HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-23-16 Board Packet 1
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DISTRICT BOARDROOM
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD
SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
MONDAY
May 23, 2016
3:00 P.M.
AGENDA
1. ROLL CALL
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION – OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO
SPEAK TO THE BOARD ON ANY SUBJECT MATTER WITHIN THE BOARD'S
JURISDICTION BUT NOT AN ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA
WORKSHOP
5. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 4302 TO APPROVE THE FY 2016-2017 OPERATING
AND CAPITAL BUDGET; APPROVE FUND TRANSFERS FOR POTABLE, RECY-
CLED, AND SEWER; APPROVE WATER AND SEWER RATE CHANGES ON ALL
BILLINGS THAT BEGIN IN CALENDAR YEAR 2017 (THIS MAY INCLUDE SOME
SERVICES PROVIDED IN DECEMBER 2016); ADOPT THE SALARY SCHEDULE;
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 555 AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AP-
PENDIX A WITH THE PROPOSED WATER AND SEWER RATE CHANGES; AND
DIRECT STAFF TO SEND RATE INCREASE NOTICES (KOEPPEN)
6. ADJOURNMENT
2
All items appearing on this agenda, whether or not expressly listed for action, may be
deliberated and may be subject to action by the Board.
The Agenda, and any attachments containing written information, are available at the
District’s website at www.otaywater.gov. Written changes to any items to be considered at
the open meeting, or to any attachments, will be posted on the District’s website. Copies
of the Agenda and all attachments are also available through the District Secretary by
contacting her at (619) 670-2280.
If you have any disability which would require accommodation in order to enable you to
participate in this meeting, please call the District Secretary at 670-2280 at least 24 hours
prior to the meeting.
Certification of Posting
I certify that on May 20, 2016, I posted a copy of the foregoing agenda near the
regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of Otay Water District, said time being at
least 24 hours in advance of the special meeting of the Board of Directors (Government
Code Section §54954.2).
Executed at Spring Valley, California on May 20, 2016.
/s/ Susan Cruz, District Secretary
STAFF REPORT
TYPE MEETING: Special Board Meeting
MEETING DATE: May 23, 2016
SUBMITTED BY: Kevin Koeppen, Finance
Manager
PROJECT: DIV. NO. All
APPROVED BY:
(Chief)
Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
German Alvarez, Assistant General Manager
Mark Watton, General Manager
SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No. 4302 to Approve the FY 2016-2017
Operating and Capital Budget; Approve Fund Transfers for
Potable, Recycled, and Sewer; Approve Water and Sewer Rate
Changes on All Billings that Begin in Calendar Year 2017
(this may include some services provided in December 2016);
Adopt the Salary Schedule; Adopt Ordinance No. 555 Amending
the Code of Ordinances Appendix A with the Proposed Water and
Sewer Rate Changes; and Direct Staff to Send Rate Increase
Notices
GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board adopt Resolution No. 4302 to approve the FY 2016-
2017 Operating and Capital Budget; approve fund transfers for
potable, recycled, and sewer; approve water and sewer rate
changes on all billings that begin in calendar year 2017 (this
may include some services provided in December 2016); adopt the
Salary Schedule; adopt Ordinance No. 555 amending the Code of
Ordinances Appendix A with the proposed water and sewer rate
changes; and direct staff to send rate increase notices.
Below are the fund transfers for approval:
Recycled:
Designated Replacement to Designated Expansion $232,900
Sewer:
Designated Replacement to Designated Betterment $ 32,800
Total $265,700
2
PURPOSE:
Adopt Resolution No. 4302 to approve the FY 2016-2017 Operating
and Capital Budget; approve fund transfers for potable,
recycled, and sewer; approve water and sewer rate changes on all
billings that begin in calendar year 2017 (this may include some
services provided in December 2016); adopt the Salary Schedule;
adopt Ordinance No. 555 amending the Code of Ordinances Appendix
A with the proposed water and sewer rate changes; and direct
staff to send rate increase notices of 5.0% for water and 3.0%
for sewer.
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the District goes through a rate setting process with
new challenges. The process begins in January and ends with the
implementation of rates the following January.
Staff has made every effort to present the most realistic set of
factors and assumptions based on information received from
various sources including: the wholesale water suppliers, the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), the
San Diego County Water Authority (CWA), and the City of San
Diego; vendors such as SDG&E; and an economic report prepared by
an Economist. The information above was utilized in addition to
other economic indicators affecting taxes and revenues such as
inflation and interest rates.
Staff has prepared the proposed Operating and Capital Budget
with the proposed water and sewer rates pending adoption by the
Board.
DISCUSSION:
The challenges affecting water rates this year are:
Drought and the Governor’s Mandate
Anticipated continued conservation levels
Water cost increases
On May 5, 2015, the State Water Board adopted California Code of
Regulations, title 23, section 866 and re-adopted sections 863,
864, and 865. Otay has successfully achieved its targeted FY
2016 conservation of 20%. On February 2, 2016, the State Water
Board extended mandatory conservation measures, but also
approved supply credits toward meeting the conservation target.
3
Otay received a supply credit related to water supplied by the
Carlsbad desalination plant which reduced the conservation
target to 12%. With an estimated 18% conservation, the
District’s FY 2017 budgeted volumes will exceed the mandated 12%
conservation target.
The District experienced a significant reduction in water sales
volume in FY 2016 from the prior year’s water sales and has not
experienced water volume levels this low since the 2000 to 2001
timeframe. Predicting changes in conservation levels, weather
patterns, and growth are key challenges of the budget process.
Based on the research performed including, input from the CWA,
other local agencies, and rate setting consultants, staff
concluded that a significant portion of the conservation based
reduction will likely be permanent. In addition, the National
Weather Service is predicting a la Niña in FY 2017, which
signifies below average rainfall for the season. As a result of
these factors, staff is predicting water volumes will remain
relatively flat in the upcoming fiscal years. For fiscal year
2016, staff is projecting potable water sales of 10.7 million
units, which will be 9% below FY 2016 budgeted volumes. Fiscal
year 2016 projected recycled water sales of 1.51 million units
will be 12% below budgeted volumes. The FY 2017 budget was
prepared estimating water volumes will increase 1% from their FY
2016 projected volumes to 10.8 million units of potable water
and 1.53 million units of recycled water.
Due to the expanded conservation efforts, it is anticipated that
a significant portion of the water volume reduction will be
permanent and future increases in water volumes will be driven
largely by growth. As a result, the six-year rate model
includes an additional 1% volume increase in FY 2018 due to
drought recovery. Increases in water sales, due to growth, are
estimated to average approximately 1.1% annually from FY 2018 to
FY 2022. These modest figures for drought recovery and growth
were used to ensure adequate margins are achieved to support the
recovery of the District’s financial position from the decline
experienced as a result of the drought.
The focus on the sewer side remains the funding of the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) costs. The replacement and
rehabilitation CIP costs total $17.7 million over the next six
years. Staff is recommending the District obtain a $3.0 million
loan from the State Revolving Fund (SRF) to fund a portion of
the CIP. This loan will reduce the CIP burden on rates and
assist in matching the cash flow of the CIP with the timing of
CIP benefits.
4
Strategic Planning and Internal Cost Cutting
In addition to the budget and rate setting process, the
District’s focus on strategic planning has played a positive
role in the financial strength of the District. By managing
staffing, automating processes, and implementing Best Management
Practices, the District has become more efficient and cost
effective.
Operating Budget
The proposed FY 2016-2017 budget covers CWA and the City of San
Diego increases in water costs, as well as increases in power
costs from SDG&E. This budget supports the Capital Budget and
strategic objectives under the reduced water sales volumes. An
objective in the current budget was to return the District’s
financial position to targeted levels. The proposed budget
presents an average 5.0% water rate increase for FY 2017. The
rate model projects the following increases for water in fiscal
years 2018 through 2022: 5.0%, 3.8%, 3.7%, 3.7%, and 3.7%,
respectively. These increases will return the District’s debt
coverage ratios and reserves to targeted levels.
For sewer customers the rate model presents an average annual
increase of 3.0% for FY 2017 through FY 2020 and 2.0% for
FY 2021 and FY 2022. The FY 2017 average sewer rate increase
will be entirely offset by a reduction in winter average usage
and the expiration of the revenue recapture, resulting in a
$0.88 monthly decrease for the typical residential customer.
When combined with the SRF loan, these increases will maintain
the reserves and debt coverage at or above targeted levels.
Debt Coverage and Credit Ratings
The debt coverage ratio is the ratio of net revenues to debt
service.
The District historically has a “no growth” debt coverage target
and bond covenant of 150% and 100%, respectively. The “no
growth” debt coverage ratio excludes capacity fees from the net
revenues used in the calculation. The District achieved a “no
growth” debt coverage ratio of 180% in FY 2014 and 168% FY 2015.
Staff is projecting a “no growth” debt coverage ratio of 123% in
FY 2016, which is below target, but remains above the 100% bond
covenant. One of the FY 2017 budget objectives is to return the
“no growth” debt coverage ratio to targeted levels which has
been achieved with this budget.
5
There is also a 125% “with growth” minimum debt coverage ratio,
as defined in the bond covenants, which includes capacity fees
omitted from the “no growth” calculation. The District achieved
“with growth” bond covenant ratios of 196% in FY 2014 and 199%
FY 2015. Staff is projecting a “with growth” bond covenant debt
ratio of 142% in FY 2016, which is above the minimum required by
the District’s bond covenants. The proposed FY 2017 budget
maintains the District’s “with growth” debt coverage ratio above
the level required by the bond covenants.
The District currently maintains a split AA/AA- credit rating,
which is comprised of a ‘AA’ rating from Standard & Poor’s (S&P)
and a ‘AA-’ rating from Fitch Ratings (Fitch). A credit rating
is an overall rating that considers many factors and debt
coverage is one of the main financial factors. These ratings
are all related to the District’s water side of the business.
No credit rating is issued for the District’s sewer system. In
September 2008, the District received a rating upgrade from S&P
to ‘AA’ from ‘AA-’ as part of their global rating recalibration
for municipal agencies. In March 2012, Fitch lowered their
credit rating for the District from ‘AA’ to ‘AA-’, based on
lower-than-budgeted water revenues and a corresponding lower
debt coverage ratio.
In April 2016, S&P affirmed the Districts ‘AA’ rating with a
stable outlook. The affirmed outlook was based on good
historical coverage metrics, a strong liquidity position,
moderate leverage, and strong financial management policies and
practices. S&P could take a positive rating action if the
District is able to materially widen margins and provide
stronger levels of coverage on a basis that S&P believes to be
sustainable. They could take a negative action if water demand
softens or rate increases are not approved as expected, leading
to thinner margins and weaker coverage metrics, or if the
District’s liquidity position is significantly drawn down.
In February 2016, Fitch affirmed the District’s ‘AA-’ rating.
The affirmed rating was based on the District’s willingness to
raise rates in support of cost recovery, strong cash reserves,
moderate leverage, and capital needs. This rating also
recognized the anticipated declines in both water sales and
margins due to the drought.
The District does not anticipate the need to issue debt for
water infrastructure in the next six years. Using the current
6
budget objectives, the District’s financial performance will
yield good levels prior to any debt issued beyond six years.
The financial strength of the District’s sewer business is
evaluated separately from the water business. While the
District currently has no sewer related debt, staff is proposing
a $3.0 million SRF loan. This loan would not adversely impact
the financial position or coverage metrics in any significant
manner; however, the loan does require a 110% coverage ratio.
The current budget projects the debt coverage ratio for sewer
will increase from of 346% to 364% within the six-year period,
which is well above the SRF loan requirement.
Financing Plan
The District uses a comprehensive approach to financing. The
Debt Policy provides guidance on debt issuances and refinancing.
The Reserve Policy provides guidance on both fund transfers and
reserve balances. With these policies, a six-year financing
plan is formulated that identifies the timing and amounts of
debt issuances, the level of rate increases, debt coverage
ratios, reserve balances, and necessary transfers.
Future debt issuances are highly dependent on the rate at which
growth returns to the District and how management responds to
these variables. Growth is expected to gradually return and
provide funding for CIPs through higher capacity fees. In
FY 2017, the CIP is supported by $265,700 of the requested
transfers.
With the proposed transfers and rate increases, the District
will be able to maintain all reserve levels at or above target
in the coming fiscal years.
Relative Position to Other Districts
The District performs an annual countywide survey of the water
provider rates. For many years the District has remained in the
lower half of this comparison. Depending on their relative
dependence on CWA water, it is expected that all water providers
in the county are facing the same rate pressures by purchasing
water from CWA and MWD. The few water districts which have
already commented on their rate increases, are looking at
implementing increases averaging approximately 6.2%. The
District’s survey, shown in the attached presentation,
illustrates the average District customer, using 11 units, will
7
be charged the 11th lowest rates when compared to all 22
agencies in the county.
The District also performs an annual survey comparing its sewer
rates to other sewer providers in the county. The District’s
survey, shown in the attached presentation, illustrates an
average residential sewer customer will be charged the 4th
lowest rates when compared to all 28 agencies in the county.
Rate Implementation - Water
The rate increase of 5.0% is being proposed for both potable and
recycled customers. This average increase is composed of a
number of changes to various rates at differing amounts. The
California Urban Water Conservation Council has established BMP
1.4 to define Best Management Practices for retail conservation
pricing. A component of the BMP recommends that fixed revenues
not exceed 30% of total applicable revenues. Due to the decline
in water sales volumes, the District is projecting it would have
exceeded the 30% threshold in FY 2016 and is therefore
recommending rate rebalancing that will bring the fixed revenue
percentage back to the 30% defined in the BMP. This rebalancing
will occur by shifting $1.1 million of fixed rate revenue to the
variable rates. This rebalancing is done through a reduction in
system fees for all customers.
Staff is proposing the MWD and CWA pass-through charges be
increased by $0.6 million, or 4.9%, to ensure that fixed revenue
collections match the fixed costs charged to the District by our
water providers. The total components of MWD and CWA fixed
charges are shown below:
Customer Service Charge $ 1,714,200
Emergency Storage Charge 4,579,800
Reliability Charge 1,848,000
Infrastructure Access Charge 1,976,400
Capacity Reservation Charge 988,800
Readiness-to-Serve Charge 1,428,000
Total MWD & CWA Fixed Charges $12,535,200
Rate Implementation - Sewer
In FY 2016, no sewer rate increase was projected for FY 2017
based on cost estimates at that time. This year, the proposed
rate increase has changed to 3.0%. The primary cause of the
necessary rate increases is due to a $4.0 million increase in
the six-year CIP plan, which is for implementing new regulatory
8
requirements, and the replacement and rehabilitation of capital
projects.
Water Sales
Using the modest figures for drought recovery and growth,
potable and recycled water sales are budgeted to be $72.2
million and $8.9 million, respectively. This is a 3.5% increase
in potable water sales and a 2.4% decrease in recycled water
sales versus the FY 2016 budget. When compared to the FY 2016
projection, FY 2017 potable water sales are increasing $6.8
million or 10.4% and recycled water sales are increasing $1.1
million or 13.4%.
The January 1, 2017 proposed potable and recycled water
increases of 5.0% will generate additional revenue of $1.7
million. This increase is required to offset the FY 2017
proposed rate increases from CWA, MWD, and SDG&E. One hundred
percent of the FY 2017 proposed rate increase is due to these
third party cost increases. The District has been successful in
managing and reducing its own internal costs through strategic
planning initiatives. This, along with the prior year rate
increases and changes in budgeted water sales volume, increased
the budgeted potable and recycled water sales by $2.2 million
versus the FY 2016 budget.
The sewer budgeted revenues are expected to decrease $0.3
million or 9.0% versus last year’s budget due to the 3.0%
proposed rate increase offset by the expiration of the revenue
recapture and the decline in the winter averages due to
conservation.
Other changes in the revenues include the following:
Capacity fee revenues funding operating expenses are
expected to increase $113,400 or 10.0%, due to increases as
major planning projects are completed.
Property tax revenues are expected to increase $135,200 or
3.5%.
Non-operating revenues are expected to increase $305,700 or
16.3%, due to an anticipated reimbursement agreement with
Pio Pico and increases in rents and leases.
9
Water Costs
For FY 2017, potable and recycled water costs are budgeted to be
$43.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively. Water costs
represent 52% of the District’s Operating Budget and any changes
in the wholesale water price has a significant impact on the
overall operating budget. Increases in water costs from
suppliers, CWA and MWD, are one of the most significant
challenges for FY 2017. Similar to Otay, both of the District’s
water suppliers have experienced lower water sales affecting
their financial position, thus putting more pressure on rates.
This has resulted in a potable water cost increase of 7.1%
versus FY 2016 budget and 4.5% versus the FY 2016 projection.
The net potable water cost decrease of $0.5 million is comprised
of a $2.5 million decrease due to the reduced water volumes,
offset by a $2.0 million increase due to supplier pricing.
Effective January 1, 2016, the City of San Diego recycled water
rate increased 116.3% from $0.80/hcf to $1.73/hcf. This
increase is the primary reason recycled water purchases are
budgeted to increase $1.9 million versus the FY 2016 budget. It
should be noted that $1.8 million of this additional cost was
offset by the March 1, 2016 rate increase and is not a large
component of the 5.0% proposed January 1, 2017 water rate
increase. In addition to the price increase, the take-or-pay
contractual volumes are also increasing, which results in an
additional cost of $0.1 million in FY 2017.
Power Costs
Power costs of $2.9 million for water and sewer are budgeted to
decrease $174,800 or 5.6% versus the FY 2016 budget. This is
due to the decrease in the FY 2017 water volume budget and is
partially offset by a 2.0% anticipated price increase from
SDG&E.
Labor and Benefits
The District has, through strategic planning, reduced the FTE
count by 23% from 174.75 in FY 2007 to 138.0 in FY 2016, and has
budgeted to reduce the FTEs to 135 in FY 2017. The reduction in
FTE’s has saved the District $30.1 million over this ten year
period. In addition, the District will recognize future savings
in pension costs with the reduced staffing levels. Labor and
benefit costs of $20.9 million are expected to increase, versus
the FY 2016 budget, by $518,900 or 2.5%. These changes are due
to the following:
10
Increase in salaries and benefits of $341,300 or 3.0%, due
to COLA and in-range salary adjustments, consistent with
the negotiated Memorandum of Understanding.
Increases in overtime, vacancy, vacation/sick, temp labor,
and workers compensation of $206,100 or 1.7%
Increase in pension costs of $276,300 or 7.1%
Increase in health care costs of $246,300 or 6.1%
Increase due to staff advancements of $41,500 or 0.3%
Increases in other benefits, such as social security and
Medicare of $14,500 or 1.5%.
Decrease of $336,300 or 1.0% due to a reduction of three
FTEs.
Decrease in OPEB costs of $186,000 or 13%
Decrease in operating labor charges of $84,800 or 3.6% due
to an increase in the allocation of internal labor to CIP
projects.
Salary Schedule
While the General Manager has authority to set salaries pursuant
to 2.01 of the Code of Ordinances, recent legislation, namely
California Code of Regulations (CCR) section 570.5, adopted and
effective August 10, 2011, as well as a CalPERS circular letter
clarifying section 570.5, require information regarding the
compensation of public employees to be publicly available.
Thus, in order to be in compliance with CCR 570.5, the District
is required to have a publicly available salary schedule that
“has been duly approved and adopted by the employer’s governing
body in accordance with requirements of applicable public
meeting laws.” As such, a copy of the Job Classification and
Salary Schedule is included herein for Board approval (Exhibit
2). Although District salaries are already made public as a
part of our NeoGov recruitment system, this salary schedule will
be retained for public inspection for the required five years
and posted to the District’s webpage per requirements of
CalPERS. Please note, that making such information publicly
available does not in any way interfere with or change the
General Manager’s authority to set salaries pursuant to the
authority granted to him. Accordingly, and consistent with such
authority, the Board is requested to authorize the General
Manager to update the salary schedule whenever necessary to
reflect changes made within his authority.
11
Administrative Expenses
The administrative expenses budget of $5.2 million is decreasing
by $237,700 or 4.4%, versus the FY 2016 budget, primarily due to
the following:
Decrease in Outside Services ($225,000) or (13.6%), due to
scaling back of the additional conservation of $250,000
budgeted in FY 2016 for drought response funding, offset by
increases due to the District performing Water and Sewer
Capacity Fee studies in FY 2017.
Decrease in Temp Services ($102,400) or (84.5%), due to the
elimination of the temp services SCADA tech and an HR temp.
Decrease in Bad Debt Expense ($50,000) or (32.3%), due to
improvements in the past due notification process and
economic recovery.
Decrease in General Expenses of ($30,200) or (8.0%), due to
decreases in insurance, postage, and printing expenses.
Decreases in other categories of ($7,700) or (1.0%), due to
several miscellaneous expense reductions.
Increase in Fees of $133,800 or 26.8%, primarily due to the
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Division of
Drinking Water (DDW) proposed increase in annual fees.
Increase in Equipment of $16,800 or 1.5%, mainly due to
renewal of the SCADA software maintenance contract.
Increase in Training of $27,000 or 27.3%, mainly due to an
increase in management training programs and new regulatory
requirements.
Materials and Maintenance
The materials and maintenance budget of $3.5 million is
decreasing $156,500 or 4.3%, due to the following:
Decrease in Metro O & M of ($160,000) or (19.6%), due to
reduced flows and strength as a result of recent data
analysis.
Decrease in Safety Equipment of ($74,800) or (58.8%), from
FY 2016 budget, which included $75k for EOC supply kits
that were not re-budgeted in FY 2017.
Decrease in Chemicals of ($36,300) or (9.1%), due to lower
water sales.
Decrease in Fuel and Oil of ($8,300) or (3.3%), due to
lower fuel prices.
12
Decrease in Other Materials & Supplies by ($8,200) or
(4.3%), due to the rescheduling of the leak detection
program.
Increase in Contracted Services of $67,200 or 9.7%, due to
$75,000 increased landfill hauling, $20,000 increased main
break insurance deductible, and $4,000 fence and gate
repairs.
Increase in Meters and Materials of $45,400 or 39.9%, due
to stepping-up the meter replacement program.
Increase in Building & Grounds Materials of $8,100 or
16.9%, due to small increases under $2,000 in the safety
supplies, paint, and erosion control categories.
Increase in Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies of $5,400
or 0.9%, due to water absorbent material for landfill
disposal.
Increase in Laboratory Equipment and Supplies of $5,300 or
13.3%, due to annual required ELAP certification costing
$3,000 and increased drinking water sampling from 33 to 38
per week costing $3,000.
Transfers
The requested transfers serve the purpose of ensuring the
reserves are funded at target levels, in accordance with the
Reserve Policy. There are two types of transfers the District
can make. The first is the use of operating revenues to fund
reserves and the second type is fund to fund transfers. Both
types are meant to rebalance funds to target levels. The total
fund to fund transfers requested separately in this staff report
total $265,700.
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget
As a component of the annual budget development process, the
Engineering staff updates the CIP Budget. This year, the total
six-year CIP Budget of $89.8 million is decreasing by $6.5
million versus last year. This decrease is a result of
completing many CIP projects, delays in developer projects, and
reprioritizing some projects. The following process is used to
prepare the CIP Budget:
CIP projects selected are based on the Water Resources
Master Plan (WRMP), the Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP),
Sub Area Master Plan (SAMP), Integrated Water Resources
13
Plan (IRP), Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP), and other
focused or specific planning documents and reports.
The CIP goes through an iterative process to meet the
criteria of growth, service levels, supply targets, and
system requirements.
CIP target expenditures for the next six years are refined
and used in the rate model.
The following general criteria are used to determine the
reasonableness of a project before it is considered for
inclusion within the CIP Budget:
Existing facility conditions
Operating system conditions
Water and sewer system deficiencies
Regulatory and permitting requirements
Developer driven requirements
Economic outlook
Growth projections
Water supply diversification goals
Board and management directives
This year, the CIP Budget includes the following amounts by
project category. Project details within each of the categories
are located in Exhibit 1 under the Capital Budget tab.
Capital Backbone $ 4.3
Replacement and Renewal 5.9
Capital Purchases .5
Total (millions)$10.7
There are a total of 85 projects in the current year of the six-
year CIP plan. Each project is listed in the FY 2017
Preliminary Operating and Capital Budget (Exhibit 1). The total
six-year cost of the 85 projects plus 18 additional projects
budgeted in FY 2018 through 2022 is $89.8 million.
Sewer CIP includes $17.7 million of rehabilitation and main
replacement projects starting in FY 2017 and finishing in FY
2022. In order to fund these projects, the Sewer Fund will need
to borrow funds beginning in FY 2017. The District has
identified the SRF loan as the most economic lending facility.
The SRF loan is a low interest loan offered by the State Water
Resources Control Board for the construction of publicly-owned
wastewater activities. To ensure the District qualifies for
14
this loan program in FY 2017, staff has begun reviewing the
conditions of the SRF loan program and related sewer projects
with the SWRCB.
FISCAL IMPACT: Joseph R. Beachem, Chief Financial Officer
A six-year rate modeling effort is one of the ways the District
can better inform its customers, minimize financial risks,
reduce rate impacts, and establish fiscal strength.
The recommended balanced Operating Budget totals $91.7 million
and the recommended CIP Budget totals $10.7 million. With
budget approval, the District will move forward into FY 2017
with clear financial direction and with rates that will rebuild
and then maintain the District’s financial strength at or above
target levels.
Average water rate increases of 5.0% are recommended for all
water services billed beginning January 1, 2017, and may include
water used as early as December 1, 2016, depending on the
billing cycle. An average sewer rate increase of 3.0% is
recommended for sewer service billings beginning January 1,
2017.
This budget, with the recommended transfers, provides sufficient
funding to pay increased water costs; continues funding for the
District’s administration, maintenance, and operations; and is
consistent with the Strategic Plan and Reserve Policy.
STRATEGIC OUTLOOK:
The District ensures its continued financial health through
long-term financial planning and debt planning.
LEGAL IMPACT:
None.
Attachments:
A) Resolution No. 4302
Exhibit 1 - FY 2016-17 Preliminary Operating and
Capital Budget
Exhibit 2 - Job Classification and Salary Schedule
B) Ordinance No. 555
Exhibit 1 – Appendix A Strike-through
Exhibit 2 – Appendix A Proposed
C) FY 2016-17 Budget Presentation
D) The London Group Presentation
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 4302
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
OTAY WATER DISTRICT ADOPTING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017
OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET; AND THE JOB
CLASSIFICATION AND SALARY SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, the Otay Water District Board of Directors have
been presented with a budget (Exhibit 1) for the operation of the
Otay Water District for Fiscal Year 2016-2017; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 Operating and Capital
Budget, has been reviewed and considered by the Board;
WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the District to adopt a
budget for said year;
WHEREAS, in connection with the adoption of the budget, the
Board is also being presented with a listing of job
classifications and salary schedule (Exhibit 2) for its
consideration, in order to comply with California Code of
Regulations Section 570.5,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by
the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District that the
Operating and Capital Budget for the operation of the District,
incorporated herein by reference, is hereby adopted as the
District’s budget for Fiscal Year 2016-2017.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby approves and
adopts the salary schedule included with the budget and,
consistent with his authority over employee compensation under
both State law and the District’s Code of Ordinances, authorizes
the General Manager to update the salary schedule whenever
necessary to reflect changes made within his authority.
Attachment A
Page 2 of 2
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of
Otay Water District at a board meeting held this 23rd day of May
2016, by the following vote:
Ayes:
Noes:
Abstain:
Absent:
________________________
President
ATTEST:
____________________________
District Secretary
FY 2015 FY 2017
11-Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Revenues
#Potable Water Sales 70,281,989$ 65,450,075$ 69,783,700$ 72,238,600$ 2,454,900$ 3.5%
Recycled Water Sales 8,853,010 7,847,149 9,116,000 8,900,300 (215,700) (2.4%)
#Sewer Revenues 3,009,634 3,154,186 3,206,300 2,918,900 (287,400) (9.0%)
#Meter Fees 90,246 81,519 66,200 66,200 - 0.0%
#Capacity Fee Revenues 1,312,108 1,333,993 1,134,800 1,248,200 113,400 10.0%
#Betterment Fees for Maintenance 188,123 - - - - (100.0%)
Tax Revenues 3,814,516 4,081,516 3,897,900 4,033,100 135,200 3.5%
#Non-operating Revenues 2,404,375 1,966,125 1,873,600 2,179,300 305,700 16.3%
#Interest 128,599 96,708 157,500 156,900 (600) (0.4%)
ExTransfer from Potable General Fund 553,800 - - - - (100.0%)
Total Revenues 90,636,400$ 84,011,271$ 89,236,000$ 91,741,500$ 2,505,500$ 2.8%
Expenditures
#Potable Water Purchases 33,952,017$ 28,882,714$ 32,332,100$ 31,271,300$ (1,060,800) (3.3%)
Recycled Water Purchases 1,360,807 1,848,699 1,705,800 3,615,900 1,910,100 112.0%
#CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,900,266 1,930,962 1,931,400 1,976,400 45,000 2.3%
#CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,796,853 1,778,099 1,777,800 1,714,200 (63,600) (3.6%)
CWA - Reliability Charge - 950,168 950,400 1,848,000 897,600 94.4%
#CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,720,701 4,681,730 4,681,800 4,579,800 (102,000) (2.2%)
#MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 701,976 883,203 806,400 988,800 182,400 22.6%
#MWD - Net RTS and Standby Charge 1,817,339 1,644,998 1,798,800 1,428,000 (370,800) (20.6%)
Subtotal - Water Costs 46,249,959$ 42,600,573$ 45,984,500$ 47,422,400$ 1,437,900$ 3.1%
#Power 3,048,335$ 2,866,383$ 3,112,800$ 2,938,000$ (174,800)$ (5.6%)
#Labor and Benefits 19,406,815 20,205,335 20,381,000 20,899,900 518,900 2.5%
#Administrative Expenses 4,503,990 4,472,404 5,387,800 5,150,100 (237,700) (4.4%)
#Materials and Maintenance 3,339,777 3,368,157 3,612,800 3,456,300 (156,500) (4.3%)
Subtotal - Operations Costs 30,298,917$ 30,912,279$ 32,494,400$ 32,444,300$ (50,100)$ (0.2%)
DTransfer to General Fund Reserve - - - 1,482,500 1,482,500 0.0%
#Expansion Reserve 2,538,900 2,695,800 2,695,800 4,093,600 1,397,800 51.9%
B Betterment Reserve 3,530,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 3,466,400 1,066,400 44.4%
ReReplacement Reserve 3,270,200 3,421,000 3,421,000 464,500 (2,956,500) (86.4%)
Transfer to Sewer General Fund 553,800 - - 1,371,800 1,371,800 100.0%
TOOPEB Trust 647,100 1,006,000 1,006,000 961,000 (45,000) (4.5%)
Potable General Fund 1,583,800 - - - - (100.0%)
Sewer Replacement 127,000 1,199,300 1,199,300 - (1,199,300) (100.0%)
New Supply Reserve 705,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 - 0.0%
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 12,955,800$ 10,757,100$ 10,757,100$ 11,874,800$ 1,117,700$ 10.4%
Total Expenditures 89,504,676$ 84,269,952$ 89,236,000$ 91,741,500$ 2,505,500$ 2.8%
Excess Revenues (Expenditures)1,131,724 (258,681) - - -
Operating Budget Summary - General Fund
Budget to Budget
VarianceFY 2016
1
Operating Budget Summary - General Fund
Potable Water Sales 72,238,600$ 78.7%
Recycled Water Sales 8,900,300 9.7%
Sewer Revenues 2,918,900 3.2%
Meter Fees 66,200 0.1%
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,248,200 1.4%
Tax Revenues 4,033,100 4.4%
Non-operating Revenues 2,179,300 2.3%
Interest 156,900 0.2%
91,741,500$ 100.0%
Potable Water Purchases 43,806,500$ 47.8%
Recycled Water Purchases 3,615,900 3.9%
Power 2,938,000 3.2%
Labor and Benefits 20,899,900 22.8%
Administrative Expenses 5,150,100 5.6%
Materials & Maintenance 3,456,300 3.8%
Reserve Funding 11,874,800 12.9%
91,741,500$ 100.0%
FY 2017 Operating Revenues
FY 2017 Operating Expenditures
2
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
Revenues
Water Sales 72,238,600$ -$ -$ 72,238,600$
Recycled Water Sales - 8,900,300 2,918,900 11,819,200
Sewer Revenues - - - -
Meter Fees 65,800 400 - 66,200
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,248,200 - - 1,248,200
Tax Revenues 3,981,500 - 51,600 4,033,100
Non-operating Revenues 2,143,800 - 35,500 2,179,300
Interest 144,300 8,300 4,300 156,900
Total Revenues 79,822,200$ 8,909,000$ 3,010,300$ 91,741,500$
Expenditures
Water Purchases 31,271,300$ 3,615,900$ -$ 34,887,200$
CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,976,400 - - 1,976,400
CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,714,200 - - 1,714,200
CWA - Reliability Charge 1,848,000 - - 1,848,000
CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,579,800 - - 4,579,800
MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 988,800 - - 988,800
MWD - Net RTS and Standby Charges 1,428,000 - - 1,428,000
Subtotal - Water Costs 43,806,500$ 3,615,900$ -$ 47,422,400$
Power 2,194,700 568,900 174,400 2,938,000$
Labor and Benefits 18,581,400 1,339,200 979,300 20,899,900
Administrative Expenses 4,589,800 331,200 229,100 5,150,100
Materials and Maintenance 2,108,600 305,000 1,042,700 3,456,300
Subtotal - Operations Costs 27,474,500$ 2,544,300$ 2,425,500$ 32,444,300$
Reserve Funding
D Transfer to General Fund Reserve 1,286,400 1,371,800 196,100 2,854,300
#Expansion Reserve 3,638,000 455,600 - 4,093,600
B Betterment Reserve 2,280,000 835,200 351,200 3,466,400
R Replacement Reserve 464,500 - - 464,500
TOOPEB Trust 872,300 51,200 37,500 961,000
New Supply Reserve - 35,000 - 35,000
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 8,541,200$ 2,748,800$ 584,800$ 11,874,800$
Total Expenditures 79,822,200$ 8,909,000$ 3,010,300$ 91,741,500$
Excess Revenue (Expenditures)-$ -$ -$ -$
FY 2017 Operating Budget Summary by System
3
Intentionally Left Blank
4
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
Water/Sewer Rates 88,571,900 93,172,600 97,691,700 102,641,300 107,891,800
Meter Fees 70,200 73,400 75,400 78,500 82,000
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,254,400 1,266,900 1,279,600 1,292,400 1,305,300
Non-operating Revenues 2,203,100 2,023,200 2,045,100 2,073,500 2,102,400
Tax Revenues 4,104,200 4,178,300 4,256,300 4,337,500 4,420,500
Interest Income 204,500 258,500 294,300 333,800 377,200
Total Revenues 96,408,300$ 100,972,900$ 105,642,400$ 110,757,000$ 116,179,200$
32,358,500$ 31,958,100$ 31,745,900$ 32,150,700$
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
Water Cost 51,706,200$ 55,093,300$ 58,880,400$ 63,210,400$ 67,865,300$
Power 3,080,200 3,217,300 3,371,500 3,543,900 3,729,200
Labor and Benefits 21,260,300 21,627,700 21,974,600 22,306,600 22,645,300
Administrative Expenses 4,989,500 5,145,100 5,395,500 5,486,500 5,644,300
Materials & Maintenance 3,538,400 3,681,800 3,831,000 3,986,300 4,148,100
Net Reserve Funding 11,833,700 12,207,700 12,189,400 12,223,300 12,147,000
Total Expenditures and Transfers 96,408,300$ 100,972,900$ 105,642,400$ 110,757,000$ 116,179,200$
Excess Revenues (Expenditures)-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$
General Fund Forecast - FY 2018 Through FY 2022
This forecast incorporates both cost increases for expenditures and rate increases for revenues, as well as growth
projections.
