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for sewer system rehabilitation efforts that have been identified. These efforts involve replacement
of approximately 13,000 lineal feet of failing or damaged pipe segments, separated pipe joints, etc.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, which has allowed debris to form, and/or are damaged and need to be repaired.
COMMENTS:
Project being designed and constructed in phases based upon area and type of repair. Calavo Basin Phase 1 under construction
in Spring 2015. Rancho San Diego (RSD) Basin Phase 1 and Trenchless Repair under design Spring 2015, construction
FY2016. Future phases of Calavo and RSD to follow in subsequent FYs.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$900 $800 $800 $800 $800 $500 $6,000
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,400
C-183
S2033
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2011 1/1/2016
3/1/2013 1/1/2017
$400
$1,000
PROJECT PHASE:
6/30/2014 6/30/2021 $4,600
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-184
P2282Vehicle Capital Purchases
Doug Rahders
6/3/1996
0
District Wide
1
$5,191,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for capital purchase of various vehicles for daily Otay Water District functions.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Replacements or newly acquired vehicles will be used for operational and administrative functions throughout the entire Otay
Water District.
COMMENTS:
2/21/14, $500K Vactor scheduled in FY 16
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$556 $298 $295 $327 $308 $317 $5,191
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$3,090
C-185
P2282
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
12/1/2000 6/30/2021 $5,191
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:4/29/2015Rita Bell
C-186
P2286 Field Equipment Capital Purchases
Doug Rahders
6/3/1996
0
District Wide
1
$1,808,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides funding for capital purchase of various pieces of field equipment used for daily Otay Water District functions.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Replacements or new acquisitions of field equipment will be used for operational functions throughout the entire Otay Water
District.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$50 $100 $83 $68 $16 $105 $1,808
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$1,386
C-187
P2286
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/1996 6/30/2021 $1,808
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-188
P2366 APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits
Doug Rahders
12/6/2000
0
District Wide
1
$3,835,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will replace and/or retrofit 14 diesel fuel burning engines with the best technology exhaust gas control systems
throughout the Otay Water District to comply with APCD engine emission regulations. The Otay Water District also needs to
replace, re-power, and/or retrofit the heavy vehicle diesel fleet to comply with upcoming emissions regulations.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The Otay Water District is required to replace and/or retrofit its engines to meet current APCD requirements including the Air
Toxics Control Measures, and to be consistent with the intended operation of the engines to meet system demands. The Otay
Water District also needs to replace, re-power, and/or retrofit the heavy vehicle diesel fleet to meet future emissions
requirements.
COMMENTS:
9/25/13, transferred $45K from FY15 to FY14 to perform emissions retrofits on District vehicles.
2/21/2014, 2 portable gensets and 2 pump engine APCD permits are scheduled to expire on 12/31/2016.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$535 $307 $157 $118 $78 $110 $3,835
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$2,530
C-189
P2366
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
12/1/2000 6/1/2001
7/1/2001 6/1/2010
$113
$312
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2010 6/1/2020 $3,410
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-190
P2556HWY 94 Upsized Utility Relocations at Melody Lane
Stephen Beppler
5
22
2
$250,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project provides the funding for the upsized utility relocations required to accommodate the County of San Diego road
improvement project along HWY 94 at Melody Lane. Facility relocations are for upsizing the existing 8-inch, 12-Inch, and 16-Inch
potable water pipeline as needed to larger pipelines. This reimbursement is only for incremental pipeline cost due to upsize.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
COMMENTS:
Cost Estimate:
$20K; 8-inch to 16-inch upsize ~ 70 feet
$120K; 12-inch to 16-inch upsize ~ 1,155 feet
$0; 16-inch relocation ~ 1,780 feet
$75K; 12-inch to 16-inch upsize ~ 735 feet
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$1 $29 $100 $100 $20 $0 $250
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
C-191
P2556
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 6/30/2016
7/1/2016 6/30/2017
$1
$5
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2017 6/30/2020 $244
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:205 & 309
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/7/2015Jolene Fielding
C-192
Otay Water District
FY2016 Budget
Workshop
May 19, 2015
Attachment B
Workshop Agenda
►Economic Overview (Gary London, The London Group)
►Strategic Plan Initiatives (Geoff Stevens)
►Drought and State Mandates (Mark Watton)
►Water Conservation Option (Joe Beachem)
►Bond Rating Risks (Kevin Koeppen)
►Budget Highlights (Joe Beachem)
►Capital Improvement Budget (Rod Posada)
►Balanced Operating Budget (Rita Bell)
►Staffing and Administrative (Adolfo Segura)
►Materials and Maintenance (Jose Martinez)
►Summary of Recommendations (Joe Beachem)2
Workshop Objectives
►Review FY 2016 –FY 2018 Strategic Plan
►Present a $89.1M Operating Budget
►Present a $11.1M CIP Budget
►Review options for water rate increases at various conservation
levels, effective January 1, 2016
►Water conservation between 8% to 16%
►Review recommended rate increases
3
Economic Overview
(Gary London, The London Group)
4
Otay Water District Strategic Plan
(2015-2018)
(Geoff Stevens)
Building the foundation and implementing meaningful performance measurement
5
FY 15 –18 Strategic Plan Timeline
Phase 1 –
Implement Key
Systems
Foundation
Phase 2 -
Focus On Process
Improvement
Using Systems
And Data
Phase 3 -
Evolving Culture
And Fine Tuning
Metrics / Unit
Costing
6
FY 2015
FY 2016
FY 2017 & 18
To provide high quality and reliable water and
wastewater services to the customers of the
Otay Water District, in a professional, effective
and efficient manner.
