HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-13-15 Board Packet 1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY
August 13, 2015
3:30 P.M.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL BOARD MEETING OF MAY 19,
2015
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC
TO SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE
BOARD'S JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
PUBLIC HEARING
6. PUBLIC HEARING ON THE CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMEN-
TAL IMPACT REPORT (FEIR) FOR THE DISTRICT’S NORTH-SOUTH DIS-
TRICT INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM PROJECT
THE BOARD WILL BE HOLDING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CERTI-
FYING THE FEIR FOR THE DISTRICT’S NORTH-SOUTH INTERCONNECTION
SYSTEM PROJECT. THE BOARD INVITES THE PUBLIC TO PROVIDE COM-
MENTS ON THE FEIR.
a) CERTIFY THAT THE FEIR FOR THE DISTRICT’S NORTH-SOUTH DIS-
TRICT INTERCONNECTION SYSTEM PROJECT HAS BEEN COM-
PLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT, THE CURRENT STATE GUIDELINES AND THE DIS-
TRICT’S LOCAL GUIDELINES, AND THAT IT REFLECTS THE INDE-
PENDENT JUDGMENT OF THE DISTRICT; FIND THAT THE POTEN-
TIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OF THE PROJECT WILL BE AVOIDED
THROUGH THE ADOPTION OF FEASIBLE MITIGATION MEASURES,
2
AS SHOWN IN THE FEIR, AND THE MITIGATION, MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE FEIR; AND APPROVE THE FIND-
INGS FOR THE PROJECT (COBURN-BOYD)
CONSENT CALENDAR
7. ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON WITHOUT DISCUSSION, UNLESS A REQUEST
IS MADE BY A MEMBER OF THE BOARD OR THE PUBLIC TO DISCUSS A
PARTICULAR ITEM:
a) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4294 DESIGNATING A CHANGE OF AU-
THORIZED SIGNATORIES FOR THE DISTRICT’S OPERATING AND
PAYROLL ACCOUNTS WITH UNION BANK, N.A.
b) APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO HAAKER
EQUIPMENT COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $402,830.28 FOR THE
PURCHASE OF ONE (1) NEW MODEL 2115P-16 VACTOR TRUCK
c) APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A PURCHASE ORDER TO TRACE3 IN
THE AMOUNT OF $174,725.29 FOR NEW NETWORK EQUIPMENT
AND SOFTWARE TO REPLACE THE EXISTING SERVER ENVIRON-
MENT
d) APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT
WITH ARRIETA CONSTRUCTION, INC. FOR A CREDIT IN THE
AMOUNT OF <$54,410.29> FOR THE CALAVO BASIN SEWER REHA-
BILITATION, PHASE 1 PROJECT
e) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO CCL CONTRACTING, INC.
FOR THE 624 PRESSURE ZONE PRESSURE REDUCING STATIONS
(PRSs) AND 944-1R PRS NO. 3 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT IN AN
AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $455,209
f) AWARD A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO FORDYCE CONSTRUC-
TION, INC. FOR THE SWEETWATER RIVER TRESTLE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $173,740.00
g) AWARD A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO CH2M FOR
THE 2015 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE (2015
UWMP UPDATE) IN AN AMOUNT NOT-TO-EXCEED $49,839
ACTION ITEMS
8. BOARD
a) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4295 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT APPROVING FUNDING OF THE WATER
3
CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, A CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS AU-
THORITY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $97,622 ANNUALLY FOR FISCAL
YEARS 2016 – 2017, FOR A TOTAL OF $195,244 (WATTON)
b) DISCUSSION OF THE 2015 BOARD MEETING CALENDAR
INFORMATIONAL ITEM
9. THE FOLLOWING ITEM IS PROVIDED TO THE BOARD FOR INFORMA-
TIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE FOLLOWING
AGENDA ITEM:
a) DROUGHT AND WATER CONSERVATION UPDATE (CAREY)
REPORTS
10. GENERAL MANAGER’S REPORT
a) SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY UPDATE
11. DIRECTORS' REPORTS/REQUESTS
12. PRESIDENT’S REPORT/REQUESTS
RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
13. CLOSED SESSION
a) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section
54956.9:
1 CASE
b) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision
(d) of Section 54956.9:
1 CASE
c) CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – PENDING LITIGATION
[GOVERNMENT CODE §54956.9]
UNITED STATES, ET AL., EX. REL. JOHN HENDRIX vs. J-M MANU-
FACTURING COMPANY, INC., ET AL.; CASE NO. ED CV 06-00055GW
4
RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
14. REPORT ON ANY ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION. THE BOARD
MAY ALSO TAKE ACTION ON ANY ITEMS POSTED IN CLOSED SESSION
15. ADJOURNMENT
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the
District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered
at the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website.
Copies of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District
Secretary by contacting her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at (619) 670-2280 at least
24 hours prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on August 10, 2015, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near
the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time be-
ing at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting of the Board of Directors (Gov-
ernment Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on August 10, 2015.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
1
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
May 19, 2015
1. The meeting was called to order by President Lopez at 3:04 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Directors Present: Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Directors Absent: None
Staff Present: General Manager Mark Watton, General Counsel Daniel
Shinoff, Asst. GM German Alvarez, Chief of Information
Technology Geoff Stevens, Chief Financial Officer Joe
Beachem, Chief of Engineering Rod Posada, Chief of
Administration Rom Sarno, Chief of Operations Pedro Porras,
District Secretary Susan Cruz and others per attached list.
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A motion was made by Director Croucher, seconded by Director Smith and carried
with the following vote:
Ayes: Directors Croucher, Lopez, Robak, Smith and Thompson
Noes: None
Abstain: None
Absent: None
to approve the agenda.
5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
No one wished to be heard.
WORKSHOP
6. REVIEW THE DISTRICT’S FISCAL YEAR 2015-2016 OPERATING AND CAPITAL
BUDGET AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF AS TO WHICH
2
CONSERVATION LEVEL SHOULD BE ASSUMED FOR THE BUDGET WHICH
WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION AT THE JUNE 3, 2015 REGULAR BOARD
MEETING
Chief Financial Officer Beachem reviewed the objectives of the workshop which
included:
Reviewing the FY 2015 - 2018 Strategic Plan
Presenting for approval an $89.1 million Operating Budget
Presenting for approval a $11.1 million CIP Budget
Review options for water rate increases at various conservation levels to be
effective January 1, 2016
Water Conservation Between 8% and 16%
Review Recommended Rate Increases
Chief Financial Officer Beachem introduced Mr. Gary London of the London Group
and indicated that he will be providing an overview of the economic outlook for San
Diego County for 2015 and beyond. Mr. London worked with staff to develop the
growth projections for the development of the District’s budget.
Mr. London presented the employment rate from January 2002 to January 2015 and
indicated that the employment level in 2015 is looking very good nationally. He
stated that the unemployment rate is also looking good, as well as, in terms of
underemployment. Income growth is finally on an upswing and the economy is
strong at the moment as was predicted last year. Growth is being experienced
across most sectors, with a year-to-year increase in employment of approximately
2%, which is healthy. He stated that the unemployment rate in 2015 is 5.4% and
that the unemployment rate has been steadily going down over the last five (5)
years which is also a reflection of the overall health of the economy.
He reviewed job growth in San Diego from December 2013 to December 2014. He
indicated that the County added 31,000 jobs which is a 2.3% decrease from the last
two years and before that the County had a 4% decrease. He noted that this is
growth to the positive, but it is not the robust makeup growth that the County had in
the first years coming out of the recession. He stated in terms of a demographic
overview, the District’s service area is growing at a substantially robust pace than
the San Diego County region as a whole. The household count is a little higher
than the County and the Hispanic and Asian populations are greater in the District’s
service area than in the overall region. He stated the median age of the population
and education in the District’s service area is about the same as the County,
however, the average and median household income is higher than the County as a
whole (see attached copy of Mr. London’s presentation). He stated this paints a
positive picture going forward.
Mr. London stated that from a real estate perspective, total sales is about the same
as in the last five or so years. The average median price of resale homes have
3
been going up, but the prices are not yet at the peak that the County experienced in
the period between 2006 and 2007. He stated from his experience since the late
1970’s, in every succeeding cycle, the peak of home values has always gone higher
than the high in the previous cycle. He indicated that home prices are not yet at
their peak, but predicts that they are going to get there before this current growth
period ends. He stated that he felt that we are close. He noted the April average
home price was about $464,000 compared to the year before which was $434,000
(up 6.8%). He stated that the County will continue to see an increase in home
values as it is assumed interest rates will increase in the next year, which is
encouraging people to purchase homes or refinance their loans now. He indicated
that there are a lot of factors in our economy that suggests that pricing will continue
to go up, not the least of which is the continuing diminishing supply of available
developable property in all areas of the County, but within the District’s service area.
He stated with regard to the commercial market, particularly in office and retail,
commercial construction is increasing significantly in 2014. Not so much in the
District’s service area, but within the University Towne Center and Sorrento Valley
areas. He stated, however, that a substantial increase is not expected as there has
not been that much demand in the commercial sector as there has been in the
residential sector.
Mr. London indicated that residential foreclosures have declined significantly and
this area of the market is in a relatively healthy condition. The foreclosure crisis is
long past. He stated that permitting for residential construction is a little less than
last year and that the prior year was a little less as well. He noted that on 100
residential units (40 single family and 60 condominium) are scheduled to be built in
the remaining months of fiscal year 2015 and 550 units (150 single family, 250
condominiums and 150 apartments [including senior homes]) are expected to be
built in fiscal year 2016. He stated that these predictions are based on discussions
with the city, developers, and SANDAG. He felt that we are in about the 5th inning
now in the economic recovery.
Director Croucher stepped off the dias at 3:23 p.m.
He stated the District’s service area represents the most affordable of new
developments and the region is looked upon as highly affordable and as high
quality. He stated, however, that we are past our most affordable period and
developments will get more and more unaffordable and buyers somehow will still be
able to put the resources together to purchase a home as they wish to live in the
region.
Director Smith inquired what would occur to the real estate market and the economy
in general if a moratorium on building was instituted due to water restrictions. Mr.
London indicted that it would bid up the pricing of housing. Building outside the
range of water restrictions could occur in small numbers, but likely it would just
delay development until the restrictions are reduced. He stated, however, that he
4
did not see a drought based water moratorium as being very helpful. He indicated
that he felt that perhaps, ultimately, saner minds would prevail on this issue. He
indicated that he looks upon the water issue as an economic issue and not a
resource issue and feels that the market is elastic with respect to increases in water
pricing. Water prices go up because availability is limited or the agencies are forced
by the larger water authorities to limit water to some extent. The translation is not a
moratorium, but higher prices and conservation. A moratorium in building would not
do anything but bid up the pricing of housing.
Director Croucher returned to the dias at 3:27 p.m.
Director Thompson inquired if residential prices remained about where they are now
for Eastern Chula Vista, have the developers indicated that there is ample
profitability in those projects moving forward at the same rate as he (Mr. London)
has projected. Or would he assume into his model a certain pricing increase over
the next several years. Mr. London indicated that they do assume a price increase
because there is a perpetual balance between supply and demand. There is
elasticity in the pricing because we cannot possibly supply enough housing.
Director Robak indicated that some believe that we are on a precipice with regard to
the economy and any change of consequence by the Federal Government
regarding interest rates would self-implode the economy. He inquired what Mr.
London’s view is on how fragile the economy may or may not be. Mr. London
indicated he believes that is why the Federal Government is being very careful with
interest rates. He stated that though we are at historically low rates by every
measure, there is reticence to increase interest rates in the near term. They want to
wait to see how strong the economic recovery is. He felt, however, there is no
doubt that we are in a fairly strong recovery. We are in our sixth (6th) year in the
recovery period, which is past the five (5) year recovery mark and he felt we have
already adjusted.
In response to any inquiry from President Lopez, Mr. London indicated that he felt
the numbers he has presented with regard to development are accurate. He stated
that his projections have been right in the short term and they will be no less right
this time.
Chief of Information Technology Geoff Stevens provided a presentation on the
District’s 2015-2018 Strategic Plan. He stated that in 2015 the District implemented
key systems as a foundation (i.e., SCADA, GIS-centric Work Order System, and the
Emergency Procedures for the Management of Disasters). In FY 2016, staff will be
focused on process improvements through the use of systems and data to run the
business. The District’s success will come directly from the work order, SCADA and
financial systems. In 2017 and 2018 the District will be evolving to fine tune the
measurement metrics and focus on unit costing; determining what costs can be
eliminated/combined to drive costs down and improve efficiency. This is the whole
key to the Strategic Plan. He presented slides indicating the District’s Mission (what
5
the District will do), Vision (how the District will do it), Statement of Values and Key
Challenges (see attached copy of staffs’ presentation). He also presented slides
stating the objectives and performance measures for each of the District’s division’s
(Administration and Information Technology, Engineering, Operations and Finance)
noting, again, the focus on streamlining and process improvements.
He stated the next steps in the Strategic Plan is to:
Utilize SCADA and Work Management for Better Metrics
Continue the Focus on Long-term Asset Management
Begin Developing System Derived Measures of Unit Costing
Add more Complete Trending Data on Performance Measures in the Extra
Net
In response to an inquiry from Director Robak, Chief of Information Technology
Stevens stated that the District’s business is to provide high quality water/sewer
service in a cost effective and efficient manner. The best way for the District to
respond to the drought is to increase its efficiency and be able to adapt and change
processes quickly and efficiently. He indicated a good example of that in the
Strategic Plan is the objectives for customer service and the ability to target specific
audiences. Staff would look in the District’s GIS and billing system to identify the
high and low use customers and use tools, identified through the strategic planning
process, to communicate with customers to encourage conservation to accomplish
the drought business objective of conservation, if that is the District’s objective right
now. He indicated that the District’s basic tools will not change and that is what the
Strategic Plan does; fine tune the direction of the District to do its business
objectives.
General Manager Watton indicated that the board is aware of the State Governor’s
mandate to reduce water consumption to 20% below 2013 usage as discussed at
the recent board workshop on the drought. The State Board approved the
Governor’s regulations on May 5, 2015 and implementation of the mandates go into
effect on June 1, 2015. The focus now is determining what will happen in upcoming
years. The State Board did consider and approve working groups to meet and
discuss over the next 270 days if the conservation mandate needs to be extended
and what is next. He indicated that the budget presented today uses a reasonable
approach to manage the 20% reduced consumption and many of the member
agencies will be using the same strategy, that staff will be presenting today, in
putting together their budgets.
He indicated the future direction of the Governor and the State Board on the
drought is unknown at this time. He asked the District’s legal counsel to provide the
board a memo regarding this fact. He stated what is known is that an agency must
be in a water supply shortage (Water Code Section 350, Emergency Storage) in
order to shut off meters. He stated this is very difficult to do if there are no findings
of a water supply shortage. He indicated that he felt that we were not at the point of
6
restricting growth at this time and there may be some legal challenges to the
mandates.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that conservation is a big challenge in
the District’s budget this year. He stated that the District’s residential customers
have already achieved a 26% reduction in their water use historically. He presented
water use projections for FY 2016 based on conservation levels of 0%, 8%, 10%,
12%, 16% and 20%. He stated that staff will continue its outreach to encourage
customers to cut back their usage, however, with the prior water use cutbacks that
customers have already achieved, it will make it pretty difficult to acquire additional
savings. He indicated that the mandated conservation period starts on June 1,
2015 through the end of February 2016 (270 days). He noted in the months of
November 2015 through February 2016, the fall and winter months, it would be very
difficult for customers to reduce their water use by an additional 20% as much of the
winter use is indoor. It is more realistic that customers could achieve a 10%
reduction in their water use during these months. Thus, if the District’s residential
customers are to achieve an overall savings of 20%, they would need to achieve
savings greater than 20% or 25% in June, July, August and September 2015 and
20% in October 2015. This may be achieved as water usage during these months
is mainly outdoor where the additional savings could possibly be attained.
However, because of the very short lead time before the conservation period
begins, he indicated that it is felt that the more realistic savings that can be attained
by customers is 6% in June, 11% in July, 15% in August, 19% in October, 13% in
November and 10% in December, January and February.
Director Smith inquired what occurs following the nine (9) month period. Chief
Financial Officer Beachem indicated that it is not certain what customers will do, but
staff will taper back to more normal usage. Staff is projecting that residential
customers will continue to cut their water use 12% over the remaining three (3)
months in the fiscal year. It was discussed that once customers remove their lawns
or change it out for water conserving plants, the water savings achieved through
these changes will continue. Following fiscal year 2016, staff is projecting annual
water conservation of 6% which takes into account growth. Staff indicated that at
the end of this fiscal year, the positive or negative cash flows would be rolled into
the next fiscal year. Staff indicated that sales were slightly above budget because
the weather was warm and dry during the winter months. In April, the weather
cooled and sales have slowed to budget projections.
Director Smith also inquired if there were any issues with the State Board with the
District proposing a budget that indicates 12% in water savings. General Manager
Watton indicated that he did have concerns, however, he found that most of the
other agencies are projecting similar savings in their budget and stated that it was a
defendable approach.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that staff had developed the water rates
based on water conservation of 12%. However, staff did run the numbers for
7
various levels of water conservation (20%, 16%, 10%, 8% and 0%) to determine
what rate increases would occur at each of these levels. He stated at a
conservation level of 12%, the proposed rate increase would be 5.4%. The debt
coverage ratio would drop below target (150%) to 141.1% and reserves will be
drawn down as well. He stated that the District will not drop below its bond
covenant unless conservation is achieved above 17.2%, which staff believes is a
very high number to achieve.
In response to an inquiry from Director Thompson, Chief Financial Officer Beachem
explained that the District looks at two Debt Coverage Ratios; with growth and
without growth. One of the ratios includes capacity fees (growth revenues) and it
cannot drop below 125% and the ratio that does not include capacity fees cannot
drop below 100%. He stated the District’s target is 150% which excludes growth.
He stated the concept is if growth were to cease, the District needs to always be in
a position that it will not violate its bond covenant. He stated this is a common
target used by other agencies as well.
He stated that none of the proposed 5.4% rate increase is due to cost increases
from the District’s operations. He indicated that 4.99% of the rate increase is due to
water wholesale cost increases from San Diego County Water Authority (CWA),
0.32% is due to increases from the City of San Diego, and 0.27% is due to
increases from San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). The District’s costs represents
-0.18% of the rate increase.
The District was able to reduce its costs through:
Reducing its water loss from 5% to 4%
Reducing personnel from 140 to 138 FTE
Reducing Administrative Expenses and Material Expenses despite increases
for conservation efforts and for leak detection
Director Robak indicated that he also felt that the District’s customers may not be
able to achieve a 20% reduction in their water consumption. He asked how staff
came up with 12% as the achievable savings. Chief Financial Officer Beachem
indicated that staff took into account the lead time to achieve the savings goal; how
much time it would take to get the 20% water savings. He indicated that it is a very
subjective question. Staff feels that 12% was the most reasonable savings that the
District’s customers could achieve based on the numbers and information.
Director Croucher indicated that decisions are being made before they are being
evaluated and there is a lot of confusion and questions regarding the mandates and
potential penalties. He indicated that he felt that the agencies need to continue to
work together, legislatively as well, to come up with what is fair. He stated that we
need to continue to think outside the box.
8
Director Smith commented that none of the rate increase is due to the District’s
internal operations and the District will be using some of its reserves to moderate
the rate increase. He suggested that the District could provide a 2% increase
(about the rate of inflation) for internal operations and utilize less reserves. He
indicated that he wished to suggest another option to work the numbers. If a 2%
increase is provided for the District’s operations, then less reserves would be
utilized and the overall increase would then be about 5.6%. He also indicated that
he felt it would be hard to explain that last year the District required a 5.8% increase
and this year the increase is 5.4%. He indicated that he understood that the District
has reduced its costs and that is the reason the increase is lower, but from a
perception stand point, it is difficult for the public to understand.
Finance Manager Kevin Koeppen presented on the District’s Bond Covenant. He
stated the Debt Coverage Ratio is a key part of the District’s budgeting process. It
is a key financial ratio that the District uses to evaluate its ability to meet it debt
obligations and one factor that the rating agencies use to rate the District’s bonds.
He indicated that the District has a Debt Covenant to set rates sufficient to yield a
debt coverage ratio of 125% (including growth revenues) and 100% (excluding
growth revenues). Staff believes, based on the District’s rate setting history,
liquidity, and current cash position, that the short term impact of any non-
compliance in the Debt Covenant would have little adverse impact if the District’s
rate setting process was reasonable and there was a plan to achieve compliance in
the following year. He stated that the potential adverse impact to the District in not
complying with the covenant is the District would be required to provide additional
disclosures and increase communications to impacted parties. Additionally, the
Rating Agencies would likely place the District on “watch” status which would result
in annual rating reviews. Currently, the District’s rating review is every two (2)
years. The impact of multi-year non-compliance with the District’s Debt Covenant,
the bond insurer or bondholders could require the District to increase it rates to
reach compliance. This would require the District to hire a rate consultant and, if
needed, require a 218 notice to raise rates. Further, the rating agencies would
likely downgrade the District’s credit rating. Currently, the District has an “AA” rating
with Standards & Poor’s and an “AA-“ rating with Fitch. Staff feels an overall
financial risk and impact to the District of a downgrade is limited at this time as the
budget presented today maintains the District’s debt coverage ratio above the
covenant level.
In response to an inquiry from Director Smith, Chief Financial Officer Beachem
indicated that it was not a good idea to let the District’s Debt Coverage Ratio drop
below the Bond Covenant as the District has an implicit agreement with its bond
holders. There are companies who may do that as they do not need to borrow for
10 years or so. However, the problem would be in the prospectus, the document
utilized to market the bonds. Even if the District has a current rating of “AA-,“ if the
District had dropped to a “A” rating over the last five (5) years, it will not attract
purchasers as they will look at the rating and conclude that the agency is not that
9
stable which would discourage them from buying the agency’s bonds. It will also
impact the District’s ability to get good interest rates in future debt issuances.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem reviewed some of the budget highlights and
reviewed the rate model and staff’s process to develop the District’s budget. He
stated that, this year, the rate model includes the Governor’s conservation
mandates. The District is also looking to rebuild the District’s Debt Coverage Ratio
to 151% by 2018 and in every year, fund the operating budget ($89.1 million) and
the capital budget ($11.1 million). This year, the District is utilizing reserves to
offset the rate increase and the reserves are being maintained above the minimum
level.
Each year staff rebalances the reserves in accordance with the District’s Reserve
Policy and propose the following inter-fund transfers (for a total of $12.6 million):
Potable:
General Fund to Replacement - $2.4 million
Designated Expansion to Replacement - $3.5 million
Designated Betterment to Replacement - $2.1 million
Designated New Water Supply to Replacement - $0.7 million
Recycled:
General Fund to Designated Expansion - $2.2 million
Sewer:
Designated Expansion to Betterment - $0.2 million
General Fund to Replacement - $1.6 million
Staff is also proposing the net operating revenue transfers as follows (for a total of
$10.61 million):
Potable:
to Replacement Reserve - $2.4 million
to Sewer Replacement Reserve - $1.2 million
to OPEB Trust Fund - $0.9 million
Recycled:
to Expansion Reserve - $2.7 million
to Betterment Reserve - $1.9 million
to Replacement Reserve - $0.31 million
to OPEB Trust Fund – $0.06
to New Supply Fund - $0.04
Sewer:
to Betterment Reserve - $0.46 million
10
to Replacement Reserve - $0.6 million
to OPEB Trust Fund - $0.03 million
Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that staff had projected in last Fiscal
Year’s (FY) six-year budget projections a water rate increase of 4.7% in FY 2016.
Staff is now proposing a slightly higher increase of 5.4% for FY 2016, which
includes 12% water conservation by the District’s customers. He noted that the
proposed rate increase would allow for the Debt Coverage Ratio to rebound to
target levels over time.
He explained with regard to the projected sewer rate increase, that the District had
a large decrease in cost from the District’s sewer processing provider and there
were decreases in labor charges to sewer and, thus, the District is not proposing
any rate increases for sewer services. He noted that there is, however, a
$1.30/month system fee increase that was implemented in 2013 due to findings of
the Cost of Service Study (COSS). The COSS found that the fixed charges were
not covering the full fixed cost for sewer services and the board had voted in 2013
to phase in the increase to the fee in three phases. This is the last of the three
phases for the increase.
He noted items in the Operating Budget that were holding down rates which
included:
Lower variable water rate increase from CWA/MWD than anticipated (1.9%
projected CY16 vs. 10.1% budgeted; this is offset by the new Reliability
Fixed charge of $1 million
Reduction in 6-year CIP of $7.4 million
Reduced water loss from 5% to 4% savings of $432,000
Reduced FTE from 140 to 138
Administrative costs decrease of $31,400
Materials & Maintenance costs decrease of $7,000
He reviewed in detail the items that are putting an upward pressure on the District’s
rates:
Water sales reduction of 12% (in volume from 2013 sales)
Fixed CWA Cost increase of $1 million
City of San Diego recycled “take or pay” increase of $104,300
Power cost increase of $274,400
2016 Salary and benefit cost net increase of $463,000 while reducing by 2
FTE (does not include the FY2015 COLA)
He indicated with regard to the sewer budget that the:
Reduction in anticipated rate increase reflects reduced service providers
rates and lower labor charges to operations
11
Typical residential customer will see a $1.30 monthly increase and no other
rate increases are anticipated in the six year budget projections
$13.9 million CIP over six years
Final payment by Potable to Sewer for a prior loan
Reserves are on target
Chief of Engineering Rod Posada presented the District’s projected six (6) year CIP
from 2016 to 2021. He stated that staff utilized Mr. London’s and the developers’
projections to develop the District’s growth projections which is presented in slide
number 38 of staffs’ report (see attached copy of presentation). He indicated that
149 units of Single-Family homes, 297 condominiums and 150 apartment units are
projected in FY 2016. There will also be approximately $35 million in commercial
development.
He indicated the development of the CIP budget for FY 2016 was based on the
following guidelines:
Growth would remain relatively flat in FY 2016
New developments will have a greater proportion of multi-family dwellings
versus single-family dwellings
In preparing the budgets for the individual CIP projects, the Engineering
Department used current construction and bidding data to adjust costs for
each project
Reprioritized projects based on District’s planning documents and Water
Supply Assessment and Verification reports
He stated in the development of the CIP budget for FY 2016, staff reprioritized
projects based on the District’s planning documents, Water Supply Assessment
reports and Developer requests and estimates the CIP Budget requirement for FY
2016 is $11.1 million. The six-year CIP Budget total for FY’s 2016 to 2021 is $96.2
million. He indicated that Director Smith inquired why there was a big difference
between last year’s forecast for FY 2016 ($23.4 million) and this year’s forecast for
FY 2016 ($11.1 million). He explained that the District had reprioritized two
projects; the Desalination Project and the 870-2 Pump Station. He stated that it
was expected that the Desalination Project would be in the design phase and the
870-2 Pump Station would be in construction in FY 2016 with an approximate cost
of $11 million. He also explained that the difference in the six-year CIP total
expenditure projections between last year of $103.6 million and today’s projection of
$96.2 million is mostly due to the moratorium for recycled water projects and a
reduction of $3 million in sewer projects.
He presented the high profile CIP projects which included:
Campo Road Sewer Replacement, $5.1 million
Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and Disinfection System, $26.8 million
870-2 Pump Station Replacement, $15.2 million
12
Sewer System Rehabilitation, $4.6 million
Reservoir Improvements, $11.3 million
for a total expenditure of $63.0 million.
He indicated of the $96.2 million projects in the CIP Budget, $56.3 million is
designated for capital facility projects (including developer reimbursement projects),
$35.9 million for replacement/renewal projects and $4 million for capital purchases.
In response to an inquiry from Director Smith, Chief Financial Officer Joe Beachem
indicated that it is approximately 2/10 to 3/10 of a percent and that assumes that
there is some borrowing between funds.
Accounting Manager Rita Bell presented the details of the FY 2016 Operating
Budget and the how the budget was developed. She indicated that the District’s
water sales projections for FY 2016 are based on FY 2013 actual sales less 12%.
She stated that staff also developed the growth rates based on projections by The
London Group and the Engineering Department. She stated that the District strives
to maintain its water and sewer rate positions relative to other agencies in the
region and would normally be providing charts showing how the District’s rates
compare to other water and sewer agencies in the region. However, the agencies,
at this time, are deciding what their strategies will be in order to comply with the
Governor’s mandate. Staff will bring the charts back to the board once the
information is received from the other agencies.
She indicated that projected potable water sales of 11,704,000 units for FY 2016 is
the lowest sales projection since 2011. Water sales are expected to decrease
1,012,300 units (or 8.6%) in the FY 2015 to FY 2016 budget projections. The
reduced water sales decreases the District’s water sales revenues by $2.3 million
(or 3.2%). The impact to the typical single-family residential customer utilizing 14
units of water per month is an increase from $81.67 to $85.69 per month.
Accounting Manager Bell indicated that staff left recycled water sales the same in
FY 2016 as last year. The projected recycled water sales volume is 1,723,100
units. Recycled sales revenues will increase $284,600 (or 3.2%). A portion of the
increased revenue for recycled water sales, $117,400, is attributed to the FY2015
rate increase and volume changes and $167,200 is due to the assumed rate
increase for FY 2016.
She also reviewed the sewer sales revenues and indicated that sewer revenues will
increase $198,000 (6.6%) in FY 2016 due to the January 1, 2015 rate increase and
system fee phase-in (of $1.30) from the prior year’s budget. She indicated that in
FY2016 budget staff had determined a:
$3.5 million decrease in the 6-year sewer CIP
$2.4 million decrease in operating expenses over the 6-year rate model
$0.3 interest expense savings
13
These savings have resulted in no rate increase for sewer services over the six year
rate model, except for the system fee increase for residential customers, and the
District has avoided the need for a $3.8 million debt issuance.
The District receives revenues from other sources which include:
Property Tax Revenues will increase $135,100 (4.4%)
Betterment Fee Revenues will decrease $301,800 (100%) due to the
expiration of betterment fee revenues (betterment fees are being shifted to
water rates); this is revenue neutral
Capacity Fee Revenues will decrease $15,800 (1.4%) due to a decrease in
developer activity
She stated that the District’s water cost is decreasing $1,179,000 or 2.6%. She
reviewed the reasons for the water cost decreases which included:
Variable Cost Increase:
Potable cost decrease of $2,189,400 or 6.3% (purchasing less potable
water)
Recycle costs will not change
Fixed Cost Increase:
Potable costs increase of $1,010,400 or 9.2% due to a rate increase
from the District’s water suppliers (CWA and MWD); $950,000 of the
increase is due to their new reliability charge
There is no change in the recycled water costs
Take or Pay
Contractual agreement (with City of San Diego) is causing a recycled
cost increase of $104,300 or 18.5%
She indicated that sewer costs will decrease $475,900 or 17.5% in FY 2016 due to
an O&M cost decrease of $205,000 from the City of San Diego Metro Commission.
The Spring Valley Sanitation District’s O&M charges will also decrease $93,200 and
all other costs (primarily labor and benefits) will decrease $177,700 in FY 2016.