Revenues
Expenditures and Transfers
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
$9
6
$1
0
1
$1
0
6
$1
1
1
$1
1
6
$9
6
$1
0
1
$1
0
6
$1
1
1
$1
1
6
Revenues and Expenditures Forecast, in millions ($)
Revenues Expenditures
5
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
General Fund 21,148,800$ 22,199,600$ 23,374,200$ 24,647,500$ 26,020,700$
Betterment Fund 1,541,300 701,800 464,800 1,552,500 1,552,700
Replacement Fund 42,732,300 33,255,300 37,543,900 43,057,200 49,715,000
Expansion Fund 388,500 526,400 494,900 502,300 504,100
New Supply Fund 1,574,800 2,546,100 3,774,900 5,190,400 6,805,400
Debt Reserve 4,477,600 4,410,900 4,320,900 4,256,400 4,162,400
Total Fund Balance 71,863,300$ 63,640,100$ 69,973,600$ 79,206,300$ 88,760,300$
(126,171) (127,711) (129,254) (131,139) (133,125)
Fund Balances by Fund
Fund Balances - FY 2018 Through FY 2022
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
Fund Balances Forecast, in millions ($)
General Fund Betterment Fund Replacement Fund Expansion Fund Debt Reserve
6
FY 2015 FY 2017
11-Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Revenues
##Water Sales 70,281,989$ 65,450,075$ 69,783,700$ 72,238,600$ 2,454,900$ 3.5%
##Meter Fees 86,165 78,166 65,800 65,800 - 0.0%
##Capacity Fee Revenues 1,304,598 1,329,214 1,134,800 1,248,200 113,400 10.0%
##Betterment Fees for Maintenance 188,123 - - - - (100.0%)
Tax Revenues 3,769,963 4,015,052 3,846,300 3,981,500 135,200 3.5%
##Property Tax 3,128,961 3,578,243 3,213,000 3,354,800 141,800 4.4%
##Availability Fees 641,002 436,809 633,300 626,700 (6,600) (1.0%)
##Non-operating Revenues 2,370,615 1,938,225 1,836,400 2,143,800 307,400 16.7%
##Interest 105,264 79,160 143,000 144,300 1,300 0.9%
Total Revenues 78,106,717$ 72,889,892$ 76,810,000$ 79,822,200$ 3,012,200$ 3.9%
Expenditures
Potable Water Purchases 33,952,017$ 28,882,714$ 32,332,100$ 31,271,300$ (1,060,800)$ (3.3%)
##CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,900,266 1,930,962 1,931,400 1,976,400 45,000 2.3%
##CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,796,853 1,778,099 1,777,800 1,714,200 (63,600) (3.6%)
##CWA - Reliability Charge - 950,168 950,400 1,848,000 897,600 94.4%
##CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,720,701 4,681,730 4,681,800 4,579,800 (102,000) (2.2%)
##MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 701,976 883,203 806,400 988,800 182,400 22.6%
##MWD-Net RTS and Standby Charge 1,817,339 1,644,998 1,798,800 1,428,000 (370,800) (20.6%)
Subtotal - Water Costs 44,889,152$ 40,751,874$ 44,278,700$ 43,806,500$ (472,200)$ (1.1%)
##Power 2,280,061 2,155,397 2,372,400 2,194,700 (177,700) (7.5%)
##Labor and Benefits 17,383,737 17,980,140 18,518,100 18,581,400 63,300 0.3%
##Administrative Expenses 4,040,636 3,924,096 4,865,200 4,589,800 (275,400) (5.7%)
##Materials and Maintenance 1,743,396 1,984,696 2,168,300 2,108,600 (59,700) (2.8%)
11-Subtotal - Operations Costs 25,447,830$ 26,044,329$ 27,924,000$ 27,474,500$ (449,500)$ (1.6%)
DS Transfer to General Fund Reserve - - - 1,286,400 1,286,400 100.0%
##Expansion Reserve - - - 3,638,000 3,638,000 100.0%
Bet Betterment Reserve 2,805,000 - - 2,280,000 2,280,000 100.0%
RepReplacement Reserve 675,000 2,493,900 2,493,900 464,500 (2,029,400) (81.4%)
swr Transfer to Sewer General Fund 553,800 - - - - (100.0%)
TO Transfer to OPEB 546,000 914,100 914,100 872,300 (41,800) (4.6%)
GF Transfer to Potable General Fund 1,583,800 - - - 0.0%
Sw Transfer to Sewer Replacement 127,000 1,199,300 1,199,300 - (1,199,300) 0.0%
NS Transfer to New Supply Fund 705,000 - - - - (100.0%)
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 6,995,600$ 4,607,300$ 4,607,300$ 8,541,200$ 3,933,900$ 85.4%
Total Expenditures 77,332,582$ 71,403,503$ 76,810,000$ 79,822,200$ 3,012,200$ 3.9%
Excess Revenues (Expenditures)774,135 1,486,389 - - -
Operating Budget Summary - Potable
Budget to Budget
VarianceFY 2016
7
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Water Sales 44,025,774$ 37,257,765$ 41,344,900$ 44,450,600$ 3,105,700$ 7.5%
System Fees 12,380,370 13,346,390 13,292,300 12,204,600 (1,087,700) -8.2%
Energy Fees 2,134,865 2,147,885 2,311,300 2,164,200 (147,100) -6.4%
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees 10,846,411 11,875,844 11,946,600 12,535,200 588,600 4.9%
Penalties 894,569 822,191 888,600 884,000 (4,600) -0.5%
Total Water Sales 70,281,989$ 65,450,075$ 69,783,700$ 72,238,600$ 2,454,900$ 3.5%
Water Sales 44,450,600$ 61.4%
System Fees 12,204,600 16.9%
Energy Fees 2,164,200 3.0%
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees 12,535,200 17.4%
Penalties 884,000 1.3%
Total Water Sales 72,238,600$ 100.0%
Water Sales: Water rates vary among classes of service and are charged per unit of water. A unit of water is equal to 100
cubic feet of water. On January 1, 2009, the District implemented a tiered rate structure for all customer types to
encourage conservation and bring equity among the classes.
System Fees: Each water service customer pays a monthly system charge for water system replacement, maintenance,
and operation expenses. The charge is based on the size of the meter.
Energy Fees: The energy pumping fee is $ .044 per 100 cubic feet of water for each 100 feet of lift above the elevation
of 450 feet. All water customers are in one of 29 zones based on elevation.
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees: These pass-through charges are calculated to recover the MWD's and CWA's fixed annual
costs including the construction, operation and maintenance of aqueducts, and emergency storage projects.
These fixed charges are based on the size of the meter.
Penalties: Charges and penalties are imposed on customer accounts for late payments and returned checks.
Classification of Water Sales - Potable
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Classification of Water Sales
FY 2016
8
Current Proposed Accounts Unit Sales Budget
Residential 45,102 6,064,600 23,445,900$
Conservation Tier (< 5 hcf)2.13$ 2.53$
6 - 10 3.32 3.95
11 - 22 4.32 5.13
over 23 hcf 6.65 7.90
Multi-Residential 822 1,449,400 6,016,400
0 - 4 3.28 3.90
5 - 9 4.25 5.05
over 10 hcf 6.56 7.80
Public and Commercial 1,459 1,860,400 7,152,100
Tier I 3.51 4.17
Tier II 3.56 4.23
Tier III 3.62 4.30
Agriculture, Landscaping, and Construction 1,350 1,432,600 7,430,000
Tier I 4.78 5.68
Tier II 4.83 5.74
Tier III 4.89 5.81
Total 48,733 10,807,000 44,044,400$
Government Fee 0.37 0.41 - - 406,200
Total Water Sales 48,733 10,807,000 44,450,600$
Units %
Residential 6,064,600 60.0%
Multi-Residential 1,449,400 10.0%
Public and Commercial 1,860,400 20.0%
Agricultural, Landscaping &
Construction 1,432,600 10.0%
Total Water Sales 10,807,000 100.0%
Water Sales Summary by Service Class - Potable
FY 2017
FY 2017 Unit Sales by Service Class
(1) Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2017.
Water Rates
(1)
9
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget
Residential 7,836,873 8,050,828 7,248,930 6,003,646 6,954,400 6,064,600
Multi-Residential 1,495,057 1,536,902 1,482,502 1,422,541 1,326,700 1,449,400
Public and Commercial 2,031,253 2,056,075 2,049,294 1,886,429 1,802,500 1,860,400
Agricultural and Landscaping 1,723,839 1,931,856 1,795,230 1,231,985 1,529,900 1,278,200
Temporary and Fire Services 102,020 144,458 168,469 155,042 90,600 154,400
Total Unit Sales 13,189,042 13,720,119 12,744,425 10,699,643 11,704,100 10,807,000
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget
Residential 44,670 44,826 44,941 45,005 45,025 45,102
Multi-Residential 800 798 806 822 862 822
Public and Commercial 1,493 1,449 1,453 1,459 1,470 1,459
Agricultural and Landscaping 1,227 1,229 1,227 1,231 1,228 1,231
Temporary and Fire Services 772 846 881 882 869 882
Total Meter Count 48,962 49,148 49,308 49,399 49,454 49,496
Unit Sales History and Meter Count by Customer Class - Potable
Unit Sales in thousands and Meter Count Trends
Actual
Actual
FY 2016
FY 2016
5,000
15,000
25,000
35,000
45,000
55,000
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
Potable Meters Potable Unit Sales
Units Meters
10
System Fees - Potable
FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2017
Meter Size Count Current Proposed Budget Budget $%
All Service Types
0.75 43,788 18.91$ 15.91$ 10,046,600$ 9,138,300$ (908,300)$ -9.0%
1.00 2,595 26.71 22.47 789,800 765,700 (24,100) -3.1%
1.50 948 46.22 38.88 527,800 483,800 (44,000) -8.3%
2.00 1,097 69.61 58.55 915,400 839,900 (75,500) -8.2%
3.00 80 132.02 111.04 118,800 115,300 (3,500) -2.9%
4.00 197 202.24 170.10 450,000 434,700 (15,300) -3.4%
6.00 20 397.31 334.18 77,300 87,800 10,500 13.6%
8.00 3 631.37 531.05 23,000 20,900 (2,100) -9.1%
10.00 5 904.44 760.72 55,000 50,000 (5,000) -9.1%
Sub-total 48,733 13,003,700 11,936,400 (1,067,300) -8.2%
Fire Services
0.63 709 24.69 20.77 207,300 193,400 (13,900) -6.7%
0.75 12 24.69 20.77 2,700 3,300 600 22.2%
1.00 26 24.69 20.77 7,800 7,100 (700) -9.0%
2.00 16 24.69 20.77 4,800 4,400 (400) -8.3%
3.00 - 24.69 20.77 - - -
4.00 - 33.27 27.98 - - -
10.00 - 33.27 27.98 - - -
Sub-total 763 222,600 208,200 (14,400) -6.5%
Turn Over Fees 10.00 10.00 66,000 60,000 (6,000)
Total 49,496 13,292,300$ 12,204,600$ (1,087,700)$ -8.2%
(1) Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2017.
Historical System Fees, in millions ($)
Budget to Budget VarianceSystem Fees
$-
$5
$10
$15
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
(1)
11
FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2017
Meter Size Count Current Proposed Budget Budget $%
0.75 43,781 16.84$ 15.00$ 8,004,300$ 8,356,300$ 352,000$ 4.4%
1.00 2,587 31.24 27.84 873,300 917,000 43,700 5.0%
1.50 943 70.66 62.96 717,800 755,600 37,800 5.3%
2.00 1,095 120.17 107.08 1,414,600 1,486,600 72,000 5.1%
3.00 80 255.60 227.75 208,800 229,300 20,500 9.8%
4.00 102 409.32 364.72 432,200 462,700 30,500 7.1%
6.00 18 837.89 746.59 145,700 171,100 25,400 17.4%
8.00 3 1,353.09 1,205.65 44,100 46,100 2,000 4.5%
10.00 5 1,947.62 1,735.39 105,800 110,500 4,700 4.4%
Total 48,614 11,946,600$ 12,535,200$ 588,600$ 4.9%
(1) Construction Meters, Fire Services, and Recycled Meters are exempt from MWD and CWA Fixed Fees.
(2) Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2017.
Historical MWD and CWA Fixed Fees, in millions ($)
Budget to Budget Variance
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees (Pass-Through) - Potable
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
(1)(2)
12
Meter Size Meter Sales Installation Fee Meter Fee Total Fees Budget
0.75 97 103.90$ 218.94$ 322.84$ 31,300$
1.00 - 103.90 282.52 386.42 -
1.50 1 103.90 459.21 563.11 600
2.00 10 103.90 658.00 761.90 7,600
3.00 2 625.55 2,050.60 2,676.15 5,400
4.00 5 625.55 3,561.56 4,187.11 20,900
6.00 - 988.10 6,151.79 7,139.89 -
8.00 - 1,515.16 7,686.20 9,201.36 -
10.00 - 1,515.16 11,054.19 12,569.35 -
Total 115 65,800$
Meter Fees - Potable
Meter Fees:Charges collected for new water service connections. Fees vary depending upon
meter size and type of service. The costs associated with meter installations are included in the
Operating Expenses section of the budget. These charges are funded by developers.
Historical Meter Count
FY 2017
-
15,000
30,000
45,000
60,000
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
13
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget
Water Sales 40,845,630$ 46,856,253$ 44,025,774$ 37,257,765$ 41,344,900$ 44,450,600$
System Fees 10,315,199 11,152,291 12,380,370 13,346,390 13,292,300 12,204,600
Energy Fees 1,964,062 2,114,844 2,134,865 2,147,885 2,311,300 2,164,200
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees 9,747,977 10,309,983 10,846,411 11,875,844 11,946,600 12,535,200
Penalties 796,426 839,025 894,569 822,191 888,600 884,000
Total Potable Revenues 63,669,294$ 71,272,396$ 70,281,989$ 65,450,075$ 69,783,700$ 72,238,600$
Revenue History - Potable
Revenue History - Potable, in millions ($)
Actual
FY 2016
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
Water Sales System Fees Energy Fees MWD & CWA Fixed Fees Penalties
14
FY 2017 FY 2017
Budget Projected Budget Projected Budget Budget $ %
Potable Water Purchases (CWA):
Rate Effective January 1,165.00$ 1,165.00$ 1,255.00$ 90$ 7.7%
Budgeted Sales 26,868.7 24,563.0 24,809.2 28,254,195$ 30,968,000$ 29,940,200$ (1,027,800)$ -3.3%
District & Unbilled Usage 61.2 71.9 66.6 77,017 70,800 80,200 9,400 13.3%
Water Loss 1,122.1 763.7 1,036.5 882,205 1,293,300 1,250,900 (42,400) -3.3%
Total Variable Charges 28,052.0 25,398.6 25,912.3 29,213,416$ 32,332,100$ 31,271,300$ (1,060,800) -3.3%
CWA and MWD Fixed Charges:
CWA - Infrastructure Access Charge 1,930,962$ 1,931,400$ 1,976,400$ 45,000$ 2.3%
CWA - Customer Service Charge 1,778,098 1,777,800 1,714,200 (63,600) -3.6%
CWA - Emergency Storage Charge 4,681,730 4,681,800 4,579,800 (102,000) -2.2%
CWA - Reliability Fixed Charge 950,168 950,400 1,848,000 897,600 94.4%
MWD - Capacity Reservation Charge 883,203 806,400 988,800 182,400 22.6%
MWD - Readiness-to-Serve Charge 1,644,998 1,798,800 1,428,000 (370,800) -20.6%
Total Fixed Charges 11,869,159$ 11,946,600$ 12,535,200$ 588,600$ 4.9%
Total Variable and Fixed Charges 41,082,575$ 44,278,700$ 43,806,500$ (472,200)$ -1.1%
Average Cost Per Acre-Foot 1,618$ 1,578$ 1,691$
Budget to Budget
Acre Feet
Water Purchases and Related Costs - Potable
Variance
FY 2016 FY 2016
Purchase Costs
-
8,000.0
16,000.0
24,000.0
32,000.0
40,000.0
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
Historical Potable Water Purchases, in acre-feet
15
Power Costs - Potable
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget $ %
164,785$ 179,919$ 216,744$ 216,300$ 225,700$ 220,600$ (5,100)$ -2.3%
Potable Transmission 1,610,428 1,878,026 2,063,318 1,939,097 2,146,700 1,974,100 (172,600) -8.0%
Total Power Costs 1,775,213$ 2,057,945$ 2,280,061$ 2,155,397$ 2,372,400$ 2,194,700$ (177,700)$ -7.5%
Budget to Budget
Variance
Administrative Buildings
Historical Power Costs, in thousands ($)
Actual
FY 2016
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
Administrative Buildings Potable Transmission
16
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Administrative Expenditures
Directors' Fees 20,382$ 23,400$ 30,000$ 33,000$ 3,000$ 10.0%
Travel and Meetings 158,205 165,042 214,400 208,600 (5,800) (2.7%)
Conservation and Outreach 144,026 163,480 176,900 177,400 500 0.3%
General Office Expense 257,756 252,748 284,700 265,500 (19,200) (6.7%)
Equipment 1,230,413 999,426 1,106,500 1,109,300 2,800 0.3%
Fees 481,243 476,364 470,900 600,600 129,700 27.5%
Services 1,526,937 1,676,027 2,224,600 1,952,500 (272,100) (12.2%)
Training 77,232 66,335 99,000 126,000 27,000 27.3%
Utilities 14,184 21,500 14,900 14,900 - 0.0%
General Expenses 821,303 773,198 836,000 825,000 (11,000) (1.3%)
Bad Debt Expense 91,269 91,005 148,000 99,800 (48,200) (32.6%)
Subtotal before Overhead 4,822,950$ 4,708,525$ 5,605,900$ 5,412,600$ (193,300)$ (3.4%)
Less: Overhead Allocation (782,314) (784,429) (740,700) (822,800) (82,100) 11.1%
Total Expenditures 4,040,636$ 3,924,096$ 4,865,200$ 4,589,800$ (275,400)$ (5.7%)
4,403,925$ 5,400,900$ 6,237,600$
Directors' Fees 33,000$ 0.6%
Travel and Meetings 208,600 3.9%
Conservation and Outreach 177,400 3.3%
General Office Expense 265,500 4.9%
Equipment 1,109,300 20.6%
Fees 600,600 11.1%
Services 1,952,500 36.1%
Training 126,000 2.3%
Utilities 14,900 0.3%
General Expenses 825,000 15.2%
Bad Debt Expense 99,800 1.8%
Subtotal 5,412,600$ 100.0%
Less: Overhead Allocation (822,800)
Total Administrative Expenses 4,589,800$
Administrative Expenditures - Potable
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Administrative Expenditures - Potable
FY 2016
17
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Potable
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Materials and Maintenance
Fuel and Oil 184,027 213,364$ 235,600$ 207,500 (28,100)$ (11.9%)
Meters and Materials 110,956 134,336 113,100 156,700 43,600 38.5%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 118,367 127,182 127,400 124,800 (2,600) (2.0%)
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 358,197 456,250 433,500 445,700 12,200 2.8%
Chemicals 190,169 192,534 225,500 199,600 (25,900) (11.5%)
Safety Equipment 39,343 75,285 126,300 51,000 (75,300) (59.6%)
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 34,655 31,550 31,000 36,300 5,300 17.1%
Other Materials and Supplies 173,865 157,672 185,200 177,200 (8,000) (4.3%)
Building and Grounds Materials 55,375 50,000 47,900 56,000 8,100 16.9%
Contracted Services 478,442 546,523 642,800 653,800 11,000 1.7%
Total Expenditures 1,743,396$ 1,984,696$ 2,168,300$ 2,108,600$ (59,700)$ (2.8%)
Fuel and Oil 207,500$ 9.9%
Meters and Materials 156,700 7.4%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 124,800 5.9%
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 445,700 21.1%
Chemicals 199,600 9.5%
Safety Equipment 51,000 2.4%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 36,300 1.7%
Other Materials and Supplies 177,200 8.4%
Building and Grounds Materials 56,000 2.7%
Contracted Services 653,800 31.0%
2,108,600$ 100.0%
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Potable
FY 2016
18
FY 2015 FY 2017
31-Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Revenues
#Recycled Water Sales 8,853,010$ 7,847,149$ 9,116,000$ 8,900,300$ (215,700)$ (2.4%)
#Meter Fees 4,081 3,353 400 400 - 0.0%#Interest 14,608 10,985 6,300 8,300 2,000 31.7%
Total Revenues 8,871,699$ 7,861,488$ 9,122,700$ 8,909,000$ (213,700)$ (2.3%)
Expenditures
Recycled Water Purchases 1,360,807 1,848,699 1,705,800 3,615,900 1,910,100 112.0%
#Power 600,799 539,100 563,600 568,900 5,300 0.9%
#Labor and Benefits 1,258,945 1,299,067 1,181,600 1,339,200 157,600 13.3%
#Administrative Expenses 290,362 356,686 321,800 331,200 9,400 2.9%
#Materials and Maintenance 270,990 226,685 287,800 305,000 17,200 6.0%
11 Subtotal - Operations Costs 3,781,903$ 4,270,237$ 4,060,600$ 6,160,200$ 2,099,600$ 51.7%
D Transfer to GF Reserve - - - 1,371,800 1,371,800 100.0%
#Expansion Reserve 2,538,900 2,695,800 2,695,800 455,600 (2,240,200) (83.1%)
B Betterment Reserve 725,000 1,945,000 1,945,000 835,200 (1,109,800) (57.1%)
R Replacement Reserve 1,679,000 328,000 328,000 - (328,000) (100.0%)
TOTransfer to OPEB 57,300 58,300 58,300 51,200 (7,100) (12.2%)
NTransfer to New Supply Fund - 35,000 35,000 35,000 - 0.0%
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 5,000,200$ 5,062,100$ 5,062,100$ 2,748,800$ (2,313,300)$ (45.7%)
Total Expenditures 8,782,103$ 9,332,337$ 9,122,700$ 8,909,000$ (213,700)$ (2.3%)
89,596$ (1,470,849)$ -$ -$ -$ Excess Revenues/Expenditures
Operating Budget Summary - Recycled
Budget to Budget
VarianceFY 2016
19
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Water Sales 6,412,122$ 5,677,101$ 6,694,500$ 6,702,300$ 7,800$ 0.1%
System Fees 431,121 469,266 464,300 432,800 (31,500) -6.8%
Energy Fees 369,302 349,800 399,200 379,100 (20,100) -5.0%
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,611,764 1,320,077 1,522,900 1,351,000 (171,900) -11.3%
Penalties 28,701 30,905 35,100 35,100 - 0.0%
Total Recycled Water Sales 8,853,010$ 7,847,149$ 9,116,000$ 8,900,300$ (215,700)$ -2.4%
Water Sales 6,702,300$ 75.3%
System Fees 432,800 4.9%
Energy Fees 379,100 4.3%
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,351,000 15.2%
Penalties 35,100 0.4%
8,900,300$ 100.0%
Water Sales: Water rates vary among classes of service and are charged per unit of water. A unit of water is equal to 100
cubic feet of water. On January 1, 2009, the District implemented a tiered rate structure for all customer types to
encourage conservation and bring equity among the classes.
System Fees: Each water service customer pays a monthly system charge for water system replacement, maintenance,
and operation expenses. The charge is based on the size of the meter.
Energy Fees: The energy pumping fee is $ .044 per 100 cubic feet of water for each 100 feet of lift above the elevation
of 450 feet. All water customers are in one of 29 zones based on elevation.
MWD and CWA Rebates: Incentive from MWD and CWA for providing recycled water. The District receives $200
from CWA and $185 from MWD for every acre-foot (AF) of recycled water sold.
Penalties: Charges and penalties are imposed on customer accounts for late payments and returned checks.
Classification of Water Sales - Recycled
Budget to Budget Variance
FY 2017 Classification of Water Sales
FY 2016
20
Current Proposed Accounts Unit Sales Budget
Recycled .75" and 1.0" Meter 102 47,600 209,200$
0 - 32 units 4.08$ 4.85$
33 - 75 units 4.14 4.92
over 76 units 4.20 4.99
Recycled 1.5" and 2.0" Meter 590 1,044,700 4,607,500
0 - 130 units 4.08 4.85
131 - 325 units 4.14 4.92
over 326 units 4.20 4.99
Recycled 3.0" and 4.0" Meter 11 81,000 358,300
0 - 440 units 4.08 4.85
441 - 1,050 units 4.14 4.92
over 1,051 units 4.20 4.99
Recycled more than 6.0" Meter 1 53,700 236,500
0 - 4,000 units 4.08 4.85
4,001 - 10,000 units 4.14 4.92
over 10,000 units 4.20 4.99
Recycled Temporary 3.0" and 4.0" Meter 40,000 177,600
0 - 440 units 4.08 4.85 3
441 - 1,050 units 4.14 4.92
over 1,051 units 4.20 4.99
Recycled Temporary more than 6.0" Meter 1 19,300 85,700
0 - 4,000 units 4.08 4.85
4,001 - 10,000 units 4.14 4.92
over 10,000 units 4.20 4.99
Recycled Commercial <10" Meter 1 108,100 357,800
0 - 440 units 2.97 3.53
441 - 1,050 units 3.03 3.60
over 1,051 units 3.07 3.65
Recycled Commercial >10" Meter 1 134,100 432,200
0 - 4,000 units 2.97 3.53
4,001 - 10,000 units 3.03 3.60
over 10,000 units 3.07 3.65
Total 710 1,528,500 6,464,800$
Government Fee 0.37 0.41 - - 237,500
Total Water Sales 710 1,528,500 6,702,300$
(1) Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2017.
FY 2017
Water Sales Summary by Meter Size - Recycled
Water Rates
(1)
21
Unit Sales History and Meter Count by Customer Class - Recycled
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget
Recycled .75" & 1.0" Meter 59,698 68,523 63,142 50,602 49,300 47,600
Recycled 1.5" & 2.0" Meter 1,366,238 1,474,879 1,365,116 934,973 1,253,400 1,044,700
Recycled 3.0" & 4.0" Meter 100,991 115,794 103,125 111,237 87,100 81,000
Recycled > 6.0" Meter 352,023 363,760 192,003 66,700 214,700 53,700
Recycled-Temp 3" & 4" Meter - 18,592 - 66,573 - 40,000
Recycled-Temp > 6" Meter - 26,782 - 44,933 - 19,300
Recycled Commercial <10" Meter - - 67,010 98,808 67,000 108,100
Recycled Commercial >10" Meter - - 51,560 131,417 51,600 134,100
Total Unit Sales 1,878,950 2,068,330 1,841,956 1,505,243 1,723,100 1,528,500
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget
Recycled .75" & 1.0" Meter 103 100 101 101 101 102
Recycled 1.5" & 2.0" Meter 587 588 590 590 591 590
Recycled 3.0" & 4.0" Meter 11 11 11 11 11 11
Recycled > 6.0" Meter 3 1 1 1 1 1
Recycled-Temp 3" & 4" Meter - 1 - 3 - 3
Recycled-Temp > 6" Meter - 1 - 1 - 1
Recycled Commercial <10" Meter - - 1 1 1 1
Recycled Commercial >10" Meter - - 1 1 1 1
Total Meter Count 704 702 705 709 706 710
Unit Sales in thousands ($) and Meter Count Trends
Actual
Actual
FY 2016
FY 2016
100
300
500
700
900
100
500
900
1,300
1,700
2,100
2,500
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
Meter Count Recycled Unit Sales
22
System Fees - Recycled
FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2017
Meter Size Meter Count Current Proposed Budget Budget $%
0.75 2 18.91$ 15.91$ 500$ 400$ (100)$ -20.0%
1.00 100 26.71 22.47 32,100 29,500 (2,600) -8.1%
1.50 395 46.22 38.88 222,400 201,700 (20,700) -9.3%
2.00 195 69.61 58.55 165,000 149,900 (15,100) -9.2%
3.00 4 132.02 111.04 6,400 5,800 (600) -9.4%
4.00 10 202.24 170.10 17,200 22,300 5,100 29.7%
6.00 3 397.31 334.18 9,700 13,200 3,500 36.1%
8.00 - 631.37 531.05 - - - 0.0%
10.00 1 904.44 760.72 11,000 10,000 (1,000) -9.1%
Total 710 464,300$ 432,800$ (31,500)$ -6.8%
(1) Proposed rates for water billed beginning in January 2017.
Budget to Budget Variance
Historical System Fees, in thousands ($)
System Fees
100
200
300
400
500
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
(1)
23
Meter Size Meter Sales Installation Fee Meter Fee Total Fees Budget
0.75 - 103.90$ 218.94$ 318.69$ -$
1.00 1 103.90 282.52 381.45 400
1.50 - 103.90 459.21 555.87 -
2.00 - 103.90 658.00 752.11 -
3.00 - 625.55 2,050.60 2,641.76 -
4.00 - 625.55 3,561.56 4,133.31 -
6.00 - 988.10 6,151.79 7,048.13 -
8.00 - 1,515.16 7,686.20 9,083.12 -
10.00 - 1,515.16 11,054.19 12,407.83 -
Total 1 400$
Meter Fees - Recycled
Historical Meter Count
Meter Fees:Charges collected for new water service connections. Fees vary depending upon
meter size and type of service. The costs associated with meter installations are included in the
Operating Expenses section of the budget. These charges are funded by developers.
FY 2017
550
575
600
625
650
675
700
725
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
24
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget
Water Sales 6,148,619$ 7,416,631$ 6,412,122$ 5,677,101$ 6,694,500$ 6,702,300$
System Fees 292,201 356,806 431,121 469,266 464,300 432,800
Energy Fees 346,064 383,513 369,302 349,800 399,200 379,100
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,660,736 1,828,134 1,611,764 1,320,077 1,522,900 1,351,000
Penalties 40,867 29,682 28,701 30,905 35,100 35,100
Total Recycled Revenues 8,488,487$ 10,014,766$ 8,853,010$ 7,847,149$ 9,116,000$ 8,900,300$
Revenue History - Recycled
Revenue History - Recycled, in millions ($)
FY 2016
Actual
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
Water Sales System Fees Energy Fees MWD and CWA Rebates Penalties
25
FY 2017 FY 2017
Budget Projected Budget Projected Budget Budget $ %
Rate Per Acre Feet 505.67$ 348.00$ 756.00$ 408.00$ 117.2%
Recycled Water Purchases 2,906.4 2,399.2 2,459.6 1,213,228$ 949,900$ 1,859,300$ 909,400 95.7%
Meter Fee $1,333.75 monthly 17,841 19,800 16,000 (3,800) -19.2%
Take-or-pay contract (1)1,910.8 1,804.0 2,302.4 617,630 736,100 1,740,600 1,004,500 136.5%
Total 4,817.2 4,203.2 4,762.0 1,848,699$ 1,705,800$ 3,615,900$ 1,910,100$ 112.0%
Average Cost Per Acre-Foot (Effective Rate)770.53$ 586.91$ 1,470.10$
(1) This is the anticipated take-or-pay amount to be paid to the City of San Diego. The contract requires
the purchase of a minimum volume of water. The District does not anticipate meeting the
minimum therefore, a payment would be due to the City of San Diego.
Water Purchases - Recycled
HISTORICAL RECYCLED WATER PURCHASES, IN ACRE-FEET
Variance
Budget to BudgetFY 2016
Purchase CostsAcre Feet
FY 2016
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
26
Power Costs - Recycled
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Total Power
Cost 471,139$ 591,883$ 469,400$ 539,100$ 563,600$ 568,900$ 5,300$ 0.9%
Budget to Budget
Variance
Historical Power Costs, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
27
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Administrative Expenditures
Equipment - 1,300 3,300 2,000 153.8%
Fees 25,587 25,600 25,500 (100) (0.4%)
Services 57,491 105,200 87,200 (18,000) (17.1%)
Subtotal before Overhead 83,078$ 132,100$ 116,000$ (16,100)$ (12.2%)
Add: Overhead Allocation 207,284 189,700 215,100 25,400 13.4%
Total Expenditures 290,362$ 321,800$ 331,100$ 9,300$ 2.9%
Equipment 3,300$ 1.0%
Fees 25,500 7.7%
Services 87,200 26.3%
Overhead Allocation 215,100 65.0%
331,100$ 100.0%
FY 2017 Administrative Expenditures - Recycled
Administrative Expenditures - Recycled
Budget to Budget
Variance
28
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Materials and Maintenance
Fuel and Oil 12,370$ 11,046$ 15,000$ 34,800$ 19,800$ 132.0%
Meters and Materials 865 3,931 700 2,500 1,800 257.1%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 81,933 52,500 72,000 75,400 3,400 4.7%
Chemicals 154,979 135,000 170,600 160,200 (10,400) (6.1%)
Safety Equipment 1,386 2,112 1,000 1,500 500 50.0%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 3,971 3,950 4,000 4,000 - -
Other Materials and Supplies 3,439 3,246 5,200 5,000 (200) (3.8%)
Contracted Services 12,047 14,900 19,300 21,600 2,300 11.9%
Total Expenditures 270,990$ 226,685$ 287,800$ 305,000$ 17,200$ 6.0%
Fuel and Oil 34,800$ 11.4%
Meters and Materials 2,500 0.8%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 75,400 24.7%
Chemicals 160,200 52.6%
Safety Equipment 1,500 0.5%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 4,000 1.3%
Other Materials and Supplies 5,000 1.6%
Contracted Services 21,600 7.1%
305,000$ 100.0%
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Recycled
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Recycled
FY 2016
29
Intentionally Left Blank
30
FY 2015 FY 2017
21-Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Revenues
#Sewer Revenues 3,009,634$ 3,154,186$ 3,206,300 2,918,900$ (287,400)$ (9.0%)
#Capacity Fee Revenues 7,510 4,779 - - - (100.0%)
Tax Revenues 44,553 66,464 51,600 51,600 - 0.0%
#Non-operating Revenues 33,760 27,900 37,200 35,500 (1,700) (4.6%)
#Interest 8,727 6,563 8,200 4,300 (3,900) (47.6%)
TF Transfer from Potable General Fund 553,800 - - - - (100.0%)
Total Revenue 3,657,984$ 3,259,892$ 3,303,300$ 3,010,300$ (293,000)$ (8.9%)
Expenditures
#Power 167,475$ 171,886 176,800$ 174,400$ (2,400)$ (1.4%)
#Labor and Benefits 764,133 926,128 681,300 979,300 298,000 43.7%
#Administrative Expenses 172,992 191,622 200,800 229,100 28,300 14.1%
#Materials and Maintenance 1,325,391 1,156,776 1,156,700 1,042,700 (114,000) (9.9%)
11 Subtotal - Operations Costs 2,429,991$ 2,446,412$ 2,215,600$ 2,425,500$ 209,900$ 9.5%
DTransfer to General Fund Reserve - - - 196,100 196,100 100.0%
B Betterment Reserve - 455,000 455,000 351,200 (103,800) (22.8%)
R Replacement Reserve 916,200 599,100 599,100 - (599,100) 0.0%
TOTransfer to OPEB 43,800 33,600 33,600 37,500 3,900 11.6%
Subtotal - Reserve Funding 960,000$ 1,087,700$ 1,087,700$ 584,800$ (502,900)$ (46.2%)
Total Expenditures 3,389,991$ 3,534,112$ 3,303,300$ 3,010,300$ (293,000)$ (8.9%)
267,993$ (274,220)$ -$ -$ -$
Excess Revenue/(Expenditures)
Operating Budget Summary - Sewer
Budget to Budget
VarianceFY 2016
31
FY 2017 FY 2017
Accounts Current Proposed(1)Projected Budget Budget $%
Residential 4,552 2.46$ 2.58$ 1,651,203$ 1,572,800$ 1,429,300$ (143,500)$ -9.1%
Multi-Residential 50 2.46 2.58 220,783 187,700 188,600 900 0.5%
Commercial
Low Strength 45 2.46 2.58 13,146 53,300 48,400 (4,900) -9.2%
Medium Strength 13 3.53 3.70 43,792 33,600 15,400 (18,200) -54.2%
High Strength 7 5.63 5.90 22,905 17,500 30,200 12,700 72.6%
Schools 6 2.46 2.46 167,412 109,900 84,600 (25,300) -23.0%
Churches 4 2.46 2.46 9,957 8,500 10,400 1,900 22.4%
Subtotal Commercial 75 257,211 222,800 189,000 (33,800) -15.2%
Total Sewer Charges 4,677 2,129,198$ 1,983,300$ 1,806,900$ (176,400)$ -8.9%
Single-Family 1,429,300$ 79.1%
Multi-Family 188,600 10.4%
Commercial 189,000 10.5%
1,806,900$ 100.0%
(1)Proposed rates for sewer service beginning in January 2017.