7
MISSION
VISION
A District that is innovative in providing water
and wastewater services at Competitive rates,
with a reputation for outstanding customer
service.
8
STATEMENT OF VALUES
As Otay Water District employees we dedicate ourselves to:
CUSTOMERS:We take pride that our commitment to customer-centered service is our highest priority.
EXCELLENCE:We strive to provide the highest quality and value in all that we do.
INTEGRITY:We commit ourselves to doing the right thing. Ethical behavior, trustworthiness andaccountability are the District’s foundation.
EMPLOYEES:We see each individual as unique and important. We value diversity andopen communication to promote fairness, dignity and respect.
TEAMWORK:We promote mutual trust by sharing information, knowledge and ideas to reach our common goals. 9
KEY CHALLENGE
10
Our key challenge, as District staff, is to quantify and
demonstrate our commitment and ability to optimize our
resources, business processes, and technology to achieve the
strategic plan goals. We, as a team, commit to regularly assess
and document how our decisions and work practices
accomplish our goals and objectives.
Balanced Scorecard Strategies
Customer:Increase customer confidence in the District
Improve and expand communications
Provide effective water services
Financial:Manage the financial issues that are critical to the District
Improve financial information and systems
Maintain District financial strength
Business Processes:Maximize efficiency and effectiveness
Actively manage water supply as well as support for water and sewer services
Identify and evaluate improvements to enterprise and departmental business
processes
Learning and Growth: Provide leadership and management expertise
Reinforce a results-oriented and accountable culture
Focus on achieving a lean flexible workforce 11
Projects Completed in 2015
Phase 1
SCADA (Communications and Equipment Control)
Work Order /AM (Management of all work on District
assets)
Emergency Preparedness /NIMS (National Incident
Management System)
12
What’s in the FY16-18 Plan
13
New Performance Measures
Added
3.2.308 -Employees per Account
3.2.309 -Percent of Customers
Paying Bills Electronically
Performance Measure
Deleted
5.1.500 -Unplanned
Disruptions (QualServe)
redundant with System
Integrity measures and not a good measure for our system
34 Strategic Objectives
48 Performance Measures
Admin and IT
Objectives
1.1.2.2 Regularly produce and evaluate communications tools and
explore the effective use of new media options including: electronic
newsletters, auto-dialer services, video streaming, social networks, or
web media to ensure the District’s outreach efforts are cost-
effectively reaching all stakeholders.