This is primarily due to improvements made by the District’s Operations department.
Accounting Manager Bell stated that power cost from SDG&E is estimated to
increase $274,400,100 or 9.7%. The reasons for the increase include:
Water demand decrease of 8.9% for potable and no change for recycled
SDG&E had indicated last year that there would be four (4) separate 2.5%
rate increases in FY 2015. They actually increased their rate 22.4% over the
period. The District had budgeted 10% of the increase and will need to raise
rates to catch up. The District, thus, has gone over budget on its power
costs due to the larger than anticipated rate increase from SDG&E.
14
In response to an inquiry from Director Robak, General Manager Watton indicated
that staff had reviewed the possibility of implementing solar energy for the District.
However, the leased terms and the cost of the power did not provide the savings
that would make it cost effective for the District at that time. Today, the lease terms
and the cost of solar power is different and the District believes that it is time to look
at solar power again and determine if it could provide power cost savings. The
District has a solar vendor reviewing the District’s power needs and they should be
submitting a proposal to the District soon.
Director Croucher indicated that the District should include in its outreach materials,
that the District had received a 22.4% rate increase from SDG&E over the last year.
He stated that it is important for the District’s customers to know what is impacting
their water rates.
General Manager Watton indicated that SDG&E was proposing last year to change
their on-peak and off-peak hours which would have drastically increased the
District’s rates even more as the District utilizes the off-peak hours to pump water
into its reservoirs and move water around its service area.
Director Thompson indicated that he would like to see a timely communication to
the Board of the outcome of the solar review. He stated that there may be some
timing issues in the District installing or not installing solar and anything that would
make the District less dependent on an energy provider is worthwhile exploring as
energy is a large expense in the District’s budget.
Director Croucher suggested, with regard to the State Water Board’s action, that if
the District is receiving complaint letters from its customers, it would be helpful to
share those with the State Water Board. They hear the representatives from the
different agencies share their customer complaints, but hearing it from our
customers directly would have more impact.
Assistant Chief of Administration and Information Technology Adolfo Segura
reviewed the staffing changes. He indicated that each year the Senior Team
members conduct an analysis of staff workload requirements and existing
vacancies. Based on the review, two (2) vacant positions were deleted reducing the
fulltime equivalent (FTE)/headcount from 140 to 138 in FY 2016. He stated that the
District has reduced the number of staff members from 174.75 in 2007 to 138 in
2016; a reduction of 36.75 employees or 21%. The cumulative cost savings from
the reduction in staffing is approximately $23,935,600 from 2007 to 2016. From an
efficiency standpoint, the customer to employee ratio has increased from 301
customers serviced per employee in 2007 to 396 customers serviced per employee
in 2016 or an increase of 31.5%.
He indicated that salaries and benefits have increased $463,000. The items
increasing salary and benefits include:
15
Increase in salaries for negotiated COLA and performance based increase of
$203,200 or 3.3%
Increase in pension costs of $280,000 or 8%
Increase for staff advancements of $137,000 or 1.3%
Increase in health costs of $228,600 or 4.9%
Increase in other benefits such as Social Security and Medicare of $65,300
or 2.2%
Offsetting the increases in salaries and benefits are a:
Decrease in the staffing level of ($106,700) or -1%
Decrease in temporary position of ($98,500) or -0.9%
Decrease in allocation to work orders ($50,800) or -2.1%
Decrease in overtime, vacancy factor, vacation/sick, and workers
compensation of ($153,100) or -1.2%
Decrease in OPEB, offset by employee contributions (on track with 2013
actuarial valuation) of ($42,000) or -2.9%
Director Robak commented that the District is constantly improving its employee to
customer ratio and inquired if staff has compared the District’s ratio with other
agencies. Chief of Information Technology Stevens indicated that the District has
done that comparison. The last time staff had done the comparison with the
District’s neighboring agencies, the District was doing better than its neighboring
agencies. Staff indicated that there is not an AWWA threshold as AWWA utilizes
much larger agencies and, thus, it is difficult to do a true comparison. Staff set the
target for comparison based on the District’s budget.
Director Thompson noted that there was a significant increase in pension cost, an
8% increase, which was not taken into consideration. The increase is very high and
he understands that the District does not control this increase. Healthcare costs
had a little less increase, however, the increases are significantly above the rate of
inflation. He indicated that he felt that one of the things the District needs to do is to
keep its total salary and benefits close to inflation. He indicated that he understand
that the District does not have much control over these increases, but he would like
to encourage staff to continue to look at those areas that we do control and figure
out how to keep costs to a minimum.
The board recessed at 5:23 p.m. and reconvened at 5:33 p.m.
Assistant Chief of Operation Jose Martinez presented on the District’s materials and
maintenance costs. He stated that despite inflation and investment in the leak
detection program, the District’s materials and maintenance costs have gone down.
He noted the reasons for the overall decrease of ($7000) or -0.2%:
Decrease in the Metro O & M of ($205,300) or -20.1%
Decrease in the Spring Valley Sewer of ($93,200) or -33.9%
16
Decrease in the unit cost of Fuel and Oil of ($53,700) or -17.6%
The above decreases were offset by the following increases:
Increase in Contracted Services of $107,200 or 18.2%
Increase in Safety Equipment by $83,100 or 188%
Increase in Other Materials & Supplies by $58,700 44.5%
Increase in Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies of $96,300 or 18.3%
He noted that because of the District’s investment in equipment and technology and
continually enhancing its business processes, it has been able to reduce its fuel
consumption by 36%, the number of vehicles (pool and construction) and
equipment (generators, backhoes, vactor trucks, etc.) has gone down 17%, and
recycled water DEH charges for inspection fees was reduced from $40,900 to
$8,000 (or 80%) over the last ten (10) years. He also shared that the District has
been able to reduce its water loss through its “Leak Detection and Repair Program”
from 5.8% in FY 2011 to 3.2% (45% decrease) in FY 2015, which is much below the
national average of 15%.
Accounting Manager Bell reviewed the District’s Administrative Costs and indicated
that the District’s overall administrative costs decreased $31,400 or -0.6%. The
decreases in costs included:
Decrease in legal expense of ($160,000)
Decrease in insurance of ($45,000)
Decrease in equipment of ($27,300)
Decrease in fees of ($25,700)
Decrease in overhead allocation of ($19,900)
Increases in Administrative Costs included:
Increase in Outside Services of $150,000 for conservation outreach efforts
Increase in Leak Detection of $107,500 (one-time cost)
She stated that staff is presenting for the board’s consideration a budget that
estimates a 12% conservation level with a potable budget of $76,667,400, a
recycled budget of $9,117,900 and a sewer budget of $3,303,300 for a total budget
of $89,088,600. The budget is supported by a 5.4% average rate increase for water
and only a system fee increase for sewer residential customers.
The presented budget also supports the water and sewer needs of the District’s
customers and the Strategic Plan. Staff indicated that the recommended 12% water
conservation level would allow for up to 17% conservation and the FY 2016 budget
will be presented for the board’s consideration at the June 3, 2015 regular board
meeting.
17
Director Croucher inquired if there is room in the budget if the board should wish to
explore pilot projects, such as, ideas to respond to conservation. General Manager
Watton indicated that staff has not budgeted funds for that general category. He
stated that if the initiative required a few thousand dollars, it can probably be funded
into the customer communications budget. However, if there is a project that
requires much more funding, staff would need to present the project to the board as
a discreet item to be added to the budget at that time. He noted that the budget
would show a negative ending balance which would go into the next year’s budget.
Director Thompson inquired with regard to the proposed rate increase, why the
increase is front loaded (rate increase of 5.4% for FY’s 2016 to 2018; and rate
increases of 3.8% for FY’s 2019 to 2021) versus equalizing the increases over the
six (6) year budget rate model. Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that the
estimated 12% reduction in sales is significant and in order for the District to
maintain its debt coverage ratio, rates need to be high enough to maintain the ratio.
Staff indicated that they did try to normalize the rates, however, the proposed six-
year rate model was the closest they could get to equalized increases over the
period. Following three years of 5.4% increases, the District needs to drop the rate
significantly to reduce the revenue inflow to where it should be by that point in time.
Staff additionally noted that some of the conservation accomplished by the District
customers will continue as once a customer takes measures to increase
conservation (ie., Xeriscape their landscape, install a new irrigation timer, buy new
water efficient appliances, etc.) that impacts their future water use permanently.
Staff is estimating that half of the water use savings will come back, but some will
be permanent. Staff utilized historical data from previous water use cutbacks to
develop the estimates, but staff can modify this assumption. It was noted that this is
reviewed each year and staff can make modifications if the actual is different from
staff’s estimates.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated that if 12% savings is compared with
10% or even 8% savings, the rate does not change too significantly and the level of
conservation wherein the bond covenant is violated does not change that
significantly as well. With regard to high levels of conservation, staff feels that it is
very unlikely that customers can reach those levels of conservation. Staff expects
that they will not be absolutely accurate on the conservation level, but feels that
12% is a reasonable estimate of the conservation that customers can achieve.
Director Thompson indicated that he felt that proposing a rate increase for master
metered customers and the tier structure for these customers did not make sense to
him. He stated that he will likely state this concern again when the District performs
its next rate study.
In response to an inquiry from Director Smith, Chief Financial Officer Beachem
indicated that the District will be drawing down the reserves by $12.2 million with the
12% conservation level. He stated at the peak, approximately three (3) to (4) years
out, the District will be below reserve target by about $5.2 million, but in six (6)
18
years the District will be back on target. Director Smith indicated that he felt that it
would be difficult to explain to the District’s customers that it is reducing its rate
increase during the drought and he would prefer not to draw down the District’s
reserves. He would like to propose a 5.8% increase for FY 2016 with the intent to
lessen the draw on reserves.
Director Croucher stated that he felt that now, during the drought, is the time to
draw on reserves. He stated he supported the budget as it is presented. Director
Thompson indicated that there are reasonable assumptions in staff’s
recommendations and the board could look at a larger rate increase next year if
staff is off on some of its assumptions. He stated that his customers always discuss
with him staff salaries and rate increases. He stated that he supported the
proposed 5.4% increase as opposed to something higher with the understanding
that the reserve levels would be adequate.
Chief Financial Officer Beachem indicated, in response to an inquiry from Director
Robak, that the other local agencies are still trying to determine what conservation
level they will propose and, thus, are not ready to provide their rates. Staff will bring
back to the board the rate comparison chart for all the agencies as soon as they
can.
President Lopez thanked staff for the good work they have done on the budget. He
indicated that it was well done and well presented. General Manager Watton
indicated that staff will bring the budget back to the June 3, 2015 board meeting for
consideration by the board.
7. ADJOURNMENT
With no further business to come before the Board, President Lopez adjourned the
meeting at 6:08 p.m.
___________________________________
President
ATTEST:
District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
Environmental Compliance
Specialist
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2511-
001101
DIV. NO.
3 & 4
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
North-South District Interconnection System Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors
(Board):
Certify that the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the District’s North-South District Interconnection System
Project (Project) has been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act, the current State
Guidelines and the District’s Local Guidelines, and that it
reflects the independent judgment of the District.
Find that the potentially significant effects of the Project
will be avoided through the adoption of feasible mitigation
measures, as shown in the FEIR, and the Mitigation, Monitoring
and Reporting Program for the FEIR.
Approve the Findings for the Project.
2
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board certification of the FEIR for the Project (see
Exhibit A for Project location).
ANALYSIS:
In November 2010, the Board awarded a professional engineering
services agreement to Lee & Ro for the design of the Project.
This Project is the design of a 30-inch pipeline and associated
booster pump station that would enable the District to convey
potable water from the North District’s 640 pressure zone to the
South District’s 624 pressure zone and vice versa. The Project
would increase the District’s potable water supply flexibility
and reliability.
The scope of work for the Project included the preparation of
the necessary environmental documents. Lee & Ro hired Helix
Environmental Planning, Inc. (Helix) as their sub-consultant for
this task. Helix prepared a draft Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) which analyzed the impact of the Project on air quality,
biological and cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse
gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and
water quality, noise and traffic and transportation.
The draft EIR was submitted for a 45-day public review period on
June 12, 2013 and ten (10) comment letters were received from
state and local agencies, organizations, and individuals. Helix
and the District prepared responses to these letters and
comments have been incorporated into the EIR. The comment
letters and responses are included in the FEIR which also
includes the revised draft EIR.
Staff had previously begun the certification process for the
FEIR in January 2015 and brought the certification staff report
to the Engineering, Operations and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) meeting on January 20, 2015. The Committee
recommended that the Board approve the certification.
(Attachment B). However, during the period of time between the
Committee meeting and the Board meeting, Caltrans sent notice to
the District that they would not be able to sell the parcels
that were identified in the EIR as the preferred site for the
pump station to the District. The staff report was pulled
3
before the Board meeting so that District staff could analyze
whether any of the other alternative parcels described in the
EIR would be appropriate for the pump station site. In early
June 2015, Caltrans notified the District that they would be
able to sell the preferred pump station site parcels to the
District and that decision made it possible for the
certification of the EIR to proceed.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To
provide high value water and wastewater services to the
customers of the Otay Water District in a professional,
effective, and efficient manner” and the General Manager’s
Vision, “A District that is at the forefront in innovations to
provide water services at affordable rates, with a reputation
for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
No legal impact is anticipated. However, in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act process, the FEIR will have
the normal 30-day legal challenge period once recorded with the
County of San Diego.
LC-B/BK:mlc
P:\WORKING\CIP P2511-North-South District Intertie\Staff Reports\BD 08-13-15, Staff Report, North-South
Interconnect FEIR.docx
Attachments: Exhibit A – Project Location
Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – BD 02-14-15, Staff Report &
Committee Notes
Attachment C – Final EIR, MMRP & Findings
S W E E T W A T E R A U T H O R I T Y
O T A Y W A T E R D I S T R I C T
O W D
S W A!V!V
H S t
State Hwy 125
Sou
t
h
Ba
y
E
xp
y
Bay Fwy
OtayLakesRd
San Miguel Rd
Bonita Rd
Elevado
StateHwy54
C e n t r a l A v e
C
o
rralCanyonRd
ProctorValley R d
S w e e t w aterRd
QuarryRd
G otha m St
Acacia Ave
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
Trl
Ti
m
S
t
Paradise V all e y Rd
P
al
m
D
r
Mojave
L
orett
a
W
o
r
t
h
i
n
gton
S
t
P r a y St
P ark b r o o k S t
Degen Dr
C
a
n
y
o
n
DrRanchodelRayPkwy
MountMiguelRd
C
o
n
d
u
it
R
d Jonel Way
Co u n t r y V i s ta sLn
Noeline A v e
laMarina
Go o deSt
S
y
l
v
i
a
S
t
Broo k h a v enRd
D
a
w
s
o
n
i
a
S
t
Driveway
P a r k D r
Lakeview Ave
Rosal
San Carlos St
E
xit 8
Chateau Ct
A ll e y
R i d g e b ackRd
U n namedStreet
Mt
Miguel
Rd
Redlands
P
l
Wi
ld
Oats
L
n
W
in
n
etk
a D
r
Eastl ak e Pkwy
laQuinta
Crestview Dr
Point Dr
Lakeshor e Dr
Zinfandel Ter
Hills i deDr
Nilo Way
ElkeltonPl
D
a
ir
y
R
d
Versailles Rd
P
ad
era
Wa
y
Casa B o nita
Dr
Loping Ln
Windy Way
S outh BayExpy
S
t
a
t
e
H
w
y
125
Driveway
H S t
OTAY WATER DISTRICTNORTH / SOUTH DISTRICT INTERCONNECTION SYSTEMPROPOSED PUMP STATION AND PIPELINE ALIGNMENT CIP # P2511
EXHIBIT A
AäH
?pE
SWEETWATERRESERVOIR
F
P:\WORKING\CIP P2511-North-South District Intertie\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\Exhibit A.mxd
LA MESA
EL CAJON
CHULAVISTA
OTAYMESA
DIV. 1
DIV. 2
DIV. 3
DIV. 5
DIV. 4
M E XI CO
VICINITY MAP
PROJECTSITE
AäH
Legend
!V!VProposed Pump Station
Proposed Pipeline Alignment
Alternative Alignment
Preferred Alignment
OWD Boundary
Division 1
Division 2
Division 3
Division 4
Division 5
SWEETWATERAUTHORITY
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2511-001101
Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for
the North-South District Interconnection System Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee
(Committee) reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22, 2015,
and the following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the board:
o Certify that the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for
the District’s North-South District Interconnection System
Project (Project) has been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act, the current State
Guidelines and the District’s Local Guidelines, and that it
reflects the independent judgment of the District.
o Find that the potentially significant effects of the Project
will be avoided through the adoption of feasible mitigation
measures, as shown in the FEIR, and the Mitigation, Monitoring
and Reporting Program for the FEIR.
o Approve the Findings for the Project.
Staff indicated that the North-South interconnection system
project consists of a 30-inch pipeline and associated booster
pump station that would enable the District to move potable
water between the District’s north and south districts. Staff
noted that the project would increase the District’s potable
water supply flexibility and reliability.
It was noted that in FY 2010, the District hired Lee & Ro as the
engineering design firm for the project and Lee & Ro’s
environmental sub-consultant is Helix Environmental Planning.
5
Helix prepared the draft environmental impact report (EIR) for
the project which analyzed the impact of the project on air
quality, biological and cultural resources, geology and soils,
greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, noise, and traffic and
transportation.
Staff stated that the draft EIR was submitted for a 45-day
public review period and ten comment letters were received from
state and local agencies, organization and individuals. These
comment letters and their responses are included in the Final
EIR.
In January 2015, staff brought this request for EIR
certification to the Engineering, Operations and Water Resources
Committee. The Committee had recommended that the EIR be
certified by the Board, but shortly after the meeting, the
District was informed by Caltrans that they would be unable to
sell the parcels designated for the Project’s pump station. The
staff report was pulled so that alternative sites could be
evaluated and included in the EIR if needed. Caltrans recently
informed the District that they would be able to sell the
parcels to the District.
Staff noted that the next phase is to bring the purchase of the
Caltrans properties to the Finance, Administration and
Communications Committee and the full Board for considerations.
In response to a comment by the Committee, staff indicated that
they have met with other local agencies (i.e. County of San
Diego and the city of Chula Vista) to see what projects they may
have to possibly collaborate with them and save money.
Staff indicated that they have been meeting with Sweetwater
Authority staff to try and gain a new connection through the
Perdue Treatment Plant. It was noted that the Authority is also
interested in other inter-connections along Conduit Road.
Following the discussion, the EO&WR Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a public hearing
item.
ATTACHMENT B
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: February 4,2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
Environmental Compliance
Specialist
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2511-
001101
DIV. NO.
3,4
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
North-South District Interconnection System Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors
(Board)certify that the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR)
for the District’s North-South District Interconnection System
Project has been completed in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the current State Guidelines, and the
District’s local Guidelines, and that it reflects the
independent judgment of the District.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board certification of the FEIR for the Otay Water
District’s North-South District Interconnection System Project
(see Exhibit A for Project location).
ANALYSIS:
In November 2010, the Board awarded a professional engineering
services agreement to Lee & Ro for the design of the North-South
Interconnection Project. This Project is the design of a 30-
inch pipeline and associated booster pump station that would
enable the District to convey potable water from the North
District’s 640 pressure zone to the South District’s 624
pressure zone and vice versa. The Project would increase the
District’s potable water supply flexibility and reliability.
The scope of work for the Project included the preparation of
the necessary environmental documents and Lee & Ro hired Helix
Environmental Planning, Inc. (Helix) as their sub-consultant for
this task. Helix prepared a draft Environmental Impact Report
which analyzed the impact of the Project on air quality,
biological and cultural resources, geology & soils, greenhouse
gas emissions, hazards & hazardous materials, hydrology & water
quality, noise and traffic & transportation.
The draft EIR was submitted for a 45-day public review period on
June 12, 2013 and ten comment letters were received from state
and local agencies, organizations, and individuals. Helix and
the District prepared responses to these letters and comments
have been incorporated into the EIR. The comment letters and
responses are included in the FEIR which also includes the
revised draft EIR.
Staff is asking that the Board certify the FEIR, but is not
requesting approval of the Project or adoption of Project
findings. These will be brought to the Board when construction
of the pipeline and pump station is scheduled to move forward.
Staff will also ask for approval of the Mitigation, Monitoring
and Reporting Program for the selected pipeline alignment and
pump station at that time. Construction is expected to start
sometime around Fiscal Year 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
No fiscal impact.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To
provide high value water and wastewater services to the
customers of the Otay Water District in a professional,
effective, and efficient manner” and the General Manager’s
Vision, “A District that is at the forefront in innovations to
provide water services at affordable rates, with a reputation
for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
No legal impact is anticipated. However, in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act process, the FEIR will have
the normal 30-day legal challenge period once recorded with the
County of San Diego.
LC-B/BK:jf
P:\WORKING\CIP P2511-North-South District Intertie\Staff Reports\BD 02-04-15, Staff Report, North-South
Interconnect FEIR.docx
Attachments: Exhibit A – Project Location
Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Final EIR
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2511-001101
Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for
the North-South District Interconnection System Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on January 20, 2015, and the
following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board certify that the Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the District’s North-South
District Interconnection System Project has been completed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
current State Guidelines, and the District’s local Guidelines,
and that it reflects the independent judgment of the District.
Staff stated that the North-South Interconnection System Project
consists of a 30-inch pipeline and an associated booster pump
station that would enable the District to move potable water
between the District’s North and South Districts. It was noted
that the Project would increase the District’s potable water
supply flexibility and reliability.
It was indicated that in 2010, the District hired Lee & Ro as the
engineering design firm for the Project and Lee & Ro’s
environmental sub consultant is Helix Environmental Planning.
Helix prepared the draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for
the Project which analyzes the impact of the Project on air
quality, biological and cultural resources, geology and soils,
greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials,
hydrology and water quality, noise, and traffic, and
transportation.
Staff noted that the EIR was submitted for a 45-day public review
period and ten (10) comment letters were received from state and
local agencies, organizations and individuals. These comment
letters and their responses are included in the EIR.
Staff is asking that the committee recommend that the Board
certify the final EIR, but is not requesting approval of the
Project or adoption of Project findings at this time. Project
approval and the corresponding Project findings will be brought
to the Board when construction of the Project is scheduled to
move forward. At that time, staff will also ask for approval of
the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting program associated with
the selected pipeline alignment and pump station site.
Construction is expected to occur sometime around Fiscal Year
2020.
The Committee commented that District staff and consultants did
an excellent job at reviewing, researching alternative
alignments, and looking at potential impacts for the Project.
The Committee stated that it is a very complete report and that
staff has placed a lot of time and effort to complete the EIR. It
was indicated that staff and consultants have been working on the
EIR since Fiscal Year 2010. With that said, the Committee
recommended that this committee agenda item move forward to the
full board for consideration.
The Committee inquired if staff was concerned with public
responses/comments to the EIR. Staff stated that there are no
major concerns, but shared that the Bonita Highlands Homeowners’
Association (BHHA) did indicate that they were opposed to the
Project because of several impacts it may cause to the community.
It was indicated that staff has addressed BHHA’s concerns at
their community meetings and in addition has met with County
Supervisor Greg Cox several times to provide extensive details of
the Project. Staff noted that approximately $1 million dollars
has been spent so far including outreach efforts by staff for
this Project.
It was indicated that BHHA provided to the District alternative
routes for the Project, which District staff had considered.
However, when taking a look at it from an engineering
perspective, there were risks with some of the tunnel and pipe
jacking, as well as, environmental issues. The District
understands the BHHA’s concerns of traffic and access to their
homes, but staff believes that this Project will consist of
different phases to alleviate some of the impacts to the
community.
In response to a question by the Committee, staff indicated that
one of the route alternatives (the straight route) was not
feasible because it goes through a horse trail that has a very
narrow easement and is basically made up of dirt road. Staff
stated that going down Frisbee Street, which goes around the
horse trail, was a better route for the Project.
The Committee commented that it is very important to provide
community outreach and updates to the community as the District
moves forward with the Project. They believe that communicating
with the homeowners will help alleviate some of their concerns
about potential impacts to the community.
The Committee recommended that staff collaborate with other
agencies to ensure that their projects will not begin at the same
time as the District’s North-South District Interconnection
System Project. The goal is to avoid significant impacts that
would upset the community.
Following the discussion, the Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a public hearing
item.
Prepared for:
Otay Water District
2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
Spring Valley, CA 91978-2004
NORTH-SOUTH DISTRICTINTERCONNECTION SYSTEM PROJECT
Final Environmental Impact Report
CIP No. P2511
SCH No. 2011081048
December 2014
Prepared by:
HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.
7578 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite 200
La Mesa, CA 91942
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem,
Chief Financial Officer
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 4294 Designating a Change of Authorized
Signatories for the District’s Operating and Payroll Accounts
with Union Bank, N.A.
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board adopt Resolution No. 4294 designating a change of
authorized signatories for the District’s operating and payroll
accounts with Union Bank, N.A.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To make a change to the authorized signatories on the District’s
operating and payroll accounts adding Kevin Koeppen, Finance Manager,
as an authorized signatory.
ANALYSIS:
On a periodic basis the District reviews its operating process and
procedures. The purpose of these reviews is to ensure the District
identifies potential weaknesses and implements improvements where
necessary. Recently, finance staff reviewed procedures for ensuring
the District is able to meet its financial obligations to vendors and
2
staff in the event of a disaster. The District maintains manual
check stock that, in a disaster situation, can be used to make
payments if the Accounts Payable system is not accessible.
These manual checks require two signatures and are maintained in a
locked cabinet, which only select personnel have access to. The
District’s current authorized signatories are:
Mark Watton - General Manager
German Alvarez – Assistant General Manager
Joseph R. Beachem – Chief Financial Officer
Staff has identified that, in the event of a disaster, there is a
risk that staff may be unable to obtain two signatures required for
issuing manual checks. Therefore, staff is recommending that the
Finance Manager, Kevin Koeppen, be added as a backup signatory to the
Union Bank operating and payroll accounts.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Demonstrate financial health through formalized policies, prudent
investing, and efficient operations.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A) Committee Action
B) Resolution No. 4294
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
Adopt Resolution No. 4294 Designating a Change of
Authorized Signatories for the District’s Operating and
Payroll Accounts with Union Bank, N.A.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on July 21, 2015 and the following
comments were made:
Staff is requesting a change to the authorized signatories for the
District’s operating and payroll accounts with Union Bank, N.A.,
adding finance manager, Kevin Koeppen, as an authorized signatory.
During a review of the Finance Division’s disaster procedures, staff
performed a review of payment capabilities and payment controls.
The District’s payment options include the use of petty cash, system
generated checks and the use of CalCards.
In the event that these payment options are not available, the
District also has the ability to issue handwritten checks.
Handwritten checks require dual signatures and, currently, there are
three (3) authorized check signers; Mark Watton, German Alvarez and
Joe Beachem.
Staff identified that in the event of a disaster, there is a risk
that staff may be unable to obtain the two (2) signatures required
for manual checks.
Staff is, thus, recommending that the District’s Finance Manager,
Kevin Koeppen, be added as a backup signer. By doing so, the
District would strengthen its ability to pay vendors in the event of
a disaster.
District staff performed a review of the District’s current internal
controls and determined the current controls would not be
compromised by this request.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the board as a consent item.
RESOLUTION NO. 4294
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT DESIGNATING A CHANGE OF
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORIES FOR THE DISTRICT’S OPERATING AND
PAYROLL ACCOUNTS WITH UNION BANK, N.A.
WHEREAS, Otay Water District (“District”) currently
has bank accounts with Union Bank, N.A. for the District’s
operating and payroll accounts; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the District
desires to designate a change of authorized signatories on
said accounts; and
WHEREAS, the additional signatory will provide for
four signatories in the event of a disaster.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of
Directors of the Otay Water District as follows:
That Kevin Koeppen, Finance Manager, be added as an
authorized designated signatory for each of the said
accounts.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors
of the Otay Water District at a regular meeting, held this
13th day of August, 2015.
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
________________________________
President
Attest:
_______________________
District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Jose Martinez,
Assistant Chief of Water
Operations
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Pedro Porras, Chief Water Operations
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approval to Purchase Vactor Truck
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board authorize the General Manager to issue a purchase
order to Haaker Equipment Company in the amount of $402,830.28 for
the purchase of one (1) new Model 2115P-16 Vactor truck.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
See Attachment “A”.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization to purchase a potable Vactor truck
to replace the District’s old Vactor truck.
ANALYSIS:
Currently, the District’s essential equipment to support facility
repairs includes two (2) potable Vactor trucks. Unit 144 is a
2003 Vactor Jet Rodder truck with 168,851 miles. Due to the nature
of the vehicle’s work, the useful in-service life of this machine
is normally 7-10 years and 100,000 miles. Funding for this Vactor
truck has been included in FY 2016 Capitol Purchase Budget, Project
P2282 vehicle replacement.
The new Vactor truck as shown in Attachment “B,” will continue to
be used in the removal and clean-up of heavily saturated soil when
performing maintenance on the water distribution system including
repair and replacement of service laterals, water mains, buried
valves, etc. The vehicle’s 15 cubic yard debris body allows the
Vactor to stay on site for extended periods during large emergency
breaks or performing multiple service leak repairs without the
need to make additional trips to empty the excavation spoils
thereby expediting the repairs. The vehicle is also used for
potholing to locate various utility types and depths with a minimal
surface street disturbance.
Based on system operation evaluations of work flow by the Utility
Maintenance supervision and management, it is recommended that one
(1) new Vactor truck Model 2115P-16 be purchased and the older
Vactor Unit 144 be declared surplus with an estimated salvage value
of $35,000.
In accordance with District policy, bids were solicited for the
replacement Vactor truck. Three (3) bids were received. Prices
received include all applicable fees such as taxes and delivery
and are shown as follows:
Dealer Vehicle Bid Bid Price
Haaker Equipment Company
Vactor Truck Model
2115P-16
$402,830.28
Owen Equipment
Vactor Truck Model
2115P-16
$407,962.00
Neverest Equipment
Company
Vactor Truck Model
2115P-16
$409,536.00
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The FY16 budget for this vehicle is $405,000.00 in the Vehicle
Replacement CIP P2282 with an anticipated lead time of 300 days
for delivery.
The Finance Department has determined that 100% of the funds are
available in the replacement fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Operate the system to meet demand twenty-four hours a day, seven
days a week.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
General Manager
Attachment “A” Committee Action
Attachment “B” Vactor Truck
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: Approval to Purchase Vactor Truck
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on July 21, 2015 and the following
comments were made:
Staff is requesting that the board approve the issuance of a
purchase order to Haaker Equipment Company in the amount of
$402,830.28 for the purchase of the one (1) Vactor truck.
The purchase is to replace the District’s old Vactor truck with
approximately 170,000 miles.
The Vactor truck pictured on Attachment B to staffs’ report will be
used to perform planned/unplanned maintenance and respond to
emergency repairs on the District’s water distribution system,
including service laterals, water mains, buried valves, and perform
cleanup efforts in an efficient and safe manner.