FY 2017 Charges Summary by Service Class
Charges Summary by Service Class - Sewer
Usage Fee
Budget to Budget
VarianceFY 2016
32
FY 2017 Current Proposed (1)FY 2017
Meter Size Accounts Rates Rates Projected Budget Budget $%
Residential 4,552 17.19$ 15.89$ 829,120$ 824,900$ 903,400$ 78,500$ 9.5%
Multi-Residential/Commercial
0.75 22 27.07 28.37 6,497 6,700 7,300 600 9.0%
1.00 6 39.89 41.80 2,393 2,800 2,900 100 3.6%
1.50 20 71.82 75.27 16,375 16,800 17,600 800 4.8%
2.00 63 110.17 115.46 80,644 81,400 85,300 3,900 4.8%
3.00 6 199.66 209.24 14,376 14,000 14,800 800 5.7%
4.00 6 327.51 343.23 23,581 23,000 24,200 1,200 5.2%
6.00 1 647.12 678.18 7,765 7,600 8,000 400 5.3%
8.00 - 1,030.67 1,080.14 - - - -
10.00 1 1,478.12 1,549.07 17,737 17,300 18,200 900 5.2%
Total System Fee 4,677 998,488$ 994,500$ 1,081,700$ 87,200$
(1)Proposed rates for sewer service beginning in January 2017.
System Fees - Sewer
Budget to Budget VarianceFY 2016
33
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget
Sewer Charges 2,588,991$ 2,736,867$ 2,986,734$ 3,127,686$ 3,173,000$ 2,888,600$
Penalties 29,300 21,000 22,900 26,500 33,300 30,300
Total 2,618,291$ 2,757,867$ 3,009,634$ 3,154,186$ 3,206,300$ 2,918,900$
Revenue History - Sewer
Revenue History - Sewer, in thousands ($)
Actual
FY 2016
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
Sewer Charges Penalties
34
Power Costs - Sewer
FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2017
Projected Budget Budget $ %
Total Power
Cost $ 184,108 159,018$ 167,475$ 171,886$ 176,800$ 174,400$ (2,400)$ -1.4%
Historical Power Costs, in thousands ($)
Budget to Budget
Variance
Actual
FY 2016
$120
$160
$200
FY 2013
Actual
FY 2014
Actual
FY 2015
Actual
FY 2016
Projected
FY 2016
Budget
FY 2017
Budget
35
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Administrative Expenditures
Equipment 3,575$ 114 4,500$ 16,500$ 12,000$ 266.7%
Fees 6,715 3,662 2,500 6,700 4,200 168.0%
Services 35,508 29,288 80,000 42,700 (37,300) (46.6%)
Bad Debt Expense 2,222 3,100 7,000 5,200 (1,800) (25.7%)
Total 48,020$ 36,164$ 94,000$ 71,100$ (22,900)$ (24.4%)
Add: Overhead Allocation 124,972 155,458 106,800 158,000 51,200 47.9%
Total Expenditures 172,992$ 191,622$ 200,800$ 229,100$ 28,300$ 14.1%
Equipment 16,500$ 7.2%
Fees 6,700 2.9%
Services 42,700 18.6%
Bad Debt Expense 5,200 2.3%
Overhead Allocation 158,000 68.9%
229,100$ 99.9%
Administrative Expenditures - Sewer
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Administrative Expenditures - Sewer
FY 2016
36
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Materials and Maintenance
Fleet Parts and Equipment 4,689$ 6,730 1,500$ 5,000$ 3,500$ 233.3%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 72,609 92,980 115,800 105,600 (10,200) (8.8%)
Chemicals 4,507 3,466 4,500 4,500 - -
Safety Equipment 44 - - - - -
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 5,221 4,500 5,000 5,000 - -
Other Materials and Supplies 2,884 200 100 100 - -
Contracted Services 26,924 52,500 33,400 87,300 53,900 161.4%
Subtotal Materials and Maintenance 116,878$ 160,376$ 160,300$ 207,500$ 47,200$ 29.4%
Sewer Charges
Metro O&M Costs 1,020,276 815,000 815,000$ 655,000 (160,000)$ (19.6%)
Spring Valley Sewer Charge 188,237 181,400 181,400 180,200 (1,200) (0.7%)
Subtotal Sewer Charges 1,208,513 996,400 996,400 835,200 (161,200) (16.2%)
Total Expenditures 1,325,391$ 1,156,776$ 1,156,700$ 1,042,700$ (114,000)$ (9.9%)
Fleet Parts and Equipment 5,000$ 0.5%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 105,600 10.1%
Chemicals 4,500 0.4%
Laboratory Equipment & Supplies (1)5,100 0.5%
Contracted Services 87,300 8.4%
Metro O&M Costs 655,000 62.8%
Spring Valley Sewer Charge 180,200 17.3%
1,042,700$ 100.0%
Includes Other Materials & Supplies.
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Sewer
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Sewer
FY 2016
(1)
37
Intentionally Left Blank
38
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Fee Revenues
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,312,108$ 1,333,993$ 1,134,800$ 1,248,200$ 113,400$ 10.0%
Betterment Fees for Maintenance 188,123 - - - - 0.0%
Subtotal Fee Revenues 1,500,231 1,333,993 1,134,800 1,248,200 113,400 10.0%
Tax Revenues
1% General Tax 3,128,961 3,578,243 3,213,000 3,354,800 141,800 4.4%
Availability Fees 685,555 503,273 684,900 678,300 (6,600) (1.0%)
Subtotal Tax Revenues 3,814,516 4,081,516 3,897,900 4,033,100 135,200 3.5%
General Revenue 5,314,747$ 5,415,508$ 5,032,700$ 5,281,300$ 248,600$ 4.9%
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Property Rental 1,232,920$ 1,286,201$ 1,269,800$ 1,310,300$ 40,500 3.2%
Sewer Billing Fees 375,741 315,724 375,500 383,100 7,600 2.0%
Set-up Fee for Lease Site 24,500 4,500 - - - 0.0%
Revenue from Shared Facility 33,760 27,900 37,200 35,500 (1,700) (4.6%)
Miscellaneous 737,454 331,801 191,100 450,400 259,300 135.7%
Non-Operating Revenue 2,404,375$ 1,966,125$ 1,873,600$ 2,179,300$ 305,700$ 16.3%
General and Non-Operating Revenues by Business (1)
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
Capacity Fee Revenues 1,248,200$ -$ -$ 1,248,200$
1% General Tax 3,354,800 - - 3,354,800
Availability Fees 626,700 - 51,600 678,300
Property Rental 1,310,300 - - 1,310,300
Sewer Billing Fees 383,100 - - 383,100
Revenue from Shared Facility - - 35,500 35,500
Miscellaneous 450,400 - - 450,400
Total General and Non-Operating Revenue 7,373,500$ -$ 87,100$ 7,460,600$
(1) For General and Non-Operating Revenues, the Potable Fund serves as the District's General Fund for accounting purposes.
FY 2017
Budget to Budget
Variance
General Revenues (1)
Budget to Budget
Variance
Non-Operating Revenues (1)
FY 2016
FY 2016
39
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
General Expense
Labor and Benefits (1)1,487,720$ 1,405,623$ 1,183,400$ 1,181,400$ (2,000)$ (0.2%)
Legal Fees 174,636 187,198$ 250,000$ 250,000 - 0.0%
General Insurance 645,410 586,000 586,000 575,000 (11,000) (1.9%)
Services 1,257 - - - - 0.0%
Total General Expense 2,309,023$ 2,178,821$ 2,019,400$ 2,006,400$ (13,000)$ (0.6%)
General Expense
Budget to Budget
Variance
(1) Benefits include District-wide labor and benefit costs not attributable to any one department, such as the
effect of cost of living raises on accrued leave liabilities or the Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) costs.
These costs are netted against the District's anticipated Vacancy Factor. The Vacancy Factor for FY 2016 and FY
2017 is $338,300 and $198,700, respectively. Additionally, the labor and benefits shown on this schedule are
those related to operating costs and does not include CIP labor and benefit costs.
FY 2016
40
Board of Directors 117,300$ 0.4%
General Manager 1,737,600 5.6%
General Expense 2,006,300 6.5%
Administrative Services 6,324,800 20.6%
Finance 5,921,000 19.3%
Water Operations 11,309,200 36.7%
Engineering 3,365,600 10.9%
30,781,800$ 100.0%
Departmental Operating Budget
Total FY 2017 Departmental Operating Budget
$30,781,800
41
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projection Budget Budget $ %
Labor Costs 11,177,926$ 11,247,833$ 11,487,900$ 11,644,900$ 157,000$ 1.4%
Benefits
Pension 3,575,595 3,827,976 3,885,300 4,161,600 276,300 7.1%
Employee Assistance Program 3,755 3,851 4,000 4,200 200 5.0%
Workers' Compensation 261,821 244,427 260,000 265,900 5,900 2.3%
Health/Dental/Life Insurance/OPEB 3,611,579 3,851,244 4,012,200 4,072,500 60,300 1.5%
Social Security/Medicare 927,579 938,873 948,200 962,700 14,500 1.5%
Salary Continuation Insurance 56,144 50,052 67,800 89,500 21,700 32.0%
State Unemployment Insurance 9,998 15,566 30,000 30,000 - 0.0%
Vacation/Sick/Holiday/Other Leave 2,277,556 2,362,669 2,195,300 2,263,000 67,700 3.1%
Total Benefits 10,724,027$ 11,294,658$ 11,402,800$ 11,849,400$ 446,600$ 3.9%
Total Labor and Benefits 21,901,953$ 22,542,491$ 22,890,700$ 23,494,300$ 603,600$ 2.6%
Less: Non-Operating Labor and Benefits
Labor Costs 1,062,022 977,519 1,048,100 1,060,800 12,700 1.2%
Benefits Allocation 661,849 649,738 700,500 763,200 62,700 9.0%
Total Non-Operating Labor and Benefits 1,723,871$ 1,627,257$ 1,748,600$ 1,824,000$ 75,400$ 4.3%
Operating Labor & Benefits 20,178,082 20,915,234 21,142,100 21,670,300 528,200 2.5%
Total Overhead Allocation 1,221,325 1,124,147 1,205,300 1,219,900 14,600 1.2%
Less: Admin Portion of Overhead (36.85%)450,058 414,248 444,200 449,500 5,300 1.2%
Total Overhead Allocation Personnel Portion 771,267$ 709,899$ 761,100$ 770,400$ 9,300$ 1.2%
Net Operating Labor and Benefits 19,406,815$ 20,205,335$ 20,381,000$ 20,899,900$ 518,900$ 2.5%
Labor and Benefits
Budget to Budget
VarianceFY 2016
140 138 135
0
40
80
120
Full - Time Equivalent (FTE)
FY 2017FY 2016FY 2015
Actual Budget
42
Labor and Benefits by Fund - Fiscal Year 2017
Potable Recycled Sewer
Developer
Reimbursed-
CIP Total
Operating Labor Costs 9,677,500$ 507,600$ 397,000$ -$ 10,582,100$
Benefits 10,263,500 462,800 358,800 - 11,085,100
Overhead Allocation-Personnel (1,428,600) 368,600 288,400 - (771,600)
Total Operating Labor and Benefits 18,512,400$ 1,339,000$ 1,044,200$ -$ 20,895,600$
CIP Labor Costs 443,200 186,200 135,800 297,300 1,062,500
Benefits 316,500 132,800 86,300 229,100 764,700
Overhead Allocation-Personnel 321,900 135,200 98,600 215,900 771,600
Total CIP Labor and Benefits 1,081,600$ 454,200$ 320,700$ 742,300$ 2,598,800$
Total Labor and Benefits 19,594,000$ 1,793,200$ 1,364,900$ 742,300$ 23,494,400$
Potable-Operating 18,512,400$ 78.8%
Potable-CIP 1,081,600 4.6%
Sewer-Operating 1,044,200 4.4%
Sewer-CIP 320,700 1.4%
Recycle-Operating 1,339,000 5.7%
Recycle-CIP 454,200 1.9%
Develeper Reimbursed-CIP 742,300 3.2%
23,494,400$ 100.0%
43
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
General Manager:
General Manager 1 1 1
Assistant General Manager 1 1 1
District Secretary 1 1 1
Sr. Confidential Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Communications Officer 1 1 1
Communications Assistant 0 0 1
General Manager 5 5 6
Total - General Manager Department 5 5 6
FTE 5 5 6
Administrative Services:
Chief, Administrative Services 1 0 1
Assistant Chief, Administrative Services 0 1 0
Confidential Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Confidential Secretary 1 1 1
Administrative Services 3 3 3
Human Resources:
Human Resources Manager 1 1 1
Senior Human Resources Analyst 1 1 1
Human Resources Analyst 1 1 1
Human Resources 3 3 3
Purchasing:
Purchasing and Facilities Manager 1 1 1
Senior Buyer 1 1 1
Assistant Buyer 1 1 0
Senior Warehouse Worker 0 0 1
Lead Warehouse/Facilities Worker 1 0 0
Warehouse/Delivery Worker 1 1 0
Facilities Maintenance Technician 2 2 2
Purchasing 7 6 5
Safety:
Safety & Security Specialist 1 1 1
Safety 1 1 1
Position Count by Department
44
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Information Technology (IT):
Chief Information Officer 1 1 0
IT Manager 1 1 1
GIS Manager 1 1 1
GIS Programmer/Analyst 1 1 1
GIS Analyst 1 1 1
GIS Technician 1 1 1
Network Engineer 1 1 1
Database Administrator 1 1 1
Data Systems Technician 0 1 1
Lead Business System Analyst 1 0 0
System Support Analyst 0 1 1
Business System Analyst I and II 2 2 2
Network Analyst 1 1 0
Information Technology 12 13 11
Total Administrative Services Department 26 26 23
FTE 26 26 23
Controller and Budgetary Services:
Chief Financial Officer 1 1 1
Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Secretary 1 1 1
Finance Manager, Controller and Budget 1 1 1
Senior Accountant 2 2 2
Accountant 1 1 1
Accounting Technician 1 1 1
Controller and Budgetary Services 8 8 8
Treasury and Accounting Services:
Finance Manager, Treasury and Accounting 1 1 1
Senior Accountant 22 2
Accountant 22 2
Accounting Technician 1 1 1
Treasury and Accounting Services 6 6 6
Customer Service:
Customer Service Manager 2 2 1
Customer Service Supervisor 0 0 1
Lead Customer Service Representative 2 2 1
Customer Service Representative I, II, III 7 6 6
Lead Customer Service Field Representative 1 1 1
Customer Service Field Representative I and II 3 2 2
Customer Service 15 13 12
45
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Conservation:
Sr. Water Conservation Specialist 1 1 1
Conservation 1 1 1
Meter Maintenance:
Lead Cross Connection/Meter Maintenance Worker 1 1 1
Meter Maintenance Worker I & II 3 3 3
Meter Maintenance 4 4 4
Total Finance Department 34 32 31
FTE 34 32 31
Operations Management:
Chief, Water Operations 1 1 1
Assistant Chief, Water Operations 0 1 1
Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Operations Management 2 3 3
Water System Operations:
System Operations Manager 1 1 1
Water Systems Supervisor 1 1 1
Recycled Water Systems Supervisor 1 1 0
Lead Water Systems Operator 2 2 2
Water Systems Operator I, II, and III 9 8 8
Valve Maintenance Worker 1 0 0
Senior SCADA Instrumentation Technician 0 0 2
Sr. Disinfection Technician 2 2 2
Recycled Water Distribution Operator 4 4 0
Water System Operations 21 19 16
Utility Maintenance/Construction:
Utility Services Manager 10 0
Utility Maintenance Supervisor 22 2
Utility Crew Leader 3 3 3
Utility Workers I and II 8 8 8
Senior Utility/Equipment Operator 3 3 3
Valve Maintenance Worker 0 2 2
Pump Electricial Supervisor 1 1 1
Electrician I and II 2 2 2
Pump Mechanic I and II 2 2 2
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor 1 1 1
Equipment Mechanic I and II 3 3 3
Utility Maintenance/Construction 26 27 27
46
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Collection/Treatment/Reclamation Operations:
Reclamation Plant Supervisor 1 1 1
Lead Reclamation Plant Operator 1 1 1
Reclamation Plant Operator I, II, III 2 2 2
Senior SCADA Instrumentation Technician 1 2 0
SCADA Instrumentation Technician 1 0 0
Laboratory Analyst 1 1 1
Collection/Treatment/Reclamation Operations 7 7 5
Total Operations Department 56 56 51
FTE 56 56 51
Engineering Management:
Chief, Engineering 1 1 1
Executive Secretary 1 1 1
Secretary 1 1 1
Engineering Management 3 3 3
Engineering:
Engineering Manager 2 2 2
Senior Civil Engineer 2 2 2
Construction Management Specialist 0 0 0
Associate Civil Engineer 0 1 1
Assistant Civil Engineer I and II 1 0 0
Environmental Compliance Specialist 1 1 1
Permit Technicians 2 2 2
Senior Engineering Technician 22 2
Field Services Manager 0 1 1
Recycled Water Systems Supervisor 0 0 1
Recycled Water Distribution Operator 0 0 3
Inspection Supervisor 1 0 1
Lead Construction Inspector 0 1 0
Construction Inspectors I and II 3 2 3
Supervising Land Surveyor 1 1 1
Assistant Survey Technician 1 1 1
Engineering 16 16 21
Total Engineering Department 19 19 24
FTE 19 19 24
District Total Position Count 140 138 135
FTE 140 138 135
47
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Lab Intern 0 0 1
Senior Civil Engineer 1 0 0
Total Contract/Temporary Employees 1 0 1
General Manager 6.00 4.4%
Administrative Services 23.00 17.0%
Finance 31.00 23.0%
Operations 51.00 37.8%
Engineering 24.00 17.8%
Total 135.00 100.0%
Contract / Temporary Employees
FY 2017 Position Count by Department
48
Operating Expenditures by Department
FY 2015 FY 2017 Budget to
Budget
Actual Projected Budget Budget Variance
Departmental Expenditures
BBoard of Directors 95,949$ 103,573$ 107,100$ 120,300$ 13,200$
GGeneral Manager 1,386,637 1,513,118 1,605,900 1,737,600 131,700
GGeneral Expense 2,309,023 2,178,821 2,019,400 2,006,400 (13,000)
AAdministrative Services 6,338,873 5,888,522 6,681,800 6,324,900 (356,900)
F Finance 5,496,511 5,609,180 6,128,400 5,858,600 (269,800)
WWater Operations 9,991,323 10,737,088 10,911,400 11,316,700 405,300
EEngineering 2,853,591 3,139,741 3,132,900 3,361,700 228,800
TTotal Departmental Expenditures 28,471,907$ 29,170,043$ 30,586,900$ 30,726,200$ 139,300$
Less: Overhead Allocation (1,221,325) (1,124,147) (1,205,300) (1,219,900) (14,600)
Net Departmental Expenditures 27,250,582$ 28,045,896$ 29,381,600$ 29,506,300$ 124,700$
Non-Departmental Expenditures
Water Purchases 46,249,959$ 42,600,573$ 45,984,500$ 47,422,400$ 1,437,900$
Power 3,048,335 2,866,383 3,112,800 2,938,000 (174,800)
Transfer to General Fund Reserve - - - 1,482,500 1,482,500
Expansion Reserve 2,538,900 2,695,800 2,695,800 4,093,600 1,397,800
Betterment Reserve 3,530,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 3,466,400 1,066,400
Replacement Reserve 3,270,200 3,421,000 3,421,000 464,500 (2,956,500)
Transfer to Sewer General Fund 553,800 - - 1,371,800 1,371,800
Transfer to General Fund Reserve 1,583,800 - - - -
Transfer to Sewer Replacement 127,000 1,199,300 1,199,300 - (1,199,300)
Transfer to OPEB 647,100 1,006,000 1,006,000 961,000 (45,000)
Transfer to New Supply Reserve 705,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 -
Total Non-Departmental Expenditure 62,254,094$ 56,224,056$ 59,854,400$ 62,235,200$ 2,380,800$
Total Operating Expenditures 89,504,676$ 84,269,952$ 89,236,000$ 91,741,500$ 2,505,500$
FY 2017 Funding Source by Department, in Millions ($)
FY 2016
$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000
Board of Directors
General Manager
Administrative Services
Finance
Water Operations
General Expense
Potable
Recycled
Sewer
49
Operating Expenditures by Object
FY 2015 FY 2017 Budget to
Budget
Actual Projected Budget Budget Variance
Departmental Expenditures
Labor and Benefits 20,177,577$ 20,915,234$ 21,142,100$ 21,670,200$ 528,100$
Director's Fees 20,382 23,400 30,000 33,000 3,000
Travel and Meetings 158,205 165,042 214,400 208,600 (5,800)
Conservation and Outreach 144,026 163,480 176,900 177,400 500
General Office Expense 257,756 252,748 284,700 265,500 (19,200)
Equipment 1,234,104 999,540 1,113,000 1,129,100 16,100
Fees 1,334,848 1,273,224 1,306,900 1,457,800 150,900
Services 1,619,936 1,827,278 2,409,800 2,082,400 (327,400)
Training 77,232 66,335 99,000 126,000 27,000
Materials & Maintenance 2,131,153 2,371,757 2,615,700 2,621,100 5,400
Power and Utilities 14,184 21,500 14,900 14,900 -
Sewer Charges 1,208,513 996,400 996,400 835,200 (161,200)
Bad Debt Expense 93,491 94,105 155,000 105,000 (50,000)
Total Departmental Expenditures 28,471,407$ 29,170,043$ 30,558,800$ 30,726,200$ 167,400$
Less: Overhead Allocation (1,221,325) (1,124,147) (1,205,300) (1,219,900) (14,600)
Net Departmental Expenditures 27,250,082$ 28,045,896$ 29,353,500$ 29,506,300$ 152,800$
Non-Departmental Expenditures
Water Purchases 46,249,959$ 42,600,573$ 45,984,500$ 47,422,400$ 1,437,900$
Power 3,048,335 2,866,383 3,112,800 2,938,000 (174,800)
Transfer to General Fund Reserve - - - 1,482,500 1,482,500
Expansion Reserve 2,538,900 2,695,800 2,695,800 4,093,600 1,397,800
Betterment Reserve 3,530,000 2,400,000 2,400,000 3,466,400 1,066,400
Replacement Reserve 3,270,200 3,421,000 3,421,000 464,500 (2,956,500)
Transfer to Sewer General Fund 553,800 - - 1,371,800 1,371,800
Transfer to General Fund Reserve 1,583,800 - - - -
Transfer to Sewer Replacement 127,000 1,199,300 1,199,300 - (1,199,300)
Transfer to OPEB 647,100 1,006,000 1,006,000 961,000 (45,000)
Transfer to New Supply Fund 705,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 -
Total Non-Departmental Expenditures 62,254,094$ 56,224,056$ 59,854,400$ 62,235,200$ 2,380,800$
Total Operating Expenditures 89,504,176$ 84,269,952$ 89,207,900$ 91,741,500$ 2,533,600$
-$
FY 2016
50
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $%
Administrative Expenditures
Directors' Fees 20,382$ 23,400$ 30,000$ 33,000$ 3,000$ 10.0%
Travel and Meetings 158,205 165,042 214,400 208,600 (5,800) (2.7%)
Conservation and Outreach 144,026 163,480 176,900 177,400 500 0.3%
General Office Expense 257,756 252,748 284,700 265,500 (19,200) (6.7%)
Equipment 1,233,988 999,540 1,112,300 1,129,100 16,800 1.5%
Fees 513,545 500,026 499,000 632,800 133,800 26.8%
Services 1,619,936 1,827,278 2,409,800 2,082,400 (327,400) (13.6%)
Training 77,232 66,335 99,000 126,000 27,000 27.3%
Utilities 14,184 21,500 14,900 14,900 - 0.0%
General Expenses 821,303 773,198 836,000 825,000 (11,000) (1.3%)
Bad Debt Expense 93,491 94,105 155,000 105,000 (50,000) (32.3%)
Subtotal before Overhead 4,954,048$ 4,886,652$ 5,832,000$ 5,599,700$ (232,300) (4.0%)
Less: Overhead Allocation (450,058) (414,248) (444,200) (449,600) (5,400) 1.2%
Total Expenditures 4,503,990$ 4,472,404$ 5,387,800$ 5,150,100$ (237,700)$ (4.4%)
4,702,612$ 5,605,400$ 6,424,700$
Directors' Fees 33,000$ 0.6%
Travel and Meetings 208,600 3.7%
Conservation & Outreach 177,400 3.2%
General Office Expense 265,500 4.7%
Equipment 1,129,100 20.1%
Fees 632,800 11.3%
Services 2,082,400 37.2%
Training 126,000 2.3%
Utilities 14,900 0.3%
General Expense 825,000 14.7%
Bad Debt Expense 105,000 1.9%
5,599,700$ 100.0%
Less: Overhead Allocation (449,600)
Total Administrative Expenses 5,150,100$
Administrative Expenditures - Total
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Total Administrative Expenditures, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
51
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget $ %
Materials and Maintenance
Fuel and Oil 196,397$ 224,410$ 250,600$ 242,300$ (8,300)$ (3.3%)
Meters and Materials 111,821 138,267 113,800 159,200 45,400 39.9%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 123,056 133,912 128,900 129,800 900 0.7%
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 512,739 601,730 621,300 626,700 5,400 0.9%
Chemicals 349,655 331,000 400,600 364,300 (36,300) (9.1%)
Safety Equipment 40,773 77,397 127,300 52,500 (74,800) (58.8%)
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 43,847 40,000 40,000 45,300 5,300 13.3%
Other Materials and Supplies 180,188 161,118 190,500 182,300 (8,200) (4.3%)
Building and Grounds Materials 55,375 50,000 47,900 56,000 8,100 16.9%
Contracted Services 517,413 613,923 695,500 762,700 67,200 9.7%
Subtotal Materials and Maintenance 2,131,264$ 2,371,757$ 2,616,400$ 2,621,100$ 4,700$ 0.2%
Sewer Charges
Metro O&M Costs 1,020,276 815,000$ 815,000$ 655,000 (160,000)$ (19.6%)
Spring Valley Sewer Charge 188,237 181,400 181,400 180,200 (1,200) (0.7%)
Subtotal Sewer Charges 1,208,513$ 996,400$ 996,400$ 835,200$ (161,200)$ (16.2%)
Total Expenditures 3,339,777$ 3,368,157$ 3,612,800$ 3,456,300$ (156,500)$ (4.3%)
Fuel and Oil 242,300$ 7.0%
Meters and Materials 159,200 4.6%
Fleet Parts and Equipment 129,800 3.8%
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 626,700 18.1%
Chemicals 364,300 10.5%
Safety Equipment 52,500 1.5%
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 45,300 1.2%
Other Materials and Supplies 182,300 5.3%
Building and Grounds Materials 56,000 1.6%
Contracted Services 762,700 22.1%
Sewer Charges 835,200 24.2%
3,456,300$ 99.9%
Materials and Maintenance Expenditures - Total
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2017 Materials and Maintenance Expenditures
FY 2016
52
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Benefits 69,094$ 72,923$ 61,600$ 71,800$
Director's Fees 20,382 23,400 30,000 33,000
Travel and Meetings 6,473 7,250 15,500 15,500
Total Expenses 95,949$ 103,573$ 107,100$ 120,300$
Board of Directors
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
$0
$30
$60
$90
$120
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
11
2
10
9
11
5
10
7
12
0
87
10
0
96
10
4
Budget Actual Projected
53
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 69,094$ 72,923$ 61,600$ 71,800$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 2,280 2,280 2,500 2,500
Travel Expenses 1,902 1,900 7,800 7,800
Conferences and Seminars 1,740 1,740 4,000 4,000
Business Meetings 551 1,330 1,200 1,200
Director's Fees 20,382 23,400 30,000 33,000
Total Administrative Expenses 26,855$ 30,650$ 45,500$ 48,500$
Total Expenses 95,949$ 103,573$ 107,100$ 120,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 1111 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
54
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits 1,152,471$ 1,184,559$ 1,199,600$ 1,349,200$
Travel and Meetings 44,127 44,409 54,600 54,700
Conservation and Outreach 4,061 9,780 6,000 6,000
General Office Expense 2,449 1,008 1,700 1,700
Equipment 2,400 2,953 3,000 3,000
Fees 57,930 49,181 48,000 81,000
Services 123,049 190,000 193,000 122,000
Materials & Maintenance - 31,123 100,000 120,000
Miscellaneous 150 105 - -
Total Expenses 1,386,637$ 1,513,118$ 1,605,900$ 1,737,600$
General Manager
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
$1,000
$1,300
$1,600
$1,900
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1,
4
8
8
1,
4
4
5
1,
5
6
2
1,
6
0
6
1,
7
3
8
1,
4
1
9
1,3
5
4
1,
3
8
7
1,
5
1
3
Budget Actual Projected
55
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 827,495$ 852,678$ 860,600$ 1,000,100$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 2,457 2,800 3,000 3,000
Travel Expenses 284 1,665 5,000 5,000
Conferences and Seminars 1,417 1,843 5,000 5,000
Business Meetings 13,597 10,000 10,000 10,000
Membership and Dues 26,156 28,000 28,000 28,000
Public Recognition Awards 4,061 9,780 6,000 6,000
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 1,984 609 1,200 1,200
Office Supplies 314 399 - -
Printing Expenses 151 - - -
Maintenance and Parts 2,400 2,953 3,000 3,000
Regulatory Agencies Fees 57,930 49,181 48,000 81,000
Outside Services 123,049 190,000 193,000 122,000
Bad Debt 150 105 - -
Total Administrative Expenses 233,950$ 297,335$ 302,700$ 264,700$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Contracted Services - 31,123 100,000 120,000
Total Materials and Maintenance -$ 31,123$ 100,000$ 120,000$
Total Expenses 1,061,445$ 1,181,136$ 1,263,300$ 1,384,800$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 1211 - GENERAL MANAGER
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
56
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 324,976$ 331,881$ 339,000$ 349,100$
Administrative Expenses
Travel Expenses - - 1,500 1,500
Conferences and Seminars 12 - 2,000 2,000
Business Meetings 204 101 100 200
Total Administrative Expenses 216$ 101$ 3,600$ 3,700$
Total Expenses 325,192$ 331,982$ 342,600$ 352,800$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2111 - ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
57
Intentionally Left Blank
58
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual (1)Projected Budget (1)Budget
Labor and Benefits 4,043,199$ 3,961,992$ 4,392,600$ 4,074,300$
Travel and Meetings 43,021 39,080 50,000 52,100
General Office Expense 101,102 90,944 107,400 94,000
Equipment 1,199,608 958,103 1,065,300 1,064,800
Fees 750 977 - -
Services 522,412 377,927 541,600 552,000
Training 63,592 52,699 77,000 103,000
Materials & Maintenance 351,005 385,300 433,000 369,800
Power and Utilities 14,184 21,500 14,900 14,900
Total Expenses 6,338,873$ 5,888,522$ 6,681,800$ 6,324,900$
-$ -$ -$
(1) In FY 2017, IT and Strategic Planning was consolidated into Administrative Services. Prior year
budget and actuals have been adjusted for comparative purposes.
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
Administrative Services
FY 2016
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
3,
6
7
9
6,
2
0
5
6,
3
6
9
6,
6
8
2
6,
3
2
5
2,
8
6
4
5,
9
3
7
6,
3
3
9
5,
8
8
9
Budget Actual Projected
59
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 1,388,931$ 834,040$ 805,700$ 544,200$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 137 15 600 600
Travel Expenses 2,773 1,879 2,000 2,000
Conferences and Seminars 5,265 941 6,000 6,000
Business Meetings 90 36 1,200 1,200
Membership and Dues - 715 800 800
Required Training - - - 1,000
Total Administrative Expenses 8,265$ 3,586$ 10,600$ 11,600$
Total Expenses 1,397,196$ 837,626$ 816,300$ 555,800$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2211 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND IT CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
60
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 582,491$ 605,397$ 599,400$ 621,100$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage - 100 200 200
Travel Expenses 927 2,039 2,000 2,400
Conferences and Seminars 1,356 2,500 1,500 2,000
Business Meetings 1,356 1,000 2,000 2,000
Membership and Dues 913 744 1,100 700
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 699 800 1,300 1,000
Outside Services 24,942 12,000 11,500 112,000
Temporary Employment Services 35,815 - 50,000 10,000
Recruitment Expense 11,212 7,000 14,000 14,000
Tuition Reimbursement 8,992 12,000 15,000 15,000
General Training - - 6,000 22,000
Employee Programs 25,561 22,000 26,000 22,500
Total Administrative Expenses 111,773$ 60,183$ 130,600$ 203,800$
Total Expenses 694,264$ 665,580$ 730,000$ 824,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2221 - HUMAN RESOURCES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
61
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 653,856$ 710,521$ 798,300$ 724,800$
Administrative Expenses
Travel Expenses - 800 1,000 1,000
Conferences and Seminars 117 1,362 300 800
Business Meetings 163 400 400 400
Membership and Dues 578 500 500 700
Office Supplies 26,328 25,800 25,800 25,800
Postage 41,262 39,000 45,000 38,000
Printing Expenses 31,299 24,000 33,400 27,400
Technology Hardware & Software 1,048 - - -
Maintenance and Parts 34,547 34,000 38,700 33,200
Rent and Leases 829 1,200 1,200 1,200
Office Furniture 6,327 5,000 6,500 5,000
Small Tools and Equipment 20,337 30,360 35,300 22,600
Regulatory Agencies Fees 750 977 - -
Outside Services 29,944 55,600 55,600 60,500
Uniforms 48,180 42,000 48,000 42,000
General Training - 2,500 5,000 4,500
Sewer 4,304 4,500 4,500 4,500
Trash Services 9,880 17,000 10,400 10,400
Total Administrative Expenses 255,893$ 284,999$ 311,600$ 278,000$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Building Ground and Materials 52,819 50,000 46,900 55,000
Contracted Services 258,843 259,000 259,800 263,800
Total Materials and Maintenance 311,662$ 309,000$ 306,700$ 318,800$
Total Expenses 1,221,411$ 1,304,520$ 1,416,600$ 1,321,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2231 - PURCHASING
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
62
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 150,417$ 154,179$ 163,000$ 172,200$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 10 228 - -
Travel Expenses 313 - 300 300
Conferences & Seminars 177 398 300 300
Business Meetings 483 478 500 500
Membership and Dues 970 500 500 500
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 531 744 500 500
Outside Services 82,297 24,318 35,000 49,500
Security Services 51,470 43,996 44,000 44,000
Health Exams 14,929 19,539 24,500 16,500
Required Training 21,449 8,000 18,000 26,000
Total Administrative Expenses 172,629$ 99,400$ 123,600$ 138,100$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Safety Equipment 39,343 76,300 126,300 51,000
Total Materials and Maintenance 39,343$ 76,300$ 126,300$ 51,000$
Total Expenses 362,389$ 329,879$ 412,900$ 361,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2241 - SAFETY & SECURITY
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
63
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 619,555$ 977,286$ 1,342,000$ 1,305,100$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage - - 200 200
Travel Expenses 3,754 4,000 600 1,000
Conferences and Seminars 14,915 17,000 17,500 17,500
Business Meetings 46 243 300 300
Membership and Dues 506 450 300 300
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 831 600 600 500
Office Supplies 41 - - -
Communication 311,463 242,493 320,200 318,500
Technology Hardware and Software 587,580 485,005 479,200 472,600
Outside Services 199,320 139,974 215,500 160,000
Total Administrative Expenses 1,118,456$ 889,765$ 1,034,400$ 970,900$
Total Expenses 1,738,011$ 1,867,051$ 2,376,400$ 2,276,000$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2421 - IT OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
64
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 647,949$ 680,569$ 684,200$ 706,900$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 171 55 300 300
Travel Expenses 4,255 1,609 1,000 3,500
Conferences and Seminars 3,577 694 8,000 6,000
Business Meetings 19 102 300 300
Membership and Dues 150 292 300 300
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 111 - 800 800
Tech Hardware and Software 237,477 160,045 184,200 211,700
Outside Services 24,303 33,500 43,500 43,500
General Training 7,590 7,000 7,000 12,000
Total Administrative Expenses 277,653$ 203,297$ 245,400$ 278,400$
Total Expenses 925,602$ 883,866$ 929,600$ 985,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2431 - GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
65
Intentionally Left Blank
66
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits 4,475,530$ 4,420,255$ 4,687,100$ 4,654,200$
Travel and Meetings 17,611 17,131 26,100 25,600
Conservation and Outreach 139,965 153,700 170,900 171,400
General Office Expense 153,875 153,861 167,800 167,800
Fees 354,813 358,400 351,600 363,900
Services 123,313 261,600 432,500 190,400
Training - 500 500 500
Materials & Maintenance 138,063 149,733 136,900 179,800
Bad Debt Expense 93,341 94,000 155,000 105,000
Total Expenses 5,496,511$ 5,609,180$ 6,128,400$ 5,858,600$
-$ -$ -$
Finance
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
$2,500
$4,000
$5,500
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
4,8
8
7
5,
8
6
3
5,
8
1
7
6,
1
2
8
5,
8
5
9
5,
6
5
5
5,
4
6
3
5,
4
9
7
5,
6
0
9
Budget Actual Projected
67
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 509,653$ 524,043$ 526,600$ 544,900$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 31 143 200 200
Travel Expenses 23 604 100 100
Conferences and Seminars 420 1,710 1,500 1,700
Business Meetings - 146 100 100
Membership and Dues 2,015 2,739 1,900 2,500
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 269 216 500 500
Postage - - 100 100
Outside Services 12,036 13,600 13,600 13,600
Total Administrative Expenses 14,794$ 19,158$ 18,000$ 18,800$
Total Expenses 524,447$ 543,201$ 544,600$ 563,700$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2311 - FINANCE CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
68
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 812,124$ 825,013$ 863,000$ 853,700$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 81 179 300 300
Travel Expenses 666 - 1,500 400
Conferences and Seminars 1,458 1,555 3,500 2,600
Business Meetings - 20 200 200
Membership and Dues 588 523 1,200 1,000
Office Supplies 179 153 1,100 1,100
Outside Services 15,140 50,000 12,500 52,500
Total Administrative Expenses 18,112$ 52,430$ 20,300$ 58,100$
Total Expenses 830,236$ 877,443$ 883,300$ 911,800$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2321 - CONTROLLER & BUDGETARY SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
69
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 928,627$ 961,092$ 970,800$ 1,035,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 46 192 100 100
Travel Expenses 206 766 500 500
Conferences and Seminars 90 1,209 1,000 1,000
Membership and Dues 530 245 200 300
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 199 - 200 200
Printing Expenses 225 492 300 300
Accounting Fees 26,323 29,400 29,400 29,500
Bank Fees 328,490 329,000 322,200 334,400
Outside Services 4,452 51,000 40,000 8,600
Total Administrative Expenses 360,561$ 412,304$ 393,900$ 374,900$
Total Expenses 1,289,188$ 1,373,396$ 1,364,700$ 1,410,500$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2331 - TREASURY & ACCOUNTING SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
70
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 1,638,938$ 1,508,297$ 1,705,800$ 1,578,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 104 50 200 200
Travel Expenses 1,520 1,500 3,100 3,100
Conferences and Seminars 2,105 1,000 1,500 1,500
Business Meetings 152 50 100 100
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 12 - 100 100
Postage 152,942 153,000 165,300 165,300
Outside Services 75,885 87,000 84,000 84,500
General Training - 500 500 500
Bad Debt 93,341 94,000 155,000 105,000
Total Administrative Expenses 326,061$ 337,100$ 409,800$ 360,300$
Total Expenses 1,964,999$ 1,845,397$ 2,115,600$ 1,938,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2341 - CUSTOMER SERVICE
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
71
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 461,394$ 466,707$ 486,300$ 504,000$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage - - 200 100
Travel Expenses 874 - 1,500 1,500
Conferences and Seminars 1,244 1,000 1,000 1,200
Business Meetings - - - -
Membership and Dues 160 300 200 1,000
Total Administrative Expenses 2,278$ 1,300$ 2,900$ 3,800$
Materials & Maintenance Expenses
Meters and Materials 106,547 128,733 108,300 151,200
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 5,417 5,000 5,000 5,000
Other Materials and Maintenance 20,877 14,000 18,600 18,600
Building Ground & Materials 2,147 - - -
Contracted Services 3,075 2,000 5,000 5,000
Total Materials and Maintenance 138,063$ 149,733$ 136,900$ 179,800$
Total Expenses 601,735$ 617,740$ 626,100$ 687,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2342 - METER SHOP
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
72
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 124,794$ 135,103$ 134,600$ 137,400$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage - - 200 100
Travel Expenses - - 1,200 1,200
Conferences and Seminars - - 800 800
Business Meetings - - 200 200
Membership and Dues 5,298 3,200 3,600 3,600
Incentives 17,326 18,000 32,200 32,200
Public Recognition Awards 5,177 12,000 15,000 15,000
Conservation Garden 117,462 123,700 123,700 124,200
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 49 - 200 200
Outside Services 15,800 60,000 282,400 31,200
Total Administrative Expenses 161,112$ 216,900$ 459,500$ 208,700$
Total Expenses 285,906$ 352,003$ 594,100$ 346,100$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 2343 - WATER CONSERVATION
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
73
Intentionally Left Blank
74
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual (2)Projected Budget (2)Budget
Labor and Benefits (1)6,753,648$ 7,416,169$ 7,264,900$ 7,817,700$
Travel and Meetings 29,911 42,000 48,800 42,400
General Office Expense - 432 300 300
Equipment 32,096 38,484 44,700 61,300
Fees 71,241 61,400 61,400 149,900
Services 243,149 370,527 540,100 445,400
Training 10,680 6,075 9,000 9,000
Materials & Maintenance 1,642,085 1,805,601 1,945,800 1,951,500
Sewer Charges 1,208,513 996,400 996,400 835,200
Total Expenses 9,991,323$ 10,737,088$ 10,911,400$ 11,312,700$
(1) Excludes CIP labor and benefits.-$ -$ -$
Water Operations
(2) In FY 2017, the Recycled Division's responsibilities have been reorganized between the Operations
and Engineering Departments. Prior year budget and actuals have been adjusted for comparative
purposes.