3.1.2.5 Enhance District's Facilities Physical Security
3.1.2.17 Evaluate opportunities to combine or transfer similar work
functions
3.1.2.28 Streamline Procurement and Contractor On-boarding Process
via Web-based eProcurement Technology
3.1.2.30 Streamline Enterprise Confine Space Program
4.1.1.4 Negotiate a successor Memorandum of Understanding for
represented employees for 2017 and beyond and related compensation
and benefits for unrepresented employees with emphasis on making
necessary updates to Employee Health Benefits related to Health Care
Reform
4.1.1.9 Improve District Emergency Response Program
4.1.1.10 Department Level Manuals and Business Functions
3.1.2.2 Continue to Implement a Mature Asset Management Program
3.1.2.16 Optimize SCADA Program
3.1.2.26 Optimize GPS/GIS Technology
3.1.2.27 Evaluate Eden's Self-service Option with HR Module
Performance Measures
1.1.100 Customer Satisfaction
1.4.104 Health & Safety Severity Rate
(QualServe)
1.4.105 Employee Turnover Rate
1.4.106 Training Hours Per Employee
1.4.107 Safety Training Program
4.1.400 Customer Satisfaction with the
Website
4.3.401 Network Availability
4.4.402 Website Visits
14
Engineering
Objectives
3.1.1.1 Evaluate City of San Diego Pure Water Program Planning/Implementation
3.1.1.8 Address Dependency on Imported Water Through Proper Planning
3.1.1.10 Sewer System Business Evaluation
3.1.1.26 Evaluate Efficiencies for Delivering Capital Assets
3.1.1.28 In Conjunction with the City of San Diego, Manage the Infrastructure for a more Efficient Transmission of Recycled Water
3.1.1.29 Evaluate the Viability of Implementing an Indirect Potable Reuse Program
3.1.2.34 Streamline Work Processes in four strategic areas including departmental synergies, technology, procurements, and alignment of business practices
3.1.2.43 Revise Business Practices by Modifying the Master Recycled Water Permit
3.1.2.44 Implement a Habitat Conservation Plan that will Streamline O&M within District Easements
Performance Measures
2.2.200 CIP Project Expenditures vs. Budget
2.2.201 Construction Change Order Incidence (without allowances)
2.3.202 Mark-out Accuracy
2.3.203 Project Closeout Time
15
Operations
Objectives
2.1.1.10 Electric Power and Fuel Management
Practices
2.1.1.11 Optimize Inventory Management
3.1.1.9 Leak Detection and Repair Program
3.1.1.27 Pressure Vessel Maintenance
Program
3.1.2.31 Streamline Operations Work
Processes
3.1.2.32 Streamline Data Input in Reporting
for Field Services
3.1.2.42 Two-Way Emergency Radio
Replacement Evaluation
Performance Measures
5.1.501 Technical Quality Complaint (QualServe)
5.2.502 Planned Potable Water Maintenance Ratio in $ (QualServe)
5.2.503 Planned Recycled Water Maintenance Ratio in $ (QualServe)
5.2.504 Planned Wastewater Maintenance Ratio in $ (QualServe)
5.2.505 Direct Cost of Treatment per MGD (QualServe)
5.2.506 O&M Cost per MG Processed of Wastewater (QualServe)
5.2.520 Leak Detection Program
5.3.507 Percent of PMs completed -Fleet Maintenance
5.3.508 Percent of PMs completed -Reclamation Plant
5.3.509 Percent of PMs completed -Pump/Electric Section
5.3.511 System Valve Exercising Program
5.3.512 Water Distribution System Integrity (QualServe)
5.3.513 Planned Water Service Disruption Rate (QualServe)
5.3.514 Potable Water Compliance Rate (QualServe)
5.3.515 Collection System Integrity (QualServe)
5.3.517 Recycled Water System Integrity
5.3.518 Sewer Overflow Rate (QualServe)
5.3.519 Emergency Facility Testing
5.3.525 Critical Valve Exercising
5.4.521 Tank Inspection and Cleaning
5.4.522 Main Flushing and Fire Hydrant Maintenance
5.4.523 Annual Recycled Water Site Inspections
5.4.524 Recycled Water Shutdown Testing
16
Finance
Objectives
1.1.1.1 Enhance Communications with
Customers
2.1.2.1 Enhance Cost Benefit Analysis
3.1.1.7 Evaluate and Enhance the District's
Water Conservation Programs and Services
3.1.2.8 Improve and Streamline Meter Related
Processes
3.1.2.14 Strengthen Internal Audit Program
3.1.2.29 Evaluate Current and New CIS
Systems
Performance Measures
1.3.104 Gallons Per Capita Per Day
3.1.300 Answer Rate
3.2.301 O&M Cost per Account
3.2.302 Billing Accuracy (QualServe)
3.2.303 Overtime Percentage
3.2.304 Sewer Rate Ranking
3.2.305 Water Rate Ranking
3.2.306 Debt Coverage Ratio (QualServe)
3.2.307 Reserve Level
3.2.308 Employees Per Account
3.2.309 Percent of Customers Paying Bills
Electronically
3.3.308 Distribution System Loss (QualServe)
17
Next Steps
Utilize SCADA and Work Management for Better Metrics
Begin Developing System Derived Measures of Unit Costing
Adding More Complete Trending Data on Performance Measures
Continue Focus on Long-term Asset Management
18
Drought and Governor’s Mandates
►On May 5, 2015 the State Water Board adopted
California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 866
and re-adopts sections 863, 864, and 865.