The District has obtained three (3) quotes for Vactor trucks as
shown on page two (2) of staffs report and the lowest responsive
bidder, Haaker Equipment Company, was selected.
Based on yearly maintenance workflow, staff is recommending the
purchase of one new Vactor truck and declaring the old Vactor, unit
number 144, as surplus.
It was indicated that the funding for this vehicle is included in
the fiscal year 2016 budget and this purchase is within the budgeted
amount.
In response to an inquiry from the Committee, staff indicated that
the new Vactor truck will replace the District’s 2003 Vactor.
The committee inquired if the maintenance cost for the 2003 Vactor
has been exhorbitant over the last couple years. Staff indicated
that they have not yet, but because of the service life of the
vehicle and the evidence of existing corrosion they wanted to avoid
any excessive maintenance costs. Corrosion starts wearing out the
integrity of the tank, which is where the most significant
maintenance costs are experienced. Staff indicated there is a fair
amount of corrosion (greater than 50%) at the bottom of the tank and
the truck may require the welding of a plate to the bottom of the
tank.
Staff indicated the 2003 Vactor has an approximate surplus value of
$35,000, which is about what the District’s last Vactor truck sold
for.
Staff noted that the lead time to receive a a Vactor truck is about
one (1) year from issuing a purchase order.
The Committee commented that the District’s budget for this year is
very tight due to the State mandated water conservation and the
success of the District’s customers to conserve. The committee
inquired if the purchase of the Vactor truck could be held off as
the District’s finances could be impacted by customers conservation
efforts, which could lead to a much larger rate increase. Staff
indicated that the Vactor truck is funded through the replacement
reserves and the truck has been scheduled for replacement in the
fiscal year 2016 budget. If the purchase is delayed, it would still
need to be purchased at some point and, thus, the capital purchases
would start backing up. The District would also be putting money
into a “dying” asset and then would need to purchase the new asset
in the future at a higher cost. The District may save now, but it
compounds future purchases and costs later.
It was indicated in response to another inquiry from the Committee
that the District is part of a shared resources program and
neighboring agencies have borrowed the District’s Vactor truck
during emergency situations. The agencies do reimburse the District
for the use of its assets.
The Vactor truck will be used for emergency and day-to-day leak
repairs, mainbreaks and maintenance of the potable system. The
truck helps reduce the risk of injuries to staff, like repetitive
motion injuries from shoveling dirt and excavating around gas lines
and fiber optic cables so staff does not have to try and locate them
with hand tools which can be dangerous. Staff also higllighted that
the Vactor track reduces the amount of labor required to perform
repairs. A typical repair that would take 8 hours to accomplish can
now be done in 4 hours with the Vactor truck.
Staff indicated that there are two other manufacturers of vacuum
trucks used in the area: GapVax and Vac-Con. Staff did not consider
the Gap-Vax trucks because they do not offer a 15 cubic yard body.
Staff inquired with other surrounding agencies that have utilized a
Vac-Con. A neighboring large agency indicated that they have tried
Vac-Con trucks for a few years (they have 37 Vacuum trucks total)
however, their fleet supervisor indicated that they are no longer
using the Vac-Con trucks and are phasing them out due to reliability
and maintenance issues. For emergency reponse, this is a
significant issue. Three other agencies that have used multiple
manufacturers prefer Vactor due to less maintenance costs and less
down time which are valuable for emergency repairs and response time
despite Vac-Con trucks costing a little less compared to Vactor
trucks that have proven to be reliable here at the District.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B
Model 2115P-16 Vactor truck
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
PROJECT: DIV. NO.: ALL
SUBMITTED BY: Michael Kerr, Information Technology Manager
APPROVED BY: Adolfo Segura, Assistant Chief, Admin/IT Services
Geoff Stevens, Chief Information Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: REPLACEMENT OF DATA CENTER SERVER EQUIPMENT AND UPGRADE
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board approve the issuance of a purchase order to Trace3 in
the amount of $174,725.29 for new network equipment and software to
replace the existing server environment.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see “Attachment A”.
PURPOSE:
To authorize the purchase of equipment and services necessary to support
Information Technology’s daily operations and services, and to enhance
District systems to meet emerging business needs as identified in the
District’s Strategic Plan.
ANALYSIS:
The District’s business system environment is comprised of a collection
of essential computing servers that manage all day-to-day access of
electronic data, applications, and storage resources. The electronic
business resources utilized by District staff include Eden Financial
System, Geographic Information System (GIS), Voice/Phone System, Data
Recovery, SharePoint Portal and Content Management, Computerized
Maintenance Management System/Work Order, Asset Management, and Data
Retention System.
The current server environment is over seven (7) years old and lacks
functionalities and features that would make the system more efficient
and limits our ability to leverage existing District
technologies. Maintenance costs have also doubled as a result of the
existing equipment reaching its end of useful life. Continuing with the
direction to further consolidate and improve the District’s computing
needs, coupled with its end-of-life status, approximately six months
ago staff commenced extensive research into a right-fit/cost-effective
business server replacement system. Staff recognized the need for a
centrally managed server system to optimize performance, day-to-day
operation, and reduce overall maintenance and support costs. In
assessing the District’s needs, staff identified the Cisco Unified
Communication Server (UCS) system to replace the existing end-of-life
Hewlett Packet (HP) server environment. The proposed server
infrastructure replacement will provide required performance,
redundancies, and future scalability, while decreasing physical
footprint in the District’s data center. This in turn will reduce power
and cooling requirements, therefore reducing the cost of
ownership. Lastly, the UCS server system will be operated by in-house
IT staff.
Staff solicited and received three (3) qualified quotes from Nexus Inc.
for $190,643.06, Trace3 for $174,725.29, and Pinnacle for $171,620.64.
Vendor Item Product
Specification/Description
Total
Price
Nexus Cisco UCS 5100
(5108) Server
UCS 5108 Chassis & Blade Servers,
16GB DDR4-2133-MHz RDIMM/PC4-
17000/dual rank/x4/1.2v
$190,643.06
Trace3 Cisco UCS 5100
(5108) Server
UCS 5108 Chassis & Blade Servers,
16GB DDR4-2133-MHz RDIMM/PC4-
17000/dual rank/x4/1.2v
$174,725.29
Pinnacle Cisco UCS 5100
(5108) Server
UCS 5108 Chassis & Blade Servers,
16GB DDR4-2133-MHz RDIMM/PC4-
17000/dual rank/x4/1.2v
$171,620.64
Staff conducted a decision analysis of competing vendors and developed
a list of specifications based on District’s technology needs (see
Attachment B).
The selection panel consisted of the Information Technology Manager,
Network Engineer, and the Assistant Chief of Administrative and
Information Technology Services. Based on the scoring criteria
(Attachment B), the panel selected Trace3 as the overall best fit and
value for the District's UCS server system replacement.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The approved capital budget is $175,000.00 for FY16 for CIP P2469
Information Technology Network and Hardware. This expenditure of
$174,725.29 will leave a remaining balance of $274.71 in this CIP.
After this expenditure this CIP will be closed. The Project Manager
anticipates, based on financial analysis, that the budget will be
sufficient to support this project. Finance has determined that 60% of
the funding is available from the Expansion Fund and 40% from the
Replacement Fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
These items are in support of the District’s required services and
Strategic Plan, which specifically improve the overall operating cost.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
Attachment A – Committee Action Report
Attachment B – Selection Panel Analysis
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: REPLACEMENT OF DATA CENTER SERVER EQUIPMENT AND UPGRADE
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on July 21, 2015 and the following
comments were made:
Staff is requesting that the board approve the issuance of a
purchase order in the amount of $174,725.29 to Trace3 Incorporated
for the procurement of a new network unified computing server
system.
Unified Computing System (UCS) is defined as centrally managed
architecture that integrates network, computer resources, storage
access, and virtualization into a single cohesive system.
Some of the dependent services that will benefit from the upgraded
UCS architecture includes the District’s financial management
software (Eden Financials), the Geographic Information System
(GIS), Asset Management, and Data recovery/retention.
Industry standards and technology best practices recommend the
upgrade or replacement of server environment and equipment every
four (4) to six (6) years. The District’s server infrastructure is
over 7 years old and has nearly reached its end-of-life
effectiveness. In addition, the District’s current server
architecture lacks the flexibility and scalability for future
District computing needs.
Upgrading and enhancing the new server architecture will also
provide for:
- Reduced provisioning time for Operating System deployment
- Security improvement and manageability
- Ease of use allowing IT staff to operate
- Disaster recovery benefits
- Smaller hardware footprint, thus, lowering total cost of
ownership
Prior to the selection of Trace3, the District conducted a thorough
analysis of the three proposals which were submitted (see staffs
report for a list of the vendors who submitted proposals). The
criteria used to rate the vendors included the experience of the
vendor’s staff, their approach to the project, capability to
perform, and leveraging of the recently upgraded Cisco network and
budget.
The new system will provide scalability, integration, and harness
the value of virtualization for the District’s server technology
architecture. Each physical server blade can support 20 to 40
virtual servers. It is expected the new system will have a life
expectancy of approximately seven (7) years.
This purchase will be funded via CIP2469, Information Technology
Network and Hardware. Following this expenditure, this CIP will be
closed.
It was indicated that the District has invested approximately $1
million for hardware and staff hours to operate and support the
current network infrastructure. The new proposed UCS system is
developed and manufactured by Cisco, which is the District’s
existing network infrastructure vendor and, thus, the District
would utilize the same source for support. These technologies work
hand-in-hand and should any technical issues arise, the District
will need only to look to one vendor for support and solutions.
In response to an inquiry from the Committee, staff indicated that
following this upgrade, the CIP will be closed and the District
should be fine in this area of technology for a number of years.
Next year, in terms of technology initiatives, staff will be
focusing on replacing the permitting application within the
Engineering Division. This is part of the plan for CityWorks where
the first phase was the implementation of the Work Order System and
second phase was the replacement of the permitting application.
Staff is looking at a few other technology enhancements, but at
this time those plans are still preliminary and will be brought
forward in the future.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the board as a consent item.
SELECTION PANEL ANALYSIS FOR BLADE SERVER SYSTEM
Experience of
Proposed Staff
Approach to
the Project
Capability
to Perform
Cost/
Pricing
Relevant
Experience Sub-
Total TOTAL
MAXIMUM POINTS 10 9 8 9 6
PINNACLE
Assistant Chief,
Admin/IT Ops 7 9 7 9 8 41
129 IT Manager 8 9 7 9 10 44
Network Engineer 9 9 9 8 9 44
NEXUS
Assistant Chief,
Admin/IT Ops 8 9 7 7 8 39
126 IT Manager 8 10 9 7 8 42
Network Engineer 9 10 10 7 9 45
TRACE3
Assistant Chief,
Admin/IT Ops 8 9 7 9 8 41
133 IT Manager 8 10 9 9 10 46
Network Engineer 9 10 10 8 9 46
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Dan Martin
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: S2033-002103
DIV. NO. 5
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Approve Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with Arrieta
Construction, Inc. for the Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation,
Phase 1 Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
approve Change Order No. 2 to the existing contract with Arrieta
Construction, Inc. (Arrieta) for a credit in the amount of
<$54,410.29> for the Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation, Phase 1
Project (see Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to execute
Change Order No. 2 for a credit in the amount of <$54,410.29> to the
contract with Arrieta for the Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation,
Phase 1 Project.
ANALYSIS:
At the November 5, 2014 Board Meeting, the Board awarded a
construction contract in an amount of $529,490 to Arrieta to
construct sewer improvements in the Calavo Sewer Basin. Those sewer
rehabilitation improvements included the replacement of approximately
2
1,200 linear feet of 8-inch gravity sewer, installation of about 220
linear feet of new 8-inch gravity sewer, 4 new sewer manholes,
reconnection of sewer lines and laterals, maintaining sewer service,
restoration of pavement and landscaping, removal of trees, traffic
control, erosion control, protection of existing utilities, and all
testing and inspection as required by the contract documents.
Since the award of the construction contract by the District to
Arrieta, Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $19,879.09, has been
approved under the General Manager’s authority to address unforeseen
utilities on the Project.
Change Order No. 2 (see Exhibit B), which serves as a close-out
Change Order for the contract, consists of a variety of items
including:
The deletion of 35 linear feet of planned sewer and associated
pavement replacement at one location due to conflicts that will
require complex utility relocations. This location will be
addressed on a future project.
Deletion of pavement restoration work resulting from field
conditions.
Deletion of rock removal and utility allowance items resulting
from field conditions.
Addition of slurry seal on Calavo Drive to satisfy requirements
of the County of San Diego.
Addition of base course pavement at Bobbie Lane repair area.
In total, Change Order No. 2 represents a net credit of <$54,410.29>.
A complete breakdown of the costs associated with each item and the
associated method of compensation is included in Change Order No. 2.
Change Order No. 2 also addresses contract time as a result of the
added Type II Slurry Seal item. An assessment of the time impacts
associated with each change is provided in Exhibit B, including the
addition of three (3) days for the Type II Slurry Seal work. In
total, the three (3) additional days added to the contract will
result in a revised total contract duration of 183 calendar days.
In summary, Change Order No. 2 will result in a net decrease to the
Project in the amount of <$54,410.29> and the addition of three (3)
calendar days. Arrieta has substantially completed the Project. The
remaining work required for contract acceptance consists of minor
punch list items.
3
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP S2033, as approved in the FY 2016 budget, is
$6,000,000. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast including Change Order No. 2, are $1,617,112.00. See
Attachment B for the budget detail for CIP S2033.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget for CIP S2033 is sufficient to support
the Project.
The Finance Department has determined that, under the current rate
model, 100% of the funding will be available from the Replacement
Fund for CIP S2033.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
DM:mlc
P:\WORKING\CIP S2033 Sewer System Rehabilitation\Staff Reports\BD 08-13-15\BD 08-13-2015, Staff Report, Change Order No
2 to Arrieta Construction, Inc., (DM).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – S2033 Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
Exhibit B – Change Order No. 2
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S2033-002103 Approve Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with Arrieta
Construction, Inc. for the Calavo Basin Sewer
Rehabilitation, Phase 1 Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22, 2015, and the
following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board approve Change Order No. 2 to
the existing contract with Arrieta Construction, Inc. (Arrieta)
for a credit in the amount of <$54,410.29> for the Calavo Basin
Sewer Rehabilitation, Phase 1 Project.
It was indicated by staff that at the November 4, 2014 Board
Meeting, the Board awarded a construction contract in the amount
of $529,490.00 to Arrieta to construct sewer improvement in the
Calavo Sewer Basin. Those improvements included replacement of
sewer facilities that were originally constructed in the early
1970’s. Staff noted that the existing sewer system was inspected
via video and specific locations were identified for
rehabilitation and replacement.
Staff indicated that the work included replacement of
approximately 1,200 linear feet of 8-inch sewer, installation of
220 feet of new 8-inch sewer, 4 new sewer manholes, reconnection
of sewer lines and lateral and restoration of the impacted
facilities.
Staff stated that since the award of the contract, one change
order has been issued under the General Manager’s authority to
address unforeseen utilities.
It was discussed that Change Order No. 2 (Exhibit B) serves as a
close out change order for the Project. The Change Order
includes:
o The deletion of 35 linear feet of planned sewer and
associated pavement replacement at one location due to
conflicts that will require complex utility relocations.
Staff noted this location will be addressed on a future
project.
o Existing field conditions also resulted in using less of the
specified item quantities included in the contract and
resulted in deletion of this work.
o Slurry seal was added on Calavo Drive to satisfy County
inspection requirements.
o Additional base course pavement was required at the Bobbie
Lane repair area.
Change Order No. 2 also addresses contract time and adds 3
calendar days as a result of the additional slurry work.
The new change to the project for the Change Order No. 2 is a
decrease totaling <$54,410.29> and the addition of three (3)
calendar days which will result in a revised total contract
duration of 183 calendar days.
Staff indicated that Arrieta has substantially completed the
contract work.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
they have identified which project will be associated with the 35
linear-feet of planned sewer as they have looked at all the mark
outs to determine the design and where to relocate the sewer.
This action was more cost efficient than having Arrieta complete
the relocation of the sewer due to conflicts associated with
required complex utility relocations.
Following the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
S2033-002103 Approve Change Order No. 2 to the Contract with Arrieta
Construction, Inc. for the Calavo Basin Sewer
Rehabilitation, Phase 1 Project
Date Updated: 7/10/2015
Budget
6,000,000
Planning
Regulatory Agency Fees 50 50 - 50 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Standard Salaries 216,679 216,679 - 216,679
Total Planning 216,729 216,729 - 216,729
Design 001102
Consultant Contracts 20,720 20,720 - 20,720 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC
21,446 21,446 - 21,446 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL
152,958 152,958 - 152,958 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC
62,256 62,256 - 62,256 ARCADIS US INC
6,995 6,995 - 6,995 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC
Professional Legal Fees 120 120 - 120 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Service Contracts 2,666 2,666 - 2,666 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
385 385 - 385 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
1,500 1,500 - 1,500 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
Standard Salaries 323,104 323,104 - 323,104
Total Design 592,149 592,149 - 592,149
Construction
Consultant Contracts 5,850 5,850 - 5,850 ALYSON CONSULTING - DESIGN REVIEW
2,400 2,400 - 2,400 RBF CONSULTING
25,200 21,450 3,750 25,200 ALYSON CONSULTING - CM SERVICES
Regulatory Agency Fees 12,004 12,004 - 12,004 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
529,490 475,080 54,410 529,490 ARRIETA CONSTRUCTION INC
19,879 19,879 - 19,879 Change Order No. 1
(54,410) - (54,410) (54,410) Change Order No. 2
32,521 22,416 10,104 32,521 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST
Professional Legal Fees 300 300 - 300 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Reimbursement Agreements 15,000 11,675 3,325 15,000 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Standard Salaries 220,000 205,276 14,724 220,000 0
Total Construction 808,234 776,331 31,903 808,234
Grand Total 1,617,112 1,585,209 31,903 1,617,112
Construction Contracts
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
S2033-Sewer System Various Locations Rehabilit
Committed Expenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(
NABAL
^_
^_^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
^_
154
81
160
42
140
60
145219
100
28
122
27123
8AVOCADO
FURY LN
BLVD
CALLE VERDE
FUERTE DR
EXPLORER RD
C
ALA
V
O
NABAL
CHALLENGE
QUEEN
MARS
PUEB LA
R
A
N
C
H
O
ANAHEIM
LOUISA
ITZAMNA
DUTTON
TAFT
ALTA RICA
LALANI
CRESTLAND
SUNDOWN
C
ENTINELLA
CAMINO ALEGRE
VIA PIC
A
N
TE
VIA ESCUDA
VIA PALMA
VERNETTE
L U PIN
DICKEY
MORNING STAR
BOBBIE
NEW MORNINGRAPATEE
CARPENTER
LA RUEDA
CARMEN
BUTTERFLY
ALTA MIRA
SUNRISE VALLEY
OLVERA
MEADOW VIEW
SUNRAY
LYONS
TOPA TOPA
VI
A M
ER
C
AD
O
AVNDA JOHANNA
LORRAINE
ANN
NOLAN
MIG
U
E
L VIE
W
AVOCADO SCHOOL
CALLE VERDE
AVNDATHOMAS
AVOCADO VILLAGE
VELASCO
DESOTO
JULIE
SHINING LIGHT
PRIVATE
P
R
I
V
AT
E
MARS
PRIVATE
PRIVATE
PASEO
ZUNIGA
PRIVATE
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
NTS DIV 5
DIV 1
DIV 2
DIV 4
DIV 3
?ò
Aä;&s
?p
?Ë
!\F
OTAY WATER DISTRICTCALAVO BASIN SEWER REHABILITATION - PHASE 1LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT A
CIP S2033P:\WORKING\CIP S2033 Sewer System Rehabilitation\Graphics\Exhibits-Figures\Exhibit A, CIP S2033, Calavo Basin Sewer Rehab - Phase 1, Location Map, 2014-08-21.mxd
F
0 1,000500
Feet
LEGEND
^_
OWD BOUNDARY
EXISTING SEWER MAIN
SEWER MAIN REPAIR LOCATION
123 SITE NUMBER
EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE!(
Contract / P.O. Change Order No. 2 page 2 of 3
Description of Work
Description
Increase Decrease Time
Item No. 1:
This Change Order decreases the amount allocated for Bid Item 7, Remove
and Replace 8-inch Sewer Main by $7,385.00 to a new authorized amount of
$245,815.00. (Delete 35 SY at $211/LF)
$7,385.00 0
Item No. 2:
This Change Order increases the amount allocated for Bid Item 9, Reconnect
Sewer Laterals by $720.00 to a new authorized amount of $7,920.00. (Add 1
EA at $720/EA)
$720.00 0
Item No. 3:
This Change Order decreases the amount allocated for Bid Item 14, Asphalt
Concrete Pavement Restoration, Private Drive by $8,385.00 to a new
authorized amount of $1,365.00. (Delete 215 SY at $39/SY)
$8,385.00 0
Item No. 4:
This Change Order decreases the amount allocated for Bid Item 15, Asphalt
Concrete Pavement Restoration, Public Street by $34,580.00 to a new
authorized amount of $17,920.00. (Delete 988 SY at $35/SY)
$34,580.00 0
Item No. 5:
This Change Order decreases the amount allocated for Bid Item 16,
Rubberized Asphalt Concrete Pavement Restoration by $13,535.71 to a new
authorized amount of $3,484.29. (Delete 366 SY at $37/SY)
$13,535.71 0
Item No. 6:
This Change Order decreases the amount allocated for Bid Item 19, Rock
Removal by $100.00 to a new authorized amount of $0.00. (Delete 1 CY at
$100/CY)
$100.00 0
Item No. 7:
This Change Order decreases the amount allocated for Bid Item 21,
Undercrossing of Utilities Over 4-inches in Diameter, Not Identified on the
Drawings by $400.00 to a new authorized amount of $100.00. (Delete 8 EA at
$50/EA)
$400.00 0
Item No. 8:
This Change Order provides up to 5,000 SF of Type II RPMS Slurry Seal on
Calavo Drive.
$6,640.60 3
Item No. 9:
This Change Order provides an additional 320 SF of base course pavement at
the Bobbie Lane repair area.
$2,614.82 0
Sub Total Amount $9,975.42 $64,385.71 0
Total Net Change Order Amount ($54,410.29)
Contract / P.O. Change Order No. 2 page 3 of 3
Revisions to: BID SCHEDULE
Item # Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount
7 Remove and Replace 8-inch Sewer Main 1165 LF $211.00 $245,815.00
9 Reconnect Sewer Laterals 11 EA $720.00 $7,920.00
14 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Restoration, Private Drive 35 SY $39.00 $1,365.00
15 Asphalt Concrete Pavement Restoration, Public Street 512 SY $35.00 $17,920.00
16 Rubberized Asphalt Concrete Pavement Restoration 94 SY $37.00 $3,484.29
19 Rock Removal 0 CY $100.00 $0.00
21 Undercrossing of Utilities Over 4-inches in Diameter 2 EA $50.00 $100.00
Reason:
Item No. 1:
The Contract Bid Item No 7, Remove and Replace 8-inch Sewer Main, required a quantity adjustment resulting from field
conditions.
Item No. 2:
The Contract Bid Item No 9, Reconnect Sewer Laterals, required a quantity adjustment resulting from field conditions.
Item No. 3:
The Contract Bid Item No 14, Asphalt Concrete Pavement Restoration, Private Drive, required a quantity adjustment resulting
from field conditions.
Item No. 4:
The Contract Bid Item No 15, Asphalt Concrete Pavement Restoration, Public Street, required a quantity adjustment resulting
from field conditions.
Item No. 5:
The Contract Bid Item No 16, Rubberized Asphalt Concrete Pavement Restoration, required a quantity adjustment resulting
from field conditions.
Item No. 6:
The Contract Bid Item No 19, Rock Removal, required a quantity adjustment resulting from field conditions.
Item No. 7:
The Contract Bid Item No 21, Undercrossing of Utilities Over 4-inches in Diameter, required a quantity adjustment resulting
from field conditions.
Item No. 8:
Prior to Notice to Proceed the County of San Diego repaved portions of Calavo Drive. County standards require slurry seal
and/or full pavement restoration on newly paved roads. As a result it was determined to slurry seal half the width of Calavo for
the length of sewerline replacement to comply with County of San Diego Standards. This change is necessary to resolve all
costs associated with Contractor Change Order Request No. 4.
Item No. 9:
During excavation and subsequent to pavement removal it was discovered that the sewerline was not in the location indicated
on the drawings. This discovery resulted in 320 SF of additional pavment removal to excavate in the discovered location. This
change is necessary to resolve all costs associated with Contractor Change Order Request No. 5.
4
PROJECT:
TITLE:
Date:ACI Job 2014-352
From:Buzz Birney To:Stephen Beppler
Arrieta Construction, Inc.Otay Water District
1215 N. Marshall Ave.2554 Sweetwater Springs Boulevard
El Cajon, CA. 92020 Spring Valley, CA 91976-2004
O.619-448-7683 O. 619-670-2209
F. 619-448-1287 steve.beppler@otaywater.gov
buzz@arrietaconst.com
Item Qty U/
M Unit Price
1.)1 LS $6,000.00
5% M/U (SUB)
2.)1 LS $239.00
15% M/U (LAB)
SUBTOTAL:
1% BOND
COR #4 TOTAL:
NOTES:
3
Buzz Birney
Project Manager
$300.00
ACI On-Site Foreman Time $239.00
$35.85
Includes TC & No Parks by Subcontractor. Same exclusions listed on attached sub quote carry on this change order.
6/16/2015
Description
$6,000.00
Total Unit Price
Type II RPMS on Calavo Drive (Min. Move On Up to 5000 FT2)
CHANGE ORDER REQUEST NO.:
OWD - CALAVO BASIN SEWER REHAB PH. 1
Slurry Seal for Calavo Drive
$6,574.85
$65.75
Additional Work Days Requested:
$6,640.60
DAILY EXTRA WORK REPORT
Job Name: Calavo Basin Sewer Rehab Phase 1
Arrieta Job No.: 2014-352
Work Performed For: Otay Water District Date of Work Performed: 4/2/2015
Date of Report: 4/2/2015
Description of Work: 320SF of additional paving required per direction received from RFI #6. The sewer alignment was different than what the plans had shown and
our crews had already ground the asphalt per the staking from the plans when the problem was identified therefore causing the SF increase in paving.
EQ.HRLY XTNDED MATERIALS & SPECIALTY ITEMS XTNDED HRLY XTNDED
#EQUIPMENT HRS RATE AMOUNT DESCRIPTION QTY COST AMOUNT LABOR HRS RATE AMOUNT
428/406 Peterbilt Truck & Pup Trailer 3 104.68 $314.04 3/4" Asphalt (Superior)11.9 64.80 $771.12 Craig Threfall (FM)REG 3 80.08 $240.24
775 Skid Steer Sweeper Attachment 1 32.28 $32.28 $0.00 OT $0.00
793 CAT 226 Skid Steer 3 38.37 $115.11 $0.00 Roberto Asencio (PL)REG 3 56.31 $168.93
449 F550 Foreman's Truck 3 36.04 $108.12 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 Julio Mendoza (PL)REG 3 56.31 $168.93
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 Clint Hamilton (TM)REG 3 57.28 $171.84
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 John Mueller (OP)REG 3 76.05 $228.15
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 REG $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 REG $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 REG $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 REG $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 REG $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 OT $0.00
TOTAL COST OF EQUIPMENT $255.51 TOTAL MATERIALS & SPECIALTY $771.12 TOTAL COST OF LABOR $978.09
TOTAL LABOR A $978.09
SUBCONTRACTOR QTY COST EXT TOTAL EQUIPMENT B $255.51
Christian Wheeler Engineering 3 $90.00 $270.00 TOTAL MATERIALS & SPECIALTY ITEMS C $771.12
$0.00 TOTAL SUBCONTRACTOR D $270.00
$0.00 % ON LABOR 15%(A)$146.71
$0.00 % ON EQUIPMENT 15%(B)$38.33
$0.00 % ON MATERIALS & SPECIALTY ITEMS 15%(C)$115.67
TOTAL COST OF SUBCONTRACTOR $270.00 % ON SUBS 5%(D)$13.50
RENTED EQUIPMENT & MATERIAL PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE PER FINAL BILLING BY SUPPLIER SUB TOTAL $2,588.93
CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE:RESIDENT ENGINEER:% ON BOND & LIABILITY INSURANCE 1%$25.89
TOTAL THIS REPORT $2,614.82
Proposal 2150099.01 February 4, 2015 Page 2
Our scope of services does not include an evaluation of the adequacy of the soil for the proposed
construction.Our services do not include the direction or supervision of the contractor’s work.The
contractor should be advised that neither the presence of our field representative nor the observation by this
firm shall excuse them in any way for defects in their work.It should further be noted that we are not
responsible for the general site safety.
SERVICE FEES
Based upon our discussion, we propose to provide our services on a time and materials basis at the unit rates
indicated below.The quantities used will depend upon the scheduling of the contractor’s work.
Project Geologist $120/hour
Soil Technician w/Nuclear Density Gauge $90/hour
Soil Maximum Density Test $175/test
Soil R-Value Test $250/test
Asphalt Concrete Hveem Density $220/test
Summary Compaction Report, lump sum $900
The fees shown are based upon the work taking place between 0600 and 1700, Monday through Friday.Any
services provided beyond eight hours on a given day or on a Saturday will be invoiced at 1.5 times the
standard rate.Any services provided on Sunday or on a company recognized holiday will be invoiced at 2
times the standard rate.All field services will be invoiced a 4-hour minimum and in one-hour increments
thereafter.A 2-hour minimum charge will be applied if field services are cancelled on the same day that they
were scheduled to be provided.All service fees will be due within 30 days of invoicing.
We understand that this project is a California State prevailing wage job and that standard prevailing wage
rates for inspectors and technicians apply.We reserve the right to revise our rates should the applicable
prevailing wage rates change between the time this proposal was prepared and the work contracted.We are
registered in the DIR as a public works contractor in compliance with SB 854.Although the DIR has
indicated that inspection is an apprenticable trade and the DAS has indicated that local training is available, it
has been our experience that the local approved apprenticeship training organization will likely not provide
apprentices for this project.If they do provide apprentices for training on this project, our inspection hours
would need to be increased by 20% to include the apprentice time at $90 per hour.
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Jeff Marchioro
Senior Civil Engineer
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P2541-
001102
R2110-
001102
DIV. NO.
DIV. NO.
2
1
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to CCL Contracting, Inc. for
the 624 Pressure Zone Pressure Reducing Stations and 944-1R
Pressure Reducing Station No. 3 Improvements Projects
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a construction contract to CCL Contracting, Inc. (CCL) and to
authorize the General Manager to execute an agreement with CCL for
the 624 Pressure Zone Pressure Reducing Stations (PRSs) and 944-1R
PRS No. 3 Improvements Projects in an amount not-to-exceed $455,209
(see Exhibit A for Project locations).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
construction contract with CCL in an amount not-to-exceed $455,209
for the 624 Pressure Zone PRSs and 944-1R PRS No. 3 Improvements
Projects.