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
$-
$4,000
$8,000
$12,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
11
,
8
5
3
10
,
9
1
3
10
,
9
1
1
10
,
9
1
1
11
,
3
1
3
10
,
4
3
9
10
,
3
1
5
9,9
9
1
10
,
7
3
7
Budget Actual Projected
75
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 417,676$ 421,466$ 422,700$ 435,900$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 24 300 300 100
Travel Expenses 3,411 4,000 4,500 3,000
Conferences and Seminars 3,402 5,000 5,000 4,000
Business Meetings - - - 300
Membership and Dues 2,678 3,000 5,000 5,000
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions - 432 300 300
Outside Services 2,530 3,500 3,500 4,000
General Training 7,185 3,000 5,000 5,000
Required Certification 3,495 3,075 4,000 4,000
Total Administrative Expenses 22,725$ 22,307$ 27,600$ 25,700$
Total Expenses 440,401$ 443,773$ 450,300$ 461,600$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3211 - WATER OPERATIONS CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
76
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 267,427$ 209,306$ 219,600$ 230,200$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases 24,141 25,200 25,200 26,100
Regulatory Agencies Fees 70,182 54,200 54,200 142,700
Outside Services 6,944 - - -
Total Administrative Expenses 101,267$ 79,400$ 79,400$ 168,800$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Other Materials and Maintenance 84 - - -
Total Materials and Maintenance 84$ -$ -$ -$
Total Expenses 368,778$ 288,706$ 299,000$ 399,000$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3221 - WATER SYSTEM OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
77
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 1,817,961$ 1,855,743$ 1,804,300$ 1,926,300$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 107,865 197,200 297,200 256,800
Total Administrative Expenses 107,865$ 197,200$ 297,200$ 256,800$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Infrastructure Equipment & Supplies 93,730 93,730 102,000 102,100
Chemicals 314,275 295,000 361,500 322,200
Other Materials and Maintenance 51 118 500 500
Contracted Services - - 1,000 1,000
Total Materials and Maintenance 408,056$ 388,848$ 465,000$ 425,800$
Total Expenses 2,333,882$ 2,441,791$ 2,566,500$ 2,608,900$
(1) In FY 2017, the Recycled Division's responsibilities have been reorganized between the
Operations and Engineering Departments. Prior year budget and actuals have been adjusted for
comparative purposes.
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3225 - WATER SYSTEM
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
(1)(1)
78
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 263,881$ 375,328$ 307,000$ 325,200$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases - 1,000 1,000 1,000
Outside Services 16,385 23,300 23,300 24,500
Temporary Employment Services - - 62,400 -
Total Administrative Expenses 16,385$ 24,300$ 86,700$ 25,500$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Infrastructure Equip and Supplies 40,496 25,000 25,000 30,000
Other Materials and Maintenance - - 200 200
Total Materials and Maintenance 40,496$ 25,000$ 25,200$ 30,200$
Total Expenses 320,762$ 424,628$ 418,900$ 380,900$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3227 - SCADA
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
79
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 228,919$ 246,706$ 243,100$ 261,300$
Total Expenses 228,919$ 246,706$ 243,100$ 261,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3231 - UTILITY SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
80
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 1,800,878$ 2,185,523$ 2,268,200$ 2,403,200$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases - 421 1,800 1,800
Total Administrative Expenses -$ 421$ 1,800$ 1,800$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Meters and Materials 5,274 9,534 5,500 8,000
Fleet Parts and Equipment - 12 - -
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 198,244 225,000 245,000 236,000
Other Materials and Maintenance 158,584 147,000 171,000 163,000
Contracted Services 223,646 275,600 284,000 274,000
Total Materials and Maintenance 585,748$ 657,146$ 705,500$ 681,000$
Total Expenses 2,386,626$ 2,843,090$ 2,975,500$ 3,086,000$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3232 - UTILITY MAINTENANCE
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
81
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 543,630$ 558,250$ 572,600$ 593,100$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 20,396 29,700 34,000 30,000
Communication 1,233 877 3,800 3,500
Technology Hardware and Software 1,735 1,136 2,400 2,400
Hazardous Waste Disposal 1,059 7,200 7,200 7,200
Outside Services 25,160 24,768 20,900 21,300
Total Administrative Expenses 49,583$ 63,681$ 68,300$ 64,400$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Fuel and Oil 184,027 212,040 235,600 207,500
Fleet Parts and Equipment 121,588 133,900 128,900 129,800
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 10,425 45,200 25,500 23,500
Other Materials and Maintenance 89 - - -
Building Ground & Materials - - - -
Total Materials and Maintenance 316,129$ 391,140$ 390,000$ 360,800$
Total Expenses 909,342$ 1,013,071$ 1,030,900$ 1,018,300$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3233 - FLEET MAINTENANCE
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
82
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 689,758$ 741,648$ 627,900$ 752,100$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases 1,412 5,850 6,500 10,500
Outside Services 30,208 63,200 77,000 57,000
Total Administrative Expenses 31,620$ 69,050$ 83,500$ 67,500$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Fleet Parts and Equipment 1,468 - - -
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 107,367 125,000 135,500 156,600
Other Materials and Maintenance 503 - - -
Building Ground and Materials 409 - 1,000 1,000
Total Materials and Maintenance 109,747$ 125,000$ 136,500$ 157,600$
Total Expenses 831,125$ 935,698$ 847,900$ 977,200$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3236 - PUMP & ELECTRICAL
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
83
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Sewer Charges
Metro O&M Costs 1,020,276 815,000 815,000 655,000
Spring Valley O&M Costs 188,237 181,400 181,400 180,200
Total Sewer Charges 1,208,513$ 996,400$ 996,400$ 835,200$
Total Expenses 1,208,513$ 996,400$ 1,294,900$ 835,200$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3241 - COLLECTION/TREATMENT/RECYCLE OPERATIONS
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
84
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 155,387$ 169,135$ 166,700$ 201,500$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 49,346 53,904 47,000 73,000
Total Administrative Expenses 49,346$ 53,904$ 47,000$ 73,000$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Laboratory Equipment and Supplies 43,847 40,000 40,000 45,300
Total Materials and Maintenance 43,847$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 45,300$
Total Expenses 248,580$ 263,039$ 253,700$ 319,800$
DIVISION 3243 - LABORATORY
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
85
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 568,131$ 653,064$ 632,800$ 688,900$
Administrative Expenses
Rent and Leases 3,575 4,000 4,000 16,000
Temporary Employment Services 4,711 4,655 8,800 8,800
Total Administrative Expenses 8,286$ 8,655$ 12,800$ 24,800$
Materials and Maintenance Expenses
Fuel and Oil 12,370 12,370 15,000 34,800
Infrastructure Equipment and Supplies 56,944 82,800 82,800 73,500
Chemicals 35,385 36,000 39,100 42,100
Safety Equipment 1,430 1,097 1,000 1,500
Contracted Services 31,849 46,200 45,700 98,900
Total Materials and Maintenance 137,978$ 178,467$ 183,600$ 250,800$
Total Expenses 714,395$ 840,186$ 829,200$ 964,500$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3244 - RECLAMATION PLANT
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
86
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual (2)Projected Budget (2)Budget
Labor and Benefits (1)2,196,415$ 2,453,713$ 2,352,900$ 2,521,600$
Travel and Meetings 17,062 15,172 19,400 18,300
General Office Expense 330 6,503 7,500 1,700
Fees 30,068 30,068 38,000 38,000
Services 606,756 627,224 702,600 772,600
Training 2,960 7,061 12,500 13,500
Total Expenses 2,853,591$ 3,139,741$ 3,132,900$ 3,365,700$
-$ -$ -$
-$
(1) Excludes CIP labor and benefits.
(2) In FY 2017, the Recycled Division's responsibilities have been reorganized between the
Operations and Engineering Departments. Prior year budget and actuals have been adjusted for
comparative purposes.
Engineering
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
1,
8
6
2
2,
0
2
6
3,1
3
3
3,1
3
3
3,
3
6
6
1,
8
1
7
1,
8
2
8
2,
8
5
4
3,
1
4
0
Budget Actual Projected
87
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 316,155$ 353,710$ 350,300$ 551,600$
Administrative Expenses
Mileage 167 207 500 300
Travel Expenses 8,650 7,300 8,000 10,000
Conferences and Seminars 3,881 3,100 4,600 3,500
Business Meetings 1,714 1,886 2,500 2,000
Membership and Dues 2,650 2,679 3,800 2,500
Books, Periodicals and Subscriptions 330 6,503 7,500 1,700
Regulatory Agencies Fees 216 - - -
Outside Services 1,298 5,826 1,000 9,000
General Training 2,315 5,805 10,000 11,200
Required Certification 645 1,256 2,500 2,300
Total Administrative Expenses 21,866$ 34,562$ 40,400$ 42,500$
Total Expenses 338,021$ 388,272$ 390,700$ 594,100$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3311 - ENGINEERING CHIEF
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
88
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 274,308$ 429,365$ 293,500$ 374,200$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 453,859 452,257 515,000 351,000
Total Administrative Expenses 453,859$ 452,257$ 515,000$ 351,000$
Total Expenses 728,167$ 881,622$ 808,500$ 725,200$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3321 - ENGINEERING SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
89
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor and Benefits 463,606$ 413,315$ 374,200$ 392,000$
Total Expenses 463,606$ 413,315$ 374,200$ 392,000$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3421 - PUBLIC SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
90
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor & Benefits 1,085,235$ 1,177,042$ 1,274,000$ 1,130,700$
Administrative Expenses
Regulatory Agencies Fees 8,236 8,068 8,000 8,000
Outside Services 95,212 111,600 111,600 222,600
Required Certification - - - -
Total Administrative Expenses 103,448 119,668$ 119,600 230,600
Total Expenses 1,188,683$ 1,296,710$ 1,393,600$ 1,361,300$
(1) In FY 2017, the Recycled Division's responsibilities have been re-organized between the Operations
Engineering Departments. Prior year budget and actuals have been adjusted for comparative purpos
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3431 - FIELD SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
(1)(1
91
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor & Benefits 57,111$ 80,281$ 60,900$ 73,100$
Administrative Expenses
Regulatory Agencies Fees 21,616 22,000 30,000 30,000
Outside Services 56,387 57,541 75,000 190,000
Total Administrative Expenses 78,003$ 79,541$ 105,000$ 220,000$
Total Expenses 135,114$ 159,822$ 165,900$ 293,100$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 3451 - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
92
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Labor and Benefits (1)1,487,720$ 1,405,623$ 1,183,400$ 1,181,400$
Fees 820,046 773,198 836,000 825,000
Services 1,257 - - -
Total Expenses 2,309,023$ 2,178,821$ 2,019,400$ 2,006,400$
-$ -$ -$
(1) Benefits include District-wide labor and benefit costs not attributable to any one department, such as the effect
of cost of living raises on accrued leave liabilities or the Other Post Employment Benefit (OPEB) costs. These costs
are netted against the District's anticipated Vacancy Factor. The Vacancy Factor for FY 2016 and FY 2017 is
$338,300 and $198,700, respectively. Additionally, the labor and benefits shown on this schedule are those related
to operating costs and does not include CIP labor and benefit costs.
General Expense
Budget vs. Actual, in thousands ($)
FY 2016
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
2,
1
7
6
2,1
5
0
2,
3
3
2
2,
0
1
9
2,
0
0
6
2,
3
4
4
2,
2
1
4
2,
3
0
9
2,
1
7
9
Budget Actual Projected
93
FY 2015 FY 2017
Actual Projected Budget Budget
Total Labor & Benefits 2,419,033$ 1,405,623$ 1,183,400$ 1,181,400$
Administrative Expenses
Outside Services 1,257 - - -
General Insurance 645,410 586,000 586,000 575,000
Legal Expenses 174,636 187,198 250,000 250,000
Total Admin Expenses 821,303 773,198$ 836,000 825,000
Total Expenses 3,240,336$ 2,178,821$ 2,019,400$ 2,006,400$
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
DIVISION 1311 - GENERAL EXPENSE (INCLUDES LEGAL)
FISCAL YEAR 2017 BUDGET
FY 2016
94
CIP No Description FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total
P2040 Res - 1655-1 Reservoir 0.5 MG 20 80 450 1,025 825 500 $ 2,900
P2267 36-Inch Main Pumpouts and Air/Vacuum Ventilation Installations 220 55 - - - - 275
P2382 Safety and Security Improvements 250 - - - - - 250
P2405 PL - 624/340 PRS, Paseo Ranchero and Otay Valley Road 5 5 5 5 50 500 570
P2451 Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and Disinfection System 50 50 50 50 50 50 300
P2453 SR-11 Utility Relocations 250 500 500 500 500 133 2383
P2460 I.D. 7 Trestle and Pipeline Demolition 50 5 5 5 530 - 595
P2466 Regional Training Facility 6 - - - - - 6
P2485 SCADA Communication System and Software Replacement 85 85 85 85 24 - 364
P2486 Asset Management - Info Master Water Implementation 25 20 - - - - 45
P2494 Multiple Species Conservation Plan 48 20 - - - - 68
P2496 Otay Lakes Road Utility Relocations 5 20 - - - - 25
P2504 Regulatory Site Access Road and Pipeline Relocation 20 330 120 100 - - 570
P2516 PL - 12-Inch, 640 Zone, Jamacha Road - Darby/Osage - - - 75 100 625 800
P2520 Motorola Mobile Radio Upgrade 30 - - - - - 30
P2521 Large Meter Vault Upgrade Program 100 100 100 100 - - 400
P2537 Operations Yard Property Acquisition Improvements 10 - - - - - 10
P2541 624 Pressure Zone PRSs 10 - - - - - 10
P2547 District Administration Vehicle Charging Stations 85 20 - - - - 105
P2550 Fuel Island Upgrade 112 - - - - - 112
P2551 Blossom Lane Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection 20 - - - - - 20
P2552 South Barcelona Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection 20 - - - - - 20
P2553 Heritage Road Bridge Replacement and Utility Relocation 100 380 685 260 - - 1425
P2564 Administration Carpet Replacement Program 5 210 - - - - 215
P2568 Technology Business Processes Improvement 100 - - - - - 100
P2569 Metro Ethernet Implementation/ District Facilities - Pilot 45 - - - - - 45
P2570 SCADA Equipment & Infrastructure Enhancement 100 100 100 - - - 300
P2571 Datacenter Network Enhancement & Replacement of
Infrastructure Componets
- - 100 100 - - 200
P2572 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Replacement - - - - 250 250 500
P2584 Res - 657-1 and 657-2 Reservoir Demolitions - - - - 70 650 720
R2077 RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta Gate/Airway 20 20 - - - - 40
R2079 RecPL - 6-Inch, 450 Zone, Otay Valley Road - Otay
Valley/Entertainment
10 10 10 10 110 - 150
R2109 Sweetwater River Wooden Trestle Improvement for the Recycled
Water Forcemain
10 5 - - - - 15
R2110 RecPS - 944-1 Optimization and Pressure Zone Modifications 5 67 - - - - 72
R2116 RecPL - 14-Inch, 927 Zone, Force Main Improvements 1,000 900 10 - - - 1910
R2117 RWCWRF Disinfection System Improvements 10 50 50 150 1,000 150 1410
R2118 Steele Canyon Sewer PS Large Solids Handling Improvements 68 - - - - - 68
R2119 RWCWRF Automation & Security Upgrades 95 50 130 - - - 275
R2120 RWCWRF Filtered Water Storage Tank Improvements 250 245 - - - - $495
R2122 Emergency Recycled Water Fire Hydrant Installations 15 - - - - - $15
R2123 Repurpose Otay Mesa Recycled Water Lines 35 5 5 5 150 150 $350
R2124 RecPS - 927-1 Pump 5 Replacement 55 - - - - - $55
S2012 San Diego County Sanitation District Outfall and RSD Outfall
Replacement
150 150 200 250 300 350 $1,400
CIP Projects ($1,000s)
The 2017 Fiscal Year CIP Budget contains 107 projects. The costs for the work planned for Fiscal Year 2017 are $10.7
million. Of the 89 projects planned for Fiscal Year 2017, four are designated as reimbursable projects with an estimated
cost of $14,000. These reimburseable projects are built by a developer and reimbursed by the District.
CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS
95
CIP No Description FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total
S2027 Rancho San Diego Pump Station Rehabilitation 50 1,200 1,200 783 - - $3,233
S2033 Sewer System Rehabilitation 200 - - - - - $200
S2043 RWCWRF Sludge Handling System 1 1 1 1 1 1 $6
S2047 Asset Management - Info Master Sewer Implementation - 30 28 - - - $58
47 Total Capital Facility Projects $ 3,745 $ 4,713 $ 3,834 $ 3,504 $ 3,960 $ 3,359 $ 23,115
P2083 PS - 870-2 Pump Station Replacement 390 3,500 10,800 500 50 50 $15,290
P2174 PS - 1090-1 Pump Station Replacement (400 gpm) 1 150 200 1,149 - - $1,500
P2400 PL - 20-Inch Pipeline Replacement, 711 Zone, Otay Lakes Road -
at Santa Paula
- - - 150 350 1,500 $2,000
P2493 624-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 60 60 - - - - $120
P2507 East Palomar Street Utility Relocation 120 100 - - - - $220
P2508 Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement Program 300 100 96 - - - $496
P2518 803-3 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 40 20 - - - - $60
P2519 832-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 65 20 - - - - $85
P2529 711-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 360 25 50 - - - $435
P2530 711-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 90 50 50 - - - $190
P2531 944-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 50 50 - - - - $100
P2532 944-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 50 50 - - - - $100
P2533 1200-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 10 700 50 50 - - $810
P2534 978-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating 615 50 50 - - - $715
P2535 458-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating & Upgrades 50 50 - - - - $100
P2538 Administration and Operations Building Fire Sprinkler
Replacement Program
10 - - - - - $10
P2539 South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Utility Relocations 100 100 40 - - - $240
P2542 850-3 Reservoir Interior Coating 50 50 - - - - $100
P2543 850-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 10 645 120 50 50 - $875
P2544 850-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating 835 135 50 50 - - $1,070
P2545 980-1 Reservoir Interior Exterior Coating 330 50 50 - - - $430
P2546 980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating - 20 1,330 50 50 - $1,450
P2555 Administration and Operations Parking Lot Improvements 275 185 - - - - $460
P2557 520 Res Recirculation Pipeline Chemical Supply and Analyzer
Feed Replacement Project
50 35 5 - - - $90
P2559 Pressure Vessel Repair and Replacement Program 65 125 125 125 125 55 $620
P2561 Res - 711-3 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 1 4 95 1,700 - - $1,800
P2562 Res - 571-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 90 2,500 5 5 - - $2,600
P2563 Res - 870-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 1 1 9 90 899 - $1,000
P2565 803-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades - - 20 820 50 50 $940
P2566 520-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades - - - 20 1,380 100 $1,500
P2567 1004-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades - - - - 20 885 $905
P2573 PL - 12-Inch Pipeline Replacement, 803 Zone, Hillsdale Road 160 225 1,365 - - -
P2574 PL - 12-Inch and 14-inch Pipeline Replacement, 803 and 978
Zone, Vista Grande, Pence Drive
50 100 275 400 1,925 - $2,750
P2578 PS - 711-2 (PS 711-1 Replacement and Expansion) - 14,000 gpm - - - 350 3,200 3,050 6600
P2579 Temporary Lower Otay Pump Station Improvements 140 - - - - - $140
P2592 East H Street Bike Lane Utility Coordination 50 - - - - -
P2593 458-1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades - - - - 10 830 $840
P2594 Large Meter Replacement 240 150 95 - - - $485
R2111 RWCWRF - RAS Pump Replacement 10 5 - - - - $15
R2112 450-1 Disinfection Facility Rehabilitation 25 25 - - - - $50
R2121 Res - 944-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement 1 1 30 1,348 - - $1,380
S2024 Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement 50 4,750 2,500 - - - $7,300
S2044 Trenchless Sewer Rehabilitation 600 50 - - - - $650
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS
CAPITAL FACILITY PROJECTS, CONTINUED
96
CIP No Description FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total
S2045 Fuerte Drive Sewer Relocation 190 10 - - - - $200
S2046 RWCWRF - Aeration Panels Replacement 250 100 100 - - - $450
S2048 Hillsdale Road Sewer Repairs 100 390 10 - - - $500
S2049 Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation - Phase 2 20 130 800 50 - - $1,000
S2050 Rancho San Diego Basin Sewer Rehabilitation - Phase 2 - - - - 50 250 $300
S2051 RWCWRF - Headworks Improvements - 50 100 600 - - $750
S2052 RWCWRF - Access Roads Repaving - - - 50 400 300 $750
S2053 RWCWRF - Sedimentation Basins Refurbishment - - - 60 140 400 $600
S2054 Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation - Phase 3 - - - - 50 250 $300
52 Total Replacements and Renewal Projects $ 5,904 $ 14,761 $18,420 $ 7,617 $ 8,749 $ 7,720 $ 61,371
CAPITAL PURCHASE PROJECTS
P2282 Vehicle Capital Purchases 197 290 240 187 236 253 $1,403
P2285 Office Equipment and Furniture Capital Purchases 15 15 15 8 - - $53
P2286 Field Equipment Capital Purchases 38 105 50 55 - - $248
P2366 APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits 820 - - - - - $820
4 Total Capital Purchase $1,070 $410 $305 $250 $236 $253 $2,524
DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENT PROJECTS .
P2325 PL-10" to 12" Oversize, 1296 Zone, PB Road-Rolling Hills Hydro
PS/PB Bndy
3 - - - - - $3
P2403 PL - 12-inch, 624 Zone, Heritage Road - Olympic/Otay Valley - - - - 50 500 $550
P2556 HWY 94 Upsized Utility Relocations at Melody Lane 1 99 - - - - $100
R2084 RecPL - 20-Inch, 680 Zone, Village 2 - Heritage/La Media 10 40 315 - - - $365
4 Total Reimbursement Projects $14 $139 $315 $0 $50 $500 $1,018
SUMMARY
CIP No Description FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 Total
89 Total - FY 2017 Projects 10,733 19,923 21,296 9,096 6,825 2,192 70,065
18 Total - FY 2018 through FY 2022 Projects - 100 1,578 2,275 6,170 9,640 19,763
107 Grand Totals 10,733 20,023 22,874 11,371 12,995 11,832 89,828
REPLACEMENT/RENEWAL PROJECTS, CONTINUED
97
Quantity Amount
Vehicles
1 34,000
1 30,000
1 44,000
1 34,000
1 55,000
Total Vehicles 197,000
Office Equipment and Furniture
various 15,000
Total Office equipment and furniture 15,000
Field Equipment
1 38,000
Total Field equipment 38,000
APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits
2 300,000
2 520,000
Total APCD engine replacements and retrofits 820,000
Grand Total : 1,070,000
P2282 Vehicles 197,000
P2285 Office equipment and furniture 15,000
P2286 Field equipment 38,000
P2366 APCD Engine replacements and retrofits 820,000
Grand Total: 1,070,000
FY 2017 Capital Purchases
Capital purchases are non-recurring operating expense items for District-wide use that cost more than
$10,000 each and have an estimated useful life of two years or more. The Capital Purchase Projects
include vehicles, office equipment and furniture, field equipment and APCD engine replacements and
retrofits.
Description
Class 5 Dump Truck with 2-3 Yard Dump Body.
3/4 Ton Pick-up with Utility Body for Disinfection Technician.
40kw Critically Silenced Genset.
1/2 Ton Pick-up for Water System Operations Section.
1/2 Ton Pick-up for the Inspection Services Section.
All Wheel Drive SUV Replacement for Inspection Services Field Manager.
Districtwide office equipment and furniture items.
Summary by Project
Two emergency stand-by portable pumps.
Two replacement portable gensets.
98
99
PROJECT TITLE: Res -1655-1 Reservoir 0.5 MG
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 8/19/1~92
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2040
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
3
$3,400,000
This project is for construction of a 0.5 million gallon reservoir and approximately 1,500 feet of 12-inch pipeline to connect to the
existing system at Prisilla Drive. These improvements are located within the Rancho Jamul Estates area.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The project will increase both system reliability and service capabilities, and provide adequate fire protection for the Rancho
Jamul Estates area within the 1655 Pressure Zone. The existing system is currently served with a hydropneumatic pump station.
COMMENTS:
In earty 2000, the project was designed to 90%, and due to the economy, the project was put on hold. The overall budget was
increased to account for the spending done prior to FY 2015. The project budget increased $1 .2 Million after receiving a
preliminary cost estimate from Concrete Tank Manufacturer and updating cost estimates from the estimate done in 2000. The
concrete tank will have to be a Type I due to location and steep grades. Added updated costs for Reservoir security items.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 % 0% 0 % 0 % 100%
TOTAL: 100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$500 $20 $80 $450 $1,025 $825 $500 $3,400
101
PROJECT TITLE: 36-lnch Main Pumpouts and AirNacuum Ventilation Installations CIP Number:P2267
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 6/3/1996
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
t.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$735,000
This project is for the installation of ventilation equipment on the existing pumpout and air/vacuum vaults on ltle 36-inch
transmission main from the San Diego County Water Authority Otay FCF No. 11 to the Regulatory Site. This project also includes
upsizing the existing 2-inch air/vacuum valves to 6-inch.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The vault openings do not stay in place when refilling because they lack ventilation. By installing vents in these vaults, the lids
will stay in place, thus eliminating a safety hazard. Draining and filling the 36-inch main at higher flow rates is required to return
the system to service in shorter periods of time.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100 o/o
TOTAL: 0% 100 % 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$460 $220 $55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $735
103
PROJECT TITLE: Safety and Security Improvements
PROJECT MANAGER: Kent Payne
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 6/5/2002
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2382
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
t.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
$2,811,000
This project is for the installation and replacement of the physical security burglar alarm systems to Digital Monitoring Systems
(DMP) and associated security components at 23 District facilities. This is to ready sites for enterprise security and access
control management software "ENTRE."
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project is to improve the security of the Otay Water District facilities by installing and upgrading the hardware and software
required to provide access control management, intrusion detection and response, and to ready the facilities for future evaluation
of video camera verification systems.
Although existing facilities are relatively safe and secure, the Federal government has recommended that security to water
systems be improved.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0 %
0 %
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$2,561
FY
2017
$250
FY
2018
$0
Betterment Replacement
0% 100 %
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$2,811
Total
100%
100%
105
PROJECT TITLE: PL - 624/340 PRS, Pas eo Ranchero and Otay Valley Road CIP Number:P2405
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$650,000
This project is for the construction of approximately 1,200 feet of 12-lnch pipeline in the 340 Pressure Zone in Otay Valley Road
and the existing 16-lnch pipeline in Otay Valley Road. Construction of a pressure reducing station between the 624/340 Pressure
Zone near the intersection of Otay Valley Road/Main Street and Heritage Road.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Thls wTII provide a redundant service connection to the 340 Pressure Zone.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE= Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $5 $5 $5 $5 $50 $500 $570
107
PROJECT TITLE: Otay Mesa Desalination Conveyance and Disinfection System CIP Number:P2451
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
PROJECT MANAGER: Bob Kennedy
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/23/2006
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2083
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$30,000,000
The Otay Water District could potentially receive a potable water supply source from the planned Rosarito Desalination Facility
via a conveyance system, pumping facilities, and disinfection systern.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The concept could provide for an independent water source to the Otay Water District.
COMMENTS:
Original Budget amount approved 5/23/2006 for $1 ,000,000. Budget increase approved 6/25/2008 to $5,000,000. On 5/21/2009,
the Budget was increased to $30,000,000 ($1 ,000,000 for UV Treatment, $9,000,000 for Pump Station, and $20,000,000 for
Conveyance Pipeline).
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Bettennent Replacement New Water Supply Total
New Water Supply Fee 0% 0% 0% 40% 40% Projects
Betterment ID 22 0% 60% 0% 0% 60%
TOTAL: 0% 60% 0% 40% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY' FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$3,575 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $50 $3,875
109
PROJECT TITLE: SR-11 Utility Relocations
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchloro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/23/2006
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2453
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
1.0. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$4,000,000
This project is for all utility relocations required due to construction of the SR-11 on the Otay Mesa. Facility relocations vary in
size from 8-inch to 24-inch_ Both the potable and recycled water systems are tmpactecL
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Caltrans will construct the SR-11, which will result in utility conflicts with existing Otay Water District facllities at various locations_
In most cases, the Otay Water District does have prior and superior rights. The facilfties must be relocated prior to Calttans'
construction of the SR-11 . The cost of the facilities relocations that have prior rights will be reimbursed by Caltrans.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $2.25M to $4M to account for actual expenses for the first two rounds of relocations and/or additional
relocations not included in the budget previously set in FY 2.011. Most expenses have been reimbursed by Caltrans.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% O'Yo 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$1,617 $250 $500 $500 $500 $500 $133 $4,000
111
PROJECT TITLE: I.D. 7 Trestle and Pipeline Demolition
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:P2460
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
I.D. LOCATION:
PRLORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
7
2
$600,000
This project is for the steel trestle demolition and removal of pipline. The 1960's steel trestle 24-inch waterline crossing of Otay
River was replaced by the Central Area and Otay Mesa Interconnection pipeline in 2001 . The trestle also carries a high pressure
gas line that supplies the 870-1 Pump Station that prevented the trestle from being demolished previously. SDG&E is proposing
to abandon tttrs gas line in 2016, replacing it witl1 a feed from the south.
JUSTIFrCATION OF PROJECT:
The exfstfng pipeline is no longer in service and should be removed to address liability concerns. The Central Area-Otay Mesa
Interconnection Pipeline supplies water to the Otay Mesa System.
COMMENTS:
FY 2017 scope is to identify the project constraints that will drive the demolition costs. including environmental factors, access
limitations, and demolition alternatives.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$5 $50
FY
2018
$5
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0 % 100 %
FY
2019
$5
FY
2020
$5
FY
2021
$530
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$600
Total
100%
100%
113
PROJECT TITLE: Regional Training Facility CIP Number:P2466
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
PROJECT MANAGER: Lisa Coburn-Boyd I.D. LOCATION: 22
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/29/2007 PRIORITY:
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS: P2504 BUDGET AMOUNT: $300,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the construction of a Regional Training Facility at the Regulatory Site through a partnership with the San
Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District
JUSTlFICATION OF PROJECT:
The Otay Water District needs a training center to train staff on trenching, shoring, fire safety, rescue, and confined space. The
San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection District has secured funding forthfs project and will be the lead agency in the
development of the training facility.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 40% 0% 0% 0% 40%
Betterment ID 22 0% 60% 0% 0% 60%
TOTAL: 40 % 60 o/o Oo/o 0% 100 o/o
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$294 $6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300
115
PROJECT TITLE: SCADA Communication System and Software Replacement CIP Number: P2485
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
PROJECT MANAGER: Michael Kerr
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/21/2009
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wlde
1
$2,014,000
This project will replace the existing SCADA software and radio communication system and install fuel level transmitters on all
diesel fuel tanks. A battery backup system will be installed at remote SCADNradio sites without emergency power generators.