►Based on Residential GPCD for the July to September
2014 period, Otay’s conservation target is 20% lower
than 2013 usage levels.
►Ongoing lobbying the Governor regarding the supply
vs. Conservation issues
19
Water Conservation Levels
41
,
9
0
9
38
,
0
4
5
34
,
9
7
1
31
,
1
7
5
29
,
8
6
1
30
,
5
4
3
31
,
8
8
4
33
,
4
0
9
30
,
7
9
3
31
,
6
0
3
29
,
3
2
6
28
,
6
8
9
28
,
0
5
2
26
,
7
7
8
25
,
5
0
1
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 Zero 8%10%12%16%20%
Ac
r
e
F
e
e
t
Historic & Optional Water Purchase Levels
20
Target Conservation
6%11%15%
19%
18%
13%
10%10%10%
-
500.0
1,000.0
1,500.0
2,000.0
2,500.0
3,000.0
3,500.0
4,000.0
Ac
r
e
F
e
e
t
Conservation Levels from 2013 Actual Volume
2013 Actuals Ramp to 12%20% Conservation
21
Measurement
period ends after
270 days
Measurement
period begins June
1, 2015
25%25%25%25%20%
15%
10%10%10%
Water Conservation Options
Proposed
Rate
Increase
Debt
Coverage
Ratio
(with growth)
Debt
Coverage
Ratio
(without growth)
Critical
Conservation
Point
0% Conservation 3.9%175.0%155.8%15.6%
8% Conservation 4.7%162.4%143.6%16.5%
10% Conservation 4.8%151.6%133.0%16.6%
12% Conservation 5.4%141.1%122.6%17.2%
16% Conservation 8.6%141.2%122.9%20.5%
20% Conservation 12.0%140.5%122.4%23.8%
Target 150%
Minimum 125%100%
22
Proposed FY 2016 Water Rate Increase
23
4.99%
0.32%
0.27%-0.18%
Otay 5.4% Rate Increase due to Cost Increases
CWA City of San Diego SDGE Otay
Cost Savings Measures
►Reduced Water Loss from 5% to 4%
►Reduced personnel from 140 to 138 FTE
►Reduced Administrative Expenses and Material Expenses
despite increases for conservation efforts and for leak
detection
24
Bond Rating Risk
(Kevin Koeppen)
25
Bond Covenant
Covenant: The District shall set rates sufficient to yield a debt coverage ratio of
125% (including growth) and 100% (excluding growth).
Impact of short-term non-compliance:
►Based on the District’s rate setting history, liquidity and cash position, our general
expectation is there would be little impact if the rate setting process was
reasonable and there is a plan to achieve compliance in the following year.
►Additional disclosures and increased communication to impacted parties
(bondholders, bond insurers, etc.).
►Rating agencies likely would place the District on watch.
Impact of multi-year non-compliance:
►Bond Insurer or bondholders could require the District increase rates to reach
compliance (require District hire rate consultants, if needed require a 218 notice
to raise rates).
►Rating agencies would likely downgrade the District’s credit rating.