2
ANALYSIS:
CIP P2541 improvements will provide two (2) PRSs feeding the 485
Pressure Zone and 458 Pressure Zones from the 624 Pressure Zone
(Terra Nova Drive 624/485 PRS and Sequoia Street 624/458 PRS,
respectively) to improve fire flow and enhance system reliability.
Both PRSs will be manually operated. The Terra Nova Drive 624/485
PRS will be needed in the event that an 18-inch water main in East H
Street will be shut down. The Sequoia Street 624/458 PRS will be
needed in the event that a 12-inch water main in Brandywine Avenue
between Sequoia Street and Olympic Parkway will be shut down.
CIP R2110 improvements include retrofit of an existing PRS vault
(944-1R PRS No. 3) with a sump pump, ventilation system, and hatch
drain improvements to mitigate water intrusion.
District staff prepared the bid documents in-house. Mayer
Reprographics (Mayer) distributed the bid documents electronically
through Mayer’s online plan room. The Project was advertised for bid
on April 28, 2015 on the District’s website and several other
publications including the San Diego Daily Transcript. A Pre-Bid
Meeting was held on May 7, 2015, which was attended by two (2)
contractors. One addendum was sent out to all bidders and plan
houses on May 12, 2015 to address questions asked during the bidding
period. Bids were publicly opened on May 21, 2015, with the
following results:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID AMOUNT
1. CCL Contracting, Inc.
Escondido, CA $455,209
2. Transtar Pipeline, Inc.
San Diego, CA $470,855
3. Wier Construction Corporation
Escondido, CA $491,090
4. C.E. Wilson Corporation
Spring Valley, CA $577,563
The Engineer's Estimate is $400,000.
The evaluation process included reviewing all bids submitted for
conformance to the contract documents. The lowest bidder, CCL,
submitted a responsible bid and holds a Class A Contractor’s License
which expires on August 31, 2015 (staff will reconfirm that CCL’s
license is still valid at the time of award). Staff checked the
references provided with CCL’s bid indicating a good performance
record on similar past projects. The proposed Project Manager has
3
experience throughout southern California on similar projects and
received good references. A background search of the company was
performed on the internet and revealed no outstanding issues. CCL
submitted the Company Background and Company Safety Questionnaires as
required by the Contract Documents. CCL has previously worked with
the District on the 36-inch Jamacha Pipeline Project.
Staff verified that the bid bond provided by Liberty Mutual Insurance
Company is valid. Once CCL signs the contract, they will furnish the
performance bond and labor and materials bond. Staff will verify
both bonds prior to executing the contract.
The CIP P2541 portion of the Project was previously bid May 22, 2014;
however, all bids were rejected because there was little interest,
especially from contractors that have successfully completed similar
work for the District (e.g., Arietta, Basile, Cass, CCL, LH Woods,
NEWest, TC Construction). Even though the design for P2451 has not
been changed since it was bid a year ago, the current low bid is
$47,855 higher compared to the previous low bid due to fluctuations
in the bidding climate. The following table summarizes May 2014 and
2015 bids for CIP P2541:
CONTRACTOR P2541 BID AMOUNT
May 2014 May 2015 Difference
CCL Did not
bid $426,909 -
Transtar Pipeline, Inc. $399,220 $427,255 +$28,035
Wier Construction $529,401 $469,010 -$60,391
C.E. Wilson Corporation Did not
bid $535,023 -
Blue Pacific Engineering
& Construction $379,054 Did not
bid -
Piperin Corporation $385,715 Did not
bid -
Cora Constructors, Inc. $498,870 Did not
bid -
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budgets for CIPs P2541 and R2110, as approved in the FY
2016 budget, are $750,000 and $200,000, respectively. Total
expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and forecast including
this contract, are $749,771 and $126,741, respectively.
4
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budgets for CIPs P2541 and R2110 are sufficient
to support the Projects. See Attachments B and C for Budget Details.
The Finance Department has determined that, under the current rate
model, for CIPs P2541 and R2110, 100% of the funding will be
available from the Betterment Fund.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
These Projects support the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
JM/BK:mlc
P:\WORKING\CIP P2541 - 624 Pressure Zone PRSs\Staff Reports\BD-08-13-15, Staff Report, 624 PRSs & 944-1R
PRS3 Const Award, (JM-BK).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail P2541
Attachment C – Budget Detail R2110
Exhibit A – Location Map
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2541-001102
R2110-001102
Award of a Construction Contract to CCL Contracting, Inc.
for 624 Pressure Zone Pressure Reducing Stations and 944-1R
Pressure Reducing Station No. 3 Improvements Projects
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22, 2015, and the
following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board award a construction contract to
CCL Contracting, Inc. (CCL) for the 624 Pressure Zone Pressure
Reducing Stations (PRSs) and 944-1R PRS No. 3 Improvements
Projects in an amount not-to-exceed $455,209.
Staff stated that the Project will provide two (2) new PRSs to
feed the 485 and the 458 Pressure Zones from the 624 Pressure
Zone. The PRSs are intended to be used during emergencies or to
help during a shut down.
It was indicated that the Project also includes retrofit of an
existing PRS vault (944-1R PRS No. 3) with a sump pump,
ventilation system, and hatch drain to mitigate water intrusion.
Staff noted that the two new PRSs portion of the Project was
advertised for bid a year ago and all bids were rejected. It was
indicated that the bid documents were the same as the previous
bid opening expect for adding the existing PRS vault retrofit
work.
Staff discussed the bid process and indicated that the District
received four (4) bids on May 21, 2015; all of which were deemed
responsive. Staff stated that CCL submitted the lowest,
responsive bid.
Staff checked CCL’s references, reviewed their Company Background
and Company Safety Questionnaire forms, and performed an internet
search on the company and did not find any significant issues.
It was noted that CCL has previously worked with the District on
the 36-inch Jamacha Pipeline Project.
Staff indicated that the table at the end of the staff report
compares the previous and current bid opening for the two new
PRSs.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
it is acceptable to reject all bids and perform a re-bid process
if there was little interest during the biding prosess.
The Committee inquired if staff changed the previous (FY2014)
engineer’s estimate after the previous bid opening. Staff
indicated that bids from the previous bid opening was used to
refine the current engineer’s estimate. The Committee also
commented that the cost of inflation this past year should be
taken into consideration with the increase of the engineer’s
estimate. The Committee shared that a line item in a bid
estimate could be created to account for fluctuations in the
bidding climate.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
they routinely meet with Operations staff when performing in-
house design work; the same meeting process used when consultants
prepare the design for the District.
Following the discussion, the committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board on the consent
calendar.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail P2541
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2541-001102
R2110-001102
Award of a Construction Contract to CCL Contracting, Inc.
for 624 Pressure Zone Pressure Reducing Stations and 944-1R
Pressure Reducing Station No. 3 Improvements Projects
Date Updated: 5/21/2015
Budget
750,000
Planning
Regulatory Agency Fees 51 51 - 51 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN
Standard Salaries 1,985 1,985 - 1,985
Total Planning 2,036 2,036 - 2,036
Design 001102
Consultant Contracts 10,462 10,462 - 10,462 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL
680 680 - 680 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC
7,868 7,868 - 7,868 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC
9,360 9,360 - 9,360 BSE ENGINEERING INC
7,200 7,200 - 7,200 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC
4,939 4,939 - 4,939 HDR ENGINEERING INC
5,000 5,000 - 5,000 MICHAEL D KEAGY REAL ESTATE
7,912 7,912 - 7,912 NARASIMHAN CONSULTING SERVICES
Professional Legal Fees 300 300 - 300 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Regulatory Agency Fees 650 650 - 650 CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Service Contracts 157 157 - 157 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
1,300 1,300 - 1,300 SOUTHERN PACIFIC TITLE CO
4,830 - 4,830 4,830 UNDERGROUND SOLUTIONS INC
4,055 4,055 - 4,055 US BANK
3,452 1,952 1,500 3,452 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
Settlements 3,100 3,100 - 3,100 ROBINHOOD POINT HOMEOWNERS
Standard Salaries 154,562 153,062 1,500 154,562
Total Design 225,826 217,996 7,830 225,826
Construction
426,909 - 426,909 426,909 CCL CONTRACTING INC.
35,000 - 35,000 35,000 CM & Inspection
35,000 - 35,000 35,000 Staff time
25,000 - 25,000 25,000 Contingency
Total Construction 521,909 - 521,909 521,909
Grand Total 749,771 220,032 529,739 749,771
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
p2541-624 Pressure Zone PRSs
CommittedExpenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
ATTACHMENT C – Budget Detail R2110
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P2541-001102
R2110-001102
Award of a Construction Contract to CCL Contracting, Inc.
for 624 Pressure Zone Pressure Reducing Stations and 944-1R
Pressure Reducing Station No. 3 Improvements Projects
Date Updated: 5/21/2015
Budget
200,000
Planning
For Ops Only - Contracted Services 3,010 3,010 - 3,010 KIRK PAVING INC
495 495 - 495 CITY OF CHULA VISTA
146 146 - 146 US BANK
Union 3 Part 62,722 62,722 - 62,722
Total Planning 66,373 66,373 - 66,373
Design 001102
Service Contracts 2,141 641 1,500 2,141 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
51 51 - 51 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Standard Salaries 13,294 11,794 1,500 13,294
Total Design 15,486 12,486 3,000 15,486
Construction
INFRASTRUCTURE EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS 1,582 1,582 - 1,582 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083
28,300 - 28,300 28,300 CCL CONTRACTING INC.
5,000 - 5,000 5,000 CM & Inspection
5,000 - 5,000 5,000 Staff time
5,000 - 5,000 5,000 Contingency
Total Construction 44,882 1,582 43,300 44,882
Grand Total 126,741 80,441 46,300 126,741
Vendor/Comments
Otay Water District
r2110-RecPS - 944-1R Optimization and Pressure
CommittedExpenditures
Outstanding
Commitment &
Forecast
Projected Final
Cost
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Stephen Beppler
Senior Civil Engineer
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: R2109-
001102
DIV. NO.: 3
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Construction Contract to Fordyce Construction, Inc.
for the Sweetwater River Trestle Improvements Project
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a construction contract to Fordyce Construction, Inc. (Fordyce
Construction) and to authorize the General Manager to execute an
agreement with Fordyce Construction for the Sweetwater River Trestle
Improvements Project in an amount not-to-exceed $173,740.00 (see
Exhibit A for Project location).
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
construction contract with Fordyce Construction for the Sweetwater
River Trestle Improvements Project in an amount not-to-exceed
$173,740.00.
2
ANALYSIS:
The effluent force main from the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation
Facility (RWCWRF) crosses the Sweetwater River by means of a 196-foot
span wooden trestle bridge in the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge,
approximately three quarters of a mile south of the plant. The area
is subject to wildfires which would have the potential to
significantly damage or destroy the bridge, resulting in the shutdown
of the RWCWRF as this is the only outlet from the plant.
The Project consists of installing fire protective measures to the
underside of the trestle, ensuring the structural integrity of the
bridge, and improving safety features for District personnel. The
addition of the fire shields is projected to increase the fire
resistance capacity of the trestle to beyond three hours.
The Project was advertised on May 18, 2015 on the District’s website
and several other publications including the San Diego Daily
Transcript. A non-mandatory Pre-Bid Meeting was held on June 2,
2015, which was attended by five (5) contractors, subcontractors, and
suppliers. One (1) addendum was sent out to all bidders and plan
houses to address questions and clarifications to the contract
documents during the bidding period. Bids were publicly opened on
June 18, 2015, with the following results:
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
AMOUNT
CORRECTED
BID AMOUNT
1 Fordyce Construction, Inc.
Santee, CA $180,018.00 $173,740.00
2 Tharsos, Inc.
La Mesa, CA $191,000.00 -
3 GEM Industrial Electric, Inc.
Lakeside, CA $247,000.00 -
4 M.A. Stevens Construction, Inc.
National City, CA $267,221.00 -
5 Beador Construction Company, Inc.
Corona, CA $299,700.00 -
6 Wier Construction Corp.
Escondido, CA $322,000.00 -
The Engineer’s Estimate is $206,000.00.
Staff reviewed the bids submitted for conformance with the contract
requirements and discovered that the Fordyce Construction Bid had an
illegible number entered for a Change to Bid Item 3 and several math
errors related to this Change. District staff, after consultation
with the District’s legal counsel and with a representative of
3
Fordyce Construction, rejected the Change amount due to the inability
to decipher the written amount clearly. The resultant Total Bid
Amount for Fordyce Construction was revised from $180,018 to
$173,740. Staff determined that Fordyce Construction was the lowest
responsive and responsible bidder. Fordyce Construction holds a
Class A Contractor’s License, which meets the contract document’s
requirements, and is valid through October 31, 2015. The reference
checks indicated an excellent performance record on similar projects.
An internet background search of the company was performed and
revealed no outstanding issues with this company. Fordyce
Construction is actively registered with the State of California’s
Department of Industrial Relations (DIR), as required by SB854.
Staff verified that the bid bond provided by Fordyce Construction is
valid. Staff will also verify that Fordyce Construction’s
Performance Bond and Labor and Materials Bond are valid prior to
execution of the contract.
Fordyce Construction is currently building the 450-1 Reservoir
Disinfection Facility (CIP R2112) for the District and the project is
on schedule and within the budget.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
The total budget for CIP R2109, as approved in the FY 2016 budget, is
$600,000.00. Total expenditures, plus outstanding commitments and
forecast, including this contract, are $339,695.04. See Attachment B
for budget detail.
Based on a review of the financial budget, the Project Manager
anticipates that the budget is sufficient to support the Project.
The Finance Department has determined that, under the current rate
model, 100% of the funding will be available from the Replacement
Fund for CIP R2109.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
4
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
SB/BK:mlc
P:\WORKING\CIP R2109 Sweetwater River Trestle Bridge\Staff Reports\BD 08-13-15, Staff Report,
Sweetwater River Trestle, Award Construction To Fordyce (SB-BK-RP).Docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Budget Detail
Exhibit A – Location Map
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2109-001102 Award of a Construction Contract to Fordyce Construction,
Inc. for the Sweetwater River Trestle Improvements Project
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22, 2015, and the
following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board award a construction contract to
Fordyce Construction, Inc. (Fordyce Construction) for the
Sweetwater River Trestle Improvements Project in an amount not-to-
exceed $173,740.00.
Staff indicated that the recycled water force main from the Ralph
W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF) crosses the
Sweetwater River by means of a 196-foot long wooden trestle in the
San Diego National Wildlife Refuge.
The trestle was constructed in FY 1980 and is located
approximately three quarter of a mile south of the RWCWRF where a
wildfire could damage the bridge. Staff noted that this is the
only forcemain from the plant; if a wildfire were to occur at this
forcemain, it would shut down the RWCWRF.
Staff discussed that the Project consists of installing fire
protective measures to the underside of the trestle to protect the
structure. Also included in this project are improvements to
safety features on the structure.
Staff noted that the addition of the fire shields is expected to
increase the fire resistance of the trestle to beyond three (3)
hours.
Staff discussed the bidding process and indicated that six (6)
bids were received on June 18, 2015, that ranged from $180,018 to
$322,000. The District’s engineer estimate is $206,000.
It was highlighted that staff reviewed the bids for conformance
with the contract requirements and discovered that Fordyce
Construction’s bid had an illegible number entered for a Change to
Bid Item 3; Fordyce also had several math errors related to this
Change. District staff, after consultation with the District’s
legal counsel, met with a representative of Fordyce and notified
them that the District rejected the Change amount to Bid Item 3.
This resulted in the Fordyce Bid to be lowered to $173,740, which
this portion of Fordyce’s Bid was clearly legible and correctly
added. Staff, then determined that Fordyce Construction was the
lowest responsive and responsible bidder.
Staff stated that the District is satisfied with the work Fordyce
Construction has performed on the District’s 450-1 Reservoir
Disinfection Facility Project.
Staff performed reference checks, internet background search,
confirmed Class A Contractor’s License and active registration
with the State Department of Industrial Relations (per SB854).
Staff stated that they did not discover any significant issues.
In response to a question from the Committee, staff stated that
Fordyce did agree with the price change and acknowledged the
illegible number they entered for a Change to Bid Item 3 as well
as a calculation error.
Staff discussed that heat shield will be constructed on the
underside of the trestle. Drain holes in the heat shield will make
sure water does not collect there. The heat shield is expected to
add an additional hour and a half of fire protection. Staff also
discussed that heavy wood members provide fire resistance
qualities comparable to other materials. The burning/charring of
the wooden trestle insulates the unburned wood core allowing it to
retain its strength. Staff stated that this Project is coupled
with another District project where the vegetation is thinned to
help prevent fire at the site.
Following the discussion, the EO&WR Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
ATTACHMENT B – Budget Detail
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
R2109-001102
Award of a Construction Contract to Fordyce Construction,
Inc. for the Sweetwater River Trestle Improvements Project
5Project
Level Title1 Committed Expenditures Outstanding
Commitment
Projected Final
Cost
Vendor
Professional
Legal Fees
$50.41 $50.41 $0.00 $50.41 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF
Standard Salaries $39,119.43 $39,119.43 $0.00 $39,119.43
Total $39,169.84 $39,169.84 $0.00 $39,169.84
$17,390.00 $16,366.88 $1,023.12 $17,390.00 PSOMAS
$26,790.00 $26,790.00 $0.00 $26,790.00 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING
$1,296.00 $437.50 $858.50 $1,296.00 MAYER REPROGRAPHICS INC
$249.50 $249.50 $0.00 $249.50 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT
Standard Salaries $33,567.70 $33,567.70 $0.00 $33,567.70
Total $79,293.20 $77,411.58 $1,881.62 $79,293.20
Consultant
Contracts
$20,000.00 $750.00 $19,250.00 $20,000.00 ALYSON CONSULTING
$2,492.00 $0.00 $2,492.00 $2,492.00 PSOMAS
$173,740.00 $0.00 $173,740.00 $173,740.00 FORDYCE CONSTRUCTION
Standard Salaries $25,000.00 $1,136.92 $23,863.08 $25,000.00
Total $221,232.00 $1,886.92 $219,345.08 $221,232.00
Budget $600,000.00
Total $339,695.04 $118,468.34 $221,226.70 $339,695.04
Project Budget Detail
R2109-Sweetwater River Wooden Trestle Improvement
1/1/2006 - 7/9/2015
Planning
Design Consultant
Contracts
Service Contracts
Construction
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board
MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
Environmental Compliance
Specialist
Bob Kennedy
Engineering Manager
PROJECT: P1210-
001101
DIV. NO. ALL
APPROVED BY:
Rod Posada, Chief, Engineering
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Award of a Professional Engineering Services Contract for the
2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update to CH2M
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Otay Water District (District) Board of Directors (Board)
award a professional services contract to CH2M and to authorize the
General Manager to execute an agreement with CH2M for the 2015 Urban
Water Management Plan Update in an amount not-to-exceed $49,839.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
Please see Attachment A.
PURPOSE:
To obtain Board authorization for the General Manager to enter into a
professional engineering services contract with CH2M for the 2015
Urban Water Management Plan Update (2015 UWMP Update) in an amount
not-to-exceed $49,839.
2
ANALYSIS:
The District requires the services of an engineering planning firm
(Consultant) to provide professional engineering services as part of
the District’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) Update for 2015
(Capital Improvement Plan Number P1210).
The Urban Water Management Planning Act requires that every urban
water supplier that provides water to 3,000 or more customers, or
that provides over 3,000 acre-feet of water annually, develop an UWMP
every five years and submit the plan to the Department of Water
Resources (DWR). An effective UWMP is prepared to ensure the
appropriate level of reliability in the District’s potable and
recycled water service sufficient to meet the needs of its customers
during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. The UWMP is also required
in order for the District to be eligible for DWR administered State
grants, loans and drought assistance. The 2015 UWMP Update will also
provide the basis for future water supply assessments which aid the
District in approving development.
As a member agency, the District will coordinate with the San Diego
County Water Authority (SDCWA) as they prepare their 2015 UWMP. The
District’s UWMP will need to incorporate information from the SDCWA
UWMP in the preparation of our 2015 UWMP Update.
It is anticipated that the final 2015 UWMP Update will be ready for
adoption by the Board in June 2016. This allows the District to meet
the July 1, 2016 deadline for the submittal of the adopted UWMP to
the DWR.
In accordance with the Board of Directors Policy Number 21, the
District initiated the consultant selection process on May 22, 2015,
by placing an advertisement in the San Diego Daily Transcript, and
posting the Project on the District’s website for Professional
Engineering Services. The advertisements attracted Letters of
Interest and Statements of Qualifications from seven (7) consulting
firms.
On June 18, 2015, proposals were received from the following five (5)
consulting firms:
1. Arcadis, Irvine, CA
2. CH2M, San Diego, CA
3. HDR Inc., San Diego, CA
4. Stetson Engineers, Inc., San Rafael, CA
5. Water Systems Consulting, Inc., San Diego, CA
3
The two firms that chose not to propose were Atkins North America,
Inc. and SA Associates.
After the proposals were evaluated and ranked by a five-member review
panel consisting of District Engineering, Finance, and Operations
staff. The panel completed the consultant ranking process and
concluded that CH2M had the best approach to the Project at the best
overall value to the District. A summary of the complete evaluation
is shown in Attachment B.
CH2M submitted the Company Background Questionnaire, as required by
the RFP, and staff did not find any significant issues. In addition,
staff checked their references and performed an internet search on
the company. Staff found the references to be excellent and did not
find any outstanding issues with the internet search.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
As a part of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 operating budget development
process, the total estimated budget for the Project was projected by
the Project Manager to be approximately $50,000 with total
expenditures anticipated to occur in FY 2016. The cost for the work
is $49,839.
Based on a review of the budget, the Project Manager has determined
that the approved FY 2016 budget will be sufficient to support the
UWMP Update Project.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
This Project supports the District’s Mission statement, “To provide
high value water and wastewater services to the customers of the Otay
Water District in a professional, effective, and efficient manner”
and the General Manager’s Vision, “A District that is at the
forefront in innovations to provide water services at affordable
rates, with a reputation for outstanding customer service.”
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
LCB/BK:mlc
P:\WORKING\CIP 00210 WMP & PEIR\2015 UWMP Update\Staff Report\BD 08-13-15 Staff Report - Award 2015 UWMP
Update Contract to CH2M (LCB-BK).docx
Attachments: Attachment A – Committee Action
Attachment B – Summary of Proposal Rankings
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT:
P1210-001101
Award of a Professional Engineering Services Contract for
Production of the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Update
to CH2M
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Engineering, Operations, and Water Resources Committee (Committee)
reviewed this item at a meeting held on July 22, 2015, and the
following comments were made:
Staff recommended that the Board award a professional services
contract to CH2M and to authorize the General Manager to execute
an agreement with CH2M for the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan
Update in an amount not-to-exceed $49,839.
Staff indicated that the Urban Water Management Planning (UWMP)
Act requires that every urban water supplier that provides water
to 3,000 or more customers, or that provides over 3,000 acre-feet
of water annually, develop an UWMP every five years.
It was noted that an effective UWMP is prepared to ensure the
appropriate level of reliability in the District’s potable and
recycled water service sufficient to meet the needs of its
customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. The UWMP
is also required in order for the District to be eligible for the
DWR administered State grants, loans and drought assistance. The
2015 UWMP Update will also provide the basis for future water
supply assessments which aid the District in approving
development.
Staff anticipates that the final 2015 UWMP Update will be ready
for adoption by the Board in June 2016. This will allow the
District to meet the July 1, 2016 deadline for the submittal of
the adopted UWMP to the DWR.
Staff discussed the selection process and indicated that they
followed the District’s Policy 21 process for the Selection of
the Consultant. The District received five (5) proposals on June
18, 2015. Staff evaluated and scored all proposals. Refer to
Attachment B of the staff report for results. Staff determined
that CH2M received the highest overall scores based on their
experience, proposed method to accomplish the work, and their
overall value to the District.
The Committee inquired about the budgeting of staff’s time for
this project. Staff indicated this project is included in the
District’s operating budget that includes staffs’ time and an
allocation of $50,000 for outside services.
Staff indicated that an interview is not required if project
costs are less than $200,000, per the District’s Policy 21.
Following the discussion, the EO&WR Committee supported staffs’
recommendation and presentation to the full board as a consent item.
Qualifications of
Staff
Understanding of
Scope, Schedule
and Resources
Soundness and
Viability of
Proposed Project
Plan
INDIVIDUAL
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
AVERAGE
SUBTOTAL -
WRITTEN
Proposed Fee*
Consultant's
Commitment to
DBE
TOTAL SCORE
30 25 30 85 85 15 Y/N 100
Poor/Good/
Excellent
Steve Beppler 23 23 25 71
Andrea Carey 23 22 25 70
Bob Kennedy 24 23 24 71
Dan Martin 27 22 26 75
Jake Vaclavek 27 23 26 76
Steve Beppler 28 24 28 80
Andrea Carey 26 24 27 77
Bob Kennedy 26 24 26 76
Dan Martin 28 24 29 81
Jake Vaclavek 30 24 29 83
Steve Beppler 24 23 28 75
Andrea Carey 23 22 27 72
Bob Kennedy 25 23 25 73
Dan Martin 26 22 26 74
Jake Vaclavek 26 24 29 79
Steve Beppler 25 22 24 71
Andrea Carey 26 22 23 71
Bob Kennedy 24 23 24 71
Dan Martin 24 20 24 68
Jake Vaclavek 26 23 25 74
Steve Beppler 28 23 28 79
Andrea Carey 25 23 24 72
Bob Kennedy 25 24 25 74
Dan Martin 27 24 28 79
Jake Vaclavek 27 24 27 78
Review Panel does not see or consider fee when scoring other categories. Fee is scored by the PM, who is not on Review Panel.
Consultant Proposed Fee Position Score
Arcadis $44,040 lowest 15
WSC $46,730 15
CH2M $49,839 14
HDR $51,800 14
Stetson $125,442 highest 1
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RANKINGS
2015 UWMP Update
Attachment B
FEE SCORING CHART
76
Y 89
88
91
1
WRITTEN
15
REFERENCES
73
79
75
Arcadis N
93Y
71
HDR
E
14
CH2M
WSC Y
MAXIMUM POINTS
Stetson N 72
15
14
P:\WORKING\CIP 00210 WMP PEIR\2015 UWMP\Staff Report\Attachment B_2015 UWMP Update_Summary of Proposal Rankings.docx
RESOLUTION NO. 4295
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
APPROVING FUNDING OF
WATER CONSERVATION AUTHORITY,
A CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY,
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2016-2017
WHEREAS, the Otay Water District (the “District”) is a member agency of the Water
Conservation Authority, a California Joint Powers Agency (the “Authority”); and
WHEREAS, the Authority entered into a WATER CONSERVATION GARDEN OPERATION
AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) with FRIENDS OF THE WATER CONSERVATION GARDEN, a
California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the “Operator”) dated October 13, 2010; and
WHEREAS, Exhibit “D” Authority Annual Contribution Commitment to the Agreement
documents the amount each member water agency of the Authority agreed to contribute
each year, beginning FY2010-11 through and including FY2014-15, to the Operator for
operation and maintenance of the Garden in accordance with the License Agreement dated
August 1, 2006, between Grossmont-Cuyamaca Community College District and the
Authority; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Authority Board of Directors to continue
contributions for two additional years to include FY2015-16 and FY2016-17 maintaining the
FY2014-15 contribution levels also referred to as “Scenario C”; and
WHEREAS, on February 16, 2015, the Authority Board of Directors unanimously voted
to request the Operator to prepare a two-year budget proposal that the members could take
back to their boards that would include the continued funding as articulated in Scenario C,
with the addition of an evaluation and outreach plan that would be collectively developed
over the next 90 days; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2015, the Authority Board of Directors approved the
continued funding of the Operator for two years at the FY2014-15 funding level referred to
as Scenario C with the City of San Diego abstaining until the Evaluation Plan was provided
and reviewed; and
WHEREAS, on May 19, 2015, the Authority Board of Directors unanimously voted
approval of the Evaluation Plan with recommended changes to certain headings and
authorized the Evaluation Committee to proceed with implementation of the Evaluation
Plan, and
WHEREAS, on June 30, 2015, the approved Evaluation Plan was distributed to the
Authority Board with the recommended heading changes; and
WHEREAS, the District supports the Water Conservation Garden and its Evaluation
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the State of California is experiencing unprecedented drought; and
WHEREAS, the State has implemented mandatory water conservation; and
WHEREAS, the Water Conservation Garden provides a resource to the community
through education and demonstration of the use of water wise and native plants in the
garden to promote much needed water conservation; and
WHEREAS, the District supports the continued funding of the Operator for two years
at the FY2014-15 funding level referred to as Scenario C; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED that the Otay
Water District agrees to the funding of the Operator of The Water Conservation Garden as
follows:
FY2015-16 FY2016-17
Otay Water District $ 97,622 $ 97,622
PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District at a
regular meeting held on this 13th day of August, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Attest:
____________________________ ____________________________
Secretary President
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board Meeting MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY: Mark Watton,
General Manager
W.O./G.F. NO: DIV. NO.
APPROVED BY:
Susan Cruz, District Secretary
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Board of Directors 2015 Calendar of Meetings
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
At the request of the Board, the attached Board of Director’s meeting
calendar for 2015 is being presented for discussion.
PURPOSE:
This staff report is being presented to provide the Board the
opportunity to review the 2015 Board of Director’s meeting calendar
and amend the schedule as needed.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
ANALYSIS:
The Board requested that this item be presented at each meeting so
they may have an opportunity to review the Board meeting calendar
schedule and amend it as needed.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachment: Calendar of Meetings for 2015
G:\UserData\DistSec\WINWORD\STAFRPTS\Board Meeting Calendar 8-13-15.doc
Board of Directors, Workshops
and Committee Meetings
2015
Regular Board Meetings:
Special Board or Committee Meetings (3rd
Wednesday of Each Month or as Noted)
January 7, 2015
February 4, 2015
March 4, 2015
April 1, 2015
May 6, 2015
June 3, 2015
June 24, 2015
August 13, 2015
September 2, 2015
October 7, 2015
November 4, 2015
December 2, 2015
January 21, 2015
February 18, 2015
March 18, 2015
April 15, 2015
May 20, 2015
June 17, 2015
July 15, 2015
August 18, 2015
September 16, 2015
October 21, 2015
November 18, 2015
December 16, 2015
SPECIAL BOARD MEETINGS:
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Regular Board MEETING DATE: August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED BY:
Andrea Carey, Customer
Service Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Drought and Water Conservation Update
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
This is an informational item only.
COMMITTEE ACTION:
N/A
PURPOSE:
To comply with the State Water Board’s emergency conservation
regulations and the state’s mandatory conservation of potable urban
water use.
ANALYSIS:
In response to four consecutive years of dry weather in the State of
California, the State Water Board adopted emergency regulations on
May 5, 2015 mandating all urban water suppliers cut potable water use
by 8 to 36 percent, depending on their residential gallons-per-
capita-per-day average from July-September 2013. Otay Water
District’s reduction target is 20%.