Money budgeted in FY 2016 and FY 2017 is for the replacement of programmable logic controller's (PLC's) in the field that will
no longer be supported at that time. $40K in FY 2016 for the SCADA Roadmap Documentation.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Beginning in 2012, the vendor no longer upgrades or supports the existing system. The radio equipment needs replacement to
allow for increased bandwidth capability to increase security systems functionality. The fuel level transmitters on all diesel fuel
tanks and remote SCADA monitoring will provide supervisors with real time fuel levels to monitor available runtime on stand-by
engines during extended power outages. The battery backup system will provide continuous communications and SCADA
monitoring and control tor 3 days it the District lost power at sites without emergency power generators.
COMMENTS:
Going into Fiscal Year 2017 and beyond, the anticipated expenditures are for the following:
Power backup for .all remote sites, both material and staff labor-$36K
PLC replacement and stationary generator fuel level readings on SCADA, both material and staff labor-$50K
FY 2018-$85K for PLC upgrade project-upgrade 10 PLCs (materials and labor)
FY 2019-$85K for PLC upgrade project-upgrade 10 PLCs (materials and labor)
FY 2020 -$85K for PLC upgrade project-upgrade 10 PLCs (materials and labor)
FY 2021 -$85K for PLC upgrade project-upgrade 10 PLCs (materials and labor)
FY 2022 -$24K for PLC upgrade project-upgrade 3 PLCs (materials and labor)
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$1,650 $85
FY
2018
$85
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$85
FY
2020
$85
FY
2021
$24
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$2,014
Total
100%
100%
117
PROJECT TITLE: Asset Management -Info Master Water Implementation CIP Number: P2486
PROJECT MANAGER: Ming Zhao
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/21/2009
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
$957,000
This project is for the development of an integrated Asset Management system. FUnds in FY 2016 were used to assign the
criticality to major facilities and testing of condition assessment methodologies. Implement the Asset Management software, Info
Master. Explore the analytical capabilities to better use asset management information.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Implementation of an Asset Management Plan is a best practice and will provide for a formal means of maintaining, replacing,
and funding the existing fixed assets. It is a strategic objective in the existing and new strategic plan.
COMMENTS:
Remaining Asset Management task for FY 2017 and FY 2018 is the implementation of the Info Master Watef Program.
Previously included Info Master sewer acquisition and implementation have been moved to a separate sewer CIP project.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 40% 0% 0% 0% 40%
Betterment ID 22 0% 60% 0% 0% 60%
TOTAL: 40% 60% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$912 $25 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $957
P2494Multiple Species Conservation Plan
Lisa Coburn-Boyd
5/21/2009
P2495
0
District Wide
1
$950,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is to develop a plan to streamline the environmental permitting processes for the Capital Improvement Program
projects to be constructed.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The project will save time and money when compared to environmental permitting each Capital Improvement Program project
individually.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$48 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$882
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
119
P2494
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2009 6/30/2018 $950
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
$0
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
120
P2496Otay Lakes Road Utility Relocations
Dan Martin
5/21/2009
4
22
1
$325,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for all utility relocations required to accommodate the City of Chula Vista Road Improvement project located along
Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The Otay Water District will be required to relocate all conflicting systems, at its own expense, as the City of Chula Vista has prior
and superior rights.
COMMENTS:
Work under construction.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$5 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $325
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$300
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
121
P2496
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2009 8/1/2009
9/1/2009 12/1/2009
$4
$11
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2010 6/30/2018 $310
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:113
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
122
123
PROJECT TITLE: Regulatory Site Access Road and Pipeline Relocation CIP Number: P2504
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5!17/2010
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2466
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$900,000
Thts project is to improve the existing access road from the proposed sheriff substation site to the Regulatory Reservoir Site.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
lmprovtng the existing access road will provide, for increased safety and all weather permanent access to the Regulatory
Reservoir Site,
COIYIMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 50% 0% 50%
Betterment ID 22 0% 50% 0 % 0% 50%
TOTAL: 0% 50% 50% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FV FY FV FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$330 $20 $330 $120 $100 $0 $0 $900 '
125
PROJECT TITLE: PL • 12-lnch, 640 Zone, Jamacha Road -Darby/Osage CIP Number:P2516
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
3
$800,000
This project is for construction of approximately 1,250 feet of 12-inch pipeline in Jamacha Road and Osage Drive in the 640
Pressure Zone.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing pipelines are located in easements in the sfde yards of homes. The pipelines are a risk and liability to the District if
they were to faiL
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE~ Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacemen~ 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $75 $100 $625 $800
127
PROJECT TITLE: Motorola Mobile Radi o Upgrade
PROJECT MANAGER: Jose Martinez
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/16/2011
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2520
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
$120,000
This project is for Motorola radio upgrades which involves three components. radio repeater upgrade, portable and base unit
upgrades, and vehicle mobile radio upgrades.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The eXisting Motorola radio equipment is an essential part of the District's Emergency Response Program. A recent assessment
of the radio equipment has determined that the equipment has reached the end of its useful life and needs upgrades.
COMMENTS:
The remaining work includes adding some additional VHF radios at pump stations that are not able to have a copper telephone
(red phone) as well as augment the EOC and some management with RCS 800 MHZ radios.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0 % 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$90 $30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120
129
PROJECT TITLE: Large Meter Vault Upgrade Program
PROJECT MAN.AGER: Roger Holly
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 511612011
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT!
CIP Number: P2521
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
$400,000
This project is for the retrofit and upgrade of approximately 50 large meter vaults to either above ground conditions or eliminate
the confined space depth.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing large meters are installed in below grade vaults which create increased costs and safety issues due to confined
space requirements. Some of the existing below grade systems are subject to flooding and create corrosive environments.
COMMENTS:
The is a re-activation of previous CIP. Staff will be looking at vaults again to see if additional meters can be brought above
ground or retrofits done to eliminate the confined space requirement.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEOULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FV FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$0 $100 $100
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FV FV FV
2019 2020 2021
$100 $100 $0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FV
2022
$0
FV
Total
$400
Total
100%
100%
131
PROJECT TITLE: Operations Yard Property Acquisition Improvements CIP Number: P2537
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 4
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 11/13/2008
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2479
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$775.000
This project will provide site improvements, including fencing, grading, and paving for vehicle parking and equipment storage.
After the one year warranty has expired, the District's Administration and Operations parking lots will be slurry sealed and
restriped.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The site improvements are required to provide flexibility ln operations and for future expansion purposes.
COMMENTS:
Construction projected to be completed during FY 2016, with potential carry over of punchlist items into FY 2017 along with
warranty Inspection.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment 10 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100 o/o 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY F.Y FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$765 $10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $775
P2541624 Pressure Zone PRSs
Jeff Marchioro
P2434
2
22
1
$760,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide two pressure reducing stations feeding the 458 and 485 Pressure Zones from the 624 Pressure Zone
(Sequoia & Brandywine 624/458 PRS and Terra Nova Drive 624/485 PRS, respectively).
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project would upgrade the 458 and 485 Pressure Zones to improve fire flow and enhance system reliability. The 624/485
PRS project will also improve blending and distribution of treated water from the future Rancho Del Rey Groundwater Well (CIP
P2434).
COMMENTS:
Overall budget increased since construction project on track to complete in FY 2016. Small budget added for warranty
inspection in FY 2017.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $760
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$750
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
133
P2541
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2013 6/30/2014
7/1/2014 8/31/2015
$2
$220
PROJECT PHASE:
9/1/2015 7/30/2016 $538
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:127
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
134
135
PROJECT TITLE: District Administration Vehicle Chargfng Stations CIP Number:P2547
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$125,000
This project is for the construction of four (4) electric vehicle charging stations at the lower Administration parking lot.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Alternative fueled vehicles are becoming more common. with electric only vehicles making up a significant portion of these. To
support the needs of these vehicles and their limited driving range, the District proposes installing vehicle charging stations to
allow employees to consider using for their commute.
COMMENTS:
$1K Permit
$81 K Engineer's Estimate
$14K Design Fee
$29K Staff time, inspection and contingency
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion
Expansion 40%
Betterment ID 22 0%
TOTAL: 40%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$20 $85 $20
Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
0% 0% 0% 40%
60% 0% 0% 60%
60% 0% 0% 100%
FY FY FY FY FY
2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $125
137
PROJECT TITLE: Fuel Island Upgrade CIP Number: P2550
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Kent Payne
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2549
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$112,000
This project is to upgrade the District's fuel system, both in the vehicles as well as the fuel island dispensers, sumps, and island.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This work is needed to comply with County requirements for the operation of the fuel island.
This project will allow any employee to fill a District vehicle with no training. Authorizations and transactions will be done wireless
so electrical lines run through the fuel hoses or ground loops will be used and it will also allow Management tighter control on the
dispensing of fuel by placing limits on types of fueling and have better reporting features.
COMMENTS:
Work to improve the secondary contafnment and dispensing equipment in accordance With District/County Settlement
agreement Budget increased from $75K to $112K based on bids received and additional regulatory compliance needs.
Construction $104,000
Fire Permit $1 ,000
APCD Permit $1,300
DEH Permit $1,700
County Fees $500 (encroachment if necessary)
Temp Fuel $1,000 (permit for tank/dispenser)
Misc. Exp. $2,500 (fuel tank/dispenser rental, etc.)
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion
0%
0%
Betterment Replacement
Replacement
TOTAL:
EXPENDITUR.E SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
FY
2017
$112
FY
2018
$0
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$112
Total
100%
100%
139
PROJECT TITLE: Blossom Lane Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection CIP Number:P2551
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2552
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$210,000
This project Is to upgrade the meter, vault, telemetry and other interconnection appurtenances to meet current standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
To upgrade the existing interconnection to meet current standards.
COMMENTS:
Project completion extended into FY 2017 for warranty period and programming of SCADA (added $10K for this, missing from
scope of work),
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100 %
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR VEA.RS: FY FY FY FY FY FV FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$190 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $210
141
PROJECT TITLE: South Barcelona Helix WD and Otay WD Interconnection CIP Number:P2552
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2551
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$210,000
This project is to upgrade the meter, telemetry. vault, and other interconnection appurtenances to current standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
To upgrade the existing interconnection to meet current standards.
COMMENTS:
Project completion extended into FY 2017 for warranty period and programming of SCADA (added $10K for this, missing from
scope of work).
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment 10 22 0% 100 o/o Oo/o Oo/o 100 o/o
TOTAL: Oo/o 100% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$190 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $210
143
PROJECT TITLE: Heritage Road Bridge Rep(acement and Utility Relocation CIP Number: P2553
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2.
$1,430,000
I The existing 16-lnch potable water pipeline to Sleep .. Train Amphitheatre and Aquatica Seaworfd's Waterpark was buift under the
Otay River.
The City of Chula Vista is planning to replace the Heritage Road Bridge (Project No. STM-364). The District has requested the
City reserve room in the bridge for a 16-inch steel pipeline for potable water use and an 8-inch pipeline for future recycled water
use. In addition to the bridge crossing, approximately 1,600 linear feet of 16-inch potable water pipeline is required. An existing
16-inch ACP pipeline in Otay River Will be abandoned or converted to recycled water use.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
A new bridge crossing of the Otay River at Heritage Road provides an opportunity for the District to relocate a pipeline out of the
river into a more secure location and also provides an economical way to build a recycled water plpelfne to these commercial
customers.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $1 .2M to $1.43M to reflect latest projected costs and scopa of work.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE;
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100 %
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$5
FY
2017
$100
FY
2018
$380
FY
2019
$685
FY
2020
$260
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1,430
Total
100%
100%
145
PROJECT TITLE: Administration Carpet Replacement Program CIP Number: P2564
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE;
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Kent Payne
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$215,000
This project covers material and labor costs for a phased replacement of the existing carpet in the following areas and in order of
need: Customer Service; Finance; GM Suite; Admin Services; Engineering; and Training Room. Materials specified include
commercial grade carpet tile and broadloom. Installation has little to no impact on daily operations with cubicle lift-in-place
technologies and night/weekend work.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing carpet was installed in 1997 during the Headquarters expansion and remodel. Normal carpet lifespan is 10-12
years; at 18 years, Admin carpet is 150-180% lifespan and shows its age including deep wear patterns with areas of backing
separation, indelible stains, and extreme fading as noted with recent cubicle removal and planned removal due to downsizing.
COMMENTS;
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$0 $5
FY
2018
$210
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
201 9
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$215
Total
100%
100%
147
PROJECT TITLE: Technology Business Processes Improvement CIP Number: P2568
PROJECT MANAGER: Michael Kerr
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
2
$135,000
This project is to advance business processes and operational efficiencies through effective implementation of Information
technology with assistance from integrated workHow tools, document management solutions, and standardization,
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
(YR1/YR2)-Redesign of Business Process Re-engineering to streamline and/or sustain future demands and growth with
existing staff and enterprise integration enhancement.
(YR 1) -lnfoPath Forms -(designing, distributing, and submitting electronic forms) -Near end of life and will soon need to be
replaced. Staff will conduct analysis on software replacement.-$20,000
(YR1)-Upgrade of the District's back-end Intranet structure (SharePoint)-Near end of life for support and will need to be
upgraded with new features to Include Bl (Business Intelligence) plug-in solution (Dashboard Designer). -$20,000
(YR2) -Enterprise Content Management and Document Management Solution. The District's current content management
solution requires adaptation and new features in keeping abreast with current technologies to include content strategies and a
standard taxonomy. The current solution also does not integrate well with SharePoint, the District's current Intranet back-end
technology solution , and other possible integration solutions.-$75,000
COMMENTS:
In Fiscal Year 2017 staff will evaluate the replacement of an enterprise-wide Content Management solution. Staff 1s currently in
the discovery phase with evaluating several solutions in preparation for next Fiscal Year 2017 project. Staff is also evaluating the
existing system (TRIM) with the potential for additional requirements that may be needed. This evaluation should be completed
by the end of May 2016.
Project Replacement Cost-$135,000
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE; Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 % 0 % 100 % 0 % 100%
TOTAL: 0 % 0 % 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FV FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$35 $100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135
149
PROJECT TITLE: Metro Ethernet Implementation/ District Facilities -Pilot CIP Number:P2569
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
PROJECT MANAGER: Michael Kerr I.D. LOCATION:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: PRIORITY:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project involves the implementation of Metro Ethernet to Otay Water District Facllities.
JUSTIFJCA TION OF PROJECT:
District Wide
2
$145,000
The District currently uses Firetide. Inc., as its wireless technology solution to provide data communication to monitor its
supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system. The current environment is supported by a third party vendor, Day
Wireless. Currently, the District telies on this technology as its main source of information, however, this solution has been
inconsistent for the past 12 to 18 months. Numerous manhours, extensive troubleshooting, and vendor involvement have been
the key to maintaining the system with a band-aid approach.
Metra-E technology is cost-effective, consistent, scalable, and also has bandwidth management monitoring, thereby, minimizing
staffs efforts in extensive troubleshooting. The design of the Metra-E solution will provide elevated security and offer continuous
availability for the District's business continuity efforts. Data will be securely transported within a private network that will be
accessible by District staff only. This new wired technology will also minimize man hours necessary to support this solution and
give the District added value ln rellablllty and sustainability. Other factors in requesting a change in technology in support of
SCADA includes, decreased maintenance costs, Quality of Service (QOS), increased i.Jtflfzation, limitation of vulnerabilities,
encryption of sensitive data, and business continuity.
COMMENTS:
IT staff commenced the reenglneering/redesigning ofthe telecommunications architecture for the District's remote facilitles from
wireless to 'hard-wrred' technology in January 2016. The timeline to complete the sites will crossover into 2nd Quarter FY 2017
Additional funds are required for costs that include: outside vendor services for electrical improvements: additional electrical
modifications to support new devices at several sites; and additional conduits needed to support existing and new Jnfrastructure
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0 %
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000);
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$100 $45
FY
2018
$0
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0 % 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0 %
0 %
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$145
Total
100%
100%
151
PROJECT TITLE: SCADA Equipment & Infrastructure Enhancement CIP Number: P2570
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
PROJECT MANAGER: Michael Kerr
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 7/1/2017
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
This project is for the replacement and enhancement of the SCAD A equipment & infrastructure_
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
District Wide
2
$300,000
SCADA equipment and Infrastructure requires replacement and enhancement to effectrvely manage the District's operational
facilities.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$0 $100
FY
2018
$100
FY
2019
$100
FY
2.020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$300
Total
100%
100%
P2571Datacenter Network Enhancement & Replacement of
Infrastructure Componets
Michael Kerr
7/7/2018
0
District Wide
2
$200,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the replacement and enhancement of the infrastructure components for the Data Center Network.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Data Center Network infrastructure is reaching the end of its service life. This project plans for enhancement and replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $100 $100 $0 $0 $200
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
153
P2571
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
$0
$0
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2018 6/30/2020 $200
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
154
155
PROJECT TtTLE: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Replacement CIP Number: P2572
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
PROJECT MANAGER: Michael Kerr
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 7/1/2020
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
This project is for the replacement of the Enterprise Resource Planning system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Dlstrlct Wide
3
$500,000
Based on preliminary road maps from the current vendor, staff anticipates that the current ERP system, Eden, will become
inflexible and constricted with new systems on the horizon. Staff is presently identifying key core business processes in
achieving improvements in productivity and quality. Staff also anticipates that the outcome of the workshops will recognize that
Eden will lack the necessary functionality, business agility, flexibility, and technology necessary for the District's overall growth.
COMMENTS:
Staff will start the discovery process in FY 202.0 to identify J)ossible alternatives for a new system. Given the history of the
current solution, Eden, staff anticipates that FY 2021 will be appropriate for a replacement, In FY 202.1, the District will have been
utilizing Eden Finanoials for over 15 years. In the interim, staff will conduct research based on the District's current technology
infrastructure for best fit for conversion of historical data, proper workflow and security, and templates for utility billing and
invorcing.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
FY
2017
$0
FY
2018
$0
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$250
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$250
FY
Total
$500
Total
100%
100%
157
PROJECT TITLE: Res -657-1 and 657-2 Reservoir Demolitions
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:P2584
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$720,000
This project is to incorporate the existing 657 Pressure Zone into the 640 Pressure Zone, abandon and demolish the two (2) 657
Reservoirs, and modify associated 657 Zone Pressure Reducing Stations.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Eliminating the existing 657 Pressure Zone will simplify operations, reduce operating cost, and improve reliability.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
FY
2017
$0
FY
2018
$0
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
202t
$70
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$650
FY
Total
$720
Total
100%
100 %
R2077RecPL - 24-Inch, 860 Zone, Alta Road - Alta Gate/Airway
Stephen Beppler
5/23/2006
R2048, R2058, R2087
2
22
4
$4,500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for construction of approximately 9,300 feet of 24-inch pipeline within the 860 Pressure Zone in Alta Road from the
Alta Gate location to Airway Road. Portions of this project are being built by developers through reimbursement agreements. The
balance of this project will be constructed as part of the Otay Mesa recycled water system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide transmission capacity for development of Otay Mesa and link the planned 860-1 Reservoir with the
recycled water transmission system in Otay Mesa. Funding opportunity is the United States Bureau of Reclamation Water
Reclamation and Reuse Program, Title XVI of P.L. 102-575.
COMMENTS:
Temporary moratorium enacted for Otay Mesa recycled water in July 2014 will be revisited in near future. In the meanwhile,
putting a hold on all recycled water projects in Otay Mesa.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:100 %0 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$20 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,852
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$2,812
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
159
R2077
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2001 12/1/2009
1/1/2010 6/30/2019
$164
$451
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2019 12/31/2024 $3,885
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:39
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
160
161
PROJECT TITlE:
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Re<:PL -6-lnch, 450 Zone, otay Valley Road -Otay
Vall~y/Entertainment
CIP Number: R2079
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAl APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: R2028
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;
I.D.lOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$150,000
This project ts to construct the pipeline across the river and the pressure reducing station to reduce the pressure from the 680
Pressure Zone to a new 450 Pressure Zone to serve the amphitheater and water park.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT;
The City Is replacing the Heritage Road Bridge south of Main Street. Village 3 will construct recycled water to the intersection ol
Heritage Road and Main Street.
COMMENTS:
The pipeline Is estimated to cost $450K and a pressure reducing station S200K. Current CIP does not reflect this work; will be
updated upon acceptance of new Master Plan.
FUND DETAilS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement
Expansion 100% 0% 0%
TOTAL: 100% 0% 0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE fX $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
so $10
FY
2018
S10
FY
2019
$10
FY
2020
$10
FY
2021
$110
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
so
FY
Total
$150
Total
100%
100%
163
PROJECT TITLE: Sweetwatet River Wooden Trestle Improvement for the Recycled
Water Forcemain
CIP NUmber:R2109
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler I.D. LOCATION: 22/27
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/14/2014 PRIORITY:
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS: BUDGET AMOUNT: $375,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the modification of the wooden trestle to reduce the potential damage of a wildfire event to the structure.
JUSTIFICAT10N OF PROJECT:
The existing wooden trestle over the Sweetwater River supports a 14-inch steel force main for recycled water_ The 200 foot long
wooden trestle was built in 1980 and a recent assessment has recommended a brush management plan be prepared to extend
into the adjacent San Diego National Wildlife Refuge. The report also recommends the installation of a heat shield, installation of
a fire suppression system, or modification of the existing structure to reduce the threat of wildfire to the structure.
COMMENTS:
Fire protective measures installed in FY 2016. Warranty work in FY 2017. Project can be closed out at end of FY 2017. Project
bodget reduced to $360K from $600K to reflect the remaining work to be completed.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$360
FY
2017
$10
FY
2018
$5
Betterment Replacement
0 % 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$375
Total
100%
100%
165
PROJECT TITLE: RecPS -944-1 Optimization and Pressure Zone Modifications CIP Number:R2110
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: R2091
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DMSION: 1
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$200,000
This project is to improve the control strategy to increase pumping capacity and streamline operation of the pump station. As a
result of this effort, replacement of 5 service saddles on Clubhouse Drive will need to be replaced with higher pressure class
saddles. Add sump pump to an existing pressure reducing station vault located east of the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and
Hunte Parkway.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Revising the control strategy will increase pumping capacity and rmprove the Districfs ability to operate the pump station during
off-peak hours when electricity rates are low. Retrofitting the PRS vault with a sump pump will prolong the life expectancy .of
existing pressure reducing station components.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment 10 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100 'Yo
TOTAL: 0% 100 % 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$128 $5 $67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200
167
PROJECT TITLE: RecPL -14-lnch, 927 Zone, Force Main Improvements CIP Number:R2116
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORJTY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$2,500,000
This project is for the repair of the existing 16,000 LF. 14-lnch force main, built in 1978, and the replacement of fifteen (15)
blow-offs.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Active leaks and significant localized corrosion have been spot repaired. Additional spot repairs and replacement of the existing
blow-offs are needed to extend the remaining useful life of the facility.
COMMENTS:
Overall budget increased for future spot repairs to be Identified/quantified November 2016.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1.000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$590 $1 ,000 $900 $10 $0 $0 $0 $2,500
R2117RWCWRF Disinfection System Improvements
Stephen Beppler
3
22
2
$2,500,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF) does not have adequate chlorine contact basin volume to meet the
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requirement for chlorine contact time (CT) for the recycled water
produced from this facility, so it subsequently needs to use the 14-inch effluent force main to obtain the required CT. It is
believed that the high chlorine dosage needed with this arrangement is adversely impacting the force main, its appurtenances,
and the reservoir liners. If CT can be met within the plant, the chlorine residual leaving the plant can be lowered substantially.
Alternatives being evaluated include additional contact basin volume, changing to ultraviolet (UV) disinfection, and other options.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The District currently uses the existing 14-Inch cement mortar lining (CML) force main to meet the required chlorine contact time
resulting in a higher corrosion rate for facilities on this pipeline. Increasing the size of the chlorine contact basin or switching to
another disinfection method at the RWCWRF will extend the useful life of the force main and reservoir liners.
COMMENTS:
Improvement options include changing to UV disinfection in addition to increasing contact time at the plant. Preliminary
assessments indicate staying with chlorine gas disinfection is the most cost effective alternative. Prior to starting design of an
expanded contact tank, the results of the force main assessment will be determined to understand the impacts of the chlorine
gas on it.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$10 $50 $50 $150 $1,000 $150 $1,520
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$110
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
169
R2117
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 12/31/2015
1/1/2016 3/31/2020
$100
$250
PROJECT PHASE:
4/1/2020 12/31/2023 $2,150
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
170
171
P'ROJECT TITLE: Steele Canyon Sewer PS Large Solids Handling Improvements CIP Number:R2118
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
J.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
18
1
$75,000
This project is for installation of measures in the Steele Bridge Sewer Pump Station wet well to protect the sewage pumps from
assorted debris. The existing pumps have been requiring a high frequency of repairs and replacement of parts due to rags,
construction materials, and other non-typical wastewater solids entering the pump station. Assessment of installing either a new
chopper pump or bar screen to handle these types of materials is needed.
J USTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The prevention of large debris from reaching the existing pumps will result in reduced maintenance repairs and extend the life of
the sewage pumps. Based upon the current frequency and cost of maintenance of the sewage pumps, the proposed
improvement should pay for itself within a few years. Improvements may trigger safety upgrades to also be included.
COMMENTS:
Planning and design to begin in FY 2016 with construction in FY 2017.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 18 0% 100% 0% O% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100 o/o
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$7 $68 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75
R2119RWCWRF Automation & Security Upgrades
Stephen Beppler
3
22
1
$300,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project will identify and implement automation improvements at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Reclamation Facility
(RWCWRF )to decrease operations staffing requirements and enhance the plant security features. Prepare master plan of
upgrades required for implementation.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
To reduce long-term operating costs of the RWCWRF, the District will implement automation to streamline operator labor
requirements. In addition to the ability to monitor the treatment processes, the automation will also include security monitoring to
ensure the protection of the District facilities as well as ensure that future requirements associated with the on-site storage of
chlorine gas are met.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $200K to $300K to reflect preparation of overall Treatment Plant Master Plan under this CIP.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %100 %0 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$95 $50 $130 $0 $0 $0 $300
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$25
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
173
R2119
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
7/1/2015 9/30/2016
10/1/2016 6/30/2017
$120
$50
PROJECT PHASE:
7/1/2017 6/30/2019 $130
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:319
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
174
175
PROJECT TITLE: RWCWRF Filtered Water Storage Tank Improvements CIP Number: R2120
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: R2096
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$500,000
This project is to seal and recoat the interior and exterior of steel tank walls and concrete floor. Construct improvements to
facilitate operation and maintenance activities and compliance with all applicable codes and OSHA standards. Salvage or
replace and improve existing floating cover.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
HDR Engineering's Inspection and Condition Assessment Report dated May 2015 recommends structural improvements,
replacement of interior and exterior coatings, and replacement of the cathodic protection system. The coatings are in relatiVely
poor condition and in need of replacement
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$5 $250 $245 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
177
PROJECT TITLE: Emergency Recycled Water Fire Hydrant Installations CIP Number:R2122
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 7/1/2015
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF·PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I.D, LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
Distoct Wide
1
$75,000
This project will install 2-3 fire hydrants on the recycled water system for emergency fire suppression, The project includes
meeting Title 22 requirements, establishing protocol, and site selection.
JUS"'fiFICATION OF PROJECT:
Due to the Governor's mandate to reduce water use, CAL Fire has requested to use recycled water for emergency fire
suppression.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Bettennent Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAl 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$60 $15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75
179
PROJECT TITLE: Repurpose Otay Mesa Recycled Water Lines CIP Number: R2123
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$350,000
This project will access the alternative use potential for the Otay Mesa recycled waterlines utilizing hydraulic modeling.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Determining alternative uses for these waterlines will allow for these assets to be used rather than lie dormant.
With the moratorium on extending recycled wate( to Otay Mesa, the recycled waterlines already installed throughout the area will
be evaluated for potential uses.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 22 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $35 $5 $5 $5 $150 $150 $350
181
PROJECT TITLE: RecPS -927-1 Pump 5 Replacement CIP Number:R2124
DIRECTOR DNISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Don Anderson 1.0. LOCATION:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE~ P~IORITY: 1
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS: BUDGET AMOUNT: $55.000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is to replace the large engine driven recycled water pump #5 at the Ralph W Chapman Water Recycling Facrtity
(RWCWRF) 927-1 Pump Station.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Existing pump is old and corroded and has lost efficiency.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0 % 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55
183
PROJECT TITLE: San Diego County Sanitation District Outfall and RSD Outfall
Replacement
CIP Number:S2012
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 6/4/2003
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCA TJON:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
18
1
$3,550,000
This project is for the Otay Water District proportionate share of the San Diego County Sanitation District total costs for
replacement of various system components of the existing Spring Valley and Rancho San Diego Outfall Systems per terms of an
existing agreement with the SVSD. The reimbursement also includes a proportionate share of operating and maintenance costs.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Various components of the San Diego County Sanitation District Spring Valley Outfall and the Rancho San Diego Outfall are in
very bad condition and are. in need of repair and/or replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
Oo/o
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$1,020 $150 $150
Betterment Replacement
0 o/o 100%
0 o/o 100%
FY FY FY
2019 2020 2021
$200 $250 $300
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$350
FY
Total
$2,420
Total
100%
100%
185
PROJECT TITLE: Rancho San Diego Pump Station Rehabilitation CIP Number:S2027
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/16/2011
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT;
1.0.. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
18
1
$3,500,000
This project provides funding for the rehabilitation of the Rancho San Diego Pump Station located near Singer Lane. The project
is being designed and constructed by the County of San Diego, with the District sharing the costs. The County invoices the
District once a year.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing sewer pump station is over 20 years old and the pumps have reached the end of their useful lives. The pump station
also needs improvements to bring the station up to current OSHA requirements.
COMMENTS:
Project design is complete and the County is in the process of receiving construction bids.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL. 2017 2018
$267 $50 $1,200
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY FY FY
2019 2020 2021
$1 ,200 $783 $0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FV
Total
$3,500
Total
100%
100%
186
CIP Number: 52027
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED PROJECT PHASE: START DATE FINISHED DATE COST (X $1,000):
PLANNING: 7/1/2011 7/1/2013 $50
DESIGN: 7/1/2013 9/30/2016 $500
CONSTRUCTION: 10/1/2016 6/30/2019 $2,950
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
MAINT: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
ENERGY: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
CHEMICAL: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECT LOCATION: OWD Map Book: 331
~ 1
~ ~ L
~
j)-~0
j)-c0-~j)-~
CAMPORD
()
"}"::> ~ 0
~
v~ • fv~ 0 9~
Submitted By : Bob Kennedy Date: 4/28/2016
187
PROJECT TITLE: Sewer System Rehabilitation
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/16/2011
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: S2033
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
18
1
$3,000,000
This project rs for sewer .system rehabilitation efforts that have been identified, The.se efforts involve replacement of
approximately 13,000 lineal-feet of failing or damaged pipe segments, separated pipe joints, etc.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, which has allowed debris to form, and/or are damaged and in need of repair.
COMMENTS:
Project to be phased out after FY 2017, with remaining work split into separate projects with clearly defined scopes of work and
budgets. Construction of the Rancho San Diego (RSO) Basln Phase 1 project will remain under this project. Budget reduced from
$6M to $3M to reflect this change.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$2,800 $200
FY
2018
$0
Bettennent Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$3,000
Total
100%
100%
189
PROJECT TITLE: RWCWRF Sludge Handling System
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/14/2013
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: R2096
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2043
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
18
3
$1 ,500,000
This project is for a Sludge Handling System at the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF) to reduce the
amount of solids the District sends to Metro.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The District currently sends all sludge produced at RWCWRF to Metro for treatment The District's Wastewater Management
Plan provided a preliminary estimate of the cost of handling sludge at the RWCWRF that is close to the cost Metro charges the
District for treatment of solids.
COMMENTS:
City of San Diego is in the process of determining future sewer rates related to the implementation of the Pure Water Program.
Once these rates are established, the feasibility of handling solids at the RWCWRF can be fully assessed.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Bettennent Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment I D 18 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$41 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $47
191
PROJECT TITLE: Asset Management-Info Master Sewer Implementation CIP Number:S2047
PROJECT MANAGER: Ming Zhao
ORIGINAL APPROVED DAT"E:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$58,000
This project is for the purchase and implementation of sewer asset management decision making software, Info Master Sewer.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Allows for asset management of sewer system.
COMMENTS:
This was originally part of the P2486 Asset Management CIP. As this portion is for sewer, a separate CIP was created to reflect
the different funding resour~. The overall CIP am9unt does not change.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment ID 18 0% 100% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 100 % 0% 0% 100 %
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $30 $28 $0 $0 $0 $58
193
PROJECT TITLE: PS -870·2 Pump Station Replacement
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/1711995
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2451
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2083
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$17,000,000
This project is for the construction of a new pump station to replace the existing low Head and High Head Pump Stations.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The two existing Pump Stations have reached the end of their useful lives.
COMMENTS:
Increased overall CIP budget since adding a new 66-inch reservoir outlet pipe (+$800K). access road Utility bench (+$200K). and
District staff cursory refinements to outdated Carollo 60% construction cost estimate (+$1M).
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$1 ,710 $390 $3,500 $10,800 $500 $50 $50 $17,000
195
PROJECT TITLE: PS -1090·1 Pump Station Replacement (400 gpm) CIP Number:P2174
DIRECTOR DrvtSION: 5
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2174, P2176
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$1,500,000
This project is for the construction of a new pump station to replace the existing pump station. Improve pump station to incl ude
fire pump (1,500 gpm) and closed zone capability to eliminate the need for redundant 1090 Pressure Zone Reservoir (CIP
P2176).
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing pump station, originally constructed in 1962, has reached the end of its useful life.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0 % 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $1 $150 $200 $1 '149 $0 $0 $1 ,500
197
PROJECT TITLE: PL-20-lnch Pipeline Replacement, 711 Zone, Otay Lakes Road ·
at Santa Paula
CIP Number: P2400
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$2,000,000
This project is to replace 3,700 feet of 16-inch asbestos concrete water main in Otay lakes Road at Santa Paula.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing water main bottlenecks from 20-inch down to 16-inch. The existing 16-inch pipe causes high head loss at peak flow;
zone is already strapped for head because of volume supplied and length of zone.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 60% 0% 60%
Betterment ID 22 0% 40% 0% 0% 40%
TOTAL: 0% 40% 60% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $150 $350 $1,500 $2,000
199
PROJECT TITLE: 624·2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/21/2009
RELATED CJP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:P2493
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 4
J.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$1 ,675,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 624-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the most recent reservoir assessment report dated August 8. 2008, the 624-2 Reservoir interior coating is in
relatively poor condition and is in need of replacement. Based on the FY 2012 Corrosion Report for Reservoir Coatings, the
exterior was scheduled to be replaced in FY 2013.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$1 ,555 $60
FY
2018
$60
Bettennent Replacement
0 % 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1,675
Total
100%
100%
201
PROJECT TITLE: East Palomar Street Utility Relocation
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/17/2010
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2507
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$940,000
This project is for the utility relocations due to construction improvements to 1-805 near East Palomar Street. Both the existing
potable and recycled water systems will be impacted.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Caltrans wilt be making improvements to 1-805 that will result in conflicts with existing pipelines. Project funds reimbursement to
Caltrans.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment ~eplacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$720 $120
FY
2018
$100
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$940
Total
100%
100%
203
PROJECT TITLE: Pipeline Cathodic Protection Replacement Program CIP Number:P2508
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/17/2010
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
1.0. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
$725,000
This project is for the replacement and repairs of existing cathodic protectfon systems on various pipelines.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The ongoing cathodic protection program efforts have identified various pipelines for anode replacement, cathodic test station
repairs, installation of isolation kits, and repair of existing anode beds.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000);
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$229 $300
FY
2018
$100
FY
2019
$96
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$725
Total
100%
100%
205
PROJECT TITLE: 803-3 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/15/2012
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:P2518
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRJORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$700,000
This project provldes funding for the interior and exterior coating of the 803-3 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
Will be accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2010 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 803-3 Reservoir Interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement
COMMENTS:
ProJect complete. Project to be suspended until warranty inspection in 2017
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0 %
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$640 $40
FY
2018
$20
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$700
Total
100%
100%
207
PROJECT TITLE: 832-2 Reservoir" Interior/Exterior Coating CIP Number:P2519
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/1512012
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$750,000
This project provides fundfng for U'le interior and exterior coating ofthe 832-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility
will be accomplisMd to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2010 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 832-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatiVely poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Project under construction.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITUR_E SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2.022 Total
$665 $65 $20 $0 $0 $0 $0 $750
209
PROJECT TITLE: 71 1·2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2530
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2529
DIR.ECTOR DIVISION: 1
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$840,000
This project is for the interiot and exterior coating of the 711-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 711-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget increase from $790K to $840K in anticipation of structural repairs that have been encountered on many of the tanks
recoated in the past few years,
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$405 $360
FY
201 8
$25
FY
2019
$50
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FV
Total
$840
Total
100%
100%
211
PROJECT TITLE: 711·1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating CIP Number: P2530
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2529
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
I.D. LOCATION;
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$1,040,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 711-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 711-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0 % 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000);
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$850 $90 $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 $1,040
213
PROJECT TITLE: 944-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS: P2532
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:P2531
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
1.0. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$410,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 944-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodtc Assessment Report, the 944-1 Reservoir inter'ior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $390K to $410K to reflect actual bid amount: for structural improvements discovered during construction.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE~
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1~000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$310 $50
FY
2018
$50
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$410
Total
100%
100%
215
PROJECT TITLE: 944-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating CIP Number:P2532
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2531
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$1,050,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 944-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 944-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacemenl
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $946K to $1.05M to reflect actual bid amount and anticipated structural improvements encountered on
many other tanks being recoated.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE .(X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$950 $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 ,050
217
PROJECT TITLE: 1200-1 Reservoir fnterlor & Exterior Coating CIP Number:P2533
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE;
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
Kevin Cameron
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$810,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of'the 1200-1 Reservoir. In addition. an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 1200-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are ln need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $565K to $810K to reflect latest bid results and include structural improvements required on many tanks
recently recoated.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Bettennent Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $10 $700 $50 $50 $0 $0 $610
219
PROJECT TITLE: 978-1 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating CIP Number: P2534
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
1.0. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$715,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 978-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF l»ROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 978-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are in relatively poor
condition and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget Increased from $325K to $715K to reflect latest bid results and include structural improvements required on many tanks
recently recoated The 978-1 was recently cleaned to remove silt. and a video of the tank showed fragments of steel on the floor.