26
Debt Coverage Ratios (12% Option)
27
180%
141%
184%
224%
275%
307%318%
145%
123%
140%
153%
165%164%164%
125%125%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
2015 Estimate 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Debt Ratio with Growth Debt Ratio without Growth Minimum Debt Ratio
Budget Highlights
(Joe Beachem)
28
Rate Model and Budget Process
29
6-Year
Rate Model
Year-end
Balances
Operating
Budget Input
6-Year CIP
Budget Input
MWD/CWA & City
Sewer Rates
Strategic
Plan
Assumptions
Interest Rates
Inflation
Growth
Sales
Targets
Debt Coverage
Reserve Levels
Operating
Budget
CIP
Budget
Water
&
Sewer
Rates
Governor’s
Mandate
Meeting District Objectives
(Fiscal Year 2016 –12% Option)
30
►Rebuilding the debt coverage target of 150%
by 2018
►Fund the $89.1M Operating Budget
►Fund the $11.1M Capital Budget
►Use reserves to partially offset rate increase
caused by Governor directed conservation
►Maintaining reserves above minimum
Inter-Fund Transfers
31
Potable
General Fund to Replacement $2.4
Designated Expansion to Replacement $3.5
Designated Betterment to Replacement $2.1
Designated New Water Supply to Replacement $0.7
Recycled
General Fund to Designated Expansion $2.2
Sewer
Designated Expansion to Betterment $0.2
General Fund to Replacement $1.6
Total Transfers $12.6
Net Operating Revenues Transfers
32
FY 2016
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
Expansion Reserve $0 $2,691,000 $0 $2,691,000
Betterment Reserve 0 1,945,000 455,000 2,400,000
Replacement Reserve 2,351,300 328,000 599,100 3,278,400
Transfer to Sewer Replacement 1,199,300 0 0 1,199,300
Transfer to OPEB 914,100 58,300 33,600 1,006,000
Transfer to New Supply Fund 0 35,000 0 35,000
Total Reserve Funding $4,465,500 $5,047,600 $1,087,700 $10,609,700
Last Year vs.This Year
33
Projected Water Rate Increase
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
FY15 5.8%4.7%4.7%4.6%4.6%4.5%
FY16 5.4%5.4%5.4%3.8%3.8%3.8%
Debt Coverage Ratio (No Growth)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
FY15 152%169%166%169%179%192%
FY16 123%140%153%165%164%164%
Projected Sewer Rate Increase
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
FY15 5.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%5.0%
FY16*0%0%0%0%0%0%
* Does not include system fee increase for Single Family Residential.
Operating Budget Highlights
Items holding down rates
►Lower variable water rate increase from CWA/MWD than
anticipated (1.9% projected CY16 vs. 10.1% budgeted; note,
this is offset by the new Reliability Fixed Charge of $1.0M)
►Reduction in 6-Year CIP of $7.4 million
►Reduced water loss from 5% to 4% savings of $432,000
►Reduced FTE from 140 to 138
►Administrative costs decrease of $31,400
►Materials & Maintenance costs decrease of $7,000
34
Operating Budget Highlights
Items putting upward pressure on rates
►Water sales reduction of 12% (in volume from 2013 sales)
►Fixed CWA costs increase of $1.0 million
►City of San Diego recycled “take or pay” increase of
$104,300
►Power cost increase of $274,400
►2016 Salary and benefit costs net increase of $463,000
while reducing by 2 FTE (Does not include FY2015 COLA)
35
Sewer Budget Highlights
►Reduction in anticipated rate increase reflects reduced service
providers rates and lower labor charges to operations
►Typical residential customer will see a $1.30 monthly increase
(final year of the phase-in of the system fee, no other rate
increases anticipated in the six year window)
►$13.8 million CIP over six years
►Final payment by Potable to Sewer for prior loan
►Reserves on target
36
Capital Improvement
Program
FY2016-2021
(Rod Posada)
37
Growth Projections1
38
FISCAL YEARS
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Single-Family
Dwelling Units 149 288 375 618 780 805
Condominium
Units 297 202 482 715 780 688
Apartment Units 150 475 885 692 757 714
Non-Residential2
(Permit valuation
in millions of
dollars)
$35 $35 $35 $43 $43 $43
1Source: The London Group Realty Advisors Report March 2015 (all dwelling units
reflected above do not have a one-to-one ratio with an EDU and are converted to
EDUs for budget purposes).
2 Office, Retail, Industrial, and Hotels in the Otay Water District Service Area.
Meter Sales and Growth
39
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2,000
Actual Projected
EDU Sales
Historic Sales Projected Sales
CIP Budget Guidelines
Growth to remain relatively flat for FY 2016.
New development with multi-family in greater proportion to single-
family dwellings.
In preparing the budgets for the individual CIP projects, the
Engineering. Department used current construction and bidding data
to adjust costs for each project.
Reprioritized projects based on District’s planning documents and
Water Supply Assessment and Verification reports.