Monthly Usage Comparison
The chart below shows total monthly potable purchases for 2013 and
2015 year-to-date and the target reduction goal of 20% of each month.
The District came in with lower consumption than its reduction target
in both May and June. May’s usage was 27.1% less than May 2013 and
June’s usage was 25.9% less than June 2013.
Conservation Efforts
In response to the state mandate, staff took action with a variety of
conservation outreach methods including:
1. Phone calls and emails to all District customers notifying them
of the state’s mandate.
2. Letters to the District’s top 10% of residential users.
3. Letters to all potable commercial irrigation customers.
4. Conservation message on the outside of the bill envelopes.
5. Bill inserts communicating drought updates and conservation
messaging.
6. Online target usage tracker.
7. Leak alarm notifications.
8. Water waste tracking.
9. Outreach events at the Water Conservation Garden.
10. Discussions with numerous homeowners and commercial customers on
watering restrictions and rebate programs.
11. Hired a CWA intern to assist in meeting the Governor’s
directive.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
20% Reduction Target
2013
2015
State Target Reduction
Neighboring Agencies
In a survey of the District’s neighboring agencies that include
Sweetwater Authority, Helix Water District, and Padre Dam Municipal
Water District, the following update has been obtained.
Sweetwater Authority saved 24% in May and 25.6% in June compared to
2013 consumption. Sweetwater sent out a Prop 218 notice to its
customers of a public hearing on August 31, 2015. The notice lists a
proposed rate increase to both the commodity charge as well as the
fixed readiness-to-serve charge, effective September 1, 2015. A
typical customer using 22 units will see an increase of $7.42
bimonthly. In addition, Sweetwater is proposing to adopt drought
rates for levels 2 through 4. At this time, they are not imposing
the drought rates on their customers.
Helix Water District saved 29.2% in May and 25% in June compared to
2013 consumption. Helix implemented water use restrictions and
penalties beginning May 25, 2015. The penalties are $100 for the
first violation, $200 for a second violation within one year, and
$500 for each additional violation within one year. In addition, if
domestic water use exceeds 31 units in a two-month billing period, a
10% penalty would be applied. The following chart is included as an
example of how the penalty charge would be imposed.
Customer
Using
Penalty
Charge
Total Bill
Before
Penalty
Total Bill
With
Penalty
Penalty as
% of Total
Bill
31 units $0.55 $164.77 $165.32 0.3%
50 units $11.02 $269.46 $280.48 3.9%
75 units $24.80 $407.21 $432.01 5.7%
100 units $38.57 $544.96 $583.53 6.6%
150 units $66.12 $820.46 $886.58 7.5%
Padre Dam Municipal Water District saved 36.6% in May and 28% in
June. To date, Padre has not imposed drought rates or penalties.
Their July 15, 2015 staff report on a drought update states that they
have a two-pronged approach of aggressive public communication and
outreach as well as increased restrictions and enforcement.
Future Actions
Staff will be closely monitoring the rate of conservation and will be
reacting, as needed, to ensure customers remain mindful of the
drought situation. Staff will continue to participate in outreach
events and publicize the drought through the District’s website,
social media sites, and bill inserts.
Staff has been working on a Water Waste Mobile App. This new app
will allow customers to report water waste, get information on water
restrictions, rebates, and even link directly to the District’s
mobile web pay site.
Staff is currently working with Otay’s bill print provider on
modifying the bill print to include usage target data for customers.
This new bill print format is expected to be completed in September.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joe Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
None.
STRATEGIC GOAL:
Actively manage water supply and demand.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A) Committee Action
B) Presentation
ATTACHMENT A
SUBJECT/PROJECT: Drought and Water Conservation Update
COMMITTEE ACTION:
The Finance, Administration, and Communications Committee reviewed
this item at a meeting held on July 21, 2015 and the following
comments were made:
This report is to provide the board an update on the District’s
water conservation activities, conservation targets and future
efforts, and neighboring agencies activities.
Staff indicated that the District’s water use decreased 27.1% in
May over the water use levels of the same month in 2013 and water
use decreased 25.9% in June compared to 2013 usage for the same
month. The District’s water reduction target is 20% and customers
are doing very well in reducing their usage to meet the State
mandated goal. Countywide, residents also did very well in meeting
the conservation goals with Rancho Santa Fe Irrigation District
customers reducing their usage 37% (June) compared to their State
mandated goal of 36%.
Staff noted that the month of May was very wet which assisted
customers in reducing their use. The reduction in June is due to
customers efforts to conserve.
The District has taken the following actions to date in response to
the conservation mandate:
- Phone calls and emails have been made to all District
customers notifying them of the conservation mandate
- Letters have been forwarded to the District’s top 10%
residential water use customers
- Letters have been forwarded to all commercial irrigation
customers advising them of the conservation mandate and
advising them of the watering schedule restrictions
- Conservation messaging has been placed on the outside of the
District’s bill envelopes
- Bill inserts have been forwarded to customers communicating
drought updates
- The online target usage tracker for customers was implemented
- The District is continuing to notify customers of leak alarms
- An online Water Waste Tracking system along with a phone
number customers can call to report water waste has been
implemented
- The District is participating in outreach events
- A CWA intern has been hired to assist with the drought efforts
Staff surveyed neighboring water agencies and obtained the
following information:
- Sweetwater Authority:
o Attained 24% water savings in May and 25.6% savings in
June which is well above their mandated target of 12%
o They have forwarded Proposition 218 notices and have a
hearing scheduled at the end of August to modify their
rates. Their lower tier went up in price/cost and their
higher tier was lowered. Those customers using a lot of
water will not see too high of an increase and those that
are not using much water will see a decent increase in
their bill. A typical customer using 22 units will see
an increase of $7.42 bimonthly. Sweetwater is not
imposing drought rates at this time, but they are
proposing adopting drought rates for drought levels two
(2) through four (4).
o Rate increases are proposed to be implemented on
September 1, 2015
- Helix Water District:
o Attained 29.2% water savings in May and 25% in June.
o They have implemented water use restrictions and
penalties beginning May 25, 2015. The penalties are $100
for the first violation, $200 for the second violation
and $500 for each additional violation within one
(1)year.
o They have also implemented a 10% penalty on any customer
that exceeds 31 units in a two-month billing period.
- Padre Dam Municipal Water District:
o Attained a 36.6% water savings in May and 28% savings in
June
o They are not, at this time, talking about drought rates
or penalties. They are just looking to do a lot of
communications and outreach.
Staff will be closely monitoring the rate of conservation and will
be reacting, as needed, to ensure customers remain mindful of the
drought situation. Customer have been doing very well and the
District will be using social media, bill inserts, etc., to
encourage the continued savings. The District is not planning to
do any large scale campaigns at this point in time.
Staff noted that the outreach campaign was really designed to be
scaled based on how customers are reacting to the District’s
conservation messages. The outreach can be ramped up or down based
on the need for the District to achieve its target of 20% water
savings.
The District is working with its billing provider to include usage
target data on customer bills and hope to have this information
available on bills by September.
The District has also been working on a Water Waste Mobile App.
This new app will allow customers to report water waste, connect
directly to the District’s Facebook and Twitter accounts, and link
directly to the District’s mobile web pay site.
Staff demonstrated the Water Waste Mobile App, which is still in
development, and how the public can use the app to report water
waste. It was noted if the user creates an account which includes
their email, the District will send a response back to the
individual reporting the waste thanking them for the report and
advising them that the District will be following up on their
report.
Staff noted that the District has its own internal water waste
system on the website for the public to report water waste. The
benefit of this system is it works with the District’s Eden System
which allows for the automated generation of letters as long as the
address can be found in the Eden System. The new app will be able
to connect into this same system. Thus, staff will not have to
spend a lot of time viewing every water waste incident and
determining which account it belongs to, what letter needs to be
sent and generate those letters.
The app also provides the user the ability to pay their bill and
includes water savings tips, such as, when to water turf, ground
cover, etc. This information is also available on the District’s
website.
The public will be able to get the app by downloading it from the
app store. The app will be both IOS and Android compatible.
Staff noted that they are currently developing a privacy policy for
potential Public Records Requests related to water waste reporting
noting that, as per State statute, both the person reporting the
water waste and the address of the property of which waste is being
reported is exempt from disclosure under the California Public
Records Act with the exception if the property is owned by an
executive of a public agency or an elected official.
The app will be ready by the board meeting date, August 13, 2015.
The committee suggested adding to each monthly report for the board
a “to date” savings summary indicating that the District’s
customers have used XX% less or more than 2013 water use and
customers need use no more than YY% through the end of February
2016 to achieve the District’s target of 20% water savings.
The committee also suggested that the County Water Authority try to
get better data on where customers heard the message of the need to
conserve (which technique resonated with customers) and where
customers cut their use. This information will help guide the
District’s future outreach programs.
Upon completion of the discussion, the committee supported
presentation to the full board as an informational item.
WATER CONSERVATION
UPDATE
Otay Water District
Board Meeting
August 13, 2015
Attachment B
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
20% REDUCTION TARGET
2013
2015
State Target Reduction
2
WATER CONSERVATION EFFORTS
Phone calls and emails to all District customers.
Letters to the District’s top residential customers.
Letters to all commercial irrigation customers.
Conservation messaging on the outside of the bill envelope.
Bill inserts communicating drought updates on conservation messages.
Online target usage tracker.
Leak alarm notifications.
Water waste tracking.
Outreach events.
Hired CWA intern to assist with drought efforts.
3
NEIGHBORING AGENCIES
Sweetwater Authority
24% savings in May and 25.6% savings in June
Prop 218 hearing end of August
Rate increases September 1st
Helix
29.2% savings in May and 25% in June
Penalty rates
Padre Dam
36.6% savings in May and 28% in June
No drought rates or penalties
4
FUTURE ACTIONS
Monitor conservation closely
Bill print changes
Water Waste App
5
WATER WASTE APP 6
QUESTIONS?
7
STAFF REPORT
TYPE
MEETING:
Regular Board
MEETING
DATE:
August 13, 2015
SUBMITTED
BY:
Mark Watton
General Manager
W.O./G.F.
NO:
N/A DIV.
NO.
N/A
APPROVED BY:
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: General Manager’s Report
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES:
Purchasing and Facilities:
FY15 Purchase Orders and Cal-Card Review – Compared to the
previous fiscal year, the average value of blanket purchase
orders was up 40%; the number of regular purchase orders
processed by staff was down 29%; and the number of Cal-Card
transactions was up 22%. By moving more low value purchases to
Cal-Card, the District is advancing its goal to establish a more
efficient workplace through reduced purchase order and accounts
payable processing costs and increased Cal-Card program rebates.
Human Resources: Employee Picnic – The Employee Picnic was held at Santee Lakes
on July 18. Despite the rainy weather, employees and their
family members enjoyed the activities and festivities. The
rainy weather brought another fun activity for the children:
playing in the rain, along with games, face painting and a party
jumper. The employees appreciated the event and it was a fun
time for all.
Annual Performance Evaluations – July was a busy month for
Managers and Supervisors as they worked to complete their annual
employee performance evaluations. Employees receive performance
reviews on an annual basis based on the fiscal year from July
through June.
2
New Hires/Promotions – The District hired an Intern through the
newly created San Diego County Water Authority Intern program
this month to assist with water conservation related work.
Safety & Security:
Treatment Plant Regulatory Inspection - Completed the annual
regulatory compliance inspection of the Treatment Plant
laboratory chemical hood units (2). No violations were noted and
only one observation for follow up was made (“The District
should verify that the hood exhaust stacks extend at least 7 ft
above the roof and discharge vertically upward to preclude the
recirculation of any hood emissions inside the building”).
Treatment Plant personnel is working with Facilities to verify
and correct, if needed.
Emergency Response:
o WebEOC Training Exercise – Staff completed the July monthly
exercise, which consisted of creating an emergency
notification announcement on the WebEOC Status Board.
o Water and Power Resiliency – Staff attended the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Water and Power Resiliency workshop. Topics discussed included increasing coordination between water utilities and electric utilities, securing back-up power, and increasing water utilities' resilience to power outages.
Training:
o Overhead and Service Truck Crane: 30 field operations staff
completed regulatory, qualified overhead and service truck
crane training and certification. This certification
complies with the requirements as established by Cal/OSHA.
o Flex and Stretch: A workshop for field operations staff was
completed. Staff received instruction on flex and stretch
techniques/exercises, which can be incorporated as part of
their daily routines.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING:
Backflow Prevention Software Deployment - Staff successfully
completed the implementation and deployment of the XC2 Backflow
Testing and Reporting Solution. This application assists in the
management and administration of the District’s backflow
prevention initiatives in preventing contamination of potable
water services. This accomplishment is the first in a series of
phased deployments to leverage the Cityworks asset management
platform coupled with the District’s overall asset management
initiative.
Cityworks - Staff successfully completed the deployment of the
District’s Enterprise Work Order and Asset Management
System. This solution replaces the legacy system, GBA. Given its
3
native architecture, Cityworks allows the District to further
leverage and integrate its other enterprise solutions:
Eden/Financial System, GIS and SCADA.
Mobile Waste Water App – In support of the California Drought
Initiatives, staff developed the “Make Every Drop Count” mobile
application. The application is intended to assist with the
District’s efforts to identify and reduce instances of water
waste within the region. The mobile application features the
ability to attach photos for reporting water waste, automatic
geographical location of incident, and water-saving tips. Staff
is continuing to fine tune the application and is working with
the Customer Service group to prepare a launch date.
GIS Presentation at the ESRI Annual International Conference -
GIS authored and presented a best practice paper titled “Mobile
Field Construction Inspection for Water Utilities” at the 2015
International User Conference held in San Diego this past
month. The paper was selected among hundreds of entries and
District GIS staff shared its current field data collection and
reporting practices to an audience of both private and public
agencies.
FINANCE:
Year-End Close - Staff is closing the fiscal year ending June
30, 2015 and preparing for the annual financial audit. The
auditors are scheduled to perform auditing procedures from
August 25th through September 5th.
Rebate Programs – MWD’s turf removal rebate program was closed
on July 16, 2015 due to $390,000,000 being fully
allocated. However, a waiting list has been established for
anyone seeking a rebate, but stipulates that funding is not
guaranteed for these applicants. MWD still has rebates for
water-saving devices that include toilets, washing machines,
rotating nozzles, and weather based irrigation controllers.
Conservation Intern – To assist in the District’s water
conservation program, Mariel Garcia was hired as a Water
Conservation Intern. Mariel is a recent graduate of the
University of Arizona with a major in Economics and Water
Resources.
Financial Reporting:
o For the twelve months ended June 30, 2015, there are total
revenues of $90,602,191 and total expenses of $89,344,141.
The revenues exceeded expenses by $1,258,050.
o The market value shown in the Portfolio Summary and in the
Investment Portfolio Details as of June 30, 2015 total
$86,032,177 with an average yield to maturity of 0.66%. The
total earnings year-to-date are $559,463.50.
4
ENGINEERING AND WATER OPERATIONS:
Engineering:
SR-11 Potable Water Utility Relocations: This project consists
of two (2) groups of potable water relocations to accommodate
the construction of the future SR-11 right-of-way and connector
ramps. The first group includes relocation of existing
pipelines in Sanyo Avenue and utility easements and is
currently in the construction phase. The contractor, Coffman
Specialties Inc., has relocated the 10-inch and 12-inch mains
and has completed a majority of the work to lower the
District’s 18-inch transmission main to accommodate the
Caltrans freeway retaining wall footings. It is anticipated
that this construction contract will reach substantial
completion in September, 2015 (ahead of schedule). The second
group, consisting of relocating a 6-inch blow off in Otay Mesa
Road, has been completed. The overall project is within budget
and on schedule. (P2453)
944-1, 944-2, & 458-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coatings &
Upgrades: This project consists of removing and replacing the
interior and exterior coatings of the 944-1 0.3 MG Reservoir,
the 944-2 3.0 MG Reservoir, and the 458-2 1.8 MG Reservoir,
along with providing structural upgrades, to ensure the tanks
comply with both State and Federal OSHA standards as well as
the American Water Works Association and the County Health
Department standards. The contractor, Olympus & Associates,
has completed the interior and exterior coating of the 944-2
Reservoir, and the reservoir was put back into service on July
29, 2015. On the same day, Operations began to drain the 944-1
Reservoir. Once the 944-1 Reservoir is empty, the contractor
will prepare the reservoir for structural upgrades which are
scheduled to begin on August 10, 2015. At the 458-2 Reservoir,
the contractor has completed the removal of the existing
coating from the interior floor, roof, and walls. An
assessment completed on the interior of this 48 year old
reservoir during the month of May indicated it needed
structural repairs to the floor and column bases. The
structural repairs have been completed. The contractor has
also completed the interior coating on the roof and shell, and
will begin coating the floor in early August, 2015. The
overall project is behind schedule. The contractor’s current
project schedule indicates a late September, 2015 completion.
Staff will submit a request to the Board for budget
augmentation. (P2531, P2532, P2535)
5
Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility (RWCWRF) Return
Activated Sludge (RAS) Pumps Replacement Project: This Project
consists of removal and replacement of the existing 5
horsepower (HP) RAS pumps with upgraded 20 HP units. On
January 7, 2015, the Board awarded a construction contract to
Cora Constructors, Inc. Pumps have been ordered and on-site
activities are projected to start in August, 2015 now due to a
manufacturer’s delay in pump production. It is anticipated
that pumps will be replaced August through October, 2015. The
project is within budget and still scheduled to be completed in
November 2015. (R2111)
Calavo Basin Sewer System Rehabilitation: This project
consists of removing and replacing approximately 1,200 linear
feet of 8-inch PVC sewer pipeline and construction of 220 feet
of new 8-inch PVC sewer pipeline in the residential streets of
the Calavo Gardens area near Avocado Boulevard. The
contractor, Arrieta Construction, has completed sewer repairs
and surface restoration. The District is awaiting construction
markups to complete as-built drawings. The project is scheduled
to be completed in August, 2015. (S2033)
Rosarito Desalination: Staff and representatives from NSC Agua
continue to coordinate on complying with the California Water
Resources Control Board Drinking Water Program regulatory
requirements related to source water quality testing.
The work on the EIR/EIS document for the project is proceeding.
All of the technical reports to support the EIR/EIS are
complete and being reviewed by staff and the U.S Department of
State. The EIR/EIS chapters are being drafted and will be
forwarded to the U.S. Department of State in August, 2015.
Jill Reilly, the U.S. Department of State representative on the
environmental document being prepared for the District’s
Presidential Permit, was called over to the House Foreign
Affairs Committee by the senior advisor to Chair Edward Royce
and the Democrat senior advisor, Brian Skretny, along with a
number of interns for a brief on the project. Chair Royce was
interested in helping push along the State Department to act on
the Presidential Permit for the pipeline crossing.
On June 26, 2015, the Diputado Federales Hector Mares
(representing the State of Baja California with the Mexican
Congress) organized a meeting of the Northern Borders
Commission and invited representatives from the Otay Water
District. Several Diputados from the northern Mexican states
were in attendance, together with state and local dignitaries.
The District was represented by Director Thompson, General
Manager Mark Watton, and Chief of Engineering Rod Posada.
Diputados Bonilla and Mares expressed gratitude for the
6
District’s participation in the writing of the Mexican Standard
on Intakes, Outfalls, and Brine Disposal for desalination
plants. The District participated in the working group writing
the Standard, an effort that lasted eighteen months.
In mid-July, 2015, staff from U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein’s
office contacted the District inquiring about Desalination and
Recycled Water projects the District is embarked on.
Subsequently, Senator Feinstein included the name of the
District as a potential recipient of funds from the “California
Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2015.” This is a Senate Bill
she is introducing that will give Congressional funds to
California in the amount of $1.3 Billion. Staff is writing a
letter of support for this Bill to the U.S. Senate. On July
24, 2015, Congressmen Juan Vargas and Edward Royce sent a
letter to U.S. Department of State in support of the
application for the Presidential Permit (see Attachment A). In
addition, Congressman Royce wrote a letter to the Editor of the
Orange County Register commenting about the Rosarito
Desalination Project as a potential solution to the drought
(see Attachment B).
On July 28, 2015, Director Thompson and General Manager Mark
Watton met with the California Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins, to
present the Rosarito Desalination project and the potential for
the District to acquire water from that source.
The Private-Public Partnership (PPP) process between NSC Agua
and the State of Baja California continues. A Governor’s
Committee is still evaluating the project and NSCA expects that
the decision will be published by mid-August, 2015. After
publication of the decision, the project will go for public
tender. The entire process is expected to be completed by
December, 2015; at that time the State will make the decision
final.
Finally, on August 3, 2015, “El Mexicano,” a local paper in
Tijuana B.C., Mexico, printed an article about the Rosarito
Desalination Project and pointed out the potential benefits to
the Tijuana/Rosarito region (see Attachment C). (P2451)
850-3 Reservoir Interior Coatings: This project consists of
removing and replacing the interior coatings of the 850-3 3.0
MG Reservoir. On April 1, 2015, the Board awarded a
construction contract to Abhe & Svoboda. The contractor has
completed applying the coating on the roof and has begun the
coating removal on the shell. The project is within budget and
scheduled to be completed at the end of September, 2015.
(P2542)
7
450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation: This project
consists of replacing two (2) sodium hypochlorite tanks,
relocating the chlorine feed pumps, installing a new roll-up
door, and constructing a containment area. The project was
substantially complete on July 23, 2015. All that remains are
minor punch list items including Operation and Maintenance
Manuals, release of liability from sub-contractors, and final
as-built drawings. The project is within budget and final
acceptance is expected by mid-August, 2015. (R2112)
711-1 & 711-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coatings & Upgrades:
This project consists of removing and replacing the interior
and exterior coatings of the 711-1 3.1 MG Reservoir and the
711-2 2.3 MG Reservoir along with providing structural upgrades
to ensure the tanks comply with both State and Federal OSHA
standards as well as the American Water Works Association and
the County Health Department standards. The project was
advertised on July 24, 2015 and the bid opening is scheduled
for August 18, 2015. The project is on schedule and on budget.
(P2529 & P2530)
Recycled Water Fire Hydrant Installations: This project
consists of installing several fire hydrants on the recycled
water system for fire suppression. The project includes
meeting Title 22 requirements, obtaining regulatory approval,
establishing protocol, and site selection. A second draft of
the engineering report prepared by fourteen (14) local
agencies, including Otay Water District, was submitted on July
14, 2015 to the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, the San
Diego office of the Division of Drinking Water, and the San
Diego County to provide a framework for approval of the
expanded use for recycled water, including fire suppression. A
meeting with these regulatory agencies was held on July 14,
2015 to discuss the application. District staff will be
scheduling a meeting in August with San Diego Fire and Cal Fire
to coordinate a submittal for tanker trucks fill modifications
and training required to meet the regulatory requirements. The
District filed a Notice of Exemption on July 31, 2015 for the
recycled water fire protection fill station proposed at the end
of Hunt Parkway in Chula Vista. Staff is also investigating
the options for the fill station to be constructed at the Ralph
W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility. (R2122)
Disposal of Real Estate Properties Declared Surplus by the
Board: The District, through a competitive process based on
qualifications and pricing, secured the real estate brokerage
services of the Norberg Group to support the disposal of six
(6) properties declared surplus by the Board. On March 13,
2015, the District entered into listing agreements with the
Norberg Group for the six (6) properties. The District has
8
closed escrow for two (2) of the surplus properties which are
located at Steele Canyon Road and Wild Mustang Place. One (1)
property located at Sweetwater Springs Boulevard is due to
close escrow in August, 2015. One (1) property located at
Proctor Valley is expected to enter escrow in August, 2015.
Two (2) properties located at Dorchester Street and Star Acres
are still in negotiations with potential buyers.
Southwestern Community College: The College has hired an
Engineer to prepare an Irrigation/Landscape Master Plan and a
comprehensive Infrastructure Master Plan. Recycled Water
facilities are a main component of these Master Plans that will
be reviewed and commented on by the District.
For the month of June, 2015, the District sold 16 meters (20
EDUs) generating $179,936 in revenue. Projection for this
period was 12.8 meters (15.3 EDUs), with budgeted revenue of
$140,758. Total revenue for Fiscal Year 2015 is $3,729,510
against the annual budget of $1,689,093.
The following table summarizes Engineering's project purchases and
Change Orders issued during the period of June 12, 2015 through August
4, 2015 that were within staff signatory authority:
Date
Action
Amount
Contractor/
Consultant
Project
7/24/15 P.O. $1,800 Potable Divers,
Inc.
944-1R Reservoir
Floating
Cover/Liner
Project (R2121)
7/27/15 P.O. $9,200 Inland Aerial
Surveys, Inc.
14-Inch Force Main
Project (R2116)
Water Operations(Reporting for the month of June):
On June 4 the San Diego Fire Department conducted an annual
inspection at the Upper Reservoir chlorine building; no issues
or citations were noted.
On June 11 staff responded to a 20-inch recycled main break in
the westbound lanes of Olympic Parkway in Chula Vista and is
coordinating with the District’s insurance carrier for third
party damages.
June 15 through June 19 staff worked with Republic Service
(Otay Landfill) for an application for a special waste profile
to send screenings from the screen compactor to the lab for
analysis. Staff is also working with Engineering to get a Cal
9
EPA number for disposal to the landfill. Staff is having
Utility Maintenance transfer screenings to drying beds until
staff gets everything setup with the landfill and have all
required permits completed.
On June 16 while exposing a leak, staff found a fissure gushing
water from a 12-inch steel main on Hillsdale Road in Rancho San
Diego. Staff immediately made repairs to the pipe and it was
placed back in service.
On June 16 San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) reported a
leak on Pipeline No. 4 near the Carlsbad desalination tie-in.
SDCWA diverted all flows through Pipeline No. 3 and were able
to meet all demands. Pipeline No. 3 has a capacity for 230 CFS.
(As of July 2, 2015 Pipeline No. 4 is still down, demands are
met via Pipeline No. 3. Demand is 95 CFS, there is an excess of
135 CFS still available).
Staff continues to clean and CCTV the sewer system with no
spills being experienced.
Staff continues to work on the inspection and cleaning project
of hydro-tanks District-wide.
Potable, Recycled and Sewer:
Total number of potable water meters is 49,419.
The June potable water purchases were 2,386.3 acre-feet which
is 26.3% below the budget of 3,237.6 acre-feet. The cumulative
purchases through June is 30,362.7 acre-feet which is 1.4%
below the cumulative budget of 30,793.3 acre-feet.
10
The June recycled water purchases and production was 452.4
acre-feet which is 5.7% below the budget of 479.9 acre-feet.
The cumulative production and purchases through June is 4,346.4
acre-feet which is 9.9% above the cumulative budget of 3,955.5
acre-feet.
Recycled water consumption for the month of June is as follows:
o June: Total Consumption = 344 acre-feet (112,060,872
gallons); average daily consumption = 3,735,362
gallons per day
o July: Total consumption = 438.2 acre-feet (142,735,604
gallons); average daily consumption = 4,604,374
gallons per day
o Total recycled water consumption as of June for FY 2015 is
4231.7 acre-feet.
o Total number of recycled water meters is 709.
Wastewater flows for the month of June were as follows:
o Total basin flow, gallons per day: 1,494,525.
o Spring Valley Sanitation District Flow to Metro, gallons per
day: 494,674.
o Total Otay flow, gallons per day: 999,851.
o Flow Processed at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling
Facility, gallons per day: 991,425.
o Flow to Metro from Otay Water District was 8,426 gallons per
day.
By the end of June there were 6,092 wastewater EDUs.
11
Attachments:
Attachment A - Letter to The Honorable John F. Kerry,
Dated July 24, 2015
Attachment B – An all-of-the-above approach to drought article,
Dated July 24, 2015
Attachment C – El Mexicano News Article, Se Construiria En Playas
de Rosarito, Duplicaria Desaladora, Disponibilidad
de Agua, Dated August 3, 2015
ATTACHMENT A
Congress of l\}t United States
Hitsrjtngtnn,S<&20515
July 24,2015
The Honorable John F.Kerry
Secretary of State
U.S.Department of State
2201 CSt,NW
Washington,D.C.20520
Dear Secretary Kerry:
In November 2013,the Otay Water District applied for a Presidential Permit to construct a water
pipeline that would bring up to 50 million gallons per day of desalinated seawater from Mexico
to California.It is our hope that this major infrastructure project will help provide additional
drinking water to more than 200,000 people in the San Diego area.We urge the State
Department to complete its assessment of the Otay Water District pipeline application promptly.
As you know,California continues to endure its worst drought in many decades,impacting a
growing number of communities.This pipeline could provide southern California with a new
water supply source while reducing dependency on the Colorado River.
We understand that the State Department is working with authorities in California on the
environmental assessment of the Otay Water Project as part of the Presidential Permit review
process and will make a national interest determination on the project.It is important that the
State Department conclude its review of the pipeline as soon as possible so that this major
infrastructure project can benefit communities in Southern California.
We look forward to continuing to work with you on this urgent matter.
Sincerely,
EDWARD R.ROYQE JUAN VARGAS
Member of Congress Meftibe of Congress
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ATTACHMENT B
The Orange County Register
OPINION
An all-of-the-above approach to drought
July 26,2015
Updated July 24,2015 3:41 p.m.
BY ED ROYGE /Contributing writer
California continues to endure its worst drought in more than 1,200 years.A growing
number of communities have been impacted by the severe drought conditions,and
mandatory water usage reductions are doing little to alleviate their effects.While we
can't make it rain,we can do more to utilize readily available water.
Local desalination projects have continuously undergone permitting battles with
government agencies.After six years of back and forth with the California Coastal
Commission and 14 lawsuits,the largest desalination project in the Western
Hemisphere,in Carlsbad,has finally been approved.It's been estimated that this
project will employ 2,500 people and provide 50 million gallons of drinking water every
day when it opens next year.
Desalination plants,using a process called reverse osmosis,convert seawater into
drinking water.This idea is not new,nor should it be seen as partisan.John F.
Kennedy saw the potential for desalination:"If we could produce freshwater from
saltwater at a low cost,that would indeed be a great service to humanity,and would
dwarf any other scientific accomplishment."
In April,Gov.Jerry Brown authorized $200 million for desalination and water recycling
projects.But delays from state and federal agencies have resulted in a pile-up of 15
pending desalination projects along the coast awaiting approval,essentially denying
residents of a potential reliable water source.
As chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee,I recently sent a letter with San
Diego-area Democratic Rep.Juan Vargas to the State Department,urging it to
complete its review of the Otay water project,which could bring up to 50 million gallons
of desalinated water from Mexico to California.Since 2013,the State Department has
been reviewing the environmental impact and U.S.national security interests of the
project.As one of the many agencies that are required to pursue an action,it is
important that the State Department conclude its work promptly.
We see these types of projects becoming more common around the world.In Israel,
where drought is not uncommon,similar government-backed projects provide 130
billion gallons of desalinated Mediterranean seawater to more than half of the nation's
population.Israel also treats and reuses nearly 70 percent of its waste water for
agriculture.Even during times of drought,Israel has a reliable water supply.We should
consider modeling our water projects after countries that have a wealth of knowledge
and experience to share.