The rafters will need to be replaced. The tank was built in 1959.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: E.xpansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FV FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 .2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $615 $50 $50 $0 $0 $0 $715
P2535458-2 Reservoir Interior & Exterior Coating & Upgrades
Kevin Cameron
5/15/2012
2
22
2
$885,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 458-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2011 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 458-2 Reservoir interior coating is in relatively poor condition and is in
need of replacement. The exterior coating on the roof is failing and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $839K to $885K to reflect actual construction costs.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$50 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $885
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$785
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
221
P2535
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/1/2013 9/30/2013
10/1/2013 12/31/2014
$10
$65
PROJECT PHASE:
1/1/2015 6/29/2018 $810
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:66
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
222
223
PROJECT TITLE: Administration and Operations Building Fire Sprinkler
Replacement Program
CIP Number: P2538
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$1 10,000
A licensed fire sprinkler designer is required to prepare plans and specifications for the work and obtain all permits and approvals
before the project can be competitively bid by contractors.
JUSTIACATION OF PROJECT:
lnspectlons of the Administration building and the Operations building fire sprinkler systems are performed to NFPA-25,
California Code of Regulations, Title 19 and Local Fire Department requirements annually_ A recent inspection of the fire
sprinkler system has identified corrosion throughout the systems as the cause for leaks the District experienced last year and is
' recommending the replacement of the existing fire sprinkler systems piping.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ;000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$100
FV
201 7
$10
FV
2018
$0
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FV
2019
$0
FV
2020
$0
FV
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FV
2022
$0
FY
Total
$110
Total
100%
100%
225
PROJECT TITLE: South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Utility Relocations CIP Number:P2539
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
1.0. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22/27
1
$1 ,090,000
This project is for all utility relocations required due to construction of South Bay BRT. Facility relocations vary in size and they
impact both the potable and recycled water systems.
JUSTrFICA TlON OF PROJECT:
Project improvements will affect the locations of some OWO facilities in streets in Chula Vista. Engineering/staff time wlll be
needed to review the design drawfngs and identify any OWD facilities which will .need relocation or vertical adjustment. A
construction budget is also needed for the work in relocating and adjusting these facilities.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $940K to $1.09M to reflect actual costs encountered to date and remaining work to be completed.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100 %
TOTAL: 0% 0 % 100% 0 % 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$850 $100 $100 $40 $0 $0 $0 $1 ,090
P2542850-3 Reservoir Interior Coating
Kevin Cameron
5
22
2
$630,000
PROJECT MANAGER:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
PROJECT TITLE:CIP Number:
DIRECTOR DIVISION:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the interior coating of the 850-3 Reservoir.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The interior coating is in poor condition and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $530K to $630K to reflect actual bid costs and added structural repairs encountered during construction.
FUNDING SOURCE:Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
TOTAL:0 %0 %100 %0 %100 %
FUND DETAILS:
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$50 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $630
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$530
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
227
P2542
PROJECT SCHEDULE:
PLANNING:
DESIGN:
CIP Number:
ESTIMATED
START DATE
ESTIMATED
FINISHED DATE
ESTIMATED
COST (X $1,000):
CONSTRUCTION:
6/30/2013 7/31/2014
8/1/2014 4/30/2015
$20
$60
PROJECT PHASE:
5/1/2015 12/29/2017 $550
PROJECT LOCATION:OWD Map Book:355
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PROJECTED INCREMENTAL OPERATING EXPENDITURES SCHEDULE ($):
MAINT:
ENERGY:
CHEMICAL:
Submitted By:Date:5/16/2016Jolene Fielding
228
229
PROJECT TITLE: 850·1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating CIP Number: P2543
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$875,000
This project is for the rnterior ar1d exterior coating of the 850-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the f._cility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT~
Based upon the current Cathodic Assessment Report, the interior and exterior coatings on the 850-1 Reservoir are nearing the
end of their useful life and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $575K to $875K to reMect recent bid prices and anticipated structural repairs that have been encountered
on many of the tanks recently recoated.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FV FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$0 $10 $645
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY FV FV
2019 2020 2021
$120 $50 $50
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FV
Total
$875
Total
100%
100%
231
PROJECT TITLE: 850-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2544
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$1,070,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 850-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the current Cathodic Assessment Report, the interior and exterior coatings on the 850-2 Reservoir are· nearing the
end of their useful life and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Budget increased fi"om $940K to $1 .07M to reflect recent bid prices and anticipated structural repairs encountered on many
tanks recently recoated.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$0 $835 $135
Bettennent Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY FY FY
2019 2020 2021
$50 $50 $0
New Water Supply
0 %
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1,070
Total
100%
100%
233
PROJECT TITLE: 980-1 Reservoir Interior Exterior Coating
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGIN.AL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2546
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2545
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$1,495,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 980-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to aU applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUST! FICA TION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 980-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are nearing the end of
their useful life and are in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
EJtpansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1;000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2.017
$1,065 $330
FY
2018
$50
FY
2019
$50
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
fY
Total
$1 ,495
Thtal
100%
100%
235
PROJECT TITLE: 980-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating CIP Number: P2546
PROJECT MANAGER : Kevfn Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2545
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
B UDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$1,450,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 980-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the current Cathodic Assessment Report, the interior and exterior coatings on the 980-2 Reservoir are nearihg the
end of their useful life and are in need of replacement
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $20 $1,330 $50 $50 $0 $1,450
237
PROJECT TITLE: Administration and Operations Parking Lot Improvements CIP Number:·P2555
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$500,000
This project is for AC pavement repairs, slurry seal, re-striping and update area lighting improvements to existing Administration
and Operations parking lots.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Parking lot needs to be re-striped and AC pavement needs to be resealed. Area lighting will be updated to more energy efficient
fixtures.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0 % 100%
TOTAL: 0 % 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$40 $275 $185 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500
239
PROJECT TITLE: 520 Res Recirculation Pipeline Chemical Supply and Analyzer
Feed Replacement Project
CIP Number: P2557
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$100,000
This project is for the existing chemical feed lines that are cast/black iron and need to be replaced with new dual wall CPVC
chemical feed lines. Other miscellaneous improvements needed. Length approximately 150 teet.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing chemical feed lines for the 520 Reservoir are experlencing deterioration and not designed to current code for
providing chemical containment.
COMMENTS:
Planning and start of design in FY 2016. Complete design and construction of replacement ammonia feed lines proposed in FY
2017.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0 % 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$10 $50 $35 $5 $0 $0 $0 $100
241
PROJECT TITLE: Pressure Vessel Repair and Replacement Program
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchi<:>ro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DAlE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2559
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I.D. LOCATION:
'PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
2.
$650,000
This project will repair, coat, and/or replace entirely the pressure vessel interiors and exteriors and appurtenances for the
District's potable and recycled water distribution systems including (13) thirteen existing steel pressure vessels and five (5}
hydropneumatic and eight (8) surge tanks of various ages. Pressure vessel interiors and exteriors and appurtenances will be
repaired, coated, and/or replaced entirely. Permanent or portable stairs or ladders will be provided as well.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT~
Pressure vessels are a key component ofthirteen (13) existing District pump stations. Routine Inspection by qualified
professionals, and follow up repair and!Of replacement, are needed to extend the life expectancy of each pressure vessel and
associated pump station facility.
COMMENTS:
Increased overall CIP budget to account for total replacement of Vista Diego hydropneumatic tank and adding access to the
pressure vessels.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,.000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$30 $65 $125
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY FY FY
2019 2020 2021
$125 $125 $125
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$55
FY
Total
.$650
Total
100%
100%
243
PROJECT TITLE: Res -711 ~3 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:P2561
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22/27
2
$1,800,000
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
E.XPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
$0 $1 $4 $95 $1 ,700 $0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1.800
Total
100%
100%
245
PROJECT TITLE: Res -571•1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS;
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2562
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$2,600,000
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The exlstin,g membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$0 $90
FY
2018
$2,500
FY
2019
$5
FY
2020
$5
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$2,600
Total
100%
100%
247
PROJECT TITLE: Res • 870-1 Reservoir Cover/Liner Replacement
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2563
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
3
$1,000,000
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with a new membrane system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YE.ARS: FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 202,
$0 $1 $1 $9 $90 $89Q
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1,000
Total
100%
100%
249
PROJECT TITLE: 803-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades CIP Number: P2565
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$940,000
This project Is for the interior and exterior coating of the 803-2 Reservoir. In addition. an assessment of the facility Will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 803-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are near the end of thelr
useful life and in need of replacement
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $725K to $940K to reflect recent bid prices and anticipated structural repairs that have been encountered
on many of the tanks recently recoated.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SC!iEOULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
FY
2017
$0
flY
2018
$0
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$20
FY
2020
$820
FY
2021
$50
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$50
FY
Total
$940
Total
100%
100%
251
PROJECT TITLE: 520-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades CIP Number:P2566
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
3
$1,500,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 520-2 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 520-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are at the end of their
useful life and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEAR.S: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $20 $1 ,380 $100 $1.500
253
PROJECT TITLE: 1004-2 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades CIP Number:P2567
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
1.0. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
3
$905,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 1004-2 Reservoir. In addition. an assessment of the fac11ity will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 1 004-2 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are at the end of their
useful life and in need of replacement
COMMENTS:
Budget increased from $565K to $905K to reflect recent bid prices and anticipated structural repairs that have been encountered
on many of the tanks recently recoated.
FUND OET AJLS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL;
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$0 $0
FY
2018
$0
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$20
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$885
FY
Total
$905
Total
100%
100%
255
PROJECT TITLE: PL -12-lnch Pipeline Replacement, 803 Zone, Hillsdale Road CIP Number: P2573
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS: P2573.B
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
1
$1,750,000
This project is for the replacement of approximately 4,000 feet of 12-inch potable water main within the 803 Pressure Zones in
Hillsdale Road. The County has a CIP to re-pave Hillsdale Road after the pipeline replacement project is complete.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project will replace thin wall, 1959 era, steel pipe of the originally constructed under as-built number 01-03. Two of the
original four miles of thin wall steel p(pe have been already replaced through separate CIP and developer projects. The
remaining 2.1 miles of pipe has developed several water main breaks, including catastrophic failures due to semi-localized
coating failures and severe corrosion of the thin wall steel can
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$0 $160 $225
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY FY FY
2019 2020 2021
$1,365 $0 so
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1 ,750
Total
100%
100%
257
PROJECT TITLE: PL -12-lnch and 14-inch Pipeline Replacement, 803 and 978
Zone, Vi.sta Grande, Pence Drive
CIP Number:P2574
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchloro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2573
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
J.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$2,750,000
This prject is for the replacement of approximately 0.6 miles of 12-fnch and 0. 7 miles of 14-inch potable water main within the
803 and 978 Pressure Zones in Vista Grande Road, Pence Drive, Vista Vereda, and easements on prfvate property.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project will replace all remaining thin wall, 1959 era, steel pipe of the originally constructed under as-built number 01-03.
Two of the original four miles of thin wall steel pipe have been already replaced through separate CIP and developer projects.
The remaining 2.1 miles of pipe has developed several watermain breaks including catastrophic failures due to semi-localized
coating failures and severe corrosion of the thin wall steel can.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
FY
2017
$50
FY
2018
$100
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$275
FY
2020
$400
FY
2021
$1 ,925
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$2,750
Total
100%
100%
259
PROJECT TITLE: PS -711-2 (PS 711-1 Replacement and Expansion) -14,000 gpm CIP Number:P2578
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro 1.0. LOCATION:
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: PRIORITY:
RELA TEO CIP PROJECTS: P2473 BUDGET AMOUNT:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the construction of a new Pump Station to replace the existing Pump Station.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing Pump Station was de-rated in 2010 to resolve vibration and cavitation issues.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply
Replacement 0% 0% 60% 0%
Betterment ID 22 0% 40% 0% 0%
TOTAL: 0% 40% 60% 0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
$0 $0 $0 $0 $350 $3,200 $3,050
2
$6,600,000
Total
60%
40%
100%
FY
Total
$6,600
261
PROJECT TITLE: Temporary Lower Otay Pump Station Improvements CIP Number:P2579
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2258
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
7
1
$140.000
This project is for the replacement of a 30-inch flow meter and adjoining pipln,g due to internal deterioration as well as the
addition of a security system as this installation is not currently so equipped
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Meter and pipe are in need of replacement and the station does not have a security system.
COMMENTS:
Station is typically used during the annual CWA aqueduct shutdown in spring. Replacement should be completed by Spring 2017
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$0 $140
FY
2018
$0
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$140
Total
100%
100%
263
PROJECT TITLE: East H Street Bike Lane Utility Coordination CIP Number: P2592
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 255
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
1
$50,000
This project is fo the relocation of conflicting District facilities. The City of Chula Vista is constructing a bike lane along East H
Street from Buena Vista Way to the Southwestern College entrance ..
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
District facilities are located with the City of Chula Vista right-of-way, requiring the District to move them as needed with
improvements.
COMMENTS:
The City of Chula Vista has indicated construction will run from May 2016 to November 2016, with most of the District wor1<
needing to be completed before August 2016.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 % 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50
265
PROJECT TITLE: 458·1 Reservoir Interior/Exterior Coating & Upgrades CIP Number: P2593
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$840,000
This project is for the interior and exterior coating of the 458-1 Reservoir. In addition, an assessment of the facility will be
accomplished to assure compliance to all applicable codes and OSHA standards.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Based upon the 2013 Cathodic Assessment Report, the 458-1 Reservoir interior and exterior coatings are at the end of their
useful life and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% HlO%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000);
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10 $830 $840
267
PROJECT TITLE: Large Meter Replacement
PROJECT MANAGER: Andrea Carey
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2594
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
1
$48-5,000
This project is for the replacement of water meters 3-inch or larger.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Of the 219 large meters in the ground, 105 are no longer repairable and must be replaced. Staff anticipates 97 of these meters
will need to replaced in the next three years.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100 %
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $240 $150 $95 $0 $0 $0 $485
269
PROJECT TITLE: RWCWRF • RAS Pump Replacement
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/14/2013
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: R2096
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CJP Number:R2111
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$570,000
This project is to replace and upgrade the RAS pumps to 360 GPM to improve process control of the plant.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
These improvements are needed due to increased pumping requirements of the new process. The existing pumps were installed
In 1992 and are reaching the end of their useful life.
COMMENTS;
Project construction completed in FY 2016. Warranty work in FY 2017. Project can be closed out at end of FY 2017 Project
budget reduced from $60DK to $560K to reflect the project status.
FUND DETAJLS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0 % 0% 100 %
0% 0 % 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$555 $10
FV
2018
$5
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0 %
0%
FY
2022
$0
FV
Total
$570
Total
100%
100%
271
PROJECT TITLE: 450-1 Oisjnfection Facility Rehabifitation CIP Number; R2112
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
1
$265,000
This project is for the replacement of the two (2) existing sodium hypochlorite tanks, relocate and replace the valves and piping
on the existing sodium hypochlorite feed system, remove existing acoustic louver and replace with roll-up door.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
One of the existing sodium hypochlorite tanks has failed and is in need of replacement. The other is approaching the end. of its
useful life. The sodium hypochlorite feed system has faulty valves that are no longer available. The acoustic louver was
installed for a diesel generator which is no longer needed. A roll-up door will ease future replacement of equipment.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$215
FY
2017
$25
FY
2018
$25
Bettennent Replacement
0% 100%
0 'Yo 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$265
Total
100%
100%
273
PROJECT TITLE: Res -944-1 Reservoi,.. Cover/Liner Replacement CIP Number:R2121
PROJECT MANAGER: Jeff Marchioro
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
J.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$1,400,000
This project is for the replacement of the existing membrane floating cover and liner with a new membrane system
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing membrane floating cover and liner have reached the end of their useful lives and require replacement to meet
regulatory requirements.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$20 $1 $1 $30 $1 ,346 $0 $0 $1,400
275
PROJECT TITLE: Campo Road Sewer Main Replacement
PROJECT MANA(?ER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGJNAL APPROVED DATE: 5/17/2010
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: 52024
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
t.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
18
1
$8,500,000
This project is to upgrade the sewer main capacity of approximately 11,050 feet of existing 10-inch PVC sewer main, 450 feet of
1 0-inch reinforced polymer mortar pipe sewer main, and 50 feet of 15-inch sewer main. The project location begins at the south
end of Avocado Blvd, through the Rancho San Diego Village Shopping Center, paralleling the SR-94/Campo Road in the
adjacent open space.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing sewer main is under-sized and must be replaced to increase capacity. Portions of the sewer main are located in
areas of sensltive habitat making it difficult to access for maintenance.
COMMENTS:
Project design to be completed in FY 2016. Construction estimate is $6.5M, wllh additional costs for administration, easements,
inspection, and management bringing the estimate to $7 .3M (was previously estimated at $4 5M). Projected construction costs
throughout the design phase have consistently been betweeo $6-7M.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Betterment 10 18 0% 50% 0% 0% 50%
Replacement 0% 0% 50% 0% 50%
TOTAL: '0% 50% 50% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$1,200 $50 $4,750 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 $8,500
277
PROJECT TITLE: Trenchless Sewer Rehabilitation
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: 52044
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$650,000
This project is to repair sewer damage by trenchJess repair methods at over 50 identified sewer sites. The planning and design
for this project was begun under 52033 and is now separated out into its own project entity.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, which has allowed debrls to form, and/or are damaged and need to be repaired.
COMMENTS:
Project planned to be bid and constructed in FY 2017.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$0 $600 $50
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY FY' FY
2019 2020 2021
$0 $0 $0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY'
2022
$0
FY
Total
$650
Total
100%
100%
279
PROJECT TITLE: Fuerte Drive Sewer Relocation
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2045
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
J.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
1
$200,000
This project fs for the relocation of the Fuerte Drive Sewer Main. The County of San Diego is realigning a portion of Fuerte Drive
in an area where the District has identified sewer Site 34 for rehabilitation. This design will be accelerated to enable the work to
be completed in coordination with the County road work.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, which has allowed debris to form, and/or are damaged and need to be repaired.
COMMENTS:
Planning work has started under the S2033 project, from which this project is being taken from.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X$1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FV FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $190 $10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200
281
PROJECT TITLE: RWCWRF ·Aeration Panels Replacement
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2046
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
18
1
$450,000
This project is for the replacement of aeration panels in 39 units to provide better air distribution at equal pressure. The existing
aeration diffuser panels installed in the aeratron basins are no longer being produced by the manufacturer and the facility has
several panels in need of replacement. Options include manufacturer's retrofit with their currently offered panels or explore other
alternative manufacturers. Each basin currently has 13 panels for a total of 39 units. Completion of the aeration header loop is
also included to provide better air distribution at equal pressure.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Failures of existing aeration diffuser panels require replacement immediately
COMMENTS:
Recommend panel replacement be perform in a two-step process. Retrofit of one basin at first will enable the functional panels
from that basin to be used as replacements in the other basins. This will allow for assessment of the operation of the new panels
prior to implementing in all basins.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Bettennent Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY' FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $250 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 $450
283
PROJECT TITLE: Hillsdale Road Sewer Repairs
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DA T·E:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2048
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
1
$500,000
This project is to reparr two (2) areas of sewer mains, Sites 790 and 878, will be designed and constructed in coordination with
the proposed waterline improvements in Hillsdale Road. This work was originally included in 52033.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, which has allowed debris to form, and/or are damaged and need to be repaired.
COMMENTS:
Coordination with the waterline project is necessary
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0 % 0% 100 % 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0 % 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $100 $390 $10 $0 $0 $0 $500
285
PROJECT TITLE: Calavo Basin Sewer Rehabilitation -Phase 2
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2049
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$1,000,000
This project is for repairs to the gravity sanitary sewer system to repair areas with potential for sewer backups and spills. This
project addresses the following nine sewer sites, primarily in the Calavo area: 25, 27, 56, 65, 78. 230. 310, 452 and 1460.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, which has allowed debrls to accumulate, and/or are damaged and need to be repaired.
COMMENTS:
This project is taken from 52033 and is the next highest priority areas after the Rancho San Diego Phase 1 project for open cut
repairs.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
FY
2017
$20
FY
2018
$130
Betterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$600
FY
2020
$50
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1,000
Total
100%
100%
287
PROJECT TITLE: Rancho San Diego Basin Sewer Rehabilitation -Phase 2 CIP Number: S2050
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
1.0 . LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$1,300,000
This project is for the repairs to gravity sanitary sewer system to repair areas with potential for sewer backups and spills. This
project addresses the followfng eight sewer sttes: 705. 724, 735, 7 47, 750, 772, 775 and 847,
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, whlch has allowed debris to form, and/or are damaged and need to be repaired.
COMMENTS:
This project is taken from S2033 and is the next highest priority area for open cut repairs after the Calavo Phase 2 project.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$0 $0
FY
2018
$0
!3etterment Replacement
0% 100%
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$50
New Wate.r Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$250
FY
Total
$300
Total
100%
100%
289
PROJECT TITLE: RWCWRF -Headworks Improvements"
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2051
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$750,000
This project is for the refurbishment of the treatment plant headworks, including rotary screen concrete channels, grating, and grit
removal facilities.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The existing concrete channels and grating are deteriorating and in need of replacement Grit removal is under-performing, with
operators indicating grit buildup in the aeration basins.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100 % 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FV FV FV FV FV FV FV
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $50 $100 $600 $0 $0 $750
291
PROJECT TITLE: RWCWRF -Access Roads Repaving
PROJECT MANAGER: Kevin Cameron
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2052
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$750,000
Ths project is to replace the existing asphalt pavement for access road from Singer Lane to the plant and within the facility. Area
to be paved is about 9000 SY.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Road surface is deteriorating and in need of replacement.
COMMENTS:
Project needs to wait for the completion of the upgrade to RSD Pump Station
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $50 $400 $300 $750
293
PROJECT TITLE: RWCWRF -Sedimentation Basins Refurbishment
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGlNAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: 52053
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 3
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$600,000
This project is to replace on each of the three (3) sedimentation basins the effluent weirs, scum weir actuators, and drives as
necessary. Install new motor actuated valves on the solids collectfon piping to complete the automation of this system.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The weirs and drives are at the end of their life and need replacement. The scum weir actuators do not function adequately to
allow for automation of the movement.
COMMEN-TS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Bettennent Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ()( $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
$0 $0 $0 $0 $60 $140
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$400
FY
Total
$600
Total
100%
100%
295
PROJECT TITLE: Calavo Basrn Sewer Rehabilitation -Phase 3
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE':
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number:S2054
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
2
$1,300,000
This project is for the repairs to gravity sanitary sewer system to repair areas with potential for sewer backups and spills. This
project addresses the following nine sewer sites in the Calavo area: 5.1, 93, 126, 150.1, 150.2, 186, 200, 436 and 1000.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The closed circuit television sewer assessment program process has assisted in the identification of sewer mains containing
sags, which has allowed debris to form. andJor are damaged and need to be repaired.
COMMENTS:
This project 4s taken from S2033 and is the next highest priority areas after the Rancho San Diego Phase 2 project for open cut
repairs.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion
0%
0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS:
TOTAL
$0
FY
2017
$0
FY
2018
$0
Bettennent Replacement
0% 100 %
0% 100%
FY
2019
$0
FY
2020
$0
FY
2021
$50
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$250
FY
Total
$300
Total
100%
100%
297
PROJECT TITLE: Vehicle Capital Purchases CIP Number: P2282
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
PROJECT MANAGER: Doug Rahders I.D. LOCATION: District Wide
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 6/3/1996 PRIORITY: 1
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: BUDGET AMOUNT: $5,491 ,000
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
This project is for the capital purchase of various vehicles for daily Otay Water District functions.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Replacements or newly acquired vehicles will be used for operational and administrative fUnctions throughout the entire Otay
Water District.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100 %
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$3,646 $197 $290 $240 $187 $236 $253 $5,049
299
PROJECT TITLE: Office Equipment and Furniture Capital Purchases CIP Number: P2285
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
PROJECT MANAGER: Kent Payne
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 6/3/1996
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
!.D. lOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
.$589,000
This project is for capital purchases· of various office equipment and furniture items used for daily Otay Water District functions.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Replacements or new acquisitions of office equrpment and furniture wnl be used for operational and administrative functions
throughout the entire Otay Water District.
COMMENTS:
2016-Projected expenditure for Customer Service wor1<station ergonomic upgrades.
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Replacement 0% 0% 100 % 0% 100%
TOTAL: 0% 0% 100% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE ~(X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$536 $15 $15 $15 $8 $0 $0 $589
301
PROJECT TITLE: Field Equipment Capital Purchases
PROJECT MANAGER: Doug Rahders
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 613/1996
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2286
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
I. D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
$1 ,634.000
This project is for capital purchases of various pieces of field equipment used for dally Otay Water District functions.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
Replacements or new acquisitions of field equipment wlfl be used for operational functions througt"lout the entire Otay Water
District.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Replacement
TOTAL:
Expansion Betterment Replacement
0% 0% 100%
0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY
TOTAL 2017
$1 ,386 $38
FY
2018
$105
FY
2019
$50
FY
2020
$55
FY
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FY
2022
$0
FY
Total
$1,634
Total
100%
100%
303
PROJECT TITLE: APCD Engine Replacements and Retrofits
PROJECT MANAGER: Doug Rahders
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 12/6/2000
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
CIP Number: P2366
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 0
J.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
District Wide
1
$3,371,000
This project will replace and/or retrofit 14 diesel fuel burning engines with the best technology exhaust gas control systems
throughout the Otay Water District to comply with APCD engine emission regulations. The Otay Water District also needs to
replace, re-power, andfor retrofit the heavy vehicle diesel fleet to comply with upcoming emissions regulations.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The Otay Water District is requrred to replace and/or retrofit its engines to meet current APCD requirements, including the Air
Toxlcs Control Measures, and to be consistent with the intended operation of the engines to meet system demands. The Otay
Water Distrfct also needs to replace, re-power, and/or retrofit the heavy vehicle diesel fleet to meet future emlssfons
requirements. In FY 2016, two (2) potable engine driven pumps estimated at $520K are being rebUdgeted in FY 2017 because
the manufacturer cannot deliver until FY 2017.
COMMENTS:
2/21/2014: Two (2) portable gensets and two (2) pump engine APCD permits are scheduled to expire on 12/31/2016.
FUND DETAILS: j
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$2,551 $820 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,371
305
PROJECT TITLE: PL-10" to 12" Oversize, 1296 Zone, PB Road-Rolling Hills Hydro
PS/PB Bndy
CIP Number: P2325
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 4
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
J.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$22,000
This project is for the construction of approximately 6.900 feet of 12-inch pipeline within the 1296 Pressure Zone, from the
Rolling Hills Hydropneumatic Pump Station to the future 1296 Reservoir. A portion of the project wlll be constructed by the
developer and is subject to reimbursement at actual cost for the oversize portion per Board policy.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
The conversion from a hydropneumatic tank system to a reservoir includes the construction of a waterline from the current
system to the proposed tank location. Upsizing of the theoretically required 10-lnch water main to a 12-inch line will provide the
District adequate water movement capabilities for future needs.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE:
Expansion
TOTAL:
Expansion
100%
100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1,000):
PRIOR YEARS~
TOTAL
$19
FV
2017
$3
FV
2018
$0
Betterment Replacement
0% 0%
0% 0%
FV
2019
$0
FV
2020
$0
FV
2021
$0
New Water Supply
0%
0%
FV
2022
$0
FY
Total
$22
Total
100%
100%
307
PROJECT TITLE: PL -12-inch, 624 Zone, Heritage Road -· Olympic/Otay Valley CIP Number: P2403
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 5/23/2005
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: P2404
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 2
1.0. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$925,000
This project is for construction of approximately 6,800 feet of 12-inch pipeline within the 624 Pressure Zone in He(itage Road
between Olympic Parkway to Otay Valley Road/Main Street. This project will be constructed by the developer and is subject to
reimbursement per Board polfcy.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This project will provide transmission capacity for development of otay Ranch and other areas within the 624 Pressure Zone.
COMMENTS:
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100% 0% 0 % 0 % 100%
TOTAL: 100 % 0% 0% 0% 100%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $11000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50 $500 $550
309
PROJECT TITLE: HWY 94 Upsized Utility Relocations at Melody lane CIP Number:P2556
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE:
RELATED CIP PROJECTS:
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 5
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$100,000
This project is for the upsized utility relocations required to accommodate the County of San Diego road improvement project
along HWY 94 at Melody Lane. Facility relocations are for upsizing the existing 8-inch, 12-lnch, and 16-lnch potable water
pipeline as needed to larger pipelines. This reimbursement is only for incremental pipeline cost due to upsize.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
COMMENTS:
Cost Estimate:
$20K -8-inch to 16-inch upsize-70 feet
$120K -12-lnch to 16-inch upsize - 1,155 feet
$0 -16-inch relocation -1, 780 feet
$75K-12-inch to 16-inch upsize -735 feet
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion
Replacement 0%
TOTAL: 0%
EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018
$0 $1 $99
Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
0% 100% 0% 100%
0% 100% 0% 100%
FY FY FY FY FY
2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100
311
PROJECT TITLE: RecPL • 20-lnch, 680 Zone, Village 2 • Heritage/la Media CIP Number: R2084
DIRECTOR DIVISION: 1
PROJECT MANAGER: Stephen Beppler
ORIGINAL APPROVED DATE: 6/2/2004
RELATED CIP PROJECTS: R2083, R2085
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
I.D. LOCATION:
PRIORITY:
BUDGET AMOUNT:
22
2
$365,000
This project is for construction of approximately 2,000 feet of20-inch pipeline within the 680 Pressure Zone In Village 2 in Santa
Victoria Road from Santa Carolina Road to Santa Alexia Avenue.
JUSTIFICATION OF PROJECT:
This proJect will provide transmission capacity for the recycled water sUpply pumped from the 680-1 Pump Station to the 680 and
higher pressure zones. Significant energy savings will occur due to lower total dynamic head requirements for the 680-1 Pump
Station. Funding opportunity is the United States Bureau of Reclamation Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, Title XVI of
P.L 102-575.
COMMENTS:
This is a developer driven project. A reimbursement agreement is expected to be considered by the Board in FY 2017.
Developer budget is 2,000 LF at a cost of $150 per foot for a total of $300K.
Inspection and staff budget is $65K..