40
CIP Six-Year Budget Look Forward
($ Millions)
41
FY 2015
FY
2016
FY
2017
FY
2018
FY
2019
FY
2020
FY
2021
Totals $ 11.1 $ 20.1 $ 20.0 $ 16.6 $ 14.0 $ 14.4
Six-Year Total:$96.2
FY 2016
FY
2015
FY
2016
FY
2017
FY
2018
FY
2019
FY
2020
Totals $ 10.6 $ 23.4 $ 27.4 $ 17.2 $ 14.5 $ 10.5
Six-Year Total:$103.6
High Profile CIP Projects
Fiscal Year 2016 ($ Millions)
42
Campo Road Sewer Replacement (Design) $ 0.5
Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and
Disinfection System (Environmental)0.3
Sewer System Rehabilitation Projects (Construction)0.9
711-1 and 711-2 Reservoir Improvements (Design/Construction)1.4
980-1 Reservoir Improvements (Design/Construction)1.0
Sweetwater River Wood Trestle Improvements (Construction)0.4
870-2 Pump Station Replacement (Design)0.3
624 Pressure Zone PRS’s (Construction)0.5
Total Expenditure Projection $ 5.3
High Profile CIP Projects
Fiscal Year 2016 –2021 CIP
($ Millions)
Campo Road Sewer Replacement $ 5.1
Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and
Disinfection System 26.8
870-2 Pump Station Replacement 15.2
Sewer System Rehabilitation Projects 4.6
Reservoir Improvements 11.3
Total Expenditure Projection $ 63.0
43
Otay Water District Initiatives
Fiscal Year 2016 –2021 CIP Expenditure Projections
Total $96.2 Million
CAPITAL FACILITIES
PROJECTS (includes
Developer Reimbursement)
$ 56.3 M
CAPITAL PURCHASES
$ 4.0 M
REPLACEMENT / RENEWAL
PROJECTS
$ 35.9 M
44
BALANCED
OPERATING
BUDGET
(Rita Bell)
45
FY 2016 Operating Budget
46
►Budget Process
►Budget Objectives
►Budget Details
►Conclusion
Budget Process
47
►Strategic Plan Objectives set the overall direction for the budgeting effort.
►Each department submits budget requests assessing actual needs of the District.
►Review of all Operating and CIP Budget requests with Chiefs, Assistant General Manager, and General Manager.
►Review and incorporate reasonable assumptions on sales, growth, interest rates, and price inflators.
►Evaluate cost-saving measures and make adjustments where prudent.
►Recommend rates that support Strategic Plan initiatives, CIP, and operational needs.
Budget Objectives
48
►Fund efficient operations, CIP and Strategic Plan
Objectives
►Minimize rate impacts
►CWA & City of San Diego water cost increases
►Rate setting built on reasonable projections
(conservation mandates, interest rates, inflation, and
growth)
►Maintain above minimum reserve levels and build debt
coverage levels to target
►Maintain water and sewer rate positions relative to other
agencies in the region
Sales Projections
►Sales projections for FY 2016 are based on the
actual of FY 2013 sales less 12%.
►SWRCB mandated cutback
►Growth rates for FY 2017 through FY 2021 were
developed using The London Group Realty Advisors’
input.