Government often stands as an obstacle to even the most obvious solutions.Large-
scale infrastructure projects are not an exception to this rule.Congress has a
responsibility to help streamline and reform the permitting process for water projects.
To that end,I am an original co-sponsor of the Western Water and American Food
Security Act authored by Central California Republican Rep.David Valadao.This bill,
which passed the House of Representatives on July 16,provides both emergency and
long-term water supply to California,increases water storage capacity and streamlines
the permitting process to approve water recycling and reuse projects.It also
establishes "one stop shop"permitting reforms aimed at building infrastructure to
capture more water.
Our current system of moving water through the California State Water Project is slow
and nontransparent;this bill takes steps in order to get more water to Southern
California and will allow us to pump more water during the wet months to use in the dry
months.
This is just a start.Our current water crisis did not appear overnight,and it will not be
solved in a day.Long-term planning requires a regulatory environment that both
ensures that water projects in the pipeline today are not bogged down by excessive red
tape,and that innovative solutions being employed around the globe can be quickly
adopted here.We should begin by approving viable and proven desalination projects
as part of an "all of the above approach"to the drought.
Ed Royce,R-Fullerton,represents California's 39th Congressional District.
ELMEXICANO
NEWSPAPER
Tijuana,B.C./Lms 3 be Agosto ie 2015 /
ATTACHMENT C
El titular rie la Cespt,Alfonso Alvarez Juan,expreso
que ven factlble contar con una planta desaladora,queduplicariaelabastoparaTijuanayPlayasdeRosarlto.
SE CONSTRUIRIA EN PLAYAS DE ROSARITO
DUPLICARIA DESALADORA,
DISPONIBIUDAD DE AGUA
TIJUANA.-La planta de-
saladora que se pretende
construir en Playas de Ro-
sarito,bajo el esquema de la
Ley de Asociacion Publico-
Privada (APP),alcanzaria
la misma capacidad que hoy
tiene el acueducto del Rio
Colorado,por lo que se con-
taria con el doble del recur-
so natural para abastecer a
los municipios de Tijuana y
Rosarito.
Se espera que,de concre-
tarse el proyecto,pueda
proveer 500 litros por se-
gundo,lo que al ano repre-
senta 100 millones de me-
tros cubicos.El titular de la Comision
Estatal de Servicios Publi-
cos de Tijuana (Cespt),Al
fonso Alvarez Juan,explico
que se analiza en la mesa
tecnica la factibilidad de
contar con una planta de-
saladora en Playas de Rosa
rito,que se convertiria enunproveedordelorganismo
operador del agua.
Considero que es viable,
puesto que no se puede de-
pender de una sola fuente
de abastecimiento,como lo
es el Rio Colorado.
La capacidad maxima
de la planta seria de cinco
met ros cubicos 6 500 litros
por segundo;anualmenteaportaria100millonesde
metros cubicos,el consumo
actual de Tijuana y Playas
de Rosarito.
"La desaladora vendria a
provocar muchas cosas,en-
tre ellas darfa certidumbre
a quienes esten pensando eninvertirenlaZonaCosta,elaguaestarfagarantizadade
manera permanente",ex
preso.
Alvarez Juan recordo que
ante la imposibilidad del go*
bierno estatal de invertir en
una obra de esa magnitud,
recurririan a la iniciativa
privada,que por un periodo
de tiempo se harfa cargo de
la operacion.Una vez finali-
zado el contrato,la planta
desaladora pasaria a manos
del gobierno.
A cerca del impacto
economico,mencionb que
actualmente el agua ya po-
tabilizada tiene un costo
promedio de 22 pesos por
metro cubico.El reto es que
la tarifa siga siendo la mis
ma o muy similar.
"El costo que est£propo-
niendo la empresa para ins-
talar la desaladora es muy
similar a lo que nos cuesta
traer el agua del Rio Colo
rado a Tijuana".El funcionario opino que
resulta mas costoso no te-
ner agua suficiente,pero
reitero que buscaran que no
se incremente la tarifa final,
(lgr)
OT A Y WATER DISTRICT
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
FOR TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,2015 (UNAUDITED)
Annual
Budget Actual Budget
REVENUES:
Potable Water Sales $ 45,669,500 $ 44,025,774 $ 45,669,500
Recycled Water Sales 8,826,600 8,853,010 8,826,600
Potable Energy Charges 2,145,600 2,134,865 2,145,600
Potable System Charges 12,337,500 12,380,370 12,337,500
Potable MWD & CW A Fixed Charges 10,936,200 10,846,41 I 10,936,200
Potable Penalties 870,300 894,569 870,300
Total Water Sales 80,785,700 79,134,999 80,785,700
Sewer Charges 3,007,700 3,009,634 3,007,700
Meter Fees 51,500 90,245 51,500
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,150,600 1,312,108 1,150,600
Betterment Fees for Maintenance 301,800 188,123 301,800
Non-Operating Revenues 1,947,800 2,385,388 1,947,800
Tax Revenues 3,763,700 3,814,516 3,763,700
Interest 77,400 113,378 77,400
Transfer from Potable General Fund 553,800 553,800 553,800
Total Revenues $ 91 ,640,000 $ 90,602,191 $ 91,640,000
EXPENSES:
Potable Water Purchases $ 34,521,500 $ 33,594,702 $ 34,521,500
Recycled Water Purchases 1,601,500 1,360,807 1,601 ,500
CW A-Infrastructure Access Charge 1,901 ,400 1,900,266 1,901 ,400
CW A-Customer Service Charge 1,792,200 1,796,853 1,792,200
CWA-Emergency Storage Charge 4,741 ,200 4,720,701 4,741 ,200
MWD-Capacity Res Charge 701 ,400 701,976 701 ,400
MWD-Readiness to Serve Charge 1,800,000 1,817,339 1,800,000
Subtotal Water Purchases 47,059,200 45,892,644 47,059,200
Power Charges 2,838,400 3,048,335 2,838,400
Payroll & Related Costs 19,747,600 19,574,036 19,747,600
Material & Maintenance 3,619,800 3,356,762 3,619,800
Administrative Expenses 5,009,200 4,312,889 5,009,200
Legal Fees 410,000 203,675 410,000
Expansion Reserve 2,538,900 2,538,900 2,538,900
Betterment Reserve 3,530,000 3,530,000 3,530,000
Replacement Reserve 3,270,200 3,270,200 3,270,200
New Supply Fee 705,000 705,000 705,000
Transfer toSewer General Fund 553,800 553,800 553,800
OPEB Trust 647,100 647,100 647,100
Potable General Fund 1,583,800 1,583,800 1,583,800
Sewer Replacement 127,000 127,000 127,000
Total Expenses $ 91 ,640,000 $ 89,344,141 $ 91 ,640,000
EXCESS REVENUES(EXPENSE) $ $ 1,258,050 $
F:/MORPT/FS2015-0615
Exhibit A
YTD
Variance Var%
$ ( 1,643,726) (3.6%)
26,410 0.3%
(10,735) (0.5%)
42,870 0.3%
(89,789) (0.8%)
24,269 2.8%
~ 1 ,650, 701 ~ (2.0%)
1,934 0.1%
38,745 75.2%
161,508 14.0%
(113,677) (37.7%)
437,588 22.5%
50,816 1.4%
35,978 46.5%
0.0%
$ (1,037,809) (l.I%)
$ 926,798 2.7%
240,693 15.0%
1,134 0.1%
( 4,653) (0.3%)
20,499 0.4%
(576) (0.1%)
(17,339) {1.0%)
1,166,556 2.5%
(209,935) (7.4%)
173,564 0.9%
263,038 7.3%
696,311 13.9%
206,325 50.3%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
$ 2,295,859 2.5%
$ 1,258,050
7/28/2015 11:32 AM
Investments
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
San Diego County Pool
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking
(not included in yiefd calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Par
Value
55,735,000.00
7,000,000.00
81,784.76
7,590,662.10
13,607,932.62
84,015,379.48
2,042,672.04
86,058,051.52
June 30 Month Ending
53,023.82
84,841,269.76
0.76%
Month End
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
June 30, 2015
Market
Value
55,727,834.05
7,002,370.00
81,784.76
7,593,516.03
13,584,000.00
83,989,504.84
2,042,672.04
86,032,176.88
Fiscal Year To Date
559,463.50
84,162,584.68
0.66%
Book
Value
55,735,752.22
6,997,200.44
81,784.76
7,590,662.10
13,607,932.62
84,013,332.14
2,042,672.04
86,056,004.18
%of
Portfolio
66.34
8.33
0.10
9.04
16.20
100.00%
Fiscal Year Ending
Term
989
851
730
728
728
559,463.50
Days to
Maturity
769
322
205
538
538
YTM YTM
360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
0.916 0.929
0.492 0.499
0.030 0.030
0.295 0.299
0.502 0.509 -----
0.757 0.767
0.231 0.234
0.757 0.767
I hereby certify that the investments contained in this report are made in accordance with the District Investment Policy Number 27 adopted by the Board of Directors on May 7, 2014. The market value in~i~a ta Corporation. The investments provide sufficient liquidity to meet the cash flow requirements of the District for the next six months of expenditures.
-7-:7-$-17
Reporting period 06/01/2015..06/30/2015
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 07120/2015 ·16:19
Portfolio OT A Y
NLIAP
PM (PRF _PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
OTA Y WATER DISTRICT
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO REVIEW
June 30, 2015
INVESTMENT OVERVIEW & MARKET STATUS:
The federal funds rate has remained constant now for over 5 years. On December 16, 2008, at the Federal Reserve Board's regular
scheduled meeting, the federal funds rate was lowered from 1.00% to "a target range of between Zero and 0.25%" in response to the
nation's ongoing financial crisis, as well as banking industry pressure to ease credit and stimulate the economy. This marked the ninth
reduction in a row since September 18,2007, when the rate was 5.25%. There have been no further changes made to the federal funds rate
at the Federal Reserve Board's subsequent regular scheduled meetings, the most recent of which was held on June 17, 2015. In
determining how long to maintain the current 0 to Y4 percent target range for the federal funds rate, they went on to say: "the Committee
will assess progress--both realized and expected--toward its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment
will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and
inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. The Committee anticipates that it will be appropriate to
raise the target range for the federal funds rate when it has seen further improvement in the labor market and is reasonably confident that
inflation will move back to its 2 percent objective over the medium term. "
Despite the large drop in available interest rates, the District's overall effective rate of return at June 30, 2015 was 0.66%, which was the
same as the previous month. At the same time the LAIF return on deposits has improved over the previous month, reaching an average
effective yield of0.299% for the month of June 2015. Based on our success at maintaining a competitive rate of return on our portfolio
during this extended period of interest rate declines, no changes in investment strategy regarding returns on investment are being
considered at this time. This desired portfolio mix is important in mitigating any liquidity risk from unforeseen changes in LAIF or County
Pool policy.
In accordance with the District's Investment Policy, all District funds continue to be managed based on the objectives, in priority order, of
safety, liquidity, and return on investment.
PORTFOLIO COMPLIANCE: June 30, 2015
Investment State Limit Ota1: Limit Ota1: Actual
8.01: Treasury Securities 100% 100% 0
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Operations) $50 Million $50 Million $7.6 Million
8.02: Local Agency Investment Fund (Bonds) 100% 100% 0
8.03: Federal Agency Issues 100% 100% 72.90%
8.04: Certificates of Deposit 30% 15% .10%
8.05: Short-Term Commercial Notes 25% 10% 0
8.06: Medium-Term Commercial Debt 30% 10% 0
8.07: Money Market Mutual Funds 20% 10% 0
8.08: San Diego County Pool 100% 100% 15.81%
12.0: Maximum Single Financial Institution 100% 50% 2.37%
.....--·-------------
$62,732,953
72.90°/o
Otay Water District
Investment Portfolio: o6/30/2015
Total Cash and Investments: $86,056,004
$2,124,456
/2.47°/o
0 Banks (Passbook/Checking/CO) •P ools (LAIF & County) CAgencies & Corporate Notes
$21,198,595
24.63°/o
Target: Meet or Exceed 100% of LAIF
f/1 0.90 ... c Ql
E ...
f/1 Ql > E
c 0
c ....
::J ... Ql
a::
Performance Measure FY-15
Return on Investment
Month
liiLAIF •Otay o Difference
CUSIP Investment#
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3133EDKF8
3134G4UCO
3134G4WJ3
3133EECX6
3134G55T8
3130A25S1
3136G1XZ7
3134G5A47
3133EELR9
3134G55X9
3133EEXC9
3134G56A8
3136G23GO
3130A3MH4
3134G6TJ2
3134G5LH6
3133EECG3
3133EECG3
3134G5PP4
3130A3N59
3133EEYE4
3130A4MF6
3130A4WT5
3136G2GN1
3130A56BO
3130A52G3
3134G63Z4
3134G6V264
2291
2305
2284
2313
2295
2299
2274
2301
2317
2298
2323
2297
2304
2314
2319
2307
2311
2312
2310
2315
2320
2318
2322
2321
2325
2324
2327
2326
Issuer
Average
Balance
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loa_n_M_o_rt...;g::..a..;;g:...e ___ _
Subtotal and Average 58,802,456.23
Federal Agency Issues· Coupon
3133EC7H1
3135GOYE7
3133EEC73
2260
2286
2329
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Data Updated: SET _MEB: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 0712012015-16:19
Month End
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
June 30, 2015
Purchase
Date
04/29/2014
09/08/2014
03/19/2014
11/25/2014
06/1212014
06/19/2014
12119/2013
06/30/2014
01/27/2015
06/10/2014
04/20/2015
06/16/2014
08/15/2014
12129/2014
04/27/2015
10/30/2014
11/20/2014
11/20/2014
1211212014
12129/2014
04/16/2015
03/30/2015
04/27/2015
04/30/2015
05/04/2015
05/11/2015
06/08/2015
06/29/2015
12117/2012
04/01/2014
06/26/2015
Par Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
55,735,000.00
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Market Value
2,000,100.00
2,000,580.00
2,002,120.00
2,000,520.00
2,001 ,820.00
2,001,980.00
1,997,740.00
2,001,640.00
2,000,540.00
1,997,920.00
1,996,500.00
2,002,680.00
2 '006 ,440. 00
2,004,440.00
1,999,200.00
2,001,380.00
1,031,266.90
2, 708,327.15
1,999,900.00
1,993,020.00
1,996,760.00
2,008,860.00
1,993,340.00
1,994,200.00
1,993,840.00
1,993,680.00
1,997,960.00
2,001,080.00
55,727,834.05
3,000,390.00
2,004,820.00
1,997,160.00
Stated
Book Value Rate
2,000,000.00
2,001,538.33
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,999,213.89
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
55,735,752.22
3,000,000.00
2,001,343.35
1,995,857.09
0.550
0.650
0.625
0.610
0.700
0.700
0.670
0.650
0.625
0.810
0.690
1.000
1.050
1.000
0.875
1.100
1.140
1.140
1.250
1.125
1.000
1.300
1.020
1.150
1.120
1.050
1.250
1.250
0.340
0.625
0.550
Page 1
S&P
YTM Days to Maturity
360 Maturity Date
0.542
0.570
0.616
0.602
M 0.690
0.690
0.661
0.641
0.616
0.799
0.681
0.986
1.036
0.986
0.863
1.085
1.124
1.124
1.233
1.110
0.986
1.282
1.006
1.134
394 07/29/2016
394 07/29/2016
446 09/19/2016
513 11/25/2016
530 1211212016
537 12119/2016
537 12119/2016
548 12130/2016
576 01/27/2017
618 03/10/2017
645 04/06/2017
716 06/16/2017
776 08/15/2017
821 09/29/2017
849 10/27/2017
852 1 0/30/2017
873 11/20/2017
873 11/20/2017
895 12112/2017
912 12129/2017
930 01/16/2018
1,002 03/29/2018
1,031 04/27/2018
1,034 04/30/2018
M 1.105 1,038 05/04/2018
M 1.036 1,045 05/11/2018
M 1.233 1 ,073 06/08/2018
M 1.233 1,094 06/29/2018
0.916
0.335
0.558
M 0.661
769
47 08/17/2015
422 08/26/2016
635 03/27/2017
Portfolio OT A Y
NL! AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
CUSIP Investment# Issuer
Subtotal and Average
Certificates of Deposit· Bank
2050003183-6 2283 California Bank & Trust
Subtotal and Average
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Average
San Diego County Pool
SD COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Average
Total and Average
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 07/20/2015-16:19
Average
Balance
5,334,030.93
81,784.76
7,307 ,328. 77
11,281,265.95
84,841,269.76
Month End
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details -Investments
June 30, 2015
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
7,000,000.00 7,002,370.00
01/22/2014 81,784.76 81 ,784.76
81,784.76 81,784.76
7,590,662.10 7,593,516.03
07/01/2014 0.00 0.00
7,590,662.10 7,593,516.03
13,607,932.62 13,584,000.00
13,607,932.62 13,584,000.00
84,015,379.48 83,989,504.84
Stated
Book Value Rate
6,997,200.44
81,784.76 0.030
81,784.76
7,590,662.10 0.299
0.00 0.267
7,590,662.10
13,607,932.62 0.509
13,607,932.62
84,013,332.14
Page 2
YTM Daysto Maturity
S&P 360 Maturity Date
0.492 322
0.030 205 01/22/2016 ----------------
0.030 205
0.295
0.263 --------------
0.295
0.502 --------------
0.502
0.757 538
Portfolio OT A Y
NL!AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment# Issuer
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PETTY CASH 9003 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PAYROLL 9005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Average Balance
Total Cash and Investments
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 0712012015 -16:19
Average
Balance
0.00
84,841,269.76
Month End
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details-Cash
June 30, 2015
Purchase
Date Par Value
10,001.55
2,950.00
1,908,178.44
07/01/2014 27,891.35
12,815.42
34,267.27
07/01/2014 0.00
07/01/2014 46,568.01
86,058,051.52
Market Value Book Value
10,001.55 10,001.55
2,950.00 2,950.00
1,908,178.44 1,908,178.44
27,891.35 27,891.35
12,815.42 12,815.42
34,267.27 34,267.27
0.00 0.00
46,568.01 46,568.01
86,032,176.88 86,056,004.18
Stated
Rate S&P
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
Page3
YTM Daysto
360 Maturity
0.010
0.000
0.247
0.000
0.010
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.757 538
Portfolio OT A Y
NL!AP
PM (PRF _PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment#
Fund: Treasury Fund
LAIF 9001
UNION MONEY 9002
PETIY CASH 9003
UNION OPERATING 9004
PAYROLL 9005
SO COUNTY POOL 9007
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011
LA IF BABS 201 0 9012
UBNA-2010 BOND 9013
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014
3133EC6F6
3133EC7H1
3135GOXR9
3136G1XZ7
3134G4PXO
2050003163-6
3134G4WJ3
3134G4WH7
3135GOYE7
3133EDKF6
3134G55T6
3134G56A6
3134G55X9
3130A25S1
3134G5A47
3136G23GO
3134G4UCO
3134G5LH6
3134G5PP4
2258
2260
2269
2274
2277
2263
2264
2285
2286
2291
2295
2297
2296
2299
2301
2304
2305
2307
2310
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 0712012015 -16:19
Investment
Class
Fair Value
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Amortized
Fair Value
Amortized
Amortized
Fair Value
Amortized
Amortized
Maturity
Date
Fair Value 06/01/2015
FairValue 08/17/2015
Fair Value 09/06/2016
FairValue 12/19/2016
Fair Value 06/27/2016
Amortized 01/22/2016
FairValue 09/19/2016
Fair Value 03/20/2017
Fair Value 08/26/2016
Fair Value 07/29/2016
Fair Value 12/12/2016
Fair Value 06/16/2017
Fair Value 03/10/2017
Fair Value 12/19/2016
Fair Value 12/30/2016
Fair Value 08/15/2017
Fair Value 07/29/2016
FairValue 10/30/2017
Fair Value 12/12/2017
Month End
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
June 1, 2015-June 30, 2015
Beginning
Invested Value
7,593,574.65
10,004.60
2,950.00
773,366.69
27,891 .35
7,792,000.00
12,615.42
34,266.96
0.00
0.00
54,153.33
3,000,000.00
3,001,470.00
2,000,060.00
2,000,500.00
1,998,760.00
61,784.76
2,000,500.00
2,000,720.00
2,004,120.00
2,000,040.00
2,000,300.00
2,000,660.00
1,997,260.00
2,000,560.00
2,000,100.00
2,005,520.00
2,001,300.00
2,002,000.00
2,000,340.00
Purchase
of Principal
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Addition
to Principal
2,800,000.00
5,106,924.77
0.00
1,134,789.55
0.00
5,800,000.00
0.01
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Redemption
of Principal
2,800,000.00
5,106,927.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,585.32
3,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Adjustment In Value
Amortization
Adjustment
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Change in
Market Value
-58.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-6,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-1,080.00
-60.00
-2,760.00
1,240.00
0.00
1,620.00
-720.00
700.00
60.00
1,520.00
2,020.00
660.00
1,420.00
1,540.00
920.00
-720.00
-620.00
-440.00
Ending
Invested Value
7,593,516.03
10,001.55
2,950.00
1 ,908,178.44
27,891.35
13,584,000.00
12,615.42
34,267.27
0.00
0.00
46,568.01
0.00
3,000,390.00
0.00
1,997,740.00
0.00
61,784.76
2,002,120.00
0.00
2,004,820.00
2,000,100.00
2,001,820.00
2,002,660.00
1,997,920.00
2,001,980.00
2,001 ,640.00
2,006,440.00
2,000,560.00
2,001,360.00
1,999,900.00
Portfolio OT A Y
NL!AP
GO (PRF_GD) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
CUSIP Investment# Fund
Fund: Treasury Fund
3133EECG3 2311 99
3133EECG3 2312 99
3133EECX6 2313 99
3130A3MH4 2314 99
3130A3N59 2315 99
3133EELR9 2317 99
3130A4MF6 2318 99
3134G6TJ2 2319 99
3133EEYE4 2320 99
3136G2GN1 2321 99
3130A4WT5 2322 99
3133EEXC9 2323 99
3130A52G3 2324 99
3130A56BO 2325 99
3134G6V264 2326 99
3134G63Z4 2327 99
3133EEC73 2329 99
3134G56NO 2300 99
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 07/20/2015-16:19
Investment
Class
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Fair Value
Amortized
Fair Value
Amortized
Fair Value
Month End
GASB 31 Compliance Detail
Sorted by Fund -Fund
Maturity Beginning Purchase
Date Invested Value of Principal
11/20/2017 1,032,770.70 0.00
11/20/2017 2,712,276.45 0.00
11/25/2016 1,998,640.00 0.00
09/29/2017 2,005,880.00 0.00
12/29/2017 1,993,460.00 0.00
01/27/2017 1,997,380.00 0.00
03/29/2018 2,010,980.00 0.00
10/27/2017 1,999,280.00 0.00
01/16/2018 1,996,760.00 0.00
04/30/2018 1,995,540.00 0.00
04/27/2018 1,995,080.00 0.00
04/06/2017 1,996,500.00 0.00
05/11/2018 1,995,800.00 0.00
05/04/2018 1,995,680.00 0.00
06/29/2018 0.00 2,000,000.00
06/08/2018 0.00 2,000,000.00
03/27/2017 0.00 1,995,824.00
06/26/2017 1,999,560.00 0.00
Subtotal 84,122,647.31 5,995,824.00
Total 84,122,647.31 5,995,824.00
Addition Redemption
to Principal of Principal
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
14,843,714.64 18,916,513.15
14,843,714.64 18,916,513.15
Adjustment In Value
Amortization Change in
Adjustment Market Value
0.00 -1,503.80
0.00 -3,949.30
0.00 1,880.00
0.00 -1,440.00
0.00 -440.00
0.00 3,160.00
0.00 -2,120.00
0.00 -80.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 -1,340.00
0.00 -1,740.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 -2,120.00
0.00 -1,840.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 -2,040.00
33.09 0.00
0.00 440.00
33.09 -15,911.92
33.09 -15,911.92
Page 2
Ending
Invested Value
1,031,266.90
2,708,327.15
2,000,520.00
2,004,440.00
1,993,020.00
2,000,540.00
2,008,860.00
1,999,200.00
1,996,760.00
1,994,200.00
1,993,340.00
1,996,500.00
1,993,680.00
1,993,840.00
2,000,000.00
1,997,960.00
1,995,857.09
0.00
86,029,793.97
86,029,793.97
Portfolio OT A Y
NL!AP
GD(PRF_GD)7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Percent
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio
Issuer: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Union Bank
UNION MONEY 9002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UNION OPERATING 9004 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
UBNA-FLEX ACCT 9014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
LAIF 9001 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal
Issuer: California Bank & Trust
Certificates of Deposit -Bank
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal
Issuer: Fannie Mae
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3135GOXR9 2269 Fannie Mae
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal
Issuer: Federal Fann Credit Bank
Data Updated: SET_MEB: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 07/20/2015-16:19
11.194%
0.095%
0.000%
Month End
Activity Report
Sorted By Issuer
June 1, 2015-June 30, 2015
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
0.010
0.250
0.010
0.010
915,470.55
0.299
7,590,662.10
8,506,132.65
81,784.76
81,784.76
0.550 06/08/2015
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Par Value
Purchases or Redemptions or
Deposits Withdrawals
5,108,924.77 5,108,927.82
1,134,789.55 0.00
0.01 0.01
0.31 0.00
0.00 7,585.32
6,243,714.64 5,116,513.15
2,800,000.00 2,800,000.00
2,800,000.00 2,800,000.00
9,043,714.64 7,916,513.15
0.00 0.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
0.00 2,000,000.00
Ending
Balance
2,042,672.04
7,590,662.10
9,633,334.14
81,784.76
81,784.76
0.00
0.00
Portfolio OT A Y
NL!AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Percent
CUSIP Investment# Issuer of Portfolio
Issuer: Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
3133EC6F6 2258 Federal Farm Credit Bank
3133EEC73 2329 Federal Farm Credit Bank
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 21.770%
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 16.268%
Issuer: Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
3134G4PXO 2277 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G4WH7 2285 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G56NO 2300 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G6V264 2326 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
3134G63Z4 2327 Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal
Issuer: Federal National Mortage Assoc ---
Federal Agency Issues-Callable
Subtotal and Balance
Federal Agency Issues -Coupon
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 0712012015-16:19
25.564%
Month End
Activity Report
June 1, 2015-June 30, 2015
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction Purchases or
Balance Rate Date Deposits
13,735,000.00
0.350 06/01/2015 0.00
0.550 06/26/2015 2,000,000.00
6,000,000.00 2,000,000.00
19,735,000.00 2,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
14,000,000.00 0.00
0.500 06/29/2015 0.00
0.900 06/22/2015 0.00
1.000 06/26/2015 0.00
1.250 06/29/2015 2,000,000.00
1.250 06/08/2015 2,000,000.00
24,000,000.00 4,000,000.00
24,000,000.00 4,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
Par Value
Redemptions or
Withdrawals
3,000,000.00
0.00
3,000,000.00
3,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
0.00
6,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
Page 2
Ending
Balance
13,735,000.00
5,000,000.00
18,735,000.00
14,000,000.00
14,000,000.00
22,000,000.00
22,000,000.00
6,000,000.00
Portfolio OT A Y
NL! AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
CUSIP Investment#
Percent
Issuer of Portfolio
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 9.296%
Issuer: San Diego County
San Diego County Pool
SO COUNTY POOL 9007 San Diego County
Subtotal and Balance
Issuer Subtotal 15.813%
Total 100.000%
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 07/20/2015-16:19
Month End
Activity Report
June 1, 2015-June 30, 2015
Par Value
Beginning Current Transaction
Balance Rate Date
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
0.509
7,807,932.62
7,807,932.62
84,130,850.03
Par Value
Purchases or Redemptions or
Deposits Withdrawals
0.00 0.00
5,800,000.00 0.00
5,800,000.00 0.00
5,800,000.00 0.00
20,843,714.64 18,916,513.15
Page 3
Ending
Balance
2,000,000.00
8,000,000.00
13,607,932.62
13,607,932.62
86,058,051.52
Portfolio OT A Y
NL! AP
DA (PRF _DA) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Month End
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Through 06/30/2015
Security ID Investment# Fund
3136G1XZ7 2274
3134G4WJ3 2284
3133EDKF8 2291
3134G55T8 2295
3134G56A8 2297
3134G55X9 2298
3130A25S1 2299
3134G5A47 2301
3136G23GO 2304
3134G4UCO 2305
3134G5LH6 2307
3134G5PP4 2310
3133EECG3 2311
3133EECG3 2312
3133EECX6 2313
3130A3MH4 2314
3130A3N59 2315
3133EELR9 2317
3130A4MF6 2318
3134G6T J2 2319
3133EEYE4 2320
3136G2GN1 2321
3130A4WT5 2322
3133EEXC9 2323
3130A52G3 2324
3130A56BO 2325
3134G6V264 2326
3134G63Z4 2327
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Issuer
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal National Mortage Assoc
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Bank
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 0712012015-16:19
Investment
Class
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Fair
Amort
Fair
Book
Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,001,538.33
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,999,213.89
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Page 1
Par
Value
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Market Current
Value Rate
YTM Current
360 Yield
Maturity/ Modified
Call Date Duration
1,997,740.00 .6700000 0.661 0.748 12/19/2016
2,002,120.00 .6250000 0.616 0.538 09/19/2016
2,000,100.00 .5500000 0.542 0.545 07/29/2016
2,001 ,820.00 .7000000 0.690 0.637 12/12/2016
2,002,680.00 1.000000 0.986 0.931 06/16/2017
1,997,920.00 .8100000 0.799 0.872 03/10/2017
2,001,980.00 .7000000 0.690 0.632 12/19/2016
2,001 ,640.00 .6500000 0.641 0.595 12/30/2016
2,006,440.00 1.050000 1.036 0.897 08/15/2017
2,000,580.00 .6500000 0.570 0.623 07/29/2016
2,001,380.00 1.100000 1.085 1.070 10/30/2017
1,999,900.00 1.250000 1.233 1.252 12/12/2017
1,031,266.90 1.140000 1.124 1.088 11/20/2017
2,708,327.15 1.140000 1.124 1.088 11/20/2017
2,000,520.00 .6100000 0.602 0.591 11/25/2016
2,004,440.00 1.000000 0.986 0.900 09/29/2017
1,993,020.00 1.125000 1.110 1.268 12/29/2017
2,000,540.00 .6250000 0.616 0.608 01/27/2017
2,008,860.00 1.300000 1.282 1.136 03/29/2018
1,999,200.00 .8750000 0.863 0.893 10/27/2017
1,996,760.00 1.000000 0.986 1.065 01/16/2018
1,994,200.00 1.150000 1.134 1.255 04/30/2018
1,993,340.00 1.020000 1.006 1.140 04/27/2018
1,996,500.00 .6900000 0.681 0.790 04/06/2017
1,993,680.00 1.050000 1.036 1.163 05/11/2018
1,993,840.00 1.120000 1.105 1.231 05/04/2018
2,001,080.00 1.250000 1.233 1.232 06/29/2018
1,997,960.00 1.250000 1.233 1.286 06/08/2018
1.456
1.209
1.070
1.436
1.934
1.675
1.456
1.488
2.087
1.069
2.291
2.401
2.344
2.344
1.391
2.214
2.450
1.557
2.681
2.290
2.497
2.770
2.768
1.746
2.806
2.783
2.930
2.871
Portfolio OT A Y
NLI AP
DU (PRF_DU) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Month End
Duration Report
Sorted by Investment Type -Investment Type
Investment
Securl~ ID Investment# Fund Issuer Class
3133EC7H1 2260 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Fair
3135GOYE7 2286 99 Federal National Mortage Assoc Fair
3133EEC73 2329 99 Federal Farm Credit Bank Amort
2050003183-6 2283 99 California Bank & Trust Amort
LAIF 9001 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair
LAIF BABS 2010 9012 99 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Fair
SDCOUNTY 9007 99 San Diego County Fair
Report Total
t = Duration can not be calculated on these investments due to incomplete Market price data.