This CIP budget was reduced from $970K to $365K for the FY 2017 CIP budget
FUND DETAILS:
FUNDING SOURCE: Expansion Betterment Replacement New Water Supply Total
Expansion 100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
TOTAL: 100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
.EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE (X $1 ,000):
PRIOR YEARS: FY FY FY FY FY FY FY
TOTAL 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
$0 $10 $40 $31 5 $0 $0 $0 $365
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Job Classification and Salary Schedule
Effective July 1, 2016
Exhibit 2
Position
Exempt (E)
Non‐Exempt
(NE)
Salary
Grade Min
Hourly
Mid Max Min
Monthly
Mid Max Min
Annually
Mid Max
Accountant NE 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
Accounting Technician NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Assistant Chief E 38 $65.7349 $73.9516 $82.1683 $11,394.05 $12,818.28 $14,242.50 $136,728.59 $153,819.31 $170,910.02
Assistant Civil Engineer I NE 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
Assistant Civil Engineer II E 27 $38.4338 $43.2379 $48.0421 $6,661.87 $7,494.57 $8,327.30 $79,942.39 $89,934.86 $99,927.57
Assistant General Manager E 43 $83.8962 $94.3831 $104.8700 $14,542.00 $16,359.73 $18,177.45 $174,504.06 $196,316.73 $218,129.41
Assistant Survey Technician NE 19 $26.0136 $29.2652 $32.5168 $4,509.02 $5,072.63 $5,636.24 $54,108.25 $60,871.56 $67,634.92
Associate Civil Engineer E 32 $49.0524 $55.1838 $61.3153 $8,502.42 $9,565.20 $10,627.98 $102,029.01 $114,782.39 $127,535.71
Business Systems Analyst I E 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
Business Systems Analyst II E 29 $42.3734 $47.6698 $52.9665 $7,344.70 $8,262.77 $9,180.85 $88,136.40 $99,153.20 $110,170.14
Buyer NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Chief Financial Officer E 40 $72.4727 $81.5317 $90.6175 $12,561.93 $14,132.15 $15,707.02 $150,743.19 $169,585.78 $188,484.27
Chief, Administrative Services E 40 $72.4727 $81.5317 $90.6175 $12,561.93 $14,132.15 $15,707.02 $150,743.19 $169,585.78 $188,484.27
Chief, Engineering E 40 $72.4727 $81.5317 $90.6175 $12,561.93 $14,132.15 $15,707.02 $150,743.19 $169,585.78 $188,484.27
Chief, Water Operations E 40 $72.4727 $81.5317 $90.6175 $12,561.93 $14,132.15 $15,707.02 $150,743.19 $169,585.78 $188,484.27
Communications Assistant NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Communications Officer E 30 $44.4919 $50.0533 $55.6148 $7,711.93 $8,675.91 $9,639.89 $92,543.16 $104,110.94 $115,678.64
Confidential Executive Secretary NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Confidential Secretary NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Construction Inspector I NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Construction Inspector II NE 24 $33.2005 $37.3506 $41.5005 $5,754.76 $6,474.10 $7,193.43 $69,057.13 $77,689.22 $86,321.19
Customer Service Field Representative I NE 16 $22.4715 $25.2804 $28.0893 $3,895.06 $4,381.92 $4,868.80 $46,740.72 $52,583.05 $58,425.58
Customer Service Field Representative II NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Customer Service Manager E 33 $51.5050 $57.9430 $64.3810 $8,927.54 $10,043.45 $11,159.37 $107,130.50 $120,521.36 $133,912.45
Customer Service Representative I NE 16 $22.4715 $25.2804 $28.0893 $3,895.06 $4,381.92 $4,868.80 $46,740.72 $52,583.05 $58,425.58
Customer Service Representative II NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Customer Service Supervisor E 27 $38.4338 $43.2379 $48.0421 $6,661.87 $7,494.57 $8,327.30 $79,942.39 $89,934.86 $99,927.57
Data Systems Technician NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Database Administrator E 32 $49.0524 $55.1838 $61.3153 $8,502.42 $9,565.20 $10,627.98 $102,029.01 $114,782.39 $127,535.71
Disinfection Technician NE 23 $31.6196 $35.5720 $39.5244 $5,480.73 $6,165.82 $6,850.89 $65,768.75 $73,989.80 $82,210.66
District Secretary E 29 $42.3734 $47.6698 $52.9665 $7,344.70 $8,262.77 $9,180.85 $88,136.40 $99,153.20 $110,170.14
Electrician I NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Electrician II NE 24 $33.2005 $37.3506 $41.5005 $5,754.76 $6,474.10 $7,193.43 $69,057.13 $77,689.22 $86,321.19
Engineering Manager E 37 $62.6047 $70.4301 $78.2555 $10,851.48 $12,207.88 $13,564.29 $130,217.70 $146,494.58 $162,771.48
Engineering Technician NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Environmental Compliance Specialist E 28 $40.3556 $45.3998 $50.4442 $6,994.96 $7,869.31 $8,743.66 $83,939.47 $94,431.69 $104,923.94
Equipment Mechanic I NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Equipment Mechanic II NE 21 $28.6800 $32.2648 $35.8497 $4,971.19 $5,592.58 $6,213.96 $59,654.24 $67,110.94 $74,567.50
Executive Secretary NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Facilities Maintenance Technician NE 19 $26.0136 $29.2652 $32.5168 $4,509.02 $5,072.63 $5,636.24 $54,108.25 $60,871.56 $67,634.92
Field Services Manager E 33 $51.5050 $57.9430 $64.3810 $8,927.54 $10,043.45 $11,159.37 $107,130.50 $120,521.36 $133,912.45
Finance Manager, Controller & Budget E 35 $56.7843 $63.8821 $70.9801 $9,842.61 $11,072.90 $12,303.21 $118,111.36 $132,874.80 $147,638.47
Board Approved – May 23, 2016; Resolution No. 4302
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Job Classification and Salary Schedule
Effective July 1, 2016
Exhibit 2
Position
Exempt (E)
Non‐Exempt
(NE)
Salary
Grade Min
Hourly
Mid Max Min
Monthly
Mid Max Min
Annually
Mid Max
Finance Manager, Treasury & Accounting E 35 $56.7843 $63.8821 $70.9801 $9,842.61 $11,072.90 $12,303.21 $118,111.36 $132,874.80 $147,638.47
Fleet Maintenance Supervisor E 28 $40.3556 $45.3998 $50.4442 $6,994.96 $7,869.31 $8,743.66 $83,939.47 $94,431.69 $104,923.94
General Manager* E N/A $229,505.10
GIS Analyst E 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
GIS Manager E 34 $54.0802 $60.8403 $67.6001 $9,373.90 $10,545.63 $11,717.34 $112,486.84 $126,547.58 $140,608.10
GIS Programmer Analyst E 27 $38.4338 $43.2379 $48.0421 $6,661.87 $7,494.57 $8,327.30 $79,942.39 $89,934.86 $99,927.57
GIS Technician NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Human Resources Analyst E 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
Human Resources Manager E 35 $56.7843 $63.8821 $70.9801 $9,842.61 $11,072.90 $12,303.21 $118,111.36 $132,874.80 $147,638.47
Information Technology Manager E 34 $54.0802 $60.8403 $67.6001 $9,373.90 $10,545.63 $11,717.34 $112,486.84 $126,547.58 $140,608.10
Inspection Supervisor E 28 $40.3556 $45.3998 $50.4442 $6,994.96 $7,869.31 $8,743.66 $83,939.47 $94,431.69 $104,923.94
Laboratory Analyst NE 26 $36.6037 $41.1790 $45.7545 $6,344.64 $7,137.69 $7,930.76 $76,135.64 $85,652.32 $95,169.10
Lead Customer Service Field Representative NE 21 $28.6800 $32.2648 $35.8497 $4,971.19 $5,592.58 $6,213.96 $59,654.24 $67,110.94 $74,567.50
Lead Customer Service Representative NE 21 $28.6800 $32.2648 $35.8497 $4,971.19 $5,592.58 $6,213.96 $59,654.24 $67,110.94 $74,567.50
Lead Meter Maintenance/Cross Conn Worker NE 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
Lead Reclamation Plant Operator NE 26 $36.6037 $41.1790 $45.7545 $6,344.64 $7,137.69 $7,930.76 $76,135.64 $85,652.32 $95,169.10
Lead Water Systems Operator NE 26 $36.6037 $41.1790 $45.7545 $6,344.64 $7,137.69 $7,930.76 $76,135.64 $85,652.32 $95,169.10
Meter Maintenance Worker I NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Meter Maintenance Worker II NE 21 $28.6800 $32.2648 $35.8497 $4,971.19 $5,592.58 $6,213.96 $59,654.24 $67,110.94 $74,567.50
Network Engineer E 31 $46.7166 $52.5560 $58.3955 $8,097.53 $9,109.71 $10,121.88 $97,170.40 $109,316.46 $121,462.59
Permit Technician NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Pump Mechanic I NE 19 $26.0136 $29.2652 $32.5168 $4,509.02 $5,072.63 $5,636.24 $54,108.25 $60,871.56 $67,634.92
Pump Mechanic II NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Pump/Electrical Supervisor E 28 $40.3556 $45.3998 $50.4442 $6,994.96 $7,869.31 $8,743.66 $83,939.47 $94,431.69 $104,923.94
Purchasing & Facilities Manager E 34 $54.0802 $60.8403 $67.6001 $9,373.90 $10,545.63 $11,717.34 $112,486.84 $126,547.58 $140,608.10
Reclamation Plant Operator I NE 19 $26.0136 $29.2652 $32.5168 $4,509.02 $5,072.63 $5,636.24 $54,108.25 $60,871.56 $67,634.92
Reclamation Plant Operator II NE 21 $28.6800 $32.2648 $35.8497 $4,971.19 $5,592.58 $6,213.96 $59,654.24 $67,110.94 $74,567.50
Reclamation Plant Operator III NE 23 $31.6196 $35.5720 $39.5244 $5,480.73 $6,165.82 $6,850.89 $65,768.75 $73,989.80 $82,210.66
Reclamation Plant Supervisor E 30 $44.4919 $50.0533 $55.6148 $7,711.93 $8,675.91 $9,639.89 $92,543.16 $104,110.94 $115,678.64
Recycled Water Distribution Operator I NE 19 $26.0136 $29.2652 $32.5168 $4,509.02 $5,072.63 $5,636.24 $54,108.25 $60,871.56 $67,634.92
Recycled Water Distribution Operator II NE 21 $28.6800 $32.2648 $35.8497 $4,971.19 $5,592.58 $6,213.96 $59,654.24 $67,110.94 $74,567.50
Recycled Water Distribution Operator III NE 23 $31.6196 $35.5720 $39.5244 $5,480.73 $6,165.82 $6,850.89 $65,768.75 $73,989.80 $82,210.66
Recycled Water System Supervisor E 30 $44.4919 $50.0533 $55.6148 $7,711.93 $8,675.91 $9,639.89 $92,543.16 $104,110.94 $115,678.64
Safety and Security Specialist E 30 $44.4919 $50.0533 $55.6148 $7,711.93 $8,675.91 $9,639.89 $92,543.16 $104,110.94 $115,678.64
SCADA/Instrumentation Technician NE 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
Secretary NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Senior Accountant E 28 $40.3556 $45.3998 $50.4442 $6,994.96 $7,869.31 $8,743.66 $83,939.47 $94,431.69 $104,923.94
Senior Buyer NE 23 $31.6196 $35.5720 $39.5244 $5,480.73 $6,165.82 $6,850.89 $65,768.75 $73,989.80 $82,210.66
Senior Civil Engineer E 34 $54.0802 $60.8403 $67.6001 $9,373.90 $10,545.63 $11,717.34 $112,486.84 $126,547.58 $140,608.10
Senior Confidential Executive Secretary E 24 $33.2005 $37.3506 $41.5005 $5,754.76 $6,474.10 $7,193.43 $69,057.13 $77,689.22 $86,321.19
Senior Disinfection Technician NE 24 $33.2005 $37.3506 $41.5005 $5,754.76 $6,474.10 $7,193.43 $69,057.13 $77,689.22 $86,321.19
Senior Engineering Technician NE 24 $33.2005 $37.3506 $41.5005 $5,754.76 $6,474.10 $7,193.43 $69,057.13 $77,689.22 $86,321.19
Board Approved – May 23, 2016; Resolution No. 4302
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Job Classification and Salary Schedule
Effective July 1, 2016
Exhibit 2
Position
Exempt (E)
Non‐Exempt
(NE)
Salary
Grade Min
Hourly
Mid Max Min
Monthly
Mid Max Min
Annually
Mid Max
Senior Human Resources Analyst E 30 $44.4919 $50.0533 $55.6148 $7,711.93 $8,675.91 $9,639.89 $92,543.16 $104,110.94 $115,678.64
Senior SCADA/Instrumentation Technician NE 28 $40.3556 $45.3998 $50.4442 $6,994.96 $7,869.31 $8,743.66 $83,939.47 $94,431.69 $104,923.94
Senior Utility/Equipment Operator NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Senior Warehouse Worker NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Senior Water Conservation Specialist E 24 $33.2005 $37.3506 $41.5005 $5,754.76 $6,474.10 $7,193.43 $69,057.13 $77,689.22 $86,321.19
Supervising Land Surveyor E 29 $42.3734 $47.6698 $52.9665 $7,344.70 $8,262.77 $9,180.85 $88,136.40 $99,153.20 $110,170.14
Survey Technician NE 25 $34.8605 $39.2181 $43.5757 $6,042.51 $6,797.80 $7,553.10 $72,510.11 $81,573.60 $90,637.24
System Operations Manager E 36 $59.6236 $67.0762 $74.5291 $10,334.74 $11,626.55 $12,918.37 $124,016.91 $139,518.56 $155,020.43
System Suppport Analyst E 29 $42.3734 $47.6698 $52.9665 $7,344.70 $8,262.77 $9,180.85 $88,136.40 $99,153.20 $110,170.14
Utility Crew Leader NE 24 $33.2005 $37.3506 $41.5005 $5,754.76 $6,474.10 $7,193.43 $69,057.13 $77,689.22 $86,321.19
Utility Maintenance Supervisor E 28 $40.3556 $45.3998 $50.4442 $6,994.96 $7,869.31 $8,743.66 $83,939.47 $94,431.69 $104,923.94
Utility Services Manager E 35 $56.7843 $63.8821 $70.9801 $9,842.61 $11,072.90 $12,303.21 $118,111.36 $132,874.80 $147,638.47
Utility Worker I NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Utility Worker II NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Valve Maintenance Worker NE 18 $24.7749 $27.8716 $30.9683 $4,294.31 $4,831.08 $5,367.85 $51,531.66 $57,972.90 $64,414.20
Water Conservation Specialist NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Water Systems Operator I NE 20 $27.3142 $30.7284 $34.1426 $4,734.46 $5,326.25 $5,918.05 $56,813.49 $63,915.05 $71,016.65
Water Systems Operator II NE 22 $30.1140 $33.8781 $37.6423 $5,219.75 $5,872.19 $6,524.66 $62,636.97 $70,466.30 $78,295.86
Water Systems Operator III NE 23 $31.6196 $35.5720 $39.5244 $5,480.73 $6,165.82 $6,850.89 $65,768.75 $73,989.80 $82,210.66
Water Systems Supervisor E 30 $44.4919 $50.0533 $55.6148 $7,711.93 $8,675.91 $9,639.89 $92,543.16 $104,110.94 $115,678.64
* Salary is determined by the Board
Board Approved – May 23, 2016; Resolution No. 4302
1
ORDINANCE NO. 555
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT
AMENDING APPENDIX A
OF THE DISTRICT’S CODE OF ORDINANCES
BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Directors of Otay Water
District that the District’s Code of Ordinances Appendix A be
amended as per Exhibit 1 to this resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the new proposed
Appendix A (Exhibit 2) of the Code of Ordinances shall become
effective January 1, 2017.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of
the Otay Water District at a regular meeting duly held this 23rd
day of May 2016, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
________________________________
President
ATTEST:
__________________________
District Secretary
Attachment B
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size
9 9.04 A.1. District Annexation Processing Fee $763.76
9.04 B.
Annexation Fees for Water Annexations
into Otay Water District Boundaries
Districtwide
Annexation Fee
3/4" $1,844.40
1" $4,611.00
1-1/2" $9,222.00
2" $14,755.20
3" $29,510.40
4 $46,110.00
6" $92,220.00
8" $147,552.00
10" $212,106.00
9.04 C.4.
Annexation Fees for Annexations to
Sewer Improvement Districts per EDU $1,056.61
10 10.01 Waiver Request $50.00
23 23.04 Backflow Certification
- Second Notification $10.00
- Third Notification $25.00
- Reconnection (service resumed) $50.00
- Initial Filing Fee (New applicants for
addition to the list of approved backflow
prevention device testers)$25.00
- Renewal Filing Fee (to remain on list
of approved backflow prevention device
testers) Annually $10.00
25 25.03 A. Set-up Fees for Accounts $10.00
25 25.03 C.
Monthly Fixed System Charges, MWD &
CWA Charges (1)Meter Size System Charge
MWD & CWA
Fixed Charge
Total Fixed
Charge
3/4"$18.91 $16.84 $35.75
1"$26.71 $31.24 $57.95
Otay Water District
Appendix A
Charges
(1) All Water used in February and billed in March 2016.
Exhibit 1
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 C.
Monthly Fixed System Charges, MWD &
CWA Charges (continued)(1)1-1/2"$46.22 $70.66 $116.88
2"$69.61 $120.17 $189.78
3"$132.02 $255.60 $387.62
4"$202.24 $409.32 $611.56
6"$397.31 $837.89 $1,235.20
8"$631.37 $1,353.09 $1,984.46
10"$904.44 $1,947.62 $2,852.06
25 25.03 E.1.(b) Domestic Residential Water Rates (1)Unit Charge
(The Conservation Tier discount applies Conservation Tier 0 - 5 $2.13
toward the first five units of water when 6-10 $3.32
overall consumption is ten units or less.) 11-22 $4.32
23 or more $6.65
25 25.03 E.2.(b)
Multiple Residential Water Rates - Per
Dwelling Unit (1) 0-4 $3.28
5-9 $4.25
10 or more $6.56
25 25.03 E.3.(b)
Business and Publicly-Owned Water
Rates (1)under 10" 0-185 $3.51
186-1,400 $3.56
1,401 or more $3.62
10" & larger 0-7,426 $3.51
7,427-14,616 $3.56
14,617 or more $3.62
25 25.03 E.4.(c)
Irrigation and Commercial Agricultural
Using Potable Water Rates (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $4.78
55-199 $4.83
200 or more $4.89
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $4.78
145-355 $4.83
356 or more $4.89
3" & larger 0-550 $4.78
551-1,200 $4.83
1,201 or more $4.89
(1) All Water used in February and billed in March 2016.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 E.5.(c)Recycled Water (1)3/4" - 1" 0-32 $4.08
(Landscape Irrigation and Certain 33-75 $4.14
Non-Irrigation Purposes Rates) 76 or more $4.20
1.5" & 2" 0-130 $4.08
131-325 $4.14
326 or more $4.20
3" & 4" 0-440 $4.08
441-1,050 $4.14
1,051 or more $4.20
6" & larger 0-4,000 $4.08
4,001-10,000 $4.14
10,001 or more $4.20
25 25.03 E.6.(c)Recycled Commercial (1)under 10" 0-173 $2.97
174-831 $3.03
832 or more $3.07
10" & larger 0-7,426 $2.97
7,427-14,616 $3.03
14,617 or more $3.07
25 25.03 E.7.(b)
Potable Temporary and Construction
Water Service Rates (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $9.56
55-199 $9.66
200 or more $9.78
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $9.56
145-355 $9.66
356 or more $9.78
3" & larger 0-550 $9.56
551-1,200 $9.66
1,201 or more $9.78
25 25.03 E.8.(b)
Recycled Temporary and Construction
Water Service Rates (1)3/4" - 1" 0-32 $8.16
33-75 $8.28
76 or more $8.40
(1) All Water used in February and billed in March 2016.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 E.8.(b)
Recycled Temporary and Construction
Water Service Rates (continued) (1)1.5" & 2" 0-130 $8.16
131-325 $8.28
326 or more $8.40
3" & 4" 0-440 $8.16
441-1,050 $8.28
1,051 or more $8.40
6" & larger 0-4,000 $8.16
4,001-10,000 $8.28
10,001 or more $8.40
25 25.03 E.10.(b) Tank Trucks Water Rates (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $9.56
55-199 $9.66
200 or more $9.78
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $9.56
145-355 $9.66
356 or more $9.78
3" & larger 0-550 $9.56
551-1,200 $9.66
1,201 or more $9.78
25 25.03 E.11.(c)
Application Fee for Water Service Outside
District Boundaries $500.00
25 25.03 E.11.(d)
Water Rate for Service Outside District
Boundaries (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $9.56
55-199 $9.66
200 or more $9.78
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $9.56
145-355 $9.66
356 or more $9.78
3" & larger 0-550 $9.56
551-1,200 $9.66
1,201 or more $9.78
25 25.03 E.12.(b)
Application Fee for Water Service Outside
an Improvement District $275.00
(1) All Water used in February and billed in March 2016.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 E.12.(c)
Water Rate for Service Outside
Improvement District (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $9.56
55-199 $9.66
200 or more $9.78
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $9.56
145-355 $9.66
356 or more $9.78
3" & larger 0-550 $9.56
551-1,200 $9.66
1,201 or more $9.78
25 25.03 E.13.(c) Fire Service Monthly Charge 3" or less $24.69
more than 4"$33.27
25 25.03 E.14.(b)
Additional Water Service for Property Not
Subject to District Taxes per unit $0.37
25 25.03 E.15.(b)
Interim Service Water Rate in
Improvement District 7 (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $9.56
55-199 $9.66
200 or more $9.78
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $9.56
145-355 $9.66
356 or more $9.78
3" & larger 0-550 $9.56
551-1,200 $9.66
1,201 or more $9.78
25 25.03 F.Energy Charges for Pumping Water (1)
Per 100 ft of lift
over 450 ft per
unit $0.07
25 25.04 A. Deposits for Non-Property Owners 3/4" $75.00
1" $150.00
1-1/2" $200.00
(1) All Water used in February and billed in March 2016.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.04 A.
Deposits for Non-Property Owner
(continued)2" $360.00
3" $800.00
4" $1,350.00
6" $3,300.00
8" $4,400.00
10" $5,500.00
28 28.01 B.1. Capacity Fees and Zone Charge
Districtwide
Capacity Fee
- All IDs excluding Triad 3/4" $8,286.84
1" $20,717.10
1-1/2" $41,434.20
2" $66,294.72
3" $132,589.44
4 $207,171.00
6" $414,342.00
8" $662,947.20
10" $952,986.60
- TRIAD 3/4" $6,217.20
1" $15,543.00
1 -1/2" $31,086.00
2" $49,737.60
3" $99,475.20
4 $155,430.00
6" $310,860.00
8" $497,376.00
10" $714,978.00
28 28.01 B.2. New Water Supply Fee
- All IDs including Triad 3/4" $1,026.51
1" $2,566.28
1-1/2" $5,132.55
2" $8,212.08
3" $16,424.16
4" $25,662.75
6" $51,325.50
8" $82,120.80
10" $118,048.65
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
28 28.02 Installation and Water Meter Charges Meter Size Meter Cost Installation Total
Meter
Box/Vault
(if Needed)
- Potable (Non-Irrigation) 3/4" x 7.5" $218.94 $103.90 $322.84 $88.20
3/4" x 9" $233.11 $103.90 $337.01 $88.20
1" $282.52 $103.90 $386.42 $88.20
1.5" $459.21 $103.90 $563.11 $199.96
2" $658.00 $103.90 $761.90 $199.96
3" $2,050.60 $625.55 $2,676.15 $3,566.92
4" $3,561.56 $625.55 $4,187.11 $3,566.92
6" $6,151.79 $988.10 $7,139.89 $3,566.92
8" $7,686.20 $1,515.16 $9,201.36 $5,117.00
10" $11,054.19 $1,515.16 $12,569.35 $5,117.00
- Potable/Recycled Irrigation 3/4" x 7.5" $218.94 $103.90 $322.84 $224.79
3/4" x 9" $233.11 $103.90 $337.01 $224.79
1" $282.52 $103.90 $386.42 $224.79
1.5" $459.21 $103.90 $563.11 $224.79
2" $658.00 $103.90 $761.90 $224.79
3" $1,419.22 $625.55 $2,044.77 $3,566.92
4" $2,763.01 $625.55 $3,388.56 $3,566.92
6" $4,974.31 $988.10 $5,962.41 $3,566.92
8" $6,626.67 $1,515.16 $8,141.83 $5,117.00
10" $4,903.75 $1,515.16 $6,418.91 $5,117.00
- Combined Fire and Domestic 4" $8,473.28 $625.55 $9,098.83 $3,566.92
6" $11,277.19 $988.10 $12,265.29 $3,566.92
8" $16,396.22 $1,515.16 $17,911.38 $5,117.00
10" $22,375.42 $1,515.16 $23,890.58 $5,117.00
31 31.02 D.1.
Requirement of Temporary Meter for
Service
minimum/per
day $25.00
31 31.03 A.1. Requirement of Deposit for Temporary Meters
3/4" $156.85
1" $184.78
1-1/2" $379.62
2" $2,046.00
4" $1,986.00
6" $2,465.00
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
31 31.03 A.1.
Requirement of Deposit for Temporary
Meters (continued)
- Construction Trailer Temporary Meter 2" $2,046.00
- Tank Truck Temporary Meter
(Ordinance No. 372)2" $850.00
31 31.03 A.4. Temporary Meter Install & Removal $128.00
31 31.03 A.5.
Temporary Meter Move Fee
(includes backflow certification)3/4" - 2" $64.00
3" and larger No backflow test $64.00
33 33.07 A.
Customer Request for Meter Test
(Deposit)5/8", 3/4" & 1" $25.00
1-1/2" & 2 " $50.00
3" & Larger $125.00
34 34.01 D.2. Returned Check Charges $25.00
34 34.02 B. Late Payment Charge
5% of
Delinquent
Balance
34 34.02 G.1.(d) Delinquency Tag $10.00
34 34.02 G.3.(a) Meter "Turn-On" Charge
During regular
business hours $35.00
34 34.02 G.3.(b) Meter "Turn-On" Charge
After regular
business hours $65.00
53 53.03 A.1. Sewer Capacity Fee per EDU for parcels within a Sewer ID $4,247.21
53 53.03 A.2. Sewer Capacity Fee per EDU for parcels not within a Sewer ID $6,642.75
53 53.03 B.1. Sewer Connection Fee - Russell Square $7,500.00
53 53.03 B.2. Monthly Sewer Service Charge - Russell Square $200.00
53 53.10 & 11 Set-up Fees for Accounts $10.00
53 53.10 Residential Sewer Usage Fee (2)
Rate multiplied
by winter
average units $2.46
(2) Sewer billed beginning January 1, 2016.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
53 53.10 Residential Sewer System Fee (2)5/8", 3/4" & larger $17.19
53 53.10 A.
Residential Sewer Without Consumption
History (2)5/8", 3/4" & larger $40.19
53 53.10 B.
Multi-Residential Usage Fee - Sewer
Without Consumption History (2) $29.27
53 53.10 B.2.Multi-Residential Usage Fee - Sewer (2)
Rate multiplied
by winter
average units $2.46
53 53.10 B. 2.Multi-Residential System Fee - Sewer (2).75"$27.07
1"$39.86
1.5"$71.82
2"$110.17
3"$199.66
4"$327.51
6"$647.12
8" $1,030.67
10"$1,478.12
53 53.11
Commercial and Institutional Sewer
Strength Factors Low Strength 1
Medium
Strength 2
High
Strength 4
53 53.11
Monthly Usage Fee for Commercial and
Institutional Sewer (2)Rate
multiplied by Low Strength $2.46
annual avg.Medium Strength $3.53
units High Strength $5.63
53 53.11
Monthly System Fee for Commercial and
Institutional Sewer (2).75"$27.07
1"$39.86
1.5"$71.82
2"$110.17
3"$199.66
4"$327.51
6"$647.12
8" $1,030.67
10"$1,478.12
(2) Sewer billed beginning January 1, 2016.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
60 60.03
Issuance of Availability Letters for Water
and/or Sewer Service $75.00
72 72.04 A.1.
Locking or Removing Damaged or
Tampered Meters
- To Pull and Reset Meter 3/4" - 2" $170.00
- Broken Curbstop or Tabs 3/4" - 1" $192.00
- If Customer uses Jumper 3/4" - 1" $149.00
- Broken Lock/Locking Device 3/4" - 1" $56.00
- Cap Lock (Welded) 3/4" - 1" $158.00
- Broken Curbstop or Tabs 1.5" - 2" $265.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 3" $351.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 4" $454.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 6" $454.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 8" $600.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 10" $600.00
72 72.05 D. A.Type I Fine
- First Violation $100.00
- Second Violations $200.00
- Third or each additional violation of that
same ordinance or requirement within a
twelve-month period $500.00
Type II Fine $5,000.00
Type III Fine $500.00
Type IV Fine $500.00
Fine up to amount specified per
each day the violation is
identified or continues.
Fine up to amount specified per
each day the violation is
identified or continues.
Will not exceed per each day the
violation is identified or
continues.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
State Water
Code
#71630 & Annual Board
Resolution #4142
Water Availability/Standby Annual Special
Assessment Charge $10.00
$10.00
$30.00
$3.00
$3.00
State Water
Code
#71630 & Annual Board
Resolution #4142
Sewer Availability/Standby Annual Special
Assessment Charge $10.00
$30.00
Annual
Board
Resolution
General Obligation Bond Annual Tax
Assessment $0.005
Policies
5 Copies of Identifiable Public Records $0.10/page
Cassette Tape Duplication $2.00/tape
Yearly Subscription Service for Agendas
and Ratified Minutes
Yearly Subscription Service for Board
Packet and Ratified Minutes
Per acre for outside I.D. &
greater than one mile from
District facilities.
Less than one acre
I.D. 4, 14, & 18
Per acre I.D. 4, 14, & 18
Per $1000 of assessed value for
I.D. 27
$20.00/year or $0.50/meeting
$100.00/year for first copy and
$200.00/year for each copy thereafter
Less than one-acre all I.D.s &
Outside an I.D.
Per acre in I.D. 1, 5, &
Outside an I.D.
Per acre in I.D.
2,3,7,9,10,19,20,22,25, & 27
Less than one-acre Outside I.D.
and greater than one mile from
District facilities.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size
9 9.04 A.1. District Annexation Processing Fee $763.76
9.04 B.
Annexation Fees for Water Annexations
into Otay Water District Boundaries
Districtwide
Annexation Fee
3/4" $1,844.40
1" $4,611.00
1-1/2" $9,222.00
2" $14,755.20
3" $29,510.40
4 $46,110.00
6" $92,220.00
8" $147,552.00
10" $212,106.00
9.04 C.4.
Annexation Fees for Annexations to
Sewer Improvement Districts per EDU $1,056.61
10 10.01 Waiver Request $50.00
23 23.04 Backflow Certification
- Second Notification $10.00
- Third Notification $25.00
- Reconnection (service resumed) $50.00
- Initial Filing Fee (New applicants for
addition to the list of approved backflow
prevention device testers)$25.00
- Renewal Filing Fee (to remain on list
of approved backflow prevention device
testers) Annually $10.00
25 25.03 A. Set-up Fees for Accounts $10.00
25 25.03 C.
Monthly Fixed System Charges, MWD &
CWA Charges (1)Meter Size System Charge
MWD & CWA
Fixed Charge
Total Fixed
Charge
3/4" $15.91 $15.00 $30.91
1" $22.47 $27.84 $50.31
Otay Water District
Appendix A
Charges
(1) All Water used in December and billed in January 2017.
Exhibit 2
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 C.
Monthly Fixed System Charges, MWD &
CWA Charges (continued)(1)1-1/2" $38.88 $62.96 $101.84
2" $58.55 $107.08 $165.63
3" $111.04 $227.75 $338.79
4" $170.10 $364.72 $534.82
6" $334.18 $746.59 $1,080.77
8" $531.05 $1,205.65 $1,736.70
10" $760.72 $1,735.39 $2,496.11
25 25.03 E.1.(b) Domestic Residential Water Rates (1)Unit Charge
(The Conservation Tier discount applies Conservation Tier 0 - 5 $2.53
toward the first five units of water when 6-10 $3.95
overall consumption is ten units or less.) 11-22 $5.13
23 or more $7.90
25 25.03 E.2.(b)
Multiple Residential Water Rates - Per
Dwelling Unit (1) 0-4 $3.90
5-9 $5.05
10 or more $7.80
25 25.03 E.3.(b)
Business and Publicly-Owned Water
Rates (1)under 10" 0-185 $4.17
186-1,400 $4.23
1,401 or more $4.30
10" & larger 0-7,426 $4.17
7,427-14,616 $4.23
14,617 or more $4.30
25 25.03 E.4.(c)
Irrigation and Commercial Agricultural
Using Potable Water Rates (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $5.68
55-199 $5.74
200 or more $5.81
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $5.68
145-355 $5.74
356 or more $5.81
3" & larger 0-550 $5.68
551-1,200 $5.74
1,201 or more $5.81
(1) All Water used in December and billed in January 2017.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 E.5.(c)Recycled Water (1)3/4" - 1" 0-32 $4.85
(Landscape Irrigation and Certain 33-75 $4.92
Non-Irrigation Purposes Rates) 76 or more $4.99
1.5" & 2" 0-130 $4.85
131-325 $4.92
326 or more $4.99
3" & 4" 0-440 $4.85
441-1,050 $4.92
1,051 or more $4.99
6" & larger 0-4,000 $4.85
4,001-10,000 $4.92
10,001 or more $4.99
25 25.03 E.6.(c)Recycled Commercial (1)under 10" 0-173 $3.53
174-831 $3.60
832 or more $3.65
10" & larger 0-7,426 $3.53
7,427-14,616 $3.60
14,617 or more $3.65
25 25.03 E.7.(b)
Potable Temporary and Construction
Water Service Rates (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $11.36
55-199 $11.48
200 or more $11.62
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $11.36
145-355 $11.48
356 or more $11.62
3" & larger 0-550 $11.36
551-1,200 $11.48
1,201 or more $11.62
25 25.03 E.8.(b)
Recycled Temporary and Construction
Water Service Rates (1)3/4" - 1" 0-32 $9.70
33-75 $9.84
76 or more $9.98
(1) All Water used in December and billed in January 2017.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 E.8.(b)
Recycled Temporary and Construction
Water Service Rates (continued) (1)1.5" & 2" 0-130 $9.70
131-325 $9.84
326 or more $9.98
3" & 4" 0-440 $9.70
441-1,050 $9.84
1,051 or more $9.98
6" & larger 0-4,000 $9.70
4,001-10,000 $9.84
10,001 or more $9.98
25 25.03 E.10.(b) Tank Trucks Water Rates (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $11.36
55-199 $11.48
200 or more $11.62
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $11.36
145-355 $11.48
356 or more $11.62
3" & larger 0-550 $11.36
551-1,200 $11.48
1,201 or more $11.62
25 25.03 E.11.(c)
Application Fee for Water Service Outside
District Boundaries $500.00
25 25.03 E.11.(d)
Water Rate for Service Outside District
Boundaries (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $11.36
55-199 $11.48
200 or more $11.62
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $11.36
145-355 $11.48
356 or more $11.62
3" & larger 0-550 $11.36
551-1,200 $11.48
1,201 or more $11.62
25 25.03 E.12.(b)
Application Fee for Water Service Outside
an Improvement District $275.00
(1) All Water used in December and billed in January 2017.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.03 E.12.(c)
Water Rate for Service Outside
Improvement District (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $11.36
55-199 $11.48
200 or more $11.62
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $11.36
145-355 $11.48
356 or more $11.62
3" & larger 0-550 $11.36
551-1,200 $11.48
1,201 or more $11.62
25 25.03 E.13.(c) Fire Service Monthly Charge 3" or less $20.77
more than 4" $27.98
25 25.03 E.14.(b)
Additional Water Service for Property Not
Subject to District Taxes per unit $0.41
25 25.03 E.15.(b)
Interim Service Water Rate in
Improvement District 7 (1)1" & smaller 0-54 $11.36
55-199 $11.48
200 or more $11.62
1.5" & 2" 0-144 $11.36
145-355 $11.48
356 or more $11.62
3" & larger 0-550 $11.36
551-1,200 $11.48
1,201 or more $11.62
25 25.03 F.Energy Charges for Pumping Water (1)
Per 100 ft of lift
over 450 ft per
unit $0.044
25 25.04 A. Deposits for Non-Property Owners 3/4" $75.00
1" $150.00
1-1/2" $200.00
(1) All Water used in December and billed in January 2017.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
25 25.04 A.
Deposits for Non-Property Owner
(continued)2" $360.00
3" $800.00
4" $1,350.00
6" $3,300.00
8" $4,400.00
10" $5,500.00
28 28.01 B.1. Capacity Fees and Zone Charge
Districtwide
Capacity Fee
- All IDs excluding Triad 3/4" $8,286.84
1" $20,717.10
1-1/2" $41,434.20
2" $66,294.72
3" $132,589.44
4 $207,171.00
6" $414,342.00
8" $662,947.20
10" $952,986.60
- TRIAD 3/4" $6,217.20
1" $15,543.00
1 -1/2" $31,086.00
2" $49,737.60
3" $99,475.20
4 $155,430.00
6" $310,860.00
8" $497,376.00
10" $714,978.00
28 28.01 B.2. New Water Supply Fee
- All IDs including Triad 3/4" $1,026.51
1" $2,566.28
1-1/2" $5,132.55
2" $8,212.08
3" $16,424.16
4" $25,662.75
6" $51,325.50
8" $82,120.80
10" $118,048.65
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
28 28.02 Installation and Water Meter Charges Meter Size Meter Cost Installation Total
Meter
Box/Vault
(if Needed)
- Potable (Non-Irrigation) 3/4" x 7.5" $218.94 $103.90 $322.84 $88.20
3/4" x 9" $233.11 $103.90 $337.01 $88.20
1" $282.52 $103.90 $386.42 $88.20
1.5" $459.21 $103.90 $563.11 $199.96
2" $658.00 $103.90 $761.90 $199.96
3" $2,050.60 $625.55 $2,676.15 $3,566.92
4" $3,561.56 $625.55 $4,187.11 $3,566.92
6" $6,151.79 $988.10 $7,139.89 $3,566.92
8" $7,686.20 $1,515.16 $9,201.36 $5,117.00
10" $11,054.19 $1,515.16 $12,569.35 $5,117.00
- Potable/Recycled Irrigation 3/4" x 7.5" $218.94 $103.90 $322.84 $224.79
3/4" x 9" $233.11 $103.90 $337.01 $224.79
1" $282.52 $103.90 $386.42 $224.79
1.5" $459.21 $103.90 $563.11 $224.79
2" $658.00 $103.90 $761.90 $224.79
3" $1,419.22 $625.55 $2,044.77 $3,566.92
4" $2,763.01 $625.55 $3,388.56 $3,566.92
6" $4,974.31 $988.10 $5,962.41 $3,566.92
8" $6,626.67 $1,515.16 $8,141.83 $5,117.00
10" $4,903.75 $1,515.16 $6,418.91 $5,117.00
- Combined Fire and Domestic 4" $8,473.28 $625.55 $9,098.83 $3,566.92
6" $11,277.19 $988.10 $12,265.29 $3,566.92
8" $16,396.22 $1,515.16 $17,911.38 $5,117.00
10" $22,375.42 $1,515.16 $23,890.58 $5,117.00
31 31.02 D.1.
Requirement of Temporary Meter for
Service
minimum/per
day $25.00
31 31.03 A.1.
Requirement of Deposit for Temporary
Meters 3/4" $156.85
1" $184.78
1-1/2" $379.62
2" $2,046.00
4" $1,986.00
6" $2,465.00
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
31 31.03 A.1.
Requirement of Deposit for Temporary
Meters (continued)
- Construction Trailer Temporary Meter 2" $2,046.00
- Tank Truck Temporary Meter
(Ordinance No. 372)2" $850.00
31 31.03 A.4. Temporary Meter Install & Removal $128.00
31 31.03 A.5.
Temporary Meter Move Fee
(includes backflow certification)3/4" - 2" $64.00
3 and larger No backflow test $64.00
33 33.07 A.