49
12,364 12,511
13,189
13,720
12,716 12,851
11,704
10,500
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000
13,500
14,000
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Projected Budget
Potable Water Sales
With 12% Reduction from FY 2013 Actuals
Potable Water Sales
50
Unit Sales in thousands
Potable Sales Revenues
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016
Budget to Budget
Variance
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Water Sales $ 46,856,253 $ 42,668,000 $ 41,3,44,900 $ (1,323,100)-3.1%
System Fees 11,152,291 11,184,200 13,151,300 1.967.100 17.6%
Energy Fees 2,114,844 1,958,100 2,311,300 353,200 18.0%
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees 10,309,983 10,399,700 11,946,600 1,546,900 14.9%
Penalties 839,025 823,500 887,000 63,500 7.7%
Total Water Sales $ 71,272,396 $ 67,033,500 $ 69,641,100 $ 2,607,600 3.9%
51
►Sales dollar increase of $2,607,600 or 3.9%
►$1,011,700 is due to FY 2015 increases and volume changes
►$1,595,900 is due to FY 2016 assumed rate increases
►Potable water volume decrease of 1,012,300 units or 8.6% from FY2015 to FY2016
►The typical Single Family Residential bill using 14 units will increase from 81.67 $to $85.69 or $4.02
1,676 1,653 1,879 2,068
1,723 1,800 1,723
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2015 FY 2016
Actual Budget Projected Budget
Recycled Water Sales
With No Change From FY2015 Budget
Recycled Water Sales
52
Unit Sales in thousands
Recycled Sales Revenues
53
►Recycled sales dollar increase of $284,600 or 3.2%
►$117,400 due to FY 2015 rate increase and volume changes
►$167,200 is due to FY 2016 assumed rate increase
►Recycled water volume same as FY2015 Budget at 1,723,100 units
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Budget to Budget
Variance
Actual Budget Budget $%
Water Sales $ 7,416,631 $ 6,506,000 $ 6,694,500 $ 188,500 2.9%
System Fees 356,806 438,600 459,500 20,900 4.8%
Energy Fees 383,513 322,300 399,200 76,900 23.9%
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,828,134 1,522,800 1,522,900 100 0.0%
Penalties 29,682 36,900 35,100 (1,800)-4.9%
Total Recycled Water Sales $ 10,014,767 $ 8,826,600 $ 9,111,200 $ 284,600 3.2%
Sewer Revenues
►Sewer Revenues increase of $198,600 or 6.6% due to the January 1,
2015 rate increase and system fee phase-in from prior year’s budget
54
Actual Budget Budget
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 $%
Sewer Charges $ 2,736,867 $ 2,977,900 $ 3,173,000 $ 195,100 6.6%
Penalties 21,000 29,800 33,300 3,500 11.7%
Total $ 2,757,867 $ 3,007,700 $ 3,206,300 $ 198,600 6.6%
Sewer 5-year Summary FY 2016 vs. FY 2015
FY 2016 vs. FY 2015 Benefits:
$3.5 million decrease in 6-year CIP
$2.4 million decrease in operating expenses
$0.3 interest expense savings
Results:
No rate increases except for a system fee increase for
residential customers
$3.8 million proposed debt issuance avoided
55
Other Revenues
►Property Tax Revenue increase of $135,100 or 4.4%
►Betterment Fee Revenues decrease of ($301,800) or
(100% )
►Due to expiration of betterment fee revenues
►Capacity Fee Revenues decrease of ($15,800) or
(1.4%)
56
Water Costs
57
Water Cost Decrease of ($1,179,000) or (2.6%)
►Variable Cost Increases
►Potable cost decrease of ($2,189,400) or (6.3%)
►Recycled cost –no change
►Fixed Cost Increases
►Potable cost increase of $1,010,400 or 9.2%
►Recycled cost -no change
►Take or Pay
►Contractual agreement causing a recycled cost increase of
$104,300 or 18.5%
Sewer Costs
►Sewer service provider cost decrease of ($475,900) or (17.5%)
►City of San Diego –Waste Water Department O&M cost decrease of
($205,000)
►Spring Valley Sanitation District O&M cost decrease of ($93,200)
►All other costs (primarily labor & benefits) decrease of ($177,700)
58
Power Costs
59
►Power Cost Increase of $274,400 or 9.7%
►Water demand decrease of 8.9% for potable and no
change for recycled
►SDG&E budgeted rate increase 16.7%
►The rate per kilowatt hour has increased 12.7% over
last year’s budgeted rate
►The District anticipates another 4% increase in the
rate for FY 2016
►72
Staffing Highlights
(Adolfo Segura)
60
Staffing Highlights
►Process
►The Senior Team and Section Managers
continuously analyze workload requirements,
cross-training opportunities, automation and areas
where we can effectively share or reallocate
resources:
►Results
►Two vacant positions were deleted, reducing
FTE from 140 to 138
61
17
4
.
7
5
17
2
.
7
5
16
8
.