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 07/20/2015-16:19
Through 06/30/2015
Book Par
Value Value
3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00
2,001,343.35 2,000,000.00
1,995,857.09 2,000,000.00
81,784.76 81,784.76
7,590,662.10 7,590,662.10
0.00 0.00
13,607,932.62 13,607,932.62
84,013,332.14 84,015,379.48
Page 2
Market Current YTM
Value Rate 360
3,000,390.00 .3400000 0.335
2,004,820.00 .6250000 0.558
1 ,997,160.00 .5500000 0.661
81,784.76 .0300000 0.030
7,593,516.03 .2990000 0.295
0.00 .2670000 0.263
13,584,000.00 .5090000 0.502
83,989,504.84
Current
Yield
0.314
0.415
0.632
0.030
0.299
0.267
0.509
0.763
Maturity/ Modified
Call Date Duration
08/17/2015 0.128
08/26/2016 1.146
03/27/2017 1.726
01/22/2016 0.559 t
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.447 t
Portfolio OT A Y
NL!AP
DU (PRF_DU) 7.1.1
Report Ver. 7.3.5
CUSIP Investment#
Fund: Treasury Fund
LAIF
UNION MONEY
9001
9002
UNION OPERATING 9004
SD COUNTY POOL 9007
RESERVE-10 COPS 9010
RESERVE-10 BABS 9011
3133EC7H1 2260
3135GOXR9 2269
3136G1XZ7
3134G4PXO
2050003183-6
3134G4WJ3
3134G4WH7
3135GOYE7
3133EDKF8
3134G55T8
3134G56A8
3134G55X9
3130A25S1
3134G5A47
3136G23GO
3134G4UCO
3134G5LH6
3134G5PP4
3133EECG3
3133EECG3
3133EECX6
3130A3MH4
3130A3N59
2274
2277
2283
2284
2285
2286
2291
2295
2297
2298
2299
2301
2304
2305
2307
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
Fund
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
99
Data Updated; SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 0712012015-16:19
Security
Type
LA1
PA1
PA1
LA3
PA1
PA1
FAC
MC1
MC1
MC1
BCD
MC1
MC1
FAC
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
MC1
Month End
Interest Earnings
Sorted by Fund -Fund
June 1, 2015 -June 30, 2015
Yield on Beginning Book Value
Ending
Par Value
Beginning
Book Value
Ending Maturity CurrentAnnuallzed
7,590,662.10
10,001.55
1 ,908,178.44
13,607,932.62
12,815.42
34,267.27
3,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
0.00
81 ,784.76
2,000,000.00
0.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
7,590,662.10
10,004.60
773,388.89
7,807,932.62
12,815.42
34,266.96
3,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
81 ,784.76
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,001,440.46
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,001,657.27
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
1,030,000.00
2,705,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
2,000,000.00
Book Value Date Rate Yield
7,590,662.10
10,001.55
1,908,178.44
13,607,932.62
12,815.42
34,267.27
3,000,000.00 08/17/2015
0.00 09/06/2016
2,000,000.00 12/19/2016
0.00 06/27/2016
81,784.76 01/22/2016
2,000,000.00 09/19/2016
0.00 03/20/2017
2,001,343.35 08/26/2016
2,000,000.00 07/29/2016
2,000,000.00 12/12/2016
2,000,000.00 06/16/2017
2,000,000.00 03/10/2017
2,000,000.00 12/19/2016
2,000,000.00 12/30/2016
2,000,000.00 08/15/2017
2,001,538.33 07/29/2016
2,000,000.00 10/30/2017
2,000,000.00 12/12/2017
1,030,000.00 11/20/2017
2,705,000.00 11/20/2017
2,000,000.00 11/25/2016
2,000,000.00 09/29/2017
2,000,000.00 12/29/2017
0.299
0.010
0.250
0.509
0.010
0.010
0.340
0.550
0.670
0.500
0.030
0.625
0.900
0.625
0.550
0.700
1.000
0.810
0.700
0.650
1.050
0.650
1.100
1.250
1.140
1.140
0.610
1.000
1.125
0.288
0.188
0.555
0.735
0.009
0.010
0.345
0.558
0.679
0.507
0.030
0.634
0.913
0.574
0.558
0.710
1.014
0.821
0.710
0.659
1.065
0.586
1.115
1.267
1.156
1.156
0.618
1.014
1.141
Interest
Earned
1,795.80
1.55
353.06
4,719.59
0.10
0.28
850.00
213.89
1,116.67
777.78
2.04
1,041.67
1,050.00
1,041.67
916.66
1 '166.67
1,666.66
1,350.00
1,166.67
1,083.33
1,750.00
1,083.33
1,833.34
2,083.33
978.50
2,569.75
1,016.67
1,666.67
1,875.00
Adjusted Interest Earnings
Amortization/ Adjusted Interest
Accretion Earnings
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-97.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-118.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,795.80
1.55
353.06
4,719.59
0.10
0.28
850.00
213.89
1,116.67
777.78
2.04
1,041.67
1,050.00
944.56
916.66
1,166.67
1,666.66
1,350.00
1 '166.67
1,083.33
1,750.00
964.39
1,833.34
2,083.33
978.50
2,569.75
1,016.67
1,666.67
1,875.00
Portfolio OT A Y
NLIAP
IE (PRF _IE) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
CUSIP Investment# Fund
Fund: Treasury Fund
3133EELR9 2317 99
3130A4MF6 2318 99
3134G6TJ2 2319 99
3133EEYE4 2320 99
3136G2GN1 2321 99
3130A4Wf5 2322 99
3133EEXC9 2323 99
3130A52G3 2324 99
3130A5680 2325 99
3134G6V264 2326 99
3134G63Z4 2327 99
3133EEC73 2329 99
3134G56NO 2300 99
Data Updated: SET_ME8: 07/20/2015 16:19
Run Date: 07120/2015 • 16:19
Security Ending
Type Par Value
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
MC1 2,000,000.00
FAC 2,000,000.00
MC1 0.00
Subtotal 85,980,642.16
Total 85,980,642.16
Month End
Interest Earnings
June 1, 2015-June 30, 2015
Beginning Ending Maturity CurrentAnnuallzed
Book Value Book Value Date Rate Yield
1 ,999,172.22 1,999,213.89 01/27/2017 0.625 0.659
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 03/29/2018 1.300 1.318
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 10/27/2017 0.875 0.887
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 01/16/2018 1.000 1.014
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 04/30/2018 1.150 1.166
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 04/27/2018 1.020 1.034
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 04/06/2017 0.690 0.700
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 05/11/2018 1.050 1.065
2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 05/04/2018 1.120 1.136
0.00 2,000,000.00 06/29/2018 1.250 1.267
0.00 2,000,000.00 06/08/2018 1.250 1.267
0.00 1,995,857.09 03/27/2017 0.550 0.680
2,000,000.00 0.00 06/26/2017 1.000 1.014 ---
81,048,125.30 85,978,594.82 0.802
81,048,125.30 85,978,594.82 0.802
Interest
Earned
1,041.66
2,166.66
1,458.33
1,666.67
1,916.66
1,700.00
1 '150.00
1,750.00
1,866.67
138.89
1,597.22
152.78
1,388.89
53,165.11
53,165.11
Page 2
Adjusted Interest Earnings
Amortization/ Adjusted Interest
Accretion
41 .67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.09
0.00
-141.29
-141.29
Earnings
1,083.33
2,166.66
1,458.33
1,666.67
1,916.66
1,700.00
1,150.00
1,750.00
1,866.67
138.89
1,597.22
185.87
1,388.89
53,023.82
53,023.82
Portfolio OT A Y
NL!AP
IE (PRF _IE) 7.2.0
Report Ver. 7.3.5
Check Total
4,085.35
4,928.92
3,240.83
4,937.50
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2043609 07/08/15 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 041124 06/09/15 COFFEE SUPPLIES 353.87 353.87
2043499 06/24/15 04066 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES - SD 040124 05/26/15 COFFEE SUPPLIES 277.75 277.75
2043727 07/22/15 15416 24 HOUR ELEVATOR INC 20610 06/01/15 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2015)436.80 436.80
2043657 07/15/15 15416 24 HOUR ELEVATOR INC 19864 05/01/15 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE (MAY 2015)436.80 436.80
2043542 07/01/15 16523 ABBEY HORNE Ref002445029 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000207035 8.15 8.15
2043591 07/08/15 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 967279 06/15/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 707.21
967823 06/22/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 707.21
967785 06/22/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 616.97
967014 06/11/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 554.20
967583 06/18/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 535.56
967582 06/18/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 515.94
967013 06/11/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 448.26
2043473 06/24/15 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 966574 06/04/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 882.79
965929 05/26/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 752.33
966328 06/01/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 723.89
966088 05/28/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 680.73
966795 06/08/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 641.50
966565 06/04/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 475.73
966564 06/04/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 456.11
966087 05/28/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 315.84
2043728 07/22/15 01910 ABCANA INDUSTRIES 968372 06/29/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 717.02
968857 07/06/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 711.14
968108 06/25/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 566.95
968107 06/25/15 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 464.94
968795 07/02/15 433.55
968796 07/02/15 347.23
SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE
2043658 07/15/15 16291 ABHE & SVOBODA INC 106302015 07/08/15 850-3 INTERIOR COATING (ENDING 6/30/15)73,409.96 73,409.96
2043474 06/24/15 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 5138 06/08/15 SHAREPOINT SERVICES (5/27/15-5/30/15)750.00 750.00
2043592 07/08/15 08488 ABLEFORCE INC 5256 07/06/15 SHAREPOINT SERVICES (6/2/15-6/25/15)3,812.50
5046 05/01/15 SHAREPOINT SERVICES (4/15.15-4/29/15)1,125.00
2043475 06/24/15 03317 ADVANCED CALL PROCESSING INC 20153460 06/10/15 PHONE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE 37,000.00 37,000.00
2043593 07/08/15 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1404 06/16/15 DEVELOPER PLAN REVIEW (5/9/15-6/12/15)11,892.48
Page 1 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
19,675.92
3,045.90
4,179.60
3,947.40
263.13
23,856.25
2043593 07/08/15 11462 AEGIS ENGINEERING MGMT INC 1404 06/16/15 DEVELOPER PLAN REVIEW (5/9/15-6/12/15)11,892.48
1322 06/12/15 AS-NEEDED DEVELOPER PROJ (5/9/15-6/7/15)7,783.44
2043476 06/24/15 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE01163546 06/18/15 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (6/1/15-6/5/15)1,887.60
OE01161183 06/11/15 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (5/26/15-5/28/15)1,158.30
2043594 07/08/15 11803 AEROTEK ENVIRONMENTAL OE01165840 06/25/15 TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT (6/8/15-6/11/15)1,544.40 1,544.40
2043729 07/22/15 16289 AGM ELECTRONICS INC B2313 07/02/15 SIGNAL ISOLATORS 802.30 802.30
2043595 07/08/15 07951 AHLEE BACKFLOW SERVICE INC 60415 06/17/15 FABRICATION OF TEMP METER STANDS 1,725.00 1,725.00
2043477 06/24/15 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131387186 05/27/15 AQUA AMMONIA 2,703.00
131387185 05/27/15 AQUA AMMONIA 1,476.60
2043730 07/22/15 07732 AIRGAS SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC 131391421 06/24/15 AQUA AMMONIA 2,716.80
131391420 06/24/15 AQUA AMMONIA 1,230.60
2043478 06/24/15 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9039845571 05/26/15 AIR BOTTLES 216.78
9927714541 05/31/15 AIR BOTTLES 46.35
2043731 07/22/15 13753 AIRGAS USA LLC 9928429052 06/30/15 BREATHING AIR BOTTLES 47.47 47.47
2043732 07/22/15 15024 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC 21 07/01/15 AS-NEEDED LAND SURVEYING (6/1/15-6/30/15)7,038.75 7,038.75
2043479 06/24/15 15024 AIRX UTILITY SURVEYORS INC 20 06/04/15 AS-NEEDED LAND SURVEYING (5/1/15-5/31/15)5,055.00 5,055.00
2043543 07/01/15 16513 AL DAVIS Ref002445019 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000052845 11.57 11.57
2043659 07/15/15 06261 ALCANTARA, CYNTHIA 07092015CA 07/09/15 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 144.68 144.68
2043544 07/01/15 12981 ALEGRIA REAL ESTATE FUND Ref002445024 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000183164 26.16 26.16
2043596 07/08/15 14256 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 301400 06/09/15 CONSULTING SERVICES (QUARTERLY)6,750.00 6,750.00
2043480 06/24/15 01463 ALLIED ELECTRONICS INC 302667 06/01/15 ELECTRICAL ACCESSORIES 17.06 17.06
2043481 06/24/15 16111 ALTIUS INFORMATION TECH INC 3059 06/04/15 NETWORK AUDIT 12,000.00 12,000.00
2043733 07/22/15 14462 ALYSON CONSULTING CM201545 07/02/15 MGMT/INSP D0676-090201 (5/22/15-6/30/15)9,466.25
CM201540 07/01/15 MGMT/INSP P2532 (6/1/15-6/30/15)5,400.00
CM201541 07/01/15 MGMT/INSP S2033 (6/1/15-6/30/15)3,450.00
CM201544 07/01/15 MGMT/INSP P2542 (6/1/15-6/30/15)2,700.00
CM201543 07/01/15 MGMT/INSP R2112 (6/1/15-6/30/15)1,660.00
CM201542 07/01/15 MGMT/INSP R2111 (6/1/15-6/30/15)1,180.00
2043597 07/08/15 14462 ALYSON CONSULTING CM201533 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP P2532 (5/1/15-5/31/15)5,700.00
Page 2 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
17,470.00
7,367.52
5,916.00
CM201534 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP S2033-002103 (5/1/15-5/31/15)4,800.00
CM201538 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP P2542 (5/1/15-5/31/15)2,250.00
CM201535 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP P2453-003103 (5/1/15-5/31/15)1,800.00
CM201537 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP R2112 (5/1/15-5/31/15)920.00
CM201536 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP R2111 (5/1/15-5/31/15)850.00
CM201532 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP P2453-002103 (5/1/15-5/31/15)600.00
CM201539 06/09/15 MGMT/INSP P2507 (5/1/15-5/31/15)550.00
2043545 07/01/15 11590 AMERICAN DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHY 20318 05/21/15 GEODATABASE LICENSE 2,125.00 2,125.00
2043546 07/01/15 16351 AMERICAN EQUIPMENT INC T10136IN 06/25/15 TRAINING SERVICES (6/24/15-6/25/15)4,300.00 4,300.00
2043660 07/15/15 06166 AMERICAN MESSAGING L1109570PG 07/01/15 PAGERS (JUNE 2015)178.21 178.21
2043661 07/15/15 03652 ANDERSON, DONALD 07032015 07/06/15 SAFETY BOOTS 141.04 141.04
2043547 07/01/15 00002 ANSWER INC 11829 06/22/15 ANSWERING SERVICES (MONTHLY)1,110.00 1,110.00
2043598 07/08/15 08967 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS EAP 41317 06/25/15 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (JULY 2015)316.66 316.66
2043599 07/08/15 03357 APEX ADVERTISING INC 274631 06/19/15 ANNUAL T-SHIRTS 4,908.36
274641 06/19/15 ANNUAL SWEATSHIRTS 2,459.16
2043662 07/15/15 16568 APRIL KRUSE Ref002446725 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000188725 33.34 33.34
2043734 07/22/15 13171 ARCADIS US INC 0725592 06/26/15 AS-NEEDED DESIGN R2117 (ENDING 5/24/15)4,041.50
0726413 07/06/15 AS-NEEDED DESIGN R2117 (ENDING 6/28/15)1,874.50
2043600 07/08/15 13171 ARCADIS US INC 07088974 06/17/15 AS-NEEDED DESIGN S2033 (ENDING 4/26/15)15,115.15 15,115.15
2043482 06/24/15 13171 ARCADIS US INC 0715193 06/02/15 AS-NEEDED DESIGN (ENDING 4/26/15)12,782.85 12,782.85
2043483 06/24/15 05753 ARRIETA CONSTRUCTION INC 505312015 06/04/15 CALAVO PHASE I (ENDING 5/31/15)61,185.31 61,185.31
2043735 07/22/15 05753 ARRIETA CONSTRUCTION INC 606302015 07/06/15 CALAVO PHASE 1 (ENDING 6/30/15)44,301.07 44,301.07
2043736 07/22/15 07785 AT&T 000006766351 07/02/15 TELEPHONE SERVICES (6/2/15-7/1/15)6,085.52 6,085.52
2043663 07/15/15 07785 AT&T 000006761185 07/01/15 TELEPHONE SERVICES (JUNE 2015)1,229.08 1,229.08
2043484 06/24/15 12810 ATKINS 1814682 06/01/15 2015 WFMP UPDATE (3/30/15-5/3/15)30,606.02 30,606.02
2043548 07/01/15 16520 AVEMARIA PERKINS Ref002445026 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000198536 97.50 97.50
2043485 06/24/15 16509 BALDWIN & SONS LLC 061615 06/16/15 20" C905 WATERLINE PIPE 720.00 720.00
2043737 07/22/15 07446 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE 2521877196 07/02/15 ADM FEES 1996 COPS (7/1/15-6/30/16)3,147.50 3,147.50
2043664 07/15/15 16559 BARNHART-REESE CONSTRUCTION CO 9400071315 07/13/15 CUSTOMER REFUND 508.32 508.32Page 3 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
1,194.00
2043664 07/15/15 16559 BARNHART-REESE CONSTRUCTION CO 9400071315 07/13/15 CUSTOMER REFUND 508.32 508.32
2043486 06/24/15 15570 BEYOND IDEAS LLC OWD06 06/19/15 CONSULTING SERVICES (3/1/15-6/1/15)2,640.00 2,640.00
2043738 07/22/15 02434 BLACK BOX CORPORATION IN0285923 07/02/15 ETHERNET SWITCH 821.26 821.26
2043665 07/15/15 16562 BLANCA BURKE Ref002446717 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000055011 26.39 26.39
2043666 07/15/15 08156 BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER 605955 06/30/15 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY (THRU 5/31/15)4,429.50 4,429.50
2043667 07/15/15 16569 BRYAN PARSONAGE Ref002446726 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000197453 21.47 21.47
2043739 07/22/15 14112 BSE ENGINEERING INC 60190 06/30/15 ELECTRICAL SERVICES P2537 (1/1/15-6/30/15)774.00
60189 06/30/15 ELECTRICAL SERVICES R2111 (1/1/2015-6/30/15)420.00
2043487 06/24/15 08490 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 505312015 06/04/15 RETENTION/ARRIETA 3,220.28 3,220.28
2043740 07/22/15 08490 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 606302015 07/02/15 RETENTION/ARRIETA (ENDING 6/30/15)2,331.64 2,331.64
2043488 06/24/15 16252 CALIFORNIA UNITED BANK 105312015 06/02/15 RETENTION/FORDYCE (ENDING 5/31/15)2,224.25 2,224.25
2043741 07/22/15 16252 CALIFORNIA UNITED BANK 206302015 07/02/15 RETENTION/FORDYCE CONST (ENDING 6/30/15)2,157.77 2,157.77
2043668 07/15/15 01432 CALIFORNIA URBAN WATER G1-2015-179 06/30/15 2015 DUES 2,315.81 2,315.81
2043601 07/08/15 01004 CALOLYMPIC SAFETY 3401672 06/10/15 SAFETY SUPPLIES 50.64 50.64
2043549 07/01/15 16515 CARL DALTON Ref002445021 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000120616 73.76 73.76
2043489 06/24/15 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7895 06/03/15 SCANNING SERVICES 23.76 23.76
2043742 07/22/15 02758 CARMEL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 7902 07/01/15 SCANNING SERVICES (6/23/15)34.56 34.56
2043669 07/15/15 16581 CARMEN LOPEZ Ref002446738 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000215780 40.57 40.57
2043670 07/15/15 04653 CARO, PATRICIA 07132015PC 07/13/15 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 1,827.00 1,827.00
2043743 07/22/15 15177 CAROLLO ENGINEERS INC 142458 07/02/15 2015 IWRP UPDATE (ENDING 6/30/15)42,778.87 42,778.87
2043602 07/08/15 14673 CGR MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS LLC 10316006 06/15/15 PROJECT MANAGEMENT (2/14/15-5/31/15)5,178.40 5,178.40
2043550 07/01/15 16511 CHRIS MADINA Ref002445017 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000029547 35.20 35.20
2043744 07/22/15 01719 CHULA VISTA CHAMBER OF 14924 07/10/15 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 175.00 175.00
2043745 07/22/15 15256 CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE / LINA 9267071015 07/10/15 AD&D & SUPP LIFE INS (JULY 2015)4,379.29 4,379.29
2043671 07/15/15 12674 CITY OF CHULA VISTA U004070115 07/01/15 UTILITY PERMITS ((3/1/15-6/30/15)15,840.00 15,840.00
2043746 07/22/15 15395 COFFMAN SPECIALTIES INC 6 07/06/15 SR-11 RELOCATIONS (ENDING 6/30/15)22,261.59 22,261.59
2043603 07/08/15 15616 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 0001070115 07/01/15 INTERNET CIRCUITS (JULY 2015)6,094.00 6,094.00Page 4 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2043603 07/08/15 15616 COGENT COMMUNICATIONS INC 0001070115 07/01/15 INTERNET CIRCUITS (JULY 2015)6,094.00 6,094.00
2043490 06/24/15 08160 COMPLETE OFFICE 17301370 05/28/15 CHAIRS 827.28 827.28
2043491 06/24/15 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1268130 05/31/15 TAPE STORAGE (MAY 2015)388.28 388.28
2043672 07/15/15 12334 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC DS1268550 06/30/15 TAPE STORAGE (JUNE 2015)365.08 365.08
2043551 07/01/15 00099 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DPWAROTAYMWD051506/19/15 EXCAVATION PERMITS (MAY 2015)498.00 498.00
2043541 06/24/15 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 4908061115 06/11/15 UPFP PERMIT RENEWAL (6/30/15-6/30/16)2,156.00 2,156.00
2043492 06/24/15 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH150115OHP 06/19/15 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE (7/1/14-6/11/15)509.27 509.27
2043673 07/15/15 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEH150121OHP 07/01/15 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE (6/12/15-6/30/15)518.11 518.11
2043674 07/15/15 00184 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2003193E61360061507/10/15 SHUT DOWN TEST (6/30/15)142.00 142.00
2043747 07/22/15 02122 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2015051205668 05/12/15 PERMIT FEES # 05668 (JULY 2015-JULY 2016)356.00 356.00
2043604 07/08/15 16506 CUBE-AIRE 48963 06/17/15 ICE MACHINE 2,864.12 2,864.12
2043605 07/08/15 11797 D & H WATER SYSTEMS INC I20150485 06/22/15 CL2GAS PARTS 2,763.12 2,763.12
2043493 06/24/15 11797 D & H WATER SYSTEMS INC I20150273 04/06/15 CL2GAS PM 3,197.64 3,197.64
2043552 07/01/15 16522 DANIEL BURBA Ref002445028 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000206350 73.69 73.69
2043675 07/15/15 16567 DANIEL TORO Ref002446724 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000188280 90.13 90.13
2043748 07/22/15 11150 DARNELL & ASSOCIATES INC 150129 07/01/15 TRAFFIC ENGINEER SERVICES (5/1/15-6/30/15)5,120.00 5,120.00
2043553 07/01/15 16517 DEBBIE GEORGE Ref002445023 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000172396 155.18 155.18
2043676 07/15/15 16517 DEBBIE GEORGE Ref002446723 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000172396 418.20 418.20
2043494 06/24/15 02349 DENNIS JANDA INCORPORATED 10683 06/04/15 CADASTRAL BASE MAP 3,120.00 3,120.00
2043495 06/24/15 16382 DJA INSPECTION SERVICES INC 12420 05/27/15 458-2 TANK SCAN 2,958.00 2,958.00
2043749 07/22/15 15084 DLT SOLUTIONS LLC SI293134 06/30/15 SERVICE & MAINTENANCE (7/9/15-7/8/16)16,045.00 16,045.00
2043554 07/01/15 16524 DONNA SANFILIPO Ref002445030 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000208615 18.85 18.85
2043750 07/22/15 05134 DYCHITAN, MARISSA 072015 07/20/15 REIMBURSEMENT 199.00 199.00
2043677 07/15/15 16560 ED LEON Ref002446714 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000027054 39.67 39.67
2043606 07/08/15 02447 EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION 5458063015 06/30/15 RECYCLING SERVICES (JUNE 2015)95.00 95.00
2043555 07/01/15 16525 EDWINA HOOVER Ref002445031 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000208732 19.02 19.02
Page 5 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
1,445.00
890.00
1,005.00
890.00
2043678 07/15/15 16566 ELIZABETH TAPIA Ref002446722 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000171572 155.00 155.00
2043751 07/22/15 08023 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT SPECIALISTS 0069668IN 05/29/15 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS (MAY 2015)718.00 718.00
2043607 07/08/15 14602 ENVIRO-CARE CO EC2140535%05/14/15 SCREENINGS WASHER COMPACTOR 3,472.58 3,472.58
2043496 06/24/15 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 5060774 06/08/15 LAB ANALYSIS (5/21/15-5/29/15)600.00
5060562 06/01/15 LAB ANALYSIS (5/9/15-5/20/15)465.00
5050811 05/27/15 LAB ANALYSIS (5/8/15-5/15/15)380.00
2043608 07/08/15 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 5060934 06/15/15 LAB ANALYSIS (5/30/15-6/5/15)445.00
5061131 06/22/15 LAB ANALYSIS (6/6/15-6/12/15)445.00
2043752 07/22/15 03227 ENVIROMATRIX ANALYTICAL INC 5061401 06/30/15 LAB ANALYSIS (6/13/15-6/22/15)1,834.50 1,834.50
2043556 07/01/15 16516 ERIC NAPUTI Ref002445022 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000140163 73.00 73.00
2043679 07/15/15 16575 ESMERALDA CHAVEZ Ref002446732 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000212502 19.32 19.32
2043497 06/24/15 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0218201 06/01/15 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (5/13/15)750.00
L0217485 05/27/15 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (5/5/15)255.00
2043753 07/22/15 14320 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL INC L0221331 06/24/15 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (6/4/15)375.00
L0221356 06/24/15 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (6/4/15)260.00
L0221338 06/24/15 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES (6/2/15)255.00
2043557 07/01/15 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0518514 06/26/15 INVENTORY 4,359.64 4,359.64
2043754 07/22/15 03546 FERGUSON WATERWORKS # 1083 0517364 06/26/15 METER BOX LIDS 3,393.90 3,393.90
2043680 07/15/15 16583 FIELD ASSET SERVICES LLC Ref002446740 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000215885 75.00 75.00
2043755 07/22/15 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 9003400615 06/30/15 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (MONTHLY)99.00 99.00
2043498 06/24/15 12187 FIRST AMERICAN DATA TREE LLC 9003400515 05/31/15 ONLINE DOCUMENTS (MONTHLY)99.00 99.00
2043681 07/15/15 16469 FIRST CHOICE SERVICES 042672 07/08/15 COFFEE SERVICES 250.24 250.24
2043500 06/24/15 02591 FITNESS TECH 9594 06/01/15 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (JUNE 2015)135.00 135.00
2043610 07/08/15 11962 FLEETWASH INC x523482 06/19/15 VEHICLE WASHING 87.23 87.23
2043558 07/01/15 11962 FLEETWASH INC x513441 06/05/15 VEHICLE WASHING 78.12 78.12
2043501 06/24/15 16119 FORDYCE CONSTRUCTION INC 105312015 06/02/15 DISINFECTION FACILITY (ENDING 5/31/15)42,260.75 42,260.75
2043756 07/22/15 16119 FORDYCE CONSTRUCTION INC 206302015 07/01/15 450-1 DISINFECTION FACILITY (ENDING 6/30/15)40,997.57 40,997.57
2043682 07/15/15 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2446694 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 350.00 350.00Page 6 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
3,720.00
3,864.00
6,290.07
4,949.43
2043682 07/15/15 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2446694 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 350.00 350.00
2043559 07/01/15 01612 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2445075 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 350.00 350.00
2043683 07/15/15 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2446696 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 88.00 88.00
2043560 07/01/15 02344 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Ben2445077 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 88.00 88.00
2043611 07/08/15 13563 FRIENDS OF THE WATER 257 05/25/15 GARDEN TOURS (5/1/15-5/22/15)3,100.00
264 06/21/15 GARDEN TOURS (6/4/15)620.00
2043684 07/15/15 10291 GOIN, JEFF 07132015JG 07/13/15 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 105.00 105.00
2043502 06/24/15 00101 GRAINGER INC 9751802928 05/27/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 1,555.43
9751654295 05/27/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 971.61
9751802910 05/27/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 313.37
9752741711 05/28/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 272.53
9751602567 05/27/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 235.04
9751654287 05/27/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 235.04
9752855362 05/28/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 109.01
9752184102 05/28/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 109.01
9751654303 05/27/15 WATER OPS. TOOLS 62.96
2043612 07/08/15 00101 GRAINGER INC 9764965258 06/12/15 OPS TOOL BAGS 490.86 490.86
2043503 06/24/15 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 13114 05/27/15 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (MAY 2015)8,909.50 8,909.50
2043757 07/22/15 12907 GREENRIDGE LANDSCAPE INC 13228 06/27/15 LANDSCAPING SERVICES (JUNE 2015)8,909.50 8,909.50
2043685 07/15/15 16584 H DIVERSIFIED INC Ref002446741 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000216701 207.78 207.78
2043758 07/22/15 00174 HACH COMPANY 9452498 07/01/15 WIMS SUPPORT (7/1/15-6/30/16)3,705.00
9438200 06/23/15 HACH APA6000 1,730.07
9458378 07/06/15 MOBILE INTERFACE 855.00
2043504 06/24/15 00174 HACH COMPANY 9407734 06/05/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 4,605.12
9397843 05/29/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 205.84
9407855 06/05/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 102.95
9400114 06/01/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 35.52
2043561 07/01/15 00174 HACH COMPANY 9392774 05/27/15 HACH ANALYZERS 2,301.46 2,301.46
2043759 07/22/15 05986 HAVS INCORPORATED 72372 07/07/15 OUTSIDE SERVICES 602.52 602.52
2043760 07/22/15 00169 HAWTHORNE POWER SYSTEMS PS010245443 06/25/15 REPAIR MANUAL 729.54 729.54
2043613 07/08/15 06640 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD E032918 06/09/15 FIRE HOSE & CONNECTIONS FOR METER TESTER 184.03 184.03Page 7 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
90.03
9,017.39
17,924.17
18,025.99
2043613 07/08/15 06640 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD E032918 06/09/15 FIRE HOSE & CONNECTIONS FOR METER TESTER 184.03 184.03
2043686 07/15/15 10973 HDR ENGINEERING INC 16 06/15/15 CORROSION SERVICES (5/3/15-5/30/15)24,040.04 24,040.04
2043614 07/08/15 10973 HDR ENGINEERING INC 15A 06/16/15 CORROSION SERVICES (2/22/15-5/2/15)93,117.16 93,117.16
2043505 06/24/15 02008 HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL 7 06/02/15 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (5/1/15-5/31/15)9,038.95 9,038.95
2043761 07/22/15 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 072015 07/16/15 WTR CONS DATABASE SVCS (7/1/14-6/30/15)1,708.20 1,708.20
2043562 07/01/15 00062 HELIX WATER DISTRICT 0341060915 06/09/15 WATER USAGE (4/7/15-6/4/15)46.67
9980060915 06/09/15 WATER USAGE (4/7/15-6/4/15)43.36
2043563 07/01/15 04209 HIDDEN VALLEY PUMP 000297070000 04/15/15 EFFLUENT PUMP #1 35,182.96 35,182.96
2043615 07/08/15 01088 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 919295500 06/10/15 STRAW WATTLES FOR BMP 624.96 624.96