Customer Request for Meter Test
(Deposit)5/8", 3/4" & 1" $25.00
1-1/2" & 2 " $50.00
3" & Larger $125.00
34 34.01 D.2. Returned Check Charges $25.00
34 34.02 B. Late Payment Charge
5% of
Delinquent
Balance
34 34.02 G.1.(d) Delinquency Tag $10.00
34 34.02 G.3.(a) Meter "Turn-On" Charge
During regular
business hours $35.00
34 34.02 G.3.(b) Meter "Turn-On" Charge
After regular
business hours $65.00
53 53.03 A.1. Sewer Capacity Fee per EDU for parcels within a Sewer ID $4,247.21
53 53.03 A.2. Sewer Capacity Fee per EDU for parcels not within a Sewer ID $6,642.75
53 53.03 B.1. Sewer Connection Fee - Russell Square $7,500.00
53 53.03 B.2. Monthly Sewer Service Charge - Russell Square $200.00
53 53.10 & 11 Set-up Fees for Accounts $10.00
(2) Sewer billed beginning January 1, 2017.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
53 53.10 Residential Sewer Usage Fee (2)
Rate multiplied
by winter
average units $2.58
53 53.10 Residential Sewer System Fee (2)5/8", 3/4" & larger $15.89
53 53.10 A.
Residential Sewer Without Consumption
History (2)5/8", 3/4" & larger $40.01
53 53.10 B.
Multi-Residential Usage Fee - Sewer
Without Consumption History (2) $24.12
53 53.10 B.2.Multi-Residential Usage Fee - Sewer (2)
Rate multiplied
by winter
average units $2.58
53 53.10 B. 2.Multi-Residential System Fee - Sewer (2).75" $28.37
1" $41.80
1.5" $75.27
2" $115.46
3" $209.24
4" $343.23
6" $678.18
8" $1,080.14
10" $1,549.07
53 53.11
Commercial and Institutional Sewer
Strength Factors Low Strength 1
Medium
Strength 2
High
Strength 4
53 53.11
Monthly Usage Fee for Commercial and
Institutional Sewer (2)Rate
multiplied by Low Strength $2.58
annual avg.Medium Strength $3.70
units High Strength $5.90
53 53.11
Monthly System Fee for Commercial and
Institutional Sewer (2).75" $28.37
1" $41.80
1.5" $75.27
2" $115.46
3" $209.24
(2) Sewer billed beginning January 1, 2017.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
53 53.11
Monthly System Fee for Commercial and
Institutional Sewer (2) (continued)4" $343.23
6" $678.18
8" $1,080.14
10" $1,549.07
60 60.03
Issuance of Availability Letters for Water
and/or Sewer Service $75.00
72 72.04 A.1.
Locking or Removing Damaged or
Tampered Meters
- To Pull and Reset Meter 3/4" - 2" $170.00
- Broken Curbstop or Tabs 3/4" - 1" $192.00
- If Customer uses Jumper 3/4" - 1" $149.00
- Broken Lock/Locking Device 3/4" - 1" $56.00
- Cap Lock (Welded) 3/4" - 1" $158.00
- Broken Curbstop or Tabs 1.5" - 2" $265.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 3" $351.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 4" $454.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 6" $454.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 8" $600.00
- To Pull and Reset Meter 10" $600.00
72 72.05 D. A.Type I Fine
- First Violation $100.00
- Second Violations $200.00
- Third or each additional violation of that
same ordinance or requirement within a
twelve-month period $500.00
Type II Fine $5,000.00
Type III Fine $500.00
Type IV Fine $500.00
Will not exceed per each day the
violation is identified or
continues.
Fine up to amount specified per
each day the violation is
identified or continues.
Fine up to amount specified per
each day the violation is
identified or continues.
Section #Code #Fee Description Meter Size Charges
State Water
Code
#71630 & Annual Board
Resolution #4142
Water Availability/Standby Annual Special
Assessment Charge $10.00
$10.00
$30.00
$3.00
$3.00
State Water
Code
#71630 & Annual Board
Resolution #4142
Sewer Availability/Standby Annual Special
Assessment Charge $10.00
$30.00
Annual
Board
Resolution
General Obligation Bond Annual Tax
Assessment $0.005
Policies
5 Copies of Identifiable Public Records $0.10/page
Cassette Tape Duplication $2.00/tape
Yearly Subscription Service for Agendas
and Ratified Minutes
Yearly Subscription Service for Board
Packet and Ratified Minutes
Less than one-acre all I.D.s &
Outside an I.D.
Per acre in I.D. 1, 5, &
Outside an I.D.
Per acre in I.D.
2,3,7,9,10,19,20,22,25, & 27
Less than one-acre Outside I.D.
and greater than one mile from
District facilities.
Per acre for outside I.D. &
greater than one mile from
District facilities.
Less than one acre
I.D. 4, 14, & 18
Per acre I.D. 4, 14, & 18
Per $1000 of assessed value for
I.D. 27
$20.00/year or $0.50/meeting
$100.00/year for first copy and
$200.00/year for each copy thereafter
Otay Water District
FY 2017 Budget
Workshop
May 23, 2016
Attachment C
Workshop Agenda
►Introduction and Objectives (Joe Beachem)
►Challenges and Strengths (Mark Watton)
►Economic Overview (Gary London, The London Group)
►Strategic Plan Initiatives (Adolfo Segura)
►Budget Highlights (Joe Beachem)
►Capital Improvement Budget (Rod Posada)
►Balanced Operating Budget (Kevin Koeppen)
►Staffing Highlights (Adolfo Segura)
►Materials and Maintenance (Jose Martinez)
►Administrative Costs (Kevin Koeppen)
►Conclusion (Kevin Koeppen)2
Workshop Objectives
►Review FY 2017 - 2018 Strategic Plan
►Present a $91.7 million Operating Budget
►Present a $10.7 million CIP Budget
►Request approval of average rate increases effective January 1, 2017
Water 5.0%
Sewer 3.0%
►Request approval of the annual fund transfers
►Request approval of the Salary Schedule 3
Challenges & Strengths
(Mark Watton)
Challenge #1 - Drought and Governor’s
Mandates
►May 5, 2015 - State Water Board adopted California Code of Regulations, title 23, section 866 and re-adopted sections 863, 864, and 865
20% Conservation target
►February 2, 2016 - State Water Board extended mandatory conservation measures
►12% Revised conservation target
►The District is forecasting 18% conservation in FY 2017 vs. estimated 20% in FY 2016
5
Challenge #2 – Water Conservation Levels
41
,
9
0
9
38
,
0
4
5
34
,
9
7
1
31
,
1
7
5
29
,
8
6
1
30
,
5
4
3
31
,
8
8
4
33
,
4
0
9
30
,
2
5
7
28
,
0
5
2
25
,
3
9
9
25
,
9
1
2
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2016 FY2017
Ac
r
e
F
e
e
t
Historic Potable Water Purchase Levels
Projection
6
Budget Budget
Challenge #3 - Water Dependency
7
10
0
%
95
%
75
%
10
0
%
10
0
%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017
Provider Percentage of Annual Rate Increases
On average 94% of District increases are due to supplier cost increases
Strengths
►Strategic Planning Process
►Efficiency Gains (Since 2007)
►23% headcount reduction
►35% increase in customers per FTE
►Bond Rating
►S&P affirmed ‘AA’ rating
►Sound Financial Management
►Reserve, debt and investment policies
►External economist to assist with growth projections
8
Economic Overview
(Gary London, The London Group)
9
Strategic Plan
(Adolfo Segura)
10
Overview
Strategic Plan Timeline
FY 2015
Implement Next
Generation Productivity
Systems
FY 2016
Focus on Process
Improvement Using New
System Data
FY 2017
Evolving Culture and
Fine Tuning Metrics
FY 2018
Continued
Evolution of
Programs in Place
12
Mission
To provide high quality and reliable water and
wastewater services to the customers of the
Otay Water District, in a professional, effective
and efficient manner.
Mission
13
A District that is innovative in providing water
services at competitive rates, with a reputation
for outstanding customer service.
VisionVision
14
TEAMWORKTEAMWORK We promote mutual trust by sharing information, knowledge and ideas to reach our common goals.
EMPLOYEESEMPLOYEES We see each individual as unique and important. We value diversity and open communication to promote fairness, dignity, and respect.
INTEGRITYINTEGRITY We commit ourselves to doing the right thing. Ethical behavior, trustworthiness, and accountability are the District’s foundation.
EXCELLENCEEXCELLENCE We strive to provide the highest quality and value in all that we do.
CUSTOMERSCUSTOMERS We take pride that our commitment to customer-centered service is our highest priority.
Statement of Values
15
Key Challenge
Our key challenge, as District staff, is to quantify and
demonstrate our commitment and ability to optimize our
resources, business processes, and technology to achieve
the strategic plan goals. We, as a team, commit to
regularly assess and document how our decisions and
work practices accomplish our goals and objectives.
16
1. Increase customer confidence in the District
2. Improve and expand communications
3. Provide effective water services
1. Improve financial information and systems
2. Maintain District financial strength
1. Actively manage water supply as well as support for water and sewer services
2. Identify and evaluate improvements to enterprise and departmental business
processes
1. Reinforce a results-oriented and accountable culture
2. Focus on achieving a lean flexible workforce
Balanced Scorecard Strategies and Goals
Customer
Financial
Business
Processes
Learning
& Growth
Provide Leadership and Management Expertise
Maximize Efficiency and Effectiveness
Manage the Financial Issues that are Critical to the District
Deliver High Quality Services to Meet and Increase Confidence of the Customer
17
What’s New
in the FY 17-18 Strategic Plan
Objectives
New Objectives
Evaluate
Implementation of an
On-line Performance
Management System
Evaluate Training and
Development Programs
for New and Existing
Supervisors/Managers
Enterprise E-Commerce
(Purchasing/Contracting)
Solution BidSync
Completed Objectives
31 Strategic Objectives
19
Measures
New Measures
Injury Incident
Rate
Accounts per
FTE
% of
Customers
Paying Bills
Electronically
Health &
Safety
Severity
Rate
Unplanned
Disruptions
(QualServe)
Planned Water
Service
Disruption Rates
(QualServe)
Deleted Measures
44 Performance Measures
20
Objectives and Measures
by Department
22
1. Regularly produce and evaluate communication tools and explore the effective use of new media
options
2. Enhance District's enterprise facilities physical security
3. Enhance District's enterprise confined space program
4. Evaluate implementation of an on-line performance management system
5. Negotiate a successor Memorandum of Understanding for represented employees for 2017
6. Enhance District's emergency response program
7. Evaluate opportunities to combine or transfer similar work functions
8. Evaluate training and development programs for new and existing Supervisors/Managers
9. Optimize SCADA program
10. Optimize asset management program
11. Advance business processes and efficiencies through implementation of technology
Administrative Services
Objectives
Administrative Services
Measures
1. Customer Satisfaction
2. Employee Turnover Rate
3. Training Hours per Employee
4. Safety Training Program
5. Enterprise System Availability
6. Injury Incident Rate
23
24
1. Evaluate City of San Diego pure water program planning/implementation
2. Address dependency of imported water
3. Evaluate sewer system business
4. Evaluate the viability of implementing an indirect potable reuse program
5. Evaluate efficiencies for delivering capital assets
6. Streamline work processes in four strategic areas
7. Revise business practices by modifying the master recycled water permit
8. Implement a habitat conservation plan that will streamline O&M within
District easements
Engineering
Objectives
25
Engineering
Measures
1. CIP Project Expenditures vs. Budget
2. Construction Change Order Incidence (without allowances)
3. Mark-out Accuracy
4. Project Closeout Time
5. Annual Recycled Water Site Inspections
6. Recycled Water Shutdown Testing
7. Planned Recycled Water Maintenance Ratio in Dollars
8. Recycled Water System Integrity
Finance
Objectives
1. Enhance communications with customers
2. Evaluate and enhance the District's water conservation programs and
services
3. Strengthen internal audit program
4. Implement a cost benefit program
5. Improve and streamline meter related processes
26
Finance
Measures
1. Answer Rate
2. Billing Accuracy
3. Water Rate Ranking
4. Percent of Customers Paying Bills
Electronically
5. Gallons per Capita per Day
6. Overtime Cost
7. Debt Coverage Ratio
8. Distribution System Loss
9. O&M Cost per Account
10. Sewer Rate Ranking
11. Reserve Levels
12. Accounts per FTE
27
Operations
Objectives
1. Electric power and fuel management practices
2. Pressure vessel maintenance program
3. Evaluate requirements for future emergency communications
system
4. Optimize operations inventory management
5. Operations workflow process evaluation
6. Leak detection and repair program
7. Streamline input of operations data
28
Operations
Measures
1. Technical Quality Complaint (AWWA)
2. Planned Potable Water Maintenance Ratio in
Dollars
3. Planned Wastewater Maintenance Ratio in
Dollars
4. Direct Cost of Treatment per MGD
5. O&M Cost per MG Processed of Wastewater
6. Leak Detection Program
7. Percent of PMs Completed-Fleet Maintenance
8. Percentage of PMs Completed-Reclamation
Plant
9. Percentage of PMs Completed-Pump/Electric
Section
10. System Valve Exercising Program
11. Potable Water Distribution System
Integrity
12. Potable Water Compliance Rate
(AWWA)
13. Collection System Integrity (AWWA)
14. Sewer Overflow Rate (AWWA)
15. Emergency Facility Power Testing
16. Tank Inspection and Cleaning
17. Main Flushing and Fire Hydrant
Maintenance
18. Critical Valve Exercising
29
Next Steps
Continue to evolve key processes and programs with the goal of improving efficiencies
and organizational performance.
30
Budget Highlights
(Joe Beachem)
31
Rate Model and Budget Process
32
6-Year
Rate Model
Year-end
Balances
Operating
Budget Input
6-Year CIP
Budget Input
MWD/CWA & City
Sewer Rates
Strategic
Plan
Assumptions
Interest Rates
Inflation
Growth
Sales
Targets
Debt Coverage
Reserve Levels
Operating
Budget
CIP
Budget
Water
&
Sewer
Rates
Governor’s
Mandate
Budget Objectives
(Fiscal Year 2017)
33
►Rebuild the debt coverage target of 150%
►Fund the $91.7 million Operating Budget
►Minimize rate impacts of supplier cost increases
►Rate setting built on reasonable projections
►Fund the $10.7 million Capital Budget
►Maintain reserves at or above target
►Maintain water and sewer rate positions relative to other
agencies in the region
Debt Coverage Ratios
34
196%
240%
280%
312%
336%
354%
160%168%171%171%174%173%
125%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Debt Ratio with Growth Debt Ratio without Growth Minimum Debt Ratio
Inter-Fund Transfers
35
Recycled
Designated Replacement to Designated Expansion $ 232,900
Sewer
Designated Replacement to Designated Betterment $ 32,800
Total Transfers $ 265,700
Net Operating Revenues Transfers
36
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
General Fund Reserve $ 1,286,400 $ 1,371,800 $ 196,100 $ 2,854,300
Expansion Reserve 3,638,000 455,600 - 4,093,600
Betterment Reserve 2,280,000 835,200 351,200 3,466,400
Replacement Reserve 464,500 - - 464,500
Transfer to OPEB 872,300 51,200 37,500 961,000
Transfer to New Supply Fund - 35,000 0 35,000
Total Reserve Funding $ 8,541,200 $ 2,748,800 $ 584,800 $11,874,800
Operating Budget Highlights
Items holding down rates
►Full-time equivalents (FTEs) decrease from 138 to 135
►Administrative costs decrease of ($237,700) or (4.4%)
►Materials & maintenance costs decrease of ($156,500)
or (4.3%)
►Refinancing 2007 COPS savings of $320,000 in FY 2017
and $1.8 million over the next six years
►Non-operating revenues increase of $305,700 or 16.3%
►Reduction in 6-Year CIP of $6.5 million to $89.8 million
37
Operating Budget Highlights
Items putting upward pressure on rates
►Water sales reduction of 19% (in volume from 2013 sales)
►CWA rate increases:
►Variable rate increase of 7.7%
►Fixed costs increase of $0.6 million
►City of San Diego recycled rate and “take or pay”
increase of $1.9 million
►Salary and benefit costs increase of $518,900 or 2.5%
38
Potable and Recycled Budget
Highlights
►5.0% proposed average rate increase
►Average residential customer monthly volume decreased from 13
units to 11 units (15%)
►Average residential customer will see a $1.21 increase in their
monthly bill
►$72.1 million CIP over six years
►No anticipated new debt issuances in the six-year rate model
►Reserves and debt coverage on target 39
Sewer Budget Highlights
►3.0% proposed average rate increase
►Typical residential customer will see a $0.88 decrease in their
monthly bill
►$17.7 million CIP over six years
►Sewer will seek $3.0 million State Revolving Fund loan
►Reserves on target
40
Last Year vs. This Year
41
Projected Water Rate Increase
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
FY16 9.9% 6.2% 6.2% 3.5% 3.5%3.5%
FY17 5.0% 5.0% 3.8% 3.7% 3.7% 3.7%
Debt Coverage Ratio (No Growth)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
FY16 142% 147% 161% 172% 172%172%
FY17 160% 168% 171% 171% 174% 173%
Projected Sewer Rate Increase
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
FY16 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%0%
FY17 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 3.0% 2.0% 2.0%
Proposed FY 2017 Water Rate Increase
42
92%
3%
5.0% Rate Increase Due to Cost Increases
CWA City of San Diego SDG&E
5%
Note: The increase recycled water rate from the City of San Diego had a negative
$1.8MM impact on the District. This rate impact was accounted for in the March 1,
2016 rate increase of 4.1%.
43
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$5
8
.
1
0
$6
2
.
8
9
$6
6
.
0
1
$6
8
.
8
8
$7
0
.
7
1
$7
1
.
8
5
$7
2
.
4
7
$7
4
.
0
2
$7
6
.
1
9
$7
6
.
6
3
$7
7
.
1
8
$7
8
.
7
0
$8
0
.
5
1
$8
0
.
8
9
$8
1
.
4
1
$8
4
.
2
3
$8
5
.
4
6
$8
7
.
1
9
$9
6
.
9
4
$9
6
.
9
5
$1
0
6
.
3
8
$1
1
0
.
5
0
Survey of Member Agency Water Rates
Based on 11 unit water use and 3/4" residential meter size
water bill effective January 2017
44
$-
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
28
.
6
4
29
.
1
3
33
.
6
0
40
.
0
1
40
.
8
4
41
.
9
2
47
.
4
7
48
.
3
3
49
.
0
2
51
.
5
1
51
.
9
1
52
.
9
0
52
.
9
6
53
.
6
3
53
.
6
9
55
.
0
8
57
.
5
2
59
.
2
5
62
.
5
3
69
.
8
3
69
.
8
8
73
.
9
1
74
.
2
9
75
.
5
0
78
.
5
9
87
.
4
6
88
.
8
4
10
8
.
2
2
Sewer Rate Comparison in San Diego County
Based on 11 units of water and 3/4 residential meter size for sewer bill effective January 2017
Capital Improvement
Program
FY 2017-2022
(Rod Posada)
45
Growth Projections1
46
FISCAL YEARS
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Single-Family
Dwelling Units 91 399 544 619 725 747
Condominium
Units 204 232 347 649 669 788
Apartment Units 519 310 563 745 557 721
Non-Residential
(Permit valuation
in millions of
dollars)
$16 $16 $28 $28 $28 $28
1 Source: The London Group Realty Advisors Report March 2016
Meter Sales and Growth
47
Actual 375
342 (est. FY 2017)
252 (est. for budget in FY 2016)
CIP Budget Guidelines
Growth to remain relatively flat for FY 2017
New development with multi-family in greater proportion
to single-family dwellings
In preparing the budgets for the individual CIP projects,
the Engineering Department used current construction and
bidding data to adjust costs for each project
Reprioritized projects based on District’s planning
documents and water supply assessment and verification
reports
48
CIP Six-Year Budget Look Forward
($ millions)
49
FY 2016
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Totals $ 10.7 $ 20.0 $ 22.9 $ 11.4 $ 13.0 $ 11.8
Six-Year Total: $ 89.8
FY 2017
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Totals $ 11.1 $ 20.1 $ 20.0 $ 16.6 $ 14.0 $ 14.4
Six-Year Total: $ 96.2
High Profile CIP Projects
Fiscal Year 2017 ($ millions)
50
870-2 PS and 571-1 Reservoir Improvements $ 0.5
14-Inch Force Main Improvements $ 1.0
711-1 and 711-2 Reservoir Improvements $ 0.5
978-1 and 850-2 Reservoir Improvements $ 1.5
Trenchless Sewer Rehabilitation $ 0.6
APCD Engine Replacement $ 0.8
Total Expenditure Projection $ 4.9
High Profile CIP Projects
Fiscal Year 2017 – 2022 ($ millions)
51
1655-1 Reservoir $ 2.9
Force Main Improvements $ 1.9
870-2 Pump Station Replacement $15.3
Sewer System Rehabilitation Projects $ 3.2
Hillsdale and Vista Grande Pipeline
Replacement
$4.5
Reservoir Improvements $16.2
Campo Sewer Main Replacement $ 7.3
Total Expenditure Projection $ 51.3
Otay Water District Initiatives
Fiscal Year 2017 – 2022 CIP Expenditure Projections
Total $89.8 Million
CAPITAL FACILITIES PROJECTS
(includes Developer reimbursements)
$ 23.8 MCAPITAL PURCHASES
$ 2.8 M
REPLACEMENT / RENEWAL
PROJECTS
$ 63.2 M
3%
27%52
70%
BALANCED
OPERATING
BUDGET
(Kevin Koeppen)
53
FY 2017 Operating Budget
54
►Budget Process
►Budget Details
►Revenues and Expense Highlights
►Conclusion
Budget Process
55
►Strategic plan objectives set the overall direction for the budgeting effort
►Each department submits budget requests assessing actual needs of the District
►Review of all Operating and CIP Budget requests with Chiefs, Assistant General Manager, and General Manager
►Review and incorporate reasonable assumptions on sales, growth, interest rates, and price inflators
►Evaluate cost-saving measures and make adjustments where prudent
►Recommend rates that support strategic plan initiatives, CIP, and operational needs
Sales Projections
►Sales projections for FY 2017 are based on FY 2016
projections plus 1% drought recovery
►Growth rates for FY 2018 through FY 2022 were
developed using The London Group Realty Advisors’
input
56
12,511 13,189 13,720
12,744
11,704 10,700 10,807
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2016 FY2017
Budget Projected Budget
Potable Water Sales
with 1% Increase from FY 2016 Actuals
Potable Water Sales
57
Unit Sales (in thousands)
Actual
Potable Rate Implementation - BMP 1.4
30% threshold for fixed revenues
36% projected for FY 2016
Recommend returning to the 30% threshold
Rebalance $1.1 million from fixed revenues
to variable revenues
Fixed CWA & MWD pass-through increase by
$0.6 million
58
51118
Units Units Units
Current Rates:
Variable Bill $11.88 $40.22 $72.17
Fixed Bill 35.75 35.75 35.75
Total Current 47.63 75.97 107.92
Proposed Rates:
Variable Bill 13.39 46.27 83.22
Fixed Bill 30.91 30.91 30.91
Total Proposed 44.30 77.18 114.13
Increase(Decrease) ($3.32) $1.21 $6.21
-7.0% 1.6% 5.8%
Average Monthly Bill
Potable Sales Revenues
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Budget to Budget
Variance
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Water Sales $ 44,025,774 $ 41,344,900 $ 44,450,600 $ 3,105,700 7.5%
System Fees 12,380,370 13,292,300 12,204,600 (1,087,700) -8.2%
Energy Fees 2,134,865 2,311,300 2,164,200 (147,100) -6.4%
MWD and CWA Fixed Fees 10,846,411 11,946,600 12,535,200 588,600 4.9%
Penalties 894,569 888,600 884,000 (4,600) -0.5%
Total Water Sales $ 70,281,989 $ 69,783,700 $ 72,238,600 $ 2,454,900 3.5%
59
►Sales dollar increase of $2,454,900 or 3.5%
►$1,548,300 is due to FY 2017 assumed rate increases
►$ 906,600 is due to FY 2016 increases and volume changes
1,676 1,653
1,879
2,068
1,842 1,723
1,513 1,529
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2016 FY2017
Actual Budget Projected Budget
Recycled Water Sales
with 1% Increase from FY 2016 Projection
Recycled Water Sales
60
Unit Sales (in thousands)
Recycled Sales Revenues
61
►Recycled sales dollar decrease of ($215,700) or (2.4%)
►$148,000 increase due to FY 2017 assumed rate increase
►($363,700) decrease due to FY 2016 rate increase offset by volume reductions
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017
Budget to Budget
Variance
Actual Budget Budget $ %
Water Sales $ 6,412,122 $ 6,694,500 $ 6,702,300 $ 7,800 0.1%
System Fees 431,121 464,300 432,800 (31,500) -9.1%
Energy Fees 369,302 399,200 379,100 (20,100) -5.0%
MWD and CWA Rebates 1,611,764 1,522,900 1,351,000 (171.900) -11.3%
Penalties 28,701 35,100 35,100 - -0.0%
Total Recycled Water Sales $ 8,853,010 $ 9,116,000 $ 8,900,300 $ (215,700) -2.4%
Sewer 5-year Summary
FY 2017 vs. FY 2016:
$4.0 million increase in six-year CIP
$0.3 million increase in operating expenses
Results:
3.0% average rate increases
$3.0 million proposed State Revolving Fund loan
62
Sewer Revenues
►Sewer revenues decrease of ($287,400) or (9.0%)
►Rate increases offset by the expiration of the system fee phase-in and reduction in
winter average usage
63
Actual Budget Budget
Budget to Budget
Variance
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 $%
Sewer Charges $ 2,986,734 $ 3,173,000 $ 2,888,600 $ (284,400) -9.0%
Penalties 33,760 33,300 30,300 (3,000) -9.0%
Total $ 3,009,634 $ 3,206,300 $ 2,918,900 $ (287,400) -9.0%
Other Revenues
►Tax revenues increase of $135,200 or 3.5%
►Capacity fee revenues increase of $113,400 or 10.0%
►Non-operating revenue increase of $305,700 or 16.3%
64
Water Supply Costs
65
FY 2017 vs. FY 2016 Budget Increase of $1.4 million or 3.1%
Changes in Supply Costs Due to:
Increases(Decreases) in Volume:
Potable Water (2.5)$
Recycled Water 0.1
Increases in Supplier Variable Fees:
Potable Water 1.4
Recycled Water 1.8
Increases (Decreases) in Supplier Fixed Fees:
CWA & MWD 0.6
Total Water Cost Increase 1.4$
$3.8 million
Power Costs
66
►Power Cost Decrease of ($174,800) or (5.6%)
►Overall decline vs. budget due to FY 2016
conservation exceeding FY 2016 budget
►Water demand increase of 1.0% for potable and
recycled
►The rate per kilowatt hour has increased 4.8% over
last year’s budgeted rate
►The District anticipates another 2.0% increase in
the rate for FY 2017
►72
Staffing Highlights
(Adolfo Segura)
67
Staffing Highlights
►Process
►The Senior Team and Section Managers
continuously analyze workload requirements,
cross-training opportunities, automation and areas
where we can effectively share or reallocate
resources
►Results
►Reduction of FTE’s from 138 to 135
68
17
4
.
7
5
17
2
.
7
5
16
8
.
7
5
16
6
15
9
15
6
14
8
14
3
14
0
13
8
13
5
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Employee Count
Staffing Reductions
Reduction of 39.75 FTE or 23%
Fiscal Year 69
Cumulative Savings Due to Staffing Reductions
70
0
$358,000
$843,900
$1,166,300
$1,862,900
$2,340,500
$3,395,900
$4,213,800
$4,799,200
$5,155,700
$5,916,700
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
7000000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Cumulative Savings = $30,052,900
(including all outside labor services)
Fiscal Year
30
1
30
6
31
4
32
1
33
6
34
4
36
6
38
0
38
9
39
6
40
6
250
270
290
310
330
350
370
390
410
430
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Customers per FTE
Efficiencies
71
35% Increase
Fiscal Year
Labor Costs
Overall Increase of $518,900 or 2.5%
►Decreases in Salary and Benefits:
►Decrease in staffing level of ($336,300) or (1.0%)
►Decrease in OPEB of ($186,000) or (13.0%)
►Decrease due to greater CIP allocation ($84,800) or
(3.6%)
72
Labor Costs (continued)
Increases in Salary and Benefits:
►Salaries for negotiated COLA and performance-based
increases of $341,300 or 3.0%
►Overtime, vacancy factor, vacation/sick, temp labor, and
workers compensation of $206,100 or 1.7%
►Pension costs of $276,300 or 7.1%
►Health costs of $246,300 or 6.1%
►Staff advancements of $41,500 or 0.3%
►Other benefits such as Social Security and Medicare of
$14,500 or 1.5%
73
Materials &
Maintenance Costs
(Jose Martinez)
74
Materials & Maintenance Costs
Overall decrease of ($156,500) or (4.3%)
Decreases in the following categories:
►Metro O&M charges of ($160,000) or (19.6%)
►Safety equipment & other materials of ($74,800) or (58.8%)
►Chemicals of ($36,300) or (9.1%)
►Fuel and oil of ($8,300) or (3.3%)
►Materials & supplies ($8,200) or (4.3%)
75
Materials & Maintenance Costs (continued)
Offset by increases in the following categories:
►Contracted services of $67,200 or 9.7%
►Meters and materials of $45,400 or 39.9%
►Building & grounds materials and supplies of $8,100 or 16.9%
►Increase in infrastructure equipment & supplies of $5,400 or 0.9%
►Infrastructure & lab equipment $5,300 or 13.3%
76
Fuel Consumption
77
39% Decrease
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Ga
l
l
o
n
s
Fuel Consumption
Gas
Diesel
TOTAL
Fiscal Year
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
&
E
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
Total Vehicle and Equipment Composition
Vehicles and Equipment
78
17% Decrease
Fiscal Year
Recycled Water DEH Charges
79
$36,000
$40,900
$31,900
$17,900
$10,900
$8,000 $6,000
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Recycled Inspection Fees
85% Decrease
Fiscal Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Wa
t
e
r
L
o
s
s
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
Historical Water Loss
80
45% Decrease
Fiscal Year
$-
$500.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
$2,000.00
$2,500.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Cost per Patch
Paving
81
65% Decrease
Fiscal Year
Administrative
Costs
(Kevin Koeppen)
82
Administrative Costs
Overall Decrease ($237,700) or (4.4%)
Due to Decreases in the Following:
Decrease in outside services of ($225,000) or
(13.6%)
Decrease in temp services of ($102,400) or (84.5%)
Decrease in bad debt expense of ($50,000) or
(32.3%)
Decrease in general expenses of ($30,200) or
(8.0%)
Decreases in other categories of ($7,700) or (1.0%)
83
Administrative Costs (continued)
►Offset by Increases in the Following:
Increase in fees of $133,800 or 26.8%
Increase in training of $27,000 or 27.3%
Increase in equipment of $16,800 or 1.5%
84
Budget Summary
85
Potable Recycled Sewer Total
Revenues
Water Sales $72,238,600 $8,900,300 $ - $81,138,900
Sewer Revenues - - 2,918,900 2,918,900
Other Revenues 7,583,600 8,700 91,400 7,683,700
Total Revenues $79,822,200 $8,909,000 $3,010,300 $91,741,500
Expenditures
Water Purchases $43,806,500 $3,615,900 $ - $47,422,400
Power 2,194,700 568,900 174,400 2,938,000
Labor and Benefits 18,581,400 1,339,200 979,300 20,899,900
Administrative Expenses 4,589,800 331,200 229,100 5,150,100
Materials & Maintenance 2,108,600 305,000 1,042,700 3,456,300
Reserve Funding 8.541,200 2,748,800 584,800 11,874,800
Total Expenditures $79,822,200 $8,909,000 $3,010,300 $91,741,500
►Balanced budget which meets the water and sewer needs of our customers
and supports the Strategic Plan
Conclusion
Requesting that the Board:
Adopt Resolution No. 4302 to approve the FY 2016-2017 Operating
and Capital Budget
Approve fund transfers for potable, recycled, and sewer
Adopt Ordinance No. 555 to amend Appendix A with the proposed
5.0% average water rate increase and 3.0% average sewer rate
increase on all billings that begin in calendar year 2017
Adopt the Salary Schedule
Obtain direction to send rate increase notices 86
QUESTIONS?
87
Otay Water District:
Economic Outlook 2016 & Beyond
The London Group Realty Advisors
Gary London
(619) 269-4010
gary@londongroup.com
Attachment D
127,000
129,000
131,000
133,000
135,000
137,000
139,000
141,000
143,000
145,000
Th
o
u
s
a
n
d
s
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
UNITED STATES PAYROLL EMPLOYMENT
Seasonally Adjusted- Monthly 2006 – Feb. 2016p*
* Jan. and Feb 2015 numbers are preliminary
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
UNITED STATES UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
Seasonally Adjusted- Monthly 2005 – Feb. 2016
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ANNUAL JOB GROWTH
2010 - 2015
-2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0%
Health Care & Social Assistance
Leisure & Hospitality
Professional & Business Services
Financial Activities
Retail Trade
Service Providing
Manufacturing
Construction
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015
Source: State of California Employment Development Department
DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW
San Diego County & Otay Water District
S.D. County OWD
2000 - 2010 Growth 10.0% 49.6%
2010 - 2016 Growth 7.0% 13.2%
Persons / Household 2.85 3.46
Non-Hispanic White 28.5% 9.0%
Hispanic 33.7% 44.3%
Asian 11.6% 17.2%
Other 14.3% 15.1%
Median Age 36.00 35.80
% > 4 Yr Degree 34.5% 33.14%
Average Household Income $89,963 $102,299
Median Household Income $65,519 $85,663
Source: The London Group Realty Advisors, Neilsen
Demographic Overview
San Diego County & Otay Water District
SAN DIEGO COUNTY RESALE MARKET
Monthly 1999 – Feb. 2016
$0
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
We
i
g
h
t
e
d
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
P
r
i
c
e
Sa
l
e
s
C
o
u
n
t
Weighted Average Median Price
Total Sales
Source: San Diego Association of Realtors
SAN DIEGO COUNTY NON-RESIDENTIAL
Permit Valuations- 2003 - 2015
$0.0
$50.0
$100.0
$150.0
$200.0
$250.0
$300.0
$350.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Office
Retail
Industrial
Source: California Homebuilding Foundation
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Quarterly Residential Foreclosures- 2009 - 2015
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Source: PropertyRadar
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Residential Units Permitted- 2004 - 2015
2,013
837 796
316 102 150 296 394 304 269 156 89
1,281
817
384
264
223 125
221
334 495 361
319
600
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Multifamily
Single Family
Source: The London Group Realty Advisors, City of Chula Vista
FISCAL YEAR 2015-
2016
2016-
2017
2017-
2018
2018-
2019
2019-
2020
2020-
2021
2021-
2022
2015-2022
Avg.
TOTAL
2015-2022
OWD SERVICE AREA
Single Family 16 100 400 550 600 700 750 445 3,116
Condominiums (1) 275 200 250 350 650 650 750 446 3,125
Apartments (including senior) 0 500 300 550 750 550 700 479 3,350
TOTAL - OWD 291 800 950 1,450 2,000 1,900 2,200 1,370 9,591
Eastern Chula Vista Forecast
by City of Chula Vista 441 1,577 1,516 1,539 984 n/a n/a n/a n/a
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Single Family 3,000 3,000 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,700 3,700 3,367 23,900
Condominiums (1) 1,200 1,200 1,750 2,100 3,150 3,650 3,650 2,175 16,700
Apartments (including senior) 4,800 4,800 5,250 4,900 3,850 3,650 3,650 4,542 30,900
TOTAL - SD CO. 9,000 9,000 10,500 10,500 10,500 11,000 11,000 10,083 71,500
CV/OM AS % OF COUNTY
Single Family 1% 3% 11% 16% 17% 19% 20% 13% 13%
Condominiums (1) 23% 17% 14% 17% 21% 18% 21% 21% 19%
Apartments (including senior) 0% 10% 6% 11% 19% 15% 19% 11% 11%
TOTAL 3% 9% 9% 14% 19% 17% 20% 14% 13%
(1) Townhomes, Garden, Mid-Rise and High-Rise Condominiums (Estimated)
Source: The London Group Realty Advisors
Projected New Residential Construction (Units Under Construction)
Otay Water District Service Area
Fiscal Years 2015 - 2022
We provide a full range
of advisory services for:
Developers
Investors
Lenders
Attorneys
Public Agencies
www.londongroup.com
The London Group Realty Advisors
Gary London
(619) 269-4010
gary@londongroup.com