7
5
16
6
15
9
15
6
14
8
14
3
14
0
13
8
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Employee Count
Staffing Reductions
Reduction of 36.75 FTE or 21%
62
Cumulative Savings Due to Staffing Reductions
$358,000
$843,900
$1,166,300
$1,862,900
$2,340,500
$3,395,900
$4,213,800
$4,799,200
$4,955,100
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16
Net Cumulative Savings = $23,935,600 (outsourcing included)
63
30
1
30
6
31
4
32
1
33
6
34
4
36
6
38
0
38
9
39
6
250
270
290
310
330
350
370
390
410
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Customers per FTE
Efficiencies
64
31.5% Increase
Labor Costs
Salary and Benefits Overall Increase of $463,000
►Increases in Salary and Benefits
►Increase in salaries for negotiated COLA and performance based
increases of $203,200 or 3.3%
►Increase in pension costs of $280,000 or 8.0%
►Increase for staff advancements of $137,000 or 1.3%
►Increase in health costs of $228,600 or 4.9%
►Increase in other benefits such as Social Security and Medicare
of $65,300 or 2.2%
65
Labor Costs (continued)
►Decreases in Staffing Levels, Salary and Benefits
►Decrease in staffing level of ($106,700) or (1.0%)
►Decrease in temporary position of ($98,500) or (0.9%)
►Decrease in allocation to work orders ($50,800) or (2.1%)
►Decrease in overtime, vacancy factor, vacation/sick, and
workers compensation of ($153,100) or (1.2%)
►Decrease in OPEB, offset by employee contributions (on
track with 2013 actuarial valuation) of ($42,000) or (2.9%)
66
Materials &
Maintenance
(Jose Martinez)
67
Materials & Maintenance Costs
►Overall decrease of $7,000 or (0.2%)
►Decrease in Metro O & M of ($205,300) or (20.1%)
►Decrease in Spring Valley Sewer of ($93,200) or (33.9%)
►Decrease in Fuel and Oil of ($53,700) or (17.6%)
►Decreases offset by:
►Increase in Contracted Services of $107,200 or 18.2%
►Increase in Safety Equipment by $83,100 or 188.0%
►Increase in Other Materials & Supplies by $58,700 or 44.5%
►Increase in Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies of $96,300 or
18.3%
68
Fuel Consumption
69
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
Ga
l
l
o
n
s
Gas Diesel TOTAL
FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015
36% Decrease
Vehicle and Equipment
70
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
&
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
FY
TOTAL
17%
Decrease
Recycled Water DEH Charges
71
$36,000
$40,900
$31,900
$17,900
$10,900 $8,000
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015
Recycled Inspection Fees
80% Decrease
Water Losses
►The District’s “Leak Detection and Repair Program” is a major
component for both water conservation and asset management.
►In conjunction with the District’s “Valve Maintenance Program,” we
have been able to reduce and maintain our water losses way below
the national average.
►AWWA: “A commonly accepted rule-of-thumb for acceptable levels
of unaccounted for water is 15%. Nonetheless, the real rule for
deciding whether unaccounted for water exists at an acceptable
level is an economic one.”
72
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015
Wa
t
e
r
L
o
s
s
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Historical Water Loss
73
45% Decrease
Administrative
Costs
(Rita Bell)
74
Administrative Costs
►Overall Decrease ($31,400) or (0.6%)
►Decrease in legal expense of ($160,000)
►Decrease in insurance of ($45,000)
►Decrease in equipment of ($27,300)
►Decrease in fees of ($25,700)
►Decrease in overhead allocation of
($19,900)
75
Administrative Costs (continued)
►Increases in Administrative Costs
►Increase in Outside Services of $150,000 (for
conservation outreach efforts)
►Increase in Leak Detection of $107,500 (one-
time)
76
Budget Summary
77
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
Revenues
Water Sales $69,641,100 $9,111,200 $78,752,300
Sewer Revenues 3,206,300 3,206,300
Other Revenues 7,026,300 6,700 97,000 7,130,000
Total Revenues $76,667,400 $9,117,900 $3,303,300 $89,088,600
Expenditures
Water Purchases $44,278,700 $1,705,800 $47,059,200
Power 2,372,400 563,600 176,800 3,112,800
Labor and Benefits 18,518,100 1,181,600 681,300 20,381,000
Administrative Expenses 4,865,200 321,800 200,800 5,387,800
Materials & Maintenance 2,168,300 287,800 1,156,700 3,612,800
Reserve Funding 4,464,700 5,057,300 1,087,700 10,609,700
Total Expenditures $76,667,400 $9,117,900 $3,303,300 $89,088,600
Summary
►Balanced budget which meets the water
and sewer needs of our customers and
supports the Strategic Plan.
►Supported by a 5.4% average rate increase for water
and only a system fee increase for sewer residential
customers.
►Staff recommends budgeting water conservation
levels of 12% (which allows up to 17% conservation)
to incorporate into budget for Board consideration
at the June 3, 2015 Regular Board Meeting 78
QUESTIONS?
79