2043616 07/08/15 03743 HYDROTEX 241366 06/09/15 OIL 3,695.35 3,695.35
2043617 07/08/15 15622 ICF JONES & STOKES INC 01082778 06/18/15 ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS R2116 (4/25/15-5/29/15)8,485.55
0108275 06/18/15 ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS P1253 (4/25/15-5/29/15)348.09
0108277 06/18/15 ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS P1253 (04/25/15-5/29/15)183.75
2043506 06/24/15 08969 INFOSEND INC 93123 05/29/15 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (MAY 2015)12,325.52
93122 05/29/15 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (MAY 2015)3,615.22
93275 06/02/15 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (MAY 2015)1,983.43
2043762 07/22/15 08969 INFOSEND INC 94166 06/30/15 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (JUNE 2015)12,664.77
94165 06/30/15 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (JUNE 2015)3,374.64
94324 07/02/15 BILL PRINTING SERVICES (JUNE 2015)1,986.58
2043618 07/08/15 13644 INNOVYZE INC 07613AM 06/01/15 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL (7/15/15-7/14/16)6,000.00 6,000.00
2043507 06/24/15 02372 INTERIOR PLANT SERVICE INC 13158 05/20/15 PLANT SERVICES (MAY 2015)226.00 226.00
2043619 07/08/15 02263 ITRON INC 376602 06/11/15 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE (7/1/15-6/30/16)2,773.97 2,773.97
2043687 07/15/15 14737 IWATER INC 6981 04/01/15 LICENSE AGREEMENT (7/1/15-6/30/16)40,000.00 40,000.00
2043763 07/22/15 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO06150131 06/01/15 JANITORIAL SERVICES (JUNE 2015)1,159.35 1,159.35
2043508 06/24/15 03077 JANI-KING OF CALIFORNIA INC SDO05150131 05/01/15 JANITORIAL SERVICES (MAY 2015)1,159.35 1,159.35
2043688 07/15/15 16582 JASON MERAM Ref002446739 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000215797 41.99 41.99
2043764 07/22/15 10563 JCI JONES CHEMICALS INC 659922 CREDIT MEMO -4,000.00
657223 CREDIT MEMO -2,000.00
Page 8 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2,369.30
81.65
5,240.42
659754 CREDIT MEMO -1,000.00
657171 06/10/15 CHLORINE TP 4,684.65
659741 07/01/15 CHEMICALS FOR TREATMENT PLANT 3,123.10
659088 06/30/15 CHLORINE TP 1,561.55
2043509 06/24/15 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 151270 06/04/15 DUSTO INSPECTIONS (MONTHLY)650.00 650.00
2043510 06/24/15 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 151192 05/27/15 DUSTO INSPECTIONS (MAY 2015)100.00 100.00
2043765 07/22/15 02269 JENAL ENGINEERING CORP 151422 06/30/15 DUSTO INSPECTIONS (JUNE 2015)100.00 100.00
2043564 07/01/15 16529 JILL KOMIVES Ref002445035 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000216198 48.55 48.55
2043511 06/24/15 05217 JONES, DANIEL 6061915 06/22/15 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 117.16 117.16
2043689 07/15/15 15713 KAPISH NORTH AMERICA SVCS INC 3139 07/08/15 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE (7/1/15-6/30/16)1,880.00 1,880.00
2043690 07/15/15 16577 KEVIN RAY Ref002446734 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000213178 27.09 27.09
2043691 07/15/15 16571 KIEWIT BUILDING GROUP Ref002446728 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000205446 1,921.54 1,921.54
2043620 07/08/15 05840 KIRK PAVING INC 5867 06/11/15 AS NEEDED PAVING SERVICES FY15 19,481.50 19,481.50
2043766 07/22/15 16350 KNOWBE4 LLC INV03406 04/30/15 SOFTWARE LICENSE 2,715.75 2,715.75
2043692 07/15/15 16572 LEANN CECOTTI Ref002446729 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000206211 30.73 30.73
2043512 06/24/15 15947 LIFESAVER 2290 06/18/15 ERGONOMIC SERVICES (6/18/15)300.00 300.00
2043565 07/01/15 16530 LLESWOR HOLDINGS, LLC Ref002445036 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000216977 37.00 37.00
2043566 07/01/15 03019 LOPEZ, JOSE 050115053115 06/24/15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (MAY 2015)74.75
060115063015 06/24/15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (JUNE 2015)6.90
2043767 07/22/15 16487 LOURDES CORONA Ref002444790 06/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000184939 58.51 58.51
2043693 07/15/15 16585 MAHA BIBO Ref002446742 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000216843 30.15 30.15
2043621 07/08/15 10512 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC OWD9402P 06/29/15 PRINTING 2,881.10
OWD9402 06/19/15 OUTSIDE SERVICES 1,966.20
OWD9439 06/22/15 PRINTING 393.12
2043513 06/24/15 10512 MAIL MANAGEMENT GROUP INC OWD9413 06/05/15 PRINTING 1,164.42 1,164.42
2043694 07/15/15 16573 MANUEL TAMAYO Ref002446730 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000206847 52.51 52.51
2043695 07/15/15 16565 MARCELINA WALKER Ref002446721 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000125616 60.01 60.01
2043696 07/15/15 05888 MARIELENA GRAHAN Ref002446715 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000039175 93.91 93.91
Page 9 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2,156.28
1,272.78
1,720.42
1,084.98
2043696 07/15/15 05888 MARIELENA GRAHAN Ref002446715 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000039175 93.91 93.91
2043697 07/15/15 16578 MARITZA MURGUEYTIO Ref002446735 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000213664 68.90 68.90
2043698 07/15/15 16576 MARITZA PEREZ Ref002446733 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000212973 75.00 75.00
2043699 07/15/15 05329 MASTER METER INC 138257 06/24/15 INVENTORY 20,754.49 20,754.49
2043514 06/24/15 01183 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO 30900292 05/27/15 HDWKS CONVEYER GATE BOLTS 152.58 152.58
2043700 07/15/15 16574 MCMILLIN MILLENIA Ref002446731 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000207265 1,852.40 1,852.40
2043622 07/08/15 16532 MIKE TEICHNER 070715 06/30/15 SMART CONTROLLER REBATE 60.00 60.00
2043515 06/24/15 00237 MISSION JANITORIAL & ABRASIVE 46279800 05/26/15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 2,086.82
46279801 05/29/15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 69.46
2043516 06/24/15 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 500204579 05/26/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 406.80
500255507 06/02/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 406.80
500204578 05/26/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 133.76
500255506 06/02/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 133.76
500244679 06/01/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 100.14
500232498 06/01/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.52
2043623 07/08/15 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 500293401 06/09/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 407.11
500339311 06/16/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 395.19
500286924 06/09/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 313.20
500293400 06/09/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 133.76
500330447 06/15/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 100.14
500374924 06/22/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 100.14
500326574 06/16/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.52
500282508 06/09/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 91.52
500339310 06/16/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 87.84
2043768 07/22/15 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 500382597 06/23/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 399.31
500429692 06/30/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 397.69
500418986 06/29/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 100.14
500382596 06/23/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 87.84
500429691 06/30/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 87.84
500377679 06/23/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 12.16
2043701 07/15/15 15136 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 500284877 06/08/15 UNIFORM SERVICES 100.14 100.14
2043702 07/15/15 15854 MITSUBISHI UFJ SEC (USA) INC 2015-48 06/30/15 REMARKETING AGENT FEE (4/1/15-6/30/15)2,109.21 2,109.21
Page 10 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
10,763.25
1,515.37
595.81
449.26
2,777.76
2043702 07/15/15 15854 MITSUBISHI UFJ SEC (USA) INC 2015-48 06/30/15 REMARKETING AGENT FEE (4/1/15-6/30/15)2,109.21 2,109.21
2043703 07/15/15 16255 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Ben2446682 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 8,428.27 8,428.27
2043567 07/01/15 16255 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Ben2445063 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 10,103.27 10,103.27
2043624 07/08/15 08531 NEWEST CONSTRUCTION 201503 06/16/15 INSTALL SCREEN COMPACTOR 9,663.00 9,663.00
2043625 07/08/15 16505 NIGHTCLUBPOOL LLC 101 06/19/15 MOBILE APPLICATION 7,000.00 7,000.00
2043769 07/22/15 00761 NINYO & MOORE GEOTECHNICAL AND 190853 07/06/15 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS S2033 (5/21/15-6/30/15)7,253.50
190852 07/06/15 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS S2024 (5/27/15-6/30/15)3,137.75
190854 07/06/15 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS P2535 (6/1/15-6/30/15)372.00
2043517 06/24/15 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 774482070001 06/05/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 472.22
771536080001 05/27/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 281.49
773073337001 05/29/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 259.15
774585456001 06/05/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 153.34
774486213001 06/08/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133.49
773478525001 06/08/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 55.44
772655752001 05/27/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.33
773700570001 06/02/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 38.33
772721529001 05/28/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 36.61
771536236001 05/27/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 34.97
2043626 07/08/15 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 776651612001 06/19/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 328.62
776815730001 06/22/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 126.52
776077989001 06/18/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 87.47
773478831001 06/19/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 53.20
2043770 07/22/15 00510 OFFICE DEPOT INC 777163137001 06/23/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 203.47
777746402001 06/25/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 161.97
777612106001 06/26/15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 83.82
2043704 07/15/15 15856 OLYMPUS AND ASSOCIATES INC 7 06/30/15 RESERVOIR COATING (ENDING 6/30/15)134,933.97 134,933.97
2043771 07/22/15 13115 ONESOURCE DISTRIBUTORS LLC S4778372001 07/06/15 SWITCH CONTACTS 375.62 375.62
2043627 07/08/15 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 302660 06/22/15 FORCEMAIN PROJECT 1,685.99 1,685.99
2043518 06/24/15 01002 PACIFIC PIPELINE SUPPLY 302667 06/01/15 INVENTORY 1,734.48
302664 06/01/15 WATER OPS TOOLS 673.92
302642 05/27/15 INVENTORY 369.36
2043568 07/01/15 09984 PADRE DAM'S SANTEE LAKES 14240625 06/29/15 EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 670.00 670.00Page 11 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
2,408.31
7,848.96
1,664.25
2043568 07/01/15 09984 PADRE DAM'S SANTEE LAKES 14240625 06/29/15 EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 670.00 670.00
2043569 07/01/15 16526 PATRICK CURRAN Ref002445032 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000208738 75.00 75.00
2043772 07/22/15 05497 PAYPAL INC 42259088 06/30/15 PHONE PAYMENT SVCS (JUNE 2015)54.10 54.10
2043519 06/24/15 05497 PAYPAL INC 41469128 05/31/15 PHONE PAYMENT SVCS (MAY 2015)54.10 54.10
2043520 06/24/15 08398 PEERLESS MATERIALS COMPANY 50597 05/27/15 RAGS 388.80 388.80
2043521 06/24/15 00227 PELL MELL SUPPLY 94463 05/28/15 FLANGE BOLTS 250.56 250.56
2043773 07/22/15 15919 PERRY FORD OF NATIONAL CITY 850319 06/23/15 PICK UP, CP#2 FY15 29,303.55 29,303.55
2043522 06/24/15 00137 PETTY CASH CUSTODIAN 062315 06/23/15 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462.92 462.92
2043523 06/24/15 15081 PINOMAKI DESIGN 4847 05/31/15 GRAPHIC DESIGN 382.50 382.50
2043628 07/08/15 15081 PINOMAKI DESIGN 4866 06/16/15 GRAPHIC DESIGN 85.00 85.00
2043774 07/22/15 15081 PINOMAKI DESIGN 4903 07/06/15 GRAPHIC DESIGN 435.00 435.00
2043629 07/08/15 00053 PITNEY BOWES INC 319203 06/19/15 MAILING MACHINE SYSTEM 12,403.88 12,403.88
2043570 07/01/15 02264 PLASTERER, MICHAEL 060515 06/26/15 SAFETY BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 150.00 150.00
2043630 07/08/15 02449 POLLARDWATER.COM 0016793 06/10/15 WATER OPS TOOLS 2,308.64
0016794 06/11/15 WATER OPS TOOLS 99.67
2043571 07/01/15 01733 PRICE TRONCONE &12990 05/26/15 ANTENNA SUBLEASE (JULY-SEPT 2015)4,335.00 4,335.00
2043775 07/22/15 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 44465 06/01/15 JANITORIAL SERVICES (JUNE 2015)3,924.48 3,924.48
2043631 07/08/15 13059 PRIORITY BUILDING SERVICES 44025 05/01/15 JANITORIAL SERVICES (MAY 2015)3,924.48
43600 04/01/15 JANITORIAL SERVICES (APR 2015)3,924.48
2043776 07/22/15 03613 PSOMAS 107908 06/25/15 AS-NEEDED DESIGN R2109 (ENDING 6/24/15)1,432.50 1,432.50
2043705 07/15/15 15083 PUBLIC AGENCY SAFETY MGMT ASSN 07072015 07/07/15 PASMA MEMBERSHIP 75.00 75.00
2043572 07/01/15 15083 PUBLIC AGENCY SAFETY MGMT ASSN 06292015 06/29/15 MEMBERSHIP DUES 75.00 75.00
2043777 07/22/15 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2446684 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 188,442.46 188,442.46
2043632 07/08/15 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2445065 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 180,039.88 180,039.88
2043524 06/24/15 00078 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RET SYSTEM Ben2444850 06/18/15 BI-WEEKLY PERS CONTRIBUTION 178,943.76 178,943.76
2043633 07/08/15 16133 R J SAFETY SUPPLY CO INC 33674900 06/09/15 CSE EQUIPMENT SERVICE 837.35
33652600 06/09/15 CSE EQUIPMENT SERVICE 826.90
Page 12 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
3,914.22
5,311.50
2043573 07/01/15 16519 RACHEL BURINDA Ref002445025 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000184911 38.02 38.02
2043706 07/15/15 16558 RAPID TATTS PHOTO &07092015 07/09/15 PICNIC ENTERTAINMENT 505.00 505.00
2043634 07/08/15 01890 RECON 51555 06/15/15 PREP OF THE SUBAREA PLAN (4/25/15-5/22/15)8,806.25 8,806.25
2043778 07/22/15 15414 REGENTS BANK 6 07/06/15 RETENTION/COFFMAN (ENDING 6/30/15)1,171.66 1,171.66
2043635 07/08/15 15647 RFYEAGER ENGINEERING LLC 15093 06/10/15 CORROSION/COATING INSP (2/1/15-5/31/15)5,380.00 5,380.00
2043779 07/22/15 15647 RFYEAGER ENGINEERING LLC 15103 07/01/15 CORROSION/COATING INSP (6/1/15-6/30/15)12,250.00 12,250.00
2043707 07/15/15 16561 RICHARD MILLER Ref002446716 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000045031 64.38 64.38
2043780 07/22/15 08972 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 0043600 07/02/15 CAMPO ROAD SUPPORT (6/1/15-6/30/15)88,832.38 88,832.38
2043636 07/08/15 08972 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 0043315 06/19/15 CAMPO ROAD SUPPORT (5/1/15-5/31/15)30,215.09 30,215.09
2043637 07/08/15 16173 RISK MANAGEMENT PROFESSIONALS 150199 06/29/15 CALARP AUDIT (4/1/15-6/26/15)6,944.95 6,944.95
2043708 07/15/15 16563 ROCHELLE MONROE Ref002446718 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000062505 41.32 41.32
2043574 07/01/15 10203 ROSEMOUNT INC 70790354 06/08/15 FST MAG METER 279.84 279.84
2043525 06/24/15 10203 ROSEMOUNT INC 70789849 06/05/15 FST MAG METER 1,504.93 1,504.93
2043638 07/08/15 02620 ROTORK CONTROLS INC CI10309 06/11/15 WBW ACTUATOR 3,687.42
CI10383 06/22/15 WBW ACTUATOR 226.80
2043575 07/01/15 16514 RUSSELL WINNE Ref002445020 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000061939 35.21 35.21
2043709 07/15/15 06016 RYAN BRADY Ref002446719 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000076030 27.88 27.88
2043526 06/24/15 09148 S & J SUPPLY COMPANY INC S100052936001 06/09/15 INVENTORY 7,533.01 7,533.01
2043527 06/24/15 06286 SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF AR300584 06/01/15 REIMBURSEMENT/SANDAG 757,775.00 757,775.00
2043710 07/15/15 02586 SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR 201503986 07/07/15 ASSESSOR DATA (6/8/15)125.00 125.00
2043711 07/15/15 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2446692 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 460.90 460.90
2043576 07/01/15 03752 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF Ben2445073 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 460.90 460.90
2043528 06/24/15 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH 0000001236 06/15/15 SCWS - MWD HEWS 2,620.00
0000001192 04/01/15 MWD SCWS - HEWS 2,160.00
0000001206 04/22/15 HOME WATER USE EVALUATION 531.50
2043781 07/22/15 00003 SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTH 0000001245 06/25/15 MWD SCWA - HEWS 1,460.00 1,460.00
2043782 07/22/15 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 513372 07/01/15 LEGAL ADVERTISING 237.60Page 13 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
405.90
156,523.42
1,753.00
3,674.03
840,013.62
2043782 07/22/15 00247 SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT 513372 07/01/15 LEGAL ADVERTISING 237.60
514184 07/06/15 NOTICE OF PREPARATION 168.30
2043639 07/08/15 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 062915 06/29/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)68,574.59
062515 06/25/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)55,760.97
061915a 06/19/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)31,088.56
062415 06/24/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)1,099.30
2043529 06/24/15 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 060515 06/05/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)18,806.61 18,806.61
2043712 07/15/15 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 070615 07/06/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)85,518.24 85,518.24
2043577 07/01/15 00121 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 061915 06/19/15 UTILITY EXPENSES (MONTHLY)4,086.44 4,086.44
2043713 07/15/15 10578 SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC 07142015HR 07/14/15 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 195.00 195.00
2043783 07/22/15 12080 SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE, THE 0000403412 07/01/15 ADVERTISEMENT 646.80 646.80
2043530 06/24/15 15086 SAVAGE, DEANDRE DS06112015 06/11/15 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 70.00 70.00
2043784 07/22/15 07783 SCRIPPS CENTER FOR EXECUTIVE 26235 06/23/15 EXECUTIVE PHYSICAL 2,101.63 2,101.63
2043578 07/01/15 16528 SHANE MCCAULEY Ref002445034 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000215505 10.93 10.93
2043640 07/08/15 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 5G01005 07/01/15 LABORATORY SERVICES (6/24/15)205.00 205.00
2043531 06/24/15 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 5F16073 06/16/15 LABORATORY SERVICES (6/10/15)205.00 205.00
2043579 07/01/15 15307 SIERRA ANALYTICAL LABS INC 5F22004 06/22/15 LABORATORY SERVICES (6/16/15)140.00 140.00
2043714 07/15/15 13327 SILVA-SILVA INTERNATIONAL 1507 07/01/15 DESAL PROJ CONSULTANT (JUNE 2015)4,000.00 4,000.00
2043532 06/24/15 00258 SLOAN ELECTRIC COMPANY 0065123 05/31/15 GEARDRIVE REPAIRS 773.00 773.00
2043785 07/22/15 14984 SOLARWINDS INC IN229440 06/26/15 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE (ANNUAL)7,191.90 7,191.90
2043641 07/08/15 15176 SOUTHCOAST HEATING &C56265 06/11/15 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)1,068.00
C56279 06/11/15 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)480.00
C56271 06/11/15 AC MAINTENANCE (MONTHLY)205.00
2043642 07/08/15 06853 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL 369939 06/10/15 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (1/1/15-1/31/15)3,429.03
370770 06/10/15 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES (4/1/15-4/30/15)245.00
2043643 07/08/15 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 51641 05/28/15 2015-16 PROPERTY/LIABILITY PROGRAM 573,047.82
50992 05/28/15 2015-16 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 266,965.80
2043786 07/22/15 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 070815 07/08/15 PROPERTY DEDUCTIBLE 500.00 500.00
2043580 07/01/15 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 0001061615 06/16/15 PROPERTY DEDUCTIBLE 500.00 500.00Page 14 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
33,193.02
32.18
2043580 07/01/15 03516 SPECIAL DISTRICT RISK 0001061615 06/16/15 PROPERTY DEDUCTIBLE 500.00 500.00
2043715 07/15/15 01460 STATE WATER RESOURCES EA04151658 07/09/15 ELAP CERT RENEWAL 2,359.00 2,359.00
2043716 07/15/15 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 98302 07/08/15 LEGAL SERVICES (JUNE 2015)19,065.35 19,065.35
2043644 07/08/15 12809 STUTZ ARTIANO SHINOFF 98120 06/22/15 LEGAL SERVICES (MAY 2015)21,029.28 21,029.28
2043645 07/08/15 10339 SUPREME OIL COMPANY 412463 06/10/15 UNLEADED FUEL 11,183.36
412467 06/11/15 RED DYED DIESEL FUEL TREATMENT PLANT 6,077.54
412468 06/10/15 RED DYED DIESEL FUEL 6,072.83
412464 06/10/15 RED DYED DIESEL FUEL 4,951.14
412466 06/10/15 RED DYED DIESEL FUEL 4,908.15
2043717 07/15/15 16564 SUSANA MADRIGAL Ref002446720 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000093376 50.62 50.62
2043787 07/22/15 00408 SWEETWATER AUTHORITY 5113408 06/30/15 OWD SHARE O&M 28,915.00 28,915.00
2043646 07/08/15 01905 SYMPRO INC 08522 05/19/15 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 8,053.00 8,053.00
2043647 07/08/15 15593 SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS LLC 14178 06/22/15 FLOWMETER REPAIR 369.94 369.94
2043788 07/22/15 01834 TC CONSTRUCTION CO INC 00016081 06/22/15 RETAINAGE RELEASE 3,312.64 3,312.64
2043533 06/24/15 02376 TECHKNOWSION INC 2583 05/30/15 SCADA UPGRADES 10,000.00 10,000.00
2043648 07/08/15 03374 TEK-COLLECT INC 303375 06/22/15 COLLECTION SERVICES 5,000.00 5,000.00
2043534 06/24/15 03374 TEK-COLLECT INC 300882 05/29/15 COLLECTION SERVICES 10,000.00 10,000.00
2043718 07/15/15 15926 TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT UNIT Ben2446698 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 184.61 184.61
2043581 07/01/15 15926 TEXAS CHILD SUPPORT UNIT Ben2445079 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY PAYROLL DEDUCTION 184.61 184.61
2043582 07/01/15 14177 THOMPSON, MITCHELL 060115063015 06/26/15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (JUNE 2015)30.48
060115063015a 06/29/15 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT (JUNE 2015)1.70
2043535 06/24/15 15398 TIMMONS GROUP INC 168354 04/07/15 CONSULTANT SERVICES (THRU 3/29/15)10,784.50 10,784.50
2043719 07/15/15 16580 TURNER CONSTRUCTION Ref002446737 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000215378 1,791.78 1,791.78
2043789 07/22/15 03261 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 045134408 06/01/15 SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE (7/1/15-6/30/16)129,899.78 129,899.78
2043790 07/22/15 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 620150488 07/01/15 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)331.50 331.50
2043536 06/24/15 00427 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF 520150486 06/01/15 UNDERGROUND ALERTS (MONTHLY)303.00 303.00
2043720 07/15/15 15675 UNITED SITE SERVICES INC 1143062890 06/26/15 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/26/15-7/23/15)80.03
Page 15 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
319.97
258.13
84,884.83
1,557.48
881.00
1143062888 06/26/15 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/26/15-7/23/15)79.98
1143062887 06/26/15 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/26/15-7/23/15)79.98
1143067547 06/29/15 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/27/15-7/24/15)79.98
2043649 07/08/15 15675 UNITED SITE SERVICES INC 1143039659 06/18/15
05/27/15
PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/18/15-7/15/15)98.17
1143047266 06/22/15 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/19/15-7/16/15)79.98
CAL CARD EXPENSES (MONTHLY)
1143015733 06/10/15 PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL (6/10/15-7/7/15)79.98
2043650 07/08/15 16467 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL 90349679
84,884.83
JOINT FUNDING AGREEMENT (8/19/14-5/27/15)109,867.99 109,867.99
2043651 07/08/15 07674 US BANK CC20150622196 06/22/15
2043652 07/08/15 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC 124199 06/30/15 SECURITY SERVICES (JUNE 2015)264.00 264.00
2043537 06/24/15 06829 US SECURITY ASSOCIATES INC A44631 04/30/15 SECURITY SERVICES (APR 2015)241.70 241.70
2043721 07/15/15 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2446688 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 15,171.65 15,171.65
2043583 07/01/15 01095 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2445069 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY DEFERRED COMP PLAN 14,712.94 14,712.94
2043722 07/15/15 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2446690 07/16/15 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 1,465.77 1,465.77
2043584 07/01/15 06414 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS Ben2445071 07/02/15 BI-WEEKLY 401A PLAN 1,675.77 1,675.77
2043653 07/08/15 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 9747711923 06/21/15 WIRELESS SERVICES (5/22/15-6/21/15)184.42 184.42
2043791 07/22/15 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 9747711917 06/21/15 CELLULAR & WIRELESS SVCS (5/22/15-6/21/15)4,723.57 4,723.57
2043723 07/15/15 03329 VERIZON WIRELESS 9747711921 06/21/15 WIRELESS SERVICES (5/22/15-6/21/15)1,108.21
9747711922 06/21/15 WIRELESS SERVICES (5/22/15-6/21/15)449.27
2043724 07/15/15 16570 VERNON SMITH Ref002446727 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000203506 218.23 218.23
2043792 07/22/15 16501 VIRGINIA L FLEMING Ref002444805 06/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000217452 75.00 75.00
2043585 07/01/15 16521 VIRGIO MARCOS Ref002445027 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000204562 54.63 54.63
2043538 06/24/15 15807 WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION, THE 425205 06/05/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS (6/4/15)263.00
425207 06/05/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS (6/4/15)128.00
425182 06/05/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS 98.00
425210 06/05/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS (6/4/15)98.00
425209 06/05/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS (6/4/15)98.00
425208 06/05/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS (6/4/15)98.00
425206 06/05/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS (6/4/15)98.00
2043654 07/08/15 15807 WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION, THE 428018 06/11/15 SECURITY SYSTEM (6/10/15)136.00 136.00
2043793 07/22/15 15807 WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION, THE 424764 06/26/15 OPERATIONS SECURITY & ACCESS (ENDING 6/26/15)13,284.00Page 16 of 17
Check Total
CHECK REGISTER
Otay Water District
Date Range: 6/18/2015 - 7/22/2015
Check #Date Vendor Vendor Name Invoice Inv. Date Description Amount
17,181.74
3,690.58
2043793 07/22/15 15807 WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION, THE 424764 06/26/15 OPERATIONS SECURITY & ACCESS (ENDING 6/26/15)13,284.00
428841 06/30/15 FACILITY SECURITY CONVERSIONS (6/29/15)2,618.81
427950 06/15/15 MONITORING SERVICES (JULY 2015)1,203.93
427984 06/10/15 MONITORING SERVICES (JULY 2015)30.00
427983 06/10/15 MONITORING SERVICES (JULY 2015)15.00
427986 06/10/15 MONITORING SERVICES (JULY 2015)15.00
427987 06/10/15 MONITORING SERVICES (JULY 2015)15.00
2043586 07/01/15 15807 WATCHLIGHT CORPORATION, THE 425283 06/08/15 SECURITY ENHANCEMENTS 2,957.28
425281 06/08/15 TREATMENT PLANT INSTALLATION 733.30
2043794 07/22/15 15726 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1466 06/30/15 AS-NEEDED HYDRAULIC MODELING (ENDING 6/30/15)3,400.00 3,400.00
2043539 06/24/15 15726 WATER SYSTEMS CONSULTING INC 1438 05/31/15 HYDRAULIC MODELING (ENDING 5/31/15)4,917.50 4,917.50
2043587 07/01/15 03781 WATTON, MARK 050115053115 06/24/15 TRAVEL EXP & MILEAGE REIMB (5/1/15-5/31/15)272.08 272.08
2043725 07/15/15 03781 WATTON, MARK 060115063015 07/14/15 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT (6/1/15-6/30/15)169.63 169.63
2043655 07/08/15 01343 WE GOT YA PEST CONTROL 97579 06/18/15 BEE REMOVAL 115.00 115.00
2043588 07/01/15 16527 WE ONEIL CONSTRUCTION CO OF CA Ref002445033 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000214076 1,723.12 1,723.12
2043656 07/08/15 07780 WEBER SCIENTIFIC 672502 06/10/15 LABORATORY SUPPLIES 44.34 44.34
2043589 07/01/15 07780 WEBER SCIENTIFIC 671950 06/04/15 LABORATORY SUPLIES 493.70 493.70
2043726 07/15/15 16579 WILLIAM MOORE Ref002446736 07/15/15 UB Refund Cst #0000214925 38.75 38.75
2043540 06/24/15 03283 WILSON BOHANNAN PADLOCK CO 0120244IN 05/26/15 AIR-VAC LOCKS 403.21 403.21
2043590 07/01/15 16512 YVONNE ACEVES Ref002445018 06/29/15 UB Refund Cst #0000040392 80.57 80.57
Amount Pd Total:4,490,852.69
Check Grand Total:4,490,852.69
Page 17 of 17